Next Article in Journal
Research on Path Planning Algorithm for Driverless Vehicles
Next Article in Special Issue
Convergence of Special Sequences of Semi-Exponential Operators
Previous Article in Journal
Signature-Based Analysis of the Weighted-r-within-Consecutive-k-out-of-n: F Systems
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Reverse Hardy–Hilbert’s Inequality Containing Multiple Parameters and One Partial Sum
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Hyers–Ulam Stability of Order k for Euler Equation and Euler–Poisson Equation in the Calculus of Variations

by
Daniela Marian
1,*,
Sorina Anamaria Ciplea
2 and
Nicolaie Lungu
1
1
Department of Mathematics, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, 28 Memorandumului Street, 400114 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
2
Department of Management and Technology, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, 28 Memorandumului Street, 400114 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mathematics 2022, 10(15), 2556; https://doi.org/10.3390/math10152556
Submission received: 27 June 2022 / Revised: 18 July 2022 / Accepted: 21 July 2022 / Published: 22 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mathematical Inequalities, Models and Applications)

Abstract

:
In this paper, we define and study Hyers–Ulam stability of order 1 for Euler’s equation and Hyers–Ulam stability of order m 1 for the Euler–Poisson equation in the calculus of variations in two special cases, when these equations have the form y ( x ) = f ( x ) and y ( m ) ( x ) = f ( x ) , respectively. We prove some estimations for J y x J y 0 x , where y is an approximate solution and y 0 is an exact solution of the corresponding Euler and Euler-Poisson equations, respectively. We also give two examples.

1. Introduction

Hyers–Ulam stability has been the subject of many papers. Ulam stability was proposed by Ulam in [1] in 1940. The first result in this direction was given in 1941 by Hyers [2]. The first authors which started the study of Hyers–Ulam stability of differential equations was Obloza [3] and Alsina and Ger [4]. After that, many types of differential equations were studied. First-order linear differential equations and linear differential equations of higher order were investigated, for example, in [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. Integral equations in [14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24] and partial differential equations in [25,26,27,28,29,30] have also been studied. The books [31,32] can be consulted for more details. The Hyers–Ulam stability of fractional differential equations and of fractional integral equations has recently begun to be studied (see [33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42]).
In what follows, we define and study Hyers–Ulam stability of order 1 for Euler’s equation and Hyers–Ulam stability of order m 1 for the Euler–Poisson equation in the calculus of variations. Section 2 is dedicated to the study of Euler’s equation, and Section 3 is dedicated to the Euler–Poisson equation. We also establish an estimation for J y x J y 0 x , where y is an approximate solution and y 0 is an exact solution for the considered equations.
This paper is a continuation of the paper [43]. In [43], Hyers–Ulam stability of the Euler equation in two special cases was studied when F = F ( x , y ) and when F = F ( y , y ) . An estimation for J y x J y 0 x is also given in [43] for the case F = F ( x , y ) . This was the first time, in [43], that the problem of Ulam stability of extremals for functionals represented in integral form was studied. In [43], a direct method and the Laplace transform method were used. Here, we will use Taylor’s formula.

2. Hyers–Ulam Stability of Euler’s Equation

We consider a class of functions A C 2 I , R , I R an open interval. Let a , b I , a < b , a 0 . Let y A , y = y ( x ) be an element in A. Let the function F : M R , M = I × R 2 , F C 2 M . We consider the functional
J y x = a b F x , y , y d x , J : A R , y A , J y x R ,
and the conditions
y a = y a , y a = y a ,
where y a , y a R are given.
We consider the following problem in the calculus of variations (see [44]): find the extremum of this functional. The necessary condition of extremum (see [44]) is given by Euler’s equation
F y x , y , y d d x F y x , y , y = 0 , y C 2 a , b .
Equation (3) can be represented (by derivation) in the form:
2 F y 2 · y + 2 F y y · y + 2 F y x F y = 0 , y C 2 a , b .
The solutions of Equation (3) or (4) are called extremals.
We will study Hyers–Ulam stability of Equation (3) (or (4)).
Let ε > 0 and a , b ( 0 , ) .
We consider the following inequalities:
F y x , y , y d d x F y x , y , y ε , y C 2 a , b ,
or
2 F y 2 · y + 2 F y y · y + 2 F y x F y ε , y C 2 a , b .
Definition 1.
Equation (3) (or (4)) is called Hyers–Ulam stable if there is a real number c > 0 such that for any solution y ( x ) of the inequality (5) (or (6)), there is a solution y 0 ( x ) of the Equation (3) (or (4)) such that
y x y 0 x c · ε , x [ a , b ] .
In the following definition, we give a new notion of stability, named stability of order 1.
Definition 2.
Equation (3) (or (4)) is called Hyers–Ulam stable of order 1 if there are real numbers c 1 > 0 , c 2 > 0 so that for any solution y ( x ) of the inequality (5) (or (6)), there is a solution y 0 ( x ) of Equation (3) (or (4)) such that
y x y 0 x c 1 · ε , x [ a , b ] ,
and
y x y 0 x c 2 · ε , x [ a , b ] .
y is called an approximate solution and y 0 is called an exact solution for Equation (3) (or (4)).
In the following, we will study the case where Euler’s equation is
y ( x ) = f ( x ) , f C [ a , b ] , x [ a , b ] .
Remark 1.
If y = y ( x ) is a solution of (7), x [ a , b ] , then (see [45]),
y x = y a + x a 1 ! y a + a x x s 1 ! f ( s ) d s .
Let ε > 0 . We consider the inequality
y ( x ) f ( x ) ε , y C 2 a , b .
Remark 2.
A function y = y ( x ) is a solution of (9) if and only if there exists a function g C a , b such that
(1)
g x ε , x a , b ,
(2)
y ( x ) f ( x ) = g x , x a , b .
Remark 3.
If y = y ( x ) is a solution of (9), using Remark 2 and Remark 1, we have
y x = y a + x a 1 ! y a + a x x s 1 ! f s + g s d s .
Theorem 1.
 (i) 
For each solution y = y ( x ) of (9), there exists a unique solution y 0 = y 0 ( x ) of (7) such that
y 0 a = y ( a ) y 0 a = y ( a ) .
 (ii) 
The Equation (7) is Hyers–Ulam stable of order 1. If y is a solution of (9) and y 0 is a solution of (7) satisfying conditions (11), then
y x y 0 x ε ( b a ) 2 2 , x [ a , b ]
and
y x y 0 x ε b a .
 (iii) 
If there exists l 1 , l 2 : [ a , b ] 0 , continuous, such that
F x , y 1 ( x ) , y 1 ( x ) F x , y 2 ( x ) , y 2 ( x ) l 1 ( x ) · y 1 ( x ) y 2 ( x ) + l 2 ( x ) y 1 ( x ) y 2 ( x ) , x [ a , b ] , y 1 , y 2 A ,
then
J y x J y 0 x ε · ( b a ) 2 2 a b l 1 ( x ) d x + ε b a a b l 2 ( x ) d x ,
where y is a solution of (9) and y 0 is a solution of (7), both satisfying the conditions of (2).
Proof 
(i) This results from Cauchy–Picard’s theorem of existence and uniqueness (see [46]).
(ii) Let y = y ( x ) be a solution of (9). Let y 0 = y 0 ( x ) be the unique solution of (7) which verifies the corresponding Cauchy conditions of (11). We have
y x y 0 x = y a + x a 1 ! y a + a x x s 1 ! f s + g s d s y a x a 1 ! y a a x x s 1 ! f s d s ,
hence
y x y 0 x = a x x s 1 ! g s d s a x x s 1 ! g s d s ,
so
y x y 0 x ε ( b a ) 2 2 , x [ a , b ] .
We also have
y x y 0 x a x g s d s ε b a .
Thus, Equation (7) is Hyers–Ulam stable of order 1.
(iii) If y is a solution of (9) and y 0 is a solution of (7), both satisfying conditions (2), then
J y x J y 0 x a b l 1 ( x ) · y ( x ) y 0 ( x ) + l 2 ( x ) y x y 0 x d x ( ) , ( ) ε · ( b a ) 2 2 a b l 1 ( x ) d x + ε b a a b l 2 ( x ) d x .
Example 1.
We consider J : A R , A C 2 I , [ 1 , 2 ] I ,
J y x = 1 2 y 2 2 x y d x ,
and the conditions
y 1 = 0 , y 1 = 1 3 .
The Euler equation becomes
y + x = 0 .
Let ε > 0 . We consider the inequality
y + x ε .
We remark that
y 0 x = x 3 6 + x 6
is a solution of Equation (18), satisfying (17).
If y is a solution of (19) and y 0 is a solution of (18), both satisfying (17), then applying Theorem 1, we get
y x y 0 x ε ( x 1 ) 2 2 ε 2 , x [ 1 , 2 ] ,
and
y x y 0 x ε ( x 1 ) ε , x [ 1 , 2 ] ,
hence, Equation (18) is Hyers–Ulam stable of order 1.
Moreover,
J y x J y 0 x 1 2 y 2 x 2 x y x y 0 2 x + 2 x y 0 x d x 1 2 y x y 0 x y x + y 0 x + 2 x y x y 0 x d x 1 2 ε x 1 ε x 1 + x 2 + 1 3 + ε x x 1 2 d x = ε 2 ε + 13 4 .

3. Hyers–Ulam Stability of the Euler–Poisson Equation

Now, we consider functionals dependent on higher derivatives.
Let n N , n 2 , A C 2 n I , R , I R be an open interval. Let a , b I , a < b . Let y A , y = y ( x ) be an element in A. Let the function F : M R , M = I × R n + 1 . We suppose that F is n + 2 times differentiable with respect to all arguments.
Let
J y x = a b F x , y x , y x , , y ( n ) x d x ,
and the conditions
y a = y a , y a = y a , , y ( 2 n 1 ) a = y a ( 2 n 1 ) ,
where y a , y a , , y a ( 2 n 1 ) R are given.
The extremals of the functional (23), given conditions (24), are the integral curves of the Euler–Poisson equation (see [44]):
F y d d x [ F y ] + d 2 d x 2 [ F y ] + 1 n d n d x n [ F y n ] = 0 .
Let ε > 0 . We consider the inequality
F y d d x [ F y ] + d 2 d x 2 [ F y ] + 1 n d n d x n [ F y n ] ε .
We give a new notion of stability, named stability of order k , k 1 , k N .
Definition 3.
Equation (25) is called Hyers–Ulam stable of order k if there are real numbers C 1 > 0 , C 2 > 0 , , C k + 1 > 0 such that for any solution y ( x ) of the inequality (26) there is a solution y 0 ( x ) of the Equation (25) such that
y x y 0 x C 1 · ε , x [ a , b ] ,
and
y x y 0 x C 2 · ε , x [ a , b ] ,
y ( k ) x y 0 ( k ) x C k + 1 · ε , x [ a , b ] .
y is called an approximate solution and y 0 is called an exact solution for Equation (25).
In the following, we will study the case where the Euler–Poisson equation is
y ( m ) ( x ) = f ( x ) , m = 2 n , f C [ a , b ] , x [ a , b ] .
Remark 4.
If y = y ( x ) is a solution of (27), then (see [45])
y x = y a + x a 1 ! y a + + ( x a ) m 1 ( m 1 ) ! y ( m 1 ) a + a x x s m 1 ( m 1 ) ! f s d s .
Let ε > 0 . We also consider the inequality
y ( m ) ( x ) f ( x ) ε , x [ a , b ] , y C m [ a , b ] .
Remark 5.
A function y = y ( x ) is a solution of (29) if and only if there exists a function g C a , b such that
 (1) 
g x ε , x a , b ,
 (2) 
y ( m ) ( x ) f ( x ) = g x , x a , b .
Remark 6.
If y = y ( x ) is a solution of (29), using Remark 5 and Remark 4, we have
y x = y a + x a 1 ! y a + + ( x a ) m 1 ( m 1 ) ! y ( m 1 ) a + a x x s m 1 ( m 1 ) ! f s + g s d s .
Theorem 2.
 (i) 
For each solution y = y ( x ) of (29), there exists a unique solution y 0 = y 0 ( x ) of (27) such that
y 0 a = y ( a ) y 0 a = y ( a ) y 0 ( m 1 ) a = y ( m 1 ) ( a ) .
 (ii) 
The Equation (27) is Hyers–Ulam stable of order m 1 , and if y is a solution of (29) and y 0 is a solution of (27) satisfying conditions (31), then
y x y 0 x ε ( b a ) m m ! , x [ a , b ] ,
y x y 0 x ε ( b a ) m 1 ( m 1 ) ! , x [ a , b ] ,
y x y 0 x ε ( b a ) m 2 ( m 2 ) ! , x [ a , b ] ,
y ( m 1 ) x y 0 ( m 1 ) x ε ( b a ) , x [ a , b ] .
 (iii) 
If there exists l 1 , l 2 , l n : [ a , b ] 0 , continuous, such that
F x , y 1 ( x ) , y 1 ( x ) , , y 1 ( n ) ( x ) F x , y 2 ( x ) , y 2 ( x ) , , y 2 ( n ) ( x ) l 1 ( x ) y 1 ( x ) y 2 ( x ) + l 2 ( x ) y 1 x y 2 x + + l n ( x ) y 1 ( n ) x y 2 ( n ) x ,
x [ a , b ] , y 1 , y 2 A , then
J y x J y 0 x ε · ( b a ) m m ! a b l 1 ( x ) d x + ε · ( b a ) m 1 ( m 1 ) ! a b l 2 ( x ) d x + + ε · ( b a ) n n ! a b l n ( x ) ,
where y is a solution of (29) and y 0 is a solution of (27), both satisfying the conditions of (24).
Proof
(i)
This results from Cauchy–Picard’s theorem of existence and uniqueness (see [46]).
(ii)
Let y = y ( x ) be a solution of (29). Let y 0 = y 0 ( x ) the unique solution of (27) satisfying the conditions of (31). Using Remark 6, we have
y x y 0 x = y a + x a 1 ! y a + + a x x s m 1 ( m 1 ) ! f s + g s d s y a x a 1 ! y a a x x s m 1 ( m 1 ) ! f s d s ,
hence
y x y 0 x = a x x s m 1 ( m 1 ) ! g s d s a x x s m 1 ( m 1 ) ! g s d s ,
so
y x y 0 x ε ( b a ) m m ! , x [ a , b ] .
We also have
y x y 0 x = a x x s m 2 ( m 2 ) ! g s d s a x x s m 2 ( m 2 ) ! g s d s ε ( b a ) m 1 ( m 1 ) ! ,
y x y 0 x = a x x s m 3 ( m 3 ) ! g s d s a x x s m 3 ( m 3 ) ! g s d s ε ( b a ) m 2 ( m 2 ) ! ,
y ( m 1 ) x y 0 ( m 1 ) x = a x g s d s a x g s d s ε ( b a ) , x [ a , b ] ,
thus the Equation (27) is Hyers–Ulam stable of order m 1 .
(iii)
If y is a solution of (29), and y 0 is a solution of (27), both satisfying the conditions of (24), then
J y x J y 0 x a b l 1 ( x ) y ( x ) y 0 ( x ) + l 2 ( x ) y x y 0 x + + l n ( x ) y ( n ) x y 0 ( n ) x d x ( i i ) ε · ( b a ) m m ! a b l 1 ( x ) d x + ε · ( b a ) m 1 ( m 1 ) ! a b l 2 ( x ) d x + + ε · ( b a ) n n ! a b l n ( x ) .
Example 2.
We consider J : A R , A C 4 I , R , [ 0 , 1 ] I ,
J y x = 0 1 360 x 2 y y 2 d x ,
y 0 = 0 , y 0 = 1 , y 0 = 6 , y 0 = 9 .
The Euler–Poisson equation becomes
y I V ( x ) 180 x 2 = 0 .
Let ε > 0 . We consider the inequality
y I V ( x ) 180 x 2 ε .
We apply Theorem 2; therefore, for each solution y = y ( x ) of (41) satisfying (39), there exists a unique solution y 0 = y 0 ( x ) of (40) satisfying (39) such that
y x y 0 x ε 1 4 ! , x [ 0 , 1 ] ,
y x y 0 x ε 1 3 ! , x [ 0 , 1 ] ,
y x y 0 x ε 1 2 ! , x [ 0 , 1 ] ,
y x y 0 x ε 1 1 ! , x [ 0 , 1 ] ;
hence, Equation (40) is Hyers–Ulam stable of order 3.
Let
y 0 x = 1 2 x 6 + 3 2 X 3 3 X 2 + X ,
be the solution of Equation (40) satisfying the conditions of (39). We remark that 6 y ( x ) 18 , x [ 0 , 1 ] . .
If y is a solution of (41)and y 0 is a solution of (40), both satisfying the conditions of (39), then
J y x J y 0 x 0 1 360 x 2 y y 2 360 x 2 y 0 + y 0 2 d x
0 1 360 x 2 y y 0 + y y 0 y + y 0 d x
0 1 360 x 2 · ε 24 + ε 2 ε 2 + 36 d x = ε ε + 92 4 .

4. Conclusions

In this paper, we have defined and studied Hyers–Ulam stability of order 1 for Euler’s equation y ( x ) = f ( x ) and Hyers–Ulam stability of order m 1 for the Euler–Poisson equation y ( m ) ( x ) = f ( x ) , in the calculus of variations. An example is considered for each case. Some estimations for J y x J y 0 x , where y is a solution of (9) and y 0 is a solution of (7), both satisfying the conditions of (2) and where y is a solution of (29) and y 0 is a solution of (27), both satisfying the conditions of (24), have been established. This paper is a continuation of the paper [43]. In [43], the Hyers–Ulam stability of Euler’s equation in two special cases was studied when F = F ( x , y ) and when F = F ( y , y ) . The general case will be the subject of future works.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, D.M. and N.L.; methodology, D.M. and N.L.; investigation, D.M., S.A.C. and N.L.; validation S.A.C.; writing—original draft preparation, D.M.; writing—review and editing, S.A.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the editor and reviewers in advance for their helpful comments.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ulam, S.M. A Collection of Mathematical Problems; Interscience: New York, NY, USA, 1960. [Google Scholar]
  2. Hyers, D.H. On the stability of the linear functional equation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1941, 27, 222–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Obloza, M. Hyers stability of the linear differential equation. Rocz. Nauk-Dydakt. Pr. Mat. 1993, 13, 259–270. [Google Scholar]
  4. Alsina, C.; Ger, R. On some inequalities and stability results related to exponential function. J. Inequal. Appl. 1998, 2, 373–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Takahasi, S.E.; Takagi, H.; Miura, T.; Miyajima, S. The Hyers-Ulam stability constant of first order linear differential operators. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2004, 296, 403–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Jung, S.-M. Hyers-Ulam stability of linear differential equations of first order. Appl. Math. Lett. 2004, 17, 1135–1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Jung, S.-M. Hyers-Ulam stability of linear differential equations of first order, II. Appl. Math. Lett. 2006, 19, 854–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Jung, S.-M. Hyers-Ulam stability of linear differential equations of first order, III. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2005, 311, 139–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Brzdek, J.; Popa, D.; Xu, B. Hyers-Ulam stability for linear equations of higher orders. Acta Math. Hung. 2008, 120, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rezaei, H.; Jung, S.-M.; Rassias, T. Laplace transform and Hyers-Ulam stability of linear differential equations. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2013, 403, 244–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Alqifiary, Q.; Jung, S.-M. Laplace transform and generalized Hyers-Ulam stability of linear differential equations. Electron. J. Differ. Equ. 2014, 2014, 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  12. Cimpean, D.S.; Popa, D. On the stability of the linear differential equation of higher order with constant coefficients. Appl. Math. Comput. 2010, 217, 4141–4146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Popa, D.; Rasa, I. Hyers-Ulam stability of the linear differential operator with non-constant coefficients. Appl. Math. Comput. 2012, 219, 1562–1568. [Google Scholar]
  14. Lungu, N.; Rus, I.A. On a functional Volterra-Fredholm integral equation, via Picard operators. J. Math. Ineq. 2009, 41, 519–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Otrocol, D. Ulam stabilities of differential equation with abstract Volterra operator in a Banach space. Nonlinear Funct. Anal. Appl. 2010, 15, 613–619. [Google Scholar]
  16. Cadariu, L. The generalized Hyers-Ulam stability for a class of the Volterra nonlinear integral equations. Sci. Bull. Politeh. Univ. Timisoara Trans. Math. Phys. 2011, 56, 30–38. [Google Scholar]
  17. Ngoc, L.T.P.; Long, N.T. On nonlinear Volterra-Hammerstein integral equation in two variables. Acta Math. Sci. 2013, 33B, 484–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ngoc, L.T.P.; Thuyet, T.M.; Long, N.T. A nonlinear Volterra-Hammerstein integral equation in three variables. Nonlinear Funct. Anal. Appl. 2014, 19, 193–211. [Google Scholar]
  19. Pachpatte, B.G. On Volterra-Fredholm integral equation in two variables. Demonstr. Math. 2007, 40, 839–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Pachpatte, B.G. On Fredholm type integral equation in two variables. Differ. Equ. Appl. 2009, 1, 27–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Pachpatte, B.G. Volterra integral and integro differential equations in two variables. J. Inequal. Pure Appl. Math. 2009, 10, 108. [Google Scholar]
  22. Ilea, V.; Otrocol, D. Existence and Uniqueness of the Solution for an Integral Equation with Supremum, via w-Distances. Symmetry 2020, 12, 1554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Marian, D.; Ciplea, S.A.; Lungu, N. Ulam-Hyers stability of Darboux-Ionescu problem. Carpatian J. Math. 2021, 37, 211–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Marian, D.; Ciplea, S.A.; Lungu, N. On a functional integral equation. Symmetry. 2021, 13, 1321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Prastaro, A.; Rassias, T.M. Ulam stability in geometry of PDE’s. Nonlinear Funct. Anal. Appl. 2003, 8, 259–278. [Google Scholar]
  26. Jung, S.-M. Hyers-Ulam stability of linear partial differential equations of first order. Appl. Math. Lett. 2009, 22, 70–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Jung, S.-M.; Lee, K.-S. Hyers-Ulam stability of first order linear partial differential equations with constant coefficients. Math. Inequal. Appl. 2007, 10, 261–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lungu, N.; Ciplea, S. Ulam-Hyers-Rassias stability of pseudoparabolic partial differential equations. Carpatian J. Math. 2015, 31, 233–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lungu, N.; Marian, D. Ulam-Hyers-Rassias stability of some quasilinear partial differential equations of first order. Carpathian J. Math. 2019, 35, 165–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lungu, N.; Popa, D. Hyers-Ulam stability of a first order partial differential equation. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2012, 385, 86–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Brzdek, J.; Popa, D.; Rasa, I.; Xu, B. Ulam Stability of Operators; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  32. Tripathy, A.K. Hyers-Ulam Stability of Ordinary Differential Equations; Taylor and Francis: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  33. Wang, J.; Lv, L.; Zhou, Y. Ulam stability and data dependence for fractional differential equations with Caputo derivative. Electron. J. Qual. Theory Differ. Equ. 2011, 63, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ibrahim, R.W. Generalized Ulam-Hyers stability for fractional differential equations. Int. J. Math. 2012, 23, 1–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Wang, J.; Lin, Z. Ulam’s Type Stability of Hadamard Type Fractional Integral Equations. Filomat 2014, 28, 1323–1331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Abbas, S.; Benchohra, M.; Lagreg, J.E.; Alsaedi, A.; Zhou, Y. Existence and Ulam stability for fractional differential equations of Hilfer-Hadamard type. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2017, 2017, 180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Benchohra, M.; Lazreg, J.E. Existence and Ulam stability for nonlinear implicit fractional differential equations with Hadamard derivative. Stud. Univ. Babes-Bolyai Math. 2017, 62, 27–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Khan, H.; Tunc, C.; Chen, W.; Khan, A. Existence theorems and Hyers-Ulam stability for a class of hybrid fractional differential equations with p-Laplacian operator. J. Appl. Anal. Comput. 2018, 8, 1211–1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ameen, R.; Jarad, F.; Abdeljawad, T. Ulam stability for delay fractional differential equations with a generalized Caputo derivative. Filomat 2018, 32, 5265–5274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Moharramniaa, A.; Eghbali, N.; Rassias, J.M. Mittag-Leffler-Hyers-Ulam stability of Prabhakar fractional integral equation. Int. J. Nonlinear Anal. Appl. 2021, 12, 25–33. [Google Scholar]
  41. Wang, S. The Ulam stability of fractional differential Equation with the Caputo-Fabrizio derivative. J. Funct. Spaces 2022, 2022, 7268518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Brzdęk, J.; Eghbali, N.; Kalvandi, V. On Ulam Stability of a Generalized Delayed Differential Equation of Fractional Order. Results Math. 2022, 77, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Marian, D.; Ciplea, S.A.; Lungu, N. Hyers-Ulam Stability of Euler’s Equation in the Calculus of Variations. Mathematics 2021, 9, 3320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Krasnov, M.L.; Makarenko, G.I.; Kiselev, A.I. Problems and Exercices in the Calculus of Variations; Mir: Moscow, Russia, 1975. [Google Scholar]
  45. Stewart, J. Multivariable Calculus: Concepts and Contexts; Brooks/Cole, Cengage Learning: Toronto, ON, Canada, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  46. Ionescu, D.V. Ecuatii Diferentiale si Integrale; Editura Didactica si Pedagogica: Bucuresti, Romania, 1964. [Google Scholar]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Marian, D.; Ciplea, S.A.; Lungu, N. Hyers–Ulam Stability of Order k for Euler Equation and Euler–Poisson Equation in the Calculus of Variations. Mathematics 2022, 10, 2556. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10152556

AMA Style

Marian D, Ciplea SA, Lungu N. Hyers–Ulam Stability of Order k for Euler Equation and Euler–Poisson Equation in the Calculus of Variations. Mathematics. 2022; 10(15):2556. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10152556

Chicago/Turabian Style

Marian, Daniela, Sorina Anamaria Ciplea, and Nicolaie Lungu. 2022. "Hyers–Ulam Stability of Order k for Euler Equation and Euler–Poisson Equation in the Calculus of Variations" Mathematics 10, no. 15: 2556. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10152556

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop