Next Article in Journal
Task-Importance-Oriented Task Selection and Allocation Scheme for Mobile Crowdsensing
Previous Article in Journal
The Potential Changes and Stereocilia Movements during the Cochlear Sound Perception Process
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Battery Mode Selection and Carbon Emission Decisions of Competitive Electric Vehicle Manufacturers

School of Economics and Management, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang 212100, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mathematics 2024, 12(16), 2472; https://doi.org/10.3390/math12162472 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 29 June 2024 / Revised: 17 July 2024 / Accepted: 8 August 2024 / Published: 10 August 2024

Abstract

Competition in China’s electric vehicle industry has intensified significantly in recent years. The production mode of power batteries, serving as the pivotal component in these vehicles, has emerged as a critical challenge for electric vehicle manufacturers. We considered a system comprising an electric vehicle (EV) manufacturer with power battery production technology and another EV manufacturer lacking power battery production technology. In the context of carbon trading policy, we constructed and solved Cournot competitive game models and asymmetric Nash negotiation game models in the CC, PC, and WC modes. We examined the decision-making process of electric vehicle manufacturers regarding power battery production modes and carbon emission reduction strategies. Our research indicates the following: (1) The reasonable patent fee for power batteries and the wholesale price of power batteries can not only compensate power battery production technology manufacturers for the losses caused by market competition but can also strengthen the cooperative relationship between manufacturers. (2) EV manufacturers equipped with power battery production technology exhibit higher profitability within the framework of a perfectly competitive power battery production mode. Conversely, manufacturers lacking power cell production technology demonstrate greater profitability when operating under a more collaborative power cell production mode. (3) Refraining from blindly persisting with and advocating for carbon emission reduction measures is advisable for manufacturers amidst rising carbon trading prices.
Keywords: production of power batteries; selection of battery models; carbon trading production of power batteries; selection of battery models; carbon trading

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Han, Z.; Si, Y.; Wang, X.; Yang, S. Battery Mode Selection and Carbon Emission Decisions of Competitive Electric Vehicle Manufacturers. Mathematics 2024, 12, 2472. https://doi.org/10.3390/math12162472

AMA Style

Han Z, Si Y, Wang X, Yang S. Battery Mode Selection and Carbon Emission Decisions of Competitive Electric Vehicle Manufacturers. Mathematics. 2024; 12(16):2472. https://doi.org/10.3390/math12162472

Chicago/Turabian Style

Han, Zhihua, Yinyuan Si, Xingye Wang, and Shuai Yang. 2024. "Battery Mode Selection and Carbon Emission Decisions of Competitive Electric Vehicle Manufacturers" Mathematics 12, no. 16: 2472. https://doi.org/10.3390/math12162472

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop