Next Article in Journal
Generalizations of the Kantorovich and Wielandt Inequalities with Applications to Statistics
Next Article in Special Issue
On the Containment of the Unit Disc Image by Analytical Functions in the Lemniscate and Nephroid Domains
Previous Article in Journal
Solution of Inverse Photoacoustic Problem for Semiconductors via Phase Neural Network
Previous Article in Special Issue
On Polar Jacobi Polynomials
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Absolute Monotonicity of Normalized Tail of Power Series Expansion of Exponential Function †

by
Feng Qi
1,2,3
1
School of Mathematics and Informatics, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454010, China
2
School of Mathematics and Physics, Hulunbuir University, Hulunbuir 021008, China
3
Independent Researcher, University Village, Dallas, TX 75252-8024, USA
This paper is dedicated to my father Shu-Gong Qi for his 82nd birthday.
Mathematics 2024, 12(18), 2859; https://doi.org/10.3390/math12182859 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 12 August 2024 / Revised: 5 September 2024 / Accepted: 13 September 2024 / Published: 14 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Polynomials: Theory and Applications, 2nd Edition)

Abstract

:
In this work, the author reviews the origination of normalized tails of the Maclaurin power series expansions of infinitely differentiable functions, presents that the ratio between two normalized tails of the Maclaurin power series expansion of the exponential function is decreasing on the positive axis, and proves that the normalized tail of the Maclaurin power series expansion of the exponential function is absolutely monotonic on the whole real axis.

1. A Short Review of Normalized Tails

In April 2023, Qi and several mathematicians considered the decreasing property of the ratio F ( u ) G ( u ) on ( 0 , π 2 ) , where
F ( u ) = ln 3 ( tan u u ) u 3 , 0 < | u | < π 2 0 , u = 0
and
G ( u ) = ln tan u u , 0 < | u | < π 2 0 , u = 0
are both even functions on ( π 2 , π 2 ) . The reason why we investigated the ratio F ( u ) G ( u ) and its monotonicity on ( π 2 , π 2 ) was stated in [1] (Remark 10).
By the study of the ratio F ( u ) G ( u ) in [1], the authors observed that the functions
tan u u and 3 ( tan u u ) u 3 = tan u u u 3 / 3
are closely related to the first two terms in the Maclaurin power series expansion
tan u = j = 1 2 2 j 2 2 j 1 ( 2 j ) ! | B 2 j | u 2 j 1 = u + u 3 3 + 2 u 5 15 + 17 u 7 315 + , | u | < π 2 ,
where the Bernoulli numbers B j are generated by
u e u 1 = j = 0 B j u j j ! = 1 u 2 + j = 1 B 2 j u 2 j ( 2 j ) ! , 0 < | u | < 2 π .
Motivated by the above observation, basing on the first two terms in the Maclaurin power series expansions
cos u = j = 0 ( 1 ) j u 2 j ( 2 j ) ! = 1 u 2 2 + u 4 24 u 6 720 + u 8 40320 , u R
and
sin u = j = 0 ( 1 ) j u 2 j + 1 ( 2 j + 1 ) ! = u u 3 6 + u 5 120 u 7 5040 + u 9 362880 , u R ,
Qi and his coauthors further constructed the even functions
ln 2 ( 1 cos u ) u 2 , 0 < | u | < 2 π ; 0 , u = 0 ,
ln 2 ( 1 cos u ) u 2 , ln cos u 0 < | u | < π 2 ; 1 6 , u = 0 , 0 , u = ± π 2 ,
ln 6 ( u sin u ) u 3 , 0 < | u | < ; 0 , u = 0 ,
and
ln 6 ( u sin u ) u 3 ln sin u u , | u | ( 0 , π ) ; 3 10 , u = 0 ; 0 , u = ± π
in the papers [2,3], respectively.
For generalizing the above observations, in the papers [4,5,6,7] and [8] (Remark 7), Qi and his coauthors introduced the concept of the normalized tails (also known as the normalized remainders) of the Maclaurin power series expansions (6) and (7) by
CosR n ( u ) = ( 1 ) n ( 2 n ) ! u 2 n cos u j = 0 n 1 ( 1 ) j u 2 j ( 2 j ) ! , u 0 1 , u = 0
and
SinR n ( u ) = ( 1 ) n ( 2 n + 1 ) ! u 2 n + 1 sin u j = 0 n 1 ( 1 ) j u 2 j + 1 ( 2 j + 1 ) ! , u 0 1 , u = 0
for n N and u R . These two normalized tails are generalizations of the functions
cos u = cos u 1 , 2 ( 1 cos u ) u 2 = cos u 1 u 2 / 2 , sin u u , 6 ( u sin u ) u 3 = sin u u u 3 / 6
which appeared in (8), (9), (10), and (11), respectively.
In [9], basing on the Maclaurin power series expansion (5), Qi and his joint authors invented the normalized tail:
1 B 2 n + 2 ( 2 n + 2 ) ! u 2 n + 2 u e u 1 1 + u 2 j = 1 n B 2 j u 2 j ( 2 j ) ! , u 0 ; 1 , u = 0 .
Through studying this normalized tail, some new knowledge about the Bernoulli polynomials was obtained in [9] (Proposition 1) and the arXiv preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2405.05280.
On the basis of the Maclaurin power series expansion (4) and utilizing the idea and thought mentioned above, Qi and his coauthors introduced the following normalized tail
( 2 n ) ! 2 2 n 2 2 n 1 1 | B 2 n | u 2 n 1 tan u j = 1 n 1 2 2 j ( 2 2 j 1 ) ( 2 j ) ! | B 2 j | u 2 j 1 , 0 < | u | < π 2 ; 1 , u = 0 .
This normalized tail is a generalization of the functions in (3), which appeared in (1) and (2). Qi and his coauthors have investigated this normalized tail in a forthcoming paper.
In the paper [10] (p. 798) and the handbook [11] (pp. 42 and 55), we can find the Maclaurin power series expansion
tan 2 u = j = 1 2 2 j + 2 2 2 j + 2 1 ( 2 j + 1 ) ( 2 j + 2 ) ! | B 2 j + 2 | u 2 j
for | u | < π 2 . Basing on the series expansion (12), imitating the above observations, and employing the above initiating idea and thought to define the normalized tails, Zhang and Qi built the normalized tail
h n ( u ) = ( 2 n + 2 ) ! tan 2 u = 1 n 1 2 2 + 2 2 2 + 2 1 ( 2 + 1 ) ( 2 + 2 ) ! | B 2 + 2 | u 2 2 2 n + 2 ( 2 2 n + 2 1 ) ( 2 n + 1 ) | B 2 n + 2 | u 2 n , u 0 1 , u = 0
for n N and | u | < π 2 in the paper [12].
Considering the relation sec 2 u = 1 + tan 2 u , we reformulate the normalized tail h n ( u ) as
h n ( u ) = ( 2 n + 2 ) ! sec 2 u = 0 n 1 2 2 + 2 2 2 + 2 1 ( 2 + 1 ) ( 2 + 2 ) ! | B 2 + 2 | u 2 2 2 n + 2 ( 2 2 n + 2 1 ) ( 2 n + 1 ) | B 2 n + 2 | u 2 n , u 0 1 , u = 0
for n N and | u | < π 2 . Hence, the quantity h n ( u ) is also the normalized tail of the Maclaurin power series expansion of the square sec 2 u about u = 0 .
In [13] (Section 5), the authors summed up the above ideas and thoughts to design normalized tails as follows:
Suppose that a real function f ( u ) has a formal Maclaurin power series expansion
f ( u ) = j = 0 f ( j ) ( 0 ) u j j ! .
If f ( n + 1 ) ( 0 ) 0 for some n N 0 , then we call the function
1 f ( n + 1 ) ( 0 ) ( n + 1 ) ! u n + 1 f ( u ) j = 0 n f ( j ) ( 0 ) u j j ! , u 0 1 , u = 0
the normalized tail of the Maclaurin power series expansion (13).

2. Motivations of This Paper

It is well known that
e u = j = 0 u j j ! , | u | R
and that, for n N and u R , the quantity
R n ( u ) = e u k = 0 n 1 u k k !
is called the nth tail of the Maclaurin power series expansion (14).
In the paper [13], the authors designed the normalized tail
f n ( u ) = n ! u n R n ( u ) , u 0 1 , u = 0
for n N and u R . The main results of the paper [13] include the following information:
  • The normalized tail f n ( u ) for n N is an increasing and logarithmically convex function of u R ;
  • The logarithm ln f n ( u ) for n N was expanded into a Maclaurin power series;
  • The function
    ln f n ( u ) u , u 0 1 n + 1 , u = 0
    for n N is increasing in u R ;
  • The inequality
    j = 0 1 j + n + 2 n u j j ! j = 0 1 j + n n u j j ! j = 0 1 j + n + 1 n u j j ! 2
    is sound for n N and u R .
The inequality (16) is equivalent to
j = 0 1 j + n + 1 n u j j ! j = 0 1 j + n n u j j ! j = 0 1 j + n + k + 1 n u j j ! j = 0 1 j + n + k n u j j !
for k , n N and u R . What is the limit of the ratio between two series on the right hand side of the inequality (17) as k ? See the second problem at the website https://math.stackexchange.com/q/4956563 (accessed on 11 August 2024).
In the paper [13], the authors did not mention the positivity of the normalized tail f n ( u ) for n N and u R . When u > 0 , it is immediate that R n ( u ) and f n ( u ) are both positive for n N . When u < 0 , the inequality e u > k = 0 n u k k ! is valid for odd n N and reverses for even n N ; see the paper [14] and the closely related references therein. As a result, the normalized tail f n ( u ) is positive for n N and u R .
Let I R be an interval. A real infinitely-differentiable function f ( u ) defined on I is said to be absolutely monotonic in u I if and only if all of its derivatives satisfy f ( k ) ( u ) 0 for k N 0 and u I . A real infinitely-differentiable function f ( u ) defined on I is said to be completely monotonic in u I if and only if all of its derivatives satisfy ( 1 ) k f ( k ) ( u ) 0 for k N 0 and u I . When I = ( 0 , ) or I = [ 0 , ) , one can refer to plenty of classical investigations on absolutely (or completely, respectively) monotonic functions in the chapters [15] (Chapter XIII) and [16] (Chapter IV) and in the monograph [17]. In the papers [18,19,20], the authors invented the notions of logarithmically absolutely (or logarithmically completely, respectively) monotonic functions.
In this paper, we aim to discuss the decreasing property of the ratio f n + 1 ( u ) f n ( u ) in u ( 0 , ) and the absolute monotonicity of the normalized tail f n ( u ) in u R for n N . This paper is a continuation of the paper [13].

3. Lemmas

For attaining our aims, we need the following lemmas, including two monotonicity rules for the ratio between two Maclaurin power series and for the ratio between two definite integrals involving one parameter.
Lemma 1
(Monotonicity rule; see [21], [22] (Theorem 4.3), and [23] (Lemma 2.1)). Let a j , b j R for j N 0 be two real sequences and let the Maclaurin power series
U ( t ) = j = 0 a j t j a n d V ( t ) = j = 0 b j t j
be convergent on ( r , r ) for some positive number r > 0 . If b j > 0 and the quotient a j b j is increasing for j N 0 , then the quotient U ( t ) V ( t ) is also increasing on ( 0 , r ) .
Lemma 2
([24] (p. 502)). For m N 0 and t R , we have
R m + 1 ( t ) = e t j = 0 m t j j ! = t m + 1 ( m + 1 ) ! 1 + t 0 1 s m + 1 e t ( 1 s ) d s .
Lemma 3
(Monotonicity rule; see [25] (Lemma 9)). Let the functions U ( s ) , V ( s ) > 0 , and W ( s , t ) > 0 be integrable in s ( α , β ) .
1. 
If the quotients W ( s , t ) / t W ( s , t ) and U ( s ) V ( s ) are both increasing or both decreasing in s ( α , β ) , then the quotient
R ( t ) = α β W ( s , t ) U ( s ) d s α β W ( s , t ) V ( s ) d s
is increasing in t.
2. 
If one of the quotients W ( s , t ) / t W ( s , t ) and U ( s ) V ( s ) is increasing and another one of them is decreasing in s ( α , β ) , then the quotient R ( t ) is decreasing in t.
Lemma 4
([26] (p. 22, Problem 94)). Let a n and b n > 0 for n N 0 be two sequences such that the infinite series n = 0 b n t n converges for t R and lim n a n b n = s . Then, the infinite series n = 0 a n t n converges too for t R ; in addition,
lim t n = 0 a n t n n = 0 b n t n = s .
Remark 1.
In the paper [27], motivated by [28], Yang and Chu employed Lemma 4 to bind the modified Bessel function of the first kind n = 0 1 ( n ! ) 2 t 2 2 n and the Toader–Qi mean
2 π 0 π / 2 a cos 2 θ b sin 2 θ d θ .

4. Decreasing Property on Positive Half-Axis

In this section, we verify that the ratio f n + 1 ( u ) f n ( u ) is decreasing in u ( 0 , ) .
Theorem 1.
For n N , the ratio f n + 1 ( u ) f n ( u ) is decreasing in u ( 0 , ) .
Proof. 
Making use of the Maclaurin power series expansion (14), we can write the normalized tail f n ( u ) as defined by (15) for n N as
f n ( u ) = j = 0 1 j + n n u j j ! , u R .
Then, for u R and n N , we have
f n + 1 ( u ) f n ( u ) = j = 0 1 j + n + 1 n + 1 u j j ! j = 0 1 j + n n u j j ! .
The ratio between coefficients of u j of two series in the above fraction is
1 j + n + 1 n + 1 1 j ! 1 j + n n 1 j ! = j + n n j + n + 1 n + 1 = ( j + n ) ! n ! j ! ( n + 1 ) ! j ! ( j + n + 1 ) ! = n + 1 j + n + 1
and it is decreasing in j N 0 for given n N . Considering Lemma 1, we conclude that the ratio f n + 1 ( u ) f n ( u ) is decreasing in u ( 0 , ) for a given n N . The proof of Theorem 1 is complete. □

5. Absolute Monotonicity

In this section, we discover the absolute monotonicity of the normalized tail f n ( u ) in u R for n N .
Theorem 2.
For n N , the normalized tail f n ( u ) is an absolutely monotonic function in u R .
Proof. 
When u > 0 , from the Maclaurin power series expansion (18), it follows immediately that the normalized tail f n ( u ) for n N is an absolutely monotonic function in u > 0 .
Utilizing Lemma 2, we arrive at
f n ( u ) = 1 + u 0 1 v n e u ( 1 v ) d v , u R
and f n ( 0 ) = 1 for n N . For m N , a direct differentiation gives
f n ( m ) ( u ) = e u u 0 1 v n ( 1 v ) m e u v d v + m 0 1 v n ( 1 v ) m 1 e u v d v m 0 1 v n ( 1 v ) m 1 d v , u 0 = m ! n ! ( m + n ) ! > 0 , m , n N .
Accordingly, in order to prove the absolute monotonicity of f n ( u ) in u < 0 for n N , we need to show
u 0 1 v n ( 1 v ) m e u v d v 0 1 v n ( 1 v ) m 1 e u v d v m
for m , n N and u < 0 .
It is easy to see that, via integration in part,
u 0 1 v n ( 1 v ) m e u v d v = 0 1 v n ( 1 v ) m d e u v d v d v = 0 1 [ v n ( 1 v ) m ] e u v d v
for m , n N and u < 0 . Applying Lemma 3 to
W ( u , v ) = e u v > 0 , U ( v ) = [ v n ( 1 v ) m ] , V ( v ) = v n ( 1 v ) m 1 > 0
for v ( 0 , 1 ) and m , n N , which satisfy that both
[ ln W ( v , u ) ] u = W ( v , u ) / u W ( v , u ) = v
and
U ( v ) V ( v ) = [ v n ( 1 v ) m ] v n ( 1 v ) m 1 = n v m n
are decreasing in v ( 0 , 1 ) , reveals that the ratio
u 0 1 v n ( 1 v ) m e u v d v 0 1 v n ( 1 v ) m 1 e u v d v = 0 1 [ v n ( 1 v ) m ] e u v d v 0 1 v n ( 1 v ) m 1 e u v d v
is increasing in u < 0 for m , n N .
In light of Equation (22), we acquire
u 0 1 v n ( 1 v ) m e u v d v 0 1 v n ( 1 v ) m 1 e u v d v = 0 1 [ n v n 1 ( 1 v ) m m v n ( 1 v ) m 1 ] e u v d v 0 1 v n ( 1 v ) m 1 e u v d v = n 0 1 v n 1 ( 1 v ) m e u v d v 0 1 v n ( 1 v ) m 1 e u v d v m
for m , n N and u R . When u , making use of Lemma 4, we obtain
lim u 0 1 v n 1 ( 1 v ) m e u v d v 0 1 v n ( 1 v ) m 1 e u v d v = lim u k = 0 ( 1 ) k u k k ! 0 1 v n + k 1 ( 1 v ) m d v k = 0 ( 1 ) k u k k ! 0 1 v n + k ( 1 v ) m 1 d v = lim u k = 0 u k k ! m ! ( n + k 1 ) ! ( m + n + k ) ! k = 0 u k k ! ( n + k ) ! ( m 1 ) ! ( m + n + k ) ! = lim k 1 k ! m ! ( n + k 1 ) ! ( m + n + k ) ! 1 k ! ( n + k ) ! ( m 1 ) ! ( m + n + k ) ! = lim k m n + k = 0
for m , n N . Consequently, the inequality (21) is sound. The proof of Theorem 2 is complete. □

6. More Remarks

In this section, we give some remarks about our main results.
Remark 2.
By the definition (15), we acquire
f n + 1 ( u ) f n ( u ) = ( n + 1 ) ! u n + 1 e u j = 0 n u j j ! n ! u n e u j = 0 n 1 u j j ! = ( n + 1 ) e u j = 0 n u j j ! u e u j = 0 n 1 u j j ! 0 , u 1 , u 0 n + 1 n , u
for n N . Accordingly, Theorem 1 implies the inequality f n + 1 ( u ) < f n ( u ) for u ( 0 , ) and n N . In particular, when n = 1 , we acquire
2 ( e u 1 u ) u 2 < e u 1 u , u ( 0 , ) ,
which can be further reformulated as
e u < 2 + u 2 u , u ( 0 , 2 ) .
Generally, utilizing Theorem 1, for n N , we have
e u < k = 0 n 1 u k k ! + n + 1 n + 1 u u n n ! , u ( 0 , n + 1 ) .
This inequality extends and refines an inequality
e u < k = 0 n 1 u k k ! + n n u u n n ! , u ( 0 , n ) .
collected in [29] (p. 269, Entry 3.6.6). This demonstrates that Theorem 1 and the notion of the normalized tail f n ( u ) of the Maclaurin power series expansion (14) of the exponential function e u are significant in mathematics.
In the paper [14], Qi constructed many inequalities similar to (23) and (24).
Remark 3.
Taking n = 1 , 2 , 3 in Theorem 2 gives that the functions
f 1 ( u ) = e u 1 u , f 2 ( u ) = 2 ( e u 1 u ) u 2 , f 2 ( u ) = 6 e u 1 u u 2 2 u 3
are absolutely monotonic on R . These special cases are not trivial for u < 0 .
Remark 4.
In [15] (p. 369), it was stated that if f is a completely monotonic function such that f ( k ) ( t ) 0 for k N 0 , then
a i = ln ( 1 ) i 1 f ( i 1 ) ( t ) , i N
is a convex sequence. By virtue of this conclusion or [16] (p. 167, Corollary 16), we see that the absolute monotonicity of f n ( u ) in u R for n N in Theorem 2 is stronger than the logarithmic convexity of f n ( u ) in u R for n N in [13] (Corollary 1).
Remark 5.
We guess that the ratio f n + 1 ( u ) f n ( u ) is decreasing for n N in u ( , 0 ) .
A direct differentiation on both sides of (19) yields
d d u f n + 1 ( u ) f n ( u ) = j = 1 1 j + n + 1 n + 1 u j 1 ( j 1 ) ! j = 0 1 j + n n u j j ! j = 0 1 j + n + 1 n + 1 u j j ! j = 1 1 j + n n u j 1 ( j 1 ) ! j = 0 1 j + n n u j j ! 2 = j = 0 1 j + n + 2 n + 1 u j j ! j = 0 1 j + n n u j j ! j = 0 1 j + n + 1 n + 1 u j j ! j = 0 1 j + n + 1 n u j j ! j = 0 1 j + n n u j j ! 2
for u R and n N . Accordingly, in order to prove the decreasing property of the ratio f n + 1 ( u ) f n ( u ) for n N in u ( , 0 ) , it suffices to show that the inequality
j = 0 1 j + n + 2 n + 1 u j j ! j = 0 1 j + n n u j j ! j = 0 1 j + n + 1 n + 1 u j j ! j = 0 1 j + n + 1 n u j j ! ]
is sound for u R and n N . See the first problem at the website https://math.stackexchange.com/q/4956563 (accessed on 11 August 2024).
The case u > 0 of the inequality (26) can be easily deduced from the combination of Theorem 1 with the derivative in (25).
The inequality (26) can be rearranged as
j = 0 1 j + n + 2 n + 1 u j j ! j = 0 1 j + n + 1 n + 1 u j j ! j = 0 1 j + n + 1 n u j j ! j = 0 1 j + n n u j j !
for u R and n N . See the third problem at the website https://math.stackexchange.com/q/4956563 (accessed on 11 August 2024). Accordingly, in order to prove the inequality (26), it is sufficient to show that the sequence
j = 0 1 j + n + 1 n u j j ! j = 0 1 j + n n u j j ! = j = 0 ( j + 1 ) u j ( j + n + 1 ) ! j = 0 u j ( j + n ) !
is decreasing in n N for u < 0 .
Remark 6.
If the guess in Remark 5 is true, making use of the limits in Remark 2, we conclude the inequality f n + 1 ( u ) f n ( u ) < n + 1 n for n N and u R . Equivalently, the inequality
R n + 1 ( u ) u n + 1 < 1 n R n ( u ) u n
is sound for n N and u R . Therefore, for n N , the inequality
( n u ) R n ( u ) u n < 1 ( n 1 ) !
is valid in u > 0 and reverses in u < 0 .
Remark 7.
For n N and u R , let
G n ( u ) = j = 0 1 j + n + 1 n + 1 u j j ! j = 0 1 j + n + 1 n u j j ! j = 0 1 j + n + 2 n + 1 u j j ! j = 0 1 j + n n u j j !
and
H n ( u ) = j = 0 1 j + n + 2 n u j j ! j = 0 1 j + n n u j j ! j = 0 1 j + n + 1 n u j j ! 2 .
We guess that the functions G n ( u ) and H n ( u ) for n N are absolutely monotonic in u R . This guess is stronger than for the inequalities (16) and (26).

7. Conclusions

In this paper, we reviewed the origination of the notion of normalized tails of infinitely differentiable functions’ Maclaurin power series expansions, presenting that the ratio f n + 1 ( u ) f n ( u ) between the normalized tails f n + 1 ( u ) and f n ( u ) for n N is decreasing in u ( 0 , ) , as well as proving that the normalized tail f n ( u ) for n N is absolutely monotonic in u R .
Moreover, the guesses posed in Remarks 5 and 7 are interesting in mathematics.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Acknowledgments

The author is thankful to anonymous reviewers for their careful corrections, helpful suggestions, and valuable comments on the original version of this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Li, Y.-W.; Qi, F.; Du, W.-S. Two forms for Maclaurin power series expansion of logarithmic expression involving tangent function. Symmetry 2023, 15, 1686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Li, Y.-F.; Qi, F. A series expansion of a logarithmic expression and a decreasing property of the ratio of two logarithmic expressions containing cosine. Open Math. 2023, 21, 20230159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Liu, X.-L.; Long, H.-X.; Qi, F. A series expansion of a logarithmic expression and a decreasing property of the ratio of two logarithmic expressions containing sine. Mathematics 2023, 11, 3107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Niu, D.-W.; Qi, F. Monotonicity results of ratios between normalized tails of Maclaurin power series expansions of sine and cosine. Mathematics 2024, 12, 1781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wan, A.; Qi, F. Power series expansion, decreasing property, and concavity related to logarithm of normalized tail of power series expansion of cosine. Electron. Res. Arch. 2024, 32, 3130–3144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wang, F.; Qi, F. Power series expansion and decreasing property related to normalized remainders of power series expansion of sine. Filomat. 2024. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/382386328 (accessed on 17 July 2024).
  7. Zhang, T.; Yang, Z.-H.; Qi, F.; Du, W.-S. Some properties of normalized tails of Maclaurin power series expansions of sine and cosine. Fractal Fract. 2024, 8, 257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Li, Y.-W.; Qi, F. A new closed-form formula of the Gauss hypergeometric function at specific arguments. Axioms 2024, 13, 317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhang, G.-Z.; Yang, Z.-H.; Qi, F. On normalized tails of series expansion of generating function of Bernoulli numbers. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Brychkov, Y.A. Power expansions of powers of trigonometric functions and series containing Bernoulli and Euler polynomials. Integral Transform. Spec. Funct. 2009, 20, 797–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gradshteyn, I.S.; Ryzhik, I.M. Table of Integrals, Series, and Products; Translated from the Russian, Translation edited and with a preface by Daniel Zwillinger and Victor Moll, Eighth edition, Revised from the seventh edition; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhang, G.-Z.; Qi, F. On convexity and power series expansion for logarithm of normalized tail of power series expansion for square of tangent. J. Math. Inequal. 2025. in press. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/383273005 (accessed on 21 August 2024).
  13. Bao, Z.-H.; Agarwal, R.P.; Qi, F.; Du, W.-S. Some properties on normalized tails of Maclaurin power series expansion of exponential function. Symmetry 2024, 16, 989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Qi, F. A method of constructing inequalities about ex. Univ. Beograd. Publ. Elektrotehn. Fak. Ser. Mat. 1997, 8, 16–23. [Google Scholar]
  15. Mitrinović, D.S.; Pečarić, J.E.; Fink, A.M. Classical and New Inequalities in Analysis; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands; Boston, MA, USA; London, UK, 1993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Widder, D.V. The Laplace Transform; Princeton Mathematical Series 6; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 1946. [Google Scholar]
  17. Schilling, R.L.; Song, R.; Vondraček, Z. Bernstein Functions, 2nd ed.; de Gruyter Studies in Mathematics 37; Walter de Gruyter: Berlin, Germany, 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Berg, C. Integral representation of some functions related to the gamma function. Mediterr. J. Math. 2004, 1, 433–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Guo, B.-N.; Qi, F. A property of logarithmically absolutely monotonic functions and the logarithmically complete monotonicity of a power-exponential function. Politehn. Univ. Bucharest Sci. Bull. Ser. A Appl. Math. Phys. 2010, 72, 21–30. [Google Scholar]
  20. Qi, F.; Chen, C.-P. A complete monotonicity property of the gamma function. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2004, 296, 603–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Rahman, Q.I. On the monotonity of certain functionals in the theory of analytic functions. Ann. Univ. Mariae Curie-Skłodowska Sect. A 1955, 9, 135–147. [Google Scholar]
  22. Heikkala, V.; Vamanamurthy, M.K.; Vuorinen, M. Generalized elliptic integrals. Comput. Methods Funct. Theory 2009, 9, 75–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ponnusamy, S.; Vuorinen, M. Asymptotic expansions and inequalities for hypergeometric functions. Mathematika 1997, 44, 278–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Alzer, H.; Brenner, J.L.; Ruehr, O.G. Inequalities for the tails of some elementary series. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 1993, 179, 500–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Qi, F. Decreasing properties of two ratios defined by three and four polygamma functions. Comptes Rendus Math. 2022, 360, 89–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Pólya, G.; Szegö, G. Problems and Theorems in Analysis, Volume I, Series, Integral Calculus, Theory of Functions; Translated from the German by D. Aeppli. Corrected printing of the revised translation of the fourth German edition. Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften, 193; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany; New York, NY, USA, 1978. [Google Scholar]
  27. Yang, Z.-H.; Chu, Y.-M. On approximating the modified Bessel function of the first kind and Toader-Qi mean. J. Inequal. Appl. 2016, 2016, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Qi, F.; Shi, X.-T.; Liu, F.-F.; Yang, Z.-H. A double inequality for an integral mean in terms of the exponential and logarithmic means. Period. Math. Hung. 2017, 75, 180–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mitrinović, D.S. Analytic Inequalities; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1970. [Google Scholar]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Qi, F. Absolute Monotonicity of Normalized Tail of Power Series Expansion of Exponential Function. Mathematics 2024, 12, 2859. https://doi.org/10.3390/math12182859

AMA Style

Qi F. Absolute Monotonicity of Normalized Tail of Power Series Expansion of Exponential Function. Mathematics. 2024; 12(18):2859. https://doi.org/10.3390/math12182859

Chicago/Turabian Style

Qi, Feng. 2024. "Absolute Monotonicity of Normalized Tail of Power Series Expansion of Exponential Function" Mathematics 12, no. 18: 2859. https://doi.org/10.3390/math12182859

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop