Abstract
We give an overview of the representation and many connections between integrals of products of polylogarithmic functions and Euler sums. We shall consider polylogarithmic functions with linear, quadratic, and trigonometric arguments, thereby producing new results and further reinforcing the well-known connection between Euler sums and polylogarithmic functions. Many examples of integrals of products of polylogarithmic functions in terms of Riemann zeta values and Dirichlet values will be given. Suggestions for further research are also suggested, including a study of polylogarithmic functions with inverse trigonometric functions.
MSC:
11M06; 11M32; 33B15
1. Introduction and Preliminaries
It is well known that integrals of products of polylogarithmic functions can be associated with Euler sums, see Reference [1]. In this paper, we investigate the representations of integrals of the type
for and for integers q and For , we give explicit representations of the integrals in terms of Euler sums. For the case LiLi for , we show that the integral satisfies a certain recurrence relation. We also mention two specific integrals with a trigonometric argument in the polylogarithm of the form
Some examples are highlighted, almost none of which are amenable to a computer mathematical package. This work extends the results given in Reference [1], where the author examined integrals with positive arguments of the polylogarithm. Devoto and Duke [2] also list many identities of lower order polylogarithmic integrals and their relations to Euler sums. Some other important sources of information on polylogarithm functions are the works of References [3] and [4]. In References [5] and [6], the authors explore the algorithmic and analytic properties of generalized harmonic Euler sums systematically, in order to compute the massive Feynman integrals which arise in quantum field theories and in certain combinatorial problems. Identities involving harmonic sums can arise from their quasi-shuffle algebra or from other properties, such as relations to the Mellin transform
where the basic functions typically involve polylogarithms and harmonic sums of lower weight. Applying the latter type of relations, the author in Reference [7] expresses all harmonic sums of the above type with weight in terms of Mellin transforms and combinations of functions and constants of lower weight. In another interesting and related paper [8], the authors prove several identities containing infinite sums of values of the Roger’s dilogarithm function. defined on , by
The Lerch transcendent,
is defined for and and satisfies the recurrence
The Lerch transcendent generalizes the Hurwitz zeta function at
and the polylogarithm, or de-Jonquière’s function, when
Let
be the harmonic number, where denotes the Euler–Mascheroni constant,
is the mth order harmonic number and is the digamma (or psi) function defined by
moreover,
More generally, a non-linear Euler sum may be expressed as
where are positive integers and
If, for a positive integer,
then we call it a -order Euler sum. The polygamma function
and satisfies the recurrence relation
The connection of the polygamma function with harmonic numbers is
and the multiplication formula is
for p is a positive integer and is the Kronecker delta. We define the alternating zeta function (or Dirichlet eta function) as
where If we put
in the case where p and q are both positive integers and is an odd integer, Flajolet and Salvy [9] gave the identity
where and in accordance with the analytic continuation of the Riemann zeta function. We also know, from the work of Reference [10] that for odd weight we have
where is the integer part of It appears that some isolated cases of for even weight can be expressed in zeta terms, but in general, almost certainly, for even weight no general closed form expression exits for Two examples with even weight are
There are also the two general forms of identities
and
for and where are the signed Bernoulli numbers of the first kind. At even weight , neither nor currently have a reduced expression in terms of zeta values and their products. Using (1) we can express
and
The work in this paper extends the results of Reference [1] and later Reference [11], in which they gave identities of products of polylogarithmic functions with positive argument in terms of zeta functions. Other works, including References [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23], cite many identities of polylogarithmic integrals and Euler sums. The following lemma was obtained by Freitas, [1]:
Lemma 1.
For q and t positive integers
where is Euler’s identity given in the next lemma.
Lemma 2.
The following identities hold: for The classical Euler identity, as given by Euler, states
The following identities are new. For p a positive even integer,
For p a positive odd integer,
where is the Dirichlet eta function, , and is the greatest integer less than For p and t positive integers we have
and
Proof.
The identity (8) is the Euler relation and by manipulation we arrive at (9) and (10). The results (9) and (10) are closely related to those given by Nakamura and Tasaka [24]. For the proof of (11) we notice that
therefore, summing over the integers
and hence (11) follows. Consider
and summing over the integers n produces the result (12). The proof of (13) and (14) follows by summing in partial fraction form. Here is an example from (10):
and from (9):
□
2. Summation Identity
We now prove the following theorems:
Theorem 1.
Proof.
By the definition of the polylogarithmic function, we have
Now we utilize the double argument identity (3) together with (11), we obtain
and we can use the alternating harmonic number sum identity (5) to simplify the last sum. However, we shall simplify further as follows:
where is the integer part of Now,
where
and the infinite positive harmonic number sums are easily obtainable from (8), (9), (10), hence the identity (15) is achieved. □
The next theorem investigates the integral of the product of polylogarithmic functions divided by a linear function.
Theorem 2.
Let be positive integers, then for an odd integer
For an even integer
Proof.
Remark 1.
It is interesting to note that for
The next theorem investigates the integral of the product of polylogarithmic functions divided by a quadratic factor.
Theorem 3.
Proof.
Follows the same process as in Theorem 2. □
The following recurrence relation holds for the reduction of the integral of the product of polylogarithmic functions multiplied by the power of its argument.
Lemma 3.
For and let
then
For
where
Proof.
The proof of the lemma follows in a straightforward manner after integration by parts. □
Theorem 4.
Proof.
The proof is similar to the one outlined in the previous theorems. □
Theorem 5.
Proof.
By the definition of the polylogarithmic function, we have
Successively integrating by parts leads to
Alternatively, we have the relation
from which we obtain
hence the identity (23) is achieved. An alternative expansion of the integral
By partial fraction expansion,
□
Remark 2.
The next theorem investigates the integral of the product of polylogarithmic functions with one positive and one negative argument.
Theorem 6.
Let be positive integers, then for an even integer,
Proof.
From (25), we have
replacing , and , with (22) and (17), respectively, leads to (17), as required. We can also consider
and successively integrating by parts, as in Theorem 1, leads to
Another expansion of
Partial fraction expansion, and summing
hence (17) follows. We note that from (18) and (32), we obtain another new Euler sum, namely
□
Example 1.
Some examples follow.
where
The next two results deal with Polylog integrals involving the inverse of the argument.
Theorem 7.
Proof.
Following the same process as in Theorem 2, we have
Integrating by parts, as in Theorem 2, we have
from the multiplication Formula (3), we can simplify so that
and the proof of the first part of the theorem is finalized. The second result is proved as in Theorem 2. □
Example 2.
3. Some Extensions
Some other valuable research on the representation of integrals of polylogarithmic functions with a trigonometric argument has been carried out, and we highlight the following results: Espinosa and Moll [25,26] give for
where is the integer part of For a non-trigonometric argument, the work of Espinosa and Moll may be extended in the following way: For , let
Rewriting
then after integration and simplification
which results in the product of zeta functions. For the case of , we may write
where is given by (6). For we find
Choi [27,28] has also produced many interesting examples of log-sine and log-cosine integrals. Mezo [29] continues the study and considers the class of integrals
such that
and
where
Mezo [29] gives the following examples:
and
It is possible to generalize (36), so that for
and
There are a number of extensions that may be very interesting to investigate further in regard to the representation of integrals of polylogarithmic functions. It would be beneficial to study the integrals
where, for instance
and
We may also study
and the moments
where
In this paper we have highlighted various new identities of general Euler type sums, which represent the analytical solution of integrals with polylogarithm functions containing linear, quadratic, and trigonometric type arguments. In a series of papers [7,30,31], the authors explore linear combinations of associated harmonic polylogarithms and nested harmonic numbers. The multiple zeta value data mine, computed by Blumlein et al. [32], is an invaluable tool for the evaluation of harmonic numbers, in which values with weights of twelve, for alternating sums, and weights above twenty for non-alternating sums are presented. Further areas of fruitful research are those related to trigonometric, inverse trigonometric, and linear arguments for products of integrals of polylogarithmic functions.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Conflicts of Interest
The author declares no conflict of interest.
References
- Freitas, P. Integrals of polylogarithmic functions, recurrence relations, and associated Euler sums. Math. Comput. 2005, 74, 1425–1440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Devoto, A.; Duke, D.W. Table of integrals and formulae for Feynman diagram calculations. Riv. Nuovo Cimento 1984, 7, 1–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kölbig, K.S. Nielsen’s generalized polylogarithms. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 1986, 17, 1232–1258. [Google Scholar]
- Lewin, R. Polylogarithms and Associated Functions; Elsevier Science Ltd.: North Holland, The Netherland; New York, NY, USA, 1981. [Google Scholar]
- Ablinger, J.; Blümlein, J.; Schneider, C. Analytic and algorithmic aspects of generalized harmonic sums and polylogarithms. J. Math. Phys. 2013, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chavez, F.; Duhr, C. Three-mass triangle integrals and single-valued polylogarithms. J. High Energy Phys. 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blümlein, J. Structural Relations of Harmonic Sums and Mellin Transforms at Weight w = 6. Motives, Quantum Field Theory, And Pseudodifferential Operators; American Mathematical Society: Providence, RI, USA, 2010; pp. 167–187. [Google Scholar]
- Hoorfar, A.; Qi, F. Sums of series of Rogers dilogarithm functions. Ramanujan J. 2009, 18, 231–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Flajolet, P.; Salvy, B. Euler sums and contour integral representations. Exp. Math. 1998, 7, 15–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Borwein, D.; Borwein, J.M.; Girgensohn, R. Explicit evaluation of Euler sums. Proc. Edinburgh Math. Soc. 1995, 38, 277–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, C.; Yan, Y.; Shi, Z. Euler sums and integrals of polylogarithm functions. J. Number Theory 2016, 165, 84–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ablinger, J.; Blümlein, J. Harmonic sums, polylogarithms, special numbers, and their generalizations. In Computer Algebra in Quantum Field Theory; Texts & Monographs in Symbolic Computation; Springer: Vienna, Austria, 2013; pp. 1–32. [Google Scholar]
- Bailey, D.H.; Borwein, J.M. Computation and structure of character polylogarithms with applications to character Mordell-Tornheim-Witten sums. Math. Comput. 2016, 85, 295–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Borwein, D.; Borwein, J.M.; Bradley, D.M. Parametric Euler sum identities. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2006, 316, 328–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Borwein, J.M.; Bradley, D.M.; Broadhurst, D.J.; Lisoněk, P. Special values of multiple polylogarithms. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 2001, 353, 907–941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Borwein, J.M.; Zucker, I.J.; Boersma, J. The evaluation of character Euler double sums. Ramanujan J. 2008, 15, 377–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davydychev, A.I.; Kalmykov, M.Y. Massive Feynman diagrams and inverse binomial sums. Nuclear Phys. B 2004, 699, 3–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kalmykov, M.Y.; Veretin, O. Single-scale diagrams and multiple binomial sums. Phys. Lett. B 2000, 483, 315–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sofo, A. Polylogarithmic connections with Euler sums. Sarajevo J. Math. 2016, 12, 17–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sofo, A. Integrals of logarithmic and hypergeometric functions. Commun. Math. 2016, 24, 7–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sofo, A. Quadratic alternating harmonic number sums. J. Number Theory 2015, 154, 144–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sofo, A. Integrals of polylogarithmic functions with negative argument. Acta Univ. Sapientiae Math. 2018, 10, 347–367. [Google Scholar]
- Sofo, A. Integral identities for sums. Math. Commun. 2008, 13, 303–309. [Google Scholar]
- Nakamura, T.; Tasaka, K. Remarks on double zeta values of level 2. J. Number Theory 2013, 133, 48–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Espinosa, O.; Moll, V. On Some Integrals Involving the Hurwitz Zeta Function: Part 2. Ramanujan J. 2002, 6, 440–468. [Google Scholar]
- Espinosa, O.; Moll, V. On Some Integrals Involving the Hurwitz Zeta Function: Part 1. Ramanujan J. 2002, 6, 159–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choi, J. Log-sine and log-cosine integrals. Honam Math. J. 2013, 35, 137–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choi, J.; Srivastava, H.M. The Clausen function Cl2x and its related integrals. Thai J. Math. 2014, 12, 251–264. [Google Scholar]
- Mezo, I. A family of polylog-trigonometric integrals. Ramanujan J. 2018, 46, 161–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ablinger, J.; Blümlein, J.; Schneider, C. Harmonic sums and polylogarithms generated by cyclotomic polynomials. J. Math. Phys. 2011, 52, 102301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blümlein, J. Algebraic relations between harmonic sums and associated quantities. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2004, 159, 19–54. [Google Scholar]
- Blümlein, J.; Broadhurst, D.J.; Vermaseren, J.A.M. The multiple zeta value data mine. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2010, 181, 582–625. [Google Scholar]
© 2019 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).