Next Article in Journal
The Bourguignon Laplacian and Harmonic Symmetric Bilinear Forms
Previous Article in Journal
Fractional Dynamics and Pseudo-Phase Space of Country Economic Processes
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Characterization of Quasi-Metric Completeness in Terms of αψ-Contractive Mappings Having Fixed Points
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Novel Delay-Dependent Asymptotic Stability Conditions for Differential and Riemann-Liouville Fractional Differential Neutral Systems with Constant Delays and Nonlinear Perturbation

by
Watcharin Chartbupapan
1,
Ovidiu Bagdasar
2 and
Kanit Mukdasai
1,*
1
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Khon Kaen University, khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
2
Department of Electronics, Computing and Mathematics, University of Derby, Derby DE22 1GB, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mathematics 2020, 8(1), 82; https://doi.org/10.3390/math8010082
Submission received: 28 November 2019 / Revised: 17 December 2019 / Accepted: 23 December 2019 / Published: 3 January 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances on Quasi-Metric Spaces)

Abstract

:
The novel delay-dependent asymptotic stability of a differential and Riemann-Liouville fractional differential neutral system with constant delays and nonlinear perturbation is studied. We describe the new asymptotic stability criterion in the form of linear matrix inequalities (LMIs), using the application of zero equations, model transformation and other inequalities. Then we show the new delay-dependent asymptotic stability criterion of a differential and Riemann-Liouville fractional differential neutral system with constant delays. Furthermore, we not only present the improved delay-dependent asymptotic stability criterion of a differential and Riemann-Liouville fractional differential neutral system with single constant delay but also the new delay-dependent asymptotic stability criterion of a differential and Riemann-Liouville fractional differential neutral equation with constant delays. Numerical examples are exploited to represent the improvement and capability of results over another research as compared with the least upper bounds of delay and nonlinear perturbation.

1. Introduction

Differential systems, or more generally functional differential systems, have been studied rather extensively for at least 200 years and are used as models to describe transportation systems, communication networks, teleportation systems, physical systems and biological systems, and so forth. Parts of fractional-order systems have not received much attention by reason of absence of appropriate utilization circumstances over the past 300 years. However, during the last 10 years fractional-order systems have been widely investigated as they have the qualification to explain various phenomena more precisely in many fields, for example, biological models, material science, finance, cardiac tissues, quantum mechanics, viscoelastic systems, medicine and fluid mechanics [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. Caputo fractional differential systems have been studied in many types of stability such as uniform stability [9], Mittag-Leffler stability [10,11,12,13], Ulam stability [14], finite time stability [15,16] and asymptotic stability [17,18]. Nevertheless, the stability of Riemann-Liouville fractional differential systems is seldom considered, see References [19,20].
The neutral systems with time delays have already been applied in many fields, such as heartbeat, memorization, locomotion, mastication and respiration, see References [21,22,23,24]. Accordingly, the issue of stability analysis for differential and Riemann-Liouville fractional differential neutral systems has attracted researchers. The asymptotic stability criteria for certain neutral differential equations (CNDE) with constant delays have been discussed in References [25,26,27,28,29] by applying Lyapunov-Krasovskii functional and several model transformations. In References [30,31,32,33], the researchers considered the exponential stability problem for CNDE with time-varying delays by several methods. In Reference [30], the results were established without the use of the bounding technique and the model transformation method, while researchers have studied it by using radially unboundedness, the Lyapunov-Krasovskii functional approach and the model transformation method in Reference [32]. Moreover, in Reference [34] Li et al. presented the asymptotic stability conditions for fractional neutral systems in the form of matrix measure and matrix norm of the system matrices. However, the criteria, drafted in the form of matrix norm, are more conservative, while Liu et al. used the Lyapunov direct method to establish the asymptotic stability criteria of Riemann-Liouville fractional neutral systems in the form of LMIs [35].
This paper is involved with the analysis problem for the asymptotic stability of differential and Riemann-Liouville fractional differential neutral systems with constant delays and nonlinear perturbation by applying a zero equation, model transformation and other inequalities. The novel asymptotic stability condition is instituted in the form of LMIs. Then we show the new delay-dependent asymptotic stability criterion of differential and Riemann-Liouville fractional differential neutral systems with constant delays. In addition, the improved delay-dependent asymptotic stability criterion of differential and Riemann-Liouville fractional differential neutral systems with single constant delay and the new delay-dependent asymptotic stability criterion of differential and Riemann-Liouville fractional differential neutral equations with constant delays are established. Numerical examples represent the capability of our results as compared with other research.

2. Problem Formulation and Preliminaries

We introduce a differential and fractional differential neutral system with constant delays and nonlinear perturbation
t 0 D t q [ x ( t ) + C x ( t τ ) ] = A x ( t ) + B x ( t σ ) + f ( x ( t σ ) ) , t > 0 , x ( t ) = ϱ ( t ) , t [ κ , 0 ] ,
for 0 < q 1 , the state vector x ( t ) R n , A , B , C are symmetric positive definite matrices with C < 1 , τ , σ are positive real constants and ϱ C ( [ κ , 0 ] ; R n ) with κ = max { τ , σ } .
The uncertainty f ( . ) represents the nonlinear parameter perturbation satisfying
f T ( x ( t ) ) f ( x ( t ) ) δ 2 x T ( t ) x ( t ) ,
f T ( x ( t σ ) ) f ( x ( t σ ) ) η 2 x T ( t σ ) x ( t σ ) ,
where δ , η are given constants.
Next, the Riemann-Liouville fractional integral and derivative [36] are defined as, respectively
t 0 D t q x ( t ) = 1 Γ ( q ) t 0 t ( t s ) q 1 x ( s ) d s , ( q > 0 ) ,
t 0 D t q x ( t ) = 1 Γ ( n q ) d n d t n t 0 t x ( s ) ( t s ) q + 1 n d s , ( n 1 q < n ) .
Lemma 1.
[37] For x ( t ) R n and p > q > 0 , then
t 0 D t q ( t 0 D t p x ( t ) ) = t 0 D t q p x ( t ) .
Lemma 2.
[17] For a vector of differentiable function x ( t ) R n , positive semi-definite matrix K R n × n and 0 < q < 1 , then
1 2 t 0 D t q ( x T ( t ) K x ( t ) ) x T ( t ) K t 0 D t q x ( t ) ,
for all t t 0 .

3. Main Results

Consider the asymptotic stability for system (1) with constant delays and nonlinear perturbation. We define a new variable
Ψ ( t ) = x ( t ) + C x ( t τ ) .
Rewrite the Equation (1) in the following equation
t 0 D t q Ψ ( t ) = A x ( t ) + B x ( t σ ) + f ( x ( t σ ) ) .
Theorem 1.
Let δ and η be positive scalars, if there are any appropriate dimensions matrices Q j ( j = 1 , 2 , 3 ) and symmetric positive definite matrices K i ( i = 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 ) such that satisfy
= Q 1 Q 1 T Ω ( 1 , 2 ) Q 1 C Q 3 T K 1 K 1 B * Ω ( 2 , 2 ) Q 2 C + Q 3 T 0 0 * * Ω ( 3 , 3 ) 0 0 * * * K 5 σ I 0 * * * * K 3 + σ η 2 I < 0 ,
where
  • Ω ( 1 , 2 ) = K 1 A + Q 1 Q 2 T ,
  • Ω ( 2 , 2 ) = Q 2 + Q 2 T + K 2 + K 3 + τ K 4 + δ 2 K 5 ,
  • Ω ( 3 , 3 ) = Q 3 C + C T Q 3 T K 2 .
Then the system (1) is asymptotically stable.
Proof of Theorem 1.
For symmetric positive definite matrices K i ( i = 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 ) and any appropriate dimensions matrices Q j ( j = 1 , 2 , 3 ) . Consider the Lyapunov-Krasovskii functional
V ( t ) = i = 1 2 V i ( t ) ,
for
V 1 ( t ) = t 0 D t q 1 Ψ T ( t ) K 1 Ψ ( t ) , V 2 ( t ) = t τ t x T ( s ) K 2 x ( s ) d s + t σ t x T ( s ) K 3 x ( s ) d s + t τ t ( τ t + s ) x T ( s ) K 4 x ( s ) d s + t σ t f T ( x ( s ) ) K 5 f ( x ( s ) ) d s .
Computing the differential of V ( t ) on the solution of system (1)
V ˙ ( t ) = i = 1 2 V i ˙ ( t ) .
The differential of V 1 ( t ) is computed by Lemma 2
V ˙ 1 ( t ) = t 0 D t q Ψ T ( t ) K 1 Ψ ( t ) 2 Ψ T ( t ) K 1 ( t 0 D t q Ψ ( t ) ) = 2 Ψ T ( t ) K 1 [ A x ( t ) + B x ( t σ ) + f ( x ( t σ ) ) ] + 2 Ψ T ( t ) Q 1 [ Ψ ( t ) + x ( t ) + C x ( t τ ) ] + 2 x T ( t ) Q 2 [ Ψ ( t ) + x ( t ) + C x ( t τ ) ] + 2 x T ( t τ ) Q 3 [ Ψ ( t ) + x ( t ) + C x ( t τ ) ] .
Taking the differential of V 2 ( t ) , we obtain
V ˙ 2 ( t ) = x T ( t ) K 2 x ( t ) x T ( t τ ) K 2 x ( t τ ) + x T ( t ) K 3 x ( t ) x T ( t σ ) K 3 x ( t σ ) + τ x T ( t ) K 4 x ( t ) t τ t x T ( s ) K 4 x ( s ) + f T ( x ( t ) ) K 5 f ( x ( t ) ) f T ( x ( t σ ) ) K 5 f ( x ( t σ ) ) x T ( t ) K 2 x ( t ) x T ( t τ ) K 2 x ( t τ ) + x T ( t ) K 3 x ( t ) x T ( t σ ) K 3 x ( t σ ) + τ x T ( t ) K 4 x ( t ) + δ 2 x T ( t ) K 5 x ( t ) f T ( x ( t σ ) ) K 5 f ( x ( t σ ) ) .
Next, from (3), we obtain
0 σ η 2 x T ( t σ ) x ( t σ ) σ f T ( x ( t σ ) ) f ( x ( t σ ) ) .
According to (13), (14) and (15), we can conclude that
V ˙ ( t ) ξ T ( t ) ξ ( t ) ,
where ξ ( t ) = c o l { Ψ ( t ) , x ( t ) , x ( t τ ) , f ( x ( t σ ) ) , x T ( t σ ) } .
Since linear matrix inequality (10) holds, then the system (1) is asymptotic stability. □
Next, we consider system (1) with f ( x ( t σ ) ) = 0 ,
t 0 D t q [ x ( t ) + C x ( t τ ) ] = A x ( t ) + B x ( t σ ) t > 0 , x ( t ) = ϱ ( t ) , t [ κ , 0 ] ,
for 0 < q 1 , the state vector x ( t ) R n , A , B , C are symmetric positive definite matrices with C < 1 , τ , σ are positive real constants and ϱ C ( [ κ , 0 ] ; R n ) with κ = max { τ , σ } .
Corollary 1.
If there are any appropriate dimensions matrices Q j ( j = 1 , 2 , 3 ) and symmetric positive definite matrices K i ( i = 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 ) such that satisfy
Q 1 Q 1 T K 1 A + Q 1 Q 2 T Q 1 C Q 3 T K 1 B * Q 2 + Q 2 T + K 2 + K 3 + τ K 4 Q 2 C + Q 3 T 0 * * Q 3 C + C T Q 3 T K 2 0 * * * K 3 < 0 .
Then the system (17) is asymptotically stable.
Proof of Corollary 1.
For symmetric positive definite matrices K i ( i = 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 ) and any appropriate dimensions matrices Q j ( j = 1 , 2 , 3 ) . Consider the Lyapunov-Krasovskii functional
V ( t ) = i = 1 2 V i ( t ) ,
for
V 1 ( t ) = t 0 D t q 1 Ψ T ( t ) K 1 Ψ ( t ) , V 2 ( t ) = t τ t x T ( s ) K 2 x ( s ) d s + t σ t x T ( s ) K 3 x ( s ) d s + t τ t ( τ t + s ) x T ( s ) K 4 x ( s ) d s .
According to Theorem 1, we present the asymptotic stability criterion (18) of system (17). □
Next, we consider system (1) with f ( x ( t σ ) ) = 0 and σ = τ ,
t 0 D t q [ x ( t ) + C x ( t τ ) ] = A x ( t ) + B x ( t τ ) t > 0 , x ( t ) = ϱ ( t ) , t [ τ , 0 ] ,
for 0 < q 1 , the state vector x ( t ) R n , A , B , C are symmetric positive definite matrices with C < 1 , τ is positive real constants and ϱ C ( [ τ , 0 ] ; R n ) .
Corollary 2.
If there are any appropriate dimensions matrices Q j ( j = 1 , 2 , 3 ) and symmetric positive definite matrices K i ( i = 1 , 2 , 3 ) such that satisfy
Q 1 Q 1 T K 1 A + Q 1 Q 2 T Q 1 C Q 3 T + K 1 B * Q 2 + Q 2 T + K 2 + τ K 3 Q 2 C + Q 3 T * * Q 3 C + C T Q 3 T K 2 < 0 .
Then the Equation (20) is asymptotically stable.
Proof of Corollary 2.
For symmetric positive definite matrices K i ( i = 1 , 2 , 3 ) and any appropriate dimensions matrices Q j ( j = 1 , 2 , 3 ) . Consider the Lyapunov-Krasovskii functional
V ( t ) = i = 1 2 V i ( t ) ,
for
V 1 ( t ) = t 0 D t q 1 Ψ T ( t ) K 1 Ψ ( t ) , V 2 ( t ) = t τ t x T ( s ) K 2 x ( s ) d s + t τ t ( τ t + s ) x T ( s ) K 3 x ( s ) d s .
According to Theorem 1, we present the asymptotic stability criterion (21) of system (20). □

4. Application

t 0 D t q [ x ( t ) + p x ( t τ ) ] = a x ( t ) + b tanh x ( t σ ) t > 0 , x ( t ) = ϱ ( t ) , t [ κ , 0 ] ,
for 0 < q 1 , the state vector x ( t ) R , a , b , p are real constants with | p | < 1 , τ , σ are positive real constants ϱ C ( [ κ , 0 ] ; R ) with κ = max { τ , σ } .
Corollary 3.
If there are positive real constants k i ( i = 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 ) and real constants q j ( j = 1 , 2 , 3 ) such that satisfy
2 q 1 k 1 a + q 1 q 2 q 1 p q 3 k 1 b 0 * 2 q 2 + k 2 + k 3 + k 4 τ + k 5 q 2 p + q 3 0 0 * * 2 q 3 p k 2 0 0 * * * k 5 σ 0 * * * * k 3 + σ < 0 .
Then the Equation (24) is asymptotically stable.
Proof of Corollary 3.
For positive real constants k i ( i = 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 ) and real constants q j ( j = 1 , 2 , 3 ) . Consider the Lyapunov-Krasovskii functional
V ( t ) = i = 1 2 V i ( t ) ,
for
V 1 ( t ) = k 1 t 0 D t q 1 Ψ 2 ( t ) , V 2 ( t ) = k 2 t τ t x 2 ( s ) d s + k 3 t σ t x 2 ( s ) d s + k 4 t τ t ( τ t + s ) x 2 ( s ) d s + k 5 t σ t tanh x 2 ( s ) d s .
According to Theorem 1, we present the asymptotic stability criterion (25) of system (3). □

5. Numerical Examples

Example 1.
The fractional neutral system:
t 0 D t q [ x ( t ) + C x ( t 0.5 ) ] = A x ( t ) + B x ( t σ ) + f ( x ( t σ ) ) .
Solving the LMI (10) when A = 1.45 0 0 1.45 , B = 0 0.4 0.4 0 , C = 0.1 0 0 0.1 , we have a set of parameters that ensures asymptotic stability of system (27) which η = 5 × 10 3 , δ = 1 and σ = 0.5 as follows: K 1 = 10 8 × 3.5993 0 0 3.5993 , K 2 = 10 7 × 1.3106 0 0 1.3106 , K 3 = 10 8 × 1.5730 0 0 1.5730 , K 4 = 10 6 × 9.7620 0 0 9.7620 , K 5 = 10 8 × 3.5456 0 0 3.5456 , Q 1 = 10 8 × 2.9931 0 0 2.9931 , Q 2 = 10 8 × 3.0980 0 0 3.0980 , Q 3 = 10 7 × 2.2267 0 0 2.2267 .
Moreover, the least upper bound of the parameter σ that ensures the asymptotic stability of system (27) is 1.3227 when η = 5 × 10 3 and δ = 1 . Table 1 represents the least upper bound σ of this example for various values of η, δ.
Example 2.
The fractional neutral system:
t 0 D t q [ x ( t ) + C x ( t τ ) ] = A x ( t ) + B x ( t 1.2 ) .
Solving the LMI (18) when A = 1.45 0 0 1.45 , B = 0 0.4 0.4 0 , C = 0.1 0 0 0.1 , we have a set of parameters that ensures asymptotic stability of system (28) which τ = 0.6 as follows: K 1 = 44.0782 0 0 44.0782 , K 2 = 32.9861 0 0 32.9861 , K 3 = 32.6501 0 0 32.6501 , K 4 = 31.8793 0 0 31.8793 , Q 1 = 14.6090 0 0 14.6090 , Q 2 = 56.7801 0 0 56.7801 , Q 3 = 3.3600 0 0 3.3600 .
Moreover, the least upper bound of the parameter τ that ensures the asymptotic stability of system (28) is 3.7 × 10 22 .
Example 3.
The fractional neutral system:
t 0 D t q [ x ( t ) + C x ( t τ ) ] = A x ( t ) + B x ( t τ ) .
Solving the LMI (21) when A = 3 1 0 1 , B = 0.2 0.1 0 0.1 , C = 0.1 0 0 0.2 , we obtain the least upper bound of the parameter τ that ensures the asymptotic stability is 2.86 × 10 24 . By the criterion in [35], the least upper bound of the parameter τ is 2.99 × 10 21 . This example represents our result is less conservative than these in [35].
Example 4.
The differential equation, which is considered in [25,27,30,31,32]:
d d t [ x ( t ) + 0.35 x ( t 0.5 ) ] = 1.5 x ( t ) + b tanh x ( t 0.5 ) .
By using linear matrix inequality (25), the comparison for the least upper bound b that ensures asymptotic stability of Equation (30) are represented in Table 2.
Example 5.
The differential equation in [27,30,31,38]:
d d t [ x ( t ) + 0.2 x ( t 0.1 ) ] = 0.6 x ( t ) + 0.3 tanh x ( t σ ) .
By using linear matrix inequality (25), the comparison for the least upper bound delay σ that ensures asymptotic stability of Equation (31) are represented in Table 3.
Example 6.
The fractional neutral equation:
t 0 D t q [ x ( t ) + p x ( t 0.5 ) ] = a x ( t ) + b tanh x ( t 0.5 ) .
Solving the LMI (25), we have a set of parameters that ensures asymptotic stability of Equation (32) which a = 0.75 ,   b = 0.3 and p = 0.4 as follows: k 1 = 3.1544 , k 2 = 1.0324 , k 3 = 1.0749 , k 4 = 0.7170 , k 5 = 0.7385 , q 1 = 0.7587 , q 2 = 1.9721 , q 3 = 0.4433 .
Furthermore, the least upper bound of b that ensures the asymptotic stability of Equation (32) is 0.6873 with a = 0.75 , p = 0.4 . Table 4 represents the least upper bound b of this example for various values of a , p .

6. Conclusions

The aim of this paper is a novel asymptotic stability analysis of differential and Riemann-Liouville fractional differential neutral systems with constant delays and nonlinear perturbation by applying zero equations, model transformation and other inequalities. The new asymptotic stability condition is given in the form of LMIs. Then we show the new delay-dependent asymptotic stability criterion of a differential and Riemann-Liouville fractional differential neutral system with constant delays. Furthermore, we propose the improved delay-dependent asymptotic stability criterion of differential and Riemann-Liouville fractional differential neutral systems with single constant delay and the new delay-dependent asymptotic stability criterion of differential and Riemann-Liouville fractional differential neutral equations with constant delays. Numerical examples illustrate the advantages and applicability of our results.

Author Contributions

All authors claim to have contributed significantly and equally to this work. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work is supported by Science Achievement Scholarship of Thailand (SAST), Research and Academic Affairs Promotion Fund, Faculty of Science, Khon Kaen University, Fiscal year 2020 and National Research Council of Thailand and Khon Kaen University, Thailand (6200069).

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions, which led to the improvement of the content of the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ahmad, B.; Alghanmi, M.; Alsaedi, A.; Agarwal, R.V. Nonlinear impulsive multi-order Caputo-Type generalized fractional differential equations with infinite delay. Mathematics 2019, 7, 1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Khan, U.; Ellahi, R.; Khan, R.; Mohyud-Din, S.T. Extracting new solitary wave solutions of Benny–Luke equation and Phi-4 equation of fractional order by using (G’/G)-expansion method. Opt. Quant. Electron. 2017, 49, 362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lundstrom, B.N.; Higgs, M.H.; Spain, W.J.; Fairhall, A.L. Fractional differentiation by neocortical pyramidal neurons. Nat. Neurosci. 2008, 11, 1335–1342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Magin, R.L.; Ovadia, M. Modeling the cardiac tissue electrode interface using fractional calculus. J. Vib. Control 2008, 14, 1431–1442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Picozzi, S.; West, B.J. Fractional Langevin model of memory in financial markets. Phys. Rev. E 2002, 66, 46–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Rahmatullah; Ellahi, R.; Mohyud-Din, S.T.; Khan, U. Exact traveling wave solutions of fractional order Boussinesq-like equations by applying Exp-function method. Results Phys. 2018, 8, 114–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sohail, A.; Maqbool, K.; Ellahi, R. Stability analysis for fractional-order partial differential equations by means of space spectral time Adams-Bashforth Moulton method. Numer. Methods Partial. Differ. Equ. 2017, 34, 19–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tripathi, D.; Pandey, S.K.; Das, S. Peristaltic flow of viscoelastic fluid with fractional Maxwell model through a channel. Appl. Math. Comput. 2010, 215, 3645–3654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Duarte-Mermoud, M.A.; Aguila-Camacho, N.; Gallegos, J.A.; Castro-Linares, R. Using general quadratic Lyapunov functions to prove Lyapunov uniform stability for fractional order systems. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 2015, 22, 650–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chen, L.P.; He, Y.G.; Chai, Y.; Wu, R.C. New results on stability stabilization of a class of nonlinear fractional-order systems. Nonlinear Dynam. 2014, 75, 633–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wu, G.C.; Abdeljawad, T.; Liu, J.; Baleanu, D.; Wu, K.T. Mittag–Leffler stability analysis of fractional discrete–time neural networks via fixed point technique. Nonlinear Anal. Model. Control 2019, 24, 919–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wu, G.C.; Baleanu, D.; Huang, L.L. Novel Mittag-Leffler stability of linear fractional delay difference equations with impulse. Appl. Math. Lett. 2018, 82, 71–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yang, X.; Li, C.; Huang, T. Mittag-Leffler stability analysis of nonlinear fractional-order systems with impulses. Appl. Math. Comput. 2017, 293, 416–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Brzdek, J.; Eghbali, N. On approximate solutions of some delayed fractional differential equations. Appl. Math. Lett. 2016, 54, 31–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chen, L.P.; Liu, C.; Wu, R.C.; He, Y.G.; Chai, Y. Finite-time stability criteria for a class of fractional-order neural networks with delay. Neural Comput. Appl. 2016, 27, 549–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, M.; Wang, J.R. Finite time stability of fractional delay differential equations. Appl. Math. Lett. 2017, 64, 170–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Liu, S.; Li, X.; Zhou, X.F.; Jiang, W. Lyapunov stability analysis of fractional nonlinear systems. Appl. Math. Lett. 2016, 51, 13–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Liu, S.; Zhou, X.F.; Li, X.; Jiang, W. Stability of fractional nonlinear singular systems its applications in synchronization of complex dynamical networks. Nonlinear Dynam. 2016, 84, 2377–2385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ozarslan, M.A.; Ustaoglu, C. Some incomplete hypergeometric functions and incomplete Riemann-Liouville fractional integral operators. Mathematics 2019, 7, 483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Rashid, S.; Abdeljawad, T.; Jarad, F.; Noor, M.A. Some estimates for generalized Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals of exponentially convex functions and their applications. Mathematics 2019, 7, 807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Fridman, E. Stability of linear descriptor systems with delays: A Lyapunov-based approach. Aust. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2002, 273, 24–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Kwon, O.M.; Park, J.H.; Lee, S.M. Augmented Lyapunov functional approach to stability of uncertain neutral systems with time-varying delays. Appl. Comput. Math. 2009, 207, 202–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Liao, X.; Liu, Y.; Guo, S.; Mai, H. Asymptotic stability of delayed neural networks: A descriptor system approach. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 2009, 14, 3120–3133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Park, J.H. Delay-dependent criterion for guaranteed cost control of neutral delay systems. J. Opt. Theory Appl. 2005, 124, 491–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Deng, S.; Liao, X.; Guo, S. Asymptotic stability analysis of certain neutral differential equations: A descriptor system approach. Math. Comput. Simul. 2009, 71, 4297–4308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kwon, O.M.; Park, J.H. On improved delay-dependent stability criterion of certain neutral differential equations. Appl. Math. Comput. 2008, 199, 385–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Nam, P.T.; Phat, V.N. An improved stability criterion for a class of neutral differential equations. Appl. Math. Lett. 2009, 22, 31–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Agarwal, R.P.; Grace, S.R. Asymptotic stability of certain neutral differential equations. Math. Comput. Model. 2000, 31, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Park, J.H.; Kwon, O.M. Stability analysis of certain nonlinear differential equation. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2008, 27, 450–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Chen, H. Some improved criteria on exponential stability of neutral differential equation. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2012, 2012, 170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Chen, H.; Meng, X. An improved exponential stability criterion for a class of neutral delayed differential equations. Appl. Math. Lett. 2011, 24, 1763–1767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Keadnarmol, P.; Rojsiraphisal, T. Globally exponential stability of a certain neutral differential equation with time-varying delays. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2014, 2014, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Li, X. Global exponential stability for a class of neural networks. Appl. Math. Lett. 2009, 22, 1235–1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Li, H.; Zhou, S.; Li, H. Asymptotic stability analysis of fractional-order neutral systems with time delay. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2015, 2015, 325–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Liu, S.; Wu, X.; Zhang, Y.J.; Yang, R. Asymptotical stability of Riemann–Liouville fractional neutral systems. Appl. Math. Lett. 2017, 69, 168–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Podlubny, I. Fractional Differential Equations; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  37. Kilbas, A.A.; Srivastava, H.M.; Trujillo, J.J. Theory and Application of Fractional Differential Equations; Elsevier: New York, NY, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  38. Rojsiraphisal, T.; Niamsup, P. Exponential stability of certain neutral differential equations. Appl. Math. Lett. 2010, 17, 3875–3880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. The least upper bound of σ for Example 1.
Table 1. The least upper bound of σ for Example 1.
η = 5 × 10 3 η = 6 × 10 3 η = 7 × 10 3
δ = 0.8 6.49204.50763.3117
δ = 0.9 4.11662.85882.1003
δ = 1 1.32270.91850.6748
Table 2. The least upper bound of b for Example 4.
Table 2. The least upper bound of b for Example 4.
Deng et al. (2009) [25]0.889
Nam and Phat (2009) [27]1.405
Chen and Meng (2011) [31]1.346
Chen (2012) [30]1.405
Keadnarmol and Rojsiraphisal (2014) [32]1.405
Corollary 31.4051
Table 3. The least upper bound of σ for Example 5.
Table 3. The least upper bound of σ for Example 5.
Nam and Phat (2009) [27]2.32
Rojsiraphisal and Niamsup (2010) [38]2.32
Chen and Meng (2011) [31] 10 21
Chen (2012) [30] 1.34 × 10 21
Corollary 3 6.21 × 10 8
Table 4. The least upper bound of b for Example 6.
Table 4. The least upper bound of b for Example 6.
a = 0.25 a = 0.5 a = 0.75 a = 1 a = 1.25
p = 0.2 0.24490.48980.73480.97971.2247
p = 0.4 0.22910.45820.68730.91651.1456
p = 0.6 0.20000.39990.59990.79990.9999
p = 0.8 0.15000.29990.44990.59990.7499

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chartbupapan, W.; Bagdasar, O.; Mukdasai, K. A Novel Delay-Dependent Asymptotic Stability Conditions for Differential and Riemann-Liouville Fractional Differential Neutral Systems with Constant Delays and Nonlinear Perturbation. Mathematics 2020, 8, 82. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8010082

AMA Style

Chartbupapan W, Bagdasar O, Mukdasai K. A Novel Delay-Dependent Asymptotic Stability Conditions for Differential and Riemann-Liouville Fractional Differential Neutral Systems with Constant Delays and Nonlinear Perturbation. Mathematics. 2020; 8(1):82. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8010082

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chartbupapan, Watcharin, Ovidiu Bagdasar, and Kanit Mukdasai. 2020. "A Novel Delay-Dependent Asymptotic Stability Conditions for Differential and Riemann-Liouville Fractional Differential Neutral Systems with Constant Delays and Nonlinear Perturbation" Mathematics 8, no. 1: 82. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8010082

APA Style

Chartbupapan, W., Bagdasar, O., & Mukdasai, K. (2020). A Novel Delay-Dependent Asymptotic Stability Conditions for Differential and Riemann-Liouville Fractional Differential Neutral Systems with Constant Delays and Nonlinear Perturbation. Mathematics, 8(1), 82. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8010082

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop