Moderating Role of Communication Competence in the Association between Professionalism and Job Satisfaction in Korean Millennial and Generation Z Nurses: A Cross-Sectional Study
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- To assess the level of nursing professionalism, communication competence, and job satisfaction among MZ generation nurses.
- To examine differences in nursing professionalism, communication competence, and job satisfaction based on the characteristics of MZ generation nurses.
- To investigate the correlations between nursing professionalism, communication competence, and job satisfaction among MZ generation nurses.
- To confirm the mediating role of communication competence in the relationship between nursing professionalism and job satisfaction among MZ generation nurses.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Research Design
2.2. Participants and Data Collection
2.3. Research Tools
2.3.1. Nursing Professionalism
2.3.2. Communication Competence
2.3.3. Job Satisfaction
2.3.4. General Characteristics
2.4. Data Analysis
2.5. Ethical Considerations
3. Results
3.1. Participant Characteristics
3.2. Level of Nursing Professionalism, Communication Competence, and Job Satisfaction
3.3. Nursing Professionalism, Communication Competence, and Job Satisfaction According to Participant Characteristics
3.4. Correlation between Nursing Professionalism, Communication Competence, and Job Satisfaction
3.5. Mediating Role of Communication Competence between Nursing Professionalism and Job Satisfaction
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Howe, N.; Strauss, W. Millennials rising: The next great generation. In Cartoons; Matson, R.J., Ed.; Vintage Books: New York, NJ, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Taylor, P.; Parker, K.; Morin, R.; Patten, E.; Brown, A. Millennials in Adulthood; Pew Research Center: Washington, DC, USA, 2014; Available online: http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2014/03/07/millennials-in-adulthood/ (accessed on 15 July 2023).
- Shatto, B.; Erwin, K. Moving on from millennials: Preparing for generation Z. J. Contin. Educ. Nurs. 2016, 47, 253–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hong, S.H.; Kim, M. A study on communication methods according to the characteristics of MZ generation. Treatise Plast. Media 2021, 24, 113–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ozkan, M.; Solmaz, B. The changing face of the employees–generation Z and their perceptions of work (a study applied to university students). Procedia Econ. Financ. 2015, 26, 476–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gharzai, L.A.; Beeler, W.H.; Jagsi, R. Playing into stereotypes: Engaging millennials and generation Z in the COVID-19 pandemic response. Adv. Radiat. Oncol. 2020, 5, 679–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schnapp, B.H.; Cloyd, T.; Hartman, N.D.; Moadel, T.; Santen, S.A.; Gottlieb, M. Avocado toasted: Mythbusting “Millennials,” “Generation Z,” and generational theory. AEM Educ. Train. 2022, 6, e10757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seo, J.; Kang, J.S. Determinants of turnover intention of MZ generation civil servants and the moderating effects of employee welfare. J. Humanit. Soc. Sci. 2022, 13, 2783–2796. [Google Scholar]
- Ministry of Health and Welfare. Healthcare Workforce Survey Results Released. 2022. Available online: http://www.mohw.go.kr/react/al/sal0301vw.jsp?PAR_MENU_ID=04&MENU_ID=0403&CONT_SEQ=372084&page=1 (accessed on 4 August 2023).
- Blandi, L.; Sabbatucci, M.; Dallagiacoma, G.; Alberti, F.; Bertuccio, P.; Odone, A. Digital information approach through social media among Gen Z and Millennials: The global scenario during the COVID-19 pandemic. Vaccines 2022, 11, 1822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cicolini, G.; Comparcini, D.; Simonetti, V. Workplace empowerment and nurses’ job satisfaction: A systematic literature review. J. Nurs. Manag. 2014, 22, 855–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kwon, K.J.; Chu, M.S.; Kim, J.A. The impact of nursing professionalism on the nursing performance, job satisfaction and retention intention among clinical nurses. J. Korean Acad. Nurs. Adm. 2009, 15, 182–192. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, J. Structural equation modeling for humor, job satisfaction, job stress and intention to turnover. J. Korean Acad. Nurs. Adm. 2013, 19, 265–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Galanis, P.; Vraka, I.; Fragkou, D.; Bilali, A.; Kaitelidou, D. Nurses’ burnout and associated risk factors during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Adv. Nurs. 2021, 77, 3286–3302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hanum, A.L.; Hu, Q.; Wei, W.; Zhou, H.; Ma, F. Professional identity, job satisfaction, and intention to stay among clinical nurses during the prolonged COVID-19 pandemic: A mediation analysis. Jpn. J. Nurs. Sci. 2023, 20, e12515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Coelho, P.; Bhattacharya, S. To analyze the level and factors of job satisfaction across different generations in India during COVID-19. Cardiometry 2022, 24, 625–634. [Google Scholar]
- Lu, H.; Zhao, Y.; While, A. Job satisfaction among hospital nurses: A literature review. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 2019, 94, 21–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yarbrough, S.; Martin, P.; Alfred, D.; McNeill, C. Professional values, job satisfaction, career development, and intent to stay. Nurs. Ethics 2017, 24, 675–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Niskala, J.; Kanste, O.; Tomietto, M.; Miettunen, J.; Tuomikoski, A.M.; Kyngäs, H.; Mikkonen, K. Interventions to improve nurses’ job satisfaction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Adv. Nurs. 2020, 76, 1498–1508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hampton, D.; Welsh, D. Work values of Generation Z nurses. J. Nurs. Adm. 2019, 49, 480–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wise, T.; Church, C. Insights into the millennial generation of nurses. Nurs. Manag. 2022, 53, 28–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Waltz, L.A.; Munoz, L.; Weber Johnson, H.; Rodriguez, T. Exploring job satisfaction and workplace engagement in millennial nurses. J. Nurs. Manag. 2020, 28, 673–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Germaine, P.; Catanzano, T.; Patel, A.; Mohan, A.; Patel, K.; Pryluck, D.; Cooke, E. Communication strategies and our learners. Curr. Probl. Diagn. Radiol. 2021, 50, 297–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Campbell, A.R.; Layne, D.; Scott, E.; Wei, H. Interventions to promote teamwork, delegation and communication among registered nurses and nursing assistants: An integrative review. J. Nurs. Manag. 2020, 28, 1465–1472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Faul, F.; Erdfelder, E.; Buchner, A.; Lang, A.G. Statistical power analyses using G* Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav. Res. Methods 2009, 41, 1149–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yeun, E.J.; Kwon, Y.M.; Ahn, O.H. Development of a nursing professional values scale. J. Korean Acad. Nurs. 2005, 35, 1091–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hur, G. Construction and validation of a global interpersonal communication competence scale. Korean J. Commun. Stud. 2003, 47, 380. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, H.S.; Kim, J.K. Relationship among communication competence, communication types, and organizational commitment in hospital nurses. J. Korean Acad. Nurs. Adm. 2010, 16, 488–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, B.S.; Eo, Y.S.; Lee, M.A. Development of job satisfaction scale for clinical nurses. J. Korean Acad. Nurs. 2018, 48, 12–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coutts, J.J.; Hayes, A.F. Questions of value, questions of magnitude: An exploration and application of methods for comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav. Res. Methods 2022, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, B.; Lee, S.Y.; An, G.J.; Lee, G.; Yun, H.J. Influence of communication competency and nursing work environment on job satisfaction in hospital nurses. J. Health Info. Stat. 2019, 44, 189–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wilson, B.; Squires, M.; Widger, K.; Cranley, L.; Tourangeau, A. Job satisfaction among a multigenerational nursing workforce. J. Nurs. Manag. 2008, 16, 716–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stevanin, S.; Palese, A.; Bressan, V.; Vehviläinen-Julkunen, K.; Kvist, T. Workplace-related generational characteristics of nurses: A mixed-method systematic review. J. Adv. Nurs. 2018, 74, 1245–1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Im, H.; Joo, H. The effect of performance evaluation’s perception of fairness on job satisfaction and organizational commitment: Focusing on the moderating effect of MZ generation. Korean J. Local Gov. Stud. 2022, 26, 379–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gaidhani, S.; Arora, L.; Sharma, B.K. Understanding the attitude of generation Z towards workplace. Int. J. Manag. Technol. Eng. 2019, 9, 2804–2812. [Google Scholar]
- Keith, A.C.; Warshawsky, N.; Talbert, S. Factors that influence millennial generation nurses’ intention to stay: An integrated literature review. J. Nurs. Adm. 2021, 51, 220–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kagan, I.; Hendel, T.; Savitsky, B. Personal initiative and work environment as predictors of job satisfaction among nurses: Cross-sectional study. BMC Nurs. 2021, 20, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Inter-Generational Respect Must Be Mutual [Internet]. 2018. Available online: https://baylorlariat.com/2018/09/11/inter-generational-respect-must-be-mutual/ (accessed on 4 August 2023).
- Kim, S.H.; Lee, M.A. Effects of emotional labor and communication competence on turnover intention in nurses. J. Korean Acad. Nurs. Adm. 2014, 20, 332–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jeong, E.; Han, S. Communication competence, nursing professionalism and job performance among home healthcare nurses. J. Korean Acad. Nurs. Adm. 2020, 26, 409–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choi, H.S.; Kim, K.A.; Lee, S.; Joung, H. The effects of empathy and gender role identity on communication competence in nursing college students. J. Korean Crit. Care Nurs. 2020, 13, 41–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mi-Won, K.; Hee-Joo, L. Gender comparison of communication skills of nursing students: Video analysis of standardized patient interview. Int. J. Adv. Nurs. Educ. Res. 2018, 3, 7–14. [Google Scholar]
- Valiee, S.; Moradi, Y.; Vatandost, S. Female patients’ experiences of barriers to communication with male nurses: A qualitative study. J. Qual. Res. Health Sci. 2022, 11, 218–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, M.J.; Jeong, H.S. Influence of the nursing work environment on the clinical decision-making ability of clinic nurses: The mediating effect of nursing professionalism and communication competence. J. Korea Entertain. Ind. Assoc. 2022, 16, 327–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, M.A.; Kang, S.; Hyun, H.S. Relationship among nursing professionalism, nursing work environment, and patient safety nursing activities in general hospital nurses. J. Korean Acad. Nurs. Adm. 2019, 25, 317–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weis, D.; Schank, M.J. Toward building an international consensus in professional values. Nurse Educ. Today 1997, 17, 366–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wynd, C.A. Current factors contributing to professionalism in nursing. J. Prof. Nurs. 2003, 19, 251–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kourkouta, L.; Papathanasiou, I.V. Communication in nursing practice. Mater. Sociomed. 2014, 26, 65–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Davis Boykins, A. Core communication competencies in patient-centered care. ABNF J. 2014, 25, 40–45. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, Y.B.; Harwood, J.; Hummert, M.L. Perceptions of conflict management styles in Chinese intergenerational dyads. Commun. Monogr. 2005, 72, 71–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seada, A.M.; Bayoumy, S.A. Effectiveness of handoff educational program on nurses interns’ knowledge, and communication competence. Am. J. Nurs. Sci. 2017, 6, 467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hsu, L.L.; Huang, Y.H.; Hsieh, S.I. The effects of scenario-based communication training on nurses’ communication competence and self-efficacy and myocardial infarction knowledge. Patient Educ. Couns. 2014, 95, 356–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Foronda, C.; MacWilliams, B.; McArthur, E. Interprofessional communication in healthcare: An integrative review. Nurse Educ. Pract. 2016, 19, 36–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Variable | Categories | n (%) | Mean ± SD | Range |
---|---|---|---|---|
Gender | Men | 68 (36.2) | ||
Women | 120 (63.8) | |||
Age (years) | 30.2 ± 3.6 | 23–39 | ||
≤29 | 84 (44.7) | |||
30–39 | 104 (55.3) | |||
Marital status | Unmarried | 133 (70.7) | ||
Married | 55 (29.3) | |||
Educational level | Diploma | 21 (11.2) | ||
Bachelor | 130 (69.1) | |||
Graduate | 37 (19.7) | |||
Salary (KRW) | <50 million 1 | 112 (59.6) | ||
≥50 million | 76 (40.4) | |||
Work experience (years) | 5.0 ± 3.5 | 1–20 | ||
≤1 | 20 (10.6) | |||
2–5 | 102 (54.3) | |||
6–10 | 54 (28.7) | |||
≥11 | 12 (6.4) | |||
Work type | Shift work | 140 (74.5) | ||
Regular working hours | 48 (25.5) | |||
Job position | Staff nurse | 174 (92.6) | ||
Charge nurse | 12 (6.4) | |||
Head nurse | 2 (1.1) | |||
Working department | Ward | 74 (39.4) | ||
ICU | 38 (20.2) | |||
OR & Laboratory | 33 (17.6) | |||
ED & OPD | 43 (22.9) | |||
Experience of job turnover | No | 131 (69.7) | ||
Yes | 57 (30.3) |
Variable | Possible Range | Mean ± SD | Actual Range |
---|---|---|---|
Nursing professionalism | 1–5 | 3.30 ± 0.52 | 2.00–4.83 |
Self-concept of the profession | 3.48 ± 0.55 | 1.67–5.00 | |
Social awareness | 2.84 ± 0.71 | 1.25–4.50 | |
Professionalism of nursing | 3.63 ± 0.59 | 2.00–5.00 | |
Roles of nursing service | 3.60 ± 0.61 | 2.00–5.00 | |
Originality of nursing | 3.07 ± 0.71 | 1.00–5.00 | |
Communication competence | 1–5 | 3.73 ± 0.46 | 2.67–5.00 |
Self-disclosure | 3.58 ± 0.82 | 1–5 | |
Empathy and perspective-taking or dual perspective | 3.97 ± 0.73 | 1–5 | |
Social relaxation | 3.32 ± 0.86 | 1–5 | |
Assertiveness | 3.55 ± 0.87 | 2–5 | |
Concentration | 3.94 ± 0.70 | 1–5 | |
Interaction management | 3.42 ± 0.86 | 1–5 | |
Expressiveness | 3.52 ± 0.80 | 1–5 | |
Supportiveness | 3.63 ± 0.91 | 1–5 | |
Immediacy | 3.80 ± 0.68 | 2–5 | |
Efficiency | 3.71 ± 0.84 | 2–5 | |
Social appropriateness | 4.28 ± 0.73 | 2–5 | |
Conversational coherence | 3.39 ± 0.83 | 2–5 | |
Goal detection | 3.89 ± 0.68 | 2–5 | |
Responsiveness | 4.13 ± 0.67 | 2–5 | |
Noise control | 3.85 ± 0.75 | 2–5 | |
Job satisfaction | 1–5 | 3.44 ± 0.59 | 1.94–5.00 |
Recognition from the organisation and professional achievement | 3.10 ± 0.76 | 1.11–5.00 | |
Personal maturation through the nursing profession | 3.34 ± 0.82 | 1.00–5.00 | |
Interpersonal interaction with respect and recognition | 3.42 ± 0.59 | 2.00–5.00 | |
Accomplishment of accountability as a nurse | 3.94 ± 0.60 | 1.75–5.00 | |
Display of professional competency | 3.69 ± 0.64 | 2.33–5.00 | |
Stability and job worth | 3.83 ± 0.69 | 2.00–5.00 |
Nursing Professionalism | Communication Competence | Job Satisfaction | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Variables | Categories | Mean ± SD | t/F (p) | Mean ± SD | t/F (p) | Mean ± SD | t/F (p) |
Gender | Men | 3.31 ± 0.49 | 0.52 | 3.83 ± 0.52 | 2.02 | 3.45 ± 0.57 | 0.29 |
Women | 3.27 ± 0.56 | (0.602) | 3.68 ± 0.41 | (0.046) | 3.43 ± 0.62 | (0.776) | |
Age (years) | ≤29 | 3.30 ± 0.52 | 1.11 | 3.77 ± 0.48 | 1.15 | 3.39 ± 0.54 | 1.17 |
30–39 | 3.30 ± 0.51 | (0.912) | 3.70 ± 0.44 | (0.251) | 3.49 ± 0.62 | (0.246) | |
Marital status | Unmarried | 3.26 ± 0.50 | 1.46 | 3.72 ± 0.47 | 0.47 | 3.35 ± 0.59 | 3.33 |
Married | 3.39 ± 0.54 | (0.146) | 3.76 ± 0.43 | (0.639) | 3.66 ± 0.54 | (0.001) | |
Educational level | Diploma | 3.43 ± 0.45 | 1.49 | 3.74 ± 0.40 | 0.12 | 3.47 ± 0.57 | 0.04 |
Bachelor | 3.31 ± 0.52 | (0.229) | 3.74 ± 0.49 | (0.889) | 3.44 ± 0.59 | (0.966) | |
Graduate | 3.19 ± 0.52 | 3.70 ± 0.39 | 1.04 | 3.45 ± 0.60 | |||
Salary (Won × 104) | <5000 | 3.29 ± 0.50 | 0.24 | 3.71 ± 0.49 | 0.97 | 3.35 ± 0.57 | 2.74 |
≥5000 | 3.31 ± 0.54 | (0.814) | 3.77 ± 0.40 | (0.335) | 3.58 ± 0.60 | (0.007) | |
Work experience (years) | ≤1 | 3.30 ± 0.55 | 0.83 | 3.70 ± 0.38 | 0.72 | 3.40 ± 0.65 | 2.19 |
2–5 | 3.26 ± 0.54 | (0.477) | 3.78 ± 0.48 | (0.540) | 3.37 ± 0.59 | (0.091) | |
6–10 | 3.35 ± 0.40 | 3.67 ± 0.40 | 3.54 ± 0.52 | ||||
≥11 | 3.47 ± 0.69 | 3.71 ± 0.56 | 3.76 ± 0.65 | ||||
Work type | Shift work | 3.26 ± 0.51 | 1.64 | 3.72 ± 0.46 | 0.56 | 3.38 ± 0.57 | 2.39 |
Regular working hours | 3.40 ± 0.54 | (0.104) | 3.76 ± 0.44 | (0.576) | 3.62 ± 0.60 | (0.018) | |
Job position | Staff nurse | 3.31 ± 0.51 | 0.64 | 3.73 ± 0.46 | 0.34 | 3.44 ± 0.58 | 0.45 |
Charge nurse | 3.20 ± 0.58 | (0.529) | 3.79 ± 0.42 | (0.693) | 3.58 ± 0.77 | (0.642) | |
Head nurse | 2.98 ± 0.51 | 3.50 ± 0.24 | 3.23 ± 0.49 | ||||
Working department | Ward (a) | 3.22 ± 0.52 | 3.78 | 3.76 ± 0.51 | 0.81 | 3.45 ± 0.56 | 3.20 |
ICU (b) | 3.16 ± 0.50 | (0.011) | 3.63 ± 0.43 | (0.492) | 3.21 ± 0.60 | (0.024) | |
OR & Laboratory (c) | 3.50 ± 0.49 | c > b * | 3.77 ± 0.49 | 3.60 ± 0.59 | c > b * | ||
ED & OPD (d) | 3.40 ± 0.49 | 3.74 ± 0.34 | 3.52 ± 0.59 | ||||
Experience of turnover | No | 3.33 ± 0.48 | 1.25 | 3.73 ± 0.43 | 0.64 | 3.47 ± 0.58 | 1.04 |
Yes | 3.23 ± 0.60 | (0.212) | 3.73 ± 0.52 | (0.949) | 3.38 ± 0.60 | (0.299) |
Variables | Nursing Professionalism r (p) | Communication Competence r (p) | Job Satisfaction r (p) |
---|---|---|---|
Nursing professionalism | 1.00 | ||
Communication competence | 0.36 (<0.001) | 1.00 | |
Job satisfaction | 0.72 (<0.001) | 0.56 (<0.001) | 1.00 |
Variables | Effect | SE | 95% CI | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
LLCI | ULCI | ||||
Direct | NP → JS | 0.67 | 0.05 | 0.56 | 0.78 |
Indirect | NP → CC → JS | 0.15 | 0.03 | 0.08 | 0.21 |
Total | 0.82 | 0.06 | 0.70 | 0.93 | |
R2 | 0.58 | ||||
F | 42.12 | ||||
p | <0.001 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Lee, Y.J.; Lee, H.; Choi, E.-H. Moderating Role of Communication Competence in the Association between Professionalism and Job Satisfaction in Korean Millennial and Generation Z Nurses: A Cross-Sectional Study. Healthcare 2023, 11, 2547. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11182547
Lee YJ, Lee H, Choi E-H. Moderating Role of Communication Competence in the Association between Professionalism and Job Satisfaction in Korean Millennial and Generation Z Nurses: A Cross-Sectional Study. Healthcare. 2023; 11(18):2547. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11182547
Chicago/Turabian StyleLee, Young Jin, Hyunjin Lee, and Eun-Hi Choi. 2023. "Moderating Role of Communication Competence in the Association between Professionalism and Job Satisfaction in Korean Millennial and Generation Z Nurses: A Cross-Sectional Study" Healthcare 11, no. 18: 2547. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11182547
APA StyleLee, Y. J., Lee, H., & Choi, E.-H. (2023). Moderating Role of Communication Competence in the Association between Professionalism and Job Satisfaction in Korean Millennial and Generation Z Nurses: A Cross-Sectional Study. Healthcare, 11(18), 2547. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11182547