Next Article in Journal
Strategies to Improve Bladder Control: A Preliminary Case Study
Previous Article in Journal
Research Trends and Hot Spots in Telemedicine for the Elderly: A Scientometric Analysis
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Prediction of Quality of Life by Frailty and Disability among Dutch Community-Dwelling People Aged 75 Years or Older
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Effect of Insulin Pen Training Using the Teach-Back Method on Diabetes Self-Management, Quality of Life, and HbA1c Levels in Older Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Quasi-Experimental Study

Healthcare 2024, 12(18), 1854; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12181854
by Tahsin Barış Değer 1,*, Huri Seval Gönderen Çakmak 2, Banu Cihan Erdoğan 2 and Mustafa Özgür Değer 3
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Healthcare 2024, 12(18), 1854; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12181854
Submission received: 3 August 2024 / Revised: 10 September 2024 / Accepted: 12 September 2024 / Published: 14 September 2024

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Dear Authos,

file annex.

Good work

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The authors present a theme of actuality that is characterized by importance and strong medical interest. 

The manuscript is well written and I consider that all main points have been debated. 

The suggestions I have is that:

  • English spelling should be revised.
  • In the abstract, the age for the participants and some inclusion criterias, the period of time the study was performed in material and method and some specific results (data analysis perhaps) should be introduced 
  • Row 42: please give some examples of errors for administration
  • I suggest that in the introduction section to add more datas or conclusions supported by the medical literature 
  • The explanation for the Teach Back method (rows 47-49), I consider it fits better to material and methods section
  • Row 84 : please detail the study of Jing et al. 
  • Row 89: did the patients sign an informed consent? Please add
  • Please explain if the scales and questionnaires provided were under any licence or they were free to be applied for the patients
  • please explain the importance of the results obtained in the results section from the data analysis
  • Also please add some data analysis from the studies presented in comparison to your study in the discussion section. 

Thank you.

Comments on the Quality of English Language

 Minor editing of English language required.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Dear Authors,

the comments in file annex.

Best

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

All the requests have been completed have been completed one way or another.

Comments on the Quality of English Language


Moderate editing of English language required but the authors declared that they would request MDPI english services.

Back to TopTop