Next Article in Journal
Debridement, Antibiotic Pearls, and Retention of the Implant (DAPRI) in the Treatment of Early Periprosthetic Knee Joint Infections: A Literature Review
Previous Article in Journal
Development of a Community-Based Communication Intervention among Latin Caregivers of Patients Coping with Cancer
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Palliative Care and Mental Health among Pancreatic Cancer Patients in the United States: An Examination of Service Utilization and Health Outcomes

Department of Health and Clinical Outcomes Research, Advanced HEAlth Data (AHEAD) Institute, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63108, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Healthcare 2024, 12(8), 842; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12080842
Submission received: 28 February 2024 / Revised: 4 April 2024 / Accepted: 8 April 2024 / Published: 16 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Pain Management)

Abstract

:
Introduction: Palliative care (PC) utilization remains low among pancreatic cancer patients. This study explores the association of PC with mental health service and pharmacotherapy utilization among pancreatic cancer patients.Methods: Retrospective analysis was conducted on a sample of patients in the United States with newly diagnosed pancreatic cancer using Electronic Health Record data from Optum’s Integrated Claims-Clinical data set. Subsequent diagnoses of anxiety and depression and PC consultation encounters were determined using ICD-9/10 codes. Adjusted associations of mental health treatments with PC and patient characteristics were quantified using multiple logistic regression. Results: Among newly diagnosed pancreatic cancer patients (n = 4029), those with PC consultations exhibited a higher prevalence of anxiety (33.9% vs. 22.8%) and depression (36.2% vs. 23.2%). Mental health service use and pharmacotherapy varied, with the highest utilization among patients having both anxiety and depression. Treatment pattern was also influenced by age (aOR 1.832 for age <55 vs. 65–70 years). Notably, PC consultations showed no significant effect on the likelihood of documented treatment. Discussion: Our study emphasizes underutilization of PC and MH treatment for pancreatic cancer patients. These findings imply a crucial need for further investigation into palliative care’s role in addressing mental health concerns among pancreatic cancer patients.

1. Introduction

Cancer is a complicated health condition with a wide range of symptoms and treatments that can have tremendous effects on a patient’s mental health and overall well-being [1]. For that reason, the management of cancer and associated symptoms presents a substantial challenge for oncology healthcare providers [1]. In recent years, palliative care has emerged as a promising approach to address these challenges [1,2,3] as it has shown positive outcomes in enhancing the quality of life for various types of cancer patients [2,4,5,6,7,8,9]. Despite the established benefits of palliative care for cancer patients, its adoption and utilization among healthcare providers have been relatively low [5,10], leading to potentially harmful consequences for patients with cancer due to a lack of palliative care-associated health interventions [11]. Numerous factors influence treatment and symptom management, including type of cancer [3,7,12,13,14]; however, the impact of cancer type on anxiety and depression remains a topic of debate in the medical community [10,12,15].
Existing literature has highlighted that the presence of anxiety and depression can exacerbate physical symptoms, such as pain, fatigue, weakness, and functional status [1,13,14,15,16], among patients with advanced cancer, therefore, diminishing their overall quality of life [13]. These mental health issues also affect end-of-life care decisions, potentially leading to more aggressive treatments, such as chemotherapy, intensive care unit admission, and ventilation [3]. Additionally, anxiety and depression can further exacerbate other symptoms, creating a compounding effect [1,4,13,14,15]. The complexity associated with comorbid cancer and anxiety/depression underscores the need for a holistic, interdisciplinary approach to supportive care for cancer patients. Despite the well-documented benefits of palliative care in cancer treatment [2,4,5,7,8,9,10,17], there remains a lack of research on the intersection of palliative care and mental health in the context of supportive cancer care.
Pancreatic cancer is medically complex, often diagnosed at later stages [8,12,15], and documents a higher prevalence of severe anxiety and depression symptoms among its patients [3,4,12,13,14], who were less likely to improve after palliative care consultation [7] compared to patients with other types of cancer. This demonstrates that the type of cancer can profoundly influence both symptom burden and palliative outcome. Patients with pancreatic cancer form a vulnerable cohort that necessitates further investigation into the effects of palliative care and mental health. To address this existing gap in research, our study aims to explore the impact of palliative care consultations on the utilization of mental health services and pharmacotherapy among pancreatic cancer patients diagnosed with anxiety and depression within 12 months of their initial cancer diagnosis.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Data Source and Study Participants

This study utilized Electronic Health Record (EHR) data from Optum’s de-identified Integrated Claims-Clinical data set, including healthcare encounters between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2018. The Integrated data set is an all-payer data set, i.e., data was captured from records of patients who were commercially, publicly, or uninsured, including Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries. The study examined adults aged 18 years and older, in the United States, with newly diagnosed pancreatic cancer within the studied period. To identify newly diagnosed pancreatic cancer, all the included patients were required to have at least 6 months of activity in the EHR data prior to the date of first pancreatic cancer diagnosis. Among the patients with newly diagnosed pancreatic cancer, the diagnosis of anxiety, depression, or both was determined, and the number of days from the date of first pancreatic cancer diagnosis to the dates of first diagnosis of these mental health issues. Anxiety and depression diagnoses were identified using ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM codes (Appendix A. Table A1). Patients who had anxiety or depression diagnosed prior to their diagnosis of pancreatic cancer were excluded from further analysis.

2.2. Ethical Considerations

The Saint Louis University Institutional Review Board deemed this to be Non-Human Subjects Research.

2.3. Measures

The primary outcome of interest was utilization of mental health services and pharmacotherapy for anxiety and/or depression. Mental health services were identified by examining the encounters of healthcare services provided by the following specialties: Clinical Neuropsychology, Marriage and Family Therapy, Psychiatric Hospital, Psychiatry, Psychiatry and Neurology, Psychoanalysis, Psychology, and Clinical Social Work. In addition, encounters with mental health services were identified by CPT and HCPCS codes (Appendix A. Table A2). Utilization of pharmacotherapy was determined by examining prescriptions of medications for anxiety and depression within 3 years following the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer (Appendix A. Table A3 and Table A4). The generic and brand names and drug classes were consistent with previous studies and informed by an academic psychiatrist collaborator [18]. The absence of either a mental health services visit or pharmacotherapy was considered no treatment. As treatment for anxiety and depression overlaps, no attempt was made to determine the diagnosis that indicated the treatment (particularly in the case of those with both depression and anxiety diagnoses), but rather whether treatment was documented.
The exposure of interest was a palliative care (PC) consultation, determined by encounters with PC services in the EHR records (ICD-9: V66.7, ICD-10: Z51.5). The V66.7 code has been validated in multiple studies on PC for patients with chronic life-threatening illnesses in the U.S (United States), which find that the code is highly specific (>90%) and moderately sensitive (45–89%) [19]. The Z51.5 code needs further validation but is equivalent to V66.7 [20]. The covariates examined at the time of cancer diagnosis included the patients’ age, gender, race, primary payer, and the Charlson–Deyo Comorbidity Index [21,22].

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Chi-Square tests were used to assess the distribution of categorical demographics among groups, as well as the prevalence of mental health service utilization, pharmacotherapy, or any mental health treatment among those with and without palliative care consultation. Continuous demographic variables (i.e., age) by exposure were examined with Student t-tests. A multiple regression analysis was conducted to quantify the effects of palliative care consultation, gender, age at time of cancer diagnosis, race, and the Charlson comorbidity index on the use of mental health services and pharmacotherapy. Statistical analyses were performed in SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). All tests were two tailed with α = 0.05 to determine statistical significance.

2.5. Results

In this study, we identified 4029 adult patients who had newly diagnosed pancreatic cancer out of 5266 patients with any record of pancreatic cancer diagnosis from 2010 to 2018. Within this sample, patients were mostly Caucasian (80.5%), while 9.7% were African American, and 9.8% identified as other. The mean age at the time of cancer diagnosis was 68 years old (Standard Deviation: 12.3 years), while the mean age at the time of anxiety or depression diagnosis was 65.2 and 64.7 years old, respectively. Pancreatic cancer patients with and without PC consultation had statistically significant differences in the distribution of race, region, Charlson Comorbidity Index scores, concurrent anxiety, or depression compared to those with PC consultation (Table 1). Notably, a higher proportion of patients with anxiety or depression had a PC consultation, compared to those who were not diagnosed with anxiety or depression (36.2% vs. 23.2%, 33.9% vs. 22.8%, respectively, Table 1).
Regardless of mental health diagnosis, most patients in the sample resided in the Midwest and identified as Caucasian (Table 2). A higher proportion of patients with a diagnosis of depression, without anxiety, were over 70 years old, compared to patients with a diagnosis of anxiety alone or both depression and anxiety (Table 2). Notably, for patients consulted by PC who had a diagnosis of anxiety alone, there was a higher prevalence of those who identified as African American, compared to those who were not consulted (10.82% vs. 5.08%, Table 2). This relationship is not observed for those diagnosed with depression and the effect was slightly reversed for those diagnosed with both anxiety and depression (Table 2). When examined by PC consultation within mental health group, the demographic trends remained comparable to those seen with pancreatic cancer patients overall, including the significant differences in comorbidity representation.
There were significant differences in treatment documented by the mental health diagnosis group. For patients with both anxiety and depression, 64.2% documented pharmacotherapy, compared to 52.7% of those with anxiety alone and 39.7% of patients diagnosed with depression alone (p < 0.0001, Appendix A. Table A2). As for the utilization of mental health services among the different mental health diagnoses, 35.3% of patients diagnosed with both depression and anxiety documented use of mental health services, compared to 21.8% of those with depression alone and 20.6% of patients with anxiety alone (p = 0.0003, Appendix A. Table A2). Regarding the prevalence of treatment among the various mental health diagnoses, stratified by PC consultation, 45.7% of patients diagnosed with both anxiety and depression who were consulted by PC documented the receipt of mental health services, whereas 28.5% of patients with both anxiety and depression but without PC consultation documented mental health services (p = 0.0118).
PC had no significant effect on the odds of receiving documented pharmacotherapy, mental health services, or any treatment. Patients diagnosed with anxiety alone or depression alone had lower odds of documented pharmacotherapy (aOR = 0.624 (0.429, 0.907), aOR = 0.365 (0.247, 0.540), respectively), mental health services (aOR = 0.411 (0.266, 0.637), aOR = 0.499 (0.320, 0.779), respectively), and any treatment (aOR = 0.551 (0.371, 0.819), aOR = 0.376; (0.251, 0.564), respectively), compared to patients diagnosed with both anxiety and depression (Table 3). Compared to patients 55–64 years old, patients less than 55 years old had around two times higher odds of documented treatment of any modality and five times higher odds of documented mental health services. A similar trend was seen for patients 55 to 64 years old, who had three times higher odds of documented mental health services than patients 65 to 70 years old. There was no observable association for patients over 70. Patients scoring over 4 on the Charlson Index had higher odds of documented pharmacotherapy (aOR = 1.975 (1.223, 3.188), aOR = 1.583 (1.011, 2.479), respectively, Table 3), and those scoring 4 to 8 had higher odds of any treatment being documented (aOR = 1.866 (1.147, 3.035), Table 3) than those scoring 0 to 3.

3. Discussion

Pancreatic cancer ranks as the seventh leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide [23]. Due to the advanced stage at the time of diagnosis and the severity of symptoms, palliative care is of utmost importance for pancreatic cancer patients, as it addresses the physical, emotional, and psychosocial needs of patients. Despite known benefits, palliative care utilization remains low among pancreatic cancer patients, consistent with other studies of cancer patients [5,13,24,25]. Our study aims to explore the impact of palliative care consultations on the utilization of mental health services and pharmacotherapy. Our study found significant differences in the distribution of race, region, Charlson Comorbidity Index scores, and concurrent anxiety or depression between pancreatic cancer patients with and without palliative care consultation. Patients consulted for palliative care had a higher proportion of comorbidities and a higher prevalence of anxiety or depression, suggesting that patients with more complex medical and psychological needs are more likely to be referred to palliative care services [26].
Patients with a diagnosis of new-onset depression, without anxiety, were more likely to be over 70 years old, while patients with a diagnosis of new-onset anxiety or both depression and anxiety were younger (Appendix A. Table A5). Moreover, these age-related patterns in mental health diagnoses can also inform further research into the underlying causes and risk factors for these conditions in different age groups. The prevalence of mental health treatment varied depending on the mental health diagnosis. Patients with anxiety alone had a higher prevalence of pharmacotherapy compared to patients with depression alone, whereas patients with anxiety and depression had the highest prevalence of mental health treatment, for both pharmacotherapy and mental health services.
In the multiple regression analysis, we found that patients diagnosed with anxiety alone or depression alone had lower odds of receiving documented pharmacotherapy, mental health services, or any treatment compared to patients diagnosed with both anxiety and depression. These findings suggest that patients with comorbid anxiety and depression may have more severe symptoms and therefore be more likely to receive treatment [27,28]. Studies suggest that depression present in palliative care patients often goes untreated, given that pancreatic cancer patients have a poor prognosis [29]. With a poor prognosis, determining the right dose and appropriate drug for pancreatic cancer patients can pose challenges with limited time. Moreover, we found that younger patients had higher odds of receiving treatment, with patients less than 55 years old having around two times higher odds of documented treatment compared to patients 65 to 70 years old, consistent with existing literature surrounding mental healthcare delivery to younger and older patients [30].
The absence of a significant association between palliative care and the likelihood of any documented treatment may be attributed to several factors. It is possible that palliative care consultations primarily addressed physical symptoms rather than focusing on mental health symptoms. A study by Hatano et al. in 2018 found that pain management was the primary reason for PC deferral, and depression was a secondary, yet less common reason. Furthermore, treatment was often withheld because of very late referrals [31]. Additionally, patients might not have prioritized mental health as a primary aspect of their care during these PC consultations.
Despite these important findings, there are several limitations to be noted. We could not determine the staging of pancreatic cancer given the nature of the administrative data source utilized in this study. Moreover, the specific focus on anxiety and depression, while important, might exclude other pertinent mental health conditions, such as acute stress reactions following cancer diagnosis, post-traumatic stress disorder, or substance use disorders, therefore reducing the comprehensive assessment of mental health in this context. Lastly, the actual receipt of pharmacotherapy and mental health is challenging to ascertain in the EHR database, leaving some possibility of misclassification.
Regardless of these limitations, this study has several notable strengths. First, we utilized a comprehensive approach to ICD-9/10 codes, which have been demonstrated in prior work to be highly sensitive [19]. The data source used for the study has both commercially and Medicare-insured patients from diverse regions across the United States and depicts a high degree of representativeness for our study, thereby rendering our findings generalizable to the broader population. These findings also provide invaluable insights into the demographics and mental health attributes of this patient group, offering healthcare professionals a deeper understanding to develop tailored interventions for pancreatic cancer patients.
The overall comprehensive approach, exploring sociodemographic factors, like race, age, gender, region, comorbidity index scores, and mental health diagnoses, yields a depiction of demographics and mental health profiles of pancreatic cancer patients. Notably, this study underscores the importance of addressing both anxiety and depression together within the scope of pancreatic cancer treatment, emphasizing the fundamental necessity for a more comprehensive and integrated approach to patient-centered care.

4. Conclusions

Our study highlights the need for further investigation of palliative care in relation to mental health treatments and services utilization for pancreatic cancer patients. Furthermore, our study findings can serve as a valuable resource for healthcare providers, enabling them to make informed decisions regarding the implementation of palliative care.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.S.S., Z.Z. and L.J.H.; Methodology, Z.Z. and E.C.D.; Validation, D.S.S., Z.Z. and E.C.D.; Data Management and Analysis, Z.Z.; Interpretation, D.S.S., Z.Z. and E.C.D.; Data Curation, Z.Z.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, D.S.S., Z.Z. and Z.T.; Writing—Review and Editing, D.S.S., Z.Z., Z.T., E.C.D., M.P.P. and L.H.; Supervision, D.S.S. and L.J.H.; Project Administration, D.S.S., E.C.D. and M.P.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is available through Optum.

Acknowledgments

An internal award from Saint Louis University Research Institute provided support to obtain commercial medical records and claims data. This work was also supported by resources from the AHEAD Institute of Saint Louis University School of Medicine.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Appendix A

Table A1. ICD-9 and ICD-10 Codes for Diagnoses of Depression and Anxiety.
Table A1. ICD-9 and ICD-10 Codes for Diagnoses of Depression and Anxiety.
ICD-9Depression Diagnosis
296.2Major depressive affective disorder, single episode, unspecified
296.21Major depressive affective disorder, single episode, mild
296.22Major depressive affective disorder, single episode, moderate
296.23Major depressive affective disorder, single episode, severe w/o psychotic features
296.24Major depressive affective disorder, single episode, severe w/ psychotic features
296.25Major depressive affective disorder, single episode, partial remission
296.26Major depressive affective disorder, single episode, full remission
311Depression, unspecified
296.3Major depressive affective disorder, recurrent, unspecified
296.31Major depressive affective disorder, recurrent, mild
296.32Major depressive affective disorder, recurrent, moderate
296.33Major depressive affective disorder, recurrent, severe w/o psychotic features
296.34Major depressive affective disorder, recurrent, sever w/ psychotic features
296.35Major depressive affective disorder, recurrent, in remission (unspecified)
296.35Major depressive affective disorder, recurrent, in remission (partial)
296.36Major depressive affective disorder, recurrent, in remission (full)
ICD-10Depression Diagnosis
F32.0MDD, single episode, mild
F32.1MDD, single episode, moderate
F32.2MDD, single episode, severe w/o psychotic features
F32.3MDD, single episode, severe w/ psychotic features
F32.4MDD, single episode, partial remission
F32.5MDD, single episode, full remission
F32.8Other depressive episodes
F32.81Premenstrual dysphoric disorder
F32.89Other specified depressive episodes
F32.9MDD, single episode, unspecified
F32.ADepression, unspecified
F33.0MDD, recurrent, mild
F33.1MDD, recurrent, moderate
F33.2MDD, recurrent, severe w/o psychotic features
F33.3MDD, recurrent, sever w/ psychotic features
F33.4MDD, recurrent, in remission
F33.40MDD, recurrent, in remission (unspecified)
F33.41MDD, recurrent, in remission (partial)
F33.42MDD, recurrent, in remission (full)
F33.8Other recurrent depressive disorders
F33.9MDD, recurrent, unspecified
ICD-9Anxiety Diagnosis
300.01Panic Disorder
300.02Generalized Anxiety Disorder
300Anxiety State, unspecified
300.09Other anxiety states
ICD-10Anxiety Diagnosis
F41.0Panic Disorder
F41.1Generalized Anxiety Disorder
F41.3Other mixed anxiety disorders
F41.8Other specified anxiety disorders
F41.9Anxiety disorder, unspecified
ICD-10Other Mental Health Disorder due to known physiological condition
F06.3Mood Disorder due to known physiological condition
F06.30Mood Disorder due to known physiological condition (unspecified)
F06.31Mood Disorder due to known physiological condition (w/ depressive features)
F06.32Mood Disorder due to known physiological condition (with major depressive like episode)
F06.33Mood Disorder due to known physiological condition (with manic features)
F06.34Mood Disorder due to known physiological condition (with mixed features)
F06.4Anxiety disorder due to known physiological condition
ICD-9Unspecified
296.9Unspecified mood disorder
300.9Unspecified mental disorder
ICD-10Unspecified
F39Unspecified mood disorder
F99Unspecified mental disorder
Table A2. CPT Codes Used to Measure Utilization of Mental Health Services.
Table A2. CPT Codes Used to Measure Utilization of Mental Health Services.
CPTProcedure Heading
Psychiatric Diagnostic Procedures
90791Psychiatric diagnostic evaluation
90792Psychiatric diagnostic evaluation with medical services
90801 *Psychiatric diagnostic interview examination
Psychotherapy
90804 *Outpatient psychotherapy, 20–30 min
90816 *Inpatient psychotherapy, 20–30 min
90804 *Outpatient psychotherapy, 45–50 min
90818 *Inpatient psychotherapy, 54–50 min
90808 *Outpatient psychotherapy, 75–80 min
90821 *Inpatient psychotherapy, 75–80 min
90832Psychotherapy, 30 min with patient
90833Psychotherapy, 30 min with patient w/E and M service
90834Psychotherapy, 45 min with patient
90836Psychotherapy, 45 min with patient w/E and M service
90837Psychotherapy, 60 min with patient
90838Psychotherapy, 60 min with patient w/E and M service
90845 *Psychoanalysis
90846 *Family psychotherapy w/o patient present
90847 *Family psychotherapy, conjoint w/ patient present
90849 *Multiple family group psychotherapy
90853 *Group psychotherapy (other than of a multiple family group)
Psychotherapy for crisis
90839Psychotherapy for crisis; first 60 min
90840Psychotherapy for crisis; each additional 30 min
Other Psychotherapy
90845Psychoanalysis
90846Family psychotherapy w/o patient, 50 min
90847Family psychotherapy w/ patient, 50 min
90849Multiple-family group psychotherapy
90853Group psychotherapy (other than of a multiple group family)
Other Psychiatric Services or Procedures
90863Pharmacologic management, including prescription review of medication, when performed with psychotherapy services
90865Narcosynthesis for psychiatric diagnostic and therapeutic purposes
90867Therapeutic repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment; initial, including cortical mapping, motor threshold determination, delivery and management
90868/9TMS, subsequent delivery and management, per session
90870ECT
90875Individual psychophysiological therapy incorporating biofeedback training by any modality, with psychotherapy; 30 min
90875Additional 45 min
90880Hypnotherapy
90882Environmental intervention for medical management purposes on a psychiatric patient’s behalf with agencies, employers, or institutions
90885Psychiatric evaluation of hospital records, other psychiatric reports, psychometric and/or projective tests, and other accumulated data for medical diagnostic purposes
90887Interpretation or explanation of results of psychiatric, other medical examinations and procedures, or other accumulated data to family or other responsible persons, or advising them how to assist patient
90889Preparation of report of patient’s psychiatric status, history, treatment, or progress for other individuals, agencies, or insurance carriers
90899Unlisted psychiatric service or procedure
Psychiatric Collaborative Care Management Services
99492Initial psychiatric collaborative care management
99493Subsequent psychiatric collaborative care management
99494Initial of subsequent psychiatric collaborative care management
Codes for Interactive Services
90802 *Interactive psychiatric diagnostic evaluation
90857 *Interactive group psychotherapy
Pharmacologic Management add-on code
90862 *Pharmacologic management, including prescription, use and review of medication with no more than minimal medical psychotherapy
* Code discontinued.
Table A3. Pharmacotherapy for Anxiety.
Table A3. Pharmacotherapy for Anxiety.
Drug ClassGeneric Name
SSRICitalopram
Escitalopram
Fluoxetine
Fluvoxamine
Paroxetine
Sertraline
Vilazodone
Vortioxetine
Nefazodone
Trazodone
SNRIDesvenlafaxine
Duloxetine
Levomilnacipran
Milnacipran
Venlafaxine
BenzodiazepineAlprazolam
Alprazolam
Bromazepam
Chlordiazepoxide
Clonazepam
Clorazepate
Diazepam
Lorazepam
Oxazepam
Prazepam
OtherBuspirone
Gabapentin
Pregabalin
Mirtazapine
Quetiapine
Hydroxyzine
Imipramine
Abbreviations: selective-serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI).
Table A4. Pharmacotherapy for Depression.
Table A4. Pharmacotherapy for Depression.
Drug ClassGeneric Name
SSRICitalopram
Escitalopram
Fluoxetine
Fluvoxamine
Paroxetine
Sertraline
Vilazodone
Vortioxetine
Nefazodone
Trazodone
SNRIDesvenlafaxine
Duloxetine
Levomilnacipran
Milnacipran
Venlafaxine
TCAAmitriptyline
Amoxapine
Clomipramine
Desipramine
Doxepin
Imipramine
Maprotiline
Nortriptyline
Protriptyline
Trimipramine
MAO-iIsocarboxazid
Phenelzine
Selegiline
Tranylcypromine
OtherBupropion
Esketamine
Mirtazapine
Abbreviations: selective-serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI), tricyclic antidepressant (TCA), monoamine-oxidase inhibitor (MAO-i).
Table A5. Sample Characteristics Stratified by Mental Health Diagnosis.
Table A5. Sample Characteristics Stratified by Mental Health Diagnosis.
New-Onset AnxietyNew-Onset DepressionBoth Anxiety and Depression
n = 296n = 257n = 204p-value
Gender (%) 0.4686
Female 55.4150.1952.45
Male 44.5949.8147.55
Race (%) 0.0848
Caucasian 88.1881.7190.2
African 7.4311.285.88
Other 4.3973.92
Age at Cancer Diagnosis (years) (%) 0.0614
<55 15.8814.424.51
55–64 31.0827.6324.02
65–70 15.5414.0115.2
>70 37.543.9736.27
Region (%) 0.6863
Midwest 50.3451.7548.04
Northeast 16.2212.0612.75
South 22.323.3528.43
West 8.788.958.33
Other/Unknown 2.363.892.45
Charlson Comorbidity Index (%) 0.6946
0–3 15.215.9514.71
4–8 29.0529.5724.51
>8 55.7454.4760.78
Treatment (%)
Pharmacotherapy 52.739.6964.22<0.0001
Mental Health Services 20.6121.7935.290.0003
Any Treatment 59.4649.4272.06<0.0001

References

  1. Corli, O.; Pellegrini, G.; Bosetti, C.; Riva, L.; Crippa, M.; Amodio, E.; Scaccabarozzi, G. Impact of Palliative Care in Evaluating and Relieving Symptoms in Patients with Advanced Cancer. Results from the DEMETRA Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 8429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. El-Jawahri, A.; LeBlanc, T.W.; Kavanaugh, A.; Webb, J.A.; Jackson, V.A.; Campbell, T.C.; O’Connor, N.; Luger, S.M.; Gafford, E.; Gustin, J.; et al. Effectiveness of Integrated Palliative and Oncology Care for Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2021, 7, 238–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Mossman, B.; Perry, L.M.; Walsh, L.E.; Gerhart, J.; Malhotra, S.; Horswell, R.; Chu, S.; Raines, A.M.; Lefante, J.; Blais, C.M.; et al. Anxiety, depression, and end-of-life care utilization in adults with metastatic cancer. Psychooncology 2021, 30, 1876–1883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Chan, H.Y.; Chung, C.K.; Tam, S.S.; Chow, R.S. Community palliative care services on addressing physical and psychosocial needs in people with advanced illness: A prospective cohort study. BMC Palliat. Care 2021, 20, 143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Do Carmo, T.M.; Paiva, B.S.R.; de Oliveira, C.Z.; Nascimento, M.S.A.; Paiva, C.E. The feasibility and benefit of a brief psychosocial intervention in addition to early palliative care in patients with advanced cancer to reduce depressive symptoms: A pilot randomized controlled clinical trial. BMC Cancer 2017, 17, 564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Koesel, N.; Tocchi, C.; Burke, L.; Yap, T.; Harrison, A. Symptom Distress: Implementation of Palliative Care Guidelines to Improve Pain, Fatigue, and Anxiety in Patients With Advanced Cancer. Clin. J. Oncol. Nurs. 2019, 23, 149–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Temel, J.S.; Greer, J.A.; El-Jawahri, A.; Pirl, W.F.; Park, E.R.; Jackson, V.A.; Back, A.L.; Kamdar, M.; Jacobsen, J.; Chittenden, E.H.; et al. Effects of Early Integrated Palliative Care in Patients With Lung and GI Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 2017, 35, 834–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Von Blanckenburg, P.; Leppin, N. Psychological interventions in palliative care. Curr. Opin. Psychiatry 2018, 31, 389–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Xu, S.; Wang, X.; Wang, R. The effects of integrated palliative care on quality of life and psychological distress in patients with advanced cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann. Palliat. Med. 2022, 11, 2586–2599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Shin, J.; Temel, J. Integrating palliative care: When and how? Curr. Opin. Pulm. Med. 2013, 19, 344–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Temel, J.S.; Greer, J.A.; Muzikansky, A.; Gallagher, E.R.; Admane, S.; Jackson, V.A.; Dahlin, C.M.; Blinderman, C.D.; Jacobsen, J.; Pirl, W.F.; et al. Early palliative care for patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010, 363, 733–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Sewtz, C.; Muscheites, W.; Grosse-Thie, C.; Kriesen, U.; Leithaeuser, M.; Glaeser, D.; Hansen, P.; Kundt, G.; Fuellen, G.; Junghanss, C. Longitudinal observation of anxiety and depression among palliative care cancer patients. Ann. Palliat. Med. 2021, 10, 3836–3846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Bužgová, R.; Jarošová, D.; Hajnová, E. Assessing anxiety and depression with respect to the quality of life in cancer inpatients receiving palliative care. Eur. J. Oncol. Nurs. 2015, 19, 667–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Wilson, K.G.; Chochinov, H.M.; Skirko, M.G.; Allard, P.; Chary, S.; Gagnon, P.R.; Macmillan, K.; De Luca, M.; O’Shea, F.; Kuhl, D.; et al. Depression and anxiety disorders in palliative cancer care. J. Pain. Symptom Manag. 2007, 33, 118–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Mercadante, S.; Adile, C.; Ferrera, P.; Cortegiani, A.; Casuccio, A. Symptom hyper-expression in advanced cancer patients with anxiety and depression admitted to an acute supportive/palliative care unit. Support. Care Cancer 2019, 27, 3081–3088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Barraclough, J. ABC of palliative care. Depression, anxiety, and confusion. BMJ 1997, 315, 1365–1368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Fulton, J.J.; Newins, A.R.; Porter, L.S.; Ramos, K. Psychotherapy Targeting Depression and Anxiety for Use in Palliative Care: A Meta-Analysis. J. Palliat. Med. 2018, 21, 1024–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. DeMarco, E.C.; Zhang, Z.; Robinson, H.; Hinyard, L. Anxiety in Parkinson’s Patients: What’s Timing Got to Do with It? J. Geriatr. Psychiatry Neurol. 2023, 36, 496–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Hua, M.; Li, G.; Clancy, C.; Morrison, R.S.; Wunsch, H. Validation of the V66.7 Code for Palliative Care Consultation in a Single Academic Medical Center. J. Palliat. Med. 2017, 20, 372–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Stubbs, J.M.; Assareh, H.; Achat, H.M.; Greenaway, S.; Muruganantham, P. Verification of administrative data to measure palliative care at terminal hospital stays. Health Inf. Manag. 2023, 52, 28–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Quan, H.; Sundararajan, V.; Halfon, P.; Fong, A.; Burnand, B.; Luthi, J.C.; Saunders, L.D.; Beck, C.A.; Feasby, T.E.; Ghali, W.A. Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med. Care 2005, 43, 1130–1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Charlson, M.E.; Pompei, P.; Ales, K.L.; MacKenzie, C.R. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validation. J. Chronic Dis. 1987, 40, 373–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Khalaf, N.; El-Serag, H.B.; Abrams, H.R.; Thrift, A.P. Burden of Pancreatic Cancer: From Epidemiology to Practice. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2021, 19, 876–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hui, D.; Kim, S.H.; Kwon, J.H.; Tanco, K.C.; Zhang, T.; Kang, J.H.; Rhondali, W.; Chisholm, G.; Bruera, E. Access to palliative care among patients treated at a comprehensive cancer center. Oncologist 2012, 17, 1574–1580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Smith, C.B.; Nelson, J.E.; Berman, A.R.; Powell, C.A.; Fleischman, J.; Salazar-Schicchi, J.; Wisnivesky, J.P. Lung cancer physicians’ referral practices for palliative care consultation. Ann. Oncol. 2012, 23, 382–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. O’Connor, M.; White, K.; Kristjanson, L.J.; Cousins, K.; Wilkes, L. The prevalence of anxiety and depression in palliative care patients with cancer in Western Australia and New South Wales. Med. J. Aust. 2010, 193, S44–S47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Roberts, T.; Miguel Esponda, G.; Krupchanka, D.; Shidhaye, R.; Patel, V.; Rathod, S. Factors associated with health service utilisation for common mental disorders: A systematic review. BMC Psychiatry 2018, 18, 262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Ziebold, C.; Mari, J.J.; Goldberg, D.P.; Minhas, F.; Razzaque, B.; Fortes, S.; Robles, R.; Lam, T.P.; Bobes, J.; Iglesias, C.; et al. Diagnostic consequences of a new category of anxious depression and a reduced duration requirement for anxiety symptoms in the ICD-11 PHC. J. Affect. Disord. 2019, 245, 120–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Lloyd-Williams, M.; Friedman, T.; Rudd, N. A survey of antidepressant prescribing in the terminally ill. Palliat. Med. 1999, 13, 243–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Maust, D.T.; Kales, H.C.; Blow, F.C. Mental Health Care Delivered to Younger and Older Adults by Office-Based Physicians Nationally. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2015, 63, 1364–1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hatano, Y.; Shikata, Y.; Izumi, H.; Kawaguchi, A. Discrepancies between Reasons of Palliative Care Team Consultation and Palliative Care Team Activities. J. Palliat. Med. 2018, 21, 1278–1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1. Sample Characteristics Stratified by Receipt of Palliative Care Consultation.
Table 1. Sample Characteristics Stratified by Receipt of Palliative Care Consultation.
Newly Diagnosed Pancreatic Cancer with Palliative Care Consults Newly Diagnosed Pancreatic Cancer without Palliative Care Consults
n = 1022n = 3007p-Value
Gender (%) 0.7651
Female 50.3949.85
Male 49.6150.15
Race (%) 0.0153
Caucasian 80.5380.51
African 11.459.15
Other 8.0210.34
Age at Cancer Diagnosis (years) (%) 0.5168
<55 13.4114.4
55–64 23.1921.98
56–70 15.5617.03
>70 47.8546.59
Region (%) 0.0344
Midwest 51.5746.49
Northeast 14.9714.83
South 22.0224.81
West 8.8111.07
Other/Unknown 2.642.79
Charlson Comorbidity Index (%) <0.0001
0–3 7.4437.35
4–8 22.4128.2
>8 70.1634.45
Depression (%) <0.0001
Yes 33.9522.85
Anxiety (%) <0.0001
Yes 36.223.21
Table 2. Sample Characteristics, Grouped by Mental Health Diagnoses and Stratified by Receipt of Palliative Care Consultation.
Table 2. Sample Characteristics, Grouped by Mental Health Diagnoses and Stratified by Receipt of Palliative Care Consultation.
New Onset Depression New Onset Anxiety Both Anxiety and Depression
With PCWithout PCp-ValueWith PCWithout PCp-ValueWith PCWithout PCp-Value
n = 88n = 169 n = 177n = 119 n = 81n = 123
Gender (%) 0.3141 0.0585 0.116
Female 54.5547.93 48.7459.89 45.6856.91
Male45.4552.07 51.2640.11 54.3243.09
Race (%) 0.0838 0.1714 0.4823
Caucasian87.578.7 84.8790.4 91.3689.43
African10.2311.83 10.825.08 3.77.32
Other2.279.47 4.24.52 4.943.25
Age at Cancer Diagnosis (years) (%) 0.3296 0.9823 0.481
<5517.0513.02 15.9715.82 22.2226.02
55–6430.6826.04 31.9330.51 24.6923.58
65–709.0916.57 15.9715.25 19.7512.2
>7043.1844.38 36.1338.42 33.3338.21
Region (%) 0.4073 0.1938 0.238
Midwest51.1452.07 50.4250.28 39.5153.66
Northeast17.059.47 20.1713.56 17.289.76
South21.5924.26 21.0123.16 29.6327.64
West7.959.47 5.0411.3 9.887.32
Other/Unknown2.274.73 3.361.69 3.71.63
Charlson Comorbidity Index (%) <0.0001 0.0003 <0.0001
0–36.8220.71 5.8821.47 1.2323.58
4–820.4534.32 26.8930.51 14.8130.89
>872.7344.97 67.2348.02 83.9545.53
Table 3. Results of Multiple Logistic Regression for Mental Health Service Use, Pharmacotherapy, and Any Treatment.
Table 3. Results of Multiple Logistic Regression for Mental Health Service Use, Pharmacotherapy, and Any Treatment.
Any TreatmentPharmacotherapyMental Health Services
Odds Ratio (95% CI)Odds Ratio (95% CI)Odds Ratio (95% CI)
Palliative Care0.806 (0.581, 1.117)0.766 (0.556, 1.055)1.410 (0.963, 2.064)
Mental Health Diagnosis
New—Onset Anxiety0.551 (0.371, 0.819)0.624 (0.429, 0.907)0.411 (0.266, 0.637)
New—Onset Depression0.376 (0.251, 0.564)0.365 (0.247, 0.540)0.499 (0.320, 0.779)
Both (ref)
Age at Cancer Diagnosis (years)
<551.832 (1.058, 3.171)1.449 (0.853, 2.462)5.18 (2.557, 10.492)
55–641.360 (0.837, 2.209)1.024 (0.635, 1.650)3.015 (1.528, 5.948)
65–70 (ref)
>701.021 (0.650, 1.606)0.914 (0.583, 1.431)1.883 (0.961, 3.688)
Gender
Female (ref)
Male1.054 (0.777, 1.430)1.133 (0.841, 1.527)0.960 (0.670, 1.374)
Race
Caucasian (ref)
African0.881 (0.508, 1.531)0.991 (0.574, 1.711)1.385 (0.736, 2.609)
Other0.724 (0.364, 1.438)0.788 (0.398, 1.561)0.590 (0.238, 1.462)
Region
Northeast (ref)
Midwest0.680 (0.420, 1.101)1.044 (0.667, 1.635)0.569 (0.353, 0.915)
South0.458 (0.269, 0.778)0.808 (0.490, 1.333)0.158 (0.083, 0.300)
West0.351 (0.181, 0.679)0.598 (0.314, 1.139)0.311 (0.140, 0.689)
Other/Unknown0.538 (0.205, 1.412)0.808 (0.312, 2.093)0.644 (0.232, 1.788)
Charlson Comorbidity Index
0–3 (ref)
4–8 1.866 (1.147, 3.035)1.975 (1.223, 3.188)1.397 (0.777, 2.509)
>81.423 (0.906, 2.234)1.583 (1.011, 2.479)1.351 (0.776, 2.350)
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Subramaniam, D.S.; Zhang, Z.; Timmer, Z.; DeMarco, E.C.; Poirier, M.P.; Hinyard, L.J. Palliative Care and Mental Health among Pancreatic Cancer Patients in the United States: An Examination of Service Utilization and Health Outcomes. Healthcare 2024, 12, 842. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12080842

AMA Style

Subramaniam DS, Zhang Z, Timmer Z, DeMarco EC, Poirier MP, Hinyard LJ. Palliative Care and Mental Health among Pancreatic Cancer Patients in the United States: An Examination of Service Utilization and Health Outcomes. Healthcare. 2024; 12(8):842. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12080842

Chicago/Turabian Style

Subramaniam, Divya S., Zidong Zhang, Zachary Timmer, Elisabeth C. DeMarco, Michael P. Poirier, and Leslie J. Hinyard. 2024. "Palliative Care and Mental Health among Pancreatic Cancer Patients in the United States: An Examination of Service Utilization and Health Outcomes" Healthcare 12, no. 8: 842. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12080842

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop