Next Article in Journal
The Effects of Concurrent Training Versus Aerobic or Resistance Training Alone on Body Composition in Middle-Aged and Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
AI-Driven Data Analysis for Asthma Risk Prediction
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Evaluation, Diagnosis, and Management of Ovarian Cysts, Masses, and Their Complications in Fetuses, Infants, Children, and Adolescents

1
Department of Pediatric Surgery, Children’s Hospital Zagreb, Ulica Vjekoslava Klaića 16, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
2
School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Šalata 3, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
3
Croatian Academy of Medical Sciences, Kaptol 15, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
4
Scientific Centre of Excellence for Reproductive and Regenerative Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Šalata 3, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
5
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinical Hospital Merkur, Zajčeva ulica 19, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
6
School of Medicine, Catholic University of Croatia, Ilica 242, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
7
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Petrova ulica 13, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
8
Department of Surgical Oncology, University Hospital for Tumors, University Hospital Centre Sestre Milosrdnice, Ilica 197, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
9
Department of Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital of Split, Spinčićeva ulica 1, 21000 Split, Croatia
10
School of Medicine, University of Split, Šoltanska ulica 2a, 21000 Split, Croatia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Healthcare 2025, 13(7), 775; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13070775
Submission received: 1 March 2025 / Revised: 25 March 2025 / Accepted: 28 March 2025 / Published: 31 March 2025

Abstract

:
The majority of abdominal masses in female children derive from the ovaries. Ovarian masses in pediatric populations can vary from simple functional cysts to malignant neoplasms. Their incidence, clinical presentation, and histological distribution vary across age groups. In the assessment of ovarian masses in children, the primary aim is to determine the probability of malignancy, as the treatment approaches for benign and malignant lesions are significantly distinct. The primary imaging tool for evaluating ovarian cysts and masses is ultrasound, which can assess the size, location, and characteristics of masses. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) may be used for further evaluation if ultrasound findings are inconclusive or if malignancy is suspected, especially in older adolescents. Serum markers may be considered in older adolescents to help assess the risk of malignancy, though it is less useful in younger populations due to normal developmental variations. Many functional ovarian cysts, especially those detected in fetuses or infants, often resolve spontaneously without intervention. Surgical intervention is indicated in cases of large cysts that cause symptoms, or if there are concerns for malignancy. Common procedures include primarily ovarian sparing laparoscopy or laparotomy. Complications like torsion, rupture, or hemorrhage may require urgent surgical intervention. Treatment should be performed in specialized centers to avoid unnecessary oophorectomies and ensure the best possible outcome for the patient. This comprehensive review aims to provide an overview of the evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment of ovarian masses in the pediatric population. Emphasis is placed on the particularities of the lesions and their management in relation to age subgroups.

1. Introduction

Ovarian lesions, ranging from simple functional cysts to malignant tumors, make up the majority of abdominal masses in the pediatric population [1,2]. Ovarian cysts represent 60% of all ovarian lesions in this population, while true ovarian neoplasms are rare, with an incidence of 2.6 cases per 100,000 girls per year. Only 3–8% of adnexal masses show a malignant character, accounting for 1–2% of all pediatric cancers [3,4,5,6]. Ovarian neoplasms are classified according to their histological origin into three groups—germ cell, sex cord-stromal, and epithelial tumors. Their incidence, etiology, and clinical presentation differ significantly between age groups. In children and adolescents, germ cell tumors are the most common ovarian neoplasms, unlike epithelial tumors in adults. Mature cystic teratomas are the most prevalent tumor type. Dysgerminomas, on the other hand, are the most common malignant ovarian neoplasms in the pediatric population [7]. Functional ovarian cysts show a bimodal distribution, with peaks in the fetal/neonatal and perimenarchal periods, as their formation is influenced by hormonal stimulation, whether by maternal gonadotropins or by the activation of the hypothalamic–pituitary–ovarian axis [8].
Adnexal masses are typically identified through imaging studies, with ultrasound being the modality of choice for initial evaluation. Further diagnostics are usually performed by magnetic resonance imaging, which allows for the excellent visualization of soft tissue organs while avoiding the use of ionizing radiation [3,4]. Imaging features, together with biochemical evaluation (levels of serum tumor markers like alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), beta subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG), cancer antigen 125 (CA-125), inhibin A and B), are crucial in the assessment of the risk of malignancy, as the management of benign and malignant lesions is essentially different [9]. During the surgical treatment of ovarian masses in children, the emphasis should be on the preservation of fertility using minimally invasive laparoscopic surgical techniques and an ovary-sparing approach when feasible [10].
This comprehensive review aims to provide an overview of the evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment of ovarian masses in the pediatric population. Emphasis is placed on the particularities of the lesions and their management in relation to age subgroups.

2. Ovarian Cysts

2.1. Fetuses

Fetal ovarian cysts, as the most common abdominal cysts in female fetuses with a frequency of 1:2500, are usually diagnosed in the third trimester [11,12]. They typically present as functional or benign cysts, and development is attributed to increased levels of fetal gonadotropins, maternal estrogens, and placental human chorionic gonadotropins [13]. Ovarian cysts < 20 mm in diameter are considered physiological, representing a maturing follicle, while cysts > 20 mm in diameter are considered abnormal and are classified as simple (round, anechoic, unilocular, and thin-walled) or complex (thick-walled with heterogeneous echogenicity, fluid-debris level, and intracystic septations) [12,14]. Differential diagnosis, by way of the careful observation and determination of the organ of origin and the position and appearance of surrounding structures, should distinguish them from simple renal cysts, multicystic dysplastic kidneys, hydronephrosis, urachal cysts, hydrocolpos, enteric duplication cysts, meconium pseudocysts, choledochal cysts, lymphatic malformations, and cystic sacrococcygeal teratoma [15,16]. Magnetic resonance imaging is potentially useful in cases such as maternal obesity, fetal malposition, and oligohydramnios [12]. A characteristic finding of fetal ovarian cysts on ultrasonography is a daughter cyst, which is a small, round, and anechoic structure within the cyst [17], but the diagnosis is usually based on the following ultrasound criteria: female sex, non-midline regular cystic structure, normal-appearing urinary tract, and normal-appearing gastrointestinal tract [11]. The highest priority in perinatal management is to carefully monitor the development of the cyst to avoid potential torsion and subsequent ovarian necrosis and other possible complications, such as cyst compression on other intra-abdominal organs [18,19,20]. The optimal treatment of fetal ovarian cysts remains controversial to date. While decompression of the cyst by percutaneous aspiration has been suggested on the one hand, particularly for cysts of ≥40 mm in diameter or for those with rapid growth, defined as ≥10 mm per week, on the other hand, a conservative expectant approach has been advocated, given the potential for spontaneous resolution, particularly in simple cysts [8,21,22,23,24,25,26]. The presence of a fetal ovarian cyst should not affect the timing and method of delivery because the risk, timing, and duration of torsion cannot be predicted [12,19].

2.2. Infants

The spontaneous regression of ovarian cysts usually occurs after birth, usually by 6 months or even 1 year of age [26,27]. The rate of spontaneous regression tends to decrease with increasing cyst size. The rate ranges from approximately 90% for cysts ≤ 2.9 cm to 20% for those ≥ 6 cm [28,29]. Accordingly, ultrasound observation after the child’s birth is recommended every 4–6 weeks. For cysts that enlarge or persist for 4 months or more, continued observation, aspiration, or surgical removal (cystectomy) are all reasonable choices [30]. Aspiration is a possible choice for uncomplicated neonatal ovarian cysts that are ≥ 6 cm in diameter, provided they have not spontaneously regressed by four months. Should the cyst recur, it can be reaspirated or surgically removed (usually for neonatal ovarian cysts that are complex, symptomatic, or enlarging). Laparoscopic surgery is a recommended surgical approach, wherein ovarian tissue must be preserved as much as possible [11,30,31,32,33]. Ovarian torsion is the most common complication of ovarian cysts in infants (Figure 1), and it occurs mainly in cysts that begin to grow rapidly and their ultrasound features change. Also, the risk of ovarian torsion has been found to be more related to the length of the pedicle than to the size of the cyst itself [30,34,35].

2.3. Children

In the prepubertal period, the incidence of ovarian cysts is low unless there is a disease affecting ovarian cysts, since ovarian stimulation by gonadotropins reduces after the neonatal period and typically stays low until puberty [36]. Factors leading to ovarian cysts in prepubertal girls encompass patients with idiopathic central precocious puberty, McCune Albright syndrome, thyroid disorders, and hormonally active ovarian tumors. However, the majority of simple ovarian cysts in children are related to the failure of an ovarian follicle to regress [37,38,39]. In prepubertal children, ovarian cysts typically appear as an asymptomatic abdominal mass causing abdominal distension or are revealed incidentally during radiographic assessments. If symptoms are present due to a larger cyst, they usually present as chronic periumbilical or lower quadrant pain and may also present with bloating, urinary frequency or retention, constipation, or a feeling of abdominal fullness. Acute severe pain is usually due to torsion, perforation, hemorrhage, or infarction [36]. In prepubertal girls, ovarian cysts should be distinguished by ultrasound from paraovarian, mesothelial, and broad ligament cysts [40,41]. The management of ovarian cysts in prepubertal girls is based on the ultrasound appearance of the cyst and associated clinical findings. For asymptomatic patients, observation is the method of choice, but children and their parents should be counseled about the signs and symptoms of ovarian torsion so that they can seek emergency care without delay. In observational studies in the prepubertal period, cysts up to 9 cm in diameter usually resolve spontaneously, and indications for surgical exploration include ovarian cysts ≥ 9 cm in diameter, which are at increased risk of malignancy, ultrasound features of a tumor process (e.g., septation, increased solid tissue, calcification), ovarian torsion, and acute rupture with bleeding and hemodynamic instability [42,43,44,45].

2.4. Adolescents

Adolescent ovaries can have several follicles at various developmental stages. The majority of ovarian cysts in adolescents are follicular cysts, which occur due to a maturing follicle’s failure to ovulate and involute. Large cysts can lead to frequent urination, constipation, or a sensation of pressure in the lower belly, whereas twisting, rupture, or hemorrhage of the cyst causes intense acute pain (Figure 2) [46].
In the phase of adolescence, the possibility of obstructive genital anomalies, ovarian tumors, tubal conditions, uterine masses, and urologic and gastrointestinal conditions should be considered in the differential diagnosis. Ultrasound is the initial imaging modality in differentiating ovarian cysts from other possible conditions [2,47]. As for follicular cysts in adolescent girls, they usually disappear spontaneously within eight weeks. At this age, monophasic combination estrogen/progestin oral contraceptive pills (OCPs) containing ≥35 mcg ethinyl estradiol are commonly recommended, as they inhibit the ovarian-hypothalamic axis and can stop ovulation and the development of a new functional cyst [48,49]. Indications for laparoscopic cystectomy or aspiration are persistence for ≥3 months, size ≥ 6 cm (simple cysts measuring 6 to 12 cm may resolve spontaneously and can be monitored safely in certain patients), pelvic pain, or urinary frequency. Because of the high recurrence rate in the case of aspiration, laparoscopic cystectomy is usually preferred [50,51,52]. For corpus luteum cysts, observation for three months is also recommended for asymptomatic patients. Monophasic combination estrogen/progestin OCPs with ≥35 mcg ethinyl estradiol are also prescribed. Cystectomy alone is rarely warranted. Persistent or non-involuting ovarian cysts should be treated through cystectomy and ovarian tissue preservation (Figure 3) [49,53,54].

3. Ovarian Masses

Even though the majority of ovarian masses in children are either functional ovarian cysts or benign ovarian tumors, early diagnosis impacts treatment outcomes for children with malignant tumors. Ovarian masses are usually presented as an incidental radiological finding, or depending on the age and size and pathology of the mass itself, they may present with abdominal pain, increased abdominal girth, a palpable mass in the abdomen or pelvis, symptoms related to compression of other organs (e.g., nausea, vomiting, abdominal fullness, constipation, lower abdominal pressure, urinary frequency or retention), precocious puberty (virilization), menstrual irregularities, and paraneoplastic or autoimmune syndrome [55,56,57,58]. Ovarian tumors, whether benign or malignant, are rare in children and adolescents, representing merely 1–2% of all tumors, with an incidence of roughly 2.6 per 100,000 girls annually [2]. Although malignant ovarian tumors are rare in children and adolescents, around 10–20% of surgically treated ovarian tumors were found to be malignant [14,59,60,61,62]. Clinical characteristics more frequently linked to malignant tumors rather than benign ones include bilateral masses, fixed masses with irregular borders, ascites, and complaints of precocious puberty [63].

3.1. Germ Cell Tumors

Most ovarian tumors (35–45%) in children and adolescents are derived from germ cells (e.g., mature teratomas (Figure 4), immature teratomas, yolk sac tumors (YSTs), gonadoblastomas, dysgerminomas (Figure 5), embryonal carcinoma, non-gestational choriocarcinoma, and mixed germ cell tumors), of which 80% of germ cell tumors (GCTs) are benign, while only 20% are malignant. They arise due to variations from the normal differentiation of germ cells [59,64]. Mature and immature teratomas account for approximately 80% of all ovarian GCTs and are bilateral in 5% of cases. The most common malignant ovarian GCTs in children are YSTs, while dysgerminomas are the most common malignant entity in adolescence, with bilaterality in 10% of cases. Gonadoblastoma is a rare GCT seen in girls with dysgenetic gonads [65,66].

3.2. Epithelial Tumors

Epithelial tumors (e.g., serous or mucinous cystadenoma), with a frequency of less than 20% in childhood, are rare in prepubertal children. Each of these tumor types may be characterized as benign, malignant, or of low malignant potential [67]. Bilateral involvement is present in up to 20% of cases, and malignant tumors, such as cystadenocarcinoma or undifferentiated carcinoma, are very rare and usually have an aggressive clinical behavior (Figure 6). Borderline ovarian tumors have been described and also labeled as tumors with low malignant potential [68,69,70].

3.3. Sex Cord-Stromal Tumors

Sex cord-stromal tumors (e.g., thecomas, fibromas, juvenile granulosa cell tumor, Sertoli–Leydig cell tumors) are rare in children and adolescents, with approximately 5% of ovarian malignancies [71]. Unlike epithelial and germ cell tumors, they often appear with signs of hormone production, such as hirsutism and virilization, menstrual changes, or precocious puberty. A subset of sex cord-stromal tumors is associated with genetic aberrations, and an underlying cancer predisposition should always be considered [72,73].

3.4. Imaging

Transabdominal ultrasound serves as the primary tool for evaluating adnexal masses in children and adolescents, allowing for the assessment of the mass’s size and origin (e.g., ovarian, paraovarian), consistency (e.g., cystic, solid), laterality, and any related findings (e.g., ascites, lymphadenopathy), while blood flow can be assessed by Doppler ultrasound [74]. The radiologist should utilize different sonographic methods and integrate the patient’s pertinent medical history and clinical information to assist in identifying the mass and differentiating between normal physiology (a normal component of ovulation) and a pathological condition. Meta-analyses of observational studies indicate that the simultaneous evaluation of ovarian masses using gray-scale morphology alongside color Doppler assessment is more effective than using either morphologic assessment, spectral Doppler assessment, or color Doppler assessment on its own [75,76]. The aim of ultrasound is not to establish if the mass is “definitely” benign or malignant but instead to assess whether the mass is “almost certainly benign” or if it carries a “reasonable chance of being malignant”. There is no universally accepted classification system for adnexal masses. The two systems are the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) Simple Rules and the Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) for ultrasound classification [77,78].
In an ultrasound evaluation, simple cysts, which are usually physiological, appear anechoic, lacking septations, solid parts, or mural nodules. They may present with ≤1 peripheral calcification and without Doppler flow. Mucinous and serous cystadenomas are a common cause of simple ovarian cysts in children and adolescents. Complex ovarian masses are cystic and display solid nodular or papillary characteristics (<50 percent), thickened walls, septations (>2 to 3 mm), multiple calcifications, or mural nodules. Factors that may cause sudden complex ovarian masses include ovarian torsion, tubo-ovarian abscess, and ectopic pregnancy, while reasons for persistent complex ovarian masses include mature teratomas, immature teratomas, and endometriomas. Masses that are primarily solid (i.e., ≥50 percent solid components) are deemed malignant until histological evaluation indicates otherwise. In children and adolescents, solid ovarian masses can arise from germ cell tumors (e.g., dysgerminoma) and sex cord-stromal tumors (e.g., juvenile granulosa cell tumors, Sertoli–Leydig cell tumors) [62,67,79,80,81]. Ultrasonographic characteristics that are more indicative of malignant tumors encompass size ≥ 8 to 10 cm, multiple lesions, bilateral masses, solid or heterogeneous (solid components > 2 cm, thick septations, papillary projections), invasive or metastatic, presence of calcifications, ascites, and increased blood flow [60,63,82,83]. If the origin of the mass remains unclear post-ultrasound, or if the tumor is sizable or thought to be malignant, further details (e.g., pelvic lymph nodes, lung or liver metastases) can be acquired through computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [84,85].

3.5. Laboratory Findings

Helpful markers for studying ovarian tumors in children and adolescents include AFP for immature teratomas, yolk sac tumors, embryonal carcinoma, and Sertoli–Leydig cell tumors (rare); LDH for dysgerminomas; β-hCG for dysgerminomas (rare), embryonal carcinoma, and non-gestational choriocarcinoma; CA-125 for malignant epithelial tumors; and inhibin A and B for juvenile granulosa cell tumors [2]. Estradiol and testosterone are measured to assess hormonally active tumors (e.g., in individuals with early puberty or signs of virilization) [86]. The use of an ovarian tumor marker panel increases sensitivity and specificity. However, the absence of elevated tumor markers does not exclude malignancy, and elevated tumor markers may be present in benign tumors. As a result, determining tumor markers cannot definitively confirm or rule out malignancy. In the context of pediatric ovarian tumors, the usefulness of human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) is still being explored and is not as well established as in adults, and understanding its role could enhance the understanding of tumor biology in children [87,88]. Similarly, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is more commonly associated with adult cancers, while its role in pediatric malignancies, including ovarian tumors, is less well-defined. Values can vary considerably depending on tumor type, age, and other individual factors [89]. The ROMA (Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm) index is a valuable tool used in the evaluation of ovarian tumors. Its application in the pediatric population has limitations primarily due to the different biological behavior of ovarian tumors in this age group. More research is needed to determine its diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility [90]. When assessing the risk of malignancy in pediatric patients with ovarian tumors, a multifactorial approach that considers clinical presentation, imaging and laboratory findings, and histology, alongside emerging scoring systems, is essential. It is worth mentioning the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) Staging System, which is used to stage ovarian tumors in children, providing a framework for determining the extent of disease and guiding treatment. Furthermore, the Children’s Oncology Group (COG) developed protocols specifically for pediatric tumors, including ovarian tumors. They provide risk stratification based on factors such as age, tumor type, stage at diagnosis, and histological features. Although primarily used in adults, the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) Staging System also applies in pediatric populations and helps to classify the stages of ovarian tumors based on tumor size and spread [91,92,93]. A definitive diagnosis of an ovarian mass can only be confirmed following its surgical removal and histopathological analysis. The monitoring of serum tumor markers is beneficial for postoperative follow-up since it can indicate potential disease relapse [94,95]. Additionally, the cytology of ascites fluid and the assessment of platelet levels could be beneficial. Increased platelet levels serve as a nonspecific marker of ovarian mass and can assist in the acute evaluation of a twisted ovarian mass (platelet counts typically remain normal in nonmalignant ovarian torsion) [96]. A childhood-detected ovarian neoplasm can be the initial indication of a cancer predisposition syndrome, making the diagnosis crucial since it provides the possibility for genetic counseling and surveillance for the patient and her relatives [97]. Ovarian neoplasms detected in childhood, although rare, can be associated with various genetic conditions such as Turner syndrome, Gorlin syndrome, Li–Fraumeni syndrome, Peutz–Jeghers syndrome, familial breast and ovarian cancer syndrome, etc. [98,99,100].

3.6. Management

The objectives of surgical intervention consist of confirming a definitive diagnosis, complete removal of neoplastic tissue, determining the stage of malignancy, preserving ovarian tissue and function (if possible), and alleviating symptoms (Figure 7) [101]. Maintaining gonadal function is crucial not just for fertility preservation but also for the normal advancement of puberty. Consequently, a conservative surgical approach is utilized to preserve ovarian tissue, except when there is strong suspicion of malignancy (indicated by imaging and elevated tumor markers) or if malignancy is definitively confirmed on a frozen section during the surgery [102,103]. Because abdominal scars can cause psychological problems and reduce self-esteem in young girls, the treatment of ovarian masses in children and adolescents should be minimally invasive, which can be accomplished through ovarian-sparing laparoscopic surgery [104]. Although ovary-preserving surgery is recommended for managing benign ovarian tumors in children and adolescents, 46–54% of these lesions are treated with oophorectomy. Patients treated by pediatric and adolescent gynecologists are less likely to receive unnecessary oophorectomy [61,105]. If malignancy is suspected or confirmed, proper staging includes abdominal and pelvic exploration, peritoneal lavage, biopsies of suspicious areas, and the sampling of pelvic and periaortic lymph nodes [106,107,108].

3.7. Differential Diagnosis

The differential diagnosis of adnexal masses in young females is extensive. The differential diagnosis of an intra-abdominal mass in fetuses or neonates includes genitourinary tract disorders (e.g., reproductive tract anomalies, urinary tract obstruction, urachal cysts), gastrointestinal tract disorders (e.g., mesenteric or omental cyst, volvulus, colonic atresia, intestinal duplication), or miscellaneous disorders (e.g., choledochal, splenic, or pancreatic cysts, lymphangioma) [15]. In children and adolescents, the differential diagnosis includes tubal and paratubal cysts, Müllerian abnormalities, tubo-ovarian abscesses, disorders with infectious etiologies (e.g., pelvic inflammatory disease), endometrioma, hydrosalpinx, pyosalpinx, and pregnancy-related masses (ectopic pregnancy). Among the nongynecologic ones, peritoneal inclusion cysts and appendicitis or appendiceal abscess should be singled out (Table 1). Diagnostic algorithms can guide further therapeutic procedures, and signs of an acute abdomen (due to bleeding, torsion, inflammation, or perforation) will indicate urgent surgery, primarily laparoscopic [109,110,111,112].

3.8. Follow-Up

Long-term follow-up after surgery for pediatric ovarian tumors is a critical component of post-operative care, focusing on monitoring for recurrence, managing complications, and addressing psychological impacts, particularly in adolescents. Follow-up visits are generally arranged every 3 to 6 months for the first 2 to 3 years post-surgery and then annually for up to 5 years or longer [113,114]. Alongside routine physical examinations, specific tumor markers are monitored, and ultrasound (CT or MRI if necessary) may be included as needed if there are worrisome symptoms or abnormal findings [115]. Postoperative complications can vary depending on the type of tumor and the initial surgical approach (laparoscopy vs. laparotomy). In addition to classic surgical complications and the formation of adhesions, attention should be directed to a possible hormonal imbalance and, consequently, fertility [116,117,118]. The diagnosis and surgery itself can lead to anxiety and depression, especially in adolescent girls, whose self-esteem can be significantly shaken. Psychosocial support from mental health professionals is of utmost importance, both in the short term and in the long term, throughout the recovery process [119,120].

4. Complications

4.1. Ovarian Torsion

Ovarian torsion occurs in girls of all ages with an incidence of 4.9 per 100,000. It is usually associated with adnexal pathology but can also occur without adnexal pathology (e.g., due to an elongated utero-ovarian ligament), especially in prepubertal girls. Ovarian masses associated with torsion are usually benign (Figure 8) [121]. If torsion happens in utero, the ovary can experience necrosis and transform into a calcified mass or a sessile mass or disappear entirely [46,122]. It commonly manifests in girls as intense one-sided pain in the lower abdomen with a sudden start (or significant irritability with an acute onset in a newborn or young infant), nausea, vomiting, and pallor. In cases of intermittent pain, it may be torsion without complete occlusion of the vascular blood supply [123,124]. There is no specific duration of time after symptom onset that is predictive of certain ovarian necrosis [125]. The timeframe for ovary necrosis to happen varies, but generally, the risk of significant ovarian damage increases as time progresses after the onset of torsion. In summary, while there is individual variability, it is critical to diagnose and treat ovarian torsion as quickly as possible to maximize the chances of ovarian preservation and prevent necrosis [126,127]. The method of choice for the imaging evaluation of ovarian torsion is ultrasound, with the addition of Doppler. Normal Doppler flow does not rule out torsion, as maintained flow may be due to partial occlusion, sporadic intermittent torsion, and collateral circulation (such as utero-ovarian vessels and infundibulopelvic vessels) [128]. The most sensitive sonographic findings are ovarian edema, abnormal ovarian blood flow, whirlpool sign, and relative enlargement of the ipsilateral ovary [129,130]. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging are not routinely performed in the evaluation of ovarian torsion but may be helpful if sonographic findings are equivocal [131,132,133]. The differential diagnosis of ovarian torsion includes conditions such as ectopic pregnancy, ruptured ovarian cyst, tubo-ovarian abscess, and appendicitis [123]. The definitive diagnosis of ovarian torsion is made by direct visualization of the rotated ovary during surgery. Ovarian torsion is a surgical emergency in which most ovaries can be salvaged by untwisting the vascular pedicle. The gold standard is the laparoscopic approach (detorquation, cystectomy with ovarian preservation). In rare cases, oophorectomy is necessary because of severe extensive necrosis or a nonviable gelatinous appearance [134,135]. It is important to note that many patients (even those with blue or black ovaries) retain ovarian function after detorsion [136,137,138]. Therefore, the trend toward ovarian preservation instead of oophorectomy has become accepted as the most appropriate initial treatment for pediatric ovarian torsion. Oophoropexy has been proposed as a means of decreasing future reproductive harm by decreasing the risk of recurrent ovarian torsion, especially in the group of high-risk patients who have had a recurrence of ovarian torsion, those with bilateral ovarian torsion, or idiopathic torsion [139]. The oophoropexy options are a plication of the utero-ovarian ligament (non-fixation technique) and oophoropexy of the ovary to the uterosacral ligament or pelvic sidewall (fixation technique) [140,141].

4.2. Fallopian Tube Torsion

Fallopian tube torsion refers to the solitary twisting of the fallopian tube about its axis, occurring without torsion of the ovary. It may happen either in the middle section of the tube itself or around the supportive ligaments of the tube [142]. The clinical presentation can involve generalized or nonspecific pain, either acute or chronic, and is frequently accompanied by nonspecific symptoms like nausea and vomiting. Unrecognized tubal torsion can lead to loss of tubal function and potentially cause hydrosalpinx or necrosis, ultimately resulting in the resorption of the affected tissue [143]. Potential risk factors for tubal torsion include tubal pathology (e.g., hydrosalpinx, segmental tubal agenesis with resulting proximal hydrosalpinx, broad ligament cysts, paratubal cysts, neoplasms, ectopic pregnancy, and congenital anomalies), ovarian mass, infection, altered tubal function (e.g., abnormal peristalsis, spasm), or extrinsic lesions (e.g., adhesions) [144,145]. Radiographically, it can present as an enlarged tubular structure, normal adjacent ovary, or cystic mass separate from the ovary. The diagnosis is typically determined during surgical exploration. Similar to ovarian torsion, performing surgical detorsion can avert permanent ischemic harm and the consequent removal of the fallopian tube [142,146].

4.3. Paratubal or Paraovarian Cyst Torsion

The torsion of a paraovarian cyst is rare in children. The preoperative diagnosis of a paraovarian cyst is difficult; however, a paraovarian cyst should be suspected if an ipsilateral normal ovary is imaged and the cyst is located next to the uterus. The presence of adnexa torsion in children and adolescents with paraovarian cysts depends on the size of the cysts (Figure 9) [40]. If torsion occurs, the cyst must be carefully excised so as not to endanger the function of the fallopian tubes and ovaries (fertility-sparing surgery). Laparoscopic cyst removal has proven to be an effective surgical approach with favorable outcomes [147,148,149].

4.4. Ruptured Hemorrhagic Ovarian Cyst

Rupture of a hemorrhagic ovarian cyst is usually accompanied by acute onset of focal unilateral lower abdominal pain, usually mid-menstrual, and may be accompanied by intraperitoneal bleeding. In cases of massive hemorrhage, shoulder pain or upper abdominal pain is present due to subphrenic blood extravasation [150]. Bleeding can either resolve on its own or be associated with hemodynamic instability. Patients with self-limiting bleeding should be monitored with serial hemoglobin/hematocrit measurements, whereas hemodynamically unstable individuals should be stabilized before surgery, which is frequently performed via laparoscopy. Laparotomy is recommended solely when the surgeon lacks experience in laparoscopic techniques in children or when the patient is hemodynamically unstable and cannot be stabilized [151,152].

5. Cystectomy

When surgery is necessary for benign ovarian disease, it is generally better to preserve as much of the ovarian cortex as possible through cystectomy or enucleation of a solid tumor rather than performing an oophorectomy. Aspiration of the cyst contents alone is not recommended because it does not provide tissue for histopathology, and cytology of the cyst fluid is not reliable in ruling out malignancy. When the ovary cannot be preserved or after attempts at conservation yield inadequate viable tissue, an oophorectomy is usually performed [117,153,154].
In open cystectomy, an elliptical incision is created through the delicate ovarian cortex along the ovary’s axis and its most dependent area, steering clear of the fallopian tube and the fimbria ovarica [155]. It is essential to separate the cyst wall from the ovarian cortex. If the cyst’s base is extremely near the ovarian stroma, it is essential to remove it using scissors or electrocautery. It is better to extract the cyst as a whole. If the cyst bursts during handling, it is essential to manage the leakage to prevent contamination of the abdominal cavity [156]. Additionally, once the cyst bursts, the abdominal cavity needs to be thoroughly cleaned to reduce the chances of complications like pseudomyxoma peritonei and chemical peritonitis [157]. After cystectomy, the ovarian tissues can be left open, which is preferable, or they can be reapproximated if hemostasis is required, avoiding sutures on the ovarian capsule. If multiple cysts are present, an attempt should be made to make the fewest possible incisions on the surface of the ovary [12].
In laparoscopic cystectomy, the utero-ovarian ligament is grasped, and the ovary is stabilized. Intact removal of the cyst is preferred if the cyst can be dissected from the surrounding ovarian cortex. Blunt dissection, or occasionally electrocautery, is usually attempted until the cyst is completely removed. If difficulties arise, a cystotomy may be performed, during which it is necessary to control for possible leakage of the cyst contents. The cyst contents should be aspirated completely, and the cyst cavity should be thoroughly rinsed. The cyst wall should then be examined in detail, and any suspicious areas should be attempted to be separated by blunt or sharp dissection. Areas that cannot be separated can be fulgurated. To reduce the risk of intraperitoneal spillage, laparoscopically guided minilaparotomy can be used for large cysts [52,151,158,159,160].

6. Oophorectomy

Indications for oophorectomy include benign ovarian neoplasms that cannot be treated with a less invasive procedure such as cystectomy or partial oophorectomy, ovarian torsion with necrosis (rare), ovarian malignancy, and tubo-ovarian abscess that does not respond to antibiotic therapy [161]. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is the preferred method for oophorectomy due to its association with reduced complications, quicker recovery, and lower expenses compared to laparotomy. Circumstances where laparotomy might be preferable over MIS involve dense adnexal adhesions, significantly enlarged ovary, or a strong suspicion of malignancy [162,163,164,165,166]. Emerging minimally invasive techniques, including robot-assisted laparoscopy and single-port laparoscopy, are still being refined, particularly for the pediatric population [167,168,169]. No matter the approach used, once access to the abdomen is gained, pelvic and abdominal lavages are collected and stored for staging if malignancy is later confirmed. Additionally, during the abdominal examination, any questionable lesion must be biopsied and dispatched for frozen section analysis. Through dissection, the broad ligament is opened, allowing the ureter to be identified on its medial or posterior side. If the fallopian tube is to be removed, the ovarian vessels are then lifted to enable clear visibility of the nearby ureter. The vessels are clamped and separated, and the pedicles are tied 1 to 2 cm above the ovary to achieve hemostasis and total removal of the ovary. To preserve the fallopian tube, the various tubal branches of the ovarian artery must be systematically clamped and ligated below and parallel to the tube during an open procedure. When done laparoscopically, the pedicles are either sealed or coagulated and then cut [170,171]. Ureteral injuries have been documented during open or minimally invasive surgical oophorectomy when the ureter was not properly identified. Although the ureter is visible through the peritoneum in many patients, there are instances where it is essential to open the peritoneum and conduct a different dissection to expose it [172,173]. Following oophorectomy, patients with a single ovary, in contrast to those with two, exhibited a reduced quantity (e.g., fewer follicles) but comparable quality (e.g., pregnancy rates) of their ovarian reserve [174].

7. Conclusions

In summary, the approach to ovarian cysts and masses in pediatric populations emphasizes careful monitoring and a conservative approach due to the differences in presentation and management compared to adults, reserving intervention for symptomatic cases or those with concerning features. Each case should be evaluated individually, tailoring the management strategy to the patient’s specific circumstances. Multidisciplinary teams, consisting of pediatric gynecologists, pediatric surgeons, and pediatric oncologists (if malignancy is suspected) in specialized centers should treat children and adolescents with an ovarian mass, which can provide optimal physical and psychological support, avoiding unnecessary oophorectomies and ensuring the preservation of ovarian function to maintain hormonal balance, fertility, and overall health.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.B.; investigation, M.B., D.H., L.Z., I.M. and Z.P.; data curation, M.B., D.H., L.Z., I.M. and Z.P.; writing—original draft preparation, M.B., D.H., L.Z., I.M. and Z.P.; writing—review and editing, M.B., D.H., L.Z., I.M. and Z.P.; visualization, M.B., D.H. and Z.P.; supervision, M.B., D.H. and Z.P.; project administration, M.B. and Z.P.; funding acquisition, M.B. and Z.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all parents of the children whose figures were included in the review.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
OCPsOral contraceptive pills
YSTYolk sac tumor
GCTGerm cell tumor
IOTAInternational Ovarian Tumor Analysis
O-RADSOvarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System
CTComputed tomography
MRIMagnetic resonance imaging
AFPAlpha-fetoprotein
LDHLactate dehydrogenase
β-hCGBeta subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin
CA-125Cancer antigen 125
HE4Human epididymis protein 4
CEACarcinoembryonic antigen
ROMARisk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm
GOGGynecologic Oncology Group
COGChildren’s Oncology Group
FIGOInternational Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics
MISMinimally invasive surgery

References

  1. Ciro, E.; Vincenzo, C.; Mariapina, C.; Fulvia, D.C.; Vincenzo, B.; Giorgia, E.; Roberto, C.; Lepore, B.; Castagnetti, M.; Califano, G.; et al. Review of a 25-Year Experience in the Management of Ovarian Masses in Neonates, Children and Adolescents: From Laparoscopy to Robotics and Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Technology. Children 2022, 9, 1219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Birbas, E.; Kanavos, T.; Gkrozou, F.; Skentou, C.; Daniilidis, A.; Vatopoulou, A. Ovarian Masses in Children and Adolescents: A Review of the Literature with Emphasis on the Diagnostic Approach. Children 2023, 10, 1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Lam, C.Z.; Chavhan, G.B. Magnetic resonance imaging of pediatric adnexal masses and mimics. Pediatr. Radiol. 2018, 48, 1291–1306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Heo, S.H.; Kim, J.W.; Shin, S.S.; Jeong, S.I.; Lim, H.S.; Choi, Y.D.; Lee, K.H.; Kang, W.D.; Jeong, Y.Y.; Kang, H.K. Review of ovarian tumors in children and adolescents: Radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 2014, 34, 2039–2055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Garel, L.; Dubois, J.; Grignon, A.; Filiatrault, D.; Van Vliet, G. US of the pediatric female pelvis: A clinical perspective. Radiographics 2001, 21, 1393–1407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Grigore, M.; Murarasu, M.; Himiniucm, L.M.; Toma, B.F.; Duma, O.; Popovici, R. Large ovarian tumors in adolescents, a systematic review of reported cases, diagnostic findings and surgical management. Taiwan J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2021, 60, 602–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hanafy, A.K.; Mujtaba, B.; Yedururi, S.; Jensen, C.T.; Sanchez, R.; Austin, M.T.; Morani, A.C. Imaging in pediatric ovarian tumors. Abdom. Radiol. 2020, 45, 520–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Brandt, M.L.; Luks, F.I.; Filiatrault, D.; Garel, L.; Desjardins, J.G.; Youssef, S. Surgical indications in antenatally diagnosed ovarian cysts. J. Pediatr. Surg. 1991, 26, 276–281; discussion 281–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tarca, E.; Trandafir, L.M.; Cojocaru, E.; Costea, C.F.; Rosu, S.T.; Butnariu, L.I.; Iordache, A.C.; Munteanu, V.; Luca, A.C. Diagnosis Difficulties and Minimally Invasive Treatment for Ovarian Masses in Adolescents. Int. J. Womens Health 2022, 14, 1047–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Łuczak, J.; Bagłaj, M.; Dryjański, P.; Kalcowska, A.; Banaszyk-Pucała, N.; Boczar, M.; Dymek, K.; Fryczek, M.; Giżewska-Kacprzak, K.; Górecki, W.; et al. What Should Be the Topics of a Prospective Study on Ovarian Masses in Children?—Results of a Multicenter Retrospective Study and a Scoping Literature Review. Curr. Oncol. 2022, 29, 1488–1500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bryant, A.E.; Laufer, M.R. Fetal ovarian cysts: Incidence, diagnosis and management. J. Reprod. Med. 2004, 49, 329–337. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  12. Trinh, T.W.; Kennedy, A.M. Fetal ovarian cysts: Review of imaging spectrum, differential diagnosis, management, and outcome. Radiographics 2015, 35, 621–635. [Google Scholar]
  13. Brandt, M.L.; Helmrath, M.A. Ovarian cysts in infants and children. Semin. Pediatr. Surg. 2005, 14, 78–85. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  14. Nussbaum, R.; Hartman, S.; Parmley, H.; Sanders, C.; Dudgeon, L. Neonatal ovarian cysts: Sonographic-pathologic correlation. Radiology 1988, 168, 817–821. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  15. Cass, D.L. Fetal abdominal tumors and cysts. Transl. Pediatr. 2021, 10, 1530–1541. [Google Scholar]
  16. Tu, C.Y. Ultrasound and differential diagnosis of fetal abdominal cysts. Exp. Ther. Med. 2017, 13, 302–306. [Google Scholar]
  17. Lee, H.J.; Woo, S.K.; Kim, J.S.; Suh, S.J. “Daughter cyst” sign: A sonographic finding of ovarian cyst in neonates, infants, and young children. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 2000, 174, 1013–1015. [Google Scholar]
  18. Holzgreve, W.; Winde, B.; Willital, G.H.; Beller, F.K. Prenatal diagnosis and perinatal management of a fetal ovarian cyst. Prenat. Diagn. 1985, 5, 155–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hara, T.; Mimura, K.; Endo, M.; Fujii, M.; Matsuyama, T.; Yagi, K.; Kawanishi, Y.; Tomimatsu, T.; Kimura, T. Diagnosis, Management, and Therapy of Fetal Ovarian Cysts Detected by Prenatal Ultrasonography: A Report of 36 Cases and Literature Review. Diagnostics 2021, 11, 2224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Župančić, B.; Bašković, M.; Sović, L.; Habek, D. Bilateral ovarian torsion during follow-up for antenatally detected ovarian cysts. APSP J. Case Rep. 2017, 8, 21. [Google Scholar]
  21. Bagolan, P.; Giorlandino, C.; Nahom, A.; Bilancioni, E.; Trucchi, A.; Gatti, C.; Aleandri, V.; Spina, V. The management of fetal ovarian cysts. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2002, 37, 25–30. [Google Scholar]
  22. Noia, G.; Riccardi, M.; Visconti, D.; Pellegrino, M.; Quattrocchi, T.; Tintoni, M.; Manzoni, C.; Pintus, C.; Masini, L.; Caruso, A. Invasive fetal therapies: Approach and results in treating fetal ovarian cysts. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012, 25, 299–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Crombleholme, T.M.; Craigo, S.D.; Garmel, S.; D’Alton, M.E. Fetal ovarian cyst decompression to prevent torsion. J. Pediatr. Surg. 1997, 32, 1447–1449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Heling, K.S.; Chaoui, R.; Kirchmair, F.; Stadie, S.; Bollmann, R. Fetal ovarian cysts: Prenatal diagnosis, management and postnatal outcome. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2002, 20, 47–50. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  25. Melinte-Popescu, A.S.; Popa, R.F.; Harabor, V.; Nechita, A.; Harabor, A.; Adam, A.M.; Vasilache, I.A.; Melinte-Popescu, M.; Vaduva, C.; Socolov, D. Managing Fetal Ovarian Cysts: Clinical Experience with a Rare Disorder. Medicina 2023, 59, 715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bascietto, F.; Liberati, M.; Marrone, L.; Khalil, A.; Pagani, G.; Gustapane, S.; Leombroni, M.; Buca, D.; Flacco, M.E.; Rizzo, G.; et al. Outcome of fetal ovarian cysts diagnosed on prenatal ultrasound examination: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2017, 50, 20–31. [Google Scholar]
  27. Cesca, E.; Midrio, P.; Boscolo-Berto, R.; Snijders, D.; Salvador, L.; D’Antona, D.; Zanon, G.F.; Gamba, P. Conservative treatment for complex neonatal ovarian cysts: A long-term follow-up analysis. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2013, 48, 510–515. [Google Scholar]
  28. Tyraskis, A.; Bakalis, S.; David, A.L.; Eaton, S.; De Coppi, P. A systematic review and meta-analysis on fetal ovarian cysts: Impact of size, appearance and prenatal aspiration. Prenat. Diagn. 2017, 37, 951–958. [Google Scholar]
  29. Sakala, E.P.; Leon, Z.A.; Rouse, G.A. Management of antenatally diagnosed fetal ovarian cysts. Obstet. Gynecol. Surv. 1991, 46, 407–414. [Google Scholar]
  30. Kessler, A.; Nagar, H.; Graif, M.; Ben-Sira, L.; Miller, E.; Fisher, D.; Hadas-Halperin, I. Percutaneous drainage as the treatment of choice for neonatal ovarian cysts. Pediatr. Radiol. 2006, 36, 954–958. [Google Scholar]
  31. Mizuno, M.; Kato, T.; Hebiguchi, T.; Yoshino, H. Surgical indications for neonatal ovarian cysts. Tohoku J. Exp. Med. 1998, 186, 27–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chiaramonte, C.; Piscopo, A.; Cataliotti, F. Ovarian cysts in newborns. Pediatr. Surg. Int. 2001, 17, 171–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Pujar, V.C.; Joshi, S.S.; Pujar, Y.V.; Dhumale, H.A. Role of laparoscopy in the management of neonatal ovarian cysts. J. Neonatal. Surg. 2014, 3, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Vogtländer, M.F.; Rijntjes-Jacobs, E.G.; van den Hoonaard, T.L.; Versteegh, F.G. Neonatal ovarian cysts. Acta Paediatr. 2003, 92, 498–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Akın, M.A.; Akın, L.; Özbek, S.; Tireli, G.; Kavuncuoğlu, S.; Sander, S.; Akçakuş, M.; Güneş, T.; Öztürk, M.A.; Kurtoğlu, S. Fetal-neonatal ovarian cysts—Their monitoring and management: Retrospective evaluation of 20 cases and review of the literature. J. Clin. Res. Pediatr. Endocrinol. 2010, 2, 28–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Pienkowski, C.; Cartault, A.; Carfagna, L.; Ernoult, P.; Vial, J.; Lemasson, F.; Le Mandat, A.; Galinier, P.; Tauber, M. Ovarian cysts in prepubertal girls. Endocr. Dev. 2012, 22, 101–111. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  37. Arisaka, O.; Shimura, N.; Nakayama, Y.; Yabuta, K.; Yoshizawa, Y.; Hirai, Y.; Yoshimine, T.; Kuwabara, N. Ovarian cysts in precocious puberty. Clin. Pediatr. 1989, 28, 44–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Tran, S.; Kim, E.E.; Chin, A.C. Severe menorrhagia, unilateral ovarian mass, elevated inhibin levels, and severe hypothyroidism: An unusual presentation of Van Wyk and Grumbach syndrome. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2013, 48, e51–e54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Millar, D.M.; Blake, J.M.; Stringer, D.A.; Hara, H.; Babiak, C. Prepubertal ovarian cyst formation: 5 years’ experience. Obstet. Gynecol. 1993, 81, 434–438. [Google Scholar]
  40. Zhang, Y.; Zhu, Q.; Wu, P.; Wu, H.; He, L.; Hua, L.; Zhou, J. Thirty-eight cases of paraovarian cysts in children and adolescents: A retrospective study. Pediatr. Surg. Int. 2024, 40, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Caprio, M.G.; Di Serafino, M.; De Feo, A.; Guerriero, E.; Perillo, T.; Barbuto, L.; Vezzali, N.; Rossi, E.; Ferro, F.; Vallone, G.; et al. Ultrasonographic and multimodal imaging of pediatric genital female diseases. J. Ultrasound 2019, 22, 273–289. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  42. Warner, B.W.; Kuhn, J.C.; Barr, L.L. Conservative management of large ovarian cysts in children: The value of serial pelvic ultrasonography. Surgery 1992, 112, 749–755. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  43. Madenci, A.L.; Levine, B.S.; Laufer, M.R.; Boyd, T.K.; Voss, S.D.; Zurakowski, D.; Frazier, A.L.; Weldon, C.B. Preoperative risk stratification of children with ovarian tumors. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2016, 51, 1507–1512. [Google Scholar]
  44. Dasgupta, R.; Renaud, E.; Goldin, A.B.; Baird, R.; Cameron, D.B.; Arnold, M.A.; Diefenbach, K.A.; Gosain, A.; Grabowski, J.; Guner, Y.S.; et al. Ovarian torsion in pediatric and adolescent patients: A systematic review. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2018, 53, 1387–1391. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  45. Ripatti, L.; Taskinen, M.; Koivusalo, A.; Taskinen, S. Surgically treated ovarian lesions in preadolescent girls. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2020, 99, 105–111. [Google Scholar]
  46. Kirkham, Y.A.; Kives, S. Ovarian cysts in adolescents: Medical and surgical management. Adolesc. Med. State Art Rev. 2012, 23, 178–191. [Google Scholar]
  47. de Silva, K.S.; Kanumakala, S.; Grover, S.R.; Chow, C.W.; Warne, G.L. Ovarian lesions in children and adolescents—An 11-year review. J. Pediatr. Endocrinol. Metab. 2004, 17, 951–957. [Google Scholar]
  48. Lasher, A.; Harris, L.E.; Solomon, A.L.; Harbin, L.M.; Raby, L.; Dietrich, C.S.; Kryscio, R.J.; van Nagell, J.R.; Pavlik, E.J. Variables Associated with Resolution and Persistence of Ovarian Cysts. Obstet. Gynecol. 2023, 142, 1293–1301. [Google Scholar]
  49. Holt, V.L.; Cushing-Haugen, K.L.; Daling, J.R. Oral contraceptives, tubal sterilization, and functional ovarian cyst risk. Obstet. Gynecol. 2003, 102, 252–258. [Google Scholar]
  50. Lipitz, S.; Seidman, D.S.; Menczer, J.; Bider, D.; Oelsner, G.; Moran, O.; Shalev, J. Recurrence rate after fluid aspiration from sonographically benign-appearing ovarian cysts. J. Reprod. Med. 1992, 37, 845–848. [Google Scholar]
  51. Marana, R.; Caruana, P.; Muzii, L.; Catalano, G.F.; Mancuso, S. Operative laparoscopy for ovarian cysts. Excision vs. aspiration. J. Reprod. Med. 1996, 41, 435–438. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  52. Akkoyun, I.; Gülen, S. Laparoscopic cystectomy for the treatment of benign ovarian cysts in children: An analysis of 21 cases. J. Pediatr. Adolesc. Gynecol. 2012, 25, 364–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Spinelli, C.; Di Giacomo, M.; Cei, M.; Mucci, N. Functional ovarian lesions in children and adolescents: When to remove them. Gynecol. Endocrinol. 2009, 25, 294–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Pogorelic, Z.; Jukic, D.; Jukic, M.; Mrklic, I. Factors Associated with Ovarian Preservation in Children and Adolescents with Primary Tumors of Ovary. Indian Pediatr. 2020, 57, 515–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Zhang, M.; Jiang, W.; Li, G.; Xu, C. Ovarian masses in children and adolescents—An analysis of 521 clinical cases. J. Pediatr. Adolesc. Gynecol. 2014, 27, e73–e77. [Google Scholar]
  56. Papic, J.C.; Finnell, S.M.; Slaven, J.E.; Billmire, D.F.; Rescorla, F.J.; Leys, C.M. Predictors of ovarian malignancy in children: Overcoming clinical barriers of ovarian preservation. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2014, 49, 144–147; discussion 147–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Al Jama, F.E.; Al Ghamdi, A.A.; Gasim, T.; Al Dakhiel, S.A.; Rahman, J.; Rahman, M.S. Ovarian tumors in children and adolescents—A clinical study of 52 patients in a university hospital. J. Pediatr. Adolesc. Gynecol. 2011, 24, 25–28. [Google Scholar]
  58. Miletić, A.I.; Habek, D.; Medić, F.; Prka, M.; Berić Lerotić, S.; Knežević, F. Ovarian yolk sac tumor in a premenarchal girl. Wien Med. Wochenschr. 2023, 173, 70–73. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  59. Qazi, S.H.; Jeelani, S.M.; Dogar, S.A.; Das, J.K.; Saxena, A.K. Approaches to the management of pediatric ovarian masses in the 21st century: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2020, 55, 357–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Renaud, E.J.; Sømme, S.; Islam, S.; Cameron, D.B.; Gates, R.L.; Williams, R.F.; Jancelewicz, T.; Oyetunji, T.A.; Grabowski, J.; Diefenbach, K.A.; et al. Ovarian masses in the child and adolescent: An American Pediatric Surgical Association Outcomes and Evidence-Based Practice Committee systematic review. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2019, 54, 369–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Hermans, A.J.; Kluivers, K.B.; Wijnen, M.H.; Bulten, J.; Massuger, L.F.; Coppus, S.F. Diagnosis and treatment of adnexal masses in children and adolescents. Obstet. Gynecol. 2015, 125, 611–615. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  62. Madenci, A.L.; Vandewalle, R.J.; Dieffenbach, B.V.; Laufer, M.R.; Boyd, T.K.; Voss, S.D.; Frazier, A.L.; Billmire, D.F.; Rescorla, F.J.; Weil, B.R.; et al. Multicenter pre-operative assessment of pediatric ovarian malignancy. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2019, 54, 1921–1925. [Google Scholar]
  63. Oltmann, S.C.; Garcia, N.; Barber, R.; Huang, R.; Hicks, B.; Fischer, A. Can we preoperatively risk stratify ovarian masses for malignancy? J. Pediatr. Surg. 2010, 45, 130–134. [Google Scholar]
  64. Rescorla, F.J. Pediatric germ cell tumors. Semin. Pediatr. Surg. 2012, 21, 51–60. [Google Scholar]
  65. von Allmen, D. Malignant lesions of the ovary in childhood. Semin. Pediatr. Surg. 2005, 14, 100–105. [Google Scholar]
  66. Pierce, J.L.; Frazier, A.L.; Amatruda, J.F. Pediatric Germ Cell Tumors: A Developmental Perspective. Adv. Urol. 2018, 2018, 9059382. [Google Scholar]
  67. Morowitz, M.; Huff, D.; von Allmen, D. Epithelial ovarian tumors in children: A retrospective analysis. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2003, 38, 331–335; discussion 331–335. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  68. Massicot, R.; Rousseau, V.; Darwish, A.A.; Sauvat, F.; Jaubert, F.; Nihoul-Fékété, C. Serous and seromucinous infantile ovarian cystadenomas—A study of 42 cases. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2009, 142, 64–67. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  69. Longacre, T.A.; McKenney, J.K.; Tazelaar, H.D.; Kempson, R.L.; Hendrickson, M.R. Ovarian serous tumors of low malignant potential (borderline tumors): Outcome-based study of 276 patients with long-term (> or =5-year) follow-up. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2005, 29, 707–723. [Google Scholar]
  70. Virgone, C.; Alaggio, R.; Dall’Igna, P.; Buffa, P.; Tonegatti, L.; Ferrari, A.; Bisogno, G.; Cecchetto, G. Epithelial Tumors of the Ovary in Children and Teenagers: A Prospective Study from the Italian TREP Project. J. Pediatr. Adolesc. Gynecol. 2015, 28, 441–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Schultz, K.A.; Harris, A.K.; Schneider, D.T.; Young, R.H.; Brown, J.; Gershenson, D.M.; Dehner, L.P.; Hill, D.A.; Messinger, Y.H.; Frazier, A.L. Ovarian Sex Cord-Stromal Tumors. J. Oncol. Pract. 2016, 12, 940–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Schneider, D.T.; Calaminus, G.; Harms, D.; Göbel, U.; German Maligne Keimzelltumoren Study Group. Ovarian sex cord-stromal tumors in children and adolescents. J. Reprod. Med. 2005, 50, 439–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Cecchetto, G.; Ferrari, A.; Bernini, G.; Alaggio, R.; Collini, P.; Virgone, C.; Terenziani, M.; Dall’igna, P.; Cozza, R.; Conte, M.; et al. Sex cord stromal tumors of the ovary in children: A clinicopathological report from the Italian TREP project. Pediatr. Blood Cancer 2011, 56, 1062–1067. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  74. Moro, F.; Esposito, R.; Landolfo, C.; Froyman, W.; Timmerman, D.; Bourne, T.; Scambia, G.; Valentin, L.; Testa, A.C. Ultrasound evaluation of ovarian masses and assessment of the extension of ovarian malignancy. Br. J. Radiol. 2021, 94, 20201375. [Google Scholar]
  75. Kinkel, K.; Lu, Y.; Mehdizade, A.; Pelte, M.F.; Hricak, H. Indeterminate ovarian mass at US: Incremental value of second imaging test for characterization—Meta-analysis and Bayesian analysis. Radiology 2005, 236, 85–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Kaijser, J.; Sayasneh, A.; Van Hoorde, K.; Ghaem-Maghami, S.; Bourne, T.; Timmerman, D.; Van Calster, B. Presurgical diagnosis of adnexal tumours using mathematical models and scoring systems: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum. Reprod. Update 2014, 20, 449–462. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  77. Froyman, W.; Timmerman, D. Methods of Assessing Ovarian Masses: International Ovarian Tumor Analysis Approach. Obstet. Gynecol. Clin. N. Am. 2019, 46, 625–641. [Google Scholar]
  78. Basha, M.A.A.; Metwally, M.I.; Gamil, S.A.; Khater, H.M.; Aly, S.A.; El Sammak, A.A.; Zaitoun, M.M.A.; Khattab, E.M.; Azmy, T.M.; Alayouty, N.A.; et al. Comparison of O-RADS, GI-RADS, and IOTA simple rules regarding malignancy rate, validity, and reliability for diagnosis of adnexal masses. Eur. Radiol. 2021, 31, 674–684. [Google Scholar]
  79. Rogers, E.M.; Casadiego Cubides, G.; Lacy, J.; Gerstle, J.T.; Kives, S.; Allen, L. Preoperative risk stratification of adnexal masses: Can we predict the optimal surgical management? J. Pediatr. Adolesc. Gynecol. 2014, 27, 125–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Stankovic, Z.B.; Djukic, M.K.; Savic, D.; Lukac, B.J.; Djuricic, S.; Sedlecki, K.; Zdravkovic, D. Pre-operative differentiation of pediatric ovarian tumors: Morphological scoring system and tumor markers. J. Pediatr. Endocrinol. Metab. 2006, 19, 1231–1238. [Google Scholar]
  81. Sayasneh, A.; Ekechi, C.; Ferrara, L.; Kaijser, J.; Stalder, C.; Sur, S.; Timmerman, D.; Bourne, T. The characteristic ultrasound features of specific types of ovarian pathology (review). Int. J. Oncol. 2015, 46, 445–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. van Heerden, J.; Tjalma, W.A. The multidisciplinary approach to ovarian tumours in children and adolescents. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2019, 243, 103–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Lawrence, A.E.; Gonzalez, D.O.; Fallat, M.E.; Aldrink, J.H.; Hewitt, G.D.; Hertweck, S.P.; Onwuka, A.; Bence, C.; Burns, R.C.; Dillon, P.A.; et al. Factors Associated with Management of Pediatric Ovarian Neoplasms. Pediatrics 2019, 144, e20182537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Munari, A.M.; Monti, C.B.; Viglio, C.; Folco, G.; Rizzetto, F.; Zirpoli, S. MRI of pediatric ovarian masses: Validation of the O-RADS framework. Eur. Radiol. 2025; ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Wang, Q.; Yu, D.; Wang, F. Clinical and Computed Tomographic Features of Ovarian Lesions in Infants, Children, and Adolescents: A Series of 222 Cases. J. Pediatr. Adolesc. Gynecol. 2021, 34, 387–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Calcaterra, V.; Nakib, G.; Pelizzo, G.; Rundo, B.; Anna Rispoli, G.; Boghen, S.; Bonetti, F.; Del Monte, B.; Gertosio, C.; Larizza, D. Central precocious puberty and granulosa cell ovarian tumor in an 8-year old female. Pediatr. Rep. 2013, 5, e13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Machida, H.; Hirakawa, T.; Tsunekawa, K.; Kimura, T.; Murakami, M.; Abe, Y. Revised Cut-Off Value of Human Epididymis Protein 4 Enhances Its Use as an Ovarian Tumor Marker. Gynecol. Obstet. Investig. 2023, 88, 349–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. James, N.E.; Chichester, C.; Ribeiro, J.R. Beyond the Biomarker: Understanding the Diverse Roles of Human Epididymis Protein 4 in the Pathogenesis of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. Front. Oncol. 2018, 8, 124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Lawrence, A.E.; Fallat, M.E.; Hewitt, G.; Hertweck, P.; Onwuka, A.; Afrazi, A.; Bence, C.; Burns, R.C.; Corkum, K.S.; Dillon, P.A.; et al. Understanding the Value of Tumor Markers in Pediatric Ovarian Neoplasms. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2020, 55, 122–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Cui, R.; Wang, Y.; Li, Y.; Li, Y. Clinical value of ROMA index in diagnosis of ovarian cancer: Meta-analysis. Cancer Manag. Res. 2019, 11, 2545–2551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Behr, G.G.; Morani, A.C.; Artunduaga, M.; Desoky, S.M.; Epelman, M.; Friedman, J.; Lala, S.V.; Seekins, J.; Towbin, A.J.; Back, S.J. Imaging of pediatric ovarian tumors: A COG Diagnostic Imaging Committee/SPR Oncology Committee White Paper. Pediatr. Blood Cancer 2023, 70 (Suppl. S4), e29995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Oltmann, S.C.; Garcia, N.M.; Barber, R.; Hicks, B.; Fischer, A.C. Pediatric ovarian malignancies: How efficacious are current staging practices? J. Pediatr. Surg. 2010, 45, 1096–1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Ergun-Longmire, B.; Greydanus, D.E. Ovarian tumors in the pediatric population: An update. Dis. Mon. 2024, 70, 101691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Matsas, A.; Stefanoudakis, D.; Troupis, T.; Kontzoglou, K.; Eleftheriades, M.; Christopoulos, P.; Panoskaltsis, T.; Stamoula, E.; Iliopoulos, D.C. Tumor Markers and Their Diagnostic Significance in Ovarian Cancer. Life 2023, 13, 1689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Englisz, A.; Smycz-Kubańska, M.; Mielczarek-Palacz, A. Sensitivity and Specificity of Selected Biomarkers and Their Combinations in the Diagnosis of Ovarian Cancer. Diagnostics 2024, 14, 949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Isingizwe, Z.R.; Meelheim, B.A.; Benbrook, D.M. Elevated Platelet Aggregation in Patients with Ovarian Cancer: More than Just Increased Platelet Count. Cancers 2024, 16, 3583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Goudie, C.; Witkowski, L.; Vairy, S.; McCluggage, W.G.; Foulkes, W.D. Paediatric ovarian tumours and their associated cancer susceptibility syndromes. J. Med. Genet. 2018, 55, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Jongmans, M.C.; Loeffen, J.L.; Waanders, E.; Hoogerbrugge, P.M.; Ligtenberg, M.J.; Kuiper, R.P.; Hoogerbrugge, N. Recognition of genetic predisposition in pediatric cancer patients: An easy-to-use selection tool. Eur. J. Med. Genet. 2016, 59, 116–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Banno, K.; Kisu, I.; Yanokura, M.; Masuda, K.; Ueki, A.; Kobayashi, Y.; Hirasawa, A.; Aoki, D. Hereditary gynecological tumors associated with Peutz-Jeghers syndrome (Review). Oncol. Lett. 2013, 6, 1184–1188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Toss, A.; Tomasello, C.; Razzaboni, E.; Contu, G.; Grandi, G.; Cagnacci, A.; Schilder, R.J.; Cortesi, L. Hereditary ovarian cancer: Not only BRCA 1 and 2 genes. BioMed Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 341723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Margioula-Siarkou, C.; Petousis, S.; Margioula-Siarkou, G.; Mavromatidis, G.; Chatzinikolaou, F.; Hatzipantelis, E.; Guyon, F.; Dinas, K. Therapeutic Management and Prognostic Factors for Ovarian Malignant Tumours in Adolescents: A Comprehensive Review of Current Guidelines. Diagnostics 2023, 13, 1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Kim, I. Intraoperative consultation for ovarian tumors. Yeungnam Univ. J. Med. 2019, 36, 163–182. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  103. Reddy, J.; Laufer, M.R. Advantage of conservative surgical management of large ovarian neoplasms in adolescents. Fertil. Steril. 2009, 91, 1941–1944. [Google Scholar]
  104. Hao, J.; Sun, Z.; Song, G. Laparoscopy for Ovary-Sparing Tumorectomy in Children with Ovarian Tumors: A Clinical Retrospective Analysis. J. Laparoendosc. Adv. Surg. Tech. A 2023, 33, 296–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Gonzalez, D.O.; Cooper, J.N.; Aldrink, J.H.; Hewitt, G.D.; Fallat, M.E.; Minneci, P.C.; Deans, K.J. Variability in surgical management of benign ovarian neoplasms in children. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2017, 52, 944–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Timmers, P.J.; Zwinderman, K.; Coens, C.; Vergote, I.; Trimbos, J.B. Lymph node sampling and taking of blind biopsies are important elements of the surgical staging of early ovarian cancer. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer 2010, 20, 1142–1147. [Google Scholar]
  107. Zuna, R.E. Diagnostic Cytopathology of Peritoneal Washings. Cytojournal 2022, 19, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Rodriguez, E.F.; Monaco, S.E.; Khalbuss, W.; Austin, R.M.; Pantanowitz, L. Abdominopelvic washings: A comprehensive review. Cytojournal 2013, 10, 7. [Google Scholar]
  109. Eskander, R.N.; Bristow, R.E. Adnexal Masses in Pediatric and Adolescent Females: A Review of the Literature. Curr. Obstet. Gynecol. Rep. 2012, 1, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Perlman, S.; Hertweck, P.; Fallat, M.E. Paratubal and tubal abnormalities. Semin. Pediatr. Surg. 2005, 14, 124–134. [Google Scholar]
  111. Kelleher, C.M.; Goldstein, A.M. Adnexal masses in children and adolescents. Clin. Obstet. Gynecol. 2015, 58, 76–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Habek, D.; Karša, M.; Kalajžić, T. Clinical evaluation of the pediatric and adolescent gynecology in University Hospital Osijek. Gynaecol. Perinatol. 2005, 14, 145–148. [Google Scholar]
  113. Feinberg, J.; Carthew, K.; Webster, E.; Chang, K.; McNeil, N.; Chi, D.S.; Long Roche, K.; Gardner, G.; Zivanovic, O.; Sonoda, Y. Ovarian cancer recurrence detection may not require in-person physical examination: An MSK team ovary study. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer. 2022, 32, 159–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Luk, H.M.; Ngu, S.F.; Lau, L.S.K.; Tse, K.Y.; Chu, M.M.Y.; Kwok, S.T.; Ngan, H.Y.S.; Chan, K.K.L. Patient-Initiated Follow-Up in Ovarian Cancer. Curr. Oncol. 2023, 30, 3627–3636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Yang, Q.; Zhang, H.; Ma, P.Q.; Peng, B.; Yin, G.T.; Zhang, N.N.; Wang, H.B. Value of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging combined with tumor markers in the diagnosis of ovarian tumors. World J. Clin. Cases 2023, 11, 7553–7561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Lee, M.; Kim, S.W.; Paek, J.; Lee, S.H.; Yim, G.W.; Kim, J.H.; Kim, J.W.; Kim, Y.T.; Nam, E.J. Comparisons of surgical outcomes, complications, and costs between laparotomy and laparoscopy in early-stage ovarian cancer. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer 2011, 21, 251–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Shandley, L.M.; Spencer, J.B.; Kipling, L.M.; Hussain, B.; Mertens, A.C.; Howards, P.P. The Risk of Infertility After Surgery for Benign Ovarian Cysts. J. Womens Health 2023, 32, 574–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Heras, M.; Alonso-Espias, M.; Arencibia, O.; Minig, L.; Marti, L.; Diestro, M.D.; Cespedes, J.; Niguez, I.; Gil-Ibañez, B.; Diaz-Feijoo, B.; et al. Real Implication of Fertility-Sparing Surgery for Ovarian Cancer: Reproductive Outcomes. Diagnostics 2024, 14, 1424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Ghamari, D.; Dehghanbanadaki, H.; Khateri, S.; Nouri, E.; Baiezeedi, S.; Azami, M.; Ezzati Amini, E.; Moradi, Y. The Prevalence of Depression and Anxiety in Women with Ovarian Cancer: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cross-Sectional Studies. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2023, 24, 3315–3325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Sáez Rodríguez, D.J.; Ortigosa Quiles, J.M.; Marin, A.R.; Martínez, R.S. Self-Esteem and Coping Strategies in Adolescent Cancer Patients during the Period of Illness and Follow-Up. Eur. J. Investig. Health Psychol. Educ. 2024, 14, 1128–1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Guthrie, B.D.; Adler, M.D.; Powell, E.C. Incidence and trends of pediatric ovarian torsion hospitalizations in the United States, 2000–2006. Pediatrics 2010, 125, 532–538. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  122. Prieto, J.M.; Kling, K.M.; Ignacio, R.C.; Bickler, S.W.; Fairbanks, T.J.; Saenz, N.C.; Nicholson, S.I.; Lazar, D.A. Premenarchal patients present differently: A twist on the typical patient presenting with ovarian torsion. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2019, 54, 2614–2616. [Google Scholar]
  123. Poonai, N.; Poonai, C.; Lim, R.; Lynch, T. Pediatric ovarian torsion: Case series and review of the literature. Can. J. Surg. 2013, 56, 103–108. [Google Scholar]
  124. Spinelli, C.; Tröbs, R.B.; Nissen, M.; Strambi, S.; Ghionzoli, M.; Bertocchini, A.; Cagnetta Domass, V.; Sanna, B.; Morganti, R.; Molinaro, F.; et al. Ovarian torsion in the pediatric population: Predictive factors for ovarian-sparing surgery-an international retrospective multicenter study and a systematic review. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2023, 308, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  125. Anders, J.F.; Powell, E.C. Urgency of evaluation and outcome of acute ovarian torsion in pediatric patients. Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med. 2005, 159, 532–535. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  126. Adams, K.; Ballard, E.; Amoako, A.; Khalil, A.; Baartz, D.; Chu, K.; Tanaka, K. When is it too late? Ovarian preservation and duration of symptoms in ovarian torsion. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2022, 42, 675–679. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  127. Mandelbaum, R.S.; Smith, M.B.; Violette, C.J.; Matsuzaki, S.; Matsushima, K.; Klar, M.; Roman, L.D.; Paulson, R.J.; Matsuo, K. Conservative surgery for ovarian torsion in young women: Perioperative complications and national trends. BJOG 2020, 127, 957–965. [Google Scholar]
  128. Adnexal Torsion in Adolescents: ACOG Committee Opinion No, 783. Obstet. Gynecol. 2019, 134, e56–e63.
  129. Moro, F.; Bolomini, G.; Sibal, M.; Vijayaraghavan, S.B.; Venkatesh, P.; Nardelli, F.; Pasciuto, T.; Mascilini, F.; Pozzati, F.; Leone, F.P.G.; et al. Imaging in gynecological disease (20): Clinical and ultrasound characteristics of adnexal torsion. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2020, 56, 934–943. [Google Scholar]
  130. Mashiach, R.; Melamed, N.; Gilad, N.; Ben-Shitrit, G.; Meizner, I. Sonographic diagnosis of ovarian torsion: Accuracy and predictive factors. J. Ultrasound Med. 2011, 30, 1205–1210. [Google Scholar]
  131. Scheier, E. Diagnosis and Management of Pediatric Ovarian Torsion in the Emergency Department: Current Insights. Open Access Emerg. Med. 2022, 14, 283–291. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  132. Servaes, S.; Zurakowski, D.; Laufer, M.R.; Feins, N.; Chow, J.S. Sonographic findings of ovarian torsion in children. Pediatr. Radiol. 2007, 37, 446–451. [Google Scholar]
  133. Sintim-Damoa, A.; Majmudar, A.S.; Cohen, H.L.; Parvey, L.S. Pediatric Ovarian Torsion: Spectrum of Imaging Findings. Radiographics 2017, 37, 1892–1908. [Google Scholar]
  134. Winton, C.; Yamoah, K. Ovarian torsion and laparoscopy in the paediatric and adolescent population. BMJ Case Rep. 2020, 13, e232610. [Google Scholar]
  135. Grabowski, A.; Korlacki, W.; Pasierbek, M. Laparoscopy in elective and emergency management of ovarian pathology in children and adolescents. Wideochir. Inne. Tech. Maloinwazyjne 2014, 9, 164–169. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  136. Aziz, D.; Davis, V.; Allen, L.; Langer, J.C. Ovarian torsion in children: Is oophorectomy necessary? J. Pediatr. Surg. 2004, 39, 750–753. [Google Scholar]
  137. Harkins, G. Ovarian torsion treated with untwisting: Second look 36 hours after untwisting. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2007, 14, 270. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  138. Oelsner, G.; Bider, D.; Goldenberg, M.; Admon, D.; Mashiach, S. Long-term follow-up of the twisted ischemic adnexa managed by detorsion. Fertil. Steril. 1993, 60, 976–979. [Google Scholar]
  139. Comeau, I.M.; Hubner, N.; Kives, S.L.; Allen, L.M. Rates and Technique for Oophoropexy in Pediatric Ovarian Torsion: A Single-Institution Case Series. J. Pediatr. Adolesc. Gynecol. 2017, 30, 418–421. [Google Scholar]
  140. Brady, P.C.; Styer, A.K. Laparoscopic uteroovarian ligament truncation and uterosacral oophoropexy for idiopathic recurrent ovarian torsion: Case report and review of literature. Fertil. Res. Pract. 2015, 1, 2. [Google Scholar]
  141. Obut, M.; Değer, U. A New Technique of Oophoropexy: Folding and Fixating of Utero-Ovarian Ligament to Round Ligament in a Patient with Reccurrent Ovarian Torsion. Case Rep. Obstet. Gynecol. 2019, 2019, 7647091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Casey, R.K.; Damle, L.F.; Gomez-Lobo, V. Isolated fallopian tube torsion in pediatric and adolescent females: A retrospective review of 15 cases at a single institution. J. Pediatr. Adolesc. Gynecol. 2013, 26, 189–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Zijun, L.; Yaqin, Z.; Weiwen, P. A rare case of isolated fallopian tubal torsion in adolescent girls: A case report and system review of literature. SAGE Open Med. Case Rep. 2023, 11, 2050313X231215207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Boukaidi, S.A.; Delotte, J.; Steyaert, H.; Valla, J.S.; Sattonet, C.; Bouaziz, J.; Bongain, A. Thirteen cases of isolated tubal torsions associated with hydrosalpinx in children and adolescents, proposal for conservative management: Retrospective review and literature survey. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2011, 46, 1425–1431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Schwartz, B.; Weerasooriya, N.; Mercier, R.; Gould, S.; Saul, D.; Berman, L. Factors Associated with Isolated Fallopian Tube Torsion in Pediatric Patients. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2024, 59, 1538–1544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Ardıçlı, B.; Ekinci, S.; Oğuz, B.; Haliloğlu, M.; Tanyel, F.C.; Karnak, İ. Laparoscopic detorsion of isolated idiopathic fallopian tube torsion: Conservative treatment in a 13-year-old girl. Turk. J. Pediatr. 2013, 55, 451–454. [Google Scholar]
  147. Muolokwu, E.; Sanchez, J.; Bercaw, J.L.; Sangi-Haghpeykar, H.; Banszek, T.; Brandt, M.L.; Dietrich, J.E. The incidence and surgical management of paratubal cysts in a pediatric and adolescent population. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2011, 46, 2161–2163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Okada, T.; Yoshida, H.; Matsunaga, T.; Kouchi, K.; Ohtsuka, Y.; Takano, H.; Horie, H.; Ohnuma, N. Paraovarian cyst with torsion in children. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2002, 37, 937–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Romeo, P.; Loria, G.; Martinelli, C.; Ercoli, A.; Romeo, C. Minimally invasive management of a giant paratubal cyst in an adolescent female: Case report and review of the literature in the pediatric population. Front. Pediatr. 2022, 10, 1080797. [Google Scholar]
  150. Kayaba, H.; Tamura, H.; Shirayama, K.; Murata, J.; Fujiwara, Y. Hemorrhagic ovarian cyst in childhood: A case report. J. Pediatr. Surg. 1996, 31, 978–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Kim, H.B.; Cho, H.Y.; Park, S.H.; Park, S.T. Laparoscopic ovarian surgery in children and adolescents. J. Soc. Laparoendosc. Surg. 2015, 19, e2014.00253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Sarihan, H.; Unal, M.; Ozoran, Y. Massive haemoperitoneum due to spontaneous rupture of ovarian cyst in children. A report of 2 cases. S. Afr. J. Surg. 1996, 34, 44–46. [Google Scholar]
  153. Sleiman, Z.; Karaman, E.; Terzic, M.; Terzic, S.; Falzone, G.; Garzon, S. Fertility Preservation in Benign Gynecological Diseases: Current Approaches and Future Perspectives. J. Reprod. Infertil. 2019, 20, 201–208. [Google Scholar]
  154. Carvalho, J.P.; Moretti-Marques, R.; Filho, A.L.D.S. Adnexal mass: Diagnosis and management. Rev. Bras. Ginecol. Obstet. 2020, 42, 438–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Gamé, X.; Mallet, R.; Guillotreau, J.; Berrogain, N.; Mouzin, M.; Vaessen, C.; Sarramon, J.P.; Malavaud, B.; Rischmann, P. Uterus, fallopian tube, ovary and vagina-sparing laparoscopic cystectomy: Technical description and results. Eur. Urol. 2007, 51, 441–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Watanabe, E.; Tanaka, K.; Takeda, N.; Takayasu, H.; Yokota, K.; Watanabe, M. Surgical technique to prevent spillage of cyst fluid during operation for cystic ovarian tumors. Pediatr. Surg. Int. 2013, 29, 645–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Ionescu, S.; Marincas, M.; Madge, O.L.; Dicu-Andreescu, I.G.; Chitoran, E.; Rotaru, V.; Cirimbei, C.; Gherghe, M.; Ene, A.; Rosca, R.; et al. Ovarian Causes of Pseudomyxoma Peritonei (PMP)-A Literature Review. Cancers 2024, 16, 1446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Shapiro, E.Y.; Kaye, J.D.; Palmer, L.S. Laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy in children. Urology 2009, 73, 526–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Seckin, B.; Ozdener, T.; Tapisiz, O.L.; Batioğlu, S. Laparoscopic treatment of ovarian cysts in adolescents and young adults. J. Pediatr. Adolesc. Gynecol. 2011, 24, 300–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Panici, P.B.; Palaia, I.; Bellati, F.; Pernice, M.; Angioli, R.; Muzii, L. Laparoscopy compared with laparoscopically guided minilaparotomy for large adnexal masses: A randomized controlled trial. Obstet. Gynecol. 2007, 110, 241–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Wong, Y.S.; Tam, Y.H.; Pang, K.K.; Mou, J.W.; Chan, K.W.; Lee, K.H. Oophorectomy in children. Who and why: 13-year experience in a single centre. J. Paediatr. Child Health 2012, 48, 600–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Dioun, S.; Huang, Y.; Melamed, A.; Gockley, A.; St Clair, C.M.; Hou, J.Y.; Tergas, A.I.; Khoury-Collado, F.; Hershman, D.L.; Wright, J.D. Trends in the Use of Minimally Invasive Adnexal Surgery in the United States. Obstet. Gynecol. 2021, 138, 738–746. [Google Scholar]
  163. Bisharah, M.; Tulandi, T. Laparoscopic preservation of ovarian function: An underused procedure. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2003, 188, 367–370. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  164. Kiblawi, R.; Zoeller, C.; Zanini, A.; Kuebler, J.F.; Dingemann, C.; Ure, B.; Schukfeh, N. Laparoscopic versus Open Pediatric Surgery: Three Decades of Comparative Studies. Eur. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2022, 32, 9–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Raźnikiewicz, A.; Korlacki, W.; Grabowski, A. The role of laparoscopy in paediatric and adolescent gynaecology. Wideochir. Inne. Tech. Maloinwazyjne 2020, 15, 424–436. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  166. Pogorelić, Z. Advances and Future Challenges of Minimally Invasive Surgery in Children. Children 2022, 9, 1959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Esposito, C.; Blanc, T.; Di Mento, C.; Ballouhey, Q.; Fourcade, L.; Mendoza-Sagaon, M.; Chiodi, A.; Cardone, R.; Escolino, M. Robotic-assisted surgery for gynecological indications in children and adolescents: European multicenter report. J. Robot. Surg. 2024, 18, 20. [Google Scholar]
  168. Pérez-Bertólez, S.; González, M.; de Los Reyes, N.; Fernández-Pineda, I. Laparoendoscopic single-site ovarian cystectomy and concomitant appendectomy in an adolescent. J. Pediatr. Adolesc. Gynecol. 2014, 27, e13–e16. [Google Scholar]
  169. Xie, X.X.; Wang, N.; Wang, Z.H.; Zhu, Y.Y.; Wang, J.R.; Wang, X.Q. Robotic-assisted resection of ovarian tumors in children: A case report and review of literature. World J. Clin. Cases 2019, 7, 2542–2548. [Google Scholar]
  170. Lozada, Y.; Bhagavath, B. A Review of Laparoscopic Salpingo-Oophorectomy: Technique and Perioperative Considerations. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2017, 24, 364–370. [Google Scholar]
  171. Lawson, A.A.; Rentea, R.M. Oophorectomy. 2022. In StatPearls [Internet]; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2025. [Google Scholar]
  172. Ade-Ojo, I.P.; Tijani, O. A Review on the Etiology, Prevention, and Management of Ureteral Injuries During Obstetric and Gynecologic Surgeries. Int. J. Womens Health 2021, 13, 895–902. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  173. Jacob, G.P.; Vilos, G.A.; Al Turki, F.; Bhangav, G.; Abu-Rafea, B.; Vilos, A.G.; Ternamian, A. Ureteric Injury During Gynaecological Surgery—Lessons from 20 Cases in Canada. Facts Views Vis. Obgyn. 2020, 12, 31–42. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  174. Younis, J.S.; Naoum, I.; Salem, N.; Perlitz, Y.; Izhaki, I. The impact of unilateral oophorectomy on ovarian reserve in assisted reproduction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2018, 125, 26–35. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
Figure 1. A 7-day-old female neonate presented with a large abdominal mass. (A) Laparoscopic examination revealed a necrotic, twisted, huge neonatal ovarian cyst measuring 6 × 5 × 4 cm; (B) Twisting of the ovarian pedicle by 720 degrees; (C) After decompression of the cyst, a laparoscopic salpingo-oophorectomy was performed due to the obvious necrosis of the ovarian tissue. Source: Archive of the Department of Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital of Split.
Figure 1. A 7-day-old female neonate presented with a large abdominal mass. (A) Laparoscopic examination revealed a necrotic, twisted, huge neonatal ovarian cyst measuring 6 × 5 × 4 cm; (B) Twisting of the ovarian pedicle by 720 degrees; (C) After decompression of the cyst, a laparoscopic salpingo-oophorectomy was performed due to the obvious necrosis of the ovarian tissue. Source: Archive of the Department of Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital of Split.
Healthcare 13 00775 g001
Figure 2. A 13-year-old adolescent presented to the emergency room because of recurrent crampy abdominal pain that lasted a short time and then subsided. She had had the symptoms for about a week. An abdominal ultrasound was performed, which showed a mass in the pelvis. (A) MSCT of the abdomen revealed a 9.1 × 8.8 cm solid cystic mass in the right ovary that was not perfused; (B) Intraoperatively, a torquing, partially necrotic tumor of the ovary was noted; (C) Pathohistological findings were consistent with a mature teratoma of the right ovary. Source: Archive of the Department of Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital of Split.
Figure 2. A 13-year-old adolescent presented to the emergency room because of recurrent crampy abdominal pain that lasted a short time and then subsided. She had had the symptoms for about a week. An abdominal ultrasound was performed, which showed a mass in the pelvis. (A) MSCT of the abdomen revealed a 9.1 × 8.8 cm solid cystic mass in the right ovary that was not perfused; (B) Intraoperatively, a torquing, partially necrotic tumor of the ovary was noted; (C) Pathohistological findings were consistent with a mature teratoma of the right ovary. Source: Archive of the Department of Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital of Split.
Healthcare 13 00775 g002
Figure 3. A 14-year-old girl presented with intermittent abdominal pain, loss of appetite, and a palpable abdominal mass. (A) Multislice computed tomography revealed a giant right abdominal ovarian cyst measuring 16.2 × 14.6 cm; (B) The cystic mass filled the entire lower abdomen and was pressing on the surrounding structures; (C) Laparoscopic examination revealed a giant ovarian cyst; (D) The ovarian cortex was opened, 2 L of clear contents were aspirated; (E) A laparoscopic cystectomy with ovarian sparing was performed. A pathohistological examination revealed a simple ovarian cyst. Source: Archive of the Department of Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital of Split.
Figure 3. A 14-year-old girl presented with intermittent abdominal pain, loss of appetite, and a palpable abdominal mass. (A) Multislice computed tomography revealed a giant right abdominal ovarian cyst measuring 16.2 × 14.6 cm; (B) The cystic mass filled the entire lower abdomen and was pressing on the surrounding structures; (C) Laparoscopic examination revealed a giant ovarian cyst; (D) The ovarian cortex was opened, 2 L of clear contents were aspirated; (E) A laparoscopic cystectomy with ovarian sparing was performed. A pathohistological examination revealed a simple ovarian cyst. Source: Archive of the Department of Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital of Split.
Healthcare 13 00775 g003
Figure 4. An 11-year-old girl noticed that her stomach was growing along with pain, nausea, and a palpable mass. Ultrasound and MRI revealed bilateral ovarian tumor inhomogeneous solid cystic masses similar to dermoid, left 13 cm, right 5 cm in diameter. Tumor markers were not increased, and due to the size of the tumor, a laparotomy approach was decided. Intraoperative findings: bilateral asymmetrical ovarian masses and bilateral cystectomy were performed. A pathohistological examination revealed a mature teratoma. Source: Archive of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinical Hospital Merkur.
Figure 4. An 11-year-old girl noticed that her stomach was growing along with pain, nausea, and a palpable mass. Ultrasound and MRI revealed bilateral ovarian tumor inhomogeneous solid cystic masses similar to dermoid, left 13 cm, right 5 cm in diameter. Tumor markers were not increased, and due to the size of the tumor, a laparotomy approach was decided. Intraoperative findings: bilateral asymmetrical ovarian masses and bilateral cystectomy were performed. A pathohistological examination revealed a mature teratoma. Source: Archive of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinical Hospital Merkur.
Healthcare 13 00775 g004
Figure 5. A 17-year-old female patient presented to a pediatric endocrinologist for primary amenorrhea. After diagnostic evaluation, the endocrinologist diagnosed a female phenotype and a male karyotype (46, XY). The MR scan of the abdomen showed a tumor in both gonads. The left gonad looked like a testis and the right one like an ovary. A diagnosis of a disorder of sexual development (DSD) was made. A bilateral laparoscopic adnexectomy was performed. The pathohistological examination revealed a bilateral gonadoblastoma with components of a dysgerminoma. No gonadal tissue was present in either of the removed specimens. TNM: T1bNXMX; Figo classification: 1b; (A) Intraoperative findings; (B) Macroscopic specimen after bilateral adnexectomy. Source: Archive of the Department of Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital of Split.
Figure 5. A 17-year-old female patient presented to a pediatric endocrinologist for primary amenorrhea. After diagnostic evaluation, the endocrinologist diagnosed a female phenotype and a male karyotype (46, XY). The MR scan of the abdomen showed a tumor in both gonads. The left gonad looked like a testis and the right one like an ovary. A diagnosis of a disorder of sexual development (DSD) was made. A bilateral laparoscopic adnexectomy was performed. The pathohistological examination revealed a bilateral gonadoblastoma with components of a dysgerminoma. No gonadal tissue was present in either of the removed specimens. TNM: T1bNXMX; Figo classification: 1b; (A) Intraoperative findings; (B) Macroscopic specimen after bilateral adnexectomy. Source: Archive of the Department of Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital of Split.
Healthcare 13 00775 g005
Figure 6. A 14-year-old girl presented with abdominal distension that had been present for several months. Apart from occasional constipation, she had no other symptoms. (A) MRI of the abdomen shows an intraperitoneal mass inseparable from the right ovary, compressing the pancreas and abdominal aorta; (B) Surgical exploration of the abdomen—mature cystic ovarian teratoma with foci of adenocarcinomas measuring 28 × 22 × 14 cm. Source: Archive of the Department of Pediatric Surgery, Children’s Hospital Zagreb.
Figure 6. A 14-year-old girl presented with abdominal distension that had been present for several months. Apart from occasional constipation, she had no other symptoms. (A) MRI of the abdomen shows an intraperitoneal mass inseparable from the right ovary, compressing the pancreas and abdominal aorta; (B) Surgical exploration of the abdomen—mature cystic ovarian teratoma with foci of adenocarcinomas measuring 28 × 22 × 14 cm. Source: Archive of the Department of Pediatric Surgery, Children’s Hospital Zagreb.
Healthcare 13 00775 g006
Figure 7. Flowchart for management of pediatric ovarian masses.
Figure 7. Flowchart for management of pediatric ovarian masses.
Healthcare 13 00775 g007
Figure 8. A 14-year-old girl presented with acute abdominal pain and vomiting. Abdominal ultrasonography revealed a left ovarian cystic-solid mass 11 × 8 cm with destruction and free fluid in the abdomen. Because of acute abdomen, exploratory laparotomy and left-side adnexectomy were performed. A ruptured torquated ovarian tumor was found. A pathohistological examination revealed a ruptured ovarian cystic mature teratoma. Source: Archive of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinical Hospital Merkur.
Figure 8. A 14-year-old girl presented with acute abdominal pain and vomiting. Abdominal ultrasonography revealed a left ovarian cystic-solid mass 11 × 8 cm with destruction and free fluid in the abdomen. Because of acute abdomen, exploratory laparotomy and left-side adnexectomy were performed. A ruptured torquated ovarian tumor was found. A pathohistological examination revealed a ruptured ovarian cystic mature teratoma. Source: Archive of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinical Hospital Merkur.
Healthcare 13 00775 g008
Figure 9. A 15-year-old girl presented with abdominal pain, fever and vomiting. The symptoms started five days prior to surgery. Abdominal ultrasonography revealed a huge cystic mass in the pelvis measuring 13 × 10 × 8 cm adjacent to the left ovary, which was edematous and without visible blood flow. (A) A laparoscopic examination revealed a huge paraovarian cyst and torsion of the left adnexa; (B) A laparoscopic salpingo-oophorectomy was performed due to the obvious gangrene of the left ovary and fallopian tube. A pathohistological examination revealed a necrotic paraovarian cyst and gangrene of the left ovary. Source: Archive of the Department of Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital of Split.
Figure 9. A 15-year-old girl presented with abdominal pain, fever and vomiting. The symptoms started five days prior to surgery. Abdominal ultrasonography revealed a huge cystic mass in the pelvis measuring 13 × 10 × 8 cm adjacent to the left ovary, which was edematous and without visible blood flow. (A) A laparoscopic examination revealed a huge paraovarian cyst and torsion of the left adnexa; (B) A laparoscopic salpingo-oophorectomy was performed due to the obvious gangrene of the left ovary and fallopian tube. A pathohistological examination revealed a necrotic paraovarian cyst and gangrene of the left ovary. Source: Archive of the Department of Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital of Split.
Healthcare 13 00775 g009
Table 1. Differential diagnosis of adnexal masses in pediatric patients.
Table 1. Differential diagnosis of adnexal masses in pediatric patients.
GynecologicNongynecologic
Functional cysts
Corpus luteum cysts
Tubal cysts
Paratubal cysts
Paraovarian cysts
Polycystic ovaries
Müllerian anomalies
Tubo-ovarian abscess
Pelvic inflammatory disease
Endometrioma
Hydrosalpinx
Pyosalpinx
Dilated (obstructed) vagina
Ectopic pregnancy
Ureterocele
Urachal cysts
Megaureter
Ureteral duplication
Cystic renal disease
Pelvic kidney
Wilms’ tumor
Hydronephrosis
Neuroblastoma
Lymphoma
Mesenteric or omental cysts
Meckel’s diverticulum
Volvulus
Intestinal duplication
Choledochal, splenic, or pancreatic cysts
Lymphangioma
Lymphadenopathy
Peritoneal inclusion cysts
Appendicitis
Appendiceal or pelvic abscess
Constipation
Ascites related to various conditions
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bašković, M.; Habek, D.; Zaninović, L.; Milas, I.; Pogorelić, Z. The Evaluation, Diagnosis, and Management of Ovarian Cysts, Masses, and Their Complications in Fetuses, Infants, Children, and Adolescents. Healthcare 2025, 13, 775. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13070775

AMA Style

Bašković M, Habek D, Zaninović L, Milas I, Pogorelić Z. The Evaluation, Diagnosis, and Management of Ovarian Cysts, Masses, and Their Complications in Fetuses, Infants, Children, and Adolescents. Healthcare. 2025; 13(7):775. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13070775

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bašković, Marko, Dubravko Habek, Luca Zaninović, Ivan Milas, and Zenon Pogorelić. 2025. "The Evaluation, Diagnosis, and Management of Ovarian Cysts, Masses, and Their Complications in Fetuses, Infants, Children, and Adolescents" Healthcare 13, no. 7: 775. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13070775

APA Style

Bašković, M., Habek, D., Zaninović, L., Milas, I., & Pogorelić, Z. (2025). The Evaluation, Diagnosis, and Management of Ovarian Cysts, Masses, and Their Complications in Fetuses, Infants, Children, and Adolescents. Healthcare, 13(7), 775. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13070775

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop