Next Article in Journal
Implementation and User Satisfaction Analysis of an Electronic Medication Reconciliation Tool (ConciliaMed) in Patients Undergoing Elective Colorectal Surgery
Previous Article in Journal
The Effects of Concurrent Training Versus Aerobic or Resistance Training Alone on Body Composition in Middle-Aged and Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Bayesian Analysis of Length of Stay Determinants in ERAS-Guided Hip Arthroplasty

1
School of Nursing, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
2
Department of Nursing, The Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730030, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Healthcare 2025, 13(7), 777; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13070777
Submission received: 26 February 2025 / Revised: 21 March 2025 / Accepted: 28 March 2025 / Published: 31 March 2025

Abstract

:
Background and Objectives: Total hip arthroplasty in China expanded rapidly post-2019. The length of hospital stay in these procedures reflects healthcare quality standards. This study analyzed the correlation between preoperative clinical factors and the length of hospital stay in total hip arthroplasty patients managed via an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol. Methods: Preoperative clinical variables were collected from total hip arthroplasty patients in an accelerated rehabilitation program. One-way ANOVA and other statistical methods analyzed correlations between these data and hospitalization time. Results: A total of 408 patients were included, with a mean length of stay of 12.01 ± 4.281 days. Right lower extremity strength (t = 2.794, p = 0.005), activities of daily living score (t = −3.481, p = 0.001), C-reactive protein (t = −2.514, p = 0.016), thrombin time (t = −2.393, p = 0.019), and prothrombin activity (t = 2.582, p = 0.013) can directly affect the length of stay in patients with total hip arthroplasty. Also, age (F = 1.958, p = 0.006) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (t = −2.519, p = 0.015) were found to affect the length of hospital stay indirectly. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that right lower extremity strength, activities of daily living score, C-reactive protein, thrombin time, and prothrombin activity significantly influence the length of hospital stay in enhanced recovery after surgery-managed total hip arthroplasty patients. Therefore, early interventions should be made to address the above factors.

1. Introduction

The escalating osteoarthritis burden in Asia is evidenced by arthroplasty prevalence trends, with China performing 950,000 total hip arthroplasties (THAs)/total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) in 2019 [1]—a 330% increase from 2011—contrasting Japan’s 146,000 annual cases [2,3]. Accelerated population aging (≥65 years) coupled with metabolic syndrome epidemics (in South and Southeast Asia, the prevalence of obesity is predicted to double between 2010 and 2030 [4]) is driving exponential growth in THA demand through the mid-century, particularly in Asia [5]. As the gold-standard intervention for terminal hip degeneration, THA achieves the primary therapeutic objectives of pain mitigation and functional recovery [6]. Existing evidence confirms the secondary rehabilitation benefits of THA. These benefits show measurable improvements in quality of life [7,8]. They also demonstrate systematic progress in daily activity capabilities [9,10].
The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) practice was first developed in the 1990s. It combines evidence-based, multidisciplinary methods to reduce surgical stress and speed recovery [11]. The ERAS Society has promoted the systematic use of perioperative care programs (“fast-track” or “accelerated recovery pathways”) for nearly 20 years. Clinical practice shows ERAS protocols significantly shorten the length of stay (LOS) [12]. Some patients even achieve same-day discharge (SDD) [13]. These approaches also reduce patients’ financial burdens [14].
Linear regression analysis (LRA) was historically the dominant method for studying LOS predictors [15]. It analyzes variable correlations, but cannot distinguish direct/indirect influences, limiting clinical utility. Bayesian networks (BNs) address this limitation. BNs have two components: directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) and conditional probability tables (CPTs). They model complex variable interactions and enable probabilistic reasoning under uncertainty [16,17,18]. BNs leverage preoperative data to infer LOS probability and flexibly, showing the influence of influencing factors on LOS. BN learning refers to obtaining a complete BN from the available information, and it is constructed by parameter learning and structure learning [19]. Structure learning, central to a BN, combines score-based and constraint-based methods, but faces challenges in network optimization. The hybrid max–min hill-climbing (MMHC) algorithm integrates these approaches to enhance accuracy [20].
Established predictors of post-arthroplasty LOS include patient-specific factors (age, BMI, and comorbidities) [21,22,23,24], pre-operative functional assessments (ASA scores and PROMs) [25], and institutional protocols (surgical technique and ERAS compliance) [26,27,28]. Preoperative biochemical markers show sporadic associations with outcomes. Examples include isolated indicators like C-reactive protein and albumin [29,30]. However, these markers remain systematically absent from LOS prediction models. This study directly investigated preoperative biochemical profiles to address this evidence gap.
This two-phase study first employed LRA to identify LOS determinants in THA patients. Subsequently, a BN framework was developed using the MMHC algorithm. This framework integrated constraint-based pruning and score-based optimization. It established directional relationships between variables to guide LOS management [31].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Design

This retrospective study analyzed THA patients managed via ERAS protocols at our institution (2018–2024). Patient records were systematically reviewed to identify LOS determinants.

2.2. Study Setting and Sampling

Data were collected retrospectively from the hospital information system (HIS) of the Second Hospital of Lanzhou University. Data were collected from 1 January 2018 to 1 January 2024. This study included 408 patients, including 204 female patients.

2.3. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

Participants in this study were recruited from patients who underwent THA with hip osteoarthritis. Inclusion criteria for this study were as follows: (1) adults over 18 years of age; (2) admitted to the hospital for osteoarthritis; (3) no communication disorders; (4) willingness to participate in this study; and (5) primary THA. Exclusion criteria included (1) previous history of psychiatric or cognitive dysfunction and (2) surgery other than THA during current hospitalization.

2.4. Data Source

Patient data were retrieved from institutional electronic health records via the HIS.

2.5. Data Collection and Data Analysis

Data in this study included hospitalization registration number, sex, age, time of surgery, LOS, left upper extremity strength, left lower extremity strength, right upper extremity strength, right lower extremity strength, activities of daily living score (ADL score), fall risk score, Branden score, C-reactive protein, urine specific gravity, prothrombin activity, international normalized ratio, thrombin time, D-dimer, white blood cell count, red blood cell count, hemoglobin count, platelet count, glucose, creatinine, carbamide, uric acid, blood potassium, total protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and interleukin-6. Preoperative laboratory parameters were collected via standard fasting venous blood and urine samples. This collection occurred within 24 h before surgery. Nurses measured muscle strength and ADL scores. These measurements occurred on the morning of the surgery, before the operation.
A priori power analysis (PASS 2021) suggested N = 241 was needed to detect f2 = 0.15 (ΔR2 = 0.15) with k = 7 predictors (α = 0.05, 80% power). Post-hoc analysis of collected data (N = 408) showed 97% power to detect ΔR2 = 0.055 from the predictors after accounting for covariates ( R cov 2 = 0.05), equivalent to f2 = 0.058. Statistical analyses employed SPSS 27.0 (univariate/multivariate) with categorical conversions of continuous variables (p < 0.05 significance threshold). BN modeling utilized R’s “bnlearn” package (Version 4.3.3), implementing the MMHC algorithm for DAG structure learning and maximum likelihood estimation for parameter optimization. Network visualization and CPT generation were executed in Netica (Version 6.9.0.0).

2.6. Ethical Approval

The Ethics Committee of the Second Hospital of Lanzhou University granted ethical approval for this retrospective study (Approval No. 2024A-682).

3. Results

3.1. Characteristics of Patients

A total of 408 patients who met the inclusion criteria and did not meet the exclusion criteria for primary THA were enrolled in this study, including 204 men and 204 women, each representing 50% of the total. D-dimer levels demonstrated the highest missing data rate (40.9%, n = 167/408). Demographic data (age, sex) maintained complete integrity. Among the ages < 41 years old, 41–60 years old, and > 60 years old, the proportions were 16.0%, 60.0%, and 24.0%, respectively. The proportions of ADL scores of 100, 61–99, 41–60, and < 41 were 22.06%, 66.42%, 6.13%, and 3.43%, respectively. The average length of hospitalization was 12.01 ± 4.281 days. Additional details can be found in Table S1 of the Supplementary Document.

3.2. Univariate Analysis of LOS for Primary THA Recipients

Age, right lower extremity muscle strength, ADL score, C-reactive protein, thrombin time, prothrombin activity, and ESR were all statistically significant (p < 0.05), as shown in Table 1. Additional details can be found in Table S1 of the Supplementary Document.

3.3. Multifactorial Analysis of LOS for Primary THA Recipients

The LOS for primary THA was the dependent variable. All general information served as independent variables in the regression analysis. Right lower extremity strength, ADL score, and ESR significantly influenced LOS in primary THA (Table 2). Supplementary Table S1 contains additional detailed data.

3.4. Building a BN

All statistically significant variables were converted into categorical variables. These variables were used as network nodes to build a BN model of factors affecting LOS in primary THA patients (Figure 1) and to calculate node probabilities.

3.5. BN Reasoning

The BN could infer unknown nodes from known nodes, allowing LOS to be predicted. As shown in Figure 2, the probability that a patient’s LOS was > 18 days when prothrombin activity was outside the reference range increased from 12.3% to 18.0%.

4. Discussion

We found that right lower extremity strength, ADL score, C-reactive protein, thrombin time, and prothrombin activity can directly influence LOS in patients with THA. Also, age and ESR were found to influence LOS indirectly. Our right lower extremity strength results agree with those of LeBrun et al., who noted that higher lower extremity mobility before surgery predicted a shorter LOS [32]. Also, the results of ADL scores agree with those of Vasta and Hewlett-Smith et al., who noted that the higher the ADL, the shorter the LOS [33,34]. In terms of C-reactive protein, our results are in agreement with those of Missmann et al. Higher C-reactive protein values are associated with a longer LOS [23]. In addition, we found that thrombin time slightly affected LOS, whereas prothrombin activity significantly prolonged LOS. Regarding indirect influences, both our study and that of Stone et al. state that age prolongs LOS [35]. Meanwhile, our research and Li et al. demonstrated that ESR influences LOS [36]; however, we further clarified the specific pathway through which ESR affects LOS, specifically via its indirect effect on the muscle strength of the right lower extremity.
In the present study, right lower extremity strength was an independent predictor of LOS, and the mechanism may involve multifactorial effects. An elevated ESR may limit hip mobility and reduce lower limb muscle strength by exacerbating synovial inflammation and pain [37,38]. Patients are already malnourished preoperatively, which directly reduces the rate of muscle protein synthesis [39], and hypercortisolism occurs during the surgical procedure, with a reduction in protein synthesis and an increase in protein catabolism, which ultimately results in a significant loss of skeletal muscle [40], resulting in lower limb muscle strength loss, which in turn prolongs the recovery time of postoperative mobility [41]. In addition, right lower extremity strength deficits directly affect ADL scores (e.g., walking, toileting, and other activities that depend on lower extremity muscle groups) [41], and thus low ADL scores comprehensively reflect the association between muscle strength deficits and LOS prolongation. Meanwhile, the effect of elevated C-reactive protein on LOS is dual: on the one hand, preoperative C-reactive protein > 5 mg/L suggests an elevated risk of infection [42,43]; on the other hand, chronic inflammation [44] and pain exacerbation [45] reflected by elevated C-reactive protein can act synergistically—the former through pro-inflammatory factor release exacerbating the postoperative inflammatory response [46], and the latter impeding functional recovery, which together prolong LOS [45].
The effect of these factors on LOS is consistent with previous studies, and the mechanism of the impact of these factors on LOS is explained by drawing on existing studies. However, no study has explicitly stated that prothrombin time and prothrombin activity affect LOS; on the contrary, this was confirmed in our study. Both thrombin time and prothrombin activity prolong LOS through complications, but they are fundamentally different. Precisely, the thrombin time mainly reflects the efficiency of converting fibrinogen to fibrin, and its prolongation indicates a decrease in fibrin production [47], in which case bleeding is a common complication. The complications represented by bleeding prolong LOS, but the impact of these complications on LOS is limited. Taking bleeding symptoms as an example, fibrin infusion can effectively reduce the amount of bleeding [48]. Decreased prothrombin activity is associated with systemic pathological conditions such as coagulation factor deficiency [49], hepatic insufficiency [47], jaundice [50], albuminemia [51], etc., and multidimensional treatment is usually required. This treatment is characterized by a long duration, which significantly prolongs LOS. Therefore, in our results, compared with the effect of thrombin time on LOS, prothrombin activity had a more significant impact on LOS.
The observed LOS (12.01 ± 4.28 days) exceeded contemporary benchmarks [23,24], likely reflecting institutional ERAS protocol limitations and cultural factors (such as the “Injured in the sinews or bones for one hundred days” concept) prolonging postoperative observation. Future work will optimize culturally adapted ERAS frameworks.
Study limitations included (1) a retrospective design with inherent selection bias [52]; (2) single-center data from Western China (2018–2024) limiting generalizability; and (3) that this study did not systematically assess the effect of preoperative albumin level on LOS. Although previous studies have suggested that the higher incidence of postoperative complications in patients due to lower albumin [29] may indirectly prolong LOS, the potential confounding effect of preoperative albumin needs to be further validated by subsequent prospective studies due to the scope of data collection in this study. Future prospective multicenter studies with expanded biochemical profiling are warranted.

5. Conclusions

The results of this retrospective study suggest that several factors (right lower extremity strength, ADL score, C-reactive protein, thrombin time, prothrombin activity, age, and ESR) directly or indirectly influence the LOS in patients undergoing primary THA according to the ERAS concept. These findings demonstrate clinical relevance for optimizing individualized care plans through preoperative risk stratification.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/healthcare13070777/s1. Table S1: Patient Characteristics.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.Y. and X.W. (Xiaoyan Wang); methodology, M.Y.; software, N.Y.; validation, N.Y., X.W. (Xiaoyan Wang), and M.Y.; formal analysis, X.W. (Xinglei Wang); investigation, N.Y.; resources, X.W. (Xiaoyan Wang); data curation, M.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, N.Y.; writing—review and editing, N.Y.; visualization, X.W. (Xiaoyan Wang); supervision, X.W. (Xinglei Wang); project administration, X.W. (Xinglei Wang); funding acquisition, X.W. (Xinglei Wang) and X.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This manuscript was supported by grants from Prof. Xinman Dou (The Fifth Batch of Provincial Science and Technology Plan of Gansu Province in 2024: 24JRRA925), Xiaoyan Wang (Cuiying Science and Technology Innovation Program of the Second Hospital of Lanzhou University: GSWSHL2022-23 and CY2021-HL-09), and Xinglei Wang (The Second Hospital of Lanzhou University “Cuiying Science and Technology Innovation” Project: CY2021-BJ-A02).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical approval for this retrospective study was granted by the Second Hospital of Lanzhou University (Approval No. 2024A-682, 12 April 2024).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author due to privacy or ethical restrictions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Bian, Y.; Cheng, K.; Chang, X.; Weng, X. Reports and Analysis of Amount of Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in China from 2011 to 2019. Chin. J. Orthop. 2020, 1453–1460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Tsuchiya, M.; Fukushima, K.; Ohashi, Y.; Mamorita, N.; Saito, H.; Uchida, K.; Uchiyama, K.; Takahira, N.; Takaso, M. Is the Increase in the Number of Total Hip Arthroplasties in Japan Due to an Aging Society? J. Orthop. Sci. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Katano, H.; Ozeki, N.; Kohno, Y.; Nakagawa, Y.; Koga, H.; Watanabe, T.; Jinno, T.; Sekiya, I. Trends in Arthroplasty in Japan by a Complete Survey, 2014–2017. J. Orthop. Sci. 2021, 26, 812–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Tham, K.W.; Abdul Ghani, R.; Cua, S.C.; Deerochanawong, C.; Fojas, M.; Hocking, S.; Lee, J.; Nam, T.Q.; Pathan, F.; Saboo, B.; et al. Obesity in South and Southeast Asia—A New Consensus on Care and Management. Obes. Rev. 2023, 24, e13520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Steinmetz, J.D.; Culbreth, G.T.; Haile, L.M.; Rafferty, Q.; Lo, J.; Fukutaki, K.G.; Cruz, J.A.; Smith, A.E.; Vollset, S.E.; Brooks, P.M.; et al. Global, Regional, and National Burden of Osteoarthritis, 1990–2020 and Projections to 2050: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet Rheumatol. 2023, 5, e508–e522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ferguson, R.J.; Palmer, A.J.; Taylor, A.; Porter, M.L.; Malchau, H.; Glyn-Jones, S. Hip Replacement. Lancet 2018, 392, 1662–1671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhou, S.; Bender, A.; Kutzner, I.; Dymke, J.; Maleitzke, T.; Perka, C.; Duda, G.N.; Winkler, T.; Damm, P. Loading of the Hip and Knee During Swimming: An in Vivo Load Study. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. 2023, 105, 1962–1971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Small, S.R.; Khalid, S.; Price, A.J.; Doherty, A. Device-Measured Physical Activity in 3506 Individuals with Knee or Hip Arthroplasty. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2024, 56, 805–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tanzer, M.; Pedneault, C.; Yakobov, E.; Hart, A.; Sullivan, M. Marital Relationship and Quality of Life in Couples Following Hip Replacement Surgery. Life 2021, 11, 401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Xiao, M.; Kristensen, S.R.; Marti, J.; Mossialos, E. The Impact of Patient Safety Incidents during Hip and Knee Replacements on Patients’ Health Related Quality of Life: A before and after Study Using Longitudinal Data Linked to Patient-Reported Outcome Measures. Int. J. Surg. 2023, 109, 1085–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, Q.; Chen, Y.; Li, Y.; Liu, R.; Rai, S.; Li, J.; Hong, P. Enhanced Recovery after Surgery in Patients after Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Postgrad. Med. J. 2024, 100, 159–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Taylor, A.J.; Kay, R.D.; Bryman, J.A.; Tye, E.Y.; Longjohn, D.B.; Najibi, S.; Runner, R.P. Outcomes of an Institutional Rapid Recovery Protocol for Total Joint Arthroplasty at a Safety Net Hospital. J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg. Glob. Res. Rev. 2022, 6, e21.00173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mateshaytis, J.; Trudeau, P.; Bisch, S.; Pin, S.; Chong, M.; Nelson, G. Improving the Rate of Same-Day Discharge in Gynecologic Oncology Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Surgery-An Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Quality Improvement Initiative. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2024, 31, 309–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Vanni, F.; Foglia, E.; Pennestrì, F.; Ferrario, L.; Banfi, G. Introducing Enhanced Recovery after Surgery in a High-Volume Orthopaedic Hospital: A Health Technology Assessment. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2020, 20, 773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Crossley, N.; Sweeney, B. Patient and Service-Level Factors Affecting Length of Inpatient Stay in an Acute Mental Health Service: A Retrospective Case Cohort Study. BMC Psychiatry 2020, 20, 438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Digitale, J.C.; Martin, J.N.; Glymour, M.M. Tutorial on Directed Acyclic Graphs. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2022, 142, 264–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sener, E.; Demir, I. Gaussian Bayesian Network Model of Healthcare, Food and Energy Sectors in the Pandemic: Türkiye Case. Heliyon 2024, 10, e23798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Pearl, J. Fusion, Propagation, and Structuring in Belief Networks. In Probabilistic and Causal Inference: The Works of Judea Pearl; Association for Computing Machinery: New York, NY, USA, 2022; Volume 36, pp. 139–188. ISBN 978-1-4503-9586-1. [Google Scholar]
  19. Campos, J.P.A.F.; Machado, I.G.; Bessani, M. Multi-Agent Genetic Algorithm for Bayesian Networks Structural Learning. Knowl. Based Syst. 2025, 310, 113025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Song, W.; Gong, H.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, L.; Qiu, L.; Hu, X.; Han, H.; Li, Y.; Li, R.; Li, Y. Using Bayesian Networks with Max-Min Hill-Climbing Algorithm to Detect Factors Related to Multimorbidity. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2022, 9, 984883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Martinkovich, S.C.; Trott, G.L.; Garay, M.; Sewecke, J.J.; Sauber, T.J.; Sotereanos, N.G. Patient Characteristics and Surgical Start Time Affect Length of Stay Following Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty. J. Arthroplast. 2020, 35, 2114–2118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Girbino, K.L.; Klika, A.K.; Barsoum, W.K.; Bloomfield, M.R.; Briskin, I.N.; Brooks, P.J.; Higuera, C.A.; Kamath, A.F.; Krebs, V.E.; McLaughlin, J.P.; et al. Understanding the Main Predictors of Length of Stay After Total Hip Arthroplasty: Patient-Related or Procedure-Related Risk Factors? J. Arthroplast. 2021, 36, 1663–1670.e4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Missmann, M.; Grenier, J.-P.; Raas, C. Modifiable Factors Influencing Length of Stay after Total Knee Arthroplasty. Eur. J. Orthop. Surg. Traumatol. 2023, 33, 1565–1572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tornese, D.; Robustelli, A.; Ricci, G.; Rancoita, P.M.V.; Maffulli, N.; Peretti, G.M. Predictors of Postoperative Hospital Length of Stay after Total Knee Arthroplasty. Singap. Med. J. 2024, 65, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Golinelli, D.; Grassi, A.; Tedesco, D.; Sanmarchi, F.; Rosa, S.; Rucci, P.; Amabile, M.; Cosentino, M.; Bordini, B.; Fantini, M.P.; et al. Patient Reported Outcomes Measures (PROMs) Trajectories after Elective Hip Arthroplasty: A Latent Class and Growth Mixture Analysis. J. Patient Rep. Outcomes 2022, 6, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Ripollés-Melchor, J.; Abad-Motos, A.; Díez-Remesal, Y.; Aseguinolaza-Pagola, M.; Padin-Barreiro, L.; Sánchez-Martín, R.; Logroño-Egea, M.; Catalá-Bauset, J.C.; García-Orallo, S.; Bisbe, E.; et al. Association Between Use of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol and Postoperative Complications in Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in the Postoperative Outcomes Within Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol in Elective Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Study (POWER2). JAMA Surg. 2020, 155, e196024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Kelly, M.E.; Turcotte, J.J.; Aja, J.M.; MacDonald, J.H.; King, P.J. General vs Neuraxial Anesthesia in Direct Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty: Effect on Length of Stay and Early Pain Control. J. Arthroplast. 2021, 36, 1013–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tirumala, V.; Bounajem, G.; Klemt, C.; Maier, S.P.; Padmanabha, A.; Kwon, Y.-M. Outcome of Spinal Versus General Anesthesia in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Analysis. JAAOS J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg. 2021, 29, e656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kishawi, D.; Schwarzman, G.; Mejia, A.; Hussain, A.K.; Gonzalez, M.H. Low Preoperative Albumin Levels Predict Adverse Outcomes After Total Joint Arthroplasty. JBJS 2020, 102, 889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yiğit, Ş.; Akar, M.S.; Şahin, M.A.; Arslan, H. Periprosthetic Infection Risks and Predictive Value of C-Reactive Protein/Albumin Ratio for Total Joint Arthroplasty. Acta Biomed. 2021, 92, e2021324a. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Fu, W.; Kan, Q.; Li, B.; Zhang, X. Prognosis Model of Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Based on Max-Min Hill-Climbing Algorithm. Comput. Math. Methods Med. 2022, 2022, 9173913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. LeBrun, D.G.; Nguyen, J.T.; Fisher, C.; Tuohy, S.; Lyman, S.; Gonzalez Della Valle, A.; Ast, M.P.; Carli, A.V. The Risk Assessment and Prediction Tool (RAPT) Score Predicts Discharge Destination, Length of Stay, and Postoperative Mobility After Total Joint Arthroplasty. J. Arthroplast. 2023, 38, S121–S129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Vasta, S.; Papalia, R.; Torre, G.; Vorini, F.; Papalia, G.; Zampogna, B.; Fossati, C.; Bravi, M.; Campi, S.; Denaro, V. The Influence of Preoperative Physical Activity on Postoperative Outcomes of Knee and Hip Arthroplasty Surgery in the Elderly: A Systematic Review. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Hewlett-Smith, N.; Pope, R.; Furness, J.; Simas, V.; Hing, W. Prognostic Factors for Inpatient Functional Recovery Following Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review. Acta Orthop. 2020, 91, 313–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Stone, K.; Zwiggelaar, R.; Jones, P.; Parthaláin, N.M. A Systematic Review of the Prediction of Hospital Length of Stay: Towards a Unified Framework. PLoS Digit. Health 2022, 1, e0000017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Li, G.; Weng, J.; Xu, C.; Wang, D.; Xiong, A.; Zeng, H. Factors Associated with the Length of Stay in Total Knee Arthroplasty Patients with the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Model. J. Orthop. Surg. Res. 2019, 14, 343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Sanchez-Ramirez, D.C.; van der Leeden, M.; van der Esch, M.; Gerritsen, M.; Roorda, L.D.; Verschueren, S.; van Dieën, J.; Dekker, J.; Lems, W.F. Association of Serum C-Reactive Protein and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate with Muscle Strength in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis. Rheumatology 2013, 52, 727–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Mathiessen, A.; Conaghan, P.G. Synovitis in Osteoarthritis: Current Understanding with Therapeutic Implications. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2017, 19, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Cannataro, R.; Carbone, L.; Petro, J.L.; Cione, E.; Vargas, S.; Angulo, H.; Forero, D.A.; Odriozola-Martínez, A.; Kreider, R.B.; Bonilla, D.A. Sarcopenia: Etiology, Nutritional Approaches, and miRNAs. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 9724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hirsch, K.R.; Wolfe, R.R.; Ferrando, A.A. Pre- and Post-Surgical Nutrition for Preservation of Muscle Mass, Strength, and Functionality Following Orthopedic Surgery. Nutrients 2021, 13, 1675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Holstege, M.S.; Lindeboom, R.; Lucas, C. Preoperative Quadriceps Strength as a Predictor for Short-Term Functional Outcome After Total Hip Replacement. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2011, 92, 236–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Pfitzner, T.; Krocker, D.; Perka, C.; Matziolis, G. Das C-Reaktive Protein. Orthopäde 2008, 37, 1116–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Shetty, S.; Ethiraj, P.; Shanthappa, A.H. C-Reactive Protein Is a Diagnostic Tool for Postoperative Infection in Orthopaedics. Cureus 2022, 14, e22270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Liang, Y.; Xu, K.; Liu, W.; Liu, X.; Yuan, P.; Xu, P.; Li, H. Monomeric C-reactive Protein Level Is Associated with Osteoarthritis. Exp. Ther. Med. 2022, 23, 277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Si, H.; Yang, T.; Zeng, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Pei, F.; Lu, Y.; Cheng, J.; Shen, B. Correlations between Inflammatory Cytokines, Muscle Damage Markers and Acute Postoperative Pain Following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2017, 18, 265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Heim, C.E.; Yamada, K.J.; Fallet, R.; Odvody, J.; Schwarz, D.M.; Lyden, E.R.; Anderson, M.J.; Alter, R.; Vidlak, D.; Hartman, C.W.; et al. Orthopaedic Surgery Elicits a Systemic Anti-Inflammatory Signature. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 2123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Lv, Y.; Liu, N.; Li, Y.; Wu, J.; Zheng, J.; Li, X.; Zeng, M. Coagulation Dysfunction in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis and Splenomegaly and Its Countermeasures: A Retrospective Study of 1522 Patients. Dis. Markers 2023, 2023, 5560560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Wikkelsø, A.J.; Edwards, H.M.; Afshari, A.; Stensballe, J.; Langhoff-Roos, J.; Albrechtsen, C.; Ekelund, K.; Hanke, G.; Secher, E.L.; Sharif, H.F.; et al. Pre-Emptive Treatment with Fibrinogen Concentrate for Postpartum Haemorrhage: Randomized Controlled Trial†. BJA Br. J. Anaesth. 2015, 114, 623–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Basili, S.; Raparelli, V.; Violi, F. The Coagulopathy of Chronic Liver Disease: Is There a Causal Relationship with Bleeding? Yes. Eur. J. Intern. Med. 2010, 21, 62–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Çakır, T.; Cingi, A.; Yeğen, C. Coagulation Dynamics and Platelet Functions in Obstructive Jaundiced Patients. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2009, 24, 748–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Cangemi, R.; Raparelli, V.; Talerico, G.; Basili, S.; Violi, F.; Giuseppe, P.; Felicia, D.; Ostilio, P.V.; Daniela, S.; Dario, D.M.; et al. Hypoalbuminemia and Risk of Portal Vein Thrombosis in Cirrhosis. Gastro Hep Adv. 2024, 3, 646–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zealley, I. Retrospective Studies—Utility and Caveats. J. R. Coll. Physicians Edinb. 2021, 51, 106–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. MMHC algorithm to construct a BN of factors influencing LOS for THA patients.
Figure 1. MMHC algorithm to construct a BN of factors influencing LOS for THA patients.
Healthcare 13 00777 g001
Figure 2. BN’s reasoning for LOS in THA patients.
Figure 2. BN’s reasoning for LOS in THA patients.
Healthcare 13 00777 g002
Table 1. Detailed description of statistical values and univariate analysis.
Table 1. Detailed description of statistical values and univariate analysis.
FactorsScale (%)Statisticp
AgeLess than 41 Years65 (16.00)1.958 a0.006 *
41–60 Years245 (60.00)
Older than 60 Years98 (24.00)
Right Lower Extremity StrengthOutside the Reference Range109 (26.72)2.234 b0.029 *
Reference Range296 (72.54)
Missing3 (0.74)
ADL score10090 (22.06)3.538 a0.03 *
61–99271 (66.42)
41–6025 (6.13)
Less than 4114 (3.43)
Missing8 (1.96)
C-reactive ProteinReference Range330 (80.88)−2.514 b0.016 *
Outside the Reference Range61 (14.95)
Missing17 (4.17)
Thrombin TimeReference Range124 (30.39)−2.393 b0.019 *
Outside the Reference Range278 (68.14)
Missing6 (1.47)
Prothrombin ActivityReference Range364 (89.22)2.582 b0.013 *
Outside the Reference Range38 (9.31)
Missing6 (1.47)
ESRReference Range304 (74.51)−2.519 b0.015 *
Outside the Reference Range94 (23.04)
Missing10 (2.45)
Note: a (F); b (t); * statistically significant.
Table 2. Multiple LRA of factors influencing LOS in primary THA patients (n = 408).
Table 2. Multiple LRA of factors influencing LOS in primary THA patients (n = 408).
ItemBias Regression CoefficientStandard ErrorStandard Regression Coefficienttp
Constant32.23220.832 1.5470.123
Right Lower Extremity Strength1.2030.4310.1342.7940.005
ADL score−0.0460.013−0.182−3.4810.001
ESR0.0400.0160.1492.5890.010
Note: R2 = 0.191, adjusted R2 = 0.131, F = 3.199, p < 0.05.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yao, N.; Wang, X.; Yang, M.; Wang, X.; Dou, X. Bayesian Analysis of Length of Stay Determinants in ERAS-Guided Hip Arthroplasty. Healthcare 2025, 13, 777. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13070777

AMA Style

Yao N, Wang X, Yang M, Wang X, Dou X. Bayesian Analysis of Length of Stay Determinants in ERAS-Guided Hip Arthroplasty. Healthcare. 2025; 13(7):777. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13070777

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yao, Nan, Xiaoyan Wang, Meng Yang, Xinglei Wang, and Xinman Dou. 2025. "Bayesian Analysis of Length of Stay Determinants in ERAS-Guided Hip Arthroplasty" Healthcare 13, no. 7: 777. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13070777

APA Style

Yao, N., Wang, X., Yang, M., Wang, X., & Dou, X. (2025). Bayesian Analysis of Length of Stay Determinants in ERAS-Guided Hip Arthroplasty. Healthcare, 13(7), 777. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13070777

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop