Next Article in Journal
Effectiveness and Adherence of Pharmacological vs. Non-Pharmacological Technology-Supported Smoking Cessation Interventions: An Umbrella Review
Previous Article in Journal
Artificial Intelligence as a Tool for Self-Care in Patients with Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes—An Integrative Literature Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Maternal Mortality Due to Abortion in Brazil: A Temporal, Regional, and Sociodemographic Analysis over the Last Three Decades

by
Pedro Omar Batista Pereira
*,
Mateus Pinheiro de Souza
,
Laura Beatriz Argôlo Moreira
,
Eumar Soares Silva Filho
,
Edjan da Silva Santos
,
Amanda Vitória Rodrigues dos Santos
,
Ana Clara Ferreira Asbeque
,
Mauro José de Deus Morais
,
Júlio Eduardo Gomes Pereira
and
Francisco Naildo Cardoso Leitão
Multidisciplinary Laboratory of Studies and Scientific Writing in Health Sciences (LAMEECCS), Federal University of Acre (UFAC), Rio Branco 69920-900, Acre, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Healthcare 2025, 13(8), 951; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13080951
Submission received: 18 December 2024 / Revised: 21 January 2025 / Accepted: 27 January 2025 / Published: 21 April 2025

Abstract

:
Background/Objectives: Maternal mortality due to abortion in Brazil has shown a significant decline of 47.37% between 1996 and 2022. This study aims to analyze temporal trends in maternal mortality due to abortion across regions and sociodemographic groups, highlighting disparities and their implications for public health. Methods: Trends were assessed using Prais–Winsten regression models to estimate the annual percentage change (APC). Data were stratified by region and sociodemographic characteristics to identify vulnerable groups. Results: The findings reveal notable regional disparities, with some regions experiencing more pronounced declines than others. Vulnerable sociodemographic groups, including women with lower levels of education and younger age groups, exhibited persistently higher mortality rates. Conclusions: Despite a significant overall reduction in maternal mortality due to abortion, disparities remain among regions and sociodemographic groups. These findings underscore the need for targeted public health policies aimed at reducing inequalities and addressing the needs of the most affected populations.

1. Introduction

In Brazil, maternal mortality due to abortion remains a critical public health issue, disproportionately affecting women of childbearing age, particularly those from marginalized groups. This study provides a comprehensive analysis of temporal trends over 27 years, aiming to inform more equitable health policies.
Every two days, a pregnant woman and her baby die due to complications related to abortion in Brazil, which is one of the leading causes of maternal mortality among women of reproductive age (10 to 49 years). Under-reporting, incomplete data, and the illegality of abortion hinder the implementation of effective health policies, making epidemiological studies essential to better understand this issue and guide public health intervention strategies in Brazil.
Globally, maternal mortality remains high, with an estimated 287,000 deaths in 2020, most of which were preventable, especially in low-income countries. Complications from unsafe abortions account for a significant proportion of these deaths, particularly in poorer regions [1]. The situation in Latin America and the Caribbean is also alarming: maternal mortality increased by 15% between 2016 and 2020, reflecting inequality in access to quality health services [2,3].
This global reality is also reflected in Brazil, where regional inequalities and limited access to reproductive healthcare exacerbate the problem. Although previous studies have shown a reduction in maternal mortality rates associated with abortion during different periods [4], this decline is not uniform across all regions of the country [5]. However, the existing literature is limited by short analysis periods, making it difficult to comprehensively evaluate trends over several decades.
In Brazil, young, Black, single women with low educational attainment are the most vulnerable to unsafe abortion, partly due to inadequate access to effective contraceptive methods, lack of sexual education, and social prejudice [4]. The absence of public policies targeting reproductive health exacerbates these conditions, contributing to an increase in unwanted pregnancies and unsafe abortions [6].
The analysis of an unprecedented 27-year time series (1996–2022) provides a comprehensive view of maternal mortality due to abortion in Brazil, considering regional variations and sociodemographic characteristics, and significantly contributes to the international literature on maternal health [7]. In this context, the following research question arises: Have the temporal, regional, and sociodemographic trends of maternal mortality due to abortion in Brazil changed over the last three decades? Additionally, the importance of monitoring severe maternal morbidity and the near miss concept is highlighted, functioning as essential complements for a more accurate analysis of maternal mortality, providing robust data that can inform more effective public policies [8].
Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the temporal and regional trends of maternal mortality due to abortion in Brazil and identify the sociodemographic characteristics of the affected women, contributing to the formulation of more effective and equitable public health policies.

2. Materials and Methods

This study is an ecological time-series analysis that examines maternal mortality due to abortion in Brazil. The country has a population of 203,080,756 inhabitants, distributed across 5568 municipalities, according to the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics [9]. Currently, Brazil is divided into five major regions: North, Northeast, Southeast, South, and Central-West. Deaths of women of childbearing age (10–49 years) recorded in the Mortality Information System of the Unified Health System (SIM/SUS) were analyzed, covering all five regions of Brazil, from 1996 to 2022.
The inclusion criteria involved women within this age range whose deaths were classified as abortion-related, according to the Tenth Revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10). Specific causes included spontaneous abortion (O03), abortion for medical reasons (O04), and other pregnancies ending in abortion (O00–O02, O05–O08). Deaths outside this age range or period, or whose cause was not categorized as abortion, were excluded from the analysis. Complete data for the variables of interest (region, marital status, race/ethnicity, and education) were required for inclusion in the analysis.
The variables analyzed included region (North, Northeast, Southeast, South, and Central-West), marital status (single, married, widowed, and legally separated), race/ethnicity (White, Black, Yellow, Brown, and Indigenous), and education (none, 1 to 3 years, 4 to 7 years, 8 to 11 years, and 12 years or more). The data used in this study were public, extracted from the Mortality Information System (SIM), and made available through the Department of Informatics of the Unified Health System (DATASUS) [10]. Population data were analyzed based on two main databases: one for the years 1996 to 2012, which included census and population count data, and another for the years 2013 to 2022, based on population projections.
To calculate maternal mortality rates related to abortion by marital status and race/ethnicity, population data from 2010 were used, while education data from 2000 were applied. These years were chosen because they are the only available sources on the website of the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE) for the respective variables. Although there may be limitations regarding the currency of these data, they were the most complete and reliable for the analysis conducted. For these categories, corrections were made based on tables provided by the IBGE [11]. The projection and rear projection of populations of women aged 10 to 49 were adjusted using an annual growth rate of 0.52%, according to the 2022 census.
Maternal mortality rates due to abortion were calculated using the formula (Number of deaths × 1,000,000)/Population. Data analysis was performed using R software (version 4.4.1), applying the Prais–Winsten generalized linear regression model with robust variance and Durbin–Watson statistics to detect serial autocorrelation. This model, widely used in time-series studies, is particularly suitable for analyzing trends in aggregated data over time, adjusting for autocorrelation in residuals and providing accurate estimates of linear trends [12]. The analyses were conducted using the following R packages: dplyr, ggplot2, openxlsx, prais, readxl, scales, and tidyr. Mean rates, the coefficient of determination (R2), and the mean annual variation, represented by the coefficient β, were analyzed. p-values below 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
The annual percent change (APC) in maternal mortality over the period was calculated using the β coefficient from the Prais–Winsten regression [12]. To determine the total accumulated variation, the Growth Factor (GF) was used. The 95% confidence interval was calculated based on the standard errors of the estimated coefficients, providing a robust and precise analysis of the trends observed over the 27-year study period.
In this study, we used the general abortion-related mortality rate in relation to the number of women of reproductive age (10 to 49 years) as the main measure, instead of the Maternal Mortality Ratio (MMR). The MMR, commonly used in maternal mortality studies, measures the number of maternal deaths per 100,000 live births and is more appropriate for analyses focused on the safety of pregnancy and childbirth. However, our aim is to assess the direct impact of abortion on the mortality of women of reproductive age, and the general abortion-related mortality rate provides a more direct and relevant measure for this purpose.
To ensure the accuracy and reliability of the data, the database was validated by two independent reviewers, who conducted a thorough check for consistency and completeness.

3. Results

During the 27-year period, 3648 maternal deaths due to abortion were reported. The overall mortality rate was 576.50 per million women of reproductive age, contributing significantly to the total of 6,327,888 deaths. On average, 135.11 deaths occurred annually (SD = 16.10), with the highest number of cases in 2009 (169) and the lowest in 2019 (108). The average rate per million was 2.25 (SD = 0.37), with the highest recorded in 1997 (3.12) and the lowest in 2019 (1.68).
The temporal analysis (Figure 1) revealed a significant reduction in maternal mortality rates due to abortion (MMA) in Brazil, with an annual percentage change (APC) of −2.44%, indicating a consistent downward trend (β = −0.011; p < 0.001; R2 = 0.570). The dotted line in the graph represents the predicted values, which are estimates generated by the regression model based on the observed data, projecting the expected trend or behavior over time.
In the regional analysis, a downward trend was observed in all regions of the country. The North region, which had the highest average mortality rates (3.63 deaths per million women/year; 95%CI: 3.29; 3.97), also showed the highest proportions throughout the period, ranging from 21% to 45%, with a sharp increase after 2013. In contrast, the South region registered the largest reduction in APV (−6.82%), going from the highest rate in 1996 to the lowest in 2022 (β = −0.031; p < 0.001; R2 = 0.537), with a significant decrease in proportions from 24% to 5%. The Northeast and Southeast regions showed more stable variations, while the Central-West region experienced more pronounced fluctuations, particularly between 2012 and 2014 (Figure 2).
Table 1 summarizes all observed APCs, highlighting p-values and trends. p-values indicate the statistical significance of the percentage variations; if below 0.05, they are considered significant, suggesting that the likelihood of the results being due to chance is less than 5%. Trends are classified as follows: increasing (APC greater than 1), decreasing (APC less than −1), and stationary (APC between −1 and 1).
These results highlight the importance of targeted public policies that address regional and sociodemographic inequalities. While some regions and groups have made progress, others, such as Indigenous women and those with 8–11 years of education, face concerning trends. Stagnation in the North and disparities across age groups and racial categories indicate structural barriers. Specific strategies for vulnerable populations, such as education and expanded access to contraceptives, are essential to reducing these disparities.
In the age analysis, the 20–29 years age group recorded the highest maternal mortality rate, with 3.72 cases per million women per year (CI95%: 2.32; 5.12). This group also showed the most significant reduction in rates, with an APC of −3.80% (CI95%: −5.05; −2.53) and a p-value <0.0001. Additionally, other age groups, such as 10–14 and 15–19 years, showed decreasing variations but without statistical significance. For the 15–19 years age group, a significant reduction in maternal mortality rates was observed (β = −0.009; p < 0.05; R2 = 0.156), although this decrease was less pronounced compared to the 20–29 years age group.
Between 1996 and 2022, the age group of 20 to 29 years had the highest proportion of abortion-related deaths, ranging from 28% to 37%, while the extreme age groups (10–14 and 40–49 years) showed significantly lower proportions (Figure 3).
Regarding marital status, the data reveal that the highest maternal mortality rates occurred in the single category, with an average of 2.18 per million women per year (CI95%: 1.36; 3.01). In contrast, the analysis showed that widowed and married individuals experienced significant reductions in rates, with an APC of −2.78% (p < 0.01) and −2.10% (p < 0.05), respectively. Meanwhile, singles and separated individuals demonstrated stationary trends, indicating that despite the high rates, there was no significant change in mortality rates in this population over the period.
From 1996 to 2022, the highest number of abortion-related deaths was observed among singles and separated individuals, with notable peaks in 2010 (54%) and in 2016 (48%), respectively, while widowed individuals consistently showed the lowest proportions, ranging from 0% to 16% (Figure 4).
For race/color, White women recorded a reduction of −2.49% (p < 0.001), while Black women showed an increasing trend of 1.97%, without statistical significance (p > 0.05). Yellow women experienced a significant reduction of −8.95% (β = −0.041; p < 0.05; R2 = 0.073), marking the largest percentage drop in the studied period. In contrast, indigenous women saw an increase of 13.92% (p < 0.01) and had the highest average rate, with 4.21 per million/year (CI95%: 2.62; 5.80). Black women also had a significant average rate of 2.47 per million/year (CI95%: 1.54; 3.40).
During the period, Black women had the highest proportion of deaths, reaching 40% in 2010, after recording 0% in 1996. In contrast, Yellow women had the lowest proportion, with a single increase to 11% in 2015 and 2022 (Figure 5).
Finally, in the analysis of education, the “none” category showed a significant reduction of −13.51% (β = −0.063; p < 0.01; R2 = 0.417). In contrast, the “8 to 11 years” group experienced a significant increase of 8.61% (p < 0.001), and this group also had the highest average rate of cases (M = 1.27 per million women/year; CI95%: 0.79; 1.76). Furthermore, in the last year analyzed (2022), the deaths recorded in this category accounted for 50.96% of the total cases (Figure 6).

4. Discussion

The temporal analysis showed an annual percentage change (APC) of −2.44%, resulting in a cumulative decrease of approximately 47.37% in maternal mortality rates due to abortion (MMA), possibly linked to greater access to prenatal care and reproductive health policies [13]. This reduction, like the 49% decrease in maternal mortality in Brazil between 1990 and 2019 [7], is still not enough, as abortion accounts for 12.5% of maternal deaths, making it the third leading cause [14]. Furthermore, regional variations and socioeconomic inequalities continue to prevent the country from achieving the 75% reduction target proposed by the Millennium Development Goals [15].
These inequalities are more pronounced in low-income regions, where the health infrastructure is poor and access to reproductive services is limited, resulting in higher maternal mortality rates [16]. Unequal public policies and cultural barriers, such as prejudices related to contraception and abortion, hinder access to essential care [17]. Understanding these dynamics is crucial to proposing interventions that promote equity in maternal health access, especially in the most vulnerable regions [15].
Regionally, the trend of reduction in maternal mortality is consistent with previous studies [4,5]. However, the Central-West region showed an increase between 2006 and 2015, suggesting that shorter periods may not reflect long-term trends. The North, in turn, recorded the highest average mortality rates, while the South experienced the greatest reduction in the annual percent change (APC) of −6.82% [4]. This highlights the persistence of regional inequalities and the need for targeted public policies [14,15].
Previous studies corroborate the regional and sociodemographic trends observed in this work. It is reported that inequalities persist, particularly in the North and Northeast regions, reflecting the limited impact of public policies in these areas [4]. Conversely, it is noted that the Southeast and South regions achieved more significant reductions, attributed to improvements in access to reproductive health services and healthcare infrastructure [5]. International research, such as studies conducted in Sub-Saharan Africa, also indicates that regional inequalities and limited access to reproductive services are key determinants of maternal mortality in low- and middle-income countries, aligning with the patterns observed in Brazil [2].
Discrepancies have been identified regarding maternal mortality rates among Indigenous women. These populations are observed to face significantly higher rates compared to other groups, highlighting the need for intercultural health policies [18,19]. Additionally, the illegality of abortion is discussed as a factor that exacerbates under-reporting and compromises the accuracy of maternal mortality data [20], a problem also emphasized in another study that highlighted the limitations of information systems [21].
These findings reinforce the importance of monitoring and evaluating reproductive health policies. Universal access to contraceptive methods and prenatal care is essential to reduce inequalities [22,23]. Thus, the results of this study expand on this evidence, proposing regional interventions targeted at the most vulnerable groups.
In sociodemographic terms, women aged 20 to 29 years had the highest MMA, despite the significant decline in this group (−3.18%) [24]. Complications during pregnancy, childbirth, and the postpartum period reinforce the importance of adequate prenatal care [21]. Regional variations, such as the prevalence of deaths among women over 40 years old in Rio Grande do Sul, indicate the need for specific regional strategies [25].
The largest reduction was among widows (−2.28%). On the other hand, single women had the highest MMA, aligning with the 60.2% of deaths among women without a partner in Recife [26]. Studies in Minas Gerais and São Paulo associate this risk with ineffective contraceptive use [24,27].
The highest rates were among Indigenous and Black women (4.21 and 2.47 per million/year, respectively). There was an increase in hospitalizations of Black, Brown, and Yellow women between 2008 and 2018, reflecting barriers to accessing healthcare [28,29].
The high rate among indigenous women, in line with the MMR in Pará (135.8 per 100,000) [19], and the MMR of 115.14 per 100,000 between 2015 and 2021 [18], reflects reproductive vulnerability. The unacceptably high maternal mortality in this population highlights the need for an intercultural approach to maternal health [30].
The largest percentage reduction occurred among women with no education (−13.51%), suggesting positive effects of educational policies. However, the highest rate was in the “8 to 11 years of education” category (M = 1.27 per million/year), which contrasts with studies that associate lower education with higher risks of unsafe abortion, especially in the North, Northeast, and Central-West regions [4,17]. Investing in quality education, particularly in sexual and reproductive health, can help mitigate these risks [22].
The illegality of abortion in Brazil exacerbates under-reporting and hinders effective policies [20]. Criminalization drives vulnerable women to unsafe procedures [6]. Essential measures such as access to obstetric care, prenatal care, reproductive education [23], and continuous family planning can reduce unwanted pregnancies, illegal abortions, and maternal mortality [4].
Although the Mortality Information System (SIM) provides good coverage, the North and Northeast regions still face issues with under-reporting, affecting data accuracy [21]. The COVID-19 pandemic worsened this under-reporting, especially in areas with greater inequality [31]. During the pandemic, the risk of death for pregnant and postpartum women increased by 2.6 times, particularly with the Gamma variant in 2021, highlighting the need for targeted health policies [32].
Under-reporting is a critical limitation of this study, as the quality and availability of data vary across regions of Brazil. In poorer regions, such as the North and Northeast, the under-reporting of abortion cases compromises the accuracy of estimates, underestimating maternal mortality rates [21]. Additionally, the lack of detailed information on the gestational weeks at the time of abortion prevents a deeper analysis of factors associated with maternal mortality at different stages of pregnancy. The database used, although comprehensive, also does not differentiate specific types of abortion, such as chemical, habitual, or induced, which limits the assessment of how these categories might influence mortality outcomes. Lastly, the absence of individual medical histories for patients restricts the analysis of pre-existing factors and clinical conditions that could be associated with maternal mortality.
Despite these limitations, the results of this study provide a comprehensive view of the temporal, regional, and sociodemographic trends in maternal mortality due to abortion in Brazil. Future studies should focus on regional analyses, especially in the North and Northeast, to identify local barriers and solutions that could reduce maternal mortality due to abortion. It is essential to evaluate the impact of public policies, such as access to contraceptives, sexual education, and prenatal care, while also considering socioeconomic and cultural factors, including race/ethnicity and education level. Research should also investigate the effects of health crises, such as COVID-19, on access to obstetric care. Finally, adopting more robust methods, such as sample surveys and independent audits, is crucial to improving data quality and addressing underreporting.

5. Conclusions

There has been an overall reduction in maternal mortality due to abortion in Brazil over time, encompassing all regions and most sociodemographic characteristics. However, a detailed analysis of the data revealed that residing in the North region, being aged between 20 and 29 years, being single, being Indigenous, and having 8 to 11 years of education are factors associated with higher rates of maternal mortality due to abortion.

Author Contributions

P.O.B.P. and F.N.C.L.; methodology, P.O.B.P.; software, P.O.B.P.; validation, M.J.d.D.M. and J.E.G.P.; formal analysis, A.V.R.d.S.; investigation, E.S.S.F. and E.d.S.S.; resources, F.N.C.L.; data curation, P.O.B.P.; writing—original draft preparation, P.O.B.P. and M.P.d.S.; writing—review and editing, A.C.F.A., L.B.A.M. and M.J.d.D.M.; visualization, P.O.B.P.; supervision, F.N.C.L. and J.E.G.P.; project administration, F.N.C.L. and J.E.G.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the ethical guidelines of CNS Resolutions 466/2012 and 510/2016. As it utilized only secondary, public, and anonymized data, it did not require approval from a Research Ethics Committee.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable, as the study utilized secondary, public, and anonymized data.

Data Availability Statement

The R script and the Excel tables used in this study are available on GitHub at [https://github.com/romah-23/maternal-mortality-analysis], accessed on 20 January 2025.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Multidisciplinary Laboratory of Studies and Scientific Writing in Health Sciences (LAMEECCS) at the Federal University of Acre (UFAC) for the support and guidance provided during the development of this research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. WHO. Maternal Mortality. 2024. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/maternal-mortality (accessed on 8 October 2024).
  2. WHO. A Woman Dies Every Two Minutes Due to Pregnancy or Childbirth: UN Agencies. 2023. Available online: https://www.who.int/news/item/23-02-2023-a-woman-dies-every-two-minutes-due-to-pregnancy-or-childbirth--un-agencies (accessed on 8 October 2024).
  3. UNICEF. Maternal Mortality Rates and Statistics. UNICEF Data. 2023. Available online: https://data.unicef.org/topic/maternal-health/maternal-mortality/ (accessed on 8 October 2024).
  4. Cardoso, B.B.; Vieira, F.M.D.S.B.; Saraceni, V. Aborto no Brasil: O que dizem os dados oficiais? Cad. Saúde Pública 2020, 36 (Suppl. S1), e00188718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lima, B.G.D.C. Mortalidade por causas relacionadas ao aborto no Brasil: Declínio e desigualdades espaciais. Rev. Panam. Salud Publica 2000, 7, 168–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. dos Anjos, K.F.; Santos, V.C.; Souzas, R.; Eugênio, B.G. Aborto e saúde pública no Brasil: Reflexões sob a perspectiva dos direitos humanos. Saúde Debate 2013, 37, 504–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Leal, L.F.; Malta, D.C.; Souza, M.D.F.M.; Vasconcelos, A.M.N.; Teixeira, R.A.; Veloso, G.A.; Lansky, S.; Ribeiro, A.L.P.; França, G.V.A.D.; Naghavi, M. Maternal Mortality in Brazil, 1990 to 2019: A systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. 2022, 55 (Suppl. S1), e0279-2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Ferreira, M.E.S.; Coutinho, R.Z.; Queiroz, B.L. Morbimortalidade materna no Brasil e a urgência de um sistema nacional de vigilância do near miss materno. Cad. Saúde Pública 2023, 39, e00013923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. IBGE. Panorama do Censo 2022. 2022. Available online: https://censo2022.ibge.gov.br/panorama/ (accessed on 8 October 2024).
  10. Informações de Saúde (TABNET)—DATASUS. Available online: https://datasus.saude.gov.br/informacoes-de-saude-tabnet/ (accessed on 8 October 2024).
  11. IBGE. Sistema IBGE de Recuperação Automática—SIDRA. Available online: https://sidra.ibge.gov.br/pesquisa/censo-demografico/series-temporais/series-temporais/ (accessed on 8 October 2024).
  12. Antunes, J.L.F.; Cardoso, M.R.A. Uso da análise de séries temporais em estudos epidemiológicos. Epidemiol. Serv. Saúde 2015, 24, 565–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Galvão, L.R.; Costa, M.C.O.; Gama, S.G.N.D.; Amaral, M.T.R.; Santos, D.B.D.; Barros, N.F.; Rosario, W.O. Maternal mortality in adolescents and young adults: Temporal trend and correlation with prenatal care coverage in the state of Bahia, Brazil, 2000–2020. Epidemiol. Serv. Saúde 2023, 32, e2023103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Domingos, S.R.D.F.; Merighi, M.A.B. O aborto como causa de mortalidade materna: Um pensar para o cuidado de enfermagem. Esc. Anna Nery 2010, 14, 177–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Oliveira, I.V.G.; Maranhão, T.A.; Frota, M.M.C.D.; Araujo, T.K.A.D.; Torres, S.D.R.F.; Rocha, M.I.F.; Xavier, M.E.D.S.; Sousa, G.J.B. Mortalidade materna no Brasil: Análise de tendências temporais e agrupamentos espaciais. Ciênc. Saúde Coletiva 2024, 29, e05012023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Victora, C.G.; Aquino, E.M.; do Carmo Leal, M.; Monteiro, C.A.; Barros, F.C.; Szwarcwald, C.L. Maternal and child health in Brazil: Progress and challenges. Lancet 2011, 377, 1863–1876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Rodrigues, M.N.G.; Vieira, F.M.D.S.B.; Vasconcellos-Silva, P.R. Análise das recomendações das Comissões Regionais de Mortalidade Materna para os casos de óbitos por aborto provocado no Município do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. Cad. Saúde Pública 2021, 37, e00215020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Lopes Garrafa, J.; Dantas-Silva, A.; Garanhani Surita, F.; de Siqueira Guida, J.P.; Bhadra Vale, D.; de Campos Brandão, M.; Trapani, A.; Knobel, R. Maternal deaths among Brazilian indigenous women—Analysis from 2015 to 2021. Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet. 2024, 167, 612–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Santos, D.R.D.; Nogueira, L.M.V.; Paiva, B.L.; Rodrigues, I.L.A.; Oliveira, L.F.D.; Caldas, S.P. Maternal mortality in the indigenous and non-indigenous population in Pará: Contribution to the surveillance of deaths. Esc. Anna Nery 2017, 21, e20170161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Martins, E.F.; Almeida, P.F.B.D.; Paixão, C.D.O.; Bicalho, P.G.; Errico, L.D.S.P.D. Causas múltiplas de mortalidade materna relacionada ao aborto no Estado de Minas Gerais, Brasil, 2000–2011. Cad. Saúde Pública 2017, 33, e00133115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Laurenti, R.; Jorge, M.H.P.D.M.; Gotlieb, S.L.D. A mortalidade materna nas capitais brasileiras: Algumas características e estimativa de um fator de ajuste. Rev. Bras. Epidemiol. 2004, 7, 449–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Brito, M.I.C.D.; Silva Junior, E.X.D. Contribuição da Educação Sexual Frente a Gravidez eo Aborto na Dolescência. In A Obra Prima: A Arte de Cuidar no Início da Vida, 1st ed.; Editora Científica Digital: São Paulo, Brazil, 2021; pp. 70–80. Available online: http://www.editoracientifica.com.br/articles/code/211006497 (accessed on 7 October 2024).
  23. Pacagnella, R.C.; Nakamura-Pereira, M.; Gomes-Sponholz, F.; Aguiar, R.A.L.P.D.; Guerra, G.V.D.Q.L.; Diniz, C.S.G.; Campos, B.B.N.D.S.; Amaral, E.M.; Moraes Filho, O.B.D. Maternal Mortality in Brazil: Proposals and Strategies for its Reduction. Rev. Bras. Ginecol. Obstet. 2018, 40, 501–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Pamplona, M.A.; Damasceno, R.d.S.; Cattaneo, S.G.d.A.; de Holanda, J.R.C.; Coelho, N.C.; Alonso, T.D.; Campos, G.B.; de Castro Rezende, M.E. Perfil da mortalidade materna no sudeste brasileiro. Braz. J. Health Rev. 2023, 6, 9439–9448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Carreno, I.; Bonilha, A.L.D.L.; Costa, J.S.D.D. Temporal evolution and spatial distribution of maternal death. Rev. Saúde Pública 2014, 48, 662–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Carvalho, P.I.D.; Frias, P.G.D.; Lemos, M.L.C.; Frutuoso, L.A.L.D.M.; Figueirôa, B.D.Q.; Pereira, C.C.D.B.; Barreto, I.D.C.; Vidal, S.A. Perfil sociodemográfico e assistencial da morte materna em Recife, 2006–2017: Estudo descritivo. Epidemiol. Serv. Saúde 2020, 29, e2019185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Souza, M.G.; Fusco, C.L.B.; Andreoni, S.A.; Silva, R.D.S.E. Prevalence and sociodemographic characteristics of women with induced abortion in a population sample of São Paulo, Brazil. Rev. Bras. Epidemiol. 2014, 17, 297–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Uliana, M.D.; Marin, D.F.D.; Silva, M.B.D.; Giugliani, C.; Iser, B.P.M. Internações por aborto no Brasil, 2008-2018: Estudo ecológico de série temporal. Epidemiol. Serv. Saúde 2022, 31, e2021341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Leal, M.d.C.; Esteves-Pereira, A.P.; Bittencourt, S.A.; Domingues, R.M.S.M.; Theme Filha, M.M.; Leite, T.H.; Ayres, B.V.D.S.; Baldisserotto, M.L.; Nakamura-Pereira, M.; Moreira, M.E.L.; et al. Protocolo do Nascer no Brasil II: Pesquisa Nacional sobre Aborto, Parto e Nascimento. Cad. Saúde Pública 2024, 40, e00036223. [Google Scholar]
  30. UN. Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues. 2019. Available online: https://documents.un.org/doc/undoc/gen/n19/144/80/pdf/n1914480.pdf (accessed on 8 October 2024).
  31. Orellana, J.D.Y.; Cunha, G.M.D.; Marrero, L.; Moreira, R.I.; Leite, I.D.C.; Horta, B.L. Excesso de mortes durante a pandemia de COVID-19: Subnotificação e desigualdades regionais no Brasil. Cad. Saúde Pública 2021, 37, e00259120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Gonçalves, B.M.M.; Franco, R.P.V.; Rodrigues, A.S. Maternal mortality associated with COVID-19 in Brazil in 2020 and 2021: Comparison with non-pregnant women and men. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0261492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Temporal trend by region, Brazil (1996–2022). Source: DATASUS, 2024.
Figure 1. Temporal trend by region, Brazil (1996–2022). Source: DATASUS, 2024.
Healthcare 13 00951 g001
Figure 2. Proportion of rates by region, Brazil (1996–2022). Source: DATASUS, 2024.
Figure 2. Proportion of rates by region, Brazil (1996–2022). Source: DATASUS, 2024.
Healthcare 13 00951 g002
Figure 3. Proportion of rates by age group, Brazil (1996–2022). Source: DATASUS, 2024.
Figure 3. Proportion of rates by age group, Brazil (1996–2022). Source: DATASUS, 2024.
Healthcare 13 00951 g003
Figure 4. Proportion of rates by marital status, Brazil (1996–2022). Source: DATASUS, 2024.
Figure 4. Proportion of rates by marital status, Brazil (1996–2022). Source: DATASUS, 2024.
Healthcare 13 00951 g004
Figure 5. Proportion of rates by race/color, Brazil (1996–2022). Source: DATASUS, 2024.
Figure 5. Proportion of rates by race/color, Brazil (1996–2022). Source: DATASUS, 2024.
Healthcare 13 00951 g005
Figure 6. Proportion of rates by education level, Brazil (1996–2022). Source: DATASUS, 2024.
Figure 6. Proportion of rates by education level, Brazil (1996–2022). Source: DATASUS, 2024.
Healthcare 13 00951 g006
Table 1. Trends in maternal mortality due to abortion, Brazil (1996–2022); source: DATASUS, 2024.
Table 1. Trends in maternal mortality due to abortion, Brazil (1996–2022); source: DATASUS, 2024.
CategoryAPC (CI95%)p-ValueTrend
Regional Brazil−2.44 (−3.10; −1.77)<0.0001Decreasing
North−0.76 (−2.71; 1.22)>0.05Stationary
Northeast−1.91 (−3.73; −0.05)>0.05Decreasing
Southeast−2.28 (−3.66; −0.88)<0.005Decreasing
South−6.82 (−9.23; −4.35)<0.0001Decreasing
Central-West−1.72 (−4.01; 0.62)>0.05Decreasing
Age Brazil−2.43 (−3.10; −1.76)<0.0001Decreasing
10–14−1.34 (−2.54; −0.11)>0.05Decreasing
15–19−2.02 (−3.69; −0.32)>0.05Decreasing
20–29−3.80 (−5.05; −2.53)<0.0001Decreasing
30–39−1.91 (−2.69; −1.12)<0.0001Decreasing
40–49−1.16 (−2.68; −0.38)>0.05Decreasing
Marital Status Brazil−1.04 (−1.69; −0.39)<0.01Decreasing
Single−0.36 (−1.65; 0.95)>0.05Stationary
Married−2.10 (−3.64; −0.54)<0.05Decreasing
Widowed−2.78 (−4.60; −0.91)<0.01Decreasing
Separated−0.96 (−4.89; 3.12)>0.05Stationary
Race Brazil−0.92 (−1.51; −0.33)<0.01Stationary
White−2.49 (−3.67; −1.29)<0.001Decreasing
Black1.97 (−1.47; 5.53)>0.05Increasing
Yellow−8.95 (−15.75; −1.62)<0.05Decreasing
Brown0.19 (−1.04; 1.44)>0.05Stationary
Indigenous13.92 (6.14; 22.28)<0.01Increasing
Education Brazil−0.88 (−1.42; −0.34)<0.01Stationary
1–3 years−0.15 (−4.48; 4.39)>0.05Stationary
4–7 years1.49 (−2.50; 5.65)>0.05Increasing
8–11 years8.61 (5.34; 11.97)<0.001Increasing
12 years or more0.04 (−0.78; 0.87)>0.05Stationary
None−13.51 (−21.85; −4.29)<0.01Decreasing
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pereira, P.O.B.; de Souza, M.P.; Moreira, L.B.A.; Silva Filho, E.S.; da Silva Santos, E.; dos Santos, A.V.R.; Asbeque, A.C.F.; Morais, M.J.d.D.; Pereira, J.E.G.; Leitão, F.N.C. Maternal Mortality Due to Abortion in Brazil: A Temporal, Regional, and Sociodemographic Analysis over the Last Three Decades. Healthcare 2025, 13, 951. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13080951

AMA Style

Pereira POB, de Souza MP, Moreira LBA, Silva Filho ES, da Silva Santos E, dos Santos AVR, Asbeque ACF, Morais MJdD, Pereira JEG, Leitão FNC. Maternal Mortality Due to Abortion in Brazil: A Temporal, Regional, and Sociodemographic Analysis over the Last Three Decades. Healthcare. 2025; 13(8):951. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13080951

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pereira, Pedro Omar Batista, Mateus Pinheiro de Souza, Laura Beatriz Argôlo Moreira, Eumar Soares Silva Filho, Edjan da Silva Santos, Amanda Vitória Rodrigues dos Santos, Ana Clara Ferreira Asbeque, Mauro José de Deus Morais, Júlio Eduardo Gomes Pereira, and Francisco Naildo Cardoso Leitão. 2025. "Maternal Mortality Due to Abortion in Brazil: A Temporal, Regional, and Sociodemographic Analysis over the Last Three Decades" Healthcare 13, no. 8: 951. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13080951

APA Style

Pereira, P. O. B., de Souza, M. P., Moreira, L. B. A., Silva Filho, E. S., da Silva Santos, E., dos Santos, A. V. R., Asbeque, A. C. F., Morais, M. J. d. D., Pereira, J. E. G., & Leitão, F. N. C. (2025). Maternal Mortality Due to Abortion in Brazil: A Temporal, Regional, and Sociodemographic Analysis over the Last Three Decades. Healthcare, 13(8), 951. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13080951

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop