Next Article in Journal
Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor Superfamily Member 21 Induces Endothelial-Mesenchymal Transition in Coronary Artery Endothelium of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Previous Article in Journal
EpisomiR, a New Family of miRNAs, and Its Possible Roles in Human Diseases
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomedicines
Volume 10
Issue 6
10.3390/biomedicines10061281
biomedicines-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Knowledge Gap in Understanding the Steroidogenic Acute Regulatory Protein Regulation in Steroidogenesis Following Exposure to Bisphenol A and Its Analogues

by
Nur Erysha Sabrina Jefferi
,
Asma’ ‘Afifah Shamhari
,
Zariyantey Abd Hamid
,
Siti Balkis Budin
,
Adam Muhammad Zackry Zulkifly
,
Fatin Norisha Roslan
and
Izatus Shima Taib
*
Centre of Diagnostic, Therapeutic and Investigative Studies, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Jalan Raja Muda Abdul Aziz, Kuala Lumpur 50300, Malaysia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomedicines 2022, 10(6), 1281; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10061281
Submission received: 29 March 2022 / Revised: 27 May 2022 / Accepted: 27 May 2022 / Published: 30 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Cell Biology and Pathology)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The use of bisphenols has become extremely common in our daily lives. Due to the extensive toxic effects of Bisphenol A (BPA), the industry has replaced this endocrine-disrupting chemical (EDC) with its analogues, which have been proven to decrease testosterone levels via several mechanisms, including targeting the steroidogenic acute regulatory (StAR) protein. However, when exposed to BPA and its analogues, the specific mechanism that emerges to target StAR protein regulations remains uncertain. Hence, this review discusses the effects of BPA and its analogues in StAR protein regulation by targeting cAMP-PKA, PLC-PKC, EGFR-MAPK/ERK and Ca2+-Nur77. BPA and its analogues mainly lead to decreased LH in blood and increased ERK expression and Ca2+ influx, with no relationship with the StAR protein regulation in testicular steroidogenesis. Furthermore, the involvement of the cAMP-PKA, PLC-PKC, and Nur77 molecules in StAR regulation in Leydig cells exposed to BPA and its analogues remains questionable. In conclusion, although BPA and its analogues have been found to disrupt the StAR protein, the evidence in connecting the signaling pathways with the StAR regulations in testicular steroidogenesis is still lacking, and more research is needed to draw a solid conclusion.

1. Introduction

Bisphenols (BPs) are a class of chemical compounds composed of two phenolic rings connected by a carbon bridge or other chemical structures. BPs are frequently used in the production of polycarbonates and epoxy resins [1]. Bisphenol A (BPA) is the most frequently used BP that was introduced to the plastics industry in the 1950s. It is primarily used to make water bottles, shatterproof windows, and epoxy resins that coat canned food, bottle caps, and pipes. BPA has also been detected in baby bottles, and due to its toxic effects, many scientists are concerned about its hazardous impact on children’s development. Studies have indicated that BPA has detrimental effects on human health, including disruption of steroid hormone synthesis, mammary gland development, and changes in obesity-related parameters [2]. Moreover, BPA has been linked to many systemic diseases, such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and liver and renal diseases [3,4,5]. Therefore, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) conducted a survey, the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III), and found detectable levels of BPA in 93% of 2517 urine samples in a cohort, ranging from six-year-old children to the elderly, in the United States [6]. Furthermore, in July 2012, BPA in many products, especially in baby products and packaging, was banned by the FDA. Consequently, developing a BPA alternative for industrial applications is critical.
Some of the BPA alternatives are Bisphenol B (BPB), Bisphenol F (BPF), Bisphenol S (BPS), Bisphenol AP (BPAP), Bisphenol AF (BPAF), Bisphenol C (BPC), and Bisphenol Z (BPZ), as shown in Table 1. All of these analogues have almost the same structure as BPA, and the characteristic that distinguishes them from each other is the positioning of their respective functional groups. As their structure is almost identical to the BPA, these alternatives have been considered as a substitute for BPA in the manufacturing industry. The chemical structure of BPA and its analogues, as well as their applications and detection matrices, are summarized in Table 1. Most BP analogues are being used to replace BPA in the polycarbonate plastics and epoxy resin industries. BPB is utilized in a wide range of food-contact coating products, resulting in the presence of this chemical in the food in question. BPF is more suited to heavy industries that build solid or high systems [7]. BPS is used for the cleaning products industry, for instance, as a fastening agent for washing machines [8]. BPAF is primarily employed in producing specialized fluorelastomers as a crosslinker [9]. Meanwhile, BPC is commonly used in the production of fire-resistant polymers. Due to its widespread usage, these BPA analogues can be detected in most biological and environmental samples, such as air, water, and soil. These analogues can also be detected in food products, especially food stored in cans and plastics. These BPA analogues appear to have the potential to become global food contaminants and environmental pollutants in the near future. Furthermore, BPA analogues may have similar detrimental, physiological effects on organisms.
BPA and its analogues are being classified as an endocrine-disruptor chemical (EDC) that acts as a systemic toxicant and has an impact particularly on the development of the reproductive system [10]. EDCs are substances found in the environment, food sources, personal care products, and manufactured products that disrupt the endocrine system’s normal function. Several studies have demonstrated that exposure to EDCs, such as BPs, during the prenatal and neonatal stages of development can cause harm and have a significant impact on the normal development of the reproductive system and functions in both males and females in adulthood. Furthermore, several studies have reported that BPs can cause male reproductive system toxicity by targeting the steroidogenesis process [11,12,13].
In general, Leydig cells and the adrenal gland are the sites of steroid hormone synthesis in mammalian cells. Steroidogenesis in Leydig cells is regulated primarily by the luteinizing hormone (LH) via several signaling pathways. It also involves a complex mechanism requiring the activation of several hormones and signaling pathways, including hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases (HSD) and cytochrome P450 enzymes [14]. In several studies, BPs have been shown to disrupt steroidogenesis by targeting the HSD and cytochrome P450 genes and proteins, which are either upregulated or downregulated as a consequence [11]. Cholesterol is a precursor in promoting testosterone synthesis, and steroidogenic acute regulatory (StAR) protein is vital in transporting cholesterol to the inner membrane of mitochondria in Leydig cells. StAR is regulated by three signaling pathways: (1) cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP)–protein kinase A (PKA) (cAMP-PKA) and phospho-lipase C (PLC)-protein kinase C (PKC)(PLC-PKC) pathways; (2) epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-induced mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)/extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERK)(MPAK/ERK); and (3) calcium ion (Ca2+) signaling and Nur77 transcription factor expression [15]. To the best of our knowledge, there are limited studies on the effects of BPA and its analogues in regulating the StAR gene and protein expression via these three signaling pathways. Hence, this review was carried out to understand a gap in the knowledge regarding these three signaling pathways, cAMP-PKA and PLC-PKC, EGFR-MAPK/ERK, and Ca2+-Nur77, in regulating the StAR gene and protein expression in case of exposure to BPA and its analogues.

2. Regulation of StAR in Normal Physiology

Testicular steroidogenesis is a complex biological process in Leydig cells that entails the transformation of cholesterol to steroid hormones. The transportation of cholesterol from the outer to inner mitochondrial membrane in Leydig cells is mediated by the StAR protein, which plays a crucial role in steroidogenesis. The protein is produced as an active cytosolic protein in the form of a 37-kDa precursor containing an N-terminal mitochondria-targeting sequence that acts on the outer membrane of the mitochondria. This StAR protein migrates to the outer mitochondrial membrane after hormonal stimulation during steroidogenesis [16]. This 37-kDa StAR protein is then cleaved to a 30-kDa form that is phosphorylated to allow the transportation of the mass of cholesterol through the inner mitochondrial membrane [17]. The function of the StAR protein on the outer membrane of mitochondria is to desorb the cholesterol, pushing it from the outer membrane of the mitochondria and allowing it to cross the mitochondrial intramembranous space in microdroplet form before being taken up by the inner membrane of mitochondria [18]. Cholesterol is converted to testosterone via a series of steroidogenic enzymatic reactions through the action of HSD and CYP450 enzymes. It is vital to remember that phosphorylation of the StAR protein is essential for it to function well in steroid biosynthesis in terms of cholesterol transportation.
StAR activity is stimulated by the luteinizing hormone (LH) and the follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) [19,20]. LH and FSH bind to the G-protein coupled receptors known as the luteinizing hormone receptor (LHR) and follicle-stimulating hormone receptor (FSHR), respectively, for their specific functions in steroidogenesis. Interestingly, the molecular processes regulating Leydig cells’ response to steroidogenic stimuli may be distinct from those influencing FSH-responsive cells, such as ovarian granulosa cells [21]. In general, the binding of LH to the cognate LHR leads to StAR protein activation in the mitochondrial membrane of Leydig cells for the cholesterol transportation needed for testosterone synthesis [22,23]. A high testosterone concentration in the circulation through a negative feedback loop triggers the hypothalamus pituitary to suppress LH secretion. This results in the reduction of LHR-mediated stimulation of Leydig cells and ultimately decreases testosterone production. Positive feedback mechanisms are regulated in the opposite direction.
Phosphorylation-dependent events are required for acute stimulation of steroid biosynthesis in all steroidogenic tissues via the activation of protein kinases, including cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA), protein kinase C (PKC), calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase, and mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) [24,25]. Upon the binding of LH on LHR, the G protein dissociates into two subunits, one of which interacts with and activates an enzyme called adenylate cyclase (AC); this converts adenosine triphosphate (ATP) to a second messenger called cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) in the cell. An increase in cAMP activates the protein kinase A (PKA) pathway, which subsequently results in the phosphorylation of several transcription factors, such as the cAMP response element modulator (CREM) protein, cAMP response element-binding (CREB) protein, and GATA-binding protein 4 (GATA4). These transcription factors acting cooperatively and their interactions with the majority, if not all, of the cis-regulatory regions appear to be involved in regulating StAR gene expression. The cAMP–PKA pathway is the most well-studied mechanism linked to adult Leydig cell activity [26]. In addition to the activation of the cAMP-PKA pathway, phospholipase C (PLC) is also activated by LH/LHR complexes. The PLC splits phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) into diacylglycerol (DAG) and inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3), resulting in the activation of the Ca2+ channel in the endoplasmic reticulum by IP3. In combination with DAG, Ca2+ stimulates PKC, which phosphorylates CREB, thereby promoting StAR gene expression [25].
While the cAMP-PKA cascade is the predominant signaling pathway in controlling LH-stimulated StAR expression and steroid production, it is well documented that MAPK-ERK signaling cascades also play a critical role in regulating these processes [27,28]. A growing body of evidence indicates that MAPK signaling cascades are activated by a diverse array of extracellular inputs, such as cAMP, PKA, and PKC, which are critical in regulating the steroidogenic response [24,25]. PLC and PKC activate a cascade of protein kinases, such as Ras and Raf, resulting in many MAPK-ERK signaling cascades that play a critical role in regulating StAR expression and steroid production in steroidogenic tissues. Moreover, the PKA-signaling pathways can activate transcription factors directly or indirectly, and both of these signaling pathways are involved in the MAPK-mediated regulation of steroidogenesis. This pathway is known as the cAMP-dependent pathway.
Besides the cAMP-PKA and PLC-PKC cascade inducer, activation of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) by extracellular stimuli, including cytokines, growth factor, ligands, and transforming agents is also involved in StAR protein regulation [29,30]. This event is known as the cAMP-independent pathway. This initiates a cascade of protein kinases, including Ras/Raf and other highly similar kinases. These protein kinases then activate a variety of transcription factors, subsequently being phosphorylated. Phosphorylation of these transcription factors regulates the StAR gene and consequently steroid production. Besides its function in StAR protein and steroid synthesis, ERK1/2 also phosphorylates the StAR protein to promote cholesterol mobilization in the synthesis of steroid hormones [31,32].
Recent evidence has shown that StAR expression is regulated not only by cAMP but also by intracellular Ca2+ concentrations by increasing intracellular Ca2+ and stimulating the Ca2+–calmodulin (CaM) protein kinase pathway in Leydig cells [26]. Calcium-regulated signal transduction acts as a second messenger in the regulation of sex steroid hormone synthesis, specifically targeting the StAR enzyme in the early cascade. cAMP production also activates a calcium-signaling pathway by increasing intracellular Ca2+ concentrations in Leydig cells, subsequently stimulating the expression of the transcription factor Nur77 (NR4a1) [33,34,35]. Nur77 (NR4a1) also acts as a mediator of hormone-stimulated StAR expression. Figure 1 shows the three signaling pathways regulating StAR expression: (1) cAMP-PKA and PLC-PKC, (2) EGFR-MAPK/ERK, and (3) Ca2+-Nur77.

3. Effects of BPA and Its Analogues on the LH-LHR, cAMP-PKA and PLC-PKC Signaling Pathways

The involvement of the cAMP-PKA and PLC-PKC signaling pathways in testicular steroidogenesis has been studied extensively. The interaction between LH and its receptor LHR on the membrane of Leydig cells is also well documented as a precursor in initiating testosterone production via the cAMP–PKA pathway. Previous studies have shown that BPA and its analogues have various effects on the LH, as the LH level is either increased or decreased upon exposure to BPA and its analogues. Several studies have shown that exposure to BPA, either in vivo or in vitro, causes a decrease in the level of LH in the blood circulation [36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44]. Most previous studies had shown that when adult male rats were exposed to multiple dosages of BPA ranging from 25 mg/kg/bw to 200 mg/kg/bw via oral gavage or intra-peritoneal injection, their LH levels decreased [36,37,38,40,41,42,43,45]. Furthermore, chronic exposure to BPS in drinking water for 48 weeks also reduced the production of LH in male rats [44]. The reduction of LH in blood circulation is due to the involvement of BPA and its analogues as EDCs, which inhibits hypothalamus–pituitary–gonad (HPG) axis regulation [46]. On the other hand, BPA increased the levels of LH after 15 days of exposure via oral gavage in Long–Evans rats [47]. A lack of responsiveness in the negative feedback regulation by testosterone on the HPG axis may occur in BPA-treated rats, resulting in serum LH overload [47].
Interestingly, previous studies also found that exposure to BPA and its analogue BPAF increased the level of LH but decreased LHR expression [48,49]. Savchuk, Söder, and Svechnikov [48] found in their research that BPA at a concentration of 10 mM increased LH levels but decreased LHR expression in Leydig cells isolated from the C57BL/6j strain. Facilitated by BPA, increased LH levels and decreased LHR expressions are impacted by Leydig cells’ capacity to produce testosterone and estradiol [48]. Moreover, the protein expression of LHR deteriorated even when LH secretion increased substantially in BPAF-treated rats [49]. Increased LH levels in serum were shown to be associated with a significant decrease in StAR protein expression in the testes of rats treated with 200 mg/kg/bw of BPAF. An explanation for these observations is that the effect of increasing LH levels on StAR expression may be abolished by the lower LHR expression in Leydig cells [49]. In contrast, an increased LHR level was detected in BPF-treated male zebrafish (Danio rerio) at concentrations of 0.1 and 1 mg/L in the tank [39]. Even though the LHR upregulation increased, the BPF exposure decreased StAR gene expression, resulting in a decrease in testosterone production [39].
Exposure to BPA in vitro studies decreased cAMP expression [50,51]. Both studies used the same cell lines, which are mouse Leydig tumor cells (mLTC), pre-incubated with BPA for 48 h and 1 h at concentrations of 10−8 mol/L and 0.01 Μm–10 μM, respectively. The researchers hypothesized that BPA attenuates hCG-stimulated cAMP, which then reduces LHR-mediated signal transduction, thereby preventing LH from activating the AC. This eventually leads to the inhibition of the cAMP pathway in such a way that BPA also triggers a decrease in intracellular cAMP accumulation [50]. In contrast, rat Leydig cells exposed to BPA at a concentration of 0.1 nM increased the cAMP expression after 24 h of exposure [52]. Furthermore, Kim et al. [52] also found that BPA increased the phosphorylation of PKA in response to an increase in cAMP expression. Furthermore, this cAMP-PKA activation also increased CREB phosphorylation and might have triggered the MAPK-ERK signaling pathway [52]. To the best of our knowledge, only one study reported the effect of BPA on the cAMP-PKA signaling pathway in testicular steroidogenesis in Leydig cells. Several previous studies focused on the cAMP-PKA signaling cascade in myocardial, sperm, and granulosa cells [53,54,55,56,57,58,59]. Researchers have found that exposure to BPA activates oxidative stress via increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, leading to an increase in the cAMP-PKA signaling cascade. Moreover, no study reported the effects of BPA and its analogues on the PLC-PKC pathway involved in testicular steroidogenesis in Leydig cells. Table 2 shows the effects of BPA and its analogues on the LH, LHR, and cAMP-PKA signaling pathways in the male reproductive system.

4. Effects of BPA and Its Analogues on EGFR-MAPK-ERK Signaling Pathway

Physiologically, despite the cAMP-dependent system, an independent mechanism also plays a crucial role in regulating the StAR protein. Several studies have suggested that cytokines and growth factors can regulate the steroidogenic pathway of Leydig cells in a cAMP-independent manner via their ability to bind to EGFR [29,30]. The pituitary hormone is crucial for steroidogenesis, as proven in granulosa and theca cells treated with FSH and LH, respectively. Both hormones cause selective inhibition of MAPK-ERK1/2, resulting in the inhibition of StAR protein, progesterone, and androgen synthesis. However, in aging, ERK activation controls mitochondrial fusion and StAR localization in mitochondria results in steroidogenesis disturbance in Leydig cells. Therefore, the role of ERK1/2 in influencing steroidogenesis is still being explored and articulated, as it has been found to be inhibitory in some studies, while other investigations have shown a beneficial influence of MAPK activation on the synthesis of sex steroids [62,63].
Notably, BPA and its analogues disrupted this cAMP-independent pathway involving MAPK-ERK; however, there is insufficient evidence to link all the information with steroidogenesis. As previously stated, MAPK-ERK not only regulates StAR but also plays a role in cell proliferation, with many research reports on this effect. Exposure to BPA during GD12 until weaning at PND21 increased EGFR and MAPK expression; however, it did not cause any alteration in the testosterone levels of male pups. This is due to the increased number of Leydig cells that compensate for testosterone synthesis [64]. The cAMP-independent pathway is involved in StAR regulation and Leydig cell proliferation [64]. The same finding was also reported in an in vitro study performed in a dose-dependent manner. When TM3 Leydig cells were exposed to BPA for 24, 48, and 72 h, BPA increased the phosphorylation of ERK1/2 and Akt in Leydig cell proliferation [65]. Ok et al. [66] found that BPA increased the phosphorylation of ERK1/2 in vitro and in vivo. Exposure to BPA at a concentration of 100 µM for 24 h increased ERK 1/2 phosphorylation in TM3 Leydig cells. The phosphorylation of ERK1/2 was also increased in the testicular tissue of rats injected with 50 mg/kg/bw of BPA once a week [66].
Exposure to the BPA analogue BPB also increased the ERK1/2 phosphorylation in Leydig cells. Exposure to BPB at doses of 100 and 200 mg/kg disrupts Leydig cell maturation in late puberty by increasing Leydig cell proliferation via increased ERK1/2 expression. Interestingly, a significant reduction was found in testosterone levels after exposure to the same dose of BPB. However, the study did not report any connections between ERK1/2 expression with the regulation of StAR but only reported its proliferation effects in Leydig cells [67]. Expression of ERK1/2 phosphorylation was reported in rat testicular Leydig cell R2C when exposed to BPA for 30 min at various concentrations (0.1, 1, and 10 nM). Furthermore, the exposure also caused activation of alternative testicular steroidogenesis pathways, as proven by increased aromatase activity. These findings suggest that the activation of aromatase is correlated to the MAPK-ERK signaling pathway [50]. Exposure of pregnant rats to BPA at a dose ranging between 0.1 and 200 mg/kg/day from gestational day 14 (GD14) to birth (D0) resulted in increased ERK1 and Raf1 expression in the testicular tissue of male offspring at PND3, 21, and 60 [68]. Notably, Thuillier et al. [68] also found that ERK1 is more prominently expressed in Sertoli cells, while Raf1 is more detectable in Leydig cells, as proven by immunohistochemistry staining. Raf1 participates in the MAPK-ERK signaling cascade during testicular steroidogenesis via a cAMP-independent event. Despite the lack of evidence on the MAPK-ERK signaling pathway in regulating the StAR protein in testicular steroidogenesis, a study by Chu et al. [69] found that the placenta exposed to BPA influenced the ERK signaling pathway by increasing the phosphorylated ERK and resulted in steroidogenesis disturbance that was proven by a reduction in progesterone levels [69]. Nevertheless, the effects of BPA and its analogues in regulating the StAR protein via the MAPK-ERK signaling pathway remain unknown. Table 3 shows the effects of BPA and its analogues on the MAPK-ERK signaling pathway in the male reproductive system.

5. Effects of BPA and Its Analogues on the Ca2+ Signaling and the Involvement of Nur77 Transcription Factor

Another signaling pathway is also reported to be involved in the upregulation of StAR, which is the calcium-regulated signal transduction. Calcium-regulated signal transduction serves as a second messenger involved in regulating sex steroid hormone synthesis, particularly targeting the early cascade, of the StAR enzyme [70]. When LH binds to its receptor, it increases intracellular cAMP levels, followed by an increase in the concentration of intracellular Ca2+. There are, however, other indications that LH increases in the concentration of intracellular Ca2+ and that its action is dependent on the presence of calcium in the extracellular medium (known as extracellular Ca2+), whose influx across the plasma membrane is required for the steroidogenic process to occur. The elevated influx of Ca2+ in Leydig cells stimulates the expression of the transcription factor Nur77. Nur77 plays a mediating role in stimulating StAR expression. Recently, there has been abundant research that correlates the expression of StAR protein with Nur77 [33,34,35]. The knockout and overexpression of Nur77 clearly showed no StAR expression or overactivity, respectively, in Leydig cells.
In previous ex vivo studies, exposure to BPA and its analogue TBPA showed a significant increase of Ca2+ [71,72,73]. Batista–Silva et al. [71], in an ex vivo study, found that BPA exposure at concentrations of 10 pM, 10 nM, and 10 µM for 30 min stimulated Ca2+ influx. According to their findings, BPA-induced Ca2+ influx occurred via the PKC pathway, as it was proven that exposure to PKC inhibitor abolished the stimulatory effect of BPA on Ca2+ influx. Furthermore, the researchers also found that IP3R was involved in inducing Ca2+ influx in the PKC pathway with BPA exposure [71]. The same finding was also noted in a study conducted by Gonçalves et al. [72]. Testes isolated from 30-day-old male Wistar rats exposed to BPA for 5 min at concentrations of 0.1 pM, 1 pM, and 10 nM showed increased Ca2+ influx. Treatment with PLC inhibitors terminated the effects of BPA-induced Ca2+ influx in the testis [72]. Furthermore, exposure to BPA and its analogue TBBPA at a concentration of 10 nM increased the Ca2+ influx in immature boar testes after incubation for 48 h [73].
An increased level of Ca2+ triggers Nur77 expression in Leydig cells. Based on previous findings, BPA and its analogue BADGE.2H2O showed an increased level of Nur77 gene expression in the mLTC line (K28) after 24 h of exposure [74,75]. Based on Song et al.’s [75] research, exposure to BPA in vitro induces Nur77 mRNA expression in a dose-dependent and time-dependent manner. However, their study showed no involvement of PKC in Nur77 gene expression, because no changes were recorded after the PKC inhibitor was inserted. Moreover, Ahn et al. [74] found that exposure to BADGE.2H20 increased Nur77 mRNA expression; however, the expression of StAR was found to decrease. Increased Nur77 expression may involve inflammatory response and apoptosis but not StAR transcription regulation [76]. Table 4 shows the effects of BPA and its analogues on Ca2+ influx and Nur77 transcription factors in the male reproductive system.

6. Effect of BPA and Its Analogues on StAR Protein Expression

The cAMP-dependent and independent mechanisms play an important role in regulating StAR expression in testicular steroidogenesis. StAR mediates the transportation of cholesterol, which is assumed to be the rate-limiting step in steroid hormone production. Therefore, disruption of StAR, either gene or protein expressions, influences the transportation of cholesterol, which is the precursor substance involved in testosterone synthesis. Past studies have indicated varied effects of BPA and its analogues: there is either increased, decreased, or no effect on the StAR genes or protein expressions. The differences in the StAR gene and protein expressions may be due to the different types and ages of the animal models used in the studies on exposure to BPA and its analogues.
Reduced StAR protein expression was found in Leydig cells as well as in the testicular tissue of the mice that were intraperitoneally injected with BPA. Furthermore, serum testosterone levels were also found to be significantly lower in BPA-treated mice at a dose of 20 mg/kg after 7 days of exposure [77]. StAR gene expression was found to be downregulated in embryo testes when pregnant mice were given drinking water contaminated with 10 µM of BPA in combination with radiation exposure [78]. The StAR protein was significantly reduced after 24 h of exposure to 70 mM of BPAF in the mouse Leydig cell tumor cell line (mLTC-1). However, after being treated with 22R-hydroxycholesterol, the researcher concludes that BPA did not cause alterations in StAR protein but inhibited SR-B1, a protein that is responsible for transporting plasma cholesterol to the steroidogenic tissues and may be a molecular target in this steroidogenic process of mLTC-1 exposed to BPAF [49].
In contrast, it has been revealed in several studies that BPA and its analogues increased StAR gene and protein expression [77,79,80,81,82]. Expression of the StAR gene was reported to be elevated significantly in a BPA-exposed group of sexually immature male medaka fish. The researcher suggested that the effects of BPA may be different when exposed during the active reproductive state [79]. An ex vivo study found that BPA at the concentrations of 10 µM and 100 µM causes a significant increase in StAR gene expression in fetus and adult testes exposed for 5 days [83]. A study was carried out by Chen et al. [80] using the ethane dimethane sulfonate (EDS)-induced Leydig cell regeneration model to assess the impact of BPA exposure on the differentiation of stem cells in vivo and in vitro, targeting the specific genes LHR and StAR. BPA was found to increase testosterone levels and Leydig cell-specific genes (LHR, StAR) and their protein expression levels in vivo. Similar findings were also observed in an in vitro study; however, StAR gene and protein expression remained unchanged. Interestingly, germ cells exposed to BPA, BPF, and BPS and a combination of all bisphenols for 24, 48, and 72 h increased StAR gene expression. The researchers concluded that BPS and BPF appear to act similarly to BPA, proven by the increase in StAR gene expression, and thus may represent comparable reproductive concerns [82].
In a comparison between BPA, BPE, and BPS, the relative mRNA expression of StAR was found to increase upon BPS exposure at doses of 0.5 and 50 g/kg/day at prenatal age [81]. There were no BPB-induced changes in StAR gene and protein expressions in relation to Leydig cell maturation in late-puberty rats. BPB alters Leydig cell maturation by increasing the number of Leydig cells, thus reducing testosterone synthesis and downregulating steroidogenesis-related gene expression; however, it does not involve the StAR-related genes [67]. Moreover, the ability of BPA analogues to adversely affect StAR gene expression was reported. Silico docking studies exhibited that BPS, in binding with the StAR protein, may influence the transportation of cholesterol into mitochondria, which in turn influences steroidogenesis [58]. Logically, an increase in StAR gene and protein expression may increase testosterone production. However, most studies have stated that an increase in StAR causes testicular steroidogenesis defects. Even though StAR gene and protein expressions were increased upon exposure to BPA and its analogues, such StAR formation entails an inactive form that is not phosphorylated. Therefore, cholesterol transportation will be affected, resulting in a decrease in testosterone synthesis. Table 5 shows the effects of BPA and its analogues on the StAR protein in testicular steroidogenesis.

7. Discussion

BPA and its analogues were found to disrupt StAR protein and gene expression; however, the data linking the signaling pathways to the regulation of StAR in testicular steroidogenesis remains insufficient. The StAR protein and genes are regulated via several pathways, including cAMP-PKA and PLC-PKC, EGFR-MAPK/ERK, and Ca2+-Nur77. Several studies have found that BPA and its analogues reduce the level of LH in blood circulation [36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44]. However, studies carried out by Bai et al. [60] and Akingbemi et al. [47] reported an increase in LH levels in blood circulation after BPA exposure. Notably, exposure to BPA and BPAF has been reported to cause an increase in LH level and a decrease in LHR expression in Leydig cells [48,49]. On the other hand, LHR expression was upregulated in the testes of male zebrafish treated with BPF, as indicated only by Yang et al. [39]. A previous study also showed that exposure to BPA and its analogues leads to HPG axis disturbances, resulting in contradictory levels between LH and LHR [11,47]. Moreover, it was revealed that decreased expression of LHR reduced the capacity of LH to activate the signaling pathways. This mechanism reduces StAR gene expression and reduces testosterone synthesis. Therefore, the mechanism and roles of LH in StAR production and regulation in Leydig cells under exposure to BPA and its analogues requires attention and further investigation. When LH binds to LHR, the cell converts ATP to cAMP. An increase in cAMP stimulates the PKA pathway, leading to the phosphorylation of many transcription factors required for the StAR protein to function well. BPA adversely affects R2C rat Leydig cells by increasing the level of cAMP. Interestingly, upon exposure to BPA, cAMP production in pre-incubated mLTC-1 decreases even after human LH is added to the cells [50]. This shows that BPA is capable of inhibiting cAMP activation upon LH stimulation. To the best of our knowledge, there are scarce findings regarding the effects of BPA and its analogues on PKA stimulation and transcription factors involved in regulating StAR protein in Leydig cells. In addition, there is no available evidence regarding the impacts of BPA and its analogues on PLC-PKC pathway activation in Leydig cells. Thus, this could be an opportunity for researchers to explore in depth EDCs’ effects on this potential targeting protein, PKC.
Furthermore, the MAPK-ERK signaling pathway is crucial in activating StAR protein expression. An increase in ERK phosphorylation through the MAPK-ERK signaling pathway was found in animal models that were exposed to BPA and its analogues [52,64,65,66,67,68,69]. However, there is no clear evidence on how BPA and its analogues affect the MAPK-ERK signaling pathway in regulating StAR protein expression. MAPK phosphatase in steroidogenic cells plays a role in turning off hormonal signaling in ERK-dependent activities, such as steroid production and cell proliferation. Moreover, a comprehensive list of previous studies illustrated that BPA and its analogues induce the modification of this signaling pathway by triggering Leydig cell proliferation. These findings possibly indicated that BPA exposure may alter the MAPK-ERK signaling pathway by switching off its normal function of inducing StAR phosphorylation and thus causing excessive cell proliferation, which can lead to tumor cell formation.
Calcium-regulated signal transduction acts as a second messenger in the regulation of sex steroid hormone production, specifically targeting the StAR protein. BPA and its analogues can also interfere with the Ca2+ transduction system by increasing the influx and concentration of Ca2+ and Nur77 expression in ex vivo and in vitro models. From the collected data, Ca2+ concentration after exposure to BPA and its analogue is shown to consistently increase. Ca2+ plays a critical role in stimulating StAR via its StAR protein transcription ability. However, an increase in Ca2+ upon BPA exposure may not trigger StAR transcription but is involved in oxidative stress in the mitochondria. The increased concentration of Ca2+ can stimulate the formation of ROS in the mitochondria during respiration, leading to oxidative stress [84]. Ca2+ in Leydig cells can stimulate Nur77 expression, which has a role in the stimulation of StAR protein expression and transcription. In addition, all the findings showed an increased in Nur77 expression after BPA exposure. Theoretically, the increase of Nur77 expression will increase the inactive form of the StAR protein. Usually, the StAR protein should be activated for it to function via phosphorylation. Hence, exposure to BPA and its analogues may only increase the inactivated form of the StAR protein, leading to a reduction in its function for cholesterol mobilization. Furthermore, the elevated Nur77 expression has been reported to be involved in inflammation. Such Nur77 may switch its role from being involved in StAR expression and transcription to the inflammatory response [76].
Previously published research suggested that BPA and its analogues have a variable influence on StAR gene and protein expression—either increasing, decreasing, or having no effect. These may be due to the differences in the dose of exposure, the route, and the organisms used in the respective studies. Even though the results vary, the changes in the StAR protein can lead to testicular steroidogenesis defects. Therefore, we suggest that BPA and its analogues can affect StAR protein regulations in steroidogenesis via several pathways, such as activation of cAMP-PKA, EGFR-MAPK/ERK, and Ca2+-Nur77 signaling pathways, which then ultimately decrease the StAR protein or its functionality.
This review article is more focused on understanding the knowledge gap in the three signaling pathways (i.e., cAMP-PKA, MAPK-ERK, and Ca2+-Nur77) regulating the StAR protein in testicular steroidogenesis upon exposure to BPA and its analogues. However, the findings from our literature search showed that researchers reported only on individual signaling pathways, such as cAMP-PKA, MAPK-ERK, and Ca2+-Nur77, leading to a lack of evidence in linking these pathways with the StAR protein in Leydig cells. We also found that other researchers conducted more studies on other cells, such as myocytes, sperm, and granulosa cells, in relation to these three signaling pathways. Most of our findings showed decreased LH in blood circulation and increased ERK expression and Ca2+ influx; however, previous researchers did not describe in detail the relationship between these molecules and StAR protein expression. BPA and its analogues decreased LH in blood circulation, resulting in decreased testosterone synthesis due to the downregulation of LHR. Moreover, BPA and its analogues may also activate the cAMP-PKA pathway, thus activating the MAPK-ERK1/2 cascade. Exposure to BPA may also increase the expression of EGFR in the Leydig cell membrane, which also triggers MAPK-ERK1/2 cascade activation. Most of the studies reported that activation of MAPK-ERK1/2 upon exposure to BPA and its analogues resulted in an increase in Leydig cell proliferation instead of increasing the phosphorylation of StAR. BPA and its analogues also increased Ca2+ influx and Nur77 expression in Leydig cells, which may be involved in oxidative stress and inflammatory response, respectively, but not involved in regulating the transcription of the StAR protein. Therefore, we postulate the possible effects of BPA and its analogues in regulating StAR gene and protein expressions via these three signaling pathways in Leydig cells, as shown in Figure 2.
BPA and its analogues disturb the StAR gene and protein regulations via these three signaling pathways, ultimately having a negative impact on human health. The StAR regulation disturbance after exposure to BPA and its analogues, targeting these three signaling pathways can downregulate the phosphorylated-StAR, also known as activated StAR. The inactive form of the StAR protein will decrease testosterone production in Leydig cells and activate aromatase activity. Increased activation of aromatase activity may increase the estradiol in the male reproductive system, which ultimately increases prostate cancer risk. Therefore, targeting these three signaling pathways in regulating the StAR protein can also benefit therapeutic approaches in alleviating the adverse effects of these EDCs.

8. Conclusions

In conclusion, BPA and its analogues represent an additional risk factor to consider due to their disruption of StAR gene and protein expressions during testicular steroidogenesis. The findings of the experimental studies mostly showed that BPA and its analogues can disrupt the LH levels and LHR expression in the Leydig cell membrane, leading to the activation of cAMP-PKA, MAPK-ERK1/2, and Ca2+ influx; however, there is a lack of evidence connecting all three signaling pathways with StAR regulation. Therefore, more research is required to establish the toxic effects of these EDCs in large populations and their molecular mechanism targeting the cAMP-PKA, PLC-PKC, MAPK-ERK1/2, Ca2+ influx, and Nur77 transcription factor to gain a better understanding of StAR regulation in the Leydig cell population. Understanding the knowledge gap with regard to these three signaling pathways (i.e., cAMP-PKA, MAPK-ERK, Ca2+-Nur77) in regulating the StAR protein can be used to determine target molecules when developing a drug for the regulation of testicular steroidogenesis. Furthermore, these data can also be used as additional information related to BPA and its analogues’ toxicity in the male reproductive system, specifically concerning testicular steroidogenesis.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.E.S.J., A.‘A.S. and I.S.T.; methodology, N.E.S.J., A.‘A.S., A.M.Z.Z., F.N.R. and I.S.T.; validation, S.B.B., Z.A.H. and I.S.T.; writing—original draft preparation, N.E.S.J., A.‘A.S. and I.S.T.; writing—review and editing, N.E.S.J., A.‘A.S. and I.S.T.; supervision, S.B.B., Z.A.H. and I.S.T.; funding acquisition, I.S.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (FRGS), FRGS/1/2021/STG03/UKM/02/3, from the Ministry of Higher Education (MOHE), Malaysia. This work was also supported by the Centre for Diagnostic, Therapeutic and Investigative Studies (CODTIS), Faculty of Health Sciences, (UKM).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Abbreviations

AAarachidonic acid
ATPadenosine 5′-triphosphate
BPAbisphenol A
BPAFbisphenol AF
BPAPbisphenol AP
BPBbisphenol B
BPCbisphenol C
BPF bisphenol F
BPS bisphenol S
BPZbisphenol Z
cAMPcyclic adenosine monophosphate
Ca2+Ion calcium
CREBcAMP response element-binding
CREMcAMP response element modulator
DAGdiacylglycerol
EDCs endocrine disrupting chemicals
ERKextracellular signal-regulated kinases
FSHfollicle-stimulating hormone
GATA4GATA Binding Protein 4
HPGhypothalamic–pituitary–gonadal axis
HSD hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase
IP3inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate
LH luteinizing hormone
LHR luteinizing hormone receptor
MAPK mitogen-activated protein kinase
mRNA messenger RNA
Pphosphorylate
PIP2phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate
PKAprotein kinase A
PKCprotein kinase C
PLCphospholipase C
StARSteroidogenic acute regulatory

References

  1. Delfosse, V.; Grimaldi, M.; Pons, J.L.; Boulahtouf, A.; Le Maire, A.; Cavailles, V.; Labesse, G.; Bourguet, W.; Balaguer, P. Structural and Mechanistic Insights into Bisphenols Action Provide Guidelines for Risk Assessment and Discovery of Bisphenol A Substitutes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 14930–14935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Miyawaki, J.; Sakayama, K.; Kato, H.; Yamamoto, H.; Masuno, H. Perinatal and Postnatal Exposure to Bisphenol a Increase Adipose Tissue Mass and Serum Cholesterol Level in Mice. J. Atheroscler. Thromb. 2007, 14, 245–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Vandenberg, L.N.; Colborn, T.; Hayes, T.B.; Heindel, J.J.; Jacobs, D.R.; Lee, D.H.; Shioda, T.; Soto, A.M.; vom Saal, F.S.; Welshons, W.V.; et al. Hormones and Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals: Low-Dose Effects and Nonmonotonic Dose Responses. Endocr. Rev. 2012, 33, 378–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Rochester, J.R. Bisphenol A and Human Health: A Review of the Literature. Reprod. Toxicol. 2013, 42, 132–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Rezg, R.; El-Fazaa, S.; Gharbi, N.; Mornagui, B. Bisphenol A and Human Chronic Diseases: Current Evidences, Possible Mechanisms, and Future Perspectives. Environ. Int. 2014, 64, 83–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Calafat, A.M.; Ye, X.; Wong, L.Y.; Reidy, J.A.; Needham, L.L. Exposure of the U.S. Population to Bisphenol A and 4-Tertiary-Octylphenol: 2003-2004. Environ. Health Perspect. 2008, 116, 39–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Fiege, H.; Voges, H.-W.; Hamamoto, T.; Umemura, S.; Iwata, T.; Miki, H.; Fujita, Y.; Buysch, H.-J.; Garbe, D.; Paulus, W. Phenol Derivatives. In Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry; John Wiley & Sons Ltd: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Liao, C.; Liu, F.; Kannan, K. Bisphenol S, a New Bisphenol Analogue, in Paper Products and Currency Bills and Its Association with Bisphenol a Residues. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 6515–6522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. NTP. Chemical Information Profile for Bisphenol AF-Supporting Nomination for Toxicological Evaluation by the National Toxicology Program. Natl. Inst. Environ. Heal. Sci. 2008. Available online: https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/ntp/htdocs/chem_background/exsumpdf/bisphenolaf_093008_508.pdf (accessed on 28 March 2022).
  10. Ohore, O.E.; Songhe, Z. Endocrine Disrupting Effects of Bisphenol a Exposure and Recent Advances on Its Removal by Water Treatment Systems. A Review. Sci. Afr. 2019, 5, e00135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Shamhari, A.‘A.; Hamid, Z.A.; Budin, S.B.; Shamsudin, N.J.; Taib, I.S. Bisphenol a and Its Analogues Deteriorate the Hormones Physiological Function of the Male Reproductive System: A Mini-Review. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 1744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Roelofs, M.J.E.; van den Berg, M.; Bovee, T.F.H.; Piersma, A.H.; van Duursen, M.B. Structural Bisphenol Analogues Differentially Target Steroidogenesis in Murine MA-10 Leydig Cells as Well as the Glucocorticoid Receptor. Toxicology 2015, 329, 10–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Jambor, T.; Jana, B.; Hana, G.; Eva, T.; Norbert, L. Male Reproduction: One of the Primary Targets of Bisphenol. In Bisphenol A Exposure and Health Risks; InTech.: London, UK, 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Payne, A.H.; Quinn, P.G.; Stalvey, J.R.D. The Stimulation of Steroid Biosynthesis by Luteinizing Hormone. In Luteinizing Hormone Action and Receptors; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2019; pp. 135–172. ISBN 9780429285684. [Google Scholar]
  15. Paz, C.; Cornejo Maciel, F.; Gorostizaga, A.; Castillo, A.F.; Mori Sequeiros García, M.M.; Maloberti, P.M.; Orlando, U.D.; Mele, P.G.; Poderoso, C.; Podesta, E.J. Role of Protein Phosphorylation and Tyrosine Phosphatases in the Adrenal Regulation of Steroid Synthesis and Mitochondrial Function. Front. Endocrinol. 2016, 7, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Galano, M.; Li, Y.; Li, L.; Sottas, C.; Papadopoulos, V. Role of Constitutive Star in Leydig Cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Manna, P.R.; Stetson, C.L.; Slominski, A.T.; Pruitt, K. Role of the Steroidogenic Acute Regulatory Protein in Health and Disease. Endocrine 2016, 51, 7–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Miller, W.L. StAR Search-What We Know about How the Steroidogenic Acute Regulatory Protein Mediates Mitochondrial Cholesterol Import. Mol. Endocrinol. 2007, 21, 589–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Bose, H.S.; Lingappat, V.R.; Miller, W.L. Rapid Regulation of Steroidogenesis by Mitochondrial Protein Import. Nature 2002, 417, 87–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kotrasová, V.; Keresztesová, B.; Ondrovičová, G.; Bauer, J.A.; Havalová, H.; Pevala, V.; Kutejová, E.; Kunová, N. Mitochondrial Kinases and the Role of Mitochondrial Protein Phosphorylation in Health and Disease. Life 2021, 11, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Cannarella, R.; Condorelli, R.A.; La Vignera, S.; Calogero, A.E. Commentary: Molecular Mechanisms of Action of FSH. Front. Endocrinol. 2019, 10, 305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Midzak, A.; Zirkin, B.; Papadopoulos, V. Translocator Protein: Pharmacology and Steroidogenesis. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2015, 43, 572–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wang, Y.; Chen, F.; Ye, L.; Zirkin, B.; Chen, H. Steroidogenesis in Leydig Cells: Effects of Aging and Environmental Factors. Reproduction 2017, 154, R111–R122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Manna, P.R.; Jo, Y.; Stocco, D.M. Regulation of Leydig Cell Steroidogenesis by Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase 1/2: Role of Protein Kinase A and Protein Kinase C Signaling. J. Endocrinol. 2007, 193, 53–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Manna, P.R.; Stocco, D.M. The Role of Specific Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Signaling Cascades in the Regulation of Steroidogenesis. J. Signal Transduct. 2011, 2011, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Smith, L.B.; Walker, W.H. Hormone Signaling in the Testis. In Knobil and Neill’s Physiology of Reproduction: Two-Volume Set; Elsevier North-Holland, Inc.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2015; Volume 1, pp. 637–690. ISBN 9780123977694. [Google Scholar]
  27. Liu, S.; Tang, Y.; Chen, B.; Zhao, Y.; Aguilar, Z.P.; Tao, X.; Xu, H. Inhibition of Testosterone Synthesis Induced by Oral TiO2NPs Is Associated with ROS-MAPK(ERK1/2)-StAR Signaling Pathway in SD Rat. Toxicol. Res. 2021, 10, 937–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Seger, R.; Hanoch, T.; Rosenberg, R.; Dantes, A.; Merz, W.E.; Strauss, J.F.; Amsterdam, A. Inhibition of Gonadotropin-Stimulated Steroidogenesis by the Erk Cascade. bioRxiv 2019, 853648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kotula-Balak, M.; Duliban, M.; Pawlicki, P.; Tuz, R.; Bilinska, B.; Plachno, B.J.; Arent, Z.J.; Krakowska, I.; Tarasiuk, K. The Meaning of Non-Classical Estrogen Receptors and Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor for Boar Leydig Cell of Immature Testis. Acta. Histochem. 2020, 122, 151526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Li, L.; Mu, X.; Ye, L.; Ze, Y.; Hong, F. Suppression of Testosterone Production by Nanoparticulate TiO 2 Is Associated with ERK1/2-PKA-PKC Signaling Pathways in Rat Primary Cultured Leydig Cells. Int. J. Nanomed. 2018, 13, 5909–5924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Duarte, A.; Castillo, A.F.; Podestá, E.J.; Poderoso, C. Mitochondrial Fusion and ERK Activity Regulate Steroidogenic Acute Regulatory Protein Localization in Mitochondria. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e100387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Castillo, A.F.; Orlando, U.; Helfenberger, K.E.; Poderoso, C.; Podesta, E.J. The Role of Mitochondrial Fusion and StAR Phosphorylation in the Regulation of StAR Activity and Steroidogenesis. Mol. Cell Endocrinol. 2014, 408, 73–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. de Santi, F.; Beltrame, F.L.; Rodrigues, B.M.; Scaramele, N.F.; Lopes, F.L.; Cerri, P.S.; Sasso-Cerri, E. Venlafaxine-Induced Adrenergic Signaling Stimulates Leydig Cells Steroidogenesis via Nur77 Overexpression: A Possible Role of EGF. Life Sci. 2022, 289, 120069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ha, M.; Zhang, P.; Li, L.; Liu, C. Triclosan Suppresses Testicular Steroidogenesis via the MiR-6321/JNK/Nur77 Cascade. Cell Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 50, 2029–2045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kim, H.; Kumar, S.; Lee, K. FOXA3, a Negative Regulator of Nur77 Expression and Activity in Testicular Steroidogenesis. Int. J. Endocrinol. 2021, 2021, 6619447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wisniewski, P.; Romano, R.M.; Kizys, M.M.L.; Oliveira, K.C.; Kasamatsu, T.; Giannocco, G.; Chiamolera, M.I.; Dias-da-Silva, M.R.; Romano, M.A. Adult Exposure to Bisphenol A (BPA) in Wistar Rats Reduces Sperm Quality with Disruption of the Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Testicular Axis. Toxicology 2015, 329, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Jiang, Z.; Wang, J.; Li, X.; Zhang, X. Echinacoside and Cistanche Tubulosa (Schenk) R. Wight Ameliorate Bisphenol A-Induced Testicular and Sperm Damage in Rats through Gonad Axis Regulated Steroidogenic Enzymes. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2016, 193, 321–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Wang, J.; Chen, C.; Jiang, Z.; Wang, M.; Jiang, H.; Zhang, X. Protective Effect of Cordyceps Militaris Extract against Bisphenol A Induced Reproductive Damage. Syst. Biol. Reprod. Med. 2016, 62, 249–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Yang, Q.; Yang, X.; Liu, J.; Ren, W.; Chen, Y.; Shen, S. Effects of BPF on Steroid Hormone Homeostasis and Gene Expression in the Hypothalamic–Pituitary–Gonadal Axis of Zebrafish. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 24, 21311–21322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Akintunde, J.K.; Farouk, A.A.; Mogbojuri, O. Metabolic Treatment of Syndrome Linked with Parkinson’s Disease and Hypothalamus Pituitary Gonadal Hormones by Turmeric Curcumin in Bisphenol-A Induced Neuro-Testicular Dysfunction of Wistar Rat. Biochem. Biophys. Rep. 2019, 17, 97–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Majid, M.; Ijaz, F.; Baig, M.W.; Nasir, B.; Khan, M.R.; Haq, I.U. Scientific Validation of Ethnomedicinal Use of Ipomoea Batatas L. Lam. as Aphrodisiac and Gonadoprotective Agent against Bisphenol a Induced Testicular Toxicity in Male Sprague Dawley Rats. Biomed Res. Int. 2019, 2019, 8939854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Alboghobeish, S.; Mahdavinia, M.; Zeidooni, L.; Samimi, A.; Oroojan, A.A.; Alizadeh, S.; Dehghani, M.A.; Ahangarpour, A.; Khorsandi, L. Efficiency of Naringin against Reproductive Toxicity and Testicular Damages Induced by Bisphenol A in Rats. Iran. J. Basic Med. Sci. 2019, 22, 315–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zahra, Z.; Khan, M.R.; Majid, M.; Maryam, S.; Sajid, M. Gonadoprotective Ability of Vincetoxicum Arnottianum Extract against Bisphenol A-Induced Testicular Toxicity and Hormonal Imbalance in Male Sprague Dawley Rats. Andrologia 2020, 52, e13590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ullah, H.; Ullah, F.; Rehman, O.; Jahan, S.; Afsar, T.; Al-Disi, D.; Almajwal, A.; Razak, S. Chronic Exposure of Bisphenol S (BPS) Affect Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Testicular Activities in Adult Male Rats: Possible in Estrogenic Mode of Action. Environ. Health Prev. Med. 2021, 26, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Jahan, S.; Ain, Q.U.; Ullah, H. Therapeutic Effects of Quercetin against Bisphenol a Induced Testicular Damage in Male Sprague Dawley Rats. Syst. Biol. Reprod. Med. 2016, 62, 114–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Oliveira, I.M.; Romano, R.M.; De Campos, P.; Cavallin, M.D.; Oliveira, C.A.; Romano, M.A. Delayed Onset of Puberty in Male Offspring from Bisphenol A-Treated Dams Is Followed by the Modulation of Gene Expression in the Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Testis Axis in Adulthood. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 2017, 29, 2496–2505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Akingbemi, B.T.; Sottas, C.M.; Koulova, A.I.; Klinefelter, G.R.; Hardy, M.P. Inhibition of Testicular Steroidogenesis by the Xenoestrogen Bisphenol a Is Associated with Reduced Pituitary Luteinizing Hormone Secretion and Decreased Steroidogenic Enzyme Gene Expression in Rat Leydig Cells. Endocrinology 2004, 145, 592–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Savchuk, I.; Söder, O.; Svechnikov, K. Mouse Leydig Cells with Different Androgen Production Potential Are Resistant to Estrogenic Stimuli but Responsive to Bisphenol A Which Attenuates Testosterone Metabolism. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e71722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Feng, Y.; Yin, J.; Jiao, Z.; Shi, J.; Li, M.; Shao, B. Bisphenol AF May Cause Testosterone Reduction by Directly Affecting Testis Function in Adult Male Rats. Toxicol. Lett. 2012, 211, 201–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Nguyen, T.M.D.; Klett, D.; Combarnous, Y. Estrogenic Compounds or Adiponectin Inhibit Cyclic AMP Response to Human Luteinizing Hormone in Mouse Leydig Tumor Cells. Biology 2019, 8, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Nikula, H.; Talonpoika, T.; Kaleva, M.; Toppari, J. Inhibition of HCG-Stimulated Steroidogenesis in Cultured Mouse Leydig Tumor Cells by Bisphenol A and Octylphenols. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 1999, 157, 166–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Kim, J.Y.; Han, E.H.; Kim, H.G.; Oh, K.N.; Kim, S.K.; Lee, K.Y.; Jeong, H.G. Bisphenol A-Induced Aromatase Activation Is Mediated by Cyclooxygenase-2 up-Regulation in Rat Testicular Leydig Cells. Toxicol. Lett. 2010, 193, 200–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Budin, S.B.; Abdul Rahman, W.Z.; Jubaidi, F.F.; Mohammed Yusof, N.L.; Taib, I.S.; Zainalabidin, S. Roselle (Hibiscus Sabdiriffa) Polyphenol-Rich Extract Prevents Testicular Damage of Diabetic Rats. J. Appl. Pharm. Sci. 2018, 8, 065–070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Akmar, K.; Noor, M.M. The Potential Effect of Gynura Procumbens Aqueous Extract as Anti-Hyperglycaemia, Pro-Fertility and Libido Agent Towards Diabetes-Induced Male Rats. Proceeding Int. Conf. Sci. Eng. 2020, 3, 103–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Jaffar, F.H.F.; Osman, K.; Hui, C.K.; Zulkefli, A.F.; Ibrahim, S.F. Edible Bird’s Nest Supplementation Improves Male Reproductive Parameters of Sprague Dawley Rat. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Kasim, R.M.; Jubaidi, F.F.; Taib, I.S.; Budin, S.B. Testicular Damage and Abnormal Sperm Characteristic Due to Chronic Hyperglycemia Exposure Restored by Polyphenol Rich Extract of Hibiscus Sabdariffa Linn. J. Adv. Res. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol. 2021, 1, 43–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Baufeld, A.; Vanselow, J. Lactate-Induced Effects on Bovine Granulosa Cells Are Mediated via PKA Signaling. Cell Tissue Res. 2022, 388, 471–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Darghouthi, M.; Rezg, R.; Boughmadi, O.; Mornagui, B. Low-Dose Bisphenol S Exposure Induces Hypospermatogenesis and Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Rats: A Possible Implication of StAR Protein. Reprod. Toxicol. 2022, 107, 104–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Lanfranchi, B.; Rubia, R.F.; Gassmann, M.; Schuler, G.; Kowalewski, M.P. Transcriptional Regulation of HIF1α-Mediated STAR Expression in Murine KK1 Granulosa Cell Line Involves CJUN, CREB and CBP-Dependent Pathways. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2022, 315, 113923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Bai, Y.; Chang, F.; Zhou, R.; Jin, P.P.; Matsumoto, H.; Sokabe, M.; Chen, L. Increase of Anteroventral Periventricular Kisspeptin Neurons and Generation of E2-Induced LH-Surge System in Male Rats Exposed Perinatally to Environmental Dose of Bisphenol-A. Endocrinology 2011, 152, 1562–1571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Ullah, A.; Pirzada, M.; Afsar, T.; Razak, S.; Almajwal, A.; Jahan, S. Effect of Bisphenol F, an Analog of Bisphenol A, on the Reproductive Functions of Male Rats. Environ. Health Prev. Med. 2019, 24, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Wilkenfeld, S.R.; Lin, C.; Frigo, D.E. Communication between Genomic and Non-Genomic Signaling Events Coordinate Steroid Hormone Actions. Steroids. 2018, 133, 2–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Falvo, S.; Santillo, A.; Chieffi Baccari, G.; Cioffi, F.; Di Fiore, M.M. D-Aspartate and N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Promote Proliferative Activity in Mouse Spermatocyte GC-2 Cells. Reprod. Biol. 2022, 22, 100601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Nanjappa, M.K.; Simon, L.; Akingbemi, B.T. The Industrial Chemical Bisphenol A (BPA) Interferes with Proliferative Activity and Development of Steroidogenic Capacity in Rat Leydig Cells. Biol. Reprod. 2012, 86, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Chen, Z.J.; Zhang, K.S.; Ge, L.C.; Liu, H.; Chen, L.K.; Du, J.; Wang, H.S. Signals Involved in the Effects of Bisphenol A (BPA) on Proliferation and Motility of Leydig Cells: A Comparative Proteomic Analysis. Toxicol. Res. 2016, 5, 1573–1584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Ok, S.; Kang, J.S.; Kim, K.M. Testicular Antioxidant Mechanism of Cultivated Wild Ginseng Extracts. Mol. Cell. Toxicol. 2016, 12, 149–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Li, Y.; Yan, H.; Yu, Y.; Zou, C.; Tian, L.; Xin, X.; Zhang, S.; Li, Z.; Ma, F.; Ge, R.S. Bisphenol B Stimulates Leydig Cell Proliferation but Inhibits Maturation in Late Pubertal Rats. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2021, 153, 112248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Thuillier, R.; Manku, G.; Wang, Y.; Culty, M. Changes in MAPK Pathway in Neonatal and Adult Testis Following Fetal Estrogen Exposure and Effects on Rat Testicular Cells. Microsc. Res. Tech. 2009, 72, 773–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Chu, P.W.; Yang, Z.J.; Huang, H.H.; Chang, A.A.; Cheng, Y.C.; Wu, G.J.; Lan, H.C. Low-Dose Bisphenol A Activates the ERK Signaling Pathway and Attenuates Steroidogenic Gene Expression in Human Placental Cells. Biol. Reprod. 2018, 98, 250–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Ham, J.; Lim, W.; You, S.; Song, G. Butylated Hydroxyanisole Induces Testicular Dysfunction in Mouse Testis Cells by Dysregulating Calcium Homeostasis and Stimulating Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 702, 134775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Batista-Silva, H.; Rodrigues, K.; Sousa de Moura, K.R.; Van Der Kraak, G.; Delalande-Lecapitaine, C.; Mena Barreto Silva, F.R. Role of Bisphenol A on Calcium Influx and Its Potential Toxicity on the Testis of Danio Rerio. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 202, 110876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Gonçalves, R.; Zanatta, A.P.; Cavalari, F.C.; do Nascimento, M.A.W.; Delalande-Lecapitaine, C.; Bouraïma-Lelong, H.; Silva, F.R.M.B. Acute Effect of Bisphenol A: Signaling Pathways on Calcium Influx in Immature Rat Testes. Reprod. Toxicol. 2018, 77, 94–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Pawlicki, P.; Duliban, M.; Tuz, R.; Ptak, A.; Milon, A.; Gorowska-Wojtowicz, E.; Tworzydlo, W.; Płachno, B.J.; Bilinska, B.; Knapczyk-Stwora, K.; et al. Do G-Protein Coupled Estrogen Receptor and Bisphenol A Analogs Influence on Leydig Cell Epigenetic Regulation in Immature Boar Testis Ex Vivo? Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2019, 207, 21–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Ahn, S.W.; Nedumaran, B.; Xie, Y.; Kim, D.K.; Kim, Y.D.; Choi, H.S. Bisphenol A Bis(2,3-Dihydroxypropyl) Ether (BADGE.2H2O) Induces Orphan Nuclear Receptor Nur77 Gene Expression and Increases Steroidogenesis in Mouse Testicular Leydig Cells. Mol. Cells 2008, 26, 74–80. [Google Scholar]
  75. Song, K.H.; Keesook, L.E.E.; Choi, H.S. Endocrine Disrupter Bisphenol A Induces Orphan Nuclear Receptor Nur77 Gene Expression and Steroidogenesis in Mouse Testicular Leydig Cells. Endocrinology 2002, 143, 2208–2215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Reddy, A.T.; Lakshmi, S.P.; Banno, A.; Jadhav, S.K.; Kadamberi, I.P.; Kim, S.C.; Reddy, R.C. Cigarette Smoke Downregulates Nur77 to Exacerbate Inflammation in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0229256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Li, C.; Zhang, L.; Ma, T.; Gao, L.; Yang, L.; Wu, M.; Pang, Z.; Wang, X.; Yao, Q.; Xiao, Y.; et al. Bisphenol A Attenuates Testosterone Production in Leydig Cells via the Inhibition of NR1D1 Signaling. Chemosphere 2021, 263, 128020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Wieckowski, M.; Ranga, S.; Moison, D.; Messiaen, S.; Abdallah, S.; Granon, S.; Habert, R.; Rouiller-Fabre, V.; Livera, G.; Guerquin, M.J. Unexpected Interacting Effects of Physical (Radiation) and Chemical (Bisphenol a) Treatments on Male Reproductive Functions in Mice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 11808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Bhandari, R.K.; Wang, X.; Vom Saal, F.S.; Tillitt, D.E. Transcriptome Analysis of Testis Reveals the Effects of Developmental Exposure to Bisphenol a or 17α-Ethinylestradiol in Medaka (Oryzias Latipes). Aquat. Toxicol. 2020, 225, 105553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Chen, L.; Zhao, Y.; Li, L.; Xie, L.; Chen, X.; Liu, J.; Li, X.; Jin, L.; Li, X.; Ge, R.S. Bisphenol A Stimulates Differentiation of Rat Stem Leydig Cells in Vivo and in Vitro. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2018, 474, 158–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Shi, M.; Whorton, A.E.; Sekulovski, N.; Maclean, J.A.; Hayashi, K. Prenatal Exposure to Bisphenol A, E, and S Induces Transgenerational Effects on Male Reproductive Functions in Mice. Toxicol. Sci. 2019, 172, 303–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Sidorkiewicz, I.; Czerniecki, J.; Jarząbek, K.; Zbucka-Krętowska, M.; Wołczyński, S. Cellular, Transcriptomic and Methylome Effects of Individual and Combined Exposure to BPA, BPF, BPS on Mouse Spermatocyte GC-2 Cell Line. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2018, 359, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Park, H.J.; Lee, W.Y.; Do, J.T.; Park, C.; Song, H. Evaluation of Testicular Toxicity upon Fetal Exposure to Bisphenol A Using an Organ Culture Method. Chemosphere 2021, 270, 129445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Bertero, E.; Maack, C. Calcium Signaling and Reactive Oxygen Species in Mitochondria. Circ. Res. 2018, 122, 1460–1478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Biomedicines 10 01281 g001 550
Figure 1. Three signaling pathways in regulating StAR expression: cAMP-PKA and PLC-PKC, EGFR-MAPK/ERK, and Ca2+-Nur77.
Figure 1. Three signaling pathways in regulating StAR expression: cAMP-PKA and PLC-PKC, EGFR-MAPK/ERK, and Ca2+-Nur77.
Biomedicines 10 01281 g001
Biomedicines 10 01281 g002 550
Figure 2. The effects of BPA and its analogues targeting the three signaling pathways in regulating the StAR gene and protein expressions. Abbreviations: ↑, increase; ↓, decrease; ∆, changes (can be increase or decrease).
Figure 2. The effects of BPA and its analogues targeting the three signaling pathways in regulating the StAR gene and protein expressions. Abbreviations: ↑, increase; ↓, decrease; ∆, changes (can be increase or decrease).
Biomedicines 10 01281 g002
Table
Table 1. The chemical structure of BPA and its analogues and detection matrices.
Table 1. The chemical structure of BPA and its analogues and detection matrices.
BisphenolChemical StructureUsageDetection Matrices
Bisphenol A Biomedicines 10 01281 i001Hard plastic items (baby bottles, reusable water bottles, food containers, pitchers, tableware and other storage containers); polycarbonate plastic (eyeglass lenses, CDs, DVDs, computers, appliances, sports safety equipment); epoxy resin linings coat the inside of metal products (foo d cans, bottle tops and water supply pipes).Air, dust, water, blood, urine, sediment, food, municipal sewage sludge
Bisphenol B Biomedicines 10 01281 i002Food-contact coatings, polymersFood, dust, sediment, blood, urine
Bisphenol F Biomedicines 10 01281 i003Epoxy resins, polycarbonates (lining of solid/high built systems); thermal receiptFood, dust, sediment, receipts, urine, PCP, municipal sewage sludge
Bisphenol S Biomedicines 10 01281 i004Wash fastening agent, electroplating solvent, thermal receipt papersBlood, food, dust, sediment, receipts, urine
Bisphenol AP Biomedicines 10 01281 i005Polycarbonates, epoxy resins, polyarylates, polyethers, polyetherimides, polyphenylene ethers, copolymersFood, dust, sediment, receipts
Bisphenol AF Biomedicines 10 01281 i006Crosslinker (specialty fluoro-elastomers synthesis)Food, dust, sediment, municipal sewage sludge
Bisphenol C Biomedicines 10 01281 i007Production of fire-resistant polymersReceipts
Table
Table 2. The effects of BPA and its analogues on the LH, LHR and cAMP-PKA signaling pathways in the male reproductive system. Abbreviations: ↑ Increase; ↓ Decrease.
Table 2. The effects of BPA and its analogues on the LH, LHR and cAMP-PKA signaling pathways in the male reproductive system. Abbreviations: ↑ Increase; ↓ Decrease.
Type of
Bisphenol		Purity
(Manufacturer)		Dose (Route)Animal CellsDuration of ExposureFindingsAuthor
BPASigma–Aldrich0.01 μM–
10 μM		Mouse Leydig Tumor Cells (mLTC)1 h of preincubation100 μM:
↓ cAMP		[50]
BPSSigma–Aldrich(0, 0.5, 5, and 50 μg/L BPS mg/kg body weight/day) of BPSWeaning Sprague–Dawley rats at postnatal day
22 (PND)		48 weeks↓ LH[44]
BPAF(99%)
Tokyo Chemical Industry		0, 2, 10, 50 and 200 mg/kg/dayMale Sprague–Dawley rats aged 7 weeks14 days200 mg/kg:
↓ LHR
↑ LH, FSH		[49]
BPASigma–Aldrichlow (2.4 or 10 g/kg/D BPA) and high (100 or 200 mg/kg/d
BPA) doses
0, 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10, 100, and 1000 nm BPA		Long–Evans strain of rat (Charles River, Wilmington, MA, USA)
Adult Leydig cells obtained from 90-day-old rats with 0, 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10, 100, and 1000 nm BPA for 18 h		 15 days of oral gavage
18 h incubation for adult Leydig cell		↑ LH[47]
BPASigma–Aldrich (natural exposure from polycarbonate cage) 10−8 mol/literLeydig tumor cells (mLTC-1 cells)preincubation of mLTC-1 cells for 48 h↓ cAMP[51]
BPASigma–Aldrich0.1 nMrat Leydig R2C cells24 h↑ CREB
↑ cAMP
↑ PKA phosphorylation		[52]
BPASigma–Aldrich10 mMCBA/Lac, C57BL/6j, BALB/c and 129S2 mouse strains17 h↓ LHR
↑ LH		[48]
BPASigma–Aldrich2 mg/kg/bw (s.c)Offspring male Sprague DawleyPerinatal exposure day 10 of gestation until day 7 of lactation↑ LH[60]
BPFJ&K Scientific Ltd.0.1 and 1 mg/Lin aquarium waterMale Zebrafish21 days ↑ LHR[39]
BPASigma-Aldrich5 or 25 mg/kg/bw (oral gavage)Adult male Wistar rats40 days↓ LH[36]
BPASigma–Aldrich50 mg/kg/bw
(oral gavage)		Adult male Wistar rats14 days↓ LH[40]
BPASigma-Aldrich50 mg/kg/bw
(oral gavage)		Adult male Wistar rats30 days↓ LH[42]
BPASigma-Aldrich200 mg/kg
(oral gavage)		Adult male SD rat42 days↓ LH[37]
BPA-25 mg/kg/bw
(i.p.)		Adult male SD ratsAlternate day for 30 days↓ LH[43]
BPAGracia chengdu chemical technology co200 mg/kg (oral gavage)Adult male SD rats28 days↓ LH[38]
BPFSanta Cruz Biotechnologies1, 5, 25, 50, and 100 mg/kg/bw
(Oral gavage)		Adult male SD rats28 days↓ LH[61]
Table
Table 3. The effects of BPA and its analogues on the EGFR-MAPK-ERK signaling pathway in the male reproductive system. Abbreviations: ↑ Increase; ↓ Decrease.
Table 3. The effects of BPA and its analogues on the EGFR-MAPK-ERK signaling pathway in the male reproductive system. Abbreviations: ↑ Increase; ↓ Decrease.
Type of
Bisphenol		Purity
(Manufacturer)		Dose (Route)Animal/
Cells		Duration of ExposureFindingsAuthor
BPASigma-Aldrich2.5 or 25 ug/kg bw
(oral gavage)		Long-Evans
(LC)		GD 12 through weaning at PND 21
Assessment of Leydig cells differentiation at 21, 35, and 90 days of age of male pups		↑ EGFR
↑ MAPK		[64]
BPASigma-Aldrich10−8 to 10−3 MLC TM324, 48, or 72 h↑ phosphorylation of ERK1/2 and Akt[65]
BPB(>98%)
Tokyo Chemical Industry		10, 100, and 200 mg/kg/bw
(oral gavage)		Male Sprague-Dawley (35 days old) rats21 days↑ the phosphorylation of AKT1, AKT2, and ERK1/2 at 100 and 200 mg/kg
↓ Testosterone		[67]
BPASigma-Aldrich(0–200 µM)JEG-3, a human choriocarcinoma cell line24 h (expose for 48, 72, 96 h)↑ phosphorylated ERK
↓ progesterone		[69]
BPASigma-Aldrich0.1, 1, 10 nMRat testicular Leydig R2C30 min↑ phosphorylation of ERK1/2
↑ aromatase activity		[52]
BPASigma-Aldrich100 μM in 0.1% DMSO
50 mg/kg body weight/week		TM3 LC
Male SD rats
(i.p)		24 h
7 days		↑ phosphorylation of ERK1/2
↑ phosphorylation of ERK1/2		[66]
BPA(>98%)
Sigma-Aldrich		0.1 to 200 mg/kg/dayPregnant SD
Male offspring at postnatal day (PND) 3, 21, or 60		(GD14) to birth (D0)
↑ ERK1, p-ERK1 (More prominent in Sertoli cell)
↑ Raf1 (more prominent in Leydig cell)		[68]
Table
Table 4. The effects of BPA and its analogues on Ca2+ influx and Nur77 transcription factor in the male reproductive system. Abbreviations: ↑ Increase; ↓ Decrease.
Table 4. The effects of BPA and its analogues on Ca2+ influx and Nur77 transcription factor in the male reproductive system. Abbreviations: ↑ Increase; ↓ Decrease.
Type of
Bisphenol		Purity
(Manufacturer)		Dosage (Route)Animal/
Cells		Duration of ExposureFindingsAuthor
BPASigma–Aldrich10 pM, 10 nM & 10 µMD. rerio (Ex vivo)5, 10, 15, 20, and 30 min incubation5, 10, 15, 20:
No effect
30 min:
BPA treatment at 10 pM and 10 nM stimulated Ca2+ influx		[71]
BPASigma–Aldrich0.1 pM, 1 pM & 10 nMThirty-day-old male Wistar rats of testes (Ex vivo)5 min incubationBPA induces Ca2+ influx involved PKC activation in rat
PLC inhibitors terminate the effect of BPA-induced Ca2+ influx.		[72]
BPA
TBBPA		Sigma-Aldrich
Santa Cruz		10 nMimmature boar testis (Ex vivo)48 hBPA and TBBPA ↑ (p < 0.01) of Ca2+ concentration[73]
BPA & BADGE.2H2OSigma-Aldrich1 µMK28 mouse Leydig tumor cell line24 hBADGE.2H2O and BPA treatment ↑ Nur77 mRNA expression
BADGE.2H2O treatment decrease the StAR expression		[74]
BPASigma-Aldrich1 μMK28 mouse Leydig tumor cell line24 hBPA specifically induces Nur77 gene expression in a time- and dose-dependent manner
No changes of Nur77 after PKC inhibitor.
BPA ↑ Nur77 gene promoter activity and its transactivation		[75]
Table
Table 5. The effects of BPA and its analogues on the StAR protein in testicular steroidogenesis. Abbreviations: ↑ Increase; ↓ Decrease.
Table 5. The effects of BPA and its analogues on the StAR protein in testicular steroidogenesis. Abbreviations: ↑ Increase; ↓ Decrease.
Type of
Bisphenol		Purity
(Manufacturer)		Dose (Route)Animal/
Cells		Duration of ExposureFindingsAuthor
BPASigma-Aldrichin vivo: 20 mg/kg (i.p.)
ex-vivo: 0, 5, 10, 20, 40, and 80 mM of BPA		C57BL/6J male wildtype (WT) mice
Primary LCs		7 days
24 h		↓ StAR
↓ serum testosterone level		[77]
BPA>99%
(Merck)		10 µM BPA (diluted in 0.1% ethanol) in drinking waterPregnant mice (testes embryo)10.5 days post-coïtum (dpc) to 18.5 dpc.Combination of radiation and BPA:
↓ gene expression (combination of StAR, Hsd3b1 and Hsd17b3)		[78]
BPA>99%
(Sigma-Aldrich)		In vivo:
10, 100 or 1000 pmol/testis
(intratesticular injection)
In vitro: 1, 10, 100, and 1000 nmol/L		SD
(60 days)		In vivo: Post-EDS days 7–28 for 21 daysIn vivo:
100 and 1000 pmol/testis of BPA from post-EDS day 14–28:
↑ serum testosterone
↑ Leydig cell-specific gene (Lhr, Star and their protein expression levels.
No alteration:
LH, FSH & proliferative capacity of Leydig cells in vivo.
In vitro:
100 nmol/L stimulated the differentiation of stem Leydig cells by:
↑ testosterone levels
up-regulating Leydig cell-specific Lhr gene and proteins but did not affect their proliferation.		[80]
BPAF>99%
(Tokyo
Chemical Industry)		0, 0.1, 1, 10, 30, 50, and 70 mMmLTC-1 cell24 h↓ StAR after exposure to 70 mM BPAF.
No alteration of StAR after treated with 22R-hydroxycholesterol		[49]
BPB>98%
(Tokyo Chemical Industry)		10, 100 and 200 mg/kg/day
(Oral gavage)		Male SD(PND) 35 to PND 56No effects of expression of StAR[67]
BPANABPA (10 μg/L) (tank)Male medaka fishfrom 8 h post-fertilization (as embryos) to adulthood 50 days
post fertilization (dpf)		↑ expression StAR gene pattern[79]
BPA, BPF and BPSSigma AldrichBPA: 10−8 M
BPF: 10−8 M
BPS: 10−8 M		Germ cell line24, 48, 72 h↑ StAR gene expression at 24, 48 and 72 h exposure[82]
BPA, BPE and BPSSigma Aldrich0.5 or 50 mg/kg/dayCD-1 miceGD7 to birth↑ relative mRNA expression of Star in BPS[81]
BPASigma Aldrich10 µM
100 µM		Fetal testis5 days↑ StAR gene expression in BPA-treated fetal & BPA exposed testes[83]
BPS98%
(Sigma Aldrich)		50 μg/L
(drinking water)		Male Wistar rats on the post-natal day (PND) 2110 weeksIn silico docking: illustrate BPS binds with StAR protein[58]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jefferi, N.E.S.; Shamhari, A.‘A.; Hamid, Z.A.; Budin, S.B.; Zulkifly, A.M.Z.; Roslan, F.N.; Taib, I.S. Knowledge Gap in Understanding the Steroidogenic Acute Regulatory Protein Regulation in Steroidogenesis Following Exposure to Bisphenol A and Its Analogues. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 1281. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10061281

AMA Style

Jefferi NES, Shamhari A‘A, Hamid ZA, Budin SB, Zulkifly AMZ, Roslan FN, Taib IS. Knowledge Gap in Understanding the Steroidogenic Acute Regulatory Protein Regulation in Steroidogenesis Following Exposure to Bisphenol A and Its Analogues. Biomedicines. 2022; 10(6):1281. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10061281

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jefferi, Nur Erysha Sabrina, Asma’ ‘Afifah Shamhari, Zariyantey Abd Hamid, Siti Balkis Budin, Adam Muhammad Zackry Zulkifly, Fatin Norisha Roslan, and Izatus Shima Taib. 2022. "Knowledge Gap in Understanding the Steroidogenic Acute Regulatory Protein Regulation in Steroidogenesis Following Exposure to Bisphenol A and Its Analogues" Biomedicines 10, no. 6: 1281. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10061281

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop