Next Article in Journal
Synergistic Power of Piceatannol and/or Vitamin D in Bleomycin-Induced Pulmonary Fibrosis In Vivo: A Preliminary Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Resolving Genotype–Phenotype Discrepancies of the Kidd Blood Group System Using Long-Read Nanopore Sequencing
Previous Article in Journal
Genetic Correlates as a Predictor of Bariatric Surgery Outcomes after 1 Year
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Fetal RHD Screening in RH1 Negative Pregnant Women: Experience in Switzerland

Biomedicines 2023, 11(10), 2646; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11102646
by Bernd Schimanski 1, Rahel Kräuchi 1, Jolanda Stettler 1, Sofia Lejon Crottet 1, Christoph Niederhauser 1,2, Frederik Banch Clausen 3, Stefano Fontana 1,4, Markus Hodel 5, Sofia Amylidi-Mohr 6, Luigi Raio 6, Claire Abbal 7 and Christine Henny 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3:
Biomedicines 2023, 11(10), 2646; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11102646
Submission received: 29 August 2023 / Revised: 22 September 2023 / Accepted: 25 September 2023 / Published: 27 September 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Molecular Diagnostics of Transfusion Medicine)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors described the data of the fetal RHD screening from cell-free DNA in blood collected from pregnant women in the Switzerland population. In this article, they showed that cfDNA screening tests are useful to avoid unnecessary administration of RHIG prophylaxis.

However, in "Materials and Methods" part, the sampling process is not clear. It is written in the article title, but the blood samples were presumably collected from pregnant women who have been confirmed serologically RHD negative. Otherwise, these tests would have no clinical advantage. But those were not written in the sampling process.  In addition, if authors could add more. Similar projects have already started in other countries, so it would be more helpful to the reader if authors showed not only the testing centre and transport or processing delay but also how they received the patient's consent or how testing costs were paid.

English language appropriate and understandable.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

 

 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

 

 Bernd Schimanski and colleagues reported on fatal genotyping for RhD antenatal prophylaxis. 

This is a hot topic and it is very actual. This paper is very well written and very much appreciated for its input and obviously practical implications. This new approach should be worldwide implemented

I believe this paper should be published ASAP in its current format.

 

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

Thank you for providing the opportunity to review the paper titled "Fetal RHD screening in RH1 negative pregnant women: Experience in Switzerland" In this paper, the authors conducted non-invasive fetal RHD screening through cell-free DNA analysis in a total of 7192 pregnant women who tested RHD-negative. I would like to express the following concerns regarding this paper.

This study comprised two parts. First, the validation study, which involved 208 RHD-negative samples and 307 RHD-positive samples, was described in the Results section. Second, a total of 7192 samples were collected from pregnant women who tested RHD-negative over a 30-month period. The authors should provide a description of the study design above in the Methods section.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop