Next Article in Journal
Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Efficacy, Toxicity, and Resistance Mechanisms—A Systematic Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Is It Time to Alter the Standard of Care for Iron Deficiency/Iron Deficiency Anemia in Reproductive-Age Women?
Previous Article in Journal
Modulation of D3R Splicing, Signaling, and Expression by D1R through PKA→PTB Phosphorylation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Factors Governing the Erythropoietic Response to Intravenous Iron Infusion in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Prevalence and Characteristics of Metabolic Hyperferritinemia in a Population-Based Central-European Cohort

1
Department of Internal Medicine I, Paracelsus Medical University, Müllner Hauptstrasse 48, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
2
Obesity Research Unit, Paracelsus Medical University, Müllner Hauptstrasse 48, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
3
Department of Medicine, General Hospital Oberndorf, Teaching Hospital of the Paracelsus Medical University, Paracelsusstraße 37, 5110 Oberndorf, Austria
4
Department of Internal Medicine 2, Gastroenterology and Hepatology and Rheumatology, University Hospital of St. Pölten, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Dunant-Platz 1, Kremser Landstraße 40, 3100 St. Pölten, Austria
5
Department of Geriatric Medicine, Christian Doppler University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, Ignaz-Harrer-Straße 79, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
6
Department of Neurology, Christian Doppler University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University and Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Affiliated Member of the European Reference Network EpiCARE, Ignaz-Harrer-Straße 79, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
7
Vienna Hepatic Hemodynamic Lab, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
8
Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Francesco Forza 35, 20122 Milan, Italy
9
Precision Medicine, Biological Resource Center Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via Francesco Sforza, 35, 20122 Milan, Italy
10
Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università degli Studi di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Via del Pozzo 71, 41124 Modena, Italy
11
Internal Medicine and Centre for Hemochromatosis and Hereditary Liver Diseases, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena Policlinico, 41124 Modena, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomedicines 2024, 12(1), 207; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12010207
Submission received: 12 December 2023 / Revised: 7 January 2024 / Accepted: 11 January 2024 / Published: 17 January 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Iron Deficiency and Iron-Related Disorders)

Abstract

:
Background: Hyperferritinemia (HF) is a common finding and can be considered as metabolic HF (MHF) in combination with metabolic diseases. The definition of MHF was heterogenous until a consensus statement was published recently. Our aim was to apply the definition of MHF to provide data on the prevalence and characteristics of MHF in a Central-European cohort. Methods: This study was a retrospective analysis of the Paracelsus 10,000 study, a population-based cohort study from the region of Salzburg, Austria. We included 8408 participants, aged 40–77. Participants with HF were divided into three categories according to their level of HF and evaluated for metabolic co-morbidities defined by the proposed criteria for MHF. Results: HF was present in 13% (n = 1111) with a clear male preponderance (n = 771, 69% of HF). Within the HF group, 81% (n = 901) of subjects fulfilled the metabolic criteria and were defined as MHF, of which 75% (n = 674) were characterized by a major criterion. In the remaining HF cohort, 52% (n = 227 of 437) of subjects were classified as MHF after application of the minor criteria. Conclusion: HF is a common finding in the general middle-aged population and the majority of cases are classified as MHF. The new classification provides useful criteria for defining MHF.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Ferritin is a multimeric protein complex with essential functions in iron homeostasis and storage. Although only a small amount is found in serum, the measurement of serum ferritin (SF) is clinically useful as an indicator of the total body iron content [1]. Hyperferritinemia (HF) is defined as elevated SF concentrations and is present in about 5–25% of the general population [2]. Several different conditions may lead to HF and are classified as primary, i.e., inherited causes based on genetic variations, or secondary, i.e., acquired causes due to hematological, inflammatory or metabolic diseases [3].
Due to the rapidly increasing prevalence of obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and metabolic-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) worldwide [4,5], persistent HF is most commonly associated with these metabolic diseases. The elevation of ferritin in patients affected by these conditions is considered a consequence of combined genetic, alimentary and inflammatory stimuli on iron fluxes. Different factors contributing to the pathogenesis, as well as associations and relations of HF with components of these disease mechanisms, have been described [6,7,8,9,10,11]. Among metabolic-associated forms of HF, an additional increase in iron stores within the liver has been referred to as dysmetabolic iron-overload syndrome [12]. Several effects of iron overload on chronic metabolic conditions and organ damage have been reported, including a higher incidence of T2DM and insulin resistance and there are conflicting data on liver disease severity and cardiovascular events [13].
Although associations between HF and various metabolic conditions are well known, they have not been conclusively defined. There have neither been uniform cut-off values for a consistent grading of HF nor have the underlying metabolic conditions for a standardized diagnosis been defined. To overcome those gaps, Valenti et al. recently published a consensus statement on the definition and classification of metabolic hyperferritinemia (MHF), which may provide a broadly accepted working definition of MHF [14].
Based on this novel definition, we evaluated the data of the Paracelsus 10,000 (P10) study from the region of Salzburg, Austria. The aim was to generate information on the prevalence of MHF in a Central-European cohort and to provide characteristics of associated metabolic co-morbidities in order to evaluate the proposed classification.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Population

Data was used from the P10 study, which is a population-based observational cohort study of the city and surrounding region of Salzburg, Austria. The objective of the P10 study is to investigate the general health of the population, with a particular focus on metabolic, cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. The recruitment phase ended in 2020, and during follow-up, clinical events were recorded. Participants were invited after random selection from the local population registry, and 10,044 participants aged 40–77 years were recruited. All participants signed an informed consent form. A detailed description of the study was provided recently [15].
For this analysis, the baseline data set was used. The study team had access to all data and ensured its protection and integrity. The P10 study protocol was approved by the local ethics committee (415-E/1521/3-2012), and all study-related procedures were carried out in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.

2.2. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

Analyses were performed at three different levels of patient selection: (i) the overall cohort, (ii) the study cohort and (iii) the affirmation cohort.
(i)
Overall cohort: A baseline serum ferritin concentration was available in n = 9915 participants, comprising our overall cohort and representing an unselected population level.
(ii)
Study cohort: For the study cohort, we applied the consensus exclusion criteria, which were (a) transferrin saturation of >50% (n = 776), (b) anemia defined as blood hemoglobin < 12.5 g/dL in women and <13.0 g/dL in men (n = 396), (c) advanced chronic kidney disease defined by an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of <30 mL/min (n = 10, with n = 1 with an eGFR < 15 mL/min) or (d) self-reported daily alcohol intake of >40 g in women and >60 g in men (n = 416). Some individuals held more than one exclusion criterion. Thus, after exclusion of a total of n = 1507 participants, the study cohort consisted of n = 8408 subjects.
(iii)
Affirmation cohort: As inaccuracies may arise from missing values with regard to the metabolic classification, we aimed to validate our findings in a cohort of subjects, in which a full metabolic characterization due to entirely complete data sets of the proposed metabolic parameters were available. This cohort comprised n = 6424 participants. Thus, any misclassification due to potentially incomplete metabolic data was avoided.
HF was defined as SF > 200 ng/mL in females and SF > 300 ng/mL in males. For further analysis, participants with HF were grouped into the three grades of HF according to the consensus:
(1)
HF grade 1 with SF < 550 ng/mL (females 200–549 ng/mL, males 300–549 ng/mL)
(2)
HF grade 2 with SF of 550–1000 ng/mL
(3)
HF grade 3 with SF > 1000 ng/mL.
Figure 1 shows a chart of the selection of the study cohort.

2.3. Definition of Metabolic Hyperferritinemia

Hyperferritinemia was defined and considered as metabolic according to the recent consensus. Table 1 shows a summary of the diagnostic criteria, and the parameters used in this study are highlighted. In brief, the criteria were summarized as presence of a major feature of metabolic dysfunction, like evidence of fatty liver and/or T2DM and/or obesity, or the presence of at least two minor features of altered metabolism, like overweight or increased abdominal circumference, elevated triglycerides, low HDL cholesterol, increased fasting glucose, arterial hypertension or elevated HOMA-Index.
For this analysis, we first applied the major criteria to classify those with manifest metabolic disease. Liver steatosis was defined with a fatty liver index (FLI) > 60 because no other techniques were available. The FLI is a non-invasive, validated biochemical assessment of liver steatosis, using triglycerides, gamma-glutamyltransferase, waist circumference and BMI (body mass index) [16,17]. All other parameters were available from the baseline evaluation of the P10 study. T2DM was defined according to national guidelines with either HbA1c ≥ 6.5% or an elevated fasting glucose of ≥126 mg/dL or a 2 h post glucose load glycemia of ≥200 mg/dL during oral glucose tolerance test or use of antidiabetic medication [18]. Obesity was defined as BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 [19]. After application of the major criteria, the minor criteria were applied to the remaining subjects. A list and definition of the minor criteria is provided in Table 1.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Continuous data are given as median ± interquartile range (IQR) and compared using Mann’s Whitney U-Test or mean ± standard deviation (SD) and compared using Student’s t-Test accordingly. Categorical data are given as numbers (percentage) and compared using the Chi-square test. All tests were two-sided, and a p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Stata/IC 17 was used for all statistical analyses.

3. Results

3.1. Characteristics of the Overall Cohort

A baseline SF level was available in n = 9915 subjects. Within this overall cohort, 86% of (n = 8527) participants had normal SF levels (n = 3845/45% male, n = 4682/55% female), while 14% (n = 1388) of participants had elevated SF, of which 66% (n = 917) were male.
Among subjects with HF, 88% (n = 1225) were classified as HF grade 1, 11% (n = 146) as HF grade 2 and 1% (n = 17) as HF grade 3, respectively. Subjects within the non-HF group were younger (mean age 55 ± 8) than the subjects within the HF group (mean age 58 ± 8 for HF 1, HF 2 and HF 3, respectively). Generally, MHF defining criteria (major and minor) were found in 55% (n = 4692) of subjects of the non-HF group, compared to 78% (n = 960), 92% (n = 134) and 94% (n = 16) of subjects within the HF groups grade 1, grade 2 and grade 3, respectively. Table 2 shows the baseline characteristics, and Table 3 shows the prevalence of major and minor metabolic characteristics of the overall cohort. Classification by minor criteria was only applied to subjects who had not been classified by a major criterion.

3.2. Characteristics of the Study Cohort Using the MHF Defining Criteria

According to the abovementioned inclusion and exclusion criteria, n = 8408 participants were eligible for analysis regarding MHF, of which n = 1111 (13%) fulfilled the criteria of HF. Within the subjects with HF, the majority, 90% (n = 997), were classified as HF grade 1, in comparison to 9% (n = 107) with HF grade 2 and 0.5% (n = 7) with HF grade 3. The mean age of subjects with and without HF was similar, at 56 ± 8 years in the non-HF-group versus 58 ± 8 years, 57 ± 8 years and 56 ± 4 years in the HF groups grade 1, grade 2 and grade 3, respectively. There was a clear male preponderance within the HF group, at 69% (n = 771) in comparison to 44% (n = 3243) men in the non-HF group. Table 4 shows the baseline and anthropometric characteristics of our study cohort.
The results with regard to application of the metabolic criteria on the HF groups are shown in Table 5. The differences between the HF and non-HF group were statistically significant, except for the minor criterion low HDL cholesterol. In general, subjects with HF fulfilled the metabolic criteria more often, at 81% (n = 901 of 1111), in comparison to the non-HF group at 56% (n = 4084 of 7297). Fulfilled metabolic criteria were found in 59% (n = 4984) of the general study cohort, but prevalence increased along the grades of HF with fulfilled metabolic criteria in 82% (n = 795) of the population with HF grade 1, 95% (n = 99) with HF grade 2 and 100% (n = 7) with HF grade 3, respectively.
Major metabolic characteristics were more frequent in the HF group, at 61% (n = 673) compared to 32% (n = 2300) in the non-HF group, and prevalence again increased among the grades of HF. In the remaining participants after application of the major criteria (n = 5435), any combination of at least two minor metabolic criteria was found in 52% (n = 227 of 437) of the remaining HF group and 36% (n = 1784 of 4997) of the remaining non-HF group.
In summary, 81% (n = 901 of 1111) of subjects within the HF group fulfilled the diagnostic metabolic criteria and may therefore be classified as MHF, of which the majority, 75% (n = 673 of 901), were characterized by the presence of a major criterion. A detailed listing of general prevalence and proportions of the major criteria within the study cohort and the minor criteria within the remaining cohort is shown in Table 5.

3.3. Characteristics of the Affirmation Cohort

For validation of our findings due to missing values, we additionally analyzed a smaller subset of n = 6424 subjects without any missing values with regard to the data required for metabolic characterization. The results did not differ from those of our study cohort. A description of this affirmation cohort is provided in the Supplementary Materials (Tables S1–S3).

4. Discussion

Our data confirm HF as a frequent laboratory finding at the population level and metabolic alterations as its leading underlying cause, with increasing prevalence among the severity of HF. Although similar observations have been published in the past, no uniform definition for MHF has been provided so far. Dysmetabolic hyperferritinemia (DHF) was first described when HF with normal transferrin saturation was linked to metabolic disorders [20] and has further been referred to as insulin resistance-associated hepatic iron overload with additional positive histological iron staining [21]. Later, the definition of dysmetabolic iron overload (DIOS) was refined as HF with normal or mildly increased transferrin saturation, metabolic abnormalities and a specific amount of hepatic iron excess with liver biopsy or MR imaging [12]. Many reports followed describing the underlying pathophysiology, metabolic alterations [22,23,24,25,26,27,28], the impact of DHF on liver damage [29], or the controversial therapeutic effect of venesection [30]. However, so far, different definitions and criteria for MHF have been used, making comparisons difficult. Additionally, the necessity of iron quantification by biopsy or MRI has complicated diagnosis due to the limited availability of both methods. The proposed new definition is based on the consensus of involved researchers and promises to overcome those difficulties by suggesting uniform cut-off values and a clear listing and definition for underlying metabolic conditions to help standardize clinical diagnosis.
We therefore applied the novel definition to provide data on MHF from a population-based cohort. The major strength of our study is its population-based design, which provides findings without preselection and allows conclusions for a general Central-European population. In general, numbers and percentages for the prevalence of metabolic alterations were similar within the overall population and the study cohort. The prevalence of HF of 13% in our study cohort (and 14% in the overall cohort) is in line with data reported so far. The prevalence of severe HF with SF > 1000 mg/dL was low, with 17 out of 9915 subjects affected on a population level for the overall cohort and 7 out of 8408 for the study cohort, accounting for just 0.5% and 1% among subjects with HF, respectively. However, the whole group of MHF grade 3 in our study cohort was classified as MHF by a major metabolic feature, underlining the relevance of metabolic alterations in severe HF besides potential other acquired conditions. Furthermore, this grade may constitute an important subset for further studies regarding additional genetic predisposition of iron metabolism disorders and iron accumulation.
Of all subjects with HF, the vast majority, 81%, were classified as MHF. Therefore, our data confirm underlying metabolic conditions as the most common reason for HF, although this high prevalence does not reflect a cause–effect relation. In three out of four subjects with MHF, a major criterion was the defining feature. In our cohort, the most common major criterion was fatty liver disease, with an overall prevalence of 32%, which is in line with known prevalence worldwide [31]. Hence, these numbers also support that FLI serves as an adequate means to estimate the presence of fatty liver on the population level. Of all subjects with MASLD (n = 2669) in our cohort, 24% (n = 636) had HF, which again supports previous estimates of HF prevalence in MASLD [32]. We also observed a higher prevalence of MASLD of 57% in subjects with HF and a further increase in MASLD prevalence along with the severity of HF [29,33,34,35]. A relationship between intravenous iron therapy and worsening of hepatic fat was also shown in the setting of dialysis [36] and recently a relationship between liver iron and MASLD was proposed by Mendelian randomization analysis [37]. It will be particularly worthwhile to analyze these genetic interrelations at the population level.
The numbers of the major criteria of obesity and T2DM also are in line with numbers reported previously for Europe [4,20,38]. Similarly to MASLD in subjects with HF, the prevalence of obesity and T2DM was significantly higher in the HF group, likely due to common underlying mechanisms like subclinical inflammation with changes in the hepcidin–ferroportin axis, abnormal endocrine function of adipose tissue and insulin resistance [6,39].
Of the remaining participants after application of the major criteria, one-half were additionally classified as MHF due to the minor criteria. The criteria of overweight, arterial hypertension, impaired fasting glucose and elevated HOMA, again, were significantly more frequent among participants with HF. Interestingly, the two least-common minor features, low HDL cholesterol and triglycerides, showed less or even no significant differences between groups. We assume an essential part of those with altered lipid metabolism were already classified with a major criterion like MASLD and hence these subjects were not counted again with these remaining minor criteria, resulting in lower numbers for respective minor categories within the HF group. And although metabolic alterations were also found in 56% of the non-HF group, we show a relevant association and increasing likelihood of HF in subjects with metabolic comorbidities at the population level.
There are also some limitations to our study. First, our findings are based on the results from one single baseline examination and were not re-evaluated after 3 months of lifestyle modification or resolution of a trigger, as suggested by the consensus. This might be particularly relevant for the influence of regular alcohol intake as we observed an increasing amount of daily alcohol consumption among the HF grades. Secondly, liver steatosis was only diagnosed non-invasively with FLI and it has to be considered that the same clinical and biochemical parameters like BMI or triglycerides are also part of the MHF defining criteria. Furthermore, a substantial number of approximately 15% of the overall cohort had to be excluded according to the suggested exclusion criteria. However, numbers and percentages for metabolic characteristics were similar in the overall and the study cohort. The high number of exclusions due to elevated transferrin saturation (n = 776) is noticeable. Even presuming a substantial part of those being caused by an increased amount of daily alcohol consumption (n = 416), the other half remains without explanation. We suggest that this exclusion criterion will need further study as it is likely that the majority of these subjects in fact also had MHF rather than hemochromatosis. We also had to handle a relevant number of missing values necessary for metabolic characterization. To provide information on MHF which was as accurate as possible at the population level, our study cohort included every subject with available baseline SF, except those who met any of the exclusion criteria. This was at the expense of missing values as a full metabolic characterization for every subject was available in n = 6424 of the population. However, the findings for MHF classification in this affirmation cohort did not differ from those of our study cohort, therefore supporting our results. Due to the descriptive scope of this study, we did not aim to perform multiple testing; a subgroup analysis between the non-HF group and each of the HF subgroups (HF 1, HF 2 + HF 3) is added in the supplementary material (Tables S4 and S5). In summary, our three-step approach demonstrated little variability in the rates for MHF classification, making the data a robust estimate of these criteria at the population level in a Central-European cohort.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, we provide reliable data on the prevalence of HF in general and the characteristics of MHF in particular, highlighting the predominance of metabolic alterations as one underlying cause of HF. The consensus offers a standardized definition of MHF with harmonized criteria that are easy to apply. It is highly based on routine laboratory testing or easily available imaging methods and non-invasive techniques. Overall, the inclusive design with positive criteria for MHF is particularly appealing and makes the definition useful not just for research questions but also for clinical routines and might help in addressing unanswered questions about the impact of MHF on liver disease severity, cardiovascular disease or as a potential value of venesection.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/biomedicines12010207/s1, Table S1: Main characteristics in total numbers, percentages (%) or median and interquartile range (IQR) for the affirmation cohort. Table S2: Presence of fulfilled metabolic criteria within the HF and non-HF groups in percentages and numbers for the affirmation cohort. Table S3: Presence of major or minor metabolic characteristics within the different groups in percentages and numbers for the affirmation cohort. Table S4: subgroup analysis of the general characteristics for the Non-HF-group and the HF 1 group, numbers represent median and interquartile range (IQR). Table S5: subgroup analysis of the general characteristics for the Non-HF-group and the HF groups 2 and 3 combined, numbers represent median and interquartile range (IQR).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.G., B.W. and E.A.; Formal analysis, S.G., B.W. and E.A.; Investigation, S.G., B.W. and E.A.; Methodology, S.G., B.W. and E.A.; Supervision, E.A.; Writing—original draft, S.G.; Writing—review and editing, B.W., F.K., G.S. (Georg Strebinger), S.Z., L.S., B.P., B.I., E.T., V.F., P.L., G.S. (Georg Semmler), L.V., E.C., C.D. and E.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors. The Paracelsus 10,000 study was financially supported by the County of Salzburg, the Salzburger Landeskliniken (SALK, the Health Care Provider of the University Hospitals Landeskrankenhaus and Christian Doppler Klinik), the Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, the Austrian Health Insurance (Österreichische Gesundheitskasse-ÖGK) and by unrestricted grants from Bayer, AstraZeneca, Sanofi-Aventis, Boehringer-Ingelheim.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The Paracelsus 10,000 study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the local ethics committee (415-E/1521/3-2012).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

Financial support from SPAR Austria to C.D. is gratefully acknowledged.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses or interpretation of the data; in the writing of the manuscript or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Plays, M.; Müller, S.; Rodriguez, R. Chemistry and biology of ferritin. Metallomics 2021, 13, mfab021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Adams, P.C.; Reboussin, D.M.; Barton, J.C.; McLaren, C.E.; Eckfeldt, J.H.; McLaren, G.D.; Dawkins, F.W.; Acton, R.T.; Harris, E.L.; Gordeuk, V.R.; et al. Hemochromatosis and iron-overload screening in a racially diverse population. N. Engl. J. Med. 2005, 352, 1769–1778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Hsu, C.C.; Senussi, N.H.; Fertrin, K.Y.; Kowdley, K.V. Iron overload disorders. Hepatol. Commun. 2022, 6, 1842–1854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Blüher, M. Obesity: Global epidemiology and pathogenesis. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2019, 15, 288–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Younossi, Z.M.; Golabi, P.; de Avila, L.; Paik, J.M.; Srishord, M.; Fukui, N.; Qiu, Y.; Burns, L.; Afendy, A.; Nader, F. The global epidemiology of NAFLD and NASH in patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Hepatol. 2019, 71, 793–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Dongiovanni, P.; Fracanzani, A.L.; Fargion, S.; Valenti, L. Iron in fatty liver and in the metabolic syndrome: A promising therapeutic target. J. Hepatol. 2011, 55, 920–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Aigner, E. Dysregulation of iron and copper homeostasis in nonalcoholic fatty liver. World J. Hepatol. 2014, 7, 177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Britton, L.J.; Subramaniam, V.N.; Crawford, D.H. Iron and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. World J. Gastroenterol. 2016, 22, 8112–8122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Milic, S.; Mikolasevic, I.; Orlic, L.; Devcic, E.; Starcevic-Cizmarevic, N.; Stimac, D.; Kapovic, M.; Ristic, S. The Role of Iron and Iron Overload in Chronic Liver Disease. Med. Sci. Monit. Int. Med. J. Exp. Clin. Res. 2016, 22, 2144–2151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. González-Domínguez, Á.; Visiedo-García, F.M.; Domínguez-Riscart, J.; González-Domínguez, R.; Mateos, R.M.; Lechuga-Sancho, A.M. Iron Metabolism in Obesity and Metabolic Syndrome. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 5529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Stechemesser, L.; Eder, S.K.; Wagner, A.; Patsch, W.; Feldman, A.; Strasser, M.; Auer, S.; Niederseer, D.; Huber-Schönauer, U.; Paulweber, B.; et al. Metabolomic profiling identifies potential pathways involved in the interaction of iron homeostasis with glucose metabolism. Mol. Metab. 2017, 6, 38–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Deugnier, Y.; Bardou-Jacquet, É.; Lainé, F. Dysmetabolic iron overload syndrome (DIOS). La Presse Médicale 2017, 46 Pt 2, e306–e311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Fernández-Real, J.M.; Manco, M. Effects of iron overload on chronic metabolic diseases. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014, 2, 513–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Valenti, L.; Corradini, E.; Adams, L.A.; Aigner, E.; Alqahtani, S.; Arrese, M.; Bardou-Jacquet, E.; Bugianesi, E.; Fernandez-Real, J.-M.; Girelli, D.; et al. Consensus Statement on the definition and classification of metabolic hyperferritinaemia. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2023, 19, 299–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Frey, V.N.; Langthaler, P.; Raphaelis, E.; Ring-Dimitriou, S.; Kedenko, L.; Aigner, E. Paracelsus 10,000: An observational cohort study about the health status of the population of Salzburg, Austria. Rationale, objectives and study design. Paracelsus Proc. Exp. Med. 2023, 1, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bedogni, G.; Bellentani, S.; Miglioli, L.; Masutti, F.; Passalacqua, M.; Castiglione, A.; Tiribelli, C. The Fatty Liver Index: A simple and accurate predictor of hepatic steatosis in the general population. BMC Gastroenterol. 2006, 6, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Carvalhana, S.; Leitão, J.; Alves, A.C.; Bourbon, M.; Cortez-Pinto, H. How good is controlled attenuation parameter and fatty liver index for assessing liver steatosis in general population: Correlation with ultrasound. Liver Int. 2014, 34, e111–e117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Harreiter, J.; Roden, M. Diabetes mellitus—Definition, Klassifikation, Diagnose, Screening und Prävention (Update 2019). Wien. Klin. Wochenschr. 2019, 131, 6–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe. WHO European Regional Obesity Report 2022; World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2022; Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/353747 (accessed on 21 January 2023).
  20. Moirand, R.; Mortaji, A.M.; Loréal, O.; Paillard, F.; Brissot, P.; Deugnier, Y. A new syndrome of liver iron overload with normal transferrin saturation. Lancet 1997, 349, 95–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Mendler, M.H.; Turlin, B.; Moirand, R.; Jouanolle, A.M.; Sapey, T.; Guyader, D.; Le Gall, J.Y.; Brissot, P.; David, V.; Deugnier, Y. Insulin resistance-associated hepatic iron overload. Gastroenterology 1999, 117, 1155–1163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Simcox, J.A.; McClain, D.A. Iron and Diabetes Risk. Cell Metab. 2013, 17, 329–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Chen, L.; Li, Y.; Zhang, F.; Zhang, S.; Zhou, X.; Ji, L. Elevated serum ferritin concentration is associated with incident type 2 diabetes mellitus in a Chinese population: A prospective cohort study. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2018, 139, 155–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Suárez-Ortegón, M.F.; Ensaldo-Carrasco, E.; Shi, T.; McLachlan, S.; Fernández-Real, J.M.; Wild, S.H. Ferritin, metabolic syndrome and its components: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Atherosclerosis 2018, 275, 97–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Corradini, E.; Buzzetti, E.; Dongiovanni, P.; Scarlini, S.; Caleffi, A.; Pelusi, S.; Bernardis, I.; Ventura, P.; Rametta, R.; Tenedini, E.; et al. Ceruloplasmin gene variants are associated with hyperferritinemia and increased liver iron in patients with NAFLD. J. Hepatol. 2021, 75, 506–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Wang, J.-W.; Jin, C.-H.; Ke, J.-F.; Ma, Y.-L.; Wang, Y.-J.; Lu, J.-X.; Li, M.-F.; Li, L.-X. Serum iron is closely associated with metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease in type 2 diabetes: A real-world study. Front. Endocrinol. 2022, 13, 942412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wang, Q.; Zhu, M.; Li, H.; Chen, P.; Wang, M.; Gu, L.; Zhang, X.; Chen, L. Hyperferritinemia Correlates to Metabolic Dysregulation and Steatosis in Chinese Biopsy-Proven Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Patients. Diabetes Metab. Syndr. Obes. Targets Ther. 2022, 15, 1543–1552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mayneris-Perxachs, J.; Cardellini, M.; Hoyles, L.; Latorre, J.; Davato, F.; Moreno-Navarrete, J.M.; Arnoriaga-Rodríguez, M.; Serino, M.; Abbott, J.; Barton, R.H.; et al. Iron status influences non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in obesity through the gut microbiome. Microbiome 2021, 9, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, H.; Sun, R.; Yang, S.; Ma, X.; Yu, C. Association between serum ferritin level and the various stages of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A systematic review. Front. Med. 2022, 9, 934989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Murali, A.R.; Gupta, A.; Brown, K. Systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the impact of iron depletion in dysmetabolic iron overload syndrome and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatol. Res. 2018, 48, E30–E41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Younossi, Z.M.; Koenig, A.B.; Abdelatif, D.; Fazel, Y.; Henry, L.; Wymer, M. Global epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease-Meta-analytic assessment of prevalence, incidence, and outcomes. Hepatol. Baltim. Md 2016, 64, 73–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Moris, W.; Verhaegh, P.; Jonkers, D.; Deursen, C.V.; Koek, G. Hyperferritinemia in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Iron Accumulation or Inflammation? Semin. Liver Dis. 2019, 39, 476–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Kowdley, K.V.; Belt, P.; Wilson, L.A.; Yeh, M.M.; Neuschwander-Tetri, B.A.; Chalasani, N.; Sanyal, A.J.; Nelson, J.E.; NASH Clinical Research Network. Serum ferritin is an independent predictor of histologic severity and advanced fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology 2012, 55, 77–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Jung, J.Y.; Shim, J.-J.; Park, S.K.; Ryoo, J.-H.; Choi, J.-M.; Oh, I.-H.; Jung, K.-W.; Cho, H.; Ki, M.; Won, Y.-J.; et al. Serum ferritin level is associated with liver steatosis and fibrosis in Korean general population. Hepatol. Int. 2019, 13, 222–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Du, S.-X.; Lu, L.-L.; Geng, N.; Victor, D.W.; Chen, L.-Z.; Wang, C.; Yue, H.-Y.; Xin, Y.-N.; Xuan, S.-Y.; Jin, W. Association of serum ferritin with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A meta-analysis. Lipids Health Dis. 2017, 16, 228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Rostoker, G.; Loridon, C.; Griuncelli, M.; Rabaté, C.; Lepeytre, F.; Ureña-Torres, P.; Issad, B.; Ghali, N.; Cohen, Y. Liver Iron Load Influences Hepatic Fat Fraction in End-Stage Renal Disease Patients on Dialysis: A Proof of Concept Study. EBioMedicine 2018, 39, 461–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Liu, C.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Xie, J.; Yu, C.; Xu, L.; Li, Y. Iron Status and NAFLD among European Populations: A Bidirectional Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study. Nutrients 2022, 14, 5237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Sun, H.; Saeedi, P.; Karuranga, S.; Pinkepank, M.; Ogurtsova, K.; Duncan, B.B.; Stein, C.; Basit, A.; Chan, J.C.N.; Mbanya, J.C.; et al. IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global, regional and country-level diabetes prevalence estimates for 2021 and projections for 2045. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2022, 183, 109119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Qiu, F.; Wu, L.; Yang, G.; Zhang, C.; Liu, X.; Sun, X.; Chen, X.; Wang, N. The role of iron metabolism in chronic diseases related to obesity. Mol. Med. 2022, 28, 130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Flowchart with inclusion and exclusion criteria of the final study cohort. Abbreviations: HF hyperferritinemia, SF serum ferritin, TfSat transferrin saturation, eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate, Hb hemoglobin.
Figure 1. Flowchart with inclusion and exclusion criteria of the final study cohort. Abbreviations: HF hyperferritinemia, SF serum ferritin, TfSat transferrin saturation, eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate, Hb hemoglobin.
Biomedicines 12 00207 g001
Table 1. Diagnostic criteria for metabolic hyperferritinemia. Abbreviations: MRI magnetic resonance imaging; OGTT oral glucose tolerance test, BMI body mass index; HDL high-density lipoprotein; HOMA homeostasis model assessment.
Table 1. Diagnostic criteria for metabolic hyperferritinemia. Abbreviations: MRI magnetic resonance imaging; OGTT oral glucose tolerance test, BMI body mass index; HDL high-density lipoprotein; HOMA homeostasis model assessment.
Hyperferritinemia If Serum Ferritin Levels > 200 ng/mL in Females or >300 ng/mL in Males. Considered as Metabolic Hyperferritinemia If:
Evidence of fatty liver
  • Liver biopsy.
  • Imaging (Ultrasound, MRI, computed tomography).
  • Continuous attenuation parameter on transient elastography.
  • Non-invasive biomarker/scores (e.g., fatty liver index).
OR evidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus
  • HbA1c ≥ 6.5%.
  • Fasting glucose ≥ 126 mg/dL.
  • Two hour post glucose load glycemia of ≥200 mg/dL at OGTT.
  • Use of antidiabetic medication.
OR evidence of obesity (BMI > 30 kg/m2)
  • BMI > 30 kg/m2.
OR ≥ 2 of the following features of altered metabolism
  • Overweight (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2) or increased waist circumference (>102/88 cm in M/F).
  • Increased circulating triglycerides (150 mg/dL).
  • Low HDL cholesterol (<45/55 mg/dL in M/F).
  • Increased fasting glucose levels (>100 mg/dL).
  • Arterial hypertension (>130/85 mmHg or use of anti-hypertensive agents).
  • Evidence of fasting hyperinsulinemia or IR (locally validated, e.g., HOMA-IR index > 2.5).
Table 2. Characteristics for the overall cohort in total numbers and percentages (%) or median and interquartile range (IQR). Abbreviations: HF hyperferritinemia, BMI body mass index, Waist waist circumference, ALT alanine transaminase, AST aspartate transaminase, Gamma GT Gamma-glutamyltransferase, ALP alkaline phosphatase, HDL high-density lipoprotein, LDL low-density lipoprotein, TG triglycerides, Hgb blood hemoglobin, WBC white blood cells, PLT platelets. The asterisk (*) denotes significant difference between the non-HF and the HF group at p < 0.05.
Table 2. Characteristics for the overall cohort in total numbers and percentages (%) or median and interquartile range (IQR). Abbreviations: HF hyperferritinemia, BMI body mass index, Waist waist circumference, ALT alanine transaminase, AST aspartate transaminase, Gamma GT Gamma-glutamyltransferase, ALP alkaline phosphatase, HDL high-density lipoprotein, LDL low-density lipoprotein, TG triglycerides, Hgb blood hemoglobin, WBC white blood cells, PLT platelets. The asterisk (*) denotes significant difference between the non-HF and the HF group at p < 0.05.
Non-HF
n = 8527
HF All Grades (n = 1388)
HF 1 (n = 1225)HF 2 (n = 146)HF 3 (n = 17)
Age 40–49 years25% (n = 2125)All grades 17% (n = 234)
17% (n = 206)18% (n = 26)12% (n = 2)
Age 50–59 years43% (n = 3684)All grades 40% (n = 554)
40% (n = 494)38% (n = 53)41% (n = 7)
Age 60–69 years28% (n = 2350)All grades 37% (n = 523)
37% (n = 454)42% (n = 62)41% (n = 7)
Age ≥ 70 years4% (n = 353)All grades 6% (n = 77)
6% (n = 71)3% (n = 5)6% (n = 1)
Male *45% (n = 3845)All grades 70% (n = 971)
67% (n = 815)95% (n = 139)100% (n = 17)
Female *55% (n = 4682)All grades 30% (n = 417)
33% (n = 410)5% (n = 7)0% (n = 0)
BMI kg/m2 *25 (23–29)28 (25–31)29 (26–32)29 (27–32)
Waist cm *92 (83–100)99 (92–107)102 (96–112)104 (99–110)
Alcohol g/d *7 (2–17)13 (4–27)15 (6–30)38 (20–81)
ALT U/L *21 (16–28)28 (21–39)38 (28–53)55 (35–105)
AST U/L *22 (19–27)25 (21–31)30 (24–39)52 (33–141)
GammaGT U/L *21 (15–32)32 (22–51)46 (29–73)170 (58–402)
ALP U/L *63 (53–75)65 (56–77)63 (51–75)68 (62–98)
HDL mg/dL *63 (52–75)55 (46–68)48 (42–55)53 (44–70)
LDL mg/dL *139 (115–164)148 (124–171)142 (116–174)155 (121–170)
TG mg/dL *94 (69–132)118 (89–167)160 (123–218)197 (102–264)
Hgb g/dL *14.2 (13.4–15.0)14.9 (14.1–15.6)15.3 (14.7–16.1)15.2 (14.6–16.5)
WBC 10⁹/L *5.8 (4.9–6.9)6.1 (5.1–7.2)5.9 (5.3–7.1)6.4 (5.7–6.9)
PLT 10⁹/L *247 (213–283)237 (205–271)210 (181–244)198 (157–218)
Table 3. Summary of rates and proportions of major and minor metabolic characteristics of the overall cohort. The prevalence of the major characteristics is calculated for the overall cohort and the prevalence of the minor characteristics for the remaining cohort after application of the major characteristics. Within the two cohorts of major or minor criteria, an individual can fulfill more than one criterion but may only be classified once. Abbreviations: HF hyperferritinemia, FLI fatty liver index, BMI body mass index, T2DM type 2 diabetes mellitus, HOMA homeostasis model assessment, HDL high-density lipoprotein. The p-value indicates significant difference between the non-HF and the HF group at p < 0.05.
Table 3. Summary of rates and proportions of major and minor metabolic characteristics of the overall cohort. The prevalence of the major characteristics is calculated for the overall cohort and the prevalence of the minor characteristics for the remaining cohort after application of the major characteristics. Within the two cohorts of major or minor criteria, an individual can fulfill more than one criterion but may only be classified once. Abbreviations: HF hyperferritinemia, FLI fatty liver index, BMI body mass index, T2DM type 2 diabetes mellitus, HOMA homeostasis model assessment, HDL high-density lipoprotein. The p-value indicates significant difference between the non-HF and the HF group at p < 0.05.
Major Criteria within the Overall Cohort n = 9915
Overall Cohort
n = 9915
HF All Grades n = 1388Non-HF
n = 8527
p-Value
HF 1
n = 1225
HF 2
n = 146
HF 3
n = 17
Major criteriaFLI > 6031%
n = 3121
All grades 57% (n = 792)27%
(n = 2329)
<0.001
54%
(n = 661)
79%
(n = 115)
94%
(n = 16)
BMI > 30 kg/m219%
n = 1923
All grades 31% (n = 433)17%
(n = 1490)
<0.001
30%
(n = 367)
40%
(n = 59)
41%
(n = 7)
T2DM6%
n = 593
All grades 10% (n = 140)5%
(n = 453)
<0.001
9%
(n = 109)
18%
(n = 26)
29%
(n = 5)
Minor Criteria within the Remaining Cohort n = 6436
Remaining cohort
n = 6436
Remaining HF all grades n = 555Remaining non-HF
n = 5881
p-value
HF 1
n = 525
HF 2
n = 29
HF 3
n = 1
Minor criteriaOverweight43%
n = 2758
All grades 57% (n = 315)42%
n = 2443
<0.001
55%
n = 303
2%
n = 11
100%
n = 1
Arterial hypertension44%
n = 2813
All grades 52% (n = 291)43%
n = 2522
<0.001
49%
n = 272
3%
n = 19
0%
n = 0
Elevated HOMA Index13%
n = 805
All grades 21% (n = 114)12%
n = 691
<0.001
19%
n = 108
1%
n = 6
0%
n = 0
Impaired fasting glucose14%
n = 876
All grades 23% (n = 126)13%
n = 750
<0.001
22%
n = 121
1%
n = 5
0%
n = 0
Low HDL cholesterol11%
n = 729
All grades 14% (n = 77)11%
n = 652
0.048
13%
n = 70
1%
n = 7
0%
n = 0
Elevated triglycerides8%
n = 544
All grades 11% (n = 60)8%
n = 484
0.037
11%
n = 59
1%
n = 5
0%
n = 0
Table 4. Characteristics of the study cohort in total numbers and percentages (%) or median and interquartile range (IQR). Abbreviations: HF hyperferritinemia, BMI body mass index, Waist waist circumference, ALT alanine transaminase, AST aspartate transaminase, Gamma GT Gamma-glutamyltransferase, ALP alkaline phosphatase, HDL high-density lipoprotein, LDL low-density lipoprotein, TG triglycerides, Hgb blood hemoglobin, WBC white blood cells, PLT platelets. The asterisk (*) denotes significant difference between the non-HF and the HF group at p < 0.05.
Table 4. Characteristics of the study cohort in total numbers and percentages (%) or median and interquartile range (IQR). Abbreviations: HF hyperferritinemia, BMI body mass index, Waist waist circumference, ALT alanine transaminase, AST aspartate transaminase, Gamma GT Gamma-glutamyltransferase, ALP alkaline phosphatase, HDL high-density lipoprotein, LDL low-density lipoprotein, TG triglycerides, Hgb blood hemoglobin, WBC white blood cells, PLT platelets. The asterisk (*) denotes significant difference between the non-HF and the HF group at p < 0.05.
Non-HF
n = 7297
HF All Grades (n = 1111)
HF 1 (n = 997)HF 2 (n = 107)HF 3 (n = 7)
Age 40–49 years25% (n = 1789)All grades 17% (n = 185)
17% (n = 166)17% (n = 18)14% (n = 1)
Age 50–59 years43% (n = 3160)All grades 41% (n = 453)
40% (n = 402)44% (n = 47)57% (n = 4)
Age 60–69 years28% (n = 2032)All grades 37% (n = 408)
37% (n = 369)35% (n = 37)29% (n = 2)
Age ≥ 70 years4% (n = 307)All grades 6% (n = 65)
6% (n = 60)5% (n = 5)0% (n = 0)
Male *44% (n = 3243)All grades 69% (n = 771)
66% (n = 661)96% (n = 103)100% (n = 7)
Female *56% (n = 4054)All grades 31% (n = 340)
34% (n = 336)4% (n = 4)0% (n = 0)
BMI kg/m2 *26 (23–29)28 (25–31)30 (26–32)31 (27–34)
Waist cm *92 (83–101)100 (93–107)102 (96–112)105 (102–112)
Alcohol g/d *6 (2–15)11 (4–21)13 (4–26)31 (15–38)
ALT U/L *21 (16–28)28 (21–39)38 (28–58)35 (25–92)
AST U/L *22 (19–26)25 (21–31)30 (24–39)58 (37–78)
GammaGT U/L *21 (15–32)32 (22–49)41 (26–62)152 (70–402)
ALP U/L *63 (53–75)65 (56–77)63 (51–75)68 (65–98)
HDL mg/dL *62 (51–75)55 (46–67)46 (40–53)58 (45–70)
LDL mg/dL *139 (116–165)148 (124–170)146 (118–173)155 (121–168)
TG mg/dL *94 (70–133)119 (89–169)157 (118–219)167 (102–304)
Hb g/dL *14.2 (13.4–15.0)14.8 (14.1–15.6)15.2 (14.7–16.0)15.2 (14.3–16.5)
WBC 10⁹/L *5.8 (4.9–6.9)6.1 (5.2–7.2)5.8 (5.2–6.9)6.7 (5.5–7.3)
PLT 10⁹/L *247 (214–283)239 (207–273)209 (179–241)206 (177–219)
Table 5. Summary of rates and proportions of major and minor metabolic characteristics. The prevalence of the major characteristics is calculated for the study cohort, and the prevalence of the minor characteristics for the remaining cohort after application of the major characteristics. Within the two cohorts of major or minor criteria, one individual may be counted more than once. However, any individual is only classified once. Abbreviations: HF hyperferritinemia, FLI fatty liver index, BMI body mass index, T2DM type 2 diabetes mellitus, HOMA homeostasis model assessment, HDL high-density lipoprotein. The p-value indicates significant difference between the non-HF and the HF group at p < 0.05.
Table 5. Summary of rates and proportions of major and minor metabolic characteristics. The prevalence of the major characteristics is calculated for the study cohort, and the prevalence of the minor characteristics for the remaining cohort after application of the major characteristics. Within the two cohorts of major or minor criteria, one individual may be counted more than once. However, any individual is only classified once. Abbreviations: HF hyperferritinemia, FLI fatty liver index, BMI body mass index, T2DM type 2 diabetes mellitus, HOMA homeostasis model assessment, HDL high-density lipoprotein. The p-value indicates significant difference between the non-HF and the HF group at p < 0.05.
Major Criteria within the Study Cohort n = 8408
Study Cohort
n = 8408
HF All Grades n = 1111Non-HF
n = 7297
p-Value
HF 1
n = 997
HF 2
n = 97
HF 3
n = 7
Major criteriaFLI > 6032%
n = 2669
All grades 57% (n = 636)28%
n = 2033
<0.001
55%
n = 544
80%
n = 86
86%
n = 6
BMI > 30 kg/m221%
n = 1745
All grades 37% (n = 409)18%
n = 1336
<0.001
31%
n = 309
43%
n = 46
57%
n = 4
T2DM6%
n = 496
All grades 11% (n = 118)5%
n = 378
<0.001
10%
n = 96
18%
n = 19
43%
n = 3
Minor Criteria within the Remaining Cohort n = 5435
Remaining cohort
n = 5435
Remaining HF all grades n = 437Remaining non-HF
n = 4998
p-value
HF 1
n = 417
HF 2
n = 20
HF 3
n = 0
Minor criteriaOverweight44%
n = 2399
All grades 58% (n = 256)43%
n = 2143
<0.001
57%
n = 249
2%
n = 7
0%
n = 0
Arterial hypertension44%
n = 2406
All grades 53% (n = 233)43%
n = 2173
<0.001
50%
n = 220
3%
n = 13
0%
n = 0
Elevated HOMA-Index14%
n = 767
All grades 21% (n = 94)12%
n = 621
<0.001
20%
n = 88
1%
n = 6
0%
n = 0
Impaired fasting glucose12%
n = 634
All grades 23% (n = 102)13%
n = 642
<0.001
22%
n = 97
1%
n = 5
0%
n = 0
Low HDL cholesterol12%
n = 635
All grades 14% (n = 63)11%
n = 572
0.067
13%
n = 58
1%
n = 5
0%
n = 0
Elevated triglycerides9%
n = 482
All grades 12% (n = 54)9%
n = 428
0.008
12%
n = 51
1%
n = 3
0%
n = 0
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gensluckner, S.; Wernly, B.; Koutny, F.; Strebinger, G.; Zandanell, S.; Stechemesser, L.; Paulweber, B.; Iglseder, B.; Trinka, E.; Frey, V.; et al. Prevalence and Characteristics of Metabolic Hyperferritinemia in a Population-Based Central-European Cohort. Biomedicines 2024, 12, 207. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12010207

AMA Style

Gensluckner S, Wernly B, Koutny F, Strebinger G, Zandanell S, Stechemesser L, Paulweber B, Iglseder B, Trinka E, Frey V, et al. Prevalence and Characteristics of Metabolic Hyperferritinemia in a Population-Based Central-European Cohort. Biomedicines. 2024; 12(1):207. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12010207

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gensluckner, Sophie, Bernhard Wernly, Florian Koutny, Georg Strebinger, Stephan Zandanell, Lars Stechemesser, Bernhard Paulweber, Bernhard Iglseder, Eugen Trinka, Vanessa Frey, and et al. 2024. "Prevalence and Characteristics of Metabolic Hyperferritinemia in a Population-Based Central-European Cohort" Biomedicines 12, no. 1: 207. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12010207

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop