Next Article in Journal
CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Gene Therapy for Glioblastoma: A Scoping Review
Next Article in Special Issue
The Comparative Effects of Myo-Inositol and Metformin Therapy on the Clinical and Biochemical Parameters of Women of Normal Weight Suffering from Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
Previous Article in Journal
In Utero Origins of Acute Leukemia in Children
Previous Article in Special Issue
Meteorin-like Protein and Zonulin in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: Exploring Associations with Obesity, Metabolic Parameters, and Inflammation
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Genetic and Epigenetic Profiles of Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome and In Vitro Bisphenol Exposure in a Human Granulosa Cell Model

Biomedicines 2024, 12(1), 237; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12010237
by Reem Sabry 1, Jenna F. Gallo 1,2, Charlie Rooney 1, Olivia L. M. Scandlan 1, Ola S. Davis 1, Shilpa Amin 2,3, Mehrnoosh Faghih 2,3, Megan Karnis 2,3, Michael S. Neal 2,3 and Laura A. Favetta 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Biomedicines 2024, 12(1), 237; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12010237
Submission received: 21 December 2023 / Revised: 14 January 2024 / Accepted: 19 January 2024 / Published: 21 January 2024

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

In the current study the authors aimed to assess the putative correlation between bisphenols exposure and PCOS focusing on the genetic and epigenetic profiles in human granulosa cells. The manuscript is clear and well written. However, it can be improved according to the comments below.

1. Please provide a clinical descriptio of the enrolled patients, including inclusion and exclusion criteria

2. Please provide the rationale of using a specific protocol (dose and timing) for CF treatment. Did the authors performed preminary studies on that? Provide reference, if any.

3. Please clarify the reason for the selection of specific target genes and miRNAs

4. It is not clear wheter figure 3 and 4 are related to PCOS or control patients. Please clarify and add a comparison between the two groups

 

Comments on the Quality of English Language

 Minor editing of English language required

Author Response

Please, see attached pdf file

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

This is a well-designed and interesting study.

 

Some suggestions to improve the quality of the paper:

1. In the abstract section, one sentence of introduction (background: what is known) and some information about the methods should be included. Not only the aim and results of the study.

2. "Endocrine-disrupting compounds" should be added to keywords.

3. The second part of the study included cells obtained from control women only, with no PCOS diagnosis. – where the control group was obtained? Were there exclusion and inclusion criteria for this group?

4. Rnase-free – please, capitalize the second letter (all main txt)

5. Why does the author present results only as the means? The median should be present if the data had a non-normal distribution.

6. In the Figures, authors should provide information about statistical tests used to examine group differences.

7. The strengths and limitations of the study should be mentioned.

8. Please add in vitro studies which aim to assess the relationship between bisphenols and PCOs, such as

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004565352203956X

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0890623823001855

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11356-023-26820-w

and discuss this results.

Author Response

Please, see attached pdf file

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The authors have addressed all my comments

Back to TopTop