You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Biomedicines
  • Review
  • Open Access

28 December 2023

Club Cells—A Guardian against Occupational Hazards

,
,
,
,
and
1
Clinical Department 5, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
2
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
3
Department of Neurology, “Victor Babeș” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timișoara, Romania
4
Department of Anatomy and Embryology, “Victor Babeş” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timișoara, Romania
This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Research in Interstitial Lung Diseases

Abstract

Club cells have a distinct role in the epithelial repair and defense mechanisms of the lung. After exposure to environmental pollutants, during chronic exposure, the secretion of club cells secretory protein (CCSP) decreases. Exposure to occupational hazards certainly has a role in a large number of interstitial lung diseases. According to the American Thoracic Society and the European Respiratory Society, around 40% of the all interstitial lung disease is attributed to occupational hazards. Some of them are very well characterized (pneumoconiosis, hypersensitivity pneumonitis), whereas others are consequences of acute exposure (e.g., paraquat) or persistent exposure (e.g., isocyanate). The category of vapors, gases, dusts, and fumes (VGDF) has been proven to produce subclinical modifications. The inflammation and altered repair process resulting from the exposure to occupational respiratory hazards create vicious loops of cooperation between epithelial cells, mesenchymal cells, innate defense mechanisms, and immune cells. The secretions of club cells modulate the communication between macrophages, epithelial cells, and fibroblasts mitigating the inflammation and/or reducing the fibrotic process. In this review, we describe the mechanisms by which club cells contribute to the development of interstitial lung diseases and the potential role for club cells as biomarkers for occupational-related fibrosis.

1. Introduction

A decade ago, Celli and Owen announced the arrival of “the time to shine” for club cells and for their secretory molecule, CC16 []. This statement was based on the accumulated data from animal experiments which showed a distinct role of these cells in epithelial repair and in the defense mechanisms of the lung. Another important reason to push for the continuation of the investigation of these cells, was the reporting of the secretion of the club cell secretory protein (CCSP) after exposure to environmental pollutants, followed, in chronic exposure, by a reduction in CCSP. The interest in these cells in lung fibrosis is due to their role in the regeneration of injured epithelia, in the metabolism of respiratory toxicants, and due to the secretion of CCSP, which modulates the activity of TGBβ and IFNγ in the distal airways [].
Exposure to occupational hazards certainly has a role in a large number of interstitial lung diseases. A recent common statement by the American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society defined an attributable fraction to almost 40% of the total interstitial lung diseases []. Some of them are very well characterized (pneumoconiosis, hypersensitivity pneumonitis); others are consequences of acute exposure (e.g., paraquat) or persistent exposure (e.g., isocyanate). The category of vapors, gazes, dusts and fumes (VGDF), a frequent complex exposure in different branches of industry or in construction, was proven to produce subclinical modifications (high attenuation areas on computer tomography) 2.64% greater (95% confidence interval, 1.23–4.19%) than in non-exposed patients []. Hopefully, the involvement of occupational physicians in the multidisciplinary discussion of interstitial lung diseases will increase the currently low percentage of recognized contribution of occupational exposures in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) pathogeny and the misclassification of diagnosis [].
An acute exposure to high concentrations of respiratory hazards leads to lung injury which might evolve with a normal repair or a fibrotic one. The evolution toward fibrosis depends on the intrinsic properties of the respiratory hazard, the duration of exposure, and the functionality of the defense mechanism, in particular of the anti-inflammatory process which limits the inflammation promoted by the destruction of normal cells.
Chronic exposure to fibers and particles stimulates phagocytosis by pro-inflammatory macrophages. Depending on the dimensions of the particles, their structure, surface reactivity, and chemical transformation, macrophages cannot digest the particles, and a “frustrated phagocytosis” develops. This frustrated phagocytosis is characterized by plasma membrane perturbation and lysosome damage and it triggers chronic inflammation in the lung via Nod-like receptor family pyrin domain containing 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome activation and interleukin-1β (IL-1β) production [,].
The inflammation and altered repair processes resulting from exposure to occupational respiratory hazards create vicious loops of cooperation between epithelial, mesenchymal, innate defense mechanisms, and immune cells.
The secretions of club cells modulate the communication between macrophages, epithelial cells, and fibroblasts, mitigating the inflammation and/or reducing the fibrotic process. It is the reason why, in this review, we describe mechanisms by which club cells contribute to the development of interstitial lung diseases. Based on the scientific data available, we explored what are the secretory molecules of club cells that could be candidate biomarkers for occupational-related fibrosis.

2. General Characteristics of Club Cells

Club cells (formerly named Clara cells) are a population of non-ciliated, non-mucous- secreting cells. Their current name derives from their club shape. They represent 11–22% of cells in the respiratory bronchioles []. Club cells are the majority of the secretory cells in the distal regions of the lung [].
Club cells were first identified by Kolliker in 1881, but their ultrastructure was described almost one century later by Popper and colleagues []. Club cells contain a large basally situated nucleus, a small amount of rough and smooth endoplasmic reticulum, but have a large number of mitochondria and electron-dense secretory granules in their apical part. Club cells secrete numerous proteins, the largest amount of which is represented by the secretoglobin family 1A member 1 (Scgb1a1; Gene Cards). Although Scgb1a1 is the official name of this protein on Gene Cards, the scientific literature also uses the name of club cell secretory protein-10 (CC-10). club cell secretory protein-16 (CC-16), club cell secretory protein (CCSP), or uteroglobin. This protein is a homodimer of 70 amino acids, with an exact molecular mass of 15,840 Daltons measured by mass spectrometry [], from which the name of CC-16 was proposed. The molecular size measured by SDS-PAGE identified a dimension of 10 kDa [], which led to the abbreviation of CC-10. The difference is not dictated by the structure or function, but the electrophoretic mobility, which influences measurement in the SDS-PAGE technique. Scgb1a1 is expressed by the endometrium (from which derived the uteroglobin name), prostate, thyroid, or mammary gland []. The secretion is likely to be much lower than in club cells and/or they bind to the local receptors; therefore, they do not influence the plasma levels of the protein. From the lungs, CC-16 leaks to the general circulation and is rapidly cleared by the kidney proximal tubule cells, having a short plasma halftime. For example, in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), this halftime is less than 18 min []. In addition to CCSP, club cells also secrete other members of the SCGB1A family, SCGB31 and SCGB3A2, which are now well characterized, and which share numerous functions with the CCSP []. As there are very few data on their relationship with exposure to respiratory hazards and interstitial lung diseases, this review will focus only on the club cell secretory protein (CCSP), which is an accepted name for the SCGB1A1 gene product.
In healthy non-smoker individuals, the concentration of CCSP in the bronchoalveolar lavage (BALF) is estimated as 1–5 μg/mL. Mean plasma CCSP concentrations in healthy human non-smokers are reported to be around 10–15 ng/mL, but this can be highly variable depending on the assay used [].
Claudin 10 is a component of tight junctions and has functions in paracellular epithelial permeation []. It is considered a marker of early-differentiated club cells and an early sign of the repairing of the bronchiolar epithelium.
Other proteins with potential interest for lung fibrosis are the surfactant proteins A (SP-A) and D (SP-D) []. Club cells contribute to the secretion of SP-A and SP-D, but the main producer is type II alveolar epithelial cells. SP-A and SP-D are large proteins, included in the generic term of “collectins”. Collectins are a group of pattern recognition molecules which bind to carbohydrates and/or lipid targets on the surface of various pathogens []. In addition to their role in defense against microorganisms, they also participate in the repair process after lung injury.
Cytochrome P-450 (Cyp) family members, namely P450 oxidoreductase, the cytochrome P450, family 2, subfamily F, polypeptide 1 (CYP2F1); the cytochrome P450, family 4, subfamily B, polypeptide 1 (CYP4B1); and the cytochrome P450, family 2, subfamily B, polypeptide 6 (CYP2B6) were identified through transcriptomic analysis []. The cytochrome P450 system plays a major role in xenobiotic metabolism, particularly in the phase I processes of oxidation.

4. Club Cell Potential Biomarkers in Occupational Interstitial Lung Diseases

In the following sections, we grouped the studies concerning the occupational hazards effects on club cells according to the main categories of occupational fibrosis (https://www.dir.ca.gov/dwc/DWCPropRegs/2020/MTUS-Evidence-Based-Updates-June-2020/Occupational-Interstitial-Lung-Disease.pdf, accessed on 8 November 2023).

4.1. Inorganic Particles

4.1.1. Silica

Silicosis, one of the oldest occupational diseases, is still present nowadays. The mixture of new jobs and industries such as artificial stone and sand blaster denim, with the traditional exposures in mining, foundries, sandblasting, ceramics, and glass industries is different between countries. Due to the chronic evolution of silicosis and the carcinogenic potential of free silica, workplace exposure represents an important health issue all around the globe.
The mandatory diagnostic criterion for silicosis is the comparison of the patients’ X-ray with standard radiographic films elaborated by ILO (last revision 2011). The early stages of silicosis are predominantly asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic, without clearly identifiable radiological aspects. As in other interstitial lung diseases, X-ray is not as sensitive as CT for the early detection of the lesions, but CT is not yet standardized for the diagnosis and identification of biomarkers for the early stages of silicosis or for the evolution towards massive progressive fibrosis; it could be an effective solution in the future.
Club cell protein 16 (CC16) appears to be an important marker for the early diagnosis of silicosis. Many studies have shown that the CC16 concentration decreases in silicotic patients. The silica-free dust particles can damage club cells either directly, or can do so indirectly by activating macrophages which release cytotoxic mediators. Concentration and duration of exposure to crystalline silica dust were negatively associated with plasma CC16 levels (p < 0.05 and 0.001, respectively), after adjusting for time spent in the community, current smoking, comorbidities, and pulmonary function []. This finding is based on an analysis of 57 stonemason workers regularly exposed to crystalline silica and 20 unexposed control workers.
There are also studies that tried to identify the cut-off value for the early stages of silicosis. Nandi et al. [] measured serum CC16 levels in 106 subjects (68 silica-exposed and 38 healthy individuals). By ELISA measurement of CC16, all subjects radiologically confirmed with silicosis had serum levels below 9 ng/mL, while healthy subjects showed CC16 > 9 ng/mL. Therefore, CC16 was proposed as a possible screening tool for early detection of silicosis among workers with a history of silica dust exposure. The recommendation was emphasized due to the relatively low cost and because the screening can be used in disadvantaged communities. The same cut-off was confirmed in another investigation of 117 silicosis subjects vs. 32 unexposed individuals []. The degree of pulmonary damage in this study was assessed with the Lung Damage Score: (LDS) = (X × Y × Z) + L, a formula in which X referred to small opacities, Y to the profusion of small opacities, Z to the number of affected lung zones, and L to the score of large opacity, based on the ILO classification. The age and the duration of exposure were also considered when designating the cut-off. Another research group [] found another cut-off (16.21 ng/mL), with an 81.10% sensitivity and 92% specificity. The study included 239 men, 75 with silicosis, 75 exposed to crystalline SiO2 without X-ray modifications suggestive of silicosis, and a control group of 89 ealthy, non-exposeh d persons. This cut-off also considered age, duration of exposure, smoking, and alcohol consumption. There was no distinction between the stages of silicosis, although the authors mentioned that the silicosis group included patients in all three stages of the disease. This differentiation was investigated in another pilot study with 121 participants by Naha et al. []. They found that in healthy non-smokers, cut-off values of 13.0 and 7.0 ng/mL could be considered to distinguish early-stage (asymptomatic phase) silicosis from terminal or advanced silicosis. For smokers, values of 9.0 and 5.0 ng/mL confirmed the additive effect of smoking. Sensitivity and specificity were high enough (≥83%) to recommend this biomarker for screening purposes. These results are promising but, as the authors mentioned, need to be validated on a larger population, analyzing different stages of the disease, for a wider range of exposures and industries and from different geographic areas.
CC16 was also determined in the BALF retrieved from the lungs of patients in different stages of silicosis []. The BALF CC16 was positively correlated with FEV1/FVC and VC max. Unfortunately, lung function deterioration is not specific to silicosis. The CC16 levels in BALF from patients with silicosis stage I and II were smaller, compared to the control group of exposed workers with respiratory symptoms but without radiological confirmation of silicosis. With the progression of silicosis, the CC16 level in BALF increased, regaining (in stage III) the level of the control group. These conflicting results might be related to the bias in the selection of the control group and to the very low number of stage III silicosis patients (13). As CC16 is also a potential biomarker for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, its diagnostic value might be reduced for silica-exposed workers who might suffer from occupational bronchitis.
Experimental data complement these clinical data: a recent RCT [] on a rat model showed that the serum level of CC16 was negatively related to lung injury and silicosis. Fibrosis models were constructed, and rats were randomly divided into control and silica-exposed groups. CC16 was measured in BALF supernatants and serum using an ELISA kit. CC16 concentrations decreased in both BALF and serum after silica exposure, and the reduction increased with silica dose in BALF and serum. Regression analysis showed that there was a significant and negative correlation between BALF CC16 concentration and silica content. This study had the advantages of studying fibrosis in vivo, of using randomization to reduced biases, and of a rigorous tool to examine the cause–effect relationship between lung injury and serum CC16 level. However, a direct transition to humans is not possible.
In summary, most evidence points to a significant reduction in serum CC16 levels in workers chronically exposed to silica dust, without respiratory symptoms and with normal chest x-rays and normal pulmonary function tests. These results recommend serum CC16 as a possible tool for detecting early asymptomatic silicosis in the silica-exposed population. More evidence is needed because in most studies either the number of patients was small, or data was not sufficient to determine an agreement on a relevant cut-off value.

4.1.2. Asbestos

Asbestos has been known since antiquity and used particularly for its insulating properties: thermic, electrical, sound-proof and fireproof. It is present with numerous combinations of hydrated silica of Mg, Fe, Ca and Na. The most used forms are chrysotile, crocidolite, amosite, anthophyllite, tremolite, and actinolite.
Exposure to asbestos fibers can affect both the lung tissue and the pleura, developing in time into lung asbestosis, pleural effusions, pleural plaques, pachypleuritis, lung cancer, or malignant mesothelioma.
The lesions resulting from the asbestos exposure are located at the bifurcation of the terminal bronchioles into alveolar ducts. The injury of the alveolar wall epithelium is due to the incomplete interstitial phagocytosis of the fibers by the macrophages, and the release of pro-inflammatory factors, cytokines (TNF-alfa, IL-1, IL-6), growth factors or free radicals. The inflammation stimulates fibroblasts proliferation and the deposit of collagen fibers.
To assess the contribution of club cells in asbestos-related lung reaction, CC-16 in serum and several proteins in BALF (CC16, SP-A and PLA2) were compared between 34 workers exposed to asbestos and 39 non-exposed individuals []. Both BALF CC-16 and SP-A were increased in the group exposed to asbestos. This increase appeared early, without statistical differences between CC-16 and SP-A, according to the existence or non-existence of the radiological findings in smokers. In exposed workers without signs of radiological impairment, the CC16 in BALF was 2.255 ± 588 microg/L, similar to the one in already diagnosed asbestosis. Smoking increased the influence of the CC-16 level, whereas SP-A was not significantly modified. The CC-16 serum/BALF ratio showed a considerable increase in the smoker group but was less marked in those exposed to asbestos or with asbestosis. PLA2 activity in BALF was slightly increased in the study group compared to the control one, without being influenced by the stage of the disease or by smoking. Age did not significantly influence CC-16.
Another cross-sectional study analyzed the level of CC-16 in both serum and BALF; the albumin level; and CD4/CD8+ and T lymphocytes in BALF in relation to the exposure time and the pulmonary deterioration stage []. These parameters were consecutively monitored both in a group of 34 workers exposed to asbestos and in a similar size control group without exposure. The exposure time was divided into short (<15 years) and long (over 15 years). The severity of the lesions was classified into three categories: without lesions, with pleural disease deterioration, and with pulmonary parenchyma deterioration. The results of this research showed a significantly high level of CC-16 in the serum and BALF of the exposed patients, but showed lower values in the smokers’ group. The serum CC-16 values positively correlated with the BALF values. The serum concentration of CC16 was significantly increased in asbestos-exposed subjects, reaching values of 27.2 ± 24.0 mg/L in asbestos-exposed subjects (n = 34) compared to 16.1 ± 7.6 mg/L in the control group (n = 34); p = 0.01. Smoking played an important role, with significant differences between serum CC16 and BALF levels, generally lower in smokers (p = 0.05 and p = 0.001, respectively) compared to higher levels in non-smokers.
No link was found between the exposure time and the degree of pulmonary deterioration, on one side, and the CC-16 in serum and albumin, CD4/CD8 and T lymphocytes in BALF, on the other. In conclusion, CC-16 increased after a short-term exposure, preceding the radiological modifications, but remained unaltered throughout the disease evolution.
There are also some experimental studies supporting a role for club cells in asbestosis. Two experimental studies on rats [,] studied inflammatory and proliferative changes and other markers of fibrogenesis in asbestosis. One of these experimental studies investigated the effect of potassium octatitanate whiskers (PT1), an asbestos substitute, on male Wistar rats []. After 3 days, as well as after 3 and 6 months from the administration of a single intratracheal instillation of 10 mL PT-1, CCSP and TTF-1 (Thyroid Transcription Factor-1) mRNA were reduced. The level of SP-A mRNA also decreased after 1, 3, and 6 months. This experiment showed that CCSP and SP-A are involved in both the acute and chronic response to exposure to PT1. Thus, the decrease of the factors that normally inhibit the fibrotic process in the lungs will lead to the development of pulmonary fibrosis.
The MEK1 (mitogen–activated protein kinase kinase-1) role of signaling epithelial cell replication and lung remodeling after asbestos injury was demonstrated by asbestos-exposed transgenic mice, expressing a dominant-negative MEK1 (Tg+) vs. transgenic–negative mice (Tg−), exposed to crocidolite asbestos. After 32 days of exposure, in Tg+ mice, the club (Clara) cells differentiated into ciliated and mucin-producing cells and decreased CCSP mRNA levels [].
More detailed investigation of the relationship between asbestos exposure and CC16 levels remains to be addressed by new studies. It is not possible to propose from the present data reference values for serum CC16 levels in asbestosis.

4.1.3. Nanomaterials

The health impacts observed in animal studies focusing on the inhalation of engineered nanoparticles encompass pulmonary fibrosis, granuloma formation, inflammation, lung cancer, mesothelioma-like effects, cardiovascular consequences, oxidative stress, and the formation of pleural plaques [,]. In addition, needle-like fibrous carbon nanotubes elicited asbestos-like granuloma formation and an increased risk of mesothelioma in a mouse strain predisposed to tumors (NIOSH, 2013).
Evidence of human health effects of ultrafine particles, (e.g., lung inflammation, oxidative damage, exacerbation of heart disease, atherosclerosis, asthma, and potentially even lung cancer), was gathered from epidemiological studies. These studies primarily focused on inadvertently produced nanoparticles originating from sources like traffic pollution and combustion by-products such as diesel exhaust and welding fumes [].
A longitudinal study [] conducted in 14 manufacturing plants in Taiwan enrolled 124 nanomaterial-handling workers and 77 non-exposed controls. The nanomaterials handled by the group of exposed workers were carbon nanotubes, silicon dioxide, titanium dioxide, and other nanomaterials, including nanoresins, nanogold, nanosilver, nanoclay, nanoalumina, and metal oxides. At 6 months of follow-up, the lung damage markers, especially CC16, were associated with the group of workers handling nanomaterials. In the exposed group, the reduction of the serum CC16 between the baseline and the 6-month follow-up value was significantly greater compared with the control group.

4.1.4. Coal

Exposure to coal dust can lead to coal worker pneumoconiosis (CWP). A Chinese study assessed the utility of certain blood biochemical markers, among which was CC16, level [] for monitoring coal dust-induced early lung injuries and the stage of coal worker’s pneumoconiosis (CWP). There were two groups consisting of, first, tunneling workers (34), coal hewers (13), and ancillary workers (17 were considered as in the control group due to their very low exposure), and the second group consisted of patients with CWP in different stages (45). The results showed that there was no difference in CC16 serum level within the workers in the first group (x2 = 2.94, ν = 3, p = 0.40), nor between the workers in the first group and the CWP patients in the second group (p = 0.20, ν = 2, p = 0.90). After analyzing the independent variable of smoking, alcohol consumption, job, age, job seniority, and CWP stage with serum CC16 level, the most relevant conclusion was that there was a strong association between the increase in job seniority and the decrease of CC16 serum level (p < 0.05, OR = 0.900, 95% CI = 0.823–0.985). Therefore, CC16 cannot be used as a biomarker for early detection and stage of CWP, further research still being required.

4.2. Organic Particles

Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) is an interstitial lung disease that involves a complex immunological reaction that appears in the context of occupational or non-occupational exposure to organic dusts or to chemical substances with small molecular mass.
In a relatively recent American study [] regarding occupational or non-occupational exposure in an HP group of patients, they conducted patient interviews investigating lung functional capacity, antibodies, exposures, HSCRP, CC16, and SST2. Analyzing the inflammatory or fibrotic biomarkers, they observed a high statistical prevalence of HSCRP, CC16, and SST2 when compared to references. For the multivariate analysis, only CC16 was significantly associated with the increased odds of HP, which might recommend CC16 as a valid biomarker, but further investigations would be necessary.

4.2.1. Bioaerosols

Bioaerosols are airborne particles from biological sources, including pollen, bacteria, fungal spores, and viruses and their metabolites and toxins []. These agents are released into the air through the handling process of the wastes. During cell lysis or active Gram-negative bacteria cell growth, endotoxins are emitted []. Chronic exposure to endotoxins may lead to non-specific inflammation of the airways (organic dust toxic syndrome (ODTS), mycotoxicosis, grain fever, toxic alveolitis) and subsequently to a decrease in lung function by releasing pro-inflammatory cytokines, thus affecting the permeability of the bronchoalveolar barrier.
Inhalation of bioaerosols may lead to irritation of the skin and mucous membranes, toxic effects such as toxic syndrome of organic dust, decreased lung function, gastrointestinal symptoms, and, less commonly, infections and allergies [,].
In the baseline examination of a prospective cohort study, Steiner et al. (2005) [] reported an increased CC16 concentration in non-smoked wastewater workers 11.0 (5.6–23.0) and garbage workers 11.3 (5.6–21.0) vs. a control group 9.4 (4.3–18); p = 0.01. The increased CC16 concentration was assumed to be compatible with the hypothesis that bioaerosols cause subclinical alveolitis. Consistent with other studies, the effect of smoking was consistently highly significant and reduced CC16 concentrations. Wastewater exposure and duration of wastewater exposure resulted in increased CC16 concentrations compared to no significant effect in the control group (waste collector or farmer exposure). However, a low adjusted r2 (maximum 6%) indicates a model with low predictive value. These results need to be further verified. In conclusion, CC16 was increased in workers exposed to bioaerosols especially in smokers, suggesting that the serum concentration might be predictive of the risk of later damage to the lung and its function.

4.2.2. Organic Dust

Organic dust is found in agricultural settings and has a heterogeneous composition containing mainly organic particles of plant, animal, and microbial origin []. Organic dust particles found in animal confinement buildings consist of animal dander, urine, and feces. These microorganisms, allergens, and toxins are widespread in the air and represent an important health risk to livestock farmers.
The organic fragments of these dusts include G-positive and G-negative bacteria, molds and yeasts, histamine, endotoxins, and even pharmaceutical compounds []. Another potential health hazards is noxious gases (e.g., ammonia and hydrogen sulfide) which come primarily from animal droppings and from manure pits. Chronic exposure to high concentrations of organic dusts may lead to chronic bronchitis, COPD, and altered lung function [,]; a significant association was found between asthma and organic dust syndrome, hypersensitivity pneumonitis, or animal farming.
An experimental study found a decreased number of club (Clara) cells and altered CC10 secretion in mice exposed multiple times to chicken barn air, compared to the control mice. The longer the exposure, the more significant the decrease in the number of club cells. It was also observed that the number of mucus-producing goblet cells increased post-exposure, probably as a response to the lung injury that can cause proliferation of these airway epithelial cells [].
Although exposure to organic dust is recognized for all agricultural workers, especially for those involved in raising animals, at present there is little evidence of the role of club cells in the etiopathogenesis and early diagnosis of extrinsic allergic alveolitis.

4.3. Mixture Exposure (Vapors, Gazes, Dust and Fumes VGDF)

4.3.1. Smoke Exposure during Firefighting

Smoke inhalation is a major occupational hazard for firefighting personnel. The results of several studies of municipal firefighters suggest that there may be a cumulative effect from repeated exposure to smoke causing chronic pulmonary dysfunction []. The smoke contains various low molecular weight oxygenated compounds such as acrolein, nitrogen and sulfur dioxides, aldehydes, and halogenated hydrocarbons which result from the combustion and pyrolysis [].
A study [] was carried out on a group of voluntary firefighters who were exposed to smoke from the combustion of polypropylene for about 20 min, in addition to a control group. The concentration of serum CC16 found in firefighters immediately after the exposure was significantly higher than that of controls examined simultaneously. Ten days later, the CC16 serum levels of all firefighters had returned to normal. This study showed a transient increase of club (Clara) cell secretion after a short exposure to smoke. The increase in CC16 serum levels suggests a disruption of the bronchoalveolar/capillary barrier caused by acute inflammatory changes in the airways. Therefore, CC16 might be considered as a biomarker for early detection of the changes in permeability of the bronchoalveolar/capillary barrier resulting from smoke inhalation or other lung irritants.

4.3.2. Coke Ovens

During the coking process, PAH (polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons) are produced in large quantities []. Coke oven workers are predominantly male and smokers. When stimulated by exogenous substances, the airways locally produce large amounts of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and inflammatory factors. On short-time exposure, the club cell secretion of CC16 counteracts these pathological mechanisms [] but the long-term exposure may lead to a decrease in the number of club cells and a decrease in their CC16 output.
A Chinese longitudinal study [], developed between 2014 and 2019, enrolled 313 workers from coking plant and investigated the associations between PAH (polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons), tobacco smoke exposure, and the levels of CC16. They measured urinary nicotine, PAH metabolite levels, and CC16 serum levels. A correlation between exposure to tobacco smoke, low plasma CC16 levels, and a decline in lung function among coke oven workers was found. The reduction in plasma CC16 levels occurred prior to the deterioration in lung function. The coke oven workers with lower plasma CC16 levels were at an increased risk of experiencing a decline in lung function following exposure to tobacco smoke.

4.3.3. Sulfur Dioxide in a Non-Ferrous Smelter

Sulfur dioxide (SO2) is a toxic gas released primarily during the burning of fossil fuels, and the roasting of sulfide ores in non-ferrous smelters. The effects of SO2, which rapidly occur, consist of irritation symptoms of the respiratory tract, decreased lung function, and mucociliary clearance []. These symptoms are shown to be aggravated by exercise, oral breathing, or co-exposure to other pollutants such as particulate matter [].
The effects of SO2 on lung epithelium were studied [] in a group of healthy male workers exposed to SO2 in the non-ferrous smelter and compared to a reference group. SO2 exposure was associated with a highly significant reduction in serum CC16 concentration and an increase in serum SP-D, with the CC16/SP-D ratio significantly reduced by an average of 42% in the most exposed workers. The changes in the serum levels of CC16 and SP-D are most likely due to the damage to the respiratory epithelium caused by exposure to SO2 and probably some other toxicants present in the atmosphere of the smelter.

4.3.4. Ozone Exposure

Ozone, an environmental air pollutant, is a highly reactive oxidant capable of causing oxidation and peroxidation of membrane lipids and proteins.
The inflammatory/antioxidant responses in the respiratory epithelium to ozone were investigated in rats exposed for 3 hours to ozone []. Histological findings of the lung showed significant desquamation and hypercellularity of the bronchiolar epithelium, loss of cilia, necrotic debris in the lumen, perivascular edema, vascular congestion, and a decrease in CC 16 in bronchoalveolar lavage, which was maximal 24 hours post-exposure. Similar changes have been described in the terminal bronchioles of mice, 48 hours after ozone exposure in other experiments []. Histological and structural alterations persisted for at least 72 hours post-exposure, suggesting a mechanism of underlying prolonged alterations in the respiratory tract, despite the resolution of inflammation and injury in the lower lung.

4.3.5. Hydrogen Peroxide

Hydrogen peroxide is a compound mainly used in chemical industrial processes, for its bleaching properties (in the paper industry, for bleaching textiles and cosmetics), hair, and as a disinfectant and for water treatment. Hydrogen peroxide is well known to be irritating to the airway mucosa. In order to avoid the potential risk of occupational exposure, closed–automated production systems are often used. Occupational hazards such as spills and leaks are associated with manual handling of hydrogen peroxide in old and/or small industrial settings [].
The acute effects of hydrogen peroxide on the serum CC16 level, as a marker for the inflammation induced by this irritant, were investigated by Ernstgård L at al. []. Eleven healthy volunteers were exposed to two different concentrations of hydrogen peroxide in a controlled exposure chamber. After 2 hours of inhalation, the level of CC16 in serum had a tendency to decrease at both post-exposure time points, the effect being more pronounced at the higher concentration of hydrogen peroxide. Moreover, men tended to have slightly higher values than women.

4.3.6. Diesel Exhaust

Diesel engine exhausts (DEE), a complex mixture of gas and diesel exhaust particles (DEP), are a primary contributor to air pollution around the world. DEP consists of mainly PAHs (polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons) []. According to Pronk et al. [] occupational exposure to DEP is high for underground mining and construction, medium for working in semi-closed spaces on the ground surface, and low for those working outside or not directly exposed.
Exposure to diesel exhaust has been shown to induce local inflammatory changes and induce T-helper type 2 (Th2) responses [].
In a double-blind, randomized crossover study [], atopic individuals were exposed to DEP, and blood samples were obtained 48 hours after exposures and assayed for CC16. As a result of DEP exposure, CC16 decreased. The mechanism by which DEP reduces airways CC16 is unknown, but it is well known that CC16 plays an important role in protecting respiratory tract epithelium against oxidative damage, and that it modulates immune responses to inhaled irritants.

4.3.7. Welding Dusts and Fumes

It is well known that welding fumes, a major issue in occupational medicine, predispose workers to high health risks of respiratory, cardiovascular, and neurological effects [,,]. In particular, welding fumes of stainless steel contain in chromium (Cr) and nickel (Ni), both metals classified by IARC as carcinogenic agents in humans.
An experimental study [] investigated the effects after 5 days and 10 days of inhalation of stainless steel welding dust particles on CC16 in rats. The BALF of rats showed decreasing club cell levels with exposure to the welding dust. Histological findings showed lung deterioration, which was associated with a significant decrease in CC16 concentration immediately after the instillation of the welding dust samples.

4.4. Chemicals

4.4.1. Isocyanates

Isocyanates are characterized by the presence of highly reactive N=C=O groups. These compounds find application in the manufacturing of polyurethane polymers, which are utilized in a diverse range of applications, such as the production of flexible and rigid foams, surface coatings, and adhesives. Spray painters are at risk for developing such symptoms due to potentially high isocyanate exposure, as most lacquers contain hexamethylene diisocyanate. The most frequently used isocyanates are toluene diisocyanate (TDI), diphenylmethane diisocyanate (MDI), hexamethylene diisocyanate (HDI), and biuret-modified HDI (HDI-BT) [].
Acute toxicity can cause throat irritation with coughing and difficulty in breathing. If the exposure is more severe, it may result in hypersensitivity pneumonitis or even pulmonary edema. Chronic inhalation can lead to immune disorders as well as respiratory tract lesions. []. The skin may also be affected [].
A study investigated 50 workers exposed to isocyanates during car spray-painting and compared their CC16 level to 30 control subjects (smokers and non-smokers never exposed to isocyanates) []. Compared to the control group, the exposed workers showed significant lowering in serum CC16 levels. Moreover, the serum CC16 was much lower compared to the non-smokers.

4.4.2. Pesticides

Pesticides have numerous negative health effects on the central and peripheral nervous system, respiratory tract, skin, gastrointestinal tract and reproductive system. []. They include a variety of substances, generally classified according to their direct effects on plants or on some vectors of disease for humans (e.g., insecticides, herbicides, fungicides, etc.) [].
An experiment investigated the behavior of rat club cells following acute exposure to a commercial insecticide or following its repetitive inhalation for 5 days []. The intracellular content of CC10 in the respiratory tract was assessed. After a single exposure to insecticide, club cells showed a great expansion in their volume and number and the bronchiolar CC10 content increased. Through repeated exposure to the insecticide, significant alterations occurred in the bronchiolar epithelium of rats, with a particular emphasis on club cells; their numbers and size substantially diminished and the secretion of CC10 was blocked.
The summary of all the data presented above is shown in the table below (Table 1):
Table 1. Club cells derived biomarkers in occupational lung fibrosis.

5. Study Limitations

Our review highlights several limitations to the use of CC-16 as a biomarker for occupational pulmonary fibrosis. Currently, there are only a few studies conducted on a limited number of participants, which reduces the reliability of the results. The different methods do not allow a clear comparison of the results, which would lead to common conclusions. The few animal studies, although consisting of randomized clinical trials, do not allow the data as such to be transferred to humans.

6. Future Perspectives

Occupational medicine has an important preventive component which includes the individual characterization of risk and the early detection of disease. An element shared by many forms of occupational fibrosis is that, in chronic exposure, the evolution is long and depends on the duration and intensity of exposure. Therefore, cessation of the exposure in the early stages of fibrosis could assure a good quality of life for many years. But this intervention has to be based on strong arguments in order to be accepted by the employee, who, in many cases, has to completely change their job. For this reason, the occupational physician needs a reliable biomarker of the early process in order to monitor the exposed workers and to detect the modifications in an early stage.
Due to the experimental data and the current knowledge of club cells, it is reasonable to believe that we might be in front of this potential biomarker. One way of validation is to perform multicentric studies on workers exposed to a common occupational hazard with fibrogenic potential. As cumulative exposure is a key factor, a similar evaluation of the past and current exposure is mandatory for comparable results.
There is also another possible approach, as workers exposed to occupational hazards could benefit from research on club cells focused on other diseases associated with lung fibrosis. If club cell products become reliable biomarkers of fibrosis, knowing that exposure to occupational dust is not only a cause but also an aggravating factor [], a part of individual risk assessment might include the monitoring of CC16 level in order to prevent the progression of fibrosis.
In view of all mentioned above, research on club cells should be extended to reach a significant exposed population to confirm their potential as early biomarkers of fibrosis.

7. Conclusions

Despite extensive literature about club cells there are many unsolved issues and roles to be clarified.
The best-studied molecule produced by club cells in occupational exposure to toxic substances is CC16. From the current available data, we can conclude that CC16 has great potential to become a sensitive biomarker for the negative lung effects of a variety of occupational exposures, from dusts and fibers to chemicals.
The most probable exposure effect is the reduction of CC16 in serum or BALF levels. However, all the studies supporting this finding included relatively small numbers of p and used different techniques of measurement which do not allow the aggregation of the results.
Surfactant proteins derived from club cells were also studied, but in much too low proportions to support any sort of conclusion.
It is worth continuing the investigation of club cell products in occupational medicine, in order to make conclusions on their relevance for monitoring and early detection of the negative health effects related to specific exposures.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.R.O. and F.G.P.; methodology, M.R.O. and F.G.P.; validation, M.R.O., F.G.P., C.O. and M.A.V. formal analysis, C.O. and F.G.P.; resources, D.R. and F.G.P.; data curation, A.M., M.A.V. and D.R.; writing—original draft preparation, M.R.O. and F.G.P.; writing—review and editing, M.R.O., F.G.P. and C.O.; visualization, D.R. and M.A.V.; supervision, M.R.O., F.G.P. and C.O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Celli, B.R.; Owen, C.A. The club cell and its protein, CC16: Time to shine. Lancet Respir. Med. 2013, 1, 757–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Dierynck, I.; Bernard, A.; Roels, H.; DeLey, M. The human Clara cell protein: Biochemical and biological characterisation of a natural immunosuppressor. MSJ 1996, 1, 385–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Blanc, P.D.; Annesi-Maesano, I.; Balmes, J.R.; Cummings, K.J.; Fishwick, D.; Miedinger, D.; Murgia, N.; Naidoo, R.N.; Reynolds, C.J.; Sigsgaard, T.; et al. The Occupational Burden of Nonmalignant Respiratory Diseases. An Official American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society Statement. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2019, 199, 1312–1334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Sack, C.S.; Doney, B.C.; Podolanczuk, A.J.; Hooper, L.G.; Seixas, N.S.; Hoffman, E.A.; Kawut, S.M.; Vedal, S.; Raghu, G.; Barr, R.G.; et al. Occupational Exposures and Subclinical Interstitial Lung Disease. The MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis) Air and Lung Studies. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2017, 196, 1031–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Blackley, D.J.; Halldin, C.N.; Cohen, R.A.; Cummings, K.J.; Storey, E.; Laney, A.S. Misclassification of Occupational Lung Disease in a U.S. Organ Transplant Registry. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2017, 195, A3846. [Google Scholar]
  6. Kuroda, A. Recent progress and perspectives on the mechanisms underlying Asbestos toxicity. Genes Environ. 2021, 43, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Dörger, M.; Münzing, S.; Allmeling, A.M.; Messmer, K.; Krombach, F. Differential responses of rat alveolar and peritoneal macrophages to man-made vitreous fibers in vitro. Environ. Res. 2001, 85, 207–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wong, A.P.; Keating, A.; Waddell, T.K. Airway regeneration: The role of the Clara cell secretory protein and the cells that express it. Cytotherapy 2009, 11, 676–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zuo, W.L.; Shenoy, S.A.; Li, S.; O’Beirne, S.L.; Strulovici-Barel, Y.; Leopold, P.L.; Wang, G.; Staudt, M.R.; Walters, M.S.; Mason, C.; et al. Ontogeny and Biology of Human Small Airway Epithelial Club Cells. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2018, 198, 1375–1388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Plopper, C.G.; Hill, L.H.; Mariassy, A.T. Ultrastructure of the nonciliated bronchiolar epithelial (Clara) cell of mammalian lung. III. A study of man with comparison of 15 mammalian species. Exp. Lung Res. 1980, 1, 171–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bernard, A.; Dumont, X.; Roels, H.; Lauwerys, R.; Dierynck, I.; De Ley, M.; Stroobant, V.; de Hoffmann, E. The molecular mass and concentrations of protein 1 or Clara cell protein in biological fluids: A reappraisal. Clin. Chim. Acta 1993, 223, 189–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hermans, C.; Bernard, A. Lung epithelium-specific proteins: Characteristics and potential applications as markers. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 1999, 159, 646–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Peri, A.; Cordella-Miele, E.; Miele, L.; Mukherjee, A.B. Tissue-specific expression of the gene coding for human Clara cell 10-kD protein, a phospholipase A2-inhibitory protein. J. Clin. Investig. 1993, 92, 2099–2109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  14. Doyle, I.R.; Hermans, C.; Bernard, A.; Nicholas, T.E.; Bersten, A.D. Clearance of Clara cell secretory protein 16 (CC16) and surfactant proteins A and B from blood in acute respiratory failure. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 1998, 158 Pt 1, 1528–1535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Kimura, S.; Yokoyama, S.; Pilon, A.L.; Kurotani, R. Emerging role of an immunomodulatory protein secretoglobin 3A2 in human diseases. Pharmacol. Ther. 2022, 236, 108112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Laucho-Contreras, M.E.; Polverino, F.; Tesfaigzi, Y.; Pilon, A.; Celli, B.R.; Owen, C.A. Club Cell Protein 16 (CC16) Augmentation: A Potential Disease-modifying Approach for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). Expert. Opin. Ther. Targets 2016, 20, 869–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Fukumoto, J.; Soundararajan, R.; Leung, J.; Cox, R.; Mahendrasah, S.; Muthavarapu, N.; Herrin, T.; Czachor, A.; Tan, L.C.; Hosseinian, N.; et al. The role of club cell phenoconversion and migration in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Aging 2016, 29, 3091–3109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Aono, Y.; Ledford, J.G.; Mukherjee, S.; Ogawa, H.; Nishioka, Y.; Sone, S.; Beers, M.F.; Noble, P.W.; Wright, J.R. Surfactant protein-D regulates effector cell function and fibrotic lung remodeling in response to bleomycin injury. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2012, 185, 525–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. van de Wetering, J.K.; van Golde, L.M.; Batenburg, J.J. Collectins: Players of the innate immune system. Eur. J. Biochem. 2004, 271, 1229–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Stripp, B.R. Hierarchical organization of lung progenitor cells: Is there an adult lung tissue stem cell? Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. 2008, 15, 695–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chen, F.; Fine, A. Stem Cells in Lung Injury and Repair. Am. J. Pathol. 2016, 186, 2544–2550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Tata, P.R.; Rajagopal, J. Plasticity in the lung: Making and breaking cell identity. Development 2017, 144, 755–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Stripp, B.R.; Reynolds, S.D. Maintenance and repair of the bronchiolar epithelium. Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. 2008, 5, 328–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Boers, J.E.; Ambergen, A.W.; Thunnissen, F.B. Number and proliferation of clara cells in normal human airway epithelium. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 1999, 159, 1585–1591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Singh, G.; Katyal, S.L. Clara cells and Clara cell 10 kD protein (CC10). Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 1997, 17, 141–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Redente, E.F.; Black, B.P.; Backos, D.S.; Bahadur, A.N.; Humphries, S.M.; Lynch, D.A.; Tuder, R.M.; Zemans, R.L.; Riches, D.W.H. Persistent, Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis and Epithelial Remodeling in Mice. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2021, 64, 669–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Strieter, R.M. What differentiates normal lung repair and fibrosis? Inflammation, resolution of repair, and fibrosis. Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. 2008, 5, 305–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Cheng, P.; Li, S.; Chen, H. Macrophages in Lung Injury, Repair, and Fibrosis. Cells 2021, 10, 436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Greene, K.E.; King, T.E.; Kuroki, Y.; Bucher-Bartelson, B.; Hunninghake, G.W.; Newman, L.S.; Nagae, H.; Mason, R.J. Serum surfactant proteins-A and -D as biomarkers in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Eur. Respir. J. 2002, 19, 439–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hukkanen, J.; Pelkonen, O.; Hakkola, J.; Raunio, H. Expression and regulation of xenobiotic-metabolizing cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes in human lung. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 2002, 32, 391–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lautt, W.W.; Greenway, C.V. Conceptual review of the hepatic vascular bed. Hepatology 1987, 7, 952–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Hynes, D.E.; DeNicola, D.B.; Carlson, G.P. Metabolism of styrene by mouse and rat isolated lung cells. Toxicol. Sci. 1999, 51, 195–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  33. Rokicki, W.; Rokicki, M.; Wojtacha, J.; Dżeljijli, A. The role and importance of club cells (Clara cells) in the pathogenesis of some respiratory diseases. Kardiochir. Torakochirurgia. Pol. 2016, 13, 26–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Lakritz, J.; Chang, A.; Weir, A.; Nishio, S.; Hyde, D.; Philpot, R.; Buckpitt, A.; Plopper, C. Cellular and metabolic basis of Clara cell tolerance to multiple doses of cytochrome P450-activated cytotoxicants. I: Bronchiolar epithelial reorganization and expression of cytochrome P450 monooxygenases in mice exposed to multiple doses of naphthalene. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1996, 278, 1408–1418. [Google Scholar]
  35. Townsend, D.M. S-glutathionylation: Indicator of cell stress and regulator of the unfolded protein response. Mol. Interv. 2007, 7, 313–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. McMillan, D.H.; van der Velden, J.L.; Lahue, K.G.; Qian, X.; Schneider, R.W.; Iberg, M.S.; Nolin, J.D.; Abdalla, S.; Casey, D.T.; Tew, K.D.; et al. Attenuation of lung fibrosis in mice with a clinically relevant inhibitor of glutathione-S-transferase π. JCI Insight 2016, 1, e85717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Harju, T.; Mazur, W.; Merikallio, H.; Soini, Y.; Kinnula, V.L. Glutathione-S-transferases in lung and sputum specimens, effects of smoking and COPD severity. Respir. Res. 2008, 9, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Devereux, T.R. Alveolar type II and Clara cells: Isolation and xenobiotic metabolism. Environ. Health Perspect. 1984, 56, 95–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  39. Adair-Kirk, T.L.; Atkinson, J.J.; Griffin, G.L.; Watson, M.A.; Kelley, D.G.; DeMello, D.; Senior, R.M.; Betsuyaku, T. Distal airways in mice exposed to cigarette smoke: Nrf2-regulated genes are increased in Clara cells. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2008, 39, 400–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Stripp, B.R.; Reynolds, S.D.; Boe, I.M.; Lund, J.; Power, J.H.; Coppens, J.T.; Wong, V.; Reynolds, P.R.; Plopper, C.G. Clara cell secretory protein deficiency alters clara cell secretory apparatus and the protein composition of airway lining fluid. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2002, 27, 170–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Liu, T.; Zhang, L.; Joo, D.; Sun, S.C. NF-κB signaling in inflammation. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2017, 2, 17023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Long, X.B.; Hu, S.; Wang, N.; Zhen, H.T.; Cui, Y.H.; Liu, Z. Clara cell 10-kDa protein gene transfection inhibits NF-κB activity in airway epithelial cells. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e35960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Pang, M.; Yuan, Y.; Wang, D.; Li, T.; Wang, D.; Shi, X.; Guo, M.; Wang, C.; Zhang, X.; Zheng, G.; et al. Recombinant CC16 protein inhibits the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines via NF-κB and p38 MAPK pathways in LPS-activated RAW264.7 macrophages. Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sin. 2017, 49, 435–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Zarubin, T.; Han, J. Activation and signaling of the p38 MAP kinase pathway. Cell Res. 2005, 15, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Murakami, M.; Kudo, I. Phospholipase A2. J. Biochem. 2002, 131, 285–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Nagase, T.; Uozumi, N.; Ishii, S.; Kita, Y.; Yamamoto, H.; Ohga, E.; Ouchi, Y.; Shimizu, T. A pivotal role of cytosolic phospholipase A(2) in bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis. Nat. Med. 2002, 8, 480–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Nagase, T.; Uozumi, N.; Ishii, S.; Kume, K.; Izumi, T.; Ouchi, Y.; Shimizu, T. Acute lung injury by sepsis and acid aspiration: A key role for cytosolic phospholipase A2. Nat. Immunol. 2000, 1, 42–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Suryadevara, V.; Ramchandran, R.; Kamp, D.W.; Natarajan, V. Lipid Mediators Regulate Pulmonary Fibrosis: Potential Mechanisms and Signaling Pathways. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Bozyk, P.D.; Moore, B.B. Prostaglandin E2 and the pathogenesis of pulmonary fibrosis. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2011, 45, 45–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Coward, W.R.; Watts, K.; Feghali-Bostwick, C.A.; Knox, A.; Pang, L. Defective histone acetylation is responsible for the diminished expression of cyclooxygenase 2 in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Mol. Cell Biol. 2009, 9, 4325–4339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Chen, L.C.; Huang, J.L.; Huang, S.K.; Kuo, M.L.; Wu, A.H. Clara Cell 10-kd Protein (CC10) Modulates Superoxide Generation and Arachidonic Acid Metabolism via Formyl Peptide Receptor-Like 1 (FPRL1). J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2019, 143 (Suppl. S2), AB190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Lesur, O.; Bernard, A.; Arsalane, K.; Lauwerys, R.; Bégin, R.; Cantin, A.; Lane, D. Clara cell protein (CC-16) induces a phospholipase A2-mediated inhibition of fibroblast migration in vitro. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 1995, 152, 290–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Wu, Y.Z.; Medjane, S.; Chabot, S.; Kubrusly, F.S.; Raw, I.; Chignard, M.; Touqui, L. Surfactant protein-A and phosphatidylglycerol suppress type IIA phospholipase A2 synthesis via nuclear factor-kappaB. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2003, 168, 692–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Chabot, S.; Koumanov, K.; Lambeau, G.; Gelb, M.H.; Balloy, V.; Chignard, M.; Whitsett, J.A.; Touqui, L. Inhibitory effects of surfactant protein A on surfactant phospholipid hydrolysis by secreted phospholipases A2. J. Immunol. 2003, 171, 995–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Ye, Z.; Hu, Y. TGF-β1: Gentlemanly orchestrator in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (Review). Int. J. Mol. Med. 2021, 48, 132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Yokoyama, T.; Yanagihara, T.; Suzuki, K.; Hamada, N.; Tsubouchi, K.; Ogata-Suetsugu, S.; Mikumo, H.; Ikeda-Harada, C.; Maeyama, T.; Kuwano, K.; et al. Depletion of club cells attenuates bleomycin-induced lung injury and fibrosis in mice. J. Inflamm. 2017, 14, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Park, S.Y.; Hong, J.Y.; Lee, S.Y.; Lee, S.H.; Kim, M.J.; Kim, S.Y.; Kim, K.W.; Shim, H.S.; Park, M.S.; Lee, C.G.; et al. Club cell-specific role of programmed cell death 5 in pulmonary fibrosis. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 2923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Van Winkle, L.S.; Isaac, J.M.; Plopper, C.G. Distribution of epidermal growth factor receptor and ligands during bronchiolar epithelial repair from naphthalene-induced Clara cell injury in the mouse. Am. J. Pathol. 1997, 151, 443–459. [Google Scholar]
  59. Okuda, K.; Chen, G.; Subramani, D.B.; Wolf, M.; Gilmore, R.C.; Kato, T.; Radicioni, G.; Kesimer, M.; Chua, M.; Dang, H.; et al. Localization of Secretory Mucins MUC5AC and MUC5B in Normal/Healthy Human Airways. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2019, 199, 715–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Hancock, L.A.; Hennessy, C.E.; Solomon, G.M.; Dobrinskikh, E.; Estrella, A.; Hara, N.; Hill, D.B.; Kissner, W.J.; Markovetz, M.R.; Grove Villalon, D.E.; et al. Muc5b overexpression causes mucociliary dysfunction and enhances lung fibrosis in mice. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 5363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Seibold, M.A.; Wise, A.L.; Speer, M.C.; Steele, M.P.; Brown, K.K.; Loyd, J.E.; Fingerlin, T.E.; Zhang, W.; Gudmundsson, G.; Groshong, S.D.; et al. A common MUC5B promoter polymorphism and pulmonary fibrosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2011, 364, 503–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Jo, S.; Na, H.G.; Choi, Y.S.; Bae, C.H.; Song, S.Y.; Kim, Y.D. Saponin attenuates diesel exhaust particle (DEP)-induced MUC5AC expression and pro-inflammatory cytokine upregulation via TLR4/TRIF/NF-κB signaling pathway in airway epithelium and ovalbumin (OVA)-sensitized mice. J. Ginseng Res. 2022, 46, 801–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Yu, Q.Y.; Tang, X.X. Irreversibility of Pulmonary Fibrosis. Aging Dis. 2022, 13, 73–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Conti, C.; Montero-Fernandez, A.; Borg, E.; Osadolor, T.; Viola, P.; De Lauretis, A.; Stock, C.J.; Bonifazi, M.; Bonini, M.; Caramori, G.; et al. Mucins MUC5B and MUC5AC in Distal Airways and Honeycomb Spaces: Comparison among Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis/Usual Interstitial Pneumonia, Fibrotic Nonspecific Interstitial Pneumonitis, and Control Lungs. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2016, 193, 462–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Tokita, E.; Tanabe, T.; Asano, K.; Suzaki, H.; Rubin, B.K. Club cell 10-kDa protein attenuates airway mucus hypersecretion and inflammation. Eur. Respir. J. 2014, 44, 1002–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Reynaud, P.; Ahmed, E.; Serre, I.; Knabe, L.; Bommart, S.; Suehs, C.; Vachier, I.; Berthet, J.P.; Romagnoli, M.; Vernisse, C.; et al. Club Cell Loss as a Feature of Bronchiolization in ILD. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 630096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Akram, K.M.; Lomas, N.J.; Spiteri, M.A.; Forsyth, N.R. Club cells inhibit alveolar epithelial wound repair via TRAIL-dependent apoptosis. Eur. Respir. J. 2013, 41, 683–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Kim, K.K.; Dotson, M.R.; Agarwal, M.; Yang, J.; Bradley, P.B.; Subbotina, N.; Osterholzer, J.J.; Sisson, T.H. Efferocytosis of apoptotic alveolar epithelial cells is sufficient to initiate lung fibrosis. Cell Death Dis. 2018, 9, 1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Bartram, U.; Speer, C.P. The role of transforming growth factor beta in lung development and disease. Chest 2004, 125, 754–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Kuwano, K. Epithelial cell apoptosis and lung remodeling. Cell Mol. Immunol. 2007, 4, 419–429. [Google Scholar]
  71. Zuo, W.-L.; Rostami, M.R.; LeBlanc, M.; Kaner, R.J.; O’Beirne, S.L.; Mezey, J.G.; Leopold, P.L.; Quast, K.; Visvanathan, S.; Fine, J.S.; et al. Dysregulation of club cell biology in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0237529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Bolton, S.J.; Pinnion, K.; Marshall, C.V.; Wilson, E.; Barker, J.E.; Oreffo, V.; Foster, M.L. Changes in Clara cell 10 kDa protein (CC10)-positive cell distribution in acute lung injury following repeated lipopolysaccharide challenge in the rat. Toxicol. Pathol. 2008, 36, 440–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Buendía-Roldán, I.; Ruiz, V.; Sierra, P.; Montes, E.; Ramírez, R.; Vega, A.; Salgado, A.; Vargas, M.H.; Mejía, M.; Pardo, A.; et al. Increased Expression of CC16 in Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0168552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Yao, X.L.; Levine, S.J.; Cowan, M.J.; Logun, C.; Shelhamer, J.H. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha stimulates human Clara cell secretory protein production by human airway epithelial cells. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 1998, 19, 629–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Hu, T.; Sun, F.; Yu, X.; Li, Q.; Zhao, L.; Hao, W.; Han, W. CC16-TNF-α negative feedback loop formed between Clara cells and normal airway epithelial cells protects against diesel exhaust particles exposure-induced inflammation. Aging 2021, 13, 19442–19459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Nance, S.C.; Yi, A.K.; Re, F.C.; Fitzpatrick, E.A. MyD88 is necessary for neutrophil recruitment in hypersensitivity pneumonitis. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2008, 83, 1207–1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Gudmundsson, G.; Hunninghake, G.W. Interferon-gamma is necessary for the expression of hypersensitivity pneumonitis. J. Clin. Investig. 1997, 99, 2386–2390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Nance, S.; Cross, R.; Fitzpatrick, E. Chemokine production during hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Eur. J. Immunol. 2004, 34, 677–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Dierynck, I.; Bernard, A.; Roels, H.; De Ley, M. Potent inhibition of both human interferon-gamma production and biologic activity by the Clara cell protein CC16. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 1995, 12, 205–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Chen, E.S.; Greenlee, B.M.; Wills-Karp, M.; Moller, D.R. Attenuation of lung inflammation and fibrosis in interferon-gamma-deficient mice after intratracheal bleomycin. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2001, 24, 545–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Segel, M.J.; Izbicki, G.; Cohen, P.Y.; Or, R.; Christensen, T.G.; Wallach-Dayan, S.B.; Breuer, R. Role of interferon-gamma in the evolution of murine bleomycin lung fibrosis. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol. 2003, 285, L1255–L1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Lindahl, G.E.; Stock, C.J.; Shi-Wen, X.; Leoni, P.; Sestini, P.; Howat, S.L.; Bou-Gharios, G.; Nicholson, A.G.; Denton, C.P.; Grutters, J.C.; et al. Microarray profiling reveals suppressed interferon stimulated gene program in fibroblasts from scleroderma-associated interstitial lung disease. Respir. Res. 2013, 14, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Peng, Z.; Duan, M.; Tang, Y.; Wu, J.; Zhao, K.; Zhong, Y.; He, Z.; Meng, J.; Chen, F.; Xiao, X.; et al. Impaired interferon-γ signaling promotes the development of silicosis. iScience 2022, 25, 104647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Vu, T.N.; Chen, X.; Foda, H.D.; Smaldone, G.C.; Hasaneen, N.A. Interferon-γ enhances the antifibrotic effects of pirfenidone by attenuating IPF lung fibroblast activation and differentiation. Respir. Res. 2019, 20, 206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Thongtip, S.; Siviroj, P.; Prapamontol, T.; Deesomchok, A.; Wisetborisut, A.; Nangola, S.; Khacha-Ananda, S. A suitable biomarker of effect, club cell protein 16, from crystalline silica exposure among Thai stone-carving workers. Toxicol. Ind. Health 2020, 36, 287–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Nandi, S.S.; Lambe, U.P.; Sarkar, K.; Sawant, S.; Deshpande, J. A rapid point of care CC16 kit for screening of occupational silica dust exposed workers for early detection of silicosis/silico-tuberculosis. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 23485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Sarkar, K.; Dhatrak, S.; Sarkar, B.; Ojha, U.C.; Raghav, P.; Pagdhune, A. Secondary prevention of silicosis and silico-tuberculosis by periodic screening of silica dust exposed workers using serum club cell protein 16 as a proxy marker. Health Sci. Rep. 2021, 4, e373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Liu, J.; Song, H.Y.; Zhu, B.L.; Pan, L.P.; Qian, X.L. The Effect of Silica Dust Exposure on the Serum Clara Cell Protein 16 Levels in Chinese Workers. Biomed. Environ. Sci. 2019, 32, 47–50. [Google Scholar]
  89. Naha, N.; Muhamed, J.C.J.; Pagdhune, A.; Sarkar, B.; Sarkar, K. Club cell protein 16 as a biomarker for early detection of silicosis. Indian J. Med. Res. 2020, 151, 319–325. [Google Scholar]
  90. Zhang, S.; Jia, Q.; Song, J.; Tan, Q.; Yu, G.; Guo, X.; Zhang, H. Clinical significance of CC16 and IL-12 in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of various stages of silicosis. Ann. Palliat. Med. 2020, 9, 3848–3856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Yang, L.; Wang, H.; Liu, M.; Wang, C.; Zuo, Y.; Zhai, Z. Club cell secretory protein 16 is a potential biomarker for silica-induced pulmonary fibrosis. Acta Biochim. Pol. 2022, 69, 697–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Lesur, O.; Bernard, A.M.; Bégin, R.O. Clara cell protein (CC-16) and surfactant-associated protein A (SP-A) in asbestos-exposed workers. Chest 1996, 109, 467–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Petrek, M.; Hermans, C.; Kolek, V.; Fialová, J.; Bernard, A. Clara cell protein (CC16) in serum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of subjects exposed to asbestos. Biomarkers 2002, 7, 58–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Ding, L.; Morimoto, Y.; Oyabu, T.; Kim, H.; Ohgami, A.; Yatera, K.; Hirohashi, M.; Yamato, H.; Hori, H.; Higashi, T.; et al. Gene Expression of Clara Cell Secretory Protein, Surfactant Protein-A and Thyroid Transcription Factor-1 in the Lungs of Rats Exposed to Potassium Octatitanate Whiskers in vivo. J. Occup. Health 2001, 43, 111–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Manning, C.B.; Sabo-Attwood, T.; Robledo, R.F.; Macpherson, M.B.; Rincón, M.; Vacek, P.; Hemenway, D.; Taatjes, D.J.; Lee, P.J.; Mossman, B.T. Targeting the MEK1 cascade in lung epithelium inhibits proliferation and fibrogenesis by asbestos. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2008, 38, 618–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  96. Borm, P.J.A.; Robbins, D.; Haubold, S.; Kuhlbusch, T.; Fissan, H.; Donaldson, K.; Schins, R.; Stone, V.; Kreyling, W.; Lademann, J.; et al. The potential risks of nanomaterials: A review carried out for ECETOC. Part Fibre. Toxicol. 2006, 3, 11–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Hubbs, A.F.; Mercer, R.R.; Benkovic, S.A.; Harkema, J.; Sriram, K.; Schwegler-Berry, D.; Goravanahally, M.P.; Nurkiewicz, T.R.; Castranova, V.; Sargent, L.M. Nanotoxicology—A Pathologist’s Perspective. Toxicol. Pathol. 2010, 39, 301–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Hesterberg, T.; Long, C.; Lapin, C.; Hamade, A.; Valberg, P. Diesel exhaust particulate (DEP) and nanoparticle exposures: What do DEP human clinical studies tell us about potential human health hazards of nanoparticles? Inhal. Toxicol. 2010, 22, 679–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Liao, H.Y.; Chung, Y.T.; Lai, C.H.; Wang, S.L.; Chiang, H.C.; Li, L.A.; Tsou, T.C.; Li, W.F.; Lee, H.L.; Wu, W.T.; et al. Six-month follow-up study of health markers of nanomaterials among workers handling engineered nano-materials. Nanotoxicology 2014, 8 (Suppl. S1), 100–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Jin, Q.; Liu, A.; Li, Q.; Xie, S.; Wan, E.; Zhang, S.; Tan, Y.; Li, X.; Xie, H.; Lu, W. Pulmonary functions and blood biochemical markers for workers with and without coal worker pneumoconiosis. Life Sci. J. 2009, 6, 33–39. [Google Scholar]
  101. Barnes, H.; Olin, A.C.; Torén, K.; McSharry, C.; Donnelly, I.; Lärstad, M.; Iribarren, C.; Quinlan, P.; Blanc, P.D. Occupation versus environmental factors in hypersensitivity pneumonitis: Population attributable fraction. ERJ Open Res. 2020, 6, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Georgakopoulos, D.G.; Despres, V.; Frohlich-Nowoisky, J.; Psenner, R.; Ariya, P.A.; Posfai, M.; Ahern, H.E. Microbiology and atmospheric processes: Biological, physical and chemical characterization of aerosol particles. Biogeosciences. 2009, 6, 721–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Behbod, B.; Urch, B.; Speck, M.; Scott, J.; Liu, L.; Poon, R.; Coull, B.; Schwartz, J.; Koutrakis, P.; Silverman, F.; et al. Endotoxin in concentrated coarse and fine ambient particles induces acute systemic inflammation in controlled human exposures. Occup. Environ. Med. 2013, 70, 761–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Thorn, J.; Beijer, L.; Rylander, R. Work related symptoms among sewage workers: A nationwide survey in Sweden. Occup. Environ. Med. 2002, 59, 562–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Yang, C.Y.; Chang, W.T.; Chuang, H.Y.; Tsai, S.S.; Wu, T.N.; Sung, F.C. Adverse health effects among household waste collectors in Taiwan. Environ. Res. 2001, 85, 195–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Steiner, D.; Jeggli, S.; Tschopp, A.; Bernard, A.; Oppliger, A.; Hilfiker, S.; Hotz, P. Clara cell protein and surfactant protein B in garbage collectors and in wastewater workers exposed to bioaerosols. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health 2005, 78, 189–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Douwes, J.; Thorne, P.; Pearce, N.; Heederik, D. Bioaerosol health effects and exposure assessment: Progress and prospects. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 2003, 47, 187–200. [Google Scholar]
  108. Kemper, N. Veterinary antibiotics in the aquatic and terrestrial environment. Ecol. Indic. 2008, 8, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Eduard, W.; Pearce, N.; Douwes, J. Chronic bronchitis, COPD, and lung function in farmers: The role of biological agents. Chest 2009, 136, 716–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Zejda, J.E.; McDuffie, H.H.; Dosman, J.A. Epidemiology of health and safety risks in agriculture and related industries. Practical applications for rural physicians. West. J. Med. 1993, 158, 56–63. [Google Scholar]
  111. Sethi, R.; David, S.; Baljit, S. Characterization of the lung epithelium of wild-type and TLR9−/− mice after single and repeated exposures to chicken barn air. Exp. Toxicol. Pathol. 2013, 65, 357–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Tepper, A.; Comstock, G.; Levine, M. A longitudinal study of pulmonary function in fire fighters. Am. J. Ind. Med. 1991, 20, 307–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Baxter, C.S. Smoke and Combustion Products. Patty’s Toxicol. 2012, 399–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Bernard, A.; Hermans, C.; Van Houte, G. Transient increase of serum Clara cell protein (CC16) after exposure to smoke. Occup. Environ. Med. 1997, 54, 63–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Cavallo, D.; Ursini, C.; Pira, E.; Romano, C.; Maiello, R.; Petyx, M.; Iavicoli, S. Evaluation of DNA damage induction on human pulmonary cells exposed to PAHs from organic extract of PM10 collected in a coke-oven plant. Acta Biomed. 2008, 79, 97–103. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  116. Van Vyve, T.; Chanez, P.; Bernard, A.; Bousquet, J.; Godard, P.; Lauwerijs, R.; Sibille, Y. Protein content in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of patients with asthma and control subjects. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 1995, 95, 60–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Liu, L.; Wei, J.; Wang, Y.; Feng, Q.; Guo, S.; Liu, G.; Dong, J.; Jiang, L.; Li, Q.; Nie, J.; et al. Effect of Club cell secretory proteins on the association of tobacco smoke and PAH co-exposure with lung function decline: A longitudinal observation of Chinese coke oven workers. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2023, 247, 114058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Nurhisanah, S.; Hasyim, H. Environmental health risk assessment of sulfur dioxide (SO2) at workers around in combined cycle power plant (CCPP). Heliyon 2022, 8, e09388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. National Research Council (US) Committee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels. Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals: Volume 8; 9, Sulfur Dioxide Acute Exposure Guideline Levels; National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2010; Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK219999 (accessed on 2 November 2023).
  120. Haddam, N.; Samira, S.; Dumont, X.; Taleb, A.; Haufroid, V.; Lison, D.; Bernard, A. Lung epithelium injury biomarkers in workers exposed to sulphur dioxide in a non-ferrous smelter. Biomarkers 2009, 4, 292–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Sunil, V.; Vayas, K.; Massa, C.; Gow, A.; Laskin, J.; Laskin, D. Ozone-induced injury and oxidative stress in bronchiolar epithelium are associated with altered pulmonary mechanics. Toxicol. Sci. 2013, 133, 309–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Cho, H.Y.; Zhang, L.Y.; Kleeberger, S. Ozone-induced lung inflammation and hyper-reactivity are mediated via tumor necrosis factor-alpha receptors. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol. 2001, 280, L537–L546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. EU-RAR. Hydrogen Peroxide. European Risk Assessment Report, 2nd Priority List; European Chemicals Bureau: Helsinki, Finland, 2003; Volume 38. Available online: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC26024 (accessed on 5 November 2023).
  124. Ernstgård, L.; Sjögren, B.; Johanson, G. Acute effects of exposure to vapors of hydrogen peroxide in humans. Toxicol. Lett. 2012, 212, 222–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. ARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Occupational Exposures in Petroleum Refining; Crude Oil and Major Petroleum Fuels. Lyon (FR): International Agency for Research on Cancer; 1989. (IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, No. 45). DIESEL FUELS. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK531266/ (accessed on 7 November 2023).
  126. Pronk, A.; Coble, J.; Stewart, P.A. Occupational exposure to diesel engine exhaust: A literature review. J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 2009, 19, 443–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Alexis, N.E.; Carlsten, C. Interplay of air pollution and asthma immunopathogenesis: A focused review of diesel exhaust and ozone. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2014, 23, 347–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Biagioni, B.; Tam, S.; Chen, Y.; Sin, D.; Carlsten, C. Effect of controlled human exposure to diesel exhaust and allergen on airway surfactant protein D, myeloperoxidase and club (Clara) cell secretory protein 16. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2016, 46, 1206–1213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Antonini, J.M. Health effects of welding. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 2003, 33, 61–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Racette, B.A.; Criswell, S.R.; Lundin, J.I.; Hobson, A.; Seixas, N.; Kotzbauer, P.T.; Evanoff, B.A.; Perlmutter, J.S.; Zhang, J.; Sheppard, L.; et al. Increased risk of parkinsonism associated with welding exposure. Neurotoxicology 2012, 33, 1356–1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Li, H.; Hedmer, M.; Kåredal, M.; Björk, J.; Stockfelt, L.; Tinnerberg, H.; Albin, M.; Broberg, K. A cross-sectional study of the cardiovascular effects of welding fumes. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0131648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Hałatek, T.; Stanisławska, M.; Świercz, R.; Domeradzka-Gajda, K.; Kuraś, R.; Wąsowicz, W. Clara cells protein, prolactin and transcription factors of protein NF-ĸB and c-Jun/AP-1 levels in rats inhaled to stainless steel welding dust and its soluble form. Int. J. Occup. Med. Environ. Health 2018, 31, 613–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Isocyanates. Available online: https://www.osha.gov/isocyanates (accessed on 5 November 2023).
  134. Baur, X.; Marek, W.; Ammon, J.; Czuppon, A.B.; Marczynski, B.; Raulf-Heimsoth, M.; Roemmelt, H.; Fruhmann, G. Respiratory and other hazards of isocyanates. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health 1994, 66, 141–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Bello, D.; Herrick, C.A.; Smith, T.J.; Woskie, S.R.; Streicher, R.P.; Cullen, M.R.; Liu, Y.; Redlich, C.A. Skin exposure to isocyanates: Reasons for concern. Environ. Health Perspect. 2007, 115, 328–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Ibrahim, I.; El-Ebiary, A.; Abuelfadl, A.; El-Maddah, E.; El-Shourbagy, S. Pulmonary Toxicity in Car Spray Painters’. Eur. Respir. J. 2011, 38 (Suppl. S55), 4943. [Google Scholar]
  137. Kim, K.H.; Kabir, E.; Jahan, S.A. Exposure to pesticides and the associated human health effects. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 575, 525–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Pathak, V.M.; Verma, V.K.; Rawat, B.S.; Kaur, B.; Babu, N.; Sharma, A.; Dewali, S.; Yadav, M.; Kumari, R.; Singh, S.; et al. Current status of pesticide effects on environment, human health and it’s eco-friendly management as bioremediation: A comprehensive review. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 962619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Elia, J.; Aoki, A.; Maldonado, C. Response of bronchiolar Clara cells induced by a domestic insecticide. Analysis of CC10 kDa protein content. Histochem. Cell. Biol. 2000, 113, 125–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Lee, S.H.; Kim, D.S.; Kim, Y.W.; Chung, M.P.; Uh, S.T.; Park, C.S.; Jeong, S.H.; Park, Y.B.; Lee, H.L.; Song, J.S.; et al. Association between occupational dust exposure and prognosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: A Korean national survey. Chest 2015, 147, 465–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.