Next Article in Journal
Impact of Sodium Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors (SGLT2i) Therapy on Dementia and Cognitive Decline
Previous Article in Journal
Salivary Profile Analysis Based on Oral Cancer Risk Habits: An Observational Cross-Sectional Study
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Disseminated Peritoneal Leiomyomatosis—A Challenging Diagnosis-Mimicking Malignancy Scoping Review of the Last 14 Years

Biomedicines 2024, 12(8), 1749; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12081749
by Carmen Elena Bucuri 1,2, Razvan Ciortea 1,*, Andrei Mihai Malutan 1, Valentin Oprea 1,2, Mihai Toma 2, Maria Patricia Roman 1, Cristina Mihaela Ormindean 1, Ionel Nati 1, Viorela Suciu 1, Marina Simon-Dudea 1 and Dan Mihu 1
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Biomedicines 2024, 12(8), 1749; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12081749
Submission received: 30 June 2024 / Revised: 28 July 2024 / Accepted: 2 August 2024 / Published: 3 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular and Translational Medicine)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The topic of disseminated peritoneal leiomyomatosis is not novel. One of the primary causes of this disease is iatrogenic, mainly due to surgical procedures, which has been mentioned in multiple literatures. I believe the author should emphasize this primary cause in the abstract and conclusion, and discuss how to better prevent iatrogenic causes during the surgical removal of uterine leiomyomas. Additionally, there should be a detailed explanation on how to differentiate it from other similar tumors. Furthermore, the differences between uterine leiomyomas and disseminated peritoneal leiomyomatosis should be discussed, as some uterine leiomyomas do not develop into disseminated peritoneal leiomyomatosis after morcellation of uterine leiomyomas.

 

Comments on the Quality of English Language

There is a language issue in the text. In the fifth paragraph of the Materials and Methods section, where it mentions the infection rate of DPL, I believe the author wants to write the incidence rate of DPL.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

In my opinion, a very interesting manuscript. The authors have addressed the interesting topic of  disseminated peritoneal leiomyomatosis

In the assessed manuscript definitely lacks a flowchart that can be used to document the sources you used in your review, and your selection and screening processes. Please include a flowchart in this manuscript consistent with the PRISMA recommendations.

In my opinion, it is worth improving the section “ conclusions”  - is written too laconically, while it should highlight the merits of the analysis made by the authors during the editing of this manuscript

 

Once the proposed revisions have been made, the manuscript can be published

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

I agree to publish this article.

Back to TopTop