Next Article in Journal
A Comparative Analysis of Punicalagin Interaction with PDIA1 and PDIA3 by Biochemical and Computational Approaches
Next Article in Special Issue
B Lymphocyte-Deficiency in Mice Causes Vascular Dysfunction by Inducing Neutrophilia
Previous Article in Journal
Oral Mucositis in Cancer and Potential Use of Omega-3 Free Fatty Acids in Its Management: A Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Stereotactic Arrhythmia Radioablation as a Novel Treatment Approach for Cardiac Arrhythmias: Facts and Limitations
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

CCR6 Deficiency Increases Infarct Size after Murine Acute Myocardial Infarction

1
Institute for Molecular Cardiovascular Research (IMCAR), RWTH Aachen University, 52074 Aachen, Germany
2
Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital, RWTH Aachen University, 52074 Aachen, Germany
3
Department of Intensive Care and Intermediate Care, University Hospital, RWTH Aachen University, 52074 Aachen, Germany
4
Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Medicine, University Hospital Aachen, 52074 Aachen, Germany
5
National Institute for Pathology “Victor Babes”, 050096 Bucharest, Romania
6
Institute for Molecular Medicine, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense, Denmark
7
Department of Pathology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Centre, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands
8
Cognizant Technology Solutions, Phase II Hinjawadi, Pune 411 057, Maharashtra, India
9
Precision Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
10
Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterolgy, Campus Virchow-Klinikum and Campus Charité Mitte, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany
11
Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Research (IZKF), RWTH Aachen University, 52074 Aachen, Germany
12
Institute for Cardiovascular Prevention (IPEK), Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, 80336 Munich, Germany
13
DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Munich Heart Alliance, 80336 Munich, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomedicines 2021, 9(11), 1532; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9111532
Submission received: 6 September 2021 / Revised: 15 October 2021 / Accepted: 19 October 2021 / Published: 25 October 2021

Abstract

:
Ischemia-reperfusion injury after the reopening of an occluded coronary artery is a major cause of cardiac damage and inflammation after acute myocardial infarction. The chemokine axis CCL20-CCR6 is a key player in various inflammatory processes, including atherosclerosis; however, its role in ischemia-reperfusion injury has remained elusive. Therefore, to gain more insight into the role of the CCR6 in acute myocardial infarction, we have studied cardiac injury after transient ligation of the left anterior descending coronary artery followed by reperfusion in Ccr6−/− mice and their respective C57Bl/6 wild-type controls. Surprisingly, Ccr6−/− mice demonstrated significantly reduced cardiac function and increased infarct sizes after ischemia/reperfusion. This coincided with a significant increase in cardiac inflammation, characterized by an accumulation of neutrophils and inflammatory macrophage accumulation. Chimeras with a bone marrow deficiency of CCR6 mirrored this adverse Ccr6−/− phenotype, while cardiac injury was unchanged in chimeras with stromal CCR6 deficiency. This study demonstrates that CCR6-dependent (bone marrow) cells exert a protective role in myocardial infarction and subsequent ischemia-reperfusion injury, supporting the notion that augmenting CCR6-dependent immune mechanisms represents an interesting therapeutic target.

1. Introduction

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI), caused by coronary artery occlusion resulting in dysfunctional myocardium, is one of the leading causes of death worldwide [1]. The current standard therapies are reperfusion strategies for restoring blood flow [2], although these may result in paradoxical cardiomyocyte dysfunction and worsen tissue damage in a process called ischemia-reperfusion injury [3]. This ischemic cell death eventually results in the formation of post-AMI cardiac fibrosis, leading to the formation of a fibrotic scar [4].
AMI triggers a temporally defined inflammatory response that is mediated by various leukocyte subsets [5,6]. The occurring cell death triggers the recruitment of neutrophils and monocytes. The recruitment of these inflammatory cells is controlled by chemokines that are released by the ischemic heart. Several chemokines, such as CCL2 and CXCL12, have been shown to be involved in the AMI response and the resulting cardiac necrosis and fibrosis [7,8]. Although it has been well described that chemokines and chemokines receptors are main regulators of leukocyte trafficking during immune surveillance and inflammation [9], it seems like they can have opposing effects on AMI [8]. For example, the silencing of CCR2 resulted in decreased infarct inflammation in mice subjected to AMI due to the attenuated recruitment of inflammatory Ly-6Chigh monocytes [10], reflecting the detrimental role of CCR2 in AMI. On the other hand, the conditional deletion of endothelial ACKR3 (previously known as CXCR7) resulted in an exacerbated heart function impairment after AMI and increased infarct sizes, reflecting a protective role of ACKR3 in AMI [11]. It could also be shown that CCL5 plays a role in AMI [12,13,14], reducing cardiac injury/inflammation by reducing neutrophil and inflammatory monocyte infiltration.
One of the chemokines that has recently been associated with ischemic heart disease, particularly AMI, is CCL20. It could be shown that in patients with an AMI, serum levels of CCL20 are significantly higher compared to those of healthy controls [15]. Furthermore, it could be demonstrated that inflamed human peripheral blood mononuclear cells have an increased expression of CCL20 [16]. Interestingly, it could also be shown that the receptor for CCL20, the chemokine receptor CCR6, plays an essential role in the recruitment of T cells to ischemic brain tissues [17]. CCR6 is highly expressed on lymphocytes, a cell type that has also been shown to contribute to ischemia-reperfusion injury after AMI [18,19]. As the role of CCR6 in AMI and cardiac injury, while plausible, is elusive, we set out to investigate this further in mice with or without CCR6 deficiency in a transient left anterior descending coronary artery ligation model and found that CCR6 deficiency increases the infract size, followed by decreased ejection fraction and stroke volume. Furthermore, CCR6 deficiency increases apoptosis and the infiltration of inflammatory cells in the injured heart.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Coronary Ischemia-Reperfusion Surgery

All animal experiments were performed in accordance with European legislation and approved by local German authorities (AZ:84-02.04.2013.A185 and AZ: 8.67-50.10.35.09.088). All mice were housed under standardized conditions in the Animal Facility of the University Hospital Aachen (Germany).
Male C57Bl/6 wild-type (Janvier Labs, Le Genest-Saint-Isle, France) and Ccr6−/− (generously donated; described in [20]) 10–12 weeks old mice were subjected to coronary ischemia-reperfusion injury, as described previously [21,22]. For bone marrow (BM) experiments, mice underwent ischemia-reperfusion injury six weeks after BM reconstitution. Briefly, mice were anaesthetized using 100 mg/kg of ketamine and 10 mg/kg of xylazine i.p., then were intubated and positive-pressure ventilated with oxygen and 0.2% isoflurane using a mouse respirator (Harvard Apparatus, March-Hugstetten, Germany). Buprenorphine (0.1 mg/kg) was administrated 30 min prior to surgery. We performed a skin and muscle incision above the left chest and opened the chest by cutting the intercostal muscle between the second and the third rib. Then, the mice were subjected to acute myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury by inducing left anterior descending coronary artery occlusion for 60 min using a 7/0 silk ligature. The ligature was reopened after 60 min to allow reperfusion of the myocardium. The ribs, muscle layer, and skin incision were closed, and buprenorphine (0.1 mg/kg) was administered until full recovery was achieved.

2.2. Bone Marrow Transplantation

BM transplantation was performed as described previously [23]. In brief, C57Bl/6 wild-type or Ccr6−/− eight-week-old male mice were irradiated and reconstituted with either C57Bl/6 wild-type or Ccr6−/− BM. Femurs and tibias were aseptically removed from donor C57Bl/6 wild-type or Ccr6−/− mice and BM cavities were flushed for BM isolation. Single-cell suspensions were prepared and donor cells (2 × 106) were administered to the recipient mice by tail-vein injection 24 h after an ablative dose of whole-body irradiation (2 × 6 Gray). The BM chimeras were split into four different groups, wild-type mice reconstituted with wild-type BM, wild-type mice reconstituted with Ccr6−/− BM, Ccr6−/− mice reconstituted with wild-type BM and Ccr6−/− mice reconstituted with Ccr6−/− BM. Mice were left to recover for 2 weeks, after which they were subjected to transient coronary artery ligation to be sacrificed 3 weeks after AMI.

2.3. Echocardiography

The left ventricular heart function was determined by echocardiography performed on a small-animal ultrasound imager (Vevo 770, FUJIFILM Visualsonics, Toronto, ON, Canada) before and three weeks after coronary ischemia-reperfusion injury. Measurements of short and long cardiac axis were taken in B-Mode (2D-realtime) and M-Mode using a 40 MHz transducer. During the procedure, mice were anesthetized with 1–2% isoflurane. The ejection fraction (EF %), stroke volume (µL) and left ventricular diameters (mm) were recorded and analyzed using the VevoLab Software (FUJIFILM Visualsonics, Toronto, ON, Canada).

2.4. Histology and Immunohistochemistry

Infarct size was evaluated 3 weeks after coronary ischemia-reperfusion injury. Mice were euthanized by isoflurane overdose and their hearts were excised, fixed in formalin, and embedded in paraffin. Serial sections (10–12 sections per mouse, 400 µm apart, up to the mitral valve) were stained with Gomori’s 1-step trichrome stain. The infarcted area was determined for all sections using Diskus software (Hilgers, Königswinter, Germany) and expressed as a percentage of total left ventricular volume, as described before [24]. Serial sections (3 sections per mouse, 400 µm apart) 2 days after coronary ischemia-reperfusion were stained to analyze the infarcted area for proliferation (KI67, ThermoFisher Scientific, Schwerte, Germany), apoptosis (TUNEL stain, In Situ Cell Death Detection Kit, Sigma-Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany), reparatory macrophages (Mac3, BD Pharmingen, Heidelberg, Germany), inflammatory macrophages (Mac3 and MPO double positive; Mac3, BD Biosciences, Heidelberg, Germany; MPO, Neomarkers, ThermoFisher Scientific, Schwerte, Germany), neutrophils (MPO, Neomarkers, ThermoFisher Scientific, Schwerte, Germany), cardiomyocytes (Troponin, ThermoFischer Scientififc, Schwerte, Germany), and B-cells (CD45R/B220, BD Biosciences, Heidelberg, Germany). Serial sections from 21 days after coronary ischemia-reperfusion injury were stained for myofibroblasts (smooth muscle actin, DAKO, Jena, Germany) and neoangiogenesis (CD31, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, Texas, USA). Positive-stained cells or vessels were counted in six different fields per section and expressed as number of cells per mm2.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Data represent mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed with the Prism7 software (GraphPad, San Diego, CA, USA). The means of two groups were compared with unpaired Student’s t test, using Welch’s correction by significant variance. More than two groups were analyzed using 1-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. p-values of < 0.05 were considered significant.

3. Results

3.1. CCR6 Deficiency Worsens Cardiac Function and Increases Infarction Size after Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury

To investigate the role of CCR6 in AMI and cardiac injury, we performed coronary ischemia-reperfusion surgery in C57Bl/6 wild-type and Ccr6−/− mice. Heart function was assessed three weeks after injury to measure early lesion formation and the recovery of cardiac performance (Figure 1A). The mortality rate of Ccr6−/− mice was strongly increased from week 2 onwards, in comparison to wild-type controls (87.5% vs. 50% for wild-type controls, respectively) (Figure 1B). The ejection fraction and stroke volume were significantly decreased in Ccr6−/− mice (20% and 30%, respectively, compared to wild-type controls), whereas the left ventricular end-systolic volume was strongly, though not significantly, increased (Figure 1C−E). Furthermore, in Ccr6−/− mice the infarction size was increased by 70% compared to wild-type mice (Figure 1F,G). Together, these data clearly indicate that deficiency of CCR6 worsens cardiac function after ischemia-reperfusion injury.

3.2. Bone Marrow Derived Immune Cells Are Responsible for the Effects of Ccr6−/− after Coronary Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury

To further assess whether resident cells or bone marrow cells are responsible for the increased infarction size and worsened heart function in Ccr6−/− mice, we performed bone marrow transplantation experiments (Figure 2A). Mice receiving Ccr6−/− BM showed a clear trend (15%) towards a reduced ejection fraction compared to mice receiving BM from wild-type mice (Figure 2B). The genotype of the recipient mice (Ccr6−/− vs. wild type) had no effect on the ejection fraction. In line with this, mice receiving Ccr6−/− BM had a significantly increased infarction size compared to controls receiving BM from wild-type mice (3.76% ± 0.44 vs. 2.49% ± 0.33 for Ccr6−/− recipients and 3.60% ± 0.95 vs. 2.36% ± 0.57 for wild-type recipients; Figure 2C,D). Conversely, the genotype of the recipient mice (Ccr6−/− vs. wild-type) again had no significant effect (3.76% ± 0.44 vs. 3.60% ± 0.95 for Ccr6−/− BM and 2.49% ± 0.33 vs. 2.36% ± 0.57 for WT BM; Figure 2C,D). The non-significant though clear effect on ejection fraction can thereby be explained by the relative small infarct size. Combined, these results clearly demonstrate that bone marrow CCR6, rather than stromal CCR6, is responsible for the observed profound effects on infarct size.

3.3. Increased Cardiac Infiltration of Inflammatory Immune Cells in CCR6−/− Mice

Decreased cardiac function following coronary ischemia-reperfusion injury can be caused either by increased inflammation and cell death, the exacerbation of the adverse remodeling by myofibroblasts or decreased vessel formation. To clarify the exact reason for the increased infarction size in Ccr6−/− mice, we first assessed the myofibroblast content and neovascularization in the infarct tissue, 21 days after ischemia-reperfusion, which both were not affected by CCR6 deficiency (Figure 3A,B). To elucidate the effects of CCR6 deficiency on inflammation, 2 days after coronary ischemia-reperfusion injury the number of B-cells, neutrophils, and inflammatory macrophages was analyzed, demonstrating that Ccr6−/− mice demonstrate more inflammatory cell infiltration into the tissue compared to their wild-type littermates (Figure 3C−G), suggesting that increased inflammation is a major underlying cause for the observed increased infarction size in these mice. In line with this notion, the number of reparative macrophages in the tissue was significantly decreased in Ccr6−/− mice compared to wild-type controls (Figure 3E), suggesting insufficient reparatory processes after AMI.
Furthermore, we determined the degree of cellular proliferation and apoptosis in the cardiac tissue 2 days after coronary ischemia-reperfusion injury. TUNEL staining showed that CCR6 deficiency led to an almost 5-fold, albeit not significant increase in apoptosis (Figure 4A−C), which could mainly be observed in cardiomyocytes (Figure 4B), while Ki−67 staining, especially present in myofibroblasts, demonstrated that proliferation was unaffected (Figure 4D−F).

4. Discussion

In this study, we aimed to elucidate the role of CCR6 in AMI and subsequent cardiac injury. We were able to show that CCR6 deficiency, more specifically in bone marrow cells, has detrimental effects on cardiac function and infarct size after ischemia-reperfusion injury. This coincided with a strong increase in cardiac tissue inflammation, characterized by the presence of inflammatory cells such as neutrophils and inflammatory macrophages, and impaired reparatory processes due to reduced reparatory macrophages.
The role of CCL20-CCR6 axis in AMI has scarcely been studied, but can be inferred from the contribution of CCR6 expressing subsets to infarct responses in the heart and brain [17,18,19,25,26]. B cells play a key contributory role in ischemia-reperfusion injury and cardiac inflammation [27]. The genetic and antibody-mediated depletion of mature B cells resulted in reduced myocardial injury and monocyte infiltration, thereby improving heart function [27]. In that study, the increased monocyte mobilization and recruitment to the heart was linked to the increased secretion of CCL7 by B cells. Indeed, we did observe B-cell accumulation in the cardiac tissue of Ccr6−/− mice, albeit it that this effect did not reach significance, probably due to the small number of animals analysed.
Further, there are data supporting the role of CCR6 in B cell development. Intriguingly, it could be observed that the lack of CCR6 led to the increased presence of the appearance of germinal centres in the spleen and increases the maturation of B cells, although the produced antibodies in Ccr6−/− B cells were of lower affinity [28,29]. In addition, CCR6 uniquely marks memory B cells (and precursors) in both mouse and human germinal centres, is essential for the appropriate anatomical positioning of memory B cells, and coordinates antigen recall by these cells [30,31]. Strikingly, B cells were also seen to migrate to ischemic areas in the brain in response to injury [25], which corresponds to the increased B-cell presence in ischemic heart tissue seen in our study.
CCR6 is also known to play an important role in T cell trafficking. Both Th17 and regulatory (Treg) cells express CCR6, which has been linked to the susceptibility to autoimmune diseases [26]. Interestingly, CCR6 expressed by tissue resident γδ T cells has also been shown to play an important role in stroke and subsequent brain ischemia [17]. A lack of CCR6 in Th17 cells has also been shown to inhibit their recruitment [26]. It seems that Th17 cells also interact with neutrophils during inflammatory processes stimulating the production of IL-23/Th17-associated cytokines, which leads to severe tissue damage and impaired repair in psoriasis [32], acute kidney injury [33], infective endocarditis [34], or multiple sclerosis [35]. Furthermore, the role of the CCR6/CCL20 axis has also already been elaborately investigated in other autoimmune diseases such as inflammatory bowel disease and rheumatoid arthritis, which also highlights its importance in Th17 cells, as recently reviewed in [36]. Strikingly similar to our AMI model, CCR6-deficient mice show aggravated tissue injury, macrophage/neutrophil inflammation, and fibrosis in models of chronic liver injury. In the liver, CCR6 is necessary for the accumulation of the subset of interleukin (IL)-17- and IL-22-expressing γδ T cells that restricts hepatic inflammation and fibrosis [37]. In the heart, Toll-like receptor signaling and IL-1β, present during neutrophil infiltration [38,39], together with IL23, expand IL-17A production [40]. IL-17A seems to act in the late phase of remodeling by increasing cardiomyocyte injury, promoting the sustained infiltration of proinflammatory cells, and enhancing fibroblast proliferation [40].
A lack of CCR6 in Th17 cells also limits the recruitment of Treg’s into inflammatory tissues in a Th17-dependent manner. Similarly, Treg expressed CCR6 also plays a crucial role in their migratory response to sites of inflammation [26]. In the healthy myocardium, only few resident Treg cells are present, however they rapidly infiltrate the tissue in the context of AMI [41,42]. Several studies have reported a beneficial role of Tregs in AMI [19]. For example, Treg expansion improves both survival and myocardial wound healing by shifting macrophages toward a more reparatory and fibrotic phenotype [43].
Supportive of a role in AMI, a recent study demonstrated that AMI patients have significantly more circulating CCR6+ lymphocytes [44] and its ligand CCL20 [15] compared to controls, rendering the CCR6/CCL20 axis a potential biomarker of AMI. However, both studies involved rather small cohorts, warranting the further confirmation of these findings in a larger cohort. Furthermore, the former study was designed as a cross-sectional study and was therefore unable to demonstrate any causality between CCR6 and AMI. By inference, it is clear that CCR6 deficiency could impact on AMI response, possibly by modulating B cell/monocyte interaction or Treg mobilisation, although the exact underlying mechanisms remain to be elucidated in future studies.

5. Conclusions

In this study, we demonstrate that a deficiency in CCR6 and, more specifically, a deficiency in CCR6 expressed in bone marrow cells aggravates cardiac function loss in a model of cardiac ischemia-reperfusion injury, which is accompanied by the sustained accumulation of B-cells, neutrophils, and inflammatory macrophages as well as a reduction in the resident macrophage pool. Though it is tempting to speculate that these effects are caused by the reduced accumulation of Treg or reparative B cell subsets, future studies are needed to fully elucidate the exact underlying mechanisms and the therapeutic potential of CCR6/CCL20 targeting in AMI. Furthermore, the investigation of the importance of the CCL20/CCR6 axis in AMI should be performed in larger human cohorts for validation purposes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.A.L., A.S., E.A.L.B.; methodology, E.A.L., A.S., E.A.L.B.; formal analysis, D.S., E.A.L., A.S., A.C., E.W.; investigation, E.A.L., A.S., A.C., E.W.; resources, S.A.L., E.A.L., F.T., J.J., E.A.L.B., E.P.C.v.d.V.; writing—original draft preparation, D.S., E.P.C.v.d.V.; writing—review and editing, E.A.L., E.A.L.B., E.P.C.v.d.V.; visualization, D.S., E.P.C.v.d.V.; funding acquisition, D.S., E.A.L., J.J., E.A.L.B., E.P.C.v.d.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Interdisciplinary Centre for Clinical Research IZKF Aachen (junior research group to E.A.L.); by a grant from the Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Research within the faculty of Medicine at the RWTH Aachen University, the DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research) and the BMBF (German Ministry of Education and Research), and NWO-ZonMw Veni (91619053) to E.P.C.v.d.V. DS was supported by the Clinician Scientist program of the Faculty of Medicine of the RWTH Aachen University. JJ was supported by grants from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) (SFB TRR 219 (Project-ID 322900939); C-04, S-03), and “CaReSyAn” (764474).

Institutional Review Board Statement

All animal experiments were performed in accordance with European legislation and approved by local German authorities (AZ:84–02.04.2013.A185, approval date: 16.08.2013 and AZ: 8.67-50.10.35.09.088 approval date: 20 June 2009).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data presented in this study are available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We thank Roya Soltan for excellent technical assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Burke, A.P.; Virmani, R. Pathophysiology of Acute Myocardial Infarction. Med Clin. North Am. 2007, 91, 553–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. O’Gara, P.T.; Kushner, F.G.; Ascheim, D.D.; Casey, D.E.; Chung, M.K.; de Lemos, J.A.; Ettinger, S.M.; Fang, J.C.; Fesmire, F.M.; Franklin, B.A.; et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of st-elevation myocardial infarction: A report of the American college of cardiology foundation/american heart association task force on practice guidelines. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2013, 61, 78–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Pagliaro, P.; Moro, F.; Tullio, F.; Perrelli, M.-G.; Penna, C. Cardioprotective Pathways During Reperfusion: Focus on Redox Signaling and Other Modalities of Cell Signaling. Antioxidants Redox Signal. 2011, 14, 833–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Gulati, A.; Jabbour, A.; Ismail, T.F.; Guha, K.; Khwaja, J.; Raza, S.; Morarji, K.; Brown, T.D.H.; Ismail, N.A.; Dweck, M.R.; et al. Association of Fibrosis With Mortality and Sudden Cardiac Death in Patients With Nonischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy. JAMA 2013, 309, 896–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Nahrendorf, M. Myeloid cell contributions to cardiovascular health and disease. Nat. Med. 2018, 24, 711–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Puhl, S.-L.; Steffens, S. Neutrophils in Post-myocardial Infarction Inflammation: Damage vs. Resolution? Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2019, 6, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Li, R.; Frangogiannis, N.G. Chemokines in cardiac fibrosis. Curr. Opin. Physiol. 2021, 19, 80–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Noels, H.; Weber, C.; Koenen, R.R. Chemokines as Therapeutic Targets in Cardiovascular Disease. Arter. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2019, 39, 583–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Koenen, R.; Weber, C. Chemokines: Established and novel targets in atherosclerosis. EMBO Mol. Med. 2011, 3, 713–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Majmudar, M.D.; Keliher, E.J.; Heidt, T.; Leuschner, F.; Truelove, J.; Sena, B.F.; Gorbatov, R.; Iwamoto, Y.; Dutta, P.; Wojtkiewicz, G.; et al. Monocyte-Directed RNAi Targeting CCR2 Improves Infarct Healing in Atherosclerosis-Prone Mice. Circ. 2013, 127, 2038–2046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Hao, H.; Hu, S.; Chen, H.; Bu, D.; Zhu, L.; Xu, C.; Chu, F.; Huo, X.; Tang, Y.; Sun, X.; et al. Loss of Endothelial CXCR7 Impairs Vascular Homeostasis and Cardiac Remodeling After Myocardial Infarction. Circ. 2017, 135, 1253–1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Vajen, T.; Koenen, R.R.; Werner, I.; Staudt, M.; Projahn, D.; Curaj, A.; Sönmez, T.T.; Simsekyilmaz, S.; Schumacher, D.; Möllmann, J.; et al. Blocking CCL5-CXCL4 heteromerization preserves heart function after myocardial infarction by attenuating leukocyte recruitment and NETosis. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Projahn, D.; Simsekyilmaz, S.; Singh, S.; Kanzler, I.; Kramp, B.K.; Langer, M.; Burlacu, A.; Bernhagen, J.; Klee, D.; Zernecke, A.; et al. Controlled intramyocardial release of engineered chemokines by biodegradable hydrogels as a treatment approach of myocardial infarction. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2014, 18, 790–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Braunersreuther, V.; Pelli, G.; Galan, K.; Proudfoot, A.E.; Belin, A.; Vuilleumier, N.; Burger, F.; Lenglet, S.; Caffa, I.; Soncini, D.; et al. Treatment with the CC chemokine-binding protein Evasin-4 improves post-infarction myocardial injury and survival in mice. Thromb. Haemost. 2013, 110, 807–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Safa, A.; Rashidinejad, H.; Khalili, M.; Dabiri, S.; Nemati, M.; Mohammadi, M.; Jafarzadeh, A. Higher circulating levels of chemokines CXCL10, CCL20 and CCL22 in patients with ischemic heart disease. Cytokine 2016, 83, 147–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lin, C.-F.; Su, C.-J.; Liu, J.-H.; Chen, S.-T.; Huang, H.-L.; Pan, S.-L. Potential Effects of CXCL9 and CCL20 on Cardiac Fibrosis in Patients with Myocardial Infarction and Isoproterenol-Treated Rats. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Arunachalam, P.; Ludewig, P.; Melich, P.; Arumugam, T.V.; Gerloff, C.; Prinz, I.; Magnus, T.; Gelderblom, M. CCR6 (CC Chemokine Receptor 6) Is Essential for the Migration of Detrimental Natural Interleukin-17–Producing γδ T Cells in Stroke. Stroke 2017, 48, 1957–1965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hofmann, U.; Frantz, S. Role of Lymphocytes in Myocardial Injury, Healing, and Remodeling After Myocardial Infarction. Circ. Res. 2015, 116, 354–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Santos-Zas, I.; Lemarié, J.; Tedgui, A.; Ait-Oufella, H. Adaptive Immune Responses Contribute to Post-ischemic Cardiac Remodeling. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2019, 5, 198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cook, D.; Prosser, D.M.; Forster, R.; Zhang, J.; A Kuklin, N.; Abbondanzo, S.J.; Niu, X.-D.; Chen, S.-C.; Manfra, D.J.; Wiekowski, M.T.; et al. CCR6 Mediates Dendritic Cell Localization, Lymphocyte Homeostasis, and Immune Responses in Mucosal Tissue. Immun. 2000, 12, 495–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Curaj, A.; Simsekyilmaz, S.; Staudt, M.; Liehn, E.A. Minimal Invasive Surgical Procedure of Inducing Myocardial Infarction in Mice. J. Vis. Exp. 2015, e52197, e52197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Schumacher, D.; Curaj, A.; Staudt, M.; Cordes, F.; Dumitraşcu, A.; Rolles, B.; Beckers, C.; Soppert, J.; Rusu, M.; Simsekyilmaz, S.; et al. Phosphatidylserine Supplementation as a Novel Strategy for Reducing Myocardial Infarct Size and Preventing Adverse Left Ventricular Remodeling. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 4401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Liehn, E.A.; Kanzler, I.; Konschalla, S.; Kroh, A.; Simsekyilmaz, S.; Sönmez, T.T.; Bucala, R.; Bernhagen, J.; Weber, C. Compartmentalized Protective and Detrimental Effects of Endogenous Macrophage Migration-Inhibitory Factor Mediated by CXCR2 in a Mouse Model of Myocardial Ischemia/Reperfusion. Arter. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2013, 33, 2180–2186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Curaj, A.; Pop-Fele, L.; Jovanovic, M.; Jonas, S.M.; Moellmann, J.; Ghertescu, D.; Novac, O.C.; Rusu, M.; Liehn, E.A. Advanced modular automated calculation of the morpho-histological parameters in myocardial infarction. Discov. 2016, 4, e66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ortega, S.B.; Torres, V.O.; Latchney, S.E.; Whoolery, C.W.; Noorbhai, I.Z.; Poinsatte, K.; Selvaraj, U.M.; Benson, M.A.; Meeuwissen, A.J.M.; Plautz, E.J.; et al. B cells migrate into remote brain areas and support neurogenesis and functional recovery after focal stroke in mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 4983–4993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Yamazaki, T.; Yang, X.O.; Chung, Y.; Fukunaga, A.; Nurieva, R.; Pappu, B.; Martin-Orozco, N.; Kang, H.S.; Ma, L.; Panopoulos, A.; et al. CCR6 Regulates the Migration of Inflammatory and Regulatory T Cells. J. Immunol. 2008, 181, 8391–8401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Zouggari, Y.; Ait-Oufella, H.; Bonnin, P.; Simon, T.; Sage, A.; Guérin, C.; Vilar, J.; Caligiuri, G.; Tsiantoulas, D.; Laurans, L.; et al. B lymphocytes trigger monocyte mobilization and impair heart function after acute myocardial infarction. Nat. Med. 2013, 19, 1273–1280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Reimer, D.; Lee, A.Y.S.; Bannan, J.; Fromm, P.; E Kara, E.; Comerford, I.; McColl, S.; Wiede, F.; Mielenz, D.; Körner, H. Early CCR6 expression on B cells modulates germinal centre kinetics and efficient antibody responses. Immunol. Cell Biol. 2016, 95, 33–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Wiede, F.; Fromm, P.D.; Comerford, I.; Kara, E.; Bannan, J.; Schuh, W.; Ranasinghe, C.; Tarlinton, D.; Winkler, T.; McColl, S.R.; et al. CCR6 is transiently upregulated on B cells after activation and modulates the germinal center reaction in the mouse. Immunol. Cell Biol. 2013, 91, 335–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Elgueta, R.; Marks, E.; Nowak, E.; Menezes, S.; Benson, M.; Raman, V.S.; Ortiz, C.; O’Connell, S.; Hess, H.; Lord, G.; et al. CCR6-Dependent Positioning of Memory B Cells Is Essential for Their Ability To Mount a Recall Response to Antigen. J. Immunol. 2015, 194, 505–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Suan, D.; Kräutler, N.J.; Maag, J.; Butt, D.; Bourne, K.; Hermes, J.R.; Avery, D.T.; Young, C.; Statham, A.; Elliott, M.; et al. CCR6 Defines Memory B Cell Precursors in Mouse and Human Germinal Centers, Revealing Light-Zone Location and Predominant Low Antigen Affinity. Immun. 2017, 47, 1142–1153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Katayama, H. Development of psoriasis by continuous neutrophil infiltration into the epidermis. Exp. Dermatol. 2018, 27, 1084–1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. González-Guerrero, C.; Morgado-Pascual, J.L.; Cannata-Ortiz, P.; Ramos-Barron, M.A.; Gómez-Alamillo, C.; Arias, M.; Mezzano, S.; Egido, J.; Ruiz-Ortega, M.; Ortiz, A.; et al. CCL20 blockade increases the severity of nephrotoxic folic acid-induced acute kidney injury. J. Pathol. 2018, 246, 191–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Yeh, C.-Y.; Shun, C.-T.; Kuo, Y.-M.; Jung, C.-J.; Hsieh, S.-C.; Chiu, Y.-L.; Chen, J.-W.; Hsu, R.-B.; Yang, C.-J.; Chia, J.-S. Activated Human Valvular Interstitial Cells Sustain Interleukin-17 Production To Recruit Neutrophils in Infective Endocarditis. Infect. Immun. 2015, 83, 2202–2212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Wojkowska, D.; Szpakowski, P.; Ksiazek-Winiarek, D.; Leszczynski, M.; Glabinski, A. Interactions between Neutrophils, Th17 Cells, and Chemokines during the Initiation of Experimental Model of Multiple Sclerosis. Mediat. Inflamm. 2014, 2014, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Meitei, H.T.; Jadhav, N.; Lal, G. CCR6-CCL20 axis as a therapeutic target for autoimmune diseases. Autoimmun. Rev. 2021, 20, 102846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hammerich, L.; Bangen, J.M.; Govaere, O.; Zimmermann, H.W.; Gassler, N.; Huss, S.; Liedtke, C.; Prinz, I.; Lira, S.A.; Luedde, T.; et al. Chemokine receptor CCR6-dependent accumulation of γδ T cells in injured liver restricts hepatic inflammation and fibrosis. Hepatol. 2014, 59, 630–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Liehn, E.A.; Postea, O.; Curaj, A.; Marx, N. Repair After Myocardial Infarction, Between Fantasy and Reality: The Role of Chemokines. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2011, 58, 2357–2362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Frangogiannis, N.G. Targeting the inflammatory response in healing myocardial infarcts. Curr. Med. Chem. 2006, 13, 1877–1893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yan, X.; Shichita, T.; Katsumata, Y.; Matsuhashi, T.; Ito, H.; Ito, K.; Anzai, A.; Endo, J.; Tamura, Y.; Kimura, K.; et al. Deleterious Effect of the IL-23/IL-17A Axis and γδT Cells on Left Ventricular Remodeling After Myocardial Infarction. J. Am. Hear. Assoc. 2012, 1, e004408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Dobaczewski, M.; Xia, Y.; Bujak, M.; Gonzalez-Quesada, C.; Frangogiannis, N. CCR5 Signaling Suppresses Inflammation and Reduces Adverse Remodeling of the Infarcted Heart, Mediating Recruitment of Regulatory T Cells. Am. J. Pathol. 2010, 176, 2177–2187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Saxena, A.; Dobaczewski, M.; Rai, V.; Haque, Z.; Chen, W.; Li, N.; Frangogiannis, N.G. Regulatory T cells are recruited in the infarcted mouse myocardium and may modulate fibroblast phenotype and function. Am. J. Physiol. Circ. Physiol. 2014, 307, H1233–H1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Weirather, J.; Hofmann, U.D.; Beyersdorf, N.; Ramos, G.; Vogel, B.; Frey, A.; Ertl, G.; Kerkau, T.; Frantz, S. Foxp3 + CD4 + T Cells Improve Healing After Myocardial Infarction by Modulating Monocyte/Macrophage Differentiation. Circ. Res. 2014, 115, 55–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Shi, X.; Lai, X.; Huang, Z.; Gua, Z. Elevated circulating level of CCR6 is related to acute myocardial infarction and severity of coronary artery stenosis. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Med. 2018, 11, 2292–2298. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. CCR6 deficiency results in decreased cardiac function and increased infarction size after ischemia-reperfusion injury. (A) Study design: wild-type and Ccr6−/− mice were subjected to ischemia-reperfusion injury, echocardiography was performed 3 weeks after injury (n = 3). Image was created using Biorender.com (Accessed on 2 September 2021). (B) Survival curve after ischemia-reperfusion injury. (C) Ejection fraction in Ccr6−/− mice compared to wild-type controls. (D) Stroke volume in Ccr6−/− mice compared to wild-type controls. (E) End-systolic volume in Ccr6−/− mice compared to wild-type controls. (F) Infarction size in Ccr6−/− mice compared to wild-type controls. (G) Representative images of Gomori’s 1-step trichrome stain. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Figure 1. CCR6 deficiency results in decreased cardiac function and increased infarction size after ischemia-reperfusion injury. (A) Study design: wild-type and Ccr6−/− mice were subjected to ischemia-reperfusion injury, echocardiography was performed 3 weeks after injury (n = 3). Image was created using Biorender.com (Accessed on 2 September 2021). (B) Survival curve after ischemia-reperfusion injury. (C) Ejection fraction in Ccr6−/− mice compared to wild-type controls. (D) Stroke volume in Ccr6−/− mice compared to wild-type controls. (E) End-systolic volume in Ccr6−/− mice compared to wild-type controls. (F) Infarction size in Ccr6−/− mice compared to wild-type controls. (G) Representative images of Gomori’s 1-step trichrome stain. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Biomedicines 09 01532 g001
Figure 2. CCR6 deficiency in the bone marrow results in increased infarction size after ischemia-reperfusion injury. (A) Study design of bone marrow transplantation experiments, where the mice were subjected to ischemia-reperfusion injury. Echocardiography was performed 3 weeks after injury. Image was created using Biorender.com (Accessed on 2 September 2021). (B) Ejection fraction in wild-type recipient mice receiving either wild-type or Ccr6−/− BM (n = 4–6) and Ccr6−/− recipient mice receiving either wild-type or Ccr6−/− BM (n = 3). (C) Infarction size in wild-type recipient mice receiving either wild-type or Ccr6−/− BM (n = 4–6) and Ccr6−/− recipient mice receiving either wild-type or Ccr6−/− BM (n = 3). (D) Representative images of heart sections stained with Gomori’1 step trichrome staining of wild-type recipient mice receiving either wild-type or Ccr6−/− BM and Ccr6−/− recipient mice receiving either wild-type or Ccr6−/− BM. * p < 0.05.
Figure 2. CCR6 deficiency in the bone marrow results in increased infarction size after ischemia-reperfusion injury. (A) Study design of bone marrow transplantation experiments, where the mice were subjected to ischemia-reperfusion injury. Echocardiography was performed 3 weeks after injury. Image was created using Biorender.com (Accessed on 2 September 2021). (B) Ejection fraction in wild-type recipient mice receiving either wild-type or Ccr6−/− BM (n = 4–6) and Ccr6−/− recipient mice receiving either wild-type or Ccr6−/− BM (n = 3). (C) Infarction size in wild-type recipient mice receiving either wild-type or Ccr6−/− BM (n = 4–6) and Ccr6−/− recipient mice receiving either wild-type or Ccr6−/− BM (n = 3). (D) Representative images of heart sections stained with Gomori’1 step trichrome staining of wild-type recipient mice receiving either wild-type or Ccr6−/− BM and Ccr6−/− recipient mice receiving either wild-type or Ccr6−/− BM. * p < 0.05.
Biomedicines 09 01532 g002
Figure 3. Deficiency of CCR6 results in the increased infiltration of inflammatory immune cells in the cardiac tissue after ischemia-reperfusion injury. (A) Quantification of the number of myofibroblast in the scar from Ccr6−/− mice compared to wild-type mice 21 days after ischemia-reperfusion, including representative images of smooth-muscle actin (Green) staining. Scale bar = 50 µm. (B) Quantification of the number of vessels in the scar from Ccr6−/− mice compared to wild-type mice 21 days after ischemia-reperfusion, including representative images of CD31 (Red) staining. Scale bar = 50 µm. (C) Quantification of infiltrating B cells, 2 days after ischemia-reperfusion in Ccr6−/− mice compared to wild-type mice, including representative images of B220 (Yellow) staining. Scale bar = 50 µm. (DF) Quantification of infiltrating inflammatory MPO+ immune cells (D), inflammatory macrophages (E) and reparatory macrophages (F), 2 days after ischemia-reperfusion in Ccr6−/− mice compared to wild-type mice. (G) Representative images of MPO (Red) and Mac3 (Green) staining. All n = 3. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Figure 3. Deficiency of CCR6 results in the increased infiltration of inflammatory immune cells in the cardiac tissue after ischemia-reperfusion injury. (A) Quantification of the number of myofibroblast in the scar from Ccr6−/− mice compared to wild-type mice 21 days after ischemia-reperfusion, including representative images of smooth-muscle actin (Green) staining. Scale bar = 50 µm. (B) Quantification of the number of vessels in the scar from Ccr6−/− mice compared to wild-type mice 21 days after ischemia-reperfusion, including representative images of CD31 (Red) staining. Scale bar = 50 µm. (C) Quantification of infiltrating B cells, 2 days after ischemia-reperfusion in Ccr6−/− mice compared to wild-type mice, including representative images of B220 (Yellow) staining. Scale bar = 50 µm. (DF) Quantification of infiltrating inflammatory MPO+ immune cells (D), inflammatory macrophages (E) and reparatory macrophages (F), 2 days after ischemia-reperfusion in Ccr6−/− mice compared to wild-type mice. (G) Representative images of MPO (Red) and Mac3 (Green) staining. All n = 3. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Biomedicines 09 01532 g003
Figure 4. Deficiency of CCR6 results in increased apoptosis, especially in cardiomyocytes, after ischemia-reperfusion injury. (AC) Representative images of TUNEL (Green) staining (A) and TUNEL (Green)/Troponin (Red) double staining (B), including the quantification of total TUNEL+ cells (C), 2 days after ischemia-reperfusion in Ccr6−/− mice compared to wild-type mice. Scale bar = 50 µm. (DF) Representative images of Ki67 (Green) staining (D) and Ki67 (Green)/smooth-muscle actin (Red) double staining (E), including the quantification of total Ki67+ cells (F), 2 days after ischemia-reperfusion in Ccr6−/− mice compared to wild-type mice. Scale bar = 50 µm. Arrows point at positively stained cells. All n = 3.
Figure 4. Deficiency of CCR6 results in increased apoptosis, especially in cardiomyocytes, after ischemia-reperfusion injury. (AC) Representative images of TUNEL (Green) staining (A) and TUNEL (Green)/Troponin (Red) double staining (B), including the quantification of total TUNEL+ cells (C), 2 days after ischemia-reperfusion in Ccr6−/− mice compared to wild-type mice. Scale bar = 50 µm. (DF) Representative images of Ki67 (Green) staining (D) and Ki67 (Green)/smooth-muscle actin (Red) double staining (E), including the quantification of total Ki67+ cells (F), 2 days after ischemia-reperfusion in Ccr6−/− mice compared to wild-type mice. Scale bar = 50 µm. Arrows point at positively stained cells. All n = 3.
Biomedicines 09 01532 g004
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Schumacher, D.; Liehn, E.A.; Singh, A.; Curaj, A.; Wijnands, E.; Lira, S.A.; Tacke, F.; Jankowski, J.; Biessen, E.A.L.; van der Vorst, E.P.C. CCR6 Deficiency Increases Infarct Size after Murine Acute Myocardial Infarction. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 1532. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9111532

AMA Style

Schumacher D, Liehn EA, Singh A, Curaj A, Wijnands E, Lira SA, Tacke F, Jankowski J, Biessen EAL, van der Vorst EPC. CCR6 Deficiency Increases Infarct Size after Murine Acute Myocardial Infarction. Biomedicines. 2021; 9(11):1532. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9111532

Chicago/Turabian Style

Schumacher, David, Elisa A. Liehn, Anjana Singh, Adelina Curaj, Erwin Wijnands, Sergio A. Lira, Frank Tacke, Joachim Jankowski, Erik A.L. Biessen, and Emiel P.C. van der Vorst. 2021. "CCR6 Deficiency Increases Infarct Size after Murine Acute Myocardial Infarction" Biomedicines 9, no. 11: 1532. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9111532

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop