Next Article in Journal
An Epidemiological Perspective on New Pediatric Cases of Type 1 Diabetes and Vitamin D Deficiency in South-East Romania: A Retrospective Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Predictors of Social Exclusion among Adolescents: The Weight of Physical Self-Concept Dimensions
Previous Article in Journal
Vitamin D Deficiency and Maternal Diseases as Risk Factors for the Development of Macrosomia in Newborns
Previous Article in Special Issue
Differences in the Development of Motor Skills in Portuguese Children Aged 12 Months after 3 Years of COVID-19 Confinement
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Association between Academic Performance, Physical Activity, and Academic Stress in Compulsory Secondary Education: An Analysis by Sex

by
Dilan Galeano-Rojas
1,
Marina Cuadros-Juárez
1,
Borys Bismark León Reyes
2,
Mónica Alexandra Castelo Reyna
3,
Claudio Farías-Valenzuela
4 and
Pedro Valdivia-Moral
1,*
1
Department of Musical, Plastic and Corporal Expression Didactics, Faculty of Educational Sciences, Universidad de Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain
2
Facultad de Educación, Universidad Estatal de Milagro UNEMI, Machala 070201, Ecuador
3
Faculty of Computer Science and Electronics, Escuela Superior Politécnica de Chimborazo, Riobamba 060105, Ecuador
4
Escuela de Ciencias de la Actividad Física, Universidad de Las Américas, Santiago 9170022, Chile
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Children 2024, 11(10), 1161; https://doi.org/10.3390/children11101161
Submission received: 25 August 2024 / Revised: 21 September 2024 / Accepted: 23 September 2024 / Published: 25 September 2024

Abstract

:
Objectives: The main objective of this study is to analyze the relationships between academic performance, physical activity, and academic stress in secondary education students, while the secondary objective is to establish differences by gender in the physical activity and academic stress levels of secondary students based on academic performance. Methods: The sample was composed of students from both sexes who attended public institutions. Data collection was conducted applying an ad hoc questionnaire for academic performance, the PAQ-C questionnaire for physical activity, and the QASSE questionnaire for academic stress. Data analysis was performed using descriptive statistics: Spearman’s correlation coefficient was used for associations, while comparisons were conducted via the Mann–Whitney U test and Kruskal–Wallis H test. Results: The results show that academic stress is negatively correlated with physical activity and academic performance. Men present significantly higher values in physical activity, while women present higher mean values in general academic stress and the academic overload dimension. Lastly, regarding academic performance, significant differences were observed in the family pressure dimension, with students who perform better academically presenting lower mean values in this dimension of academic stress. Conclusions: In conclusion, the more the general academic stress, the lower the physical activity levels and academic performance. In addition, physical activity appears as a potential coping strategy for academic stress, and its influence on academic performance should be further studied in secondary education.

1. Introduction

Currently, the health and wellbeing of adolescents have become topics of special interest at the global level [1,2,3]. The adolescence stage implies significant behavioral changes that may lead to unstable and unhealthy behaviors attributed to adherence to pernicious habits such as alcohol or drug consumption, a poor diet, and sedentarism [4,5]. Therefore, adolescence is a key stage to establish a healthy lifestyle that reflects on other dimensions of life such as education and professional perspectives, which will, in turn, have implications at the physical, psychological, and emotional levels [2,6,7].
Sedentarism has become one of the most widespread risk factors in the world’s population [8,9]. It is estimated that more than 50% of adolescents exhibit sedentary behaviors and have a physically inactive lifestyle [10,11,12]. In addition, according to Barth et al. [13], physical inactivity in children and youngsters is accompanied by an increase in mental health problems. More than 14% of children in the world present these conditions [14], which can impact their quality of life in the short, medium, and long term, as this is a critical period for their development [5,15,16,17].
In particular, the transition to secondary education is, for most students, a stage riddled with anxiety and stress due to the academic demands and the new educational, social, and physical environment to which they need to adapt [18,19]. According to Naranjo [20] and Marcial et al. [21], the increase in stress levels can cause students physical, mental, and emotional health problems, reducing their self-esteem and affecting their personal development. In this context, academic stress consists of a reaction of students to school stimuli or demands considered stressors—i.e., exams, homework and task overloads, family pressure, or their own expectations—which affect both their wellbeing and academic performance [22,23,24].
In this sense, academic stress is recognized as a risk factor and a problem that school centers should prevent by fostering a positive and healthy environment [25]. Furthermore, considering that the sources of academic stress in general cannot be avoided, generating suitable coping strategies becomes necessary [26], mainly because of the relationship between academic stress and academic performance, which is key at the personal, professional, family, and institutional level [27,28]. Academic performance is understood as students’ achievement and progress in terms of learning, based on the educational objectives established during the school stage [29]. According to Scrimin et al. [26] and Colunga-Rodríguez et al. [30], the close link between academic stress and academic failure can generate higher levels of frustration and anxiety that, in turn, are related to worse academic performance. This becomes even more evident in higher education stages, as reflected by a higher school failure rate [31,32].
In this sense, the study of factors that affect academic performance, such as academic stress, has gained growing interest at the social and research level, as the influence of parents, teachers, and some sectors of society are decisive [28,33]. In this line, various studies indicate that the practice of regular physical activity (PA) can positively contribute to the academic performance and psychological wellbeing of students [19,34,35,36]. PA is understood as any body movement produced by the skeletal muscles that implies spending energy and allows for performing daily activities in the environment [37]. More physically active students with high levels of stress have been found to present less stress-induced diseases, while students with a more sedentary lifestyle and high levels of stress are more vulnerable to various diseases [11,38,39]; therefore, PA may have a protective effect against stress and other associated diseases [25].
In fact, Wunsch et al. [24] maintain that PA acts as a moderator variable between stress and academic performance, as it has positive effects on memory, reaction time, creativity, intelligence, and the synthesis process as a consequence of higher levels of oxygen in the brain, and it improves cognitive function [13,40]. In addition, strong factors such as an involvement with teachers and classmates and the possibility of practicing PA at school and outside school are associated with lower stress levels, with PA being an effective coping strategy for frustration that improves the mood and reduces anxiety levels [41], as well as facilitating adherence to healthy life behaviors such as good sleep and diet, which are in turn associated with better academic performance [36,42].
In this sense, considering that adolescents spent a high number of hours at school, and that the stress derived from various demands is a factor that affects academic performance [16], the relationship between stress and the lifestyle choices related to the practice of PA should be identified, as according to Visier-Alfonso et al. [42], the mechanisms behind this influence are still unclear. Contextual factors, such as the academic periods during which stress is assessed, the type of stress, and the nature of the PA interventions (exercise, training, sports, etc.), as well as the bidirectional or tridirectional relationships explored in the investigation of stress and its connection to other psychosocial variables [15,24,36], highlight the need for further research on this topic at the secondary education level. Therefore, the main objective of this study is to analyze the relationships between academic performance, PA, and academic stress in secondary students, while the second objective is to establish differences by gender in the PA and academic stress levels of students based on academic performance.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Participants

The sample was composed of 310 students from mixed public Compulsory Secondary Education (ESO, in Spanish) institutions from the Spanish provinces of Granada, Jaén, and Málaga. The sampling was non-probabilistic and by convenience, as participants were selected according to the characteristics of the study [43].
Regarding the characteristics of the sample, the mean age of the participants was 13.9 years old (SD = 1.22), 169 were men (54.5%), 125 were women (40.3%), and 16 did not specify a sex (5.2%). In addition, 82 participants were in their 1st year of ESO (26.5%), 74 in their 2nd year (23.9%), 96 in their 3d year (31%), 53 in their 4th year (17.1%) and 5 did not specify their year (1.6%).

2.2. Design

The study employed a quantitative research approach with a non-experimental and a descriptive cross-sectional design, as the variables were not manipulated, and the data collection was conducted at a specific time and only once in order to describe the phenomena, contexts, and facts analyzed and explain the trends in the population under study [43].

2.3. Instruments and Variables

A Likert scale was used as it enabled the measurement of different dimensions, such as the beliefs, thoughts, feelings, and behaviors of the participants, through various questions. The variables and measurement instruments validated for the population under study are introduced below:
  • Sociodemographic characteristics
An ad hoc questionnaire was employed to collect the following sociodemographic data: age, sex, type of school attended, country of origin, and grade.
  • Academic performance
An ad hoc questionnaire was created as in previous studies [13,44]. The mathematics, physical education, language, and English grades of the last term were considered to establish general academic performance. The measurement scale is the same used to grade students at school centers, i.e., ranges from 1 to 10. In addition, the criterion adopted to establish the academic performance level of students was “low” for grades from 0 to 6, “medium” for grades from 7 to 8, and “high” for grades from 9 to 10, as in other studies [30,45].
  • Physical activity
The Spanish version of the PAQ-C questionnaire was applied [46]. This instrument calculates the PA of students during the last seven days through 10 questions, of which 9 refer to the level of PA and one to the presence of pathologies or events that impeded conducting PA during the last week. The response scale generates scores from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating higher levels of PA: The internal consistency of the instrument presented in this study was α = 0.91, and it obtained α = 0.83 after validation.
  • Academic stress
The Questionnaire on Academic Stress in Secondary School (QASSE) was employed [22]. The instrument is composed of 24 items presented on a Likert scale, where 1 equals “no stress at all” and 5 “a lot of stress”. The questionnaire measures the following dimensions: academic overload and school performance (items 1, 4, 5, 7, 10, 16, 18, 20, and 23), interaction with classmates, (items 2, 3, 6, 8, 9, 17, and 24), family pressure (items 15, 19, 21, and 22) and future prospects (items 11, 12, 13, and 14). The internal consistency of the questionnaire after its validation was α = 0.92, and in this study, it reached α = 0.91.

2.4. Procedure

A literature review was first conducted to have an overview of research on this topic. Then, the objective of the study was established, and the instruments for data collection were selected. Subsequently, the management team from the ESO institutes was contacted and informed about the purpose of the study through an informative letter, as well as about the approval of the same by the Ethics Committee of Universidad de Granada under the code 3324/CEIH/2023. Upon acceptance, schools were requested to send informed consent forms to the guardians or parents of students. In addition, the students’ families were informed about the objective of the students’ participation, clarifying that this was completely voluntary, anonymous, and confidential, and that students could abandon the study at any time in line with the recommendations of the Declaration of Helsinki [47].
For data collection, participants were given paper questionnaires. When answering them, students were accompanied by members of the research team, who could answer any questions or solve any problems that might arise. Lastly, after data collection, the data were statistically analyzed to obtain the results, discuss them, and establish conclusions based on the objectives of the study.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

The data normality was compared using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Descriptive statistics are presented as mean, standard deviation, frequency, and percentages. The internal consistency of the questionnaires used was calculated via Cronbach’s alpha. Based on normality, it was decided that non-parametric tests would be used for inferential statistics. To determine the degree of correlation between academic performance, physical activity, and academic stress, Spearman’s correlation test was employed. Subsequently, Mann–Whitney’s U test was used to compare means by sex, while Kruskal–Wallis’s H test was selected for academic performance, calculating the size effect through Hedges’ g and eta squared, respectively. The statistical program used was SPSS V27 (Inc., IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, NY, USA). A significance of <5% was adopted.

3. Results

The results of this work are presented below in the same order as the established objectives and based on the statistical tests mentioned above. The mean and standard deviation values of the variables under study are shown in Table 1.
PA is observed to present an M = 2.66, i.e., moderate PA levels. In academic performance, M = 6.87 is on a “medium” scale value, with an SD = 1.62, which indicates some variability among participants. Regarding general academic stress, an M = 2.88 value is observed, with participants showing higher academic stress levels in the academic overload dimension (M = 3.34) and lower ones in the classmate interaction dimension (M = 2.38).
In Table 2, a descriptive analysis is presented based on the academic performance levels, i.e., low, medium, and high academic performance.
After analyzing the percentages, 30% of the students present a low academic performance, while most participants (46.4%) have a medium academic performance. In turn, the smallest percentage (23.6%) corresponds to students with a high academic performance.
Table 3 presents the results of the correlation analysis between variables through Spearman’s coefficient.
Initially, PA is observed to be negatively related to general academic stress (p = 0.049, rho = −0.150), i.e., the higher the PA level, the lower the academic stress levels. In turn, academic performance is negatively correlated to general academic stress (p = 0.016, rho = −0.169) and the dimensions of family pressure (p = <0.001, rho = −0.256) and future prospects (p = 0.029, rho = −0.140). Lastly, general academic stress and each of its dimensions are positively and significantly related with each other (p = <0.01).
Table 4 presents the results of the Mann–Whitney U test for calculating the mean differences based on gender. Statistically significant differences were found in PA (p = 0.005, g = 0.71), with higher mean values in men. In turn, there are significant differences in general academic stress (p = 0.007, g = 0.79) and the dimension of academic overload (p = <0.001, g = 0.88), with higher mean scores for women. No significant statistical differences were present in the other variables; however, it is noteworthy that women present higher mean values in all dimensions of academic stress.
Lastly, the results of the Kruskal–Wallis H test in Table 5 show significant differences related to academic performance in general academic stress (H = 6.79, p = 0.034, η2 = 0.02) and in family pressure (H = 21.36, p = <0.001, η² = 0.08). After the post hoc analysis using the Games–Howell method, students with high academic performance present significantly lower mean scores than students with a medium (p = 0.002) and lower (p = <0.001) performance in the family pressure dimension. However, general academic stress did not exhibit significant differences according to low, medium, and high academic performance after the post hoc analysis.

4. Discussion

The main objective of this study was to analyze the relationships between academic performance, physical activity, and academic stress in secondary education students, while the secondary objective was to establish differences by gender of levels of physical activity and academic stress based on academic performance. This study shows an association between the variables analyzed, which provides key information for the acknowledgment of academic stress in the school context as a factor that affects the academic performance of students as multiple factors become stressors [25], for which effective coping strategies are required [26], such as the regular practice of PA [34,36], as students with higher levels of PA present less academic stress, and the lower the academic stress, the better the academic performance. In line with this, the findings of this study can lead to the design of effective coping strategies for school stress, with the goal of improving students’ academic performance through the practice of PA, which will contribute to the adherence of ESO students to a healthier lifestyle.
Initially, the descriptive data analysis reveals moderate PA levels in the population under study, a medium academic performance, and higher academic stress levels in the academic overload dimension, but lower ones in the interaction with classmate’s dimension. These results agree with those of previous studies showing that PA levels remain moderate–low, as students are a population that does not follow a great percentage of the established PA recommendations [10,12], due to the fact that they spend most of the day performing low-energy or sedentary activities, such as playing video games, watching television, or using the telephone, to which is added the little interest in encouraging young people to have a healthy and active lifestyle of the media that have a great influence on their behaviors [10,12].
Regarding academic performance, the relative mean of other studies often remains in the “medium” value scale, considering that there are multiple factors affecting this variable (economy, family, gender, sociodemographic characteristics) and that this, in turn, plays a mediating role in terms of healthy lifestyle habits [2,48]. In addition, in the works of Muñoz-Donoso et al. [6] and Borghi et al. [23], high academic stress levels from academic overload were also found, with physically less active students perceiving more stress from homework and assignments, and the exams period being frequently the biggest stressor in this category, mainly due to poor time management. Nevertheless, it is noteworthy that interaction with classmates motivates lower stress, as the pressure of the social environment has been demonstrated to also be a significant source of stress [26,49].
The results of the correlation analysis between variables indicate that both academic performance and PA are negatively associated with general academic stress, i.e., the higher the general academic stress, the lower the PA levels and academic performance. These findings are in line with studies such as that by Zhu et al. [15], which also demonstrates the need to reduce academic stress and increase PA practice, since the higher the academic stress levels, the lower the PA levels and the higher the vulnerability to mental health disorders. In this context, the study by Castro-Sánchez et al. [44] also shows that PA is associated with lower stress and higher academic performance, despite this last association not being significant in this study. This is because the regular practice of PA releases endorphins, which are neurotransmitters that generate feelings of happiness and reduce the perception of pain, which contributes to lower levels of anxiety and stress [44]. In addition, PA improves cognitive function, memory, and concentration, crucial factors for learning and academic performance [13,24].
In contrast, in the work by Castro-Sánchez et al. [44], academic performance also displays a positive relationship with stress; however, the authors warn that these data should be interpreted with caution, as is it understood that students with higher academic stress levels perform worse academically [50]. Regardless, students with medium levels of academic stress have been demonstrated to improve their learning achievements with adequate coping strategies, which can be, to a certain extent, an opportunity to improve performance [51,52]. Students can adapt to stressful situations thanks to a modulation in the production of cortisol, which provides the energy and substrates necessary to cope with the stimuli that give rise to stress [23], taking into account, in addition, its relationship with levels of motivation and resilience [23,44].
Regarding differences by gender, significant differences were found in PA levels, with higher mean values in men, which is in accordance with other studies where men presented the highest PA values [19,53]. In this line, Bobo-Arce et al. [54] and Burton et al. [55] believe that girls often have lower PA levels owing to different social stereotypes inside and outside the school environment that make them be more concerned with academic tasks. In addition, significant differences were observed in the general academic stress and the academic overload dimension, with higher mean values in women. This psychological malaise is attributed to the overload of academic tasks, assessments from teachers, classwork, and lack of time for academic-related activities [56]. In this sense, as indicated by Jones et al. [57], and Gasiūnienė and Miežienė [19], more physically active students—such as men in this case—present lower levels of academic stress. Therefore, the practice of regular PA is suggested to enrich the psychological health of students [58].
Lastly, with respect to academic performance, there are significant differences in general academic performance, and in the family pressure dimension, students who perform well academically present lower levels of academic stress derived from family pressure. In this context, the inverse relationship between family pressure and future prospects and academic performance found in the correlation analysis should be noted. Pressure from parents and the social environment has been demonstrated to increase the fear of failure, which may generate more anxiety and stress [26,49,59]. According to Naranjo [20], family pressure is classified as an external source of stress, while future prospects is an internal source; these sources increase in specific periods such as exam week, when the family’s perfectionist and rigid expectations exceed reality and generate frustration, making students feel incapable and unable to project their ideas for the future, and they arrives at a position of predominant anxiety. This scenario, according to Colunga-Rodríguez et al. [30], is associated with worse academic performance.
Thus, in line with the practice of PA as a potential coping strategy for academic stress, the study of its influence on academic performance should be furthered [60], underscoring the essential role of family in the promotion and adherence to PA, to which are attributed multiple benefits for mental health, such as the reduction of academic stress [61]. The social support provided by the family can significantly affect the motivation, participation, and continuity of young people in physical–sport activities, both positively and negatively, especially from an emotional perspective [20,59,62]. It has been shown that parents who adopt active behaviors and promote a healthy lifestyle tend to have children who also incorporate these habits into their daily lives [63]. Therefore, family support is essential to promote a physically active and healthy lifestyle during this stage, and it is even reflected in academic performance.
One of the main limitations of this study is its non-experimental and descriptive cross-sectional design, which does not allow for establishing causal relationships; therefore, the results should be interpreted with caution. In addition, regarding the measurement instruments, the use of accelerometers could provide more accurate information about the PA of students. Moreover, since all the participants attended public education centers, similar studies could be conducted in the future, but comparing public, state-subsidized, and private schools, expanding the sample size and including upper and lower grades to determine how the results change based on grade and age. Lastly, after analyzing the results of this study, interventions and longitudinal experimental studies should be conducted with a focus on the regular practice of PA, to measure its influence on the stress and academic performance of students.

5. Conclusions

With respect to the objectives proposed, and specifically to the main objective, it is concluded that academic performance, PA, and academic stress have different relationships with one another. In this context, academic performance is negatively associated with general academic stress, while general academic stress and each of its dimensions are positively related.
As for the secondary objective, ESO students see their PA levels and academic performance reduced as academic stress increases. In this scenario, women score higher in general academic stress and academic overload, and present lower levels of PA. Conversely, men present higher levels of PA and less academic stress in all dimensions. Therefore, it can be asserted that PA is an effective coping mechanism for academic stress disorder in secondary education. Lastly, based on academic performance, statistical differences are found in the family pressure dimension as a source of academic stress, with high-achieving students presenting less family pressure compared to students with a medium and low academic performance. Thus, the family plays a key role in the onset of stress. Therefore, encouraging the practice of PA among students should be a priority task for families and schools, proposing spaces and activities that are adapted to the needs and interests of students in order to improve their physical and mental health, which, in turn, can potentially contribute to better school performance.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.C.-J. and P.V.-M.; methodology, D.G.-R. and C.F.-V.; software, B.B.L.R. and M.A.C.R.; formal analysis, D.G.-R. and M.C.-J.; investigation, M.C.-J. and C.F.-V.; resources, P.V.-M. and B.B.L.R.; writing—original draft preparation, M.C.-J. and D.G.-R.; writing—review and editing, P.V.-M. and C.F.-V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board (or Ethics Committee) of the University of Granada. Code: 3324/CEIH/2023. Date of approval: 16 March 2024.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study. Written informed consent has been obtained from the participant(s) to publish this paper.

Data Availability Statement

Data are not available due to ethical requirements because they contain personal data.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Pinilla-Quintana, I.; Martín-Moraleda, E.; Jiménez-Zazo, F.; Martinez-Romero, M.T.; DoradoSuárez, A.; Romero-Blanco, C.; García, M.V.; Cabanillas, E.; Mota-Utanda, M.C.; Queralt, A.; et al. Active commuting to school and environmental, social, and lifestyle influences in Spanish adolescents: PACO Y PACA (Pedal and walk to school, Pedal and walk home) protocol study. J. Sport Health Res. 2024, 16, 167–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Pérez-Mármol, M.; Chacón-Cuberos, R.; Belmonte-Arévalo, A.B.; Gamarra-Vengoechea, M.A.; Castro-Sánchez, M. Academic performance and self-concept as mediators of healthy habits: Linear model in adolescents. J. Sport Health Res. 2024, 16, 127–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Galindo-Perdomo, F.; Camacho Coy, H.; Monterrosa Quintero, A. Association between levels of self-perceived physical activity and sociodemographic variables among school children. Retos 2023, 50, 456–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Paiement, K.; Drapeau, V.; Gilbert, J.A.; Lemoyne, J.; Moreau, N.; Monthuy-Blanc, J.; Tremblay, J.; Marcil, V.; Mathieu, M.E. Changes in Lifestyle Habits among Adolescent Girls after FitSpirit Participation. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 4388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Moral Moreno, L.; Flores Ferro, E.; Maureira Cid, F. Physical activity level in university students: A Spain-Chile comparative study. Retos 2024, 56, 188–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Muñoz-Donoso, D.; Soto-Sánchez, J.; Leyton, B.; Carrasco-Beltran, H.; Valdés Cabezas, E. Level of physical activity and academic stress perceived by university students in the health sector during their final examinations. Retos 2023, 49, 22–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kralik, R. The Influence of family and school in shaping the values of children and young people in the theory of free time and pedagogy. J. Educ. Cult. Soc. 2023, 14, 249–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Alvarado-Melo, J.E.; Leon-Ariza, H.; Ladino Marin, E.V. Physical activity in students and its association with attention. A systematic review. Retos 2024, 56, 834–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yáñez Sepúlveda, R.; Barraza Gómez, F.; Mahecha Matsudo, S. Actividad física, rendimiento académico y autoconcepto físico en adolescentes de Quintero, Chile. Educ. Física Y Cienc. 2016, 18, e017. [Google Scholar]
  10. García, W.F. Sedentarismo en niños y adolescentes Factor de riesgo en aumento. Rev. Científica Mundo La Investig. Y El Conoc. 2019, 3, 1602–1624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kantomaa, M.T.; Stamatakis, E.; Kankaanpää, A.; Kajantie, E.; Taanila, A.; Tammelin, T. Associations of physical activity and sedentary behavior with adolescents’ academic achievement. J. Res. Adolesc. 2016, 26, 432–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Miranda, V.P.N.; Coimbra, D.R.; Bastos, R.R.; Miranda Junior, M.V.; Amorim, P.R. Use of latent class analysis as a method for assessing physical activity level, sedentary behavior, and nutritional habits in adolescents’ lifestyles: A scoping review. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0256069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Barth, I.; Anderssen, S.A.; Eikeland, H.; Skulberg, K.R.; Thurston, M. Physical activity, mental health, and academic achievement: A cross-sectional study of Norwegian adolescents. Ment. Health Phys. Act. 2020, 18, 100322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Organización Mundial de la Salud. Trastornos Mentales. 8 de Junio de 2022. Available online: https://www.who.int/es/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/mental-disorders (accessed on 1 June 2024).
  15. Zhu, X.; Haegele, J.A.; Liu, H.; Yu, F. Academic stress, physical activity, sleep, and mental health among Chinese adolescents. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 7257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Hosseinkhani, Z.; Hassanabadi, H.R.; Parsaeian, M.; Nedjat, S.; Foroozanfar, Z. Role of mental health, academic stress, academic achievement, and physical activity in self-rated health among adolescents in Iran: A multilevel analysis. J. Educ. Health Promot. 2020, 9, 182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Murgaš, F.; Petrovič, F.; Maturkanič, P.; Kralik, R. Happiness or Quality of Life? Or Both? J. Educ. Cult. Soc. 2022, 13, 17–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bahri, M.S. Stress, stressors, and coping strategies among secondary school students in a Malaysian government secondary school: Initial findings. ASEAN J. Psychiatr. 2010, 11, 1–15. [Google Scholar]
  19. Gasiūnienė, L.; Miežienė, B. The Relationship Between Students’ Physical Activity and Academic Stress. Balt. J. Sport Health Sci. 2021, 4, 4–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Naranjo, M. Una revisión teórica sobre estrés y algunos aspectos relevantes de este en el ámbito educativo. Rev. Educ. 2009, 33, 171–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Marcial, D.; Villalobos Lara, R.E.; Marcial Alamilla, E.M. Impact of an intervention program on the reduction of perceived stress in university students in the health area. Retos 2024, 57, 473–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. García-Ros, R.; Pérez-González, F.; Tomás, J.M. Development and validation of a questionnaire on academic stress in secondary schools: Structure, reliability and nomological validity. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Borghi, F.; Rocha-Teles, C.M.; McFadden, S.K.; da Silva, P.C.; Luiz Souza, A.; Grassi-Kassisse, D.M. Influence of academic exam routine on perceived stress, resilience, and salivary cortisol in Brazilian pharmacy undergraduate students. Personal. Individ. Differ. 2021, 179, 110928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wunsch, K.; Fiedler, J.; Bachert, P.; Woll, A. The bidirectional relationship among physical activity, stress, and academic performance among university students: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Arce, E.; Azofeifa-Mora, C.; Morera-Castro, M.; Rojas Valverde, D. Asociación entre estrés académico, composición corporal, actividad física y habilidad emocional en mujeres universitarias. MHSalud. Rev. En Cienc. Del Mov. Hum. Y Salud 2020, 17, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Scrimin, S.; Moscardino, U.; Altoè, G.; Mason, L. Attentional Bias for Academic Stressors and Classroom Climate Predict Students’ Grades and Socioemotional Functioning. J. Res. Adolesc. 2018, 28, 245–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Reynoso, O.; Méndez-Luévano, T.E. ¿Es posible predecir el rendimiento académico? La regulación de la conducta como un indicador del rendimiento académico en estudiantes de educación superior. Diálogos Sobre Educación. Temas Actuales En Educ. Educ. 2018, 9, 1–19. [Google Scholar]
  28. Sahin, E.; Çekin, R.; Özçelik, I.Y. Predictors of Academic Achievement among Physical Education and Sport Undergraduate Students. Sports 2018, 6, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Silveira Pérez, Y.; Sanabria Navarro, J.R.; de Cortina Núñez, M.J.; Arango Buelvas, L.J. Perceptions of the association between physical activity and quality of life and academic performance in Colombian universities. Retos 2023, 47, 902–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Colunga-Rodríguez, C.; Ángel-González, M.; Vázquez-Colunga, C.L.; Vázquez-Juárez, C.L.; Colunga-Rodríguez, B.A. Relación entre ansiedad y rendimiento académico en alumnado de secundaria. Rev. Estud. E Investig. En Psicol. Y Educ. 2021, 8, 229–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. González-Valenzuela, M.J.; Martín-Ruíz, I. Rendimiento académico, lenguaje escrito, and motivación en adolescentes españoles. Univ. Psychol. 2019, 18, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Maureira Cid, F.; Flores Ferro, E.; Cortés Escafi, B.; Maureira Roldán, G. Relationship between existential nihilism and intra- and interpersonal skills and academic stress in physical education students in Chile. Retos 2024, 53, 11–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lamas, H.A. Sobre el rendimiento escolar. Propósitos Y Represent. 2015, 3, 313–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Alghadir, A.H.; Gabr, S.A.; Iqbal, Z.A. Effects of gender, physical activity, and stress-related hormones on adolescent’s academic achievements. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 4143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Wang, T.; Guo, C. Inverted U-Shaped Relationship between Physical Activity and Academic Achievement among Chinese Adolescents: The Mediating Role of Physical and Mental Health. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 4678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Warnier-Medina, A.; Orellana-Lepe, G.; Cortés-Roco, G.; Fernández-Ojeda, A.; Núñez-Burgos, C.; Riveros, J.; Yañez-Sepulveda, R.A. Physical exercise, eating habits, and stress: What happened to university students during the pandemic? Retos 2024, 53, 100–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Organización Mundial de la Salud. Actividad Física. 16 de Junio de 2024. Available online: https://www.who.int/es/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/physical-activity (accessed on 1 July 2024).
  38. Dale, L.P.; Vanderloo, L.; Moore, S.; Faulkner, G. Physical activity, depression, anxiety, and self-esteem in children and adolescents: An umbrella systematic review. Ment. Health Phys. Act. 2019, 16, 66–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lubans, D.; Richards, J.; Hillman, C.; Faulkner, G.; Beauchamp, M.; Nilsson, M.; Kelly, P.; Smith, J.; Raine, L.; Biddle, S. Physical activity for cognitive and mental health in youth: A systematic review of mechanisms. Pediatrics 2016, 138, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Godoy, A.; Valdés, P.; Fariña, C.; Cárcamo Mora, F.; Medina Herrera, B.; Meneses Sandoval, E.; Gedda Muñoz, R.; Durán Agüero, S. Asociación entre la condición física, estado nutricional y rendimiento académico en estudiantes de educación física. Nutr. Hosp. 2015, 32, 1722–1728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Tacillas, I.S.; Vásquez, E.E.; Verde, E.E.; Colque Díaz, E. Rendimiento académico: Universo muy complejo para el quehacer pedagógico. Muro Investig. 2020, 5, 53–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Visier-Alfonso, M.E.; Sánchez-López, M.; Álvarez-Bueno, C.; Ruiz-Hermosa, A.; Nieto-López, M.; Martínez-Vizcaíno, V. Mediators of physical activity and academic achievement: A systematic review. Wiley Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 2021, 32, 452–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Rodríguez, M.; Mendivelso, F. Diseño de investigación de corte transversal. Rev. Médica Sanitas 2018, 21, 141–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Castro-Sánchez, M.; Zurita-Ortega, F.; García-Mármol, E.; Chacón-Cuberos, R. Motivational Climate in Sport Is Associated with Life Stress Levels, Academic Performance, and Physical Activity Engagement of Adolescents. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 1198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Salcedo, M.; Villalba, M.A. El rendimiento académico en el nivel de educación media como factor asociado al rendimiento académico en la universidad. Civilizar Cienc. Soc. Y Humanas 2008, 8, 163–185. [Google Scholar]
  46. Manchola-González, J.; Bagur-Calafat, C.; Girabent-Farrés, M. Fiabilidad de la versión española del cuestionario de actividad física PAQ-C. Rev. Int. Med. Y Cienc. La Act. Física Y El Deporte 2017, 17, 139–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. World Medical Asociation. Declaración de Helsinki de la AMM. Principios Éticos Para las Investigaciones Médicas en Seres Humanos. 21 de Marzo de 2017. Available online: https://www.wma.net/es/policies-post/declaracion-de-helsinki-de-la-amm-principios-eticos-para-las-investigaciones-medicas-en-seres-humanos/ (accessed on 1 June 2024).
  48. Cerón Bedoya, J.D.; González Marmolejo, W.; Mora Rojas, D.L.; Fernandez Barona, E.J. Relationship between physical activity levels and academic performance in students at a university institution. Multicentric Study. Retos 2023, 47, 775–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Deighton, J.; Humphrey, N.; Belsky, J.; Boehnke, J.; Vostanis, P.; Patalay, P. Longitudinal pathways between mental health difficulties and academic performance during middle childhood and early adolescence. Br. J. Dev. Psychol. 2018, 36, 110–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Pacheco-Castillo, J. Estrés Académico de los Estudiantes de Enfermería en una Universidad Privada de Puerto Rico y su Asociación Con el Rendimiento Académico. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad de Málaga, Malaga, Spain, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  51. Espinosa-Castro, J.F.; Hernández-Lalinde, J.; Rodríguez, J.E.; Chacín, M.; Bermúdez-Pirela, V. Influencia del estrés sobre el rendimiento académico. AVFT Arch. Venez. Farmacol. Y Ter. 2020, 39, 63–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Reinoso Toledo, E.P. Influencia del estrés en el rendimiento académico de los estudiantes de 5to semestre de la facultad de odontología de la Universidad Central del Ecuador. Atlante Cuad. Educ. Y Desarro. 2018, 1, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  53. Fraile-García, J.; Tejero-González, C.M.; Esteban-Cornejo, I.E.; Veiga, Ó.L. Asociación entre disfrute, autoeficacia motriz, actividad física y rendimiento académico en educación física. Retos 2019, 36, 58–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Bobo-Arce, M.; Saavedra-García, M.; Montero-Ordóñez, L.F. Analysis of perceived barriers to physical activity in Ecuadorian university students: Comparison by sex. Retos 2024, 55, 857–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Burton, N.W.; Kadir, M.A.; Khan, A. Physical activity attitudes of adolescents in Bangladesh. Public Health 2020, 179, 59–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Alfonso, B.; Calcines, M.; Monteagudo, R.; Nieves Achon, Z. Estrés académico. Edumecentro 2015, 7, 163–178. [Google Scholar]
  57. Jones, M.; Taylor, A.; Liao, Y.; Intille, S.S.; Dunton, G.F. Real-time subjective assessment of psychological stress: Associations with objectively measured physical activity levels. Psychol. Sport Exerc. 2017, 31, 79–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Kawabata, M. Facilitating flow experiences in physical education settings. Psychol. Sport Exerc. 2018, 38, 28–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Ma, Y.; Siu, A.; Tse, W.S. The Role of High Parental Expectations in Adolescents’ Academic Performance and Depression in Hong Kong. J. Fam. Issues 2018, 39, 2505–2522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. González-Laguillo, B.; García-Tardón, B.; Pascual, D. Actividad físico-deportiva y rendimiento académico en la etapa de Educación Primaria: Un estudio durante el confinamiento. J. Sport Health Res. 2023, 15, 625–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Shepherd, H.A.; Evans, T.; Gupta, S.; McDonough, M.H.; Doyle-Baker, P.; Belton, K.L.; Karmali, S.; Pawer, S.; Hadly, G.; Pike, I.; et al. Impact of COVID-19 on High School Student-Athlete Experiences with Physical Activity, Mental Health, and Social Connection. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 3515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Porto Maciel, L.F.; Krapp do Nascimento, R.; Milistetd, M.; Vieira do Nascimento, J.; Folle, A. Systematic Review of Social Influences in Sport: Family, Coach and Teammate Support. Apunt. Educ. Física Y Deportes 2021, 145, 39–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Jaimes Reyes, A.L.; Betancourt Ocampo, D.; Tellez Vasquez, M.H.; Rubio Sosa, H.I.; González González, A. Parents as models of physical activity in Mexican boys and girls. Retos 2022, 43, 742–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Mean and standard deviation of the variables under study.
Table 1. Mean and standard deviation of the variables under study.
MSD
Physical activity2.660.77
Academic performance6.871.62
General academic stress2.880.80
Academic overload3.340.90
Interaction with classmates2.380.89
Future prospects2.871.16
Family pressure2.931.04
Note: M = mean; SD = standard deviation.
Table 2. Descriptive analysis of academic performance.
Table 2. Descriptive analysis of academic performance.
N%
Low9330
Medium14446.4
High7323.6
Total310100
Table 3. Correlation coefficients between the study variables.
Table 3. Correlation coefficients between the study variables.
2.3.4.5.6.7.
1. Physical activityRho0.087−0.119−0.150 *−0.042−0.025−0.115
Sig.0.2680.1470.0490.5750.7390.138
2. Academic performanceRho −0.169 *−0.069−0.046−0.256 **−0.140 *
Sig. 0.0160.2930.467<0.0010.029
3. General academic stressRho 0.842 **0.767 **0.777 **0.800 **
Sig. <0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001
4. Academic overloadRho 0.454 **0.531 **0.550 **
Sig. <0.001<0.001<0.001
5. Interaction with classmatesRho 0.492 **0.574 **
Sig. <0.001<0.001
6. Family pressureRho 0.525 **
Sig. <0.001
7. Future prospects
Note: * = p < 0.05; ** = p < 0.01; Rho = Spearman’s correlation coefficient.
Table 4. Statistical differences by gender.
Table 4. Statistical differences by gender.
VariablesGenderpG
Man
M ± SD
Women
M ± SD
Physical activity2.77 ± 0.692.49 ± 0.740.0050.71
Academic performance6.86 ± 1.536.92 ± 1.730.4781.63
General academic stress2.75 ± 0.843.05 ± 0.710.0070.79
Academic overload3.15 ± 0.903.58 ± 0.84<0.0010.88
Interaction with classmates2.28 ± 0.882.46 ± 0.830.0510.86
Family pressure2.86 ± 1.162.92 ± 1.160.7281.16
Future prospects2.88 ± 1.093.01 ± 0.980.2521.05
Note: M = mean; SD = standard deviation; p = significance (<0.05); G = heel effect size.
Table 5. Statistical differences by academic performance.
Table 5. Statistical differences by academic performance.
VariablesAcademic Performancepη²
Low
M ± SD
Medium
M ± SD
High
M ± SD
Physical activity2.54 ± 0.782.76 ± 0.732.55 ± 0.720.1170.02
General academic stress3.02 ± 0.802.85 ± 0.762.69 ± 0.800.0340.02
Academic overload3.45 ± 0.923.29 ± 0.893.28 ± 0.950.2470.01
Interaction with classmates2.30 ± 0.852.41 ± 0.862.14 ± 0.870.1440.01
Family pressure3.11 ± 1.072.86 ± 1.172.18 ± 1.10<0.0010.08
Future prospects3.07 ± 1.102.79 ± 0.992.78 ± 1.060.1230.02
Note: M = mean; SD = standard deviation; p = significance (<0.05); η² = effect size of square eta.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Galeano-Rojas, D.; Cuadros-Juárez, M.; León Reyes, B.B.; Castelo Reyna, M.A.; Farías-Valenzuela, C.; Valdivia-Moral, P. Association between Academic Performance, Physical Activity, and Academic Stress in Compulsory Secondary Education: An Analysis by Sex. Children 2024, 11, 1161. https://doi.org/10.3390/children11101161

AMA Style

Galeano-Rojas D, Cuadros-Juárez M, León Reyes BB, Castelo Reyna MA, Farías-Valenzuela C, Valdivia-Moral P. Association between Academic Performance, Physical Activity, and Academic Stress in Compulsory Secondary Education: An Analysis by Sex. Children. 2024; 11(10):1161. https://doi.org/10.3390/children11101161

Chicago/Turabian Style

Galeano-Rojas, Dilan, Marina Cuadros-Juárez, Borys Bismark León Reyes, Mónica Alexandra Castelo Reyna, Claudio Farías-Valenzuela, and Pedro Valdivia-Moral. 2024. "Association between Academic Performance, Physical Activity, and Academic Stress in Compulsory Secondary Education: An Analysis by Sex" Children 11, no. 10: 1161. https://doi.org/10.3390/children11101161

APA Style

Galeano-Rojas, D., Cuadros-Juárez, M., León Reyes, B. B., Castelo Reyna, M. A., Farías-Valenzuela, C., & Valdivia-Moral, P. (2024). Association between Academic Performance, Physical Activity, and Academic Stress in Compulsory Secondary Education: An Analysis by Sex. Children, 11(10), 1161. https://doi.org/10.3390/children11101161

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop