Next Article in Journal
Neuropsychological and Academic Performance in Colombian Children with Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: A Comparative Study with a Control Group
Previous Article in Journal
Options for Regenerative Treatment with Bone Grafts in Children with Anterior Lip/Palate Cleft—A Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Case Report

Novel KIF11 Mutation Associated with Microcephaly, Chorioretinopathy and Impaired Intellectual Development: 20 Years of Follow-Up

Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Children 2025, 12(5), 560; https://doi.org/10.3390/children12050560 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 30 March 2025 / Revised: 18 April 2025 / Accepted: 23 April 2025 / Published: 26 April 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Developmental Disabilities in Children: Intervention Programmes)

Abstract

:
Background: KIF11 mutations are responsible for a large portion of microcephaly with or without chorioretinopathy, lymphedema or impaired intellectual development (MCLMR). Methods: This report describes longitudinal ophthalmological management of an 8-year-old male pediatric patient presenting with MCLMR diagnosed in infancy and associated with a novel, de novo KIF11 mutation. Results: The patient presented with ophthalmological features of low visual acuity and chorioretinal atrophy and later developed bilateral retinal detachments. Syndromic features included microcephaly and developmental delay. Scleral buckling and vitrectomy were ultimately performed in both eyes, with a period of conservative management in the interim. Postoperative visual acuity was preserved in the right eye, although poor in the left eye. The patient received low-vision rehabilitation services and was able to participate in school and extracurricular activities. Conclusions: Early recognition and close monitoring of ocular and systemic manifestations of KIF11 mutations are important to optimize visual rehabilitation efforts.

1. Introduction

EG5, a kinesin protein product of the KIF11 gene, is thought to play an important role in the division of neural stem cells, including the neural retina, and dysfunction in animal models leads to congenital anomalies [1]. KIF11 mutations are thought to be responsible for all inherited, and nearly half of sporadic, cases of microcephaly with or without chorioretinopathy, lymphedema or impaired intellectual development (MCLMR; OMIM 152950) [2]. The prevalence of MCLMR is estimated to be less than 1 in 1,000,000 people worldwide [2,3]. We present a case of a patient with MCLMR and a novel, de novo KIF11 mutation with longstanding follow-up at an academic eye center.

2. Case Presentation

An 8-year-old male presented to the pediatric ophthalmology clinic for evaluation of possible strabismus and poor vision. Past medical history was significant for microcephaly- and lymphedema-related developmental delays requiring special education and speech therapy, as well as a history of seizures (in remission without antiepileptic drugs for at least one year). The patient had been clinically diagnosed with microcephaly–lymphedema–chorioretinal dysplasia syndrome (MLCRD) prior to presentation. His height and weight were in the fifth percentile for his age. Family ocular history was positive only for strabismus, and there was a maternal family history of hereditary lymphedema. Upon initial examination, visual acuity was 20/400 eccentrically in the right eye with a correction of −0.50 +1.00 × 180 and 20/60 in the left eye with a correction of −0.50. Visual fields were full to confrontation, and extraocular movements were normal. The anterior segment examination was within normal limits. A dilated fundus exam demonstrated areas of retinal pigment epithelium deposits and chorioretinal atrophy (CRA) bilaterally (Figure 1 and Figure 2).
Electroretinography testing was performed with skin electrodes using LKC Utas user-defined protocol as described in the 2008 ISCEV standards, with a light-adapted background of 30 cd/m2 and flash intensity of 2.5 cd/s/m2 for both light-adapted and dark-adapted conditions [4]. ERG signals were abnormally low, even when multiplied by a maximum attenuation factor of 10, and responses were often delayed, including in light. These results suggested generalized retinal disease affecting both rods and cones. MRI of the brain and orbits demonstrated a parenchymal volume lower than expected for age, with prominent ventricles and sulci, possible periventricular white matter attenuation, and normal orbits. Dark adaptation was measured with the cone adaptation test and was found to be functionally normal. A mild red-green color deficiency was detected.
Through the Children’s Vision Rehabilitation Project (CVRP), an interdisciplinary outreach pediatric low-vision clinic in West Virginia with support of the Department of Education, the patient was prescribed a light-gathering magnifier for near objects and a 2.8× magnification monocular device for distance. The patient received additional support and therapy in school and was able to participate in farmwork and sports, during which he was instructed to wear polycarbonate safety glasses. He followed up in a retina clinic every six months thereafter, or more frequently as indicated by exams, imaging, or patient concerns.
By the age of 11, the patient had developed a macula-off retinal detachment (RD) in the left eye and a macula-on RD in the right eye. He underwent multiple surgeries including pars plana vitrectomy, scleral buckling, and cataract extraction with left intraocular lens placement. However, even after extensive intervention, the vision in his left eye gradually declined to no light perception by early adulthood. Given the patient’s monocular status and stability of the RD in the right eye, conservative management was pursued.
The patient continued to attend surveillance appointments for the next decade with a relatively stable clinical course. Next generation sequencing and Sanger sequencing of the KIF11 gene and flanking introns performed in consultation with a medical geneticist revealed a previously undocumented, heterozygous de novo c.210+2del intronic variant of the KIF11 gene (Prevention Genetics, 2017, Marshfield, WI, USA, NM_004523.3). The patient’s biological parents and two siblings declined clinical examination and genetic testing for the variant. At age 32, a small right vitreous hemorrhage was identified, and there was concern for progression and temporal foveal encroachment of the patient’s chronic RD (Figure 3). The patient underwent a right scleral buckle procedure with external drainage, limited pars plana vitrectomy, cryoretinopexy, and intravitreal injection of SF6 gas. Following postoperative recovery, visual acuity in the right eye improved to 20/200 from a baseline of 20/400, and the macula and fovea remained attached (Figure 4).

3. Discussion

Phenotypes from isolated Familial Exudative Vitreoretinopathy (FEVR) to systemic, syndromic presentations are attributable to KIF11 mutations [5,6]. FEVR is an inherited disease characterized by poor vascularization of the peripheral retina, retinal neovascularization, subretinal exudates, and RD, and linked to multiple mutations in genes including KIF11, FZD4, TSPAN12, LRP5, NDP, JAG1, ZNF408, and TUBGCP6 [7,8,9,10]. Cases of FEVR-like retinopathy have been documented with multiple syndromes, including 11q deletion syndrome, Turner syndrome, homocystinuria, CDMMR (chorioretinal dysplasia, microcephaly, and intellectual disability), MLCRD (microcephaly, primary lymphedema, and chorioretinal dysplasia), and other genetic conditions [9,10,11,12,13,14]. Due to the similarity of phenotypic and genotypic causes of MLCRD and CDMMR, these are now both considered to fall within the same classification; that is, MCLMR (OMIM 152950) [14]. MCLMR has an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern with incomplete penetrance, but as many as 40% of cases originate from de novo mutations [15,16]. KIF11 mosaicism has been reported in asymptomatic parents of probands, complicating estimates of the frequency of these de novo mutations [17].
Here, MCLMR presented with bilateral RD, chorioretinal atrophy, microcephaly, developmental delay, and childhood seizures. Ocular features of MCLMR may include rod and cone dysfunction, chorioretinopathy, retinal folds, and RD [6,8,18]. Tractional RDs are especially associated with MCLMR, and amongst MCLMR patients, bilateral RDs are more highly associated with developmental delays [6,19]. The most common systemic features are microcephaly, learning disability, and lymphedema. In a subset of patients, epilepsy and cardiac defects are found [8,16,18].
In the present case, the patient underwent left scleral buckling and vitrectomy bilaterally, with an extended period of conservative management preceding surgery in the right eye. Following surgery, visual outcomes were poor in the left eye and slightly improved in the right eye. Though there is a dearth of studies on the management of ocular manifestations of KIF11-associated MCLMR specifically, numerous case series have documented FEVR management and outcomes. Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents have been used with varying success [20,21,22]. Laser ablation may be used especially for earlier stages of FEVR with good visual outcomes [23,24]. As in this case, more advanced disease with RD necessitates surgical management, including scleral buckling, vitrectomy, and/or membrane peeling [23,25]. Anatomic reattachment is often successful, though repairs may be complicated and visual acuity outcomes are variable [24,26,27,28,29]. Lensectomy may also be performed in cases of anterior segment complications associated with FEVR to prevent secondary glaucoma [27,30]. Prognosis likely depends on disease stage and progression of fibrovascular proliferation at the time of surgery [23,24]. Here, the patient underwent biannual retinal exams during periods of relative stability and was followed more closely when necessitated by disease progression or acute events. The appropriate frequency of ophthalmological examinations in a patient with MCLMR may depend upon phenotypic severity at presentation and will likely vary over time.
The patient in this case received low-vision rehabilitation and assistive devices and was able to progress through schooling and participate in work and extracurricular activities. Visual rehabilitation is an important effort toward maximizing quality of life for patients affected by KIF11-assocated FEVR, MCLMR, and other vision-impairing conditions. Early recognition of ocular, neurologic, and genetic causes of vision loss and subtle behavioral indicators of vision difficulties in children allows for prompt referral to appropriate services. Rehabilitative goals change with the patient’s age; in a school-aged child as in the initial presentation here, emphasis is placed on assistance in the classroom with an individualized educational plan (IEP), which may include seating preference, magnification tools, and high-contrast electronic devices [31]. For physical education and extracurricular sports, protective lenses and other safety accommodations are recommended [31].
Numerous organizations exist to offer support, resources, and advocacy for patients with low vision and their families. A Germany-based nonprofit organization, KIF11 Kids e.V. (kif11kids.com; accessed on 8 March 2025), provides support and community specifically to families affected by KIF11 mutations. Providers caring for pediatric patients with low vision should be familiar with these organizations.

4. Conclusions

Here, we document a longstanding follow-up of a case of MCLMR associated with a novel, de novo KIF11 mutation presenting with microcephaly, developmental delay, CRA, and bilateral RD, for which both surgical and expectant management were utilized. Vision was preserved unilaterally. Physicians should be familiar with the ocular and systemic manifestations of KIF11 mutations in children, as earlier retina specialist referral for close monitoring and intervention promotes visual rehabilitation.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.H.Y., M.L. and A.P.; data curation, A.H.Y.; resources, M.L.; writing—original draft: A.H.Y.; Writing—review and editing, M.L., A.P. and A.H.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Research reported in this publication was supported by West Virginia University Ophthalmology Department startup funds and the National Eye Institute (NEI) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) under award number R01EY036475. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was approved by the West Virginia University Institutional Review Board (Morgantown, WV, USA) under protocol #2011172145 (8 January 2021).

Informed Consent Statement

Written informed consent has been obtained from all subjects to publish this paper.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We thank the physicians at the WVU Eye Institute and pediatric geneticists who helped take care of the patient over 20 years. Two prior conference posters included the subject of this case report at initial presentation, prior to the specific genetic testing, longstanding follow-up, and intervention documented here [32,33].

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest based on the contents of this article.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
MCLMRMicrocephaly with or without chorioretinopathy, lymphedema, or impaired intellectual development
RDRetinal detachment
CRAChorioretinal atrophy
FEVRFamilial Exudative Vitreoretinopathy

References

  1. Zhou, Y.; Xu, M.-F.; Chen, J.; Zhang, J.-L.; Wang, X.-Y.; Huang, M.-H.; Wei, Y.-L.; She, Z.-Y. Loss-of-Function of Kinesin-5 KIF11 Causes Microcephaly, Chorioretinopathy, and Developmental Disorders through Chromosome Instability and Cell Cycle Arrest. Exp. Cell Res. 2024, 436, 113975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Schlögel, M.J.; Mendola, A.; Fastré, E.; Vasudevan, P.; Devriendt, K.; De Ravel, T.J.; Van Esch, H.; Casteels, I.; Arroyo Carrera, I.; Cristofoli, F.; et al. No Evidence of Locus Heterogeneity in Familial Microcephaly with or without Chorioretinopathy, Lymphedema, or Mental Retardation Syndrome. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 2015, 10, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mirzaa, G.M.; Enyedi, L.; Parsons, G.; Collins, S.; Medne, L.; Adams, C.; Ward, T.; Davitt, B.; Bicknese, A.; Zackai, E.; et al. Congenital Microcephaly and Chorioretinopathy Due to de novo Heterozygous KIF11 Mutations: Five Novel Mutations and a Review of the Literature. Am. J. Med Genet. 2014, 164, 2879–2886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Marmor, M.F.; Fulton, A.B.; Holder, G.E.; Miyake, Y.; Brigell, M.; Bach, M.; (for the International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision). ISCEV Standard for Full-Field Clinical Electroretinography (2008 Update). Doc. Ophthalmol. 2009, 118, 69–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Chen, C.; Sun, L.; Li, S.; Huang, L.; Zhang, T.; Wang, Z.; Yu, B.; Luo, X.; Ding, X. Novel Variants in Familial Exudative Vitreoretinopathy Patients with KIF11 Mutations and the Genotype–Phenotype Correlation. Exp. Eye Res. 2020, 199, 108165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chang, H.; Zhang, X.; Xu, K.; Li, N.; Xie, Y.; Yan, W.; Li, Y. Phenotype-Based Genetic Analysis Reveals Missing Heritability of KIF11-Related Retinopathy: Clinical and Genetic Findings. Genes 2023, 14, 212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Ranchod, T.M.; Ho, L.Y.; Drenser, K.A.; Capone, A.; Trese, M.T. Clinical Presentation of Familial Exudative Vitreoretinopathy. Ophthalmology 2011, 118, 2070–2075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Huang, L.; Sun, L.; Li, S.; Zhang, T.; Ding, X. Update on the Phenotypic and Genotypic Spectrum of KIF11-Related Retinopathy. Genes 2022, 13, 713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tanenbaum, R.; Acon, D.; El Hamichi, S.; Negron, C.; Berrocal, A.M. Unrecognized ROPER in a Child with a Novel Pathogenic Variant in ZNF408 Gene. Ophthalmic Genet. 2023, 44, 171–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sengillo, J.D.; Ashkenazy, N.; Shoji, M.K.; Iyer, P.; Robles-Holmes, H.K.; Lopez, A.; Yannuzzi, N.A.; Negron, C.I.; Berrocal, A.M. Familial Exudative Vitreoretinopathy–Like Phenotype in a Patient With Microcephaly and TUBGCP6 Mutations. J. Vitreoretin. Dis. 2023, 7, 344–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hoyek, S.; Wang, M.; Berrocal, A.M.; Wong, A.; Place, E.M.; Mason-Suares, H.; Lin, A.E.; Mukai, S.; Patel, N.A. Combined X-Linked Familial Exudative Vitreoretinopathy and Retinopathy of Prematurity Phenotype in an Infant with Mosaic Turner Syndrome with Ring X Chromosome. Ophthalmic Genet. 2023, 44, 198–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Garcia, M.D.; Ventura, C.V.; Berrocal, A.M. FEVR-like Presentation in an 11q Deletion Syndrome and 16p13.11 Microdeletion. J. Pediatr. Ophthalmol. Strabismus 2017, 54, e71–e74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Montalvo, L.A.; Venincasa, V.D.; Aziz, H.A.; Hess, D.; Berrocal, A.M. FEVR-Like Presentation of Homocystinuria. Case Rep. Ophthalmol. Med. 2014, 2014, 1–2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ostergaard, P.; Simpson, M.A.; Mendola, A.; Vasudevan, P.; Connell, F.C.; van Impel, A.; Moore, A.T.; Loeys, B.L.; Ghalamkarpour, A.; Onoufriadis, A.; et al. Mutations in KIF11 Cause Autosomal-Dominant Microcephaly Variably Associated with Congenital Lymphedema and Chorioretinopathy. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2012, 90, 356–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wang, K.; Zhang, X.; Tian, T.; Zhao, P. Identification of a Novel Mutation in KIF11 with Functional Analysis in a Cohort of 516 Familial Patients with Exudative Vitreoretinopathy. Mol. Vis. 2021, 27, 528–541. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  16. Jones, G.E.; Ostergaard, P.; Moore, A.T.; Connell, F.C.; Williams, D.; Quarrell, O.; Brady, A.F.; Spier, I.; Hazan, F.; Moldovan, O.; et al. Microcephaly with or without Chorioretinopathy, Lymphoedema, or Mental Retardation (MCLMR): Review of Phenotype Associated with KIF11 Mutations. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2014, 22, 881–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Karjosukarso, D.W.; Cremers, F.P.M.; Van Nouhuys, C.E.; Collin, R.W.J. Detection and Quantification of a KIF11 Mosaicism in a Subject Presenting Familial Exudative Vitreoretinopathy with Microcephaly. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2018, 26, 1819–1823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Balikova, I.; Robson, A.G.; Holder, G.E.; Ostergaard, P.; Mansour, S.; Moore, A.T. Ocular Manifestations of Microcephaly with or without Chorioretinopathy, Lymphedema or Intellectual Disability (MCLID) Syndrome Associated with Mutations in KIF11. Acta Ophthalmol. 2016, 94, 92–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kondo, H.; Matsushita, I.; Nagata, T.; Fujihara, E.; Hosono, K.; Uchio, E.; Hotta, Y.; Kusaka, S. Retinal Features of Family Members With Familial Exudative Vitreoretinopathy Caused By Mutations in KIF11 Gene. Transl. Vis. Sci. Technol. 2021, 10, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Henry, C.R.; Sisk, R.A.; Tzu, J.H.; Albini, T.A.; Davis, J.L.; Murray, T.G.; Berrocal, A.M. Long-Term Follow-up of Intravitreal Bevacizumab for the Treatment of Pediatric Retinal and Choroidal Diseases. J. Am. Assoc. Pediatr. Ophthalmol. Strabismus 2015, 19, 541–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tagami, M.; Kusuhara, S.; Honda, S.; Tsukahara, Y.; Negi, A. Rapid Regression of Retinal Hemorrhage and Neovascularization in a Case of Familial Exudative Vitreoretinopathy Treated with Intravitreal Bevacizumab. Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2008, 246, 1787–1789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Lyu, J.; Zhang, Q.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, X.; Fei, P.; Zhao, P. Intravitreal Ranibizumab Treatment for Advanced Familial Exudative Vitreoretinopathy with High Vascular Activity. Retina 2021, 41, 1976–1985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Pendergast, S. Familial Exudative Vitreoretinopathy Results of Surgical Management. Ophthalmology 1998, 105, 1015–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Shukla, D.; Singh, J.; Sudheer, G.; Soman, M.; John, R.K.; Ramasamy, K.; Perumalsamy, N. Familial Exudative Vitreoretinopathy (FEVR). Clinical Profile and Management. Indian J. Ophthalmol. 2003, 51, 323–328. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  25. Glazer, L.C.; Maguire, A.; Blumenkranz, M.S.; Trese, M.T.; Green, W.R. Improved Surgical Treatment of Familial Exudative Vitreoretinopathy in Children. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 1995, 120, 471–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Shubert, A.; Tasman, W. Familial Exudative Vitreoretinopathy: Surgical Intervention and Visual Acuity Outcomes. Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 1997, 235, 490–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yamane, T.; Yokoi, T.; Nakayama, Y.; Nishina, S.; Azuma, N. Surgical Outcomes of Progressive Tractional Retinal Detachment Associated with Familial Exudative Vitreoretinopathy. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2014, 158, 1049–1055.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chen, S.-N.; Hwang, J.-F.; Lin, C.-J. Clinical Characteristics and Surgical Management of Familial Edudative Vitreoretinopahty-Associated Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment. Retina 2012, 32, 220–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ikeda, T.; Fujikado, T.; Tano, Y.; Tsujikawa, K.; Koizumi, K.; Sawa, H.; Yasuhara, T.; Maeda, K.; Kinoshita, S. Vitrectomy for Rhegmatogenous or Tractional Retinal Detachment with Familial Exudative Vitreoretinopathy. Ophthalmology 1999, 106, 1081–1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Fei, P.; Yang, W.; Zhang, Q.; Jin, H.; Li, J.; Zhao, P. Surgical Management of Advanced Familial Exudative Vitreoretinopathy with Complications. Retina 2016, 36, 1480–1485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Jackson, M.L.; Virgili, G.; Shepherd, J.D.; Di Nome, M.A.; Fletcher, D.C.; Kaleem, M.A.; Lam, L.A.; Lawrence, L.M.; Sunness, J.S.; Riddering, A.T. Vision Rehabilitation Preferred Practice Pattern®. Ophthalmology 2023, 130, P271–P335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Leys, M.J.; Leys, A.M.; Casteels, I.; Spileers, W.; Bradford, G.; Odom, J.V. Ocular findings in microcephaly–lymphedema–chorioretinal dysplasia syndrome. In Proceedings of the ARVO Annual Meeting, Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA, 29 April 2001. [Google Scholar]
  33. Leys, M.J. Ocular Findings in Lymphedema, Microcephaly and Chorioretinal Dysplasia Syndrome. In Proceedings of the 39th Symposium of the International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision, Mont Orford, QC, Canada, 17–22 June 2001. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Chorioretinal atrophy of the right eye; macular view (left) and nasal retina (right), age 10.
Figure 1. Chorioretinal atrophy of the right eye; macular view (left) and nasal retina (right), age 10.
Children 12 00560 g001
Figure 2. Chorioretinal atrophy of the left eye; macular view (left) and nasal retina (right), age 10.
Figure 2. Chorioretinal atrophy of the left eye; macular view (left) and nasal retina (right), age 10.
Children 12 00560 g002
Figure 3. Vitreous hemorrhage (arrow), right eye, age 32.
Figure 3. Vitreous hemorrhage (arrow), right eye, age 32.
Children 12 00560 g003
Figure 4. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) of macula, 8 months following pars plana vitrectomy with scleral buckle procedure, right eye, age 32. The vitreous hemorrhage had cleared, and the macula was flat. Resolution was poor due to nystagmus.
Figure 4. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) of macula, 8 months following pars plana vitrectomy with scleral buckle procedure, right eye, age 32. The vitreous hemorrhage had cleared, and the macula was flat. Resolution was poor due to nystagmus.
Children 12 00560 g004
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yaskanich, A.H.; Patel, A.; Leys, M. Novel KIF11 Mutation Associated with Microcephaly, Chorioretinopathy and Impaired Intellectual Development: 20 Years of Follow-Up. Children 2025, 12, 560. https://doi.org/10.3390/children12050560

AMA Style

Yaskanich AH, Patel A, Leys M. Novel KIF11 Mutation Associated with Microcephaly, Chorioretinopathy and Impaired Intellectual Development: 20 Years of Follow-Up. Children. 2025; 12(5):560. https://doi.org/10.3390/children12050560

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yaskanich, Ashley H., Ami Patel, and Monique Leys. 2025. "Novel KIF11 Mutation Associated with Microcephaly, Chorioretinopathy and Impaired Intellectual Development: 20 Years of Follow-Up" Children 12, no. 5: 560. https://doi.org/10.3390/children12050560

APA Style

Yaskanich, A. H., Patel, A., & Leys, M. (2025). Novel KIF11 Mutation Associated with Microcephaly, Chorioretinopathy and Impaired Intellectual Development: 20 Years of Follow-Up. Children, 12(5), 560. https://doi.org/10.3390/children12050560

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop