Next Article in Journal
Development of a Novel Green Bio-Nanofluid from Sapindus Saponaria for Enhanced Oil Recovery Processes
Next Article in Special Issue
Research on an Improved Sliding Mode Observer for Speed Estimation in Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor
Previous Article in Journal
Experimental Study on Gas Seepage Characteristics of Axially Unloaded Coal under Different Confining Pressures and Gas Pressures
Previous Article in Special Issue
A GAPN Approach for the Flexible Job-Shop Scheduling Problem with Indirect Energy and Time-of-Use Electricity Pricing
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Lightweight Design and Experimental Study of Ceramic Composite Armor

Processes 2022, 10(6), 1056; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10061056
by Jianmei Chen 1,2, Yihui Zeng 1, Xiaopeng Liang 2, Yanbin Hou 1, Yunliang Wang 1, Zhenqi Sun 1 and Shuwan Cui 3,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Processes 2022, 10(6), 1056; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10061056
Submission received: 29 April 2022 / Revised: 19 May 2022 / Accepted: 23 May 2022 / Published: 25 May 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Manuscript Number: processes-1727361

Manuscript title: Lightweight Design and Experimental Study of Ceramic Composite Armor

Journal: Processes

 

The results in this work are interesting, the manuscript is well written and authors present clearly their findings. In my opinion the manuscript should be accepted for publication. Few points should be corrected further before acceptance.

 

  • The authors should state more clearly which are the novelties of their work in comparison with literature data.
  • The authors should better explain what is needed for practical applications of the samples.
  • The authors should also discuss the cost of producing the examined materials.

Author Response

Thank you for your comments concerning our manuscript.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

  1. The manuscript needs English polishing
  2. The used materials in section 2.4. be completely introduced. Be added the type of materials, density, mechanical features, the producer company and country.
  3. The initial speed of projectable be added into the section of 3.
  4. The image from the destructed surface of structure be added into the manuscript.

Author Response

Thank you for your comments concerning our manuscript.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The revised manuscript can be accepted.

Back to TopTop