Machine Learning Model for Quality Parameters Prediction and Control System Design in the Kecombrang Flower (Etlingera elatior) Extraction Process

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Please make the following text and figure corrections:

Line 95: please review editing parameters “Applied Machine Learning technique” is written with different size

Line 120: “machine” is written different (text size issues)

Line 125: 50°C is not spelled correct

At page 6 of t13, figure 5 is not visible and is mispositioned (rescale).

Figure 2 – the figure it seems to be not correct drawn and is incomplete

Figure 1 is not proper placed is after Figure 2, please correct the error

The figure 5 is not properly marked

At page 7 – Figure 8 text is not visible / and “Viscosity” is misplaced

Line 205 “variation” word is written different (text size issues)

Figure 9 – the text under Figure 9 is not visible

Page 9 – you repeated the Figure 3 and Figure 4 – is no need to do that

Figure 10 – the text under the figure is not visible

Figure 11 – please improve resolution of the figure (is blurred)

Line 221 – please provide the competition between brackets “()”

 Your conclusion from my point of view is incomplete and also to short. In an extraction process (distillation or hydrodistillation mixed) you must also take into consideration the temperature correlation with cooling units or cooling water depending on the system solution and design you used. You are not specify enough data on this. Please provide more data.  

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,
Thank you for your valuable comments and suggestions in this manuscript. I rewrite the comments and the answers in the manuscript for easy reading. Please find the revised manuscript attached with this notes (Please see the attachment). I also had the english native check done. 

Best regards,
Author

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The contribution of this work is very interesting. However, the results are poorly presented, there are many typo errors, english must be improved and checked by a native speaker, figures are wrong placed.

Furthermore, the abstract and introduction must be improved. I recommend to explain what are the inputs and outputs of the ANN in the abstract and introduction. In addition, I recomend to explain which is explained in subsection 3.4 before the methodology and presentation of results; the reason:  the figures and description of the problem are illuminating and it is worth having this information before knowing the methodology and results.

One more time: check all the figures and the overall format of the article.

 

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,
Thank you for your valuable comments and suggestions in this manuscript. I rewrite the comments and the answers in the manuscript for easy reading. Please find the revised manuscript attached with this notes (Please see the attachment). I also had the english native check done. 

Best regards,
Author

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The requested text changes were made by the authors.
With these changes the scientific paper has improved,
and the information communicated in this scientific paper is better.
From my point of view no other changes are required.

 

Author Response

Dear reviewer,

Thank you for your valuable suggestion for may manuscript.

As for the references, we add articles that related to advance control process using machine learning and adaptive control system. 

Best regards,

Authors

Author Response File: Author Response.docx