Next Article in Journal
LCA-Based Carbon Footprint Accounting of Mixed Rare Earth Oxides Production from Ionic Rare Earths
Next Article in Special Issue
Investigation of CO2 Splitting on Ceria-Based Redox Materials for Low-Temperature Solar Thermochemical Cycling with Oxygen Isotope Exchange Experiments
Previous Article in Journal
Active and Passive Defense Strategies of Cyber-Physical Power System against Cyber Attacks Considering Node Vulnerability
Previous Article in Special Issue
Integration of Kazakhstan Technologies for Silicon and Monosilane Production with the Suitable World Practices for the Production of Solar Cells and Panels
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Possibility of Silicon Purification by Metallurgical Methods: Part I

Institute of Physics and Technology, Satbayev University, Ibragimova 11, Almaty 050032, Kazakhstan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2022, 10(7), 1353; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10071353
Submission received: 12 June 2022 / Revised: 3 July 2022 / Accepted: 6 July 2022 / Published: 12 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Materials for Solar Thermal Energy Conversion and Storage)

Abstract

:
This silicon purification research work has two stages and results will be provided in two articles due to the large scope of work. This paper provides the results of the first stage, concerning the metallurgical silicon purification. Silicon was purified by a combined method consisting of slag refining with new slag composition and acid leaching. In the first phase, the metallurgical grade silicon produced by the classical carbothermic reduction method was investigated. In the second phase, the metallurgical purification by slag refining was completed using slags of various new compositions. The purified silicon samples obtained after the melting processes were analyzed for concentrations of impurities. Finally, acid leaching treatment of the obtained silicon was done, followed by elemental analysis of purified silicon. According to our experience we can determine that obtained silicon purity is adequate for further stages of planned study.

1. Introduction

Today, solar power is the fastest-growing branch of the energy industry. Installed capacities are in fact ahead of all development forecasts and, in addition, solar power plants successfully compete with traditional energy sources in terms of cost per unit of generated power. According to a review of the global solar energy market, a total of 756 GW of solar energy power plants were installed and connected in 2020, despite the “lockdowns” due to COVID-19, and there was no decline in the photovoltaic market in 2020 [1,2]. Rapidly growing competitiveness in the solar energy market is one of the main development factors in the energy sector during the recent years. There has been a significant 10% decrease in the solar electricity price compared to 2019 [1] due to improvements in both silicon (Si) purification technologies and the solar cell industrial fabrication process. In 2020, the price of electricity generated by solar panels became cheaper than wind energy [1,2]. Despite numerous studies and new materials used for solar cell production, silicon remains the most popular raw material in solar energy. Currently, the share of solar energy created on the basis of Crystalline-Si is about 95% against 5% created on the basis of thin-film technologies [1]. The solar cell cost significantly depends on the price of Si, since 70–75% of the solar cell cost is made up of the Si cost.
There have been numerous studies aimed at reducing solar energy prices further by various processes, such as research on improving and optimizing the solar cells production technology [3,4,5,6,7,8,9], controlling Si wafer thickness [10], and combining the different renewable energy systems in to a multigeneration system [11,12]. Research and development to obtain and purify Si, used as the raw material for the production of solar cells based on crystalline Si are also needed and therefore conducted in different ways. For example, one study provides a recycling process from waste crystalline-silicon PV Cell and Ribbon to obtain Si (as raw material) and Ag, Cu, Pb, Sn [13]. There is also a process of purification of MG-Si by using solvent refining published in the literature [14].
Metallurgical methods, or physical methods, as they are often called in the literature, completely eliminate the use of chlorosilanes. The required Si purity is achieved by using high-purity raw materials: quartz and carbon, followed by metallurgical and physical-chemical conversions. It is planned worldwide to increase the production of solar grade Si (SoG-Si) by metallurgical methods in a short period, and their development and extensive application are being given great attention. For example, Elkem (Kristiansand, Norway), Waker (Munich, Germany), PhotoSil, SolSilc (Netherlands, Norway), CaliSolar (Los Angeles, CA, USA), CPI (Santa Clara, CA, USA), and SEMCO ENGINEERING (Montpellier, France) have implemented pilot and/or industrial projects to produce SoG-Si using such methods. Researchers have presented the results of a mass-production test of Upgraded Metallurgical Grade Silicon (UMG-Si) and production of Solar Cells and Modules Made of obtained UMG-Si [15].
This article is devoted to analyzing one Si purification method without a gas phase. Namely, the slag refining method was used for purification. The Institute of Physics and Technology (Almaty, Kazakhstan) has conducted several studies on methods of metallurgical-grade silicon (MG-Si) production and purification of silicon to UMG-Si, as well as research on silane production methods [16,17,18,19,20,21,22]. As a result of previously conducted studies and works, purified silicon samples and Si crystals grown by the Czochralski method were obtained on a laboratory scale, approximately 2–3 kg. The results are summarized in [16].
Based on the results of the literature sources [23,24,25], as well as a number of our preliminary research concerning this topic [16,17,18,19,20,21,22], further development and improvement of technologies for obtaining and refining Si to solar quality is promising and of strategic importance for the Si industry of Kazakhstan.

2. Materials and Methods

Metallurgical grade Si (MG-Si), obtained by a well-known carbothermic reduction process, was used for purification. For this study, 100 kg of MG-Si of KR-0 grade was used (LLC RUSAL Silicon Urals). Si impurity composition is shown in Table 1. MG-Si is mass-produced all over the world but due to insufficient purity it cannot be used directly as a raw material for solar cell production. MG-Si was chosen for the experimental cleaning work due to its greater availability. The entire mass of MG-Si was crushed to 15 mm size using Pulverisette 1 crusher. Upon crushing, Si was mixed and divided into 9 parts intended for 9 slag refining processes. We chose samples from each batch for elemental analysis to determine the initial MG-Si impurity. In order to obtain more reliable information, the elemental analysis of all samples was completed by two methods. The atomic emission spectrometry method with high-frequency inductively coupled plasma (ICP AES) with Optima 2000DV (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA) spectrometer and X-ray fluorescent method (XRF) with RLP-21 (Aspap-Geo, Almaty, Kazakhstan) device [26] were used. MG-Si as well as purified Si was analyzed for the main doping impurities (boron, phosphorus, arsenic, gallium, and indium) and metal impurities that have a significant negative effect on the solar cell efficiency [27]. The impurity composition of both MG-Si and Si obtained after slag refining is shown in Table 1.
Based on previous studies [16,17,18], we calculated the new slag composition for 9 slag refining processes. MG-Si slag-refining method was worked out using the “Parallel” induction furnace during the experiments (Figure 1). Mixtures of CaO, SiO2, CaF2, MgO, BaF2, BaO, LiF, and other oxides and fluorides were used as fluxes. One of the main effects of the slag refining is that slag can rise to the molten Si surface or come down to the bottom of the crucible while interacting with the impurities and further could be easily removed. Practice has shown that such elements as B, Al, P, S, Ga, Ge, Sr can also be effectively removed together with slag. In total, 9 slag-refining processes with different new slag composition were completed to produce purified MG-Si. Different compositions were used to determine more acceptable slag composition that would result to the best cleaning efficiency. Compositions of the 9 completed melting processes are shown in Table 2. Samples obtained after each slag refining process were analyzed to determine the impurity quantities in the obtained purified MG-Si (Table 1).
The weight of melted MG-Si was 5 kg, and the Slag/Si ratio was 1:1 for each slag refining process. Photos of the obtained ingots are shown in Figure 2.
The final step was the acid leaching process. For this stage the purified MG-Si obtained after the three most successful slag refining processes was selected.
Various acids and parameters (temperature, duration etc.) were used for the acid purification process. The acid leaching method was well tested and described in our previous studies, and it can be found in detail in [16]. Impurities, usually as a result of crystallization and associated segregation effect, are located at the grain boundaries of Si as silicide and intermetallic compounds. However, impurities also may be included in Si grains themselves if crystallization occurs quickly enough. Therefore, thermal conditions are very important point during melting and crystallization processes. Various oxides and carbides, in turn, are located to a greater extent at the grain boundaries and to a lesser extent inside the grains. When the ingot is crushed, fractures occur at the grain boundaries. Thus, if MG-Si pieces are crushed to a particle size equivalent to the size of a polycrystalline grain, most metallic impurities will be located on the surface of the particles. Further, it is quite easy to remove impurities from the surface of the particles using the acid leaching process, in case of optimal process parameters. As known from previous studies [16,17,18] the best Si impurity removal levels by the acid leaching process were achieved for the samples crushed to 0.5–3 mm size. Therefore, the acid purification step was completed with Si crushed to the specified size, according to a proven method. It can be seen from the analysis results (Table 3) that acid purification is especially effective for impurities of transition and alkaline earth metals. The slight increase in boron and phosphorus concentrations after the acid leaching process of the melting #8 sample is most likely due to the standard measurement deviation and is within the expanded measurement uncertainty for ICP-AES and XRF analysis.
As we can see from the Table 3 results and based on our experience, we can say that obtained silicon could be used in further research. Si obtained post-acid purification will be additionally purified using a vacuum purification process. Such a process will provide additional purification of Si from impurities to the level sufficient for further directional crystallization in a vacuum furnace by the Bridgeman-Stockbarger method or the Czochralski method. It is understood that impurity concentrations decrease in Si crystal during crystallization process due to the segregation effect. Values of the segregation coefficient are defined as the ratio of the equilibrium concentration of impurities in solid and liquid states of the substance. After Si crystallization various impurities are distributed differently along the obtained ingot’s height, a segregation effect. This effect is used to purify Si when the solid–liquid interface is flat; the melt has a homogeneous composition and minor diffusion occurs in the solid composition [28,29]. The obtained Si crystal will be analyzed and its main electrical data (resistance, carrier lifetime, etc.) will be studied. Moreover, wafers will be cut from obtained Si crystals, the test solar cells will be produced, and their specifications will be studied.

3. Results and Discussion

The negative effect of various elements upon the solar cell specifications have been fairly well studied since the 1980s [27]. As can be seen from the analysis results (Table 1), the initial MG-Si contains a significant number of impurities and cannot be used as a raw material for SoG- Si production. It therefore requires purification to UMG-Si quality.
Calculations of the slag composition and the process flow for the slag refining processes were made to allow implement the following tasks:
  • Obtaining a homogeneous Si phase;
  • Identifying the melting parameters, the amount of slag, slag/Si ratio;
  • Finding the amount and optimum excess of SiO2 for the formation of a homogeneous Si phase (basicity modulus);
  • Finding the sequence of adding the compositions into the melt (technical melting procedure), for complete melting of the charge components and Si, and to obtain the maximum yield of the final product.
On average, the yield of purified Si was 4 kg, that is 80% of Si mass loaded for purification (the yield of purified Si varied from 70% up to 99%). According to the results of nine completed processes, it can be seen that the most successful slag refining processes are meltings #3, #8 and #9 (Table 3). It should be noted that the main purpose of purification was to remove boron impurity, which has a segregation coefficient of 0.8–0.82 [28]. Because of its high segregation coefficient, boron is removed significantly less than other impurities [29] during Si crystal growing process. It means that about 80% of boron transfers from the melt to the growing Si crystal [28]. The remaining transition metal impurities have segregation coefficients in the order of magnitude 10−5–10−6 and therefore could be sufficiently well removed during the Si crystallization process. The sufficiently high phosphorus concentration can be compensated for by adding the gallium impurity without causing additional negative effects upon specifications of both Si and solar cells [19].

4. Conclusions

Nine new processes of MG-Si slag purification were completed using the induction furnace to obtain optimal process parameters. Optimal slag composition for MG-Si refining process was determined.
It is shown that stable results can be obtained for production of UMG-Si ingots, with sufficient Si yield up to 99% by weight. In addition, the flux composition used for purification allows reduces the concentration of boron 3–5 times. Elemental analyses performed by two methods, XRF and AES-ICP, allowed control over the purification process at each stage and obtained reliable results.
Acid purification is very effective for transition metal impurities and less effective for doping impurities. According to our calculation and modelling of resistivity variation along the ingot’s height, fully described in [19], the purity of the Si obtained after the final stage will be enough for further experimental work and can be used as a raw material for Si crystal growing by directional crystallization to obtain SoG-Si. In the next step, it is planned to run more detailed study of Si obtained after purification by directional crystallization method, namely, the production of test solar cells and a study of their specifications.

Author Contributions

A.S. was a major contributor in writing the manuscript. A.P. calculated the slag and the flux compositions and made the slag refining processes. B.M. lead the project. T.T. wrote the manuscript. D.K. conducted acid leaching work and ICP-AES analysis. K.Z. conducted slag refining and acid leaching experimental work. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan, grant number № AP08856059.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. International Technology Roadmap for Photovoltaic (ITRPV) 2021 Results. 12 ed. VDMA Photovoltaic Equipment, Germany. April 2021. Available online: https://www.pv.vdma.org (accessed on 14 December 2021).
  2. Solar Power Europe Global Market Outlook for Solar Power 2020–2024. 3 June; Van der Poorten Printers: Leuven, Belgium. Available online: https://www.solarpowereurope.org (accessed on 14 December 2021).
  3. Basher, M.K.; Khalid Hossain, M.; Afaz, R.; Tayyaba, S.; Akand, M.A.R.; Rahman, M.T.; Eman, N.M. Study and investigation of phosphorus doping time on emitter region for contact resistance optimization of monocrystalline silicon solar cell. Results Phys. 2018, 10, 205–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yeo, Z.Y.; Ling, Z.P.; Ho, J.W.; Lim, Q.X.; So, Y.H.; Wang, S. Status review and future perspectives on mitigating light-induced degradation on silicon-based solar cells. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 159, 112223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Basher, M.K.; Khalid Hossain, M.; Jalal Uddin, M.; Akand, M.A.R.; Shorowordi, K.M. Effect of pyramidal texturization on the optical surface reflectance of monocrystalline photovoltaic silicon wafers. Optik 2018, 172, 801–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Dai, R.; Huang, T.; Zhou, W.; Yang, J.; Zhang, H.; Yu, F.; Chen, A.; Wang, F.; Zhang, J.; Sun, T.; et al. Improved Interfacial Contact for Pyramidal Texturing of Silicon Heterojunction Solar Cells. Molecules 2022, 27, 1710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Subramanian, M.; Nagarajan, B.; Ravichandran, A.; Subhash Betageri, V.; Thirunavukkarasu, G.S.; Jamei, E.; Seyedmahmoudian, M.; Stojcevski, A.; Mekhilef, S.; Minnam Reddy, V.R. Optimization of Effective Doping Concentration of Emitter for Ideal c-Si Solar Cell Device with PC1D Simulation. Crystals 2022, 12, 244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hajjiah, A.; Samir, E.; Shehata, N.; Salah, M. Lanthanide-Doped Ceria Nanoparticles as Backside Coaters to Improve Silicon Solar Cell Efficiency. Nanomaterials 2018, 8, 357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Yu, C.; Xu, S.; Yao, J.; Han, S. Recent Advances in and New Perspectives on Crystalline Silicon Solar Cells with Carrier-Selective Passivation Contacts. Crystals 2018, 8, 430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Zhu, L.; Mei, B.; Zhu, W.; Li, W. Laser-based Thickness Control in a Double-Side Polishing System for Silicon Wafers. Sensors 2020, 20, 1603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Javadi, M.A.; Abhari, M.K.; Ghasemiasl, R.; Ghomashi, H. Energy, exergy and exergy-economic analysis of a new multigeneration system based on double-flash geothermal power plant and solar power tower. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2021, 47, 101536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Javadi, M.A.; Khalajia, M.; Ghasemiasl, R. Exergoeconomic and environmental analysis of a combined power and water desalination plant with parabolic solar collector. Desalination Water Treat. 2020, 193, 212–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chen, W.-S.; Chen, Y.-J.; Lee, C.-H.; Cheng, Y.-J.; Chen, Y.-A.; Liu, F.-W.; Wang, Y.-C.; Chueh, Y.-L. Recovery of Valuable Materials from the Waste Crystalline-Silicon Photovoltaic Cell and Ribbon. Processes 2021, 9, 712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. He, Y.; Ma, W.; Xing, A.; Hu, M.; Liu, S.; Yang, X.; Li, J.; Du, S.; Zhou, W. A review of the process on the purification of metallurgical grade silicon by solvent refining. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Processing 2022, 141, 106438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Forniés, E.; Ceccaroli, B.; Méndez, L.; Souto, A.; Pérez Vázquez, A.; Vlasenko, T.; Dieguez, J. Mass Production Test of Solar Cells and Modules Made of 100% UMG Silicon. 20.76% Record Efficiency. Energies 2019, 12, 1495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Mukashev, B.; Abdullin, K.; Tamendarov, M.; Turmagambetov, T.; Beketov, B.; Page, M.; Kline, D. A met-al-lurgical route to produce upgraded silicon and monosilane. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2009, 93, 1785–1791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Mukashev, B.N.; Betekbaev, A.A.; Kalugulov, D.A.; Pellegrin, Y.; Skakov, D.M.; Turmagambetov, T.S. KAZPV PROJECT: Industrial development of a vertically integrated pv production in Kazakhstan (from guartz processing up to production high technology outputs). Rep. Natl. Acad. Sci. Repub. Kazakhstan 2013, 6, 5–19. [Google Scholar]
  18. Mukashev, B.; Betekbaev, A.; Skakov, D.; Pellegrin, I.; Pavlov, A.; Bektemirov, Z. Upgrading Metallurgical Grade Silicon to Solar Grade Silicon. Eurasian Chem. J. 2014, 16, 309–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Betekbaev, A.A.; Mukashev, B.N.; Pelissier, L.; Lay, P.; Fortin, G.; Bounaas, L.; Skakov, D.M.; Pavlov, A.A. Doping optimiza-tion of solar grade (SOG) silicon ingots for increasing ingot yield and cell efficiency. Mater. Electron. Eng. 2015, 18, 103–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Betekbaev, A.A.; Mukashev, B.N.; Pelissier, L.; Lay, P.; Fortin, G.; Bounaas, L.; Skakov, D.M.; Kalygulov, D.A.; Turmagam-betov, T.; Lee, V.V. Comparison of the characteristics of solar cells fabricated from multicrystalline silicon with those fab-ricated from silicon obtained by the monolike technology. Semiconductors 2016, 50, 1085–1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Betekbaev, A.A.; Mukashev, B.N.; Pelissier, L.; Lay, P.; Fortin, G.; Bounaas, L.; Skakov, D.M.; Kalygulov, D.A.; Pavlov, A.A.; Turmagambetov, T.S.; et al. Monolike ingot growth by directional solidification of Solar Grade silicon. Mater. Electron. Engin. 2017, 20, 194–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kalygulov, D.; Klinovitskaya, I.; Turmagambetov, T.; Pavlov, A.; Plotnikov, S.; Mukashev, B.; Serikkanov, A.; Agabekov, Z.; Kantarbaeva, D. High-tech production of photo-energy in Kazakhstan based on the Sarykol quartz deposit. News Natl. Acad. Sci. Repub. Kazakhstan 2019, 3, 120–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lynn, H.; Bradford, T. Polysilicon: Supply, Demand and Implication for the PV Industry. Report of Prometheus Institute for Sustainable Development. Available online: http://www.prometheus.org (accessed on 14 December 2021).
  24. Johnston, M.D.; Barati, M. Distribution of impurity elements in slag–silicon equilibria for oxidative refining of metallurgical silicon for solar cell applications. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2010, 94, 2085–2090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Safarian, J.; Tranell, G.; Tangstad, M. Processes for upgrading metallurgical grade silicon to solar grade silicon. Energy Procedia 2012, 20, 88–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Efimenko, S.A.; Lyozin, A.N. X-ray radiometric laboratory device RLP-21. Instrum. Tech. Exp. 2009, 1, 180–181. [Google Scholar]
  27. Davis, J.R.; Rohatgi, A.; Hopkins, R.H.; Blais, P.D.; Rai-Choudhury, P.; McCormick, J.R.; Mollenkopf, H.C. Impurities in silicon solar cells. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 1980, 27, 677–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Coletti, G. Impurities in Silicon and Their Impact on Solar Cell Performance. Ph.D. Thesis, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  29. Kekelidze, N.; Tavadze, G.; Khutsishvili, E.; Gabrichidze, L.; Mikaberidze, G. Studies on effective segregation coefficients of impurities in silicon pulled from mg-si melt. Eur. Chem. Bull. 2016, 5, 376–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The “Parallel” induction furnace during slag refining process.
Figure 1. The “Parallel” induction furnace during slag refining process.
Processes 10 01353 g001
Figure 2. Photos of 4 purified MG-Si ingots obtained after the slag refining process.
Figure 2. Photos of 4 purified MG-Si ingots obtained after the slag refining process.
Processes 10 01353 g002
Table 1. Impurity composition of metallurgical Si and Si after slag refining.
Table 1. Impurity composition of metallurgical Si and Si after slag refining.
SampleAlFeCaInGaAsBP
ppm
MG-Si1277155118211143-3127
melting № 14438907085111-1258
melting № 21489803379128-1237
melting № 3129520297852130.2927
melting № 4184250933968960.0749.556
melting № 518022880101814840.3841143
melting № 620225429218700.0531149
melting № 7624186811194511.51141
melting № 859318629001.5462.5934
melting № 93022964002.8522.2735
Table 2. Slag Composition for 9 slag refining processes.
Table 2. Slag Composition for 9 slag refining processes.
Melting NumberCaOSiO2CaF2Na2CO3Al2O3MgO
Melting №1%405010---
kg22.50.5---
Melting №2%603010---
kg31.50.5---
Melting №3%-60-40--
kg-3-2--
Melting №4%10501030--
kg0.52.50.51.5--
Melting №5%7030----
kg3.51.5----
Melting №6%4040--20-
kg22--1-
Melting №7%4040---20
kg22---1
Melting №8%4040--1010
kg22--0.50.5
Melting №9%304010-1010
kg1.520.5-0.50.5
Table 3. Impurity composition of MG-Si and purified Si after slag refining and after acid leaching (a/l).
Table 3. Impurity composition of MG-Si and purified Si after slag refining and after acid leaching (a/l).
SampleAlFeCaInGaAsBP
ppm
MG-Si1277155118211143-3127
Melting #3129520297852130.2927
Melting #3 after a/l4.173872.3826150.77.8626.4
Melting #859318629001.5462.5934
Melting #8 after a/l22057017317130.91135
Melting #93022964002,8522.2735
Melting #9 after a/l99779221200.66.430
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Serikkanov, A.; Pavlov, A.; Mukashev, B.; Turmagambetov, T.; Kantarbayeva, D.; Zholdybayev, K. The Possibility of Silicon Purification by Metallurgical Methods: Part I. Processes 2022, 10, 1353. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10071353

AMA Style

Serikkanov A, Pavlov A, Mukashev B, Turmagambetov T, Kantarbayeva D, Zholdybayev K. The Possibility of Silicon Purification by Metallurgical Methods: Part I. Processes. 2022; 10(7):1353. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10071353

Chicago/Turabian Style

Serikkanov, Abay, Artem Pavlov, Bolat Mukashev, Tleuzhan Turmagambetov, Dinara Kantarbayeva, and Kairat Zholdybayev. 2022. "The Possibility of Silicon Purification by Metallurgical Methods: Part I" Processes 10, no. 7: 1353. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10071353

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop