Next Article in Journal
Experimental and Mathematical Investigation of Anaerobic Granulate Density via Settling Velocity
Previous Article in Journal
Adaptive Energy Management Strategy Based on Intelligent Prediction of Driving Cycle for Plug−In Hybrid Electric Vehicle
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Role of Conventional Methods and Artificial Intelligence in the Wastewater Treatment: A Comprehensive Review

by
Wahid Ali Hamood Altowayti
1,*,
Shafinaz Shahir
1,*,
Norzila Othman
2,
Taiseer Abdalla Elfadil Eisa
3,
Wael M. S. Yafooz
4,
Arafat Al-Dhaqm
5,
Chan Yong Soon
2,
Izzati Binti Yahya
2,
Nur Anis Natasha binti Che Rahim
2,
Mohammed Abaker
6 and
Abdulalem Ali
5
1
Department of Biosciences, Faculty of Science, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor, Johor Bahru 81310, Malaysia
2
Micro-Pollutant Research Centre (MPRC), Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, Johor, Parit Raja 86400, Malaysia
3
Department of Information Systems-Girls Section, King Khalid University, Mahayil 62529, Saudi Arabia
4
Computer Science Department, Taibah University, Medina 42353, Saudi Arabia
5
Faculty of Engineering, School of Computing, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM), Johor, Johor Bahru 81310, Malaysia
6
Department Computer Science of Community College, King Khalid University, Muhayel Aseer 61913, Saudi Arabia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2022, 10(9), 1832; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10091832
Submission received: 9 August 2022 / Revised: 28 August 2022 / Accepted: 7 September 2022 / Published: 12 September 2022

Abstract

:
Water pollution is a severe health concern. Several studies have recently demonstrated the efficacy of various approaches for treating wastewater from anthropogenic activities. Wastewater treatment is an artificial procedure that removes contaminants and impurities from wastewater or sewage before discharging the effluent back into the environment. It can also be recycled by being further treated or polished to provide safe quality water for use, such as potable water. Municipal and industrial wastewater treatment systems are designed to create effluent discharged to the surrounding environments and must comply with various authorities’ environmental discharge quality rules. An effective, low-cost, environmentally friendly, and long-term wastewater treatment system is critical to protecting our unique and finite water supplies. Moreover, this paper discusses water pollution classification and the three traditional treatment methods of precipitation/encapsulation, adsorption, and membrane technologies, such as electrodialysis, nanofiltration, reverse osmosis, and other artificial intelligence technology. The treatment performances in terms of application and variables have been fully addressed. The ultimate purpose of wastewater treatment is to protect the environment that is compatible with public health and socioeconomic considerations. Realization of the nature of wastewater is the guiding concept for designing a practical and advanced treatment technology to assure the treated wastewater’s productivity, safety, and quality.

1. Introduction

There are generally three types of wastewater or sewage: domestic, industrial, and storm sewage [1]. Domestic wastewater, also called sanitary sewage, is wastewater either from blackwater (wastewater from toilets that contain feces, urine, or toilet paper) or greywater (water from sinks, baths, washing machines, and others) [2].
Pollution and exorbitant use seriously compromise the availability of fresh and clean water around the earth and may cause a critical impact in the future. It is mandatory to protect and produce healthy water of sufficient quality at an economical cost while conserving the ecosystems. Every country will release liquid and air emissions and solid wastes. Wastewater is essentially the water supply that comes from the people in the city after it has been used in various applications [3].
From a practical standpoint, wastewater includes dissolved and suspended organic solids. These are waste that contains organic matter capable of decomposition by microorganisms and of such a character and proportion that causes odors and the capability to attract or provide food for ecosystems like birds and other animals. Another principal physical characteristic of wastewater can be defined by its color and temperature [4]. The color function explains the basic condition of wastewater. Wastewater with the color light brown is less than 6 h old, while light to medium grey color is wastewater that has been processed in the collection system. Finally, the wastewater is typically septic, undergoing immeasurable germs decomposition under anaerobic conditions if the color is dark grey or black. Next, the wastewater temperature is frequently higher than that of the water supply because warm municipal water has been added. The temperature of wastewater will vary from different weather and also with geographical locations.
Wastewater treatment is a process in which the solids in wastewater are partially removed and changed. Designing wastewater treatment facilities need to base on the characteristics of the wastewater. Table 1 lists some key characteristics of concern [5].
The following main categories can be used to group water treatment technologies: Energy-intensive methods, chemical methods, and physical methods [6].
Physical methods are the main water treatment technology. Recirculation technologies can be divided into two parts—conventional and non-conventional. To recognize the role of recirculation, it is important to conduct a variance study about the cleaning and purification of industry and urban waters with the different unit processes [7].
Chemical treatment methods depend on the chemical reaction of the contaminants that the community removes from water and the inquiry of chemicals that encourage pollution from water. This method can be applied as a stand-alone or fundamentally with physical techniques [8].
Next, energy-intensive technologies, including the generated electric current, are applied to drinking water applications [9].
In this review, the first part determines the classification of water pollutants. It aims to provide an overview of the water pollutant and what chemicals and materials can produce wastewater. The following three sections discuss the common conventional method for wastewater treatment, including precipitation, adsorption, and membrane technologies. Moreover, the last part of this review explains the role of artificial intelligence models in wastewater treatment. These three conventional technologies groups can integrate into water treatment or merge by referring to the aim of the water treatment. The option to achieve the objective of water treatment not only depends on the technology’s functionality but on choosing a suitable method of water treatment, which also depends upon such factors as (1) the cost of purifying the water, (2) the effectiveness after using the technologies, (3) the quantity of water and environment need to manage, (4) the materials and tools need to use to separate the waste. The above explains the difficulty of choosing the ideal technologies to treat water. To evolve the water treatment technologies, we need to consider the cost-effective design; we need to identify many aspects and the knowledge of operating the technologies. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first review highlighting conventional methods and artificial intelligence in wastewater treatment. A bibliometric analysis of the most recent publications between 2012 and 2022 is carried out to evaluate the research bias on artificial intelligence in wastewater treatment. The main purpose of bibliometric indicators is to visually represent the significant elements pertaining to scientific subjects. The most significant publications and countries were identified in the current review using bibliometric markers such as co-authorship analysis. The largest database for scientific research publications is Scopus, which includes information on all current research fields. It is utilized in this research. Additionally, OSViewer (version 1.6.18) is utilized in this paper. VOSviewer has been developed by Nees Jan van Eck and Ludo Waltman at Leiden University’s Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS) in the Netherlands.

2. Classification of Water Pollutants

Wastewater consists primarily of water with the remaining solid, which can be in either dissolved solid or suspended solid form that may be classified as organic, inorganic, and biological [10]. In addition, there are also thermal and radioactive pollutants discharged from power plants, nuclear plants, and industries where water is used as a coolant, mining, etc. [11]. The types of contaminants found in the wastewater depend on the activities that release municipal, industrial, or agricultural wastewater. The four main types of water contaminants are suspended solids, microorganisms, and organic and inorganic pollutants. These contaminants in the water continue to exist in solvated, colloidal, or suspended forms.

2.1. Organic Pollutants

The organic matter in municipal wastewater originates primarily from residential and commercial food processing and urine and feces [12]. This pollutant, with a considerable concentration of biodegradable organic compounds, undergoes degradation and decomposition by bacterial activity [13]. Wastewater is processed by biological treatment to remove organic matter. However, approximately 30% of the organic matter is still not biodegradable and must be disposed of as waste sludge [14].
Some contaminants include synthetic pesticides, detergents, food additives, medicines, insecticides, paints, synthetic textiles, plastics, solvents, and volatile organic compounds [15]. There are also synthetic organic compounds found in wastewater due to various artificial activities such as agricultural and industrial activities. For instance, the wastewater discharged by the food industry may contain complex organic pollutants with a high concentration of BOD, and the coke plant wastewater may contain various polynuclear hydrocarbons. The wastewater of the chemical industry may contain various carcinogenic compounds like PCB (polychlorinated biphenyls, widely used as coolant fluids). The wastewater of the farmland may contain a high concentration of pesticides or herbicides [16]. Most toxic synthetic organic pollutants are resistant to decomposition by ordinary biological mechanisms. Carcinogenic PCB has been widely used in industries since the 1930s. It is fat-soluble and moves easily through the environment and within the tissues and cells with high stability to chemical reagents [17].
In addition, an oil complex mixture of hydrocarbons and degradable under bacteria action is also considered one of the organic pollutants [18]. Oil may enter the water body through oil spills, leakage of oil pipes, and wastewater produced from refineries and production factories. With a density lesser than water, it may spread over the surface of the water body, resulting in a decrease of dissolved oxygen and reduction of light transmission through the water surface and affecting the life of aquatic flora and fauna.
The two primary techniques used to determine the amount of organic matter are chemical oxygen demand (COD) and biochemical oxygen demand (BOD). One of the most crucial factors in the design and operation of sewage treatment facilities is the BOD, which measures the biodegradability of organic matter. Industrial sewage may have BOD levels many times than domestic sewage. Dissolved oxygen (DO) is an important water quality factor for lakes and rivers. The higher the concentration of DO, the better the water quality. When sewage enters a water body, decomposition of the organic matter begins as organic matter is served as food in the microorganism metabolism process. The microorganism’s population will grow and lead to the increase in consumption of DO in the water body, which next may then affect the aquatic living organisms. A decrease of dissolved oxygen below 4.0 mg/L is considered pollution [19].

2.2. Inorganic Pollutants:

Water quality is established and controlled by several inorganic components that are present in both natural and effluent. Natural water dissolves rocks and minerals with which they come in contact. Much of the inorganic matter in natural waters is also in wastewater. However, much of the inorganic matter is added via human activity, such as nitrite ions [20].
The inorganic pollutants include mineral acids, inorganic salts, trace elements, nitrates, phosphates, sulfates, fluorides, chlorides, oxalates, cyanides, etc. [21]. For example, municipal wastewater may contain excessive nitrates and phosphorus from phosphate builders in detergents [22,23]. The high phosphorus content may lead to the eutrophication of water bodies. The rapid growth of algae in the lake is harmful and has a negative effect on the entire food chain, as some of these algae may produce toxins. Another example of an inorganic pollutant is sulfate, where its ion in wastewater may reduce biologically to sulfide. It then combines with hydrogen to form hydrogen sulfide (H2S), which is toxic to animals and plants. Toxic inorganic compounds such as copper, lead, silver, arsenic, boron, and chromium are classified as priority pollutants and are toxic to microorganisms [24,25]. These pollutants can kill off the microorganism needed for biological treatment in the wastewater treatment process.
The most prevalent inorganic water contaminants are also heavy metals. They are very poisonous, naturally carcinogenic, non-biodegradable, and may linger in the environment and food supply. The removal of heavy metal ions from diverse wastewater sources has been addressed using various approaches [26]. These procedures might be divided into categories such as adsorption, membrane-, chemical-, electric-, and photocatalytic-based therapy [27]. Among the heavy metals with a high atomic mass are plutonium, mercury, lead, cadmium, zinc, arsenic, and chromium. There is no safe amount of exposure to lead since it is a hazardous metal that originates through the exhaust of vehicles that use leaded gasoline [28]. Table 2 shows some typical heavy metals in wastewater that affect human health.

2.3. Microbes/Pathogens

Cholera, typhoid, polio, and hepatitis are examples of water-borne illnesses that can be spread by pathogenic microorganisms that enter a body of water by sewage discharge or through businesses like slaughterhouses [29,30]. Different kinds of bacteria that thrive in sewage might cause many ailments. Salmonella-causing bacteria, hepatitis A viruses, protozoa, fungus, algae, plankton, amoebas, and other worms like hookworm and whipworm are among the potentially dangerous germs. Escherichia coli, an intestinal bacterium secreted by all warm-blooded animals, is also measured to determine the presence of fecal contamination [31].

2.4. Suspended Solid and Sediments

Suspended solid normally is the first item to be extracted from wastewater at the beginning of the treatment plant through the screening process [32]. Items such as wet wipes, diapers, sanitary napkins, expired medication, medical packaging, and other items are flushed into the toilet even at the risk of causing blockages. Trash and garbage in the street may also be carried to the combined sewer system by stormwater runoff [33]. Industrial and storm sewage may contain more suspended solid waste than domestic sewage. In addition, the treatment plant’s effectiveness in removing suspended solids also determines the efficiency of the treatment process [34].

3. Source of Pollution

3.1. Urban Pollution

Urban can be defined as the association of massively populated cities and the surrounding areas. From the definition, the crucial key of a city is that it has a lot of people, buildings, structures, and infrastructures. The smaller centered areas in the city, such as the waterways, will be affected and cause a negative impact on the environment since all people in the city share the same residential area, air, and water. Water resources in urban areas need to receive a lot of pollutants from various sources. For example, effluents from industry, vehicle sources such as oil, wastewater from housing, garbage, and rainwater are polluted due to urban landscapes [35].
The problems with the urban water can be described as ‘too little, too much, too dirty.’ This is because the populated areas have people intervene at high levels in the natural hydrological cycles to keep up with the water supply and storm water management. The systems for urban water are interconnecting with various systems; thus, it gets an impact indirectly and causes water issues that will also affect other problems [36].
As mentioned, there are a few sources of urban pollution, one of which is anthropogenic activities. Examples of anthropogenic activities are vehicle transportation and washing building surfaces. Based on a previous study, vehicle operation is the main cause of environmental pollution [37]. The operation includes the exhaust, fluid leakages, and washing vehicle. Exhaust gas from vehicles releases pollutants such as hydrocarbons from internal combustion engines. The leakages of the automotive fluids and the oil for the engine were reported to be likely the cause of BTEX pollutants. Other than that, washing vehicles also contribute to various chemical discharges and particles that attach to the car [38].

3.2. Agricultural Pollution

Agriculture can be expressed as the action of farming, working on the soil to produce a variety of plants, breeding livestock, and diverting the levels of preparation and marketing of the product produced. Agricultural activities have been done for thousands of years using the natural process, which does not affect soil fertility. Despite that, the current implementation of agriculture activities has been causing environmental pollution, unlike the previous agriculture practices [20,39]. This has caused the deterioration of the environment, land, and ecosystem.
The water pollution issues in agriculture modern practices are happening globally. It contemplates the possibilities of the growth of the human population and food demand increases. The result is estimated that the livestock demand will increase, mass production will occur, and the use of chemicals will intensify [40].
There are a few elements that cause water pollution from agricultural activities. The first is the soil fertilizers, be they artificial or organic; both fertilizers cause water contamination and affect aquatic ecosystems [20]. The content of nutrient in the fertilizers that helps fertilize the plants, lawns, and golf fields cause the immediate growth of algae. These algae are also known as an algal bloom, and when these algae die, they feed on the bacteria. The bacteria then will conquer the freshwater and causes the degradation of oxygen which reduce the survival rate of fish and plants in the water [41]. Furthermore, some algae can also produce toxins that can be dangerous to humans.
Apart from fertilizers, pesticides are also widely used in modern agricultural practices. The chemicals in pesticides are very toxic to insects but less toxic to mammals [42]. Based on a previous study, the substantial use of pesticides has contaminated the soil and drinking water in Central Asia. The dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) and lindane of organohalogen pesticides (OCPs) have been discovered in the water samples of the river. Four water samples were taken in the area where pesticides were applied. The results show that the OCPs found in the samples are hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH), DDT, and dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene (DDE). These OCPs have been washed out from the soil and flow into the water [43].

3.3. Industrial Pollution

A large-scale business that produces goods is often correlated with the meaning of the industrial. About 19 percent of water was pulled out to be used for industrial purposes globally. For the past years until now, the industry has extensively influenced water pollution because it produces very dangerous contaminants to human beings and the environment [44]. The ecological environment in China has been facing serious impairment, particularly water pollution due to industrial activities. In addition, the physical and mental health, quality of life, and productivity of the citizens in China are also affected [45].
Some pollutants come from industrial activities, and one of them is oil. The petroleum industry is one of the major contributors towards the surface water and groundwater pollution. There are refineries that operate deep-injection wells to get rid of the wastewater produced in the plants, and some of the unusable water ends up in the groundwater [46]. The wastewater produced at the refineries is possibly greatly contaminated by looking at the total sources in contact with the procedure of the refinery. Polluted wastewater might be the product of desalting, cooling tower water, distillation water, or cracking [47].
Besides the petroleum industry, the radioactive industry also has a huge imprint on the water contamination issue. The atom is usually illustrated as the center of the nucleus with several electrons that rotate like the earth’s orbit around the sun. It comprises comparatively higher protons that convey the positive electrostatic and neutrons that have no charge. If the nucleus is unstable, it is not balanced, and the atoms can be radioactive. In order to get the internal balanced, the nucleus will give out alpha or beta particles, or also can be gamma radiation, or both. [48]. Radioactivity can affect drinking water by the occurrence when groundwater moves through the soil that contains radionuclides. This is because some areas are vulnerable to pollution when the soils and rocks are rich in phosphate. The contaminants from radionuclides in drinking water can result in bone radium concentrates, and cancers and are toxic to kidneys [49].

4. Wastewater Treatment Technology

Wastewater treatment can be divided into several units of operations or processes that are selected and combined to serve its designed purposes and cater to the area under its consideration. In general, it may be separated into primary, secondary, and tertiary treatments [50].
While secondary treatment focuses on the biological treatment of wastewater, primary treatment entails first purifying procedures of a physical and chemical character. Effluent that is low in solids and organics after the primary and secondary process is fit to discharge back into the receiving water after it has been treated. These include chlorination, UV treatment, or a range of filtration options that aim to disinfect, remove the nutrients, or alter the pH after considering the receiving environment for the effluent. In tertiary treatment processes, most pollutants are removed and wastewater is converted into safe quality water suitable for human consumption, industrial, medicinal, etc. supplies [51].
In a full water treatment plant, the units from all three of these processes are chosen and integrated to create high-quality, safe water while also considering total cost, including building operation and maintenance expenses [52,53]. The overall scheme of wastewater technologies and sludge treatment is summarized in Table 3 below.
There are several techniques in use, and Table 4 lists several regularly employed techniques for heavy metal removal [54]. Table 4 compares several methods for removing heavy metals from wastewater.

4.1. Precipitation/Encapsulation

Metals must be removed from wastewater since some are hazardous to humans and animals and do not decompose in the environment. By decreasing their solubilities by adding chemicals or organic solvents (a pricey option), etc., dissolved pollutants (target more on metal ions/heavy metal, phosphate, and organics) are transformed into solid particles/precipitates in this procedure [27]. The ionic metals are changed into insoluble particles by a chemical reaction between the soluble metal complexes and the precipitating reagent. The generated particles are then filtered or settled out. The chemicals such as sodium bicarbonates, ferric chloride, ferrous sulfate, or calcium hydroxide (lime) are used. The type of ionic metals present, pH, and temperature are the main factors for the success of the process [59]. The main issue with this procedure is the significant amount of sludge generated, and the presence of oil and grease may interfere with precipitation.
The principal process in a precipitation reaction is forming a new solid phase from a solution before water is used for the human body and industry. An illustration of one kind of wastewater treatment procedure is shown in Figure 1, beginning with the environment and ending with houses.
The wastewater treatment method’s precipitation step aims to purge the water of phosphates and soluble metal ions. Before performing the reactions, the first step is determining whether compounds are soluble. An illustration of a precipitation reaction in a test tube is shown in Figure 2 below. The reaction produces a solid that may be eliminated by filtering. In the precipitation reactions during wastewater treatment, the same procedure applies.
The three heavy metal removal techniques stated above are ion exchange, adsorption, and chemical precipitation [61]. However, chemical precipitation is the most popular technique for removing dissolved metals from solutions, such as process wastewaters containing hazardous metals. The ionic metal was changed into an insoluble particle by the chemical interaction between the soluble metal compounds and the precipitating agent. The particles produced by this reaction are eliminated from the solution by settling or filtering. The type and quantity of ionic metals present in the solution, the precipitant utilized, the reaction conditions, and the existence of other components’ reactions are some parameters that must be considered for the chemical precipitation process to work well. The most economical method to remove metals from wastewater is calcium hydroxide (lime), which is often used in the chemical precipitation process. Ion exchange is the second technique most frequently utilized in the water treatment sector. This technique is also cost-effective; the ion exchange process effectively removes heavy metals from aqueous solutions and often uses inexpensive components and simple procedures. The wastewater treatment may be easily distinguished and includes the following processes: screening, sedimentation, precipitation, filtration, absorption, and disinfection. The steps of wastewater treatment are depicted in Figure 3.
Stage 1—Bar screening filters big particles from influents to protect facility equipment.
Stage 2—By passing the influent over or through a grit chamber, screening is used to eliminate the grift.
Stage 3—initial separation of solid organic materials from wastewater using a primary clarifier.
Stage 4—Aeration involves pumping air into the aeration tank to promote chemical precipitation conversion and supply oxygen for bacteria to continue growing and reproducing.
Stage 5—Pumping treated wastewater through a secondary clarifier enables any organic matter still present in the flow of treated water to settle out.
Stage 6—Chlorination (Disinfection). To eliminate any leftover bacteria in the contact chamber, chlorine is introduced.
Stage 7—Water testing and analysis. Testing to verify the water is flowing, clarifying, and aerating at the right rates and the optimum pH level.
Stage 8—Waste disposal. Clean water is discharged into the environment once it satisfies all permit requirements.

4.1.1. Primary Process

  • Screening
Screening is considered the preliminary or pre-process to remove the larger solid waste present in the wastewater, such as wood, clothes, kitchen refuse, and others. The purpose of screening also is to separate the larger solid waste so that it will not cause any potential damage to the next process equipment, especially the pump and process that treat finer pollutants. The screen can be classified into three broad categories—coarse, fine, and micro. Hand cleaned coarse screen is normally adopted in the small treatment plant, whereas a mechanically cleaned screen, which is more efficient, is classified further into four types—chain-driven screen, catenary screen, reciprocating rakes, and continuous belt screen [62]
  • Centrifugal separation
Using a decanter centrifuge (Figure 4), this method generates liquid-solid separation, sludge dewatering, and sludge thickening. The wastewater is applied to centrifugal devices and rotated at a different speed so that solids or sludges are separated and discharged according to their density [63]. Sludge discharge can be adjusted to suit its disposal requirements either in fluid condition for land application or as dry stackable cake (dewatered sludge) to reduce its weight and volume before transportation or disposal. The disadvantage of this method is it requires high capital cost and frequent maintenance since high horsepower motors are used.
Centrifugal separators are also widely used in the marine industry as an alternative option for the gravity separators that are used in the bilge water treatment (dirty water collected inside the bilges of the ship, which contains contaminants such as waste oils, oily wastes, lubricant, grease, etc. [64].
  • Coagulation & Flocculation
Coagulation is the act of introducing a coagulant to destabilize a stabilized charged particle [65]. In contrast, flocculation is a mixing technique that promotes agglomeration and aids in particle settling through mixing duration and intensity management. The additional coagulant will cause a colloidal particle in the wastewater that is too small for gravity settling to lose charge [64]. Destabilization causes larger flocs to develop, which facilitates easier settling. One of the determining criteria for the procedure’s effectiveness is pH, temperature, and contact duration.
The inorganic coagulants alum, ferric sulfate, ferric chloride, starch, activated silica, and aluminum salt are used often. These highly charged ions will neutralize the suspended particles when introduced to water. Short polymer chains are produced by the generated inorganic hydroxides, which promote micro-flocs’ development. Most suspended particles may be removed using inorganic coagulants. Still, some organic precursors may also mix with chlorine to make disinfection by-products and produce significant amounts of floc, which can trap bacteria when they settle. As they consume alkalinity, inorganic coagulants have the potential to change the pH of water. As a result, corrosion-resistant feed and storage equipment is needed, and the settling floc needs to be disposed of in a way that does not harm the environment [66]. Here are a few instances of how inorganic coagulants react:
Ferric Sulfate
Fe2(SO4)3 + 3Ca(HCO3)2 — Fe(OH)3 + 3CaSO4 + 6 CO2
Ferric Chloride
2FeCl3 + 3Ca(HCO3)2 — 2 Fe(OH)3 + 3CaCl2 + 6CO2
ALUM
AL2(SO4)3 + 3 CA(HCO3)2 — 2AL(OH)3 + 3CaSO4 + 6CO2
Along with conventional inorganic coagulants, polymers, often more expensive, can be utilized as coagulant aids. The efficacy of sedimentation and gravity separation is increased by adding synthetic cationic, anionic, and non-ionic polymers. To draw suspended materials and balance their surface charges, cationic polymers can be employed alone or in conjunction with alum or ferric coagulants, whereas anionic polymers are frequently utilized with metal coagulants [66].
  • Floatation
The suspended solids, oils, greases, and other materials may be eliminated by adding air or gas to the flotation process. The solid will stick to gas or air and condense into agglomerates, which then collect at the water’s surface and are readily skimmed off [67].
  • Separation by gravity and sedimentation
Throughout this procedure, the wastewater is left undisturbed or semi-undisturbed for varying lengths of time in various types of tanks, enabling the suspended particles to fall to the bottom of the tanks under the force of gravity [68].

4.1.2. Secondary Process

This process involves biological wastewater treatment designed to degrade wastewater pollutants by the action of indigenous, water-borne microorganisms [69], either by aerobic or anaerobic treatment. In a reactor with a constant high concentration of microorganisms, wastewater is cycled. Most of the time, bacteria or fungi assist in the conversion of organic contaminants into substances like alcohol, glucose, nitrate, etc., and occasionally they also assist in the detoxification of inorganic material.
  • Aerobic process
Activated sludge, lagoon, and pond-based treatments spray and surface aeration, aerobic digestion, and simple or aerobic septic tanks are examples of aerobic wastewater treatment systems [70]. This process normally occurs in the oxidation ponds and effectively removes BOD, COD, dissolved and suspended organic, nitrates, phosphates, etc. However, the disadvantage is that many bio-solids are produced and require further treatment and management. This process can be summarized as below:
Organic matter + O2 + Bacteria → CO2 + H2O + Bacteria + By-products
  • Anaerobic process
Anaerobic decomposition will occur in wastewater if free dissolved oxygen is not present. Bacteria transform organic matter into simpler organic matter based on nitrogen, carbon, and sulfur by producing gases like nitrogen, ammonia, hydrogen sulfide, and methane. Biogas containing methane is obtained by anaerobic digestion and utilized for energy recovery [71]. This process can be summarized as below:
Organic matter + Bacteria → CO2 + CH4 + Bacteria + By-products
  • Encapsulation
The atmosphere contains large amounts of nitrogen gas in a very stable and non-reactive state. Although soils only contain little nitrogen in their reactive forms (ammonium, nitrite, and nitrate), nitrogen is crucial for plant development. The Haber-Bosch process, developed in 1909, is the primary industrial method used today to create ammonia by converting atmospheric N2 to ammonia (NH3) through a reaction with hydrogen (H2) [72]. The manufacture of N-based fertilizers has aided the ability to produce more food and crops. Still, at the same time, it is excreted mostly as urea and NH4+ by human metabolism and dumped into the sewer.
Although the traditional activated sludge technique is seen to be an effective way to treat wastewater, one of its drawbacks is that it frequently takes a while for slow-growing organisms like nitrifiers and anaerobic methane producers to become caught by the system [73]. The effectiveness of this process also depends on a higher biomass concentration; however, municipal wastewater treatment produces an input stream with a relatively low biomass content that is greatly diluted.
Using immobilization methods like encapsulation or attachment can help with this. Both have greater solid-liquid separation, can sustain a high cell concentration, and are less temperature-sensitive. In encapsulation, cells are immobilized by ionotropic or thermal gelatine, which is applied to porous polymeric materials such as alginate, agar, polyacrylamide, carrageenan, cellulose acetate, and polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) [74]. Additionally, polymer gels, microcapsules, liposomes, hollow fibers, and ultrafiltration membranes are utilized in the encapsulation process [75]. PVA is the most popular material among the many options available since its physical stability (solubility, biodegradability, and diffusivity) and mechanical stability are unaffected. It can generate a lot more concentrated cell population and thus increase nitrification rates

4.1.3. Tertiary Process

In urban areas where the population is increasing, and water resources are constrained, wastewater may be a useful resource. The tertiary process’ technologies may create water of high safety standards that can be utilized for human consumption, industry, medicine, etc.
  • Oxidation/Advanced oxidation
Organic wastewater is often treated and hygienically cleaned using oxidations. The chemical oxidation technique uses substances that may oxidize pollutants and destroy organic molecules, such as chlorine, ozone (O3), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), Fenton’s reagent (solution of H2O2 with ferrous iron as the catalyst), chlorine dioxide (ClO2), etc. Ammonia, phenols, dyes, hydrocarbons, and other organic contaminants may be effectively removed with this technique [76].
The main advantage of this method is the organic contaminants are generally oxidized to CO2. The single oxidation process may not be sufficient and efficient; hence, the combination of the few oxidation processes called advanced oxidation can be carried out simultaneously. Advanced oxidation is combined with ozone and peroxide, enhanced ultraviolet oxidation such as UV/Fenton, UV/ozone, and photocatalysis [77]. The drawback of this method is the cost is high since a continuous input of chemical reagents is required to maintain the operation of most of the system. It is not cost-effective to use oxidation methods solely to handle a large amount of wastewater; instead, they should be deployed in the final stage after primary and secondary treatments for disinfection purposes.

4.2. Adsorption

Organic pollutants can be eliminated from wastewater streams via adsorption [56]. Mass transfer processes like liquid-liquid, gas-liquid, gas-solid, or liquid-solid interfaces include adsorption. A technique for physically removing soluble molecules (adsorbate) from surfaces of solid substrates (adsorbent) [78]. Adsorption is a technique for removing organic pollutants from wastewater streams. Adsorption is a mass transfer process that can occur at a liquid-liquid, gas-liquid, gas-solid, or liquid-solid interface. A physical procedure wherein soluble molecules (adsorbate) are removed by adhesion to the surface of a solid substrate (adsorbent). The adsorbent should thus be activated before use. By using adsorption, a variety of organic compounds may be eliminated. Activated carbon is the most popular adsorbent and may be made from biomass [79]. The distinction between absorption and adsorption is seen in Figure 5. The most often used adsorbent is activated carbon, a kind of carbon that has been treated to produce numerous tiny, low-volume holes that increase the surface area accessible for adsorption [80].
Some factors affect adsorptions, (1) particle diameter, (2) adsorbate concentration, (3) temperature, (4) molecular weight, (5) pH, and (6) Iodine number [82]. The adsorption is directly proportional to the surface area and inversely proportional to the adsorbent’s particle size, according to particle diameter. However, when the relationship between temperature and adsorption is direct, temperature is another component that influences adsorption. In addition, molecular weight is often inversely related to adsorption depending on the compound weight and the design of the pores used for diffusion control. Due to surface charge, adsorption is inversely proportional to pH [83]. It is challenging to compare the individual characteristics of adsorbent and adsorbate.
A molecular, atomic film (adsorbate) is formed when a liquid or gas solute accumulates on the surface of a solid or liquid (adsorbent) as a result of a surface phenomenon mechanism. A material or molecule adhering to the surface of another substance or adsorbent is known as the adhesion process. The adsorbent can be made of natural materials such as activated carbon, charcoal, clay, zeolites, and ores or artificial materials, including sewage sludge, household trash, industrial waste, and polymeric adsorbent [84]. Each adsorbent has unique properties, such as porosity, pore structure, and the type of surfaces it may adsorb from. In general, there are three different adsorption processes: exchange ion, chemical, and physical (stronger bonding and largely irreversible). Adsorption is regarded as one of the cost-effective and low-maintenance treatment options due to the local availability of the material and the fact that the process is temperature-dependent [7].
Adsorption filters away organic compounds, fluorine, chlorine, and radon. However, it is thought to be ineffective at filtering out inorganic, metal, and microbe forms of substances. However, recent nanomaterials such as carbon nanotubes and their composite have been developed and used to remove heavy metals and organic pollutants. Pre-filtration is required before adsorption because suspended particles and oils reduce the process efficiency.
Using this technique, contaminants that can be treated are organic pollutants, dyes from industrial wastes, and phenols, which are usually used to synthesize dyes, plastics, and pharmaceuticals used to make antiseptic and pesticide chemical industries [76]. Figure 6 shows the adsorption procedures of dye from wastewater. The regeneration of columns and column life is the main issue to be considered in this method.
The non-toxic ions from an ion exchanger, which may be either a cation or an anion and contains active sites on its surface, are exchanged with the hazardous ions found in wastewater. Low amounts of inorganic and organic materials are eliminated using this technique. Acrylic, zeolites, and sodium silicates are examples of ion exchangers [86].

4.3. Membrane Technologies

Several methods were used for the wastewater treatment technologies, such as coagulation-flocculation, biological treatment systems, and conventional filtration. Improvement from the existing water treatment technologies also meets the current discharge and reused standards. Membrane technologies are a major use in water treatment in this decade. According to Singh and Hankins [87], membrane technologies are the most economical and sustainable for wastewater treatment; this is because they do not use chemicals and are environmentally friendly, and are easy to use for all sectors. These membrane technologies are not a new invention because the efficiency and the effectiveness of using this make the wastewater have good quality.
A membrane is a selective style with two phases in the movement of components. Isotropic and anisotropic are two classifications of membranes [88]. Isotropic membranes are uniform in composition and physical structure. Anisotropic is non-uniform, consisting of different layers, forms, and designs. The material used in the membrane can be classified into two, organic and inorganic [89]. Organic membranes are made from synthetic organic polymers. Inorganic membranes are made from such materials as metals, ceramics, zeolites, or silica [90]. The membrane can be classified according to its bulk structure, morphology, and application Figure 7 [5].
The driving forces will move media through the membranes with different effects. The schematic diagram below Figure 8 summarizes membrane processes according to their driving forces. These are based on the membrane process, non-equilibrium and equilibrium, pressure, and non-pressure driven process.
Above are five types of the membrane process, which are commonly used in water and wastewater treatment for non-equilibrium based:
  • Micro and ultra-filtration.
  • Membrane bioreactor (MBR).
  • Reverse osmosis (RO).
  • Electrolysis.
  • Electrodialysis.
These methods can remove dissolved compounds and finely dispersed particles from liquids. Membrane transport, or the flow of solutes or solvents through thin, porous polymeric membranes, is at the heart of all five technologies.
  • Micro and ultra-filtration
This method can remove particles of 0.04 to 1 μm [76] in size with the total suspended solids not exceeding 100 mg/L. The filters used are made of cotton, wool, rayon, cellulose, fiberglass, nylon, asbestos, etc., arranged in different arrangements or patterns and operate under a pressure of about 1–3 bar. Pre-removal of suspended solids is required for the long life of the filter.
  • Membrane bioreactor (MBR)
This combines activated sludge with membrane filtration equipment, typically low-pressure microfiltration or ultrafiltration membranes [92]. In normally activated sludge facilities, the critical solid-liquid separation process is done using a clarified system instead. MBR system often comprises ten or eleven sub-systems and includes fine screening, the membrane zone, and some type of post-disinfection process (Figure 9). The membrane zone is the initial step in the biological process where microbes are used to degrade pollutants filtered by a series of submerged membranes. Air is introduced through integral diffusers to continually scour the membrane surface during filtration to facilitate mixing and contribute oxygen to the biological process [93,94]. The benefits of MBR have reduced plant footprint and higher quality of effluent, and it comes with a modular schematic that allows for flexible configuration [95].
  • Reverse osmosis (RO)
This process, also known as hyper-filtration, may remove up to 99% of total dissolved solids, organic dissolved materials, bacteria, viruses, and other microorganisms since its filter pore width is smaller than that of micro- and ultra-filtration [76]. The membranes that are applied with pressure larger than the osmotic pressure include cellulose, polyether, and polyamide membranes that are structured in tubular, disc, spiral, and other shapes. RO is the most cost-effective method for producing potable water today from desalinated saltwater and salty water. Since RO systems are self-cleaning, do not use chemicals, and only power and high-pressure water, they require very little maintenance. To reduce the concentration of colloidal and dispersed particles, pre-treatment is also necessary. Reverse osmosis is contrasted with other membrane processes in Figure 10.
  • Electrolysis
Compared to conventional wastewater treatment processes, this approach is innovative and alternative. In the process of electrolysis, soluble substances either deposit on the surface of the electrodes or break down due to an electrochemical redox reaction. Most metal ions are deposited on the electrode surface while organics are broken down into CO2 and H2O or other low or non-toxic compounds. Due primarily to the present capital expense of its electrodes, this approach has not yet been fully applied to the wastewater treatment at the commercial level [97]. It is used to treat some industrial effluent, particularly those enriched with metal ions and organics. Additionally, Figure 11 displays the electrolysis processes used to cleanse wastewater sludge.
  • Electrodialysis (ED)
The advantages of ED include high recovery and chemical-free functioning. Water, nutrients, salts, acids, and bases may all be recovered from the effluents of animal farms, desalination plants, and municipal wastewater treatment facilities [98]. The fundamental idea behind ED is that it is an electromechanical separation technique that supports ionic separation by utilizing an ion-exchange membrane as a dynamic force. It is primarily thought to be useful for removing ionic species, hardness, and organics from electrolytes (Figure 12). Electrical current travels through the ED stack while a power source charges an electrode. The cation moves to the cathode while the electrically charged anions of the feed solution go to the anode. The anion exchange membrane (AEM) blocks the passage of cations via the cation exchange membrane (CEM) and vice versa (Figure 13), which causes the concentration of salt in the concentrate compartment to increase and the concentration of salt in the dilute compartment to decrease [99].
The foundation of traditional sewage treatment is that it is difficult to recover nutrients as gas or waste sludge that is released into the atmosphere. The advantage of ED is that it may simultaneously minimize nutrient loading into water resources while increasing the availability of phosphorus and nitrogen through the process of nutrient recovery. Fouling, a key disadvantage to using membranes to recover nutrients from wastewater, is the problem with ED. The positive charges of the anion exchange membranes are strongly attracted to most of the colloids’ and organics’ negative charges, making the anion exchange membrane more susceptible to organic fouling [62,99].

4.4. Artificial Intelligence Models to Treat the Wastewater

These applications discussed wastewater treatment from different perspectives. Each perspective has its weaknesses and strengths. Moreover, Figure 14 illustrates journals with many published articles on artificial intelligence models for wastewater treatment. As a result, the most prolific publications on this subject are water science and technology, environmental modeling & software, and lecture notes in computer science.
On the other hand, Figure 15 shows which countries are performing the most research on artificial intelligence models for wastewater treatment. The United States topped the list, followed by Spain, China, Iran, and Italy.
Nevertheless, several applications of artificial intelligence (AI) in wastewater treatment have been developed in the literature, as shown in Figure 16.
In the wastewater treatment process, artificial intelligence (AI) could be employed to minimize complexities [102]. AI is applicable to predicting the performance of water treatment, designing the sensors that estimate key components, optimizing the operating parameters, evaluating the effluent quality, designing the treatment units, optimizing the micropollutants and other emergent pollutants, predicting maintenance strategies using fault diagnosis, optimizing the energy efficiency of treatment processes, operating instructions based on performance, and making the systems fully automated. During the past few decades, the use of AI-based models in wastewater treatments has caused an increase in manifolds. Every intelligent controlling method has its weaknesses and strengths. To achieve the best outcomes, these methods must be chosen considering the treatment system mechanism and the aim for which they are employed [103].
The present study investigates the application of different models to wastewater treatment by searching the Scopus database with the following keywords: ‘wastewater treatment,’ ‘Artificial Intelligence, and the model’s name. In recent years, several soft computing tools and approaches in machine learning [104,105,106,107,108,109,110] and artificial neural networks (ANNs) [104,111,112,113,114] have been applied to the prediction of water quality and associated variables. In brief, ANNs process the information; these systems involve data computation as input and output.
ANN can assess the wastewater treatment process by evaluating variables such as BOD, COD, and total suspended solids (TSS). Esquerre et al. [115] used the BOD determination approach by applying the multilayer network and link networking analysis method to the wastewater biological treatment units (lagoon). In other studies, Akratos, et al. [116] and Hamed, et al. [117] introduced a new ANN-based model applicable to the BOD removal process. Nourani, Elkiran and Abba [104] compared three different models in terms of evaluating a wastewater treatment facility’s performance, considering variables such as TSS, BOD, and COD. Their findings confirmed that the ensemble neural network model outperformed the others regarding the reliability in the prediction of BOD (24% increase) and COD along with total nitrogen in the effluent (around 5% for both). In the same way, the BOD values of a highly-eutrophic river were predicted by employing a computational modeling system. Based on the obtained results, the parameters could be predicted beforehand with the use of 16-4-1 modelling with employing phosphate as one of the essential input variables [118]. The role of AI could play in modelling in the degradation process of penicillin-type antibiotics (i.e., amoxicillin, cloxacillin, and ampicillin) within an aqueous medium by a Fenton procedure known as COD removal. The results obtained by ANN showed a high correlation coefficient, which revealed that the model was successful. The following factors impacted the COD removal: time, pH, concentration, and the molar ratio of hydrogen, peroxide, and ferrous ions [119]. The estimation of COD removal efficiency in the case of sewerage water was investigated using ANN [30]. In a case study, Samaneh et al. evaluated the performance of the Khorramabad wastewater treatment facility using AI. They considered the influent characteristics such as pH, temperature, dissolved oxygen, BOD, and COD dissolved solids, and the output performance was examined regarding COD, BOD, and total solids. They achieved acceptable correlation coefficients with maximum contaminant removal efficiency of 87.68%. Zaqoot et al. utilized an ANN-based linear regression model in order to determine the water quality parameters. The authors considered some influent values such as temperature, pH, COD, BOD, and TSS. The findings revealed that ANN better evaluated the wastewater’s performance than the linear regression; this result was also confirmed by the error analyses and regression coefficient values [111]. In another project, a hybrid approach was used by Zhu to predict the BOD concentrations. Combining the connectionist systems, regression analysis, and goal programming caused a decrease in the overall accuracy of the approach used, but it demonstrated good BOD concentrations predictably [112]. In [120], the researchers used AI to examine how operational conditions affect the exclusion of chemical oxygen demand from olive mill waste effluent. They performed several experiments to check the impact of pH, process time, and electricity flowing per unit cross-sectional area upon the chemical oxygen demand removal efficiency. They found that the chemical oxygen demand deduction’s predicted effectiveness was equivalent to the experimental results (42.7%), with an R2 value of 0.92.
Zhang, et al. [121] proposed a novel hydraulic model to predicate the sewer flow using long short-term memory (LSTM) through time series, which obtain accurate results that help sewer management. In the same way, Kang, Yang, Huang and Oh [114] used bi-LSTM (bidirectional long short-term memory) to the wastewater flow rate in a practical sense with data collected for training for 31 days around 4464 for both tanning and validation. Mamandipoor, et al. [122] proposed methods for automatic wastewater fault detection using LSTM without human intervention. They used real-life datasets collected from around 5.1 million sensors and then applied statistical analysis methods, machine learning classifier, specifically, support vector machine (SVM), and LSTM. The proposed model performance is evaluated in term recall reached ninety-two% using LSTM. Similarly, Mateo Pérez, Mesa Fernández, Villanueva Balsera and Alonso Álvarez [115] developed a method to predicate fats, oils, and greases in wastewater. They used SVM; the model recorded 98.45% in training and 72.73% in evaluation. Moreover, Zhuang, et al. [123] used a hybrid model consisting of CNN and LSTM, the extraction process of the features from data of the sequence of the water quality performed in the first phase, which is the CNN, while the predication in the second phase, which LSTM after obtaining the input from the first phase. In using reinforcement learning, Granata, et al. [124] focus on optimization strategy in the papermaking process for treating the wastewater based on simulation of the natural environment. Barzegar, et al. [125] focus on the quality of water indicators based on the four factors: TSS, TDS, COD, BOD using the dataset from different areas with 3765. Then, they used two machine learning classifiers: support vector regression and regression trees. The results show that support vector regression is better than regression trees.
Numerous specific AI models, methods, and tools have been proposed to solve specific wastewater treatment scenarios through this survey. These models have various redundant processes, concepts, methods, activities, and tasks, making applications of artificial intelligence in wastewater treatment unstructured and complex among domain practitioners. Therefore, a structured and unified framework is lacking to facilitate managing, sharing, and reusing artificial intelligence applications in wastewater treatment. Therefore, this study suggests a high abstract model organizes, unifies, and structures artificial intelligence applications in wastewater treatment among domain practitioners. This aims to identify, recognize, extract and match different processes, concepts, activities, and tasks from various applications of artificial intelligence in wastewater treatment in a developed high abstract model, thus, allowing domain practitioners to derive/instantiate solution models easily.
Furthermore, the impacts and optimization of operational parameters on heavy metal removal efficiency are described in Table 5. These operating factors primarily include starting concentration, temperature, pH, and adsorbent dosage. In addition, the various removal technologies for heavy metal removal and their possible adverse effects on the surrounding environment need to be discussed to enable a significant and influential choice to be made to reduce the potential for adverse health effects and boost the effectiveness of heavy metal removal [126]. The selection of the most effective technologies, on the other hand, might be difficult since each approach has its own unique set of criteria. Therefore, strategies that are friendlier to the environment and more sustainable are quite important. Consequently, sustainable treatment methods and an efficient method for improving heavy metal removal from wastewater are approaches that do not generate secondary environmental contamination, consume less energy, and are more cost-effective. In addition to this, sustainable treatment methods are also environmentally friendly. In addition, more studies are needed to establish the most effective ways for heavy metal removal efficiency using artificial intelligence while maintaining the same adsorption circumstances. This is necessary to anticipate the removal with a high level of accuracy.

5. Conclusions

In summary, water resources are very important for humans and all living things on earth. While water resources take up most of the earth, the exponential growth of population, livestock and food demand increases, and rapid industrial and urbanization cause restraints on the freshwater supply. The entire globe is having a water quality crisis due to unstoppable development growth.
The growth in world population, urbanization, and industrialization is increasing with a proportionate growth in wastewater generation and water consumption. This makes it important to have a complete well-functional waste treatment system to protect our limited water resources and environment. As discussed, different methods and technology with their pros and cons shall be considered in designing a unique, efficient, cost-effective, and environmentally friendly treatment facility to serve its purposes.
In addition, given that wastewater is rich in nutrients and contains other useable chemicals, the wastewater treatment plant also plays an additional role as one of the resource recovery facilities, not just the former role as a mere pollution mitigation entity. Newer technologies and approaches must continue to be studied and improved to create a more sustainable system to benefit mankind and protect our planet.
Furthermore, the water issues’ main cause is the lack of focus and comprehension of water management and wastewater treatments. This action poses greater threats as, daily, human activities are degrading the quality of fresh water. Urban water pollution is mostly caused by anthropogenic activities, which are very concerning because it is a common behavior in daily life.
Modern agricultural activities are no less threatening to the ecosystem and environment. The widespread usage of fertilizers and pesticides has deteriorated the soil. When the water runoff goes into the river, the water is most likely to be contaminated with the residue of chemicals from using fertilizers which encourage algae growth. The dying algae promote bacteria growth in rivers, threatening the river’s aquatic lives.
Industrial activities also cause a lot of water pollution, especially in the petroleum industry and radioactive industries. Both industries produce dangerous wastewater if they are not treated and managed properly. The chemicals release toxic waste that can endanger all living things on earth.
In conclusion, it is important to have proper wastewater management and treatment. Both centralized and decentralized systems of water management can benefit the environment. Authorities have to plan the system according to the surroundings to have good results for wastewater management. Overall, the public also needs to participate in improving water and wastewater management.

Author Contributions

W.A.H.A., Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Resources, Visualization, Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing; S.S., Supervision, Resources, Conceptualization, Project administration, Funding acquisition; N.O., Data curation, Formal analysis, Resources, Visualization; T.A.E.E., Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition; W.M.S.Y., Resources, Data curation, Visualization, A.A.-D.; Software, Validation, Resources, C.Y.S.; Writing—original draft, Data curation, Validation, Funding acquisition; I.B.Y., Writing—original draft, Resources, Data curation, Visualization; N.A.N.b.C.R., Writing—review & editing; M.A., Investigation and Formal analysis; A.A., Investigation and Formal analysis. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Deanship of Scientific Research at King Khalid University through Large Groups (Project under grant number (RGP.2/49/43)). Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia (MOHE) and Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM) project funding (UTMFR Grant No. 21H22) and the Post-Doctoral Fellowship Scheme under Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM) Professional Development Research University Grant (06E27).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors fully acknowledged the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Khalid University for funding this work through Large Groups (Project under grant number (RGP.2/49/43)). The authors extend their appreciation to the Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia (MOHE) and Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM) for project funding (UTMFR Grant No. 21H22) and making this important research viable and effective. Moreover, Wahid Ali Hamood Altowayti extends his gratitude to Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM) for financial sponsorship and the Post-Doctoral Fellowship Scheme under UTM Professional Development Research University Grant (06E27).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Tarfeen, N.; Nisa, K.U.; Hamid, B.; Bashir, Z.; Yatoo, A.M.; Dar, M.A.; Mohiddin, F.A.; Amin, Z.; Ahmad, R.a.A.; Sayyed, R. Microbial Remediation: A Promising Tool for Reclamation of Contaminated Sites with Special Emphasis on Heavy Metal and Pesticide Pollution: A Review. Processes 2022, 10, 1358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bani-Melhem, K.; Al-Shannag, M.; Alrousan, D.; Al-Kofahi, S.; Al-Qodah, Z.; Al-Kilani, M.R. Impact of soluble COD on grey water treatment by electrocoagulation technique. Desalination Water Treat. 2017, 89, 101–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Sonune, A.; Ghate, R. Developments in wastewater treatment methods. Desalination 2004, 167, 55–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Munter, R. Industrial Wastewater Characteristics; The Baltic University Programme (BUP): Uppsala, Sweden, 2003; pp. 185–194. [Google Scholar]
  5. Obotey Ezugbe, E.; Rathilal, S. Membrane technologies in wastewater treatment: A review. Membranes 2020, 10, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Cheremisinoff, N.P. Handbook of Water and Wastewater Treatment Technologies; Butterworth-Heinemann: Oxford, UK, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  7. Bakar, N.A.; Othman, N.; Yunus, Z.M.; Altowayti, W.A.H.; Al-Gheethi, A.; Asharuddin, S.M.; Tahir, M.; Fitriani, N.; Mohd-Salleh, S.N.A. Nipah (Musa Acuminata Balbisiana) banana peel as a lignocellulosic precursor for activated carbon: Characterization study after carbonization process with phosphoric acid impregnated activated carbon. Biomass Convers. Biorefinery, 2021; in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Li, L.; Rong, S.; Wang, R.; Yu, S. Recent advances in artificial intelligence and machine learning for nonlinear relationship analysis and process control in drinking water treatment: A review. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 405, 126673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pichel, N.; Vivar, M.; Fuentes, M. The problem of drinking water access: A review of disinfection technologies with an emphasis on solar treatment methods. Chemosphere 2019, 218, 1014–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Shah, D.V. Role of Absorption and Adsorption in the Removal of Waste. In Emerging Trends in Environmental Biotechnology; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2022; pp. 33–47. [Google Scholar]
  11. Iqbal, J.; Howari, F.M.; Mohamed, A.-M.O.; Paleologos, E.K. Assessment of radiation pollution from nuclear power plants. In Pollution Assessment for Sustainable Practices in Applied Sciences and Engineering; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; pp. 1027–1053. [Google Scholar]
  12. Li, A.J.; Pal, V.K.; Kannan, K. A review of environmental occurrence, toxicity, biotransformation and biomonitoring of volatile organic compounds. Environ. Chem. Ecotoxicol. 2021, 3, 91–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Altowayti, W.; Othman, N.; Shahir, S.; Alshalif, A.; Al-Gheethi, A.; Al-Towayti, F.; Saleh, Z.; Haris, S. Removal of arsenic from wastewater by using different technologies and adsorbents: A review. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021, 9, 9243–9266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Pitás, V.; Somogyi, V.; Kárpáti, Á.; Thury, P.; Fráter, T. Reduction of chemical oxygen demand in a conventional activated sludge system treating coke oven wastewater. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 273, 122482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mahmood, T.; Momin, S.; Ali, R.; Naeem, A.; Khan, A. Technologies for removal of emerging contaminants from wastewater. In Wastewater Treatment; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  16. Zheng, C.; Zhao, L.; Zhou, X.; Fu, Z.; Li, A. Treatment technologies for organic wastewater. Water Treat. 2013, 11, 250–286. [Google Scholar]
  17. Zhang, H.; Zhang, H.; Zhao, L.; Zhou, B.; Li, P.; Liu, B.; Wang, Y.; Yang, C.; Huang, K.; Zhang, C. Ecosystem impact and dietary exposure of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and heavy metals in Chinese mitten crabs (Eriocheir sinensis) and their farming areas in Jiangsu, China. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 227, 112936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Elijah, A.A. A Review of the Petroleum Hydrocarbons Contamination of Soil, Water and Air and the Available Remediation Techniques, Taking into Consideration the Sustainable Development Goals. Earthline J. Chem. Sci. 2022, 7, 97–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Pandit, D.N.; Kumari, R.; Shitanshu, S.K. A comparative assessment of the status of Surajkund and Rani Pond, Aurangabad, Bihar, India using overall Index of Pollution and Water Quality Index. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2022, 42, 149–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Altowayti, W.A.H.; Allozy, H.G.A.; Shahir, S.; Goh, P.S.; Yunus, M.A.M. A novel nanocomposite of aminated silica nanotube (MWCNT/Si/NH 2) and its potential on adsorption of nitrite. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 28737–28748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wasewar, K.L. Process intensification in wastewater treatments: Basics of process intensification and inorganic pollutants. In Contamination of Water; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; pp. 313–337. [Google Scholar]
  22. Ankodia, V. Water Pollution. In Contemporary Global Issues and Challenges; Sunrise Publisher: Jaipur, India, 2021; 231p. [Google Scholar]
  23. Altowayti, W.A.H.; Othman, N.; Goh, P.S.; Alshalif, A.F.; Al-Gheethi, A.A.; Algaifi, H.A. Application of a novel nanocomposites carbon nanotubes functionalized with mesoporous silica-nitrenium ions (CNT-MS-N) in nitrate removal: Optimizations and nonlinear and linear regression analysis. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2021, 22, 101428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Leong, Y.K.; Chang, J.-S. Bioremediation of heavy metals using microalgae: Recent advances and mechanisms. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 303, 122886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Sulivan Jouanneau, A.A.; Durand, M.-J.; Thouand, G. Detection and Effects of Metal and Organometallic Compounds with Microbial Bioluminescence and Raman Spectroscopy. In Handbook of Cell Biosensors; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2022; p. 825. [Google Scholar]
  26. Haris, S.A.; Altowayti, W.A.H.; Ibrahim, Z.; Shahir, S. Arsenic biosorption using pretreated biomass of psychrotolerant Yersinia sp. strain SOM-12D3 isolated from Svalbard, Arctic. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 27959–27970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Qasem, N.A.; Mohammed, R.H.; Lawal, D.U. Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewater: A comprehensive and critical review. Npj Clean Water 2021, 4, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Nachana’a Timothy, E.T.W. Environmental pollution by heavy metal: An overview. Chemistry 2019, 3, 72–82. [Google Scholar]
  29. Izah, S.C.; Ngun, C.T.; Richard, G. Microbial quality of groundwater in the Niger Delta region of Nigeria: Health implications and effective⇓ treatment technologies. In Current Directions in Water Scarcity Research; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; Volume 6, pp. 149–172. [Google Scholar]
  30. Sekyere, J.O.; Faife, S.L. Pathogens, Virulence and Resistance Genes Surveillance with Metagenomics Can Pre-Empt Dissemination and Escalation of Untreatable Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses. bioRxiv 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Devane, M.; Moriarty, E.; Weaver, L.; Cookson, A.; Gilpin, B. Fecal indicator bacteria from environmental sources; strategies for identification to improve water quality monitoring. Water Res. 2020, 185, 116204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Lu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhong, C.; Martin, J.W.; Alessi, D.S.; Goss, G.G.; Ren, Y.; He, Y. Suspended solids-associated toxicity of hydraulic fracturing flowback and produced water on early life stages of zebrafish (Danio rerio). Environ. Pollut. 2021, 287, 117614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Turjja, S.R. Controlling the Contamination: Preventing Environmental Impacts of Combined Sewage Overflows in NYC. Bachelor’s Thesis, Fordham University, New York, NY, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  34. Hongyang, X.; Pedret, C.; Santin, I.; Vilanova, R. Decentralized model predictive control for N and P removal in wastewater treatment plants. In Proceedings of the 2018 22nd International Conference on System Theory, Control and Computing (ICSTCC), IEEE, Sinaia, Romania, 10–12 October 2018; pp. 224–230. [Google Scholar]
  35. Singh, N.; Poonia, T.; Siwal, S.S.; Srivastav, A.L.; Sharma, H.K.; Mittal, S.K. Challenges of water contamination in urban areas. In Current Directions in Water Scarcity Research; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; Volume 6, pp. 173–202. [Google Scholar]
  36. Arjen, Y.; Hoekstra, J.B.; van Ginkel, K.C.H. Urban water security: A review. Environ. Res. Lett. 2018, 13, 053002. [Google Scholar]
  37. Angelevska, B.; Atanasova, V.; Andreevski, I. Urban air quality guidance based on measures categorization in road transport. Civ. Eng. J. 2021, 7, 253–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Alexandra Muller, H.O.; Marsalek, J.; Viklander, M. The pollution conveyed by urban runoff: A review of sources. Sci. Toatal Environ. 2020, 709, 136125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Viktor, Z.; Anatolii, L.; Olha, Z.; Svetlana, M. Conceptual Principles of Reengineering of Agricultural Resources: Open Problems, Challenges and Future Trends. In The Digital Agricultural Revolution: Innovations and Challenges in Agriculture through Technology Disruptions; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2022; pp. 269–287. [Google Scholar]
  40. Evans, A.E.V.; Sagasta, J.M.-S.; Qadir, M.; Boelee, E.; Ippolito, A. Agriculture water pollution: Key knowledge gaps and research needs. Environ. Sustain. 2019, 36, 20–27. [Google Scholar]
  41. El-Sheekh, M.; Abdel-Daim, M.M.; Okba, M.; Gharib, S.; Soliman, A.; El-Kassas, H. Green technology for bioremediation of the eutrophication phenomenon in aquatic ecosystems: A review. Afr. J. Aquat. Sci. 2021, 46, 274–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Sharma, A.; Shukla, A.; Attri, K.; Kumar, M.; Kumar, P.; Suttee, A.; Singh, G.; Barnwal, R.P.; Singla, N. Global trends in pesticides: A looming threat and viable alternatives. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 201, 110812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Liu, Y.; Wang, P.; Gojenko, B.; Yu, J.; Wei, L.; Lio, D.; Xiao, T. A review of water pollution arising from agriculture and mining activities in Central Asia: Facts, causes and effects. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 291, 118209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Zhang, J.; Li, H.; Jiao, G.; Wang, J.; Li, J.; Li, M.; Jiang, H. Spatial Pattern of Technological Innovation in the Yangtze River Delta Region and Its Impact on Water Pollution. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 7437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zhou, Z.; Liu, J.; Zhou, N.; Zhang, T.; Zeng, H. Does the “10-Point Water Plan” reduce the intensity of industrial water pollution> Quasi-experimental evidence from China. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 295, 113048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Mroue, A.M.; Obkirchner, G.; Dargin, J.; Muell, J. Water-Energy Nexus: The Role of Hydraulic Fracturing. In Regulating Water Security in Unconventional Oil and Gas; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; pp. 21–38. [Google Scholar]
  47. Jafarinejad, S. Environmental impacts of the petroleum industry, protection options, and Regulations. Pet. Waste Treat. Pollut. Control. 2017, 85–116. [Google Scholar]
  48. Towne, W.W.; Tsivoglou, E.C. Sources and Control of Radioactive Water Pollutants. Sew. Ind. Wastes 1957, 29, 143–156. [Google Scholar]
  49. Bonavigo, L.; Zucchetti, M.; Mankolli, H. Water Radioactive Pollution and Related Environmental Aspects. J. Int. Environ. Appl. Sci. 2009, 4, 357–363. [Google Scholar]
  50. Reddy, A.S.; Nair, A.T. The fate of microplastics in wastewater treatment plants: An overview of source and remediation technologies. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2022, 28, 102815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Saravanan, A.; Kumar, P.S.; Jeevanantham, S.; Karishma, S.; Tajsabreen, B.; Yaashikaa, P.; Reshma, B. Effective water/wastewater treatment methodologies for toxic pollutants removal: Processes and applications towards sustainable development. Chemosphere 2021, 280, 130595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zubrowska-Sudol, M.; Walczak, J.; Piechota, G. Disintegration of waste sludge as an element bio-circular economy in waste water treatment plant towards carbon recovery for biological nutrient removal. Bioresour. Technol. 2022, 360, 127622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Cran, M.; Gray, S.; Schmidt, J.; Gao, L. Root cause analysis for membrane system validation failure at a full-scale recycled water treatment plant. Desalination 2022, 523, 115405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Wasewar, K.L.; Singh, S.; Kansal, S.K. Process intensification of treatment of inorganic water pollutants. In Inorganic Pollutants in Water; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 245–271. [Google Scholar]
  55. Asharuddin, S.M.; Othman, N.; Altowayti, W.A.H.; Bakar, N.A.; Hassan, A. Recent advancement in starch modification and its application as water treatment agent. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2021, 23, 101637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ayob, S.; Othman, N.; Altowayti, W.A.H.; Khalid, F.S.; Bakar, N.A.; Tahir, M.; Soedjono, E.S. A review on adsorption of heavy metals from wood-industrial wastewater by oil palm waste. J. Ecol. Eng. 2021, 22, 249–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Martín-Yerga, D.; González-García, M.B.; Costa-García, A. Electrochemical determination of mercury: A review. Talanta 2013, 116, 1091–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Chaemiso, T.D.; Nefo, T. Removal methods of heavy metals from laboratory wastewater. J. Nat. Sci. Res. 2019, 9, 36–42. [Google Scholar]
  59. Birkett, J.W.; Lester, J.N. Endocrine Disrupters in Wastewater and Sludge Treatment Processes; IWA Publishing: London, UK, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  60. Altowayti, W.A.H.; Othman, N.; Tajarudin, H.A.; Al-Dhaqm, A.; Asharuddin, S.M.; Al-Gheethi, A.; Alshalif, A.F.; Salem, A.A.; Din, M.F.M.; Fitriani, N. Evaluating the pressure and loss behavior in water pipes using smart mathematical modelling. Water 2021, 13, 3500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Lieser, K. Steps in precipitation reactions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1969, 8, 188–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Pankratz, T.M. Screening Equipment Handbook: For Industrial and Municipal Water and Wastewater Treatment; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  63. Lin, C.-C.; Wu, J.-M. A Novel Centrifugal Filtration Device. Separations 2022, 9, 129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Amran, N.A.; Mustapha, S.N.A. Oil–Water Separation Techniques for Bilge Water Treatment. In Resources of Water; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  65. Zakaria, S.N.F.; Aziz, H.A.; Mohamad, M. Comparison Performance of Coagulation Flocculation Process and Combination with Ozonation Process of Stabilized Landfill Leachate Treatment. Water Environ. Res. 2022, 94, e10770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Eng, L.Z.; Loo, K.P. Microwave-assisted extraction of banana peel bio-flocculant and its potential in wastewater treatment. Glob. J. Eng. Technol. Adv. 2019, 1, 001–009. [Google Scholar]
  67. Badawi, A.K.; Ismail, B.; Baaloudj, O.; Abdalla, K.Z. Advanced wastewater treatment process using algal photo-bioreactor associated with dissolved-air flotation system: A pilot-scale demonstration. J. Water Process Eng. 2022, 46, 102565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Hamidi, S.; Banaee, M.; Pourkhabbaz, H.R.; Sureda, A.; Khodadoust, S.; Pourkhabbaz, A.R. Effect of petroleum wastewater treated with gravity separation and magnetite nanoparticles adsorption methods on the blood biochemical response of mrigal fish (Cirrhinus cirrhosus). Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 3718–3732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Zhang, Z.; Chen, Y. Effects of microplastics on wastewater and sewage sludge treatment and their removal: A review. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 382, 122955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Nguyen, P.; Carvalho, G.; Reis, M.A.; Oehmen, A. A review of the biotransformations of priority pharmaceuticals in biological wastewater treatment processes. Water Res. 2021, 188, 116446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Rout, P.R.; Zhang, T.C.; Bhunia, P.; Surampalli, R.Y. Treatment technologies for emerging contaminants in wastewater treatment plants: A review. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 753, 141990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Smith, C.; Hill, A.K.; Torrente-Murciano, L. Current and future role of Haber–Bosch ammonia in a carbon-free energy landscape. Energy Environ. Sci. 2020, 13, 331–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. He, Z.-W.; Yang, W.-J.; Ren, Y.-X.; Jin, H.-Y.; Tang, C.-C.; Liu, W.-Z.; Yang, C.-X.; Zhou, A.-J.; Wang, A.-J. Occurrence, effect, and fate of residual microplastics in anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge: A state-of-the-art review. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 331, 125035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Guerrero, J.A.; Almeida-Naranjo, C.E.; Villamar Ayala, C.A. Improvement of nutrients removal from domestic wastewater by activated-sludge encapsulation with polyvinyl alcohol (PVA). J. Environ. Sci. Health Part A 2019, 54, 721–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Wu, C.P. Ammonia Wastewater Treatment by Immobilized Activated Sludge. Bachelor’s Thesis, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  76. Gupta, V.K.; Ali, I.; Saleh, T.A.; Nayak, A.; Agarwal, S. Chemical treatment technologies for waste-water recycling—An overview. Rsc Adv. 2012, 2, 6380–6388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Khan, A.H.; Khan, N.A.; Ahmed, S.; Dhingra, A.; Singh, C.P.; Khan, S.U.; Mohammadi, A.A.; Changani, F.; Yousefi, M.; Alam, S. Application of advanced oxidation processes followed by different treatment technologies for hospital wastewater treatment. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 269, 122411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Guadarrama-Pérez, O.; Gutiérrez-Macías, T.; García-Sánchez, L.; Guadarrama-Pérez, V.H.; Estrada-Arriaga, E.B. Recent advances in constructed wetland-microbial fuel cells for simultaneous bioelectricity production and wastewater treatment: A review. Int. J. Energy Res. 2019, 43, 5106–5127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. De Gisi, S.; Lofrano, G.; Grassi, M.; Notarnicola, M. Characteristics and adsorption capacities of low-cost sorbents for wastewater treatment: A review. Sustain. Mater. Technol. 2016, 9, 10–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Bakar, N.A.; Othman, N.; Yunus, Z.M.; Altowayti, W.A.H.; Tahir, M.; Fitriani, N.; Mohd-Salleh, S.N.A. An insight review of lignocellulosic materials as activated carbon precursor for textile wastewater treatment. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2021, 22, 101445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Samer, M. Biological and chemical wastewater treatment processes. Wastewater Treat. Eng. 2015, 150, 212. [Google Scholar]
  82. Yang, S.; Guo, B.; Shao, Y.; Mohammed, A.; Vincent, S.; Ashbolt, N.J.; Liu, Y. The value of floc and biofilm bacteria for anammox stability when treating ammonia-rich digester sludge thickening lagoon supernatant. Chemosphere 2019, 233, 472–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Altowayti, W.A.H.; Othman, N.; Al-Gheethi, A.; Dzahir, N.H.b.M.; Asharuddin, S.M.; Alshalif, A.F.; Nasser, I.M.; Tajarudin, H.A.; Al-Towayti, F.A.H. Adsorption of Zn2+ from Synthetic Wastewater Using Dried Watermelon Rind (D-WMR): An Overview of Nonlinear and Linear Regression and Error Analysis. Molecules 2021, 26, 6176. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  84. Rashed, M.N. Adsorption technique for the removal of organic pollutants from water and wastewater. Org. Pollut. Monit. Risk Treat. 2013, 7, 167–194. [Google Scholar]
  85. Li, W.; Mu, B.; Yang, Y. Feasibility of industrial-scale treatment of dye wastewater via bio-adsorption technology. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 277, 157–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Swanckaert, B.; Geltmeyer, J.; Rabaey, K.; De Buysser, K.; Bonin, L.; De Clerck, K. A review on ion-exchange nanofiber membranes: Properties, structure and application in electrochemical (waste) water treatment. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2022, 287, 120529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Singh, R.; Hankins, N. Emerging Membrane Technology for Sustainable Water Treatment; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  88. Cadee, K.; O’Leary, B.; Smith, P.; Slunjski, M.; Bourke, M. World’s first magnetic ion exchange (MIEX®) water treatment plant to be installed in Western Australia. In Proceedings of the American Water Works Association Conference, Denver, CO, USA, 11–15 June 2020; pp. 11–15. [Google Scholar]
  89. Sales, M.G.F.; Delerue-Matos, C.; Martins, I.; Serra, I.; Silva, M.; Morais, S. A waste management school approach towards sustainability. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2006, 48, 197–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Nqombolo, A.; Mpupa, A.; Moutloali, R.M.; Nomngongo, P.N. Wastewater treatment using membrane technology. In Wastewater Water Quality; InTechOpen: London, UK, 2018; p. 29. [Google Scholar]
  91. Jhaveri, J.H.; Murthy, Z. A comprehensive review on anti-fouling nanocomposite membranes for pressure driven membrane separation processes. Desalination 2016, 379, 137–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Aldana, J.C.; Acero, J.L.; Álvarez, P.M. Membrane filtration, activated sludge and solar photocatalytic technologies for the effective treatment of table olive processing wastewater. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 105743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Kim, I.; Choi, D.-C.; Lee, J.; Chae, H.-R.; Jang, J.H.; Lee, C.-H.; Park, P.-K.; Won, Y.-J. Preparation and application of patterned hollow-fiber membranes to membrane bioreactor for wastewater treatment. J. Membr. Sci. 2015, 490, 190–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Yin, X.; Li, J.; Li, X.; Hua, Z.; Wang, X.; Ren, Y. Self-generated electric field to suppress sludge production and fouling development in a membrane bioreactor for wastewater treatment. Chemosphere 2020, 261, 128046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Iorhemen, O.T.; Hamza, R.A.; Tay, J.H. Membrane bioreactor (MBR) technology for wastewater treatment and reclamation: Membrane fouling. Membranes 2016, 6, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Anjoo Anna, S.J.; Sheela, A.M. Review of Modern Technologies in Biological Wastewater Treatment. Int. J. Sci. Res. 2018, 9, 1380–1393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Fudge, T.; Bulmer, I.; Bowman, K.; Pathmakanthan, S.; Gambier, W.; Dehouche, Z.; Al-Salem, S.M.; Constantinou, A. Microbial Electrolysis Cells for Decentralised Wastewater Treatment: The Next Steps. Water 2021, 13, 445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Al-Amshawee, S.; Yunus, M.Y.B.M.; Azoddein, A.A.M.; Hassell, D.G.; Dakhil, I.H.; Hasan, H.A. Electrodialysis desalination for water and wastewater: A review. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 380, 122231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Mohammadi, R.; Tang, W.; Sillanpää, M. A systematic review and statistical analysis of nutrient recovery from municipal wastewater by electrodialysis. Desalination 2021, 498, 114626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Zhang, Z.; Chen, A. Simultaneous removal of nitrate and hardness ions from groundwater using electrodeionization. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2016, 164, 107–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Sosa-Fernandez, P.; Post, J.; Bruning, H.; Leermakers, F.; Rijnaarts, H. Electrodialysis-based desalination and reuse of sea and brackish polymer-flooding produced water. Desalination 2018, 447, 120–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Pan, Y.; Froese, F.; Liu, N.; Hu, Y.; Ye, M. The adoption of artificial intelligence in employee recruitment: The influence of contextual factors. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2021, 33, 1125–1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Malviya, A.; Jaspal, D. Artificial intelligence as an upcoming technology in wastewater treatment: A comprehensive review. Environ. Technol. Rev. 2021, 10, 177–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Nourani, V.; Elkiran, G.; Abba, S. Wastewater treatment plant performance analysis using artificial intelligence—An ensemble approach. Water Sci. Technol. 2018, 78, 2064–2076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Kim, Y.; Oh, S. Machine-learning insights into nitrate-reducing communities in a full-scale municipal wastewater treatment plant. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 300, 113795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Hernández-del-Olmo, F.; Gaudioso, E.; Duro, N.; Dormido, R. Machine learning weather soft-sensor for advanced control of wastewater treatment plants. Sensors 2019, 19, 3139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Heo, S.; Nam, K.; Tariq, S.; Lim, J.Y.; Park, J.; Yoo, C. A hybrid machine learning–based multi-objective supervisory control strategy of a full-scale wastewater treatment for cost-effective and sustainable operation under varying influent conditions. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 291, 125853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Bernardelli, A.; Marsili-Libelli, S.; Manzini, A.; Stancari, S.; Tardini, G.; Montanari, D.; Anceschi, G.; Gelli, P.; Venier, S. Real-time model predictive control of a wastewater treatment plant based on machine learning. Water Sci. Technol. 2020, 81, 2391–2400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Elkiran, G.; Nourani, V.; Abba, S. Multi-step ahead modelling of river water quality parameters using ensemble artificial intelligence-based approach. J. Hydrol. 2019, 577, 123962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Yu, P.; Cao, J.; Jegatheesan, V.; Du, X. A real-time BOD estimation method in wastewater treatment process based on an optimized extreme learning machine. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Khademikia, S.; Haghizadeh, A.; Godini, H.; Shams, K.G. The performance evaluation of Khorramabad wastewater treatment plant by using artificial intelligence network. Yafte 2016, 18, 12–23. [Google Scholar]
  112. Zhu, J.-J.; Kang, L.; Anderson, P.R. Predicting influent biochemical oxygen demand: Balancing energy demand and risk management. Water Res. 2018, 128, 304–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Kang, H.; Yang, S.; Huang, J.; Oh, J. Time series prediction of wastewater flow rate by bidirectional LSTM deep learning. Int. J. Control Autom. Syst. 2020, 18, 3023–3030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Mateo Pérez, V.; Mesa Fernández, J.M.; Villanueva Balsera, J.; Alonso Álvarez, C. A Random Forest Model for the Prediction of FOG Content in Inlet Wastewater from Urban WWTPs. Water 2021, 13, 1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Oliveira-Esquerre, K.P.; Seborg, D.E.; Mori, M.; Bruns, R.E. Application of steady-state and dynamic modeling for the prediction of the BOD of an aerated lagoon at a pulp and paper mill: Part II. Nonlinear approaches. Chem. Eng. J. 2004, 105, 61–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Akratos, C.S.; Papaspyros, J.N.; Tsihrintzis, V.A. An artificial neural network model and design equations for BOD and COD removal prediction in horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands. Chem. Eng. J. 2008, 143, 96–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Hamed, M.M.; Khalafallah, M.G.; Hassanien, E.A. Prediction of wastewater treatment plant performance using artificial neural networks. Environ. Model. Softw. 2004, 19, 919–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Talib, A.; Abu Hasan, Y.; Abdul Rahman, N. Predicting biochemical oxygen demand as indicator of river pollution using artificial neural networks. In Proceedings of the 18th World IMACS/MODSIM Congress, Citeseer, Cairns, Australia, 13–17 July 2009; pp. 13–17. [Google Scholar]
  119. Elmolla, E.S.; Chaudhuri, M.; Eltoukhy, M.M. The use of artificial neural network (ANN) for modeling of COD removal from antibiotic aqueous solution by the Fenton process. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 179, 127–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Nasr, M.; Ateia, M.; Hassan, K. Artificial intelligence for greywater treatment using electrocoagulation process. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2016, 51, 96–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Zhang, D.; Hølland, E.S.; Lindholm, G.; Ratnaweera, H. Hydraulic modeling and deep learning based flow forecasting for optimizing inter catchment wastewater transfer. J. Hydrol. 2018, 567, 792–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Mamandipoor, B.; Majd, M.; Sheikhalishahi, S.; Modena, C.; Osmani, V. Monitoring and detecting faults in wastewater treatment plants using deep learning. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2020, 192, 148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Zhuang, Z.; Sun, Z.; Cheng, Y.; Yao, R.; Zhang, W. Modeling and optimization of paper-making wastewater treatment based on reinforcement learning. In Proceedings of the 2018 37th Chinese Control Conference (CCC), Wuhan, China, 25–27 July 2018; pp. 8342–8346. [Google Scholar]
  124. Granata, F.; Papirio, S.; Esposito, G.; Gargano, R.; De Marinis, G. Machine learning algorithms for the forecasting of wastewater quality indicators. Water 2017, 9, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Barzegar, R.; Aalami, M.T.; Adamowski, J. Short-term water quality variable prediction using a hybrid CNN–LSTM deep learning model. Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 2020, 34, 415–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Basu, A.; Ali, S.S.; Hossain, S.; Asif, M. A Review of the Dynamic Mathematical Modeling of Heavy Metal Removal with the Biosorption Process. Processes 2022, 10, 1154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Joshi, S.; Sharma, M.; Kumari, A.; Shrestha, S.; Shrestha, B. Arsenic removal from water by adsorption onto iron oxide/nano-porous carbon magnetic composite. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 3732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Liu, B.; Liu, Z.; Wu, H.; Pan, S.; Cheng, X.; Sun, Y.; Xu, Y. Effective and simultaneous removal of organic/inorganic arsenic using polymer-based hydrated iron oxide adsorbent: Capacity evaluation and mechanism. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 742, 140508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Das, T.K.; Bezbaruah, A.N. Comparative study of arsenic removal by iron-based nanomaterials: Potential candidates for field applications. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 764, 142914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Inchaurrondo, N.; Di Luca, C.; Mori, F.; Pintar, A.; Žerjav, G.; Valiente, M.; Palet, C. Synthesis and adsorption behavior of mesoporous alumina and Fe-doped alumina for the removal of dominant arsenic species in contaminated waters. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 102901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Muedi, K.; Brink, H.; Masindi, V.; Maree, J. Effective removal of arsenate from wastewater using aluminium enriched ferric oxide-hydroxide recovered from authentic acid mine drainage. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 414, 125491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Nguyen, T.H.; Tran, H.N.; Vu, H.A.; Trinh, M.V.; Nguyen, T.V.; Loganathan, P.; Vigneswaran, S.; Nguyen, T.M.; Vu, D.L.; Nguyen, T.H.H. Laterite as a low-cost adsorbent in a sustainable decentralized filtration system to remove arsenic from groundwater in Vietnam. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 699, 134267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Murugesan, G.; Sathishkumar, M.; Swaminathan, K. Arsenic removal from groundwater by pretreated waste tea fungal biomass. Bioresour. Technol. 2006, 97, 483–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Singh, K.; Sinha, T.J.M.; Srivastava, S. Functionalized nanocrystalline cellulose: Smart biosorbent for decontamination of arsenic. Int. J. Miner. Processing 2015, 139, 51–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Bahari, Z.M.; Altowayti, W.A.H.; Ibrahim, Z.; Jaafar, J.; Shahir, S. Biosorption of As (III) by non-living biomass of an arsenic-hypertolerant Bacillus cereus strain SZ2 isolated from a gold mining environment: Equilibrium and kinetic study. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2013, 171, 2247–2261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Ghosh, P.; Samanta, A.N.; Ray, S. Reduction of COD and removal of Zn2+ from rayon industry wastewater by combined electro-Fenton treatment and chemical precipitation. Desalination 2011, 266, 213–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Mohsen-Nia, M.; Montazeri, P.; Modarress, H. Removal of Cu2+ and Ni2+ from wastewater with a chelating agent and reverse osmosis processes. Desalination 2007, 217, 276–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Khamesy, S.; Hamidian, A.; Atghia, O. Identification of the fungi absorbing heavy metals isolated from waste deposits of zinc factories. Mycol. Iran. 2016, 3, 65–73. [Google Scholar]
  139. Allozy, H.G.A.; Abd Karim, K.J. Removal of copper ions from aqueous solutions using poly (vinylbenzyl chloride). Malays. J. Anal. Sci. 2020, 24, 978–991. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Block diagram of wastewater treatment facility [60].
Figure 1. Block diagram of wastewater treatment facility [60].
Processes 10 01832 g001
Figure 2. Precipitation reactions in wastewater treatment.
Figure 2. Precipitation reactions in wastewater treatment.
Processes 10 01832 g002
Figure 3. Eight Stages of the Wastewater Process.
Figure 3. Eight Stages of the Wastewater Process.
Processes 10 01832 g003
Figure 4. Decanter centrifuge operation.
Figure 4. Decanter centrifuge operation.
Processes 10 01832 g004
Figure 5. A comparison between absorption and adsorption [81].
Figure 5. A comparison between absorption and adsorption [81].
Processes 10 01832 g005
Figure 6. Adsorption of dyeing wastewater [85], with permission from Elsevier.
Figure 6. Adsorption of dyeing wastewater [85], with permission from Elsevier.
Processes 10 01832 g006
Figure 7. Membrane types are classified based on their bulk structure (symmetric or asymmetric), morphology (porous, sponge, dense, integrally skinned, thin-film composite), and application.
Figure 7. Membrane types are classified based on their bulk structure (symmetric or asymmetric), morphology (porous, sponge, dense, integrally skinned, thin-film composite), and application.
Processes 10 01832 g007
Figure 8. Some membrane processes are depicted schematically. Adapted from [91], with permission from Elsevier.
Figure 8. Some membrane processes are depicted schematically. Adapted from [91], with permission from Elsevier.
Processes 10 01832 g008
Figure 9. Membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment [96].
Figure 9. Membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment [96].
Processes 10 01832 g009
Figure 10. Comparison of membrane process characteristics.
Figure 10. Comparison of membrane process characteristics.
Processes 10 01832 g010
Figure 11. Electrolysis procedures for the treatment of wastewater sludge [97].
Figure 11. Electrolysis procedures for the treatment of wastewater sludge [97].
Processes 10 01832 g011
Figure 12. Schematic diagram of electrodialysis [100], with permission from Elsevier.
Figure 12. Schematic diagram of electrodialysis [100], with permission from Elsevier.
Processes 10 01832 g012
Figure 13. Electrodialysis stack with five cell pairs of AEM CEM [101], with permission from Elsevier.
Figure 13. Electrodialysis stack with five cell pairs of AEM CEM [101], with permission from Elsevier.
Processes 10 01832 g013
Figure 14. Journals with significant numbers of artificial intelligence models for wastewater treatment articles generated using VOSviewer. VOSviewer network visualization map of Journals using the keyword “artificial intelligence models for wastewater treatment,” data collected from Scopus between 2012 and 2022.
Figure 14. Journals with significant numbers of artificial intelligence models for wastewater treatment articles generated using VOSviewer. VOSviewer network visualization map of Journals using the keyword “artificial intelligence models for wastewater treatment,” data collected from Scopus between 2012 and 2022.
Processes 10 01832 g014
Figure 15. Network of relationships between countries with research teams. Source Data from the Scopus between 2012 and 2022. VOSviewer network visualization map of the top producing countries for “artificial intelligence models for wastewater treatment” research.
Figure 15. Network of relationships between countries with research teams. Source Data from the Scopus between 2012 and 2022. VOSviewer network visualization map of the top producing countries for “artificial intelligence models for wastewater treatment” research.
Processes 10 01832 g015
Figure 16. Applications of artificial intelligence in wastewater treatment.
Figure 16. Applications of artificial intelligence in wastewater treatment.
Processes 10 01832 g016
Table 1. Design factors consider wastewater’s physical, chemical, and biological properties.
Table 1. Design factors consider wastewater’s physical, chemical, and biological properties.
PhysicalChemicalBiological
Solids
Temperature
Colour
Odor
Organic substances include proteins, sugars, lipids, surfactants, phenols, and insecticides.
Inorganics: heavy metals, hazardous substances, alkalinity, nitrogen, phosphorus, and pH.
Gases: Oxygen, hydrogen sulfide, methane
Plants
Animals
Viruses
Table 2. Common heavy metals found in wastewater, their origins, and the health problems they cause [27].
Table 2. Common heavy metals found in wastewater, their origins, and the health problems they cause [27].
Heavy MetalMain SourcesMain Organ and System Affected
Lead
(Pb)
Lead-based batteries, leaded gasoline, alloys, cable sheathing pigments, rust inhibitors, ammunition, glazes, and plastic stabilizers.Bones, liver, kidneys, brain, lungs, spleen.
Immunological, hematological, cardiovascular, reproductive system.
Arsenic (As)Electronics and glass production.Skin, lungs, brain, kidneys.
Metabolic, cardiovascular, immunological, and endocrine systems.
Copper (Cu)Corroded plumbing systems, electronic and cables industry.Liver, brain, kidneys, cornea.
Gastrointestinal, lungs, immunological, hematological system.
Zinc
(Zn)
Brass coating, rubber products, some cosmetics, and aerosol deodorants.Stomach cramps, skin irritations, vomiting, nausea, anemia, and convulsions.
Chromium
(Cr)
Steel and pulp mills and tanneries.Skin, lungs, kidneys, liver, brain, pancreas.
Tastes, gastrointestinal, reproductive system
Cadmium (Cd)Batteries, paints, steel industry, plastic industries, metal refineries, and corroded galvanized pipes.Bones, liver, kidneys, lungs, testes, brain.
Immunological, cardiovascular system.
Mercury (Hg)Electrolytic production of chlorine and caustic soda, runoff from landfills and agriculture, electrical appliances, Industrial and control instruments, laboratory apparatus, and refineries.Brain, lungs, kidneys, liver.
Immunological, cardiovascular, endocrine, and reproductive systems.
Nickel
(Ni)
Manufacturing of nickel alloys and stainless steel. Kidney, pulmonary fibrosis, gastrointestinal problems, lung, and skin.
Table 3. Overall scheme of wastewater treatment technologies.
Table 3. Overall scheme of wastewater treatment technologies.
PrimarySecondaryTertiarySludge Treatment and Disposal
-Screening
-Centrifugal
separation
-Coagulation &
flocculation
-Floatation
-Sedimentation, gravity separation
-Aerobic
-Anaerobic
-Encapsulation
-Oxidation/Advanced oxidation
-Adsorption
-Micro and ultra-filtration
-Membrane bioreactor (MBR)
-Reverse osmosis
-Electrolysis
-Electrodialysis
-Precipitation
-Distillation
-Ion exchange
-Crystallization
-Evaporation
-Solvent extraction
-Thickening
-Digestion
-Dewatering
-Disposal
Table 4. Comparison of technologies for heavy metal removal from wastewater.
Table 4. Comparison of technologies for heavy metal removal from wastewater.
MethodAdvantageDisadvantageReference
Chemical precipitationSimple/Inexpensive
The majority of metals can be eliminated.
Significant sludge production led to disposal issues [20]
Chemical coagulationDewatering and Sludge settling High price, large chemical use [55]
Ion—exchangehigh rate of material regeneration
a metal-specific
High price
fewer metal ions are eliminated
[56]
Electrochemical
Method
a metal-specific
No chemical consumption
Pure metals are attainable.
capital coat high
high ongoing expenses
the pH of the starting solution and current density
[57]
Adsorption
Using activated carbon
Most metals are easily removed.
high effectiveness (99%)
Activated carbon price
lacking regeneration
Performance is influenced by the adsorbent
[23]
Using natural zeoliteMetals may generally be removed.
reasonably affordable materials
low effectiveness [58]
Membrane process and
ultrafiltration
created a less solid waste
less use of chemicals
high effectiveness (>95% for a single metal)
high start-up and operating costs
minimal flow rates
Removal (9%) falls off when additional metals are present.
[13]
Table 5. Comparative evaluation of different adsorbents and methods for heavy metal removal under different operational parameters.
Table 5. Comparative evaluation of different adsorbents and methods for heavy metal removal under different operational parameters.
MethodsAdsorption ConditionsHeavy MetalRemoval CapacityReference
ConcentrationTemperature °CpHDosage
Iron oxide/nano-porous carbon magnetic
composite
5 mg/LRoom 81.8 g/LAs (III)6.69 mg/g[127]
Polymer-based hydrated iron oxide adsorbent50 mg/LRoom7100
mg/L
As (V)71.5 mg/g[128]
Graphene oxide supported nanoscale zero-valent iron5 mg/L22 ± 23–90.43As (III)36 mg/g[129]
γ-Al2O31002540.5As (V)54 mg/g[130]
Fe/AlO(OH)150 ppmRoom31 gAs (V)102 mg/g[131]
Natural laterite from Thach That (NLTT)200 μg/L302–92.5 gAs (V)580
μg /g
[132]
Tea fungal biomass1.3–0.9 mg/L307.220 g/LAs (V)76%[133]
Functionalized
nanocrystalline
cellulose
50 mg/L7.5–2.5Room0.5 g/LAs (III)10.56 mg/g[134]
B. cereus strain ZS280 μM3070.5 g/LAs (III)153 mg/g[135]
Yersinia sp. strain SOM-12D3)6.5 mg/L3070.5 g/LAs (III)159 mg/g[26]
Chemical precipitation (CaO)32 mg/L 9–10 Zn2+99%[136]
Membrane (RO)500 mg/LOperation pressure 5 atmNi2+99.5%[137]
Aspergillus fumigatus (Dead)10 mg/L2850.04 mg/LPb (II)102 mg/g[138]
Aspergillus fumigatus (Dead)10 mg/L2850.04 mg/LCd (II)120 mg/g[138]
Poly(vinylbenzyl chloride)160 mg/Lroom714 mgCu2+263.15 mg/g[139]
Dried Watermelon Rind400 mg/L 30–4081.5 mg/LZn2+25 mg/g[83]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Altowayti, W.A.H.; Shahir, S.; Othman, N.; Eisa, T.A.E.; Yafooz, W.M.S.; Al-Dhaqm, A.; Soon, C.Y.; Yahya, I.B.; Che Rahim, N.A.N.b.; Abaker, M.; et al. The Role of Conventional Methods and Artificial Intelligence in the Wastewater Treatment: A Comprehensive Review. Processes 2022, 10, 1832. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10091832

AMA Style

Altowayti WAH, Shahir S, Othman N, Eisa TAE, Yafooz WMS, Al-Dhaqm A, Soon CY, Yahya IB, Che Rahim NANb, Abaker M, et al. The Role of Conventional Methods and Artificial Intelligence in the Wastewater Treatment: A Comprehensive Review. Processes. 2022; 10(9):1832. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10091832

Chicago/Turabian Style

Altowayti, Wahid Ali Hamood, Shafinaz Shahir, Norzila Othman, Taiseer Abdalla Elfadil Eisa, Wael M. S. Yafooz, Arafat Al-Dhaqm, Chan Yong Soon, Izzati Binti Yahya, Nur Anis Natasha binti Che Rahim, Mohammed Abaker, and et al. 2022. "The Role of Conventional Methods and Artificial Intelligence in the Wastewater Treatment: A Comprehensive Review" Processes 10, no. 9: 1832. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10091832

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop