Next Article in Journal
Decision Making for Control of the Gasoline Fraction Hydrotreating Process in a Fuzzy Environment
Previous Article in Journal
The Distribution Law of Ground Stress Field in Yingcheng Coal Mine Based on Rhino Surface Modeling
Previous Article in Special Issue
Recycled Smelter Slags for In Situ and Ex Situ Water and Wastewater Treatment—Current Knowledge and Opportunities
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Novel Adsorbents for Environmental Remediation

1
Global Centre for Environmental Remediation, ATC Building, Newcastle, NSW 2308, Australia
2
Contamination Assessment and Remediation of the Environment (crcCARE), ATC Building, Newcastle, NSW 2308, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2024, 12(4), 670; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12040670
Submission received: 30 January 2024 / Accepted: 27 February 2024 / Published: 27 March 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Novel Adsorbent for Environmental Remediation)

1. Environmental Remediation and the Application of Adsorbents

Exposure to environmental pollution due to the contamination of soil, surface and groundwater, and air poses potential health risks to biotic and abiotic ecosystems. The remediation of these risks should be prioritised to ensure sustainable ecosystems. Among the many remediation technologies, adsorption has become promising due to its efficiency, biocompatibility, and low operating costs [1]. The development of sustainable, environmentally friendly, and cost-effective adsorbent materials for long-term use in remediation is critical. “Green” or “eco-friendly” adsorbent materials are usually prepared from renewable or recycled resources, have minimal environmental toxicity, involve synthesis processes with a reduced chemical or energy footprint, have high reusability, and do not contribute to further waste or contamination. Evaluating their cost-effectiveness and long-term environmental effects involves considering how they are made and their regeneration potential.
This Special Issue, “Novel Adsorbents for Environmental Remediation”, contains eight original articles and one review article that cover the preparation of sorbent materials and their application in soil and water remediation. They discuss soil, water, and air remediation using low-cost resources, e.g., smelter slag, biochar, red mud, clay minerals, nanoparticles, and biomass. The contaminants studied are heavy metals, phosphorus, chlorobenzenes, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and CO2. The abovementioned materials have the potential to serve as green and eco-friendly sorbents, and the incorporation of circular economic principles in their preparation will help address the sustainable development goals.

2. Low-Cost and Sustainable Precursor Materials

Low-cost, renewable, and waste materials are being investigated as precursor materials for the preparation of eco-friendly adsorbent materials. These include earth materials like clays and zeolites, agricultural and industrial wastes such as plant biomass and slag, and recycled materials such as plastics. This represents an increasing trend in this research area, as evident from review articles published elsewhere [2]. The use of low-cost and waste materials as precursors of adsorbents is increasing, partly because governments, environmental regulators, and industries are burdened with their disposal and recycling [3]. To achieve the sustainable development goals (SDGs) of the United Nations [4] and create a circular economy [5], increased research efforts are required in this area. Using waste or low-cost sorbent materials may not reduce waste as much as waste-to-energy or waste-to-building/construction materials approaches; however, it can still provide significant benefits, including reducing waste volume, decreasing environmental pollution, and improving resource efficiency. Value-added products can also be generated from waste and low-cost materials to provide additional economic value and social benefits.
Raw or waste materials may include biosorbents from agricultural waste [6], shell-based waste adsorbents [7], red mud- and fly ash-based materials [8,9], biosolid-to-biochar materials [9] and clay minerals [10]. However, thanks to extensive research efforts in this field, this list is growing and could extend beyond our current inventory. This Special Issue hosts several papers that describe research using candidates for these types of precursors. For example, Zhang et al. produced a biochar from wood pyrolysis in oxygen-limited conditions (650 °C for 4 h). This char was used to immobilise cadmium (Cd) and copper (Cu) from soil [11]. The use of chitosan–ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)-modified biochar [12,13] and rubber-seed-shell-based activated carbon [14] was also reported for the remediation of heavy metals in soil and water, in addition to CO2 capture. Additionally, Li et al. prepared a sorbent—iron-modified bacterial biomass—for the removal of antimony(III), and they argued it had a higher sorption capacity than some previously reported sorbents [15]. Natural biopolymers, such as chitosan or bacterial-based adsorbents, are deemed to be biocompatible and environmentally friendly, making them valuable alternatives for the preparation of sorbent materials.
Animal wastes (e.g., feathers, hair, manure, bones) are also among the most investigated waste materials for the development of adsorbent materials. We continue to see a considerable amount of research whereby keratin protein in feathers and hair, organic matter and nutrients in manure, and calcium and phosphate minerals in animal bones are chemically or thermally modified for the preparation of sorbent materials. Industrial wastes (e.g., smelter slag [16]) can also contain various metal oxides and carbonates, and their functional groups can be used as sorbents. For example, the iron and other metallic oxides in smelter slag contribute to the remediation of contaminants. A review of current knowledge and prospects regarding such insights is available in this issue [16].
Continuously exploring the options and providing case-by-case solutions for the utilisation of waste materials as sorbents will contribute to achieving the sustainable development goals and a circular economy. The application of different materials exhibiting various active sites, functional groups, and chemical/physical properties will be beneficial for industrial development.

3. Greener Preparation Processes

Precursor materials normally undergo various treatments for maximised sorption capacity and to maintain their cost-effective and “eco-friendly” features. Adsorption performance, kinetics, stability, selectivity, regeneration, and cost-effectiveness are among the research topics intensively studied to achieve green or eco-friendly adsorbents [17]. This field of research aligns with those of green chemistry [18] and renewable and biodegradable resources, where achieving low environmental impact during production, use, and disposal is expected [19]. Biswas and Naidu [20] utilised an Australian palygorskite clay mineral to make a lanthanum-doped clay sorbent. They argued that this material could effectively bury phosphate ions from lake water without having a toxic effect on water microorganisms thanks to the preparation process, where the authors chose to use a trace amount of lanthanum to avoid its potential inherent toxic effect.
Developing novel adsorbents with the desired properties is a vital part of environmental remediation. As studies presented in this Special Issue, possible synthesis methods can be applied to achieve these properties through applying physical (e.g., milling, centrifugation), chemical, and thermal treatments. Technical challenges may exist in achieving all the properties required for “green” or “eco-friendly” sorbent materials in a single adsorbent, and in finding a balanced approach which is fit for purpose. In some cases, if the regeneration of adsorbent materials is desired, compromises in sorption capacity might be required.
It is increasingly emphasised in the literature that the green synthesis approach will also consider reducing chemical usage where possible [21]. It is also worth noting that the costs of sourcing precursor minerals and the preparation process also depend on various parameters and vary from country to country. Therefore, it is difficult to verify the degree to which an adsorbent is ‘green/eco-friendly’ by relying only on the reported outcome; it requires a comprehensive assessment of its chemical footprint and cost analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

List of Contributions

  • Martí, V.; Jubany, I.; Fernández-Rojo, L.; Ribas, D.; Benito, J.A.; Diéguez, B.; Ginesta, A. Improvement of As(V) Adsorption by Reduction of Granular to Micro-Sized Ferric Hydroxide. Processes 2022, 10, 1029. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10051029.
  • Biswas, B.; Naidu, R. Highly Stable and Nontoxic Lanthanum-Treated Activated Palygorskite for the Removal of Lake Water Phosphorus. Processes 2021, 9, 1960. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9111960.
  • Zhang, Y.; Chen, R.; Riviere, J.E.; Comer, J. Extraction of Chlorobenzenes and PCBs from Water by ZnO Nanoparticles. Processes 2021, 9, 1764. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9101764.
  • Mokti, N.; Borhan, A.; Zaine, S.N.A.; Mohd Zaid, H.F. Development of Rubber Seed Shell–Activated Carbon Using Impregnated Pyridinium-Based Ionic Liquid for Enhanced CO2 Adsorption. Processes 2021, 9, 1161. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9071161.
  • Li, X.; Deng, R.; Tang, Z.; Zhou, S.; Zeng, X.; Wang, J.; Hursthouse, A. A Study of the Adsorption and Removal of Sb(III) from Aqueous Solution by Fe(III) Modified Proteus cibarius with Mechanistic Insights Using Response Surface Methodology. Processes 2021, 9, 933. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9060933.
  • Chowdhury, S.R. Recycled Smelter Slags for In Situ and Ex Situ Water and Wastewater Treatment—Current Knowledge and Opportunities. Processes 2023, 11, 783. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11030783.

References

  1. Worch, E. Adsorption Technology in Water Treatment: Fundamentals, Processes, and Modeling; Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  2. Dehghani, M.H.; Ahmadi, S.; Ghosh, S.; Othmani, A.; Osagie, C.; Meskini, M.; AlKafaas, S.S.; Malloum, A.; Khanday, W.A.; Jacob, A.O.; et al. Recent advances on sustainable adsorbents for the remediation of noxious pollutants from water and wastewater: A critical review. Arab. J. Chem. 2023, 16, 105303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kaza, S.; Yao, L.C.; Bhada-Tata, P.; Van Woerden, F. What a Waste 2.0: A Global Snapshot of Solid Waste Management to 2050; World Bank Publications: Washington, DC, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  4. Lee, B.X.; Kjaerulf, F.; Turner, S.; Cohen, L.; Donnelly, P.D.; Muggah, R.; Davis, R.; Realini, A.; Kieselbach, B.; MacGregor, L.S.; et al. Transforming our world: Implementing the 2030 agenda through sustainable development goal indicators. J. Public Health Policy 2016, 37, 13–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kirchherr, J.; Reike, D.; Hekkert, M. Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2017, 127, 221–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hassan, M.; Liu, Y.; Naidu, R.; Parikh, S.J.; Du, J.; Qi, F.; Willett, I.R. Influences of feedstock sources and pyrolysis temperature on the properties of biochar and functionality as adsorbents: A meta-analysis. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 744, 140714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Nayagam, J.O.P.; Prasanna, K. Utilization of shell-based agricultural waste adsorbents for removing dyes: A review. Chemosphere 2022, 291, 132737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Liu, Y.; Naidu, R.; Ming, H. Red mud as an amendment for pollutants in solid and liquid phases. Geoderma 2011, 163, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Aigbe, U.O.; Ukhurebor, K.E.; Onyancha, R.B.; Osibote, O.A.; Darmokoesoemo, H.; Kusuma, H.S. Fly ash-based adsorbent for adsorption of heavy metals and dyes from aqueous solution: A review. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2021, 14, 2751–2774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Biswas, B.; Warr, L.N.; Hilder, E.F.; Goswami, N.; Rahman, M.M.; Churchman, J.G.; Vasilev, K.; Pan, G.; Naidu, R. Biocompatible functionalisation of nanoclays for improved environmental remediation. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019, 48, 3740–3770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Zhang, D.; Yan, K.; Liu, Y.; Naidu, R. Effects of Phosphate, Red Mud, and Biochar on As, Cd, and Cu Immobilization and Enzymatic Activity in a Co-Contaminated Soil. Processes 2022, 10, 1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zheng, L.; Ji, H.; Gao, Y.; Yang, Z.; Ji, L.; Zhao, Q.; Liu, Y.; Pan, X. Effects of Modified Biochar on the Mobility and Speciation Distribution of Cadmium in Contaminated Soil. Processes 2022, 10, 818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zheng, L.; Gao, Y.; Du, J.; Zhang, W.; Huang, Y.; Zhao, Q.; Duan, L.; Liu, Y.; Naidu, R.; Pan, X. Single and Binary Adsorption Behaviour and Mechanisms of Cd2+, Cu2+ and Ni2+ onto Modified Biochar in Aqueous Solutions. Processes 2021, 9, 1829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mokti, N.; Borhan, A.; Zaine, S.N.A.; Zaid, H.F.M. Development of Rubber Seed Shell–Activated Carbon Using Impregnated Pyridinium-Based Ionic Liquid for Enhanced CO2 Adsorption. Processes 2021, 9, 1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Li, X.; Deng, R.; Tang, Z.; Zhou, S.; Zeng, X.; Wang, J.; Hursthouse, A. A study of the adsorption and removal of Sb (III) from aqueous solution by Fe (III) modified Proteus cibarius with mechanistic insights using response surface methodology. Processes 2021, 9, 933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chowdhury, S.R. Recycled Smelter Slags for In Situ and Ex Situ Water and Wastewater Treatment— Current Knowledge and Opportunities. Processes 2023, 11, 783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Mishra, A.; Clark, J.H. Green Materials for Sustainable Water Remediation and Treatment; Royal Society of Chemistry: London, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  18. Anastas, P.T.; Warner, J.C. Green Chemistry: Theory and Practice; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  19. Thakur, A.K.; Singh, R.; Pullela, R.T.; Pundir, V. Green adsorbents for the removal of heavy metals from Wastewater: A review. Mater. Today Proc. 2022, 57, 1468–1472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Biswas, B.; Naidu, R. Highly Stable and Nontoxic Lanthanum-Treated Activated Palygorskite for the Removal of Lake Water Phosphorus. Processes 2021, 9, 1960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Naidu, R.; Biswas, B.; Willett, I.R.; Cribb, J.; Singh, B.K.; Nathanail, C.P.; Coulon, F.; Semple, K.T.; Jones, K.C.; Barclay, A.; et al. Chemical pollution: A growing peril and potential catastrophic risk to humanity. Environ. Int. 2021, 156, 106616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, Y.; Biswas, B.; Naidu, R. Novel Adsorbents for Environmental Remediation. Processes 2024, 12, 670. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12040670

AMA Style

Liu Y, Biswas B, Naidu R. Novel Adsorbents for Environmental Remediation. Processes. 2024; 12(4):670. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12040670

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Yanju, Bhabananda Biswas, and Ravi Naidu. 2024. "Novel Adsorbents for Environmental Remediation" Processes 12, no. 4: 670. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12040670

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop