Next Article in Journal
Thermolytic Synthesis of Asphaltene-like Nitrogenous Bases and Study of Their Aggregative Stability
Previous Article in Journal
Modeling and Optimizing Biocontrol in Wines: pH as a Modulator of Yeast Amensalism Interaction
Previous Article in Special Issue
Retaining Resveratrol Content in Berries and Berry Products with Agricultural and Processing Techniques: Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Special Issue “Recent Advances in Processing Technologies for Substance Extraction, Separation, and Enrichment”

by
Yanlin Zhang
1,* and
Prashank K. Sarswat
2,*
1
School of Chemistry, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
2
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2024, 12(7), 1447; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12071447
Submission received: 20 June 2024 / Accepted: 8 July 2024 / Published: 11 July 2024
Substance separation has always been the foundation of production processes in a variety of industrial sectors such as hydrometallurgy, natural compounds extraction, food industry, pharmaceutical industry, and environmental engineering. Separation processes can be performed for different purposes, e.g., extraction of valuable components from less valuable matrices, removal of impurities, and enrichment of trace components. Conventional techniques, including distillation, liquid-phase extraction (LPE), solid-phase extraction (SPE), precipitation, and electrodeposition, are the dominant technologies in the separation of various types of substances and have found a broad application in both lab-scale research and industrial production. With the development of new theories, materials, and technologies, significant advancements have occurred in recent decades that have demonstrated advantages with regards to efficiency, energy saving, environment friendliness, costs, and value addition. In particular, new modeling techniques for process optimization, novel extraction and separation systems, green solvents, and novel solid-phase materials (e.g., mesoporous and nanostructured materials) for extraction have been developed and adopted by engineers for various applications. Typical examples include the modeling and simulation of electrochemical processes (deposition and separation), liquid–liquid extraction process for the optimization of mass transfer performance, minimization of energy consumption, application of green solvents and new ionic liquids, tailored materials for highly selective separation, membranes for SPE, extraction of natural products for nutritional, and medical and health care applications. The use of these new materials and technologies can effectively improve the mass transfer performance and separation efficiency, facilitate environmental and/or user friendliness, and improve people’s quality of life.
This Special Issue on the “Recent Advances in Processing Technologies for Substance Extraction, Separation and Enrichment” aimed to provide a forum for scientists to present their research findings in new solvents, extractants, solid-phase materials, techniques, as well as modeling and optimization methodologies, to address some of the most challenging problems faced by industries today and to demonstrate the potential value of a variety of resources which may previously have been overlooked. Thanks to the tremendous efforts of our esteemed authors, this Special Issue is brimming with excitement, featuring twenty-one cutting-edge research papers and five comprehensive review articles. Dive into the forefront of innovation where we explore diverse extraction systems—from the depths of hydrometallurgy to the extraction of nutritious natural compounds. Discover how novel green solvents and advanced technologies are revolutionizing the utilization of secondary resources. This collection promises to ignite your curiosity and inspire breakthroughs in extraction science.
Separation technologies play a crucial role in hydrometallurgy. Several research papers and review articles have presented the use of different extraction techniques for the separation of different elements [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. Their applications cover the separation of base metals, recovery of precious metals, and separation of rare earth metals. Waste water treatment in this industry via separation technology has also been presented in a research paper [8].
The utilization of natural organic substances (such as bioactive compounds, proteins, and nutritional components in natural resources) and food industry residues (such as nutrients, health care products, and skin care components) has been a fascinating research topic in recent decades. This Special Issue involves a number of research and review articles that present the use of different technologies for the extraction of such components from different resources [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22]. In many of these contributions, various novel reagents and methods have been utilized by the authors to demonstrate the value of new technologies, including three-phase partitioning [10], reactive extraction [12], supercritical fluid extraction [14,15], deep eutectic solvents [17,20], enzymatic processing [11,23], ultrasound assisted extraction [11,13,15,19,22], microwave-assisted extraction [13], centrifugal extractor [20], pulsed electric field technology [19,21], and high-pressure homogenization [13,22]. Many of the papers dealing with natural compounds are accompanied by an assessment of their properties, such as antioxidant activity, providing an indication of the extraction’s value [13,15,17,19,24].
Different forms of membrane separation technologies that feature a reduced footprint, low-energy requirements, and that are environmentally benign are attractive areas for research and applications, as indicated by the papers in this Special Issue [25,26].
As the guest editors, we would like to express our gratitude to all the authors who generously contributed their excellent work to this Special Issue. We also acknowledge the colleagues and assistant editors involved in this Issue, especially Lily Liu and Scott Pan, for their collaboration and cooperation in the whole editing process.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Baimbetov, B.; Moldabayeva, G.; Yeleuliyeva, A.; Jumankulova, S.; Taimassova, A.; Adilzhan, Z.; Baisultanov, R.; Yakob, E.; Serikbayev, V. Prospects of Processing Tungsten Ores from the Akchatau Deposit. Processes 2024, 12, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Domańska, U.; Wiśniewska, A.; Dąbrowski, Z. Recovery of Strategic Metals from Waste Printed Circuit Boards with Deep Eutectic Solvents and Ionic Liquids. Processes 2024, 12, 530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kostanyan, A.E.; Belova, V.V.; Tsareva, Y.V.; Petyaeva, M.M. Separation of Rare Earth Elements in Multistage Extraction Columns in Chromatography Mode: Experimental Study and Mathematical Simulation. Processes 2023, 11, 1757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Mwase, J.M.; Safarian, J. Desilication of Sodium Aluminate Solutions from the Alkaline Leaching of Calcium-Aluminate Slags. Processes 2022, 10, 1769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Pathapati, S.V.S.H.; Free, M.L.; Sarswat, P.K. A Comparative Study on Recent Developments for Individual Rare Earth Elements Separation. Processes 2023, 11, 2070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhang, Y.; Duan, X.; Hu, C.; Du, G.; Wang, Y. Green and Cost-Effective Separation of Cadmium from Base Metals in Chloride Medium with Halide-Loaded Anion Exchanger. Processes 2023, 11, 1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Free, M.L.; Ilunga, J.K.; Podder, P.; Sarswat, P.K. Assessing and Improving Biooxidation for Acid Generation and Rare Earth Element Extraction. Processes 2023, 11, 1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ding, X.; Jiang, J.; Zhao, Y.; Dong, Z.; Wang, L.; Liu, Y. The Recovery of Sulfuric Acid in the Presence of Zr(IV) and Hf(IV) by Solvent Extraction with TEHA and Its Mixtures. Processes 2024, 12, 940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kim, S.J. Experimental Study on Enrichment of Indole in Wash Oil by a Combined Process of Extraction and Re-Extraction. Processes 2023, 11, 3097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Liu, B.; Li, X.; Liu, Q.; Tan, Z. Extraction and Purification of Kiwifruit Seed Oil Using Three-Phase Partitioning: An Efficient and Value-Adding Method for Agro-Industrial Residue Utilization. Processes 2023, 11, 2581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Anita Šalić, A.; Lina Šepić, L.; Iva Turkalj, I.; Bruno Zelić, B.; Dunja Šamec, D. Comparative Analysis of Enzyme-, Ultrasound-, Mechanical-, and Chemical-Assisted Extraction of Biflavonoids from Ginkgo Leaves. Processes 2024, 12, 982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Blaga, A.C.; Kloetzer, L.; Cascaval, D.; Galaction, A.-I.; Tucaliuc, A. Studies on Reactive Extraction of Itaconic Acid from Fermentation Broths. Processes 2024, 12, 725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Cegledi, E.; Dobroslavić, E.; Zorić, Z.; Repajić, M.; Garofulić, I.E. Antioxidant Activity of Carob Tree (Ceratonia siliqua L.) Leaf Extracts Obtained by Advanced Extraction Techniques. Processes 2024, 12, 658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Cestonaro, G.; Gonzalez-Ortega, R.; Grosso, A.L.; Morozova, K.; Ferrentino, G.; Scampicchio, M.; Costanzo, E. Comparing Quality and Functional Properties of Protein Isolates from Soybean Cakes: Effect of De-Oiling Technologies. Processes 2024, 12, 600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Čulina, P.; Balbino, S.; Jokić, S.; Dragović-Uzelac, V.; Pedisić, S. Efficiency of Supercritical CO2 and Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction Techniques for Isolation of Bioactive Molecules from Sea Buckthorn (Elaeagnus rhamnoides (L.) A. Nelson) Berry Oils and Cakes. Processes 2024, 12, 698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ispiryan, A.; Kraujutiene, I.; Viskelis, J. Retaining Resveratrol Content in Berries and Berry Products with Agricultural and Processing Techniques: Review. Processes 2024, 12, 1216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ivkovic, D.; Cvijetic, I.; Radoicic, A.; Stojkovic-Filipovic, J.; Trifkovic, J.; Ristivojevic, M.K.; Ristivojevic, P. NADES-Based Extracts of Selected Medicinal Herbs as Promising Formulations for Cosmetic Usage. Processes 2024, 12, 992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kaliniewicz, Z.; Markowska-Mendik, A.; Warechowska, M.; Lipiński, S.; Gasparis, S. Correlations between a Friabilin Content Indicator and Selected Physicochemical and Mechanical Properties of Wheat Grain for Processing Suitability Assessment. Processes 2024, 12, 398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kourelatou, A.; Chatzimitakos, T.; Athanasiadis, V.; Kotsou, K.; Makrygiannis, I.; Bozinou, E.; Lalas, S.I. Seeking Optimal Extraction Method for Augmenting Hibiscus sabdariffa Bioactive Compounds and Antioxidant Activity. Processes 2024, 12, 581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lobovich, D.V.; Zinov’eva, I.V.; Milevskii, N.A.; Kostanyan, A.E.; Zakhodyaeva, Y.A.; Voshkin, A.A. Extraction Kinetics of Pyridine, Quinoline, and Indole from the Organic Phase with Natural Deep Eutectic Solvents and Separation Study Using a Centrifugal Extractor. Processes 2024, 12, 488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ramaswamy, R.; Krishnan, S.B.; Leong, S.S.J. Pulsed Electric Field Technology for Recovery of Proteins from Waste Plant Resources and Deformed Mushrooms: A Review. Processes 2024, 12, 342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Rida, H.; Peydecastaing, J.; Takache, H.; Ismail, A.; Pontalier, P.-Y. Comparison of Tetraselmis Suecica Cell Disruption Techniques: Kinetic Study and Extraction of Hydrosoluble Compounds. Processes 2024, 12, 1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Alzahrani, F.; Akanbi, T.O.; Scarlett, C.J.; Aryee, A.N.A. The Use of Immobilised Enzymes for Lipid and Dairy Processing and Their Waste Products: A Review of Current Progress. Processes 2024, 12, 634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. de Meneses Costa Ferreira, L.M.; de Souza, P.D.Q.; Pereira, R.R.; da Silva, E.O.; Barbosa, W.L.R.; Silva-Júnior, J.O.C.; Converti, A.; Ribeiro-Costa, R.M. Preliminary Study on the Chemical and Biological Properties of Propolis Extract from Stingless Bees from the Northern Region of Brazil. Processes 2024, 12, 700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Alguacil, F.J.; Robla, J.I. Solvent Extraction of Gold(III) by 2-Ethylhexanol and Modeling of Facilitated Transport across a Supported Liquid Membrane. Processes 2024, 12, 771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Alammar, A.Y.; Choi, S.-H.; Buonomenna, M.G. Hollow Fiber Membrane Modification by Interfacial Polymerization for Organic Solvent Nanofiltration. Processes 2024, 12, 563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, Y.; Sarswat, P.K. Special Issue “Recent Advances in Processing Technologies for Substance Extraction, Separation, and Enrichment”. Processes 2024, 12, 1447. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12071447

AMA Style

Zhang Y, Sarswat PK. Special Issue “Recent Advances in Processing Technologies for Substance Extraction, Separation, and Enrichment”. Processes. 2024; 12(7):1447. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12071447

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Yanlin, and Prashank K. Sarswat. 2024. "Special Issue “Recent Advances in Processing Technologies for Substance Extraction, Separation, and Enrichment”" Processes 12, no. 7: 1447. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12071447

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop