Next Article in Journal
Optimization Analysis of Various Parameters Based on Response Surface Methodology for Enhancing NOx Catalytic Reduction Performance of Urea Selective Catalytic Reduction on Cu-ZSM-13 Catalyst
Previous Article in Journal
A Preliminary Study on Determining Seasonal Variations in Halloumi Cheese Using Near-Infrared Spectroscopy and Chemometrics
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Review of Hydrogen-Driven Power-to-X Technology and Application Status in China

1
State Key Laboratory of Clean Energy Utilization, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China
2
China Energy Engineering Group Zhejiang Electric Power Design Institute Co., Ltd., Hangzhou 310012, China
3
Zhejiang SUPCON Technology Co., Ltd., Hangzhou 310053, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2024, 12(7), 1518; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12071518
Submission received: 23 June 2024 / Revised: 14 July 2024 / Accepted: 17 July 2024 / Published: 19 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Chemical Processes and Systems)

Abstract

:
Given China’s ambition to realize carbon peak by 2030 and carbon neutralization by 2060, hydrogen is gradually becoming the pivotal energy source for the needs of energy structure optimization and energy system transformation. Thus, hydrogen combined with renewable energy has received more and more attention. Nowadays, power-to-hydrogen, power-to-methanol, and power-to-ammonia are regarded as the most promising three hydrogen-driven power-to-X technologies due to the many commercial or demonstration projects in China. In this paper, these three hydrogen-driven power-to-X technologies and their application status in China are introduced and discussed. First, a general introduction of hydrogen energy policies in China is summarized, and then the basic principles, technical characteristics, trends, and challenges of the three hydrogen-driven power-to-X technologies are reviewed. Finally, several typical commercial or demonstration projects are selected and discussed in detail to illustrate the development of the power-to-X technologies in China.

1. Introduction

In recent years, communities have been focused on the importance of energy system transformation and decarbonization [1,2]. In order to tackle climate change and enhance energy security, renewable energy sources have received sustained and widespread attention, especially for solar and wind energy, which have the highest potential as substitutes for fossil fuels for electricity production [3,4]. The European Union (EU) has taken steps to increase the share of renewable energy sources in its energy consumption. In October 2023, the new Renewables Energy Directive (“RED III”) was approved, which aims to raise the share from the previous 32% to 42.5% by 2030, with an additional 2.5% indicative supplement to meet the 45% target. As for China, the wind power [5] and photovoltaic (PV) power installations and generations increased rapidly, ranking at the top in the world. By the end of 2023, China’s installed capacity of renewable energy had reached 14.5 billion kilowatt, accounting for over 50% of the country’s total installed capacity. Moreover, the installed capacity of renewable energy surpassed that of thermal power for the first time in history [6]. The energy structure has been greatly changed. Furthermore, in the 14th Five-Year Plan for renewable energy development [7], China set a clear target that the cumulative installed capacity of wind power and solar power would exceed 120 GW by 2030.
However, the core problem of utilizing renewable energy sources, especially for solar and wind energy, is their inherent unpredictability and intermittency, which makes it difficult to integrate them into the existing power grid and guarantee the power balance [8]. In addition, the distribution of renewable energy resources often varies significantly between regions. In China, the great northwest sand desert is rich in renewable energy sources [9], while the electricity demand is relatively lower. And the existing transmission and distribution of infrastructure in these regions cannot meet the requirements for such a large amount of power output. The southeast of China has fewer renewable energy resources but greater capacity to consume electricity [10]. To address these challenges, hydrogen has the potential to be an ideal carrier for the storage of renewable energy [11].
Hydrogen energy is a kind of secondary energy with high gravimetric energy density. It has nearly four times the energy content of standard coal and three times the energy content of gasoline for the same mass. The gravimetric energy density and volumetric energy density (based on lower heating values) of typical fuels are shown in Table 1 [12]. Moreover, hydrogen is clean and low-carbon [13,14,15], and its application process only produces water. Whether hydrogen is used for combustion or in fuel cell electrochemical reactions, it does not generate carbon emissions [16,17]. In addition, hydrogen could be applied in multiple fields, including the chemical industry [18], transportation [19,20], electricity, and construction [21].
According to hydrogen production technologies and energy sources, the clean energy industry often classifies by color [22,23]. The main classifications of hydrogen energy in colors are grey hydrogen, blue hydrogen, and green hydrogen [24,25]. The grey hydrogens refer to hydrogen produced by gasification [26], reforming [27] or pyrolysis of fossil fuels, causing carbon emission during the production process. The blue hydrogen combines grey hydrogen with carbon capture and a storage process, reducing the emission of carbon. Green hydrogen is produced by electrolysis (supplied by renewable electricity) [28], photolysis [29], or biomass [30] methods, which are carbon-free in the process. The main classifications of hydrogen energy and their corresponding production technologies as shown in Figure 1. In addition, hydrogen is classified by the industry based on lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions [31]. In 2020, the group standard “Standard and evaluation of low-carbon hydrogen, clean hydrogen and renewable hydrogen” was issued in China, classifying hydrogen into low-carbon hydrogen, clean hydrogen, and renewable hydrogen. In terms of carbon emissions of hydrogen, the carbon emissions of low-carbon hydrogen are no more than 14.51 kgCO2e/kgH2, while the carbon emissions of clean hydrogen and renewable hydrogen are no more than 4.9 kgCO2e/kgH2. Renewable hydrogen also requires that energy source of hydrogen production must be renewable energy.
At present, although the majority of hydrogen is grey hydrogen, the proportion of green hydrogen would be significantly increased with the goal of reducing carbon emissions and the rapid development of renewable energy. As for green hydrogen production technologies, there are still many difficult problems to overcome. For example, photolysis suffers from poor stability and efficiency of catalysts [32]. Biomass method is limited by the rate of reaction and scale of technology [30]. Water electrolysis is a promising technology combined with the power produced by renewable energy for large-scale application. The process that uses the excess and underutilized renewable sources [33] to generate electricity and produce green hydrogen via water electrolysis is also called power-to-hydrogen.
Considering the drop of the hydrogen chain in diverse applications, the total value chain from power generation by renewable sources to the utilization of hydrogen is commonly termed power-to-X [34,35,36,37,38]. This concept was first summarized in 2013/14 in Germany [39]. In China, in addition to power-to-hydrogen, power-to-methanol and power-to-ammonia are the other two main power-to-X technical routes, which have large development perspective on a commercial scale [40]. Methanol is one of the most important raw materials in the chemical and pharmaceutical industry and for hydrocarbons synthesis [41,42]. It is directly used as a fuel for transportation as an energy carrier. Ammonia is a crucial component for chemical materials synthesis, with over 76% of all nitrogen-based products utilizing it [43]. And it could be used as a carbon-free fuel applied to transportation and power generation. Traditional synthesis methods for these two chemicals involve high carbon emission, while power-to-methanol and power-to-ammonia processes enable a net-neutral decarbonization. Moreover, by extending the use of these two chemicals in the energy field, the demand could be significantly increased, and, thus, offers a major opportunity to implement a green and low-carbon energy system. However, to the best of our knowledge, a clear and exhaustive review on these three hydrogen-driven power-to-X technologies and their application status in China is lacking.
This paper makes contributions for better understanding of the status quo and promoting the sustainable development of China’s power-to-X technologies based on hydrogen. The focus of this study is to review the hydrogen energy policies of China, status and development of hydrogen driven power-to-X technologies, including power-to-hydrogen technologies (e.g., alkaline water electrolysis, proton electrolyte membrane water electrolysis, and solid oxide water electrolysis), power-to-methanol technology, and power-to-ammonia technology, in China. According to the general situation of green hydrogen in China, current challenges and future perspectives of hydrogen-driven power-to-X techniques are discussed in detail. Several typical commercial or demonstration projects are also introduced for a better understanding of the application status in China.

2. Hydrogen Energy Policies in China

Many countries, including Japan, France, South Korea, Germany, etc., have launched their national hydrogen strategies, plans, or roadmaps. The Chinese government has also issued a series of hydrogen-energy-related policies to actively promote transformation and decarbonizing of energy systems, such as proposing overall development strategy and promoting crucial technologies progress. The summary of China hydrogen energy policies is shown in Table 2.
As early as the 1980s, the hydrogen energy industry in China began scientific research programs, such as the National High-tech R&D Program (863 Program) and National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program), which included several studies aimed at developing hydrogen fuel cells. Subsequently, policies began to focus on hydrogen energy and hydrogen fuel cells. In 2006, hydrogen energy and fuel cell technologies were incorporated into advanced energy technologies in the outline of the national medium- and long-term planning for development of science and technology (from 2006 to 2020). In recent years, especially since 2019, with the increase in research [44,45,46], the number of hydrogen energy policies issued by the Chinese government has steadily increased over time [47]. In 2019, for the first time, hydrogen was included in the government work report. In 2022, the China maps 2021–2035 plan on hydrogen energy development was issued, which defined the energy properties and strategic positioning of hydrogen. Particularly, this plan proposed to actively guide the transformation of industries such as synthetic ammonia and methanol from high-carbon processes to low-carbon processes, promoting the green and low-carbon development of high-energy-consuming industries.

3. Power-to-Hydrogen

China is currently the world’s largest producer of hydrogen, producing 37.81 million tons of hydrogen in 2022 [48]. However, most hydrogen is derived from fossil fuels [49], namely, grey hydrogen, with a relatively low proportion of green hydrogen. The percentage of hydrogen production from coal is 57.06%, natural gas is 21.90%, industrial byproduct is 18.15%, water electrolysis is 1.42%, and other sources is 1.47% [50]. According to IEA forecasts, the global production of green hydrogen in 2050 will be much higher than blue hydrogen. By 2060, the vast majority of hydrogen production capacity will be supplied by green hydrogen, of which nearly 80% will come from electrolysis of water. It is clear that water electrolysis powered by renewable sources, i.e., power-to-hydrogen, is an important hydrogen production method for the future.

3.1. Typical Water Electrolysis Techniques

Water electrolysis is the most common electrochemical hydrogen production method [51]. Its basic principle is passing an electric current through water to split it into hydrogen and oxygen. Electrochemical processes involve two half-cell reactions, i.e., hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) and oxygen evolution reaction (OER), occurring at the cathode and anode, respectively [52]. The overall reaction is shown in Equation (1). The reaction takes place in an electrolyzer, which mainly consists of two electrodes (cathode and anode), a diaphragm, and a bipolar plate. Water electrolysis [53,54,55] is mainly classified into three types: alkaline (ALK) electrolysis, proton exchange membrane (PEM) electrolysis, and solid oxide cell (SOEC) electrolysis [56,57]. Figure 2 presents the schematic diagrams of the three electrolyzer structures. The characteristics of the three typical electrolytic water production technologies are shown in Table 3.
2H2O → 2H2 + O2
The most conventional and mature method for water electrolysis is ALK electrolysis, proposed by Troostwijk and Diemann in 1789 [59,60]. When the current passes, the water obtains electrons via reduction reaction at the cathode, producing H2 and hydroxide ions (OH). To maintain charge balance, the OH penetrates the diaphragm, which loses electrons at the anode, producing O2. The electrode reaction equations of ALK electrolysis are shown in Equations (2) and (3). Although there have been many studies on novel catalysts such as platinum-based catalysts [61] and crystalline catalysts [62], nickel-based catalysts remain the widely used catalysts for commercial ALK electrolyzers due to their relatively high electrocatalytic activity and low cost. In the past, thick asbestos diaphragms were generally used in AKL cells to separate the anolyte and catholyte compartments [63]. Recently, new materials such as nickel oxide, PTFE, and different types of polysulfone have been used to replace thick asbestos materials [64]. The electrolyte could help ionic transport and conduction; the most commonly used electrolyte in ALK electrolyzers is KOH solution with mass fraction of 20–30% [65]. Most ALK electrolyzers adapt tiny-gap or zero-gap structures to reduce ohmic loss [66]. In these structures, the electrode and diaphragm are very close, even in connection.
4OH → 2H2O + O2 + 4e (OER at Anode)
4H2O + 4e → 2H2 + 4OH (HER at Cathode)
PEM electrolysis is another relatively mature technology for water electrolysis, first introduced in the 1960s [67]. Different from ALK electrolysis, it is a proton that is transported in the PEM electrolyte [68,69]. Protons are generated at the anode and penetrate the diaphragm, obtaining electrons at the cathode, producing H2. The electrode reaction equations of PEM electrolysis are shown in Equations (4) and (5). The precious metal iridium and its oxides [70] are still the most advanced water anode catalysts for PEM electrolysis because of their best balance of activity and stability for the OER [71]. Generally, HERs require platinum-based catalysts. The most widely used diaphragm for PEM electrolyzers is solid perfluoro sulfonic acid (PFSA). Both precious metal catalysts and PFSA diaphragm cause the costs of PEM electrolyzers to be significantly higher than the costs of ALK electrolyzers. Nevertheless, PEM electrolysis could enhance the purity of hydrogen, with fast dynamic response speed and compact structure. It is still one of the most promising technologies for water electrolysis hydrogen production.
2H2O → O2 + 4H+ + 4e (OER at Anode)
4H+ + 4e → 2H2 (HER at Cathode)
SOEC electrolysis has developed rapidly in recent years, but it still in the laboratory stage and is less mature commercially. The electrode reaction equations of SOEC electrolysis are shown in Equations (6) and (7). At present, oxygen ion (O2−) is the most common SOEC electrolysis carrier. In SOEC electrolyzers, water obtains electrons at the cathode, producing H2 and O2−, and then O2− penetrates the diaphragm and loses electrons at the anode, producing O2 [72]. SOEC electrolysis operates at high temperatures compared to other electrolysis technologies. The higher temperatures enable higher efficiencies of SOEC electrolysis [73]. However, that leads to attach the limiting condition to the choice of materials, demanding that electrodes and electrolyte materials retain stability under high-temperature conditions. Currently, anodes commonly use perovskite and cathodes use ceramic–metal composites or perovskite. Materials with high ionic conductivity, such as yttria-stabilized zirconia (YSZ) and doped ceria (CeO2), are typically used as electrode materials in SOEC electrolysis [74].
2O2− → O2 + 4e (OER at Anode)
2H2O + 4e → 2H2 + 2O2− (HER at Cathode)

3.2. Chinese Electrolyzer Manufacturers

As mentioned before, ALK water electrolysis and PEM water electrolysis technologies are relatively mature; thus, these two types of electrolyzers are more widely used in industry and business, especially for ALK electrolyzers. The majority of Chinese electrolyzer manufacturers focus on producing ALK electrolyzers, and some manufacturers choose to produce PEM electrolyzers. In addition, the application of SOEC water electrolysis technology is not wide enough, but there are a few Chinese electrolyzer manufacturers starting to produce SOEC electrolyzers. Based on preliminary statistics, there have been more than 100 electrolyzer manufacturers in China, distributed mainly in the east of China. Table 4 lists the specific parameters for several Chinese typical electrolyzer manufacturers, such as Peric Hydrogen from Hebei, Longi from Shanxi, Tianjin Mainland Hydrogen Equipment from Tianjin, Shandong Saikesaisi Hydrogen Energy from Shandong, and H2-Bank Hydrogen from Zhejiang.
Peric Hydrogen is a manufacturer for both ALK and PEM electrolyzers, with an annual output reaching 1.5 GW. The hydrogen production rate for ALK electrolyzer products ranges from 20 Nm3/h to 2000 Nm3/h. For ALK electrolyzers, both one-piece equipment and modular equipment are provided. The purity of hydrogen before purification can reach 99.8%, the purity of oxygen can reach 99.2%, and the purity of hydrogen after purification can reach 99.999%. The ALK electrolyzers adopt a bipolar press filter structure, with good seal performance of the insulating gasket. The hydrogen production rate for PEM electrolyzer products ranges from 0.01 Nm3/h to 300 Nm3/h. Compared to ALK electrolyzer products, PEM electrolyzer products are smaller in size and lighter in weight, with higher current density and efficiency.
Longi Hydrogen is a manufacturer for ALK electrolyzers; its output reached 1.5 GW in 2022. It is expected that by 2025, the production capacity of Longi Hydrogen will reach 5–10 GW. According to different products’ characteristics, ALK electrolyzers could be divided into two series. The Longi ALK Hi1 series with the maximum hydrogen production is rated to 1000 Nm3/h, with a power consumption of just 4.1–4.3 kWh/Nm3. In September 2023, LONGi ALK G series were launched; the biggest draw to this series is that the maximum hydrogen production rate can reach 3000 Nm3/h. In addition, each model has a service life of around 200,000 h.
Tianjin Mainland Hydrogen Equipment produces ALK electrolyzers, gas purification equipment, and small PEM electrolyzers as main products. The hydrogen production rate for ALK electrolyzer products ranges from 0.1 Nm3/h to 1000 Nm3/h, while for PEM electrolyzer products, it ranges from 0.4 Nm3/h to 10 Nm3/h. Specifically, the hydrogen production pressure of ALK electrolyzers could reach 5.0 MPa; this is the highest operating pressure of ALK electrolyzers produced in China.
Shandong Saikesaisi Hydrogen Energy is one of the earliest manufacturers engaged in PEM water electrolysis equipment production. It includes 13 series with hydrogen production rates range from 0.5 Nm3/h to 200 Nm3/h. At present, PEM electrolyzer products produced by Shandong Saikesaisi hydrogen energy have been exported to more than 30 countries and regions.
H2-Bank is an electrolyzers manufacturer for SOEC electrolyzers. The operating temperature of SOEC electrolyzers is 750 °C. Moreover, the hydrogen production rate is 2 Nm3/h and the power consumption is 3.5 kWh/Nm3.

3.3. Trends and Challenges

The current level of advancement and features of each electrolysis technology are quite different. ALK electrolysis technology is more advanced and cheaper than other electrolysis technologies, and China has a relatively mature alkaline-electrolyzer industry. However, some improvements are still needed, including increasing the current density [75], preventing the crossover of the gases, and widening the operating range. The PEM electrolysis technology is well adapted for integration with variable renewable energy sources. There have been some studies on the flexibility of PEM electrolysis technology via dynamic models or experimental methods [76,77]. Still, the cost-effective cell components need to be developed. It is necessary to address existing challenges by finding transition metals to replace precious metal as catalysts, developing proton exchange membrane materials with high conductivity and low cost, exploiting new preparation methods of membrane electrode assembly, etc. The SOEC electrolysis technology is still in its early stages of development. While it could be more favorably considered for integration with exothermic reactions in synthesis process of methanol or ammonia, the biggest challenge of SOEC electrolysis technology is to maintain structural stability and withstand the thermal stresses generated at long-term high temperatures, which lead to material creep.
In China, with the continuous increase in the installed capacity of renewable energy, the scale of power-to-X systems is increasing. At present, Chinese electrolyzer manufacturers could produce ALK electrolyzers with the maximum hydrogen production rate to 3000 Nm3/h; these stacks and their balance of plant (BOP) systems still need to be verified by the commercial or demonstration project. Moreover, China boasts a vast landmass, and most renewable energy is located in the less developed regions. Since there are multiple conversion steps from renewable energy to power and power-to-hydrogen, it makes economic sense in regions with favorable renewable energy resources and corresponding land availability [78]. That raises a spatial mismatch between hydrogen energy consumption and supply. The high cost of hydrogen storage and transportation is a barrier; thus, additional research and development is needed.

4. Power-to-Methanol

Methanol is widely used as a basic chemical and in the production of formaldehyde, acetic acid, dimethyl ether, methyl tertbutyl ether, and many other chemicals [79]. The boiling and melting point of methanol at standard atmospheric pressure are 64.7 °C and −97.8 °C, respectively, making it easy to store and transport in liquid form [80]. Due to its much higher volumetric energy density than hydrogen and ease of transport, it can serve as a hydrogen carrier. Methanol can be directly used as a transportation fuel and is also considered as energy. Generally, in industrial applications, syngas is produced from coal gasification or natural gas reforming first, and then methanol is produced from syngas at 5–10 MPa and 250–300 °C using copper (Cu)-based catalysts [81]. Nevertheless, the process in which methanol is produced from captured carbon dioxide and green hydrogen from renewable energy sources has received a lot of attention and research in recent years [82]. The methanol synthesis process of power-to-methanol in this paper refers to this process as well.

4.1. Methanol Synthetic Reaction

The main reaction equations involved in methanol synthesis from H2 and CO2 are shown in Equations (8) and (10) [83]. In addition to the methanol formation reaction from CO2 hydrogenation, the reverse water gas shift (RWGS) reaction as well as the CO hydrogenation to methanol reaction can occur. The whole process of methanol synthesis is thermodynamically exothermic, and lower temperatures promote the CO2 hydrogenation reaction. However, the average kinetic energy of the reactants increases with the increase in temperature, leading to faster motion and higher collision frequency of the molecules, and, consequently, facilitates the reaction. In general, the temperature range of methanol synthesis process is 250–300 °C. Furthermore, the methanol synthesis process has to occur under elevated pressure normally at the range of 3–5 MPa.
CO2 + 3H2 → CH3OH + H2O ΔH298K = −49.1 kJ/mol
CO2 + H2 → CO + H2O ΔH298K = +41.2 kJ/mol
CO + 2H2 → CH3OH ΔH298K = −90.8 kJ/mol
One of the crucial challenges of the CO2 hydrogenation reaction for researchers is to seek catalysts with efficient methanol production as well as high methanol selectivity. As catalysts are the key factors that determine the cost and efficiency of methanol synthesis from H2 and CO2, great attempts have been made in recent years [84,85,86,87]. The catalysts used for methanol synthesis from H2 and CO2 are mainly various heterogeneous catalysts, including copper-based catalysts [88,89,90], indium oxide (In2O3)-based catalysts [91,92], and noble metal catalysts [93,94]. The catalytic performance of several different catalysts in references is shown in Table 5. Cu-based catalysts are reported in many studies due to their relatively high activity and methanol selectivity. The majority of Cu-based catalysts consist of Cu, ZnO as support, along with different promoters such as aluminum, cerium, zirconium, silicon, boron, gallium, etc. Among them, Cu/ZnO/Al2O3 catalysts are the most promising for large-scale industrial applications because of their economic benefits, where ZnO as support alters the structure of the Cu phase by adding more active sites to the Cu surface and improving the dispersion of active species, and Al2O3 as promoter increases the overall catalytic activity [95]. In addition, Cu/ZnO/ZrO2 catalysts have also received a lot of research attention as they generally show significant catalytic efficiency [96]. In2O3-based catalysts exhibit high methanol selectivity and outstanding stability [97]. It has been reported that In2O3/ZrO2 catalysts, i.e., In2O3-based catalysts with ZrO2 as support, demonstrate excellent activity, nearly 100% methanol selectivity and remarkable stability for 1000 h under industrially relevant conditions [98]. Concerns have been raised for noble metal catalysts mainly because of their catalytic and anti-sintering activity. However, noble metal catalysts are currently expensive and economically unfeasible.

4.2. Methanol Synthesis Process System

The methanol synthesis process system from H2 and CO2 consists of a compression unit, a reaction unit, a separation and purification unit, and a storage unit. Altogether, it can be divided into four subsections, as shown in Figure 3. In the compression unit, both H2 and CO2 as fresh gas are compressed to relatively high pressure, normally between 3 and 5 MPa, by multistage compressors. In the reaction unit, the compressed gas is mixed together and is heated in the heat exchanger first. Then the heated gas is fed to the synthesis reactor, where the catalyst is immersed inside. The synthesis reaction in the reactor has a low single-pass conversion efficiency; hence, gas from the reactor outlet comprises the produced methanol, together with the unreacted H2, CO2, CO, and other byproducts such as H2O. In the separation and purification unit, gas from the reactor outlet is cooled down before entering the flash evaporators. In the first flash evaporator, some vapor is condensed into a liquid form and separated. In the second flash evaporator, crude methanol vapor is condensed into a liquid form and separated with the unreacted H2, CO2, and CO. Next, the unreacted H2, CO2, and CO are recycled back and mixed together with the compressed fresh gas, and then the reaction process is recycled. The crude methanol, mainly composed of methanol and water, is sent further for distillation forming and is stored in tanks.

4.3. Trends and Challenges

The reactor is one of the core pieces of equipment in a methanol synthesis process system [113]. The primary reactor design considerations are effective heat removal and low pressure drop, as well as flexibility and economics [114]. Nowadays, the dominant and technically well-established reactor is a quasi-isothermal fixed-bed reactor via cooling through vaporizing water [40]. In China, it is also the most used type of reactor for industrial application. The improvement of the reactor should be considered to adapt the newly developed catalysts. In addition, recently, researchers have attempted to develop novel reactors, include membrane reactors, micro (channel and monolith-structured) reactors, and nonthermal dielectric plasma reactors, to improve the efficiency of conversion [115,116].
The integration and optimization of hydrogen production from new energy sources coupled with the methanol synthesis system is the key to the power-to-methanol system. It is necessary to overcome the fluctuation of fresh H2 and enhance variable load capacity. For these purposes, there have been some studies on capacity planning, dispatch, and the flowsheet optimization model [117,118,119,120,121,122,123]. However, because of the complex dynamics of methanol synthesis and distillation-based separation, the capacity planning and integration for the power-to-methanol system needs further study.
Currently, there are many planned or under-construction power-to-methanol projects in China. The market for methanol production is mature and large. However, due to the lack of domestic standards and policies for power-to-methanol products, the products have not received premium attention, and they compete with traditional synthetic methanol products in the same market. This is also a challenge faced by the current development of power-to-methanol in China.

5. Power-to-Ammonia

Ammonia is an important chemical raw material in modern industry and is widely used in the production of fertilizers in agriculture. It is a chemical precursor used in the production of polyimides, nitric acid, nylon, pharmaceuticals, refrigerants, and other industrial materials [124]. As a carbon-free chemical, ammonia has recently been considered as a promising hydrogen carrier, and it is easier to store and transport as a liquid than hydrogen [125]. It can be transported in liquid form at environmental pressure and a temperature of −33 °C, or environmental temperature and a pressure of 0.8 MPa. Furthermore, ammonia can be converted back to hydrogen with low energy consumption, or directly used as a fuel with low carbon emission or a chemical commodity [126]. In modern industry, the ammonia is commonly synthesized through the Haber–Bosch process [127,128], where hydrogen and nitrogen react over iron-based catalysts at 10–30 MPa and 350–550 °C. For power-to-ammonia in this paper, we refer to the process in which the green hydrogen from renewable energy sources reacts with nitrogen obtained by air separation through the thermochemical reaction method.

5.1. Ammonia Synthetic Reaction

The ammonia synthesis from H2 and N2 is also thermodynamically exothermic, and the reaction equation is shown in Equation (11). The reaction process in the presence of catalyst mainly includes the following steps [129]: (1) adsorption of hydrogen and nitrogen on the catalyst surface; (2) dissociation of hydrogen and nitrogen molecules to hydrogen and nitrogen atoms, respectively; (3) combination of activated hydrogen atoms with activated nitrogen atoms to form surface-bound ammonia; (4) desorption of ammonia molecules from the catalysts. Because the nitrogen molecule is very stable and is difficult to activate with the strong nitrogen–nitrogen triple bond, the ammonia synthesis reactions from H2 and N2 have to occur at high temperature and pressure [130]. The dissociation of nitrogen molecules to nitrogen atoms is the rate-determining step under high-temperature and high-pressure conditions [124].
N2 + 3H2 → 2NH3 ΔH298K = −45.9 kJ/mol
Nowadays, significant efforts have been made to improve the conventional thermocatalytic ammonia synthesis reaction by finding new catalysts that can decrease reaction temperature and pressure. The types of catalysts include iron-based catalysts, ruthenium-based catalysts, cobalt-based catalysts, nickel-based catalysts, and metal-nitride-based catalysts. The catalytic performances of several different catalysts in the references are shown in Table 6. As early as the beginning of last century, many efforts have been made to focus on Fe-based catalysts, which are still the most widely used in the industrial ammonia synthesis today due to their low cost and good catalytic performance [131]. The two typical oxide precursors for Fe-based ammonia synthesis catalysts are magnetite (Fe3O4), with an inverse spinal crystal lattice structure, and wustite (Fe1−xO), with a cubic lattice structure [132]. Among them, the wustite catalysts show much higher activity and lower reduction temperature than the magnetite catalysts [133]. Generally, small addition of promoters, such as Al2O3, K2O, CaO, and SiO2, could promote the performance of Fe-based catalysts. The most common structural and electronic promotors for Fe-based ammonia synthesis catalysts are Al2O3 and K2O, respectively [130]. In addition to Fe-based catalysts, Ru-based catalysts are the only other catalysts that can be used in industrial ammonia synthesis. In particular, Ru-based catalysts exhibit high activity at reduced temperature and pressure, which leads to ammonia synthesis under relatively mild conditions. Generally, the synthesis of ammonia from hydrogen and nitrogen using Fe-based catalysts occurs under 350–550 °C and 10–30 MPa. For Ru-based catalysts, the range of reaction temperature is 300–450 °C and the pressure is 4–15 MPa [134]. The other focuses of Ru-based catalysts include the precursor form [135], different support materials [136], and promotors [137]. However, Ru-based catalysts are limited by Ru’s insufficient resources and high price.

5.2. Ammonia Synthesis Process System

The ammonia synthesis process system from H2 and N2 consists of four parts: a compression unit, a reaction unit, a refrigeration and separation unit, and a storage unit. The system diagram is shown in Figure 4. First, the fresh H2 and N2 are mixed together, where N2 is extracted from the air via different methods including cryogenic distillation, pressure swing adsorption, and membrane separation [148]. Then, the mixed fresh gas is compressed to the required pressure by multistage compressors. At the heat exchanger, the compressed gas is heated up before entering the synthesis reactor. Similar to methanol synthesis, the ammonia synthesis reaction has a low single-pass conversion efficiency in the reactor [149]. In the refrigeration and separation unit, unreacted H2 and N2 are separated with the produced NH3 and are returned for recycling reactions. The produced NH3 is stored in tanks in a liquid form.

5.3. Trends and Challenges

The presence of oxygen in the fresh gas would reduce the activity of ammonia synthesis catalysts and lead to catalyst poisoning. Recent research has shown that even oxygen impurities below 1 ppm can lead to the obvious deactivation of iron-based ammonia synthesis catalysts [150]. Oxygen is the byproduct of hydrogen production by water electrolysis and it inevitably exists in hydrogen products. Hence, extensive purification processes must be adopted to obtain pure hydrogen to avoid poisoning of the ammonia synthesis catalysts. These purification processes not only increase the initial and operating costs of large-scale ammonia synthesis plants, but also reduce the overall efficiency. Therefore, it is necessary to improve the oxygenate tolerance of catalysts and continue develop new catalysts in the future. In addition, the development of ammonia synthesis catalysts should take into account the intermittency of renewables, making it work efficiently at different loads.
In the traditional chemical industry, most ammonia synthesis process is operated under relatively stable conditions. In China, multiple-bed adiabatic reactors with intercooling stages are generally used as types of ammonia synthesis reactors [151]. For the hydrogen-to ammonia process, rapid and frequent start–stop, and change of reaction temperature and pressure for the reactors are common because of the fluctuations of the fresh hydrogen. This may have adverse effects on materials, instruments, and operation of the ammonia synthesis reactor. The research on integration and flexibility of power-to-ammonia system is not mature enough, either. Overall, substantial efforts need to be devoted to improving the flexibility of ammonia synthesis reactors and power-to-ammonia systems.
Similar to power-to-methanol, ammonia products produced by power-to-ammonia have not received premium attention and do not have enough competitiveness due to the lack of supporting and subsidized policies. There are dozens of power-to-ammonia projects in planning or approval stages in China. It is also an important path for many enterprises to lay out in the hydrogen energy industry. However, sustainable and healthy development of power-to-ammonia in China needs improvements in technology, market, policy, and standards.

6. Typical Commercial or Demonstration Projects

In recent years, following several power-to-X demonstration projects, such as the Lanzhou Liquid Solar Fuel Production Demonstration Project and Kuqa Green Hydrogen Pilot Project, the power-to-X projects have continued to heat up in China. Due to the differences in wind and solar resources, project scales, technical routes, etc., the costs vary significantly among different projects. The approximate costs [40,112,152] for difference power-to-X technologies are shown in Table 7. Dozens of power-to-X projects are currently in progress, and some of the commercial or demonstration projects in China are listed in Table 8. These projects are concentrated in the northwest and northeast regions of China, which are abundant in wind and solar resources. Great breakthroughs have been made in terms of renewable power scale, output of hydrogen, methanol, and ammonia. However, only a few projects have signed product purchase agreements, and the business models still need to be further explored.
China’s largest green hydrogen production project has commenced operation in Kuqa city of Aksu prefecture, Xinjiang Uygur autonomous region. The project is also China’s first 10,000-ton level solar-generated green hydrogen demonstration project. It mainly comprises three parts: a 200 MW capacity photovoltaic power generation system, a power transmission and transformation system, and a 20,000 tons per annum water electrolysis hydrogen production system. As a demonstration project, it is expected to reduce 485,000 tons of carbon dioxide emissions annually. It is of great significance to promote the development of the green hydrogen industry chain, and promote the transformation and upgrading of the energy industry.
The Lanzhou Liquid Solar Fuel Production Demonstration Project was successfully tested in January 2020, which is China’s first 1000-ton level project in converting solar energy into methanol. This project constructed a 10 MW solar photovoltaic power generation system for hydrogen production by water electrolysis, and then hydrogen was used for methanol synthesis combined with carbon dioxide. When the project operates at the design capacity, it could consume 2000 tons of CO2 and produce 1500 tons of methanol annually. Specifically, the methanol synthesis unit adopts a solid solution bimetallic oxide catalyst (ZnO-ZrO2) with high methanol selectivity and good stability. The methanol selectivity is greater than 90%, and the catalyst performance degradation after 3000 h of operation is less than 2%.
Construction of the Da’an Wind and Solar Green Hydrogen Synthesis Ammonia Integration Demonstration Project has now commenced, which is also the world’s largest green synthetic ammonia project that was launched in 2022. The project is located in an industrial park in the city of Da’an, Jilin province, and it will build a total installed capacity of 800 MW of wind and solar, providing 32,000 tons of hydrogen production and 180,000 tons of synthetic ammonia annually. Among the hydrogen production system, 50 sets of PEM hydrogen production systems and 39 sets of alkaline hydrogen production systems are included. The first phase of this project is expected to start operation in 2024.

7. Conclusions

In China, hydrogen has become an important strategic choice to accelerate energy transformation and upgrading. Hydrogen can be produced from renewable energy by electrolysis as the final energy carrier or converted into X. Collectively, power-to-X provides a cost-effective way to balance the intermittent renewable energy power generation and demands. This paper provides a review of three hydrogen-driven power-to-X technologies and their applications in China, which are power-to-hydrogen, power-to-methanol, and power-to-ammonia. These three hydrogen-driven power-to-X technologies are also the most promoted technical routes in China.
Currently, China has already become the world’s largest producer and consumer of hydrogen. Especially for the recent five years, a large number of policies has been issued intensively. In 2022, China issued a hydrogen national strategy for the first time. It states that hydrogen shall play a key role in the development of China’s energy sector. Moreover, it explicitly mentions the exploration and promotion of using hydrogen from renewable energy for replacing fossil fuels in industries such as synthetic ammonia and methanol. In conclusion, China attaches importance to the development and application of hydrogen-driven power-to-X technology.
Among the different methods for power-to-hydrogen, ALK water electrolysis, PEM water electrolysis, and SOEC water electrolysis are the three mainstream water electrolysis methods under research. ALK electrolysis is the most mature method; the maximum hydrogen production rate produced by Chinese electrolyzer manufacturers could reach 3000 Nm3/h. The capacity to integrate with variable renewable energy sources needs improve due to its low load range and long response time. PEM electrolysis has advantages in terms of short time response and widened load range between 0 and 150%. Reducing the cost of cell components could be very challenging. SOEC electrolysis is still less mature commercially, and the stability at high temperatures needs to be studied. Chinese electrolyzer manufacturers are capable of producing the above three types of electrolyzers.
Cu-based catalysts and Fe-based catalysts are the most widely used catalysts in industrial methanol and ammonia synthesis, respectively. For power-to-methanol and power-to-ammonia, it is vitally important for research to proceed on synthetic reaction catalysts with excellent catalytic performance and high selectivity at different loads, with the ability to withstand the harsh reaction conditions, and cost-effectiveness. In addition, in order for both technologies to be applied on larger scales, considerable advances in equipment and systems have to be achieved.
In China, most commercial or demonstration projects of power-to-hydrogen, power-to-methanol, and power-to-ammonia are in planning, approval or construction stages. These projects are located in the regions abundant in wind and solar resources. A few demonstration projects have already been put into operation, whereas demonstrations are a key step for technologies towards reaching the market. All these three hydrogen-driven power-to-X technical routes have very wide popularization and application prospects in China.
In addition, power-to-X are not limited to the as-mentioned three power-to-X technical routes. There are other power-to-X pathways, including power-to-methane, power-to-formic acid, power-to-formaldehyde, and power-to-alkanes, which are rapidly developing and have great prospects. With the development of these technologies and the increase in decarbonization demand, other power-to-X technologies will gain more attention in China.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.Z. and Y.H.; methodology, Y.Z., Y.H., J.S., W.Z., X.T., Z.W. and W.W.; investigation, Y.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.Z.; writing—review and editing, Y.Z., Y.H. and J.S.; supervision, Y.H.; funding acquisition, Y.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2023YFE0114400), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52125605) and Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (LR23E060001).

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

Authors Yunchu Zhai, Weiling Zhang, Xiaofan Tong were employed by the company China Energy Engineering Group Zhejiang Electric Power Design Institute Co., Ltd. Author Jiaming Shao was employed by the company Zhejiang SUPCON Technology Co., Ltd. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. BP Energy Outlook. 2023. Available online: https://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/energy-economics/energy-outlook.html (accessed on 5 July 2023).
  2. Hota, P.; Das, A.; Maiti, D.K. A short review on generation of green fuel hydrogen through water splitting. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2023, 48, 523–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Amin, M.; Shah, H.H.; Fareed, A.G.; Khan, W.U.; Chung, E.; Zia, A.; Rahman Farooqi, Z.U.; Lee, C. Hydrogen production through renewable and non-renewable energy processes and their impact on climate change. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2022, 47, 33112–33134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sharma, S.; Agarwal, S.; Jain, A. Significance of hydrogen as economic and environmentally friendly fuel. Energies 2021, 14, 7389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Li, Z.; Guo, P.; Han, R.; Sun, H. Current status and development trend of wind power generation-based hydrogen production technology. Energy Explor. Exploit. 2018, 37, 5–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Available online: https://www.gov.cn/lianbo/bumen/202307/content_6895756.htm (accessed on 22 December 2023).
  7. 14th Five-Year Plan for Renewable Energy Development. Available online: https://chinaenergyportal.org/14th-five-year-plan-for-renewable-energy-development/ (accessed on 1 June 2022).
  8. Gan, W.; Yan, M.; Yao, W.; Wen, J. Peer to peer transactive energy for multiple energy hub with the penetration of high-level renewable energy. Appl. Energy 2021, 295, 117027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Meng, X.; Chen, M.; Gu, A.; Wu, X.; Liu, B.; Zhou, J.; Mao, Z. China’s hydrogen development strategy in the context of double carbon targets. Nat. Gas Ind. B 2022, 9, 521–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zheng, K.; Gao, X.; Fan, Y.; Luo, Z.; Li, Z.; Zheng, Y.; Liu, Y. Comparison and Application Prospects of Ammonia and Methanol Technologies Supporting Large-Scale Development of Green Hydrogen Energy. South. Energy Constr. 2023, 10, 63–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhong, Z.; Fang, J.; Hu, K.; Huang, D.; Ai, X.; Yang, X.; Wen, J.; Pan, Y.; Cheng, S. Power-to-Hydrogen by Electrolysis in Carbon Neutrality: Technology Overview and Future Development. CSEE J. Power Energy Syst. 2023, 9, 1266–1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hu, G.; Chen, C.; Lu, H.T.; Wu, Y.; Liu, C.; Tao, L.; Men, Y.; He, G.; Li, K.G. A Review of Technical Advances, Barriers, and Solutions in the Power to Hydrogen (P2H) Roadmap. Engineering 2020, 6, 1364–1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Liu, W.; Sun, L.; Li, Z.; Fujii, M.; Geng, Y.; Dong, L.; Fujita, T. Trends and future challenges in hydrogen production and storage research. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2020, 27, 31092–31104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Dawood, F.; Anda, M.; Shafiullah, G.M. Hydrogen production for energy: An overview. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 3847–3869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sazali, N. Emerging technologies by hydrogen: A review. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 18753–18771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ayodele, T.R.; Munda, J.L. Potential and economic viability of green hydrogen production by water electrolysis using wind energy resources in South Africa. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2019, 44, 17669–17687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Huang, Y.-S.; Liu, S.-J. Chinese Green Hydrogen Production Potential Development: A Provincial Case Study. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 171968–171976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Griffiths, S.; Sovacool, B.K.; Kim, J.; Bazilian, M.; Uratani, J.M. Industrial decarbonization via hydrogen: A critical and systematic review of developments, socio-technical systems and policy options. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2021, 80, 102208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Pramuanjaroenkij, A.; Kakaç, S. The fuel cell electric vehicles: The highlight review. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2023, 48, 9401–9425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhou, P.; Gao, S.; Wang, B.; Wang, Y.; Li, C.; Wang, Y.; Sun, B. Influence of hydrogen fuel cell temperature safety on bus driving characteristics and stack heating mode. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2023, 48, 11541–11554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, J.; An, Q.; Zhao, Y.; Pan, G.; Song, J.; Hu, Q.; Tan, C.-W. Role of electrolytic hydrogen in smart city decarbonization in China. Appl. Energy 2023, 336, 120699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Noussan, M.; Raimondi, P.P.; Scita, R.; Hafner, M. The Role of Green and Blue Hydrogen in the Energy Transition—A Technological and Geopolitical Perspective. Sustainability 2020, 13, 298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Reda, B.; Elzamar, A.A.; AlFazzani, S.; Ezzat, S.M. Green hydrogen as a source of renewable energy: A step towards sustainability, an overview. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Saha, P.; Akash, F.A.; Shovon, S.M.; Monir, M.U.; Ahmed, M.T.; Khan, M.F.H.; Sarkar, S.M.; Islam, M.K.; Hasan, M.M.; Vo, D.-V.N.; et al. Grey, blue, and green hydrogen: A comprehensive review of production methods and prospects for zero-emission energy. Int. J. Green Energy 2023, 21, 1383–1397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hermesmann, M.; Müller, T.E. Green, Turquoise, Blue, or Grey? Environmentally friendly Hydrogen Production in Transforming Energy Systems. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2022, 90, 100996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Midilli, A.; Kucuk, H.; Topal, M.E.; Akbulut, U.; Dincer, I. A comprehensive review on hydrogen production from coal gasification: Challenges and Opportunities. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2021, 46, 25385–25412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yang, X.; Wang, S.; He, Y. Review of catalytic reforming for hydrogen production in a membrane-assisted fluidized bed reactor. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 154, 111832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Shiva Kumar, S.; Lim, H. An overview of water electrolysis technologies for green hydrogen production. Energy Rep. 2022, 8, 13793–13813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Song, H.; Luo, S.; Huang, H.; Deng, B.; Ye, J. Solar-Driven Hydrogen Production: Recent Advances, Challenges, and Future Perspectives. ACS Energy Lett. 2022, 7, 1043–1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Pal, D.B.; Singh, A.; Bhatnagar, A. A review on biomass based hydrogen production technologies. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2022, 47, 1461–1480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liu, W.; Wan, Y.; Xiong, Y.; Gao, P. Green hydrogen standard in China: Standard and evaluation of low-carbon hydrogen, clean hydrogen, and renewable hydrogen. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2022, 47, 24584–24591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lakhera, S.K.; Rajan, A.; Rugma, T.P.; Bernaurdshaw, N. A review on particulate photocatalytic hydrogen production system: Progress made in achieving high energy conversion efficiency and key challenges ahead. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 152, 111694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Daiyan, R.; MacGill, I.; Amal, R. Opportunities and Challenges for Renewable Power-to-X. ACS Energy Lett. 2020, 5, 3843–3847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chehade, Z.; Mansilla, C.; Lucchese, P.; Hilliard, S.; Proost, J. Review and analysis of demonstration projects on power-to-X pathways in the world. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2019, 44, 27637–27655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Cormos, C.-C. Deployment of integrated Power-to-X and CO2 utilization systems: Techno-economic assessment of synthetic natural gas and methanol cases. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2023, 231, 120943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Qi, M.; Vo, D.N.; Yu, H.; Shu, C.-M.; Cui, C.; Liu, Y.; Park, J.; Moon, I. Strategies for flexible operation of power-to-X processes coupled with renewables. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2023, 179, 113282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Watanabe, M.D.B.; Hu, X.; Ballal, V.; Cavalett, O.; Cherubini, F. Climate change mitigation potentials of on grid-connected Power-to-X fuels and advanced biofuels for the European maritime transport. Energy Convers. Manag. X 2023, 20, 100418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Breyer, C.; Lopez, G.; Bogdanov, D.; Laaksonen, P. The role of electricity-based hydrogen in the emerging power-to-X economy. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, 49, 351–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sterner, M.; Specht, M. Power-to-Gas and Power-to-X—The History and Results of Developing a New Storage Concept. Energies 2021, 14, 6594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Palys, M.J.; Daoutidis, P. Power-to-X: A review and perspective. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2022, 165, 107948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Arnaiz del Pozo, C.; Cloete, S.; Jiménez Álvaro, Á. Techno-economic assessment of long-term methanol production from natural gas and renewables. Energy Convers. Manag. 2022, 266, 115785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Sonthalia, A.; Kumar, N.; Tomar, M.; Edwin Geo, V.; Thiyagarajan, S.; Pugazhendhi, A. Moving ahead from hydrogen to methanol economy: Scope and challenges. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 2023, 25, 551–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Alrebei, O.F.; Le Page, L.M.; McKay, G.; El-Naas, M.H.; Amhamed, A.I. Recalibration of carbon-free NH3/H2 fuel blend process: Qatar’s roadmap for blue ammonia. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2023, 48, 23716–23736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Chen, T.; Zheng, G.; Liu, K.; Zhang, G.; Huang, Z.; Liu, M.; Zhou, J.; Wang, S. Application of CuNi–CeO2 fuel electrode in oxygen electrode supported reversible solid oxide cell. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2023, 48, 9565–9573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Xu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Su, L.; Zhang, H.; Miao, X. High efficient trifunctional electrocatalyst based on bimetallic oxide with rich oxygen vacancies towards electrochemical oxidation of small molecules at high current density. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2023, 48, 9669–9681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ye, J.; Cui, J.; Hua, Z.; Xie, J.; Peng, W.; Wang, W. Study on the high-pressure hydrogen gas flow characteristics of the needle valve with different spool shapes. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2023, 48, 11370–11381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Huang, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Zhong, R.; Wei, C.; Zhu, B. Hydrogen energy development in China: Potential assessment and policy implications. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, 49, 659–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Xiaoyu, H.; Weiwei, C.; Hao, Y.; Yingying, R.; Guiping, D.; Lei, P. Development Status of Hydrogen Energy Industry Chain in China. Electr. Power Surv. Des. 2024, 3, 12–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Chai, S.; Zhang, G.; Li, G.; Zhang, Y. Industrial hydrogen production technology and development status in China: A review. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 2021, 23, 1931–1946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Li, T.; Liu, W.; Wan, Y.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, M.; Zhang, Y. China’s Green Hydrogen New Era 2030: China’s Renewable Hydrogen 100GW Roadmap; RMI China Energy Alliance Research Institute: Snowmass, CO, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  51. Anwar, S.; Khan, F.; Zhang, Y.; Djire, A. Recent development in electrocatalysts for hydrogen production through water electrolysis. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2021, 46, 32284–32317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Yan, D.; Mebrahtu, C.; Wang, S.; Palkovits, R. Innovative Electrochemical Strategies for Hydrogen Production: From Electricity Input to Electricity Output. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2023, 62, e202214333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Madadi Avargani, V.; Zendehboudi, S.; Cata Saady, N.M.; Dusseault, M.B. A comprehensive review on hydrogen production and utilization in North America: Prospects and challenges. Energy Convers. Manag. 2022, 269, 115927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Varela, C.; Mostafa, M.; Zondervan, E. Modeling alkaline water electrolysis for power-to-x applications: A scheduling approach. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2021, 46, 9303–9313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Epelle, E.I.; Desongu, K.S.; Obande, W.; Adeleke, A.A.; Ikubanni, P.P.; Okolie, J.A.; Gunes, B. A comprehensive review of hydrogen production and storage: A focus on the role of nanomaterials. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2022, 47, 20398–20431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ishaq, H.; Dincer, I.; Crawford, C. A review on hydrogen production and utilization: Challenges and opportunities. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2022, 47, 26238–26264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Lange, H.; Klose, A.; Lippmann, W.; Urbas, L. Technical evaluation of the flexibility of water electrolysis systems to increase energy flexibility: A review. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2023, 48, 15771–15783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Xiaofeng, M.; Shuhan, Z.; Yong, H.; Yanqun, Z.; Zhihua, W. Research status and application prospect of PEM electrolysis water technology for hydrogen production. Acta Energiae Solaris Sin. 2022, 43, 420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Jang, D.; Cho, H.-S.; Kang, S. Numerical modeling and analysis of the effect of pressure on the performance of an alkaline water electrolysis system. Appl. Energy 2021, 287, 116554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Hu, S.; Guo, B.; Ding, S.; Yang, F.; Dang, J.; Liu, B.; Gu, J.; Ma, J.; Ouyang, M. A comprehensive review of alkaline water electrolysis mathematical modeling. Appl. Energy 2022, 327, 120099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Alanazi, H.E.; Emran, K.M. Nd-Gd–Platinum doped TiO2 nanotube arrays catalyst for water splitting in Alkaline Medium. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2023, 18, 100112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Marelli, E.; Lyu, J.; Morin, M.; Lemenager, M.; Shang, T.; Yuzbasi, N.S.; Aegerter, D.; Huang, J.; Daffe, N.D.; Clark, A.H.; et al. Cobalt-free layered perovskites RBaCuFeO(5+delta) (R = 4f lanthanide) as electrocatalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction. EES Catal. 2024, 2, 335–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Dubouis, N.; Aymé-Perrot, D.; Degoulange, D.; Grimaud, A.; Girault, H. Alkaline electrolyzers: Powering industries and overcoming fundamental challenges. Joule 2024, 8, 883–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. de Groot, M.T.; Vreman, A.W. Ohmic resistance in zero gap alkaline electrolysis with a Zirfon diaphragm. Electrochim. Acta 2021, 369, 137684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Petrov, Y.; Schosger, J.-P.; Stoynov, Z.; de Bruijn, F. Hydrogen evolution on nickel electrode in synthetic tap water—Alkaline solution. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2011, 36, 12715–12724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Haverkort, J.W.; Rajaei, H. Voltage losses in zero-gap alkaline water electrolysis. J. Power Sources 2021, 497, 229864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Mucci, S.; Mitsos, A.; Bongartz, D. Power-to-X processes based on PEM water electrolyzers: A review of process integration and flexible operation. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2023, 175, 108260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Wang, T.; Cao, X.; Jiao, L. PEM water electrolysis for hydrogen production: Fundamentals, advances, and prospects. Carbon Neutrality 2022, 1, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Maier, M.; Smith, K.; Dodwell, J.; Hinds, G.; Shearing, P.R.; Brett, D.J.L. Mass transport in PEM water electrolysers: A review. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2022, 47, 30–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Aizaz Ud Din, M.; Irfan, S.; Dar, S.U.; Rizwan, S. Synthesis of 3D IrRuMn Sphere as a Superior Oxygen Evolution Electrocatalyst in Acidic Environment. Chemistry 2020, 26, 5662–5666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Wallnöfer-Ogris, E.; Grimmer, I.; Ranz, M.; Höglinger, M.; Kartusch, S.; Rauh, J.; Macherhammer, M.-G.; Grabner, B.; Trattner, A. A review on understanding and identifying degradation mechanisms in PEM water electrolysis cells: Insights for stack application, development, and research. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, 65, 381–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Nechache, A.; Hody, S. Alternative and innovative solid oxide electrolysis cell materials: A short review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 149, 111322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Lo Basso, G.; Mojtahed, A.; Pastore, L.M.; De Santoli, L. High-temperature green hydrogen production: A innovative– application of SOEC coupled with AEC through sCO2 HP. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, 52, 978–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Alamiery, A. Advancements in materials for hydrogen production: A review of cutting-edge technologies. ChemPhysMater 2024, 3, 64–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Liu, S.; Li, B.; Mohite, S.V.; Devaraji, P.; Mao, L.; Xing, R. Ultrathin MoS2 nanosheets in situ grown on rich defective Ni0.96S as heterojunction bifunctional electrocatalysts for alkaline water electrolysis. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 29929–29937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Alshehri, F.; Suárez, V.G.; Torres, J.L.R.; Perilla, A.; van der Meijden, M.A.M.M. Modelling and evaluation of PEM hydrogen technologies for frequency ancillary services in future multi-energy sustainable power systems. Heliyon 2019, 5, e01396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Koponen, J.; Kosonen, A.; Ruuskanen, V.; Huoman, K.; Niemela, M.; Ahola, J. Control and energy efficiency of PEM water electrolyzers in renewable energy systems. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2017, 42, 29648–29660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Scheller, F.; Wald, S.; Kondziella, H.; Gunkel, P.A.; Bruckner, T.; Keles, D. Future role and economic benefits of hydrogen and synthetic energy carriers in Germany: A review of long-term energy scenarios. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2023, 56, 103037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Nemmour, A.; Inayat, A.; Janajreh, I.; Ghenai, C. Green hydrogen-based E-fuels (E-methane, E-methanol, E-ammonia) to support clean energy transition: A literature review. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2023, 48, 29011–29033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Nyári, J. Techno-Economic Feasibility Study of a Methanol Plant Using Carbon Dioxide and Hydrogen. Master’s Thesis, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland, 2018. Available online: https://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/items/9af1d544-fc0c-4a80-bc68-5b68a0c6dd9f (accessed on 14 July 2024).
  81. Leonzio, G. Methanol Synthesis: Optimal Solution for a Better Efficiency of the Process. Processes 2018, 6, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Shih, C.F.; Zhang, T.; Li, J.; Bai, C. Powering the Future with Liquid Sunshine. Joule 2018, 2, 1925–1949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Van-Dal, É.S.; Bouallou, C. Design and simulation of a methanol production plant from CO2 hydrogenation. J. Clean. Prod. 2013, 57, 38–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Huang, C.; Wen, J.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, M.; Bao, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Liang, L.; Fu, M.; Wu, J.; Ye, D.; et al. CO2 hydrogenation to methanol over Cu/ZnO plate model catalyst: Effects of reducing gas induced Cu nanoparticle morphology. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 374, 221–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Fang, X.; Men, Y.; Wu, F.; Zhao, Q.; Singh, R.; Xiao, P.; Du, T.; Webley, P.A. Improved methanol yield and selectivity from CO2 hydrogenation using a novel Cu-ZnO-ZrO2 catalyst supported on Mg-Al layered double hydroxide (LDH). J. CO2 Util. 2019, 29, 57–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Wang, J.; Song, Y.; Li, J.; Liu, F.; Wang, J.; Lv, J.; Wang, S.; Li, M.; Bao, X.; Ma, X. Modulation of Al2O3 and ZrO2 composite in Cu/ZnO-based catalysts with enhanced performance for CO2 hydrogenation to methanol. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2024, 674, 119618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Zhang, H.; Yang, J.; Wang, S.; Zhao, N.; Xiao, F.; Wang, Y. Effect of Ni content on Cu–Mn/ZrO2 catalysts for methanol synthesis from CO2 hydrogenation. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2024, 14, 2153–2165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Sharma, S.K.; Khan, T.S.; Singha, R.K.; Paul, B.; Poddar, M.K.; Sasaki, T.; Bordoloi, A.; Samanta, C.; Gupta, S.; Bal, R. Design of highly stable MgO promoted Cu/ZnO catalyst for clean methanol production through selective hydrogenation of CO2. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2021, 623, 118239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Vergara, T.; Gómez, D.; Lacerda de Oliveira Campos, B.; Herrera Delgado, K.; Concepción, P.; Jiménez, R.; Karelovic, A. Combined role of Ce promotion and TiO2 support improves CO2 hydrogenation to methanol on Cu catalysts: Interplay between structure and kinetics. J. Catal. 2023, 426, 200–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Ren, M.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, X.; Qiu, H. Catalytic Hydrogenation of CO2 to Methanol: A Review. Catalysts 2022, 12, 403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Wu, H.; Xiong, S.; Liu, C.-J. Preparation of In2O3/ZrO2 catalyst via DBD plasma decomposition of Zr(OH)4 for CO2 hydrogenation to methanol. Catal. Today 2023, 423, 114024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Tsoukalou, A.; Serykh, A.I.; Willinger, E.; Kierzkowska, A.; Abdala, P.M.; Fedorov, A.; Müller, C.R. Hydrogen dissociation sites on indium-based ZrO2-supported catalysts for hydrogenation of CO2 to methanol. Catal. Today 2022, 387, 38–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Vourros, A.; Garagounis, I.; Kyriakou, V.; Carabineiro, S.A.C.; Maldonado-Hódar, F.J.; Marnellos, G.E.; Konsolakis, M. Carbon dioxide hydrogenation over supported Au nanoparticles: Effect of the support. J. CO2 Util. 2017, 19, 247–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Kuwahara, Y.; Mihogi, T.; Hamahara, K.; Kusu, K.; Kobayashi, H.; Yamashita, H. A quasi-stable molybdenum sub-oxide with abundant oxygen vacancies that promotes CO2 hydrogenation to methanol. Chem. Sci. 2021, 12, 9902–9915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Darji, H.R.; Kale, H.B.; Shaikh, F.F.; Gawande, M.B. Advancement and State-of-art of heterogeneous catalysis for selective CO2 hydrogenation to methanol. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2023, 497, 215409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Wang, Y.; Kattel, S.; Gao, W.; Li, K.; Liu, P.; Chen, J.G.; Wang, H. Exploring the ternary interactions in Cu-ZnO-ZrO(2) catalysts for efficient CO2 hydrogenation to methanol. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Gao, P.; Zhang, L.; Li, S.; Zhou, Z.; Sun, Y. Novel Heterogeneous Catalysts for CO2 Hydrogenation to Liquid Fuels. ACS Cent. Sci. 2020, 6, 1657–1670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Martin, O.; Martin, A.J.; Mondelli, C.; Mitchell, S.; Segawa, T.F.; Hauert, R.; Drouilly, C.; Curulla-Ferre, D.; Perez-Ramirez, J. Indium Oxide as a Superior Catalyst for Methanol Synthesis by CO2 Hydrogenation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2016, 55, 6261–6265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Pontzen, F.; Liebner, W.; Gronemann, V.; Rothaemel, M.; Ahlers, B. CO2-based methanol and DME—Efficient technologies for industrial scale production. Catal. Today 2011, 171, 242–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Toyir, J.; Miloua, R.; Elkadri, N.E.; Nawdali, M.; Toufik, H.; Miloua, F.; Saito, M. Sustainable process for the production of methanol from CO2 and H2 using Cu/ZnO-based multicomponent catalyst. Phys. Procedia 2009, 2, 1075–1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Doss, B.; Ramos, C.; Atkins, S. Optimization of Methanol Synthesis from Carbon Dioxide and Hydrogen: Demonstration of a Pilot-Scale Carbon-Neutral Synthetic Fuels Process. Energy Fuels 2009, 23, 4647–4650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Choi, E.J.; Lee, Y.H.; Lee, D.-W.; Moon, D.-J.; Lee, K.-Y. Hydrogenation of CO2 to methanol over Pd–Cu/CeO2 catalysts. Mol. Catal. 2017, 434, 146–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Tan, Q.; Shi, Z.; Wu, D. CO2 Hydrogenation to Methanol over a Highly Active Cu–Ni/CeO2–Nanotube Catalyst. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2018, 57, 10148–10158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Zabilskiy, M.; Sushkevich, V.L.; Palagin, D.; Newton, M.A.; Krumeich, F.; van Bokhoven, J.A. The unique interplay between copper and zinc during catalytic carbon dioxide hydrogenation to methanol. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 2409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Liang, Z.; Gao, P.; Tang, Z.; Lv, M.; Sun, Y. Three dimensional porous Cu-Zn/Al foam monolithic catalyst for CO2 hydrogenation to methanol in microreactor. J. CO2 Util. 2017, 21, 191–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Zhang, L.; Hu, X.; Wang, N.; Chen, B. The copper size effect of CuZn/CeO2 catalyst in CO2 hydrogenation to methanol. Catal. Today 2024, 436, 114773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Wang, S.; Yang, J.; Zhou, H.; Xiao, F.; Zhao, N. Performance of Cu-Mn-Zn/ZrO2 catalysts for methanol synthesis from CO2 hydrogenation: The effect of Zn content. J. Fuel Chem. Technol. 2024, 52, 293–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Rui, N.; Wang, Z.; Sun, K.; Ye, J.; Ge, Q.; Liu, C.-J. CO2 hydrogenation to methanol over Pd/In2O3: Effects of Pd and oxygen vacancy. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2017, 218, 488–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Chou, C.-Y.; Lobo, R.F. Direct conversion of CO2 into methanol over promoted indium oxide-based catalysts. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2019, 583, 117144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Wang, J.; Tang, C.; Li, G.; Han, Z.; Li, Z.; Liu, H.; Cheng, F.; Li, C. High-Performance MaZrOx (Ma = Cd, Ga) Solid-Solution Catalysts for CO2 Hydrogenation to Methanol. ACS Catal. 2019, 9, 10253–10259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Li, X.; Liu, G.; Xu, D.; Hong, X.; Edman Tsang, S.C. Confinement of subnanometric PdZn at a defect enriched ZnO/ZIF-8 interface for efficient and selective CO2 hydrogenation to methanol. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 23878–23885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Incer-Valverde, J.; Patiño-Arévalo, L.J.; Tsatsaronis, G.; Morosuk, T. Hydrogen-driven Power-to-X: State of the art and multicriteria evaluation of a study case. Energy Convers. Manag. 2022, 266, 115814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Chen, C.; Yang, A. Power-to-methanol: The role of process flexibility in the integration of variable renewable energy into chemical production. Energy Convers. Manag. 2021, 228, 113673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Dieterich, V.; Buttler, A.; Hanel, A.; Spliethoff, H.; Fendt, S. Power-to-liquidviasynthesis of methanol, DME or Fischer–Tropsch-fuels: A review. Energy Environ. Sci. 2020, 13, 3207–3252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Iliuta, I.; Larachi, F. Enhanced Methanol Synthesis Process via an Integrated Process Involving CO2 Hydrogenation under Plasma Conditions. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2019, 59, 6815–6827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Leonzio, G. State of art and perspectives about the production of methanol, dimethyl ether and syngas by carbon dioxide hydrogenation. J. CO2 Util. 2018, 27, 326–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Chen, C.; Yang, A.; Bañares-Alcántara, R. Renewable methanol production: Understanding the interplay between storage sizing, renewable mix and dispatchable energy price. Adv. Appl. Energy 2021, 2, 100021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Tso, W.W.; Demirhan, C.D.; Lee, S.; Song, H.; Powell, J.B.; Pistikopoulos, E.N. Energy Carrier Supply Chain Optimization: A Texas Case Study. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Foundations of Computer-Aided Process Design, Copper Mountain, CO, USA, 14–18 July 2019; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Martín, M.; Grossmann, I.E. Optimal integration of a self sustained algae based facility with solar and/or wind energy. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 145, 336–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Kiss, A.A.; Pragt, J.J.; Vos, H.J.; Bargeman, G.; de Groot, M.T. Novel efficient process for methanol synthesis by CO2 hydrogenation. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 284, 260–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Atsonios, K.; Panopoulos, K.D.; Kakaras, E. Thermocatalytic CO2 hydrogenation for methanol and ethanol production: Process improvements. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2016, 41, 792–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Kim, J.; Qi, M.; Park, J.; Moon, I. Revealing the impact of renewable uncertainty on grid-assisted power-to-X: A data-driven reliability-based design optimization approach. Appl. Energy 2023, 339, 121015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Moioli, E.; Wötzel, A.; Schildhauer, T. Feasibility assessment of small-scale methanol production via power-to-X. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 359, 132071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Ye, D.; Tsang, S.C.E. Prospects and challenges of green ammonia synthesis. Nat. Synth. 2023, 2, 612–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Aziz, M.; Wijayanta, A.T.; Nandiyanto, A.B.D. Ammonia as Effective Hydrogen Storage: A Review on Production, Storage and Utilization. Energies 2020, 13, 3062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Bennani, Y.; Perl, A.; Patil, A.C.; Someren, C.V.; Heijne, L.; Steenis, M.V. Power-to-Ammonia: Rethinking the Role of Ammonia—From a Value Product to a Flexible Energy Carrier (FlexNH3); Hanzehogeschool Groningen: Groningen, The Netherlands, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  127. Kyriakou, V.; Garagounis, I.; Vourros, A.; Vasileiou, E.; Stoukides, M. An Electrochemical Haber-Bosch Process. Joule 2020, 4, 142–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Liu, H. Ammonia synthesis catalyst 100 years: Practice, enlightenment and challenge. Chin. J. Catal. 2014, 35, 1619–1640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Mortensen, J.J.; Hansen, L.B.; Hammer, B.; Nørskov, J.K. Nitrogen Adsorption and Dissociation on Fe(111). J. Catal. 1999, 182, 479–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Moghadam, M.R.; Bazmandegan-Shamili, A.; Bagheri, H. The current methods of ammonia synthesis by Haber-Bosch process. In Progresses in Ammonia: Science, Technology and Membranes; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2024; pp. 1–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Humphreys, J.; Lan, R.; Tao, S. Development and Recent Progress on Ammonia Synthesis Catalysts for Haber–Bosch Process. Adv. Energy Sustain. Res. 2020, 2, 2000043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Weiss, W.; Ranke, W. Surface chemistry and catalysis on well-defined epitaxial iron-oxide layers. Prog. Surf. Sci. 2002, 70, 1–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Hu, L.Z.N. Development of novel low temperature and low pressure ammonia synthesis catalyst. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 1996, 142, 209–222. [Google Scholar]
  134. Berwal, P.; Kumar, S.; Khandelwal, B. A comprehensive review on synthesis, chemical kinetics, and practical application of ammonia as future fuel for combustion. J. Energy Inst. 2021, 99, 273–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Ghoreishian, S.M.; Shariati, K.; Huh, Y.S.; Lauterbach, J. Recent advances in ammonia synthesis over ruthenium single-atom-embedded catalysts: A focused review. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 467, 143533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Inoue, Y.; Kitano, M.; Kim, S.-W.; Yokoyama, T.; Hara, M.; Hosono, H. Highly Dispersed Ru on Electride [Ca24Al28O64]4+(e)4 as a Catalyst for Ammonia Synthesis. ACS Catal. 2014, 4, 674–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Kitano, M.; Inoue, Y.; Sasase, M.; Kishida, K.; Kobayashi, Y.; Nishiyama, K.; Tada, T.; Kawamura, S.; Yokoyama, T.; Hara, M.; et al. Self-organized Ruthenium-Barium Core-Shell Nanoparticles on a Mesoporous Calcium Amide Matrix for Efficient Low-Temperature Ammonia Synthesis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2018, 57, 2648–2652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Han, W.; Huang, S.; Cheng, T.; Tang, H.; Li, Y.; Liu, H. Promotion of Nb2O5 on the wustite-based iron catalyst for ammonia synthesis. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 353, 17–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Xiujin, Y.U.; Lin, B.; Lin, J.; Wang, R.; Wei, K. A novel fused iron catalyst for ammonia synthesis promoted with rare earth gangue. J. Rare Earths 2008, 26, 6. [Google Scholar]
  140. Czekajło, Ł.; Lendzion-Bieluń, Z. Wustite based iron-cobalt catalyst for ammonia synthesis. Catal. Today 2017, 286, 114–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Jafari, A.; Ebadi, A.; Sahebdelfar, S. Effect of iron oxide precursor on the properties and ammonia synthesis activity of fused iron catalysts. React. Kinet. Mech. Catal. 2018, 126, 307–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Kobayashi, Y.; Tang, Y.; Kageyama, T.; Yamashita, H.; Masuda, N.; Hosokawa, S.; Kageyama, H. Titanium-Based Hydrides as Heterogeneous Catalysts for Ammonia Synthesis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 18240–18246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Han, W.; Li, Z.; Liu, H. La2Ce2O7 supported ruthenium as a robust catalyst for ammonia synthesis. J. Rare Earths 2019, 37, 492–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Lin, B.; Guo, Y.; Cao, C.; Ni, J.; Lin, J.; Jiang, L. Carbon support surface effects in the catalytic performance of Ba-promoted Ru catalyst for ammonia synthesis. Catal. Today 2018, 316, 230–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Karolewska, M.; Truszkiewicz, E.; Wściseł, M.; Mierzwa, B.; Kępiński, L.; Raróg-Pilecka, W. Ammonia synthesis over a Ba and Ce-promoted carbon-supported cobalt catalyst. Effect of the cerium addition and preparation procedure. J. Catal. 2013, 303, 130–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Zybert, M.; Wyszyńska, M.; Tarka, A.; Patkowski, W.; Ronduda, H.; Mierzwa, B.; Kępiński, L.; Sarnecki, A.; Moszyński, D.; Raróg-Pilecka, W. Surface enrichment phenomenon in the Ba-doped cobalt catalyst for ammonia synthesis. Vacuum 2019, 168, 108831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Ye, T.N.; Park, S.W.; Lu, Y.; Li, J.; Sasase, M.; Kitano, M.; Hosono, H. Contribution of Nitrogen Vacancies to Ammonia Synthesis over Metal Nitride Catalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 14374–14383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Morgan, E.R. Techno-Economic Feasibility Study of Ammonia Plants Powered by Offshore Wind. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Provo, UT, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  149. Cheema, I.I.; Krewer, U. Operating envelope of Haber-Bosch process design for power-to-ammonia. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 34926–34936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Folke, J.; Song, H.; Schittkowski, J.; Schlögl, R.; Ruland, H. Oxygen Poisoning in Laboratory Testing of Iron-Based Ammonia Synthesis Catalysts and its Potential Sources. Chem. Ing. Tech. 2020, 92, 1567–1573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Rouwenhorst, K.H.R.; Krzywda, P.M.; Benes, N.E.; Mul, G.; Lefferts, L. Ammonia Production Technologies. In Techno-Economic Challenges of Green Ammonia as an Energy Vector; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 2021; pp. 41–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Available online: https://www.iea.org/reports/global-hydrogen-review-2023 (accessed on 1 September 2023).
Figure 1. The main classifications of hydrogen energy and their corresponding production technologies.
Figure 1. The main classifications of hydrogen energy and their corresponding production technologies.
Processes 12 01518 g001
Figure 2. The schematic diagrams of the three electrolyzer structures [28]. (a) ALK electrolysis. (b) PEM electrolysis. (c) SOEC electrolysis.
Figure 2. The schematic diagrams of the three electrolyzer structures [28]. (a) ALK electrolysis. (b) PEM electrolysis. (c) SOEC electrolysis.
Processes 12 01518 g002aProcesses 12 01518 g002b
Figure 3. Methanol synthesis process system [112].
Figure 3. Methanol synthesis process system [112].
Processes 12 01518 g003
Figure 4. Ammonia synthesis process system [112].
Figure 4. Ammonia synthesis process system [112].
Processes 12 01518 g004
Table 1. Gravimetric energy density and volumetric energy density (based on lower heating values) of fuels [12].
Table 1. Gravimetric energy density and volumetric energy density (based on lower heating values) of fuels [12].
Gravimetric Energy Density (MJ/kg)Gravimetric Energy Density (kWh/kg)Volumetric Energy Density (MJ/L)Volumetric Energy Density (kWh/L)
H2 (35 Mpa)120.033.32.80.8
H2 (70 Mpa)120.033.34.81.3
H2 (liquid)120.033.38.52.2
CH4 (25 Mpa)50.113.99.52.6
Standard coal29.38.1
Gasoline43.112.232.08.9
Diesel46.012.838.610.7
Table 2. Summary of China hydrogen energy policies.
Table 2. Summary of China hydrogen energy policies.
YearMain PolicyKey Points
2006Outline of the National Medium- and Long-term Planning for Development of Science and Technology (From 2006 to 2020)Hydrogen energy and fuel cell technologies were incorporated into the advanced energy technologies.
2012Plan for Development of the Energy Efficient and New Energy Automobile Industry (2012–2020)The government proposed to drive the development of hydrogen production, storage, transportation, and refueling technology by means of fuel cell application demonstration.
2014Energy Development Strategy Action Plan (2014–2020)Hydrogen energy and fuel cell were determined as strategic directions for energy technology innovation
2016China Energy Technology Innovation Action Plan 2016–2030The section on hydrogen energy has significantly expanded, covering hydrogen production from renewable energy and nuclear energy, fuel cell distributed power generation, etc.
2019Government Work ReportFor the first time, hydrogen was included in the government work report, which emphasized the need to promote the implementation of charging and hydrogen refueling facilities.
2020The energy law of the people’s republic of China (Exposure Draft)At the level of national law, hydrogen energy was incorporated in the energy management.
2021Action Plan for Carbon Dioxide Peaking Before 2030The plan proposed to explore the large-scale application of hydrogen energy in industry, transportation, construction, and other fields.
2022New Energy Storage Development Implementation during the 14th Five-year PlanIt clarified the position of hydrogen energy and ammonia energy as a new type of energy storage.
202214th Five-year plan for renewable energy developmentIt was emphasized that large-scale hydrogen production from renewable energy sources was promoted.
2022China maps 2021–2035 plan on hydrogen energy developmentThe plan defined the energy properties of hydrogen, and proposed that hydrogen energy would play an important supporting role in the country’s green energy transformation.
2023Guidelines on Hydrogen Energy Industry Standard System Construction (2023)The guidelines systematically established a standard system for the entire industrial chain of hydrogen energy, including hydrogen production, storage, transportation, and utilization.
Table 3. Technical characteristics of typical water electrolysis technologies [58].
Table 3. Technical characteristics of typical water electrolysis technologies [58].
TypeALKPEMSOEC
Current density (A/cm2)0.2~0.70.1~2.21.0~2.0
Temperature (°C)50~8040~80700~900
H2 Purity (%)99.5~99.999.9999.90
Pressure (MPa)1.0~3.02.0~5.00.1~1.5
Energy consumption (kWh/Nm3)4.5~5.53.4~4.42.23~2.27
Efficiency (%)56~8076~8590~100
Load range (%)15~1000~1500~120
Respond speedDozens of secondsSeveral secondsSeveral minutes
Lifetime (h)90,00020,000~50,000~7000
Table 4. Several Chinese typical electrolyzer manufacturers.
Table 4. Several Chinese typical electrolyzer manufacturers.
BrandProvinceTechnologyHydrogen Production Rate (Nm3/h)Hydrogen Pressure (MPa)Power Consumption (kWh/Nm3)
Peric HydrogenHebeiALK20–20001.5–2.5≤4.3–4.5
PEM0.01–2000.1–3.2≤5.4
Longi HydrogenShannxiALK1–30001.64.1–4.3 (ALK Hi1)
4.3–4.5 (ALK G)
SungrowAnhuiALK≤10001.8-
PEM≤2503-
Tianjin Mainland Hydrogen EquipmentTianjinALK0.1–10005≤4.4–4.9
PEM0.4–107-
SanyHunanALK500–20001.84.3–4.7
PEM≤20034.3
GuofuheeJiangsuALK50–1000--
PEM4–200--
Kohodo Hydrogen EnergyGuangdongALK0.5–10001.64.0
Changchun lvdongJilinPEM≤200--
Shandong Saikesaisi Hydrogen EnergyShandongPEM0.5–2003-
BPEGBeijingALK2–2000-4.3
C hySAGuangdongPEM0.2–3003.5-
H2-BankZhejiangSOEC2-3.5
Table 5. Catalytic performance of different methanol synthesis catalysts in different references.
Table 5. Catalytic performance of different methanol synthesis catalysts in different references.
ReferenceCatalystsH2:CO2Temperature (°C)Pressure (MPa)GHSV (h−1)CO2 Conversion
(%)
Methanol Selectivity (%)
Florian et al. [99]Standard commercial catalyst (Süd-Chemie)3.1:1250810,500
Toyir et al. [100]Cu/ZnO/ZrO2/Al2O3/SiO23.7:1250710,000
Doss et al. [101]commercial catalyst (Johnson Matthey)
Cu/ZnO/Al2O3
3:12406.933005.81
Choi et al. [102]Cu-Pd/CeO23:12703 16.126.7
Tan et al. [103]Cu/ZnO/Al2O33:12603600023.131.2
Tan et al. [103]CuNi2/CeO2−NT3:12603600017.878.8
Zabilskiy et al. [104]Standard Cu/ZnO/Al2O3 catalyst (Alfa Aesar)3:12601.5 243
Liang et al. [105]Cn-Zn/Al foam3:12503 13.664.5
Wang et al. [96]Cu/ZnO/ZrO23:12203 18.980.2
Zhang et al. [106]CuZn/CeO 2603 68.5
Wang et al. [107]Cu-Mn-Zn/ZrO3:1250540006.573.7
Martin et al. [98]In2O3/ZrO24:1300520,0005.299.8
Rui et al. [108]In2O34:1300521,0008.271
Chou et al. [109]In2O3/ZrO24:1300452,00010.553
Chou et al. [109]1.5YIn2O3/ZrO24:1300452,0007.669
Wang et al. [110]MaZrOx (Ma = Cd, Ga) solid-solution catalysts3:1300524,0004.3–12.480
Li et al. [111]Pd/ZnO-ZIF-83:12704.5 9.374
Table 6. Catalytic performance of different ammonia synthesis catalysts in different references.
Table 6. Catalytic performance of different ammonia synthesis catalysts in different references.
ReferenceCatalystsCompositions (wt.%)H2:N3Temperature
(°C)
Pressure
(MPa)
GHSV
(h−1)
NH3 Concentration
(%)
Han et al. [138]WBC80.46FeO + 12.66Fe2O3 + 1.8Al2O3 + 0.6K2O + 1.8CaO + 2.68others3:1350–475530,00010.4–18.5
Han et al. [138]Nb-WBC80FeO + 12.52Fe2O3 + 1.8Al2O3 + 0.6K2O + 1.8CaO + 0.6Nb2O5 + 2.08others3:1350–475530,0009.6–17.9
Yu et al. [139]A110-368Fe(total) + 2.2Al2O3 + 0.59K2O + 1.2CaO + 0.36SiO23:14251510,00019.5
Yu et al. [139]FA40168Fe(total) + 2.3Al2O3 + 0.58K2O + 1.1CaO + 0.33SiO2 + 0.3MgO + 0.38others3:14251510,00020.8
Czekajło et al. [140]ZBRW-102.18Al2O3 + 0.44K2O + 1.3CaO + 2.01CoO23:14751020,00010.8
Jafari et al. [141]Wustite65.7O + 30.62Fe + 2.4Al + 0.31K + 1Ca3:1350–5303
Jafari et al. [141]Magnetite65.7O + 30.24Fe + 3.3Al + 0.23K + 0.54Ca3:1350–5303
Kobayashi et al. [142]Ru/BaTiO2.5H0.50.9Ru3:14005 0.17
Han et al. [143]Ru/La2Ce2O74Ru3:14251010,00012.94
Lin et al. [144]Ba-Ru/AC-G9Ba3:140010
Karolewska et al. [145](Co-Ce)-Ba/C9.34Co3:14009
Zybert et al. [146]Co/Ba(CP) 3:14006.370,000
Ye et al. [147]Ni/CeN NPs10Ni3:14000.136,000
Table 7. The cost for different power-to-X technologies.
Table 7. The cost for different power-to-X technologies.
Power-to-HydrogenPower-to-MethanolPower-to-Ammonia
ALKPEMSOEC
Cost CNY 5437~9425/kWCNY 14,500/kWCNY 25,375/kWCNY 7.91~15.81/kgCH3OHCNY 7.12/kgNH3
Table 8. Some of the commercial or demonstration projects in China.
Table 8. Some of the commercial or demonstration projects in China.
Project NameLocationScaleStatus
Guyuan Wind Energy Hydrogen Production Industrial Application ProjectGuyuan, Hebei200 MW wind
10 MW H2
2022 start operation
Kuqa Green Hydrogen Pilot ProjectKuqa, Xinjiang200 MW solar
20,000 t/a H2
2023.06 the first phase start operation
Ordos Green Hydrogen Pilot ProjectOrdos, Inner Mongolia450 MW wind
250 MW solar
30,000 t/a H2
Under construction
Lanzhou Liquid Solar Fuel Production Demonstration ProjectLanzhou, Gansu10 MW solar
1000 t/a CH3OH
2020.01 start operation
The Da’an Wind and Solar Green Hydrogen Synthesis Ammonia Integration Demonstration ProjectDa’an, Jilin700 MW wind power
100 MW solar
32,000 t/a H2
180,000 t/a NH3
Under construction
Songwon Hydrogen Energy Industrial Park ProjectSongyuan, Jilin800 MW wind power
100 MW solar
45,000 t/a H2
200,000 t/a NH3
20,000 t/a CH3OH
Under construction
Liaoyuan Power-to-X ProjectLiaoyuan, Jilin1.4 GW wind power
0.4 GW solar
100,000 t/a H2
38,000 t/a NH3
620,000 t/a CH3OH
Under construction
Qianguo Power-to-X ProjectSongyuan, Jilin1.3 GW wind power
20,000 t/a NH3
400,000 t/a CH3OH
Planning
Xingan League Energy Carbon- zero Hydrogen Production ProjectUlanhot, Inner Mongolia1.25 GW wind power
56,200 t/a H2
300,000 t/a NH3
Planning
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhai, Y.; He, Y.; Shao, J.; Zhang, W.; Tong, X.; Wang, Z.; Weng, W. Review of Hydrogen-Driven Power-to-X Technology and Application Status in China. Processes 2024, 12, 1518. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12071518

AMA Style

Zhai Y, He Y, Shao J, Zhang W, Tong X, Wang Z, Weng W. Review of Hydrogen-Driven Power-to-X Technology and Application Status in China. Processes. 2024; 12(7):1518. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12071518

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhai, Yunchu, Yong He, Jiaming Shao, Weiling Zhang, Xiaofan Tong, Zhihua Wang, and Wubin Weng. 2024. "Review of Hydrogen-Driven Power-to-X Technology and Application Status in China" Processes 12, no. 7: 1518. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12071518

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop