Next Article in Journal
Damage Evolution in High-Temperature-Treated Granite: Combined DIC and AE Experimental Study
Previous Article in Journal
Biodegradable Polymer Composites Based on Polypropylene and Hybrid Fillers for Applications in the Automotive Industry
Previous Article in Special Issue
Energy Storage and Management of Offshore Wind-Based Green Hydrogen Production
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Techno-Economic Analysis of Hydrogen Transport via Truck Using Liquid Organic Hydrogen Carriers

by
Carmine Cava
1,*,
Gabriele Guglielmo Gagliardi
1,2,*,
Enrica Piscolla
3 and
Domenico Borello
1,2
1
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Sapienza University of Rome, 00184 Rome, Italy
2
Hydro-Eco Center, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
3
Enel Green Power, 00198 Rome, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2025, 13(4), 1081; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13041081
Submission received: 14 February 2025 / Revised: 28 March 2025 / Accepted: 1 April 2025 / Published: 3 April 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Hydrogen Production Processes)

Abstract

This study presents a techno-economic analysis of hydrogen transportation via liquid organic hydrogen carriers by road, comparing this option with compressed hydrogen (350 bar) and liquefied hydrogen. The analysis includes the simulation of hydrogenation and dehydrogenation reactors for the dibenzyltoluene/perhydro-dibenzyltoluene system using ASPEN Plus, along with a cost assessment of compression, liquefaction, and trucking. A sensitivity analysis is also carried out, evaluating hydrogen transport at varying daily demand levels (1, 2, and 4 t/d) and transport distances (50, 150, and 300 km), with varying electricity prices and capital expenditures for hydrogenation and dehydrogenation units. Results indicate that compressed hydrogen is the most cost-effective solution for short distances up to 150 km, with a levelized cost of transported hydrogen ranging from 1.10 to 1.61 EUR/kg. However, LOHC technology becomes more competitive at longer distances, with LCOTH values between 1.49 and 1.90 EUR/kg at 300 km across all demand levels. Liquefied hydrogen remains the least competitive option, reaching costs up to 5.35 EUR/kg, although it requires fewer annual trips due to higher trailer capacity. Notably, at 150 km, LOHC transport becomes more cost-effective than compressed hydrogen when electricity prices exceed 0.22 EUR/kWh or when the capital costs for hydrogenation and dehydrogenation units are minimized. From an environmental perspective, switching from compressed to liquid hydrogen carriers significantly reduces CO2 emissions—by 56% for LOHCs and 78% for liquid hydrogen—highlighting the potential of these technologies to support the decarbonization of hydrogen logistics.
Keywords: LOHCs; hydrogen transportation; techno-economic analysis LOHCs; hydrogen transportation; techno-economic analysis

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cava, C.; Gagliardi, G.G.; Piscolla, E.; Borello, D. Techno-Economic Analysis of Hydrogen Transport via Truck Using Liquid Organic Hydrogen Carriers. Processes 2025, 13, 1081. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13041081

AMA Style

Cava C, Gagliardi GG, Piscolla E, Borello D. Techno-Economic Analysis of Hydrogen Transport via Truck Using Liquid Organic Hydrogen Carriers. Processes. 2025; 13(4):1081. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13041081

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cava, Carmine, Gabriele Guglielmo Gagliardi, Enrica Piscolla, and Domenico Borello. 2025. "Techno-Economic Analysis of Hydrogen Transport via Truck Using Liquid Organic Hydrogen Carriers" Processes 13, no. 4: 1081. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13041081

APA Style

Cava, C., Gagliardi, G. G., Piscolla, E., & Borello, D. (2025). Techno-Economic Analysis of Hydrogen Transport via Truck Using Liquid Organic Hydrogen Carriers. Processes, 13(4), 1081. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13041081

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop