Next Article in Journal
Optimising Brewery-Wastewater-Supported Acid Mine Drainage Treatment vis-à-vis Response Surface Methodology and Artificial Neural Network
Previous Article in Journal
Improved Phenolic Compositions and Sensory Attributes of Red Wines by Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mutant CM8 Overproducing Cell-Wall Mannoproteins
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Carbonaceous Adsorbent Derived from Sulfur-Impregnated Heavy Oil Ash and Its Lead Removal Ability from Aqueous Solution

Department of Urban Environment Systems, Graduate School of Engineering, Chiba University, 1-33 Yayoi-cho, Inage-ku, Chiba 263-8522, Japan
Processes 2020, 8(11), 1484; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8111484
Submission received: 14 September 2020 / Revised: 11 November 2020 / Accepted: 17 November 2020 / Published: 18 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Environmental and Green Processes)

Abstract

:
A novel carbonaceous adsorbent was prepared from sulfur-impregnated heavy oil ash via pyrolysis using potassium sulfide (K2S) solution, and its ability to remove lead (Pb2+) from aqueous solutions was examined. It was compared with an adsorbent synthesized by conventional pyrolysis using potassium hydroxide (KOH) solution. Specifically, the raw ash was immersed in 1 M K2S solution or 1 M KOH solution for 1 day and subsequently heated at 100–1000 °C in a nitrogen (N2) atmosphere. After heating for 1 h, the solid was naturally cooled in N2 atmosphere, and subsequently washed and dried to yield the product. Regardless of the pyrolysis temperature, the product generated using K2S (Product-K2S) has a higher sulfur content than that obtained using KOH (Product-KOH). Moreover, Product-K2S has a higher lead removal ability than Product-KOH, whereas the specific surface area of the former is smaller than that of the latter. Product-K2S obtained at 300 °C (Product-K2S-300) achieves the highest lead adsorption and a high selective lead removal from a ternary Pb2+–Cu2+–Zn2+ solution. The equilibrium capacity of Product-K2S-300 was found to fit the Langmuir model better than the Freundlich model, and its calculated maximum adsorption capacity is 0.54 mmol/g. From the ternary Pb2+–Cu2+–Zn2+ solution, the order of adsorption by Product-K2S-300 is Pb2+ > Cu2+ > Zn2+, and the removal of Pb2+ and Cu2+ increases as the pH of the solution increases.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

In oil-fired power plants, oil-fired fly ash following discharge, prior to passing through a flue, is collected by cyclones or electrostatic precipitators. The ash is mainly composed of unburned carbon (up to 90 wt.%), water-soluble sulphates, and metal oxides, such as iron (1–5 wt.%), vanadium (0.6–3.6 wt.%), and nickel (0.1–1.7 wt.%) oxides. There is concern regarding the environmental problems of ash, such as generation of acidic liquid, release of heavy metals, and dusting. Because oil-fired fly ashes have a high content of vanadium (V) and nickel (Ni), their recovery from heavy oil ash has attracted attention since the 1960s worldwide [1]. In the traditional hydrometallurgical processes [2], in the first leaching stage, the vanadium and nickel compounds in ash are dissolved in acidic or basic solutions. Consequently, the produced unburned carbon (carbonaceous residues) from the ash has to be disposed of to landfill sites, requiring high processing costs [3]. Because they have a high carbon content and heavy metal-free, these residues can be used as precursors for activated carbon [4,5,6] or be burned with or without coal in a coal boiler for energy recovery.
Activated carbon has various uses in wastewater treatment for drinking water production, control of atmospheric pollution, and removal of poisonous gases. Activated carbon is favorable for removing organic chemicals from wastewater, whereas it is not promising for removing inorganic pollutants from aqueous solutions, because of its relatively nonpolar character [7]. This property prevents the attraction between some functional groups on activated carbon surface and charged metal species. The adsorption can be enhanced by introducing functional groups with high affinity for specific substrates by functionalization processes. The choice of functional groups allows defining the specificity of an adsorbing material for a particular substrate. For example, a bio-based substance (BBS) from composited bio-wastes was impregnated in γ-alumina to promote the adsorption of polar pollutants via the several acidic and basic functional groups of the BBS [8,9]. Activated carbon is typically modified by various ligands, which introduce additional heteroatoms so that the sorbent develops a high selectivity toward certain metal ions. Sulfur (S)-containing ligands prove more selective toward some heavy metals than their oxygen and nitrogen analogues [10,11,12]. In previous studies, S-impregnated carbonaceous adsorbents with high heavy metal removal were prepared from an industrial waste—paper sludge—by pyrolysis after immersion in potassium sulfide (K2S) solution [13]. In the Pearson theory, a soft base, S, had better to interact with soft acids, Zn2+, Pb2+, and Cd2+, instead of with a hard base, oxygen, in activated carbon [14,15]. Therefore, there is a possibility to manufacture a low-cost adsorbent with removal of heavy metals from carbonaceous heavy oil ash by pyrolysis with K2S solution.
In this study, the preparation of a carbonaceous adsorbent with removal property of heavy metals from heavy oil ash by pyrolysis with K2S solution was investigated, and the lead removal ability of the S-impregnated adsorbents was examined. This was motivated by Pb2+ being one of the representative poisons among heavy metals. In addition, to clarify the effect of S in the raw ash, the adsorbent was prepared by the same procedure using potassium hydroxide (KOH) solution to compare the properties of lead removal.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Heavy Oil Ash

A heavy oil ash collected from an electrostatic precipitator of a Japanese electric power plant in Akita was used. Table 1 lists some of the properties of this heavy oil ash. The proximate and ultimate analysis of the heavy oil ash is reported in Table 1. The raw ash has a high carbonaceous fraction content (75–80%), appropriate for the preparation of a carbonaceous adsorbent.

2.2. Preparation of Adsorbent

The preparation procedure for the adsorbent is shown in Figure 1. The raw ash (10 g) was added to 1 M K2S solution or 1 M KOH solution (100 mL), stirred for 1 day, and then filtrated and dried in an oven to obtain K2S-immersed ash (Ash-K2S) or KOH-immersed ash (Ash-KOH), respectively. These immersed ashes were pyrolyzed, then washed with distilled water, and dried in an oven to prepare the carbonized products (Product-K2S from Ash-K2S and Product-KOH from Ash-KOH).
The pyrolysis was performed using a horizontal reactor, similar to a previous study [13]. Ash-K2S or Ash-KOH was set in the middle of a quartz tube (0.45 mm inside diameter and 1 m length). N2 gas was injected to purge the air in the tube (1.0 L/min rate) for 30 min. The ashes were heated at 100–1000 °C in an electric furnace, with a N2 gas continuous flow (1.0 L/min). After 1 h of heating, the product was naturally cooled under the flow of N2 gas in the tube (1.0 L/min rate), and finally, it was collected from the tube.

2.3. Lead Removal

Pb2+ adsorption capacities of the samples were examined using lead nitrate (Pb(NO3)2) aqueous solutions. Each sample (0.1 g) was added to 10 mM Pb2+ solution (10 mL) in a centrifuge tube and shaken with a reciprocal shaker. After shaking for 1 day, the tube was centrifuged, and the Pb2+ concentration in the supernatant and the pH of the supernatant were measured.
The adsorption of Pb2+ by the S-impregnated adsorbents was examined using solutions containing various Pb2+ contents. Each adsorbent (50 mg) was added to 0–8 mM Pb2+ solutions (10 mL) in tubes, which were shaken with a shaker. After shaking for 1 day, the tubes were centrifuged, and the Pb2+concentrations in the supernatants and the pH values of the supernatants were measured.
The selectivity of Pb2+ removal of the S-impregnated adsorbents was examined using a mixed aqueous solution of Pb(NO3)2, zinc nitrate, and copper nitrate, each having a concentration of 1 mmol/L in the ternary solution. Each adsorbent (0.1 g) was added to 10 mL of ternary solutions having various pH values, which were adjusted to 1–4 using nitric acid solution, and the tubes were shaken with a shaker. After shaking for 1 day, the tubes were centrifuged, and the concentrations of Pb2+, Zn2+, and Cu2+ in the supernatants and the pH values of the supernatant were measured.
The adsorption amounts (q (mmol/g)) and the removal ratio (R (%)) were calculated using the following equations:
qM = (C0C) × V/w
RM = (C0C)/C0 × 100
where M = Pb2+, Zn2+, or Cu2+. C0 and C are the initial and measured concentrations of Pb2+, Zn2+, and Cu2+ in the solution (mmol/L), respectively. V is the solution volume (L), and w is the weight of the added sample (g).

2.4. Characterization

The chemical contents and mineralogical phases of the samples were analyzed via X-ray fluorescence (XRF-Primini, Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan) and powder X-ray diffraction (monochromated CuKα radiation) (Ultima IV, Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan), respectively. The morphologies of the samples were observed via scanning electron microscopy (SU-70, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). The carbon contents in the samples were analyzed using a CHNS/O elemental analysis apparatus (2400II, Perkin Elmer Japan, Yokohama, Japan). The specific surface area of each sample was determined using an automatic gas adsorption apparatus (Belsorp-mini II, MicrotracBel, Osaka, Japan). The heavy metal ion concentrations in the solutions were analyzed using an inductively coupled plasma emission analyzer (SPS 5510, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). The pH of the solutions was measured by a pH meter (pH/Ion meter D-53, Horiba, Kyoto, Japan).

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 2 shows the mineral compositions of (a) raw ash, (b) Ash-K2S, and (c) Ash-KOH. The raw ash mainly contains ammonium sulfate ((NH4)2SO4) and magnesium chloride (MgCl2), produced by the neutralization of acidic gas by ammonia and magnesium oxide. After the treatment with K2S and KOH, these mineral phases are diminished, elemental S appears in Ash-K2S, and potassium sulfate (K2SO4) appears in Ash-KOH.
Figure 3 shows the lead removal achieved by the products obtained at various pyrolysis temperatures. Regardless of the pyrolysis temperatures, the removal ability of Product-K2S is higher than that of Product-KOH. In the case of Product-KOH, as the temperature of pyrolysis is increased to 600 °C, the lead removal ability decreases to zero. The lead removal ability of the product obtained above 700 °C is higher than that of the product obtained at 600 °C, and becomes almost constant (approximately 25%). In the case of Product-K2S, as the temperature of pyrolysis increases to 300 °C, the Pb2+ removal ability of the product increases, followed by a decrease up to 600 °C, and becoming almost constant above 600 °C. Therefore, the maximum lead removal ability achieved by heating Ash-K2S is at 300 °C.
Figure 4 shows the XRD patterns of (a) Product-K2S and (b) Product-KOH after pyrolysis at various temperatures. All the obtained products present mainly amorphous phases produced by pyrolysis. It is noted that a metal alloy of Fe and Ni appears in Product-K2S obtained at 1000 °C and in Product-KOH above 700 °C, owing to the reduction of metal oxides in the ash by the carbon content.
Figure 5 shows the contents of carbon and S of Ash-K2S, Ash-KOH, Product-K2S, and Product-KOH as functions of the pyrolysis temperature. It is noted that the results of Ash-K2S and Ash-KOH are plotted at the origin. The carbon contents of Ash-K2S and Ash-KOH are approximately 50% each, which is lower than that of raw ash. After pyrolysis, the carbon contents of all the products are approximately 65–70%. The S content of Ash-K2S (12%) is higher than those of Ash-KOH (4%) and raw ash (4%). After pyrolysis, the S contents of all the Product-K2S are higher than those of all the Product-KOH. The S content of Product-K2S obtained at 100 °C is almost the same as that of Ash-K2S, and that of Product-K2S obtained above 200 °C is almost constant (5–7.5%), which are lower than those of Ash-K2S. The S content of Product-KOH is almost constant, which is almost same as that of Ash-KOH.
Figure 6 shows the specific surface areas of Ash-K2S, Ash-KOH, Product-K2S, and Product-KOH as functions of the pyrolysis temperature. It is also noted that the results of Ash-K2S and Ash-KOH are plotted at the origin. The specific surface areas of raw ash, Ash-K2S, and Ash-KOH are almost the same (approximately 6%). After pyrolysis, regardless of the pyrolysis temperature, the specific surface area of Product-K2S is lower than that of Product-KOH, and both are almost constant (5–10% and 15–20 %, respectively).
The S contents of Ash-K2S and Ash-KOH comprise elemental S and K2SO4, respectively. Volatile matters in these ashes are released at 100–200 °C to form carbonaceous materials. The melting and boiling points of elemental S are 188 °C and 445 °C, respectively, whereas those of potassium sulfate are 1069 °C and 1689 °C, respectively. For Ash-K2S, melting S was rated with the surface of carbonaceous ash to form S functional groups for heavy metal ion removal at 200–400 °C. Moreover, S was vaporized without reacting with the carbonaceous surface above 400 °C. Therefore, the lead removal ability of the product pyrolyzed at approximately 300 °C from Ash-K2S is the highest. For Ash-KOH, K2SO4 does not react with the carbonaceous surface without the melting S content forming the S functional group. Therefore, the lead removal ability of the product pyrolyzed from Ash-KOH is lower than of that from Ash-K2S.
The SEM images of (a) the raw ash, (b) Product-K2S obtained at 300 °C, and (c) Product-KOH at 300 °C are shown in Figure 7. A collection of spongy particles and some aggregates are observed in the raw ash, and the morphologies of both the obtained products appear very similar to that of the starting ash, which suggests that the spongy structure of the heavy oil ash is maintained in the obtained adsorbents.
The lead removal isotherm of Product-K2S obtained at 300 °C is shown in Figure 8. With the increase in the equilibrium lead concentration, the lead adsorption increases to approximately 0.4 mmol/g, and then becomes almost constant. The isotherm was analyzed using two typical isotherm models: Langmuir and Freundlich models. The liner forms of the Langmuir and Freundlich models are given by:
Ce/qe = 1/(Qmax × KL) + Ce/Qmax
ln(qe) = ln(KF) + (1/n) × ln(Ce)
where qe is the lead concentration on the adsorbent at equilibrium (mmol/g), and Qmax (mmol/g) and KL (L/mmol) are the maximum adsorption capacity and Langmuir constant (equilibrium adsorption constant), respectively. KF and n are the Freundlich constants.
The calculated parameters for each isotherm model are listed in Table 2. The correlation regression coefficient (R2) as a measure of the goodness-of-fit using the Langmuir and Freundlich models are 0.999 and 0.813, respectively, indicating that the Langmuir model is fitted better than the Freundlich model. This suggests that the lead adsorption occurs uniformly and follows monolayer adsorption, instead of multilayer adsorption. Moreover, the adsorption occurs at equivalent adsorption energies and homogeneous binding sites with no interaction between the adsorbates [16]. The calculated maximum adsorption capacity, Qmax, is 0.38 mmol/g. The lead adsorbents, such as natural materials [17,18,19], synthetic carbon materials [20,21,22], and activated carbon prepared from wastes [23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30] were reported, and the maximum adsorption capacity of 0.38 mmol/g is comparable to those of other reported adsorbents (Table 3). It can be concluded that the adsorbent obtained from oil ash by S-impregnation is a promising material for treatment of wastewater containing lead ion.
Lead removal ability of Product-K2S prepared at 300 °C from ternary solutions was examined. Figure 9 presents the heavy metal removal ability of the product from a Pb2+–Zn2+–Cu2+ solution. The product can remove Pb2+ and Cu2+ ions from the ternary solution, whereas Zn2+ ions cannot be removed in this experiment. With the increase in the equilibrium pH, the removal of Pb2+ first increases from pH 3 to pH 6, and then that of Cu2+ increases from pH 4.5 to pH 6. The increase in the removal of Pb2+ and Cu2+ when the pH increases may be attributed to two reasons. First, the number of negatively charged active sites increases and the number of positively charged sites decreases at high pH values, which increase the electrostatic adsorption between the metal ions and the S-impregnated product. Second, at a low pH, the competitive interaction between the metal ions and protons with the active sites increases, resulting in a low adsorption capacity of the metal ions.
The order of adsorption using Product-K2S-300 is Pb2+ > Cu2+ > Zn2+, indicating that the product has a high affinity for Pb2+ among the heavy metal ions. A functionalized carbon nanotube with S functional groups (=C=S, -SH) presented increased adsorption of Cu2+ with an increase of the solution pH from 2 to 6 and was more favorable to Cu2+ than Zn2+ [31]. For a resin with sulfur functional groups, the adsorption of Pb2+ and Cu2+ increases with an increase of the solution pH, and the adsorption amount of Pb2+ is slightly higher than that of Cu2+ [32]. There is good agreement with our results.
From these results, a carbonaceous product can be prepared by both the procedures, and Product-K2S has a higher lead removal ability than Product-KOH. Product-K2S has a higher S content and lower specific surface area than Product-KOH, which suggests that chemical adsorption with S content has a higher dependence on lead removal from an aqueous solution than physical adsorption.

4. Conclusions

Preparation of a carbonaceous adsorbent with removal of heavy metals from heavy oil ash by S impregnation was investigated, and its lead removal ability from an aqueous solution was estimated. K2S solution can immerse S into the ash, and K2S-immersed ash can be converted into a carbonaceous product with a high S content by pyrolysis. Product-K2S pyrolyzed at 300 °C presents the highest lead adsorption from an aqueous solution, and there is high selective removal for lead ions from a ternary Pb2+–Cu2+–Zn2+ solution. The lead removal is found to fit the Langmuir adsorption model more than the Freundlich model. In the ternary Pb2+–Cu2+–Zn2+ solution, with an increase in the solution pH, the removal of Pb2+ and Cu2+ increased and the order of adsorption was Pb2+ > Cu2+ > Zn2+. The carbonaceous adsorbent with heavy metal removal can be prepared from heavy oil ash by S impregnation, and it can be applied to water treatment for heavy metal removal, particularly Pb2+.

Funding

This research was partly supported by the Environmental Research and Technology Development Fund (K113029) of the Ministry of the Environment, Japan, JSPS KAKENHI (20K12234): Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C), and by the Arai Science and Technology Foundation.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Amer, A.M. Processing of Egyptian boiler-ash for extraction of vanadium and nickel. Waste Manag. 2002, 22, 515–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Tsai, S.-L.; Tsai, M.-S. A study of the extraction of vanadium and nickel in oil-fired fly ash. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 1998, 22, 163–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hsieh, Y.-M.; Tsai, M.-S. Physical and chemical analyses of unburned carbon from oil-fired fly ash. Carbon 2003, 41, 2317–2324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Caramuscio, P.; De Stefano, L.; Seggiani, M.; Vitolo, S.; Narducci, P. Preparation of activated carbons from heavy-oil ash. Waste Manag. 2003, 23, 345–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Seggiani, M.; Vitolo, S.; Narducci, P. Investigation on the porosity development by CO2 activation in heavy oil ashes. Fuel 2003, 82, 1441–1450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Seggiani, M.; Vitolo, S.; Filippis, P.D. Effect of pre-oxidation on the porosity development in a heavy oil fly ash by CO2 activation. Fuel 2005, 84, 1593–1596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Adhoum, N.; Monser, L. Removal of cyanide from aqueous solution using impregnated activated carbon. Chem. Eng. Process. 2002, 41, 17–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sadraei, R.; Paganini, M.C.; Calza, P.; Magnacca, G. An easy synthesis for preparing bia-based hybrid adsorbent useful for fast adsorption of polar pollutants. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Magnacca, G.; Santos, F.N.D.; Sadraei, R. Bio-based substances from compost as reactant and active phase for selective capture of cationic pollutants from waste water. Front. Chem. 2020, 8, 550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Volkan, M.; Ataman, A.; Howard, A. Pre-concentration of some trace metals from sea water on a mercapto-modified silica gel. Analyst 1987, 112, 1409–1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Krishnan, K.A.; Anirudhan, T.S. Removal of cadmium(II) from aqueous solutions by steam-activated sulphurised carbon prepared from sugar-cane bagasse pith: Kinetics and equilibrium studies. Water SA 2003, 29, 147–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Gomez-Serrano, V.; Macias-Garcia, A.; Espinosa-Mansilla, A.; Valenzuela-Calahorroc, C. Adsorption of mercury, cadmium and lead from aqueous solution on heat-treated and sulphurized activated carbon. Water Res. 1998, 32, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wajima, T. A new carbonaceous adsorbent for heavy metal removal from aqueous solution prepared from paper sludge by sulfur-impregnation and pyrolysis. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2017, 112, 342–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Pearson, R.G. Hard and soft acids and bases. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1963, 85, 3533–3539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Pearson, R.G. Recent advances in the concept of hard and soft acids and bases. J. Chem. Educ. 1987, 64, 561–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhao, D.; Gao, X.; Wu, C.; Xie, R.; Feng, S.; Chen, C. Facile preparation of amino functionalized graphene oxide decorated with Fe2O3 nanoparticles for the adsorption of Cr (IV). Appl. Surf. Sci. 2016, 384, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Erdem, M.; Ozverdi, A. Lead adsorption from aqueous solution onto siderite. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2005, 42, 259–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Adebowale, K.O.; Unuabonah, I.E.; Olu-Owolabi, B.I. The effect of some operating variables on the adsorption of lead and cadmium ions on kaolinite clay. J. Hazard. Mater. 2006, 134, 130–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Feng, Q.; Lin, Q.; Gong, F.; Sugita, S.; Shoya, M. Adsorption of lead and mercury by rice husk ash. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2004, 278, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Huang, Y.H.; Hsueh, C.L.; Huang, C.P.; Su, L.C.; Chen, C.Y. Adsorption thermodynamic and kinetic studies of Pb (II) removal from water onto a versatile Al2O3-supported iron oxide. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2007, 55, 23–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Vuković, G.D.; Marinković, A.D.; Škapin, S.D.; Ristić, M.T.; Aleksić, R.; Perić-Grujić, A.A.; Uskoković, P.S. Removal of lead from water by amino modified multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 173, 855–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Saha, D.; Barakat, S.; Bramer, S.E.V.; Nelson, K.A.; Hensley, D.K.; Chen, J. Noncompetitive and competitive adsorption of heavy metals in sulfur-functionalized ordered mesoporous carbon. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 34132–34142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Imamoglu, M.; Tekir, O. Removal of copper (II) and lead (II) ions from aqueous solutions by adsorption on activated carbon from a new precursor hazelnut husks. Desalination 2008, 228, 108–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Abdulkarim, M.; Al-Rub, F.A. Adsorption of lead ions from aqueous solution onto activated carbon and chemically-modified activated carbon prepared from date pits. Adsorp. Sci. Technol. 2004, 22, 119–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Brown, P.; Jefcoat, I.A.; Parrish, D.; Gil, S.; Graham, E. Evaluation of the adsorptive capacity of peanut hull pellets for heavy metals in solution. Adv. Environ. Res. 2000, 4, 19–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Johns, M.M.; Marshall, W.E.; Toles, C.A. Agricultural by-products as granular activated carbons for adsorbing dissolved metals and organics. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 1998, 71, 131–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Vilar, V.J.P.; Botelho, C.M.S.; Boaventura, R.A.R. Influence of pH, ionic strength and temperature on lead biosorption by Gelidium and agar extraction algal waste. Process Biochem. 2005, 40, 3267–3275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bansode, R.R.; Losso, J.N.; Marshall, W.E.; Rao, R.M.; Portier, R.J. Adsorption of metal ions by pecan shell-based granular activated carbons. Bioresour. Technol. 2003, 89, 115–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kikuchi, Y.; Qian, Q.; Machida, M.; Tatsumoto, H. Effect of ZnO loading to activated carbon on Pb (II) adsorption from aqueous solution. Carbon 2006, 44, 195–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Issabayeva, G.; Aroua, M.K.; Sulaiman, N.M.N. Removal of lead from aqueous solutions on palm shell activated carbon. Bioresour. Technol. 2006, 97, 2350–2355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Li, Q.; Yu, J.; Zhou, F.; Jiang, X. Synthesis and characterization of dithiocarbamate carbon nanotubes for the removal of heavy metal ions from aqueous solutions. Colloids Surf. A 2015, 482, 306–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Jing, X.; Liu, F.; Yang, X.; Ling, P.; Li, L.; Long, C.; Li, A. Adsorption performances and mechanisms of the newly synthesized N, N′-di(carboxymethyl) dithiocabamate chelating resin toward divalent heavy metal ions from aqueous media. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 167, 589–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Flowchart for preparation of the product.
Figure 1. Flowchart for preparation of the product.
Processes 08 01484 g001
Figure 2. XRD patterns of (a) raw ash, (b) Ash-K2S, and (c) Ash-KOH.
Figure 2. XRD patterns of (a) raw ash, (b) Ash-K2S, and (c) Ash-KOH.
Processes 08 01484 g002
Figure 3. Lead removal abilities of Product-K2S and Product-KOH.
Figure 3. Lead removal abilities of Product-K2S and Product-KOH.
Processes 08 01484 g003
Figure 4. XRD patterns of (a) Product-K2S and (b) Product-KOH after pyrolysis at various temperatures.
Figure 4. XRD patterns of (a) Product-K2S and (b) Product-KOH after pyrolysis at various temperatures.
Processes 08 01484 g004
Figure 5. Contents of carbon and sulfur of products pyrolyzed at various pyrolysis temperatures.
Figure 5. Contents of carbon and sulfur of products pyrolyzed at various pyrolysis temperatures.
Processes 08 01484 g005
Figure 6. Specific surface areas of products pyrolyzed at various temperatures.
Figure 6. Specific surface areas of products pyrolyzed at various temperatures.
Processes 08 01484 g006
Figure 7. SEM photographs of (a) raw ash, (b) Product-K2S obtained at 300 °C, and (c) Product-KOH at 300 °C.
Figure 7. SEM photographs of (a) raw ash, (b) Product-K2S obtained at 300 °C, and (c) Product-KOH at 300 °C.
Processes 08 01484 g007
Figure 8. Isotherm of lead ion using Product-K2S obtained at 300 °C.
Figure 8. Isotherm of lead ion using Product-K2S obtained at 300 °C.
Processes 08 01484 g008
Figure 9. Removal of Product-K2S obtained at 300 °C for Pb2+, Zn2+, and Cu2+ from the mixed solution.
Figure 9. Removal of Product-K2S obtained at 300 °C for Pb2+, Zn2+, and Cu2+ from the mixed solution.
Processes 08 01484 g009
Table 1. Analyses of raw ash.
Table 1. Analyses of raw ash.
Raw Ash
Proximate analysis (wt% dry basis)
Volatile matter 119.0
Fixed carbon73.3
Ash7.7
Ultimate analysis (wt% dry ash free)
Carbon79.5
Hydrogen1.2
Nitrogen4.4
Sulfur4.0
Ash composition (wt%)
NiO29.9
Fe2O318.8
SO314.1
SiO27.7
CaO6.2
V2O55.6
Na2O5.0
Al2O33.8
ZnO3.2
MgO1.1
K2O0.9
Specific surface area (m2/g)6.2
1 Value at 800 °C.
Table 2. Parameters and correlation regression for two models, Langmuir and Freundlich.
Table 2. Parameters and correlation regression for two models, Langmuir and Freundlich.
LangmuirFreundlich
QmaxKLR2NKFR2
0.548.480.9994.060.410.813
Table 3. Comparison of lead ion adsorption with some reported data.
Table 3. Comparison of lead ion adsorption with some reported data.
AdsorbentAdsorption Capacity (mmol/g)Reference
Siderite0.06[17]
Kaolinite clay0.09[18]
Rice husk ash0.06[19]
Alumina supported iron oxide0.14[20]
Carbon nanotube0.01[21]
Sulfur-functionalized ordered mesoporous carbon0.14[22]
Hazelnut husk activated carbon0.06[23]
Date pits activated carbon0.15[24]
Peanut hull activated carbon0.15[25]
Rice straw activated carbon0.17[26]
Algal waste activated carbon0.21[27]
Pecan shell activated carbon0.31[28]
Coconut shell activated carbon0.37[29]
Palm shell activated carbon0.4[30]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wajima, T. Carbonaceous Adsorbent Derived from Sulfur-Impregnated Heavy Oil Ash and Its Lead Removal Ability from Aqueous Solution. Processes 2020, 8, 1484. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8111484

AMA Style

Wajima T. Carbonaceous Adsorbent Derived from Sulfur-Impregnated Heavy Oil Ash and Its Lead Removal Ability from Aqueous Solution. Processes. 2020; 8(11):1484. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8111484

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wajima, Takaaki. 2020. "Carbonaceous Adsorbent Derived from Sulfur-Impregnated Heavy Oil Ash and Its Lead Removal Ability from Aqueous Solution" Processes 8, no. 11: 1484. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8111484

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop