Next Article in Journal
Development of an Oxygen Pressure Estimator Using the Immersion and Invariance Method for a Particular PEMFC System
Previous Article in Journal
Short-Chain Polyglycerol Production via Microwave-Assisted Solventless Glycerol Polymerization Process Over Lioh-Modified Aluminium Pillared Clay Catalyst: Parametric Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Mixed Commercial Cold Flow Improvers on Flow Properties of Biodiesel from Waste Cooking Oil

Miami College, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2020, 8(9), 1094; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8091094
Submission received: 8 August 2020 / Revised: 25 August 2020 / Accepted: 29 August 2020 / Published: 3 September 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Chemical Processes and Systems)

Abstract

:
The uniform design method was used to screen the solidifying point depressing effects of 18 traditional diesel cold flow improvers on biodiesel derived from waste cooking oil. The cold flow improvers with good effects were selected for orthogonal optimization. Finally, the mixed cold flow improver (CFI) with the best depressing effect was selected to explore its depressing mechanism for biodiesel. The results show that the typical CFIs such as A132, A146, 10-320, 10-330, A-4, CS-1, AH-BSFH, Haote, T1804D, and HL21 all have a certain solidifying point depressing effect on biodiesel, while other cold flow improvers had no obvious effect. Amongst them, 10-330 (PMA polymer) and AH-BSFH (EVA polymer) had better solidifying point depressing effects over others, both of which reduced the solidifying point (SP) of biodiesel by 4 °C and the cold filter plugging point (CFPP) by 2 °C and 3 °C, respectively. From the orthogonal mixing experiment, it can be seen that the combination of 10-330 and AH-BSFH at a mass ratio of 1:8 had the best depressing effect, reducing the solidifying point and cold filter plugging point of biodiesel by 5 °C and 3 °C, respectively. Orthogonal analysis showed that when used in combination, AH-BSFH had a greater impact on the solidifying point, while the ratio of the combination had a greater impact on the cold filter plugging point.

1. Introduction

Biodiesel refers to fatty acid methyl esters or ethyl esters derived from raw material oils such as crop oil, wild crop oil, engineered microalgae oil, animal fat, and waste cooking oil through transesterification with alcohols such as methanol or ethanol [1,2,3]. Biodiesel is a high-quality diesel substitute [4,5] and is a typical “green energy” in term of its better carbon balance over fossil fuels [6,7] and limited environmental impacts, e.g., higher SO2 emission in biomass planting and biodiesel production processes [8,9]. Vigorously developing of biodiesel has great strategic significance for solving the shortage of petroleum resources, reducing environmental pollution and the greenhouse effect, and ensuring national energy safety [10]. As an alternative fuel for petrochemical diesel, biodiesel has attracted wide attention from all over the world, and large-scale production has been formed in European and American countries [11]. The economic feasibility analysis of biodiesel [12,13], the selection of raw materials, the optimization of production process, and the research of biodiesel combustion emissions have been reported at home and abroad [14,15,16,17]. However, the solidifying point of biodiesel is generally around 0 °C [11,18]. At low temperatures, the crystallization of fatty acid methyl esters in biodiesel often blocks the oil pipeline and filters, hindering the normal operation of the engine [19]. Therefore, improving the low temperature fluidity of biodiesel is a problem that must be faced and solved in the process of biodiesel research and development [20,21,22].
The measures that can be taken to solve the problem of poor low-temperature fluidity of biodiesel are: (1) Winterization [23,24]. This method has some problems, such as low yield and serious waste of resources; (2) Change the structure of biodiesel [25]. However, its cost is high which makes it difficult to achieve industrialization; (3) Mixing a certain amount of refined diesel [26]. Adding 2% to 20% volume fraction of biodiesel to petrochemical diesel can reduce the solidifying point by 7 to 10 °C [27]. Since the method to improve the low-temperature flow properties of biodiesel requires the addition of refined diesel, and the production of refined diesel in China is small and in short supply, making this method not feasible; (4) The addition of cold flow improvers (CFIs) [28,29], due to the small amount of addition and the low cost and easy to operate, it has become the first choice to solve the low temperature flow performance of biodiesel. There are few studies on solidifying point depressing of biodiesel at home and abroad, and a complete theoretical system has not yet been formed. There are few studies on the effect of commonly used CFIs on biodiesel, especially the research on the effect of CFIs on biodiesel solidifying point depressing mechanism is still lacking in China [30,31,32]. This study mainly investigated the CFI mechanism of the mixed CFI on biodiesel and investigated the CFI effect on a variety of commonly used CFIs on biodiesel. It has laid a certain theoretical basis to further study the interaction between CFIs and biodiesel and develop a new and efficient biodiesel CFI.

2. Experimental

2.1. Reagents and Instruments

SYP1022-2 multi-functional low temperature tester, Shanghai Boli Instrument Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China; DSC27HP Differential scanning calorimeter (DSC), Mettler Instrument Co. Ltd., Zurich, Swiss; X’Pert PRD X-ray diffraction (XRD), Malvern Panalytical Ltd., Malvern, United Kingdom; Polarizing optical microscope, Linkam Scientific Instruments Ltd., Redhill, United Kingdom.

2.2. Experimental Part

2.2.1. Experimental Materials and Instruments

The raw materials used in the experiment include: biodiesel, prepared from waste cooking oil according to our reported work [5,7]; Commercial diesel CFIs: P388, A132, A134, A146, A148, T803, V-300, IX-248, LZ-7749, V-385, 10-320, 10-330, A-4, CS-1, AH-BSFH, Haote, T1804D, and HL21.

2.2.2. Determination of the Solidifying Point and Cold Filter Plugging Point of Biodiesel

The solidifying point (SP) is the highest temperature at which the sample begins to lose fluidity under the specified experimental conditions. When the sample was placed in a prescribed test tube and cooled to an overdue temperature, the test tube was tilted 45 degrees for one minute and observed whether the liquid level moves.
The cold filter plugging point (CFPP) refers to the maximum temperature at which the test oil passes through the filter (363 mesh/in) when the test oil passes through the filter is less than 20 mL in 1 min under specified conditions and under vacuum pressure of 1960 Pa [33,34].

2.2.3. Differential Scanning Calorimetry Analysis

The DSC curves of biodiesel samples before and after adding CFI were tested. The liquid sample was sealed in a miniature aluminum crucible, weighed and put into the instrument, in a high-purity atmosphere of N2, at a rate of 2 °C/min, from 5 °C to −10 °C to record its DSC curve.

2.2.4. Low Temperature Polarization Microscope Analysis

Polarized light microscopy is a microscope used to identify the optical properties of the fine structure of a substance. Any substance with birefringence can be clearly distinguished under a polarizing microscope. Of course, these substances can also be observed by dyeing method, but some are not possible, and a polarizing microscope must be used. The low-temperature polarizing microscope adds a cooling function, which can easily observe the fine structure of the sample at a certain temperature. In this study, a low-temperature polarized microscope was used to observe the changes in the crystal form of the system crystals during the cooling process of the samples, and then to analyze the changes in the crystallization process caused by the addition of CFIs.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. The Effect of Various CFIs on Biodiesel

The 18 commercially available CFIs were numbered according to their respective categories (PAO = poly-alpha-olefin; PMA = polymethyl acrylate; EVA (and PPD) = ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer; HPMA = polymaleic anhydride), to facilitate the design of experiments in groups during orthogonal experiments. The same amount (0.1 wt%) of CFI was added to biodiesel to investigate their SP and CFPP reduction effects on biodiesel. The results are shown in Table 1.
It can be seen in Table 1 that A132, A146, 10-320, 10-330, A-4, CS-1, AH-BSFH, Haote, T1804D, and HL21 have a certain solidifying point depressing effect on biodiesel. Among them, 10-330 and AH-BSFH had a better solidifying point depressing effect, while other types of CFIs were not obvious. This showed that most of the commonly used CFIs had a certain CFI effect on biodiesel, but most of the CFIs were not particularly significant. Therefore, it is necessary to develop new and efficient biodiesel CFI or well-designed mixed CFI.

3.2. Orthogonal Test and Analysis

Based on single factor investigation, A132, A146, 10-320, 10-330, A-4, CS-1, AH-BSFH, Haute, T1804D, and HL21 were selected to design the mixed CFIs for the orthogonal test to determine the optimal mixed one and their weight proportions. The ten CFIs were divided into two groups according to their categories. Take PMA series (A), EVA series (B), and mixed ratio (C) as the three factors to carry out a three-factor five-level orthogonal experiment. The factor-level, orthogonal experiments (and results), and range analysis are shown in Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4, respectively.
As shown in Table 4, to calculate the orthogonal experimental data, K1, K2, K3, K4, and K5 are used to represent the sum of the corresponding experimental results of each factor and each level. R1, R2, R3, R4, and R5 are used to represent the average value of each level to compare the quality of the different levels of each factor. The range R is to describe the influence of each factor on the experimental indicators, which is referred to the difference between the maximum value and the minimum value of R1, R2, R3, R4, and R5 in each column. The size of the range reflects the size of the effects of various factors in the experiment. A large range indicates that this factor has a large impact on the index, which is usually an important factor; a small range indicates that this factor has a small impact on the index.
According to the judgment of the range, the influence of this experimental factor on ΔSP is B > A = C; the influence of this experimental factor on ΔCFPP is C > A = B. It can be seen from the calculation results in the table that the best operating conditions are A2B4C5. The best process conditions obtained are mixing PMA-2 and PPD-6 with a mass ratio of 1:8.

3.3. Analysis on the Enhancing Mechanism of Mixed CFI on Biodiesel Flow Properties

3.3.1. DSC Analysis

Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) can quantitatively determine the effect of CFI on the energy change of biodiesel during the phase change process [30,31]. Therefore, the DSC test of blank biodiesel and biodiesel added with 0.1% mixed CFI (PMA-2 and PPD-6, a mixed mass ratio of 1:8, the same below), the DSC curve is shown in Figure 1 and the data analysis is listed in Table 5.
It is recognized that the onset temperature of the crystallization peak in the diesel DSC curve with the heat flow rate as the ordinate and temperature as the abscissa reflected the temperature at which the diesel began to precipitate wax crystals. The slope of the crystallization peak reflected the rate of precipitation of wax crystals in diesel oil, and the solid-liquid phase transformation energy (the absolute value of ΔH) reflected the stability of the dispersion system where the wax crystals were located [35].
As can be seen in Table 5, after adding 0.1% mixed CFI to biodiesel, the crystal precipitation temperature (Onset) changed significantly to −1.86 °C, and the peak crystallization temperature (Peak) decreased to −2.41 °C. The slope of the peak did not change much, and the phase transition energy in the whole process was reduced from 55.369 to 32.218. This showed that the mixed CFI reduced the temperature at which biodiesel started to precipitate crystals and had little effect on the slope of the biodiesel crystallization peak. The smaller the slope of the biodiesel crystallization peak, the slower the crystallization rate of diesel wax, which in turn indicated that the mixed CFI did not change the crystallization rate of the biodiesel wax; the absolute value of the solid-liquid phase transformation energy (ΔH) of the phase changed the process of the biodiesel became smaller after the addition of the CFI, indicating that the low temperature depressant increased the stability of the wax crystal in the dispersed system. The crystallization peak area of biodiesel with mixed CFI was 299.947 mJ, which was smaller than pure biodiesel, indicating that the number of precipitated crystals was also less. In summary, after adding a mixed CFI to biodiesel, the CFI mainly penetrated the nucleus of fatty acid methyl ester crystals through the polar groups in its molecular structure, and the non-polar groups were distributed in the crystals’ surface to improve the stability of the dispersion system where the wax crystals are located to play a role in depressing solidifying point.

3.3.2. XRD Analysis

X-ray diffraction spectroscopy (XRD) can analyze the lattice parameters of the wax crystals precipitated in biodiesel, to understand the structure of the wax crystals [32]. However, since biodiesel is a volatile liquid, and its research needs to be carried out in a low temperature environment, most of the previous researches is limited to offline analysis, that is, first reduce biodiesel with mixed CFI to the required temperature, and then perform XRD scanning. This can only make a rough analysis of the growth of diesel wax crystals at low temperatures, and it is impossible to continuously observe the crystal changes of wax crystals in diesel at different temperatures in time, especially for the wax at the cold filter plugging point where the low-temperature performance of biodiesel is extremely critical. The crystal change is not conducive to the in-depth study of its solidifying point reduction mechanism. Therefore, this article and the Institute of Organic Chemistry of the Chinese Academy of Sciences tried to use low-temperature in-situ XRD to analyze the CFI mechanism. Take the solidifying point of pure biodiesel at 6 °C as the test temperature. The X-ray diffraction pattern of pure biodiesel and biodiesel with 0.1% mixed CFI at 6 °C is shown in Figure 2, and the XRD diffraction peak data analysis is shown in Table 6 and Table 7.
It can be seen from Figure 2 that the 2θ of pure biodiesel and biodiesel with mixed CFI has a wide diffuse scattering peak between 10° and 30°, and the 2θ of pure biodiesel is at 5.5°, 21.63°, 28.8°, 34.9°. There are sharp diffraction peaks near 36.9°, and the 2θ of the biodiesel with mixed CFI has sharp diffraction peaks near 5.6°, 20.6°, 42.6°, 46.3°, and 51.3°, indicating that both of them precipitated amorphous and crystal wax. The two diffuse scattering peaks have the same peak shape width, which indicated that the amount of amorphous wax precipitated by the two is not much different. According to references [36,37], the wax crystal peaks of the XRD pattern are analyzed, and the results are shown in Table 3. It can be seen that the crystal peak area of pure biodiesel is much larger than that of biodiesel with mixed CFI, indicating that at the same temperature and the number of precipitated crystals in the biodiesel with mixed CFI is greatly reduced. The different S values in pure biodiesel (0.720) and biodiesel with additive (0.012) indicates that the CFI changed the growth mode of wax crystals. The content of precipitated orthorhombic crystals is reduced, monoclinic crystals, and the content of orthorhombic crystals increases, while monoclinic crystals are not easy to aggregate and grow. The presence of orthorhombic crystals in the liquid phase is advantageous because it can delay the formation of three-dimensional network waxy structure, so crystals are smaller in size and easier to pass through the filter. In addition, the amount of wax crystals in the biodiesel with mixed CFI is also less, so the overall result was that the cold filter plugging point of the biodiesel with mixed CFI is lower.

3.3.3. Polarized Light Microscope Analysis

The low-temperature polarizing microscope can observe the changes of wax crystals in diesel before and after adding additives online [38,39]. The cold filter plugging point of the biodiesel with mixed CFI is −1 °C, so this experiment uses a polarizing microscope to study the crystal morphology of pure biodiesel and biodiesel diesel with 0.1% mixed CFI at −1 °C. The magnification is 200 times and the photos are shown in Figure 3.
It can be seen from Figure 3 that at −1 °C, there are some long strips of crystals densely distributed in the pure biodiesel, and they are bonded together. After being treated with the mixed CFI, a large number of small spherical crystals are distributed inside the biodiesel system at −1 °C, but there is no tendency to stick, and the crystals are more dispersed than pure biodiesel. This showed that at low temperature, various fatty acid methyl esters in biodiesel gradually precipitate out and exist as long strips of crystals and adhere to each other. As the temperature decreases, the crystals increase and adhere to form a three-dimensional network structure, which envelops the organisms. The liquid component of diesel fuel, so that biodiesel lost its flow properties. After adding a mixed CFI to biodiesel, the CFI penetrates the nucleus of fatty acid methyl esters through the polar groups in its molecular structure to have a eutectic effect with it, and the non-polar groups are distributed in the crystal surface which changed the interface properties of the crystal, thereby changing the crystal shape and dispersion state, improving the low-temperature flow properties of biodiesel.

4. Conclusions

It shows that most of the commonly used cold flow improvers have a certain cold flow improver effect on biodiesel, but most of the cold flow improvers are not effective. Therefore, it is particularly important to develop new and efficient biodiesel cold flow improvers or well-designed mixed cold flow improvers. As long as the appropriate mixing ratio is adopted, the compounding use of cold flow improver has a better cold flow improving effect than the single ones on biodiesel. When the optimal mixing mass ratio of PMA-2 and PPD-6 is 8:1. DSC analysis shows that after adding a mixed CFI to biodiesel, the CFI mainly penetrates the nucleus of fatty acid methyl ester crystals through the polar groups in its molecular structure, and the non-polar groups are distributed in the crystals. Low-temperature XRD analysis showed that the CFI in the biodiesel with mixed CFI changed the growth mode of wax crystals, the content of precipitated orthorhombic crystals decreased, the content of monoclinic crystals and orthorhombic crystals increased, and the crystal size in the system was smaller and easy to pass through the filter. The polarized light microscope shows that the CFI penetrates the nucleus of fatty acid methyl ester through the polar group in its molecular structure to have a eutectic effect with it, thereby changing the crystal form and the dispersed state, thus improving the low temperature flow properties of biodiesel.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.C.; data curation, L.C.; formal analysis, S.N.; investigation, S.N.; writing—original draft, S.N.; writing—review & editing, L.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

We thank for the help from Sheng Han’s group in carrying out part of the tests on the cold filter plugging points and the low temperature XRD of our samples.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Dwivedi, G.; Sharma, M.P. Investigation and improvement in cold flow properties of pongamia biodiesel. Waste Biomass Valori. 2015, 6, 73–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Unlu, D.; Boz, N.; Ilgen, O.; Hilmioglu, N. Improvement of fuel properties of biodiesel with bioadditive ethyl levulinate. Open Chem. 2018, 16, 647–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Xue, Y.; Yang, C.; Xu, G.W.; Zhao, Z.C.; Lian, X.; Sheng, H.; Lin, H.L. The influence of polymethyl acrylate as a pour point depressant for biodiesel. Energy Source Part A 2017, 39, 17–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lapuerta, M.; Gonzalez-Garcia, I.; Cespedes, I.; Estevez, C.; Bayarri, N. Improvement of cold flow properties of a new biofuel derived from glycerol. Fuel 2019, 242, 794–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Cao, L.C.; Zhang, S.C. Production and characterization of biodiesel derived from Hodgsonia macrocarpa seed oil. Appl. Energy 2015, 146, 135–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Curran, M.A. Assessing environmental impacts of biofuels using lifecycle-based approaches. Manag. Environ. Qual. 2012, 24, 34–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Milazzo, M.F.; Spina, F. The use of the risk assessment in the life cycle assessment framework Human health impacts of a soy-biodiesel production. Manag. Environ. Qual. 2015, 26, 389–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Nemanashi, M.; Noh, J.H.; Meijboom, R. Hydrogenation of biomass-derived levulinic acid to gamma-valerolactone catalyzed by mesoporous supported dendrimer-derived Ru and Pt catalysts: An alternative method for the production of renewable biofuels. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2018, 550, 77–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Milazzo, M.F.; Spina, F.; Cavallaro, S.; Bart, J.C.J. Sustainable soy biodiesel. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2013, 27, 806–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mohanan, A.; Bouzidi, L.; Li, S.J.; Narine, S.S. Mitigating crystallization of saturated fames in biodiesel: 1. Lowering crystallization temperatures via addition of metathesized soybean oil. Energy 2016, 96, 335–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, J.N.; Zhao, W.N.; Ai, Y.N.; Chen, H.Y.; Cao, L.C.; Han, S. Improving the fuel properties of biodiesel via complementary blending with diesel from direct coal liquefaction. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 45575–45581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kim, D.S.; Hanifzadeh, M.; Kumar, A. Trend of Biodiesel Feedstock and Its Impact on Biodiesel Emission Characteristics. Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy 2018, 37, 7–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhou, M.A.; He, Y.; Chen, Y.W.; Yang, Y.P.; Lin, H.L.; Han, S. Synthesis and Evaluation of Terpolymers Consist of Methacrylates with Maleic Anhydride and Methacrylic Morpholine and Their Amine Compound as Pour Point Depressants in Diesel Fuels. Energy Fuel 2015, 29, 5618–5624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Abe, M.; Hirata, S.; Komatsu, H.; Yamagiwa, K.; Tajima, H. Thermodynamic selection of effective additives to improve the cloud point of biodiesel fuels. Fuel 2016, 171, 94–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, H.; Tabatabaei, M.; Aghbashlo, M.; Khanali, M.; Demirbas, A. A comprehensive review on the environmental impacts of diesel/biodiesel additives. Energy Convers. Manag. 2018, 174, 579–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Maglinao, R.L.; Resurrection, E.P.; Kumar, S.; Maglinao, A.L.; Capareda, S.; Moser, B.R. Hydrodeoxygenation-Alkylation Pathway for the Synthesis of a Sustainable Lubricant Improver from Plant Oils and Lignin-Derived Phenols. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2019, 58, 4317–4330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Srikanth, H.V.; Venkatesh, J.; Godiganur, S.; Venkateswaran, S.; Manne, B. Bio-based diluents improve cold flow properties of dairy washed milk-scum biodiesel. Renew. Energy 2017, 111, 168–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, H.; Wang, J.G.; Shen, B.X. The rheological properties of biodiesel derived from cottonseed oil. Energy Source Part A 2016, 38, 3181–3186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lian, X.; Xue, Y.; Xu, G.W.; Zhao, Z.C.; Sheng, H.; Lin, H.L. Effect of methyl acetoacetate as a potential cold flow improver for biodiesel. Energy Source Part A 2017, 39, 97–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Evcil, A.; Al-Shanableh, F.; Savas, M.A. Variation of solid fraction with cold flow properties of biodiesel produced from waste frying oil. Fuel 2018, 215, 522–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhou, M.A.; He, Y.; Lin, H.L.; Han, S. Effect of MC-MA polymer pour point depressants on the flow properties of biodiesel. Energy Source Part A 2016, 38, 1962–1968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Srikanth, H.V.; Venkatesh, J.; Godiganur, S.; Manne, B. Acetone and Diethyl ether: Improve cold flow properties of Dairy Washed Milkscum biodiesel. Renew. Energy 2019, 130, 446–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Liu, H.; Jiang, S.S.; Guo, H.S.; Han, S.; Yang, C.; Jiang, J.Z. A new kind of pour point depressant: Diesel from direct coal liquefaction. Fuel Process. Technol. 2016, 149, 285–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhao, Z.C.; Xue, Y.; Xu, G.W.; Zhou, J.W.; Lian, X.; Liu, P.; Chen, D.M.; Han, S.; Lin, H.L. Effect of the nano-hybrid pour point depressants on the cold flow properties of diesel fuel. Fuel 2017, 193, 65–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Imdadul, H.K.; Masjuki, H.H.; Kalam, M.A.; Zulkifli, N.W.M.; Rashed, M.M.; Rashedul, H.K.; Monirul, I.M.; Mosarof, M.H. A comprehensive review on the assessment of fuel additive effects on combustion behavior in CI engine fuelled with diesel biodiesel blends. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 67541–67567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Abe, M.; Komatsu, H.; Yamagiwa, K.; Tajima, H. Effect of nonionic surfactants on the low temperature winterization separation of fatty acid methyl ester mixtures. Fuel 2017, 190, 351–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Roy, M.M.; Calder, J.; Wang, W.; Mangad, A.; Diniz, F.C.M. Emission analysis of a modern Tier 4 DI diesel engine fueled by biodiesel-diesel blends with a cold flow improver (Wintron Synergy) at multiple idling conditions. Appl. Energy 2016, 179, 45–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Eiadtrong, S.; Maliwan, K.; Prateepchaikul, G.; Kattiyawan, T.; Thephsorn, P.; Leevijit, T. Preparation, important fuel properties, and comparative use of un-preheated palm fatty acid distillate-diesel blends in a single cylinder diesel engine. Renew. Energy 2019, 134, 1089–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhao, W.N.; Xue, Y.; Ma, P.; Ma, W.F.; Wang, J.N.; Lu, D.L.; Han, S. Improving the cold flow properties of high-proportional waste cooking oil biodiesel blends with mixed cold flow improvers. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 13365–13370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Cao, L.C.; Wang, J.N.; Liu, K.J.; Han, S. Ethyl acetoacetate: A potential bio-based diluent for improving the cold flow properties of biodiesel from waste cooking oil. Appl. Energy 2014, 114, 18–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tasic, I.; Tomic, M.D.; Aleksic, A.L.; Durisic-Mladenovic, N.; Martinovic, F.L.; Micic, R.D. Improvement of low-temperature characteristics of biodiesel by additivation. Hem. Ind. 2019, 73, 103–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wang, W.C.; Li, F.S.; Li, Y. Effect of biodiesel ester structure optimization on low temperature performance and oxidation stability. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2020, 9, 2727–2736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Rajaeifar, M.A.; Abdi, R.; Tabatabaei, M. Expanded polystyrene waste application for improving biodiesel environmental performance parameters from life cycle assessment point of view. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 74, 278–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Verma, P.; Sharma, M.P.; Dwivedi, G. Evaluation and enhancement of cold flow properties of palm oil and its biodiesel. Energy Rep. 2016, 2, 8–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Dunn, R.O.; Ngo, H.L.; Haas, M.J. Branched-Chain Fatty Acid Methyl Esters as Cold Flow Improvers for Biodiesel. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2015, 92, 853–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Cao, L.C.; Wang, J.N.; Liu, C.; Chen, Y.W.; Liu, K.J.; Han, S. Ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer: A bio-based cold flow improver for waste cooking oil derived biodiesel blends. Appl. Energy 2014, 132, 163–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Madihalli, C.; Sudhakar, H.; Doble, M. Mannosylerythritol Lipid-A as a Pour Point Depressant for Enhancing the Low-Temperature Fluidity of Biodiesel and Hydrocarbon Fuels. Energy Fuel 2016, 30, 4118–4125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wang, J.N.; Cao, L.C.; Han, S. Effect of polymeric cold flow improvers on flow properties of biodiesel from waste cooking oil. Fuel 2014, 117, 876–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Mohanan, A.; Bouzidi, L.; Narine, S.S. Harnessing the synergies between lipid-based crystallization modifiers and a polymer pour point depressant to improve pour point of biodiesel. Energy 2017, 120, 895–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. DSC curve of blank and biodiesel with mixed CFI.
Figure 1. DSC curve of blank and biodiesel with mixed CFI.
Processes 08 01094 g001
Figure 2. XRD patterns of different biodiesel.
Figure 2. XRD patterns of different biodiesel.
Processes 08 01094 g002
Figure 3. Low-temperature polarizing microscope photos of biodiesels with or without mixed CFI at −1 °C.
Figure 3. Low-temperature polarizing microscope photos of biodiesels with or without mixed CFI at −1 °C.
Processes 08 01094 g003
Table 1. Effects of various CFIs on biodiesel.
Table 1. Effects of various CFIs on biodiesel.
Name of CFINumberingSP (°C)ΔSP (°C)CFPP (°C)ΔCFPP (°C)
No dosage---0---2---
P388PAO-10020
A132PAO-2−1111
A134PAO-3−2220
A146PAO-4−3302
A148PAO-5−1111
T803PAO-6−1120
V-300PPD-10011
IX-248PPD-20030
LZ-7749PPD-3−2220
CS-1PPD-4−1120
HautPPD-5−2202
AH-BSFHPPD-6−44−13
HL21PPD-70011
10-320PMA-1−3302
10-330PMA-2−4402
A-4PMA-2−4411
T1804DEVA−3302
V-385HPMA0020
Table 2. Factors-Level list.
Table 2. Factors-Level list.
Level12345
PMA series (A)PMA-1PMA-2PMA-3PAO-2PAO-4
EVA series (B)EVAPPD-4PPD-5PPD-6PPD-7
Mixed ratio (C)8:14:11:11:41:8
Table 3. Orthogonal experiment design and results.
Table 3. Orthogonal experiment design and results.
Experiment NumberPMA Series (A)EVA Series (B)Mixed Ratio (C)ΔSP (°C)ΔCFPP (°C)
1PMA-1EVA8:101
2PMA-1PPD-44:100
3PMA-1PPD-51:110
4PMA-1PPD-61:423
5PMA-1PPD-71:831
6PMA-2EVA4:121
7PMA-2PPD-41:142
8PMA-2PPD-51:401
9PMA-2PPD-61:853
10PMA-2PPD-78:131
11PMA-3EVA1:110
12PMA-3PPD-41:400
13PMA-3PPD-51:812
14PMA-3PPD-68:131
15PMA-3PPD-74:130
16PA-2EVA1:412
17PA-2PPD-41:802
18PA-2PPD-58:121
19PA-2PPD-64:141
20PA-2PPD-71:111
21PA-4EVA1:832
22PA-4PPD-48:110
23PA-4PPD-54:111
24PA-4PPD-61:121
25PA-4PPD-71:412
Table 4. Range analysis of orthogonal experiment.
Table 4. Range analysis of orthogonal experiment.
ΔSP (°C)ΔCFPP (°C)
PMA (A)EVA (B)Mixed Ratio (C) PMA (A)EVA (B)Mixed Ratio (C)
K1679K1564
K214510K2843
K3859K3354
K48164K4798
K581112K56510
R11.21.41.8R111.20.8
R22.812R21.60.80.6
R31.611.8R30.610.8
R41.63.20.8R41.41.81.6
R51.62.22.4R51.212
R1.62.21.6R111.4
Optimal levelA2B4C5Optimal levelA2B4C5
Table 5. DSC analysis results.
Table 5. DSC analysis results.
SampleOnset/°CPeak/°CEndset/°CΔH/J·g−1Area/mJ
Pure biodiesel2.564.26−17.546−55.369538.189
Biodiesel with mixed CFI−1.86−2.41−14.915−32.218299.947
Table 6. Diffraction peak analysis results.
Table 6. Diffraction peak analysis results.
Temperature (°C)Pure BiodieselAdd Mixed CFI Biodiesel
d(A)Peak Aread(A)Peak Area
64.07321.67815,7354.63919.0337625
8.08310.92957,8566.73713.10913,513
12.1697.62739,71420.2614.379919
16.2555.448733841.2462.1872857
20.5694.31542,25842.8782.10713,782
21.6284.106178,89143.9852.0578680
24.1253.68686,42246.0841.9682773
29.8382.992290150.0481.82116,083
34.9462.565520351.3881.7776039
36.9132.43396652.3791.7453447
Table 7. XRD data analysis.
Table 7. XRD data analysis.
Pure BiodieselAdd Mixed CFI Biodiesel
SASA
0.720437,2840.01275,718

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nie, S.; Cao, L. Effect of Mixed Commercial Cold Flow Improvers on Flow Properties of Biodiesel from Waste Cooking Oil. Processes 2020, 8, 1094. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8091094

AMA Style

Nie S, Cao L. Effect of Mixed Commercial Cold Flow Improvers on Flow Properties of Biodiesel from Waste Cooking Oil. Processes. 2020; 8(9):1094. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8091094

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nie, Siyu, and Leichang Cao. 2020. "Effect of Mixed Commercial Cold Flow Improvers on Flow Properties of Biodiesel from Waste Cooking Oil" Processes 8, no. 9: 1094. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8091094

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop