Next Article in Journal
A Modified Expectation Maximization Approach for Process Data Rectification
Previous Article in Journal
Numerical Simulation of the Aerosol Particle Motion in Granular Filters with Solid and Porous Granules
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Processes
Volume 9
Issue 2
10.3390/pr9020269
processes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Gd3+ Complexes Conjugated to Cyclodextrins: Hydroxyl Functions Influence the Relaxation Properties

by
Anais Biscotti
1,
François Estour
1,
Berthe-Sandra Sembo-Backonly
1,
Sébastien Balieu
1,
Michaël Bosco
1,
Cécile Barbot
1,
Agnès Pallier
2,
Éva Tóth
2,
Célia S. Bonnet
2,* and
Géraldine Gouhier
1,*
1
Normandie Université, COBRA, UMR 6014, FR 3038, INSA Rouen, CNRS, IRIB, IRCOF, 1 rue Tesnière, 76821 Mont Saint Aignan, France
2
Centre de Biophysique Moléculaire, CNRS UPR 4301, Université d’Orléans, Rue Charles Sadron, CEDEX 2, 45071 Orléans, France
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2021, 9(2), 269; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9020269
Submission received: 18 December 2020 / Revised: 20 January 2021 / Accepted: 26 January 2021 / Published: 30 January 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Chemical Processes and Systems)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In the search for improvement in the properties of gadolinium-based contrast agents, cyclodextrins (CDs) are interesting hydrophilic scaffolds with high molecular weight. The impact of the hydrophilicity of these systems on the MRI efficacy has been studied using five β-CDs substituted with DOTA or TTHA ligands which, respectively, allow for one (q = 1) or no water molecule (q = 0) in the inner coordination sphere of the Gd3+ ion. Original synthetic pathways were developed to immobilize the ligands at C-6 position of various hydroxylated and permethylated β-CDs via an amide bond. To describe the influence of alcohol and ether oxide functions of the CD macrocycle on the relaxation properties of the Gd3+ complexes, 1H Nuclear Magnetic Relaxation Dispersion (NMRD) profiles, and 17O transverse relaxation rates have been measured at various temperatures. The differences observed between the hydroxylated and permethylated β-CDs bearing non-hydrated GdTTHA complexes can be rationalized by a second sphere contribution to the relaxivity in the case of the hydroxylated derivatives, induced by hydrogen-bound water molecules around the hydroxyl groups. In contrast, for the DOTA analogs the exchange rate of the water molecule directly coordinated to the Gd3+ is clearly influenced by the number of hydroxyl groups present on the CD, which in turn influences the relaxivity and gives rise to a very complex behavior of these hydrophilic systems.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is currently used to diagnose diseases and to monitor treatment progress in deep tissues. This noninvasive technique is based on the measurement of nuclear spin relaxation times of water protons of the organism. MR images are obtained thanks to the variation of the longitudinal or the transverse relaxation times (T1- or T2-weighted images, respectively) between different tissues [1,2,3]. In order to improve the image contrast and reduce the examination time, contrast agents are commonly injected to patients. These compounds are stable gadolinium chelates formed with polyamino-polycarboxylate ligands, such as the macrocyclic GdDOTA (H4DOTA = 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid). Via dipole–dipole interactions between the water proton spins and the electron spin of Gd3+, such paramagnetic complexes induce an acceleration of the proton spin relaxation. In the GdDOTA chelate, the metal ion is nine-coordinated with one water molecule in the inner coordination sphere (IS), q = 1. The presence of this water molecule, directly coordinated to Gd3+, is important for an efficient relaxation effect [4,5,6]. Indeed, its exchange with surrounding water molecules transmits the paramagnetic effect of the Gd3+ to bulk water, which is then detectable on the MR images. In the absence of inner sphere coordination water, a Gd3+ complex has a more limited effect on the water proton relaxation times.
The efficiency of a T1 contrast agent is assessed by its longitudinal relaxivity, r1, defined as the paramagnetic relaxation rate enhancement referred to 1 mM concentration of the metal ion. A high r1 value translates to good contrast enhancing capability in MR imaging. Relaxivity is influenced by different relaxation mechanisms [7]. Inner sphere relaxivity arises from the interaction of the Gd3+ electron spin with the inner sphere water protons and their exchange with bulk water. This mechanism is described by the theory of Solomon, Bloembergen, and Morgan for paramagnetic nuclear relaxation, which relates the relaxivity to microscopic parameters of the Gd3+ complex, such as the hydration number q, the water exchange rate kex, and the rotational correlation time τr [8,9]. The outer sphere (OS) relaxation mechanism originates from interactions of the Gd3+ electron spin with water molecules randomly diffusing around the complex. Finally, a second sphere (2S) mechanism might be also operating for systems containing water molecules strongly hydrogen-bonded to the functional groups of the complex. This second sphere effect is usually negligible, and it is difficult to describe when it exists. The contribution of each mechanism to the relaxivity depends on the structure of the complex, especially the size, the presence of hydrogen bonding acceptors, the charge, and the hydrophilicity. Commercial contrast agents are small, monohydrated Gd3+ complexes of polyamino-polycarboxylate ligands for which the IS and OS relaxivity contributions are similar. With an appropriate chemical design, the inner and second sphere contributions can be substantially increased, while the outer sphere relaxivity can practically not be modified.
The inner sphere relaxivity term is linearly proportional to the hydration number. Therefore, increasing q is a straightforward way to improve relaxivity. However, the presence of two or more inner sphere water molecules in the complex can seriously compromise its stability, thereby increasing the potential risk of releasing free and toxic Gd3+ [10,11,12]. Relaxivity can be also increased by optimizing the water exchange rate and the rotational motion time of the complex. The rate of water exchange is correlated with the exchange mechanism. The majority of the polyamino-polycarboxylate complexes of Gd3+ undergo a dissociative exchange, i.e., the leaving of the bound water molecule precedes the entering of the incoming water molecule. In this case, the steric hindrance around the water binding site and the global charge of the complex are important parameters to determine the exchange rate, and water exchange can be accelerated by increasing the steric hindrance around the water binding site. The most common way to reach higher relaxivity, with major improvements at medium frequencies (20–60 MHz), has been to increase the rotational correlation time, τr, by increasing the molecular weight of the complex. Indeed, for low molecular weight complexes, fast rotation limits the relaxation efficiency. Thus, a large number of bulkier ligands coordinating the Gd3+ ion was developed to create more efficient MRI contrast agents. Gd3+ complexes were therefore incorporated into macromolecular systems such as proteins [12,13,14,15], dendrimers [16], cyclodextrins [17], polyrotaxanes [18,19,20], etc. However, the relaxivity enhancements has been often less than those expected, due to the flexibility of the macromolecule which implies faster local motion for Gd3+ than the overall slow motion of the entire macromolecule.
We have focused our study on cyclodextrins (CDs) as interesting and versatile scaffolds to design potential MRI contrast agents. CDs are natural cyclic oligosaccharides with 6, 7, or 8 glucose units, issued from starch degradation by glucosyltransferase (CGTase) and so-called α-, β-, and γ-CD, respectively [21]. Cyclodextrins have primary (C-6) and secondary hydroxyl groups (C-2, C-3) forming the smaller and larger crowns of the cone, respectively. For β-CD, this cone shape is especially reinforced by hydrogen bonding between two adjacent units (C-2-OH and C-3-OH). The 21 alcohol functions also favor interactions with water molecules and improve the solubility in aqueous medium. The internal cavity (host), composed of glycosidic oxygen and C-H groups, is less hydrophilic and makes possible intermolecular interactions with organic molecules (guests). Host–guest inclusion complexes improve the water solubility and the stability of the guests, such as small bioactive molecules. In the context of MRI contrast agents, cyclodextrins have been mainly explored in three distinct approaches in the objective of modulating the rotational motion, thus improving relaxivity: (i) as host to form inclusion complexes with contrast agents functionalized by lipophilic groups [22,23,24], (ii) as high molecular weight scaffolds by covalently immobilizing one or more Gd3+ complexes [25,26], and (iii) as a platform for Ln3+ complexation [27,28].
In the first two approaches, dimers, trimers [23], polymers [29], and polyrotaxanes [18,19,20] of CDs were developed in order to maximize the number of Gd3+ complexes per molecule. For the development of platform for Ln3+ complexation, CDs were modified, for instance, into per-3,6-anhydro derivatives, which affected their structure leading to a hydrophilic cavity capable of metal binding. The replacement of the hydroxyl groups by carboxylate functions gives a ligand, which can complex hard Ln3+ ions to form mono- and bimetallic species [27]. The relaxivity of the monometallic Gd3+ has been investigated in details using a rigorous approach, where a maximum of the microscopic parameters was determined independently. It has been demonstrated that the high relaxivity obtained was due to the high hydration number of the complex and a relatively long rotational correlation time explained by the hydrophilic character of the complex [28].
6-O-Peracetylated-β-CDs were also synthesized to coordinate Gd3+ in the axis of the macrocycle [30,31,32]. In particular, the effect of the second hydration sphere has been studied using the native and permethylated CDs. It has been proved that this functionalization had an impact on the relaxivity. Indeed, a 40% relaxivity enhancement was observed with perhydroxylated β-CDs (4.6 mM−1 s−1 and 6.5 mM−1 s−1, respectively). As these complexes had similar structure and identical hydration number (q = 2), the relaxivity difference was attributed to the presence of hydrogen-bound water molecules around the hydroxyl groups inducing an important second-sphere (2S) contribution to relaxivity.
In order to improve the thermodynamic stability of the Gd3+ chelate and further study the influence of the hydrogen-bonding network provided by the hydrophilic cyclodextrins on the relaxivity, several functionalized cyclodextrins were synthesized and studied. Modified DOTA and TTHA (3,6,9,12-tetrakis(carboxymethyl)-3,6,9,12-tetraazatetradecane-1,14-dioic acid) ligands were conjugated at one of the C-6 position of various β-CDs by replacing a carboxylate function by an amide (1–5, Figure 1).
The DOTA monoamide (DOTAMA) ligand is known to form thermodynamically stable and kinetically inert complexes with Ln3+. The GdDOTAMA complex was introduced at one of the O-6-position on the small rim of the native (hydroxylated) β-CD (1), of the 6-O-permethylated β-CD (2), and of the 2,3,6-O-permethylated β-CD (3). With contrast agent 2, the hydroxyl groups are in the vicinity of the GdDOTAMA complex, while the methoxy groups are located on the opposite side on the larger rim of the CD. In order to better decipher the relaxation behavior of those compounds, TTHA monoamide (TTHAMA) was also introduced on the native (5) and 2,3,6-O-permethylated β-CD (4) (Figure 1). TTHA is a commercially available linear ligand with six carboxylic acid and four amine functions which can chelate the Gd3+ ion. This full coordination by the ligand prevents inner sphere (IS) binding of any water molecule. Indeed, the Gd3+ complex of TTHAMA has no inner sphere hydration water molecule (q = 0), which means that the relaxivity will be governed by outer sphere, and possibly second sphere mechanisms [33].

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Synthesis of CDs Functionalized with DOTA Ligand

The monofunctionalization of native β-CD 6 was based on the difference of reactivity between the hydroxyl groups (Scheme 1). Indeed, the secondary alcohols are more acidic: the position 3 less accessible. We substituted the more nucleophile primary alcohol at 6 position to keep the larger cavity available to form inclusion complex. We reported herein the introduction of DOTA and TTHA ligands on native and methylated-β-CDs.
All synthesis used the same precursor mono(6-amino-6-deoxy)-β-CD 7 obtained after monotosylation of primary face of β-CD 6 and substitution reaction by sodium azide (Scheme 1) [34]. The CD 7 was permethylated after deprotonation and treatment with methyl iodide (Supplementary Materials). The synthesis of the mono(6-azido-6-deoxy)-6-O-permethylated-β-CD 9 required two additional steps, the protection of secondary alcohol functions by tert-butyldimethylsilyl groups and the deprotection using ammonium fluoride reagent (Supplementary Materials).
The azide reduction using Staudinger reaction led to mono(6-amino-6-deoxy)-β-cyclodextrins precursors 10–12 with yields between 40–52%, which was confirmed by the disappearance of the signal in IR spectroscopy of azide function at 2199 cm−1 and appearance of amine function at 2920 cm−1. A shift of 10 ppm corresponding to the methylene carbon bearing the amine function was observed by 13C DEPT confirming the reduction step (Supplementary Materials). A peptide coupling was then applied with DOTA structure 13 protected by three tert-butyl groups (Scheme 1) [35]. The activation of the free acid function in presence of DCC and HOBt led to the three precursors 14–16 in 21%, 12%, and 70% yields, respectively. In order to improve the yields, uronium salt HATU was tested but it did not improve the reactivity [36]. Consequently, another strategy has been developed using the activation of the primary amine function by chloroacetyl chloride reagent (Scheme 2). However, only the permethylated β-CD 12 was substituted in this case in 82% yield. In the case of mono(6-amino-6-deoxy)-perhydroxylated β-CD 10 and mono(6-amino-6-deoxy)-2,3-O-permethylated-β-CD 11, the reactions led to many secondary products due to polysubstitution reactions of the alcohol functions. In order to control the monosubstitution reaction, other precursors 17 and 18 have to be used (Scheme 2).
Thus, the mono(6-amino-6-deoxy)-β-CD 7 was quantitatively peracetylated using anhydride acetic in pyridine and the azido function was then reduced by catalytic hydrogenation in 50% yield (see Scheme 1 in experimental section) (Supplementary Materials). From the same precursor 7, the mono(6-amino-6-deoxy)-2,3-permethyl-β-CD protected with silyl groups at 6 positions 18 was obtained in three steps by silylation of the residual primary alcohols of the intermediate mono(6-azido-6-deoxy)-β-CD 7 (Scheme 1), followed by a permethylation of the secondary face and after Staudinger reduction of azido group in 51% over yield (see Scheme 2 in experimental section) (Supplementary Materials). The two mono(6-amino-6-deoxy)-CDs 17 and 18 were substituted with chloromethylacetyl group in 89% and 77% yields, respectively (Supplementary Materials). From precursor 18, an additional deprotection step of the TBS group was required using ammonium fluoride, providing quantitatively compound 20 (see Scheme 3 in experimental section) (Supplementary Materials). The coupling was carried out from the free secondary amine of the commercially available DO3A derivative 22 bearing three tert-butylester groups. The DOTAMA ligand was introduced with yields varying between 59% and 88% leading the compounds 23, 15, and 16, thereby improving the initial yields obtained with the direct strategy (21% and 12% yields for 14 and 15, respectively) (Scheme 1 and Scheme 2).
The 1H NMR spectra confirmed that the substitution of DOTAMA on 15, 16, and 23 compounds was effective by the presence of tert-butyl groups clearly observed at 1.45 ppm; the other signals being hidden by those of the CD scaffold (Supplementary Materials). For example, the 13C NMR spectrum of precursor 19 revealed a characteristic peak at 42.6 ppm corresponding to the carbon at alpha position of chlorine atom. This signal disappeared in the DOTAMA-substituted 23 and the tert-butyl groups signals appeared at 81.8 and 28.0 ppm, respectively. Finally, the methylene groups of the DOTAMA ligand were observed between 55.7 and 62.7 ppm (N-CH2-CH2-N and CH2-COOH) proving the substitution reaction. All the structural analysis was confirmed by mass spectrometry analyses (Supplementary Materials).
The ester functions of compounds 23, 15, and 16 were quantitatively deprotected using trifluoroacetic acid in a mixture of dichloromethane/toluene (1/1). In the case of the peracetylated-6-O-mono-DOTAMA-β-CD 23, an additional step using sodium methanoate in methanol was necessary to obtain the hydroxylated CD 24 after a treatment on proton exchange anion resin. The mass spectrometry analyses and the disappearance of tert-butyl and acetyl protecting groups on 13C NMR spectrum confirmed the structures 24–26 (Supplementary Materials).
Finally, Gd3+ complexes of ligands 24–26 were prepared in the presence of one equivalent of gadolinium chloride hexahydrate in aqueous medium at pH 5.4 (Scheme 3).

2.2. Synthesis of CDs Functionalized with TTHA Ligand

In order to immobilize TTHA on CD 12, one carboxylic acid function was activated using one equivalent of HBTU reagent in presence of triethylamine (Scheme 4). The corresponding compound 27 was obtained in 65% yield.
As the direct substitution of the perhydroxylated 6-O-monoamino-β-CD 10 did not occur (Scheme 1), the peracetylated derivated 17 having a higher solubility in organic solvents was tested. The introduction of the ligand was then possible with 46% yield. This result was confirmed by 13C NMR spectrometry thanks to the characteristic signals of carbonyl function at 171 ppm and the methylene groups of the TTHAMA ligand (57.5–52.5 ppm) (Supplementary Materials). The mass spectrometry analysis was in accordance with the structure 28 (Supplementary Materials). The perhydroxylated compound 29 was obtained quantitatively by basic treatment and purification on Dowex column. The disappearance of the acetyl signals at 21.6 ppm was observed by 13C NMR and the molecular peak at m/z = 1610.6 [M + H]+ confirmed the structure (Supplementary Materials).
Finally, CD-GdTTHAMA 4 and CD(OH)-GdTTHAMA 5 were obtained by addition of gadolinium chloride hexahydrate under controlled pH (Scheme 5).

2.3. Relaxometric Analysis of the TTHA-Derived Complexes 4 and 5

Nuclear Magnetic Relaxation Dispersion (NMRD) profiles describe the efficacy of the complex in terms of relaxivity as a function of the magnetic field, and they are helpful to characterize the parameters governing proton relaxivity [37,38]. Typically, the analysis of NMRD curves allows for estimating some of the physicochemical parameters that determine relaxivity, in particular the rotational correlation time (τR), the water exchange rate (kex), the number of water molecules directly coordinated to Gd3+ (q), and the electronic relaxation rates. However, it is important to determine a maximum of these parameters independently for the reliability of the results.
In the case of TTHA complexes, as there is no water molecule directly coordinated to Gd3+, the relaxivity is a sum of outer sphere and, if present, second sphere contributions [33]. The NMRD profiles of 4 and 5 were measured between 10 kHz and 400 MHz and are presented in Figure 2 and in supporting information (Figure S6 in Supplementary Materials).
The low relaxivities observed are in accordance with the absence of inner sphere water molecules in the complexes. At 20 MHz, 25 °C, the relaxivities are 2.99 and 3.75 mM−1 s−1 for 4 and 5, respectively; therefore, an increase of 25% is observed when replacing OMe by OH groups on the CDs. As the two complexes are supposed to have similar size, thus rotational dynamics, the higher relaxivity for 5 can be ascribed to the presence of second sphere water molecules contributing to the overall relaxivity, which is consistent with the presence of an H-bonding network in the case of the TTHA-substituted native CD 5. It should be noted that rough simulations of a purely outer sphere mechanism give a relaxivity of 2.3 mM−1 s−1 at 20 MHz and 25 °C, in the same order of magnitude as that measured for 4. This is also the value reported for GdTTHA in the same conditions [33].

2.4. Relaxometric Analysis of DOTA-Derived Complexes 1–3

The NMRD profiles of 1–3 were also recorded between 10 kHz and 400 MHz, at 25 °C, 37 °C, and 50 °C (see Figure 3 and Figures S3–S5 in Supplementary Materials). It should be noted that the relaxivity profile of 3 was already partially measured and analyzed by Botta et al. [25], but for the sake of direct comparison, it was re-measured in identical conditions as those of 1 and 2. The relaxivity values of 3 were similar (within 5–10%) to those previously reported.
The relaxivities determined at 20 MHz and 25 °C were 9.67, 10.50, and 9.64 mM−1 s−1 for 1, 2, and 3, respectively. These values are ~2.5 times higher than the relaxivity of clinically used contrast agents like GdDOTA (3.5 mM−1 s−1). In the NMRD profiles, we note however the absence of a relaxivity “hump” at intermediate fields, which is characteristic of slowly rotating macromolecular Gd3+ complexes. This is also in accordance with previous data from Botta et al. [25] and us [18], and indicates that the CD-based systems are not characterized by very slow motion as they are relatively flexible, and do not aggregate in aqueous solution. The relaxivity (measured at 25 °C and 20 MHz) was found independent of the concentration (between 0.5 and 5 mM), evidencing again the absence of intermolecular interactions in this concentration range.
The relaxivity of the native CD 1 and permethylated one 3 were similar, in contrast to what had been observed previously in the case of CD substituted by TTHA derivatives 4 and 5. A modest increase of relaxivity of ~9% was observed for the partially methylated CD 2. On the simple assumption that a higher hydrogen bonding network would result in a higher number of second sphere water molecules contributing to relaxivity, we would have expected a relaxivity increase in the following order: 3 < 2 < 1.
The temperature dependence of the relaxivities provides qualitative information on the parameter that limits relaxivity for a given system. Indeed, upon temperature increase, both the water exchange and the rotational dynamics become faster. If fast rotational dynamics is a limiting factor, the relaxivity will decrease upon increasing the temperature. Conversely, if relaxivity is limited by slow water exchange, increasing the temperature will lead to the acceleration of the water exchange, thus an increase in relaxivity. If slow water exchange and fast rotation are both limiting factors, as a result of an interplay between the two, relaxivity can be relatively independent of temperature. The temperature dependence of the different systems (1–3) showed similar relaxivities at 25 °C and 37 °C, whereas r1 became lower at 50 °C (Supplementary Materials). This suggests that at the lower temperatures slow water exchange starts to become the limiting parameter, rather than fast rotational dynamics. In order to better decipher the relaxivity dependence, we performed 17O NMR measurements on the different 1–3 complexes.

2.5. 17O NMR Data of Complexes 1–3

Variable temperature 17O T2 measurements give access to the water exchange rate, kex. The reduced 17O transverse relaxation rates for 1–3 are presented in Figure 4. The behavior of 3 is classical with an increase of the reduced transverse relaxation rates (up to ~55 °C), followed by a decrease with increasing temperature, indicating that the complex is in the slow kinetic region below 55 °C. In this region, 1/T2r is directly determined by the water exchange rate constant kex, allowing for a reliable determination of kex value. The 17O data have been fitted to the Swift–Connick equations, where the number of water molecules coordinated to Gd3+ was fixed to 1, and the scalar coupling constant, A/ħ, was fixed to −3.6 × 106 rad s−1. The fit yielded a value of kex298 = (1.49 ± 0.08) × 106 s−1, while ΔH≠ = (37 ± 3) kJ mol−1 was obtained for the activation enthalpy of the water exchange. The kex298 value is similar to what was previously estimated by Botta et al. from the fitting of the NMRD profile (kex298 = 1.7 × 106 s−1) [25], and in the same order of magnitude as water exchange rate constants typical of monoamide DOTA complexes of Gd3+ [7]. It is nearly three times lower than the water exchange rate of GdDOTA (kex298 = 4.1 × 106), and higher than that of GdDOTAM (see Table 1), which is consistent with previous observations on analogous systems. Indeed, in the case of dissociative exchange for DOTA-derivatives (which is expected here), it is generally observed that the replacement of one negatively charged carboxylate in the complex with a neutral amide decreases the water exchange rate of about one-third [7].
In contrast to 3, 1 and 2 have a very different behavior. Indeed, at low temperatures the 17O ln(1/T2r) values are rather constant. This might be indicative of the presence of more than one species (isomers) in solution with different water exchange properties. The SAP (square antiprismatic) and TSAP (twisted square antiprismatic) isomers of macrocyclic systems such as DOTA derivatives are known to have different water exchange rate and their ratio can be very different depending on the systems [42,43]. In order to obtain information on the potential coexistence of different species in solution, we recorded 1H NMR spectra on the corresponding Eu3+ complexes obtained using similar protocol as for the Gd complexes (Figures S7 and S8 in the Supplementary Materials). Europium is the neighboring element to Gd in the lanthanide series, so they are expected to have similar coordination environment. Eu3+ is also paramagnetic; it causes large chemical shifts but much less line-broadening than Gd3+. Unfortunately, the 1H NMR spectra of the Eu3+ analogs of 1 and 2, recorded at different temperatures, show broad resonances, combined with the presence of many protons of the cyclodextrins in the diamagnetic window which dominate the spectra. Overall, this prevents distinguishing different isomers. In the absence of information about the presence of different species in solution and their ratio, the analysis of the 17O transverse relaxation rates could not be realized for 1 and 2. Nevertheless, the temperature dependence of the transverse 17O relaxation rates at low temperature clearly showed a very different water exchange for 1–3. Although we can only speculate on the origin of this difference, it is plausible to hypothesize that it could be related to the different H-bonding network generated by the three different cyclodextrins scaffolds, which can have an influence on the water exchange rate of the Gd3+ complexes.
In overall, the combined 17O NMR and NMRD data suggest that these highly hydrophilic systems have a complex behavior in which the hydrogen bonding network does not only contribute to a second sphere proton relaxation mechanism, but it also affects the exchange rate of the inner sphere water molecule of the Gd3+ complexes. The complexity of the systems prevents any reliable fit of the NMRD data.

3. Conclusions

We described β-CDs bearing derivatives of DOTA and TTHA ligands for Gd3+ complexation. The molecules have been obtained using novel synthetic routes. We studied the influence of the numerous hydrophilic OH groups of the CD structure, which create a strong hydrogen bonding network involving second sphere water molecules, on the proton relaxivity and on the water exchange rate of the Gd3+ complexes. In the absence of inner sphere water molecule in the Gd3+ complex (TTHA ligand), the relaxivity increases with the increasing number of hydroxyl groups on the CD, confirming a strong second sphere contribution to the relaxivity, induced by the hydrophilicity of the molecule. In the case of DOTA derivatives, the situation is more complicated. Indeed, the variation of the relaxivity between the systems containing a different number of OH groups on the CD is not guided by the increase of hydroxyl functions. 17O NMR measurements revealed different water exchange processes depending on the number of hydroxyls on the CD. For the permethylated system 3, a classical water exchange rate is found, consistent with typical GdDOTA-monoamide complexes. In contrast, when hydroxyls are present on the CD 1 and 2, the water exchange process becomes clearly different, as evidenced by 17O T2 data. These different water exchange properties will very likely impact the relaxivity. In overall, these highly hydrophilic systems have a hydrogen-bound network that induces a second sphere relaxivity, but it also influences the water exchange process. Altogether this leads to a complicated relaxation behavior.

Supplementary Materials

The materials, method, synthesis, and characterization details of products 7, 9, 12, 15–21, 23–29, 1–5, and europium complexes are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9717/9/2/269/s1. 1H NMRD profiles of contrast agents 1–4 at 25 °C, 37 °C, and 1H NMR spectra of europium complexes of 24 and 25 at 9.4 T and 5 °C, 25 °C, and 37 °C are also reported.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.G. and F.E.; Methodology, G.G., F.E., É.T., and C.S.B.; Validation, G.G., F.E., É.T., and C.S.B.; Formal Analysis, A.B., B.-S.S.-B., S.B., M.B., C.B., A.P. and C.S.B.; Investigation, A.B., B.-S.S.-B., S.B., M.B., C.B., and A.P.; Writing—Original draft preparation G.G. and C.S.B.; Writing—review and editing, F.E. and É.T.; Supervision, G.G., F.E., S.B., C.S.B., and É.T.; Project administration, Funding acquisition, G.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscripts.

Funding

This research was funded by the Interreg IV AI-Chem Channel (PhD A.B.).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No data.

Acknowledgments

We thank Raphaël Tripier from UMR 6521, University of Bretagne Occidentale (Brest) for sending some tritertbutylDOTA 13. We are also grateful for the compagny Cyclolab, https://cyclolab.hu/, for its contribution by sending β-CD-NH2 10.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Caravan, P.; Ellison, J.J.; McMurry, T.J.; Lauffer, R.B. Gadolinium(III) Chelates as MRI Contrast Agents: Structure, Dynamics, and Applications. Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 2293–2352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Aime, S.; Botta, M.; Terreno, E. Gd(III)-based contrast agents for MRI. Adv. Inorg. Chem. 2005, 57, 173–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hermann, P.; Kotek, J.; Kubícek, V.; Lukes, I. Gadolinium(III) Complexes as MRI Contrast Agents: Ligand Design and Properties of the Complexes. Dalton Trans. 2008, 23, 3027–3047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Botta, M. Second Coordination Sphere Water Molecules and Relaxivity of Gadolinium(III) Complexes: Implications for MRI Contrast Agents. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2000, 2000, 399–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Rudovsky, J.; Kotek, J.; Hermann, P.; Lukes, I.; Mainero, V.; Aime, S. Synthesis of a bifunctional monophosphinic acid DOTA analogue ligand and its lanthanide(III) complexes. A gadolinium(III) complex endowed with an optimal water exchange rate for MRI applications. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2005, 3, 112–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Bonnet, C.S.; Fries, P.H.; Crouzy, S.; Delangle, P. Outer-Sphere Investigation of MRI Relaxation Contrast Agents. Example of a Cyclodecapeptide Gadolinium Complex with Second-Sphere Water. J. Phys. Chem. B 2010, 114, 8770–8781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Merbach, A.; Helm, L.; Toth, E. The Chemistry of Contrast Agents in Medical Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2nd ed.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA; Chichester, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Solomon, I.; Bloembergen, N. Nuclear Magnetic Interactions in the HF Molecule. J. Chem. Phys. 1956, 25, 261–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bloembergen, N.; Morgan, L.O. Proton Relaxation Times in Paramagnetic Solutions. Effects of Electron Spin Relaxation. J. Chem. Phys. 1961, 34, 842–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Idée, J.-M.; Port, M.; Medina, C.; Lancelot, E.; Fayoux, E.; Ballet, S.; Corot, C. Possible Involvement of Gadolinium Chelates in the Pathophysiology of Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis: A Critical Review. Toxicology 2008, 248, 77–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Port, M.; Idée, J.-M.; Medina, C.; Robic, C.; Sabatou, M.; Corot, C. Efficiency, thermodynamic and kinetic stability of marketed gadolinium chelates and their possible clinical consequences: A critical review. Biometals 2008, 21, 469–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Fraum, T.J.; Ludwig, D.R.; Bashir, M.R.; Kathryn, J.F. Toxicity Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents: A Comprehensive Risk Assessment: Gadolinium Risk Assessment. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2017, 46, 338–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Sieving, P.F.; Watson, A.D.; Roklage, S.M. Preparation and Characterization of Paramagnetic Polychelates and Their Protein Conjugates. Bioconjugate Chem. 1990, 1, 65–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Tóth, E.; Connac, F.; Helm, L.; Adzamli, K.; Merbach, A.E. Direct assessment of water exchange on a Gd(III) chelate bound to a protein. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 1998, 3, 606–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zech, S.G.; Eldredge, H.B.; Lowe, M.P.; Caravan, P. Protein Binding to Lanthanide(III) Complexes Can Reduce the Water Exchange Rate at the Lanthanide. Inorg. Chem. 2007, 46, 3576–3584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Rudovsky, J.; Botta, M.; Hermann, P.; Hardcastle, K.I.; Lukes, I.; Aime, S. PAMAM Dendrimeric Conjugates with a Gd-DOTA Phosphinate Derivative and Their Adducts with Polyaminoacids: The Interplay of Global Motion, Internal Rotation, and Fast Water Exchange. Bioconjugate Chem. 2006, 17, 975–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Champagne, P.-L.; Barbot, C.; Zhang, P.; Han, X.; Gaamoussi, I.; Hubert-Roux, M.; Bertolesi, G.E.; Gouhier, G.; Ling, C.-C. Synthesis and Unprecedented Complexation Properties of β-Cyclodextrin-Based Ligand for Lanthanide Ions. Inorg. Chem. 2018, 57, 8964–8977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Fredy, J.W.; Scelle, J.; Guenet, A.; Morel, E.; Adam de Beaumais, S.; Menand, M.; Marvaud, V.; Bonnet, C.S.; Toth, E.; Sollogoub, M.; et al. Cyclodextrin Polyrotaxanes as a Highly Modular Platform for the Development of Imaging Agents. Chem. Eur. J. 2014, 20, 10915–10920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Fredy, J.W.; Scelle, J.; Ramniceanu, G.; Doan, B.-T.; Bonnet, C.S.; Tóth, É.; Ménand, M.; Sollogoub, M.; Vives, G.; Hasenknopf, B. Mechanostereoselective One-Pot Synthesis of Functionalized Head-to-Head Cyclodextrin [3] Rotaxanes and Their Application as Magnetic Resonance Imaging Contrast Agents. Org. Lett. 2017, 19, 1136–1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Mondjinou, Y.A.; Loren, B.P.; Collins, C.J.; Hyun, S.-H.; Demoret, A.; Skulsky, J.; Chaplain, C.; Badwaik, V.; Thompson, D.H. Gd3+: DOTA-Modified 2-Hydroxypropyl-β-Cyclodextrin/4-Sulfobutyl Ether-β-Cyclodextrin-Based Polyrotaxanes as Long Circulating High Relaxivity MRI Contrast Agents. Bioconjugate Chem. 2018, 29, 3550–3560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. D’Souza, V.T.; Lipkowitz, K.B. Cyclodextrins: Introduction. Chem. Rev. 1998, 98, 1741–1742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Aime, S.; Gianolio, E.; Terreno, E.; Menegotto, I.; Bracco, C.; Milone, L.; Cravotto, G. β-Cyclodextrin adducts of Gd(III) chelates: Useful models for investigating the structural and dynamic determinants of the relaxivity of gadolinium-based systems. Magn. Reson. Chem. 2003, 41, 800–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Aime, S.; Gianolio, E.; Arena, F.; Alessandro Barge, A.; Martina, K.; Heropoulos, G.; Cravotto, G. New cyclodextrin dimers and trimers capable of forming supramolecular adducts with shape-specific ligands. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2009, 7, 370–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Cao, Y.; Zu, G.; Kuang, Y.; He, Y.; Mao, Z.; Liu, M.; Xiong, D.; Pei, R. Biodegradable Nanoglobular Magnetic Resonance Imaging Contrast Agent Constructed with Host-Guest Self-Assembly for Tumor-Targeted Imaging. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 26906–26916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Skinner, P.J.; Beeby, A.; Dickins, R.S.; Parker, D.; Aime, S.; Botta, M. Conjugates of cyclodextrins with charged and neutral macrocyclic europium, terbium and gadolinium complexes: Sensitized luminescence and relaxometric investigations and an example of supramolecular relaxivity enhancement. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2000, 2, 1329–1338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hana, Y.; Qian, Y.; Zhoub, X.; Hub, H.; Liua, X.; Zhoua, Z.; Tanga, J.; Shena, Y. Biodegradable Nanoglobular Magnetic Resonance Imaging Contrast Agent Constructed with Host-Guest Self-Assembly for Tumor-Targeted Imaging. Polym. Chem. 2016, 7, 6354–6362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bonnet, C.; Gadelle, A.; Pecaut, J.; Friesa, P.H.; Delangle, P. Inclusion complexes of trivalent lutetium cations with an acidic derivative of per(3,6-anhydro)-α-cyclodextrin. Chem. Commun. 2005, 5, 625–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Bonnet, C.S.; Fries, P.H.; Gadelle, A.; Gambarelli, S.; Delangle, P. A Rigorous Framework to Interpret Water Relaxivity. The Case Study of a Gd(III) Complex with an α-Cyclodextrin Derivative. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 10401–10413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Battistini, E.; Gianolio, E.; Gref, R.; Couvreur, P.; Fuzerova, S.; Othman, M.; Aime, S.; Badet, B.; Durand, P. High-Relaxivity Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Contrast Agent Based on Supramolecular Assembly between a Gadolinium Chelate, a Modified Dextran, and Poly-β-Cyclodextrin. Chem. Eur. J. 2008, 14, 4551–4561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Idriss, H.; Estour, F.; Zgani, I.; Barbot, C.; Biscotti, A.; Petit, S.; Galaup, C.; Hubert-Roux, M.; Nicol, L.; Mulder, P.; et al. Effect of the Second Coordination Sphere on New Contrast Agents Based on Cyclodextrin Scaffolds for MRI Signals. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 4531–4534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zgani, I.; Idriss, H.; Barbot, C.; Djedaïni-Pilard, F.; Petit, S.; Hubert-Roux, M.; Estour, F.; Gouhier, G. Positive Variation of the MRI Signal via Intramolecular Inclusion Complexation of a C-2 Functionalized β-Cyclodextrin. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2017, 15, 564–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Biscotti, A.; Barbot, C.; Nicol, L.; Mulder, P.; Sappei, C.; Hubert-Roux, M.; Déchamps-Olivier, I.; Estour, F.; Gouhier, G. MRI probes based on C6-peracetate β-cyclodextrins: Synthesis, gadolinium complexation and in vivo relaxivity studies. Polyhedron 2018, 148, 32–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zitha-Bovens, E.; Muller, R.N.; Laurent, S.; Vander, E.L.; Geraldes, C.F.G.C.; van Bekkum, H.; Peters, J.A. Structure and Dynamics of Lanthanide Complexes of Triethylenetetramine-N, N, N′, N′′, N′′′, N′′′-hexaacetic Acid (H6ttha) and of Diamides H4ttha (NHR) Derived from H6ttha as Studied by NMR, NMRD, and EPR. Helv. Chim. Acta 2005, 88, 618–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Martinelli, J.; Thangavel, K.; Tei, L.; Botta, M. Dendrimeric b-Cyclodextrin/GdIII Chelate SupramolecularHost–Guest Adducts as High-Relaxivity MRI Probes. Chem. Eur. J. 2014, 20, 10944–10952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Laakso, J.; Rosser, G.A.; Szíjjártó, C.; Beeby, A.; Borbas, K.E. Synthesis of Chlorin-Sensitized Near Infrared-Emitting Lanthanide Complexes. Inorg. Chem. 2012, 51, 10366–10374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Montalbetti, C.A.G.N.; Falque, V. Amide bond formation and peptide coupling. Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 10827–10852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Swift, T.J.; Connick, R.E. NMR Relaxation Mechanisms of O17 in Aqueous Solutions of Paramagnetic Cations and the Lifetime of Water Molecules in the First Coordination Sphere. J. Chem. Phys. 1962, 37, 307–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Powell, D.H.; Ni Dhubhghaill, O.M.; Pubanz, D.; Helm, L.; Lebedev, Y.S.; Schlaepfer, W.; Merbach, A.E. Structural and Dynamic Parameters Obtained from 17O NMR, EPR, and NMRD Studies of Monomeric and Dimeric Gd3+ Complexes of Interest in Magnetic Resonance Imaging: An Integrated and Theoretically Self-Consistent Approach. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 9333–9346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Tóth, É.; Pubanz, D.; Vauthey, S.; Helm, L.; Merbach, A.E. The Role of Water Exchange in Attaining Maximum Relaxivities for Dendrimeric MRI Contrast Agents. Chem. Eur. J. 1996, 2, 1607–1615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Florès, O.; Pliquett, J.; Galan, L.A.; Lescure, R.; Denat, F.; Maury, O.; Pallier, A.; Bellaye, P.-S.; Collin, B.; Même, S.; et al. Aza-BODIPY Platform: Toward an Efficient Water-Soluble Bimodal Imaging Probe for MRI and Near-Infrared Fluorescence. Inorg. Chem. 2020, 59, 1306–1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Aime, S.; Barge, A.; Bruce, J.I.; Botta, M.; Howard, J.A.K.; Moloney, J.M.; Parker, D.; De Sousa, A.S.; Woods, M. NMR, Relaxometric, and Structural Studies of the Hydration and Exchange Dynamics of Cationic Lanthanide Complexes of Macrocyclic Tetraamide Ligands. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 5762–5771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Aime, S.; Barge, A.; Botta, M.; De Sousa, A.S.; Parker, P. Direct NMR Spectroscopic Observation of a Lanthanide-Coordinated Water Molecule whose Exchange Rate Is Dependent on the Conformation of the Complexes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 2673–2675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Platas-Iglesias, C. The Solution Structure and Dynamics of MRI Probes Based on Lanthanide(III) DOTA as Investigated by DFT and NMR Spectroscopy. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2012, 12, 2023–2033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Processes 09 00269 g001 550
Figure 1. Structure of new contrast agents based on β-CDs-DOTAMA (1–3) and β-CDs-TTHAMA (4 and 5) ligands.
Figure 1. Structure of new contrast agents based on β-CDs-DOTAMA (1–3) and β-CDs-TTHAMA (4 and 5) ligands.
Processes 09 00269 g001
Processes 09 00269 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Synthesis route of 6-O-monoamino-β-cyclodextrins precursors 10–12 and DOTAMA derivatives 14–16.
Scheme 1. Synthesis route of 6-O-monoamino-β-cyclodextrins precursors 10–12 and DOTAMA derivatives 14–16.
Processes 09 00269 sch001
Processes 09 00269 sch002 550
Scheme 2. Second strategy to the synthesis of β-CDs-DOTAMA ligands 24–26.
Scheme 2. Second strategy to the synthesis of β-CDs-DOTAMA ligands 24–26.
Processes 09 00269 sch002
Processes 09 00269 sch003 550
Scheme 3. Formation of β-CD(OH)-GdDOTAMA 1, β-CD(OH)(OMe)-GdDOTAMA 2, and β-CD(OMe)-GdDOTAMA 3.
Scheme 3. Formation of β-CD(OH)-GdDOTAMA 1, β-CD(OH)(OMe)-GdDOTAMA 2, and β-CD(OMe)-GdDOTAMA 3.
Processes 09 00269 sch003
Processes 09 00269 sch004 550
Scheme 4. Formation of β-CDs-TTHAMA 27 and 29.
Scheme 4. Formation of β-CDs-TTHAMA 27 and 29.
Processes 09 00269 sch004
Processes 09 00269 sch005 550
Scheme 5. Formation of β-CD(OMe)-GdTTHAMA 4, β-CD(OH)-GdDOTAMA 5.
Scheme 5. Formation of β-CD(OMe)-GdTTHAMA 4, β-CD(OH)-GdDOTAMA 5.
Processes 09 00269 sch005
Processes 09 00269 g002 550
Figure 2. 1H NMRD profiles of 4 (■) and 5 (♦) at 25 °C and pH = 7.0.
Figure 2. 1H NMRD profiles of 4 (■) and 5 (♦) at 25 °C and pH = 7.0.
Processes 09 00269 g002
Processes 09 00269 g003 550
Figure 3. 1H NMRD profiles of 1 (♦) 2 (●), and 3 (■) at 25 °C and pH = 7.0.
Figure 3. 1H NMRD profiles of 1 (♦) 2 (●), and 3 (■) at 25 °C and pH = 7.0.
Processes 09 00269 g003
Processes 09 00269 g004 550
Figure 4. Temperature dependence of the reduced 17O transverse relaxation rates of 1 (♦, 10.04 mM) 2 (●, 3.2 mM), and 3 (■, 10.33 mM) at 9.4 T and pH = 7.0. The continuous curve represents the best fit to the experimental data points of 3.
Figure 4. Temperature dependence of the reduced 17O transverse relaxation rates of 1 (♦, 10.04 mM) 2 (●, 3.2 mM), and 3 (■, 10.33 mM) at 9.4 T and pH = 7.0. The continuous curve represents the best fit to the experimental data points of 3.
Processes 09 00269 g004
Table
Table 1. Water exchange rates (kex298) of various GdDOTA derivative complexes.
Table 1. Water exchange rates (kex298) of various GdDOTA derivative complexes.
33 aGdDO3A-bz-NO2Gd2-Wazaby6GdDOTAGdDOTAM
Coordinating unitDOTA-monoamideDOTA-monoamideDOTA-monoamide + COO-DOTA-monoamideDOTADOTA-tetramide
kex298 (106 s−1)1.49 ± 0.081.71.62.84.10.053
ReferenceThis work[25][39][40][38][41]
a Obtained from fitting of NMRD data from ref. [25].
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Biscotti, A.; Estour, F.; Sembo-Backonly, B.-S.; Balieu, S.; Bosco, M.; Barbot, C.; Pallier, A.; Tóth, É.; Bonnet, C.S.; Gouhier, G. Gd3+ Complexes Conjugated to Cyclodextrins: Hydroxyl Functions Influence the Relaxation Properties. Processes 2021, 9, 269. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9020269

AMA Style

Biscotti A, Estour F, Sembo-Backonly B-S, Balieu S, Bosco M, Barbot C, Pallier A, Tóth É, Bonnet CS, Gouhier G. Gd3+ Complexes Conjugated to Cyclodextrins: Hydroxyl Functions Influence the Relaxation Properties. Processes. 2021; 9(2):269. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9020269

Chicago/Turabian Style

Biscotti, Anais, François Estour, Berthe-Sandra Sembo-Backonly, Sébastien Balieu, Michaël Bosco, Cécile Barbot, Agnès Pallier, Éva Tóth, Célia S. Bonnet, and Géraldine Gouhier. 2021. "Gd3+ Complexes Conjugated to Cyclodextrins: Hydroxyl Functions Influence the Relaxation Properties" Processes 9, no. 2: 269. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9020269

APA Style

Biscotti, A., Estour, F., Sembo-Backonly, B.-S., Balieu, S., Bosco, M., Barbot, C., Pallier, A., Tóth, É., Bonnet, C. S., & Gouhier, G. (2021). Gd3+ Complexes Conjugated to Cyclodextrins: Hydroxyl Functions Influence the Relaxation Properties. Processes, 9(2), 269. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9020269

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop