Next Article in Journal
Mechanism of the Breakage of Spherical Gypsum Particles under 3-Point Contact Conditions
Next Article in Special Issue
g-C3N4 Sensitized by an Indoline Dye for Photocatalytic H2 Evolution
Previous Article in Journal
Process Intensification in Bio-Ethanol Production–Recent Developments in Membrane Separation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effect of Steam Quality on Extra-Heavy Crude Oil Upgrading and Oil Recovery Assisted with PdO and NiO-Functionalized Al2O3 Nanoparticles
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Real-Time Industrial Process Fault Diagnosis Based on Time Delayed Mutual Information Analysis

Processes 2021, 9(6), 1027; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9061027
by Cheng Ji, Fangyuan Ma, Jianhong Wang, Jingde Wang and Wei Sun *
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Processes 2021, 9(6), 1027; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9061027
Submission received: 22 May 2021 / Revised: 5 June 2021 / Accepted: 9 June 2021 / Published: 11 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Redesign Processes in the Age of the Fourth Industrial Revolution)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The work presented in the paper is commendable and the scientific level is suitable for the journal. I only want to suggest some minor improvements:

- a lot of abbreviations are used within the paper (DCS, IE, MI, TEP, TDMI), which are explained when introduced. Even if that approach is correct, it forces the reader to go back and forth between sections as he reads the paper, which worsens the understanding of its contents. I suggest that the authors introduce a short paragraph at the end of the introductory section outlining all the abbreviations used in the paper

- the conclusions section is rather short (the usefulness of the proposed approach should be presented in more detail) and no further research directions are introduced

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The presented paper describes algorithm to calculate the fault diagnosis. The work is interesting and well written. However, the fault diagnosis has a lot of known methods. From my point of view, the work must have comparison with different algorithm showing the benefits of the new one. The quantitive and qualitive comparison should be performed.

The minor comments:

1) Figure 9. Fault propagation digraph result. - the figure is very trivial

2) Can we find the type of fault based on this research.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The work was updated according to remarks.

Back to TopTop