Next Article in Journal
The Role of Globalization, Economic Growth and Natural Resources on the Ecological Footprint in Thailand: Evidence from Nonlinear Causal Estimations
Next Article in Special Issue
Theoretical Estimation of Evaporation Heat in Paper Drying Process Based on Drying Curve
Previous Article in Journal
Boosting Electrochemical Performance of Hematite Nanorods via Quenching-Induced Alkaline Earth Metal Ion Doping
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Method to Reduce Steam Consumption of ECF Bleaching Based on Operation Optimizing
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Analysis of Cadmium-Stress-Induced microRNAs and Their Targets Reveals bra-miR172b-3p as a Potential Cd2+-Specific Resistance Factor in Brassica juncea

1
School of Life Science, Hunan University of Science and Technology, Taoyuan Road, Xiangtan 411201, China
2
Hunan Key Laboratory of Economic Crops Genetic Improvement and Integrated Utilization, Hunan University of Science and Technology, Taoyuan Road, Xiangtan 411201, China
3
South China Institute of Biomedine, Guangzhou 510700, China
4
Crop Research Institute, Hunan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changsha 410125, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2021, 9(7), 1099; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9071099
Submission received: 17 May 2021 / Revised: 15 June 2021 / Accepted: 16 June 2021 / Published: 24 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Energy Conservation and Emission Reduction in Process Industry)

Abstract

:
The contamination of soil with high levels of cadmium (Cd) is of increasing concern, as Cd is a heavy metal element that seriously limits crop productivity and quality, thus affecting human health. (1) Background: Some miRNAs play key regulatory roles in response to Cd stress, but few have been explored in the highly Cd-enriched coefficient oilseed crop, Brassica juncea. (2) Methods: The genome-wide identification and characterization of miRNAs and their targets in leaves and roots of Brassica juncea exposed to Cd stress was undertaken using strand specific transcript sequencing and miRNA sequencing. (3) Results: In total, 11 known and novel miRNAs, as well as 56 target transcripts, were identified as Cd-responsive miRNAs and transcripts. Additionally, four corresponding target transcripts of six miRNAs, including FLA9 (Fasciclin-Like Arabinogalactan-protein 9), ATCAT3 (catalase 3), DOX1 (dioxygenases) and ATCCS (copper chaperone for superoxide dismutase), were found to be involved in the plant’s biotic stress pathway. We further validated the expression of three miRNA and six target genes in response to Cd, hydrargyrum (Hg), manganese (Mn), plumbum (Pb) or natrium (Na) stress and Mucor infection by qRT-PCR, and show that ATCCS and FLA9 were significantly and differentially regulated in the Cd-treated leaves. In addition, our results showed that DOX1 was obviously induced by Pb stress. Among the respective target miRNAs, bra-miR172b-3p (target for ATCCS) and ra-miR398-3p (target for FLA9) were down-regulated in Cd-treated leaves. (4) Conclusions: We identified bra-miR172b-3p as a potential Cd-specific resistant inhibitor, which may be negatively regulated in ATCCS in response to Cd stress. These findings could provide further insight into the regulatory networks of Cd-responsive miRNA in Brassica juncea.

1. Introduction

Heavy metals have been found to be a kind of widespread pollutant and to pose a threat to organisms. Vast areas of agricultural soil are contaminated by heavy metals via atmospheric deposition or anthropogenic activities, such as animal manure, the direct application of phosphate fertilizers, sewage sludge, and irrigation water [1,2]. Cadmium (Cd), is one of the most prevalent and poisonous elements in agricultural soil, and jeopardizes the environment and human health. Toxicology studies have been undertaken of Cd stress in plants affecting tissue morphological, biochemical and physiological changes, as well as altered gene expressions [3,4,5,6]. The presence of 40 mg L1 Cd in soil has already been found to affect yield in some crops [7]. Cadmium ions are easily taken in by plant roots and then transported to other organs, given Cd’s high mobility and water solubility, and this severely disturbs physiological processes in plants [8] and inhibits plant development by affecting respiration, photosynthesis and nitrogen metabolism [9].
Brassica juncea L. (AABB, 2n = 36) is an amphidiploid species that originated from interspecies crosses between Brassica nigra (AA, 2n = 16) and Brassica rapa (BB, 2n = 20), which is another important annual or biennial oil crop and leafy vegetable used worldwide [10,11]. Brassica juncea is also a cruciferous plant capable of accumulating significant quantities of metals, including Cd, Pb, zinc (Zn), chromium (Cr), copper (Cu), aurum (Au) and selenium (Se) [12,13,14]. The plant can accumulate >400 μg Cd/g dry weight in its leaves over 96 h, and it therefore holds promise for the remediation of Cd-contaminated soils, given its high biomass, moderate metal accumulation capacity, ease of harvesting, and metal tolerance [15].
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a class of small endogenous non-coding regulatory RNA molecules containing approximately 18–30 nucleotides (nt), which can regulate gene expression through guiding translational repression and can also target mRNA cleavage, mainly at the post-transcriptional level [16,17,18]. An increasing number of studies have indicated that miRNAs play important regulatory in the response to heavy metals (Cd iron) in different species, such as Brassica napus [5,19], Arabidopsis [20,21], Ipomoea aquatic Forsk [22], Typha angustifolia [23], Raphanus sativus L. [24], maize [25], wheat [26,27] and rice [28,29,30]. Exploring Cd-regulated gene expression and the regulatory relationship between miRNA and target genes are both areas of interest as regards the molecular mechanism of metal homeostasis and accumulation [21,27,31]. Numerous studies have indicated the importance of miRNAs in biotic and abiotic stress responses to ion metals at the post-transcriptional level. For example, 39 differentially expressed miRNAs were identified via a comprehensive analysis of miRNA expression profiles after Cd treatment in Brassica napus [19]. Moreover, a Cd treatment of Brassica napus significantly affected the expression of 22 miRNAs belonging to 11 families in the roots, and 29 miRNAs belonging to 14 miRNA families in the shoots, of Brassica napus [5]. In total, 39 known and eight novel miRNAs were aberrantly expressed in response to Cd treatment in rice [28]. About 199 miRNAs were identified in xylem sap from maize seedlings, including 97 newly discovered miRNAs and 102 known miRNAs [25]. Plants overexpressing miR156 accumulated significantly less Cd in the shoots than the roots, and showed higher tolerance against Cd-stress [20]. The miR398 is involved in oxidative stress tolerance via the regulation of its target CSD, which is active in wheat seedlings exposed to Cd stress [26]. miR166 and miR268 act as negative regulators, modulating Cd tolerance and accumulation in rice [29,30]. miRNA395 is an up-regulator that enhances Cd retention and detoxification in the roots of Ipomoea aquatic Forsk, and miR5139, miR1511 and miR8155 contribute to Cd’s translocation into the shoots of low-shoot-Cd cultivars [22]. This evidence strongly suggests the key roles of miRNAs in plants’ Cd stress responses, and comprehensive analyses of plants’ transcriptome and miRNA profiles are widely used to screen important miRNAs involved in biotic stress.
Our previous study has investigated the physiological responses of Brassica juncea L. to 30 and 50 mg kg1 Cd stress, and demonstrated the activities of catalase enzymes, the contents of soluble sugar and chlorophyll were reduced, the content of the soluble protein malondialdehyde increased [6]. Moreover, comparative transcriptomic analysis indicated that the downregulation of HMA3 and the upregulation of Nramp3, HMA2 and Nramp1 also play roles in reducing Cd toxicity in the roots of Brassica juncea L. under Cd stress. However, the molecular activity of Cd in response to miRNAs and their corresponding pathways in Brassica juncea have yet to be fully elucidated. A combined analysis of microRNA and mRNA expression to infer Cd-induced regulation has not been performed for Brassica juncea. In the current study, with the aim of identifying the Cd-regulated unigenes and miRNAs in roots and leaves and developing a Cd-associated miRNA regulatory network, we constructed mRNA and sRNA libraries of Cd-treated and Cd-free Brassica juncea, which were then sequenced via an Illumina Hiseq2500 system. These results could provide a new perspective for studying the regulation of miRNAs in root and leaf under Cd stress, and facilitate genetic breeding of Cd tolerance in Brassica juncea.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Culture and Cd Treatment

Seeds of Brassica juncea (collected from the Biological Park, Hunan University of Science and Technology, Xiangtan, China) were surface-sterilized with 75% ethanol for 1 min and mercuric chloride for 15 min, followed by rinsing and soaking in sterile distilled water. After germination at 22 °C for 3 days, the seeds were transferred to a growth chamber with modified half-strength (MS) solid medium for 16 h at 22 °C (light), 8 h at 16 °C (dark). The concentration of Cd in dry weight of crop leaves was more than 5–10 μg Cd g−1, which was toxic to plants organs [32]. To examine the impact of Cd contamination on the expression patterns of mRNAs and miRNAs, plants grown in MS solid medium were supplemented with 0, 15, 30, 45 or 60 mg L1 Cd2+ for 30 days, and seedlings grown in Cd2+-free MS solid medium were used as the control.
Previous studies have demonstrated that a high concentration of Cd (40 mg L1; 50 mg Kg−1) causes damage to seedlings by changing their cellular metabolic activity [6,7]. In this study, seedlings treated with 30 mg/L Cd were subjected to RNA sequencing or RT-PCR analysis. The roots and shoots were separately harvested and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen. Meanwhile, seeds grown in MS medium containing NaCl (Na+, 3.45 g L1), PbNO3 (Pb+, 800 mg L1), HgCl (Hg+, 30 mg L1) and MnSO4 (Mn2+, 200 mg L1), and Mucor of positive infection (0.1 mL of spore suspension, obtained by the dilution of Mucorracemosus to 102 cfu mL1, was added in the culture medium) were used in the qRT-PCR analysis. Leaves were harvested after 30 d. There were six biological replicates in each experiment, with three technical repetitions.

2.2. High-Throughput Sequencing of Transcriptome and Small RNAs

Total RNA was isolated from each pooled sample using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The RNA’s quantity and quality were determined via an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent, MN, USA). The transcriptome library was prepared using an Illumina TruSeq Stranded Total RNA LT Sample Prep Kit (Illumina, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocols. In short, 3 μg purified total RNA was used for extracting coding RNA and non-coding RNA using a Ribo-Zero kit, which can remove ribosomal RNA. Then, the isolated RNA was eluted and fragmented in Elute-Prime-Fragment Mix at 94 °C for 8 min, followed by first-strand and second-strand cDNA syntheses, and end-repair and dA-tailing ligation. To construct four small RNA (sRNA) libraries from the roots and leaves, sRNAs of 18–30 bp were separated and gel-purified from approximately 5 ug total RNAs each group. Then, 5′ and 3′-Illumina RNA adapters were ligated to the isolated sRNAs using T4 RNA ligase, and the adapter-ligated sRNAs were reverse-transcribed and amplified for 15 cycles with PCR. Both the transcriptome and sRNAs were sequenced on the Illumina HiSeq2500.

2.3. Transcriptome Assembly and Unigene Annotation

Raw RNA-seq reads were processed by the ShortRead package to remove some PCR primer sequences, adapters, and the low-quality nucleotides [33]. Reads less more than 2 N and longer than 35 nt (ambiguous nucleotides) were retained. Moreover, the paired reads that mapped to the SILVA database (http://www.arb-silva.de/download/arb-files/, accessed on January 2020) were discarded. The clean reads of each sample were then assembled as unigenes using the Trinity package, with –SS_lib_type FR and an optimized k-mer length of 25 [34,35]. The assembled unigenes of all samples were cleaned by removing redundancies, and further assembled as all-unigenes using CD-HIT software [36]. The cleaned reads of each sample were aligned to the assembled all-unigenes using FANSe2 [37], allowing for 7 nt mismatches [38]. The all-unigenes with at least 10 mapped reads were considered reliably assembled unigenes.
The Cluster of Orthologous Groups (COG) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes database (KEGG) pathway annotations were performed via a BLASTX search against UniProt (UniProtKB/TrEMBL Invertebrate Protein Database), the KEGG, and the COG database with an E-value of 1e−5. Gene ontology (GO) analysis, which is a form of functional analysis that associates differentially expressed genes with GO categories, was performed on our data. In each annotated sequence, successful blast hits were strand-specifically mapped and annotated using Blast2GO for all the unigenes. The GO analysis of the all-unigenes was performed using the WEGO software [39,40].

2.4. Identification of Differentially Expressed Unigenes

The read numbers of each unigene were first transformed into Reads Per Kilo bases per Million reads (RPKM), and then differentially expressed unigenes in Cd-treated plants were identified by the DEGseq package using an MA-plot-based method with Fisher’s exact test (FET) [33]. p < 0.05 and |fold change| > 2 were used as the threshold to judge the significance of the unigene expression difference between the treatment and the control. To identify significantly enriched GO and pathway terms, all unigenes showing significant differences in terms of transcript abundance between the two groups were mapped to the GO databases with Blast2GO software and plant pathway databases with MapMan software [24].

2.5. Bioinformatic Analysis of Small RNA Sequencing Data

Based on clean reads from two independent small RNA libraries (removed from impurity and low quality in the raw reads), the unique small RNAs, ranging from 18 to 30 bp, were mapped to the Brassica juncea reference sequences, which contain mRNA transcriptome sequences, genomic survey sequences (GSS) and expressed sequence tag (EST) sequences deposited in NCBI databases. These unique sRNA sequences were compared with RNA family (Rfam) databases with the BLASTn search program. Some non-coding RNAs were then filtered out, including ribosomal RNAs (rRNA), transfer RNAs (tRNAs), small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs), and small nuclear RNAs (snRNAs)
After identifying known miRNAs by mapping the clean reads to the Nt, Rfam and miRBase databases (http://www.mirbase.org/index.shtml, accessed on March 2020), the remaining unannotated sRNAs were used to screen the novel miRNAs in the MIREAP software (https://sourceforge.net/projects/mireap/, accessed on March 2020), according to the following parameters: the allowed miRNA sequence length ranged from 18 to 30 bp, and the allowed reference sequence length ranged from 20 to 23 bp. The previously reported basic criteria were also employed in the novel miRNA prediction [41]. According to the instructions for determining high-confidence miRNAs in miRBase 21, the predicted novel miRNAs were further screened and validated in this study. The secondary structures of pre-miRNA for novel candidates were constructed by the Mfold software [42].

2.6. Differential Expression Analysis of Cd Treatment-Related miRNAs

The small RNA clean reads were then aligned to known miRNA sequences from other plant species deposited in miRBase 21. The expression abundance of all the identified miRNAs was normalized in each library (normalized expression = actual miRNA count/total count of clean reads × 1,000,000, transcripts per million (TPM)). The differential expression of Cd2+ treatment-related miRNAs between the four libraries was calculated as follows: fold-change = log2 (miRNA normalized reads in “T-Leaf”/miRNA normalized reads in “C-leaf” or “T-Root”/miRNA normalized reads in “C-Root”). The p-value was calculated via previously established methods [43]. miRNAs with log2|fold-change| ≥ 1 and p ≤ 0.05 were considered as up- or down-regulated miRNAs in response to Cd stress, respectively.

2.7. Prediction and Annotation of Target Genes for miRNAs

The potential target prediction of differentially expressed miRNAs was conducted with the plant small RNA target server or web-based resource [44]. Some analysis parameters were set as the default for predicting potential miRNA target genes, as follows: (1) no more than four mismatches between identified miRNAs and target genes; (2) no mismatch between positions 10 and 11; (3) no more than two consecutive mismatches.

2.8. qRT-PCR Validation

Reverse transcription–quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed to validate the quality of the high-throughput-sequencing and the relative quantitative expression levels of miRNAs and targets from roots and leaves cultivated with different metal ions (Cd2+, Hg2+, Mn2+, Pb2+, and Na+) or Mucor infection, as previously described. The total RNAs from three biological replicates were isolated and treated with DNase I, and then transcribed to cDNA following the manufacturer’s protocol [41]. The amplification reactions were carried out on a BioRad iQ5 sequence detection system (BioRad, USA), following the reported protocol [6]. The specific primers of target genes for qRT-PCR were designed using Beacon Designer 7.0 (Premier Bio-soft International, USA). All the primer sequences of PCRs are listed in Supplementary Table S1. The relative gene expression data were analyzed using the 2−ΔΔCT method. 5.8S rRNA and GAPDH were used as the reference genes.

3. Results

3.1. High-Throughput Sequencing of Transcriptome and sRNA Response to Cd2+ Stress

To obtain a comprehensive overview of the Brassica juncea transcriptome, mRNA libraries constructed from the total RNAs of the leaves and roots were sequenced via the HiSeq2500 system, resulting in the generation of 48,486,320 and 42,168,040 raw reads for the leaves and roots, respectively (Table 1). After the removal of poly (A) tails, short and low-quality tags, and adaptor contamination, 47,383,313 and 41,228,691 clean reads were obtained, respectively. After further pair-end annotation and gap filling, 126,072 unigenes were assembled with an average length of 1770 bp and an N75 length of 975 bp (Table 2). The root and leaf transcriptome libraries combined with available GSS and EST sequences made up the reference sequences of Brassica juncea for the prediction of novel miRNAs.
To screen the response of miRNAs to Cd in Brassica juncea, four sRNA libraries were constructed from the Cd-free and Cd-treated leaves and roots of Brassica juncea (T-root, C-root, T-leaf and C-leaf), and these were sequenced on the platform of a Hiseq 2500. Totals of 1,443,355, 1,115,351, 1,797,217 and 745,941 unique sequences were obtained from the C-leaf, T-leaf, C-root and T-root libraries, respectively (Table 3). In total, 6230 (C-leaf), 6749 (T-leaf), 10,716 (C-root) and 9974 (T-root) unique sequences were successfully mapped to reference sequences. After removing the non-coding rRNAs, tRNAs, snRNAs and snoRNAs, 245 (C-leaf), 245 (T-leaf), 254 (C-root) and 207 (T-root) uniquely matched known miRNAs were obtained by querying the remaining sequences against miRbase. There were 1,437,125 (C-leaf), 1,108,602 (T-leaf), 1,786,501 (C-root) and 735,967 (T-root) unannotated unique sRNA sequences available for use to predict potentially novel miRNAs.

3.2. Functional Annotation of Unigenes

Annotation of the Brassica juncea transcriptome sequences was performed against two public databases, which were the Arabidopsis thaliana protein database and Uniprot protein database, using the BLASTX algorithm with a significant E-value threshold of 1 × 10−5 (Figure 1a). Based on protein annotation and the E-value distribution, 25.5% and 29.8% of the mapped sequences showed strong homology (E-value < 10−5) to available plant sequences in the Uniprot protein database and the Arabidopsis thaliana protein database, respectively, while 20.0% and 20.6% of mapped sequences showed very strong homology (E-value < 10−50). Nearly 90% of unigenes can be annotated from five top-hit species, including Brassica napus, Brassica rapa subsp., Brassica juncea, Eutrema salsugineum and Arabidopsos thaliana (Figure 1b).
To understand the biological roles of unigenes, GO and pathway analyses were performed using Blast2GO. In each of the three “GO classification” categories, including biological process (BP), cellular component (CC) and molecular function (MF), which was mainly involved in metabolic process, cell and binding, respectively. Moreover, cellular process, cell part and catalytic were also well represented (Figure 2). However, few genes were assigned to the aspects such as locomotion, virion part and protein tag.
Functional classification and pathway assignment were performed via COG and KEGG. In total, 82,718 unigenes were classified into 25 COG categories (Figure 3), among which signal transduction mechanisms represented the largest group (10,587), followed by general function prediction, posttranslational modification, protein turnover and transcription. Meanwhile, coenzyme transport and metabolism, extracellular structures and cell motility were the smallest groups.

3.3. Identification of Known miRNAs in Brassica juncea

miRNAs are a class of small non-coding regulatory RNAs molecules with the length distribution of 18–30 nt [42,44]. In this study, the length of sRNAs ranged from 18 to 29 nt, and the majority of the total sequence reads were sRNAs of 21 nt in length (Figure 4). To screen the known miRNAs in the leaves and roots of Brassica juncea, the unique sequences were aligned to the mature sequences of known miRNAs deposited in miRBase. Among these miRNA families, miR156, miR169 and miR166 are the largest in the leaf and root. Besides this, miR9408 was only found in the leaf, while miR169_6 and miR857 were only found in the root (Figure 5a). The read number dramatically differed among the 43 miRNA families identified in the root and leaf libraries. miR166, miR156, miR159 and miR168 showed notably high expression levels in both libraries. miR166 was the most abundant gene family, with a normalized frequency in both libraries, followed by miR158 (Figure 5b). Several miRNA families, such as miR398, miR403 and miR1885, were moderately abundant. Moreover, different miRNA families displayed significantly different expression levels in two libraries, such as miR169_6 and miR857, which were identified in only one library.

3.4. Identification of Cd-Responsive Unigenes and miRNAs in Brassica juncea

After calculation, the expression of each unigene was determined. We found that the number of down-regulated unigenes (1417) was larger than that of up-regulated unigenes (514) identified in T-leaf vs. C-leaf (Figure 6a,c). The numbers of up-regulated unigenes (312) and down-regulated unigenes (273) identified between T-root and C-root were similar. To explore the biological roles of unigenes, GO enrichment analysis was conducted (Figure 6b). The unigenes in leaves were mainly involved in photosynthesis and oxidation reduction, whereas the unigenes in roots were significantly related to the response to oxidative stress and the chitin catabolic process after Cd treatment, compared with controls.
To identify differentially expressed miRNAs under Cd stress in Brassica juncea, known and novel miRNAs were subjected to differential expression analysis between T-leaf and C-leaf, and between T-root and C-root, respectively. A total of 152 differentially expressed miRNAs, including 59 known and 93 novel, were identified and considered as Cd-responsive miRNAs (Figure 6c).

3.5. Target Prediction of Cd-Responsive miRNAs

To functionally characterize the biological roles of miRNAs that respond to Cd stress, the psRNATarget server was applied to identify target genes for known and novel miRNAs. A total of 27 target sequences for four conserved miRNAs (bra-miR408-5p, bra-miR397b, bra-miR398-3p and bra-miR172b-3p) were identified using MapMan, among which AT3G04320, AT1G03870 (fasciclin-like arabinogalactan protein 9, FLA9), AT1G20620 (catalase 3, ATCAT3), AT3G01420 (dioxygenases, DOX1), AT1G12520 (copper chaperone for superoxide dismutase, ATCCS) and AT1G73260 (ATKT1) were associated with biotic stresses on biological pathways (Table 4). Among these miRNAs, several were involved in translational inhibition, while some were related to target mRNA cleavage via regulating target sequences. Additionally, 29 target genes for seven novel miRNAs (mireap-3258, mireap-2590, mireap-3259, mireap-3479, mireap-2593, mireap-3553 and mireap-2592) were also predicted, among which AT1G03870 was related to biotic stresses on biological pathways (Table 5 and Table 6).
To further explore the roles of Cd-responsive miRNAs, the relevant biological pathways were conserved, and novel miRNAs that may play key roles in Cd response were depicted (Figure 7a). We found that six miRNAs were related to the abiotic stress pathway, including bra-miR398-3p and mireap-2590 which target FLA9; mireap-2590, bra-miR408-5p and bra-miR398-5p, which target AT3G04320, and bra-miR172b-3p, which targets DOX1, ATCCS, ATCAT3 and ATKT1.

3.6. Validation of Cd-Specific Resistant miRNA and Target Genes

To evaluate the validity of Illumina sequencing results, and further assess the regulation of resistant miRNAs and their target genes involved in Cd stress in Brassica juncea, the expression levels of six selected target genes—ATCCS, AT3G04320, FLA9, DOX1, ATCAT3 and ATKT1, and three miRNAs, including bra-miR172b-3p, mireap-2590 and bra-miR398-3p, in response to Cd, Hg, Mn, Pb and Na stress and Mucor infection were validated via qRT-PCR analysis, then compared with the normal control (Figure 7b). Among these, ATCCS, FLA9 and ATCAT3 showed more significant responses to heavy metal contamination. Moreover, ATCCS and FLA9 were significantly and differentially up- or down-regulated in the Cd-treated leaves, respectively. DOX1 was obviously induced by Pb2+. Among the respective target miRNAs, bra-miR172b-3p (target for ATCCS) and bra-miR398-3p (target for FLA9) were down-regulated in Cd-treated leaves. However, bra-miR398-3p was oppositely regulated when assessed via the RNA-seq data. Based on the results of miRNA-seq and RNA-seq, bra-mir172b-3p was down-regulated, and its target genes DOX1, ATCCS, ATCAT3 were significantly up-regulated expression in Brassica juncea under Cd stress, which was in line with the results by qRT-PCR analysis (Figure 7b,c). Therefore, we identified bra-miR172b-3p as a potential Cd-resistant inhibitor in Brassica juncea, the downregulation of which may release ATCCS in response to Cd stress.

4. Discussion

Cadmium has been considered with increasing frequency worldwide as a toxicant, and it is a serious and urgent environmental problem. Meanwhile, Cd also poses a threat to human health as a result of accumulation in the human body via the food chain, leading to chronic toxicity in bones, lungs, kidney and other organs [45,46]. Considering these detriments of Cd, many studies have applied a high-throughput sequencing approach to identify dysregulated genes and miRNAs associated with Cd stress in several species [9,33]. Notably, a number of miRNAs and target genes responding to Cd stress have been identified in some species. However, few studies have analyzed Cd stress-associated mRNAs and miRNAs in Brassica juncea. In this report, approximate 16 and eight million raw reads were obtained from transcriptome and sRNA libraries of Brassica juncea leaves and roots with or without Cd treatment, respectively.
High-throughput sequencing technologies have been applied to obtain comprehensive sequencing data for transcriptome and non-coding RNA analysis, which may help elucidate the molecular mechanisms at play in associated biological processes and pathways [33,47]. In the current study, 4 transcriptomes and four sRNA libraries were constructed from the leaves and roots of Cd-treated and normal control in Brassica juncea, and sequence data were generated by the Illumina platform to analyse the miRNA–unigene regulatory pathway and genes networks in response to Cd stress. Transcriptomic pooling from the leaves and roots of Brassica juncea with or without Cd treatments has provided more valuable information to facilitate the screening of Cd-responsive miRNAs and their targets [6]. We found that the differentially expressed unigenes identified from roots and leaves were mainly down-regulated after Cd treatment, which was consistent with previous studies [24]. Importantly, we found that aberrantly expressed unigenes were significantly enriched in a metabolic process that was severely affected by Cd stress. The unigenes affect metabolic processes by interacting with organic compounds when Cd2+ enters plant cells or interacts with lipids and proteins through oxidative stress [48]. These findings suggest that the down-regulation of unigenes might play a crucial role in plants’ responses to Cd stress.
Moreover, 59 conserved miRNAs and 93 novel miRNAs were successfully screened as associated with Cd stress in Brassica juncea. Among them, 57 miRNAs were down-regulated, while 95 were up-regulated, in response to Cd exposure, indicating that miRNAs are differentially regulated under heavy metal stress. Various published reports have identified the many responses of miRNAs to diverse heavy metals, such as Cd, Hg, As and Al in soybean [42], rice [43], Brassica juncea [44] and M. truncatula [17], which has provided valuable information regarding the regulatory mechanisms of plant miRNAs in response to heavy metal stresses.
In this report, conserved microRNA families, including miR156, miR159, miR166 and miR398, were differentially regulated in response to Cd stress, which agreed with the findings for rice and Brassica napus [43,44]. We also observed that some conserved miRNA families, such as miR172, miR161 and miR162, were dysregulated in response to Cd stress, but there was no significantly differential expression after Cd treatment in radishes [24]. Notably, some previously reported miRNA families in responses to heavy metal stress showed temporal organ-specific expression patterns. In a previous report, miR161, miR171, miR398, miR319 and miR385 were differentially expressed in roots and shoots [17]. Similarly, we found that only the miR857 family was expressed in the root, while miR9408 was expressed in the leaf. Therefore, further studies will be needed to explore the molecular mechanisms of those miRNAs in plants’ responses to Cd stress.
miRNA is a major regulator of target gene expression at the post-transcriptional level. A great number of dysregulated miRNAs and their target genes exert key roles in response to plant organs under heavy metal stress [24,42,44]. One miRNA named bra-miR172b-3p was found to target 15 transcripts, and also showed significant differential expression between two contrasting Finger millet genotypes while under salinity stress [49], which was in line with our results in this study. Moreover, bra-miR172b-3p has been found to be down-regulated under Turnip mosaic virus stress in non-heading Chinese cabbage, providing a better way to understand the relationship between plants and virus [50].
Surprisingly, several key enzymes associated with heavy metal (Cd2+, Hg2+, Mn2+, Pb2+ or Na+) uptake and translocation were found to be target genes for a few conserved miRNAs. bra-miR172b-3p targeted several gene-encoding enzymes related to abiotic stress, such as DOX1, ATCCS, ATCAT3 and ATKT1 (Figure 7a). Functional annotation analysis indicated that these target genes participate in various stress responses, including abiotic stress. It is well known that production of reactive oxygen species in plants is closely related to the phytotoxicity caused by heavy metals, and toxic concentrations of high Cd also induce oxidative stress in plant [51,52].
Although Cd is not a redox-active element, increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels may be induced via indirect stress or a maladjustment of the antioxidant system, such as the induction of enzymatic lipid peroxidation and the activation of ROS-producing enzymes [53,54]. Moreover, superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase have been widely considered as important defense systems of plants against oxygen free radicals. SOD as an antioxidant enzyme in physiological mechanism and defense system against high concentrations of ROS, and is associated with enhanced tolerance and resistance to oxidative stress [55,56], indicating the critical role of ATCCS in abiotic stress regulated by miRNAs. A previous study demonstrated the effects of aluminum on lipid peroxidation and the activities of enzymes associated with the production of activated oxygen stress [6].
Notably, a certain degree of Cd accumulation is involved in the induction of oxidative response in Holcuslanatus and Saccharomyces cerevisiae, immediately activated antioxidant enzyme to resist the stress response [57,58]. Recently, the key role of SOD in the detoxification process against Cd in Paxillusinvolutus has been demonstrated using high-throughput sequencing [59]. Meanwhile, CCS delivers heavy metals to SOD in cytosol [60]. Similar to copper chaperone for superoxide dismutase, ATCCS plays an important role in the Cd defense by regulating the levels of SOD in plants. These findings suggest that bra-miR172b-3p could be involved in the Cd defense against oxygen free radicals by directing the regulation of DOX1, ATCCS, ATCAT3 and ATKT1 in Brassica juncea. Notably, a recent study has demonstrated the role of miR172 in regulating tobacco tolerance to high salt environment (NaCl), which was consistent with our qRT-PCR results showing that the level of bra-miR172b-3p significantly decreased after NaCl treatment [61]. By targeting complementary sequences, miRNA negatively regulates targeted gene expression, the identified miRNA-mediated gene expression of DOX1, ATCCS, ATCAT3, and ATKT1 could play a vital role in the regulatory networks of Cd detoxification in Brassica juncea.
Although RNA-seq generally offers higher detection sensitivity and opens a new avenue in the research on gene fusions, novel alternative transcripts and allele-specific expression, some limitations also exist. The nonconformity between RNA-seq and qRT-PCR verification for bra-miR398-3p suggests a gene-specific biases in high-throughput sequencing, but qRT-PCR should be considered for the final detection of interesting miRNAs or target genes [62]. Meanwhile, only one sample group was detected in the RNA-seq experiment, and three replicate tests were conducted in qRT-PCR due to limited funds. Therefore, this nonconformity may be a false positive because of the individual differences in various samples.

5. Conclusions

This study achieved the genome-wide identification of Cd-responsive conserved and novel miRNAs and their target genes in Brassica juncea via transcriptomic and sRNA-sequencing technology. In total, 11 miRNAs and 56 transcripts were identified and considered as Cd-related miRNAs and transcripts. Several targets were functionally predicted to encode stress-responsive enzymes or proteins. Specifically, bra-miR172b-3p plays a key role in the response to Cd stress via regulating ATCCS. These findings may deepen our understanding of the regulatory relationship between miRNA and transcripts in Brassica juncea in response to Cd stress, and provide further insight into the molecular mechanisms of Cd stress in plants.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/pr9071099/s1, Table S1: Primers for qRT-PCR.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.L., D.Z. and M.L.; methodology, H.Y. and L.L.; software and analysis, H.Y. and L.S.; investigation, Y.L., L.S. and X.Y.; data curation, H.Y. and L.L.; writing—original draft preparation, L.L. and H.Y.; writing—review and editing, L.L. and M.Y. funding acquisition, L.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The Young Scholar Fund of Hunan Provincial Education Department in China (2016601).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available at http://www.mirbase.org/, February 2020. These data were derived from the following resources available in the public domain: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, March 2020; https://sourceforge.net/projects/mireap/, March 2020.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

BPBiological process.
CCCellular component
CdCadmium
COGCluster of Orthologous Groups
DOX1Dioxygenases1
ESTExpressed sequence tag
FETFisher’s exact test
FLA9Fasciclin-Like Abrabinogalactan-protein 9
GDPDGlycerophosphodiester phosphodiesterase
GOGene ontology
GSSGenomic survey sequences
HMA2Heavy metal ATPase 2
HMA3Heavy metal ATPase 3
KEGGKyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes database
MFMolecular function
MiRNAsMicroRNAs
MSModified half-strength
Nramp1Natural resistance-associated macrophage proteins 1
Nramp3Natural resistance-associated macrophage proteins 3
ntNucleotides
PAPPurple acid phosphatase
qRT-PCRQuantitative real-time PCR
RfamRNA family
ROSReactive oxygen species
RPKMReads Per Kilo bases per Million reads
RrnaRibosomal RNAs
snoRNAsSmall nuclear RNAs
SODSuperoxide dismutase
sRNASmall endogenous non-coding regulatory RNA
TPMTranscripts per million
TRNAsTransfer RNAs

References

  1. Uraguchi, S.; Mori, S.; Kuramata, M.; Kawasaki, A.; Arao, T.; Ishikawa, S. Root-to-shoot Cd translocation via the xylem is the major process determining shoot and grain cadmium accumulation in rice. J. Exp. Bot. 2009, 60, 2677–2688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Gao, J.; Sun, L.; Yang, X.; Liu, J.-X. Transcriptomic analysis of cadmium stress response in the heavy metal hyperaccumulator Sedum alfredii Hance. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e64643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Bernard, F.; Dumez, S.; Brulle, F.; Lemière, S.; Platel, A.; Nesslany, F.; Cuny, D.; Deram, A.; Vandenbulcke, F. Antioxidant defense gene analysis in Brassica oleracea and Trifolium repens exposed to Cd and/or Pb. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2016, 23, 3136–3151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bernard, F.; Dumez, S.; Lemière, S.; Platel, A.; Nesslany, F.; Deram, A.; Vandenbulcke, F.; Cuny, D. Impact of cadmium on forage kale (Brassica oleracea var. viridis cv “Prover”) after 3-,10- and 56-day exposure to a Cd-spiked field soil. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Fu, Y.; Mason, A.S.; Zhang, Y.F.; Lin, B.G.; Xiao, M.L.; Fu, D.H.; Yu, H.S. MicroRNA-mRNA expression profiles and their potential role in cadmium stress response in Brassica napus. BMC Plant Biol. 2019, 19, 570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhang, D.W.; Du, Y.Y.; He, D.; Zhou, D.G.; Wu, J.F.; Peng, J.S.; Liu, L.L.; Liu, Z.S.; Yan, M.L. Use of comparative transcriptomics combined with physiological analyses to identify key factors underlying cadmium accumulation in Brassica junceaL. Front. Genet. 2021, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. John, M.K. Cadmium uptake by eight food crops as influenced by various soil levels of cadmium. Environ. Pollut. 1973, 4, 7–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Cao, X.R.; Luo, J.P.; Wang, X.Z.; Chen, Z.Q.; Liu, G.Q.; Khan, M.B.; Kang, K.J.; Feng, Y.; He, Z.L.; Yang, X. Responses of soil bacterial community and Cd phytoextraction to a Sedum alfredii-oilseed rape (Brassica napus L. and Brassica juncea L.) intercropping system. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 723, 138152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Besson-Bard, A.; Gravot, A.; Richaud, P.; Auroy, P.; Duc, C.; Gaymard, F.; Taconnat, L.; Renou, J.P.; Pugin, A.; Wendehenne, D. Nitric oxide contributes to cadmium toxicity in Arabidopsis by promoting cadmium accumulation in roots and by up-regulating genes related to iron uptake. Plant Physiol. 2009, 149, 1302–1315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Huang, L.K.; Wang, Q.; Zhou, Q.Y.; Ma, L.Y.; Wu, Y.J.; Liu, Q.Z.; Wang, S. Cadmium uptake from soil and transport by leafy vegetables: A meta-analysis. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 264, 114677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Zhang, D.; Liu, L.; Zhou, D.; Liu, X.; Liu, Z.; Yan, M. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of anthocyanin biosynthetic genes in Brassica juncea. J. Integr. Agric. 2020, 19, 1250–1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Banuelos, G.; Terry, N.; Leduc, D.L.; Pilon-Smits, E.A.; Mackey, B. Field trial of transgenic Indian mustard plants shows enhanced phytoremediation of selenium-contaminated sediment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39, 1771–1777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Meyers, D.E.; Auchterlonie, G.J.; Webb, R.I.; Wood, B. Uptake and localisation of lead in the root system of Brassica juncea. Environ. Pollut. 2008, 153, 323–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhu, Y.L.; Pilon-Smits, E.A.; Tarun, A.S.; Weber, S.U.; Jouanin, L.; Terry, N. Cadmium tolerance and accumulation in Indian mustard is enhanced by overexpressing gamma-glutamylcysteine synthetase. Plant Physiol. 1999, 121, 1169–1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Alvarez, S.; Berla, B.M.; Sheffield, J.; Cahoon, R.E.; Jez, J.M.; Hicks, L.M. Comprehensive analysis of the Brassica juncea root proteome in response to cadmium exposure by complementary proteomic approaches. Proteomics 2009, 9, 2419–2431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Guo, H.S.; Xie, Q.; Fei, J.F.; Chua, N.H. MicroRNA directs mRNA cleavage of the transcription factor NAC1 to downregulate auxin signals for Arabidopsis lateral root development. Plant Cell 2005, 17, 1376–1386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Zhou, Z.S.; Zeng, H.Q.; Liu, Z.P.; Yang, Z.M. Genome-wide identification of Medicago truncatula microRNAs and their targets reveals their differential regulation by heavy metal. Plant Cell Environ. 2012, 35, 86–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Gielen, H.; Remans, T.; Vangronsveld, J.; Cuypers, A. MicroRNAs in metal stress: Specific roles or secondary responses? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2012, 13, 15826–15847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Jian, H.; Yang, B.; Zhang, A.; Ma, J.; Ding, Y.; Chen, Z.; Li, J.; Xu, X.; Liu, L. Genome-Wide Identification of MicroRNAs in Response to Cadmium Stress in Oilseed Rape (Brassica napus L.) Using High-Throughput Sequencing. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Zhang, L.; Ding, H.; Jiang, H.; Wang, H.; Chen, K.; Duan, J.; Feng, S.; Wu, G. Regulation of cadmium tolerance and accumulation by miR156 in Arabidopsis. Chemosphere 2020, 242, 125168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Pegler, J.L.; Oultram, J.M.J.; Nguyen, D.Q.; Grof, C.P.L.; Eamens, A.L. MicroRNA-Mediated Responses to Cadmium Stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plants 2021, 10, 130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Shen, C.; Huang, Y.Y.; He, C.T.; Zhou, Q.; Chen, J.X.; Tan, X.; Mubeen, S.; Yuan, J.G.; Yang, Z.Y. Comparative analysis of cadmium responsive microRNAs in roots of two Ipomoea aquatica Forsk. cultivars with different cadmium accumulation capacities. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2017, 111, 329–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Xu, Y.C.; Chu, L.L.; Jin, Q.J.; Wang, Y.J.; Chen, X.; Zhao, H.; Xue, Z.Y. Transcriptome-wide identification of miRNAs and their targets from typha angustifolia by RNA-Seq and their response to cadmium stress. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0125462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Xu, L.; Wang, Y.; Zhai, L.; Xu, Y.; Wang, L.; Zhu, X.; Gong, Y.; Yu, R.; Limera, C.; Liu, L. Genome-wide identification and characterization of cadmium-responsive microRNAs and their target genes in radish (Raphanus sativus L.) roots. J. Exp. Bot. 2013, 64, 4271–4287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wang, B.X.; Cheng, D.; Chen, Z.Y.; Zhang, M.M.; Zhang, G.Q.; Jiang, M.Y.; Tan, M.P. Bioinformatic Exploration of the Targets of Xylem Sap miRNAs in Maize under Cadmium Stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 1474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Qiu, Z.; Hai, B.; Guo, J.; Li, Y.; Zhang, L. Characterization of wheat miRNAs and their target genes responsive to cadmium stress. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2016, 101, 60–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Zhou, M.; Zheng, S.; Liu, R.; Lu, L.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, L.; Yant, L.; Wu, Y. The genome-wide impact of cadmium on microRNA and mRNA expression in contrasting Cd responsive wheat genotypes. BMC Genom. 2019, 20, 615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Tang, M.; Mao, D.; Xu, L.; Li, D.; Chen, S.S. Integrated analysis of miRNA and mRNA expression profiles in response to Cd exposure in rice seedlings. BMC Genom. 2014, 15, 835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Ding, Y.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, Z.; Wang, F.; Jiang, Q.; Sun, J.; Chen, Z.; Zhu, C. MicroRNA268 Overexpression Affects Rice Seedling Growth under Cadmium Stress. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017, 65, 5860–5867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ding, Y.; Gong, S.; Wang, Y.; Wang, F.; Bao, H.; Sun, J.; Cai, C.; Yi, K.; Chen, Z.; Zhu, C. MicroRNA166 Modulates Cadmium Tolerance and Accumulation in Rice. Plant Physiol. 2018, 177, 1691–1703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Khraiwesh, B.; Zhu, J.K.; Zhu, J. Role of miRNAs and siRNAs in biotic and abiotic stress responses of plants. Biochim. Biophys. Acta BBA Gene Regul. Mech. 2012, 1819, 137–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Verbruggen, N.; Hermans, C.; Schat, H. Mechanisms to cope with arsenic or cadmium excess in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2009, 12, 364–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Morozova, O.; Marra, M.A. Applications of next-generation sequencing technologies in functional genomics. Genomics 2008, 92, 255–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Tao, X.; Gu, Y.H.; Wang, H.Y.; Zheng, W.; Li, X.; Zhao, C.W.; Zhang, Y.-Z. Digital gene expression analysis based on integrated de novo transcriptome assembly of sweet potato [Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.]. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e36234. [Google Scholar]
  35. Chen, J.; Liu, F.; Tang, Y.; Yuan, Y.; Guo, Q. Transcriptome Sequencing and Profiling of Expressed Genes in Phloem and Xylem of Ramie (Boehmeria nivea L. Gaud). PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e110623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Dong, S.; Liu, Y.; Niu, J.; Ning, Y.; Lin, S.; Zhang, Z. De novo transcriptome analysis of the Siberian apricot (Prunus sibirica L.) and search for potential SSR markers by 454 pyrosequencing. Gene 2014, 544, 220–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Xiao, C.L.; Mai, Z.B.; Lian, X.L.; Zhong, J.Y.; Jin, J.J.; He, Q.Y.; Zhang, G. FANSe2: A robust and cost-efficient alignment tool for quantitative next-generation sequencing applications. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e94250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wang, Y.; Lei, R.; Zhuang, X.; Zhang, N.; Pan, H.; Li, G.; Hu, J.; Pan, X.; Tao, Q.; Fu, D.; et al. DLC1-dependent parathyroid hormone-like hormone inhibition suppresses breast cancer bone metastasis. J. Clin. Investig. 2014, 124, 1646–1659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Lulin, H.; Xiao, Y.; Pei, S.; Wen, T.; Shangqin, H. The first Illumina-based de novo transcriptome sequencing and analysis of safflower flowers. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e38653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ye, J.; Fang, L.; Zheng, H.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, J.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, J.; Li, S.; Li, R.; Bolund, L. WEGO: A web tool for plotting GO annotations. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34, W293–W297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Nie, S.S.; Xu, L.; Wang, Y.; Huang, D.Q. Identification of bolting-related microRNAs and their targets reveals complex miRNA-mediated flowerin g-time regulatory networks in radish (Raphanus sativus L.). Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 14034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Zeng, Q.Y.; Yang, C.Y.; Ma, Q.B.; Li, X.P.; Dong, W.W.; Nian, H. Identification of wild soybean miRNAs and their target genes responsive to aluminum stress. BMC Plant Biol. 2012, 12, 182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Ding, Y.; Qu, A.; Gong, S.; Huang, S.; Lv, B.; Zhu, C. Molecular identification and analysis of Cd-responsive microRNAs in rice. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 11668–11675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Srivastava, S.; Srivastava, A.K.; Suprasanna, P.; D’souza, S. Identification and profiling of arsenic stress-induced microRNAs in Brassica juncea. J. Exp. Bot. 2013, 64, 303–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Grant, C.; Clarke, J.; Duguid, S.; Chaney, R. Selection and breeding of plant cultivars to minimize cadmium accumulation. Sci. Total Environ. 2008, 390, 301–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Ishikawa, S.; Ishimaru, Y.; Igura, M.; Kuramata, M.; Abe, T.; Senoura, T.; Hase, Y.; Arao, T.; Nishizawa, N.K.; Nakanishi, H. Ion-beam irradiation, gene identification, and marker-assisted breeding in the development of low-cadmium rice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 19166–19171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Mochida, K.; Shinozaki, K. Advances in omics and bioinformatics tools for systems analyses of plant functions. Plant Cell Physiol. 2011, 52, 2017–2038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Pál, M.; Horváth, E.; Janda, T.; Páldi, E.; Szalai, G. Physiological changes and defense mechanisms induced by cadmium stress in maize. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2006, 169, 239–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Selvam, J.; Rahman, H.N.; Senthil, N.; Boopathi, M.N.; Raveendran, M. Computational identification of salinity responsive microRNAs in contrasting genotypes of Finger millet (Eleusinecoracana L.). Res. J. Biotechnol. 2015, 10, 52–64. [Google Scholar]
  50. Wang, Z.; Jiang, D.; Zhang, C.; Tan, H.; Li, Y.; Lv, S.; Hou, X.; Cui, X. Genome-wide identification of turnip mosaic virus-responsive microRNAs in non-heading Chinese cabbage by high-throughput sequencing. Gene 2015, 571, 178–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Mittler, R.; Vanderauwera, S.; Gollery, M.; Van Breusegem, F. Reactive oxygen gene network of plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2004, 9, 490–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Smeets, K. Oxidative Stress as a Modulator in Cellular Responses during Cadmium and Copper Toxicity in Arabidopsis Thaliana. Ph.D. Thesis, Faculteit Wetenschappen, Universiteit Hasselt, Hasselt, Belgium, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  53. Di Toppi, L.S.; Gabbrielli, R. Response to cadmium in higher plants. Environ. Exp. Bot. 1999, 41, 105–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Heyno, E.; Klose, C.; Krieger-Liszkay, A. Origin of cadmium-induced reactive oxygen species production: Mitochondrial electron transfer versus plasma membrane NADPH oxidase. New Phytol. 2008, 179, 687–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Arisi, A.C.; Cornic, G.; Jouanin, L.; Foyer, C.H. Overexpression of iron superoxide dismutase in transformed poplar modifies the regulation of photosynthesis at low CO2 partial pressures or following exposure to the prooxidant herbicide methyl viologen. Plant Physiol. 1998, 117, 565–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Alscher, R.G.; Erturk, N.; Heath, L.S. Role of superoxide dismutases (SODs) in controlling oxidative stress in plants. J. Exp. Bot. 2002, 53, 1331–1341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Stuhlbacher, A.; Bradley, M.C.; Naylor, C.; Calow, P. Induction of cadmium tolerance in two clones of Daphnia magna straus. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C Comp. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 1992, 101, 571–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Brennan, R.J.; Schiestl, R.H. Cadmium is an inducer of oxidative stress in yeast. Mutat. Res. 1996, 356, 171–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Jacob, C.; Courbot, M.; Brun, A.; Steinman, H.M.; Jacquot, J.P.; Botton, B.; Chalot, M. Molecular cloning, characterization and regulation by cadmium of a superoxide dismutase from the ectomycorrhizal fungus Paxillus involutus. Eur. J. Biochem. 2001, 268, 3223–3232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Chou, D.K.; Zhao, Y.; Gao, S.; Chou, I.N.; Toselli, P.; Stone, P.; Li, W. Perturbation of copper (Cu) homeostasis and expression of Cu-binding proteins in cadmium-resistant lung fibroblasts. Toxicol. Sci. 2007, 99, 267–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Frazier, T.P.; Sun, G.; Burklew, C.E.; Zhang, B. Salt and drought stresses induce the aberrant expression of microRNA genes in tobacco. Mol. Biotechnol. 2011, 49, 159–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Consortium, S.M.I. A comprehensive assessment of RNA-seq accuracy, reproducibility and information content by the Sequencing Quality Control Consortium. Nat. Biotechnol. 2014, 32, 903–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Blast E-value and distribution of top-hit species for transcriptome sequence: (a) Blast E-value on Uniprot protein database and Arabidopsis thaliana protein database; (b) the 25 top-hit species based on Uniprot annotation.
Figure 1. Blast E-value and distribution of top-hit species for transcriptome sequence: (a) Blast E-value on Uniprot protein database and Arabidopsis thaliana protein database; (b) the 25 top-hit species based on Uniprot annotation.
Processes 09 01099 g001
Figure 2. Gene Ontology classification of assembled unigenes in Brassica juncea. The results are summarized in the categories of cellular component, biological process and molecular function. The right Y-axis represents the number of genes and the left Y-axis shows the percentage of total unigenes.
Figure 2. Gene Ontology classification of assembled unigenes in Brassica juncea. The results are summarized in the categories of cellular component, biological process and molecular function. The right Y-axis represents the number of genes and the left Y-axis shows the percentage of total unigenes.
Processes 09 01099 g002
Figure 3. COG annotations of Brassica juncea unigenes. In total, 82,718 unigenes were classified into 25 COG categories.
Figure 3. COG annotations of Brassica juncea unigenes. In total, 82,718 unigenes were classified into 25 COG categories.
Processes 09 01099 g003
Figure 4. Length distribution of miRNAs identified from Brassica juncea.
Figure 4. Length distribution of miRNAs identified from Brassica juncea.
Processes 09 01099 g004
Figure 5. Sizes and abundance of identified known miRNA families from leaves and root of Brassica juncea: (a) Distribution of known miRNA family size in Brassica juncea; (b) Log2 (counts) of each known miRNA family from leaves and roots of Brassica juncea.
Figure 5. Sizes and abundance of identified known miRNA families from leaves and root of Brassica juncea: (a) Distribution of known miRNA family size in Brassica juncea; (b) Log2 (counts) of each known miRNA family from leaves and roots of Brassica juncea.
Processes 09 01099 g005
Figure 6. Identification and annotation of differentially expressed unigenes and miRNAs from leaves and roots with or without Cd treatment in Brassica juncea: (a) Changes of transcript abundance levels in leaves and roots with or without Cd2+ treatment. (b) Functional annotation of differentially expressed unigenes in leaves and roots with or without Cd treatment. (c) The number of identified up- and down-regulated unigenes, and the known and novel miRNAs in leaves and roots of Brassica juncea, the red * sign means the numbers of intersection in leaf and root with down-regulated miRNA and negative(up)-regulated unigenes; the green * sign means the numbers of intersection in leaf and root with up-regulated miRNA and negative(down)-regulated unigenes.
Figure 6. Identification and annotation of differentially expressed unigenes and miRNAs from leaves and roots with or without Cd treatment in Brassica juncea: (a) Changes of transcript abundance levels in leaves and roots with or without Cd2+ treatment. (b) Functional annotation of differentially expressed unigenes in leaves and roots with or without Cd treatment. (c) The number of identified up- and down-regulated unigenes, and the known and novel miRNAs in leaves and roots of Brassica juncea, the red * sign means the numbers of intersection in leaf and root with down-regulated miRNA and negative(up)-regulated unigenes; the green * sign means the numbers of intersection in leaf and root with up-regulated miRNA and negative(down)-regulated unigenes.
Processes 09 01099 g006
Figure 7. Verification of Cd stress in Brassica juncea and Cd-responsive miRNAs, and target genes from the biological pathway network (* p < 0.05): (a) Changes of expression in plant samples in response to pathogens visualized using MapMan. (b) Changed expression levels of identified unigenes and microRNAs (c) under different conditions.
Figure 7. Verification of Cd stress in Brassica juncea and Cd-responsive miRNAs, and target genes from the biological pathway network (* p < 0.05): (a) Changes of expression in plant samples in response to pathogens visualized using MapMan. (b) Changed expression levels of identified unigenes and microRNAs (c) under different conditions.
Processes 09 01099 g007
Table 1. Statistical analysis of sequencing reads from RNA-seq and miRNA-seq libraries of Brassica juncea L. leaves and roots.
Table 1. Statistical analysis of sequencing reads from RNA-seq and miRNA-seq libraries of Brassica juncea L. leaves and roots.
CategoryRNA-seqmiRNA-seq
C-LeafT-LeafC-RootT-RootC-LeafT-LeafC-RootT-Root
Raw Reads46,653,69648,486,32043,480,45242,168,04021,966,29222,022,24222,330,21024,168,375
Clean Reads45,524,28247,383,31342,495,03441,228,69116,143,36416,240,56817,621,18318,108,357
rRNA Trim42,887,55639,793,16440,859,85239,793,16416,140,55716,237,73617,618,40418,105,841
Clean Ratio91.9%82.1%94.0%94.4%73.5%73.7%78.9%74.9%
Table 2. Assembly statistics for the Brassica juncea L. transcriptome.
Table 2. Assembly statistics for the Brassica juncea L. transcriptome.
N25N50N75LongestMeanMedianShortestUnigenesUniprot BlastATH AGI Blast
2233153697516,40817701536201126,072106,227101,520
Table 3. The distribution of small RNAs among different categories in the leaves’ and roots’ libraries.
Table 3. The distribution of small RNAs among different categories in the leaves’ and roots’ libraries.
CategoryC-LeafT-LeafC-RootT-Root
UniqueCountsUniqueCountsUniqueCountsUniqueCounts
Total sRNA1,443,35510,581,3841,115,3519,229,3401,797,21714,053,530745,94113,365,075
miRNA245959,224245807,224254957,135207255,389
rRNA4766365,4865541347,2759739702,4929299932,729
tRNA1185416,521944231,68563987,03743432,504
snRNA276416556679426167
snoRNA7253318218815
Unannotated1,437,1258,840,0641,108,6027,843,0981,786,50112,305,854735,96712,144,271
Table 4. Identified target genes for conserved miRNAs in Brassica juncea L.
Table 4. Identified target genes for conserved miRNAs in Brassica juncea L.
miRNATarget SequenceTarget GeneDescriptionInhibition
bra-miR408-5pblank_rootc30873_g3_i1AT3G04320Kunitz family trypsin and protease inhibitor proteinCleavage
blank_leafc31640_g1_i4AT5G41080a member of the GDPD familyTranslation
blank_rootc32568_g1_i4AT3G47340a glutamine-dependent asparagine synthetaseCleavage
blank_leafc28232_g1_i1AT1G30720FAD-binding Berberine family proteinTranslation
blank_leafc31751_g3_i2AT1G21100O-methyltransferase family proteinCleavage
bra-miR397bblank_rootc33048_g2_i5AT3G16240Delta tonoplast intrinsic proteinTranslation
Experi_leafc29467_g1_i3AT1G80380a glycerate kinase Cleavage
blank_leafc32085_g1_i2AT3G47340a glutamine-dependent asparagine synthetaseTranslation
bra-miR398-3pExperi_leafc23645_g1_i1AT1G03870fasciclin-like arabinogalactan-protein 9Translation
blank_rootc30463_g1_i4AT1G80380a glycerate kinase Translation
Experi_leafc30568_g1_i1AT1G61520PSI type III chlorophyll a/b-binding protein (Lhca3*1), cell-to-cell mobileTranslation
Experi_rootc31467_g1_i3AT1G61520PSI type III chlorophyll a/b-binding protein (Lhca3*1), cell-to-cell mobileTranslation
bra-miR172b-3pExperi_rootc35086_g1_i9AT3G60140a protein similar to beta-glucosidase Cleavage
Experi_leafc32122_g1_i2AT1G20620Catalase, catalyzes the breakdown of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2)Translation
Experi_leafc25017_g1_i2AT2G01890a purple acid phosphatase (PAP)Cleavage
Experi_leafc30056_g1_i1AT3G01420an alpha-dioxygenaseTranslation
Experi_leafc22299_g1_i2AT1G49470Family of unknown function (DUF716)Translation
Experi_leafc24092_g1_i1AT1G12520Copper-zinc SOD copper chaperoneCleavage
blank_rootc25533_g1_i1AT1G12520Copper-zinc SOD copper chaperone Cleavage
blank_leafc21081_g1_i1AT3G04720a protein similar to the antifungal chitin-binding proteinTranslation
Experi_leafc24092_g1_i4AT1G12520Copper-zinc SOD copper chaperoneCleavage
blank_rootc25533_g1_i2AT1G12520Copper-zinc SOD copper chaperone Cleavage
Experi_rootc22458_g2_i1AT1G73260a trypsin inhibitor, modulating programmed cell deathTranslation
blank_leafc30331_g2_i4AT5G39610a NAC-domain transcription factorTranslation
Experi_leafc30462_g1_i2AT1G53990Contains lipase signature motif and GDSL domainTranslation
blank_leafc16527_g1_i1AT4G04830methionine sulfoxide reductase B5 (MSRB5)Translation
Experi_rootc2154_g1_i2AT2G05520a glycine-rich protein in stems and leavesTranslation
Genes related to the biotic stress pathway are underlined.
Table 5. Novel miRNAs related to Cd resistance.
Table 5. Novel miRNAs related to Cd resistance.
miRNA IDLengthSequencePositionTPM
C-RootT-RootC-LeafT-Leaf
bra-mireap-325820 ntGCGUGCUCAGGGCGUCGGCA3p78.1193.564.7215.3
bra-mireap-259020 ntGGCUAAGUCCGUUCGGUGGA5p113.6281.78.259.9
bra-mireap-325922 ntGUGCUUGGCAGAAUCAGCGGGG5p4.09.84.115.9
bra-mireap-347921 ntGCAUGCUCAGGGCGUCGGCCU3p10.926.99.228.1
bra-mireap-259321 ntCCCAGUUCUGAACCCGUCGAC3p70.2173.9182.9344.9
bra-mireap-355320 ntGCGUGCUCAGGGCGUCGGUC3p1.02.40.06.1
bra-mireap-259223 ntGGAUUGGCUCUGAGGGCUGGGCU5p4.09.86.222.0
Table 6. Identified target genes for novel miRNAs in Brassica juncea L.
Table 6. Identified target genes for novel miRNAs in Brassica juncea L.
miRNATarget SequenceTarget GeneDescriptionInhibition
mireap-3258Experi_leafc19595_g1_i1AT4G22520Bifunctional inhibitor/lipid-transfer/seed storage 2S albumin superfamily proteinCleavage
blank_leafc31640_g1_i4AT5G41080a member of the GDPD familyCleavage
blank_rootc32568_g1_i4AT3G47340a glutamine-dependent asparagine synthetaseTranslation
Experi_leafc29467_g1_i3AT1G80380a glycerate kinase Cleavage
blank_leafc32085_g1_i2AT3G47340a glutamine-dependent asparagine synthetaseTranslation
mireap-2590blank_rootc30463_g1_i4AT1G80380a glycerate kinase Translation
Experi_leafc23645_g1_i1AT1G03870fasciclin-like arabinogalactan-protein 9Translation
Experi_leafc29467_g1_i3AT1G80380a glycerate kinase Cleavage
mireap-3259Experi_rootc31467_g1_i3AT1G61520PSI type III chlorophyll a/b-binding proteinCleavage
blank_leafc28232_g1_i1AT1G30720FAD-binding Berberine family proteinTranslation
blank_rootc32568_g1_i4AT3G47340a glutamine-dependent asparagine synthetaseCleavage
mireap-3479blank_leafc31751_g3_i2AT1G21100O-methyltransferase family proteinCleavage
Experi_leafc29467_g1_i3AT1G80380a glycerate kinase Translation
blank_rootc32568_g1_i4AT3G47340a glutamine-dependent asparagine synthetaseTranslation
blank_leafc32085_g1_i2AT3G47340a glutamine-dependent asparagine synthetaseTranslation
mireap-2593Experi_rootc31467_g1_i3AT1G61520PSI type III chlorophyll a/b-binding proteinTranslation
blank_leafc31640_g1_i4AT5G41080a member of the GDPD familyTranslation
blank_leafc31751_g3_i2AT1G21100O-methyltransferase family proteinCleavage
mireap-3553Experi_leafc19595_g1_i1AT4G22520Bifunctional inhibitor/lipid-transfer protein/seed storage 2S albumin superfamily proteinCleavage
blank_leafc31640_g1_i4AT5G41080a member of the GDPD familyCleavage
blank_rootc32568_g1_i4AT3G47340a glutamine-dependent asparagine synthetaseTranslation
Experi_leafc29467_g1_i3AT1G80380a glycerate kinase Cleavage
mireap-2592blank_leafc31751_g3_i2AT1G21100O-methyltransferase family proteinCleavage
blank_rootc32568_g1_i4AT3G47340a glutamine-dependent asparagine synthetaseTranslation
blank_rootc30463_g1_i4AT1G80380a glycerate kinase Cleavage
Experi_leafc29467_g1_i3AT1G80380a glycerate kinase Cleavage
blank_leafc32085_g1_i2AT3G47340a glutamine-dependent asparagine synthetaseTranslation
blank_leafc31640_g1_i4AT5G41080a member of the GDPD familyCleavage
blank_rootc30873_g3_i1AT3G04320Kunitz family trypsin and protease inhibitor proteinCleavage
Genes related to the biotic stress pathway are underlined.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, L.; Yin, H.; Liu, Y.; Shen, L.; Yang, X.; Zhang, D.; Li, M.; Yan, M. Analysis of Cadmium-Stress-Induced microRNAs and Their Targets Reveals bra-miR172b-3p as a Potential Cd2+-Specific Resistance Factor in Brassica juncea. Processes 2021, 9, 1099. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9071099

AMA Style

Liu L, Yin H, Liu Y, Shen L, Yang X, Zhang D, Li M, Yan M. Analysis of Cadmium-Stress-Induced microRNAs and Their Targets Reveals bra-miR172b-3p as a Potential Cd2+-Specific Resistance Factor in Brassica juncea. Processes. 2021; 9(7):1099. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9071099

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Lili, Hanqi Yin, Yanhui Liu, Lunhao Shen, Xiaojun Yang, Dawei Zhang, Mei Li, and Mingli Yan. 2021. "Analysis of Cadmium-Stress-Induced microRNAs and Their Targets Reveals bra-miR172b-3p as a Potential Cd2+-Specific Resistance Factor in Brassica juncea" Processes 9, no. 7: 1099. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9071099

APA Style

Liu, L., Yin, H., Liu, Y., Shen, L., Yang, X., Zhang, D., Li, M., & Yan, M. (2021). Analysis of Cadmium-Stress-Induced microRNAs and Their Targets Reveals bra-miR172b-3p as a Potential Cd2+-Specific Resistance Factor in Brassica juncea. Processes, 9(7), 1099. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9071099

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop