You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
  • Systematic Review
  • Open Access

22 February 2022

Benefits of Pilates in the Elderly Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

,
,
,
,
,
,
and
1
Faculdade de Ciências do Desporto e Educação Física, Universidade de Coimbra, 3040-248 Coimbra, Portugal
2
ESEC-UNICID-ASSERT, Instituto Politécnico de Coimbra, 3030-329 Coimbra, Portugal
3
ROBOCORP, IIA, Instituto Politécnico de Coimbra, 3030-329 Coimbra, Portugal
4
Research Unit for Sport and Physical Activity (CIDAF) (UID/DTP/04213/2020), Universidade de Coimbra, 3040-248 Coimbra, Portugal
This article belongs to the Special Issue Active or Healthy Ageing

Abstract

The aim of this systematic review is to collect and summarize the benefits of Pilates in the elderly population (>60 years old), within the current scientific production, assessing its contribution to Healthy Ageing (HA). We used PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis) to select, collect, and analyse this thematic. The methodological procedures were registered in the PROSPERO database. The main results of the studies analysed (n = 30) point to significant differences between the intervention and the control groups in dynamic balance, strength, mobility, functional capacity, risk of falling reduction, and mental and psychological health. Thus, the results showed that Pilates may be beneficial for the health of the elderly. The meta-analysis found statistical differences between means on the dynamic balance (mean difference (MD) = −0.0, 95% CI [−0.71, −0.50]; I2: 0%) and the aerobic capacity and aerobic resistance [(MD) = 38.29, 95% CI [6.82, 69.77]; I2: 0%). Thus, it is concluded that the efficacy of Pilates has been shown in various areas of HA and has proven to be affordable and safe for the majority of people, using just a mat on the floor. Future studies should focus on the analysis of the relationship between the cost and the benefit of a Pilates intervention in the elderly population, to better understand how health costs can be minimized and to contribute to a multidisciplinary and generalized HA. Pilates has practical application for the clinicians, therapists, and health professionals that work with the elderly population.

1. Introduction

The number of people aged 80 years or more will triple and reach 434 million by 2050. On a world scale, the number of people aged over 60 is increasing at a yearly rate of 3%, far higher than the younger age groups. The prediction is that in 2050 the elderly will represent 22% of the population []. This demographic evolution has a strong social, political, and economic impact and is an indicator of the social transformation of the 21st century.
Ageing results in molecular and cellular decline, with a progressive influence on all body systems and, inherently, on the person’s psychosocial condition [,]. Physical activity may help reduce the speed of this decline, raising or maintaining the elder person’s intrinsic and functional capacity by improving physical capacities (e.g., strength, balance, and flexibility) []. Therefore, physical activity represents one of the factors that may minimize the direct influence of chronological age on the loss of bio-psychosocial function associated with ageing []. This multidisciplinary approach to ageing converges with the benefits of physical activity, given the pertinence and reach of its influence in the quality of life of the elderly []. Additionally, its efficiency and impact on the health of populations and the costs associated with these services fulfill the demands of current and future political decisions [].
The Pilates method was developed in the 1920s by Joseph Pilates. Given its holistic approach, it is presented as one of the most efficient ways to reach the goals of Healthy Ageing (HA). It uses exercises that encompass a dualism—body and mind—which demands trunk stability, strength, and flexibility, as well as a focus on muscular control, body posture, and breathing. It uses six fundamental principles: (i) center, (ii) concentration, (iii) control, (iv) precision, (v) fluidity, and (vi) breathing. It may be done solo or in groups, with apparatuses (e.g., the Reformer or Trapezius) or on the ground (using a mat) or with only the body weight []. The efficiency of the Pilates method emerges from here, enabling psychomotor benefits and contributing to a better functional capacity, increasing independence and quality of life [,].
There has been a gradual increase in studies about the Pilates method in recent years []. The current research points to the efficiency of Pilates in health, particularly in physiotherapy and rehabilitation [,]. Additionally, there are psychological benefits [,] as well as benefits to the elderly person’s quality of life [,]. Furthermore, there is an evident economic benefit when compared with other medical procedures and the absence of relevant contraindications. However, despite this evolution only three systematic reviews analyzing the benefits of Pilates interventions for the elderly were conducted in the last 5 years.
Thus, it seems pertinent to update the question: is Pilates an effective way to promote HA? If so, how? The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to collect and synthesize the benefits of Pilates in the elderly population (older than 60), assessing its contribution to HA. This review included comparative studies, where Pilates was compared with other interventions, and studies with a control group without intervention. The results of physical capacities, such as strength, flexibility, and balance, as well as psychological and well-being variables, were analysed.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Search Strategy

This systematic review used PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis) [] to select, collect, and analyse this thematic (Figure 1). The methodological procedures were registered in the PROSPERO database under the ID number CRD42021246371. Five databases were analysed: SportDiscus with Full Text; PEDro; PUBMED; Web of Science—Core Collection; and B-ON. The term “Pilates”, associated with the descriptors “elderly” or “ag*” or “old* adult” and “health” or “physical fitness” or “functional capacity”, and the Boolean operators “AND” and “OR”, were used. The timespan selection is from 2016, and it is justified with the increase in the number of published studies in this field of study, from this date, and the need to systematize and update the knowledge during this period. Afterwards, the main crossed references of the articles included in the review were analysed. No grey literature research was made, and no specialists were consulted as no valid references were found.
Figure 1. Prisma Flowchart (adapted from []).

2.2. Eligibility Criteria

The inclusion criteria were the following: (i) published works between 1 January 2016 and 21 April 2021; (ii) works written in English, Portuguese, Spanish, or French; (iii) studies that used the work “Pilates” in the title or in the keywords, with a sample over 60 years of age; (iv) random clinical trials; and (v) studies where Pilates was one of the dependent variables in the experiment. The following criteria were used for exclusion: (i) publications prior to 2016; (ii) publications without full text; (iii) academic theses, books, or non-scientific articles; and (iv) studies where the Pilates method was used along with other interventions or techniques (see Figure 1).
The selection process was conducted according to the following stages: (i) research that used the descriptors in the aforementioned databases; (ii) exclusion of duplicate articles; (iii) reading of abstracts; and (iv) critical reading and assessment of the articles (cf. Figure 1). The selection and extraction of the data from the articles was conducted in two stages. Firstly, two authors (MP, RM) made an independent selection and data collection from the eligible articles. After gathering both selections, the resolution of tie situations was solved in a meeting between both authors. If needed, a third author was called to decide (MC). After this process and the reaching of a consensus higher than 85%, one of the authors (MP) completed the process for the remaining eligible articles. For a review of this nature, the most reliable source is the Random Clinical Experimental Trials (RCTs) []. Regardless, evidence from observational or non-randomized trials was equally included, broadening the span of the collection that could guide the intervention of the technicians using the Pilates methods in HA. To keep data quality control and the methodological requisites for this review, we chose to analyse and treat these two categories separately. Finally, the definition of an exclusion criteria of articles written in other idioms is justified by two reasons: the first is due to the fact the difficulty in assessing articles without consulting the full text would skew the data that would result from non-technical translations. The second is due to the fact that this idiom limitation has not changed the conclusions of the systematic reviews made [].

2.3. Quality Assessement

PEDro (Physiotherapy Evidence Database) was used by two authors (M.J.P., R.M.) to independently register the included studies. The PEDro scale can be used in the assessment of the publication bias of the clinical trials []. It assesses two aspects of the quality of a clinical trial: (i) credibility, that is, internal validity and (ii) whether the article contains enough statistical information to be interpreted. The first item of the scale assesses the external validity and does not encompass the quantification of the final score. To assess the internal validity, eight criteria were used: (i) random distribution, (ii) secret allocation, (iii) comparison of groups in the beginning, (iv) blind subject, (v) therapist, (vi) evaluators, (vii) analysis by treatment intention, and (viii) complete following period (items 2–9 of the PEDro scale). To assess interpretability, statistical comparisons between the groups were used and, as reported, the (x) precision measurements and the (XI) variability (items 10 and 11 of the PEDro scale). The final score higher than 7 is attributed to a study with “high quality”. Between 5 and 6, “moderate quality” is considered. Scores lower than 4 are of “low quality”.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

This meta-analysis was conducted using the mean and standard deviation of the following variables: static balance, dynamic balance, balance confidence, strength and aerobic capacity, and resistance. All the data were analysed with Review Manager (RevMan, Version 5.4, the Cochrane collaboration, 2020). The data were grouped by random effects, with a confidence interval of 95% (MD95%). Heterogeneity was assessed with an I-squared test. In the case that this value was above 50%, it would be classified as high, and the data would be relativized in the subsequent analysis. No publication bias study was conducted as we did not find more than 10 studies for any specific physical capacity [].

3. Results

Of the five databases analysed, a total of 354 entries were considered eligible, according to the following distribution: SportDiscus (n = 31), PEDro (n = 21), PUBMED (n = 68), Web of Science Core Collection (n = 68), and B-ON (n = 166).
For this systematic review, 30 RCT studies were analysed. The remaining ones were non-randomized, and observational studies were included in the qualitative analysis in order to frame the practice and use of Pilates as a means of enhancing HA.

3.1. RCT Studies

The PEDro Scale assessment of the 30 studies resulted in 9 of low methodological quality, 14 of moderate quality, and 7 high-quality studies.
Table 1, Table 2, Table 3, Table 4 and Table 5 present the details of the studies analysed in this systematic review.
Table 1. Structured summary of the studies included in the analysis (RCT).
Table 2. Structured summary of the studies included in the analysis (RCT).
Table 3. Structured summary of the studies included in the analysis (RCT).
Table 4. Structured summary of the studies included in the analysis (RCT).
Table 5. Structured summary of the studies included in the analysis (RCT).
Of the six studies presented in Table 1, half did not report advantages of the Pilates method per se or in combination with other techniques and interventions [,]. The first did not find any evident benefit for trunk strength and balance, whereas the second did not find Pilates to be the most effective method in strength gains or in the transfer of these gains to the functional autonomy of the elderly. In contrast, one study shows a beneficial effect of Pilates in the functional autonomy of the elderly []. The remaining studies showed gains in flexibility [], emotional health [], balance, and reduction in the risk of falling [].
The study of Gabizon et al. [] is the third without evidence of a positive influence of Pilates. To the authors, this may be due to the fact that Pilates is not a specific method for the development of balance. On the other hand, there is the advantage of Pilates in reducing waist perimeter and BMI []. In the remaining studies, balance and confidence in balance [] and improvements in walking ability and in fear of falling, with the corresponding reduction in the risk of falling, were highlighted by some authors [,]. Lower limb strength and functional autonomy were also reported as having benefited from Pilates [].
Regarding this set of studies, lower limb strength improvements were reported [,,]. Balance is also improved with Pilates, particularly for those with deficits in trunk control and trunk stability []. Jurakic et al. (2017) showed that Pilates is beneficial for elderly people with short-term memory deficits []. Finally, pulmonary function also improves [].
Balance improvements, reduction in the risk of falling, increase in functional mobility, and postural stability are reported in this set of studies [,]. Additionally, improvements in pulmonary function are also reported []. Improvements in quality of life, satisfaction with life, and perception of health status were also reported [,,], as well as improvements in functional autonomy [] and sleep quality [].
The studies presented a set of results considering the advantages of Pilates in balance [,,] and strength [,,]. One study revealed improvements in functional capacity, walking, and mobility []. The same authors also found beneficial effects of Pilates interventions in the cognitive dimension. Advantages in cardiorespiratory fitness were also reported [].
In summary, 27 of the 30 studies analysed reported advantages of Pilates for the elderly. The areas where more advantages were reported were in static or dynamic balance [,,,,,,,,]. Four studies showed benefits in total strength, three in lower limb strength, and two studies reported benefits in respiratory strength. Functional capacity and functional autonomy also tend to improve with Pilates, according to four studies [,,,]. The psychological and mental-health-related variables (e.g., perception of health, quality of life, satisfaction with life, emotional health, and sleep quality) also improved significantly with Pilates [,,,]. In two experimental studies, flexibility was improved [,], and two other studies showed improvement in aerobic resistance [,]. A decrease in BMI and waist perimeter was also reported []. Finally, gains in short-term memory were also reported in cognitively disabled people [].

3.2. Observational or Non-Randomized Studies

Table 6 presents the details of the observational or non-randomized studies included in this review.
Table 6. Structured summary of observational or non-randomized studies included in the review.
This section included 14 studies with similar benefits being reported, despite different methodologies used. Two studies show that Pilates is not the most effective intervention to control blood pressure, glycaemia [], and the sensory regulation of static or dynamic balance []. The remaining studies, however, report gains in strength [,,] and improvements in the functional capacity and mobility of the elderly [,,]. Psychological variables, such as self-resilience [], well-being [], quality of life [], or health-related psychological variables [], benefited with Pilates interventions. Additionally, improvements in walking ability [], haemodynamic behaviour [], fall-risk reduction [], and salivary S-IgA [] were mentioned once.

4. Meta-Analysis

4.1. Balance

Static balance (One Leg Stance—OLS) was analysed in three studies [,,] and dynamic balance gathered nine, divided between the Timed Up-and-Go Test (TUG) [,,,,,] and the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) [,,], with a total sample of 196 individuals.
The results of the meta-analysis calculated for the OLS show a mean difference of 3.33 s between groups, without statistical significance (95% CI: [−0.27, 6.94]; I2: 0%) (Figure 2).
Figure 2. Meta-analysis of the comparison of intervention and control groups on OLS Test.
For the dynamic balance, when considering each test separately, we found a significant mean difference favouring the Pilates group compared to the control group of −0.60 s (95% CI: [−0.70, −0.49]; I2: 0%) in the TUG test. In the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) the results are not significant, despite the mean difference between groups also showing a better performance in the Pilates group (−1.46; 95% CI: [−3.06, 0.15]; I2: 33%).
For the global analysis of dynamic balance capacity, a significant difference in the mean difference was found between the Pilates and the control groups, with a value of −0.60 s (95% CI: [−0.71, −0.50]; I2: 0%) with an advantage for the first group (Figure 3).
Figure 3. Meta-analysis of the comparison of intervention and control groups on dynamic balance.
The three studies that assessed confidence in balance using the ABC Scale [,,] point to the absence of a significant mean difference between the groups (3.65; 95% CI: [−1.50, 8.79]; I2: 0%) (Figure 4).
Figure 4. Meta-analysis of the comparison of intervention and control groups on ABC test.

4.2. Strength

Regarding strength, three studies using handgrip strength were eligible [,,]. The mean difference between both groups is not significant (1.86; 95% CI: [−1.52, 5.24]; I2: 0%) (Figure 5).
Figure 5. Meta-analysis of the comparison of intervention and control groups on handgrip test.

4.3. Aerobic Capacity and Aerobic Resistance

The 6 min walk test allows the assessment of aerobic capacity and aerobic resistance. From the studies analysed [,,,], statistically significant differences were found in the mean difference to complete the test: 38,29 m plus to the Pilates group (95% CI: [6.82, 69.77]; I2: 0%). The data from Lima et al., 2021, were not included in the meta-analysis due to their heterogeneity (Figure 6).
Figure 6. Meta-analysis of the comparison of intervention and control groups on 6 m walk test.

5. Discussion

The aim of this systematic revision is to collect and summarize the benefits of Pilates in the elderly population, within the current scientific production, assessing its contribution to Healthy Ageing (HA). In the first place, due to the state of the art and our findings, we could verify that the Pilates method has gained adepts over the last years. The increase in the elderly population is a fact and with it is the need to find processes that enable HA. Therefore, it is important to confirm the benefits of Pilates and scientifically validate them. The multiplication of the adaptations of this method, according to the current know-how or in order to meet the goals of the practice, has diversified the exercises and the reach of this method. A great example of this is the use of Pilates apparatuses that appear to point to differences between mat and apparatuses [,].
The use of springs and the consequent external load that they impose, along with the number of exercises made in an orthostatic position in these apparatuses may influence the results obtained. Similarly, the systematization difficulties and lack of consensus around the techniques and assessment instruments for the physical capabilities, among others, has resulted in a variability that creates difficulties in extrapolating and comparing the results and conclusions [].
The results appear to show a robust tendency towards the benefits of Pilates for the elderly population. The analysis also points to a total absence of risks or contraindications of this method. Additionally, the benefits of this method are reinforced by the broad cultural and ethnic scope of the studies analysed, reducing any eventual contextual influence in the benefits presented.
Nevertheless, it is not clear that the Pilates method alone or in combination with other techniques and interventions [,] points to a robust tendency of the benefits of Pilates for the elder population. Still, it is important to emphasise the benefits of Pilates in the functional autonomy of the elderly [], namely in flexibility [], emotional health [], and reduction in the risk of falling []. Moreover, there is an advantage of Pilates in reducing waist perimeter and BMI [] and in improvements in walking ability [,,]. Furthermore, the results also indicate that lower limb strength and functional autonomy were also reported as having benefited from Pilates [].
Similarly, Jurakic et al. (2017) consider that Pilates has benefits for the elderly with short-term memory deficits [] and that pulmonary function also improves []. In this context, improvements in quality of life, satisfaction with life, and perception of health status were also reported [,,], as well as improvements in functional autonomy [] and sleep quality []. Additionally, the results also showed the advantages of Pilates in balance [,,], strength [,,], improvements in functional capacity, walking and mobility [], and in the cognitive dimension and cardiorespiratory function [].
In a broader perspective, we emphasise that 27 of the 30 studies analysed reported the advantages of Pilates for the elderly. Standing out are the advantages in total strength, lower limb strength, functional capacity and functional autonomy [,,,]. Verified too are significant gains in psychological and mental health-related variables, in particular: perception of health, quality of life, satisfaction with life, emotional health [,,,], flexibility [,], aerobic resistance [,], waist perimeter []. Finally, advantages were also found for people with cognitive impairment [].
Although the results point out that Pilates is not the most effective intervention to control blood pressure, glycaemia [], and the sensory regulation of static or dynamic balance [], we could not, however, fail to highlight the positive effects of Pilates on strength [,,], improvements in the functional capacity and mobility of the elderly [,,], and in psychological variables such as self-resilience [] and well-being []. Furthermore, improvements in haemodynamic behaviour [] and salivary S-IgA [] were also mentioned in the systematic review of the studies.
Moreover, the meta-analysis shows some results that are consistent with the previous systematic reviews and meta-analysis regarding the benefits of Pilates for the elderly [,,,]. All the demonstrated advantages of this practice for the development of static and dynamic balance show some consistency and robustness in the results. Regarding aerobic capacity and resistance, the results are consistent with the meta-analysis of Bueno et al. (2018).
The main limitations of this review were the time limitation and the exclusion of information regarding other studies (e.g., books, magazines, or theses). Regarding the studies included in our analysis, the limitations are related to the clinical and methodological variability. Additionally, the high number of studies in which the control group did not suffer any type of intervention may condition the results, namely when calculating a more robust meta-analysis. Most of the studies had a sample composed mainly of women, which may also limit the analysis and interpretation of the results. Therefore, it is important to increase the research in this field, particularly with greater and more gender-balanced samples. Moreover, the protocols should be more standardized in order to better compare the results obtained. Future studies should focus on the analysis of the relationship between the cost and benefit of a Pilates intervention in the elderly population, to better understand how health costs can be minimized and to contribute to a multidisciplinary and generalized HA. Moreover, future systematic reviews may analyse which type of psychomotor responses are associated with the eventual neuromuscular benefits that may come from a Pilates intervention in the elderly population.

6. Conclusions

This review of studies shows a robust tendency towards the benefits of Pilates in physical capacity and in dynamic balance. The results also show that Pilates may be beneficial for the health of the elderly, contributing to HA that may slow down and fight the degenerative processes associated with senescence. It is also concluded that the efficacy of Pilates has been studied in various areas of HA and has proven to be affordable and safe for the majority of people, using just a mat on the floor. This way, clinicians, therapists, and exercise professionals that work with the elderly population may find in Pilates a viable strategy towards healthy ageing. The well-being improvements in the elderly are enabled by an association between the social and the physical components of practising Pilates, thus contributing to a healthier and more active ageing.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.J.P., R.S.M. and G.D.; methodology, M.J.P., R.S.M. and G.D. validation, M.J.P., R.M., R.S.M. and M.A.C.; data collection: M.J.P., R.M., R.S.M. and M.A.C.; statistical analyses and graphics: M.J.P., R.S.M., F.M. and G.D.; Writing the manuscript: M.J.P., R.S.M., R.G., J.G. and G.D.; Edited the final version: M.J.P. and G.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work is funded by FCT/MCTES through national funds and when applicable co-funded EU funds under the project UIDB/50008/2020.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of Polytechnic Institute of Coimbra (Approval number: 82_CEPC2/2021).

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request by the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

Researcher MAC acknowledges the sponsor of FCT—Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, under the project UIDB/00285/2020.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. World Health Organization. Resumo Relatório Mundial de Envelhecimento e Saúde. Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/186468/WHO_FWC_ALC_15.01_por.pdf?sequence=6 (accessed on 27 December 2021).
  2. Długosz-Boś, M.; Filar-Mierzwa, K.; Stawarz, R.; Ścisłowska-Czarnecka, A.; Jankowicz-Szymańska, A.; Bac, A. Effect of three months pilates training on balance and fall risk in older women. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 3663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Lima, M.; Silva, B.; Rocha-Rodrigues, S.; Bezerra, P. The impact of an 8-week Pilates-based physical training program on functional mobility: Data from a septuagenarian group. Biomed. Hum. Kinet. 2021, 13, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chodzko-Zajko, W.; Schwingel, A.; Park, C.H. Successful Aging: The role of physical activity. Am. J. Lifestyle Med. 2009, 3, 20–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Pucci, G.C.; Neves, E.B.; Santana, F.S.; de Almeida Neves, D.; Saavedra, F.J. Comparative analysis of Pilates and resistance training in physical fitness of elderly. Retos 2021, 41, 628–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Parra-Rizo, M.A. Componentes de influencia más valorados en la calidad de vida por las personas mayores de 60 años físicamente activas. Eur. J. Investig. Health Psychol. Educ. 2018, 7, 135–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wells, C.; Kolt, G.S.; Bialocerkowski, A. Defining Pilates exercise: A systematic review. Complement. Ther. Med. 2012, 20, 253–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. García-Garro, P.A.; Hita-Contreras, F.; Martínez-Amat, A.; Achalandabaso-Ochoa, A.; Jiménez-García, J.D.; Cruz-Díaz, D.; Aibar-Almazán, A. Effectiveness of a Pilates training program on cognitive and functional abilities in postmenopausal women. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 3580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Villarreal-Angeles, M.A.; Moncada-Jimenez, J.; Ruiz-Juan, F. Mejora de variables psicológicas en adultos mayores mediante Pilates. Retos 2020, 40, 47–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Moreno-Segura, N.; Igual-Camacho, C.; Ballester-Gil, Y.Y.; Blasco-Igual, M.C.; Blasco, J.M. The effects of the Pilates training method on balance and falls of older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J. Aging Phys. Act. 2018, 26, 327–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Da Silva, A.C.L.G.; Mannrich, G. Pilates na Reabilitação: Uma Revisão Sistemática. Fisioter. Mov. 2009, 22, 449–455. Available online: https://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/19479/18823 (accessed on 27 December 2021).
  12. Barrocal, J.; Franco, Y.R.; de Oliveira, N.T.; Moura, K.F.; Cabral, C.M. Aplicação do método Pilates na fisioterapia: Uma revisão sistemática na base de dados PEDro. Fisioter. Bras. 2017, 18, 223–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Fleming, K.M.; Herring, M.P. The effects of pilates on mental health outcomes: A meta-analysis of controlled trials. Complement. Ther. Med. 2018, 37, 80–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Torales, J.; Almirón, M.; González, I.; Navarro, R.; O’Higgins, M.; Castaldelli-Maia, J.; Ventriglio, A. Mejora el PILATES la salud mental? Mem. Inst. Investig. Cienc. Salud 2019, 17, 97–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Goedert, A.; Santos, K.B.; Bento, P.C.; Rodacki, A.L. The effect of Pilates practice on balance in elderly: A systematic review. Rev. Bras. Ativ. Fís. Saúde 2019, 23, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Pucci, G.C.; Saavedra, E.B.; Neves, N.F.; Saavedra, J.F. Effect of pilates method on physical fitness related to health in the elderly: A systematic review. Rev. Bras. Med. Esporte 2019, 25, 76–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Page, M.J.; Moher, D.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021, 372, n160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D. PRISMA_2020_flow_diagram_new_SRs_v1. BMJ 2021, 372. Available online: http://www.prisma-statement.org/PRISMAStatement/FlowDiagram (accessed on 27 December 2021).
  19. Higgins, J.; Green, S. (Eds.) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interviews, Version 5.1; The Cochrane Collaboration: Chichester, UK, 2011; Available online: https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/archive/v5.1/ (accessed on 27 December 2021).
  20. Higgins, J.P.; Thomas, J.; Chandler, J.; Cumpston, M.; Li, T.; Page, M.J.; Welch, V.A. (Eds.) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, 2nd ed.; The Cochrane Collaboration: Chichester, UK, 2019; ISBN 978-1-119-53662-8. [Google Scholar]
  21. Bø, K.; Herbert, R.D. There is not yet strong evidence that exercise regimens other than pelvic floor muscle training can reduce stress urinary incontinence in women: A systematic review. J. Physiother. 2013, 59, 159–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Donath, L.; Roth, R.; Hürlimann, C.; Zahner, L.; Faude, O. Pilates vs. balance training in health community-dwelling seniors: A 3-arm, randomized controlled trial. Int. J. Sports Med. 2016, 37, 202–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Oliveira, L.C.; Oliveira, R.G.; Pires-Oliveira, D. Comparison between static stretching and the Pilates method on the flexibility of older women. J. Bodyw. Mov. Ther. 2016, 20, 800–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Oliveira, L.C.; Pires-Oliveira, D.A.; Prado, R.C.; Oliveira, D.P.; Antônio, T.D.; Oliveira, R.F.; Oliveira, R.G. Effects of Pilates on postural balance and functional autonomy of elderly: A randomized controlled trial. Man. Ther. Posturology Rehabil. J. 2016, 14, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ángeles, M.A.; Jiménez, J.M.; Sánchez, J.J.G.; Juan, F.R. El efecto de un programa de ejercicios basado en Pilates sobre el estado de ánimo en adultos mayores mexicanos. Retos 2016, 30, 106–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Barker, A.L.; Talevski, J.; Bohensky, M.A.; Brand, C.A.; Cameron, P.A.; Morello, R.T. Feasibility of Pilates exercise to decrease falls risk: A pilot randomized controlled trial in community-dwelling older people. Clin. Rehabil. 2016, 30, 984–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Filho, M.L.M.; Vianna, J.M.; Venturini, G.R.; de Matos, D.G.; Ferreira, M.E. Avaliacao de diferentes programas de exercicios fisicos na forca muscular e autonomia funcional de idosas. Motricidade 2016, 12, 124–133. Available online: Link.gale.com/apps/doc/A500197470/IFME (accessed on 27 December 2021).
  28. Gabizon, H.; Press, Y.; Volkov, I.; Melzer, I. The Effects of Pilates Training on Balance Control and Self-Reported Health Status in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J. Aging Phys. Act. 2016, 24, 376–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Josephs, S.; Pratt, M.L.; Calk Meadows, E.; Thurmond, S.; Wagner, A. The effectiveness of Pilates on balance and falls in community dwelling older adults. J. Bodyw. Mov. Ther. 2016, 20, 815–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Pestana, M.D.; Netto, E.M.; Pestana, M.C.; Pestana, V.S.; Schinoni, M.I. Pilates versus resistance exercise on the serum levels of hs-CRP, in the abdominal circumference and body mass index (BMI) in elderly individuals. Motricidade 2016, 12, 128–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yoon, S.; Kim, J.N.; Lim, H.S. Effects of modified pilates on variability of inter-joint coordination during walking in the elderly. J. Phys. Ther. Sci. 2016, 28, 3463–3467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  32. Badiei, M.; Shahboulaghi, F.M.; Hosseini, M.A.; Norouzi, M.; Nazari, S. Effect of Pilates exercise on fear of falling in Iranian elderly women. Iran. Rehabil. J. 2017, 15, 389–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  33. Teixeira de Carvalho, F.; de Andrade Mesquita, L.S.; Pereira, R.; Neto, O.P.; Amaro Zangaro, R. Pilates and Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation Methods Induce Similar Strength Gains but Different Neuromuscular Adaptations in Elderly Women. Exp. Aging Res. 2017, 43, 440–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Greblo Jurakic, Z.; Krizanic, V.; Sarabon, N.; Markovic, G. Effects of feedback-based balance and core resistance training vs. Pilates training on cognitive functions in older women with mild cognitive impairment: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 2017, 29, 1295–1298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Oliveira, L.C.; Pires-Oliveira, D.A.; Abucarub, A.C.; Oliveira, L.S.; Oliveira, R.G. Pilates increases isokinetic muscular strength of the elbow flexor and extensor muscles of older women: A randomized controlled clinical trial. J. Bodyw. Mov. Ther. 2017, 21, 2–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Oliveira, L.C.; Oliveira, R.G.; Pires-Oliveira, D.A. Pilates increases the isokinetic muscular strength of the knee extensors and flexors in elderly women. J. Bodyw. Mov. Ther. 2017, 21, 815–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Sofianidis, G.; Dimitriou, A.M.; Hatzitaki, V. A comparative study of the effects of pilates and Latin dance on static and dynamic balance in older adults. J. Aging Phys. Act. 2017, 25, 412–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Vieira, N.D.; Testa, D.; Ruas, P.C.; Salvini, T.D.; Catai, A.M.; Melo, R.C. The effects of 12 weeks Pilates-inspired exercise training on functional performance in older women: A randomized clinical trial. J. Bodyw. Mov. Ther. 2016, 21, 251–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Alvarenga, G.M.; Charkovski, S.A.; Santos, L.K.; Silva, M.; Tomaz, G.O.; Gamba, H.R. The influence of inspiratory muscle training combined with the Pilates method on lung function in elderly women: A randomized controlled trial. Clinics 2018, 73, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Curi, V.S.; Haas, A.N.; Alves-Vilaça, J.; Fernandes, H.M. Effects of 16-weeks of Pilates on functional autonomy and life satisfaction among elderly women. J. Bodyw. Mov. Ther. 2018, 22, 424–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Curi, V.S.; Vilaca, J.; Haas, A.N.; Fernandes, H.M. Effects of 16-weeks of Pilates on health perception and sleep quality among elderly women. Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. 2018, 74, 118–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Roller, M.; Kachingwe, A.; Beling, J.; Ickes, D.M.; Cabot, A.; Shrier, G. Pilates Reformer exercises for fall risk reduction in older adults: A randomized controlled trial. J. Bodyw. Mov. Ther. 2018, 22, 983–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Tozim, B.M.; Navega, M.T. Effect of pilates method on inspiratory and expiratory muscle strength in the elderly. Rev. Bras. Cineantropometria Hum. 2018, 20, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Aibar-Almazán, A.; Martínez-Amat, A.; Cruz-Díaz, D.; de la Torre-Cruz, M.J.; Jiménez-García, J.D.; Zagalaz-Anula, N.; Pérez-Herrezuelo, I.; Hita-Contreras, F. Effects of Pilates on fall risk factors in community-dwelling elderly women: A randomized, controlled trial. Eur. J. Sport Sci. 2019, 19, 1386–1394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Liposcki, D.B.; da Silva Nagata, I.F.; Silvano, G.A.; Zanella, K.; Schneider, R.H. Influence of a Pilates exercise program on the quality of life of sedentary elderly people: A randomized clinical trial. J. Bodyw. Mov. Ther. 2019, 23, 390–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Buttelli, A.C.; Costa, R.R.; Farinha, J.B.; Fagundes, A.O.; Vieira, A.F.; Barroso, B.M.; Bracht, C.G.; Coconcelli, L.; Reichert, T.; Rocha, V.M.; et al. Pilates training improves aerobic capacity, but not lipid or lipoprotein levels in elderly women with dyslipidemia: A controlled trial. J. Bodyw. Mov. Ther. 2021, 26, 227–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Patti, A.; Zangla, D.; Sahin, F.N.; Cataldi, S.; Lavanco, G.; Palma, A.; Fischietti, F. Physical exercise and prevention of falls. Effects of a Pilates training method compared with a general physical activity program: A randomized controlled trial. Medicine 2021, 100, e25289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Queiroz, L.C.; Bertolini, S.M.; Bennemann, R.M.; Silva, E.S. The effect Mat Pilates practice on muscle mass in elderly women. Rev. Rede Enferm. Nord. 2016, 17, 618–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Roh, S.Y. Effect of a 16-week Pilates exercise program on the ego resiliency and depression in elderly women. J. Exerc. Rehabil. 2016, 12, 494–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Roh, S.Y. The effect of 12-week Pilates exercises on wellness in the elderly. J. Exerc. Rehabil. 2016, 12, 119–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Hwang, Y.; Park, J.; Lim, K. Effects of pilates exercise on salivary Secretory immunoglobulin a levels in older women. J. Aging Phys. Act. 2016, 24, 399–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Bertoli, J.; Biduski, G.M.; de la Rocha Freitas, C. Six weeks of Mat Pilates training are enough to improve functional capacity in elderly women. J. Bodyw. Mov. Ther. 2017, 21, 1003–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Bertoli, J.; Dal Pupo, J.; Vaz, M.A.; Detanico, D.; Biduski, G.M.; de la Rocha Freitas, C. Effects of Mat Pilates on hip and knee isokinetic torque parameters in elderly women. J. Bodyw. Mov. Ther. 2018, 22, 798–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Mello, N.F.; Costa, D.L.; Vasconcellos, S.V.; Lensen, C.M.; Corazza, S.T. Método Pilates Contemporâneo na aptidão física, cognição e promoção da qualidade de vida em idosos. Rev. Bras. Geriatr. Gerontol. 2018, 21, 620–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Scherf, B.G.; Guadagnin, E.C.; Tier, C.G.; De Almeida Dias, S.L. Effect of a Mat Pilates protocol on fall risk in elderly women. Rev. Andaluza Med. Deport. 2019, 12, 317–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Bueno, J.A.; Alves, R.G.; Smoralek, A.C.; Junior, T.S. Haemodynamic and perceptual behaviour in elderly women subjected to one session of different Pilates protocols. Rer. Bras. Pres. Fisio. Exerc. 2019, 13, 481–492. Available online: www.researchgate.net/publication/335569390_Revista_Brasileira_de_Prescricao_e_Fisiologia_do_Exercicio (accessed on 27 December 2021).
  57. Nascimento, M.D.; Pereira, L.G.; Júnior, E.D.; de Castro, H.D.; Appell Coriolano, H.J. Avaliação Da Regulação Exteroceptiva E Interoceptiva Do Equilíbrio Corporal De Idosos Ativos. Rev. Bras. Ciência Mov. 2019, 27, 50–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Machado, O.A.; de Campos, S.V.; Killian, L.F.; Machado, G.A.; Gianolla, F. Effect of a single exercise session on blood glucose and blood pressure in elderly. J. Phys. Educ. Sport 2020, 20, 2637–2642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Choi, W.; Joo, Y.; Lee, S. Pilates exercise focused on ankle movements for improving gait ability in older women. J. Women Aging 2021, 33, 30–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Mueller, D.; Redkva, P.E.; Fernando de Borba, E.; Barbosa, S.C.; Krause, M.P.; Gregorio da Silva, S. Effect of mat vs. apparatus pilates training on the functional capacity of elderly women. J. Bodyw. Mov. Ther. 2021, 25, 80–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Cruz-Díaz, D.; Bergamin, M.; Gobbo, S.; Martínez-Amat, A.; Hita-Contreras, F. Comparative effects of 12 weeks of equipment based and mat Pilates in patients with chronic low back pain on pain, function and transversus abdominis activation. A randomized controlled trial. Complement. Ther. Med. 2017, 33, 72–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Da Luz, M.A.; Costa, L.O.; Fuhro, F.F.; Manzoni, A.C.; Oliveira, N.T.; Cabral, C.M. Effectiveness of mat Pilates or equipment-based Pilates exercises in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain: A randomized controlled trial. Phys. Ther. 2014, 94, 623–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Bueno de Souza, R.O.; Marcon, L.D.; de Arruda, A.S.; Pontes Junior, F.L.; de Melo, R.C. Effects of mat pilates on physical functional performance of older adults: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2018, 97, 414–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.