Next Article in Journal
Effect of CuO Loading on the Photocatalytic Activity of SrTiO3 for Hydrogen Evolution
Next Article in Special Issue
Reactivity and Stability of a Ring-Expanded N-Heterocyclic Carbene Copper(I) Boryl Imidinate
Previous Article in Journal
The Role of the Bridge in Single-Ion Magnet Behaviour: Reinvestigation of Cobalt(II) Succinate and Fumarate Coordination Polymers with Nicotinamide
Previous Article in Special Issue
Fluoro-Germanium (IV) Cations with Neutral Co-Ligands—Synthesis, Properties and Comparison with Neutral GeF4 Adducts
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Inorganics
Volume 10
Issue 9
10.3390/inorganics10090129
inorganics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

N-O Ligand Supported Stannylenes: Preparation, Crystal, and Molecular Structures

by
Hannah S. I. Sullivan
1,2,
Andrew J. Straiton
1,
Gabriele Kociok-Köhn
3 and
Andrew L. Johnson
1,*
1
Department of Chemistry, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, UK
2
Centre for Sustainable Chemical Technologies, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, UK
3
Material and Chemical Characterisation Facility (MC2), University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Inorganics 2022, 10(9), 129; https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics10090129
Submission received: 26 July 2022 / Revised: 19 August 2022 / Accepted: 20 August 2022 / Published: 31 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Synergy between Main Group and Transition Metal Chemistry)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
A new series of tin(II) complexes (1, 2, 4, and 5) were successfully synthesized by employing hydroxy functionalized pyridine ligands, specifically 2-hydroxypyridine (hpH), 8-hydroxyquinoline (hqH), and 10-hydroxybenzo[h]quinoline (hbqH) as stabilizing ligands. Complexes [Sn(μ-κ2ON-OC5H4N)(N{SiMe3}2)]2 (1) and [Sn4(μ-κ2ON-OC5H4N)6(κ1O-OC5H4N)2] (2) are the first structurally characterized examples of tin(II) oxypyridinato complexes exhibiting {Sn2(OCN)2} heterocyclic cores. As part of our study, 1H DOSY NMR experiments were undertaken using an external calibration curve (ECC) approach, with temperature-independent normalized diffusion coefficients, to determine the nature of oligomerisation of 2 in solution. An experimentally determined diffusion coefficient (298 K) of 6.87 × 10−10 m2 s−1 corresponds to a hydrodynamic radius of Ca. 4.95 Å. This is consistent with the observation of an averaged hydrodynamic radii and equilibria between dimeric [Sn{hp}2]2 and tetrameric [Sn{hp}2]4 species at 298 K. Testing this hypothesis, 1H DOSY NMR experiments were undertaken at regular intervals between 298 K–348 K and show a clear change in the calculated hydrodynamic radii form 4.95 Å (298 K) to 4.35 Å (348 K) consistent with a tetramer ⇄ dimer equilibria which lies towards the dimeric species at higher temperatures. Using these data, thermodynamic parameters for the equilibrium (ΔH° = 70.4 (±9.22) kJ mol−1, ΔS° = 259 (±29.5) J K−1 mol−1 and ΔG°298 = −6.97 (±12.7) kJ mol−1) were calculated. In the course of our studies, the Sn(II) oxo cluster, [Sn6(m3-O)6(OR)4:{Sn(II)(OR)2}2] (3) (R = C5H4N) was serendipitously isolated, and its molecular structure was determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis. However, attempts to characterise the complex by multinuclear NMR spectroscopy were thwarted by solubility issues, and attempts to synthesise 3 on a larger scale were unsuccessful. In contrast to the oligomeric structures observed for 1 and 2, single-crystal X-ray diffraction studies unambiguously establish the monomeric 4-coordinate solid-state structures of [Sn(κ2ON-OC9H6N)2)] (4) and [Sn(κ2ON-OC13H8N)2)] (5).

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The chemistry of heavy carbene analogues [MR2:M = Si, Ge, Sn, Pb; R = stabilizing anionic ligand) has attracted considerable interest for some time now and is of fundamental interest in main group p-block chemistry [1,2,3]. Their marked dual Lewis acidic and Lewis basic characteristics, alongside steric and electronic tuneability via astute ligand selection result in diverse and often unique chemistry [2].
A particular class of tetrylenes of interest are the stannylene complexes with the general formula [Sn(R-L)2-x(X)x], where [R-L] is a monoanionic ligand bearing a lariat donor group (L) fragment capable of forming either intra- or inter-molecular Lewis base adducts with the metal atom, Figure 1, thus acting as an anionic chelate or bridging ligand, and where X is an ancillary monodentate ligand such as a halogen atom or {N(SiMe3)2} group [4,5,6,7,8,9]. These Sn(II) compounds have potential applications as ligands for transition metals, intermediates in organic synthesis [10,11,12,13], catalysts in the conversion of small molecules [14,15,16,17,18,19,20] or the ring opening polymerisation of lactones [21], or as precursors for electronic thin film materials [8,18,22,23,24,25,26].
It is well established that the nature of the ligand (donor atoms) has a significant effect on the chemical and structural properties of these heavy carbene analogues. Amongst the library of [Sn(II)(R-L)2-x(X)x] systems, perhaps the most frequently studied are those bearing an N-N’ chelate as the [R-L] ligands, such as amidinates [22,27,28,29], guanidinates [8,25,30,31,32,33], β-diketiminates [5,21,34,35,36,37,38,39], and amino/imino-pyrrolides [9]. While Sn(II) [Sn(R-L)2-x(X)x] systems bearing an N,O chelate ligand such as amino alcohols [7,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48], amino-phenols [49], organic amides [23,50], salicylaldiminato [50,51,52,53], ketiminate [54], and hydroxyquinolinates [55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64] are known, their derivative chemistry is less developed.
While the anionic derivatives of 2-hydroxypyridine (hpH) [65,66] and 8-hydroxyquinoline (hqH) [67,68] have been utilized as 1,3- 1,4-k2N,O chelate ligands, respectively, for a range of metals, examples of the coordination chemistry of 10-hydroxybenzo[h]quinoline (hbqH) (Figure 2) and its derivatives are scarce, despite its commercial availability.
The anions of 2-hydroxypyridine derivatives belong to a wider class of tri-atomic bridging ligands, such as carboxylate, triazenide, amidinate, sulfonates, and phosphates [65,69]. The presence of two different donor atoms results in rich coordination chemistry with a variety of potential binding modes for the oxypyridinato ligand, common examples of which are shown in Figure 2, illustrating the unusual binding modes of the {hp} ligand that constrained 1,3-N,O (four-membered ring) coordination can induce. A search of the literature reveals numerous oxypyridinato ligated transition metal complexes, whilst there are in comparison only a handful of main group complexes (reported in the CSCD) [70,71,72,73,74,75], and to date, none of these represent Sn(II)-supported species. In contrast, the quinolinato, {hq} and the oxybenzo[h]quinolinato {hbq} ligands exclusively display 1,4- and 1,5-κ2-N,O coordination modes, respectively.
To-date, Sn(II) derivatives of these systems (i.e., {hp}, {hq} and {hbq}), are limited to a handful of homoleptic [61,64] and heteroleptic [55,56,57,58,59,60,62,63] Sn(II) hydroxyquinolate complexes. Here, we describe the details of the synthesis and structure of a series of Sn(II) complexes supported by the 1,3-, 1,4- and 1,5-κ2N,O chelate ligands oxypyridinato (hpH), hydroxyquinolinato {hqH} and oxybenzo[h]quinolinato {hbq}, respectively.

2. Synthesis of Tin(II) Complexes

In all cases, the isolated products were characterised by solution-state NMR (1H, 13C{1H} and 119Sn{1H}) spectroscopy and elemental analysis. The reaction of the bulky Sn(II) amide system [Sn{N(SiMe3)2}2] with ligand 2-hydroxypyridine in a stoichiometric 1:1 reaction results in the formation and isolation after recrystallisation (−28 °C in toluene), of complex 1 as pale yellow crystals (Scheme 1). The 1H NMR spectrum of 1 (in C6D6) clearly shows the presence of a singlet resonance at δ = 0.37 ppm, representative of the presence of an {HMDS} group. The 1H NMR spectra also clearly show a series of four multiplets corresponding to the aromatic protons of the {hp} ligand at δ = 6.20, 6.48, 6.97 and 7.99 ppm, respectively, in a 1:1:1:1:18 ratio, with the {N(SiMe3)2} group indicating the formation of a mono-substituted complex of the general form [{hp}Sn{N(SiMe3)2}]. This is supported by the 13C{1H} NMR spectra, which clearly show the expected six resonances [δ = 170.0, 142.6, 142.2, 116.6 114.0, and 5.9 ppm].
Likewise, the 119Sn{1H} NMR spectra shows a single sharp resonance [δ = –84.9 ppm], respectively, (cf. δ = 776.0 ppm, for [Sn{N(SiMe3)2}2]). A reaction of [Sn{N(SiMe3)2}2] with two equivalents of 2-hydroxypyridine in toluene results in the formation of a colourless precipitate, which, after heating into solution followed by filtration and cooling, afforded a crop of colourless crystals of 2. The 1H NMR spectrum of 2 (in C6D6) shows only four multiplets corresponding to the aromatic protons of the {hp} ligand at δ = 6.02, 6.62, 6.92, and 7.63 ppm, respectively, in a 1:1:1:1 ratio. The clear absence of a peak corresponding to the {N(SiMe3)2} group indicates the formation of a bis-substituted complex of the general form [Sn{hp}2]. The 13C NMR spectra consist of five resonances [δ = 112.7, 115.7, 140.4, 143.7, and 169.3 ppm], while the 119Sn NMR spectra display a single broad resonance at δ = −525.5 ppm. Low-temperature NMR studies (223 K) on complex 2 in d8-Tol showed no significant changes in the 1H, 13C{1H}, or 119Sn{1H} NMR spectra, suggestive of an exchange process faster than the NMR time scale even at 223 K. Below 223 K, low solubility issues resulted in the loss of the 119Sn signal.
To determine the nature of the oligomerisation of 2 in solution, 1H DOSY NMR experiments were undertaken, using the novel external calibration curve (ECC) approach, with temperature-independent normalized diffusion coefficients, for MW-determination described by Stalke et al. [76,77].
The room temperature (298 K) 1H DOSY NMR spectrum for compound 2, shown in Figure 3, clearly shows a single diffusion coefficient (Dnorm = 6.87 × 10−10 m2 s−1) which corresponds to a hydrodynamic radius of Ca. 4.95 Å.
Based on the single-crystal data (infra vide), the molecular volume of the tetrameric 2 observed in the solid state was calculated as ca. 721 Å3, with a molecular radius of 5.56 Å. While molecular shapes are important to the accurate interpretation of diffusion data, diffusion coefficient/molecular weight correlation studies have shown that merged calibration curves based around molecules in solution behave as either (i) compact spheres, (ii) dissipated spheres or ellipsoids, or (iii) expanded discs that can be used to estimate molecular weights.
Assuming each “[Sn{hp}2]” unit is “spherical” and possesses an approximate volume of 183 Å3, as determined by X-ray crystallography, the experimentally determined hydrodynamic volume, based on the Stokes-Einstein equation, is consistent with the presence of a trimeric species in solution. While a trimeric species is possible, we believe a more likely scenario is that the experimentally determined hydrodynamic volume is an averaged diffusion coefficient (and hydrodynamic volume) constant with a rapid (on the NMR timescale) equilibria between dimeric [Sn{hp}2]2 and tetrameric [Sn{hp}2]4 species (Scheme 2) at 296 K.
Using Stalke’s method, and correcting empirically for molecular density (using an empirically determined density correction factor of 1.5535 and hence accounting for the heavy Sn atom) [78], we predict a molecular mass of 937 Da (c.f. a calculated mass for a trimeric species [Sn{hp}2]3 of 921 Da, 2% error). To test our hypothesis, 1H DOSY NMR experiments were undertaken at regular intervals between 298 K–348 K. Table 1 and Figure 4 show the diffusion coefficients of 2, 5.43 mM in d8-Tol as a function of temperature. At 298 K, 1H DOSY NMR affords an experimentally determined diffusion coefficient of D = 7.97 × 10−10 m2 s−1, which on warming to 348 K increases to D = 1.75 × 10−9 m2 s−1. The observed change in the calculated hydrodynamic radii is concomitant with a decrease in the calculated hydrodynamic radii, such that at 348 K RHyd-cal = 4.37 Å (cf. RHyd-cal = 4.93 Å at 298 K and a crystal graphically determined R = 4.44 Å) consistent with a tetramer ⇄ dimer equilibria which lies towards the dimeric species at higher temperatures. When cooled to room temperature, the observed diffusion coefficient returns to D = 7.97 × 10−10 m2 s−1, implying a low barrier to tetramer formation.
A subsequent attempt followed to obtain thermodynamic parameters for the equilibrium process from the experimentally observed diffusion coefficients and the crystal graphically determined radii of the tetramer and the dimer species, which in turn can be used to estimate the molar fractions of the tetramer and dimer in solution and the equilibrium constants K at various temperatures (see ESI). A plot of ln(Keq) vs. 1/T reveals an endothermic reaction process with the following parameters: ΔH° = 70.4 (±9.22) kJ mol−1, ΔS° = 259 (±29.5) J K−1 mol−1, and ΔG°298 = −6.97 (±12.7) kJ mol−1.
While these values are only estimates, and no substantial emphasis should be placed on them, the values may be compared with those found for another dimer—tetramer equilibrium process [79] and indicate that in this instance, tetramer formation is significantly favoured at lower temperatures.
During our investigation into the synthesis of complex 2, crystals of a second product, 3, were serendipitously isolated from the reaction liquors. Unfortunately, the low yield of the product inhibited full characterisation. Attempts to produce crystals of 3 on a larger scale, either by a controlled reaction of [Sn{N(SiMe3)2}2] with 2-hydroxypyridine and water, as shown in Scheme 3, or by the slow (4 weeks) diffusion of air and atmospheric moisture into a solution of 2 in toluene at room temperature, failed [80].
The single-crystal X-ray analysis of these crystals revealed the product to be an Sn(II) oxo cluster, specifically [{Sn6(μ3-O)6(μ-OC5H5N)2(OC5H4N)2}:2{Sn(κ2ON-OC5H4N)2}] (3), vide infra. Scheme 3 shows a possible synthetic pathway to 3.
The reaction of [Sn{N(SiMe3)2}2] with equimolar amounts of the ligands 8-hydroxyquinoline and 10-hydroxybenzo[h]quinoline, respectively (Scheme 4), results in the formation of the bis-quinolinato complexes, 4–5, in yields < 50%, suggestive of an equilibrium in which the putative mono-amide intermediates are unstable with respect to disproportionation, and formation of the bis-complex.
In both cases (4 and 5), the 1H and 13C{1H} NMR spectra display a series of multiplet resonances in the aromatic region. The intrinsic C2-symmetry of complexes 4–5 (Scheme 4) is negated somewhat in solution by a rapid, so-called “flip-flop” equilibrium process in which the N → Sn coordination bonds repeatedly open and close, a process observed for other Sn(II) systems containing O,N chelate ligands, resulting in a single set of resonances. The absence of a peak corresponding to the {N(SiMe3)2} group is consistent with the formation of the bis-substituted complexes [Sn{hq}2] and [Sn{hbq}2], an assertion supported by the presence in the 119Sn{1H} NMR spectra of single peaks at δ = −386 ppm and −542 ppm, respectively. The stoichiometric reaction (2:1) of the pro-ligands hqH and hbqH, with [Sn{N(SiMe3)2}2] produces the expected complexes cleanly in moderate to high yields (69–84%). The formation of the bis-quinolinato complexes was supported by elemental analysis.

3. Single-Crystal X-ray Diffraction Studies and Molecular Structures of Tin(II) Complexes

X-ray diffraction studies on single crystals of complexes 1, 2, 4, and 5 unambiguously established their solid-state structures. The structures of the heteroleptic and homoleptic complexes, [Sn(μ-κ2ON-OC5H4N)(N{SiMe3}2)]2 (1), and [Sn4(μ-κ2ON-OC5H4N)6(κ1O-OC5H4N)2] (2) are shown in Figure 5 and Figure 6, respectively, with selected bond lengths and angles in Table 2 and Table 3, respectively. Compound 1 (Figure 5) exists as a centrosymmetric dimer in the solid-state, comprising two independent [{hp}Sn{N(SiMe3)2}] molecules in the asymmetric unit cell, with symmetry operators generating the second half of each dimer.
Both the oxygen and nitrogen donor atoms of the oxypyridinato ligands bridge the two transoidal Sn{N(SiMe3)2} moieties in a head-to-tail (HT) μ-η2 coordination mode, resulting in an eight-membered Sn2O2C2N2 cyclic core to the molecule.
Each Sn(II) centre in 1 is three-coordinate and may be regarded as being at the centre of a distorted trigonal pyramid in which the Sn atoms are coordinated by one oxygen atom and one nitrogen atom from two different {hp} ligands in a “Head-to-Tail“ fashion (see Figure 2), as well as the nitrogen of a terminal {N(SiMe3)2} ligand [Sn(1)-N(1) 2.101(2) Å and Sn(2)-N(3) 2.106(2) Å]. The bond angles about each Sn(II) atom in 1 [i.e., N(2A)-Sn(1)-O(1) 90.71°; N(2A)-Sn(1)-N(1) 90.30°; O(1)-Sn(1)-N(1) 93.36°] suggest the absence of significant sp-hybridisation at tin.
The Sn–O and Sn–N bond lengths within the eight-membered ring [Sn(1)-O(2) 2.1491(14), Sn(1)-N(2) 2.2751(19), and Sn(2)-O(2) 2.1434(15), Sn(2)-N(4) 2.2590(19) Å] are shorter than the range expected for simple Sn ← O and Sn ← N Lewis acid–base complexes [9,51,81,82,83]. Although the pyridine rings are stacked in the crystal lattice in an antiparallel-displaced arrangement, the inter-ring distance (>4 Å) is greater than that expected for any significant electronic interaction (i.e., 3.4 Å) [84].
Furthermore, in each Sn-containing eight-membered ring, the core of the molecule adopts a chair-like ring conformation similar to that observed in the pyridine-selenolate complex [Sn2{μ-η2Se-2-C5H4N}2{SeC5H4N}2] [85]. While Sn(II) oxypyridinato complexes such as 1 have not, to the best of our knowledge, been previously reported, the core structure of 1 is reminiscent of Sn(II) carboxylate complexes [{Sn(NR2)(μ-η2-O2CAr)2}] (Ar = m-terphenyl) [86]. As the bridging ligand oxypyridinato is isolobal to a carboxylate ligand [O2CR], this comparison is unsurprising. Similarly, 1 is also reminiscent of the bis(trimethylsilyl)amido Sn(II) triflate [{Sn(NR2)(μ-η2-OTf)2}] complex, which also consists of an Sn-containing eight-membered heterocyclic ring [83]. However, unlike the triflate derivative, complex 1 is a discrete entity and shows no evidence of intermolecular Sn∙∙∙O interactions between adjacent eight-membered rings. The puckering of the central {Sn2O2C2N2} ring may be considered to be a result of the folding of the eight-membered ring along the two inter-ligand O∙∙∙N vectors, such that it adopts a chair-like conformation (I) (Scheme 5). The extent of the folding (θring) may be defined as the angle between the {SnON} planes and the {O2N2} plane. In the absence of steric interactions, the “ideal” folding angle (θring) should be ca. 130°; the fold angle in 1 is θring = 129.14°. A similar bonding arrangement for the μ2-O,N hydroxypyridine ligand is observed in the aluminium complex [(tBu)2Al(μ-O-2-C5H4N)]2 [70].
The molecular structure of 2 is shown in Figure 6 and comprises a series of three eight-membered spiro-Sn2O2C2N2 rings that link through the Sn centres to create a one-dimensional three-link chain; selected bond lengths and angles are given in Table 3. Compound 2 is tetrameric, containing four Sn atoms and eight oxypyridinato ligands with three different coordination modes; two {hp} ligands are observed in terminal positions coordinating to the two three-coordinate Sn(II) centres via the oxygen atom of the {hp} ligand. Two oxypyridinato ligands in the central eight-membered ring bridge two four-coordinate Sn(II) centres in a μ–η2 head-to-tail (HT) coordination mode. The four remaining oxypyridinato ligands bridge between the two four-coordinate Sn(II) centre in the central 8-membered ring and the two three-coordinate Sn(II) centres in a μ–η2 head-to-head (HH) coordination mode.
At the centre of complex 2 is a {Sn2O2C2N2} ring comparable in coordination geometry to that observed in complex 1; the central ring in complex 2 can be considered to be in a boat-like conformation (II) (Scheme 6), resulting from folding along Sn∙∙∙O vectors such that the two pyridine rings tend towards co-planarity, with an angle between the {SnONC5} planes of 35.36° and an inter-ring distance of 3.760(2) Å. As a result of this puckering, the Sn∙∙∙Sn distance in the inner ring is marginally reduced to 4.082 Å (cf. 4.468 Å in 1).
Both Sn(II) centres in this central ring are four-coordinate, and may be considered to be the spiro atoms linking the three eight-membered {SnN2C2O2Sn} rings together. While the two Sn(II) centres are four-coordinate, their geometry may be regarded as either distorted trigonal bipyramidal with a stereo-active lone pair of electrons or disphenoidal.
As noted above, the two outer {SnN2C2O2Sn} rings are different to the central ring with the oxypyridinato ligands bridging the two Sn(II) centres in the outer rings in head-to-head bridging modes. The puckering of the “outer” Sn2O2C2N2 rings may be considered to be chair-like (III) (Scheme 6), resulting from the folding of the eight-membered ring along the two inter-ligand O∙∙∙N vectors; θring angle between {SnO2} plane/{O2N2} plane = 39.91(5)°, and between {O2N2} plane/{SnN2} plane = 97.92(5)°, thus resulting in a solid-state arrangement, such that the three-coordinate Sn(II) centres are folded under the {O2N2} plane (see (III) in Scheme 6).
The Sn–O and Sn–N bond lengths within both the three eight-membered rings and the exo-Sn-O bonds are within expected ranges for these complexes. Similarly, bond lengths and bond angles within the oxypyridinato ligands are all similar and within parameters observed in related complexes (vide supra).
While for complex 1 there are no comparable mono thio- or seleno-pyidinato complexes with which the coordination chemistry of oxy-pryidinato {hp} ligand can be compared, the homoleptic bis-thio and bis-seleno- complexes, [Sn{S-C5NH4}2] [87] and [Sn{Se-C5NH4}2] [85] are known, and display different structural chemistry to their oxygen-containing cousin, 2. Similarly, the homoleptic lead(II) 3,5-dinitro-2-pyridonate complex possesses a polymeric 1D solid-state structure, consisting of a {Pb2O2} core [73].
As noted above, during our investigation into the synthesis of complex 2, crystals of a second product were isolated from the reaction liquors. The single-crystal X-ray analysis of these crystals revealed the product to be the Sn(II) oxo cluster, [{Sn6(μ3-O)6(μ-OC5H5N)2(OC5H4N)2}:2{Sn(κ2ON-OC5H4N)2}] (3), which is composed of a central {Sn6O6} core supported by four {hp} ligands, two of which are coordinated in N,O-μ-η2 coordination mode, and two of which are terminal (Scheme 6). The cluster is further appended by the coordination of two [Sn{hp}2] moieties, previously unobserved in this study, via a dative O←Sn interaction between two {μ3-O} groups of the {Sn6O6} cluster and the Sn atoms of [Sn{hp}2] units (Scheme 3).
While the principal {Sn6O6} core is comparable to other Sn(II) oxo-alkoxide systems [88], to the best of our knowledge, this is the first example of any such a cluster engaging in exo-coordinating to any metal centre via a dative M ← {μ3-O} interaction, rather than an Sn(II) centre [89,90,91,92]. The molecular structure of complex 3 is shown in the supplementary information, along with selected bond lengths and bond angles.
The solid-state molecular structures of 4 and 5, as determined by single-crystal X-ray crystallography, are shown in Figure 7, with selected bond distances (Å) and bond angles (°) in Table 4. Complex 3 crystallises in orthorhombic space group Pbcn with half of the molecular complex in the asymmetric unit. Contrastingly, complex 5 crystallises in the triclinic space group P-1, with one full molecule in the unit cell alongside one whole molecule of disordered toluene.
The solid-state structures of 4 and 5 are consistent with the spectroscopic data, suggesting the monomeric structures of the complexes in the solid-state are retained in solution. Both complexes have what may be described as “two-bladed propeller”-like geometry, with a C2 axis lying on the bisectors of the N–Sn–N axis. Whilst 3 and 4 are both chiral, by virtue of their molecular C2 symmetry, the enantiomers co-crystallise in non-centrosymmetric space groups.
Despite coordination numbers of four, in both 4 and 5, analysis of the N-Sn-N and O-Sn-O bond angles about the Sn(II) centres suggests the Sn atoms adopt a pseudo trigonal bipyramidal, or disphenoidal geometry, each with a stereoactive lone pair of electrons [4: τ = 0.67, 5: τ = 0.74] with the nitrogen atoms occupying the axial coordination sites and oxygen atoms the equatorial positions. The N–Sn–N bond angles increase from ∼138.5° to 141.5° as the chelate ring is changed from 1,4-κ2N,O, to 1,5-κ2N,O coordination, respectively. The associated O–Sn–O angles [4: 98.224(17)°, 5: 97.331(14)°] are both close to 90°, suggesting that the Sn–O bonds are largely based around the Sn(II) p-orbitals. The 1,4-κ2N,O and 1,5-κ2N,O coordination of the ligands are associated with acute bite angles (N–Sn–O) of 73.23(2)° for 4 and 74.76(3)/77.07(3)° for 5 and induce a distortion of the axial vector (N–Sn–N) from linearity to angles of 138.56(2)° and 141.52(5)° for 4 and 5, respectively.
In complexes 4 and 5, the Sn–O distances (4: 2.0985(17) Å; 5: 2.0824(15) and 2.0779(17) Å) are slightly shorter than comparable Sn–O interactions in complexes 1 and 2. For 4, the Sn-O and Sn-N bond lengths are comparable to related systems (vide supra). Contrastingly, the Sn–N interactions in 4 and 5 (2.4014(19) Å and 2.4140(19)/2.4289(19) Å) are slightly longer than those observed in 1 and 2. However, both Sn-O and Sn-N bond lengths are in good agreement with the interatomic distances reported for comparable Sn(II) O-N chelate complexes (vide supra).
As noted previously, complex 4 possesses molecular C2 symmetry. In contrast, one of the {hbq} ligands is folded along the inter-ligand O(1)∙∙∙N(2) vectors, such that the three-rings of the {hbq} ligand are moved away from the second {hbq} ligand. A closer inspection of the intermolecular distances associated with complex 5 reveals both favourable π-π stacking interactions, between the {C(1)-N(1)} and {C(1)#-N(1)#} poly-aromatic rings, [3.687(12)Å between the parallel planes defined by the atoms {C(1)-N(1)} and {C(1)#-N(1)#}, respectively], and C-H∙∙∙π interactions between adjacent molecules as shown in Figure 8, [H(4)-(1)cent = 2.658(12) Å and H(6)-(2)cent = 3.227(12) Å], which are presumably the origin of the observed distortion from molecular C2 symmetry in the solid state. Interestingly, complex 5 appears to be one of a small number of structurally characterised examples of the {hbq} ligand coordinated to a metal centre, other than [Be{hbq}2] [93] [Me2Ga{hbq}] and [Me2In{hbq}]2 [94], as reported in the literature.

4. Experimental Section

Experimental Details: 1H, 13C, and 119Sn NMR spectra were recorded on Bruker Avance 300 or 500 MHz FT-NMR spectrometers, as appropriate, in saturated solutions at room temperature. Chemical shifts are expressed in ppm with respect to Me4Si (1H and 13C) and SnMe4 (119Sn) in C6D6. Elemental Analysis was performed externally by London Metropolitan University Elemental Analysis Service.
All reactions were carried out under an inert atmosphere using standard Schlenk techniques. The solvents were dried and degassed under an argon atmosphere over activated alumina columns using an Innovative Technology solvent purification system (SPS). The Sn(II) amide, [Sn{N(SiMe3)2}2], was prepared by the literature methods [95].
Synthesis of [Sn(μ-κ2ON-OC5H4N)(N{SiMe3}2)]2 (1): To a cooled solution of [Sn{N(SiMe3)2}2] (1 mmol, 0.44 g) in toluene (10 mL) a suspension of 2-hydroxypyridine (1 mmol, 0.10 g) in toluene (10 mL) was added and stirred for 2 hrs. The resulting solution gradually became yellow in colour. The reaction mixture was heated to near reflux and filtered through a Celite® pad (hot) to afford a clear pale-yellow filtrate. The removal of excess solvent under vacuum followed by storage at −28 °C yielded 0.20 g pale yellow microcrystals crystals (Yield = 54%). Elemental Analysis (C11H22N2OSi2Sn)2 (expected): C 35.59% (35.40%), H 6.02% (5.94%), N 7.51% (7.51%). 1H NMR (C6D6, 500 MHz): δ 0.37 (s, 18H, -N{SiMe3}2), 6.19–6.23 (m, 1H, 5-CH), 6.47–6.50 (m, 1H, 3-CH), 6.94–6.99 (m, 1H, 4-CH), 7.97–8.01 (m, 1H, 6-CH). 13C NMR (C6D6, 125.7 MHz): δ 6.0 (-N{SiMe3}2), 114.0 (5-C), 116.6 (3-C), 142.2 (4-C), 142.6 (6-C), 170.0 (2-C). 119Sn NMR (C6D6, 186.5 MHz): δ −85.
Synthesis of [Sn4(μ-κ2ON-OC5H4N)6(κ1O-OC5H4N)2] (2): To a cooled solution of [Sn{N(SiMe3)2}2] (2 mmol, 0.88 g) in toluene (10 mL) a suspension of 2-Hydroxypyridine (4 mmol, 1.23 g) in toluene (10 mL) was added. A colourless precipitate was observed to form over time. The suspension was allowed to stir for 2 h before the precipitate was heated into solution. Filtration through a Celite® pad afforded a colourless filtrate. Slow cooling (−28 °C) afforded 0.58 g of small starburst colourless crystals. (yield = 94%). Elemental Analysis (C10H8N2O2Sn)4 (expected): C 38. 7% (39.14%), H 2.85% (2.63%), N 9.11% (9.13%). 1H NMR (C6D6, 500 MHz): δ 5.98–6.05 (m, 1H, 5-CH), 6.54–6.61 (m, 1H, 3-CH), 6.88–6.95 (m, 1H, 4-CH), 7.58–7.67 (m, 1H, 6-CH). 13C NMR (C6D6, 125.7 MHz): δ 112.71 (5-C), 115.70 (3-C), 140.44 (4-C), 143.73 (6-C), 19.30 (2-C). 119Sn NMR (C6D6, 186.5 MHz): δ −526.
Synthesis of [Sn(μ-κ2ON-OC9H6N)2] (4): A suspension of 8-Hydroxyquinoline (4 mmol, 0.5806 g) in toluene (10 mL) was added, via cannula, to a cooled solution of [Sn{N(SiMe3)2}2] (2 mmol, 0.88 g) in toluene. A bright yellow precipitate was generated instantly. The suspension was allowed to stir for 2 h before the precipitate was heated into solution and filtered through a Celite® pad affording a yellow filtrate. Slow cooling (−28 °C) afforded 0.62 g of large yellow crystals. (yield = 76%). Elemental Analysis C18H12N2O2Sn (expected): C 53.27% (53.12%), H 3.02% (2.97%), N 6.85% (6.88%). 1H NMR (C6D6, 500 MHz): δ 8.32 (d, J3H-H = 5 Hz, 1H 2-CH) 7.45 (d, J3H-H = 10 Hz, 1H, 7-CH) 7.19 (dd, J3H-H = 10 Hz, J3H-H = 10 Hz, 1H, 3-CH), 7.10 (dd, J3H-H = 10 Hz, J3H-H = 5 Hz, 1H, 6-CH), 6.69 (d, J3H-H = 10 Hz, J3H-H = 10 Hz, 1H, 4-CH), 6.61 (dd, (dd, J3H-H = 5 Hz, J3H-H = 5 Hz, 1H, 5-CH). 13C NMR (C6D6, 125.7 MHz): δ 112.6 (4-C), 115.2 (6-C), 121.0 (5-C), 130.6 (3-C), 130.8 (8-C), 138.4 (7-C), 140.2 (9-C), 143.3 (2-C), 162.9 (1-C). 119Sn NMR (C6D6, 186.5 MHz): δ −386.
Synthesis of [Sn(μ-κ2ON-OC13H8N)2] (5): A suspension of 10-Hydroxybenzo[h]quinoline (4 mmol, 0.7810 g) in toluene (10 mL) was added, via cannula, to a cooled solution of [Sn{N(SiMe3)2}2] (2 mmol, 0.88 g) in toluene. A bright yellow precipitate was generated instantly. The suspension was stirred for 2 h before the precipitate was heated into solution and filtered through a Celite® pad affording a yellow filtrate. Slow cooling (−28 °C) afforded 0.62 g of large yellow crystals. (yield = 85%). Elemental Analysis C26H16N2O2Sn:C7H8 (expected): C 65.97% (66.04%), H 4.11% (4.03%), N 4.65% (4.66%). 1H NMR (C6D6, 500 MHz): δ 6.67 (dd, J3H-H = 10 Hz, 5 Hz, 1H, CH), 6.83 (dd, J3H-H = 5 Hz, 2 Hz, 2H, CH), 6.91 (dd, J3H-H = 10 Hz, 10 Hz, 1H, CH), 6.99–7.03 (m 2H CH), 7.22 (d, J3H-H = 2 Hz, 1H, CH), 8.08 (dd, J3H-H = 5 Hz, 2 Hz, 1H, CH), 8.79 (dd, J3H-H = 5 Hz, 2 Hz, 1H, CH). 13C NMR (C6D6, 125.7 MHz): δ 116.9, 118.3, 120.0, 120.3, 120.7, 123.0, 125.6, 126.3, 126.7, 130.6, 145.0 145.6, 169.3. 119Sn NMR (C6D6, 186.5 MHz): δ −542.
Single Crystal X-ray Diffraction Studies: Experimental details relating to the single-crystal X-ray crystallographic data for compounds 1–4 are summarized in Table S1 (ESI). The single-crystal X-ray crystallography data were collected at 150 K on RIGAKU SuperNova Dual wavelength diffractometer equipped with an Oxford Cryostream, featuring a micro source with MoKα radiation (λ = 0.71073 Å) and Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5418 Å). Crystals were isolated from an argon-filled Schlenk flask and immersed under oil before being mounted onto the diffractometer. The structures were solved by direct methods throughout and refined on F2 data using the OLEX2 suite of programs [30]. All hydrogen atoms were included in idealized positions and refined using the riding model. Refinements were straightforward with no additional points that merit note. CCDC 2015978–2015982 contains the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge at www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/conts/retrieving.html (accessed on 25 July 2022) [or from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, 12, Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK; Fax: + 44-1223/336-033; E-mail: [email protected]].

5. Conclusions

In recent years, 1,3-O,N, 1,4-O,N, and to a lesser extent 1,5-O,N chelate ligands based around the “basic” oxo-pyridinato system have been shown to play an important role as sterically and electronically tuneable ligands to a range of metal centres. The ambidentate nature of these tuneable ligands has allowed the stabilisation of metals spanning most of the periodic table. However, there is a paucity of main group metal examples bearing such ligands. Here, we describe an explorative investigation into the chemistry of these systems and highlight the array of reactive and novel bonding modes such versatile ligands display in a family of Sn(II) complexes bearing the pyridinato ligands oxopyridinato {hp} (1 and 2), quinolinato, {hq} (3) and oxybenzo[h]quinolinato {hbq} (4). The Sn(II) complexes bearing these ligands were synthesized and characterised in solution and in the solid state. In the case of the 1,3-κ2NO oxpyridinato systems, the ligand displays a diverse coordination geometry, mirroring some observations noted in transition metal chemistry. In contrast, the coordination chemistry of the quinolinato, {hq}, and oxybenzo[h]quinolinato {hbq} ligands display a much more limited variety in their bonding modes, with 3 and 4 displaying distorted trigonal bipyramidal geometries. To the best of our knowledge, complexes 1 and 2 are the first reported examples of Sn(II) centres supported by oxo-pyridinato ligands. In addition, complex 5 is a rare example of a coordination complex of the oxybenzo[h]quinolinato (5) ligands, and as such, one of only a small number from across the whole of the periodic table.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/inorganics10090129/s1, Figure S1: Two views of the molecular structure of complex 3; Table S1: Selected Bond lengths [Å] for Complex 3; Table S2: Selected Bond angles [°] for complex 3; Table S3: Crystal data and structure refinement for complexes 1–5.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.L.J.; methodology, H.S.I.S.; Crystallographic analysis, A.L.J. and G.K.-K.; NMR Investigation, A.J.S.; writing—original draft preparation, A.L.J.; writing—review and editing, A.L.J. and A.J.S.; supervision, A.L.J.; project administration, A.L.J.; funding acquisition, A.L.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by EPSRC, grant number EP/L0163541 and EP/G03768X/1.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All the data reported in the study can be found in the supporting information and from the CCDC repository with accession numbers: 2015978–2015982.

Acknowledgments

We thank the EPSRC Doctoral Training Centre in Sustainable Chemical Technologies (CSCT) for a PhD studentship (H.S.I.S).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lappert, M.; Protchenko, A.; Power, P.; Seeber, A. Subvalent Amides of Silicon and the Group 14 Metals. In Metal Amide Chemistry; John Wiley & Sons Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2008; pp. 263–326. [Google Scholar]
  2. Mizuhata, Y.; Sasamori, T.; Tokitoh, N. Stable Heavier Carbene Analogues. Chem. Rev. 2009, 109, 3479–3511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Lee, V.Y.; Sekiguchi, A. Organometallic Compounds of Low-Coordinate Si, Ge, Sn and Pb: From Phantom Species to Stable Compounds; Wiley: Oxford, UK, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  4. Dias, H.V.R.; Wang, Z. Germanium-Containing Heterobicyclic 10-π-Electron Ring Systems. Synthesis and Characterization of Neutral and Cationic Germanium(II) Derivatives of Aminotroponiminates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 4650–4655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Akkari, A.; Byrne, J.J.; Saur, I.; Rima, G.; Gornitzka, H.; Barrau, J. Three coordinate divalent Group 14 element compounds with a β-diketiminate as supporting ligand L2MX [L2=PhNC(Me)CHC(Me)NPh, X = Cl, I; M = Ge, Sn]. J. Organomet. Chem. 2001, 622, 190–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sen, S.S.; Kritzler-Kosch, M.P.; Nagendran, S.; Roesky, H.W.; Beck, T.; Pal, A.; Herbst-Irmer, R. Synthesis of Monomeric Divalent Tin(II) Compounds with Terminal Chloride, Amide, and Triflate Substituents. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2010, 2010, 5304–5311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zaitsev, K.V.; Cherepakhin, V.S.; Churakov, A.V.; Peregudov, A.S.; Tarasevich, B.N.; Egorov, M.P.; Zaitseva, G.S.; Karlov, S.S. Extending the family of stable heavier carbenes: New tetrylenes based on N,N,O-ligands. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2016, 443, 91–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ahmet, I.Y.; Hill, M.S.; Raithby, P.R.; Johnson, A.L. Tin guanidinato complexes: Oxidative control of Sn, SnS, SnSe and SnTe thin film deposition. Dalton Trans. 2018, 47, 5031–5048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Parish, J.D.; Snook, M.W.; Johnson, A.L.; Kociok-Köhn, G. Synthesis, characterisation and thermal properties of Sn(ii) pyrrolide complexes. Dalton Trans. 2018, 47, 7721–7729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Holt, M.S.; Wilson, W.L.; Nelson, J.H. Transition metal-tin chemistry. Chem. Rev. 1989, 89, 11–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bartolin, J.M.; Kavara, A.; Kampf, J.; Banaszak Holl, M.M. Tin-Mediated CH Activation and Cross-Coupling in a Single Flask. Organometallics 2006, 25, 4738–4740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Summerscales, O.T.; Caputo, C.A.; Knapp, C.E.; Fettinger, J.C.; Power, P.P. The Role of Group 14 Element Hydrides in the Activation of C–H Bonds in Cyclic Olefins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 14595–14603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lai, T.Y.; Fettinger, J.C.; Power, P.P. Facile C–H Bond Metathesis Mediated by a Stannylene. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 5674–5677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Padělková, Z.; Nechaev, M.S.; Lyčka, A.; Holubová, J.; Zevaco, T.A.; Růžička, A. Reactivity of C,N-Chelated Stannylene with Azobenzene. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2009, 2009, 2058–2061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mandal, S.K.; Roesky, H.W. Group 14 Hydrides with Low Valent Elements for Activation of Small Molecules. Acc. Chem. Res. 2011, 45, 298–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Stewart, C.A.; Dickie, D.A.; Moasser, B.; Kemp, R.A. Reactions of CO2 and related heteroallenes with CF3-substituted aromatic silylamines of tin. Polyhedron 2012, 32, 14–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Padělková, Z.; Švec, P.; Pejchal, V.; Růžička, A. Activation of E–Cl bonds (E = C, Si, Ge and Sn) by a C,N-chelated stannylene. Dalton Trans. 2013, 42, 7660–7671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Wildsmith, T.; Hill, M.S.; Johnson, A.L.; Kingsley, A.J.; Molloy, K.C. Exclusive formation of SnO by low temperature single-source AACVD. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 8773–8775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chu, T.; Nikonov, G.I. Oxidative Addition and Reductive Elimination at Main-Group Element Centers. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 3608–3680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hadlington, T.J.; Driess, M.; Jones, C. Low-valent group 14 element hydride chemistry: Towards catalysis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 4176–4197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Dove, A.P.; Gibson, V.C.; Marshall, E.L.; White, A.J.P.; Williams, D.J. A well defined tin(ii) initiator for the living polymerisation of lactide. Chem. Commun. 2001, 2001, 283–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kim, S.B.; Sinsermsuksakul, P.; Hock, A.S.; Pike, R.D.; Gordon, R.G. Synthesis of N-Heterocyclic Stannylene (Sn(II)) and Germylene (Ge(II)) and a Sn(II) Amidinate and Their Application as Precursors for Atomic Layer Deposition. Chem. Mater. 2014, 26, 3065–3073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Catherall, A.L.; Harris, S.; Hill, M.S.; Johnson, A.L.; Mahon, M.F. Deposition of SnS Thin Films from Sn(II) Thioamidate Precursors. Cryst. Growth Des. 2017, 17, 5544–5551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kim, H.-S.; Jung, E.A.; Han, S.H.; Han, J.H.; Park, B.K.; Kim, C.G.; Chung, T.-M. Germanium Compounds Containing Ge═E Double Bonds (E = S, Se, Te) as Single-Source Precursors for Germanium Chalcogenide Materials. Inorg. Chem. 2017, 56, 4084–4092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ahmet, I.Y.; Thompson, J.R.; Johnson, A.L. Oxidative Addition to Sn(II) Guanidinate Complexes: Precursors to Tin(II) Chalcogenide Nanocrystals. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2018, 2018, 1670–1678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Park, J.-H.; Kang, S.G.; Lee, Y.K.; Chung, T.-M.; Park, B.K.; Kim, C.G. Tin(II) Aminothiolate and Tin(IV) Aminothiolate Selenide Compounds as Single-Source Precursors for Tin Chalcogenide Materials. Inorg. Chem. 2020, 59, 3513–3517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Foley, S.R.; Yap, G.P.A.; Richeson, D.S. Oxidative addition to M(II) (M = Ge, Sn) amidinate complexes: Routes to group 14 chalcogenolates with hypervalent coordination environments. J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 2000, 2000, 1663–1668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Nimitsiriwat, N.; Gibson, V.C.; Marshall, E.L.; White, A.J.P.; Dale, S.H.; Elsegood, M.R.J. Tert-butylamidinate tin(ii) complexes: High activity, single-site initiators for the controlled production of polylactide. Dalton Trans. 2007, 2007, 4464–4471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chlupatý, T.; Růžičková, Z.; Horáček, M.; Alonso, M.; De Proft, F.; Kampová, H.; Brus, J.; Růžička, A. Oxidative Additions of Homoleptic Tin(II) Amidinate. Organometallics 2015, 34, 606–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Chlupatý, T.; Padělková, Z.; DeProft, F.; Willem, R.; Růžička, A. Addition of Lappert’s Stannylenes to Carbodiimides, Providing a New Class of Tin(II) Guanidinates. Organometallics 2012, 31, 2203–2211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Barman, M.K.; Baishya, A.; Peddarao, T.; Nembenna, S. Guanidinate stabilized germanium(II) and tin(II) amide complexes and their catalytic activity for aryl isocyanate cyclization. J. Organomet. Chem. 2014, 772–773, 265–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chlupatý, T.; Růžičková, Z.; Horáček, M.; Merna, J.; Alonso, M.; De Proft, F.; Růžička, A. Reactivity of Tin(II) Guanidinate with 1,2- and 1,3-Diones: Oxidative Cycloaddition or Ligand Substitution? Organometallics 2014, 34, 2202–2211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ungpittagul, T.; Wongmahasirikun, P.; Phomphrai, K. Synthesis and characterization of guanidinate tin(ii) complexes for ring-opening polymerization of cyclic esters. Dalton Trans. 2020, 49, 8460–8471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Dove, A.P.; Gibson, V.C.; Marshall, E.L.; Rzepa, H.S.; White, A.J.P.; Williams, D.J. Synthetic, Structural, Mechanistic, and Computational Studies on Single-Site β-Diketiminate Tin(II) Initiators for the Polymerization ofrac-Lactide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 9834–9843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Jana, A.; Roesky, H.W.; Schulzke, C. Hydrostannylation of Ketones and Alkynes with LSnH [L = HC(CMeNAr)2, Ar = 2,6-iPr2C6H3]. Inorg. Chem. 2009, 48, 9543–9548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Jana, A.; Objartel, I.; Roesky, H.W.; Stalke, D. Reaction of β-diketiminate tin(ii) dimethylamide LSnNMe2 [L = HC(CMeNAr)2; Ar = 2,6-iPr2C6H3] with ketones and alkynes. Dalton Trans. 2010, 39, 4647–4650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Harris, L.A.M.; Coles, M.P.; Fulton, J.R. Synthesis and reactivity of tin amide complexes. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2011, 369, 97–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Taylor, M.J.; Saunders, A.J.; Coles, M.P.; Fulton, J.R. Low-Coordinate Tin and Lead Cations. Organometallics 2011, 30, 1334–1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Harris, L.A.M.; Tam, E.C.Y.; Coles, M.P.; Fulton, J.R. Lead and tin β-diketiminato amido/anilido complexes: Competitive nucleophilic reactivity at the β-diketiminato γ-carbon. Dalton Trans. 2014, 43, 13803–13814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zemlyansky, N.N.; Borisova, I.V.; Kuznetsova, M.G.; Khrustalev, V.N.; Ustynyuk, Y.A.; Nechaev, M.S.; Lunin, V.V.; Barrau, J.; Rima, G. New stable germylenes, stannylenes, and related compounds. 1. Stable germanium(II) and tin(II) compounds M(OCH2CH2NMe2)(2) (M = Ge, Sn) with intramolecular coordination metal-nitrogen bonds. Synthesis and structure. Organometallics 2003, 22, 1675–1681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Khrustalev, V.N.; Portnyagin, I.A.; Zemlyansky, N.N.; Borisova, I.V.; Nechaev, M.S.; Ustynyuk, Y.A.; Antipin, M.Y.; Lunin, V. New stable germylenes, stannylenes, and related compounds 6. Heteroleptic germanium(II) and tin(II) compounds [(SiMe3)(2)N-E-14-OCH(2)CH(2)NMe2](n) (E-14 = Ge, n = 1; Sn, n = 2): Synthesis and structure. J. Organomet. Chem. 2005, 690, 1172–1177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Khrustalev, V.N.; Portnyagin, I.A.; Zemlyansky, N.N.; Borisova, I.V.; Ustynyuk, Y.A.; Antipin, M.Y. New stable germylenes, stannylenes, and related compounds. 5. Germanium(II) and tin(II) azides [N-3-E-14-OCH2CH2NMe2](2) (E-14 = Ge, Sn): Synthesis and structure. J. Organomet. Chem. 2005, 690, 1056–1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Hollingsworth, N.; Horley, G.A.; Mazhar, M.; Mahon, M.F.; Molloy, K.C.; Haycock, P.W.; Myers, C.P.; Critchlow, G.W. Tin(II) aminoalkoxides and heterobimetallic derivatives: The structures of Sn6(O)4(dmae)4, Sn6(O)4(OEt)4 and [Sn(dmae)2Cd(acac)2]2. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2006, 20, 687–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Khrustalev, V.N.; Glukhov, I.V.; Borisova, I.V.; Zemlyansky, N.N. New stable germylenes, stannylenes, and related compounds. 8. Amidogermanium(II) and -tin(II) chlorides R2N-E-14-Cl (E-14 = Ge, R = Et; E-14 = Sn, R = Me) revealing new structural motifs. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2007, 21, 551–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Khrustalev, V.N.; Zemlyansky, N.N.; Borisova, I.V.; Kuznetsova, M.G.; Krut’ko, E.B.; Antipin, M.Y. New stable germylenes, stannylenes, and related compounds 7.* Synthesis and structures of compounds. Russ. Chem. Bull. 2007, 56, 267–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Aysin, R.R.; Leites, L.A.; Bukalov, S.S.; Khrustalev, V.N.; Borisova, I.V.; Zemlyanskii, N.N.; Smirnov, A.Y.; Nechaev, M.S. Vibrational spectra and structural features of carbene analogs El(II)(OCH2CH2NMe2)(2) and ClEl(II)OCH(2)CH(2)NMe(2) (El(II) = Ge, Sn, Pb). Russ. Chem. Bull. 2011, 60, 69–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Han, J.H.; Chung, Y.J.; Park, B.K.; Kim, S.K.; Kim, H.-S.; Kim, C.G.; Chung, T.-M. Growth of p-Type Tin(II) Monoxide Thin Films by Atomic Layer Deposition from Bis(1-dimethylamino-2-methyl-2propoxy)tin and H2O. Chem. Mater. 2014, 26, 6088–6091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Han, S.H.; Jung, E.A.; Lee, J.H.; Kim, D.H.; Lee, G.Y.; Park, B.K.; Kim, C.G.; Son, S.U.; Chung, T.M. Synthesis and Structure of Novel Tin Complexes Containing Aminoalkoxide Ligands. ChemistrySelect 2018, 3, 7836–7839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wang, L.; Kefalidis, C.E.; Roisnel, T.; Sinbandhit, S.; Maron, L.; Carpentier, J.-F.; Sarazin, Y. Structure vs. 119Sn NMR Chemical Shift in Three-Coordinated Tin(II) Complexes: Experimental Data and Predictive DFT Computations. Organometallics 2014, 34, 2139–2150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Alvarez-Rodriguez, L.; Cabeza, J.A.; Garcia-Alvarez, P.; Polo, D. Organic Amides as Suitable Precursors to Stabilize Stannylenes. Organometallics 2013, 32, 3557–3561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Nimitsiriwat, N.; Gibson, V.C.; Marshall, E.L.; Elsegood, M.R.J. The Reversible Amination of Tin(II)-Ligated Imines: Latent Initiators for the Polymerization ofrac-Lactide. Inorg. Chem. 2008, 47, 5417–5424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Nimitsiriwat, N.; Gibson, V.C.; Marshall, E.L.; Elsegood, M.R.J. Bidentate salicylaldiminato tin(ii) complexes and their use as lactide polymerisation initiators. Dalton Trans. 2009, 2009, 3710–3715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Piromjitpong, P.; Ratanapanee, P.; Thumrongpatanaraks, W.; Kongsaeree, P.; Phomphrai, K. Synthesis of cyclic polylactide catalysed by bis(salicylaldiminato)tin(ii) complexes. Dalton Trans. 2012, 41, 12704–12710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Kao, H.-M.; Ho, S.-M.; Chen, I.C.; Kuo, P.-C.; Lin, C.-Y.; Tu, C.-Y.; Hu, C.-H.; Huang, J.-H.; Lee, G.-H. Synthesis and structures of three, four, and six-coordinate monomeric tin(II) and tin(IV) compounds containing η2-ketiminate ligands. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2008, 361, 2792–2798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Morrison, J.S.; Haendler, H.M. Some reactions of tin(II) chloride in nonaqueous solution. J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 1967, 29, 393–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Sister, M.A.D.; Brother, C.C. Moessbauer and infrared spectra of some tin(II) complexes. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1969, 3, 169–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Bhide, S.N.; Umapathy, P.; Sen, D.N. Oxidative addition reactions of tin(II) oxinates. J. Indian Chem. Soc. 1977, 54, 851–856. [Google Scholar]
  58. Bhide, S.N.; Umapathy, P.; Gupta, M.P.; Sen, D.N. Tin-119 Moessbauer spectral studies in organotin(IV) and tin(II) substituted oxinates. J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 1978, 40, 1003–1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Umapathy, P.; Badrinarayanan, S.; Sinha, A.P.B. An ESCA study of tin(IV) and tin(II) chelates with substituted 8-quinolinols. J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 1983, 28, 261–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Uddin, M.J.; Islam, S.; Islam, M.A.; Begum, F.; Haider, S.Z. Synthesis, characterization and antimicrobial properties of some heavy metal oxinates. J. Bangladesh Chem. Soc. 1995, 8, 7–16. [Google Scholar]
  61. Kitamura, C.; Maeda, N.; Kamada, N.; Ouchi, M.; Yoneda, A. Synthesis of 2-(substituted methyl)quinolin-8-ols and their complexation with Sn(II). J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1 2000, 2000, 781–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. El-Sonbati, A.Z.; El-Bindary, A.A. Stereochemistry of new nitrogen containing aldehydes. V. Novel synthesis and spectroscopic studies of some quinoline Schiff bases complexes. Pol. J. Chem. 2000, 74, 621–630. [Google Scholar]
  63. Yoneda, A.; Ohfuchi, S.; Hoshimoto, A.; Kitamura, C. Synthesis and characterization of 2-vinylene-8-quinolinols using the Witting reaction. Kenkyu Hokoku Himeji Kogyo Daigaku Kogakubu 2002, 54, 60–67. [Google Scholar]
  64. Kitamura, C.; Yoneda, A.; Sugiura, K.; Sakata, Y. Bis(2-methyl-8-quinolinolato-N,O)tin(II). Acta Crystallogr. Sect. C Cryst. Struct. Commun. 1999, 55, 876–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Rawson, J.M.; Winpenny, R.E.P. The coordination chemistry of 2-pyridone and its derivatives. Coord. Chem. Rev. 1995, 139, 313–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Parsons, S.; Winpenny, R.E.P. Structural Chemistry of Pyridonate Complexes of Late 3d-Metals. Acc. Chem. Res. 1997, 30, 89–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Albrecht, M.; Fiege, M.; Osetska, O. 8-Hydroxyquinolines in metallosupramolecular chemistry. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2008, 252, 812–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Dolomanov, O.V.; Bourhis, L.J.; Gildea, R.J.; Howard, J.A.K.; Puschmann, H. OLEX2: A complete structure solution, refinement and analysis program. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2009, 42, 339–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Drover, M.W.; Love, J.A.; Schafer, L.L. 1,3-N,O-Complexes of late transition metals. Ligands with flexible bonding modes and reaction profiles. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 2913–2940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Francis, J.A.; Bott, S.G.; Barron, A.R. Aluminium compounds containing bidentate ligands: Chelate ring size and rigid conformation effects. J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 1998, 19, 3305–3310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Bashall, A.; Beswick, M.A.; Feeder, N.; Hopkins, A.D.; Kidd, S.J.; McPartlin, M.; Raithby, P.R.; Wright, D.S. Reactions of the spiro monoanion [{(Me2N)Sb(μ-NCy)2}2Sb]− with alcohols and thiols (REH; E = O or S); syntheses of nido-[Sb3(μ-NCy)3(μ3-NCy)(ER)2] anions and the unique antimony(III) imido cubane [(2-NC5H4O)Sb(μ3-NCy)]4 (Cy = cyclohexyl). J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 2000, 12, 1841–1847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Bickley, J.F.; Bond, A.D.; García, F.; Jantos, K.; Lawson, G.T.; McPartlin, M.; Steiner, A.; Wright, D.S. Syntheses and structures of the cubanes [PhOSb(µ3-NCy)]4and [pyOBi(µ3-NCy)]4(Cy = cyclohexyl, py = 2-pyridyl). J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 2002, 24, 4629–4633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. She, J.-B.; Zhang, G.-F.; Zhao, F.-Q.; Lei, Z.-L.; Fan, X.-Z. The first two structurally characterized energetic catalysts derived from dinitropyridone. Struct. Chem. 2007, 18, 373–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Sunderland, T.L.; Berry, J.F. The first bismuth(II)–rhodium(II) oxypyridinate paddlewheel complexes: Synthesis and structural characterization. J. Coord. Chem. 2016, 69, 1949–1956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Brewster, T.P.; Nguyen, T.H.; Li, Z.; Eckenhoff, W.T.; Schley, N.D.; DeYonker, N.J. Synthesis and Characterization of Heterobimetallic Iridium–Aluminum and Rhodium–Aluminum Complexes. Inorg. Chem. 2018, 57, 1148–1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Neufeld, R.; Stalke, D. Accurate molecular weight determination of small molecules via DOSY-NMR by using external calibration curves with normalized diffusion coefficients. Chem. Sci. 2015, 6, 3354–3364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  77. Bachmann, S.; Gernert, B.; Stalke, D. Solution structures of alkali metal cyclopentadienides in THF estimated by ECC-DOSY NMR-spectroscopy (incl. software). Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 12861–12864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Kreyenschmidt, A.-K.; Bachmann, S.; Niklas, T.; Stalke, D. Molecular Weight Estimation of Molecules Incorporating Heavier Elements from van-der-Waals Corrected ECC-DOSY. ChemistrySelect 2017, 2, 6957–6960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Chisholm, M.H.; Clark, D.L.; Hampden-Smith, M.J. Hexaisopropoxyditungsten and dodecaisopropoxytetratungsten: W2(O-i-Pr)6 and W4(O-i-Pr)12. 2. Studies of cluster dynamics and the equilibrium between the 12-electron cluster and two metal-metal triple bonds. A symmetry-allowed [.pi.s2 + .pi.s2] cycloaddition reaction and comparisons with the chemistry of cyclobutadiene. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 111, 574–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Boyle, T.J.; Alam, T.M.; Rodriguez, M.A.; Zechmann, C.A. Hydrolysis of Tin(II) Neo-pentoxide: Syntheses, Characterization, and X-ray Structures of [Sn(ONep)2]∞, Sn5(μ3-O)2(μ-ONep)6, and Sn6(μ3-O)4(μ-ONep)4 Where ONep = OCH2CMe3. Inorg. Chem. 2002, 41, 2574–2582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Wang, L.; Kefalidis, C.E.; Sinbandhit, S.; Dorcet, V.; Carpentier, J.-F.; Maron, L.; Sarazin, Y. Heteroleptic Tin(II) Initiators for the Ring-Opening (Co)Polymerization of Lactide and Trimethylene Carbonate: Mechanistic Insights from Experiments and Computations. Chem.—A Eur. J. 2013, 19, 13463–13478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Wiederkehr, J.; Wölper, C.; Schulz, S. Synthesis, solid-state structures and reduction reactions of heteroleptic Ge(II) and Sn(II) β-ketoiminate complexes. Z. Für Nat. B 2017, 72, 813–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Hitchcock, P.B.; Lappert, M.F.; Lawless, G.A.; de Lima, G.M.; Pierssens, L.J.M. Synthesis and structural characterisation of bis(trimethylsilyl)amidotin(II) triflate [{Sn(NR2)-(mu-eta(2)-OTf)(2)}](infinity) (R = SiMe3, -OTf = -OSO2CF3). J. Organomet. Chem. 2000, 601, 142–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Yao, Z.-F.; Wang, J.-Y.; Pei, J. Control of π–π Stacking via Crystal Engineering in Organic Conjugated Small Molecule Crystals. Cryst. Growth Des. 2017, 18, 7–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Cheng, Y.F.; Emge, T.J.; Brennan, J.G. Pyridineselenolate complexes of tin and lead: Sn(2-SeNC5H4)(2), Sn(2-SeNC5H4)(4), Pb(2-SeNC5H4)(2), and Pb(3-Me(3)Si-2-SeNC5H3)(2). Volatile CVD precursors to group IV group VI semiconductors. Inorg. Chem. 1996, 35, 342–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Dickie, D.A.; Lee, P.T.K.; Labeodan, O.A.; Schatte, G.; Weinberg, N.; Lewis, A.R.; Bernard, G.M.; Wasylishen, R.E.; Clyburne, J.A.C. Flexible coordination of the carboxylate ligand in tin(ii) amides and a 1,3-diaza-2,4-distannacyclobutanediyl. Dalton Trans. 2007, 27, 2862–2869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Wächtler, E.; Gericke, R.; Kutter, S.; Brendler, E.; Wagler, J. Molecular structures of pyridinethiolato complexes of Sn(II), Sn(IV), Ge(IV), and Si(IV). Main Group Metal. Chem. 2013, 36, 181–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Barbul, I.; Johnson, A.L.; Kociok-Köhn, G.; Molloy, K.C.; Silvestru, C.; Sudlow, A.L. The Reaction and Materials Chemistry of [Sn6(O)4(OSiMe3)4]: Chemical Vapour Deposition of Tin Oxide. ChemPlusChem 2013, 78, 866–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Schiemenz, B.; Ettel, F.; Huttner, G.; Zsolnai, L. Metallorganische schutzgruppen für den aufbau ungewöhnlicher zinn-chalkogen-käfigverbindungen: Thiostannat(II) Sn3S42− und “Zinnoxidhydrat” Sn6(μ3-OH)4(μ3-O)4 als Liganden in RCp(CO)2Mn-Komplexen. J. Organomet. Chem. 1993, 458, 159–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Sita, L.R.; Xi, R.; Yap, G.P.A.; Liable-Sands, L.M.; Rheingold, A.L. High Yield Synthesis and Characterization of Sn6(μ3-O)4(μ3-OSiMe3)4: A Novel Main Group Cluster for the Support of Multiple Transition Metal Centers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 756–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Kircher, P.; Huttner, G.; Zsolnai, L.; Driess, A. Partially Oxidized Zintl Ions? The Characterization of [(μ3-OH)(μ3-O)3(OEt)3{(CO)5W}7Sn7]2−. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 1666–1668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Mertens, L.; Leonhardt, C.; Rüffer, T.; Toma, A.; Silvestru, C.; Mehring, M. Heterobimetallic tin(II) oxido clusters of the type [{Sn 6 (μ 3 -O) 4 (μ 3 -OCH 2 R) 4 } {W(CO) 5} 4] and [{Sn 5 (μ 3 -O) 2 (μ-OCH 2 R) 4 (μ 3 -OCH 2 R) 2}{Fe(CO) 4} 2]. J. Organomet. Chem. 2016, 821, 206–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Freidzon, A.Y.; Safonov, A.A.; Bagaturyants, A.A. Theoretical Study of the Spectral and Charge-Transport Parameters of an Electron-Transporting Material Bis(10-hydroxybenzo[h]qinolinato)beryllium (Bebq2). J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 26817–26827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Wu, X.S.; Sun, H.S.; Pan, Y.; Chen, H.B.; Sun, X.Z. The reaction of metal trialkyls with benzo[H]quinolin-10-ol. Chin. Chem. Lett. 1999, 10, 875–878. [Google Scholar]
  95. Fjeldberg, T.; Hope, H.k.; Lappert, M.F.; Power, P.P.; Thorne, A.J. Molecular structures of the main group 4 metal(II) bis(trimethylsilyl)-amides M[N(SiMe3)2]2 in the crystal (X-ray) and vapour (gas-phase electron diffraction). J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1983, 11, 639–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Inorganics 10 00129 g001 550
Figure 1. Stabilization of stannylene [Sn(R-L)2-x(X)x)] complexes.
Figure 1. Stabilization of stannylene [Sn(R-L)2-x(X)x)] complexes.
Inorganics 10 00129 g001
Inorganics 10 00129 g002 550
Figure 2. Overview of the N,O donor pro-ligands, hpH, hqH, and hbqH used in this study (A), and the common coordination modes observed for the 2-hydroxpyridinato (hp) ligand (B).
Figure 2. Overview of the N,O donor pro-ligands, hpH, hqH, and hbqH used in this study (A), and the common coordination modes observed for the 2-hydroxpyridinato (hp) ligand (B).
Inorganics 10 00129 g002
Inorganics 10 00129 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Formation of complexes 1 and 2.
Scheme 1. Formation of complexes 1 and 2.
Inorganics 10 00129 sch001
Inorganics 10 00129 g003 550
Figure 3. Plot showing the 1H DOSY NMR spectrum for compound 2 (298 K).
Figure 3. Plot showing the 1H DOSY NMR spectrum for compound 2 (298 K).
Inorganics 10 00129 g003
Inorganics 10 00129 sch002 550
Scheme 2. Proposed Tetramer Dimer equilibria observed for 2.
Scheme 2. Proposed Tetramer Dimer equilibria observed for 2.
Inorganics 10 00129 sch002
Inorganics 10 00129 g004 550
Figure 4. Graph showing the experimentally determined diffusion coefficients of 2, 5.43 mM in d8-Tol, as a function of temperature. *: Radius (4.44 Å) as determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction.
Figure 4. Graph showing the experimentally determined diffusion coefficients of 2, 5.43 mM in d8-Tol, as a function of temperature. *: Radius (4.44 Å) as determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction.
Inorganics 10 00129 g004
Inorganics 10 00129 sch003 550
Scheme 3. Formation of the Sn(II) oxo cluster (3).
Scheme 3. Formation of the Sn(II) oxo cluster (3).
Inorganics 10 00129 sch003
Inorganics 10 00129 sch004 550
Scheme 4. The synthesis of complexes 4 and 5.
Scheme 4. The synthesis of complexes 4 and 5.
Inorganics 10 00129 sch004
Inorganics 10 00129 g005 550
Figure 5. The molecular structure of one of the two full molecules of complex 1 present in the unit cell. Symmetry transformations (#) used to generate equivalent atoms; #: −X, −Y, 1−Z. Thermal ellipsoids are shown at 50% probability. Hydrogen atoms have been omitted for clarity.
Figure 5. The molecular structure of one of the two full molecules of complex 1 present in the unit cell. Symmetry transformations (#) used to generate equivalent atoms; #: −X, −Y, 1−Z. Thermal ellipsoids are shown at 50% probability. Hydrogen atoms have been omitted for clarity.
Inorganics 10 00129 g005
Inorganics 10 00129 g006 550
Figure 6. The solid-state molecular structure of complex 2. Symmetry transformations (#) used to generate equivalent atoms; #: 3/2−X, Y, 1−Z. Thermal ellipsoids are shown at 50% probability. Hydrogen atoms have been omitted for clarity.
Figure 6. The solid-state molecular structure of complex 2. Symmetry transformations (#) used to generate equivalent atoms; #: 3/2−X, Y, 1−Z. Thermal ellipsoids are shown at 50% probability. Hydrogen atoms have been omitted for clarity.
Inorganics 10 00129 g006
Inorganics 10 00129 sch005 550
Scheme 5. Schematic drawing showing the coordination of the {hp} ligand in complex 1.
Scheme 5. Schematic drawing showing the coordination of the {hp} ligand in complex 1.
Inorganics 10 00129 sch005
Inorganics 10 00129 sch006 550
Scheme 6. Schematic drawing showing the coordination of the {hp} ligands in complex 2.
Scheme 6. Schematic drawing showing the coordination of the {hp} ligands in complex 2.
Inorganics 10 00129 sch006
Inorganics 10 00129 g007 550
Figure 7. The molecular structure of 4 (a,c) and 5 (b,d). Thermal ellipsoids are shown at 50% probability. H-atoms are omitted for clarity. Solvent of crystallization (toluene) in 5 is omitted for clarity. Symmetry transformations used to generate equivalent atoms: #1 3/2−X, Y, 1−Z.
Figure 7. The molecular structure of 4 (a,c) and 5 (b,d). Thermal ellipsoids are shown at 50% probability. H-atoms are omitted for clarity. Solvent of crystallization (toluene) in 5 is omitted for clarity. Symmetry transformations used to generate equivalent atoms: #1 3/2−X, Y, 1−Z.
Inorganics 10 00129 g007
Inorganics 10 00129 g008 550
Figure 8. A representation of the H-Bonding and π-π stacking observed in the solid-state structure of 5. Bond lengths: H(4)-(1)cent = 2.658(12) Å and H(6)-(2)cent = 3.227(12) Å. Inter-plane distance: {C(1)-N(1)}/{C(1)#-CN(1)#} = 3.687(12) Å. Symmetry transformations used to generate equivalent atoms: #1: X−1, 1+Y, -Z; $#: X−1, 1+Y, Z;”# X−1, 1+Y, Z.
Figure 8. A representation of the H-Bonding and π-π stacking observed in the solid-state structure of 5. Bond lengths: H(4)-(1)cent = 2.658(12) Å and H(6)-(2)cent = 3.227(12) Å. Inter-plane distance: {C(1)-N(1)}/{C(1)#-CN(1)#} = 3.687(12) Å. Symmetry transformations used to generate equivalent atoms: #1: X−1, 1+Y, -Z; $#: X−1, 1+Y, Z;”# X−1, 1+Y, Z.
Inorganics 10 00129 g008
Table
Table 1. Experimentally determined (1H DOSY NMR) diffusion coefficients (D), calculated Hydrodynamic radii (RHyd-cal) and calculated Molecular volume (Vcal) of 2 at temperatures between 298–348 K.
Table 1. Experimentally determined (1H DOSY NMR) diffusion coefficients (D), calculated Hydrodynamic radii (RHyd-cal) and calculated Molecular volume (Vcal) of 2 at temperatures between 298–348 K.
Temp (K)D (m2s−1)RHyd-cal (Å)Vcal (Å3)
2987.974 × 10−104.93503
3089.416 × 10−104.85477
3181.116 × 10−94.70436
3281.310 × 10−94.57400
3381.538 × 10−94.41360
3481.750 × 10−94.37350
Table
Table 2. Selected bond lengths (Å) and bond angles (°) for complex 1. Symmetry-generated atoms are marked with (#).
Table 2. Selected bond lengths (Å) and bond angles (°) for complex 1. Symmetry-generated atoms are marked with (#).
Selected Bond Lengths (Å)Selected Bond Angles (°)
Sn(1)-N(1)2.1009(16)N(1)-Sn(1)-N(2)#90.30(7)
Sn(2)-N(3)2.1064(16)N(1)-Sn(1)-O(1)93.36(6)
O(1)-Sn(1)-N(2)#90.72(6)
Sn(1)-O(1)2.1491(14)
Sn(2)-O(2)2.1434(15)N(3)-Sn(2)-N(4)#90.08(7)
N(3)-Sn(2)-O(2)92.91(6)
Sn(1)-N(2)2.2751(19)O(2)-Sn(2)-N(4)#92.46(6)
Sn(2)-N(4)2.2590(19)
C(1)-O(1)1.302(3)O(1)-C(1)-N(2)116.7(2)
C(1)-N(2)1.355(3)O(2)-C(21)-N(4)116.6(2)
C(21)-O(2)1.302(3)
C(21)-N(4)1.351(3)O(1)-C(1)-N(2)-Sn(1)#3.2(2)
O(2)-C(21)-N(4)-Sn(2)#3.0(2)
Table
Table 3. Selected bond lengths (Å) and bond angles (°) for complex 2. Symmetry-generated atoms are marked with (#).
Table 3. Selected bond lengths (Å) and bond angles (°) for complex 2. Symmetry-generated atoms are marked with (#).
Selected Bond Lengths (Å)Selected Bond Angles (°)
Sn(1)-O(1)2.135(3)N(2)-Sn(1)-N(3)86.64(13)
Sn(1)-N(2)2.239(4)O(1)-Sn(1)-N(2)87.04(14)
Sn(1)-N(3)2.337(4)O(1)-Sn(1)-N(3)79.58(13)
Sn(2)-O(2)2.370(3)O(2)-Sn(2)-O(4)157.89(13)
Sn(2)-O(3)2.142(3)O(3)-Sn(2)-N(4)#83.40(14)
Sn(2)-O(4)2.263(3)O(2)-Sn(2)-O(3)78.57(12)
Sn(2)-N(4)#2.230(4)O(2)-Sn(2)-N(4)#78.58(13)
O(3)-Sn(2)-O(4)86.85(12)
O(1)-C(1)1.322(5)O(4)-Sn(2)-N(4)#83.35(12)
C(1)-N(1)1.333(6)O(1)-C(1)-N(1)116.5(4)
O(2)-C(21)1.289(6)O(2)-C(21)-N(2)116.1(4)
C(21)-N(2)1.357(6)O(3)-C(31)-N(3)116.6(4)
O(3)-C(31)1.310(6)O(4)-C(41)-N(4)116.4(4)
C(31)-N(3)1.347(6)Sn(1)-O(1)-C(1)-N(1)6.8(5)
O(4)-C(41)1.297(6)Sn(1)-N(2)-C(21)-O(2)0.6(5)
C(41)-N(4)1.348(6)Sn(1)-N(3)-C(31)-O(3)2.3(5)
Sn(2)#-N(4)-C(41)-O(4)0.4(4)
Table
Table 4. Selected bond lengths (Å) and bond angles (°) for complexes 4 and 5.
Table 4. Selected bond lengths (Å) and bond angles (°) for complexes 4 and 5.
45
Selected Bond Lengths (Å)
Sn(1)-O(1)2.0985(17)Sn(1)-O(1)
Sn(1)-O(2)		2.0824(15)
2.0779(17)
Sn(1)-N(1)2.4014(19)Sn(1)-N(1)
Sn(1)-N(2)		2.4140(19)
2.4289(19)
O(1)-C(1)1.326(3)O(1)-C(1)
O(2)-C(21)		1.328(3)
1.326(3)
Selected bond angles (°) 1
N(1)-Sn(1)-N(1)#138.54(9)N(1)-Sn(1)-N(2)141.52(7)
O(1)-Sn(1)-O(1)#98.23(10)O(1)-Sn(1)-O(2)97.33(7)
1 # denotes symmetry generated atom (#: 3/2−X, Y, 1−Z).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sullivan, H.S.I.; Straiton, A.J.; Kociok-Köhn, G.; Johnson, A.L. N-O Ligand Supported Stannylenes: Preparation, Crystal, and Molecular Structures. Inorganics 2022, 10, 129. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics10090129

AMA Style

Sullivan HSI, Straiton AJ, Kociok-Köhn G, Johnson AL. N-O Ligand Supported Stannylenes: Preparation, Crystal, and Molecular Structures. Inorganics. 2022; 10(9):129. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics10090129

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sullivan, Hannah S. I., Andrew J. Straiton, Gabriele Kociok-Köhn, and Andrew L. Johnson. 2022. "N-O Ligand Supported Stannylenes: Preparation, Crystal, and Molecular Structures" Inorganics 10, no. 9: 129. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics10090129

APA Style

Sullivan, H. S. I., Straiton, A. J., Kociok-Köhn, G., & Johnson, A. L. (2022). N-O Ligand Supported Stannylenes: Preparation, Crystal, and Molecular Structures. Inorganics, 10(9), 129. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics10090129

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop