Self-Assembled Monolayers of Molybdenum Sulfide Clusters on Au Electrode as Hydrogen Evolution Catalyst for Solar Water Splitting

Abstract

Hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) activities of self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) of [Mo₃S₇(S₂CNMe₂)₃] and several other MoS_x molecular clusters are presented on planer Au electrode. Our study suggests that such Mo-S clusters are unstable under HER reaction conditions of a strongly acidic electrolyte. The [Mo₃S₇(S₂CNEt₂)₃]I monolayer prepared from DMF showed greater stability among all the studied precursors. The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis on a monolayer of [Mo₃S₇(S₂CNMe₂)₃]I in THF assembled on Au/ITO suggested sulfur-rich composition with S:Mo ratio of 2.278. The Mo-S monolayer clusters resulting from [Mo₃S₇(S₂CNMe₂)₃]I in THF showed a Tafel slope of 75.74 mV dec⁻¹ and required a lower overpotential of 410 mV to reach a high HER catalytic current density of 100 mA cm⁻² compared to the other studied precursors. Surface coverage of the Mo-S clusters on the Au surface was confirmed by cyclic voltammetry (CV) curves from K₃Fe(CN)₆ and anodization of Au surface. Further, the rotating ring-disk electrode (RRDE) measurements were performed for the monolayer of [Mo₃S₇(S₂CNMe₂)₃]I prepared in THF to study its reaction kinetics. The HER catalytic activity of such monolayer Mo-S clusters can further be improved by controlling the sulfur vacancy.

1. Introduction

Due to the adverse environmental effects of fossil fuels and their rapid decrease in availability, there is a growing demand for developing new clean and renewable energy resources. Solar power could be a viable solution to this problem, as it is a readily available and abundant source of renewable energy [1]. One of the popular methods among various emerging power conversion technologies is photoelectrochemical (PEC) water splitting that utilizes solar energy alongside electrochemistry to split water to produce hydrogen-based fuels in solar-to-fuel devices [2]. PEC water splitting involves the following necessary steps: (1) absorption at the photocatalyst such that the photon energy absorbed is more than the band gap energy of the photocatalyst; (2) generation of photo-excited electron–hole pairs; (3) separation of these charges across the surface of the photocatalyst without recombination; and (4) reduction and oxidation of water by the photogenerated electrons and holes to produce H₂ and O₂ [3]. The first three steps are primarily dependent on the structural and electronic properties of the photocatalyst, whereas the co-catalyst drives the last step. PEC water splitting can be challenging due to the need of thermodynamic potential of −1.23 V vs. RHE at least for the reaction to occur as well as the requirements for an efficient photocatalyst. Some of these requirements include a suitable band gap that lies within 1.6–2.5 eV, band edge position that lies between the redox potentials of H₂O, a charge transfer rate fast enough to prevent photocorrosion and shifting of the band edges. The photocatalyst must also be stable, nontoxic, and abundantly available [3]. Most popular and widely employed photocatalysts in solar-to-fuel devices include semiconductors such as TiO₂ and ZnO. However, these semiconductors have a higher band gap, which limits the amount of actual sunlight they can utilize and convert to energy. TiO₂, for example, has a band gap of 3.0–3.2 eV, which requires UV light to operate. Solar light consists of 5% UV, 43% visible, and 52% infrared light [4]. Therefore, developing a new photocatalyst that exhibits higher activity when exposed to visible light is preferable. However, it is difficult to have such photocatalysts. The semiconductors that are visible-light active are either less catalytic or prone to stability issues. On the other hand, some materials/organic compounds are highly catalytic but do not contribute much under visible-light. Noble metal nanoparticles (NPs) have the potential to address this issue; for instance, Au NPs show high optical absorption in the visible region (500–600 nm) [4,5]. The approach is to synergistically improve the water splitting performance by combining the visible-light-absorbing and highly catalytic materials. Platinum is the best-known electrocatalyst for the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER). However, its scarcity and enormous cost make it a poor choice for use in solar-to-hydrogen devices. Therefore, developing low-cost and Earth-abundant catalysts with a performance comparable to that of Pt-group metals is crucial [6]. Some examples of Earth-abundant HER electrocatalyst include transition metal-based sulfides (e.g., MoS₂ [7], CoS₂ [8], and WS₂ [9]), selenides (e.g., MoSe₂ [10]_, NiSe₂ [11], and CoSe₂ [12]), phosphides (e.g., Ni₂P [13] and FeP [14]), carbides (e.g., Ni/C [15] and MoC [16]), and molecular organic catalysts (e.g., cobalt and nickel diimine-dioxime complexes [17] and ligand-centered homogeneous electrocatalysts [18]). Recently, monolayers of metal chalcogenide-based molecular catalysts are gaining interest due to their structural tunability and low-cost production [19,20].

Molybdenum sulfide (MoS₂) is one such promising candidate, which has the potential to replace precious metal catalysts for sustainable development towards hydrogen generation. MoS₂ is a renowned HER catalyst, known for its excellent ability to absorb hydrogen and activate it for the reduction of organo-sulfur and organo-nitrogen molecules in the hydrotreating of crude petroleum. Several forms of molybdenum sulfide such as amorphous MoS_x [21,22], crystalline MoS₂ [23,24], sulfur-rich [25,26] or sulfur-deficient [27,28] MoS₂, and metal-promoted MoS₂ [29] have been synthesized on conducting substrates via simple solution-based chemical techniques that includes drop-casting, dip-coating, hydrothermal, and electrodeposition. Such HER electrocatalysts achieved a Tafel slope in the range of 39–95 mV dec⁻¹ and overpotential in the range of 150–300 mV at 10 mA cm⁻² [30].

Various speculations about the origin of the catalytic ability of MoS₂ have been reported in the literature ranging from edge site configuration to sulfur vacancy, to the assembled structure of MoS₂ [4,31,32]. Regarding sulfur vacancy, it was observed that a vacancy density of 7–10% could drastically shift the onset potential to more positive potentials [32]. A variety of studies have been conducted in trying to maximize the catalytic ability of MoS₂ by changing the concentration, the method of MoS₂ deposition, the number of layers deposited, and the semiconductor material [4,24]. A few of these studies have chosen to study as-grown MoS₂, which requires several days to synthesize the as-grown MoS₂ [31,33]. Our team recently demonstrated a simple method of coating catalytic MoS₂ layer onto Cu₂O photocathode to enhance its stability and hydrogen evolution reaction under sunlight illumination [24]. MoS₂ coating on top of Cu₂O has been achieved by spin coating appropriate amount of [Mo₃S₇(S₂CNEt₂)₃]I precursor solution combined with a thermal annealing process to obtain the optimal stoichiometry. MoS₂ thin films synthesized using this method exhibited good prospects as both a protective layer and an electrocatalyst for hydrogen evolution reactions (HER) due to excellent stability and high electrocatalytic activity, as shown in Figure 1. Through this work, we demonstrated a sustained proton reduction performance from Cu₂O photocathode using ~40 nm thick coating of MoS₂, which was prepared by spin-coating three layers of 2.5 mM MoS₂ precursor solution on the Cu₂O surface. Although the enhanced catalytic performance for HER from two-dimensional (2D) MoS₂ has been widely reported in the literature, the role of monolayer MoS₂ is still not well understood. Few reports on monolayer MoS₂ have been concentrated on investigating their electrochemical and kinetic properties using CV, XPS, and RRDE techniques, and Tafel slope measurements to understand the HER mechanisms.

Here, we propose using Au instead of Cu₂O due to the Au–S bond being relatively strong and easy to assemble the MoS_x. Assembling MoS_x monolayers on Au should increase the rate of interfacial charge transfer because the increased number of terminal S-atoms on MoS_x precursor derivatives act as active sites for proton reduction [34,35]. Here, we self-assembled the monolayers of MoS_x on to Au from different MoS_x precursor derivatives using immersion, spin-coating, drop-casting and air-drying techniques in an attempt to explore the role of monolayer MoS_x through CV and RRDE measurements and Tafel slope calculations.

2. Results and Discussion

Prior to studying their monolayer performances for proton reduction reaction, we previously demonstrated the proton reduction characteristics of thin films resulting from [Mo₃S₇(S₂CNMe₂)₃]I precursor and a few other precursor derivatives such as Mo₃S₇(S₂CNEt₂)₃I, Mo₃S₄(S₂CNEt₂)₄, (NH₄)₂[Mo₃S₁₃], and (NBu₄)₂[Mo₃S₁₃]. These precursors were spin-coated onto the conducting FTO glass substrates using organic solvents such as THF, DMF, or CH₂Cl₂ to obtain catalytic films on FTO. Owing to their limited adherence and stability on FTO, the spin-coated films were annealed at 450 °C for 1 h in a N₂ environment to obtain crystalline MoS₂. The proton reduction HER curves for all the derivatives are shown in Figure 2.

The MoS₂ film obtained from [Mo₃S₇(S₂CNMe₂)₃]I in THF exhibited the most promising HER activity. All other films obtained by the post-annealing treatment showed more or less enhanced HER activities than the bare FTO substrate. The major issues with this thin film study are that intrinsic molecular catalytic activities are missing. Therefore, there is a need to prepare self-assembled monolayers (Figure 3) of these molecular precursors on a conductive surface such as gold to learn their proton reduction kinetics.

The benefits of using a monolayer configuration instead of thin films of the Mo-S molecular clusters include: (1) short charge transfer distance for catalyzing proton reduction; (2) intrinsic catalytic characteristics are more likely to be retained than the results shown in Figure 2; and (3) there is no mass transfer effect of molecular catalysts for proton reduction reaction in such heterogeneous system in comparison to that of a homogenous molecular catalysis system for proton reduction.

An XPS study was performed on the 1 × 1 cm² ITO coated with Au and the most stable MoS_x precursor, [Mo₃S₇(S₂CNEt₂)₃]I in DMF, to determine the chemical composition of the Mo-S layer. Figure 4A shows the survey spectrum of [Mo₃S₇(S₂CNEt₂)₃]I precursor assembled on Au-coated ITO surface. The quantitative analysis of the survey spectrum (inset of Figure 4A) revealed the presence of Mo at 30.51% and sulfur at 69.49%. The actual sulfur-to-molybdenum ratio (S:Mo) obtained from XPS study is ca. 2.278 (69.49:30.51), indicating the formation of sulfur-rich MoS_x monolayer complex on the Au surface. Figure 4A also indicates the presence of nitrogen, carbon, and iodine, all of which are present in the precursor derivative. Figure 4B depicts the deconvoluted high-resolution XPS spectra of Mo 3d, S 2p, and C 1s lines. The two peaks at 229.5 eV and 232.7 eV can be attributed to the doublet Mo 3d_5/2 and Mo 3d_3/2, respectively, while the broad peak at 226.9 eV can be identified as S 2p [31]. The peaks located at 163.7 and 162.5 eV can be ascribed to the S 2p_1/2 and S 2p_3/2 peaks, respectively. These results are consistent with other reported results for non-stoichiometric MoS₂, indicating that the other elements present are impurities rather than the precursor staying intact and being entirely deposited onto the Au surface [36]. For XPS measurement, the substrate was annealed with nitrogen in an attempt to determine whether the entire precursor remained intact and was deposited onto the Au surface or if the nitrogen and iodine are impurities. The source of the Ag impurity is unknown but suspected to arise from an impurity in the potassium aurocyanide used to deposit the thin film of Au on to ITO.

To examine the surface coverage of MoS_x from [Mo₃S₇(S₂CNMe₂)₃]I in THF, the precursor was deposited onto the Au-disc electrode and run in a solution of 0.1 mM K₃Fe(CN)₆ in 1 M KNO₃ at different scan rates. Figure 5 shows the CVs at different scan rates revealing the reduction of electroactive species (ferricyanide to ferrocyanide) in the K₃Fe(CN)₆ electrolyte and subsequent oxidation at the surface of Au-disc electrode, before and after modification with the Mo-S clusters, where the current density increases as the scan rate increases.

For 100% surface coverage, it is expected that the oxidation and reduction peaks would disappear, assuming that K₃Fe(CN)₆ does not reduce or oxidize at the surface of the MoS_x monolayer. Thus, since the “before” and “after” CV profiles look relatively similar, inadequate surface coverage is expected.

To determine the electrochemically active surface area before and after the coating of MoS_x, the anodic (or cathodic) peak currents in Figure 5A,B are plotted against the square root of scan rate (ν) in Figure 6A,B. The linear dependence of I_pa against ν^−1/2 plot means that the electrode reaction is diffusion-controlled. This type of plot is derived from the Randles–Sevcik equation,

I_p = 2.69 × 10⁵ × A_ESCA × n^3/2D^1/2Cν^1/2

(1)

where, I_p is the peak current (anodic or cathodic), A_ESCA is the electrochemically active surface area, D^1/2 is the diffusion constant for the electrolyte (D = 6.20 × 10⁻⁶ cm² s⁻¹ for K₃Fe(CN)₆), n is the number of electrons transferred (n = 1 for [Fe(CN)₆]^3−/4−), ν is the scan rate, and C is the concentration of the electrolyte [37]. Using the slope in Figure 6, the Randles–Sevcik equation can be rewritten as follows:

$$A_{ESCA}=\frac{Slope\left(I_{p}vs.v^{1/2}\right)}{2.69\times {10}^5\times n^{3/2}\times D^{1/2}\times C}$$

(2)

The change in the electrochemically active surface area (ΔA_ESCA) was calculated to be 3.4 × 10⁻⁵ cm². The percentage of MoS_x coverage can also be calculated from the electrochemically active surface area using the area calculated using both the anodic and cathodic peak currents before and after Mo-S cluster modification, with the percent coverage of ca. 4.7%. This calculation may not be completely accurate, as it assumes that the K₃Fe(CN)₆ cannot be reduced or oxidized at the surface of the MoS_x monolayer. However, this is not the case when sufficient overpotential is supplied to overcome the potential barrier of the Mo-S molecular clusters self-assembled onto the Au surface.

Then, the polarization curves of a bare Au/ITO electrode and the MoS_x/Au/ITO electrodes prepared by dip-coating (overnight immersion) and spin-coating methods were recorded and analyzed. Figure 7 shows the CV curves of bare Au/ITO and MoS_x-coated Au/ITO electrodes recorded at the scan rate of 50 mV s⁻¹ from 0.5 M H₂SO₄. All the Au/ITO electrodes underwent oxidation except the one that was immersed overnight in the Mo-S precursor solution. There seems to be little change in the current density for the electrodes. This could be because the electrode is rich in sulfur, as indicated by the XPS quantitative data. Because sulfur vacancy has been reported to influence the catalytic activity, it is fair to conclude that sulfur-rich MoS_x on Au/ITO electrode could be hindering its catalytic ability to be an efficient HER catalyst.

The surface coverage of the MoS_x monolayer was calculated for the immersed substrate for comparison to the data calculated from scan-rate dependent CV studies using potassium ferricyanide. The immersed MoS_x/Au/ITO electrode was used as it is not prone to Au oxidation, indicating that it may have adequate surface coverage. To calculate the surface coverage of MoS_x, the oxidation peaks for bare Au/ITO and the one dipped overnight were integrated, yielding a surface coverage of 64.4%.

To gain insight as to which MoS_x precursor derivative would produce the best HER electrocatalytic activity, CVs were recorded on each of the Au disc electrodes immersed overnight in different MoS_x precursor solutions. Figure 8A indicates that (NBu₄)₂[Mo₃S₁₃] in DMF has the highest current density and the [Mo₃S₇(S₂CNEt₂)₃]I in DMF has the lowest onset potential, which is the minimum potential required for initiation of the catalytic reaction. Repeated CV scans were recorded for each precursor derivative. It is observed that the current density decreased with each scan for each precursor derivative, except for [Mo₃S₇(S₂CNEt₂)₃]I in DMF. This observation indicates that most of the MoS_x derivatives were unstable under these conditions.

To better understand the HER kinetics of the MoS₂-modified Au disc electrode, the polarization curves in Figure 8A are plotted in Figure 8B as overpotential (η) versus the logarithm of current density (J). This type of plot is known as a Tafel plot. The linear portion near the onset of current is fit to the Tafel equation η = b logJ/J₀, where J is the current density, J₀ is the exchange current density, and b is the Tafel slope. The Tafel slope is regarded as a measure of catalytic ability. A lower Tafel slope is optimal for Pt-group electrode, which is the best HER catalyst having a Tafel slope of 30 mV dec⁻¹. The MoS_x precursor that was the most stable Au, i.e., [Mo₃S₇(S₂CNEt₂)₃]I in DMF, has the highest Tafel slope of 185.26 mV dec⁻¹, indicating that it is not a suitable HER catalyst.

The HER activity of a catalyst in acidic electrolyte generally follows one of two reactions pathways—the Volmer–Tafel or the Volmer–Heyrovsky mechanism—to reduce the protons (H⁺) to hydrogen (H₂). These mechanisms proceed through three reaction steps decided by the Tafel slopes. The rate-limiting steps can be [24]:

(i)

Electrochemical hydrogen adsorption, H₃O⁺ + e⁻ → H_ads + H₂O (Tafel slope: 120 mV dec⁻¹)

(ii)

Electrochemical desorption, H_ads + H₃O⁺ + e⁻ → H₂ + H₂O (Tafel slope: 40–120 mV dec⁻¹)

(iii)

Chemical desorption, H_ads + H_ads → H₂ (Tafel slope: 30–40 mV dec⁻¹)

The precursor [Mo₃S₇(S₂CNMe₂)₃]I in THF is thus far the best candidate for HER among all the studied precursors because of its optimal properties in terms of Tafel slope and overpotential. MoS_x resulting from this precursor exhibits a low Tafel slope of 75.74 mV dec⁻¹ and requires the low overpotentials of 331 mV and 410 mV to fetch the HER current densities of 10 and 100 mA cm⁻², respectively. From the Tafel slope, we can infer that the MoS_x monolayer formed using [Mo₃S₇(S₂CNMe₂)₃]I in THF follows the Volmer–Tafel mechanism. All these Mo-S clusters are interesting HER catalysts in homogenous solution because of the facile loss of sulfur from the bridging disulfide (S₂²⁻) ligands and favorable interaction with protons to facilitate proton reduction upon charge interaction. For example, our study with [Mo₃S₇(S₂CNⁱBu₂)₃]I suggested superior high turnover frequency of several hundred in several hours during homogeneous photolysis experiments because of its good solubility and favorable HER activities. The difference in the HER activities of these self-assembled derivatives might be associated with the surface coverage and bonding orientation on the Au electrode surface.

To further study the kinetics of this particular precursor, a RRDE study was conducted using glassy carbon (GC) disc electrode. Figure 9 shows the current density responses obtained from MoS_x coated-GC electrode. Protons are reduced on the GC electrode (with or without Au and MoS_x coating) resulting in H₂ molecules. The disc current density was higher, and the onset potential was lower for the MoS_x-coated GC and Au/GC electrodes suggesting that [Mo₃S₇(S₂CNMe₂)₃]I self-assembled onto the Au surface is a promising HER catalyst. More work is needed to further understand the stability of such MoS_x monolayers and the structural defects through spectroscopy and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy techniques.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials

Potassium ferricyanide (K₃Fe(CN)₆, 99%, Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA), potassium aurocyanide (KAu(CN)₂, Orotemp 24, Technic, Cranston, RI, USA), acetone, ethanol, tetrahydrofuran (THF), hydrosulfuric acid (H₂SO₄, 18.4 M), nitric acid (KNO₃, 15.6 M) and dimethylformamide (DMF) were used as-received without further purification. Commercially available transparent and conducting indium-doped tin oxide (ITO 15–20 Ω cm⁻²)-coated glass substrates were used for thin film deposition of Mo-S precursors. The syntheses of (NBu₄)₂[Mo₃S₁₃], [Mo₃S₇(S₂CNMe₂)₃]I, (NH₄)₂[Mo₃S₁₃], [Mo₃S₇(S₂CNEt₂)₃]I, [Mo₃S₇(S₂CNⁱBu₂)₃]I, and [Mo₃S₇(S₂CNⁱBu₂)₃]PF₆ were detailed in our previous published work [24].

3.2. Preparation and Assembling of Monolayer on Au-Disc Electrode

The Au-disc electrode (area = 0.0314 cm²) was polished using 0.3 μm Al₂O₃, then 50 nm Al₂O₃, and finally 0.3 μm Al₂O₃ polish for 5 min each, moving the electrode in a figure eight motion. The electrode was sonicated in deionized (DI) water for 1 min and then dried under nitrogen steam between each polish and at the end before immersing the electrode in the solution. The MoS_x precursor solutions were all 0.1 mM in 10 mL of their respective solvents, which were prepared by dilution from a freshly prepared 1 mM stock solution. All solutions were sonicated for 10 min to ensure the precursor was completely dissolved. The Au-disc electrode was immersed such that it remained suspended in the Mo-S precursor solution overnight.

3.3. Preparation and Assembling of Monolayer on Au/ITO Electrode

ITO strips were cut into 1 × 2 cm² (or 1.5 × 2.5 cm² for spin coating) strips and then subsequently cleaned using detergent, DI water, acetone, and ethyl alcohol and DI water, each for 10 min in an ultrasonic bath, and finally dried under a nitrogen stream. A thin film of Au was deposited onto the surface of ITO using CV technique in a three-electrode configuration using ITO as the working electrode, graphite as the counter electrode, and silver/silver chloride (Ag/AgCl sat. KCl) as the reference electrode from KAu(CN)₂ electrolyte. The CV was scanned from 0 to −1.5 for 1 cycle at the scan rate of 50 mV s⁻¹. The Au-coated ITO electrodes were immediately washed in DI water and dried with air. Two Au/ITO substrates (size 1 × 2 cm) were immersed overnight in a 0.1 mM solution of [Mo₃S₇(S₂CNEt₂)₃]I in DMF. One substrate was cut down to 1 × 1 cm² for X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The Au/ITO substrate (size 1.5 × 2.5 cm²) was immersed overnight in a 0.1 mM solution of [Mo₃S₇(S₂CNMe₂)₃]I in THF. Two Au/ITO substrate (size 1.5 × 2.5 cm²) were cut down to 1.5 × 1.5 cm² for spin coating. An 80 μL drop of 0.1 mM solution of [Mo₃S₇(S₂CNMe₂)₃]I in THF was dropped onto the Au/ITO substrate. One was prepared at 2000 rpm, and the other was prepared at 3000 rpm.

3.4. RRDE Study

The RRDE voltammograms were recorded on an RRDE with GC-Pt configuration (ALS Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) having two working electrodes such as glassy carbon (GC) disc (area = 0.5 cm²) and Pt ring electrode (area = 0.75 cm²). The RRDE was sonicated for 1 min in ethanol followed by sonication in DI water for 1 min and dried under a nitrogen stream. All measurements were performed in 0.5 M H₂SO₄ electrolyte at room temperature at the scan rate of 50 mV s⁻¹ using a three-electrode system consisting of the RRDE as the working electrode, silver/silver chloride (Ag/AgCl with sat. KCl) as the reference electrode and a platinum coil as the counter electrode. The rotational speed was varied from 0 to 6400 rpm by squares, and any bubbles on the surface of the working electrode were removed between each measurement. A layer of Au was deposited onto the surface of GC using the same method as depositing Au onto ITO. A layer of MoS_x was deposited onto the surface of GC (or Au/GC) by drop-casting and air drying a 5 µL drop of 0.1 mM [Mo₃S₇(S₂CNMe₂)₃]I in THF.

3.5. Proton Reduction Measurement

All polarization curves were performed using the following instruments unless otherwise indicated: an electrochemical workstation (CHI 760c, CH Instruments, Austin, TX, USA) and a three-electrode system with graphite or platinum coil as the counter electrode, silver/silver chloride (Ag/AgCl sat. KCl) as the reference electrode, and Au-disc electrode as the working electrode. The graphite was washed with DI water and dried with air, and the Ag/AgCl electrode was washed with DI water before recording the CV. The electrolyte used for the proton reduction measurements was 0.5 M H₂SO₄. The CV curves were scanned from open circuit potential (OCP) to −0.7 V vs. Ag/AgCl for 1 cycle at the scan rate of 100 mV s⁻¹. The MoS_x/Au/ITO electrodes prepared by overnight immersion and spin-coating methods using [Mo₃S₇(S₂CNMe₂)₃]I in THF were assembled in a three-arm electrochemical reactor with an electrolyte exposure area of 0.1807 cm². All the potential measurements were taken against the Ag/AgCl reference electrode and are reported versus the reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE) using the Nernst Equation below:

E_RHE = E_Reference + 0.059 × pH + E°_Reference

(3)

where E_RHE is the converted potential versus RHE, E_Reference is the potential measured versus the reference electrode (Ag/AgCl sat. KCl), and E°_Reference is the standard potential of the reference electrode (0.1916 V for Ag/AgCl at 25 °C). The CVs of the Au-disc electrodes, both bare and coated with [Mo₃S₇(S₂CNMe₂)₃]I in THF through immersion for surface coverage calculations were recorded in 1 mM K₃Fe(CN)₆ in 0.1 M KNO₃ at different scan rates such as 0.025, 0.05, 0.1, 0.25, and 0.5 V s⁻¹.

4. Conclusions

We successfully assembled the monolayer of MoS_x precursor clusters such as (NBu₄)₂[Mo₃S₁₃], [Mo₃S₇(S₂CNMe₂)₃]I, (NH₄)₂[Mo₃S₁₃], [Mo₃S₇(S₂CNEt₂)₃]I, [Mo₃S₇(S₂CNⁱBu₂)₃]I, and [Mo₃S₇(S₂CNⁱBu₂)₃]PF₆. XPS study of MoS_x monolayer assembled on Au using [Mo₃S₇(S₂CNMe₂)₃]I in THF showed sulfur-rich Mo-S clusters with Mo at 30.51% and sulfur at 69.49%. The catalytic activity of MoS_x monolayer is hindered by sulfur-rich clusters, which could be improved by the creation of sulfur vacancies. By comparing various MoS_x precursors, we were able to identify the most catalytically active precursor to be [Mo₃S₇(S₂CNMe₂)₃]I in THF, as it has the optimal properties of having a relatively low Tafel slope of 75.74 mV dec⁻¹ and requiring a lower overpotential of 410 mV to reach a high current density of 100 mA cm⁻² compared to the other studied precursors. The electrochemically active surface area of MoS_x monomer obtained using this particular precursor was calculated using two different ways with drastically different results, those being 4.7% from the ferricyanide study and 64.4% from the spin coating study. The reason for these different results could be due to assuming that ferricyanide does do not reduce at the surface of MoS_x monolayer, which may have been inaccurate. Thus, it is assumed that 64.4% of surface coverage is a more probable result, as is evident by higher catalytic current density.