Characterization and Photophysical Properties of a Luminescent Aluminum Hydride Complex Supported by a β-Diketiminate Ligand

Abstract

Aluminum hydrides are versatile compounds utilized as reducing agents, precursors of aluminum complexes, and as catalysts for polymerization reactions. However, their photophysical properties have been overlooked, although several luminescent aluminum complexes have been utilized conventionally for emitting layers in modern light-emitting devices. Herein, we report the synthesis and photophysical properties of a luminescent β-diketiminate dihydride complex through the reaction between lithium aluminum hydride and the corresponding ligand. The obtained compound exhibits crystallization-induced emission (CIE) properties at room temperature and long-lifetime phosphorescence at 80 K. Our experimental and theoretical investigations suggest that low-energy molecular vibration could play an important role in the realization of the CIE property.

1. Introduction

Organic and inorganic aluminum complexes have attracted a tremendous amount of attention as not only a catalyst for organic and polymerization reactions, but also as a luminescent material, owing to their specific reactivities, the abundance of aluminum in the earth’s crust, and their low environmental burden. Aluminum hydrides have been one of the most important reducing agents in organic chemistry, and some of the most important precursors of various types of complexes since Schlesinger et al. synthesized lithium aluminum hydride in 1947 [1,2]. Furthermore, a group of luminescent aluminum complexes has shed new light on the chemistry and physics of organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs) since tris(8-quinolinolato) aluminum (Alq₃) was applied to an emitting layer of light-emitting diodes [3,4,5]. Because of the superior electron-carrier ability and the luminescent properties, Alq₃ is currently known as the conventional material for constructing modern OLEDs. Most of these complexes, however, exhibit weaker emission intensity as solids than in dilute solutions, although most potential applications require efficient luminescence in the condensed state. The disappearance of the luminescence of the molecules is caused by intermolecular interaction in the condensed state. Indeed, there are still a limited number of stable aluminum complexes that exhibit sufficient emission properties [4]. Thus, it is essential to develop a new class of solid-state luminescent aluminum complexes.

β-Diketiminate ligands, also known as β-diiminate or “nacnac” ligands, have been utilized to construct a wide variety of unstable complexes containing main-group and transition metals. These complexes have been applied for diverse chemical reactions, e.g., activation of inert chemical bonds, catalytic hydroboration [6], and polymerization [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. In particular, since the monomeric β-diketiminate aluminum(I) complex was isolated in 2000 [17], the activation of a variety of inert chemical bonds have been established by using aluminum(I) complexes. Now, various kinds of four-coordinated aluminum(III) complexes have been obtained by the bond-activation method [18,19,20,21]. However, the optical and electronic properties of these complexes have been ignored, probably because they exhibit a slight absorption band in the visible region due to the limited π-conjugation length of the β-diketiminate ligands.

Recently, solid-state emissive β-diketiminate complexes composed of four-coordinate group 13 elements, boron and gallium, have been reported [22,23,24,25,26,27,28]. It has been clarified that the extension of the π-conjugated system involving β-diketiminate ligands makes the corresponding complexes luminescent in the visible region. Most importantly, these complexes emit weakly in dilute solution. Meanwhile, they present efficient emission in solids. Furthermore, their emission quantum yields are higher in the crystalline state than in the amorphous state. These enhancement behaviors by aggregation and by crystallization are called aggregation-induced emission (AIE) and crystallization-induced emission (CIE), respectively. These luminescent characteristics have been paid much attention because of their potential application in the field of OLEDs, fluorescent sensors, bioimaging, and lasers [29,30,31,32]. The bulky peripheral aromatic substituents in these molecules consume the excited energy via molecular vibration in the solution. In contrast, the aggregation and the crystallization restrict the intramolecular vibration, and the hindered groups expel the intermolecular interactions, which lead to severe concentration quenching in the condensed state for typical luminescent molecules [30]. As a result, intense solid-state emission is obtained from these systems. Furthermore, it has been found that the luminescence intensity and colors are able to be varied with high sensitivity toward environmental changes by modulating the degree of molecular motions and morphology [33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40]. Thus, these complexes are expected to be a promising scaffold for developing stimulus-responsive optical materials, as well as solid-state luminescent dyes.

Based on the information and the enormous potential of aluminum complexes, we introduced the aluminum complexes into the chemistry of the AIE and CIE properties. We envisioned that π-extended β-diketiminate ligands could serve as a scaffold for obtaining efficient solid-state emission properties from complexes containing aluminum atoms. In order to achieve this aim, we designed and synthesized a β-diketiminate aluminum dihydride composed of a bulky and π-extended ligand. Herein, it is demonstrated that the synthesized complex exhibited a CIE property at room temperature. Moreover, this compound showed long-lifetime phosphorescence at 80 K, despite the absence of heavy atoms in the molecular structure. This is the first report on the luminescent aluminum dihydride complex. Our experimental and theoretical investigation suggest that intramolecular vibrational modes of the complex might be one of the key factors responsible for the nonradiative decay process in the solution state.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Synthesis and Characterization

According to the earlier study [41], with a minor modification, the aluminum dihydride complex LAlH was prepared by the reaction of the β-diketiminate ligand [42] and an excess amount of lithium aluminum hydride in toluene at 90 °C (Scheme 1). From the results of the ¹H NMR measurements, the ligand was completely consumed in 16 h. After recrystallization, compound LAlH was fully characterized by ¹H, ¹³C{¹H} and ²⁷Al{¹H} NMR spectroscopy and high-resolution mass spectrometry with the DART (Direct Analysis in Real-Time) method. The ¹H NMR spectrum showed the broad resonance at 4.74 ppm attributed to AlH [43]. Such peak broadening should be due to the quadrupolar feature of ²⁷Al (I = 5/2). In the ²⁷Al{¹H} NMR, the broad peak was observed at around 65 ppm, which is the characteristic value for four-coordinated aluminum nuclei [44] and is similar to that of the related β-diketiminate aluminum hydride complex [41]. The complex is storable under an inert atmosphere in both C₆D₆ solution and crystalline states at room temperature without any decomposition.

The molecular structure of LAlH was determined by single-crystal X-ray analysis. The bright yellow crystals of LAlH suitable for the analysis were grown from the mixed solvent of toluene and hexane by cooling from 25 to 10 °C. The compound crystallized in the orthorhombic space group Pbca (CCDC number: 1946518). The asymmetric unit consists of one crystallographically independent molecule, and its structure and the structural parameters are shown in Figure 1a and

Table 1. Selected structural parameters of LAlH in the single crystal.

Distances
Atom1	Atom2		Length/Å
Al1	N1		1.898(1)
Al1	N2		1.899(1)
N1	C1		1.339(2)
N2	C3		1.334(2)
C1	C2		1.405(2)
C2	C3		1.410(2)
Angles
Atom1	Atom2	Atom3	Angle/deg
N1	Al1	N2	96.84(5)
Al1	N1	C1	121.98(8)
Al1	N2	C3	121.01(8)
N1	C1	C2	122.3(1)
N2	C3	C2	122.5(1)
C1	C2	C3	127.9(1)
Dihedral Angles
Plane1 a	Plane2 b		Dihedral Angle/deg
C3N2	AlN2		23.95
C3N2	C4–9		40.29
C3N2	C10–15		45.99
C3N2	C16–21		81.48
C3N2	C22–27		69.84

^a C₃N₂ plane consists of N1, C1, C2, C3, and N2 atoms. ^b AlN₂ plane consists of Al1, N1 and N2 atoms.

. The single-crystal structure of the complex shows three structural features: (i) a planar C₃N₂ π-conjugated system, (ii) displaced coordination at the Al center, and (iii) a propeller-shaped ligand. Firstly, the C₃N₂ moiety of the central six-membered ring is nearly planar. As shown in Table 1, the CN and CC bond lengths are intermediate values between their normal single and double bond lengths. These facts indicate that delocalization of π-electrons along with the β-diketiminate moiety, which possesses the isoelectronic structure of the pentadienyl anion [45]. Secondly, the aluminum atom is displaced from the C₃N₂ plane, and a dihedral angle between the C₃N₂ and AlN₂ planes is 23.95°, probably because of the steric hindrance of the diisopropylphenyl and the phenyl groups. Such a distorted structure was not observed in the previously reported structures of β-diketiminate aluminum dihydrides [41,46,47], while similar distortion has frequently been observed in the sterically encumbered dihalogen, dialkyl, and other metal complexes [48]. On the other hand, the Al–N lengths and the N–Al–N coordination angles are within the natural values of the reported dihydride complexes [41,46,47]. Finally, it is worth noting that the dihedral angles between the C₃N₂ plane and the peripheral aromatic rings lie within the range 40.29°–81.48°. Such a propeller-like structure would prohibit the undesired intermolecular interactions that cause the concentration quenching of emission, e.g., π–π stacking and excimer formation [30]. Indeed, all chromophores seem to be distinctly isolated in the crystal structure (see Figure S4).

2.2. Photophysical Properties

LAlH showed clear crystallization-induced emission property. The crystals of LAlH exhibited bright bluish-green emission upon UV irradiation (365 nm) at room temperature, while its solution (2-methylpentane/toluene = 99/1; 1 × 10⁻⁵ M) showed no emission at the same temperature (Figure 1b). The crystallization probably restricts inter- and intramolecular motion and vibration, which nonradiatively consume the excited state energy of the molecules in the solution state at room temperature [22,23,25,26]. We provide a further explanation for this phenomenon in the following discussion.

To elucidate the photophysical characteristics of LAlH, the UV–Vis absorption spectrum of the solution and photoluminescence spectra of both the solution and the crystals were recorded (Figure 2a,

Table 2. Photophysical properties of LAlH at room temperature.

		λabs/nm a	εmax/104 M−1 cm−1 b	λem/nm c	ΦFLd	ΦPhosd
solution e	r.t.	394	1.4	457	<0.01	<0.01
	80 K	— f	— f	430, 449	0.80	0.13
crystal	r.t.	— f	— f	501	0.34	<0.01
	80 K	— f	— f	456, 479	0.83	<0.01

^a Absorption maximum wavelength. ^b Molar absorption coefficient at λ_abs. ^c Emission maximum excited at 380 nm. ^d Absolute photoluminescence quantum yield excited at λ_abs. ^e 1 × 10⁻⁵ M in 2-methylpentane/toluene (99/1, v/v). ^f Not determined.

). Photoexcitation was carried out at 380 nm for the luminescence spectroscopy. The absorption band was peaked at 394 nm and showed no clear vibronic structure at room temperature. Under the same conditions, a quite weak and broad emission band was detected at around 457 nm. A natural radiative decay constant ($k_{\mathrm{FL}}^0$) can be estimated using the Strickler–Berg (SB) equation (see Supporting Material) [49]:

$$k_{\mathrm{FL}}^0=2.880\times {10}^{-9}{n}^2{\tilde{\nu }}^2\frac{g_l}{g_u}{\displaystyle \int }ϵ\left(\tilde{\nu }\right)d\tilde{\nu }$$

(1)

where $n$ represents the refractive index of the solvent, $\widetilde{{\nu }_0}$ denotes the photon energy in wavenumber at an absorption maximum, $g_l$ and $g_u$ are the degeneracies of the lower and upper states of interest, and $ϵ\left(\tilde{\nu }\right)$ is the molar absorption coefficient as a function of wavenumber. The calculated value is 1.9 × 10⁸ s⁻¹, and this large $k_{\mathrm{FL}}^0$ clearly means this electronic transition is allowed. The absolute quantum yield of LAlH, however, is less than 0.01 in the solution at room temperature. This result indicates that the singlet excited state should be decayed through critical nonradiative paths under this condition, like vibronic coupling and conical intersections.

Meanwhile, the emission spectrum in the crystalline state exhibited a strong maximum at 501 nm and a distinct weak peak around 460 nm. These two distinct peaks might be assigned to the same luminescent species because of the similar values of their fluorescence lifetimes (Figure S6 and Table S4). The absolute fluorescence quantum efficiency ${\Phi }_{\mathrm{FL}}$ of the crystals was determined to be 0.34 at room temperature when the crystals were excited at 394 nm. The average fluorescence lifetime $⟨\tau \rangle$ was 2.3 ns (Figure 2b and

Table 3. Photoluminescence lifetimes and kinetic constants of LAlH.

		τ1/ns; f1 (%) a	τ2/ns; f2 (%) a	χ2b	<τ>/ns c	kFL/108 s−1 d	knrS/108 s−1 e
solution	80 K	1.43 f; 7.72 f	3.27 f; 87.32 f	1.20	3.0	2.7	<0.68
crystal	r.t.	1.39; 31.07	2.75; 68.93	1.01	2.3	1.5	2.8
	80 K	2.07; 21.07	3.27; 78.93	0.94	3.0	2.8	0.56

^a Photoluminescence decay curve was fitted with two-exponential decay function: I(t) = I₀ Σ α_i exp(−t/τ_i). f_i’s are fractions of each component i, which can be written as follows: f_i = α_iτ_i/Σ α_iτ_i. ^b Goodness-of-fit. ^c <τ> = Σ α_iτ_i²/Σ α_iτ_i = Σ f_iτ_i. ^d k_FL = Φ_FL/<τ>. ^e k_nr^S = (1 − Φ_FL)/<τ>. ^f Fitted by three-components exponential decay with one fixed component as scattered light (τ = 27.7 ps, f = 4.96%).

). Considering the simple photophysical picture (Figure S7), the fluorescence rate constant $k_{\mathrm{FL}}^S$ can be estimated by the following equations.

$$⟨\tau \rangle ={\left(k_{\mathrm{FL}}+k_{\mathrm{nr}}^S+k_{\mathrm{ISC}}\right)}^{-1}$$

(2)

$$k_{\mathrm{FL}}={\Phi }_{\mathrm{FL}}/⟨\tau \rangle$$

(3)

where $k_{\mathrm{nr}}^S$ and $k_{\mathrm{ISC}}$ are the nonradiative decays from the singlet excited state and intersystem crossing rate constants, respectively. The estimated $k_{\mathrm{FL}}$ value is 1.5 × 10⁸ s⁻¹, which is comparable to the calculated $k_{\mathrm{FL}}^0$ value from the SB equation, vide supra.

The effects of temperature on the photophysical properties were investigated by monitoring photoluminescence spectra with variable temperatures (Figure 3). For the solution sample, the intensity of the emission band drastically increased as the temperature decreased. In the frozen state of the solution at 80 K, intense photoluminescence was observed within the range of 400–650 nm (Figure 3), and the absolute luminescence quantum yield was determined to be 0.92. The emission peak at 449 nm was assigned to fluorescence because of its short lifetime (3.0 ns, Table 3). The shoulder peak around 430 nm is likely to be attributable to a vibronic structure, because the lifetimes were almost the same when the signals were detected at 425 and 450 nm (Figure S6 and Table S4). In addition, distinct peaks were detected at 510 nm and longer wavelength regions. This emission band was also detected after 1.0 ms from the excitation and its luminescence lifetime was quite long (230 ms), while the fluorescence peak completely disappeared under this condition (Figure S8 and Table S5). According to these results, the emission band at the longer wavelength region was assigned to phosphorescence. From the results of the Gaussian deconvolution of the whole photoluminescence spectrum (Figure S9 and Table S6), the fluorescence and the phosphorescence quantum yields were calculated to be 0.80 and 0.12, respectively (Table 3). Regarding the fluorescence part, the smaller Stokes shift (1851 cm⁻¹) suggests that the relaxed structure of the complex at the singlet excited state (S₁) is similar to that of the singlet ground state (S₀). These observations indicate that the nonradiative decay processes of the excited molecule due to the molecular motion and vibration were restricted at 80 K.

In the case of the crystalline state at 80 K, the fluorescence band showed a clear vibronic structure and the bathochromic shift to 456 nm compared with that of the solution at 80 K (Figure 3b). Taking the condensed situation into account, the bathochromic shift of the first peak probably originates from self-absorption. Indeed, the onset wavelength of the UV–Vis absorption spectrum was obtained around 450 nm at the solution stage (Figure 2a). In addition, the vibronic peak at 479 nm was also observed in the emission spectrum in the solution at 80 K. These results strongly suggest that the intrinsic electronic nature of the single molecule should not be affected by the crystallization. It is worth noting that the luminescence intensities corresponding to the weak fluorescence band (460 nm) at r.t. dramatically increased as the temperature decreased to 215 K or below. Moreover, the fluorescence lifetime recorded at 450 nm was almost identical to that at 480 nm. These results mean that the high energy emission band could be attributed to a vibronic peak (Figure 3b). The fluorescence quantum yield at 80 K (0.83) was estimated from the comparison of the integration intensity between the spectra at room temperature and 80 K. This value is comparable to that in the solution state at 80 K (0.80). The phosphorescence, on the other hand, was slightly observed at 560 nm when the spectrum was after 1.0 ms from the excitation (Figure S8b), but the intensity was too weak to determine the phosphorescence quantum yield under this condition (Figure 3b). Defects, impurities and diffusion of excitons in the crystal packing might be responsible for the decrease in the phosphorescence quantum yield due to the relatively long lifetime of the triplet excited state.

2.3. Theoretical Calculations

To obtain deep insight on optical behaviors originating from the electronic features of the complex, density functional theory (DFT) and time-dependent DFT (TD-DFT) calculations were performed with the Gaussian 16 rev. B.01 package [50]. We treat only singlet ground and excited states in the following discussion, because the observed phosphorescence quantum yields were relatively low, even at low temperature, as mentioned above. Geometry optimizations and single point energy calculations were carried out at the CAM-B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p) and the CAM-B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p) levels of theory, respectively. Geometry optimizations were performed for singlet ground (S₀) and first singlet excited (S₁) states. The single-crystal structure and the optimized structure at the S₀ state were employed as the initial geometries for the optimization at the S₀ and the S₁ states, respectively. Both optimized structures were confirmed as local minima for each potential energy surface (PES) by using frequency calculations. As shown in Figure S10, the obtained S₀ structure is consistent with that in the single crystal.

Figure 4a shows the calculated energy diagrams of the frontier orbitals with the optimized structures and Kohn–Sham highest occupied and lowest unoccupied molecular orbitals (HOMO and LUMO, respectively). For the S₀ structure, the S₀–S₁ transition energy was estimated to be 3.57 eV (347 nm), and the transition was composed mainly of the HOMO–LUMO transition (

Table 4. Results of TD-DFT calculations.

Geometry	Transition	Composition	Coefficient a	f b	λ/nm c
S0 geom	S0–S1	HOMO–LUMO	0.68764	0.4205	347.05
S1 geom	S0–S1	HOMO–LUMO	0.69035	0.3807	404.73

^a Expansion coefficients for the electronic transition. ^b Oscillator strength. ^c Excitation wavelength.

). Thus, we assign the absorption band in the lowest energy region as the HOMO–LUMO transition. Regarding the central six-membered ring, the distributions of the HOMO and LUMO were consistent with those of pentadienyl anion (Figure 4b), which belongs to the C_2v point group. Therefore, the symmetry species of the HOMO and the LUMO of LAlH were approximately assigned to B₂ and A₂ in the point group, respectively. Considering the direct product of the two symmetry species, the symmetry of the HOMO–LUMO electronic transition is B₂. Hence, the corresponding electronic transition moment has a non-zero value, then the transition is symmetry-allowed [45]. This fact is consistent with the calculated large oscillator strength of the S₀–S₁ transition of LAlH (Table 4), although the molecular structure of LAlH is disordered from the C_2v structure due to the sterically hindered peripheral aromatic groups. Indeed, the relatively large molar absorption coefficient strongly supports the fact that this band is an allowed electronic transition.

Since the electronic characteristics of the S₁–S₀ transition for the S₁ structure is almost the same as that of the S₀ structure, the calculations revealed that the electronic transition for the S₁ structure possesses the large oscillator strength (0.3807). In addition, the corresponding Stokes shift (4.1 × 10³ cm⁻¹) can be calculated from the energetic change between the electronic transitions for the S₀ and S₁ structures. This value is comparable to the experimental value in the solution at room temperature (4.0 × 10³ cm⁻¹). The experimental luminescence quantum yield, however, was significantly small (<0.01) under the same condition as mentioned above. These results clearly indicate that excited molecules could nonradiatively decay to the ground state through significantly fast vibrational quenching or conical intersections.

To develop advanced luminescence materials, it is essential to reveal an intrinsic origin of the nonradiative quenching paths. For this purpose, we calculated Huang–Rhys (HR) factors [51,52], S_i’s, for the S₁–S₀ transition (see Supporting Information for details). The HR factor is one of the essential parameters for evaluating the nonradiative decay rate, brought into a series of investigations for the AIE systems by Shuai et al. [53,54,55]. The HR factor for the j-th normal mode (ω_j), S_j, is approximately regarded as the average number of phonons (vibrational quanta corresponding to the j-th normal mode) emitted through electron–phonon coupling during a nonradiative process (see Supporting Information for details). Consequently, the normal modes corresponding with the large HR factors mainly contribute to the radiationless quenching of the excited state energy. When an excited molecule decays to the ground state, its molecular geometry relaxes to the most stable one. Considering the structural relaxation resulting in the same energetic change (Figure 5a), the displacement of the atomic coordinates (ΔQ) for typical AIE-active molecules would be larger than that for rigid AIE-inactive molecules (ΔQ^{AIE Active} > ΔQ^{AIE Inactive}). This is because these AIE-active ones are composed of movable aromatic moieties on the periphery of the system. In other words, these AIE-gens possess relatively flat PESs compared to the inactive molecules. This means that the normal modes of these molecules could contain very low frequencies. Hence, relatively large HR factors (>10) have appeared in some well-known AIE-active molecules within the range of 10 to 100 cm⁻¹. These low-energy modes are generally attributed to rotational vibration or out-of-plane vibration of a π-system, like peripheral phenyl groups, in the molecules [53,54,55,56,57]. On the other hand, such low-frequency modes with large HR factors are absent or few for typical AIE-inactive molecules, while these molecules possess smaller (<1) HR factors in the high-frequency region (–1500 cm⁻¹). The corresponding high-energy normal modes are generally assigned to single- or double-bond stretching modes of the π-conjugated systems [53,54,55,56,57]. From these observations, it can be noted that low-energy normal modes with large HR factors can play an essential role in realizing the AIE effect. It should be noted that we still neglect the breakdown of the adiabatic approximation in this regime. To treat the real systems in more accurate manner, we should need further considerations, for example Duschinsky rotation [55,56,57].

The calculated HR factors for LAlH are depicted in Figure 5b, and those selected are listed in

Table 5. Selected Huang–Rhys factors and the corresponding normal modes.

Mode Index, i	ωi/cm−1	Si	λi/cm−1 a
1	15.2511	10.2582	156.44883
3	33.1647	6.53073	216.5897
4	39.4657	1.14514	45.19375
6	51.8166	0.76687	39.73634
8	56.779	0.98173	55.74187
13	80.6648	0.86301	69.61493
124	1065.3059	0.5273	561.74006

^a Reorganization energy determined by λ_i = ω_i S_i.

. All normal modes with large HR factors are located within the range from 0 to 100 cm⁻¹. Notably, the significant HR factors appear at 15.3 (ω₁) and 33.2 cm⁻¹ (ω₃). The displacement vectors for ω₁ and ω₃ are shown in Figure 5c. These normal modes, ω₁ and ω₃, are mainly attributed to the out-of-plane twisting and the rotational vibration, respectively. These vibrational modes could intrinsically lead to the radiationless decay process of the excited state, although there are other couplings between molecular electronic states and other states, e.g., vibrational modes of solvents. From these data, it is indicated that it might be possible to control the emission properties of the system through the restriction of the vibration utilizing a synthetic methodology.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials

All reactions were performed under argon or nitrogen atmosphere using modified Schlenk line techniques and an MBRAUN glovebox system UNIlab, unless otherwise noted. Analytical thin layer chromatography (TLC) was performed with silica gel 60 Merck F254 plates. Column chromatography was performed with Wakogel C-200 SiO₂. Deoxygenated toluene (FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.; FWPCI), and deoxygenated hexane (FWPCI) were purchased from commercial sources and used as received. LiAlH₄ (Tokyo Chemicals Industry Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.) was purified by recrystallization from diethyl ether under inert atmosphere before use. Deuterated benzene was stored with microwave-activated molecular sieves 4A (FWPCI) and degassed in a glovebox before use.

3.2. Synthesis of LAlH

A 30 mL Schlenk flask and a stir tip were dried in an oven set at 120 °C for several hours and taken into a glovebox. The flask was charged with a ligand (250 mg, 0.46 mmol) and fleshly recrystallized lithium aluminum hydride (26 mg, 0.69 mmol) in a glovebox and sealed with a rubber septum. To the flask attached to a double manifold was added toluene (4 mL) at room temperature, and the yellow suspension was allowed to warm to 90 °C. After stirring for 20 h, all volatile compounds were removed under reduced pressure. In a glovebox, the residue was extracted with toluene and filtered with a hydrophobic PTFE filter (Merck Millipore, pore size: 0.20 μm) and a disposable syringe (HSW NORM-JECT^®). The filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure with a manifold, then transferred into a glovebox and layered by hexane in a vial to grow crystals. After storing for 6 days, a crop of yellow crystals was collected and washed with hexane, then dried in vacuo to give an analytically pure product as bright yellow crystals (60 mg, 23%). ¹H NMR (400 MHz; C₆H₆) δ = 7.22–7.20 (m, 4H), 7.06–6.98 (m, 6H), 6.81 (m, 6H), 5.64 (s, 1H, C=CH–C), 4.73 (br, 2H, AlH), 3.62 (sep, ³J = 6.7 Hz, 4H, CHMe₂), 1.44 (d, ³J = 6.7 Hz, 12H, Me), 1.03 (d, ³J = 6.7 Hz, 12H, Me). ¹³C NMR (101 MHz; C₆H₆) δ = 171.2, 144.6, 140.1, 139.1, 129.2, 127.7, 127.5, 124.7, 101.4, 28.8, 26.7, 23.6. ¹H NMR (400 MHz; CDCl₃) δ = 7.24–7.02 (m, 16H), 5.53 (s, 1H, C=CH–C), 4.03 (br, 2H, AlH), 3.31 (sep, ³J = 6.7 Hz, 4H, CHMe₂), 1.25 (d, ³J = 6.7 Hz, 12H, Me), 0.97 (d, ³J = 6.7 Hz, 12H, Me). ¹³C{¹H} NMR (101 MHz; CDCl₃): δ = 170.7, 144.2, 139.6, 138.5, 129.0, 128.8, 127.4, 126.9, 124.1, 100.9, 28.3, 26.3, 23.4. ²⁷Al{¹H} NMR (130 MHz; C₆D₆): δ = 65.7 ppm (ν_1/2 = 170 Hz). HRMS (DART) for [M + H]⁺, Found: 571.3620, Calcd.: 571.3627.

3.3. NMR Spectroscopy

¹H (400 MHz) and ¹³C{¹H} (100 MHz) NMR spectra were recorded on JEOL JNM-AL400 spectrometer with a J-Young Valve NMR tube. In ¹H and ¹³C{¹H} NMR spectra, tetramethylsilane (TMS) and/or residual solvent peaks were used as internal standards.

²⁷Al{¹H} NMR (130 MHz) spectra were recorded at the Technical Support Office (Department of Synthetic Chemistry and Biological Chemistry, Graduate School of Engineering, Kyoto University) on a JEOL JNM-ECZ500 spectrometer and referenced to 1.0 M Al(NO₃)₃∙9H₂O in D₂O (0 ppm) as an external standard. Phase correction was not able to be performed reasonably for the sample containing LAlH due to the wavy baseline. Hence the phasing parameters of the measurement for the external standard were used for the sample as well.

3.4. High Resolution Mass Spectrometry

High-resolution mass (HRMS) spectrometry was performed at the Technical Support Office (Department of Synthetic Chemistry and Biological Chemistry, Graduate School of Engineering, Kyoto University), and the HRMS spectra were obtained on a Thermo Fisher Scientific EXACTIVE spectrometer for electrospray ionization (ESI) and for direct analysis in real time (DART).

3.5. Single Crystal X-Ray Analysis

Single crystals were grown in a glovebox from toluene/hexane mixed solution at room temperature to 10 °C. A crystal in liquid paraffin was scooped with a sampling loop inside the glovebox, then mounted on a goniometer and cooled to 93 K with N₂ gas stream as soon as possible. Liquid paraffin was stored in a vial with divided elemental potassium in a glovebox for several months before use.

X-ray diffraction data were collected using a Rigaku R-AXIS RAPID-F. Data were collected at 93 K with graphite-monochromated Mo Kα radiation diffractometer and an imaging plate. Equivalent reflections were merged, and a symmetry related absorption correction was carried out with the program ABSCOR [58]. The structures were solved with SHELXT 2014 [59] and refined on F² with SHELXL [60] on Yadokari-XG [61] or Shelxle [62]. Two hydrogen atoms bonding to an aluminum atom were located from a ΔF map and refined freely with U_iso set to 1.5-fold of U_eq of the aluminum atom. The other hydrogen atoms were refined with a riding model. The program ORTEP-3 [63] was used to generate the X-ray structural diagram.

3.6. Photophysical Measurements

UV−vis absorption spectra were recorded on a SHIMADZU UV–3600 spectrophotometer. Fluorescence and phosphorescence emission spectra and phosphorescence decay were measured with a HORIBA JOBIN YVON Fluorolog–3 spectrofluorometer and an Oxford Optistat DN for temperature control. Absolute photoluminescence quantum yields were measured with a Hamamatsu Photonics Quantaurus-QY Plus C13534-01 and a sample holder for low temperature A11238-05 was used for the measurements at 77 K. Fluorescence lifetimes were measured by a Horiba FluoroCube spectrofluorometer system with an Oxford Optistat DN for temperature control and a UV diode laser (NanoLED 375 nm).

4. Conclusions

We synthesized the CIE-active β-diketiminate dihydroaluminum complex through the reaction of lithium aluminum hydride and the corresponding ligand. The synthesized molecule presents fluorescence in the crystal at room temperature, while it hardly emits in the solution state at room temperature. The results of variable temperature photoluminescence spectroscopy and TD-DFT calculations suggested that the out-of-plane twisting and the rotational vibration suppressed the radiative decay process in the solution state at room temperature. Finally, we discovered that the complex exhibited nearly quantitative luminescence in the solution state at 80 K, including weak phosphorescence with a long lifetime. From these optical properties, it can be expected that the β-diketiminate ligand structure could open a new window for developing a new class of solid-state luminescent materials by further modification.