Food Bloggers on the Twitter Social Network: Yummy, Healthy, Homemade, and Vegan Food
Abstract
:1. Introduction
1.1. Food-Choice Methodology Related Consumer Research
1.2. Research Opportunities and Importance of Social Network Analysis
1.3. Social Media Analysis Based on Hashtag Research (SMAHR) Framework
- (a)
- Image analysis is a method, where we classify individual objects in the image using machine learning models. This method is more suitable for “image-oriented social media” such as Instagram [70].
- (b)
- Text analysis is focused on the text part of message. Frameworks focusing on social media analysis applying natural language processing may fail to detect specific types of information since the report from which the hashtags are removed may be devoid of information. Furthermore, sarcasm is frequently utilized in the text, which the Natura Language algorithm finds difficult to recognize [71].
1.4. Research Gap
1.5. Research Question and Aim of the Study
2. Materials and Methods
- (1)
- Data acquisition: The Twitter API [77] was used to extract messages (Tweets) from the Twitter network. Tweets were collected in the time period between 30 May 2017 and 30 May 2022 (a 5-year period). In total, 686,450 Tweets with the hashtag #foodblogger were captured from 171,243 unique users by the Python script [78] during that period. This dataset contained all messages sent to the Twitter social network that included the hashtag #foodblogger during the monitored period.
- (2)
- Content transformation: As our study was focused on hashtags, we excluded any phrases that did not start with the hashtag symbol (“#”). This resulted in a dataset consisting only of hashtags (i.e., words beginning with #). Subsequently, all uppercase characters were changed to lowercase letters to eliminate any duplications (for example, the program could interpret #Healthy, #healthy, and #HEALTHY to be three different hashtags). Then, a last change was made to separate strings of associated hashtags, such as “#healthy#organic,” which became “#healthy; #organic.” The data were imported into Gephi 0.9.3, and a hashtag corpus based on the interdependence of hashtags was developed (see Figure 2). Gephi is an open-source software for network visualization and relationship between nodes (hashtags) exploration [79].
- (3)
- Hashtag reduction: Hashtag reduction was required in order to eliminate micro-communities prior to undertaking the community and modularity study. An abundance of hashtags, including local hashtags such as “#dallas” and “#dallasmicrocommunities,” creates much noise.
- (4)
- Data mining: The hashtag network was described using the data mining methods listed below:
- (a)
- Frequency: A frequency is a number representing the frequency of hashtags in a network.
- (b)
- Eigenvector centrality: This metric reflects the impact of hashtags in a network and is an extension of degree centrality. Eigenvector centrality is calculated based on the premise that links to hashtags with high degree centrality values have a larger impact than links with similar or lower degree centrality values. A hashtag with a high eigenvector centrality value is connected to a large number of hashtags with a high degree centrality value. The eigenvector centrality was determined as follows:
- (c)
- Community analysis and modularity value: The most convoluted networks feature hashtags that are more closely related to one another than to the rest of the network. Communities are groups of such hashtags [80]. Modularity is an index that measures the cohesiveness of communities inside a network [81]. The goal of this analysis is to find hashtag groups that are more strongly linked than other hashtag communities. High modularity networks demonstrate significant relationships between hashtags within the community, but fewer links between hashtags in different communities [82]. Based on one modularity detection study [83], the community analysis then determines the number of various communities in the network, as follows (see Equation (3)):
- (5)
- Knowledge representation: The use of visualization tools to represent the outcomes of data mining is known as knowledge representation. Knowledge is represented through the synthesis of individual values and outputs from the data assessment process.
3. Results and Discussion
- (1)
- Hashtags that are broad categorizations of a topic, such as #food or #blogger
- (2)
- Hashtags identifying the characteristics of a given Tweet
3.1. Community Analysis
- (1)
- Consumer behavior
- (2)
- Business Marketing
- (3)
- Healthy Policy
3.2. Limitations
3.3. Future Research
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Wibowo, A.; Chen, S.-C.; Wiangin, U.; Ma, Y.; Ruangkanjanases, A. Customer Behavior as an Outcome of Social Media Marketing: The Role of Social Media Marketing Activity and Customer Experience. Sustainability 2020, 13, 189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ginsberg, K. Instabranding: Shaping the Personalities of the Top Food Brands on Instagram. Elon J. Undergrad. Res. Commun. 2015, 6, 1–2. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, H.-M.; Kang, J.-W.; Namkung, Y. Instagram Users’ Information Acceptance Process for Food-Content. Sustainability 2021, 13, 2638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Walsh, M.J.; Baker, S.A. Clean Eating and Instagram: Purity, Defilement, and the Idealization of Food. Food Cult. Soc. 2020, 23, 570–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reagan, R.; Filice, S.; Santarossa, S.; Woodrugg, J.S. #ad on Instagram: Investigating the Promotion of Food and Beverage Products. J. Soc. MEDIA Soc. 2020, 9, 1–28. [Google Scholar]
- Roach, A. The Ultimate Guide To The Best Instagram Hashtags For Likes. 2002. Available online: https://www.oberlo.com/blog/best-instagram-hashtags-for-likes (accessed on 1 April 2022).
- Molenaar, K. The Ultimate List of Trending Hashtags on Every Platform. 2022. Available online: https://influencermarketinghub.com/trending-hashtags/ (accessed on 1 April 2022).
- Mainolfi, G.; Marino, V.; Resciniti, R. Not Just Food: Exploring the Influence of Food Blog Engagement on Intention to Taste and to Visit. Br. Food J. 2022, 124, 430–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hookway, N. Blog Analysis. In SAGE Research Methods Foundations; SAGE Publications Ltd.: London, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Lepkowska-White, E.; Kortright, E. The Business of Blogging: Effective Approaches of Women Food Bloggers. J. Foodserv. Bus. Res. 2018, 21, 257–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pfister, D.S. Networked Media, Networked Rhetorics; Penn State University Press: University Park, TX, USA, 2014; ISBN 9780271065809. [Google Scholar]
- Schmidt, J. Blogging Practices: An Analytical Framework. J. Comput. Commun. 2007, 12, 1409–1427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schneider, E.P.; McGovern, E.E.; Lynch, C.L.; Brown, L.S. Do Food Blogs Serve as a Source of Nutritionally Balanced Recipes? An Analysis of 6 Popular Food Blogs. J. Nutr. Educ. Behav. 2013, 45, 696–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dickinson, K.; Watson, M.; Prichard, I. Are Clean Eating Blogs a Source of Healthy Recipes? A Comparative Study of the Nutrient Composition of Foods with and without Clean Eating Claims. Nutrients 2018, 10, 1440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jia, N.; Chen, J.; Wang, R. An Attention-Based Convolutional Neural Network for Recipe Recommendation. Expert. Syst. Appl. 2022, 201, 116979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sthapit, E.; Piramanayayagam, S.; Björk, P. Tourists’ Motivations, Emotions, and Memorable Local Food Experiences. J. Gastron. Tour. 2020, 5, 17–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soulis, G.; Kotsani, M.; Benetos, A. Let Food and Physical Activity Be Your Medicine. Eur. Geriatr. Med. 2019, 10, 553–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cesiri, D. The Discourse of Food Blogs; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2020; ISBN 9780429455865. [Google Scholar]
- Johnston, J.; Goodman, M.K. Spectacular Foodscapes. Food Cult. Soc. 2015, 18, 205–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brombin, A.; Mascarello, G.; Pinto, A.; Crovato, S.; Ricaldi, G.; Giaretta, M.; Ravarotto, L. New Ways of Spreading Food Safety Online: The Role of Food Bloggers in Risk Communication. Br. Food J. 2022, 124, 775–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Naulin, S. Are food bloggers a new kind of influencer? In Lifestyle Journalism; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2019; p. 12. ISBN 9781351123389. [Google Scholar]
- Presswood, A.L. Food Blogs, Postfeminism, and the Communication of Expertise: Digital Domestics; Lexington Books: Blue Ridge Summit, PA, USA, 2018; ISBN 978-1498593687. [Google Scholar]
- Salvio, P.M. Dishing It Out: Food Blogs and Post-Feminist Domesticity. Gastronomica 2012, 12, 31–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rodney, A.; Cappeliez, S.; Oleschuk, M.; Johnston, J. The Online Domestic Goddess: An Analysis of Food Blog Femininities. Food Cult. Soc. 2017, 20, 685–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Greville-Harris, M.; Smithson, J.; Karl, A. What Are People’s Experiences of Orthorexia Nervosa? A Qualitative Study of Online Blogs. Eat. Weight Disord.-Stud. Anorexia Bulim. Obes. 2020, 25, 1693–1702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bissonnette-Maheux, V.; Provencher, V.; Lapointe, A.; Dugrenier, M.; Dumas, A.-A.; Pluye, P.; Straus, S.; Gagnon, M.-P.; Desroches, S. Exploring Women’s Beliefs and Perceptions About Healthy Eating Blogs: A Qualitative Study. J. Med. Internet Res. 2015, 17, e87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boepple, L.; Thompson, J.K. A Content Analysis of Healthy Living Blogs: Evidence of Content Thematically Consistent with Dysfunctional Eating Attitudes and Behaviors. Int. J. Eat. Disord. 2014, 47, 362–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tiusanen, K. Fulfilling the Self through Food in Wellness Blogs: Governing the Healthy Subject. Eur. J. Cult. Stud. 2021, 24, 1382–1400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Véron, O. From Seitan Bourguignon to Tofu Blanquette: Popularizing Veganism in France with Food Blogs. In Critical Perspectives on Veganism; Palgrave Macmillan: London, UK, 2016; pp. 287–305. [Google Scholar]
- Hart, D. Faux-Meat and Masculinity: The Gendering of Food on Three Vegan Blogs. Can. Food Stud. Rev. Can. Études L’aliment. 2018, 5, 133–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Taillon, B.J.; Mueller, S.M.; Kowalczyk, C.M.; Jones, D.N. Understanding the Relationships between Social Media Influencers and Their Followers: The Moderating Role of Closeness. J. Prod. Brand Manag. 2020, 29, 767–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goodman, M.K.; Jaworska, S. Mapping Digital Foodscapes: Digital Food Influencers and the Grammars of Good Food. Geoforum 2020, 117, 183–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lofgren, J. Food Blogging and Food-Related Media Convergence. M/C J. 2013, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lynch, M.; Chamberlain, K. Exploring the food blogosphere. In Research Methods in Digital Food Studies; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2021; p. 14. ISBN 9781003010845. [Google Scholar]
- Germic, E.R.; Eckert, S.; Vultee, F. The Impact of Instagram Mommy Blogger Content on the Perceived Self-Efficacy of Mothers. Soc. Media Soc. 2021, 7, 205630512110416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gauthier, M.; Durocher, M. A Food Blog Created by and for Elders: A Political Gesture Informed by the Normative Injunctions to Eat and Age Well. Interact. Des. Archit. 2018, 75–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Diemer, S.; Brunner, M.-L.; Schmidt, S. “Like, Pasta, Pizza and Stuff”—New Trends in Online Food Discourse. Cuizine 2014, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kleindienst, D.; Pfleger, R.; Schoch, M. The Business Alignment of Social Media Analytics. In Proceedings of the ECIS Twenty-Third European Conference on Information Systems, Münster, Germany, 29 May 2015; p. 103. [Google Scholar]
- Pilař, L.; Kvasničková Stanislavská, L.; Pitrová, J.; Krejčí, I.; Tichá, I.; Chalupová, M. Twitter Analysis of Global Communication in the Field of Sustainability. Sustainability 2019, 11, 6958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, P.-J.; Antonelli, M. Conceptual Models of Food Choice: Influential Factors Related to Foods, Individual Differences, and Society. Foods 2020, 9, 1898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kahneman, D. Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics. Am. Econ. Rev. 2003, 93, 1449–1475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Decker, R.; Trusov, M. Estimating Aggregate Consumer Preferences from Online Product Reviews. Int. J. Res. Mark. 2010, 27, 293–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Köster, E.P. The Psychology of Food Choice: Some Often Encountered Fallacies. Food Qual. Prefer. 2003, 14, 359–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Podsakoff, P.M.; MacKenzie, S.B.; Lee, J.-Y.; Podsakoff, N.P. Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies. J. Appl. Psychol. 2003, 88, 879–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roudsari, A.; Vedadhir, A.; Amiri, P.; Kalantari, N.; Omidvar, N.; Eini-Zinab, H. Developing and Validating Food Choice Determinants Questionnaire: An Instrument for Exploring Food Choice Determinants in Iran. Int. J. Prev. Med. 2020, 11, 141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wilson, C. Questionnaires and Surveys. In Credible Checklists and Quality Questionnaires; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2013; pp. 29–79. [Google Scholar]
- Penna, A.C.G.; Portel, C.S.; Pagani, M.M.; Mársico, E.T.; Silva, A.C.O.; Esmerino, E.A. Impact of Food Choice and Consumption Profile on the Perception of Food Coloring on Kefir Labels: Insights of the Projective Technique of Product Personality Profiling. Food Res. Int. 2021, 150, 110802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rivaroli, S.; Calvo-Porral, C.; Spadoni, R. Using Food Choice Questionnaire to Explain Millennials’ Attitudes towards Craft Beer. Food Qual. Prefer. 2022, 96, 104408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marsola, C.d.M.; Cunha, L.M.; Carvalho-Ferreira, J.P.; da Cunha, D.T. A Dataset of Food Choice Motives among Adults Consumers in Brazil: The Use of Food Choice Questionnaire. Data Br. 2022, 40, 107703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jaeger, S.R.; Prescott, J.; Worch, T. Food Neophobia Modulates Importance of Food Choice Motives: Replication, Extension, and Behavioural Validation. Food Qual. Prefer. 2022, 97, 104439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pilař, L.; Stanislavská, L.K.; Kvasnička, R.; Hartman, R.; Tichá, I. Healthy Food on Instagram Social Network: Vegan, Homemade and Clean Eating. Nutrients 2021, 13, 1991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pilař, L.; Kvasničková Stanislavská, L.; Poláková, J.; Rojík, S.; Kvasnička, R.; Gresham, G. Customer Experience with Organic Food: Global View. Emirates J. Food Agric. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pilař, L.; Kvasničková Stanislavská, L.; Kvasnička, R. Healthy Food on the Twitter Social Network: Vegan, Homemade, and Organic Food. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 3815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Statista Research Department Social Media-Statistics & Facts. Available online: https://www.statista.com/topics/1164/social-networks/#dossierKeyfigures (accessed on 1 April 2022).
- Worldometer World Population Projections. Available online: https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/world-population-projections/ (accessed on 1 April 2022).
- Pilař, L.; Poláková, J.; Gresham, G.; Rojík, S.; Tichá, I. Why People Use Hashtags When Visiting Farmers’ Markets. In Proceedings of the Agrarian Perspectives XXVI: Competitiveness of European Agriculture and Food Sectors, Prague, Czech Republic, 13–15 September 2017; pp. 287–292. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, K.; Geng, Y.; Zhao, J.; Liu, J.; Li, W. Sentiment Analysis of Social Media via Multimodal Feature Fusion. Symmetry 2020, 12, 2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Childers, C.C.; Lemon, L.L.; Hoy, M.G. #Sponsored #Ad: Agency Perspective on Influencer Marketing Campaigns. J. Curr. Issues Res. Advert. 2019, 40, 258–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Veirman, M.; Cauberghe, V.; Hudders, L. Marketing through Instagram Influencers: The Impact of Number of Followers and Product Divergence on Brand Attitude. Int. J. Advert. 2017, 36, 798–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Malik, A.; Berggren, W.; Al-Busaidi, A.S. Instagram as a Research Tool for Examining Tobacco-Related Content: A Methodological Review. Technol. Soc. 2022, 70, 102008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palazzo, M.; Vollero, A.; Vitale, P.; Siano, A. Urban and Rural Destinations on Instagram: Exploring the Influencers’ Role in #sustainabletourism. Land Use Policy 2021, 100, 104915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martina, C.; Ladislav, P.; Stanislav, R. Organic wine as an Instagram star using a design thinking approach. In Transdisciplinary Case Studies on Design for Food and Sustainability; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; pp. 149–163. [Google Scholar]
- Vrain, E.; Wilson, C. Social Networks and Communication Behaviour Underlying Smart Home Adoption in the UK. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit. 2021, 38, 82–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moreno, M.A.; Standiford, M.; Cody, P. Social Media and Adolescent Health. Curr. Pediatr. Rep. 2018, 6, 132–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pilař, L.; Balcarová, T.; Rojík, S.; Tichá, I.; Poláková, J. Customer Experience with Farmers’ Markets: What Hashtags Can Reveal. Int. Food Agribus. Manag. Rev. 2018, 21, 755–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gascoyne, C.; Scully, M.; Wakefield, M.; Morley, B. Food and Drink Marketing on Social Media and Dietary Intake in Australian Adolescents: Findings from a Cross-Sectional Survey. Appetite 2021, 166, 105431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Molenaar, A.; Saw, W.Y.; Brennan, L.; Reid, M.; Lim, M.S.C.; McCaffrey, T.A. Effects of Advertising: A Qualitative Analysis of Young Adults’ Engagement with Social Media About Food. Nutrients 2021, 13, 1934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pilař, L.; Kvasničková Stanislavská, L.; Kvasnička, R.; Bouda, P.; Pitrová, J. Framework for Social Media Analysis Based on Hashtag Research. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 3697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maynard, D.; Roberts, I.; Greenwood, M.A.; Rout, D.; Bontcheva, K. A Framework for Real-Time Semantic Social Media Analysis. J. Web Semant. 2017, 44, 75–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arefieva, V.; Egger, R.; Yu, J. A Machine Learning Approach to Cluster Destination Image on Instagram. Tour. Manag. 2021, 85, 104318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ashwitha, A.; Shruthi, G.; Shruthi, H.R.; Makarand, U.; Abhra, P.R.; Manjunath, T.C. Sarcasm Detection in Natural Language Processing. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 37, 3324–3331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pilařová, L.; Kvasničková Stanislavská, L.; Pilař, L.; Balcarová, T.; Pitrová, J. Cultured Meat on the Social Network Twitter: Clean, Future and Sustainable Meats. Foods 2022, 11, 2695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kvasničková Stanislavská, L.; Pilař, L.; Margarisová, K.; Kvasnička, R. Corporate Social Responsibility and Social Media: Comparison between Developing and Developed Countries. Sustainability 2020, 12, 5255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, H.-C.; Iyer, H. Trends in Twitter Hashtag Applications: Design Features for Value-Added Dimensions to Future Library Catalogues. Libr. Trends 2012, 61, 248–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pilař, L.; Moulis, P.; Pitrová, J.; Bouda, P.; Gresham, G.; Balcarová, T.; Rojík, S. Education and Business as a Key Topics at the Instagram Posts in the Area of Gamification. J. Effic. Responsib. Educ. Sci. 2019, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pilař, L.; Rojík, S.; Tučková, K.; Balcarová, T.; Selby, R. Gamification In Education: Social Network Analysis. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference Efficiency And Responsibility In Education, (ERIE), Prague, Czech Rebublic, 8–9 June 2017; pp. 318–324. [Google Scholar]
- Twitter Twitter API v2: Early Access. Available online: https://developer.twitter.com/en/docs/twitter-api/early-access (accessed on 1 April 2022).
- Edward, A. An Extensive Guide to Collecting Tweets from Twitter API v2 for Academic Research Using Python 3. Available online: https://developer.twitter.com/en/products/twitter-api/academic-research (accessed on 1 April 2022).
- Bastian, M.; Eymann, S.H.; Jacomy, M. Gephi: An Open Source Software for Exploring and Manipulating Networks. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, San Jose, CA, USA, 17–20 May 2009. [Google Scholar]
- McCurdie, T.; Sanderson, P.; Aitken, L.M. Applying Social Network Analysis to the Examination of Interruptions in Healthcare. Appl. Ergon. 2018, 67, 50–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Newman, M.E.J.; Girvan, M. Finding and Evaluating Community Structure in Networks. Phys. Rev. E 2004, 69, 026113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Knoke, D.; Yang, S. Social Network Analysis; Sage Publications Inc.: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2008; Volume 154, ISBN 9781412927499. [Google Scholar]
- Blondel, V.D.; Guillaume, J.-L.; Lambiotte, R.; Lefebvre, E. Fast Unfolding of Communities in Large Networks. J. Stat. Mech. Theory Exp. 2008, 2008, P10008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muralidhara, S.; Paul, M.J. #Healthy Selfies: Exploration of Health Topics on Instagram. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2018, 4, e10150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cavazza, N.; Graziani, A.R.; Guidetti, M. Impression Formation via #foodporn: Effects of Posting Gender-Stereotyped Food Pictures on Instagram Profiles. Appetite 2020, 147, 104565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mejova, Y.; Haddadi, H.; Noulas, A.; Weber, I. #FoodPorn. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Digital Health, New York, NY, USA, 18 May 2015; ACM: New York, NY, USA, 2015; pp. 51–58. [Google Scholar]
- Mejova, Y.; Abbar, S.; Haddabi, H. Fetishizing Food in Digital Age: #foodporn Around the World. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, Cologne, Germany, 17–20 May 2016; pp. 250–258. [Google Scholar]
- Scherer, L.; Behrens, P.; Tukker, A. Opportunity for a Dietary Win-Win-Win in Nutrition, Environment, and Animal Welfare. One Earth 2019, 1, 349–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bauer, J.M.; van der Laan, L.N.; de Bruijn, G.-J.; Reisch, L.A. Battle of the Primes–The Effect and Interplay of Health and Hedonic Primes on Food Choice. Appetite 2022, 172, 105956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marty, L.; Chambaron, S.; de Lauzon-Guillain, B.; Nicklaus, S. The Motivational Roots of Sustainable Diets: Analysis of Food Choice Motives Associated to Health, Environmental and Socio-Cultural Aspects of Diet Sustainability in a Sample of French Adults. Clean. Responsible Consum. 2022, 5, 100059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Jans, S.; Spielvogel, I.; Naderer, B.; Hudders, L. Digital Food Marketing to Children: How an Influencer’s Lifestyle Can Stimulate Healthy Food Choices among Children. Appetite 2021, 162, 105182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Santaoja, M.; Jallinoja, P. Food out of Its Usual Rut. Carnivalesque Online Veganism as Political Consumerism. Geoforum 2021, 126, 59–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tankovska, H. Daily Social Media Time among Teens and Young Adults Worldwide. 2017. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/800821/average-daily-time-spent-social-media-teens-young-adults/ (accessed on 1 April 2022).
- North, M.; Kothe, E.; Klas, A.; Ling, M. How to Define “Vegan”: An Exploratory Study of Definition Preferences among Omnivores, Vegetarians, and Vegans. Food Qual. Prefer. 2021, 93, 104246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stremmel, G.; Elshiewy, O.; Boztug, Y.; Carneiro-Otto, F. Vegan Labeling for What Is Already Vegan: Product Perceptions and Consumption Intentions. Appetite 2022, 175, 106048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Saboia, I.; Pisco Almeida, A.M.; Sousa, P.; Pernencar, C. I Am with You: A Netnographic Analysis of the Instagram Opinion Leaders on Eating Behavior Change. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2018, 138, 97–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Bavel, J.J.; Rathje, S.; Harris, E.; Robertson, C.; Sternisko, A. How Social Media Shapes Polarization. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2021, 25, 913–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bruns, A. After the ‘APIcalypse’: Social Media Platforms and Their Fight against Critical Scholarly Research. Inf. Commun. Soc. 2019, 22, 1544–1566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
No. | Hashtag | Frequency | Eigenvector Centrality | No. | Hashtag | Frequency | Eigenvector Centrality |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | #foodblogger | 686,450 | 1 | 16 | #homemade | 69,514 | 0.981272 |
2 | #foodie | 319,361 | 0.999088 | 17 | #tasty | 68,151 | 0.985122 |
3 | #food | 291,155 | 0.999291 | 18 | #foodgasm | 67,723 | 0.984966 |
4 | #foodporn | 202,342 | 0.996423 | 19 | #recipes | 62,243 | 0.96859 |
5 | #foodphotography | 157,368 | 0.994621 | 20 | #dinner | 59,555 | 0.989529 |
6 | #yummy | 142,153 | 0.991842 | 21 | #love | 46,012 | 0.982301 |
7 | #delicious | 129,975 | 0.991128 | 22 | #foodpics | 44,557 | 0.983585 |
8 | #foodstagram | 128,112 | 0.991433 | 23 | #instagood | 43,199 | 0.983739 |
9 | #foodlover | 123,272 | 0.992486 | 24 | #healthy | 35,465 | 0.972448 |
10 | #instafood | 101,580 | 0.990388 | 25 | #vegan | 35,122 | 0.981412 |
11 | #healthyfood | 81,997 | 0.983406 | 26 | #blogger | 33,071 | 0.987989 |
12 | #foodies | 81,501 | 0.992421 | 27 | #chef | 32,989 | 0.981213 |
13 | #recipe | 79,525 | 0.976214 | 28 | #lunch | 32,267 | 0.985012 |
14 | #foodblog | 78,431 | 0.991668 | 29 | #eat | 32,153 | 0.974965 |
15 | #cooking | 72,079 | 0.986917 | 30 | #foods | 31,029 | 0.975571 |
Meals of the Day | Frequency |
---|---|
Breakfast | 24,231 |
Brunch | 7327 |
Lunch | 32,267 |
Dinner | 59,555 |
Snack | 8008 |
Type of Diet | Frequency |
---|---|
Vegan diet | 32,153 |
Vegetarian diet | 12,363 |
Organic food diet | 10,117 |
Gluten-free diet | 7483 |
Weight loss diet | 3261 |
Clean eating diet | 2907 |
Low-carb diet | 1235 |
Dairy-free diet | 1757 |
Sugar-free diet | 670 |
Meat Category | Frequency |
---|---|
Poultry * | 16,165 |
Beef | 4657 |
Seafood | 6333 |
Pork | 2828 |
Mutton and Goat | 1051 |
No. Community * | Name of Community | Key Hashtags | Size of Community |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Healthy lifestyle | Healthylifestyle, vegan, healthyeating, vegetarian, glutenfree, organic, diet | 35.92% |
2 | Home-made food | Tasty, healthy, homemade, dinner, homemadefood, homecooking | 32.95% |
3 | Fast food | Pizza, pasta, burger, delivery, yummy pizzatime, cheatdate, delicious | 18.94% |
4 | Breakfast and brunch | Cake, sweet, chocolate, coffee, baking, cook, desserts, brunch, breakfast | 7.56% |
5 | Food traveling | Travel, travelblogger, travelgram, foodtravel, traveler, travelfoodblog | 4.64% |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Pilař, L.; Pilařová, L.; Chalupová, M.; Kvasničková Stanislavská, L.; Pitrová, J. Food Bloggers on the Twitter Social Network: Yummy, Healthy, Homemade, and Vegan Food. Foods 2022, 11, 2798. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11182798
Pilař L, Pilařová L, Chalupová M, Kvasničková Stanislavská L, Pitrová J. Food Bloggers on the Twitter Social Network: Yummy, Healthy, Homemade, and Vegan Food. Foods. 2022; 11(18):2798. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11182798
Chicago/Turabian StylePilař, Ladislav, Lucie Pilařová, Martina Chalupová, Lucie Kvasničková Stanislavská, and Jana Pitrová. 2022. "Food Bloggers on the Twitter Social Network: Yummy, Healthy, Homemade, and Vegan Food" Foods 11, no. 18: 2798. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11182798
APA StylePilař, L., Pilařová, L., Chalupová, M., Kvasničková Stanislavská, L., & Pitrová, J. (2022). Food Bloggers on the Twitter Social Network: Yummy, Healthy, Homemade, and Vegan Food. Foods, 11(18), 2798. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11182798