Next Article in Journal
Latest Advances in Preservation Technology for Fresh Fruit and Vegetables
Next Article in Special Issue
Effect of Grafted Insect Protein with Palatinose on Quality Properties of Phosphate-Free Meat Emulsion
Previous Article in Journal
Simple and Reliable Determination of the Histamine Content of Selected Greek Vegetables and Related Products in the Frame of “Low Histamine Diet”
Previous Article in Special Issue
Carcass Characteristics and Beef Quality of Young Grass-Fed Angus x Salers Bovines
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Species-Specific Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Identification of Bovine in Cultured Meat Serum for halal Status

by
Mohd Izhar Ariff Mohd Kashim
1,2,
Alia Aryssa Abdul Haris
3,
Nur Asmadayana Hasim
2,
Sahilah Abd Mutalib
3,4,* and
Nurina Anuar
5
1
Research Centre of Sharia, Faculty of Islamic Studies, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia
2
Institute of Islam Hadhari, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia
3
Department of Food Science, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia
4
Innovation Centre for Confectionery Technology (MANIS), Faculty of Science and Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia
5
Department of Chemical and Process Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2022, 11(20), 3235; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11203235
Submission received: 30 August 2022 / Revised: 4 October 2022 / Accepted: 7 October 2022 / Published: 17 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Future Challenges in Meat and Meat Products Technology)

Abstract

:
Meat culturing technology goes beyond laboratory research and materialises in the market. Nonetheless, this technology has raised concerns among Muslim consumers worldwide due to its medium, especially foetal bovine serum (FBS), which originates from blood. Thus, the aim of this research was to determine the halal status of cultured meat by detecting species-specific DNA of bovine serum as one of the media used during meat production. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis was conducted by targeting mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase II (COII) gene sequences, producing a 165 bp amplicon. The sequences of the primers used were Bovine-F, 5′-CAT CAT AGC AAT TGC CAT AGT CC-3′ and Bovine-R, 5′-GTA CTA GTA GTA TTA GAG CTA GAA TTA G-3′. DNA extraction was conducted using a QIAGEN Blood and Tissue™ commercial kit. The presence study also included a literature review on the Istihalah (transformation) concept in order to determine the halal status of cultured meat. The results revealed that bovine DNA was detected in all samples tested using PCR analysis. Therefore, Istihalah tammah (perfect transformation) does not occur due to the ability of PCR analysis to detect bovine DNA in FBS and is prohibited according to Shariah law.

1. Introduction

The presence of modern food products is increasing in the market owing to their ease of production, cost-effectiveness and high demand in urban society [1]. Modern food is defined as food produced with advanced food science and technology in the modern era [2]. Modern food products exposed are produced using raw material sources mixed with gelatine; fat; blood; alcohol; parts of unslaughtered animals; carcasses; and prohibited animals, such as pigs [3]. This causes concern among consumers, especially Muslims, in choosing modern food products that are halal (permitted). The word ‘halal’ is derived from and Arabic word that means allowed or permitted [1]. A halal food designation indicates that the food is allowed to be eaten by Muslims [1]. Recently, Singapore announced that the largest cultured meat facility in Asia is scheduled open in 2023 [4]. This news has induced anxiety among Muslim consumers, especially in Malaysia, with a 60% Muslim population and located near Singapore [5].
According to Sirini and colleagues [6], recent studies have shown that there is consumer demand for healthier and functional formulations of meat products. Generally, cultured meat offers eclectic benefits and resolves financial, animal welfare, ethics, resource scarcity and general health issues [7,8]. By definition, ‘cultured meat’ is in vitro, synthetic or lab-grown meat produced in a bioreactor through tissue engineering technology [8]. Bhat et al. [9] noted that cultured meat is produced outside the animal body, i.e., through cell production with specialised stem cells. Stem cells and tissues are then placed in a medium appropriate for their growth and maturation into muscle fibre, which is the essential component of meat. The medium used should also contain all the nutrients and substrates required by cells and tissues or stem cells to multiply and mature [9].
In cultured meat production, foetal bovine serum (FBS) is often used as a medium. The culture medium contains amino acids, vitamins, inorganic salts, glucose, growth factors (hormones) and other nutrients needed for cell growth [10]. FBS is a fraction of clotted blood fluid from a bovine fetus, cell-free fibrin and clotting factors, with high contents of nutrients and macromolecules essential for cell growth. In addition, FBS is a universal supplement containing 200–400 distinct proteins and thousands of small-molecule metabolites, such as amino acids, sugars, lipids and hormones, in unknown concentrations. Hormones, vitamins, transport proteins, trace minerals and growth factors are vital for cell proliferation and maintenance [11]. Jochems et al. [12] reported that FBS is collected from the blood of unborn calves during the last two trimesters of pregnancy, mostly during the slaughter of pregnant cows. Other types of serum include newborn calf serum and horse serum. Growth factors are currently extracted from cattle foetuses, but they are difficult to obtain in large quantities, and purification methods are complex and expensive [10].
New technology always brings new challenges and opportunities to the religious community [13]. For Muslim consumers, cultured meat technology raises doubts due to the use of serum in meat cell culturing [10,14]. Serum is a byproduct of blood obtained by a coagulation and centrifugation process to remove the clot and blood cells. According to Malaysian Standard MS1500: 2019 halal Food, blood is classified as al-mutawassitah najs (intermediate impurity) and is haram for consumption [15,16]. Plasma and serum are categorised as al-mutawassitah najs because they are obtained from blood. However, plasma and serum can be used if the food/final product goes through an istihalah (transformation) process, which is a terminological process that transforms or converts a substance (najs/impurity) through changes in its composition and properties [17]. The detection of species-specific DNA in blood plasma was reported by Shahimi et al. [18] in chicken meatballs made with fresh and commercial blood plasma. Essentially, it involves detection of agents of change either naturally or unnaturally through synthetic processes or human intervention. In the discipline of fiqh, this theory is part of an alternative purification mechanism called Istihalah (transformation). Istihalah is a process that allows an element or a component to be used if it changes through a natural process. Istihalah tammah or perfect transformation is the process of najs conversion to a new product that differs entirely from the original product. The aim of this process is to purify najs or materials that come into contact with najs.
Perfect transformation is similar to the concepts of ethanol change to acetic acid. Ethanol is prohibited for consumption if it is derived from a fermentation process and halal if it is derived from other processes. Acetic acid is halal and derived from the oxidative fermentation of acetic acid bacteria, such as Acetobacter and Gluconobacter genera [19]. The concept of ethanol-to-acetic transformation involves the idea of existence or presence; therefore, PCR is used to determine the presence of serum. According to Shariah law, cattle are among halal animals to be consumed when they are slaughtered [1]. If bovine DNA is not detected in bovine serum, this indicates that the istihalah process has taken place, and there is no doubt about using bovine serum as a medium. On the other hand, if bovine DNA can be detected in the tested serum medium, this indicates that the serum was not transformed sufficiently, such as by ethanol to acetic acid. With respect to serum transformation from blood, the colour changes from red to a yellow, transparent liquid. The addition of DNase in the serum will eliminate the DNA detection.
Several methods for species identification of meat are available, including DNA [20,21,22], protein [23,24] and fat-based analysis [25]. Species-specific identification of animals based on DNA analysis, such as PCR-based assays, have been applied to detect samples of meat, milks products, gelatine and blood plasma [18,26,27,28]. Animal DNA detection has not been reported in serum to date. Mid-infrared (MIR) spectroscopy and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays have been used for protein detection [23,24]. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy was used to evaluate offal in beef patties [25]. In the present study, DNA-based PCR was chosen due to its frequent use to evaluate authenticity, fraud and adulteration of food components. This technique is easy, simple, sensitive and relatively low-cost. The aim of this study is to determine the halal status of cultured meat using FBS as a medium, which can be detected by PCR analysis. Hence, this study serves as a reference for stakeholders in the food industry, as well as Muslim consumers. PCR is an easy, fast and reproducible technique to identify species-specific animal DNA in the event of contamination by blood sources [29]. In this study, we compared DNA detection between bovine serum and bovine blood plasma. PCR detection can determine whether an Istihalah tammah (perfect transformation) process has occurred, indicating the halal status of cultured meat.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Samples for Analysis

Blood plasma and bovine serum (Bos taurus) were commercially obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. Blood plasma was received powdered form, whereas the serum was obtained in liquid form. The powdered form of blood plasma was diluted with 10 mL of distilled water. Commercial bovine genomic DNA (Novagen®, Darmstadt, Germany) was used as a positive control.

2.2. DNA Extraction

A QIAGEN Blood and Tissue™ commercial kit (Hilden, Germany) was used for DNA extraction from serum and plasma. The following materials were used for each extraction: 360 µL food lysis buffer (ATL buffer), 20 µL proteinase K, 200 µL AL buffer, 200 µL 100% (v/v) ethanol, 500 µL AW1 buffer, 500 µL AW2 buffer and 100 µL AE buffer (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany). Sample volumes of 300 µL and 500 µL were used for extraction. Extracted DNA was stored at −20 °C until further analysis. All DNA samples were extracted in duplicate from each source.

2.3. Oligonucleotide Primers

A pair of species-specific primers were used in each PCR assay for bovine detection. Bovine-F/Bovine-R primers were used to detect bovine DNA in the following sequence: Bovine-F, 5′-CAT CAT AGC AAT TGC CAT AGT CC-3′ and Bovine-R, 5′-GTA CTA GTA GTA TTA GAG CTA GAA TTA G-3′ [30]. These primers targeted the mitochondrial DNA of the cytochrome oxidase II (COII) gene sequence and produced an amplicon size of 165 bp. All primers were supplied by Apical Scientific (Seri Kembangan, Selangor, Malaysia).

2.4. Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)

The PCR simplex amplification technique using COII primers targeting mtDNA was performed at a final volume of 50 μL; the volumes of each PCR mixtures are shown in Table 1. A mastercycler® gradient thermal cycler (Eppendorf, Westbury, NY, USA) was used to run the PCR with a temperature program as stated in Table 2. The detection limit reported for the analysis was as low as 0.1 ng DNA [30].
The amplification products were electrophoresed through a 2.5% (w/v) agarose gel in a 1 × TAE buffer (40 mM Tris-acetate, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0) at 100 V for 45 min and pre-stained with MaestrosafeTM nucleic acid (V-BioScience, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia) [31]. Commercial bovine DNA NovaGen® (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) was used as a positive control. All of the agarose gel electrophoreses of the PCR product used a GeneRulerTM 100-bp DNA ladder (Fermentas, Vilnius, Lithuania) as a molecular size marker and were visualized using a UV gel documentation system (Syngene, Cambridge, UK).

3. Results and Discussion

This study was conducted to detect animal DNA in serum and blood plasma. The results can be used by stakeholders with respect to decisions concerning cultured meat consumption. The issue of law (hukm) is relevant to cultured serum media when the use of foetal bovine serum (FBS) is unavoidable laboratory meat culture processes. Carlo [12] claimed that serum is a solution without platelets and clotting factors, i.e., fibrinogen cells. FBS is directly involved in the production process of cultured meat, affecting purity of the meat produced. FBS is a major growth factor in the production of cultured meat. Islam prohibits the intake of animal blood, and it is believed to contain a variety of potentially harmful microorganisms and metabolic products and toxins [1,32]. The mixture of FBS components is believed to contain many unknown chemical constituents, as well as contaminants, such as endotoxins, mycoplasms, viruses and prion proteins [33]. Therefore, the use of blood serum can be detrimental to health, for example, causing allergies caused by blood proteins. Flowing blood is classified as an element of najis, which is agreed (ijma’) by scholars to be prohibited [34].
In the present study, bovine blood plasma and serum showed bands at the 165 bp position, targeting the cytochrome oxidase II (COII) gene sequence for bovine species. No statistical analysis was applied, samples were examined in duplicates (D) for 300 µL and triplicates for 500 µL blood plasma samples. Figure 1 shows the amplicons for 500 µL bovine blood plasma samples, labelled as D1, D2 and D3, and 300 µL bovine blood plasma samples, labelled as D4 and D5.
The positive control was labelled as PC and produced 165 bp amplicons. Based on agarose gel observation, all blood plasma samples were in line with the PC, indicating a similar molecular size. For the negative control (NC), no DNA band was observed due to the absence of DNA. As shown in Figure 1, lanes 1–3 were brighter than lanes 4 and 5, indicating that the DNA intensity was aligned with the concentration of DNA. The higher the volume of extracted DNA, the higher the concentration of obtained DNA and therefore increased intensity. This finding is in line with a study by Shahimi et al. [18], who reported that thicker bands showed more DNA was available and amplified by the primers.
Bovine serum amplicons with a volume of 500 µL (D1, D2 and D3) a volume of 300 µL (D4, D5 and D6) are shown in Figure 2. All amplicons showed at 165 bp with similar intensities. Sample volume did not seem to have an effect on blood plasma DNA. The intensities of all samples were identical, although the DNA was extracted from different volumes. The appearance of serum is similar to that of blood plasma, appearing as a yellow transparent solution that does not contain fibrinogen, which prevents blood clotting when used as a medium for the proliferation of cultured meat. The intensity of the bands in blood plasma was greater than that in serum. The serum may have a lower concentration of DNA than plasma after having undergone fibrinogen removal. Blood serum PCR analysis was not conducted on animal DNA.
The application of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) COII as targeted gene was previously reported by Corona et al. [30]. Similar results are presented here; both blood plasma and serum showed bands at the 165 bp amplicon. mtDNA using COII as targeted gene results in a high probability of positive results from samples subjected to high temperatures during processing [35,36]. Azli et al. [34] also reported the detection of bovine DNA from ghee treated at high temperatures. PCR analysis has the ability to detect DNA in food products [37,38,39] associated with blood plasma as ingredients, despite having undergone processing, such as thermal and high-pressure treatment [31,40,41].

4. Conclusions

In the present study, PCR analysis was used to detect animal DNA in serum. The use of any component derived from blood is prohibited in Islam. Cultured meat is an innovative meat product that has the potential to materialised in a near future as an alternative to conventional meat. However, concerns with respect to the technology of cultured meat include the use of serum as a component of growth media. Muslim consumers are only permitted to consume foods that are in compliance with Shariah laws. As demonstrated in the present study, serum does not undergo perfect transformation or Istihalah tammah; based on the detection of species-specific animal DNA in serum, cultured meat is prohibited for consumption.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.I.A.M.K.; methodology, S.A.M.; validation, M.I.A.M.K., S.A.M. and N.A.; investigation, A.A.A.H.; resources, M.I.A.M.K. and S.A.M.; writing—original draft preparation, A.A.A.H. and N.A.H.; writing—review and editing, S.A.M.; visualization, M.I.A.M.K.; supervision, S.A.M. and N.A.; project administration, M.I.A.M.K. and S.A.M.; funding acquisition, M.I.A.M.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National University of Malaysia, grant number DIP-2021-015.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated for this study are available on request to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Faculty of Science and Technology and Faculty of Islamic Studies of the National University of Malaysia for providing support in the production of this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kashim, M.; Ab Rahman, Z.; Mohd Noor, A.; Md Sham, F.; Hasim, N.A.; Safiai, M.H.; Mokhtar, M.H.; Hamjah, S.H. Principles regarding the use of haram sources in modern food products: An Islamic perspective. J. Crit. Rev 2020, 7, 1017–1024. [Google Scholar]
  2. Hart, F.L.; Fisher, H.J. Modern Food Analysis; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  3. Jamaludin, M.A.; Ramli, M.A.; Rahman, S.A. Panduan Makanan Halal Haram Menurut Perspektif Al-Quran: Analisis Terhadap Isu-Isu Makanan Semasa. In Proceedings of the Kertas Kerja International Seminar on Wahyu Asas Tamadun, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia (USIM), Nilai, Malaysia, 21–22 September 2011. [Google Scholar]
  4. Chew, H.M. Largest Cultivated Chicken Meat Facility in Asia Breaks Ground in Singapore. Available online: https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/cultivated-cultured-lab-chicken-good-meat-josh-tetrick-singapore-2739016 (accessed on 29 July 2022).
  5. Malaysia, D.D.o.S. Total Population by Sex, Ethnic Group, Age Group, Households and Living Quarters, State. Available online: https://www.dosm.gov.my/-v1/index.php?r=column/ctheme&menu_id=L0pheU4-3NWJwRWVSZklWdzQ4-TlhUUT09&bul_id=MDMxdHZjWTk1SjFzTzNkRXYzcVZjdz09 (accessed on 14 February 2020).
  6. Sirini, N.; Munekata, P.E.; Lorenzo, J.M.; Stegmayer, M.Á.; Pateiro, M.; Pérez-Álvarez, J.Á.; Sepúlveda, N.; Sosa-Morales, M.E.; Teixeira, A.; Fernández-López, J. Development of healthier and functional dry fermented Sausages: Present and future. Foods 2022, 11, 1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Stephens, N.; Di Silvio, L.; Dunsford, I.; Ellis, M.; Glencross, A.; Sexton, A. Bringing cultured meat to market: Technical, socio-political, and regulatory challenges in cellular agriculture. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 78, 155–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhang, G.; Zhao, X.; Li, X.; Du, G.; Zhou, J.; Chen, J. Challenges and possibilities for bio-manufacturing cultured meat. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 97, 443–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bhat, Z.F.; Kumar, S.; Fayaz, H. In vitro meat production: Challenges and benefits over conventional meat production. J. Integr. Agric. 2015, 14, 241–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sato, K. Cultured Meat Production Technology: Challenges and Future Development. Mitsui & Co. Global Strategic Studies Institute Monthly Report. Available online: https://www.mitsui.com/mgssi/en/report/detail/__icsFiles/afieldfile/2021/01/18/2011t_sato_e.pdf (accessed on 1 November 2021).
  11. Brunner, D.; Frank, J.; Appl, H.; Schöffl, H.; Pfaller, W.; Gstraunthaler, G. The serum-free media interactive online database. ALTEX-Altern. Anim. Exp. 2010, 27, 53–62. [Google Scholar]
  12. Jochems, C.E.; Van Der Valk, J.B.; Stafleu, F.R.; Baumans, V. The use of fetal bovine serum: Ethical or scientific problem? Altern. Lab. Anim. 2002, 30, 219–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Whyte, S.A. Islamic religious authority in cyberspace: A qualitative study of Muslim religious actors in Australia. Religions 2022, 13, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hamdan, M.N.; Post, M.; Ramli, M.A.; Kamarudin, M.K.; Ariffin, M.F.M.; Huri, N.M.F.Z. Cultured Meat: Islamic and Other Religious Perspectives. UMRAN-Int. J. Islamic Civiliz. Stud. 2021, 8, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kashim, M.; Majid, L.A.; Adnan, A.H.M.; Husni, A.b.M.; Nasohah, Z.; Samsudin, M.A.; Yahaya, M.Z. Principles regarding the use of haram (forbidden) sources in food processing: A critical Islamic analysis. Asian Soc. Sci. 2015, 11, 17–25. [Google Scholar]
  16. Kashim, M.I.A.M.; Hasim, N.A.; Othaman, R.; Yahaya, M.Z.; Khalid, R.; Samsudin, M.A.; DM, M.Z. Blood plasma in food from Islam and science perspectives [Plasma darah dalam makanan daripada perspektif Islam dan sains]. Sains Malays. 2017, 46, 1779–1787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kashim, M.; Mohamad, M.N.; Sukor, A.S.A.; Adnan, N.I.M.; Safiai, M.H.; Jamsari, E.A. Animal urine therapy according to Islamic and scientific perspectives. Int. J. Civ. Eng. Technol. 2019, 10, 2280–2286. [Google Scholar]
  18. Shahimi, S.; Mutalib, S.A.; Ismail, N.; Elias, A.; Hashim, H.; Kashim, M.I.A.M. Species-specific identification of porcine blood plasma in heat-treated chicken meatballs. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2021, 28, 2447–2452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jamaludin, M.A. Teori istihalah menurut perspektif Islam dan sains: Aplikasi terhadap beberapa penghasilan produk makanan. J. Syariah 2009, 17, 169–194. [Google Scholar]
  20. Calvo, J.H.; Osta, R.; Zaragoza, P. Quantitative PCR detection of pork in raw and heated ground beef and pâté. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 5265–5267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ali, M.E.; Razzak, M.A.; Abd Hamid, S.B.; Rahman, M.M.; Al Amin, M.; Abd Rashid, N.R. Multiplex PCR assay for the detection of five meat species forbidden in Islamic foods. Food Chem. 2015, 177, 214–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Azam, N.F.N.; Roy, S.; Lim, S.A.; Ahmed, M.U. Meat species identification using DNA-luminol interaction and their slow diffusion onto the biochip surface. Food Chem. 2018, 248, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Al-Jowder, O.; Defernez, M.; Kemsley, E.K.; Wilson, R.H. Mid-infrared spectroscopy and chemometrics for the authentication of meat products. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1999, 47, 3210–3218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ayaz, Y.; Ayaz, N.; Erol, I. Detection of species in meat and meat products using Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay. J. Muscle Foods 2006, 17, 214–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Abidin, S.A.S.Z.; Rosli, S.H.; Bujang, A.; Nordin, R.; Nizar, N.N.A. Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy for Determination of Offal in Beef Patties. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE 12th Control and System Graduate Research Colloquium (ICSGRC), Shah Alam, Malaysia, 7 August 2021; pp. 116–121. [Google Scholar]
  26. Čapla, J.; Zajác, P.; Čurlej, J.; Belej, Ľ.; Kročko, M.; Bobko, M.; Benešová, L.; Jakabová, S.; Vlčko, T. Procedures for the Identification and Detection of Adulteration of Fish and Meat Products. Slovak J. Food Sci. 2020, 14, 978–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Böhme, K.; Calo-Mata, P.; Barros-Velázquez, J.; Ortea, I. Review of recent DNA-based methods for main food-authentication topics. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 3854–3864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Abbas, O.; Zadravec, M.; Baeten, V.; Mikuš, T.; Lešić, T.; Vulić, A.; Prpić, J.; Jemeršić, L.; Pleadin, J. Analytical methods used for the authentication of food of animal origin. Food Chem. 2018, 246, 6–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Shahimi, S.; Ahmad Ghazali, N.A.; Elias, A.; Mohd Zaini, N.A.; Abd Mutalib, S. Analisis Tindak Balas Berantai Polimerase (PCR) Simpleks dan Multipleks ke atas Produk Surimi Terawat Terma bagi Pengesanan DNA Lembu dan Babi. Sains Malays. 2020, 49, 1959–1967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Corona, B.; Lleonard, R.; Carpio, Y.; Uffo, O.; Martínez, S. PCR detection of DNA of bovine, ovine-caprine and porcine origin in feed as part of a bovine spongiform encephalopathy control program. Span. J. Agric. Res. 2007, 5, 312–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Ismail, N.F. Kesan Kaedah Pemanasan Berbeza ke Atas Pengesanan DNA Ayam di Dalam Bebola Daging Dengan Menggunakan Tindak Balas Berantai Polimerase (PCR). Master’s Thesis, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  32. Pascoal, A.; Prado, M.; Calo, P.; Cepeda, A.; Barros-Velázquez, J. Detection of bovine DNA in raw and heat-processed foodstuffs, commercial foods and specific risk materials by a novel specific polymerase chain reaction method. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2005, 220, 444–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Prado, M.; Franco, C.M.; Fente, C.A.; Cepeda, A.; Vázquez, B.I.; Barros-Velázquez, J. Comparison of extraction methods for the recovery, amplification and species-specific analysis of DNA from bone and bone meals. Electrophoresis 2002, 23, 1005–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Azli, N.H.N.; Sahilah, A.M.; Hashim, H.; Maaruf, A.G.; Kashim, M.I.A.M. Pengasingan dan pengesanan asid deoksiribonukleik (DNA) spesies haiwan menggunakan multipleks tindak balas rantaian polimerase (PCR) daripada minyak sapi. Sains Malays. 2021, 50, 3275–3284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Mohamad, N.A.; El Sheikha, A.F.; Mustafa, S.; Mokhtar, N.F.K. Comparison of gene nature used in real-time PCR for porcine identification and quantification: A review. Food Res. Int. 2013, 50, 330–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Foran, D.R. Relative degradation of nuclear and mitochondrial DNA: An experimental approach. J. Forensic Sci. 2006, 51, 766–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Myers, M.J.; Friedman, S.L.; Farrell, D.E.; Dove-Pettit, D.A.; Bucker, M.F.; Kelly, S.; Madzo, S.; Campbell, W.; Wang, R.-F.; Paine, D. Validation of a polymerase chain reaction method for the detection of rendered bovine-derived materials in feedstuffs. J. Food Prot. 2001, 64, 564–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Rodríguez Escobar, M.I.; Cadena, E.; Nhu, T.T.; Cooreman-Algoed, M.; De Smet, S.; Dewulf, J. Analysis of the Cultured Meat Production System in Function of Its Environmental Footprint: Current Status, Gaps and Recommendations. Foods 2021, 10, 2941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Bottero, M.T.; Civera, T.; Nucera, D.; Rosati, S.; Sacchi, P.; Turi, R. A multiplex polymerase chain reaction for the identification of cows’, goats’ and sheep’s milk in dairy products. Int. Dairy J. 2003, 13, 277–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Liyana, L.; Sahilah, A.; Nur Qistina, Z.; Mohd Khan, A.; Aminah, A.; Abdul Salam, B. Detection of porcine DNA in cooked meatballs using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay. Int. Food Res. J. 2018, 25, 1953–1958. [Google Scholar]
  41. Abd Mutalib, S.; Muin, N.M.; Abdullah, A.; Hassan, O.; Mustapha, W.A.W.; Sani, N.A.; Maskat, M.Y. Sensitivity of polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-southern hybridization and conventional PCR analysis for Halal authentication of gelatin capsules. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 63, 714–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. PCR amplification results for bovine blood plasma samples. M Lane: 100 bp marker; PC lane: positive control (165 bp); lane 1: D1; lane 2: D2; lane 3: D3; lane 4: D4; lane 5: D5; NC: negative control.
Figure 1. PCR amplification results for bovine blood plasma samples. M Lane: 100 bp marker; PC lane: positive control (165 bp); lane 1: D1; lane 2: D2; lane 3: D3; lane 4: D4; lane 5: D5; NC: negative control.
Foods 11 03235 g001
Figure 2. PCR amplification results for bovine serum samples. M Lane: 100 bp marker; PC lane: positive control (165 bp); lane 1: D1; lane 2: D2; lane 3: D3: lane 4: D4; lane 5: D5; lane 6: D6; NC: negative control.
Figure 2. PCR amplification results for bovine serum samples. M Lane: 100 bp marker; PC lane: positive control (165 bp); lane 1: D1; lane 2: D2; lane 3: D3: lane 4: D4; lane 5: D5; lane 6: D6; NC: negative control.
Foods 11 03235 g002
Table 1. Volume of PCR mixture.
Table 1. Volume of PCR mixture.
PCR Mixture Material (µL)SamplePositive ControlNegative Control
DreamTaq parent mix™ green PCR (2×)252525
Primer (front)1.01.01.0
Primer (rear)1.01.01.0
DNA template2
DNA samples2
Nuclease-free water (NFW)232323
Total volume (µL)52.052.050.0
Table 2. PCR program for bovine DNA detection.
Table 2. PCR program for bovine DNA detection.
PrimerMethodTemperature (°C)/Time (min)Reference
Bovine-F/Bovine-RInitial denaturation95/2Corona et al. [30]
Denaturation94/1
Annealing55/1
Elongation72/2
Annealing55/1
Elongation72/2
Final elongation72/10
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mohd Kashim, M.I.A.; Abdul Haris, A.A.; Hasim, N.A.; Abd Mutalib, S.; Anuar, N. Species-Specific Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Identification of Bovine in Cultured Meat Serum for halal Status. Foods 2022, 11, 3235. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11203235

AMA Style

Mohd Kashim MIA, Abdul Haris AA, Hasim NA, Abd Mutalib S, Anuar N. Species-Specific Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Identification of Bovine in Cultured Meat Serum for halal Status. Foods. 2022; 11(20):3235. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11203235

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mohd Kashim, Mohd Izhar Ariff, Alia Aryssa Abdul Haris, Nur Asmadayana Hasim, Sahilah Abd Mutalib, and Nurina Anuar. 2022. "Species-Specific Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Identification of Bovine in Cultured Meat Serum for halal Status" Foods 11, no. 20: 3235. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11203235

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop