Next Article in Journal
Food Security in China: A Brief View of Rice Production in Recent 20 Years
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Dietary Tannic Acid on Obesity and Gut Microbiota in C57BL/6J Mice Fed with High-Fat Diet
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Nutritional Value and Physicochemical Characteristics of Alternative Protein for Meat and Dairy—A Review

1
National Engineering Laboratory for Industrial Enzymes, Tianjin Institute of Industrial Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiqidao No. 32, Airport Economic Area, Tianjin 300308, China
2
National Technology Innovation Center of Synthetic Biology, Tianjin 300308, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2022, 11(21), 3326; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11213326
Submission received: 18 September 2022 / Revised: 9 October 2022 / Accepted: 18 October 2022 / Published: 23 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Foods)

Abstract

In order to alleviate the pressure on environmental resources faced by meat and dairy production and to satisfy the increasing demands of consumers for food safety and health, alternative proteins have drawn considerable attention in the food industry. However, despite the successive reports of alternative protein food, the processing and application foundation of alternative proteins for meat and dairy is still weak. This paper summarizes the nutritional composition and physicochemical characteristics of meat and dairy alternative proteins from four sources: plant proteins, fungal proteins, algal proteins and insect proteins. The difference between these alternative proteins to animal proteins, the effects of their structural features and environmental conditions on their properties, as well as the corresponding mechanism are compared and discussed. Though fungal proteins, algal proteins and insect proteins have shown some advantages over traditional plant proteins, such as the comparable protein content of insect proteins to meat, the better digestibility of fungal proteins and the better foaming properties of algal proteins, there is still a big gap between alternative proteins and meat and dairy proteins. In addition to needing to provide amino acid composition and digestibility similar to animal proteins, alternative proteins also face challenges such as maintaining good solubility and emulsion properties. Their nutritional and physicochemical properties still need thorough investigation, and for commercial application, it is important to develop and optimize industrial technology in alternative protein separation and modification.
Keywords: alternative proteins; nutritional value; physicochemical characteristics alternative proteins; nutritional value; physicochemical characteristics

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zeng, Y.; Chen, E.; Zhang, X.; Li, D.; Wang, Q.; Sun, Y. Nutritional Value and Physicochemical Characteristics of Alternative Protein for Meat and Dairy—A Review. Foods 2022, 11, 3326. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11213326

AMA Style

Zeng Y, Chen E, Zhang X, Li D, Wang Q, Sun Y. Nutritional Value and Physicochemical Characteristics of Alternative Protein for Meat and Dairy—A Review. Foods. 2022; 11(21):3326. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11213326

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zeng, Yan, Enhui Chen, Xuewen Zhang, Demao Li, Qinhong Wang, and Yuanxia Sun. 2022. "Nutritional Value and Physicochemical Characteristics of Alternative Protein for Meat and Dairy—A Review" Foods 11, no. 21: 3326. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11213326

APA Style

Zeng, Y., Chen, E., Zhang, X., Li, D., Wang, Q., & Sun, Y. (2022). Nutritional Value and Physicochemical Characteristics of Alternative Protein for Meat and Dairy—A Review. Foods, 11(21), 3326. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11213326

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop