Next Article in Journal
The Lipid-Soluble Bioactive Substances of Fagopyrum esculentum Varieties under Different Tillage and Nitrogen Fertilisation
Next Article in Special Issue
Biochemical and Genomic Characterization of Two New Strains of Lacticaseibacillus paracasei Isolated from the Traditional Corn-Based Beverage of South Africa, Mahewu, and Their Comparison with Strains Isolated from Kefir Grains
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Ultrasound Combined with Glycerol-Mediated Low-Sodium Curing on the Quality and Protein Structure of Pork Tenderloin
Previous Article in Special Issue
Vegan Ice Cream Made from Soy Extract, Soy Kefir and Jaboticaba Peel: Antioxidant Capacity and Sensory Profile
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Probiotic Lactic Acid Bacteria (LAB) on the Quality and Safety of Greek Yogurt

Department of Food and Nutrition, College of Human Ecology, Kyung Hee University, 26 Kyungheedae-ro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 02447, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2022, 11(23), 3799; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11233799
Submission received: 20 October 2022 / Revised: 20 November 2022 / Accepted: 21 November 2022 / Published: 25 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Research on Probiotics and Fermented Products)

Abstract

:
Greek yogurt is a strained yogurt with a high protein content that brings nutritional benefits. To enhance the functional benefits of Greek yogurt, Greek yogurt was prepared with various combinations of probiotic lactic acid bacteria (LAB) (Streptococcus thermophilus, Lactobacillus bulgaricus, Lactobacillus gasseri BNR17, and Lactobacillus plantarum HY7714). Effects of probiotic LAB on quality, sensory, and microbiological characteristics of Greek yogurt were then compared. Among samples, Greek yogurt fermented by S. thermophilus and L. bulgaricus showed the highest changes of pH and titratable acidity during 21 d of storage at 4 °C. Greek yogurt fermented with L. plantarum HY7714 had a higher viscosity than other samples. Greek yogurt fermented with S. thermophilus, L. bulgaricus, L. gasseri BNR17, and L. plantarum HY7714 showed superior physicochemical properties and received the highest preference score from sensory evaluation among samples. Overall, the population of enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC) was more effectively reduced in Greek yogurt fermented with probiotic LAB than in commercial Greek yogurt during storage at 4, 10, and 25 °C. Thus, the addition of L. gasseri BNR17 and L. plantarum HY7714 as starter cultures could enhance the microbial safety of Greek yogurt and sensory acceptance by consumers.

1. Introduction

Greek yogurt is known as a healthy snack that can increase lean muscle mass and decrease body fat [1]. The manufacture of Greek yogurt begins with homogenization of standardized milk. The homogenized milk is then pasteurized and cooled at an incubation temperature up to 40 °C. After a starter culture is inoculated, the yogurt gets a thicker texture through a concentration step [1,2]. This “concentration” step can increase protein content to be around 9–10% and give Greek yogurt a hard texture [3]. Protein in Greek yogurt makes the perception of hunger lower and the time between meals longer [4].
Commercial yogurt is prepared with probiotics to help intestinal function, stabilize gut microflora, and change compositions and numbers of intestinal microflora [5]. Lactobacillus gasseri BNR17 originally isolated from human breast milk is known to inhibit weight gain [6]. L. gasseri BNR17 can reduce the amount of food intake and 2 h postprandial blood glucose [7]. L. gasseri BNR17 can also reduce levels of leptin and insulin [8], waist circumferences, hip circumferences, and visceral adipose tissues [9]. Lactobacillus plantarum HY7714 isolated from healthy infant feces is a registered probiotic that can prevent photoaging, restore procollagen, and increase the retention of water in the face and hand [10,11,12,13]. Recently, Lee et al. [14] have reported that L. plantarum HY7714 can produce exopolysaccharides, which can control tight junctions in intestinal epithelial cells and recover cytotoxicity and hydration capacity in Hs68 cells induced by UVB irradiation. Although L. gasseri BNR17 and L. plantarum HY7714 are used to manufacture functional capsules or powder, neither L. gasseri BNR17 nor L. plantarum HY7714 has been applied in the manufacturing of healthy foods such as yogurt.
Enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC) has strong acid resistance and maintains viability at low pH [15]. Acid resistance of EHEC has been clarified more due to the outbreak of EHEC in yogurt, where the risk of foodborne pathogens is very low [16]. EHEC can survive well in yogurt at 4 and 10 °C for 21 d of storage [17]. Recently, the antimicrobial effect of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) on E. coli has been reported [18,19]. LAB shows antagonistic activities, expressing higher inhibition effects on E. coli and E. coli O157:H7 than Salmonella typhimurium, S. Enteritidis, and Listeria monocytogenes [18]. Choi et al. [19] have reported that Leuconostoc mesenteroides and L. plantarum can inhibit the viability of E. coli O157:H7 in kimchi. Although consumers’ preference for Greek yogurt is increasing, L. gasseri BNR17 and L. plantarum HY7714 have not been tested as starter cultures for Greek yogurt manufacturing. Their effects as antimicrobial agents in various functional foods remain unclear.
Therefore, the objective of this study is to manufacture new functional Greek yogurt with L. gasseri BNR17 and L. plantarum HY7714 known to have various health benefits. How each LAB affected the viscosity, consumer preference, and microbiological safety of Greek yogurt at 4, 10, and 25 °C is also investigated.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Starter Culture for Preparation of Greek Yogurt

For Greek yogurt production, probiotic LAB including Streptococcus thermophilus (ST, KCTC 3779), Lactobacillus bulgaricus (LB, KCTC 3635), Lactobacillus gasseri BNR17(KCTC 10902BP), and Lactobacillus plantarum HY7714 (KCTC 12400BP) were purchased from Korean Collection for Type Cultures (KCTC). All strains were maintained at −80 °C in De Man, Rogosa, and Sharpe broth (MRS, DifcoTM, Difco Laboratories, Detroit, MI, USA) with 20% glycerol. Thawed ST was aerobically incubated at 42 °C overnight in an incubator. LB was anaerobically incubated overnight at 36 °C using an anaerobic jar system (Don Whitley Scientific Ltd., Bradford, UK). L. gasseri BNR17 and L. plantarum HY7714 were aerobically incubated at 36 °C with shaking at 140 rpm in a rotary shaker (VS-8480SR, Vision). L. gasseri BNR17 and L. plantarum HY7714 were centrifugated at 4500× g for 15 min (VS-550, Vision), washed with sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) twice, and resuspended to a final concentration of 109 CFU/mL according to Kim et al. [11] with some modifications.

2.2. Preparation of Enterohaemorrhagic E. coli for the Safety Study

Enterohaemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) strains (NCCP 13720, 13721), including E. coli O157:H7 (NCTC 12079), were obtained from the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS) to investigate the effect of LAB probiotics on the behavior of EHEC in Greek yogurt at various temperatures. Frozen strains were maintained at −80 °C with 20% glycerol in tryptic soy broth (TSB, MB cell, Seoul, Republic of Korea). Then 10 μL of thawed EHEC was inoculated into 10 mL of TSB and incubated at 36 °C in a rotary shaker at 140 rpm overnight. After centrifuging at 4000× g for 10 min, the supernatant was removed, and the pellet was washed with 10 mL of 0.1% sterilized peptone water (DifcoTM Peptone water, Difco Laboratories). A cocktail of EHEC strains was prepared by resuspending them with 0.1% sterilized peptone water. Then 1 mL aliquot of EHEC was diluted with 0.1% sterilized peptone water for inoculum.

2.3. Manufacturing of Greek Yogurt

Pasteurized whole milk by high-temperature short-time (HTST) was purchased from a local market (Seoul, Republic of Korea) and heated in glass bottles at 42 °C in a water bath (SB-1200, EYELA Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China). Four different Greek yogurts with various combinations of starter culture (5% wt/wt) were prepared as follows: ST and LB as traditional yogurt strains (T1, control), ST, LB, and L. gasseri BNR17 (T2), ST, LB, and L. plantarum HY7714 (T3), and ST, LB, L. gasseri BNR17, and L. plantarum HY7714 (T4). All strains were mixed in equal proportions. Fermentation of Greek yogurt was carried out at 42 °C until pH was 4.4. Samples were then distributed into 250 mL polypropylene centrifuge bottles (Beckman Coulter AvantiTM, Indianapolis, IN, USA) and centrifuged at 4500× g for 15 min. After Greek yogurt (60 g) was transferred to sterilized plastic cups, quality evaluation was conducted every three days for 21 days of storage at 4 °C. A flow chart of the manufacturing step for Greek yogurt is shown in Figure 1.

2.4. pH, Titratable Acidity, and Viscosity

The pH and titratable acidity were measured according to the method of AOAC [20]. Greek yogurt (10 g) was homogenized with 90 mL of distilled water using a stomacher (Stomacher, Interscience, Saint-Nom-la-Bretèche, France). The pH was measured with a benchtop pH meter equipped with a glass electrode (OrionTM Star A211, Thermo Fisher Scientific Co., Waltham, MA, USA). Greek yogurt (5 g) was homogenized with 45 mL of distilled water in a sterile filter bag to determine titratable acidity. Then 20 g of the filtrate was titrated with 0.1 N NaOH using 0.5 mL of phenolphthalein indicator until pH reached 8.3. The titratable acidity was expressed as a percentage of lactic acid. It was calculated as follows:
Titratable   acidity   ( % ) = 0.1   N   NaOH   ( mL ) × 0.1 N   NaOH   factor × 0.009 Sample   ( g ) × 100 .
The viscosity of Greek yogurt was determined according to the method of Ghasempour et al. [21] with modifications. Briefly, all samples were divided into glass bottles in equal volumes. The viscosity of each sample was measured with RV-spindle No. 6 for 20 s at 10 rpm using a Brookfield viscometer (DV1, Brookfield Laboratories, Inc., Middleboro, MA, USA). It was expressed as Pascal-second (Pa·s) and millipascal-second (mPa·s).

2.5. Consumer Prefernce Test

The consumer preference test was performed following the rules of the Institutional Review Board (IRB) to comply with bioethics (KHSIRB-21-354). Four Greek yogurt samples (T1: ST and LB; T2: ST, LB, and L. gasseri BNR17; T3: ST, LB, and L. plantarum HY7714; T4: ST, LB, L. gasseri BNR17, and L. plantarum HY7714) were stored at 4 °C before the sensory test. Each sample (30 g) was scooped into paper cups labeled with 3-digit random numbers, which were served monadically to the panelist with spring water and a spoon. The consumer preference test was conducted by 60 panelists (44 women and 16 men) aged between 20 and 68. The purpose of sensory evaluation and the direction of how to score the sensory properties of samples (flavor, sweetness, sourness, viscosity, creaminess, mouthfeel, and overall acceptance) were provided to participants (Table 1). Participants scored each sample with a 7-point Hedonic scale (1 = dislike very much; 2 = dislike moderately; 3 = dislike slightly; 4 = neither like nor dislike; 5 = like slightly; 6 = like moderately, 7 = like very much) [22].

2.6. Microbiological Analysis

Enumeration of LAB in Greek yogurt was carried out by the standard plate counting method. Each sample (10 g) was diluted 10-fold with 0.9% sterile saline solution (NaCl, Duksan, Ansan-si, Republic of Korea). Then 1 mL of aliquot was inoculated onto MRS agar and incubated at 36 °C for 48 h.
To analyze the behavior of EHEC in Greek yogurt, each sample made with different probiotic LAB was aseptically divided in 10 g into 50 mL conical tubes (SPL Life Science Co., Pocheon-si, Republic of Korea) and compared with a commercial Greek yogurt (Foodis Plain Greek yogurt, ILDONG Foodis Co., Seoul, Republic of Korea) as a control. The commercial Greek yogurt was manufactured with complex lactic acid bacteria (15 × 1010/80 g). Each Greek yogurt was inoculated with a cocktail of diluted EHEC at an initial level of 5~6 log CFU/g and stored at 4, 10, and 25 °C. After an appropriate interval time, samples were homogenized with 0.1% sterilized peptone water, and 1 mL of aliquot was serially diluted. A diluted solution of EHEC was spread on eosin methylene blue agar (EMB agar, Oxoid) and incubated at 36 °C for 24 h to analyze the behavior of EHEC in Greek yogurt. The primary survival model of EHEC in Greek yogurt was applied to the Weibull model [26] (Equation (1)) using the GinaFit V1.7 program [27]. Delta value (time for the first decimal reduction) was then calculated.
Weibull   equation :   Log ( N ) = Log ( N 0 ) ( t d e l t a ) p
N0: log the initial number of cells.
t: time.
delta: time for the first decimal reduction.
p: shape (p > 1: concave downward curve; p < 1: concave upward curve; p = 1: log-linear).
The secondary model for delta value was developed, and the Davey model (Equation (3)) was used to predict delta values as a function of temperature:
Davey   model :   Y = a + ( b / T ) + ( c / T 2 )
a, b, c: constant.
T: temperature.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

All experiments were conducted three times or more. Results of this study were subjected to ANOVA and Duncan’s multiple range test using SAS software ver. 9.4 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA). The significance was tested at p < 0.05 level.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Effect of Probiotic LAB on pH and Titratable Acidity

Changes in physicochemical characteristics of Greek yogurt at 4 °C during 21 d of storage are shown in Figure 2 and Figure 3. The pH and titratable acidity of traditional Greek yogurt were 4.06 to 4.64 and 0.919 to 1.579%, respectively [28]. High acidity can negatively affect the water-holding capacity and viscosity of yogurt [29]. After centrifugation, the pH values of all samples decreased from 4.4~4.44 to 4.15~4.17 in this work. The pH of the Greek yogurt made with ST and LB (T1) was further dropped from 4.167 to 3.843 after 21 d of storage, while Greek yogurt made with ST, LB, and L. gasseri BNR17 (T2) had relatively constant pH values (Figure 2). Overall, the pH decrease rate was low in Greek yogurt containing L. gasseri BNR17 (T2 and T4) during 21 d of storage at 4 °C (Figure 3). The titratable acidity of all Greek yogurt samples increased during 21 d of storage. The increase of titratable acidity of Greek yogurt made with ST and LB (T1) was the highest (+0.780 ± 0.227) among all samples (p < 0.05) during storage. The pH dropped while titratable acidity increased in all Greek yogurt samples during storage in this study, similar to the results of previous studies [30,31]. Greek yogurt made with L. gasseri BNR17 showed the least changes in pH and titratable acidity during storage, indicating that L. gasseri BNR17 did not affect the pH change of yogurt. Increased levels of L. rhamnosus GG decrease titratable acidity [32]. L. casei AST18 also inhibits the acidogenicity of a commercial yogurt starter [33]. These results confirm that changes in the physicochemical characteristics of Greek yogurt can be controlled by the kind of starter culture used during yogurt manufacturing. Adding various probiotic LAB as starter cultures may contribute to the development of sensory characteristics of a consumer-oriented product.

3.2. Effect of Probiotic LAB on Viscosity and LAB Population

Consumers favor Greek yogurt because of its unique firmness, dense texture, moderate sweet aromatic, milk fat and dairy sour flavors, and moderately sour taste [23]. Thus, viscosity is one of the most important quality characteristics of Greek yogurt. In the present study, the viscosity of Greek yogurt ranged from 70.9 to 71.4 Pa·s (7.09 × 104 to 7.14 × 104 mPa·s) at 0 d after centrifugation. It was increased during 21 d of storage at 4 °C (Figure 2). Greek yogurt containing L. plantarum HY 7714 (T3 and T4) had the highest viscosity at 21 d and the highest increase rate of viscosity during 21 d of storage among samples (Figure 3) (p < 0.05). L. plantarum strains can produce exopolysaccharide (EPS), a macromolecule composed of monosaccharide residues of sugar and sugar derivatives. EPS can act as an important factor in the physicochemical and rheological properties of yogurt due to its role as a natural concentrate agent and stabilizer [34,35]. Nambiar et al. [36] have reported that EPS isolated from L. plantarum HM47 has high thermal stability and that it can enhance the texture of yogurt at a low pH (4.0). In this work, L. plantarum HY 7714 also increased the viscosity of Greek yogurt.
As shown in Figure 2, Greek yogurt had LAB populations above 108 CFU/g after a concentration step. Yogurt should contain a minimum of 107 CFU/g of live and active cultures [37]. The LAB population was well maintained above the criteria in Greek yogurt at 4 °C during 21 d of storage in this work. Greek yogurt with ST, LB, and L. gasseri BNR17 (T2) showed the lowest decrease in the LAB population (−0.022 ± 0.002) during 21 d of storage at 4 °C. However, no significant difference in the decreased extent of LAB population was observed between T2 and T4 (ST, LB, L. gasseri BNR17, and L. plantarum HY7714) (Figure 3). These results indicated that populations of probiotic LAB were well maintained in Greek yogurt containing L. gasseri BNR17 during storage.

3.3. Antimicrobial Effect of Probiotic LAB on EHEC

Effects of LAB on the survival of EHEC in Greek yogurt stored at 4, 10, and 25 °C are shown in Figure 4. At both 4 °C and 10 °C, the most rapid reduction of EHEC was observed in Greek yogurt made with ST and LB (T1). On the other hand, populations of EHEC were well maintained in all other Greek yogurt stored at 4 °C and 10 °C. At 25 °C, the most rapid reduction of EHEC was observed in Greek yogurt made with ST, LB, and L. plantarum HY7714 (T3), in which EHEC was not detected after 4 d of storage. The population of EHEC was maintained in commercial Greek yogurt up to 4 d of storage and then rapidly decreased, indicating that the type of probiotic LAB could affect the behavior of EHEC in Greek yogurt at ambient temperature. Ogwaro et al. [38] have manufactured yogurt with pasteurized full cream milk and found that E. coli O157:H7 can survive at 4 °C, while there is no E. coli O157:H7 on the fifth day of storage time at 25 °C. Moineau-Jean et al. [39] have also prepared Greek-style yogurt using centrifugation and ultrafiltration methods. Ultrafiltration methods more effectively inhibited the viability of non-pathogenic E. coli strains than traditional and centrifugation methods. In addition, E. coli had a lower viability at 8 °C than at 4 °C (p < 0.05).
Commercial Greek yogurt had higher delta values than other Greek yogurt prepared in this work (p < 0.05), indicating that the highest survival ability of EHEC was observed in commercial Greek yogurt at all temperatures. This trend was confirmed with delta values as a function of temperature, which indicated how rapidly pathogens were killed with an increase in temperature (Table 2). The low pH (4.52) and viscosity (59.6 ± 0.26 Pa·s, 5.96 × 104 ± 0.26 mPa·s) of commercial Greek yogurt might have affected the survival ability of EHEC. On the contrary, EHEC died more quickly in Greek yogurt prepared with various probiotic LAB in the present study. Especially, Greek yogurt made with ST and LB (T1) had the lowest pH and delta values and the highest titratable acidity among all samples (p < 0.05). The presence of lactic acid produced from LAB can control the growth of E. coli O157:H7 in yogurt [40]. Hu et al. [41] have observed that organic acid produced from L. plantarum exhibits antimicrobial activity against E. coli. E. coli O157:H7 was also inhibited by reduced pH and lactic acid produced by L. acidophilus and L. casei [42]. Guraya et al. [43] have reported that a pH below 4.1 can significantly inhibit the growth of EHEC in yogurt. Moreover, cell-free supernatant of LAB strains, including Leuconostoc mesenteroides and L. plantarum shows antimicrobial activities against EPEC, ETEC, and E. coli O157:H7 in kimchi [19].

3.4. Consumer Preference Test

Consumer preference test results of Greek yogurt are shown in Table 3. There were no significant differences in flavor scores of Greek yogurts among all samples, indicating that the panelist did not recognize the difference in the flavor of Greek yogurts prepared in this work. The average preference score for the flavor of Greek yogurts ranged from 4.82 to 5.08. Overall, Greek yogurt made with ST, LB, L. gasseri BNR17, and L. plantarum HY7714 (T4) had the highest preference scores of all sensory properties, including flavor (5.08), sweetness (5.05), sourness (5.3), viscosity (5.42), creaminess (5.68), mouthfeel (5.87), and overall acceptability (5.8). Among sensory preference scores, scores for the sourness and overall acceptability of Greek yogurt (T4) were significantly higher than those of other Greek yogurt samples (p < 0.05). For sourness, T4 (5.3) had the highest preference score, followed by T2 (4.75), T3 (4.42), and T1 (4.37) (p < 0.05). These results are related to the titratable acidity of Greek yogurt. The highest titratable acidity of Greek yogurt made with ST and LB (T1) received the lowest preference score for sourness. Greek yogurt containing L. gasseri BNR17 or/and L. plantarum HY7714 (T2, T3, T4) received higher scores of sweetness and sourness than Greek yogurt containing only traditional starter culture (T1). Although there were no significant differences in viscosity scores among samples, T4 had the highest viscosity score (5.42) among all samples, followed by T3 (5.28), T2 (5.25), and T1 (5.15). T4 also had the highest scores for creaminess (5.68) and mouthfeel (5.87), followed by T3 (5.55 and 5.57), T2 (5.4 and 5.4), and T1 (5.18 and 5.3). Lastly, Greek yogurt containing both L. gasseri BNR17 and L. plantarum HY7714 (T4) had the highest score for overall acceptability (5.8), which indicates “like moderately”, followed by T2 and T3 with the same score (5.2) and T1 (4.78) (p < 0.05). These results show that using L. gasseri BNR17 and L. plantarum HY7714 as starter cultures in Greek yogurt manufacturing can improve various sensory qualities of yogurt, which are closely related to consumer preference and acceptability. Moreover, the highest preference sensory score for T4 among samples might be attributed to the combination of various probiotic LAB in T4. Coggins et al. [44] have found that taste and texture rather than flavor or appearance make a difference in the preference for yogurt. Aroma, sweetness, sourness, chalky mouthfeel, and viscosity are also significant factors affecting the preference for yogurt drinks [45].
LAB can change carbohydrates into lactic acid or other metabolites, caseins into peptides and free amino acids, and milk fat into free fatty acids during fermentation. These mechanisms make the unique flavor of yogurt [46,47]. Leuconostoc strains are preferred to increase the butter-like flavor of yogurt due to diacetyl, acetic acid, and ethanol produced during fermentation [48]. Bifidobacteria contribute to the production of acetaldehyde and acetoin with effects on the overall flavor quality of yogurt [49]. When quantitative descriptive analysis and consumer preference evaluation were performed to compare six conventional yogurt samples and three probiotic yogurt samples, probiotic yogurt samples had higher scores of sweet taste, creaminess, and overall sensory quality than conventional yogurt samples. This result appeared to be due to the high preference for probiotic yogurt samples for the degree of uniformity of particles and viscosity in the mouth [50]. Recently, higher preferences for color and overall taste of probiotic yogurt samples containing L. fermentum KU200060 than control yogurt have been also reported [51]. Additionally, a combination of L. rhamnosus GG, L. plantarum NK181, or L. delbeuckii KU200171 with a traditional starter culture led to high scores of tastes, texture, flavor, and overall preferences given by trained panelists [52]. In the study of Desai et al. [23], consumer preferences were not significantly different between traditional strained yogurt and fortified Greek yogurt. However, the results of the quality property and consumer preference test in this study confirmed that the use of L. gasseri BNR17 and L. plantarum HY7714 as starter cultures could enhance consumers’ preference for Greek yogurt.

4. Conclusions

Streptococcus thermophilus (ST), Lactobacillus bulgaricus (LB), Lactobacillus gasseri BNR17, and Lactobacillus plantarum HY7714 were used to evaluate the combined effects of various probiotic LAB on the quality and safety aspects of Greek yogurt. The pH and titratable acidity of Greek yogurt made with ST, LB, L. gasseri BNR17, and L. plantarum HY7714 (T4) was kept relatively constant. In contrast, Greek yogurt made with ST and LB (T1) showed significant changes in pH and titratable acidity (p < 0.05), leading to the lowest preference scores for all sensory attributes. Greek yogurt containing L. plantarum HY7714 (T3 and T4) had high viscosity, consistent with the results of the viscosity score in the consumer preference test. At 4 °C and 10 °C, the most effective antimicrobial effect against EHEC was observed with T1 due to its low pH and high titratable acidity. At 25 °C, EHEC showed low viability in Greek yogurt containing L. gasseri BNR17 and L. plantarum HY7714 than in commercial Greek yogurt (p < 0.05). Sensory panelists preferred Greek yogurt containing L. gasseri BNR17 and L. plantarum HY7714 (T4) over other samples. Thus, it is concluded that using probiotic LAB such as L. gasseri BNR17 and L. plantarum HY7714 as starter cultures for Greek yogurt manufacturing can enhance consumers’ preference and functionality.

Author Contributions

Investigation, S.-Y.Y. and K.-S.Y.; methodology, S.-Y.Y. and K.-S.Y.; project administration, K.-S.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, S.-Y.Y.; writing—review and editing, K.-S.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lee, W.J.; Lucey, J.A. Formation and physical properties of yogurt. Asian Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2010, 23, 1127–1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Li, S.; Ye, A.; Singh, H. Effects of seasonal variations on the quality of set yogurt, stirred yogurt, and Greek-style yogurt. J. Dairy Sci. 2021, 104, 1424–1432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Moineau-Jean, A.; Champagne, C.P.; Roy, D.; Raymond, Y.; LaPointe, G. Effect of Greek-style yoghurt manufacturing processes on starter and probiotic bacteria populations during storage. Int. Dairy J. 2019, 93, 35–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Douglas, S.M.; Ortinau, L.C.; Hoertel, H.A.; Leidy, H.J. Low, moderate, or high protein yogurt snacks on appetite control and subsequent eating in healthy women. Appetite 2013, 60, 117–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Daniali, M.; Nikfar, S.; Abdollahi, M. A brief overview on the use of probiotics to treat overweight and obese patients. Expert Rev. Endocrinol. Metab. 2020, 15, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Kang, J.H.; Yun, S.I.; Park, H.O. Composition for Prevention and Treatment of Diabetes Mellitus with Lactobacillus gasseri BNR17. Korean Patent KR20080048976A, 29 November 2007. [Google Scholar]
  7. Yun, S.I.; Park, H.O.; Kang, J.H. Effect of Lactobacillus gasseri BNR17 on blood glucose levels and body weight in a mouse model of type 2 diabetes. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2009, 107, 1681–1686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kang, J.H.; Yun, S.I.; Park, M.H.; Park, J.H.; Jeong, S.Y.; Park, H.O. Anti-obesity effect of Lactobacillus gasseri BNR17 in high-sucrose diet-induced obese mice. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e54617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Kim, J.; Yun, J.M.; Kim, M.K.; Kwon, O.; Cho, B. Lactobacillus gasseri BNR17 supplementation reduces the visceral fat accumulation and waist circumference in obese adults: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J. Med. Food. 2018, 21, 454–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lee, D.E.; Kim, H.M.; Park, S.D.; Kim, Y.T.; Kim, Y.J.; Jeong, J.W.; Lee, J.H.; Myoung, K.S.; Jang, S.S.; Huh, C.S. Probiotics of Lactobacillus plantarum HY7714 for skin wrinkle inhibitory and moisurizing effects and use of thereof as skin anti-wrinkle or moisturizing products. Korean Patent KR101492003B1, 29 April 2013. [Google Scholar]
  11. Kim, H.M.; Lee, D.E.; Park, S.D.; Kim, Y.T.; Kim, Y.J.; Jeong, J.W.; Jang, S.S.; Ahn, Y.T.; Sim, J.H.; Huh, C.S.; et al. Oral administration of Lactobacillus plantarum HY7714 protects hairless mouse against ultraviolet B-induced photoaging. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 24, 1583–1591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lee, D.E.; Huh, C.S.; Ra, J.; Choi, I.D.; Jeong, J.W.; Kim, S.H.; Ryu, J.H.; Seo, Y.K.; Koh, J.S.; Lee, J.H.; et al. Clinical evidence of effects of Lactobacillus plantarum HY7714 on skin aging: A randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled study. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015, 25, 2160–2168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS). Health Functional Food Code. Available online: https://www.khsa.or.kr/assets/extra/hfood/01.pdf (accessed on 2 July 2021).
  14. Lee, K.; Kim, H.J.; Kim, S.A.; Park, S.D.; Shim, J.J.; Lee, J.L. Exopolysaccharide from Lactobacillus plantarum HY7714 protects against skin aging through skin–gut axis communication. Molecules 2021, 26, 1651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Kim, G.H.; Breidt, F.; Fratamico, P.; Oh, D.H. Acid resistance and molecular characterization of Escherichia coli O157: H7 and different non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing E. coli serogroups. J. Food Sci. 2015, 80, M2257–M2264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Morgan, D.; Newman, C.P.; Hutchinson, D.N.; Walker, A.M.; Rowe, B.; Majid, F. Verotoxin producing Escherichia coli O 157 infections associated with the consumption of yoghurt. Epidemiol. Infect. 1993, 111, 181–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Yang, S.Y.; Yoon, K.S. Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment of Listeria monocytogenes and Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli in Yogurt. Foods 2022, 11, 971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Reuben, R.C.; Roy, P.C.; Sarkar, S.L.; Alam, A.R.U.; Jahid, I.K. Characterization and evaluation of lactic acid bacteria from indigenous raw milk for potential probiotic properties. J. Dairy Sci. 2020, 103, 1223–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Choi, S.J.; Yang, S.Y.; Yoon, K.S. Lactic acid bacteria starter in combination with sodium chloride controls pathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC, ETEC, and EHEC) in kimchi. Food Microbiol. 2021, 100, 103868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. AOAC International. Method Official Methods of Analysis, 16th ed.; AOAC International: Arlington, VA, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  21. Ghasempour, Z.; Javanmard, N.; Langroodi, A.M.; Alizadeh-Sani, M.; Ehsani, A.; Kia, E.M. Development of probiotic yogurt containing red beet extract and basil seed gum; techno-functional, microbial and sensorial characterization. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2020, 29, 101785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Karagul-Yuceer, Y.; Drake, M. Sensory analysis of yogurt. In Manufacturing Yogurt and Fermented Milk, 2nd ed.; Chandan, R.C., Kilara, A., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  23. Desai, N.T.; Shepard, L.; Drake, M.A. Sensory properties and drivers of liking for Greek yogurts. J. Dairy Sci. 2013, 96, 7454–7466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Cayot, P.; Schenker, F.; Houze, G.; Sulmont-Rosse, C.; Colas, B. Creaminess in relation to consistency and particle size in stirred fat-free yogurt. Int. Dairy J. 2008, 18, 303–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Greis, M.; Sainio, T.; Katina, K.; Kinchla, A.K.; Nolden, A.; Partanen, R.; Seppa, L. Dynamic texture perception in plant-based yogurt alternatives: Identifying temperal drivers of liking by TDS. Food Qual. Prefer. 2020, 86, 104019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mafart, P.; Couvert, O.; Gaillard, S.; Leguérinel, I. On calculating sterility in thermal preservation methods: Application of the Weibull frequency distribution model. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2002, 72, 107–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Geeraerd, A.H.; Valdramidis, V.P.; Van Impe, J.F. GInaFiT, a freeware tool to assess non-log-linear microbial survivor curves. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2005, 102, 95–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Serafeimidou, A.; Zlatanos, S.; Laskaridis, K.; Sagredos, A. Chemical characteristics, fatty acid composition, and conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) content of traditional Greek yogurts. Food Chem. 2012, 134, 1839–1846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sodini, I.; Mattas, J.; Tong, P.S. Influence of pH and heat treatment of whey on the functional properties of whey protein concentrates in yoghurt. Int. Dairy, J. 2006, 16, 1464–1469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Zhou, T.; Huo, R.; Kwok, L.Y.; Li, C.; Ma, Y.; Mi, Z.; Chen, Y. Effects of applying Lactobacillus helveticus H9 as adjunct starter culture in yogurt fermentation and storage. J. Dairy Sci. 2019, 102, 223–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Soni, R.; Jain, N.K.; Shah, V.; Soni, J.; Suthar, D.; Gohel, P. Development of probiotic yogurt: Effect of strain combination on nutritional, rheological, organoleptic and probiotic properties. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 57, 2038–2050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Jia, R.; Chen, H.; Chen, H.; Ding, W. Effects of fermentation with Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG on product quality and fatty acids of goat milk yogurt. J. Dairy Sci. 2016, 99, 221–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Li, H.; Liu, L.; Zhang, S.; Uluko, H.; Cui, W.; Lv, J. Potential use of Lactobacillus casei AST18 as a bioprotective culture in yogurt. Food Control 2013, 34, 675–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Duboc, P.; Mollet, B. Applications of exopolysaccharides in the dairy industry. Int. Dairy J. 2001, 11, 759–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. İspirli, H.; Dertli, E. Isolation and identification of exopolysaccharide producer lactic acid bacteria from Turkish yogurt. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2018, 42, e13351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Nambiar, R.B.; Sellamuthu, P.S.; Perumal, A.B.; Sadiku, E.R.; Phiri, G.; Jayaramudu, J. Characterization of an exopolysaccharide produced by Lactobacillus plantarum HM47 isolated from human breast milk. Process. Biochem. 2018, 73, 15–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Milk and Cream Products and Yogurt Products; Final Rule to Revoke the Standards for Lowfat Yogurt and Nonfat Yogurt and to Amend the Standard for Yogurt. Available online: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/06/11/2021-12220/milk-and-cream-products-and-yogurt-products-final-rule-to-revoke-the-standards-for-lowfat-yogurt-and (accessed on 16 November 2021).
  38. Ogwaro, B.A.; Gibson, H.; Whitehead, M.; Hill, D.J. Survival of Escherichia coli O157: H7 in traditional African yoghurt fermentation. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2002, 79, 105–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Moineau-Jean, A.; Guévremont, E.; Champagne, C.P.; Roy, D.; Raymond, Y.; LaPointe, G. Fate of Escherichia coli and Kluyveromyces marxianus contaminants during storage of Greek-style yogurt produced by centrifugation or ultrafiltration. Int. Dairy J. 2017, 72, 36–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Cutrim, C.S.; de Barros, R.F.; da Costa, M.P.; Franco, R.M.; Conte-Junior, C.A.; Cortez, M.A.S. Survival of Escherichia coli O157: H7 during manufacture and storage of traditional and low lactose yogurt. LWT 2016, 70, 178–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hu, C.H.; Ren, L.Q.; Zhou, Y.; Ye, B.C. Characterization of antimicrobial activity of three Lactobacillus plantarum strains isolated from Chinese traditional dairy food. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019, 7, 1997–2005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Ogawa, M.; Shimizu, K.; Nomoto, K.; Tanaka, R.; Hamabata, T.; Yamasaki, S.; Takeda, T.; Takeda, Y. Inhibition of in vitro growth of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli O157: H7 by probiotic Lactobacillus strains due to production of lactic acid. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2001, 68, 135–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Guraya, R.; Frank, J.F.; Hassan, A.N. Effectiveness of salt, pH, and diacetyl as inhibitors for Escherichia coli O157: H7 in dairy foods stored at refrigeration temperatures. J. Food Prot. 1998, 61, 1098–1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Coggins, P.C.; Schilling, M.W.; Kumari, S.; Gerrard, P.D. Development of a sensory lexicon for conventional milk yogurt in the United States. J. Sens. Stud. 2008, 23, 671–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Allgeyer, L.C.; Miller, M.J.; Lee, S.Y. Sensory and microbiological quality of yogurt drinks with prebiotics and probiotics. J. Dairy Sci. 2010, 93, 4471–4479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Steele, J.; Broadbent, J.; Kok, J. Perspectives on the contribution of lactic acid bacteria to cheese flavor development. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2013, 24, 135–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Chen, C.; Zhao, S.; Hao, G.; Yu, H.; Tian, H.; Zhao, G. Role of lactic acid bacteria on the yogurt flavour: A review. Int. J. Food Prop. 2017, 20, S316–S330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Boumerdassi, H.; Monnet, C.; Desmazeaud, M.; Corrieu, G. Isolation and properties of Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis biovar diacetylactis CNRZ 483 mutants producing diacetyl and acetoin from glucose. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1997, 63, 2293–2299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Zareba, D.; Ziarno, M.; Obiedzinski, M. Volatile profile of non-fermented milk and milk fermented by Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis. Int. J. Food Prop. 2012, 15, 1010–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Majchrzak, D.; Lahm, B.; Duerrschmid, K. Conventional and probiotic yogurts differ in sensory properties but not in consumers’ preferences. J. Sens. Stud. 2010, 25, 431–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Lim, S.M.; Lee, N.K.; Kim, K.T.; Paik, H.D. Probiotic Lactobacillus fermentum KU200060 isolated from watery kimchi and its application in probiotic yogurt for oral health. Microb. Pathog. 2020, 147, 104430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Kim, E.D.; Lee, H.S.; Kim, K.T.; Paik, H.D. Antioxidant and Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme (ACE) Inhibitory Activities of Yogurt Supplemented with Lactiplantibacillus plantarum NK181 and Lactobacillus delbrueckii KU200171 and Sensory Evaluation. Foods 2021, 10, 2324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Flow chart of the manufacturing of Greek yogurt with four types of starter culture.
Figure 1. Flow chart of the manufacturing of Greek yogurt with four types of starter culture.
Foods 11 03799 g001
Figure 2. Change of physicochemical characteristics of Greek yogurt with different treatments during storage for 21 days at 4 °C. S. thermophilus and L. bulgaricus (T1): x, S. thermophilus, L. bulgaricus and L. gasseri BNR17 (T2): , S. thermophilus, L. bulgaricus and L. plantarum HY7714 (T3): ▲, S. thermophilus, L. bulgaricus, L. gasseri BNR17, and L. plantarum HY7714 (T4): .
Figure 2. Change of physicochemical characteristics of Greek yogurt with different treatments during storage for 21 days at 4 °C. S. thermophilus and L. bulgaricus (T1): x, S. thermophilus, L. bulgaricus and L. gasseri BNR17 (T2): , S. thermophilus, L. bulgaricus and L. plantarum HY7714 (T3): ▲, S. thermophilus, L. bulgaricus, L. gasseri BNR17, and L. plantarum HY7714 (T4): .
Foods 11 03799 g002
Figure 3. Increase rate of titratable acidity and viscosity (A), and decrease rate of pH and LAB (B). Decrease rate = (final value − initial value)/initial value, Increase rate = (final value − initial value)/initial value. T1: S. thermophilus and L. bulgaricus; T2: S. thermophilus, L. bulgaricus and L. gasseri BNR17; T3: S. thermophilus, L. bulgaricus and L. plantarum HY7714; T4: S. thermophilus, L. bulgaricus, L. gasseri BNR17 and L. plantarum HY7714. A–D Means values in the TA and pH categories with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05) a–c Means values in the viscosity and LAB categories with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Figure 3. Increase rate of titratable acidity and viscosity (A), and decrease rate of pH and LAB (B). Decrease rate = (final value − initial value)/initial value, Increase rate = (final value − initial value)/initial value. T1: S. thermophilus and L. bulgaricus; T2: S. thermophilus, L. bulgaricus and L. gasseri BNR17; T3: S. thermophilus, L. bulgaricus and L. plantarum HY7714; T4: S. thermophilus, L. bulgaricus, L. gasseri BNR17 and L. plantarum HY7714. A–D Means values in the TA and pH categories with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05) a–c Means values in the viscosity and LAB categories with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Foods 11 03799 g003
Figure 4. The effect of lactic acid bacteria on the survival of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli in Greek yogurt at 4, 10, and 25 °C. S. thermophilus and L. bulgaricus (T1): X, S. thermophilus, L. bulgaricus and L. gasseri BNR17 (T2): , S. thermophilus, L. bulgaricus and L. planatarum HY7714 (T3): ▲, S. thermophilus, L. bulgaricus, L. gasseri BNR17 and L. planatarum HY7714 (T4): ■, Commercial Greek yogurt (ILDONG Foodis Plain Greek yogurt): .
Figure 4. The effect of lactic acid bacteria on the survival of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli in Greek yogurt at 4, 10, and 25 °C. S. thermophilus and L. bulgaricus (T1): X, S. thermophilus, L. bulgaricus and L. gasseri BNR17 (T2): , S. thermophilus, L. bulgaricus and L. planatarum HY7714 (T3): ▲, S. thermophilus, L. bulgaricus, L. gasseri BNR17 and L. planatarum HY7714 (T4): ■, Commercial Greek yogurt (ILDONG Foodis Plain Greek yogurt): .
Foods 11 03799 g004
Table 1. Sensory attributes of Greek yogurt.
Table 1. Sensory attributes of Greek yogurt.
AttributeDefinition 1
FlavorThe tangy and dairy-sour flavor
SweetnessThe basic taste associated with sugar
SournessThe basic taste associated with acid
ViscosityThe force required to move the spoon back and forth
CreaminessSmooth texture and behave like a fluid product.
MouthfeelThe physical sensation created by food in the mouth.
1 Terms were adapted from Desai et al. [23], Cayot et al. [24], and Greis et al. [25].
Table 2. Delta values in Greek yogurt at 4, 10, and 25 °C.
Table 2. Delta values in Greek yogurt at 4, 10, and 25 °C.
Sample 1Temperature
41025
T1 115.47 ± 0.11 d8.30 ± 0.23 e1.63 ± 0.24 d
T240.93 ± 0.91 bc24.90 ± 1.54 c1.98 ± 0.06 c
T337.30 ± 3.34 c19.69 ± 2.23 d1.79 ± 0.05 d
T442.04 ± 1.51 b31.06 ± 5.96 b2.65 ± 0.18 b
Commercial 247.76 ± 6.16 a36.77 ± 2.67 a5.00 ± 0.07 a
1 T1: Fermented by S. thermophilus and L. bulgaricus, T2: Fermented by S. thermophilus, L. bulgaricus and L. gasseri BNR17, T3: Fermented by S. thermophilus, L. bulgaricus and L. plantarum HY7714, T4: Fermented by S. thermophilus, L. bulgaricus, L. gasseri BNR17, and L. plantarum HY7714. 2 ILDONG Foodis Plain Greek yogurt. a–e Means values in the same column with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Table 3. Sensory scores of Greek yogurts with different starter cultures by Consumer preference test.
Table 3. Sensory scores of Greek yogurts with different starter cultures by Consumer preference test.
Sample 2Sensory Scores 1
FlavorSweetnessSournessViscosityCreaminessMouthfeel Overall Acceptability
T15.03 ± 1.354.23 ± 1.47 b4.37 ± 1.58 b5.15 ± 1.305.18 ± 1.26 b5.30 ± 1.45 b4.78 ± 1.56 b
T24.98 ± 1.354.77 ± 1.21 a4.75 ± 1.27 b5.25 ± 1.045.40 ± 1.17 ab5.40 ± 1.18 b5.20 ± 1.33 b
T34.82 ± 1.414.77 ± 1.20 a4.42 ± 1.36 b5.28 ± 1.015.55 ± 1.11 ab5.57 ± 1.21 ab5.20 ± 1.27 b
T45.08 ± 1.335.05 ± 1.47 a5.30 ± 1.34 a5.42 ± 1.125.68 ± 1.11 a5.87 ± 0.96 a5.80 ± 1.13 a
1 1 = dislike very much; 2 = dislike moderately; 3 = dislike slightly; 4 = neither like nor dislike; 5 = like slightly; 6 = like moderately, 7 = like very much. 2 T1: fermented by S. thermophilus and L. bulgaricus, T2: fermented by S. thermophilus, L. bulgaricus and L. gasseri BNR17, T3: fermented by S. thermophilus, L. bulgaricus and L. plantarum HY7714, T4: fermented by S. thermophilus, L. bulgaricus, L. gasseri BNR17 and L. plantarum HY7714. a,b Means values in the same column with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yang, S.-Y.; Yoon, K.-S. Effect of Probiotic Lactic Acid Bacteria (LAB) on the Quality and Safety of Greek Yogurt. Foods 2022, 11, 3799. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11233799

AMA Style

Yang S-Y, Yoon K-S. Effect of Probiotic Lactic Acid Bacteria (LAB) on the Quality and Safety of Greek Yogurt. Foods. 2022; 11(23):3799. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11233799

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yang, So-Young, and Ki-Sun Yoon. 2022. "Effect of Probiotic Lactic Acid Bacteria (LAB) on the Quality and Safety of Greek Yogurt" Foods 11, no. 23: 3799. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11233799

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop