Next Article in Journal
Study of the Efficacy of Probiotic Bacteria to Reduce Acrylamide in Food and In Vitro Digestion
Next Article in Special Issue
Growth and Spoilage Potential of an Aeromonas salmonicida Strain in Refrigerated Atlantic Cod (Gadus morhua) Stored under Various Modified Atmospheres
Previous Article in Journal
Characterization of Four Rearing Managements and Their Influence on Carcass and Meat Qualities in Charolais Heifers
Previous Article in Special Issue
Spoilage Investigation of Chill Stored Meagre (Argyrosomus regius) Using Modern Microbiological and Analytical Techniques
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genomic Analysis of Two Representative Strains of Shewanella putrefaciens Isolated from Bigeye Tuna: Biofilm and Spoilage-Associated Behavior

1
College of Food Science & Technology, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China
2
Shanghai Professional Technology Service Platform on Cold Chain Equipment Performance and Energy Saving Evaluation, Shanghai 201306, China
3
National Experimental Teaching Demonstration Center for Food Science and Engineering, Shanghai 201306, China
4
Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Aquatic Product Processing & Preservation, Shanghai 201306, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2022, 11(9), 1261; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11091261
Submission received: 2 April 2022 / Revised: 22 April 2022 / Accepted: 26 April 2022 / Published: 27 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Spoilage Microorganism in Seafood: Prevalence and Control)

Abstract

:
Shewanella putrefaciens can cause the spoilage of seafood and shorten its shelf life. In this study, both strains of S. putrefaciens (YZ08 and YZ-J) isolated from spoiled bigeye tuna were subjected to in-depth phenotypic and genotypic characterization to better understand their roles in seafood spoilage. The complete genome sequences of strains YZ08 and YZ-J were reported. Unique genes of the two S. putrefaciens strains were identified by pan-genomic analysis. In vitro experiments revealed that YZ08 and YZ-J could adapt to various environmental stresses, including cold-shock temperature, pH, NaCl, and nutrient stresses. YZ08 was better at adapting to NaCl stress, and its genome possessed more NaCl stress-related genes compared with the YZ-J strain. YZ-J was a higher biofilm and exopolysaccharide producer than YZ08 at 4 and 30 °C, while YZ08 showed greater motility and enhanced capacity for biogenic amine metabolism, trimethylamine metabolism, and sulfur metabolism compared with YZ-J at both temperatures. That YZ08 produced low biofilm and exopolysaccharide contents and displayed high motility may be associated with the presence of more a greater number of genes encoding chemotaxis-related proteins (cheX) and low expression of the bpfA operon. This study provided novel molecular targets for the development of new antiseptic antisepsis strategies.

1. Introduction

Aquatic products are regarded as an important food source globally owing to its low-fat content and rich animal protein. However, aquatic products are highly perishable foods after death, even under refrigerated conditions. Microorganisms are essential in the spoilage of aquatic products, even with the rapid development of modern preservation technologies [1,2]. The main microorganisms responsible for food spoilage are known as specific spoilage organisms (SSOs) [3]. These SSOs can break down nitrogenous compounds (amino acids and proteins) in aquatic products into ammonia, biogenic amines, sulfides, and volatile compounds (including aldehydes, ketones, alcohols, and organic acids), leading to the degradation of sensory properties and making fish products unacceptable [4,5].
Although low temperatures inhibit the growth and metabolism of most microbes, many studies showed that S. putrefaciens can reduce the shelf life of refrigerated seafood, such as tuna [6], Pacific white shrimp [7], and cod [8]. Most S. putrefaciens strains can reduce trimethylamine oxide (TMAO) to trimethylamine (TMA) [9] and decarboxylate specific amino acids to biogenic amines, including putrescine, histamine, and cadaverine [10]. S. putrefaciens can also form biofilms in the aquatic matrix to enhance its adsorption capacity [11], degrade myofibrillar proteins in fish meat, and oxidize lipids [12]. However, relatively few studies have focused on the genome of S. putrefaciens, when investigating its relationship with its spoilage potential.
In recent years, genome-wide mining has contributed to the understanding of spoilage-associated metabolic pathways in SSO [13]. Exploring spoilage-related metabolic pathways by gene mining is essential for gaining insight into the spoilage behavior of spoilage bacteria. Chen et al. [14] reported the genome-wide sequence of S. putrefaciens WS13. However, the spoilage potential of S. putrefaciens has not been resolved at the genomic level. In addition, S. putrefaciens possesses good cold adaptability under low temperature conditions, which may be related to the expression of genes regulating fatty acid metabolism [15]. To date, there are no studies reporting the association between spoilage-related genes and phenotypic traits of S. putrefaciens.
The aim of this work was to reveal the mechanisms of S. putrefaciens underlying the spoilage activity at the genetic level. To achieve this, the whole genome sequences of two S. putrefaciens strains with different spoilage abilities were studied and compared to reveal the spoilage-associated genetic differences and identify key spoilage-causing genes. Phenotypes and related genotypes, including growth under stress, biofilm formation, motility, protein hydrolysis, lipolytic activity, TMA, and hydrogen sulfide (H2S) production capacity, were investigated in both strains to elucidate the relationship between spoilage-related genes and bacterial phenotypes. This study is helpful for the search for new spoilage factors of S putrefaciens and can be further verified by molecular biology methods. Our results provide new directions in the advancement of spoilage detection and prevention methods and identify novel involved in microbe-mediated fish spoilage.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. S. putrefaciens Strains and Cultures

S. putrefaciens YZ08 and YZ-J strains were isolated from spoiled bigeye tuna during 4 °C storage for 8 days. Spoiled bigeye tuna was determined by sensory evaluation as described by Yi and Xie [16]. A total of 25 g of spoiled tuna flesh was homogenized in 225 mL of 0.85% sterile saline and serial dilutions were prepared. For bacterial purification, all the isolates from the highest dilution plate (nutrient broth, containing 30–100 isolates) were incubated in nutrient broth for 48 h at 30 °C and were subsequently purified on iron agar (IA) at 30 °C. Shewanella spp. is an H2S-producing bacterium that produces black clones on IA. The H2S-producing bacteria strains were dominant species (20/50). All purified colonies were identified by 16S rRNA gene sequencing using primers 27F (5′-AGAGTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG-3′) and 1492R (5′-GGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3′). In a preliminary experiment, 14 S. putrefaciens strains were inoculated into sterilized tuna meat. The sterile fish blocks were prepared according to Li et al. [12]. After inoculation, fish blocks were placed in sterile bags for refrigeration at 4 °C for 8 days. Through preliminary sensory identification, the clones associated with the best and the worst quality of inoculated fish meat were selected for further study (identified as S. putrefaciens YZ08 and YZ-J). Purified strains were stored in tryptose soya broth (TSB) contained 25% glycerine at −80 °C. Before use, stains were pre-cultured in TSB for 18 h and then cultured in TSB at 30 °C for 8 h. Bacterial cell cultures at the logarithmic phase (8 log CFU/mL, OD600 ≈ 0.8) were used for inoculation in subsequent experiments (including bacterial DNA extraction, growth, biofilm formation, motility assays, protein hydrolysis, lipolysis, measurement of spoilage-related indicators and RT-qPCR).

2.2. Complete Genome Sequencing of S. putrefaciens YZ08 and YZ-J and Functional Annotation

The high-quality genomic DNA was extracted from two S. putrefaciens strains with a Bacterial DNA Kit (OMEGA). Genome sequencing was performed by Shanghai Biozeron Technology Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China) using Illumina NovaSeq 6000 sequencing platform and PacBio RSII platform. A total of 3μg of genomic DNA (150 ng/μL) were used for sequencing library construction. Two libraries with insert sizes of approximately 400 bp and 15–20 kb was constructed and sequenced on an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 sequencing platform and a PacBio RSII platform, respectively. Raw data obtained from the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 sequencing platform and PacBio RSII platform were quality controlled (remove low-quality reads and repeat reads) for further assembly. First, Illumina sequencing data were assembled using SOAPdenova v1.05 and then were compared with the PacBio sequencing data corrected errors. Next, the corrected data were assembled using Celera Assembler v8.0 to generate the scaffolds. Finally, the assembled scaffolds were mapped back to Illumina clean reads using GapCloser v1.12 for gap closing.
Functional annotation was performed using databases of non-redundant (NR) protein, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG), Swiss-Prot, Cluster of Orthologous Groups (COG), and Gene Ontology (GO). Genomic tRNAs and rRNAs were analyzed using tRNAscan-SE v1.3.1 (University of California, California, USA) and RNAmmer v1.2 (Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark). Secretory proteins were predicted using the signal peptide prediction tool signalP v5.0 (Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark) [17].
For the identification of genes associated with spoilage behavior, key proteins related to spoilage metabolism were collected. Candidate genes were obtained by searching all predicted proteins in the YZ08 and YZ-J genomes (E-value = 1E10; coverage ≥ 70%; identity ≥ 35%) using the blastP algorithm. Candidate genes were further confirmed by protein, COG, and GO functional annotation [18]. In addition, relevant metabolic genes were obtained directly by KEGG pathway analysis.

2.3. Pan-Genome Analysis and Genome Mining of S. putrefaciens YZ08 and YZ-J

Pairwise genome alignment and visualization analysis of S. ptrefaciens YZ08 and YZ-J strains were performed using MAUVE v2.4.0 (University of Wisconsin, Wisconsin, USA) [19]. All 10 S. putrefaciens complete genomes in NCBI were subjected to pan/core genome analysis using the Bacterial Pan Genome Analysis tool (BPGA v1.3) [20]. The NCBI accession numbers for 8 of the 10 strains (excluding strains YZ08 and YZ-J) were NZ_CP066370, NZ_CP066369, NZ_CP046329, LR134303, CP015194, NZ_CP078038, NZ_CP028435, and CP070865. Each nucleotide sequence was analyzed using default settings. In BPGA, homologous protein clusters were identified using USEARCH (a clustering tool) with a threshold of 0.5 and a phylogenetic tree was constructed based on the core genome. In addition, pan-genomic analysis was performed for strains YZ08 and YZ-J and unique genes were subjected to COG and KEGG functional annotation.

2.4. Growth and Biofilm Formation of S. putrefaciens YZ08 and YZ-J under Stress Conditions

S. putrefaciens strains YZ08 and YZ-J were pre-cultured in Luria Broth (LB) medium at 30 °C for 12 h. As a control, each strain was inoculated into LB medium (pH 7.0) at a ratio of 1:1000 and incubated at 30 °C. To induce pH stress, the incubation temperature was kept constant (30 °C), but the pH of the LB medium was regulated to 6.0 using HCl; for NaCl stress, the NaCl concentration was adjusted to 5% by adding NaCl; for nutrient stress, the medium was diluted to 20% by adding distilled water; for temperature stress, the temperature was set at 4 °C. The bacteria were incubated under stress conditions for 168 h, and the total cell numbers was measured every 12 h. The total cell numbers were performed using plate count agar (PCA). Samples (1 mL) were serially diluted 10-fold with normal saline, and dilutions (0.1 mL) were spread on PCA. Plates were placed at 30 °C for 48 h and the total cell numbers were determined.
One milliliter of the dilutions (1:1000) of the above pre-cultures under various stress conditions were transferred to a 48-well plate. The plates were incubated under static conditions for 12, 24, 48, and 72 h. Biofilm formation were determinate by Yan and Xie [11]. Briefly, after culture, the supernatant was carefully discarded and the adherent cells were washed twice using saline (0.85%) and dried, then stained with 0.2% crystal violet for 15 min, washed and dried. Finally, it was dissolved in 95% ethanol to determine OD600. The total cell numbers in LB medium were also determined for normalization. The total cell numbers were determined by serial dilution as described in Section 2.4. The normalized results were expressed as the ratio of the OD600 to the total number of cells.

2.5. Motility Assays

Swarming and swimming motility were measured on LB cultures containing 1.5% and 0.3% agar, respectively. Five microliters of bacterial culture (1 × 108 CFU/mL) was dropped onto agar plates and incubated at 4 °C and 30 °C for 24, 48, and 72 h, and the diameters of the motility zones were measured, respectively.

2.6. Proteolytic and Lipolytic Activity

Proteolytic activity was measured on agar plates containing 5% skimmed milk (prepared with deionized water containing 5% skimmed milk powder and 2% agar), and lipolytic activity was measured on triglyceride agar (Solarbio, Beijing, China). Incubation was performed at 30 °C for 24, 48, and 72 h and 4 °C for 1, 2, and 4 days, respectively. Finally, proteolytic and lipolytic activity was determined according to the size of the produced halos.

2.7. Spoilage-Related Indicators

2.7.1. Determination of TMA Content

Both strains of S. putrefaciens were inoculated in LB medium with TMAO (10 mM) and phosphate buffer saline (PBS, 100 mM) for 6 days at 4 °C and 48 h at 30 °C. TMA content was determined using the picric acid method [21].

2.7.2. Determination of Biogenic Amines (BAs) Content

Both strains of S. putrefaciens were inoculated in LB medium with 0.5% L-ornithine monohydrochloride, L-arginine monohydrochloride, and lysine monohydrochloride with 0.005% pyridoxal-5′-phosphate for 6 days at 4 °C and 48 h at 30 °C. BAs were extracted according to Zhuang et al. [22], then separated and quantified using HPLC (SHIMADZU, LC-2010C HT, Kyoto, Japan) and COSMOSIL 5C18-PAQ columns after derivatization with dansyl chloride. Chromatographic conditions were according to Hong et al. [23].

2.7.3. Preparation and Inoculation of Sterile Tuna Juice

Minced bigeye tuna back muscle (2 kg) was homogenized and boiled for 5 min with 2 L of distilled water. After adding 1.6 g/L TMAO, 40 mg/L L-cysteine and L-methionine, the filtrate was sterilized (121 °C, 15 min), yielding sterile bigeye tuna juice. The S. putrefaciens strains were separately inoculated into the fish juice at a final concentration of approximately 5 log CFU/mL and stored at 4 and 30 °C.

2.7.4. Determination of H2S Content

The H2S content in fish juice was determined using a H2S concentration determination kit (Beijing Solabao, Beijing, China) and was expressed as μmol/mL.

2.7.5. Determination of Exopolysaccharide Content and Extracellular Protease Activity

The exopolysaccharide of the inoculated fish juice was extracted according to the method of Feng et al. [24]. Nine milliliters of the inoculated fish juice was transferred to a six-well plate and incubated at 30 °C for 24, 48, and 72 h and at 4 °C for 1, 2, and 4 days, respectively. After carefully removing the cultures from the wells, the plate was cleaned 3 times with PBS to remove residual bacterial cells, 9 mL of PBS was added to each well, followed by sonication at 50 kHz for 5 min to dissolve the exopolysaccharides that had adhered to the walls of the wells (sonication can lyse cells in biofilms, resulting in the release of intracellular content). After centrifugation at 12,000× g for 15 min at 4 °C, the obtained supernatant was used to measure exopolysaccharide content using the phenol-sulfuric acid method [25], with glucose serving as a standard. Exopolysaccharide content was expressed as μg/mL.
Extracellular protease activity was determined according to Anbu [26], with some modifications. After centrifugation at 10,000× g at 4 °C, the supernatant (500 μL) of the fish juice was added to an equal volume of 1% (w/v) casein substrate solution and incubated at 37 °C for 10 min. The reaction was terminated by adding 1 mL of TCA (20%). Finally, after centrifugation (12,000× g, 10 min), the tyrosine content was determined using the Folin method [27]. The results were expressed as U/mL.

2.8. RT-qPCR

S. putrefaciens strains YZ08 and YZ-J were inoculated in LB medium at 30 °C until the log phase (OD600 = 0.8). Total RNA was isolated from cultured cells using a Spin Column Bacteria Total RNA Purification Kit (Sangon, Shanghai, China) and reverse-transcribed into cDNA using an AMV First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Sangon, Shanghai, China) with random primer p(dN)6. qPCR was performed using SG Fast qPCR Master Mix (SYBR Green) (Sangon, Shanghai, China). The sequences of the primers used for qPCR are listed in Table S1. mRNA levels were normalized to that of the 16 S rRNA gene. The relative expression levels of each gene were determined using the 2−ΔΔCt method [28].

2.9. Statistical Analysis

All data were analyzed using SPSS 19.0 (IBM, Chicago, IL, USA). The Student’s t-test was employed for comparisons between two groups. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Duncan’s post-hoc test was used for multiple groups. p < 0.05 were considered significant. All experiments were repeated at least three times.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Identification and Genome Properties of S. putrefaciens Strains YZ08 and YZ-J

The complete genome sequences were submitted in GenBank with accession numbers CP080633 (for YZ08) and CP080635 (for YZ-J). The genomes of S. putrefaciens YZ08 and YZ-J were determined to be 5,019,740 bp and 4,386,160 bp long, with average GC contents of 47.69% and 46.53%, respectively (Figure 1). Genes were annotated in multiple databases: NR, 4353 and 3806; Swiss-Prot, 3122 and 2842; COG, 3803 and 3464; KEGG, 2314 and 2194; GO, 1456 and 1429; VFDB, 527 and 535; and CAZy, 80 and 64. The genome contained 4443 and 3890 of genes in which 4301 and 3761 (96.80% and 96.68%) were assigned predicted proteins in YZ08 and YZ-J, respectively.

3.2. Gene Function Analysis

3.2.1. COG, GO, and KEGG Function Classification Analysis of the Two Strains

The unknown function category contained the largest number of genes for both S. putrefaciens strains. Both strains showed similar trends by which amino acid transport and metabolism, and energy production and conversion were the main COGs (Figure 2A). For energy production and conversion, the four most abundant COGs were COG0243, COG1012, COG0437, and COG1301 for YZ08, and COG1012, COG1053, COG0243, and COG0437 for YZ-J. COG0437 plays a crucial role in various electron transfer processes and several enzymatic reactions [29]. In response to environmental stresses, two Na+ ions were transported by COG1301 [30]. A similar COG functional classification was also found in S. baltica 128 (accession number CP028730). The differences in COG classification may be indicative of differences in metabolism and adaptability to the environment between the two strains. S. putrefaciens YZ08 and YZ-J genes were assigned to three function classifications by GO analysis (Figure 2B). The genes of the YZ08 and YZ-J strains in the biological process category were divided into 20 subfunctions, most of which were associated with cellular processes (GO:0009987), metabolic processes (GO:0008152), and response to stimulus (GO:0050896), which was consistent with the features reported for Shewanella spp. [13]. A similar GO functional classification was found for S. putrefaciens XY07 (accession number CP070865). The results for the KEGG pathway analysis of S. putrefaciens YZ08 and YZ-J genes are shown in Figure 2C,D. In the five KEGG pathways of the two strains, metabolism comprised the largest number of genes, followed by environmental information processing, cellular processes, and genetic information processing. Some pathways may be related to the distinct phenotypes shown by the two strains, such as two-component system (ko02020), microbial metabolism in diverse environments (ko01120), biosynthesis of amino acids (ko01230), bacterial chemotaxis (ko02030), ABC transporters (ko02010), biofilm formation-Vibrio cholerae (ko05111), flagellar assembly (ko02040), and cysteine and methionine metabolism (ko00270). Two-component systems (TCS) can translate extracellular signals into gene expression patterns that facilitate bacterial regulation of various physiological functions. ABC transporters (ko02010) are transmembrane proteins that use energy to transport substrates into the cell [31].

3.2.2. Genome Synteny and Pan-Genome Analysis

To explore the genetic differences between both strains, a genome synteny and pan-genome analysis were also investigated. As shown in Figure 3A, analysis of the genome sequences using MAUVE revealed that S. putrefaciensYZ08 and YZ-J shared many homologous regions. Although large genomic rearrangements and inversions were found in both strains, overall, the YZ08 and YZ-J genomes shared a large number of homologous regions.
The pan-genome of the 10 S. putrefaciens strains included 2637 core genes, 10,413 accessory genes and 1944 unique genes. Analysis of the pan-genome and core genome maps of oral S. putrefaciens (Figure 3B,C) showed that the number of the pan-genome increased, while that of the core genome decreased, indicating that S. putrefaciens has an open pan-genome and has the ability to survive in a variety of environments [13]. To investigate the phylogenetic relationships among the 10 strains, a phylogenetic tree was generated based on 2637 core genes (Figure 3D). S. putrefaciens YZ08 showed the greatest genetic relationship with the pap11 strain, while YZ-J was close to XY07, ATCC8071, and WS13.
The pan-genome of S. putrefaciens YZ08 and YZ-J was investigated. The unique genes of both strains were listed in Tables S2 and S3. The unique genes of the two strains were annotated using KEGG and COG distribution (Figure 3E,F). In COG distribution, many unique genes of both strains were related to signal transduction mechanisms, which were involved in the regulation of various life activities of microorganisms. Key biofilm regulatory genes were identified in strain YZ08, annotated as COG5001 (diguanylate cyclase phosphodiesterase) in COG and classified as ko05111 (biofilm formation—Vibrio cholerae) in KEGG. These genes may play an inhibitory role in biofilm formation [32]. YZ08 may possess stronger amino acid metabolic activity than YZ-J owing to a greater abundance of COG0834 components (ABC-type amino acid transport/signal transduction system). KEGG distribution showed that only YZ08 was involved in trimethylamine metabolism in methane metabolism (ko00680). Both strains contained genes coding for proteins with functions in membrane transport (ABC transporters). These transporters are involved in transporting a large number of endogenous substrates and exogenous compounds across lipid membranes and are associated with many important biological processes, such as the release of secreted proteins, cellular detoxification, lipid homeostasis, ion channel regulation, and ribosome assembly [33]. In addition, COG and KEGG distributions indicated that YZ08 possessed more cell motility-related genes than YZ-J, especially those associated with bacterial chemotaxis. In conclusion, the pan-genomic analysis provided new insights into the differential genetic content of the two strains.

3.3. Stress Adaptation

During food processing, microbes are subjected to a range of stresses, such as temperature, salt, pH, and nutrition stresses. The growth and biofilm formation of S. putrefaciens YZ08 and YZ-J under different stress conditions are shown in Figure 4. The growth of both YZ08 and YZ-J in 5% NaCl and 20% LB was reduced compared with that in the control group (Figure 4A). The lag period for the growth of the two strains in the 4 °C groups was substantially longer than that of the control, but the maximum cell concentrations of the two strains were similar, which was consistent with the previous study [15]. The growth rate of YZ08 was higher than that of YZ-J in 5% NaCl; however, no significant differences were observed between the two strains for the other stress conditions. The Normalized biofilm formation rates of two strains in the 5% NaCl, 20% LB and 4 °C groups were higher than those in the control group, reaching significance in the 4 °C groups for both strains (p < 0.05) (Figure 4B). Low temperatures promote the expression of related genes to enhance the formation of biofilms [11]. Similarly, the higher normalized biofilm formation rates recorded under pH 6.0, 5% NaCl, and 20% LB stress relative to the control condition may be related to the formation of a greater amount of biofilm to protect the bacteria under stressful conditions [13]. In addition, the normalized biofilm decreased from 24 h to 144 h in the control, pH 6.0, NaCl 5%, and 4 °C groups, likely because the biofilm at this stage was in the dispersal period [34]. In all groups, the normalized biofilm formation of YZ08 was lower than that of YZ-J.
A series of stress-related genes of S. putrefaciens YZ08 and YZ-J, including temperature, pH, NaCl, and nutrient stresses, is shown in Table 1. The cold shock genes cspA and cspD in L. monocytogenes are required to induce its growth at low temperatures [35,36] and may exert a similar function in S. putrefaciens YZ08 and YZ-J. Three cspA/cspD genes (K2227_07410, K2227_08825, K2227_12570, and K3G22_06460, K3G22_07485, K3G22_10845, respectively) were identified in the YZ08 and YZ-J genomes, which may explain the similar cold adaptability of the two strains. Furthermore, the genomes of both YZ08 and YZ-J contained eight genes encoding stress-related F0F1 ATP synthase, which is associated with the synthesis of ATP using ion translocation [37]. Interestingly, YZ08 contained six genes encoding sodium: proton antiporter and one encoding a transporter protein (K2227_13575) related to osmotic pressure, whereas YZ-J contained only four genes encoding sodium: proton transporters and none coding for the osmotic pressure-related transporter protein. This observation may partially explain the better growth of the YZ08 strain under 5% NaCl relative to that of strain YZ-J. The presence of genes encoding choline/glycine/proline betaine transporter and plasma membrane protein involved in salt tolerance indicated that S. putrefaciens maintains osmotic balance using a compatible solutes strategy when exposed to osmotic stress. RT-qPCR was used to study the expression of osmotic stress-related genes (encoding choline/glycine/proline betaine transporter and plasma membrane protein—K2227_07790 and K2227_01670, respectively, in YZ08 and K3G22_06825 and K3G22_01330, respectively, in YZ-J). As shown in Figure 5, the expression of the genes encoding choline/glycine/proline betaine transporter were significantly higher in strain YZ08 than in strain YZ-J (p < 0.001), which was consistent with YZ08 being better adapted to a high salt environment relative to YZ-J. However, the expression levels of the gene encoding the plasma membrane protein did not show significant differences between in the two strains (p > 0.05). In addition, YZ08 and YZ-J shared similar genes encoding amino acid synthases.

3.4. Motility

Cell surface characteristics (chemotactic systems) and motility are critical during biofilm formation [38]. S. putrefaciens motility (swimming and swarming) is shown in Figure 6. The swimming motility of both YZ08 and YZ-J increased in a time-dependent manner at the optimal growth temperature (30 °C), but swimming behavior began late at low temperatures (4 °C), especially for strain YZ-J (Figure 6A). The swimming ability of YZ08 strain at the two temperatures was stronger than that of strain YZ-J, which may have been due to the stronger movement ability of the polar flagella of YZ08, as previously described for Vibrio parahaemolyticus RIMD2210633. [39]. The swimming abilities of the two S. putrefaciens strains were stronger than those of S. baltica SB02 and S. baltica OS155 [24,40]. Differences in genes encoding chemotaxis proteins and the regulation of some differential key genes such as flgM, encoding an important regulatory factor for flagella gene expression; zomB, encoding a flagellar motor control protein; and genes encoding PilZ domain proteins, may explain the different swimming phenotypes of the two strains [41,42]. In contrast to their strong swimming abilities, the swarming abilities of S. putrefaciens YZ08 and YZ-J were weak, and also showed a time dependence (Figure 6B). At 30 °C, the difference in swarming ability between the two strains was not significant, while at 4 °C the swarming ability of YZ08 was slightly stronger than that of YZ-J. The absence of lateral flagella may explain the weaker swarming ability of Shewanella spp. relative to Vibrio spp. [39,43]. No genes encoding lateral flagella were found in either strain in this study, which would account for their weak swarming ability.
Table 2 lists most of the motility-associated genes in YZ08 and YZ-J. No differences were found between the two strains for the three gene clusters encoding polar flagellins (A-I, A-II, and A-III). A-I contains structural genes coding for sodium-driven motor rings, loops and hook proteins, and assembly and chaperone proteins, as previously described in Vibrio [44]. The A-II gene cluster contains genes encoding regulatory proteins, filaments, basal bodies, switch proteins, and export proteins. The deletion of these genes can lead to the loss of motility in bacteria, as previously described in Pseudomonas fluorescens F113 [45]. The third cluster (A-III) contains chemotaxis genes, export genes, and regulatory genes that express late flagellar genes encoding filament proteins, motor proteins, and other flagellar-associated secretory proteins, as previously described [46]. In addition to genes encoding flagellins, those coding for chemotaxis proteins are also critical for bacterial motility [47]. The YZ08 strain contained up to 19 genes encoding chemotaxis proteins compared with only 13 for YZ-J (Table 2), which may explain the markedly greater swimming ability of YZ08 relative to that of YZ-J.

3.5. Spoilage-Related Metabolic Pathways

S. putrefaciens usually generates spoilage metabolites such as total volatile base nitrogen (TVB-N), TMA, and biogenic amines (BAs) in seafood, leading to a decline in its quality [7]. The spoilage potential of S. putrefaciens is associated with sulfur metabolism, BAs metabolism, TMA metabolism, and protease secretion [2].

3.5.1. Biogenic Amines (BAs) Metabolism

Putrescine, cadaverine, and histamine are common BAs found in spoiled tuna [48]. However, as S. putrefaciens is mainly associated with the production of putrescine and cadaverine, and generates only limited amounts of histamine [49]. We focused on investigating the putrescine and cadaverine production activities in the two S. putrefaciens strains. The amounts of putrescine and cadaverine produced by YZ08 and YZ-J at 30 and 4 °C using ornithine, arginine, and lysine as substrates are shown in Figure 7A,B. The findings indicated that YZ08 produced greater amounts of putrescine and cadaverine than YZ-J at both the optimum growth temperature and low temperature. We also found that both S. putrefaciens strains produced more putrescine than cadaverine, which may be because putrescine can be produced using different substrates (ornithine and arginine) and through different pathways, whereas cadaverine is produced through only one pathway (lysine decarboxylation) [22].
The genomic analysis identified several BA-related genes in the two tested strains (Table 2). Several pot genes involved in putrescine metabolism were identified in S. putrefaciens, including genes encoding substrate-binding proteins of the putrescine transport system, a putrescine transport ATP-binding protein, spermidine/putrescine ABC transporter permease, putrescine transport system permease protein, and a putrescine-ornithine antiporter. In addition, genes encoding putrescine importer PuuP and gamma-glutamylputrescine oxidoreductase were also found in the genomes of both strains. In S. putrefaciens CN32, ornithine decarboxylase is a key enzyme capable of producing putrescine from L-ornithine [2]. Similarly, arginine is converted to cadaverine by ornithine/arginine decarboxylase. The presence of ornithine/arginine decarboxylase corroborated the production of putrescine and cadaverine by the two strains. Although no difference was found in putrescine-related genes, the levels of putrescine and cadaverine production in YZ08 and YZ-J were different, indicating that some regulatory factors could induce the expression of these genes. The results of qRT-PCR supported this hypothesis, indicating that the expression of speC in S.putrefaciens YZ08 was significantly higher than that in YZ-J (p < 0.01, Figure 5).

3.5.2. TMA Metabolism

As mentioned earlier, most Shewanella spp. can reduce TMAO to TMA and produce a fishy odor. Figure 7C shows the amount of TMA produced by YZ08 and YZ-J in LB medium containing TMAO at 4 and 30 °C. At both temperatures, the amount of TMA produced by YZ08 was significantly higher than that of YZ-J (p < 0.05). As shown in Table 2, genes encoding trimethylamine N-oxide reductase system protein TorE (K2227_16520), pentaheme c-type cytochrome TorC (K2227_16525), trimethylamine-N-oxide reductase TorA (K2227_16530), molecular chaperone TorD (K2227_16535), histidine kinase TorS (K2227_16540), periplasmic protein TorT (K2227_16545), and response regulator TorR (K2227_16550) were found in YZ08, but not found in YZ-J. The same TMA metabolism related genes were identified in other strains (S. baltica OS155 and 128) [13,50]. Although no trimethylamine metabolism-related genes were found in YZ-J, this strain also produced small amounts of TMA, suggestive of the existence of other trimethylamine metabolism pathways. It has been reported that gut microbiota can metabolize compounds containing trimethylamine groups to produce TMA from the precursors of TMA containing choline, phosphatidylcholine, and glycerophosphatidylcholine. The key genes involved in this process are cutC, encoding a choline TMA-lyase and gene cutD, encoding a choline TMA-lyase activase [51]. In the present study, pflA/D genes, homologs of cutC/D were found in S. putrefaciens YZ08 and YZ-J. cutD and pflD are related to pyruvate formate lyase activating enzyme, and cutC and pflA are homologous to pyruvate formate lyase. Therefore, a small amount of TMA produced in S. putrefaciens YZ-J may be related to the presence of pflA/D.

3.5.3. Sulfur Metabolism

H2S gas has a characteristic off-odor and is associated with the presence of Shewanella spp. during the spoilage of seafood [2]. In this study, we explored the H2S content produced by S. putrefaciens YZ08 and YZ-J (Figure 7D). At 30 °C, YZ08 produced a significant amount of H2S in the fish juice. However, at the low temperature (4 °C), both strains generated low amounts of H2S at the end of storage (144 h). In general, YZ08 metabolized more H2S than YZ-J. The genes associated with sulfur metabolism in YZ08 and YZ-J are listed in Table 2. Sulfate is converted to adenosine 5′-phosphosulfate (APS) by sulfate adenylyltransferase (encoded by the cysN gene). APS is then converted to 3′-phosphonoadenosine-5′-phosphate sulfate (PAPS) by the action of adenylyl-sulfate kinase (encoded by cysC), which is then further reduced to sulfite by phosphonoadenosine phosphate reductase (encoded by cysH). Finally, sulfite is reduced to sulfide by dissimilatory sulfite reductase (encoded by sirA). Moreover, the ttrSRBC encoding tetrathionate response regulatory protein, tetrathionate sensor histidine kinase, tetrathionate reductase subunit B and cysteine synthase C was also identified in the genomes of both S. putrefaciens strains, suggesting that tetrathionate may be reduced and eventually form sulfide through the activity of these enzymes, consistent with the findings of Leustek et al. [52]. That the two strains contained the same sulfur metabolism genes, suggests that they produce different amounts of H2S. This could be explained by differences in the transcription levels given that the level of SirA was significantly greater in YZ08 than in YZ-J (p < 0.01) (Figure 5). Highly similar genes related to sulfur metabolism were found in S. baltica 128 and S. putrefaciens YZ07.

3.5.4. Biofilm and Exopolysaccharide Formation

Biofilms have a strong adhesive ability, and they envelop bacteria, thereby enhancing their resistance to adverse environments [53]. On the surface of food processing equipment, some spoilage microorganisms, and pathogenic microorganisms form biofilms. These biofilms are resistant to disinfectants and are difficult to clear, thus affecting food quality and safety. In this study, both strains of S. putrefaciens produced biofilms; however, YZ-J produced a significantly greater amount of biofilm than YZ08 at both temperatures (4 and 30 °C) tested (Figure 4B). The genes associated with biofilm formation in YZ08 and YZ-J are listed in Table 2. The key factors regulating biofilm formation of Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa include c-di-GMP regulatory system, the cAMP/Vfr pathway, and the two-component regulatory system GacS-GacA and EnvZ-ompR [54,55]. The presence of the above genes in the genomes of both YZ08 and YZ-J suggested that there may be multiple pathways regulating biofilm formation in two strains. The mechanisms involved in biofilm regulation in Shewanella spp. are poorly understood but are thought to be primarily related to the c-di-GMP pathway. c-di-GMP is synthesized by diguanylate cyclase (DGC) from two molecules of GTP and is decomposed into two molecules of GTP through the activity of phosphodiesterase (PDE) [56]. Several genes encoding DGC and PDE were found in the genomes of both YZ08 and YZ-J (data not shown). However, the cdgC gene encoding c-di-GMP PDE was only found in YZ08 (Table 2). Both Shewanella putrefaciens CN32 and Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 possess a conserved operon containing seven genes [57,58], and this operon also exists in YZ08 and YZ-J. The operon encodes an adhesion protein BpfA; a type I secretion system responsible for the secretion of BpfA into the extracellular compartment (a type I secretion system permease/ATPase, a HlyD family type I secretion periplasmic adaptor subunit, a TolC family outer membrane protein and an OmpA family protein); the protease that regulates BpfA activity (transglutaminase-like cysteine peptidase) and the c-di-GMP receptor protein (EAL domain-containing protein). The secretion of the adhesion protein BpfA in Shewanella promotes bacterial adhesion to solid surface, and the bacteria lacking this protein cannot form biofilms [59].
When the intracellular c-di-GMP content is low, the transcription factor FlrA can promote flagellar operon transcription and repress bpfA operon transcription by directly binding to the promoter region of bpfA, and ultimately biofilm formation is inhibited. When the intracellular c-di-GMP level is high, c-di-GMP binds to and forms a complex with the transcription factor FlrA, thereby relieving the transcriptional activation of flagellar-related genes and the transcriptional repression of the bpfA operon. Eventually, the bacterium undergoes irreversible initiation of adsorption and biofilm formation [59]. c-di-GMP also activates the transcriptional regulator RpoS, thereby upregulating the expression of biofilm-associated genes [24]. The amount of biofilm of YZ-J was greater than that of YZ08, which may be due to the higher content of c-di-GMP and the weak motility in YZ-J. Although there are many regulatory mechanisms for biofilm formation, the mechanism for biofilm formation in Shewanella spp. mainly involves regulation of the secretion of the adhesion protein BpfA by the FlrA factor. Accordingly, we explored the differences in the expression levels of flrA and bpfA between the two strains. The RT-qPCR results showed that the expression of flrA, encoding an inhibitor of biofilm formation, was significantly higher, and that of bpfA significantly lower, in the YZ08 strain than in the YZ-J strain (both p < 0.01) (Figure 5), which was in line with the higher amount of biofilm formation in strain YZ-J relative to that in strain YZ08.
Exopolysaccharide is an important component of bacterial biofilms, and bacteria can promote microcolony formation and biofilm maturation by regulating exopolysaccharide synthesis [60]. Similar to the pattern of biofilm formation, the levels of exopolysaccharide produced by YZ-J were significantly higher than those generated by YZ08 at the end of storage (Figure 7E). The genes responsible for exopolysaccharide synthesis in both strains are listed in Table 2. No genes responsible for the biosynthesis of the polysaccharides alginate, Psl, Pel, or that of any other exopolysaccharide, were identified in the genome of either strain. Only glycogen synthesis genes were found. Glucose 6-phosphate is converted to glucose 1-phosphate by the phosphoglucomutase (encoded by pgm), following which glucose 1-phosphate is converted to ADP-glucose through the activity of glucose-1-phosphate adenyltransferase (encoded by glgC). ADP-glucose is subsequently used to extend the α-1,4-glucosidic chain through glycogen synthase (encoded by glgA), after which branching enzyme (encoded by glgB) catalyzes the formation of α-1,6-linked branch chains, yielding glycogen. Glycogen is broken down into glucose by glycogen phosphatase (encoded by glgP) [61]. In our study, RT-qPCR results (Figure 5) showed that the expression of glgA in S. putrefaciens YZ-J was significantly higher than in S. putrefaciens YZ08 (p < 0.001), which could explain the higher production of exopolysaccharides in the former.

3.5.5. Protease and Lipase

Proteases and lipases secreted by spoilage bacteria hydrolyze, respectively, protein and fat in seafood, thus reducing its quality [62]. The protease and lipase activity of S. putrefaciens YZ08 and YZ-J is shown in Figure 7F and Figure 8. The protease activity of YZ08 was found to be significantly greater than that of YZ-J (p < 0.05). The results also showed that YZ08 had substantially larger protease hydrolysis halos than YZ-J, and that no protease hydrolysis halo was seen for YZ-J at 4 °C (Figure 8A,B). However, the lipolytic activity of YZ08 was slightly lower than that of YZ-J, although the difference was not significant (Figure 8E).
Genes encoding protease and lipase from in the YZ08 and YZ-J genomes are listed in Table 3. There were differences in the genes encoding proteases that contain signal peptides between YZ08 and YZ-J. Signal peptides in enzymes are necessary for enzyme secretion [63], and extracellular protease secreted by bacteria generally contains a signal peptide. Here, we found that YZ08 contained two genes encoding M48 family metalloproteases (K2227_09265 and K2227_17060) and one encoding an M4 family metallopeptidase (Hap) while YZ-J had only one gene encoding M48 family metalloprotease (K3G22_08175). YZ08, but not YZ-J, also contained a gene encoding an alkaline serine protease. Moreover, we found that YZ-J lacked protease activity at 4 °C (no halo was produced on skimmed milk-containing), which may be related to absence of any gene encoding an alkaline serine protease in this strain, which usually still exhibited activity over a large temperature range (0–50 °C) [64]. YZ08 and YZ-J shared the same lipase encoding gene, likely explaining why the two strains showed similar lipolytic activity. Genes encoding alkaline serine proteases have also been found in S. baltica 128 and S. putrefaciens XY07, while the hap gene was found in only S. baltica 128. Genes encoding lipases were found in both S. baltica 128 and S. putrefaciens XY07.

4. Conclusions

In this study, we analyzed the phenotypic traits (environmental stress, BAs metabolism, TMA metabolism, sulfur metabolism, biofilm formation, exopolysaccharide production, motility, extracellular protease, and lipase activity) and the whole genomes of S. putrefaciens YZ08 and YZ-J to identify the genomic determinants of their spoilage-related phenotypes. Although YZ08 and YZ-J were found to be genetically similar, the phenotypic analysis indicated that significant differences in responses to NaCl stress, motility, and spoilage-related metabolism existed between the two strains. Strain YZ08 displayed better growth than YZ-J under NaCl stress, which may be relevant to the presence of more genes encoding sodium:proton antiporter and the high expression of a gene encoding a choline/glycine/proline betaine transporter protein in the YZ08 strain. YZ08 also was found to have greater swimming motility than YZ-J, which was consistent with the greater number of cheX genes found in the former strain. The strong swimming motility and the low transcript levels of the bpfA gene, possibly due to low c-di-GMP content, likely resulted in a low biofilm-forming capacity for YZ08. The lower production of exopolysaccharides in YZ08 relative to YZ-J may be related to the low expression of glgA, which encodes glycogen synthase. The lack of the TMA metabolism-related operon torECADSTR may explain the lower TMA generation in YZ-J. The presence of genes encoding extracellular proteases (alkaline serine protease and M4 family metallopeptidase) may be important factors causing low extracellular protease activity of YZ-J. Overall, some differences in the genetic factors of two strains were consistent with the phenotypic differences. This study contributes to the understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying the spread, motility, and spoilage activity of two strains of S. putrefaciens.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/foods11091261/s1, Table S1: quantitative real-time PCR primers used in this study; Table S2: unique genes of S. putrefaciens YZ08 by pan-genome analysis between S. putrefaciens YZ08 and YZ-J.; Table S3: unique genes of S. putrefaciens YZ-J by pan-genome analysis between S. putrefaciens YZ08 and YZ-J.

Author Contributions

Z.Y.: conceptualization, methodology, software, investigation, writing. J.X.: validation, formal analysis, writing—review and editing, examination, funding acquisition. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31972142), key project of the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (19DZ1207503), China Agriculture Research System of MOF and MARA (CARS-47) and was also supported by the Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Project to enhance the capabilities of the platform (19DZ2284000, 19DZ1207503).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article and Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gram, L.; Huss, H.H. Microbiological spoilage of fish and fish products. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1996, 33, 121–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Remenant, B.; Jaffrès, E.; Dousset, X.; Pilet, M.-F.; Zagorec, M. Bacterial spoilers of food: Behavior, fitness and functional properties. Food Microbiol. 2015, 45, 45–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Anagnostopoulos, D.A.; Parlapani, F.F.; Boziaris, I.S. The evolution of knowledge on seafood spoilage microbiota from the 20th to the 21st century: Have we finished or just begun? Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 120, 236–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Boziaris, I.S.; Parlapani, F.F. Specific Spoilage Organisms (SSOs) in Fish. In The Microbiological Quality of Food; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017; pp. 61–98. [Google Scholar]
  5. Odeyemi, O.A.; Burke, C.M.; Bolch, C.C.J.; Stanley, R. Seafood spoilage microbiota and associated volatile organic compounds at different storage temperatures and packaging conditions. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2018, 280, 87–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lee, B.H.; Wu, S.C.; Shen, T.L.; Hsu, Y.Y.; Chen, C.H.; Hsu, W.H. The applications of Lactobacillus plantarum-derived extracellular vesicles as a novel natural antibacterial agent for improving quality and safety in tuna fish. Food Chem. 2021, 340, 128104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Qian, Y.-F.; Xie, J.; Yang, S.-P.; Wu, W.-H.; Xiong, Q.; Gao, Z.-L. In vivo study of spoilage bacteria on polyphenoloxidase activity and melanosis of modified atmosphere packaged Pacific white shrimp. Food Chem. 2014, 155, 126–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Vogel, B.F.; Venkateswaran, K.; Satomi, M.; Gram, L. Identification of Shewanella baltica as the Most Important H2S-Producing Species during Iced Storage of Danish Marine Fish. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71, 6689–6697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Fu, L.; Wang, C.; Liu, N.; Ma, A.; Wang, Y. Quorum sensing system-regulated genes affect the spoilage potential of Shewanella baltica. Food Res. Int. 2018, 107, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yi, Z.; Xie, J. Assessment of spoilage potential and amino acids deamination & decarboxylation activities of Shewanella putrefaciens in bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus). LWT 2022, 156, 113016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yan, J.; Xie, J. Comparative Proteome Analysis of Shewanella putrefaciens WS13 Mature Biofilm Under Cold Stress. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 1225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Li, Y.; Jia, S.; Hong, H.; Zhang, L.; Zhuang, S.; Sun, X.; Liu, X.; Luo, Y. Assessment of bacterial contributions to the biochemical changes of chill-stored blunt snout bream (Megalobrama amblycephala) fillets: Protein degradation and volatile organic compounds accumulation. Food Microbiol. 2020, 91, 103495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Li, J.; Yu, H.; Yang, X.; Dong, R.; Liu, Z.; Zeng, M. Complete genome sequence provides insights into the quorum sensing-related spoilage potential of Shewanella baltica 128 isolated from spoiled shrimp. Genomics 2020, 112, 736–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chen, L.; Yang, S.; Qian, Y.; Xie, J. Sequencing and Analysis of the Shewanella putrefaciens WS13 Genome. J. Biobased Mater. Bioenergy 2019, 13, 182–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yang, S.-P.; Xie, J.; Cheng, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Qian, Y.-F. Response of Shewanella putrefaciens to low temperature regulated by membrane fluidity and fatty acid metabolism. LWT 2020, 117, 108638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yi, Z.; Xie, J. Prediction in the Dynamics and Spoilage of Shewanella putrefaciens in Bigeye Tuna (Thunnus obesus) by Gas Sensors Stored at Different Refrigeration Temperatures. Foods 2021, 10, 2132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Cai, L.; Zheng, S.-W.; Shen, Y.-J.; Zheng, G.-D.; Liu, H.-T.; Wu, Z.-Y. Complete genome sequence provides insights into the biodrying-related microbial function of Bacillus thermoamylovorans isolated from sewage sludge biodrying material. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 260, 141–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Tatusov, R.L.; Koonin, E.V.; Lipman, D.J. A Genomic Perspective on Protein Families. Science 1997, 278, 631–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Darling, A.C.E.; Mau, B.; Blattner, F.R.; Perna, N.T. Mauve: Multiple Alignment of Conserved Genomic Sequence With Rearrangements. Genome Res. 2004, 14, 1394–1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Chaudhari, N.M.; Gupta, V.K.; Dutta, C. BPGA—An ultra-fast pan-genome analysis pipeline. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 24373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Dyer, W.J. Amines in Fish Muscle: I. Colorimetric Determination of Trimethylamine as the Picrate Salt. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 1945, 6d, 351–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhuang, S.; Liu, X.; Li, Y.; Zhang, L.; Hong, H.; Liu, J.; Luo, Y. Biochemical changes and amino acid deamination & decarboxylation activities of spoilage microbiota in chill-stored grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella) fillets. Food Chem. 2021, 336, 127683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Hong, H.; Luo, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Bao, Y.; Lu, H.; Shen, H. Effects of different freezing treatments on the biogenic amine and quality changes of bighead carp (Aristichthys nobilis) heads during ice storage. Food Chem. 2013, 138, 1476–1482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Feng, L.; Bi, W.; Chen, S.; Zhu, J.; Liu, X. Regulatory function of sigma factors RpoS/RpoN in adaptation and spoilage potential of Shewanella baltica. Food Microbiol. 2021, 97, 103755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. DuBois, M.; Gilles, K.A.; Hamilton, J.K.; Rebers, P.A.; Smith, F. Colorimetric Method for Determination of Sugars and Related Substances. Anal. Chem. 1956, 28, 350–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Anbu, P. Characterization of solvent stable extracellular protease from Bacillus koreensis (BK-P21A). Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2013, 56, 162–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Lowry, O.H.; Rosebrough, N.J.; Farr, A.L.; Randall, R.J. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J. Biol. Chem. 1951, 193, 265–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of Relative Gene Expression Data Using Real-Time Quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT Method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Lange, H.; Kaut, A.; Kispal, G.; Lill, R. A mitochondrial ferredoxin is essential for biogenesis of cellular iron-sulfur proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 1050–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Pajor, A.M.; Sun, N.N. Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs and Other Anthranilic Acids Inhibit the Na+/Dicarboxylate Symporter from Staphylococcus aureus. Biochemistry 2013, 52, 2924–2932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gang, H.; Xiao, C.; Xiao, Y.; Yan, W.; Bai, R.; Ding, R.; Yang, Z.; Zhao, F. Proteomic analysis of the reduction and resistance mechanisms of Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 under long-term hexavalent chromium stress. Environ. Int. 2019, 127, 94–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Paul, R.; Abel, S.; Wassmann, P.; Beck, A.; Heerklotz, H.; Jenal, U. Activation of the Diguanylate Cyclase PleD by Phosphorylation-mediated Dimerization. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 29170–29177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Higgins, C. ABC Transporters: From Mircoorganisms to Man. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 1992, 8, 67–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Mukherjee, M.; Zaiden, N.; Teng, A.; Hu, Y.; Cao, B. Shewanella biofilm development and engineering for environmental and bioenergy applications. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2020, 59, 84–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kragh, M.L.; Muchaamba, F.; Tasara, T.; Truelstrup Hansen, L. Cold-shock proteins affect desiccation tolerance, biofilm formation and motility in Listeria monocytogenes. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2020, 329, 108662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Chan, Y.C.; Raengpradub, S.; Boor, K.J.; Wiedmann, M. Microarray-Based Characterization of the Listeria monocytogenes Cold Regulon in Log- and Stationary-Phase Cells. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73, 6484–6498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Zhang, W.; Guo, H.; Cao, C.; Li, L.; Kwok, L.-Y.; Zhang, H.; Sun, Z. Adaptation of Lactobacillus casei Zhang to Gentamycin Involves an Alkaline Shock Protein. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 2316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Quintieri, L.; Caputo, L.; De Angelis, M.; Fanelli, F. Genomic Analysis of Three Cheese-Borne Pseudomonas lactis with Biofilm and Spoilage-Associated Behavior. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Cao, J.; Liu, H.; Wang, Y.; He, X.; Jiang, H.; Yao, J.; Xia, F.; Zhao, Y.; Chen, X. Antimicrobial and antivirulence efficacies of citral against foodborne pathogen Vibrio parahaemolyticus RIMD2210633. Food Control 2021, 120, 107507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wang, F.; Wang, Y.; Cen, C.; Fu, L.; Wang, Y. A tandem GGDEF-EAL domain protein-regulated c-di-GMP signal contributes to spoilage-related activities of Shewanella baltica OS155. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 104, 2205–2216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Brenzinger, S.; Pecina, A.; Mrusek, D.; Mann, P.; Völse, K.; Wimmi, S.; Ruppert, U.; Becker, A.; Ringgaard, S.; Bange, G.; et al. ZomB is essential for flagellar motor reversals in Shewanella putrefaciens and Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Mol. Microbiol. 2018, 109, 694–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Pecina, A.; Schwan, M.; Blagotinsek, V.; Rick, T.; Klüber, P.; Leonhard, T.; Bange, G.; Thormann, K.M. The Stand-Alone PilZ-Domain Protein MotL Specifically Regulates the Activity of the Secondary Lateral Flagellar System in Shewanella putrefaciens. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wu, L.; Wang, J.; Tang, P.; Chen, H.; Gao, H. Genetic and Molecular Characterization of Flagellar Assembly in Shewanella oneidensis. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e21479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Terashima, H.; Koike, M.; Kojima, S.; Homma, M. The Flagellar Basal Body-Associated Protein FlgT Is Essential for a Novel Ring Structure in the Sodium-Driven Vibrio Motor. J. Bacteriol. 2010, 192, 5609–5615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Capdevila, S.; Martínez-Granero, F.M.; Sánchez-Contreras, M.; Rivilla, R.; Martín, M. Analysis of Pseudomonas fluorescens F113 genes implicated in flagellar filament synthesis and their role in competitive root colonization. Microbiology 2004, 150, 3889–3897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Chevance, F.F.V.; Hughes, K.T. Coordinating assembly of a bacterial macromolecular machine. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2008, 6, 455–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Charon, N.W.; Cockburn, A.; Li, C.; Liu, J.; Miller, K.A.; Miller, M.R.; Motaleb, M.A.; Wolgemuth, C.W. The Unique Paradigm of Spirochete Motility and Chemotaxis. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2012, 66, 349–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Jaguey-Hernández, Y.; Aguilar-Arteaga, K.; Ojeda-Ramirez, D.; Añorve-Morga, J.; González-Olivares, L.G.; Castañeda-Ovando, A. Biogenic amines levels in food processing: Efforts for their control in foodstuffs. Food Res. Int. 2021, 144, 110341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. López-Caballero, M.; Sánchez-Fernández, J.; Moral, A. Growth and metabolic activity of Shewanella putrefaciens maintained under different CO2 and O2 concentrations. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2001, 64, 277–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Wang, Y.; Wang, F.; Wang, C.; Li, X.; Fu, L. Positive regulation of spoilage potential and biofilm formation in Shewanella baltica OS155 via quorum sensing system composed of DKP and orphan LuxRs. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Craciun, S.; Balskus, E.P. Microbial conversion of choline to trimethylamine requires a glycyl radical enzyme. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 21307–21312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Leustek, T.; Martin, M.N.; Bick, J.-A.; Davies, J.P. Pathways and regulation of sulfur metabolism revealed through molecular and genetic studies. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 2000, 51, 141–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Flemming, H.-C.; Wingender, J.; Szewzyk, U.; Steinberg, P.; Rice, S.A.; Kjelleberg, S. Biofilms: An emergent form of bacterial life. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2016, 14, 563–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Gosset, G.; Zhang, Z.; Nayyar, S.; Cuevas, W.A.; Saier, M.H. Transcriptome Analysis of Crp-Dependent Catabolite Control of Gene Expression in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 2004, 186, 3516–3524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Rasamiravaka, T.; Labtani, Q.; Duez, P.; El Jaziri, M. The Formation of Biofilms by Pseudomonas aeruginosa: A Review of the Natural and Synthetic Compounds Interfering with Control Mechanisms. BioMed Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 759348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Sondermann, H.; Shikuma, N.J.; Yildiz, F.H. You’ve come a long way: C-di-GMP signaling. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2012, 15, 140–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Zhou, G.; Yuan, J.; Gao, H. Regulation of biofilm formation by BpfA, BpfD, and BpfG in Shewanella oneidensis. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Wu, C.; Cheng, Y.-Y.; Yin, H.; Song, X.-N.; Li, W.-W.; Zhou, X.-X.; Zhao, L.-P.; Tian, L.-J.; Han, J.-C.; Yu, H.-Q. Oxygen promotes biofilm formation of Shewanella putrefaciens CN32 through a diguanylate cyclase and an adhesin. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 1945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Cheng, Y.-Y.; Wu, C.; Wu, J.-Y.; Jia, H.-L.; Wang, M.-Y.; Wang, H.-Y.; Zou, S.-M.; Sun, R.-R.; Jia, R.; Xiao, Y.-Z. FlrA Represses Transcription of the Biofilm-Associated bpfA Operon in Shewanella putrefaciens. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2017, 83, e02410–e02416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Jenal, U.; Reinders, A.; Lori, C. Cyclic di-GMP: Second messenger extraordinaire. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2017, 15, 271–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Ballicora, M.A.; Iglesias, A.A.; Preiss, J. ADP-Glucose Pyrophosphorylase, a Regulatory Enzyme for Bacterial Glycogen Synthesis. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2003, 67, 213–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Chen, S.-C.; Adams, A.; Richards, R.H. Extracellular products from Mycobacterium spp. in fish. J. Fish Dis. 1997, 20, 19–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Liu, Y.; Shi, C.; Li, D.; Chen, X.; Li, J.; Zhang, Y.; Yuan, H.; Li, Y.; Lu, F. Engineering a highly efficient expression system to produce BcaPRO protease in Bacillus subtilis by an optimized promoter and signal peptide. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 138, 903–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Damare, S.; Raghukumar, C.; Muraleedharan, U.D.; Raghukumar, S. Deep-sea fungi as a source of alkaline and cold-tolerant proteases. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2006, 39, 172–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Map of the circular genome of Shewanella putrefaciens YZ08 and YZ-J. Genome size (first circle); coding DNA sequences on forward and reverse chains based on COGs categories (second and third circles); forward strand and reverse strand non-coding RNA (ncRNA) (fourth and fifth circle); guanine-cytosine (GC) content (sixth circle) and GC skew (fifth circle).
Figure 1. Map of the circular genome of Shewanella putrefaciens YZ08 and YZ-J. Genome size (first circle); coding DNA sequences on forward and reverse chains based on COGs categories (second and third circles); forward strand and reverse strand non-coding RNA (ncRNA) (fourth and fifth circle); guanine-cytosine (GC) content (sixth circle) and GC skew (fifth circle).
Foods 11 01261 g001
Figure 2. Whole genome sequence analysis of S. putrefaciens YZ08 and YZ-J. (A), Cluster of orthologous groups (COG). (B), Gene ontology (GO). (C), Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) Classification. (D), Top 20 KEGG pathways.
Figure 2. Whole genome sequence analysis of S. putrefaciens YZ08 and YZ-J. (A), Cluster of orthologous groups (COG). (B), Gene ontology (GO). (C), Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) Classification. (D), Top 20 KEGG pathways.
Foods 11 01261 g002
Figure 3. Genome synteny and pan-genome analysis of S.putrefaciens. (A) The mauve visualization of the whole genomes of S. putrefaciens YZ08 and YZ-J. The homologs distributed in these genomes are connected by lines; (B) pan-genome and core genome profile of different 10 S. putrefaciens strains; (C) prediction of increase in gene number when adding new genome; (D) phylogenetic tree based on pan genomes; (E) COG and (F) KEGG distribution of unique genes based on pan-genome of S. putrefaciens YZ08 and YZ-J.
Figure 3. Genome synteny and pan-genome analysis of S.putrefaciens. (A) The mauve visualization of the whole genomes of S. putrefaciens YZ08 and YZ-J. The homologs distributed in these genomes are connected by lines; (B) pan-genome and core genome profile of different 10 S. putrefaciens strains; (C) prediction of increase in gene number when adding new genome; (D) phylogenetic tree based on pan genomes; (E) COG and (F) KEGG distribution of unique genes based on pan-genome of S. putrefaciens YZ08 and YZ-J.
Foods 11 01261 g003
Figure 4. Growth curves (A) and biofilm formation (B) for Shewanella putrefaciens YZ08 and YZ-J under different stress conditions. The significance analysis of the same strain under different stress conditions at the same culture time was conducted; different lowercase letters indicate a significant difference (p < 0.05, the different styles of letters are used to distinguish the different groups).
Figure 4. Growth curves (A) and biofilm formation (B) for Shewanella putrefaciens YZ08 and YZ-J under different stress conditions. The significance analysis of the same strain under different stress conditions at the same culture time was conducted; different lowercase letters indicate a significant difference (p < 0.05, the different styles of letters are used to distinguish the different groups).
Foods 11 01261 g004
Figure 5. Comparison of the expression levels of biofilm formation-related and spoilage-related genes associated with salt stress between Shewanella putrefaciens strains YZ-J and YZ08. Gene expression levels in S. putrefaciens YZ-J are expressed as values relative to the control group (S. putrefaciens YZ08). ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Figure 5. Comparison of the expression levels of biofilm formation-related and spoilage-related genes associated with salt stress between Shewanella putrefaciens strains YZ-J and YZ08. Gene expression levels in S. putrefaciens YZ-J are expressed as values relative to the control group (S. putrefaciens YZ08). ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Foods 11 01261 g005
Figure 6. Swimming (A) and swarming (B) motility of S. putrefaciens YZ08 and YZ-J in LB performed at 15 and 30 °C. no mark p > 0.05, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Figure 6. Swimming (A) and swarming (B) motility of S. putrefaciens YZ08 and YZ-J in LB performed at 15 and 30 °C. no mark p > 0.05, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Foods 11 01261 g006
Figure 7. Changes in the putrescine (A), cadaverine (B), TMA (C), H2S (D), exopolysaccharide (E) and protease activity (F) produced by S. putrefaciens YZ08 and YZ-J during storage at 4 and 30 °C. The significance analysis for different strains at the same culture time and temperature was performed. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 7. Changes in the putrescine (A), cadaverine (B), TMA (C), H2S (D), exopolysaccharide (E) and protease activity (F) produced by S. putrefaciens YZ08 and YZ-J during storage at 4 and 30 °C. The significance analysis for different strains at the same culture time and temperature was performed. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Foods 11 01261 g007
Figure 8. Halos associated with proteolytic (measured on agar plates containing 5% skimmed milk) (A,B) and lipase (measured on triglyceride agar) (C,D) activity of Shewanella putrefaciens YZ08 and YZ-J following incubation at 4 and 30 °C for 48 and 144 h. Bars in the graphs represent the mean diameter of clear proteolytic and lipolytic halos at 30 °C for 12, 24, and 48 h and 4 °C for 48, 96, and 144 h (E).
Figure 8. Halos associated with proteolytic (measured on agar plates containing 5% skimmed milk) (A,B) and lipase (measured on triglyceride agar) (C,D) activity of Shewanella putrefaciens YZ08 and YZ-J following incubation at 4 and 30 °C for 48 and 144 h. Bars in the graphs represent the mean diameter of clear proteolytic and lipolytic halos at 30 °C for 12, 24, and 48 h and 4 °C for 48, 96, and 144 h (E).
Foods 11 01261 g008
Table 1. Stress-related genes of S. putrefaciens YZ08 and YZ-J.
Table 1. Stress-related genes of S. putrefaciens YZ08 and YZ-J.
StressGeneEncoded ProteinLocus Tag
YZ08YZ-J
TemperaturegrpEHeat shock protein GrpEK2227_15635K3G22_06000
dnaKMolecular chaperone DnaKK2227_17110K3G22_14795
dnaJMolecular chaperone DnaJK2227_04710
K2227_09435
K2227_17105
K3G22_07810
K3G22_14790
K3G22_15110
hslRHeat shock protein 15K2227_00795K3G22_18295
hslJHeat shock protein HslJK2227_17775K3G22_03895
ibpAHeat shock protein IbpAK2227_12130K3G22_10395
htpXHeat shock protein HtpXK2227_13200K3G22_11625
cspACold shock proteinK2227_07410
K2227_08825
K2227_12570
K3G22_06460
K3G22_07485
K3G22_10845
groeSCo-chaperonin GroES (heat shock protein)K2227_03200K3G22_02865
groeLMolecular chaperone GroEL (heat shock protein)K2227_03205K3G22_02870
pHatpC/atpD/atpG/atpA/atpH/atpF/atpE/atpBF0F1 ATP synthaseK2227_21885
K2227_21890
K2227_21895
K2227_21900
K2227_21905
K2227_21910
K2227_21915
K2227_21920
K3G22_19335
K3G22_19340
K3G22_19345
K3G22_19350
K3G22_19355
K3G22_19360
K3G22_19365
K3G22_19370
phoA/phoDAlkaline phosphataseK2227_03285
K2227_03290
K2227_04030
K3G22_15755
NaClnhaD/nhaC/YuiFSodium: proton antiporterK2227_06070
K2227_06375
K2227_10490
K2227_10855
K2227_17710
K2227_20195
K3G22_03965
K3G22_05205
K3G22_09220
K3G22_17770
envZOsmolarity sensor histidine kinase EnvZK2227_21175K3G22_00555
ompRTranscriptional regulatory protein OmpRK2227_21170K3G22_00560
Choline/glycine/proline betaine transport proteinK2227_07790K3G22_06825
Plasma membrane protein involved in salt toleranceK2227_01670K3G22_01330
NutrientpurAAdenylosuccinate synthetaseK2227_03495
K2227_16420
K3G22_03065
K3G22_14060
thiCHydroxymethyl-pyrimidine synthaseK2227_11880K3G22_09485
pabBAminodeoxychorismate synthase component 1K2227_10065K3G22_08745
panCPantothenate synthetaseK2227_04225K3G22_15605
argGArgininosuccinate synthaseK2227_20520K3G22_18080
cysMCysteine synthase BK2227_05310K3G22_04610
cysKCysteine synthase AK2227_13820K3G22_11825
metHMethionine synthaseK2227_04845
K2227_16165
K3G22_13880
K3G22_14750
glnAGlutamine synthetaseK2227_01730
K2227_05875
K3G22_01380
K3G22_05075
thrCThreonine synthaseK2227_16000K3G22_13695
Table 2. Genes associated with motility, biogenic amine metabolism, trimethylamine metabolism, sulfur metabolism, biofilm formation, and exopolysaccharide formation in S. putrefaciens YZ08 and YZ-J.
Table 2. Genes associated with motility, biogenic amine metabolism, trimethylamine metabolism, sulfur metabolism, biofilm formation, and exopolysaccharide formation in S. putrefaciens YZ08 and YZ-J.
GeneEncoded ProteinLocus Tag
YZ08YZ-J
MotilityA-IBasal body rod, rings, hook, and regulation protein K2227_15200-K2227_15275K3G22_12995-K3G22_13070
A-IIFilament, basal body, switch, and export proteinsK2227_15080-K2227_15195K3G22_12875-K3G22_12990
A-IIIRegulatory, export, chemotaxis, and motor proteinsK2227_15020-K2227_15075
K2227_15610 K2227_15615
K2227_03500 K2227_03505
K3G22_12815-K3G22_12870
K3G22_17150 K3G22_17155
K3G22_06020 K3G22_06025
cheXChemotaxis proteinsK2227_03560 K2227_11490
K2227_11495 K2227_11500
K2227_11510 K2227_11515
K2227_11520 K2227_13440 K2227_14420 K2227_15020 K2227_15025 K2227_15050 K2227_15055 K2227_15255 K2227_15260 K2227_15040 K2227_15045 K2227_16425K2227_19145
K3G22_03130 K3G22_11550 K3G22_12430 K3G22_12815 K3G22_12820 K3G22_12835 K3G22_12840 K3G22_12845 K3G22_12850 K3G22_13050 K3G22_13055 K3G22_14065 K3G22_16555
zomBFlagellar motor control protein ZomBK2227_12675K3G22_10945
pilZPilz domain-containing proteinK2227_08445 K2227_12485
K2227_16555 K2227_16565
K3G22_07390 K3G22_10760
K3G22_14160 K3G22_14170
mcpMethyl-accepting chemotaxis proteinK2227_01520 K2227_01560
K2227_04495 K2227_05180
K2227_05395 K2227_05730
K2227_05985 K2227_07050
K2227_09095 K2227_09850
K2227_10100 K2227_11990
K2227_13265 K2227_14075
K2227_14105 K2227_15425
K2227_15910 K2227_15945
K2227_17160 K2227_17180
K2227_17310 K2227_17445 K2227_17510 K2227_17895
K2227_18115 K2227_18355
K2227_18980 K2227_20645
K2227_20825 K2227_21180
K3G22_01230 K3G22_01265 K3G22_01935 K3G22_02480 K3G22_02665 K3G22_02720
K3G22_03550 K3G22_04190
K3G22_04340 K3G22_04510 K3G22_04680 K3G22_05125 K3G22_05590 K3G22_06750
K3G22_06810 K3G22_08945
K3G22_09970 K3G22_10280
K3G22_10305 K3G22_12080
K3G22_13645 K3G22_14785
K3G22_15015 K3G22_15195
K3G22_15940 K3G22_16410 K3G22_18525
Biogenic amines metabolismpuuPPutrescine importer PuuPK2227_02810K3G22_02305
puuBGamma-glutamylputrescine oxidoreductaseK2227_05900K3G22_05100
potFPutrescine transport system substrate-binding proteinK2227_05880K3G22_05080
potGPutrescine transport ATP-binding proteinK2227_05885K3G22_05085
potHSpermidine/putrescine ABC transporter permeaseK2227_05890K3G22_05090
potIPutrescine transport system permease proteinK2227_05895K3G22_05095
potEPutrescine-ornithine antiporterK2227_20335K3G22_17905
speCOrnithine/lysine decarboxylaseK2227_20330K3G22_17900
speABiosynthetic arginine decarboxylaseK2227_09155K3G22_07940
lysELysine transporterK2227_05120
K2227_10525
K3G22_02835
K3G22_06765
Trimethylamine metabolismtorETrimethylamine N-oxide reductase system protein TorEK2227_16520
torCPentaheme c-type cytochrome TorCK2227_16525
torATrimethylamine-N-oxide reductase TorAK2227_16530
torDMolecular chaperone TorDK2227_16535
torSTMAO reductase system sensor histidine kinase/response regulator TorSK2227_16540
torTTMAO reductase system periplasmic protein TorTK2227_16545
torRTwo-component system response regulator TorRK2227_16550
pflDFormate C-acetyltransferaseK2227_13855K3G22_11865
pflAPyruvate formate lyase 1-activating proteinK2227_13860K3G22_11870
Sulfur metabolismcysESerine O-acetyltransferaseK2227_12190K3G22_10455
cysZSulfate transporterK2227_13805K3G22_11810
cysKCysteine synthase AK2227_13820K3G22_11825
cysQ3′(2′),5′-bisphosphate nucleotidaseK2227_00930
K2227_07435
K3G22_18190
K3G22_06480
cysJSulfite reductase [NADPH] flavoprotein alpha-componentK2227_04610K3G22_15255
cysISulfite reductase (NADPH) hemoprotein, beta-componentK2227_04615K3G22_15250
cysHPhosphoadenylyl-sulfate reductaseK2227_04620K3G22_15245
cysDSulfate adenylyltransferase subunit 2K2227_04650K3G22_15150
cysNSulfate adenylyltransferase subunit 1K2227_04655K3G22_15145
cysCadenylyl-sulfate kinaseK2227_04665K3G22_15135
cysASulfate transport system ATP-binding proteinK2227_05290K3G22_04590
cysWSulfate transport system permease proteinK2227_05295K3G22_04595
cysUsulfate/thiosulfate ABC transporter permeaseK2227_05300K3G22_04600
cysPThiosulfate ABC transporter substrate-bindingK2227_05305K3G22_04605
cysMCysteine synthase BK2227_05310K3G22_04610
sirADissimilatory sulfite reductase SirAK2227_19420K3G22_16750
phsAThiosulfate reductaseK2227_02935K3G22_02440
metBCystathionine gamma-synthaseK2227_02960K3G22_02465
sseA3-mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferaseK2227_05850K3G22_05050
metAHomoserine O-succinyltransferaseK2227_07535K3G22_06595
ttrRTetrathionate response regulatory proteinK2227_18710K3G22_02690
ttrSTetrathionate sensor histidine kinaseK2227_18715K3G22_02685
ttrBTetrathionate reductase subunit BK2227_18720K3G22_02680
ttrCTetrathionate reductase subunit CK2227_18725K3G22_02675
ttrATetrathionate reductase subunit AK2227_18730K3G22_02670
glpEThiosulfate sulfurtransferaseK2227_21760K3G22_00255
Bilofilm formationgspXType II secretion system proteinK2227_00800 K2227_00805
K2227_00810 K2227_00815
K2227_00820 K2227_00825
K2227_00830 K2227_00835
K2227_00840 K2227_00845
K2227_00850 K2227_00855
K2227_06060 K2227_06065
K3G22_02165 K3G22_05200 K3G22_18235 K3G22_18240
K3G22_18245 K3G22_18250
K3G22_18255 K3G22_18260
K3G22_18265 K3G22_18270
K3G22_18275 K3G22_18280
K3G22_18285 K3G22_18290
ompRTwo-component system, OmpR family, phosphate regulon response regulator OmpRK2227_21170K3G22_00560
envZTwo-component system, OmpR family, osmolarity sensor histidine kinase EnvZK2227_21175K3G22_00555
cyaAclass I adenylate cyclaseK2227_19915K3G22_17425
csgBMinor curlin subunitK2227_04215K3G22_15615
cpdA3′,5′-cyclic-AMP phosphodiesteraseK2227_03910K3G22_03185
crp/vfrcAMP-activated global transcriptional regulator CRPK2227_18785K3G22_02620
trpEanthranilate synthase component 1K2227_13995K3G22_11985
trpGaminodeoxychorismate/anthranilate synthase component IIK2227_14000K3G22_11990
mshEMSHA biogenesis protein MshEK2227_02690K3G22_02185
mshBMSHA pilin protein MshBK2227_02705K3G22_02200
mshAMSHA pilin protein MshAK2227_02710K3G22_02205
mshCMSHA pilin protein MshCK2227_02715K3G22_02210
mshDMSHA pilin protein MshDK2227_02720K3G22_02215
flrCTwo-component system, response regulator FlrCK2227_15155K3G22_12950
flrBTwo-component system, sensor histidine kinase FlrBK2227_15160K3G22_12955
flrA/fleQSigma-54 dependent transcriptional regulatorK2227_15165K3G22_12960
fliARNA polymerase sigma factor FliAK2227_15060K3G22_12855
flgMFlagellar biosynthesis anti-sigma factor FlgMK2227_15270K3G22_13065
luxSS-ribosylhomocysteine lyaseK2227_17240K3G22_04260
csrAcarbon storage regulator CsrAK2227_16070K3G22_13785
gacS/barATwo-component sensor histidine kinaseK2227_16195K3G22_13910
gacA/uvrYTwo-component response regulator transcription factorK2227_13250K3G22_07880
rpoSRNA polymerase sigma factor RpoSK2227_16100K3G22_13815
rpoNRNA polymerase factor sigma-54K2227_03400K3G22_02925
rpoDRNA polymerase sigma factor RpoDK2227_06000K3G22_05135
aphBLysR family transcriptional regulator, AphBK2227_17170K3G22_04330
hfqRNA chaperone HfqK2227_18885K3G22_16320
fisDNA-binding transcriptional regulator FisK2227_19855K3G22_17135
crrPTS glucose transporter subunit IIAK2227_12010K3G22_10300
hapM4 family metallopeptidaseK2227_02450-
cdgCc-di-GMP phosphodiesteraseK2227_03335-
dksARNA polymerase-binding protein DksAK2227_04250K3G22_15580
gcvATranscriptional regulator GcvAK2227_15595K3G22_06040
gcvRglycine cleavage system transcriptional repressorK2227_13180K3G22_08205
arcATwo-component system response regulator ArcAK2227_18630K3G22_02750
bpfABiofilm-promoting protein BpfAK2227_19940K3G22_17455
Type I secretion system permease/ATPaseK2227_19945K3G22_17460
HlyD family type I secretion periplasmic adaptor subunitK2227_19950K3G22_17465
TolC family outer membrane proteinK2227_19955K3G22_17470
OmpA family proteinK2227_19960K3G22_17475
Transglutaminase-like cysteine peptidaseK2227_19965K3G22_17480
EAL domain-containing proteinK2227_19970K3G22_17485
Exopolysaccharide formationglgAGlycogen synthaseK2227_15730K3G22_05905
glgCGlucose-1-phosphate adenylyltransferaseK2227_15735K3G22_05900
glgPglycogen/starch/alpha-glucan phosphorylaseK2227_15740K3G22_05895
glgB1,4-alpha-glucan branching protein GlgBK2227_15750K3G22_05885
pgmPhosphoglucomutaseK2227_10900K3G22_09265
Table 3. Genes encoding proteases and lipases of S. putrefaciens YZ08 and YZ-J.
Table 3. Genes encoding proteases and lipases of S. putrefaciens YZ08 and YZ-J.
GeneEncoded ProteinLocus TagSignal Peptide
YZ08YZ-J
ProteasectpACarboxyl-terminal proteaseK2227_00255K3G22_19255No
hapM4 family metallopeptidaseK2227_02450-Yes
hslUATP-dependent protease ATPase subunit HslUK2227_02475K3G22_02010No
hslVATP-dependent protease subunit HslVK2227_02480K3G22_02015No
tldDMetalloprotease TldDK2227_02775K3G22_02275No
pmbAMetalloprotease PmbAK2227_02825K3G22_02340No
degSOuter membrane-stress sensor serine endopeptidase DegSK2227_03465K3G22_03035No
sprTSprT family zinc-dependent metalloproteaseK2227_04050K3G22_15735No
gluPRhomboid family intramembrane serine proteaseK2227_04770K3G22_00250No
resPSigma E protease regulator RsePK2227_07350K3G22_06405No
clpPATP-dependent Clp endopeptidase proteolytic subunit ClpPK2227_08100K3G22_07070No
clpXATP-dependent protease ATP-binding subunit ClpXK2227_08105K3G22_07075No
lonEndopeptidase LaK2227_08110K3G22_07080No
bepAM48 family metalloproteaseK2227_09265
K2227_17060
K3G22_08175Yes
clpAATP-dependent Clp protease ATP-binding subunit ClpAK2227_12560K3G22_10835No
htpXProtease HtpXK2227_13200K3G22_11625No
sohBProtease SohBK2227_13950K3G22_11940No
fstHATP-dependent zinc metalloprotease FtsHK2227_16705K3G22_14305No
Alkaline serine proteaseK2227_16455Yes
glgGRhomboid family intramembrane serine protease glgGK2227_21765K3G22_04125No
Transglutaminase-like cysteine peptidaseK2227_19965K3G22_17475Yes
LipasepldAPhospholipase AK2227_04640K3G22_15160Yes
LipaseK2227_13955K3G22_11945Yes
Patatin-like phospholipase family proteinK2227_14815
K2227_19695
K3G22_12635
K3G22_16980
Yes
phoDAlkaline phosphatase D family proteinK2227_18295K3G22_15860Yes
rssAPatatin-like phospholipase RssAK2227_08360K3G22_07315No
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yi, Z.; Xie, J. Genomic Analysis of Two Representative Strains of Shewanella putrefaciens Isolated from Bigeye Tuna: Biofilm and Spoilage-Associated Behavior. Foods 2022, 11, 1261. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11091261

AMA Style

Yi Z, Xie J. Genomic Analysis of Two Representative Strains of Shewanella putrefaciens Isolated from Bigeye Tuna: Biofilm and Spoilage-Associated Behavior. Foods. 2022; 11(9):1261. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11091261

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yi, Zhengkai, and Jing Xie. 2022. "Genomic Analysis of Two Representative Strains of Shewanella putrefaciens Isolated from Bigeye Tuna: Biofilm and Spoilage-Associated Behavior" Foods 11, no. 9: 1261. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11091261

APA Style

Yi, Z., & Xie, J. (2022). Genomic Analysis of Two Representative Strains of Shewanella putrefaciens Isolated from Bigeye Tuna: Biofilm and Spoilage-Associated Behavior. Foods, 11(9), 1261. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11091261

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop