Next Article in Journal
Preparation, Characterization and Antioxidant Activity of Glycosylated Whey Protein Isolate/Proanthocyanidin Compounds
Next Article in Special Issue
Food from the Wild—Roles and Values of Wild Edible Plants and Fungi
Previous Article in Journal
Determination and Risk Assessment of Flavor Components in Flavored Milk
Previous Article in Special Issue
Quality Attributes and Metabolic Profiles of Uvaia (Eugenia pyriformis), a Native Brazilian Atlantic Forest Fruit
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Composition of Sugars, Organic Acids, Phenolic Compounds, and Volatile Organic Compounds in Lingonberries (Vaccinium vitis-idaea L.) at Five Ripening Stages

1
Nofima AS, Osloveien 1, 1340 Ås, Norway
2
Department of Arctic and Marine Biology, UiT the Arctic University of Norway, 9037 Tromsø, Norway
3
Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research (NIBIO), 1431 Ås, Norway
4
Food Chemistry and Food Development Unit, Department of Life Technologies, University of Turku, FI-20014 Turku, Finland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2023, 12(11), 2154; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12112154
Submission received: 7 April 2023 / Revised: 22 May 2023 / Accepted: 23 May 2023 / Published: 26 May 2023

Abstract

:
Wild lingonberries are a traditional source of food in the Nordic countries and an important contributor to economic activity of non-wood forest products in the region. Lingonberries are a rich source of bioactive compounds and can be a valuable contributor to a healthy diet. However, there are few studies available on how the bioactive compounds in lingonberries develop as they ripen. In this investigation, we examined the content of 27 phenolic compounds, three sugars, four organic acids, and 71 volatile organic compounds at five ripening stages. The study showed that, while the highest content of phenolic compounds was found early in the development, the organoleptic quality of the fruits improved as they ripened. From the first to the last stage of development, anthocyanins went from being nearly absent to 100 mg/100 g fw, and there was an increased content of sugars from 2.7 to 7.2 g/100 g fw, whereas the content of organic acids decreased from 4.9 to 2.7 g/100 g fw, and there were several changes in the profile of volatiles. The contents of flavonols, cinnamic acid derivatives, flavan-3-ols, and the total concentration of phenolic compounds were significantly lower in the fully ripe berries compared to berries in the early green stage. In addition to the changes occurring due to ripening, there was observed variation in the profile of both phenolic compounds and volatiles, depending on the growth location of the berries. The present data are useful for the assessment of harvest time to obtain the desired quality of lingonberries.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Lingonberry (Vaccinium vitis-idaea L.), belonging to the family of the Ericaceae and the genus Vaccinium, is a perennial dwarf shrub with scarlet red fruits [1]. The Vaccinium genus also contains blueberries (V. corymbosum), cranberries (V. macrocarpon), and bilberries (V. myrtillus), which are increasing in popularity worldwide. Lingonberries grow wildly and abundantly in forests across the Nordic countries and are an important source of income for the Nordic rural communities. Despite an increasing interest in wild berries, only an average of 7.6% of the total yield of lingonberries is harvested annually [2,3]. Lingonberries are mainly sold as fresh or frozen, or produced into jams. These berries are known to have a sour and astringent taste found challenging for many consumers, and appraised the reason for the relatively low consumption of lingonberries [4]. The flavor profile of lingonberries is mostly attributed to both the low content of sugars and the high content of phenolic compounds and organic acids in the berries [5,6,7,8]. Flavour is also affected by volatile organic compounds (VOCs), but little is known about the aroma profile of lingonberries [9]. Lingonberries have a super-food potential, as several studies have found health beneficial effects of including them in the diet [10,11,12,13,14].
The ripening of berries in the Vaccinium genus is non-climacteric, with a continuous respiration rate throughout the process. After berry formation, several processes occur simultaneously, causing changes in the composition of the berries. In various Vaccinium berries, large changes in the composition of phenolics and terpenoids during the season have been observed [15,16,17,18,19,20]. The synthesis of most phenolic compounds starts at fruit onset, with the highest content of total phenolic compounds observed in immature fruits [16,19,21]. In immature fruits, the content of sugars is low and organic acids is high, and, as the berries ripen, the sugar content increases and organic acid content decreases [22]. As reduced astringency in the berries is considered an important factor for increased use of lingonberries, it is important to study the effects of ripening on composition. The development of volatile compounds has not been extensively studied in lingonberries [9]. In grapes, however, ripening has generally been found to be characterized by accumulation of alcohols, fruity esters, and terpenes during the later stages of development [23]. It is also known that the ripening process is influenced by growth conditions [15,18,24].
The process of berry ripening is visually expressed with an increase in size and accumulation of color in their skin [17,20]. Due to the sour taste and astringency of the berries, it is key to understand how the targeted compounds, influencing the flavor, develop during ripening. Ripening also influences the health properties of lingonberries. The objective of this study was to investigate how sugars, organic acids, and phenolic and volatile organic compounds vary in lingonberries as they ripen. Changes in the metabolic profile during maturation are considered to influence the flavor and antioxidant and antimicrobial potential of the berries. Improved understanding of the ripening processes is essential to increase the use of lingonberries and can be used to optimize harvest time and quality control.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Lingonberry Sample Material

2.1.1. Harvest of Wild Berry Samples

Wild lingonberries were sampled between July and September 2020, from three natural stands (250 m2) in southern Norway within a 3 km radius (Supplementary Material Figure S1). Whole undamaged lingonberries (100 g) were harvested by hand at five stages of ripening based on predetermined visual criteria of the berry skin surface color, ranging from large unripe green fruit in July to fully ripe fruit in September (Table 1). After harvest, the berries were frozen within three hours and stored at −40 °C until further analysis.

2.1.2. Chemicals

Water used in the experiments was purified by a Milli-Q purification system (Millipore Sigma, Burlington, MA, USA), and solvents used were of HPLC-isocratic grade or higher. The chemicals used as standards in the experiments were purchased from several different vendors. From Acros Organics (Antwerp, Belgium), we purchased 2-hexenal. From Chem Service Inc. (West Chester, PA, USA), we purchased acetophenone, fructose, glucose, and sucrose. From Fluka (Steinheim, Switzerland), we purchased chlorogenic acid and eucalyptol. From Merck (Darmstadt, Germany), we purchased quinic acid. From Polyphenols AS (Sandnes, Norway), we purchased cyanidin-3-O-galactoside. From Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA), we purchased benzaldehyde, catechin hydrate, citric acid, o-cymene, p-cymene, 2-ethyl furan, ethyl octanoate, (E,E)-2,4-heptadienal, (E,E)-2,4-hexadienal, hexanal, hexanoic acid, 1-hexanol, hexyl acetate, linalool, d-limonene, malic acid, methylbutanal, 3-methyl-1-butanol acetate, 6-methyl-5-hepten-2-one, 4-Methyl-2-pentanol, n-alkane mixture (C7–C30), neryl acetate, 1-octen-3-ol, 1-pentanol, quercetin-3-O-rutinoside, 2-α-pinene, shikimic acid, and γ-terpinene.

2.1.3. Methanolic Extraction of Lingonberries

The non-volatile metabolites in lingonberries were extracted in duplicate at ambient temperature (20–22 °C) following the methanolic extraction method described previously [26,27]. Frozen lingonberries (~50 g) were milled before lyophilization for 72 h at a pressure of 0.633 mbar (Gamma 1–16, Christ GmbH, Osterode am Harz, Germany). Dry samples (400 ± 10 mg) were mixed with 5 mL 70% methanol in water (v/v) in a vortex mixer for 15 s before sonication for 10 min (Ultrasonic Cleaner, VWR International, Radnor, PA, USA) and centrifugation for 10 min at 39,200× g (Avanti J-26 XP Centrifuge, Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA). After collection of the supernatant, a re-extraction of the insoluble material was performed. Supernatants were pooled, and the volume was made up to 20 mL with the extraction solvent (70% methanol in water). The extracts were filtered through Millex HA 0.45 μm filters (Millipore Corp., Burlington, MA, USA) before transfer to HPLC vials and stored at −80 °C until analysis.

2.2. Analysis of Sugars and Organic Acids

Sugars and organic acid content were determined using an Agilent 1100 series HPLC system, equipped with a diode array detector (DAD) and a refractometer index (RI) detector (Model 132; Gilson, Villiers-le-Bel, France), as previously described by Woznicki et al. [28]. The methanolic extracts (20 μL) were injected in a randomized order, and separation was performed on a Rezex ROA-Organic acid H+ (8%) column (300 × 7.8 mm; Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA) at 45 °C with mobile phase 7.2 mmol/L H2SO4 run at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min. The detection of the sugars was performed with a RI detector and the organic acid detection was performed with DAD at 210 nm. Identification and quantification was performed according to the method described by Amundsen, et al. [24], and results were presented on a equivalent g/100 g fresh weight (fw) basis.

2.3. Analysis of Anthocyanins, Flavonols, Cinnamic Acid Derivatives and Procyanidins

Targeted analysis of phenolic compounds was performed using an Agilent 1100 series HPLC system (Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany) equipped with an autosampler cooled to 4 °C, a DAD, and a MSD XCT ion trap mass spectrometer was fitted with an electrospray ionization interface with the method described by Aaby, et al. [29]. In a randomized order, 10 μL of the extracts were injected, and separation was performed on a Synergi 4 μm MAX RP C12 column (250 mm × 2.0 mm i.d.), to which a 5 μm C12 guard column (4.0 mm × 2.0 mm i.d.) was equipped. Both columns were produced by Phenomenex (Torrance, CA, USA). The mobile phases used were set up as a binary solvent system, which consisted of: (A) formic acid/water (2/98, v/v) and (B) acetonitrile. The two solvents were used in a gradient of: 0–10 min 5–10% B, 10–22 min 10–12.4% B, 22–42 min 12.4–28% B, 42–50 min 28–60% B, 50–55 min 60% B, and 55–58 min 60–5% B. Elution was performed with a flow rate of 0.25 mL/min at 40 °C, with a total run time of 60 min. The mass spectrometer (MS) was operated in positive and negative ion modes according to a previously described method by Aaby et al. [30]. Identification and quantification were performed according to the method described by [24], and results were presented on a equivalent mg/100 g fresh weight (fw) basis.

2.4. Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds

The analysis on the composition of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) was performed according to the method previously described by Marsol-Vall et al. [31]. Determination of the VOC composition was performed with a Trace 1310 gas chromatograph coupled with a TSQ 7000 EVO mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, Reinach, Switzerland). To extract volatile compounds, a TriPlus RSH multipurpose autosampler (Thermo Scientific, Reinach, Switzerland) equipped with a HS-SPME with a 2 cm DVB/CAR/PDMS 50/30 µm fiber (Supelco, Bellefonte, PA, USA) was used. Two grams of a lingonberry sample, which was partially thawed, was weighed to a 20 mL headspace vial and spiked with 10 µL of the internal standard mix (4-methyl-2-pentanol at 100 µg/mL and neryl acetate at 113 µg/L in methanol). Then, the berries were crushed. Equilibration of the sample was performed for 10 min at 45 °C, followed by exposure of the fiber to the headspace of the sample vial for 30 min at 45 °C. Separation was performed using a polar capillary column (DB-WAX, 60 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 µm: J&W Scientific, Folsom, CA, USA). The carrier gas helium was used with a constant flow of 1.6 mL/min. Identification and quantification were performed according to the method described by [24] and expressed as normalized peak areas (compound area/ISTD area). Each lingonberry sample was analyzed in quadruplicate.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

To assess the effect of ripening on groups of compounds in lingonberry, a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and a Tukey’s Honestly Significant Difference (HSD) test were performed, reporting significant differences at level p < 0.05. To illustrate the variation in the composition of volatile compounds in the samples, a principal component analysis (PCA) was performed with the Unscrambler Software (The Unscrambler®X version 10.4.1, CAMO Software AS, Oslo, Norway). Pareto scaling (weighed by 1/square root of the standard deviation) was applied before the multivariate data analysis.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Sugars and Organic Acids

There were three sugars and four organic acids identified in lingonberries in this study: sucrose, glucose and fructose, and quinic, citric, malic, and shikimic acid, respectively. During ripening, the total content of sugars increased from 2.7 g/100 g fw in the early green berries to 7.2 g/100 g fw in the late season ripe berries (Table 2, Supplementary Material Table S1), whereas the content of organic acids decreased from 4.9 g/100 g fw to 2.7 g/100 g fw during the same period. There were no major changes in the profile of sugars during ripening, though the proportion of sucrose (8.8–4.3%) and glucose (50–47%) slightly decreased, whereas the proportion of fructose (42–49%) increased during ripening. Although both glucose and fructose increased in absolute amounts, the sucrose content remained relatively stable throughout ripening. During ripening, particularly the concentrations of quinic and malic acid decreased, whereas only insignificant changes were observed in the concentration of citric acid. The proportion of citric acid thus increased (42–64%), whereas the proportion of quinic (55–34%) and malic acid (3.2–1.8%) decreased. Shikimic acid contributed only to >1% of the total content of lingonberry organic acids. Shikimic acid has been shown to play a role in the synthesis of phenolic compounds [32]. However, no major changes were detected in its content in the course of lingonberry ripening. In a previous study of blueberries, no changes in the proportions of sugars were detected [22], whereas there was a slightly higher content of fructose than glucose, as well as lower content of sucrose in the berries throughout the ripening period in bilberries [33]. In cranberries, the content of quinic acid decreased, and malic acid increased, whereas there was no change in the citric acid content [34]. The total concentrations of sugars and organic acids in ripe berries were comparable to previous findings in lingonberries [5,35,36]. The simultaneous increase in sugar content with a decrease in organic acids is among the most important and characteristic features of fruit and berry ripening and was thus expected [22]. Additionally, earlier studies on lingonberries and bilberries have indicated increasing content of sugars towards the end of ripening [33,37]. The increase in sugar concentration and decrease in the organic acid concentration improve the palatability of the berries. The ratio of sugar to organic acids, which increased from 0.6 to 2.7 during ripening, influences the perceived sweetness of berries and is likely to influence the liking of the lingonberries [4,8]. As lingonberries are generally considered to have a low degree of sweetness, and addition of sugars is often seen as a necessity in products, and berries with a high ratio of sugars to organic acids would be preferred. Harvest of berries later in the season could thus improve quality as the ratio of sugars to organic acids is significantly higher than earlier in the season.

3.2. Phenolic Compounds

There were in total 27 phenolic compounds tentatively identified (Supplementary Material Table S2) and quantified in lingonberries during the five stages of ripening (Table 3). Five anthocyanins, eleven flavonols, eight cinnamic acid derivatives, and three flavan-3-ols were identified. The anthocyanins identified were all glycosides of cyanidin. Flavonols tentatively identified were mostly glycosides of quercetin, with small amounts of kaempferol glycosides. Cinnamic acid derivatives (CADs) identified were hexosides of ferulic, caffeic, sinapic and p-coumaric acid, a coumaroyl iridoid and chlorogenic acid. Exact quantification of all flavan-3-ols was not possible due to coelution and low molar absorptivity. However, catechin, a B-type dimer, and an A-type dimer could be quantified. Chemical composition of ripe lingonberries has been investigated in several publications, and the composition of anthocyanins, flavonols, and flavan-3-ols were in line to what has been previously reported [7,15,36,38,39,40,41,42].
In the green lingonberries, the accumulation of anthocyanins had just started with 0.4 mg/100 g fw measured. As the berries ripened, accumulation increased, and the content of anthocyanins was 80 mg/100 g fw in ripe berries and increased to 99 mg/100 g fw late in the season (Table 3, Figure 1). All anthocyanins increased with ripening, but the proportion of cyanidin-3-O-galactoside decreased from 92% to 80% in the ripe berries. This was mostly due to a strong increase in the proportions of cyanidin-3-O-arabinoside and cyanidin-3-O-glucoside that were absent in green berries and had a proportion of 13.1% and 5.7%, respectively, in late season berries. In a previous study, the proportion of cyanidin-3-O-galactoside also decreased from 94% to 81% between early berries on 29th of July and late season berries on the 4th of October. In the same study, increases in both the proportion of cyanidin-3-O-arabinoside from 1% to 11% and cyandin-3-O-glucoside from 5% to 6% were detected [15]. The content of the individual compounds is of importance, as studies have shown that the glycosylation influences the absorption of the lingonberry anthocyanins in humans [43]. The anthocyanins of lingonberries accumulate mostly in the skin with little coloration in the fruit flesh [18]. The increase in the anthocyanin content in the fruit skin is the visual expression of ripening [18]. It is thought that plants accumulate anthocyanins to attract seed dispersers, indicating a ripe berry, but they also protect the berry against outside stressors, such as radiation [16,17,18,19,20]. It has been found that birds prefer lingonberries with higher anthocyanin content [1]. Though the process was gradual, most anthocyanin accumulation had taken place as the berry had turned fully red. However, a significantly higher content was detected in the fully ripe late season berries.
While the anthocyanins accumulate throughout the season from 0.4 to 98.5 mg/100 g fw, the content of flavan-3-ols and CADs decreased from 206.0 to 72.6 mg/100 g fw and from 51.9 to 11.3 mg/100 g fw (Table 3). Additionally, the flavonols decreased from 41.2 and 20.1 mg/100 g fw, but their decrease was more gradual throughout the season. The highest total content of phenolic compounds, consisting of flavonols, flavan-3-ols, and CADs, were found in early green berries (Figure 1). Similar results have been found in many fruits and berries, and it is thought that they are a defense mechanism of the plants to protect the immature seeds against predators and herbivores early in the season [18]. In cranberries, the content of flavonols and proanthocyanidins approximately halved as they ripened [44]. In the present study, the profile of flavonols changed during ripening. The content of all flavonols besides kaempferol-3-O-(HMG)-rhamnoside decreased or remained stable during ripening. A previous study reported a decrease in the total concentration of flavonols in lingonberries during ripening, with a particularly large decrease in the content of glucosides and rhamnosides [15]. In the present study, in the early green and half red lingonberries, the proportion of ferulic acid among the CADs was between 55–60%. As the berries ripened, the large decrease in CAD content was mainly due to the decrease in the concentration of a ferulic acid, hexoside. In ripe berries, the proportion of ferulic acid was 8.5%. The high content of ferulic acid in green berries could be linked to the role of ferulic acid in the crosslinks of structural carbohydrates prior to the softening of cell tissues. The content of a coumaric acid, hexoside, remained high throughout ripening. This is probably due to coumaric acid hexoside being a precursor in the cyanidin synthesis [28]. The two dimeric procyanidins measured (A- and B-type procyanidins) and catechin all decreased during ripening. However, there was a stronger decrease in the concentration of the A-type (74%) than the B-type (54%) procyanidin during ripening. Similarly, in a previous study of lingonberries harvested at several timepoints during the season, a relative decrease in the A-type and increase in the B-type proanthocyanidins was observed [15]. Proanthocyanins are among the most interesting health-promoting compounds in lingonberries [10]. The A-type proanthocyanins found in the highest content in the early fruit are less common and have been shown to have the strongest anti-lipid peroxidation activity [45]. This shows that in the early stage, green berries also contain a high content of interesting compounds that could be utilized.

3.3. Volatile Compounds

A total of 71 volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were tentatively identified in lingonberries during ripening (Supplementary Material Table S3). The VOCs consisted of twenty aldehydes, nine esters, of which six were acetates, six ketones, eleven alcohols, eight acids, sixteen terpenoids, and one furan. Previously, five studies have been performed analyzing volatile organic compounds in lingonberries [6,24,31,46,47]. Among the studies, only one has analyzed whole crushed berries [24], three have analyzed lingonberry juices [6,31,46], and one analyzed the press residue from juice production [47]. Aldehydes were the most abundant group of VOCs found in the present study (Figure 2). Among aldehydes, many compounds are known to give various aromas, and they most often have green, fatty, or tallow aromas [48]. In previous research of lingonberries, several compounds that were also identified in this study were highlighted as contributors to aroma using GC-olfactometry, such as 2-methylbutanoic acid [46,47], eucalyptol, hexanal, linalool, and methyl benzoate [31]. Diacetyl and 2-methylpropanoate were also identified, but they could not be quantified in this study [31]. Additionally, in cranberries, large variation in the profile of VOC compounds has been found [9]. Most studies of cranberries report the presence of benzyl compounds, including benzyl alcohol, benzoic acid, and benzaldehyde. Additionally, a major part of the studies also have found the terpene α-terpineol in relatively high levels. These compounds were also identified in lingonberries in this study.
During ripening, several changes occurred in the profile of VOCs in lingonberries (Figure 2). During ripening, also, different numbers of compounds were measured: 57 at the first stage of ripening, 63 at the second stage, 67 at the third, 63 at fourth, and 65 at the fifth (Supplementary Material Table S3). The highest total content of VOCs was found in the late season berries closely followed by the red berries. This is in contrast to what has been shown in grapes, in which a higher number of volatiles was found before initiation of ripening (pre- compared to post-veraison fruit) [49]. Previous research has shown that VOCs, amongst others, act as signaling molecules to attract pollinators and seed dispersers, and it is, therefore, natural that a high content is found just prior to ripening. This has been shown in highbush blueberries (V. corymbosum L.), in which the highest content of VOCs was found just prior to ripening [50]. In lingonberries, an increase in the content of volatile acids and a tendency for increase in the content of ketones, terpenes, and furan during ripening was detected (Figure 2). Synthesis of volatile compounds is part of other metabolic processes occurring in the berries during ripening. The continuous increase in volatile, short chained fatty acids (C5–C9) during ripening could be due to an increase in the fatty acid fraction in the wax layer of the lingonberry surface during berry ripening [51]. The content of esters was highest in green fruits. When the coloration of the skin had begun, there was little variation in their contents. This is contrary to their role in fully mature blueberries, where esters previously have been proposed to be responsible for fruity aroma characteristics [9]. In lingonberries, a high content of alcohols in the green berries was detected, as well as a tendency for an increase in the late season berries. Two studies of V. padifolium showed an increase in the content of alcohols in the ripe berries compared to earlier in the season [19]. Additionally in red grapes, increased alcohol concentrations occur as the berries ripen, whereas the concentration of aldehydes decreased [23]. The content of aldehydes in the present study, however, did not decrease as the berries ripen, as the content was highest in red and late season berries (Figure 2). The high temperature detected when collecting the red berries (Table 1) may have influenced the release of aldehydes and terpenes at this stage. Grapes harvested at higher temperatures have previously been shown to contain a higher content of terpenes [52]. The content of benzyl acetate, benzyl alcohol, and methyl benzoate increased in lingonberries as the berries ripened (Supplementary Material Table S3). This is in line with previous findings showing that the content of benzoic acids increases as the berries ripen [34].
Clear differences in the profiles and responses between the three stands were found, particularly, in the profile of aldehydes and terpenes (Figure 2). Berries from stands A and C were picked from pine forest with medium forest density, whereas the berries from stand B were picked from a clear-cut area. As berries in a clearcut forest are more exposed to radiation than berries grown in a denser forest, this may affect the synthesis of metabolites, such as terpenes. However, lingonberry genetics, growth environment, and their interaction can all influence the synthesis of volatile compounds in a complex manner [18]. In grapes, large variation in aroma compounds has been between different cultivars independent of grape color [23]. Similarly to the results from our study, it has previously been shown in grapes that the terpenes were influenced significantly by UV-B radiation during ripening [52]. This could also explain why the distance from forests has been shown to influence the composition of grapes, which could be due to shading effect [49]. Additionally, genetic background affects the VOC composition, for example, in both highbush and rabbiteye blueberries, large variations have been found between different cultivars during ripening [9]. With the changes observed in the number of VOCs, and their relative quantities, this study indicates that the ripeness of lingonberries affects the profile of VOCs in the berries, which is likely to influence the perceived aroma.

3.4. General Discussion

In the PCA of all the measured compounds from the three locations (A, B, C) at the five ripening stages (1–5), the first two components explained 86% of the variation in the data set (Figure 3A). There was a clear clustering of both ripening stage and location. The five ripeness stages spread in the first principal component (73%), showing that the ripeness most significantly influenced the chemical composition of lingonberries. The difference between stands spread in the second principal component (13%) with berries from stand B being separated from berries from stands A and C. Though there was a clear horizontal separation between each ripening stage, it was an evident clustering of berries before (1–2) and after full coloration of the skin (3–5). The cluster of the most ripe berries was characterized by the highest content of anthocyanins, sugars, volatile acids, benzyl alcohol, and acetophenone (Figure 3B). In contrast, the berries prior to ripening were characterized by high content of several of the CADs and flavonols, the flavan-3-ols, malic and quinic acid, methyl acetate, 1-octen-3-ol, 5-methyl-hepthen-one, caryophyllene, and 2,4-heptadienal. Early in the season, lingonberries from a single cluster can vary in ripeness depending on their position. Berries less exposed to sunlight appear to ripen at a slower rate. These differences in ripening on a bush can influence the overall quality of the product. Therefore, efforts should be placed on separation of berries based on color if the berries are harvested early in the season. This study gives clear evidence for a variation in the profile of volatiles in lingonberries with ripening. However, there is still a large gap within the understanding of the influence of changes in composition and their relation to fruit flavor itself. This is in part due to the complex nature of the interactions between the compounds in aroma. Additionally, while lingonberries generally have a high content of phenolic compounds, there is not enough evidence available to determine how variation in these compounds during ripening will influence the berry aroma.
The samples from each of the sampling stands were most clustered in the second and third dimension. Particularly, stand B stood out, but there were differences observed between the five stages of ripening. Though the lingonberries were collected from three locations within a 3 km radius from one another, there was a large variation in the chemical composition particularly in the composition of terpenes and aldehydes between the three locations. This could be due to different forest density, thus different solar radiation, at the three stands, as previously discussed (Section 3.3). The variation in the content of flavonoids is also likely influenced by differences in the growth environment as both radiation and temperature have previously been shown to influence their composition [24,37,53]. However, a recently published paper shows that the composition of both phenolic compounds and triterpenoids in lingonberries grown under the same conditions is strongly influenced by genetic variation of the plants [54]. Plants with different genetic backgrounds may also react differently to different environmental conditions [15,18,24,37,55].

4. Conclusions

The chemical composition of lingonberries changed markedly during fruit ripening. The highest contents of phenolic compounds, especially proanthocyanidins, were found in the early stages of berry development, whereas the highest content of anthocyanins and a richer aroma profile was detected in the late harvested lingonberries. Therefore, for the traditional food uses, highest quality berries are achieved by waiting until late in the season with harvest. Potentially, the green berries often harvested together with the first ripe berries in the early season, could be separated and utilized for other purposes. The results reported are of interest for both consumers and producers, as they highlight the influence of ripening and harvest time on the quality of the berries. Further studies are needed for better understanding the relation between volatile compounds and aroma profiles of lingonberries, and the impact of genetic and environmental factors on variation of the aroma profiles and flavor of the berries.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/foods12112154/s1, Figure S1: Coordinates of stands in the experiment. Table S1: Content of all compounds analyzed in lingonberries from the three stands in Ås Norway, at five ripening stages; Table S2: Characterization of phenolic compounds in lingonberries using HPLC-DAD-MS; Table S3: Characterization of volatile organic compounds in lingonberries using HS-SPME-GC-MS.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.A., K.A., A.L.H., I.M. and L.J.; methodology, M.A., K.A., G.S., N.K., B.Y., O.L., L.J., I.M. and A.L.H.; software, M.A.; formal analysis, M.A.; investigation, M.A., N.K. and S.T.; resources, K.A. and B.Y.; data curation, M.A.; writing—original draft preparation, M.A.; writing—review and editing, K.A., N.K., S.T., L.J., B.Y., O.L., G.S., I.M. and A.L.H.; visualization, M.A.; supervision, K.A., L.J. and G.S.; project administration, I.M.; funding acquisition, I.M., L.J., and K.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The work carried out in this paper was funded by the Research Council of Norway (grant no. 294797) and the Norwegian Fund for Research Fees for Agricultural Products (grant no. 314599).

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article or supplementary material.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hjalmarsson, I.; Ortiz, R. Lingonberry: Botany and horticulture. Hortic. Rev. 2001, 27, 79–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Salo, K. Metsä: Monikäyttö ja Ekosysteemipalvelut; Luonnonvarakeskus (Luke): Helsinki, Finland, 2015; Available online: https://urn.fi/URN:978-952-326-123-5 (accessed on 15 February 2023).
  3. Paassilta, M.M.; Moisio, S.; Jaakola, L.; Häggman, H. Voice of the Nordic Wild Berry Industry. A Survey among the Companies; Oulu University Press: Oulu, Finland, 2009; pp. 1–84. [Google Scholar]
  4. Laaksonen, O.; Knaapila, A.; Niva, T.; Deegan, K.C.; Sandell, M. Sensory properties and consumer characteristics contributing to liking of berries. Food Qual. Prefer. 2016, 53, 117–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Viljakainen, S.; Visti, A.; Laakso, S. Concentrations of organic acids and soluble sugars in juices from Nordic berries. Acta Agric. Scand.—B Soil Plant Sci. 2002, 52, 101–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Viljanen, K.; Heiniö, R.-L.; Juvonen, R.; Kössö, T.; Puupponen-Pimiä, R. Relation of sensory perception with chemical composition of bioprocessed lingonberry. Food Chem. 2014, 157, 148–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bujor, O.-C.; Ginies, C.; Popa, V.I.; Dufour, C. Phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity of lingonberry (Vaccinium vitis-idaea L.) leaf, stem and fruit at different harvest periods. Food Chem. 2018, 252, 356–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mikulic-Petkovsek, M.; Schmitzer, V.; Slatnar, A.; Stampar, F.; Veberic, R. Composition of sugars, organic acids, and total phenolics in 25 wild or cultivated berry species. J. Food Sci. 2012, 77, C1064–C1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sater, H.M.; Bizzio, L.N.; Tieman, D.M.; Muñoz, P.D. A review of the fruit volatiles found in blueberry and other Vaccinium species. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 5777–5786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kowalska, K. Lingonberry (Vaccinium vitis-idaea L.) fruit as a source of bioactive compounds with health-promoting effects—A review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 5126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Shamilov, A.A.; Bubenchikova, V.N.; Chemikov, M.V.; Pozdnyakov, D.I.; Garsiya, E.R. Vaccinium vitis-idaea L.: Chemical contents, pharmacological activities. Pharm. Sci. 2020, 26, 344–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ryyti, R.; Hämäläinen, M.; Peltola, R.; Moilanen, E. Beneficial effects of lingonberry (Vaccinium vitis-idaea L.) supplementation on metabolic and inflammatory adverse effects induced by high-fat diet in a mouse model of obesity. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0232605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lima, R.d.C.L.; Böcker, U.; McDougall, G.J.; Allwood, J.W.; Afseth, N.K.; Wubshet, S.G. Magnetic ligand fishing using immobilized DPP-IV for identification of antidiabetic ligands in lingonberry extract. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0247329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Cosme, F.; Pinto, T.; Aires, A.; Morais, M.C.; Bacelar, E.; Anjos, R.; Ferreira-Cardoso, J.; Oliveira, I.; Vilela, A.; Gonçalves, B. Red fruits composition and their health benefits—A review. Foods 2022, 11, 644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Vilkickyte, G.; Raudone, L. Vaccinium vitis-idaea L. Fruits: Chromatographic Analysis of Seasonal and Geographical Variation in Bioactive Compounds. Foods 2021, 10, 2243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Aires, A.; Carvalho, R.; Matos, M.; Carnide, V.; Silva, A.P.; Gonçalves, B. Variation of chemical constituents, antioxidant activity, and endogenous plant hormones throughout different ripening stages of highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum L.) cultivars produced in centre of Portugal. J. Food Biochem. 2017, 41, e12414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Dare, A.P.; Günther, C.S.; Grey, A.C.; Guo, G.; Demarais, N.J.; Cordiner, S.; McGhie, T.K.; Boldingh, H.; Hunt, M.; Deng, C.; et al. Resolving the developmental distribution patterns of polyphenols and related primary metabolites in bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus) fruit. Food Chem. 2022, 374, 131703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Karppinen, K.; Zoratti, L.; Nguyenquynh, N.; Haggman, H.; Jaakola, L. On the developmental and environmental regulation of secondary metabolism in Vaccinium spp. Berries. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bernal-Gallardo, J.O.; Molina-Torres, J.; Angoa-Pérez, M.V.; Cárdenas-Valdovinos, J.G.; García-Ruíz, I.; Ceja-Díaz, J.A.; Mena-Violante, H.G. Phenolic compound content and the antioxidant and antimicrobial activity of wild blueberries (Vaccinium stenophyllum steud.) fruits extracts during ripening. Horticulturae 2021, 8, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jaakola, L.; Maatta, K.; Pirttila, A.M.; Torronen, R.; Karenlampi, S.; Hohtola, A. Expression of genes involved in anthocyanin biosynthesis in relation to anthocyanin, proanthocyanidin, and flavonol levels during bilberry fruit development. Plant Physiol. 2002, 130, 729–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Castrejón, A.D.R.; Eichholz, I.; Rohn, S.; Kroh, L.W.; Huyskens-Keil, S. Phenolic profile and antioxidant activity of highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum L.) during fruit maturation and ripening. Food Chem. 2008, 109, 564–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Forney, C.F.; Kalt, W.; Jordan, M.A.; Vinqvist-Tymchuk, M.R.; Fillmore, S.A. Blueberry and cranberry fruit composition during development. J. Berry Res. 2012, 2, 169–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. González-Barreiro, C.; Rial-Otero, R.; Cancho-Grande, B.; Simal-Gándara, J. Wine aroma compounds in grapes: A critical review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2015, 55, 202–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Amundsen, M.; Jaakola, L.; Aaby, K.; Martinussen, I.; Kelanne, N.; Tuominen, S.; Laaksonen, O.; Yang, B.; Hykkerud, A. Effect of ripening temperature on the chemical composition of lingonberries (Vaccinium vitis-idaea L.) of northern and southern origin. Food Res. Int. 2023, 167, 112738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lussana, C.; Tveito, O.E.; Dobler, A.; Tunheim, K. seNorge_2018, daily precipitation, and temperature datasets over Norway. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 2019, 11, 1531–1551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Aaby, K.; Amundsen, M. Evaluation of extraction methods for determination of phenolic compounds, organic acids and sugars in lingonberries (Vaccinium vitis-idaea). In Proceedings of the XII International Vaccinium Symposium 1357, Debert, NS, Canada, 30 August–1 September 2021; pp. 215–222. [Google Scholar]
  27. Davik, J.; Aaby, K.; Buti, M.; Alsheikh, M.; Šurbanovski, N.; Martens, S.; Røen, D.; Sargent, D.J. Major-effect candidate genes identified in cultivated strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) for ellagic acid deoxyhexoside and pelargonidin-3-O-malonylglucoside biosynthesis, key polyphenolic compounds. Hortic. Res. 2020, 7, 125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Woznicki, T.L.; Sønsteby, A.; Aaby, K.; Martinsen, B.K.; Heide, O.M.; Wold, A.B.; Remberg, S.F. Ascorbate pool, sugars and organic acids in black currant (Ribes nigrum L.) berries are strongly influenced by genotype and post-flowering temperature. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2017, 97, 1302–1309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Aaby, K.; Grimmer, S.; Holtung, L. Extraction of phenolic compounds from bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus L.) press residue: Effects on phenolic composition and cell proliferation. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2013, 54, 257–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Aaby, K.; Ekeberg, D.; Skrede, G. Characterization of phenolic compounds in strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa) fruits by different HPLC detectors and contribution of individual compounds to total antioxidant capacity. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007, 55, 4395–4406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Marsol-Vall, A.; Kelanne, N.; Nuutinen, A.; Yang, B.; Laaksonen, O. Influence of enzymatic treatment on the chemical composition of lingonberry (Vaccinium vitis-idaea) juice. Food Chem. 2020, 339, 128052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Walker, R.P.; Famiani, F. Organic Acids in Fruits. In Horticultural Reviews; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2018; pp. 371–430. [Google Scholar]
  33. Samkumar, A.; Karppinen, K.; Dhakal, B.; Martinussen, I.; Jaakola, L. Insights into sugar metabolism during bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus L.) fruit development. Physiol. Plant. 2022, 174, e13657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wang, Y.; Johnson-Cicalese, J.; Singh, A.P.; Vorsa, N. Characterization and quantification of flavonoids and organic acids over fruit development in American cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon) cultivars using HPLC and APCI-MS/MS. Plant Sci. 2017, 262, 91–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Mikulic-Petkovsek, M.; Slatnar, A.; Stampar, F.; Veberic, R. HPLC-MSn identification and quantification of flavonol glycosides in 28 wild and cultivated berry species. Food Chem. 2012, 135, 2138–2146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Jensen, H.D.; Krogfelt, K.A.; Cornett, C.; Hansen, S.H.; Christensen, S.B. Hydrophilic carboxylic acids and iridoid glycosides in the juice of American and European cranberries (Vaccinium macrocarpon and V. oxycoccos), lingonberries (V. vitis-idaea), and blueberries (V. myrtillus). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 6871–6874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Vilkickyte, G.; Raudonis, R.; Motiekaityte, V.; Vainoriene, R.; Burdulis, D.; Viskelis, J.; Raudone, L. Composition of sugars in wild and cultivated lingonberries (Vaccinium vitis-idaea L.). Molecules 2019, 24, 4225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Grace, M.H.; Esposito, D.; Dunlap, K.L.; Lila, M.A. Comparative analysis of phenolic content and profile, antioxidant capacity, and anti-inflammatory bioactivity in wild Alaskan and commercial Vaccinium berries. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 4007–4017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Andersen, Ø.M. Chromatographic Separation of Anthocyanins in Cowberry (Lingonberry) Vaccinium vites-idaea L. J. Food Sci. 1985, 50, 1230–1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kelanne, N.; Laaksonen, O.; Seppälä, T.; Yang, W.; Tuukkanen, K.; Loponen, J.; Yang, B. Impact of cyclodextrin treatment on composition and sensory properties of lingonberry (Vaccinium vitis-idaea) juice. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 113, 108295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ek, S.; Kartimo, H.; Mattila, S.; Tolonen, A. Characterization of phenolic compounds from lingonberry (Vaccinium vitis-idaea). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 9834–9842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Hokkanen, J.; Mattila, S.; Jaakola, L.; Pirttilä, A.M.; Tolonen, A. Identification of phenolic compounds from lingonberry (Vaccinium vitis-idaea L.), bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus L.) and hybrid bilberry (Vaccinium x intermedium Ruthe L.) leaves. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 9437–9447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. McGhie, T.K.; Ainge, G.D.; Barnett, L.E.; Cooney, J.M.; Jensen, D.J. Anthocyanin Glycosides from Berry Fruit Are Absorbed and Excreted Unmetabolized by Both Humans and Rats. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 4539–4548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Šedbarė, R.; Pašakinskienė, I.; Janulis, V. Changes in the Composition of Biologically Active Compounds during the Ripening Period in Fruit of Different Large Cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon Aiton) Cultivars Grown in the Lithuanian Collection. Plants 2023, 12, 202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kylli, P.; Nohynek, L.; Puupponen-Pimia, R.; Westerlund-Wikstrom, B.; Leppanen, T.; Welling, J.; Moilanen, E.; Heinonen, M. Lingonberry (Vaccinium vitis-idaea) and European cranberry (Vaccinium microcarpon) proanthocyanidins: Isolation, identification, and bioactivities. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 3373–3384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Anjou, K.; Von Sydow, E. Aroma of cranberries juice of Vaccinium vitis-idaea L. Acta Chem. Scand. 1969, 23, 109–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Anjou, K.; Von Sydow, E. Aroma cranberries. I. Vaccinium vitis-idaea L. Acta Chem. Scand. 1967, 21, 945–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhu, J.; Chen, F.; Wang, L.; Niu, Y.; Chen, H.; Wang, H.; Xiao, Z. Characterization of the Key Aroma Volatile Compounds in Cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon Ait.) Using Gas Chromatography–Olfactometry (GC-O) and Odor Activity Value (OAV). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2016, 64, 4990–4999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kalua, C.M.; Boss, P.K. Evolution of volatile compounds during the development of Cabernet Sauvignon grapes (Vitis vinifera L.). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 3818–3830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Gilbert, J.L.; Schwieterman, M.L.; Colquhoun, T.A.; Clark, D.G.; Olmstead, J.W. Potential for Increasing Southern Highbush Blueberry Flavor Acceptance by Breeding for Major Volatile Components. HortScience 2013, 48, 835–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Dashbaldan, S.; Becker, R.; Pączkowski, C.; Szakiel, A. Various Patterns of Composition and Accumulation of Steroids and Triterpenoids in Cuticular Waxes from Screened Ericaceae and Caprifoliaceae Berries during Fruit Development. Molecules 2019, 24, 3826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Gil, M.; Bottini, R.; Berli, F.; Pontin, M.; Silva, M.F.; Piccoli, P. Volatile organic compounds characterized from grapevine (Vitis vinifera L. cv. Malbec) berries increase at pre-harvest and in response to UV-B radiation. Phytochemistry 2013, 96, 148–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Klavins, L.; Mezulis, M.; Nikolajeva, V.; Klavins, M. Composition, sun protective and antimicrobial activity of lipophilic bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus L.) and lingonberry (Vaccinium vitis-idaea L.) extract fractions. LWT 2021, 138, 110784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Vilkickyte, G.; Motiekaityte, V.; Vainoriene, R.; Raudone, L. Promising cultivars and intraspecific taxa of lingonberries (Vaccinium vitis-idaea L.): Profiling of phenolics and triterpenoids. J. Food Compost. Anal. 2022, 114, 104796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Vyas, P.; Curran, N.H.; Igamberdiev, A.U.; Debnath, S.C. Antioxidant properties of lingonberry (Vaccinium vitis-idaea L.) leaves within a set of wild clones and cultivars. Can. J. Plant Sci. 2015, 95, 663–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Concentrations of groups of phenolic compounds (mg/100 g fw), sugars, and organic acids (g/100 g fw) in lingonberries at the five different stages of ripening. CAD—cinnamic acid derivatives.
Figure 1. Concentrations of groups of phenolic compounds (mg/100 g fw), sugars, and organic acids (g/100 g fw) in lingonberries at the five different stages of ripening. CAD—cinnamic acid derivatives.
Foods 12 02154 g001
Figure 2. Changes in the mean content of aldehydes, volatile acids, alcohols, ketones, esters, terpenes, and ethyl furan in % normalized area of the internal standard in lingonberries at the three stands (A–C) at the five stages of ripening. Different letters (a–b) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) between the samples, as determined by Tukey’s HSD test.
Figure 2. Changes in the mean content of aldehydes, volatile acids, alcohols, ketones, esters, terpenes, and ethyl furan in % normalized area of the internal standard in lingonberries at the three stands (A–C) at the five stages of ripening. Different letters (a–b) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) between the samples, as determined by Tukey’s HSD test.
Foods 12 02154 g002aFoods 12 02154 g002b
Figure 3. Plots after principal component analysis (PCA) of sugars, organic acids, phenolic compounds, and volatile organic compounds in the lingonberry samples. (A) Score plot of berries harvested from three locations (A–C) at five ripening stages; green berries (1; blue squares), half red berries (2; red circles), red but not fully ripe (3; green triangles), ripe berries (4; black diamonds); and late season berries (5; inverted brown triangles). (B) Loading plot showing the contribution of each compound in the experiment to the differences between the samples.
Figure 3. Plots after principal component analysis (PCA) of sugars, organic acids, phenolic compounds, and volatile organic compounds in the lingonberry samples. (A) Score plot of berries harvested from three locations (A–C) at five ripening stages; green berries (1; blue squares), half red berries (2; red circles), red but not fully ripe (3; green triangles), ripe berries (4; black diamonds); and late season berries (5; inverted brown triangles). (B) Loading plot showing the contribution of each compound in the experiment to the differences between the samples.
Foods 12 02154 g003
Table 1. Characterisation of the lingonberry samples a and weather characteristics at the sampling day b.
Table 1. Characterisation of the lingonberry samples a and weather characteristics at the sampling day b.
Harvest DateFruit ColorWeight
(g/berry)
Dry Weight (%)Temp Mean (°C)Max (°C)Min (°C)Rain (mm)
23 July 2020Unripe green Foods 12 02154 i0010.21 ± 0.0515.5 ± 0.213.219.45.00
24 July 2020Half red Foods 12 02154 i0020.23 ± 0.0815.3 ± 1.114.220.47.80
8 August 2020Ripening fully red Foods 12 02154 i0030.28 ± 0.1015.6 ± 1.219.025.212.40.1
27 August 2020Fully ripe scarlet red Foods 12 02154 i0040.28 ± 0.0515.0 ± 1.511.819.94.20
28 September 2020Late season scarlet red Foods 12 02154 i0050.27 ± 0.0215.1 ± 1.29.715.42.50.1
a Weight and dry weights are mean values ± standard deviation of three samples. b Weather data were obtained from the Norwegian Meteorological Institutes Ås weather station and represent mean, minimum, and maximum daily temperature and precipitation during the day of harvest [25].
Table 2. Concentration of sugars and organic acids in lingonberries picked at five ripening stages a.
Table 2. Concentration of sugars and organic acids in lingonberries picked at five ripening stages a.
GreenHalf RedRedFully RipeLate Season
Sucrose0.23 ± 0.010.37 ± 0.070.38 ± 0.070.34 ± 0.060.31 ± 0.02
Fructose1.1 ± 0.3 d1.9 ± 0.3 c2.7 ± 0.5 b3.2 ± 0.1 ab3.5 ± 0.4 a
Glucose1.3 ± 0.2 b2.2 ± 0.2 b3.0 ± 0.5 a3.3 ± 0.4 a3.4 ± 0.1 a
Total sugars2.7 ± 0.5 c4.4 ± 0.4 b6.2 ± 1.0 a6.9 ± 0.4 a7.2 ± 0.4 a
Citric acids2.1 ± 0.42.2 ± 0.32.1 ± 0.32.1 ± 0.61.7 ± 0.4
Quinic acid2.7 ± 0.5 a1.9 ± 0.1 b1.5 ± 0.2 bc1.1 ± 0.2 cd0.9 ± 0.1 d
Malic acid155 ± 39 a114 ± 54 ab93 ± 24 abc79 ± 25 bc48 ± 17 c
Shikimic acid3.0 ± 0.72.4 ± 0.32.3 ± 0.52.3 ± 1.02.3 ± 0.9
Total organic acids4.9 ± 0.4 a4.2 ± 40.3 ab3.8 ± 0.1 bc3.2 ± 0.7 cd2.7 ± 0.5 d
Sugar: acid ratio0.6 ± 0.2 b1.0 ± 0.1 b1.6 ± 0.3 b2.2 ± 0.4 ab2.7 ± 0.3 a
a All concentrations are mean values ± standard deviation of three samples analyzed in duplicate presented as concentration in g/100 g fw, except shikimic and malic acid in mg/100 g fw. Different letters (a–d) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) between the samples, as determined by Tukey’s HSD test.
Table 3. Content of phenolic compounds in lingonberries picked at five ripening stages a.
Table 3. Content of phenolic compounds in lingonberries picked at five ripening stages a.
GreenHalf RedRedFully RipeLate Season
Cyanidin-3-O-galactoside0.4 ± 0.1 b17.8 ± 1.3 b57.9 ± 4.0 a65.4 ± 11.0 a79.3 ± 17.5 a
Cyanidin-3-O-glucoside0.0 ± 0.0 c0.6 ± 0.1 c3.1 ± 0.5 b4.5 ± 1.0 ab5.6 ± 1.5 a
Cyanidin-3-O-arabinoside0.0 ± 0.0 c0.9 ± 0.0 c6.6 ± 0.2 b10.0 ± 0.7 ab13.0 ± 3.4 a
Cyanidin-3-O-pentoside0.0 ± 0.0 c0.1 ± 0.0 c0.6 ± 0.1 b0.9 ± 0.1 ab1.2 ± 0.4 a
Cyanidin-3-O-(acetyl)glucoside0.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.1 0.1 ± 0.10.1 ± 0.1
Total anthocyanins0.4 ± 0.1 c19.4 ± 0.7 c68.3 ± 2.3 b80.9 ± 7.0 ab98.5 ± 12.6 a
Quercetin-3-O-galactoside 10.4 ± 2.3 a10.5 ± 4.1 a7.6 ± 2.8 ab5.5 ± 0.6 b4.6 ± 2.0 b
Quercetin-3-O-glucoside 2.4 ± 0.2 a2.3 ± 0.4 a1.6 ± 0.3 ab1.2 ± 0.1 b1.2 ± 0.3 b
Quercetin-3-O-xyloside 1.7 ± 0.21.6 ± 0.3 1.4 ± 0.1 1.3 ± 0.2 1.2 ± 0.2
Quercetin-3-O-arabinoside 10.4 ± 0.8 a10.8 ± 0.6 a9.5 ± 1.3 ab7.8 ± 0.5 bc6.6 ± 0.8 c
Quercetin-3-O-arabinofuranoside 1.0 ± 0.1 a0.8 ± 0.1 b0.6 ± 0.1 c0.5 ± 0.1 d0.4 ± 0.1 d
Quercetin-3-O-rhamnoside 6.3 ± 4.56.3 ± 4.85.2 ± 3.63.8 ± 2.62.4 ± 1.7
Quercetin-(HMG)-pentoside 0.4 ± 0.1 a0.4 ± 0.1 ab0.3 ± 0.0 abc0.3 ± 0.0 bc0.2 ± 0.0 c
Quercetin-3-O-(HMG)-pentoside 2 b0.0 ± 0.0 b0.1 ± 0.1 ab0.2 ± 0.1 a0.0 ± 0.1 b0.0 ± 0.0 b
Kaempferol-3-O-rhamnoside0.4 ± 0.2 a0.3 ± 0.2 ab0.3 ± 0.1 ab0.2 ± 0.1 ab0.2 ± 0.0 b
Quercetin-3-O-(HMG)-rhamnoside b 8.2 ± 7.87.6 ± 5.85.7 ± 4.94.6 ± 4.32.8 ± 2.6
Kaempferol-3-O-(HMG)-rhamnoside b0.0 ± 0.0 b0.1 ± 0.0 b0.4 ± 0.1 ab0.7 ± 0.2 b0.5 ± 0.1 b
Total flavonols41.2 ± 7.7 a40.8 ± 7.3 a32.8 ± 5.3 ab25.8 ± 4.2 b20.1 ± 1.2 b
Ferulic acid-hexoside 11.2 ± 0.8 c2.4 ± 0.4 ab2.8 ± 0.6 a1.5 ± 0.2 bc1.3 ± 0.2 c
Ferulic acid-hexoside 231.4 ± 11.2 a30 ± 19.2 a3.6 ± 1.5 b0.8 ± 0.1 b0.7 ± 0.1 b
Coumaroyl iridoid5.7 ± 2.2 a2.9 ± 1.4 ab1.6 ± 0.8 b1.1 ± 0.8 b1.0 ± 0.8 b
Caffeic acid hexoside 12.1 ± 0.3 a1.9 ± 0.5 ab1.1 ± 0.1 bc0.8 ± 0.2 c0.7 ± 0.1 c
Caffeic acid hexoside 23.1 ± 0.3 a2.9 ± 1.6 a1.0 ± 0.3 b0.5 ± 0.1 b0.3 ± 0.0 b
p-Coumaric acid hexoside5.7 ± 0.5 4.7 ± 1.1 5.3 ± 0.1 4.2 ± 0.3 5.7 ± 1.6
Chlorogenic acid2.6 ± 0.6 3.8 ± 4.4 1.8 ± 1.0 1.3 ± 0.1 1.7 ± 0.7
Sinapic acid hexoside0.1 ± 0.0 a0.1 ± 0.0 ab0.1 ± 0.0 ab0.1 ± 0.0 b0.1 ± 0.0 b
Total cinnamic acid derivatives51.9 ± 6.4 a48.8 ± 14.1 a17.4 ± 1.7 b10.3 ± 0.7 b11.3 ± 1.1 b
Proanthocyanidin dimer A103.8 ± 41.7 a78.8 ± 34.6 ab46.8 ± 28.3 b34.1 ± 13.6 b27.2 ± 4.3 b
Proanthocyanidin dimer B30.8 ± 7.4 a26.7 ± 8.3 ab17.8 ± 3.5 bc14.1 ± 3.5 c14.2 ± 4.7 c
Catechin71.4 ± 24.6 a54.4 ± 20.3 ab36.7 ± 10.7 bc26.1 ± 7.9 c31.4 ± 11.4 c
Total Flavan-3-ols206.0 ± 67.8 a159.8 ± 61 ab101.4 ± 33.4 bc74.3 ± 10.7 c72.8 ± 14.6 c
a Concentrations are mean values ± standard deviation of three samples analyzed in duplicate. Anthocyanins were quantified as mg/100 g fresh weight (fw) equivalents of cyanidin-3-galactoside at 520 nm, flavonol glycosides as quercetin-3-rutinoside at 360 nm, cinnamic acid derivatives as chlorogenic acid at 320 nm, and flavan-3-ols as catechin at 280 nm. Different letters (a–d) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) between the samples, as determined by Tukey’s HSD test. b HMG = Hydroxy-3-methylglutaroyl.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Amundsen, M.; Hykkerud, A.L.; Kelanne, N.; Tuominen, S.; Schmidt, G.; Laaksonen, O.; Yang, B.; Martinussen, I.; Jaakola, L.; Aaby, K. Composition of Sugars, Organic Acids, Phenolic Compounds, and Volatile Organic Compounds in Lingonberries (Vaccinium vitis-idaea L.) at Five Ripening Stages. Foods 2023, 12, 2154. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12112154

AMA Style

Amundsen M, Hykkerud AL, Kelanne N, Tuominen S, Schmidt G, Laaksonen O, Yang B, Martinussen I, Jaakola L, Aaby K. Composition of Sugars, Organic Acids, Phenolic Compounds, and Volatile Organic Compounds in Lingonberries (Vaccinium vitis-idaea L.) at Five Ripening Stages. Foods. 2023; 12(11):2154. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12112154

Chicago/Turabian Style

Amundsen, Mathias, Anne Linn Hykkerud, Niina Kelanne, Sanni Tuominen, Gesine Schmidt, Oskar Laaksonen, Baoru Yang, Inger Martinussen, Laura Jaakola, and Kjersti Aaby. 2023. "Composition of Sugars, Organic Acids, Phenolic Compounds, and Volatile Organic Compounds in Lingonberries (Vaccinium vitis-idaea L.) at Five Ripening Stages" Foods 12, no. 11: 2154. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12112154

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop