Next Article in Journal
Genome-Wide Comparative Analysis of Lactiplantibacillus pentosus Isolates Autochthonous to Cucumber Fermentation Reveals Subclades of Divergent Ancestry
Next Article in Special Issue
Safety Assessment of Herbal Food Supplements: Elemental Profiling and Associated Risk
Previous Article in Journal
Theogallin-to-Gallic-Acid Ratio as a Potential Biomarker of Pu-Erh Teas
Previous Article in Special Issue
Food Safety Controls during Bulk Food Preparation—An Observational Analysis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Multivariate Assessment and Risk Ranking of Pesticide Residues in Citrus Fruits

1
Anahem Laboratory, Mocartova 10, 11160 Belgrade, Serbia
2
Innovation Center of the Faculty of Technology and Metallurgy, Karnegijeva 4, 11120 Belgrade, Serbia
3
Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences, University of Belgrade, Mike Alasa 12-14, 11351 Belgrade, Serbia
4
Faculty of Technology and Metallurgy, University of Belgrade, Karnegijeva 4, 11120 Belgrade, Serbia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2023, 12(13), 2454; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12132454
Submission received: 22 May 2023 / Revised: 18 June 2023 / Accepted: 19 June 2023 / Published: 22 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Food Risk Assessment and Control of Food Hazards)

Abstract

Pesticides are extensively used in the cultivation and postharvest protection of citrus fruits, therefore continuous monitoring and health risk assessments of their residues are required. This study aimed to investigate the occurrence of pesticide residues on citrus fruits and to evaluate the acute and chronic risk for adults and children. The risk ranking of twenty-three detected pesticides was carried out according to a matrix ranking scheme. Multiple residues were detected in 83% of 76 analyzed samples. In addition, 28% contained pesticides at or above maximum residue levels (MRLs). The most frequently detected pesticides were imazalil, azoxystrobin, and dimethomorph. According to the risk ranking method, imazalil was classified in the high-risk group, followed by prochloraz, chlorpyrifos, azinphos-methyl, tebufenpyrad, and fenpiroximate, which were considered to pose a medium risk. The majority of detected pesticides (74%) posed a low risk. The health risk assessment indicated that imazalil and thiabendazole contribute to acute (HQa) and chronic (HQc) dietary risk, respectively. The HQc was negligible for the general population, while the HQa of imazalil and thiabendazole exceeded the acceptable level in the worst-case scenario. Cumulative chronic/acute risk (HIc/HIa) assessment showed that chronic risk was acceptable in all samples for children and adults, while the acute risk was unacceptable in 5.3% of citrus fruits for adults and 26% of citrus fruits for children. Sensitivity analyses indicated that the ingestion rate and individual body weight were the most influential risk factors.
Keywords: LC-MS/MS; GC-MS/MS; QuEChERS; health risks; Monte Carlo simulation; sensitivity analysis LC-MS/MS; GC-MS/MS; QuEChERS; health risks; Monte Carlo simulation; sensitivity analysis

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Radulović, J.; Lučić, M.; Nešić, A.; Onjia, A. Multivariate Assessment and Risk Ranking of Pesticide Residues in Citrus Fruits. Foods 2023, 12, 2454. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12132454

AMA Style

Radulović J, Lučić M, Nešić A, Onjia A. Multivariate Assessment and Risk Ranking of Pesticide Residues in Citrus Fruits. Foods. 2023; 12(13):2454. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12132454

Chicago/Turabian Style

Radulović, Jelena, Milica Lučić, Aleksandra Nešić, and Antonije Onjia. 2023. "Multivariate Assessment and Risk Ranking of Pesticide Residues in Citrus Fruits" Foods 12, no. 13: 2454. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12132454

APA Style

Radulović, J., Lučić, M., Nešić, A., & Onjia, A. (2023). Multivariate Assessment and Risk Ranking of Pesticide Residues in Citrus Fruits. Foods, 12(13), 2454. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12132454

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop