Next Article in Journal
Lentinula edodes Sing Polysaccharide: Extraction, Characterization, Bioactivities, and Emulsifying Applications
Next Article in Special Issue
Natural Antimicrobial Agents Utilized in Food Preservation
Previous Article in Journal
Three-Dimensional Printing of Foods: A Critical Review of the Present State in Healthcare Applications, and Potential Risks and Benefits
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Essential Oils and Their Combination with Lactic Acid Bacteria and Bacteriocins to Improve the Safety and Shelf Life of Foods: A Review

by
Danka Bukvicki
1,
Margherita D’Alessandro
2,
Samantha Rossi
2,
Lorenzo Siroli
2,*,
Davide Gottardi
2,3,
Giacomo Braschi
2,
Francesca Patrignani
2,3 and
Rosalba Lanciotti
2,3
1
Faculty of Biology, Institute of Botany and Botanical Garden ‘Jevremovac’, University of Belgrade, Takovska 43, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
2
Department of Agricultural and Food Sciences, University of Bologna, 40127 Bologna, Italy
3
Interdepartmental Centre for Industrial Agri-Food Research, University of Bologna, 47521 Cesena, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2023, 12(17), 3288; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12173288
Submission received: 1 August 2023 / Revised: 24 August 2023 / Accepted: 28 August 2023 / Published: 1 September 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Natural Antimicrobial Agents Utilized in Food Preservation)

Abstract

:
The use of plant extracts (e.g., essential oils and their active compounds) represents an interesting alternative to chemical additives and preservatives applied to delay the alteration and oxidation of foods during their storage. Essential oils (EO) are nowadays considered valuable sources of food preservatives as they provide a healthier alternative to synthetic chemicals while serving the same purpose without affecting food quality parameters. The natural antimicrobial molecules found in medicinal plants represent a possible solution against drug-resistant bacteria, which represent a global health problem, especially for foodborne infections. Several solutions related to their application on food have been described, such as incorporation in active packaging or edible film and direct encapsulation. However, the use of bioactive concentrations of plant derivatives may negatively impact the sensorial characteristics of the final product, and to solve this problem, their application has been proposed in combination with other hurdles, including biocontrol agents. Biocontrol agents are microbial cultures capable of producing natural antimicrobials, including bacteriocins, organic acids, volatile organic compounds, and hydrolytic enzymes. The major effect of bacteriocins or bacteriocin-producing LAB (lactic acid bacteria) on food is obtained when their use is combined with other preservation methods. The combined use of EOs and biocontrol agents in fruit and vegetables, meat, and dairy products is becoming more and more important due to growing concerns about potentially dangerous and toxic synthetic additives. The combination of these two hurdles can improve the safety and shelf life (inactivation of spoilage or pathogenic microorganisms) of the final products while maintaining or stabilizing their sensory and nutritional quality. This review critically describes and collects the most updated works regarding the application of EOs in different food sectors and their combination with biocontrol agents and bacteriocins.

1. Introduction

Medicinal plants are a valuable source of new antibacterial, antifungal, and antioxidant compounds due to the large biological and structural diversity of their constituents [1,2,3]. Botanical species and their derivatives, including EOs, extracts, and bioactive compounds (BACs), have been discovered to be key contributors to the pharmaceutical, agricultural, and food industries.
Traditionally, medicinal plants are used to treat diseases, but they are also well suited for the food industry as natural antimicrobial preservatives [4,5,6,7]. Chemicals (benzoates, propionates, sorbates, nitrates, nitrites, etc.) commonly used as food additives are reported to be the cause of health problems such as allergies, asthma, liver damage, and cancer [8,9,10,11,12]. These concerns reinforce the interest in using natural antimicrobials in food formulations.
Alcohols, ethers or oxides, aldehydes, ketones, esters, amines, amides, phenols, heterocycles, terpenes (an oxygenated derivative of terpenoids), and polyphenols represent the chemical classes to which belong the constituents of EOs and plant extracts. Some terpene compounds identified in EOs are limonene, β-caryophyllene, β-pinene, α-pinene, α-terpinene, sabinene, β-myrcene, γ-terpinene, cinnamyl alcohol, δ-3-carene, and p-cymene. Limonene is mainly distributed in citrus EOs: orange [13], grapefruit [14], and pomelo [15]. Thymol, carvacrol, and eugenol, deriving from Thymus [16], Origanum [17], and Ocimum [18], represent the main phenolic terpenes associated with EOs obtained from medical and aromatic plants (Figure 1).
A large variety of these compounds are recognized to have strong and effective antimicrobial activity [19,20,21,22]. EOs from the Lamiaceae family aromatic plants (Table 1) (i.e., oregano and thyme) and their constituents (like carvacrol and thymol) have been described in the literature as potential preservatives with significant effects on food shelf-life [23,24,25,26,27,28,29]. For instance, clove (Syzygium aromaticum), thyme (Thymus vulgaris), and rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis) have high antibacterial activity against pathogenic bacteria, including Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus cereus, Escherichia coli, Salmonella enteritidis, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and can be used safely as food preservatives [30]. Plant-based EOs and extracts’ antibacterial modes of action have been discovered to be dependent on their influence on bacterial cell membranes by lowering cytoplasmic pH and promoting cell membrane hyperpolarization [30].
The lipophilic nature of EOs is directly related to their antibacterial activity. EOs destabilize the membrane potential of bacterial cells by disrupting the permeability of the plasma membrane [31]. Degradation of membrane lipid fractions by the EO component thymol leads to destabilization of membrane permeability [32]. EOs affect quorum sensing signaling and can inhibit cell-to-cell communication, e.g., biofilm formation in bacterial cells [33]. Bouyahya et al. (2019) [34] reported the antimicrobial activity of Origanum compactum EO in the context of disrupting cell membrane stability and integrity and increasing membrane permeability, leading to leakage of cellular material (DNA and RNA). Moreover, the effect of EOs on inhibiting biofilm formation in bacterial communities triggers the breakdown of their sensing communication [35]. Few studies report that the mechanisms of action of phenolic compounds in EOs are mainly related to their activity on cell viability and interaction with transcriptional regulators of quorum sensing communication and biofilm formation [36,37]. In addition, EOs can inhibit cell-cell communication and biofilm formation in bacterial cells [33,35]. Martínez et al. (2021) [38] reported the inhibitory effect of Lippia origanoides and Thymus vulgaris EOs (containing thymol–carvacrol) against the biofilm formation of S. aureus and E. coli. In addition, EOs cause leakage of cytoplasmic materials and damage to the plasma membrane, leading to the efflux of DNA, RNA, and proteins in bacteria [39]. Han et al. (2020) [40] investigated the antibacterial activity of limonene against Listeria monocytogenes and concluded that limonene at a concentration of 20 mL/L can destroy the cell wall and cell membrane, leading to leakage of proteins and nucleic acids. By inhibiting ATPase activity, limonene could inhibit ATP synthesis and respiratory chain complex activity. The effect of EOs during biosynthesis occurs via proton motive force through degradation of the plasma membrane, potential disruption of the electron transport system, proton pump disintegration, and ATP depletion [34].
Several EOs, including those of thyme, marjoram, oregano, basil, ginger, lemongrass, and clove, were shown to be highly effective in inhibiting spoilage bacteria in meat [41], dairy products [42,43,44,45,46], and beverages [47]. It is generally accepted that plants are an important source of antimicrobial metabolites, including flavonoids, phenolic compounds, tannins, terpenoids, saponins, and alkaloids. Other than being endowed with antibacterial and antioxidant properties, BACs may help to enhance the food’s sensory and organoleptic properties and its acceptability, including its shelf life [48].
Many EOs and plant extracts have the GRAS (generally recognized as safe) status obtained by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), (Table 1 and Figure 2). Therefore, they can be applied in the food industry, meeting in this way the consumer requirement for natural food preservatives [4].
However, despite EOs positive effect, their practical use as effective antimicrobial agents in the food sector is still a challenge due to their volatile characteristics, hydrophobicity, and low stability. Nowadays, new technologies and delivery strategies such as nanoencapsulation, encapsulation in active packaging, or polymer-based coatings have efficiently addressed these issues and improved the efficacy and gradual release of EOs [49]. Eventually, EO application can be limited by the sensory impact it imparts when applied at the required active concentrations. Therefore, a possible solution to overcome this aspect is their combination with other natural strategies. Among the ones proposed for increasing the safety and shelf-life of fruit, vegetables, meat, and dairy products is the application of safe microorganisms, including lactic acid bacteria (LAB) and yeasts and their metabolites, as biocontrol agents to inhibit the growth of pathogenic and spoiling microorganisms [50]. Due to its GRAS status, LABs are largely the most commonly used biocontrol agents; however, yeasts are mainly used as biocontrol agents to control postharvest diseases. The mechanism of action of LABs is linked to several factors that include competition for space and nutrients, the production of organic acids that can enter microbiological cells, lowering the internal pH, causing enzyme denaturation, disruption of the cell membrane, and the collapse of the proton motive force [51]. In addition, LABs are reported to produce hydrogen peroxide, this compound is a strong oxidant capable of causing oxidative damage to microbial cells, mainly targeting thiol groups within enzymes [51,52]. Diacetyl is also an aromatic molecule largely produced by LABs, able to exert high antimicrobial activity, especially against Gram-negative bacteria, and whose mechanism of action is mainly attributed to protein damage and interference in arginine metabolism [53].
Finally, LABs can produce different classes of antimicrobial peptides called bacteriocins. These molecules are antimicrobial peptides produced by specific bacterial species to protect themselves from other bacteria by inhibiting or killing them without harming themselves. The bacteriocins action mechanism is mainly associated with the permeabilization of the cell membrane, but it is reported that they can also act on protein metabolism, DNA and RNA, and quorum sensing [54,55]. The application of bacteriocins in the food sector has increased in recent years. They have attracted noticeable attention for their potential application as natural and safe food preservatives since they are easily digestible in the gastrointestinal tract. Nisin represents the most known and studied bacteriocin; it is produced by Lactococcus lactis, and its use was authorized by the Food Drug and Administration (FDA) in more than 50 countries [56]. Three ways of bacteriocin applications in foods are reported: inoculation of bacteriocin-producing LABs directly in the food products (starter or protective cultures), application as a food additive, and incorporation in food packaging of the purified or partially purified bacteriocin. Several studies have investigated the direct application of LABs as potential biopreservatives due to their ability to produce antimicrobial compounds such as bacteriocins, other bioactive peptides, organic acids, and hydrogen peroxide [57]. The great advantage of this strategy is represented by the lesser legal restriction on the use of LABs cultures in foods compared to the directed use of pure or refined bacteriocins [58,59]. Combining EOs, or their components, with protective microorganisms has been proposed as a promising approach to enhancing the shelf life of ready to eat fruits and vegetables. The combined use of some EOs and LABs or LABs products, such as bacteriocins, can be very effective against food pathogens and may improve the sensory properties. In fact, the combination of EOs with biocontrol agents may reduce the EO concentration necessary to achieve sufficient antimicrobial activity and can have a synergistic effect. For example, Iseppi et al., 2020 [60] tested T. vulgaris, S. officinalis EOs, and bacLP17 alone and in combination to control the growth of L. monocytogenes in seafood and proved that the combined use of EOs and bacteriocins produced synergistic effects and overcame the sensory effects of EOs. In addition, Turgis et al. (2012) [61] tested six EOs and four bacteriocins (nisin, pediocin, and two bacteriocins isolated from Enterococcus faecium) against foodborne pathogens. The combination of nisin and O. vulgare EO produced a synergistic effect against L. monocytogenes, while nisin and T. vulgaris EO together produced a synergistic effect against S. typhimurium. Two bacteriocins in combination with thyme EO and one in combination with rosemary EO showed additive activity against L. monocytogenes and E. coli O157:H7 [62]. In the following chapters, an overall description of EOs and protective cultures, applied alone or in combination, will be provided. Moreover, their applications in real food systems will be critically described.
Table 1. Biological activities of medicinal plant products and their components in food model systems.
Table 1. Biological activities of medicinal plant products and their components in food model systems.
Botanical/Common NamePlant ProductBioactivity in Food Model/Product QualityReference(s)
Artemisia dracunculus L. (Tarragon)* EOAntimicrobial in beef burger/flavor enhancer in meat products[63]
Allium sativum (Garlic)EOAntibacterial/in poultry meat[64]
Allium schoenoprasum (Chives)Diallyl sulfidesInhibits the growth of foodborne pathogens[65]
Anethum graveolens (Dill)EOAntimicrobial in dairy products/improves the physico-chemical and sensory characteristics of yogurt[66]
Brassica nigra (Black mustard)Extracts combined with oregano, Syzygium, and cinnamonAntimicrobial, antioxidant/chicken meat/improve sensory attributes [67]
Carum carvi (Caraway)* EOImproves the quality of dry-fermented sausages/reduces the level of sodium nitrite in dry-fermented sausages[68]
Citrus aurantifolia (Lime)* EO, Limonene, β-Pinene, γ-Terpinene, and CitralAntimicrobial[69]
Crocus sativus (Saffron)Stigma powderAntimicrobial, antioxidant/chicken breast meat/improves physico-chemical characteristics of chicken meat[70]
Curcuma longa (Turmeric)Rhizome extract/curcuminOxidative stability of meat increases the shelf life and quality in meat.[71,72]
Cuminum cyminum (Cumin)* EO, cuminalAntibacterial/meet protection/prolongs the shelf life[73]
Cymbopogon citratus (Lemon grass)* EO combined with ginger EOAntimicrobial in fresh chicken meat/extends the shelf life of chicken meat for 9 days at a temperature of 2–7 °C[74]
Foeniculum vulgare (Fennel)* EOAntioxidant and antimicrobial nanocoating of fennel EO in meat/fish packaging/improves the antioxidant and antimicrobial properties of coatings[75]
Hyssopus officinalis (Hyssop)* EO combined with coriander EOProlongs the shelf life of ground beef/preserve in vacuum-packed meat[76]
Kaempferia galanga (Kencur)ExtractAntibacterial activity in poultry products/cell membranes damage in food pathogen bacteria [77]
Laurus nobilis (Bay)* EO/leaf extractAntibacterial/increase the shelf life of lamb meat/increases the shelf life of lamb meat [78]
Lippia graveolens (Mexican oregano)EO mixed with basil EOMicroencapsulated EOs increases the shelf life of refrigerated meat products and positive effect on the sensory properties [79]
Mentha piperita (Mint)* EOProlongs the shelf life of beef meat/extends the shelf life[80,81]
Melissa officinalis (Balm)* EO combined with thyme EOAntimicrobial/may protect the chicken meat from decomposition during storage and extends the shelf life[82]
Ocimum basilicum (Basil)* EO with aloe veraExtend the shelf-life of strawberry fruit and preserve post-harvest quality
Combinations of EOs of O. basilicum, Cymbopogon nardus and C. flexuosus increased banana shelf life by up to 21 days/control post-harvest diseases, and extended storage life.
[83,84]
Murraya koenigii (Curry leaf)Leaf powderAntioxidant/cooked goat meat/inhibitor of oxidation products in raw ground and cooked goat meat [85]
Myristica fragrans (Nutmeg)* EOAntibacterial and antioxidant/improves the color stability and sensory properties of beef slices[86]
Nigella sativa (Black cumin)EOEO prolongs the shelf life and improves the sensory quality of fresh fish fillets[87]
Origanum vulgare (Oregano)* EO/carvacrolAntibacterial/increases the shelf life of pork, antimicrobial oregano oil nanoemulsions in fresh lettuce, antibacterial in vacuum-packed minced beef[23,88,89]
Pimpinella anisum (Anise)* EOAntimicrobial/antioxidant/prolongs the shelf life of chicken fillets[90]
Rhus coriaria (Sumac)Water extract Antimicrobial effect/extends shelf life of refrigerated raw broiler wings, improving sensory quality, and color[91]
Rosmarinus officinalis (Rosemary)* EOAntimicrobial against meat pathogens/extends the shelf life of beef stored at 4 °C for 20 days[92]
Salvia officinalis (Sage)* EO
Ethanolic extracts
Hydro-ethanol extract
Oil and ethanol extracts
Prolongs the shelf life and compositional quality of fish burgers (4 months at frozen storage)
Antioxidant/extends the shelf life of mayonnaise during storage
Prolongs the shelf life of trout fillets
Antibacterial/prolongs the storage stability of vacuum-packed low pressure chicken meat
[93,94,95,96]
Satureja montana (Winter savory)EO/supercritical extractsAntioxidants in pre-cooked pork chops/extends the shelf life[97]
Thymus vulgaris (Thyme)* EOAntimicrobial/prolongs the shelf life of gilthead seabream
extends the shelf life of oranges for fresh use and juice processing
[47,98]
Thymus capitatus (Headed Savory)EOAntimicrobial/improves the microbial and sensory quality of beef meat[99]
Trachyspermum ammi (Ajwan)EOAntibacterial/chitosan-based film with EO improves the safety of chicken fillet stored for 12 days at refrigerated temperature[100]
Zingiber officinale (Ginger)* EOAntimicrobial/extends the shelf life of minced meat[101]
* EOs—Essential Oils considered generally safe by the FDA—GRAS. https://www.biosourcenaturals.com/pure-essential-oils/essential-oils-considered-safe-by-the-fda/ (accessed on 28 July 2023)

2. Use of Essential Oils and Biocontrol in Minimally Processed Fruit and Vegetables

Over recent years, the market for minimally processed fruits and vegetables has increased steadily. Their popularity is due to their convenience, reduced waste production, and high nutritional content. In fact, these foods represent a source of valuable compounds such as vitamins, minerals, fibers, and antioxidants and may help prevent chronic diseases. Nevertheless, fruits and vegetables are a suitable matrix for microbial proliferation [102,103]. In fact, these foods can be easily spoiled due to the high nutrient and water content and the numerous processing steps that fresh produce undergoes (i.e., peeling, cutting, or slicing), which can promote microbial proliferation by releasing nutrients and transporting the microbial population present on the surfaces of vegetables and fruits into the cut ones [104,105]. In addition, several outbreaks of foodborne illness in the last twenty years were attributed by the FDA and EFSA to the consumption of fruits, vegetables, and fresh juices. In particular, fruits and vegetables have been associated with outbreaks of listeriosis, salmonellosis, and Shiga toxin-producing E. coli at EU and international levels (EFSA and ECDC). In addition, literature data indicated the potential presence of pathogens, including Salmonella spp., Listeria monocytogenes, Aeromonas hydrophila, Yersinia enterocolitica, Staphylococcus aureus, and E. coli, on fresh fruit and related minimally processed products [103].
Currently, the use of chemical sanitizers in the washing step, as well as the maintenance of refrigerated temperatures during processing and storage, are the only stages capable of reducing and controlling the microbial population in minimally processed vegetables [106]. However, the use of chemical sanitizers, especially chlorine-based ones, is not always effective, can result in the production of toxic molecules, and is not well accepted by consumers [88]. Because of these drawbacks, researchers are looking to alternative sanitizers (i.e., ozone, hydrogen peroxide, and peroxyacetic acid), physical treatments (UV light, ultrasound, and gamma rays), and natural food additives. As a result of their antibacterial and antioxidant properties as well as their GRAS classification, EOs have the potential to extend the shelf life of several foods, including fresh-cut fruits and vegetables. EOs can be used in various stages of food and vegetable processing, including the washing step, directly on the product, or in the packaging. In fact, the incorporation of EOs and their components in active food packaging is of high relevance. Active packaging is a solid matrix from which EOs are gradually released during food storage. Generally, various methods, including direct incorporation, coating, and surface modification, are applied to incorporate EOs into active packaging [107]. Antimicrobial active packaging is designed to enhance product safety and shelf life by inhibiting or reducing microbial growth in packaged foods [92,108,109]. In this context, it is fundamental to use suitable solvents or polymeric carriers, as EOs are always used in diluted form, which should be food-grade and not interfere with the antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of EO constituents [110].
Several studies have demonstrated the potential of natural antimicrobials, including EOs, to improve the quality and safety properties of processed fruits and juices (Table 2). Among the EOs, those derived from citrus fruit peels are the most interesting. Citral (3,7-dimethyl-2-7-octadienal) contains two isomers, geranial and neral, and is often applied as a flavoring agent in citrus drinks. It is characterized by strong antimicrobial activity. Low concentrations of citral and citron EO were shown to be effective in increasing the shelf life of fruit-based salads in syrup [111] and improving the stability of fruit-based beverages. Hexanal and 2-(E)-hexenal, which are volatile compounds produced by various fruits and vegetables, are also interesting compounds that have already been tested as antimicrobials in minimally processed fruits and vegetables [112]. These molecules are characterized by strong antimicrobial activity against spoiling yeasts, and the addition of these molecules in the storage atmosphere of fresh-cut apples resulted in an extended shelf life [92]. In addition, these molecules also have a positive impact on sensorial properties and exert antioxidant activity that prevents browning of the packaged products. These compounds showed remarkable antibacterial activity against pathogens such as Salmonella spp., E. coli, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa [50].
Other researchers found that dipping sliced apples in a solution containing dissolved hexanal (250 ppm) or the combinations hexanal/2-(E)-hexenal and citral/2-(E)-hexenal (125 ppm of each compound) increased quality parameters and extended the shelf life by reducing the proliferation of naturally occurring yeast [102]. In addition, sliced apples treated with hexanal/2-(E)-hexenal, and citral better retained both color and textural properties. The combination with an active, modified atmosphere (7% O2 and 0% CO2) enhanced the safety and shelf life of minimally processed apples washed with a solution containing a mixture of hexanal/2-(E)-hexenal. Other researchers discovered that active packaging containing thymol and eugenol inhibited the growth of mesophilic bacteria and yeasts and consequently extended the shelf life of table grapes stored in a modified atmosphere (MAP) compared to the control group [108]. Moreover, when compared to a control, a package containing eugenol, thymol, menthol, or eucalyptol was able to reduce mold, yeast, and total aerobic mesophilic bacteria cell loads [113]. An edible coating based on apple puree alginate enriched with lemongrass, oregano, and vanillin reduced the growth kinetics of psychrophilic bacteria, yeasts, and molds on freshly cut ‘Fuji’ apples [105]. Moreover, the same active coating containing lemongrass (1.0 and 1.5% w/w) and oregano oil (0.5% w/w) showed the highest antimicrobial activity on Listeria innocua (4.0 log reduction) [105]. Abadias et al. (2011) [104] investigated alternative products to reduce the unwanted chlorine by-products in the fresh-cut industry. When used at 5–15 mM in the dipping solution, cinnamic acid and carvacrol were highly efficient in reducing microflora on fresh-cut apples, kiwifruit, and fresh-cut melon [114] (Table 2).
The use of EOs has great potential, even in minimally processed vegetables. In fact, herbal EOs and their constituents were studied as alternative natural disinfectants for reducing the presence of spoiling and pathogenic bacteria. Due to the strong antimicrobial activity in vitro of oregano (Origanum vulgare) and thyme (Thymus vulgaris) EOs and their main constituents (carvacrol and thymol), these compounds are the most suitable to be used in minimally processed vegetables [31,54,112,119,120].
For example, the inclusion of oregano and thyme EOs at a concentration of 250 ppm in the washing solution of minimally processed lamb’s lettuce resulted in a product shelf life comparable to the one obtained by using chlorine (120 ppm) in the washing step [119]. In fact, the use of EOs resulted in a preliminary decrease in the microbial population. In addition, the color and turgidity of the lettuce were not affected throughout the storage period while the sensorial properties were not negatively affected [119].
When used in the washing solution, oregano oil (Origanum onites) was able to inactivate Salmonella typhimurium inoculated on iceberg lettuce. The effectiveness of oregano EO treatment (75 ppm) was comparable to that of chlorine treatment at 50 ppm [122]. A new antimicrobial active packaging made of polypropylene (PP)/ethylene-vinyl alcohol copolymer (EVOH) film and activated with oregano EO or citral, combined with a modified atmosphere, was successfully tested to improve the shelf life and safety of packaged salads [115]. Indeed, the addition of oregano or citral reduced the cell load of Enterobacteriaceae, yeasts, and molds by about 2 log cycles. This active packaging also decreased the cell load of aerobic bacteria, lactic acid bacteria, and psychrotrophic bacteria. Citral-based films, on the other hand, showed better antimicrobial activity and sensory properties compared to oregano-based films.
When oregano EO was applied to ready to eat lettuce and carrots, the initial decontamination effect was comparable to that of chlorine [127]. Furthermore, oregano EO did not negatively affect the color, texture, or water activity of the samples. However, sensory acceptance of the product treated with oregano EO was only observed for carrots. Volatile antimicrobial compounds such as borneol, carvacrol, cinnamaldehyde, eugenol, menthol, thymol, and vanillin were able to inhibit the growth of Bacillus cereus inoculated in carrot juice. Direct application of EOs in the food system has some drawbacks due to their strong odor, chemical reactivity, hydrophobicity, low solubility, and potential negative interaction with the food matrix, leading to alteration of organoleptic properties. Several technological approaches have been tested for EO delivery in food. EO encapsulation is a novel and advanced delivery system. It provides enhanced antimicrobial efficacy as well as control over the release of EO flavors into the food system [128]. Numerous biopolymeric matrices, including chitosan, alginate, starch, cellulose, and dextran, are characterized by excellent biodegradability, biocompatibility, and non-toxicity; for these reasons, they were proposed as carriers for the encapsulation of EOs [49]. Consequently, the encapsulation of EOs represents a non-toxic and environmentally friendly technology.
Several studies reported that various lactic acid bacteria strains, including Lacticaseibacillus casei, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, Leuconostoc spp., Pediococcus parvulus, and Lactococcus lactis, are able to enhance the shelf life and safety of minimally processed lettuce, carrots, and apples [129]. LAB isolated from the same food matrix in which they are applied have the best chance of being used as biocontrol agents [120]. Furthermore, combining bioprotective cultures with additional hurdles such as EOs can have an additive or synergistic effect. Siroli et al., 2015, [120] isolated and characterized LAB from minimally processed vegetables and selected Lactiplantibacillus plantarum V7B3 and Lacticaseibacillus casei V4B4 as potential biocontrol agents in combination with thyme EO in lamb’s lettuce, demonstrating that the addition of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum V7B3 in the washing step increased product shelf life and safety compared to the control. Furthermore, the nisin producer strain Lactococcus lactis CBM21, whether combined or not with thyme EO and supplemented to the washing solution of minimally processed lamb’s lettuce, reduced the cell load of L. monocytogenes and E. coli, as well as the total aerobic bacteria, without affecting the color parameters or sensory attributes [118]. The effect of biocontrol agents has been widely assessed in minimally processed fruit, also in combination with modified atmospheres, natural antimicrobials [119], gamma radiation [130], reducing agents [131], and heat treatments [132].
The use of LAB as bioprotective cultures in minimally processed fruits is more limited than in vegetables due to the higher sugar content combined with the low pH, which favors yeast growth with respect to bacteria. Indeed, L. mesenteroides and L. citreum have been tested as potential biocontrol agents on ready to eat Golden Delicious apples [133]. These strains strongly reduced the growth rate of L. monocytogenes. Other authors have selected LAB strains from ready to eat apples and tested them as bioprotective cultures in ready to eat apples (Golden Delicious) packaged in a modified atmosphere and combined with the addition of 2-(E)-hexenal/hexanal and 2-(E)-hexenal/citral [120]. The strain Lactiplantibacillus plantarum CIT3, added to the apple dipping solution, was able to extend the shelf life by reducing the yeast growth. The combination of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum with 2-(E)-hexenal/citral increased the antimicrobial activity and reduced the detrimental effect on color parameters due to the antioxidant activity of the natural antimicrobials. Moreover, [119,134] tested a L. lactis strain as a potential biocontrol agent for sliced apples in combination with the mixtures 2-(E)-hexenal/hexanal and/or 2-(E)-hexenal/citral. This approach improved the product’s safety as well as its shelf life. In fact, L. monocytogenes was significantly inhibited, especially when the biocontrol agent was combined with natural antimicrobials.
Although interest in the use of bioprotective cultures in ready to eat fruits and vegetables has increased recently, a critical review of the literature shows that the efficacy of bioprotective cultures, regardless of the microorganism used, is strongly influenced by the inoculum level, the naturally occurring microflora, the product’s physical-chemical properties and composition, and the conditions of storage. Because of the numerous variables involved, standardizing bio-protective methods and, as a result, their industrial scaling up is difficult.

3. Application of Essential Oils as Meat and Dairy Preservatives

3.1. Antimicrobials as Meat Preservatives

Fresh meat and fresh meat produce are extremely perishable and prone to oxidative and microbial spoilage. These products are easily subject to oxidation, which reduces nutritional value, affecting lipids, proteins, myoglobin (pigments), texture, and flavor [135]. Plant extracts are a natural source of compounds with antioxidants and antimicrobial activity that can be used as an alternative to synthetic ones. EOs and their constituents have been successfully used in meat and meat products to prevent oxidation, degradation, and microbial proliferation [136,137,138]. Promising results can be achieved with EOs from the Lamiaceae family, including oregano, thyme, sage, and rosemary, which are commonly used as flavoring agents and prevent oxidative degradation. The antioxidant activity of EOs is well documented and can be attributed to phenolic compounds including eugenol, carvacrol, and thymol, which act as hydrogen donors and scavengers of free radicals [139,140].
Fasseas and colleagues (2007) [141] measured the antioxidant activity of pork and beef meats (raw and cooked) treated with sage and oregano EOs over a 12 day storage period at 4 °C. Compared to controls without added EOs, the EO-treated meat (raw and cooked) had higher TBA (thiobarbituric acid) scores and 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging activity. However, oregano EO showed higher antioxidant activity than sage EOs (p < 0.001) both in raw and cooked meat samples [141].
Estévez et al. (2007) [142] reported that 0.1% of sage and rosemary EOs improved the lipids stability to oxidation in refrigerated stored liver pates (90 days). The effects were primarily attributed to reduced polyunsaturated fatty acid degradation, which prevented the synthesis of lipid-derived volatiles and residual components such as malonaldehyde. However, the application of EOs as antioxidants in meat and meat derivates requires deeper research into their properties and antioxidant mechanisms of action [139]. Some EOs can promote meat oxidation, depending on their concentration. The oxidation of the phenolic compounds of EOs to phenoxyl radicals could lead to new degradative reactions [143].
Meat contaminated with spoilage microorganisms shows color changes, the development of uncharacteristic and undesirable odors and tastes, and the formation of superficial slime [144,145]. Bacteria belonging to the genera Pseudomonas, Acinetobacter, Staphylococcus, Brochothrix, Moraxella, Micrococcus, and Flavobacterium, as well as LAB and genera belonging to the Enterobacteriaceae family, are reported to be involved in the spoilage of meat and meat derivatives [145,146]. In addition to spoilage microorganisms, poultry, pork, beef, sheep, and other animal meat consumed by humans can also be reservoirs or carriers of foodborne pathogens. In fact, it has been reported that the ingestion of contaminated meat can transmit enteropathogenic bacteria, including Escherichia coli, Salmonella spp., Yersinia enterocolitica, Shigella spp., Campylobacter, Clostridium botulinum, Listeria monocytogenes, Staphylococcus aureus, and Vibrio spp. [147,148,149].
The antimicrobial properties of EOs are generally dependent on their chemical composition. As mentioned earlier, in addition to phenolic compounds, EOs are a complex mixture of terpenes (mono- and sesqui-), terpenoids, alcohols, ketones, aldehydes, esters, and other aromatic and aliphatic compound classes [150]. A literature review indicated that EOs can be used as antimicrobials against both meat spoilage agents and pathogens. Some examples are given in this section.
Cell loads of foodborne pathogen L. monocytogenes deliberately inoculated on ham (3 log CFU/g) were decreased by 10 and 19% after supplementation of Cinnamon cassia and oregano EOs, respectively [151]. Cinnamon cassia EO was also effective in promoting the shelf life of ground lamb meat throughout refrigerated storage at 4 °C. Compared to control samples, supplementation of Cinnamon cassia EO (0.5%) reduced from the 4th to the 16th day the lactic acid bacteria spoilage population up to 1.9 log CFU/g and Enterobacteriaceae up to 1.1 CFU/g [152]. A reduced microbial spoilage population was also observed in minced meat with rosemary, thyme, and oregano EOs at concentrations between 1 and 1.5% (v/w). Compared to the control group, treated samples showed reduced loads of LAB, molds, and yeast [153]. Thyme EOs tested at two different concentrations (0.02 and 0.05 w/w) inhibited the growth of coliform in chicken hamburgers [154].
The use of EOs as antioxidants and preservatives for meat is dependent on the bioactivity and stability of their components. Most EO constituents lose physical stability when they interact with meat constituents [155], probably due to the binding ability of fats and proteins in meat to volatiles in EOs [155]. When encapsulated EOs are added to edible coatings, plastic films, or meat during marinating, their stability increases significantly. The possibility of using active packaging supplemented with natural antioxidants and antimicrobials has recently been investigated [58,156]. The use of milk protein-based film added with 1% (w/v) of oregano EO led to a shelf life extension and the inhibition of foodborne pathogens (E. coli O157:H7 and Pseudomonas spp.) in beef slices [157]. Oregano oil also showed a good efficacy, when incorporated into a whey protein-based coating, to extend the shelf life and microbial stability of Portuguese sausages without affecting the sensorial properties of the product. In addition, a reduction in oxidation of the lipid fraction was also observed [158] (Table 3).
The stability, antioxidant, and antimicrobial properties of rosemary EO can be enforced by encapsulation with nanogel. Compared to samples treated with free rosemary EO, rosemary EO encapsulated in chitosan-benzoic acid-based nanogels showed greater efficacy in reducing the cell load of Salmonella typhimurium inoculated on beef chops during storage at 4 °C [128]. Chitosan-based coatings also improved the performance of oregano EO in reducing lipid oxidation in dry fermented sausages in comparison to control samples after 7 months of storage [159].
Another strategy to improve EO stability is to convey EOs during the meat marinating process. Siroli et al. (2020) [160] used an oil/beer/lemon marinade solution containing oregano, rosemary, and juniper EOs to improve the shelf life and food safety of pork loin slices. The marinade supplemented with EOs reduced the growth of Salmonella enteritidis, Listeria monocytogenes, and Staphylococcus aureus. A water solution of sodium lactate/lactic acid buffer (2%) and NaCl (10%) enriched with a combination of EOs obtained by cinnamon (Cinnamomum zeylanicum), thyme (Thymus zygis), and oregano (Oreganum compactum) was able to increase the shelf life of pork fillet, whereas this approach was not effective for chicken breast fillet [161].
LABs can be added for two different purposes: as starting materials for producing fermented meat products or as a bioprotective culture used only to compete with naturally occurring microflora and produce antimicrobial peptides [59]. Many studies have investigated the application of strains belonging to Pediococcus acidilactici, Latilactobacillus curvatus, and Latilactobacillus sakei in various cured meats from the Mediterranean region to counteract the growth of pathogens including Salmonella spp., E. coli, Listeria spp., and S. aureus [162]. Bacteriogenic cultures of L. carnosum, Lactococcus Lactis, L. sakei, and L. curvatus sprayed on the surfaces of vacuum-packed chicken or beef, ham, bacon, and fermented sausages have been shown to inhibit spoiling microorganisms (Enterobacteriaceae and B. thermosphacta) and also inhibit the growth of Listeria [59,163,164]. Some commercial products are also currently available on the market (Bactoferm™ F-LC, commercialized by Chr. Hansen, and ALCMix1, commercialized by Danisco DuPont).
Although the use of bacteriocinogenic LAB is an appropriate approach for meat products, not all meat products can provide suitable environmental conditions to sustain the culture’s growth and bacteriocin production.
Direct addition of bacteriocins to meat products may result in some loss of their activity caused by various factors, such as dilution phenomena leading to depletion of antimicrobial peptides [165] or inactivation due to interaction with lipids and enzymes present in meat [164,166].
Since the meat is generally contaminated by microorganisms on its surface, the inclusion of bacteriocins on active packaging represents an efficient solution.
The constant release of antimicrobial peptides from the packaging to the product surface could help to maintain the bacteriocin concentration at the optimal level to carry out their bioprotective effect [165]. In various studies, films containing the bacteriocin nisin have been successfully used to preserve meat products [59]. Pullulan film containing Nisin Z, which was used for the packaging of refrigerated vacuum-packed raw beef and deli ham, strongly inhibited various foodborne pathogens, including Salmonella spp., S. aureus, L. monocytogenes, and E. coli [167]. Furthermore, the efficacy of this nisin/pullulan film was improved by the addition of lauric alginate [167]. Reduced growth of S. aureus on chilled sliced beef was observed when packaged with an alginate-based palmitoylated film supplemented with nisin [168]. Nisin-internalized cellulose envelopes demonstrated anti-Listeria properties on chilled vacuum-packed frankfurters (sausages) [169,170] and vacuum-packed hot dogs wrapped with a plastic film enriched with nisin. A combination of nisin and Nisaplin® (a commercial product from DuPont) adsorbed in cellulose-based packaging paper was shown to inhibit S. aureus, L. innocua, and LAB on cooked ham [171].
The use of a combination of biocontrol agent/bacteriocins and EOs, or plant actives, in a real food system is not common. Ghalfi et al., 2007 [172] reported that bacteriocin from Latilactobacillus curvatus combined with oregano EO was able to limit the proliferation of Listeria monocytogenes in refrigerated (4 °C) pork meat for up to 6 weeks, while the single treatment maintained the cell load of the pathogen under the detection limit only for 3–4 weeks. Other works performed in the real food system concern mainly fish. Abdollahzadeh et al. (2014) [173] reported that the combination of thyme EO (at 0.8% or 1.2%) with nisin (at 500 or 1000 IU/g) decreased the cell load of L. monocytogenes below 2.0 log CFU/g in minced fish after two days of storage at 4 °C. No increases in the pathogen cell load were observed during the 12 days of storage considered. Instead, Iseppi et al. (2023) [174] showed that the addition of bacteriocin bacLP17 in edible coating reduced the MIC values of Salvia officinalis, Citrus limon, Mentha piperita, or Thymus vulgaris EOs against L. monocytogenes when tested on artificially contaminated shrimps.
Table 3. Short overview of applications of EOs and combinations of EOs with bacteriocins/nisins in meat or meat products.
Table 3. Short overview of applications of EOs and combinations of EOs with bacteriocins/nisins in meat or meat products.
Microbial TargetMeat/Meat ProductsEO or CombinationsConcentration Used/Product BenefitsReference(s)
Listeria monocytogenesHamOregano and Cinnamon cassia EOs500 ppm/inhibit the growth of food pathogens with no effect on sensory attributes[151]
EnterobacteriaceaeLamb meatCinnamon cassia EO(0.5%) (w/w)/reducing bacteria growth but worse color stability[152]
S. enteritidis, Listeria monocytogenes, St. auresuMarinated pork loinOregano, rosemary, and juniper EO(0.02–0.03%) (w/w)/extends shelf life, Improve sensory characteristics[160]
Salmonella typhimuriumPork meatMicromeria dalmatica EO0.15 mg/mL/reduces bacterial growth[175]
E. coli, Salmonella sp.Chicken breast meatThyme and balm EO(0.5%) (w/w)/extends the shelf life[82]
E. coliChicken hamburgers Thyme EO0.02 and 0.05 w/w/provides oxidative and microbial stability [154]
Salmonella, Listeria and E. coliSausagesOreganum virens EOEO incorporated in active film/extends the shelf life and sensory properties[158]
psychrotrophics, Brochothrix thermosphacta, Pseudomonas Beef meatRosemary EO4% (w/w)/extends the shelf-life of refrigerated beef meat[92]
L. monocytogenesPork meatOregano EO + bacteriocin50 µL/100 g/synergistic effect of EO and bacteriocins prolongs the shelf life for two weeks while under storage at 4 °C[172]
L. monocytogenesMinced fishThyme EO + NisinEO 0.4% nisin (1000 IU/g)/control bacteria growth and improve sensory properties[173]
L. monocytogenesShrimpsSalvia, Citrus, Mentha, Thymus EO+ bacLP17EOs 8-128 µL/mL; bacLP17 16 µL/mL /improve organoleptic properties and reduce growth of L. monocytogenes[174]
Pseudomonas spp., LAB
and B. thermosphacta
Marinated beefThymol and carvacrol0.4% and 0.8% (w/w)/extends the shelf life [176]
Salmonella typhimurium, Listeria monocytogenes, and Escherichia coli O157:H7Beef slicesThymol(0.5%) (w/w)/inhibited growth aerobic bacteria inactivate coliform bacteria[177]
Salmonella enteritidis, Campylobacter and E. coliBreast fillets and wingsMarinade with thyme and orange EOs(0.5%) (w/w)/inhibit microbes[178]

3.2. Essential Oils as Dairy Preservatives

Plants and spices have been used in cheese production since ancient times, often linked to local traditions. Traditionally, spices and herbs or their extracts were rubbed directly on the cheese. In fact, herbs and spices can be applied as antioxidant, antimicrobial, flavoring, enriching, and functionalizing ingredients, which may improve the appearance and appeal of the product [179].
Although many dairy products undergo heat treatment during their manufacture, they are perishable and can be easily contaminated by microorganisms, resulting in food spoilage, consumer health risks, and a shortened product shelf life. Furthermore, as they are rich in lipids, oxidative processes can lead to a loss of flavor, nutrients, and color, the development of off-flavors, and the accumulation of compounds that may be of concern to human health [180]. For that reason, there is growing interest in the application of plants, extracts, and EOs as natural preservatives in the dairy sector as an alternative to synthetic preservatives [181]. The antimicrobial activity of natural products is commonly assessed against the main pathogens and spoilage bacteria commonly found in the dairy sector, such as L. monocytogenes, S. aureus, E. coli, Salmonella spp., and Pseudomonas spp., as well as yeasts and molds, such as Penicillium and Aspergillus [179]. For example, black cumin seed oil supplemented during the manufacturing of a soft cheese inhibited several pathogenic microorganisms generally associated with cheese [182]. The addition of green pepper and cayenne to traditional Egyptian Kareish cheese allowed for a decrease in S. aureus cell load [183]. Moreover, the addition in processed cheese of extracts from cinnamon, garlic, lemongrass, cress, rosemary, sage, and oregano resulted in the inhibition of L. monocytogenes in processed cheese [184]. Kholy et al., 2017 [185] showed that cumin, rosemary, and thyme EOs were effective antimicrobials, preventing the growth of S. aureus, E. coli, Bacillus subtilis, B. cereus, Salmonella typhi, and Aspergillus niger in ultra-filtrated soft cheese. Clove and cinnamon EOs at 1% were the most effective against L. monocytogenes in low-fat cheese within 3 days (≤1 log CFU/mL), while a similar achievement was obtained in full-fat cheese only with clove EO. The same EO was also effective in reducing S. enteritidis population mainly in full-fat rather than low-fat cheeses [186]. Bukvicki et al., 2018 [42] showed that the addition of 25 µL of Thymus algeriensis EO reduced the incidence of contamination caused by the food pathogenic mold Penicillium aurantiogriseum in soft cheese throughout 30 days of refrigerated storage (4 °C). Caleja et al., 2015 [187] increased the antioxidant activity of cheese during 14 days of storage by using Foeniculum vulgare decoction. The elevated content of phenolic compounds, but also carotenoids, phenolic diterpenes, flavonoids and anthocyanidins, seems to be the major reason for the strong antioxidant activity of plant-derived compounds [179]. Natural compounds can play a crucial role in increasing food shelf life, but they can also exert a positive effect on consumer health. For instance, Ref. [188] showed that the functional features of cheese can be enhanced after the addition of tomato powder at different concentrations. Fortified cheeses had a higher lycopene content, even after two months of storage. Furthermore, the addition of Satureja hortenis to cheese can not only inhibit microbial growth but also stimulate the intake of essential elements (i.e., Fe), which cheese lacks [189].
Natural products have also been proven in additional types of dairy products, including milk. Jemaa et al., 2017 [190] showed that EO of Thymus capitatus ameliorated pasteurization effectiveness in maintaining raw milk quality. Incorporation of EOs from basil, peppermint, and zataria in the formulation of probiotic yoghurt increased the inhibition of E. coli and L. monocytogenes compared to yoghurt without EOs. However, only the EOs of basil and peppermint showed good antioxidant and antiradical activity along with good sensory acceptability [191]. The application of Echinophora platyloba EO and lycopene was effective as natural preservatives for dairy products with high fat content, such as butter and cream. Pasteurized cream treated with a mixture of EO and lycopene (0.5% and 50 ppm, respectively) showed improved shelf life (both from a microbiological and chemical point of view) compared to control samples. Sensory evaluation results showed that all the samples have satisfactory overall acceptability, although the greatest sensorial features were detected in creams prepared with a combination of low concentrations of Echinophora EO and lycopene (0.1% and 20 ppm, respectively) [192] (Table 4). Other authors extended the shelf life of butter using thyme and cumin EOs [193], while Ozkan et al. (2007) [194] explored the potential of Satureja cilicica EO as a natural flavoring and antioxidant in the same dairy product.
Although many studies highlight the beneficial properties of herbal preservatives, other papers report that dairy fats, carbohydrates, or proteins may interact with them and reduce their functional properties. Consequently, higher amounts of EOs are necessary to attain the desired effect, with subsequent drawbacks related to sensorial impacts. To overcome this aspect, different approaches have been investigated. For instance, the use of mixtures of EOs may produce a synergistic effect, determining in turn the requirement for a lower amount of the individual natural compounds.
Nisin is permitted as a food additive for processed cheese by the FAO/WHO Codex Committee at a concentration of 12.5 mg/kg product, while the US FDA is permitted to use up to 250 mg/kg [203]. It is generally known that the effectiveness of nisin is dependent on the dairy products considered. In particular, neutral-pH dairy products made from whole milk are not suitable for nisin use [204]. Nisin, one of the few bacteriocins permitted as a preservative in dairy products, was effective in controlling various pathogens such as L. monocytogenes and S. aureus in real food matrices (Table 5).
As reported by Arqués et al., 2011, nisin reduced L. monocytogenes and S. aureus in refrigerated stored milk [205]. Other studies showed the inhibition of L. monocytogenes in cheddar, cottage cheese, and ricotta after nisin addition [206]. In addition, its potential against L. monocytogenes has also been demonstrated in pasteurized dairy products, including clotted cream, flavored milk, chilled desserts, and evaporated milk. To exploit the synergistic effect of natural compounds (Table 5), Chen et al., 2017 [207] used a ternary combination of nisin (500 IU/mL), thymol (2 mg/mL), and lactobionic acid (10 mg/mL) to reduce L. monocytogenes in whole milk.
As already reported for natural plant-derived substances, the activity of bacteriocins can also be negatively affected by interaction with the food matrix. Various approaches have been developed to overcome these shortcomings. Nano- or micro-encapsulation of natural products is a promising approach that guarantees their long-term activity. For instance, rosemary EO was microencapsulated with inulin and whey protein isolate and then incorporated into the Minas Frescal cheese. Alternatively, natural molecules could be incorporated into edible films and coatings. This approach allowed a gradual release over time and long-term antimicrobial activity. For instance, Balaguer et al., 2013 [109] have shown that a film coating incorporated with cinnamon EOs having 5% cinnamaldehyde inhibited the growth of Apergillus niger and Penicillium expansum on spreadable cheese. So far, a limited number of studies have studied the efficacy of coatings or films added with bacteriocins or bacteriocin-producing LAB in dairy products. However, literature data indicate a reduction in the growth of pathogens when foods were packed with coatings and films enriched with LAB bioactive metabolites [208,209,210,211,212] or containing directly viable LAB cells [213,214].
Table 5. Applications of nisin in combination with other natural compounds for the preservation of dairy products.
Table 5. Applications of nisin in combination with other natural compounds for the preservation of dairy products.
Combined Antimicrobial
Dairy Food ApplicationTarget MicroorganismsNisin ConcentrationAntimicrobial TypeAntimicrobial ConcentrationOther TreatmentActivity ReportedReference
Unpasteurized cow milkEscherichia coli, S. aureus0.008 mg/mLMagnesium oxide nanoparticles2 mg/mL without heatNA *MgO NP in combination with nisin lead to damage to the cell membrane, causing the pathogen’s death[215]
0.5 mg/mLHeat (60 °C)
Pasteurized milkS. aureus, L. monocytogenes16 µg/mLPerilla oil1 mg/mLNA *Synergistic effect resulting in higher cell wall damage when nisin and perilla oil were used in combination[216]
S. aureus8 mg/mLCinnamaldehyde0.25 mg/mLNA *Synergistic effect with increased antimicrobial activity against S. aureus[217]
0.37 and 0.75 µg/mLPhage-encoded endolysin LysH57.5 and 15 U/mLNA *Synergistic effect of the absence of S. aureus was reached only with the combination of the two antimicrobials[218]
8 µg/mLp-Anisaldehyde NA *Synergistic effect demonstrated[219]
1.5 µg/mLBacteriophage Φ35 Bacteriophage Φ881:1 cocktail of phages Φ35 and Φ88 at 103 pfu/mLNA *nisin activity, which can induce surface changes that can impair bacteriophage activity[220]
UHT whole milkS. aureus400, 600, 800, and 1200 AU/mLBovicin HC5 400, 600, 800, and 1200 AU/mLNA *Bovicin and nisin combinations were effective in inhibiting Listeria and S. aureus at lower concentrations than when used alone[221]
L. monocytogenes,
Listeria innocua,
UHT processed 2% reduced-fat milk and whole milkL. monocytogenes250 and 500 IU/mLLactobionic acid10 mg/mLNA *LBA increased the synergistic effect between nisin and thymol against L. monocytogenes but not E. coli [207]
Thymol1–2 mg/mL
UHT skimmed milk with 0.04% fatL. monocytogenes, S. aureus, E. coli O157:H7, Salmonella enterica, Yersinia enterocolitica, Aeromonas hydrophila, Campylobacter jejuni100 IU/mLReuterin8 AU6/mLNA *Nisin and reuterin showed a synergistic effect in milk at refrigerated temperatures causing the complete deactivation of Listeria and S. aureus[205]
Cow milkStaphylococcus aureus, Listeria monocytogenes1/4 MICThymol, eugenol, carvacrol, and cinnamaldehyde1/4 MICNA *Nisin combination with phenolic compounds showed a synergistic effect[222]
Whole, low, and skimmed milkL. monocytogenes62.5, 125, 250, and 500 IU/mLCone EO of Metasequoia glyptostroboides1 and 2%NA *Synergistic effect of nisin and cone EO against listeria in whole, low, and skimmed milk[223]
Leaf EO of Metasequoia glyptostroboides1, 2, and 5%NA *Remarkable synergism of leaf EO and nisin against listeria in whole, low, and skimmed milk[197]
Whole (3.5%), low (1%), and skimmed (no fat content) milk62.5, 125, 250, and 500 IU/mLGarlic shoot juice2.5 and 5%NA *Synergistic anti-listerial activity of nisin and garlic shoot juice[224]
Chocolate milk25 µg/mLThymol100 µg/mLNA *Enhanced antilisterial activity by the combination of nisin with carvacrol or cinnamaldehyde[225]
Carvacrol304 µg/mL
trans-cinnamaldehyde327.6 µg/mL
Reconstituted powdered infant milk formulaCronobacter sakazakii60 µM and 250 µg/mLCarvacrol300 µg/mLNA *Bioengineered nisin variants showed an increased antimicrobial activity compared to nisin A and an enhanced synergistic effect with carvacrol[226]
Citric acid30 mM
Homogenized UHT skimmed milkS. aureus1 to 20 IU/mLLysozyme300 to 5000 IU/mLHigh-intensity pulsed-electric field: 120 to 1200 µsSynergistic effect[227]
Enterocin AS-48 (AS-48)28 AU/mL
Iranian youghurt (Doogh)E. coli O157:H7250 and 500 IU/mLZiziphora clinopodioides Essential Oil5 mg/mLNA *Nisin and EO combination reduced E. coli population, showing a synergistic effect[228]
*: NA—not applicable.

4. Conclusions

Essential oils and bioactive compounds can be applied as food preservatives due to their antimicrobial and antioxidant activities, which prevent spoiling processes and guarantee food safety. On the other hand, an additional strategy to increase the safety and shelf life of various types of foods, including minimally processed fruits and vegetables, vegetable beverages, meat, and dairy products, can be represented by the use of protective cultures, especially lactic acid bacteria, which are able to produce antimicrobial compounds such as bacteriocins in addition to organic acids and hydrogen peroxide. Recently, innovative new technologies and delivery strategies such as nanoencapsulation or polymer-based coatings have improved the efficacy and allowed the controlled release of natural antimicrobials. In addition, the use of EOs and bioactive plant molecules in combination with bioprotective cultures or bacteriocins can exert an additive or synergistic effect and reduce the applied concentration of EO. The combination of these antimicrobial agents represents an interesting strategy to increase the shelf life and safety of food due to their antimicrobial and antioxidant properties. The synergistic combinations of EOs and LAB metabolites such as bacteriocins or nisins allow the exploration of promising ways to overcome both the narrow range of antimicrobial action and the unpleasant sensory properties of foods. Future research should focus on the efficacy of different EOs in different food and beverage matrices. At the same time, the combined use of antimicrobial natural products could overcome some of the drawbacks associated with their use in non-combined form. The development of novel strategies such as edible coatings is a great benefit to the environment, as such coatings are biocompatible and environmentally friendly.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.B., F.P. and R.L.; writing—original draft preparation, D.B., M.D., S.R., L.S., D.G., G.B., F.P. and R.L.; writing—review and editing, D.B., M.D., S.R., L.S., D.G., G.B., F.P. and R.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Ministry of Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia (grant number 451-03-47/2023-01/200178) and Project by the National Recovery and Resilience Plan (NRRP), Mission 4 Component 2 Investment 1.3—Call for tender No. 341 of 15 March 2022 of Italian Ministry of University and Research funded by the European Union—NextGenerationEU; Project code PE00000003, Concession Decree No. 1550 of 11 October 2022 adopted by the Italian Ministry of University and Research, CUP D93C22000890001, Project title "ON Foods—Research and innovation network on food and nutrition Sustainability, Safety and Security—Working ON Foods.

Data Availability Statement

The data used to support the findings of this study can be made available by the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest, financial or otherwise.

References

  1. Gutierrez, J.; Barry-Ryan, C.; Bourke, P. The Antimicrobial Efficacy of Plant Essential Oil Combinations and Interactions with Food Ingredients. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2008, 124, 91–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Gutierrez, J.; Rodriguez, G.; Barry-Ryan, C.; Bourke, P. Efficacy of Plant Essential Oils against Foodborne Pathogens and Spoilage Bacteria Associated with Ready-to-Eat Vegetables: Antimicrobial and Sensory Screening. J. Food Prot. 2008, 71, 1846–1854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Aqil, F.; Zahin, M.; Ahmad, I.; Owais, M.; Khan, M.S.A.; Bansal, S.S.; Farooq, S. Antifungal Activity of Medicinal Plant Extracts and Phytocompounds: A Review. In Combating Fungal Infections Problems and Remedy; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010; pp. 449–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Saeed, F.; Afzaal, M.; Tufail, T.; Ahmad, A. Use of Natural Antimicrobial Agents: A Safe Preservation Approach. In Active Antimicrobial Food Packaging; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Davidson, P.M.; Critzer, F.J.; Matthew Taylor, T. Naturally Occurring Antimicrobials for Minimally Processed Foods. Annu. Rev. Food Sci. Technol. 2013, 4, 163–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Moreira, M.R.; Ponce, A.G.; Del Valle, C.E.; Roura, S.I. Inhibitory Parameters of Essential Oils to Reduce a Foodborne Pathogen. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2005, 38, 565–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Weerakkody, N.S.; Caffin, N.; Turner, M.S.; Dykes, G.A. In Vitro Antimicrobial Activity of Less-Utilized Spice and Herb Extracts against Selected Food-Borne Bacteria. Food Control 2010, 21, 1408–1414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Adu, A.A.; Sudiana, I.K.; Martini, S. The Effect of Nitrite Food Preservatives Added to Se’i Meat on the Expression of Wild-Type P53 Protein. Open Chem. 2020, 18, 559–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Karwowska, M.; Kononiuk, A. Nitrates/Nitrites in Food—Risk for Nitrosative Stress and Benefits. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Song, P.; Wu, L.; Guan, W. Dietary Nitrates, Nitrites, and Nitrosamines Intake and the Risk of Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis. Nutrients 2015, 7, 9872–9895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Crowe, W.; Elliott, C.T.; Green, B.D. A Review of the In Vivo Evidence Investigating the Role of Nitrite Exposure from Processed Meat Consumption in the Development of Colorectal Cancer. Nutrients 2019, 11, 2673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Schwarz, U.I.; Seemann, D.; Oertel, R.; Miehlke, S.; Kuhlisch, E.; Fromm, M.F.; Kim, R.B.; Bailey, D.G.; Kirch, W. Grapefruit Juice Ingestion Significantly Reduces Talinolol Bioavailability. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2005, 77, 291–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Geraci, A.; Di Stefano, V.; Di Martino, E.; Schillaci, D.; Schicchi, R. Essential Oil Components of Orange Peels and Antimicrobial Activity. Nat. Prod. Res. 2017, 31, 653–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Deng, W.; Liu, K.; Cao, S.; Sun, J.; Zhong, B.; Chun, J. Chemical Composition, Antimicrobial, Antioxidant, and Antiproliferative Properties of Grapefruit Essential Oil Prepared by Molecular Distillation. Molecules 2020, 25, 217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ou, M.C.; Liu, Y.H.; Sun, Y.W.; Chan, C.F. The Composition, Antioxidant and Antibacterial Activities of Cold-Pressed and Distilled Essential Oils of Citrus paradisi and Citrus grandis (L.) Osbeck. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2015, 2015, 804091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Satyal, P.; Murray, B.L.; McFeeters, R.L.; Setzer, W.N. Essential Oil Characterization of Thymus vulgaris from Various Geographical Locations. Foods 2016, 5, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Teixeira, B.; Marques, A.; Ramos, C.; Serrano, C.; Matos, O.; Neng, N.R.; Nogueira, J.M.F.; Saraiva, J.A.; Nunes, M.L. Chemical Composition and Bioactivity of Different Oregano (Origanum Vulgare) Extracts and Essential Oil. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2013, 93, 2707–2714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Sharma, P.; Upadhyaya, K. Characteristic Features and Comparative Analysis of Essential Oil Composition of Selected Genus of Ocimum sanctum L. through GC-MS. J. Vector Borne Dis. 2023, 60, 94–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Sakkas, H.; Papadopoulou, C. Antimicrobial Activity of Basil, Oregano, and Thyme Essential Oils. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017, 27, 429–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Babovic, N.; Djilas, S.; Jadranin, M.; Vajs, V.; Ivanovic, J.; Petrovic, S.; Zizovic, I. Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Extraction of Antioxidant Fractions from Selected Lamiaceae Herbs and Their Antioxidant Capacity. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2010, 11, 98–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Radaelli, M.; da Silva, B.P.; Weidlich, L.; Hoehne, L.; Flach, A.; da Costa, L.A.M.A.; Ethur, E.M. Antimicrobial Activities of Six Essential Oils Commonly Used as Condiments in Brazil against Clostridium Perfringens. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2016, 47, 424–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ksouri, S.; Djebir, S.; Bentorki, A.A.; Gouri, A.; Hadef, Y.; Benakhla, A. Antifungal Activity of Essential Oils Extract from Origanum floribundum Munby, Rosmarinus officinalis L. and Thymus ciliatus Desf. against Candida albicans Isolated from Bovine Clinical Mastitis. J. Mycol. Med. 2017, 27, 245–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Boskovic, M.; Djordjevic, J.; Glisic, M.; Ciric, J.; Janjic, J.; Zdravkovic, N.; Krnjaic, D.; Baltic, M.Z. The Effect of Oregano (Origanum vulgare) Essential Oil on Four Salmonella Serovars and Shelf Life of Refrigerated Pork Meat Packaged under Vacuum and Modified Atmosphere. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2020, 44, e14311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Naghdibadi, H.; Abdollahi, M.; Mehrafarin, A.; Ghorbanpour, M.; Tolyat, S.; Qaderi, A.; Ghiaci Yekta, M. An Overview on Two Valuable Natural and Bioactive Compounds, Thymol and Carvacrol, in Medicinal Plants. J. Med. Plants 2017, 16, 1–32. [Google Scholar]
  25. Javidanpour, S.; Dianat, M.; Badavi, M.; Mard, S.A. The Cardioprotective Effect of Rosmarinic Acid on Acute Myocardial Infarction and Genes Involved in Ca2+homeostasis. Free Radic. Res. 2017, 51, 911–923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Memar, M.Y.; Raei, P.; Alizadeh, N.; Aghdam, M.A.; Kafil, H.S. Carvacrol and Thymol: Strong Antimicrobial Agents against Resistant Isolates. Rev. Med. Microbiol. 2017, 28, 63–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wei, Y.; Pu, X.; Zhao, L. Preclinical Studies for the Combination of Paclitaxel and Curcumin in Cancer Therapy. Oncol. Rep. 2017, 37, 3159–3166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Fachini-Queiroz, F.C.; Kummer, R.; Estevão-Silva, C.F.; Carvalho, M.D.D.B.; Cunha, J.M.; Grespan, R.; Bersani-Amado, C.A.; Cuman, R.K.N. Effects of Thymol and Carvacrol, Constituents of Thymus vulgaris L. Essential Oil, on the Inflammatory Response. Evid.-Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2012, 2012, 657026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Xu, J.; Zhou, F.; Ji, B.P.; Pei, R.S.; Xu, N. The Antibacterial Mechanism of Carvacrol and Thymol against Escherichia coli. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2008, 47, 174–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Gonelimali, F.D.; Lin, J.; Miao, W.; Xuan, J.; Charles, F.; Chen, M.; Hatab, S.R. Antimicrobial Properties and Mechanism of Action of Some Plant Extracts Against Food Pathogens and Spoilage Microorganisms. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Burt, S. Essential Oils: Their Antibacterial Properties and Potential Applications in Foods—A Review. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2004, 94, 223–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sokolik, C.G.; Ben-Shabat-Binyamini, R.; Gedanken, A.; Lellouche, J.P. Proteinaceous Microspheres as a Delivery System for Carvacrol and Thymol in Antibacterial Applications. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2018, 41, 288–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. El-Tarabily, K.A.; El-Saadony, M.T.; Alagawany, M.; Arif, M.; Batiha, G.E.; Khafaga, A.F.; Elwan, H.A.M.; Elnesr, S.S.; Abd El-Hack, M.E. Using Essential Oils to Overcome Bacterial Biofilm Formation and Their Antimicrobial Resistance. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2021, 28, 5145–5156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Bouyahya, A.; Abrini, J.; Dakka, N.; Bakri, Y. Essential Oils of Origanum Compactum Increase Membrane Permeability, Disturb Cell Membrane Integrity, and Suppress Quorum-Sensing Phenotype in Bacteria. J. Pharm. Anal. 2019, 9, 301–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bouyahya, A.; Dakka, N.; Et-Touys, A.; Abrini, J.; Bakri, Y. Medicinal Plant Products Targeting Quorum Sensing for Combating Bacterial Infections. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Med. 2017, 10, 729–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wang, Y.; Feng, L.; Lu, H.; Zhu, J.; Kumar, V.; Liu, X. Transcriptomic Analysis of the Food Spoilers Pseudomonas Fluorescens Reveals the Antibiofilm of Carvacrol by Interference with Intracellular Signaling Processes. Food Control 2021, 127, 108115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Rathod, N.B.; Kulawik, P.; Ozogul, F.; Regenstein, J.M.; Ozogul, Y. Biological Activity of Plant-Based Carvacrol and Thymol and Their Impact on Human Health and Food Quality. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 116, 733–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Martínez, A.; Manrique-Moreno, M.; Klaiss-Luna, M.C.; Stashenko, E.; Zafra, G.; Ortiz, C. Effect of Essential Oils on Growth Inhibition, Biofilm Formation and Membrane Integrity of Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus Aureus. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 1474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Diao, W.R.; Hu, Q.P.; Zhang, H.; Xu, J.G. Chemical Composition, Antibacterial Activity and Mechanism of Action of Essential Oil from Seeds of Fennel (Foeniculum vulgare Mill.). Food Control 2014, 35, 109–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Han, Y.; Sun, Z.; Chen, W. Antimicrobial Susceptibility and Antibacterial Mechanism of Limonene against Listeria monocytogenes. Molecules 2020, 25, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Barbosa, L.N.; Rall, V.L.M.; Fernandes, A.A.H.; Ushimaru, P.I.; da Silva Probst, I.; Fernandes, A., Jr. Essential Oils Against Foodborne Pathogens and Spoilage Bacteria in Minced Meat. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2009, 6, 725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bukvicki, D.; Giweli, A.; Stojkovic, D.; Vujisic, L.; Tesevic, V.; Nikolic, M.; Sokovic, M.; Marin, P.D. Short Communication: Cheese Supplemented with Thymus algeriensis Oil, a Potential Natural Food Preservative. J. Dairy Sci. 2018, 101, 3859–3865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Sessou, P.; Farougou, S.; Ahounou, S.; Hounnankpon, Y.; Azokpota, P.; Youssao, I.; Sohounhloue, D. Comparative Study of Antifungal Activities of Six Selected Essential Oils against Fungal Isolates from Cheese Wagashi in Benin. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 2013, 16, 1751–1757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Kulabas, S.S.; Ipek, H.; Tufekci, A.R.; Arslan, S.; Demirtas, I.; Ekren, R.; Sezerman, U.; Tumer, T.B. Ameliorative Potential of Lavandula Stoechas in Metabolic Syndrome via Multitarget Interactions. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2018, 223, 88–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Ekpenyong, C.E.; Akpan, E.E. Use of Cymbopogon Citratus Essential Oil in Food Preservation: Recent Advances and Future Perspectives. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2017, 57, 2541–2559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Nardoni, S.; D’Ascenzi, C.; Caracciolo, I.; Mannaioni, G.; Amerigo Papini, R.; Pistelli, L.; Najar, B.; Mancianti, F. Activity of Selected Essential Oils on Spoiling Fungi Cultured from Marzolino Cheese. Ann. Agric. Environ. Med. 2018, 25, 280–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Pinto, L.; Cefola, M.; Bonifacio, M.A.; Cometa, S.; Bocchino, C.; Pace, B.; De Giglio, E.; Palumbo, M.; Sada, A.; Logrieco, A.F.; et al. Effect of Red Thyme Oil (Thymus vulgaris L.) Vapours on Fungal Decay, Quality Parameters and Shelf-Life of Oranges during Cold Storage. Food Chem. 2021, 336, 127590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Juneja, V.K.; Dwivedi, H.P.; Yan, X. Novel Natural Food Antimicrobials. Annu. Rev. Food Sci. Technol. 2012, 3, 381–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Maurya, A.; Prasad, J.; Das, S.; Dwivedy, A.K. Essential Oils and Their Application in Food Safety. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2021, 5, 653420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Raybaudi-Massilia, R.M.; Mosqueda-Melgar, J.; Soliva-Fortuny, R.; Martín-Belloso, O. Control of Pathogenic and Spoilage Microorganisms in Fresh-Cut Fruits and Fruit Juices by Traditional and Alternative Natural Antimicrobials. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2009, 8, 157–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Fischer, S.W.; Titgemeyer, F. Protective Cultures in Food Products: From Science to Market. Foods 2023, 12, 1541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ito, A.; Sato, Y.; Kudo, S.; Sato, S.; Nakajima, H.; Toba, T. The Screening of Hydrogen Peroxide-Producing Lactic Acid Bacteria and Their Application to Inactivating Psychrotrophic Food-Borne Pathogens. Curr. Microbiol. 2003, 47, 231–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Lanciotti, R.; Patrignani, F.; Bagnolini, F.; Guerzoni, M.E.; Gardini, F. Evaluation of Diacetyl Antimicrobial Activity against Escherichia coli, Listeria monocytogenes and Staphylococcus Aureus. Food Microbiol. 2003, 20, 537–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Siroli, L.; Patrignani, F.; Serrazanetti, D.I.; Gardini, F.; Lanciotti, R. Innovative Strategies Based on the Use of Bio-Control Agents to Improve the Safety, Shelf-Life and Quality of Minimally Processed Fruits and Vegetables. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 46, 302–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Cotter, P.D.; Ross, R.P.; Hill, C. Bacteriocins-a Viable Alternative to Antibiotics? Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2013, 11, 95–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Castellano, P.; Ibarreche, M.P.; Massani, M.B.; Fontana, C.; Vignolo, G.M. Strategies for Pathogen Biocontrol Using Lactic Acid Bacteria and Their Metabolites: A Focus on Meat Ecosystems and Industrial Environments. Microorganisms 2017, 5, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Daba, G.M.; Elnahas, M.O.; Elkhateeb, W.A. Beyond Biopreservatives, Bacteriocins Biotechnological Applications: History, Current Status, and Promising Potentials. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2022, 39, 102248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Šimat, V.; Čagalj, M.; Skroza, D.; Gardini, F.; Tabanelli, G.; Montanari, C.; Hassoun, A.; Ozogul, F. Sustainable Sources for Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Compounds Used in Meat and Seafood Products. Adv. Food Nutr. Res. 2021, 97, 55–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Woraprayote, W.; Malila, Y.; Sorapukdee, S.; Swetwiwathana, A.; Benjakul, S.; Visessanguan, W. Bacteriocins from Lactic Acid Bacteria and Their Applications in Meat and Meat Products. Meat Sci. 2016, 120, 118–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Iseppi, R.; Camellini, S.; Sabia, C.; Messi, P. Combined Antimicrobial Use of Essential Oils and Bacteriocin BacLP17 as Seafood Biopreservative to Control Listeria monocytogenes Both in Planktonic and in Sessile Forms. Res. Microbiol. 2020, 171, 351–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Turgis, M.; Vu, K.D.; Dupont, C.; Lacroix, M. Combined Antimicrobial Effect of Essential Oils and Bacteriocins against Foodborne Pathogens and Food Spoilage Bacteria. Food Res. Int. 2012, 48, 696–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Gaamouche, S.; Arakrak, A.; Bakkali, M.; Laglaoui, A. Combined Antimicrobial Effect of Bacteriocins of LAB Isolated from a Traditional Brine Table Olives and Essential Oils against Foodborne Pathogens. Moroccan J. Chem. 2021, 9, 464–473. [Google Scholar]
  63. Sharafati-chaleshtori, R.; Rokni, N.; Rafieian-kopaei, M.; Drees, F.; Sharafati-Chaleshtori, A.; Salehi, E. Use of Tarragon (Artemisia dracunculus) Essential Oil as a Natural Preservative in Beef Burger. Ital. J. Food Sci. 2014, 26, 427–432. [Google Scholar]
  64. Yadav, A.; Singh, R. Natural Preservatives in Poultry Meat Products. Nat. Prod. Rad. 2004, 3, 300–303. [Google Scholar]
  65. Rattanachaikunsopon, P.; Phumkhachorn, P. Diallyl Sulfide Content and Antimicrobial Activity against Food-Borne Pathogenic Bacteria of Chives (Allium schoenoprasum). Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2008, 72, 2987–2991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Mehdizadeh, T.; Mojaddar Langroodi, A.; Shakouri, R.; Khorshidi, S. Physicochemical, Microbiological, and Sensory Characteristics of Probiotic Yogurt Enhanced with Anethum Graveolens Essential Oil. J. Food Saf. 2019, 39, e12683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Radha Krishnan, K.; Babuskin, S.; Azhagu Saravana Babu, P.; Sasikala, M.; Sabina, K.; Archana, G.; Sivarajan, M.; Sukumar, M. Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Effects of Spice Extracts on the Shelf Life Extension of Raw Chicken Meat. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2014, 171, 32–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Tomović, V.; Šojić, B.; Savanović, J.; Kocić-Tanackov, S.; Pavlić, B.; Jokanović, M.; Đorđević, V.; Parunović, N.; Martinović, A.; Vujadinović, D. Caraway (Carum carvi L.) Essential Oil Improves Quality of Dry-Fermented Sausages Produced with Different Levels of Sodium Nitrite. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2021, 46, e15786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Bora, H.; Kamle, M.; Mahato, D.K.; Tiwari, P.; Kumar, P. Citrus Essential Oils (CEOs) and Their Applications in Food: An Overview. Plants 2020, 9, 357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Masoumi, B.; Abbasi, A.; Mazloomi, S.M. The Effect of Saffron on Microbial, Physicochemical and Texture Profile of Chicken (Breast) Meat Stored in Refrigerator. Int. J. Nutr. Sci. 2018, 3, 164–170. [Google Scholar]
  71. Bojorges, H.; Ríos-Corripio, M.A.; Hernández-Cázares, A.S.; Hidalgo-Contreras, J.V.; Contreras-Oliva, A. Effect of the Application of an Edible Film with Turmeric (Curcuma longa L.) on the Oxidative Stability of Meat. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 8, 4308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Mancini, S.; Paci, G.; Pisseri, F.; Preziuso, G. Effect of Turmeric (Curcuma longa L.) Powder as Dietary Antioxidant Supplementation on Pig Meat Quality. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2017, 41, e12878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Hernández-Ochoa, L.; Aguirre-Prieto, Y.B.; Nevárez-Moorillón, G.V.; Gutierrez-Mendez, N.; Salas-Muñoz, E. Use of Essential Oils and Extracts from Spices in Meat Protection. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 51, 957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Hartanti, D.; Haqqi, M.Z.U.; Hamad, A. Potency of Combination of Essential Oils of Ginger and Lemongrass as Fresh Chicken Meat Natural Preservative. Adv. Sci. Lett. 2018, 24, 91–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Sayyari, Z.; Rabani, M.; Farahmandfar, R.; Kenari, R.E.; Nadoshan, R.M. The Effect of Nanocomposite Edible Coating Enriched with Foeniculum vulgare Essential Oil on the Shelf Life of Oncorhynchus Mykiss Fish Fillets during the Storage. J. Aquat. Food Prod. Technol. 2021, 30, 579–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Michalczyk, M.; Macura, R.; Tesarowicz, I.; Banaś, J. Effect of Adding Essential Oils of Coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.) and Hyssop (Hyssopus officinalis L.) on the Shelf Life of Ground Beef. Meat Sci. 2012, 90, 842–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Song, L.; Wu, X.; Xie, J.; Zhang, H.; Yang, H.; Zeng, Q.; Yang, X.; Xie, W. Kaempferia Galanga Linn. Extract—A Potential Antibacterial Agent for Preservation of Poultry Products. LWT 2021, 147, 111553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Mahmoud, S.H.; Wafa, M.M. The Antibacterial Activity of Laurus Nobilis Leaf Extract and Its Potential Use as a Preservative for Fresh Lamb Meat. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 2020, 14, 617–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Hernández-Hernández, E.; Castillo-Hernández, G.; González-Gutiérrez, C.J.; Silva-Dávila, A.J.; Gracida-Rodríguez, J.N.; García-Almendárez, B.E.; Pierro, P.D.; Vázquez-Landaverde, P.; Regalado-González, C. Microbiological and Physicochemical Properties of Meat Coated with Microencapsulated Mexican Oregano (Lippia graveolens Kunth) and Basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) Essential Oils Mixture. Coatings 2019, 9, 414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Smaoui, S.; Hsouna, A.B.; Lahmar, A.; Ennouri, K.; Mtibaa-Chakchouk, A.; Sellem, I.; Najah, S.; Bouaziz, M.; Mellouli, L. Bio-Preservative Effect of the Essential Oil of the Endemic Mentha piperita Used Alone and in Combination with BacTN635 in Stored Minced Beef Meat. Meat Sci. 2016, 117, 196–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Raeisi, M.; Hashemi, M.; Ansarian, E.; Hejazi, J.; Hassanzad Azar, H.; Daneshamooz, S.; Jannat, B.; Aminzare, M. Antibacterial Effect of Mentha Piperita Essential Oil Against Foodborne Pathogens in Minced Meat During Storage at Abuse Refrigeration Temperature. Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci. 2019, 7, 720–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Fratianni, F.; De Martino, L.; Melone, A.; De Feo, V.; Coppola, R.; Nazzaro, F. Preservation of Chicken Breast Meat Treated with Thyme and Balm Essential Oils. J. Food Sci. 2010, 75, M528–M535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Mohammadi, L.; Tanaka, F.; Tanaka, F. Preservation of Strawberry Fruit with an Aloe Vera Gel and Basil (Ocimum basilicum) Essential Oil Coating at Ambient Temperature. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2021, 45, e15836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Anthony, S.; Abeywickrama, K.; Wijeratnam, S.W. The Effect of Spraying Essential Oils of Cymbopogon nardus, Cymbopogon flexuosus and Ocimum basilicum on Postharvest Diseases and Storage Life of Embul Banana. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 2003, 78, 780–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Das, A.K.; Rajkumar, V.; Dwivedi, D.K. Antioxidant Effect of Curry Leaf (Murraya koenigii) Powder on Quality of Ground and Cooked Goat Meat. Int. Food Res. J. 2011, 18, 563–569. [Google Scholar]
  86. Kiarsi, Z.; Hojjati, M.; Behbahani, B.A.; Noshad, M. In Vitro Antimicrobial Effects of Myristica Fragrans Essential Oil on Foodborne Pathogens and Its Influence on Beef Quality during Refrigerated Storage. J. Food Saf. 2020, 40, e12782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Ozpolat, E.; Duman, M. Effect of Black Cumin Oil (Nigella sativa L.) on Fresh Fish (Barbus grypus) Fillets during Storage at 2 ± 1 °C. Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 37, 148–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Bhargava, K.; Conti, D.S.; da Rocha, S.R.P.; Zhang, Y. Application of an Oregano Oil Nanoemulsion to the Control of Foodborne Bacteria on Fresh Lettuce. Food Microbiol. 2015, 47, 69–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Hulankova, R.; Borilova, G.; Steinhauserova, I. Combined Antimicrobial Effect of Oregano Essential Oil and Caprylic Acid in Minced Beef. Meat Sci. 2013, 95, 190–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Fathi-Achachlouei, B.; Babolanimogadam, N.; Zahedi, Y. Influence of Anise (Pimpinella anisum L.) Essential Oil on the Microbial, Chemical, and Sensory Properties of Chicken Fillets Wrapped with Gelatin Film. Food Sci. Technol. Int. 2021, 27, 123–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Gulmez, M.; Oral, N.; Vatansever, L. The Effect of Water Extract of Sumac (Rhus coriaria L.) and Lactic Acid on Decontamination and Shelf Life of Raw Broiler Wings. Poult. Sci. 2006, 85, 1466–1471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Sirocchi, V.; Devlieghere, F.; Peelman, N.; Sagratini, G.; Maggi, F.; Vittori, S.; Ragaert, P. Effect of Rosmarinus officinalis L. Essential Oil Combined with Different Packaging Conditions to Extend the Shelf Life of Refrigerated Beef Meat. Food Chem. 2017, 221, 1069–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Gomaa, A.A.; Srour, T.M.; Abdallah, A.E. The Effect of Sage Essential Oil on the Compositional Quality of Anchovy Fish Burger During Freeze Storage. J. Adv. Agric. Res. 2019, 24, 534–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Hassan, A.A.; Rasmy, N.M.; Foda, I.; El-Moghazy, M.M. Assessment of the Antioxidant Activity of Sage (Salvia officinalis L.) Extracts on the Shelf Life of Mayonnaise. World J. Dairy Food Sci. 2012, 7, 28–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Mehdizadeh, T.; Tajik, H.; Jafarie, S.; Kaboudari, A. Effect of Salvia Officinalis L. Extract on Chemical, Microbial, Sensory and Shelf Life of Rainbow Trout Fillet. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2019, 28, 1499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Cegiełka, A.; Hać-Szymańczuk, E.; Piwowarek, K.; Dasiewicz, K.; Słowiński, M.; Wrońska, K. The Use of Bioactive Properties of Sage Preparations to Improve the Storage Stability of Low-Pressure Mechanically Separated Meat from Chickens. Poult. Sci. 2019, 98, 5045–5053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Jokanović, M.; Ivić, M.; Škaljac, S.; Tomović, V.; Pavlić, B.; Šojić, B.; Zeković, Z.; Peulić, T.; Ikonić, P. Essential Oil and Supercritical Extracts of Winter Savory (Satureja montana L.) as Antioxidants in Precooked Pork Chops during Chilled Storage. LWT 2020, 134, 110260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Hernández, A.; García García, B.; Jordán, M.J.; Hernández, M.D. Study of the Dose of Thyme Essential Oil in Feed to Prolong the Shelf Life of Gilthead Seabream (Sparus aurata). Aquac. Nutr. 2015, 21, 740–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Jayari, A.; Jouini, A.; Boukhris, H.; Hamrouni, S.; Damergi, C.; Ben Hadj Ahmed, S.; Maaroufi, A. Essential Oils from Thymus Capitatus and Thymus algeriensis as Antimicrobial Agents to Control Pathogenic and Spoilage Bacteria in Ground Meat. J. Food Qual. 2021, 2021, 5599374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Karimnezhad, F.; Razavilar, V.; Anvar, A.A.; Eskandari, S. Study the Antimicrobial Effects of Chitosan-Based Edible Film Containing the Trachyspermum Ammi Essential Oil on Shelf-Life of Chicken Meat. Microbiol. Res. 2017, 8, 7226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Al-Fadhly, N.K.Z. Extraction, Characterization of Essential Oils of Ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosco) and Study the Effectiveness of Antimicrobial on Shelf Life Extension of Minced Beef Meat. Basrah J. Agric. Sci. 2016, 29, 523–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Siroli, L.; Patrignani, F.; Serrazanetti, D.I.; Tabanelli, G.; Montanari, C.; Tappi, S.; Rocculi, P.; Gardini, F.; Lanciotti, R. Efficacy of Natural Antimicrobials to Prolong the Shelf-Life of Minimally Processed Apples Packaged in Modified Atmosphere. Food Control 2014, 46, 403–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. De Azeredo, G.A.; Stamford, T.L.M.; Nunes, P.C.; Gomes Neto, N.J.; De Oliveira, M.E.G.; De Souza, E.L. Combined Application of Essential Oils from Origanum vulgare L. and Rosmarinus officinalis L. to Inhibit Bacteria and Autochthonous Microflora Associated with Minimally Processed Vegetables. Food Res. Int. 2011, 44, 1541–1548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Abadias, M.; Alegre, I.; Usall, J.; Torres, R.; Viñas, I. Evaluation of Alternative Sanitizers to Chlorine Disinfection for Reducing Foodborne Pathogens in Fresh-Cut Apple. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2011, 3, 289–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Rojas-Graü, M.A.; Raybaudi-Massilia, R.M.; Soliva-Fortuny, R.C.; Avena-Bustillos, R.J.; McHugh, T.H.; Martín-Belloso, O. Apple Puree-Alginate Edible Coating as Carrier of Antimicrobial Agents to Prolong Shelf-Life of Fresh-Cut Apples. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2007, 45, 254–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Singh, N.; Singh, R.K.; Bhunia, A.K.; Stroshine, R.L. Efficacy of Chlorine Dioxide, Ozone, and Thyme Essential Oil or a Sequential Washing in Killing Escherichia coli O157:H7 on Lettuce and Baby Carrots. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2002, 35, 720–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Mukurumbira, A.R.; Shellie, R.A.; Keast, R.; Palombo, E.A.; Jadhav, S.R. Encapsulation of Essential Oils and Their Application in Antimicrobial Active Packaging. Food Control 2022, 136, 108883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Valero, D.; Valverde, J.M.; Martínez-Romero, D.; Guillén, F.; Castillo, S.; Serrano, M. The Combination of Modified Atmosphere Packaging with Eugenol or Thymol to Maintain Quality, Safety and Functional Properties of Table Grapes. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2006, 41, 317–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Balaguer, M.P.; Lopez-Carballo, G.; Catala, R.; Gavara, R.; Hernandez-Munoz, P. Antifungal Properties of Gliadin Films Incorporating Cinnamaldehyde and Application in Active Food Packaging of Bread and Cheese Spread Foodstuffs. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2013, 166, 369–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Chiriac, A.P.; Rusu, A.G.; Nita, L.E.; Chiriac, V.M.; Neamtu, I.; Sandu, A. Polymeric Carriers Designed for Encapsulation of Essential Oils with Biological Activity. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Belletti, N.; Lanciotti, R.; Patrignani, F.; Gardini, F. Antimicrobial Efficacy of Citron Essential Oil on Spoilage and Pathogenic Microorganisms in Fruit-Based Salads. J. Food Sci. 2008, 73, M331–M338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Lanciotti, R.; Gianotti, A.; Patrignani, F.; Belletti, N.; Guerzoni, M.E.; Gardini, F. Use of Natural Aroma Compounds to Improve Shelf-Life and Safety of Minimally Processed Fruits. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2004, 15, 201–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Serrano, M.; Martínez-Romero, D.; Castillo, S.; Guillén, F.; Valero, D. The Use of Natural Antifungal Compounds Improves the Beneficial Effect of MAP in Sweet Cherry Storage. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2005, 6, 115–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Roller, S.; Seedhar, P. Carvacrol and Cinnamic Acid Inhibit Microbial Growth in Fresh-Cut Melon and Kiwifruit at 4° and 8 °C. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2002, 35, 390–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Muriel-Galet, V.; Cerisuelo, J.P.; López-Carballo, G.; Aucejo, S.; Gavara, R.; Hernández-Muñoz, P. Evaluation of EVOH-Coated PP Films with Oregano Essential Oil and Citral to Improve the Shelf-Life of Packaged Salad. Food Control 2013, 30, 137–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Sellamuthu, P.S.; Mafune, M.; Sivakumar, D.; Soundy, P. Thyme Oil Vapour and Modified Atmosphere Packaging Reduce Anthracnose Incidence and Maintain Fruit Quality in Avocado. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2013, 93, 3024–3031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Lanciotti, R.; Belletti, N.; Patrignani, F.; Gianotti, A.; Gardini, F.; Guerzoni, M.E. Application of Hexanal, (E)-2-Hexenal, and Hexyl Acetate To Improve the Safety of Fresh-Sliced Apples. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 2958–2963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Siroli, L.; Patrignani, F.; Serrazanetti, D.I.; Vernocchi, P.; Del Chierico, F.; Russo, A.; Torriani, S.; Putignani, L.; Gardini, F.; Lanciotti, R. Effect of Thyme Essential Oil and Lactococcus Lactis CBM21 on the Microbiota Composition and Quality of Minimally Processed Lamb’s Lettuce. Food Microbiol. 2017, 68, 61–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Siroli, L.; Patrignani, F.; Serrazanetti, D.I.; Tappi, S.; Rocculi, P.; Gardini, F.; Lanciotti, R. Natural Antimicrobials to Prolong the Shelf-Life of Minimally Processed Lamb’s Lettuce. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2015, 103, 35–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Siroli, L.; Patrignani, F.; Serrazanetti, D.I.; Tabanelli, G.; Montanari, C.; Gardini, F.; Lanciotti, R. Lactic Acid Bacteria and Natural Antimicrobials to Improve the Safety and Shelf-Life of Minimally Processed Sliced Apples and Lamb’s Lettuce. Food Microbiol. 2015, 47, 74–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Skandamis, P.N.; Nychas, G.J.E. Development and Evaluation of a Model Predicting the Survival of Escherichia coli O157:H7 NCTC 12900 in Homemade Eggplant Salad at Various Temperatures, PHs, and Oregano Essential Oil Concentrations. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2000, 66, 1646–1653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Gündüz, G.T.; Gönül, Ş.A.; Karapinar, M. Efficacy of Oregano Oil in the Inactivation of Salmonella Typhimurium on Lettuce. Food Control 2010, 21, 513–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Charfi, S.; Boujida, N.; El Moussaoui, N.; Abrini, J.; Senhaji, N.S. Thymbra Capitata Essential Oil Use to Preserve Physicochemical and Microbiological Qualities of Pomegranate Juice. Food Sci. Technol. Res. 2019, 25, 257–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Friedman, M.; Henika, P.R.; Levin, C.E.; Mandrell, R.E. Antibacterial Activities of Plant Essential Oils and Their Components against Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Salmonella Enterica in Apple Juice. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004, 52, 6042–6048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Sánchez-Rubio, M.; Taboada-Rodríguez, A.; Cava-Roda, R.; López-Gómez, A.; Marín-Iniesta, F. Combined Use of Thermo-Ultrasound and Cinnamon Leaf Essential Oil to Inactivate Saccharomyces Cerevisiae in Natural Orange and Pomegranate Juices. Lwt 2016, 73, 140–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Krisch, J.; Tserennadmid, R.; Vágvölgyi, C. Essential Oils against Yeasts and Moulds Causing Food Spoilage. In Science against Microbial Pathogens: Communicating Current Research and Technological Advances; Méndez-Vilas, A., Ed.; Formatex Research Center: Badajoz, Spain, 2011; pp. 1135–1142. [Google Scholar]
  127. Gutierrez, J.; Bourke, P.; Lonchamp, J.; Barry-Ryan, C. Impact of Plant Essential Oils on Microbiological, Organoleptic and Quality Markers of Minimally Processed Vegetables. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2009, 10, 195–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Hadian, M.; Rajaei, A.; Mohsenifar, A.; Tabatabaei, M. Encapsulation of Rosmarinus officinalis Essential Oils in Chitosan-Benzoic Acid Nanogel with Enhanced Antibacterial Activity in Beef Cutlet against Salmonella Typhimurium during Refrigerated Storage. LWT 2017, 84, 394–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Pálmai, M.; Buchanan, R.L. The Effect of Lactococcus Lactis on the Growth Characteristics of Listeria monocytogenes in Alfalfa Sprout Broth. Acta Aliment. 2002, 31, 379–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Mostafavi, H.A.; Mirmajlessi, S.M.; Mirjalili, S.M.; Fathollahi, H.; Askari, H. Gamma Radiation Effects on Physico-Chemical Parameters of Apple Fruit during Commercial Post-Harvest Preservation. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2012, 81, 666–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Alegre, I.; Viñas, I.; Usall, J.; Teixidó, N.; Figge, M.J.; Abadias, M. Control of Foodborne Pathogens on Fresh-Cut Fruit by a Novel Strain of Pseudomonas Graminis. Food Microbiol. 2013, 34, 390–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Leverentz, B.; Conway, W.S.; Janisiewicz, W.J.; Saftner, R.A.; Camp, M.J. Effect of Combining MCP Treatment, Heat Treatment, and Biocontrol on the Reduction of Postharvest Decay of ‘Golden Delicious’ Apples. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2003, 27, 221–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Trias, R.; Badosa, E.; Montesinos, E.; Bañeras, L. Bioprotective Leuconostoc Strains against Listeria monocytogenes in Fresh Fruits and Vegetables. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2008, 127, 91–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Siroli, L.; Patrignani, F.; Serrazanetti, D.I.; Vannini, L.; Salvetti, E.; Torriani, S.; Gardini, F.; Lanciotti, R. Use of a Nisin-Producing Lactococcus Lactis Strain, Combined with Natural Antimicrobials, to Improve the Safety and Shelf-Life of Minimally Processed Sliced Apples. Food Microbiol. 2016, 54, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Devatkal, S.K.; Thorat, P.; Manjunatha, M. Effect of Vacuum Packaging and Pomegranate Peel Extract on Quality Aspects of Ground Goat Meat and Nuggets. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 51, 2685–2691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Alirezalu, K.; Pateiro, M.; Yaghoubi, M.; Alirezalu, A.; Peighambardoust, S.H.; Lorenzo, J.M. Phytochemical Constituents, Advanced Extraction Technologies and Techno-Functional Properties of Selected Mediterranean Plants for Use in Meat Products. A Comprehensive Review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 100, 292–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Aminzare, M.; Hashemi, M.; Ansarian, E.; Bimkar, M.; Azar, H.H.; Mehrasbi, M.R.; Daneshamooz, S.; Raeisi, M.; Jannat, B.; Afshari, A. Using Natural Antioxidants in Meat and Meat Products as Preservatives: A Review. Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci. 2019, 7, 417–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Bukvički, D.; Stojković, D.; Soković, M.; Vannini, L.; Montanari, C.; Pejin, B.; Savić, A.; Veljić, M.; Grujić, S.; Marin, P.D. Satureja Horvatii Essential Oil: In Vitro Antimicrobial and Antiradical Properties and in Situ Control of Listeria monocytogenes in Pork Meat. Meat Sci. 2014, 96, 1355–1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Hyldgaard, M.; Mygind, T.; Meyer, R.L. Essential Oils in Food Preservation: Mode of Action, Synergies, and Interactions with Food Matrix Components. Front. Microbiol. 2012, 3, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Seydim, A.C.; Sarikus, G. Antimicrobial Activity of Whey Protein Based Edible Films Incorporated with Oregano, Rosemary and Garlic Essential Oils. Food Res. Int. 2006, 39, 639–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Fasseas, M.K.; Mountzouris, K.C.; Tarantilis, P.A.; Polissiou, M.; Zervas, G. Antioxidant Activity in Meat Treated with Oregano and Sage Essential Oils. Food Chem. 2008, 106, 1188–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Estévez, M.; Ramírez, R.; Ventanas, S.; Cava, R. Sage and Rosemary Essential Oils versus BHT for the Inhibition of Lipid Oxidative Reactions in Liver Pâté. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2007, 40, 58–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Chivandi, E.; Dangarembizi, R.; Nyakudya, T.T.; Erlwanger, K.H. Chapter 8—Use of Essential Oils as a Preservative of Meat. In Essential Oils in Food Preservation, Flavor and Safety; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2016; pp. 85–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Casaburi, A.; Piombino, P.; Nychas, G.J.; Villani, F.; Ercolini, D. Bacterial Populations and the Volatilome Associated to Meat Spoilage. Food Microbiol. 2015, 45, 83–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Doulgeraki, A.I.; Ercolini, D.; Villani, F.; Nychas, G.J.E. Spoilage Microbiota Associated to the Storage of Raw Meat in Different Conditions. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2012, 157, 130–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Pennacchia, C.; Ercolini, D.; Villani, F. Spoilage-Related Microbiota Associated with Chilled Beef Stored in Air or Vacuum Pack. Food Microbiol. 2011, 28, 84–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Heredia, N.; García, S. Animals as Sources of Food-Borne Pathogens: A Review. Anim. Nutr. 2018, 4, 250–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Hu, J.; Li, Z.; Xu, L.T.; Sun, A.J.; Fu, X.Y.; Zhang, L.; Jing, L.L.; Lu, A.D.; Dong, Y.F.; Jia, Z.P. Protective Effect of Apigenin on Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury of the Isolated Rat Heart. Cardiovasc. Toxicol. 2015, 15, 241–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Shiningeni, D.; Chimwamurombe, P.; Shilangale, R.; Misihairabgwi, J. Prevalence of Pathogenic Bacteria in Street Vended Ready-to-Eat Meats in Windhoek, Namibia. Meat Sci. 2019, 148, 223–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Bertoli, A.; Cüneyt Çõrak, Ç.; Teixeira Da Silva, J.A. Hypericum Species as Sources of Valuable Essential Oils. Med. Aromat. Plant Sci. Biotechnol. 2011, 5, 29–47. [Google Scholar]
  151. Dussault, D.; Vu, K.D.; Lacroix, M. In Vitro Evaluation of Antimicrobial Activities of Various Commercial Essential Oils, Oleoresin and Pure Compounds against Food Pathogens and Application in Ham. Meat Sci. 2014, 96, 514–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Hussain, Z.; Li, X.; Zhang, D.; Hou, C.; Ijaz, M.; Bai, Y.; Xiao, X.; Zheng, X. Influence of Adding Cinnamon Bark Oil on Meat Quality of Ground Lamb during Storage at 4 °C. Meat Sci. 2021, 171, 108269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Amariei, S.; Poroch- Serițan, M.; Gutt, G.; Oroian, M.; Ciornei, E. Rosemary, thyme and oregano essential oils influence on physicochemical properties and microbiological stability of minced meat. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. Food Sci. 2016, 2017, 670–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Sariçoban, C.; Yilmaz, M.T. Effect of Thyme/Cumin Essential Oils and Butylated Hydroxyl Anisole/Butylated Hydroxyl Toluene on Physicochemical Properties and Oxidative/Microbial Stability of Chicken Patties. Poult. Sci. 2014, 93, 456–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Sultanbawa, Y. Plant Antimicrobials in Food Applications: Minireview. In Science against Microbial Pathogens: Communicating Current Research and Technological Advances; Mendez-Vilas, A., Ed.; Formatex Research Center: Badajoz, Spain, 2011; Volume 2, pp. 1084–1093. [Google Scholar]
  156. Domínguez, R.; Barba, F.J.; Gómez, B.; Putnik, P.; Bursać Kovačević, D.; Pateiro, M.; Santos, E.M.; Lorenzo, J.M. Active Packaging Films with Natural Antioxidants to Be Used in Meat Industry: A Review. Food Res. Int. 2018, 113, 93–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Oussalah, M.; Caillet, S.; Salmiéri, S.; Saucier, L.; Lacroix, M. Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Effects of Milk Protein-Based Film Containing Essential Oils for the Preservation of Whole Beef Muscle. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004, 52, 5598–5605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Catarino, M.D.; Alves-Silva, J.M.; Fernandes, R.P.; Gonçalves, M.J.; Salgueiro, L.R.; Henriques, M.F.; Cardoso, S.M. Development and Performance of Whey Protein Active Coatings with Origanum Virens Essential Oils in the Quality and Shelf Life Improvement of Processed Meat Products. Food Control 2017, 80, 273–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Krkić, N.; Šojić, B.; Lazić, V.; Petrović, L.; Mandić, A.; Sedej, I.; Tomović, V. Lipid Oxidative Changes in Chitosan-Oregano Coated Traditional Dry Fermented Sausage Petrovská Klobása. Meat Sci. 2013, 93, 767–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Siroli, L.; Baldi, G.; Soglia, F.; Bukvicki, D.; Patrignani, F.; Petracci, M.; Lanciotti, R. Use of Essential Oils to Increase the Safety and the Quality of Marinated Pork Loin. Foods 2020, 9, 987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Van Haute, S.; Raes, K.; Van der Meeren, P.; Sampers, I. The Effect of Cinnamon, Oregano and Thyme Essential Oils in Marinade on the Microbial Shelf Life of Fish and Meat Products. Food Control 2016, 68, 30–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Oliveira, M.; Ferreira, V.; Magalhães, R.; Teixeira, P. Biocontrol Strategies for Mediterranean-Style Fermented Sausages. Food Res. Int. 2018, 103, 438–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Ben Said, L.; Gaudreau, H.; Dallaire, L.; Tessier, M.; Fliss, I. Bioprotective Culture: A New Generation of Food Additives for the Preservation of Food Quality and Safety. Ind. Biotechnol. 2019, 15, 138–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Favaro, L.; Todorov, S.D. Bacteriocinogenic LAB Strains for Fermented Meat Preservation: Perspectives, Challenges, and Limitations. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 2017, 9, 444–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Quintavalla, S.; Vicini, L. Antimicrobial Food Packaging in Meat Industry. Meat Sci. 2002, 62, 373–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Rose, N.L.; Sporns, P.; Stiles, M.E.; McMullen, L.M. Inactivation of Nisin by Glutathione in Fresh Meat. J. Food Sci. 1999, 64, 759–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Pattanayaiying, R.; H-Kittikun, A.; Cutter, C.N. Incorporation of Nisin Z and Lauric Arginate into Pullulan Films to Inhibit Foodborne Pathogens Associated with Fresh and Ready-to-Eat Muscle Foods. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2015, 207, 77–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Millette, M.; Le Tien, C.; Smoragiewicz, W.; Lacroix, M. Inhibition of Staphylococcus Aureus on Beef by Nisin-Containing Modified Alginate Films and Beads. Food Control 2007, 18, 878–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Luchansky, J.B.; Call, J.E. Evaluation of Nisin-Coated Cellulose Casings for the Control of Listeria monocytogenes Inoculated onto the Surface of Commercially Prepared Frankfurters. J. Food Prot. 2004, 67, 1017–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Franklin, N.B.; Cooksey, K.D.; Getty, K.J.K. Inhibition of Listeria monocytogenes on the Surface of Individually Packaged Hot Dogs with a Packaging Film Coating Containing Nisin. J. Food Prot. 2004, 67, 480–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  171. Scannell, A.G.M.; Hill, C.; Ross, R.P.; Marx, S.; Hartmeier, W.; Arendt, E.K. Development of Bioactive Food Packaging Materials Using Immobilised Bacteriocins Lacticin 3147 and Nisaplin. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2000, 60, 241–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Ghalfi, H.; Benkerroum, N.; Doguiet, D.D.K.; Bensaid, M.; Thonart, P. Effectiveness of Cell-Adsorbed Bacteriocin Produced by Lactobacillus Curvatus CWBI-B28 and Selected Essential Oils to Control Listeria monocytogenes in Pork Meat during Cold Storage. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2007, 44, 268–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Abdollahzadeh, E.; Rezaei, M.; Hosseini, H. Antibacterial Activity of Plant Essential Oils and Extracts: The Role of Thyme Essential Oil, Nisin, and Their Combination to Control Listeria monocytogenes Inoculated in Minced Fish Meat. Food Control 2014, 35, 177–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Iseppi, R.; Camellini, S.; Zurlini, C.; Cigognini, I.M.; Cannavacciuolo, M.; Messi, P. Essential Oils and Bacteriocin-Based Active Edible Coating: An Innovative, Natural and Sustainable Approach for the Control of Listeria monocytogenes in Seafoods. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 2562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Bukvicki, D.; Stojkovic, D.; Sokovic, M.; Nikolic, M.; Vannini, L.; Montanari, C.; Marin, P.D. Potential Application of Micromeria Dalmatica Essential Oil as a Protective Agent in a Food System. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 63, 262–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Karam, L.; Chehab, R.; Osaili, T.M.; Savvaidis, I.N. Antimicrobial Effect of Thymol and Carvacrol Added to a Vinegar-Based Marinade for Controlling Spoilage of Marinated Beef (Shawarma) Stored in Air or Vacuum Packaging. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2020, 332, 108769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Moon, H.; Kim, N.H.; Kim, S.H.; Kim, Y.; Ryu, J.H.; Rhee, M.S. Teriyaki Sauce with Carvacrol or Thymol Effectively Controls Escherichia coli O157:H7, Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella Typhimurium, and Indigenous Flora in Marinated Beef and Marinade. Meat Sci. 2017, 129, 147–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Thanissery, R.; Smith, D.P. Marinade with Thyme and Orange Oils Reduces Salmonella Enteritidis and Campylobacter Coli on Inoculated Broiler Breast Fillets and Whole Wings. Poult. Sci. 2014, 93, 1258–1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  179. Ritota, M.; Manzi, P. Natural Preservatives from Plant in Cheese Making. Animals 2020, 10, 749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Gad, A.S.; Sayd, A.F.; Gad, A.S.; Sayd, A.F. Antioxidant Properties of Rosemary and Its Potential Uses as Natural Antioxidant in Dairy Products—A Review. Food Nutr. Sci. 2015, 6, 179–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Mishra, A.P.; Devkota, H.P.; Nigam, M.; Adetunji, C.O.; Srivastava, N.; Saklani, S.; Shukla, I.; Azmi, L.; Shariati, M.A.; Melo Coutinho, H.D.; et al. Combination of Essential Oils in Dairy Products: A Review of Their Functions and Potential Benefits. LWT 2020, 133, 110116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Hassanien, M.F.R.; Mahgoub, S.A.; El-Zahar, K.M. Soft Cheese Supplemented with Black Cumin Oil: Impact on Food Borne Pathogens and Quality during Storage. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2014, 21, 280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  183. Wahba, N.M.; Ahmed, A.S.; Ebraheim, Z.Z. Antimicrobial Effects of Pepper, Parsley, and Dill and Their Roles in the Microbiological Quality Enhancement of Traditional Egyptian Kareish Cheese. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2010, 7, 411–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Tayel, A.A.; Hussein, H.; Sorour, N.M.; El-Tras, W.F. Foodborne Pathogens Prevention and Sensory Attributes Enhancement in Processed Cheese via Flavoring with Plant Extracts. J. Food Sci. 2015, 80, M2886–M2891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Kholy, W.E.; Aamer, R.A.; Mailam, M.A. Effect of Some Essential Oils on the Quality of UF-Soft Cheese During Storage. Alex. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 14, 13–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Smith-Palmer, A.; Stewart, J.; Fyfe, L. The Potential Application of Plant Essential Oils as Natural Food Preservatives in Soft Cheese. Food Microbiol. 2001, 18, 463–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Caleja, C.; Barros, L.; Antonio, A.L.; Ciric, A.; Soković, M.; Oliveira, M.B.P.P.; Santos-Buelga, C.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Foeniculum vulgare Mill. as Natural Conservation Enhancer and Health Promoter by Incorporation in Cottage Cheese. J. Funct. Foods 2015, 12, 428–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Solhi, P.; Azadmard-Damirchi, S.; Hesari, J.; Hamishehkar, H. Production of the Processed Cheese Containing Tomato Powder and Evaluation of Its Rheological, Chemical and Sensory Characteristics. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 57, 2198–2205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Alexa, E.; Danciu, C.; Cocan, I.; Negrea, M.; Morar, A.; Obistioiu, D.; Dogaru, D.; Berbecea, A.; Radulov, I. Chemical Composition and Antimicrobial Potential of Satureja hortensis L. in Fresh Cow Cheese. J. Food Qual. 2018, 2018, 8424035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Ben Jemaa, M.; Falleh, H.; Saada, M.; Oueslati, M.; Snoussi, M.; Ksouri, R. Thymus Capitatus Essential Oil Ameliorates Pasteurization Efficiency. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 55, 3446–3452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Azizkhani, M.; Tooryan, F. Antimicrobial Activities of Probiotic Yogurts Flavored with Peppermint, Basil, and Zataria against Escherichia coli and Listeria monocytogenes. J. Food Qual. Hazards Control 2016, 3, 79–86. [Google Scholar]
  192. Ehsani, A.; Hashemi, M.; Jazani, N.H.; Aliakbarlu, J.; Shokri, S.; Naghibi, S.S.; Dvm, M.H. Effect of Echinophora Platyloba DC. Essential Oil and Lycopene on the Stability of Pasteurized Cream Obtained from Cow Milk. Vet. Res. Forum 2016, 7, 139. [Google Scholar]
  193. Farag, R.S.; Ali, M.N.; Taha, S.H. Use of Some Essential Oils as Natural Preservatives for Butter. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 1990, 67, 188–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Ozkan, G.; Simsek, B.; Kuleasan, H. Antioxidant Activities of Satureja Cilicica Essential Oil in Butter and in Vitro. J. Food Eng. 2007, 79, 1391–1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Yilmaztekin, M.; Lević, S.; Kalušević, A.; Cam, M.; Bugarski, B.; Rakić, V.; Pavlović, V.; Nedović, V. Characterisation of Peppermint (Mentha piperita L.) Essential Oil Encapsulates. J. Microencapsul. 2019, 36, 109–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Tomar, O.; Akarca, G. Effects of Ice Cream Produced with Lemon, Mandarin, and Orange Peel Essential Oils on Some Physicochemical, Microbiological and Sensorial Properties. Kocatepe Vet. J. 2019, 12, 62–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Bajpai, V.K.; Yoon, J.I.; Bhardwaj, M.; Kang, S.C. Anti-Listerial Synergism of Leaf Essential Oil of Metasequoia glyptostroboides with Nisin in Whole, Low and Skim Milks. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Med. 2014, 7, 602–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Babashahi, M.; Mirlohi, M.; Torki-Baghbadorani, S.; Ghiasvand, R.; Azadbakht, L.; Mosharaf, L. Effects of Probiotic Soy Milk Fermented by Lactobacillus Plantarum A7 (KC 355240) Added with Cuminum Cyminum Essential Oil on Fasting Blood Glucose Levels, Serum Lipid Profile and Body Weight in Diabetic Wistar Rats. Int. J. Prev. Med. 2020, 11, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Tornambé, G.; Cornu, A.; Verdier-Metz, I.; Pradel, P.; Kondjoyan, N.; Figueredo, G.; Hulin, S.; Martin, B. Addition of Pasture Plant Essential Oil in Milk: Influence on Chemical and Sensory Properties of Milk and Cheese. J. Dairy Sci. 2008, 91, 58–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  200. Xue, J.; Davidson, P.M.; Zhong, Q. Inhibition of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Listeria Monocytognes Growth in Milk and Cantaloupe Juice by Thymol Nanoemulsions Prepared with Gelatin and Lecithin. Food Control 2017, 73, 1499–1506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Singh, G.; Kapoor, I.P.S.; Singh, P. Effect of volatile oil and oleoresin of anise on the shelf life of yogurt. J. Food Process Preserv. 2011, 35, 778–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Azizkhani, M.; Parsaeimehr, M. Probiotics Survival, Antioxidant Activity and Sensory Properties of Yogurt Flavored with Herbal Essential Oils. Int. Food Res. J. 2018, 25, 921–927. [Google Scholar]
  203. Sobrino-López, A.; Martín-Belloso, O. Use of Nisin and Other Bacteriocins for Preservation of Dairy Products. Int. Dairy J. 2008, 18, 329–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Gharsallaoui, A.; Oulahal, N.; Joly, C.; Degraeve, P. Nisin as a Food Preservative: Part 1: Physicochemical Properties, Antimicrobial Activity, and Main Uses. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2015, 56, 1262–1274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Arqués, J.L.; Rodríguez, E.; Nuñez, M.; Medina, M. Combined Effect of Reuterin and Lactic Acid Bacteria Bacteriocins on the Inactivation of Food-Borne Pathogens in Milk. Food Control 2011, 22, 457–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Chen, H.; Hoover, D.G. Bacteriocins and Their Food Applications. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2003, 2, 82–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Chen, H.; Zhong, Q. Lactobionic Acid Enhances the Synergistic Effect of Nisin and Thymol against Listeria monocytogenes Scott A in Tryptic Soy Broth and Milk. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2017, 260, 36–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Cao-Hoang, L.; Grégoire, L.; Chaine, A.; Waché, Y. Importance and Efficiency of In-Depth Antimicrobial Activity for the Control of Listeria Development with Nisin-Incorporated Sodium Caseinate Films. Food Control 2010, 21, 1227–1233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Malheiros, P.d.S.; Sant’Anna, V.; Barbosa, M.d.S.; Brandelli, A.; Franco, B.D.G.d.M. Effect of Liposome-Encapsulated Nisin and Bacteriocin-like Substance P34 on Listeria monocytogenes Growth in Minas Frescal Cheese. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2012, 156, 272–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Ercolini, D.; Ferrocino, I.; La Storia, A.; Mauriello, G.; Gigli, S.; Masi, P.; Villani, F. Development of Spoilage Microbiota in Beef Stored in Nisin Activated Packaging. Food Microbiol. 2010, 27, 137–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  211. López Aguayo, M.d.C.; Grande Burgos, M.J.; Pérez Pulido, R.; Gálvez, A.; López, R.L. Effect of Different Activated Coatings Containing Enterocin AS-48 against Listeria monocytogenes on Apple Cubes. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2016, 35, 177–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Malheiros, P.S.; Cuccovia, I.M.; Franco, B.D.G.M. Inhibition of Listeria monocytogenes in Vitro and in Goat Milk by Liposomal Nanovesicles Containing Bacteriocins Produced by Lactobacillus Sakei Subsp. Sakei 2a. Food Control 2016, 63, 158–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Concha-Meyer, A.; Schöbitz, R.; Brito, C.; Fuentes, R. Lactic Acid Bacteria in an Alginate Film Inhibit Listeria monocytogenes Growth on Smoked Salmon. Food Control 2011, 22, 485–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Barbosa, M.S.; Todorov, S.D.; Jurkiewicz, C.H.; Franco, B.D.G.M. Bacteriocin Production by Lactobacillus Curvatus MBSa2 Entrapped in Calcium Alginate during Ripening of Salami for Control of Listeria monocytogenes. Food Control 2015, 47, 147–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Mirhosseini, M.; Afzali, M. Investigation into the Antibacterial Behavior of Suspensions of Magnesium Oxide Nanoparticles in Combination with Nisin and Heat against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus Aureus in Milk. Food Control 2016, 68, 208–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Zhao, X.; Shi, C.; Meng, R.; Liu, Z.; Huang, Y.; Zhao, Z.; Guo, N. Effect of Nisin and Perilla Oil Combination against Listeria monocytogenes and Staphylococcus Aureus in Milk. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 53, 2644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  217. Shi, C.; Zhang, X.; Zhao, X.; Meng, R.; Liu, Z.; Chen, X.; Guo, N. Synergistic Interactions of Nisin in Combination with Cinnamaldehyde against Staphylococcus Aureus in Pasteurized Milk. Food Control 2017, 71, 10–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. García, P.; Martínez, B.; Rodríguez, L.; Rodríguez, A. Synergy between the Phage Endolysin LysH5 and Nisin to Kill Staphylococcus Aureus in Pasteurized Milk. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2010, 141, 151–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Shi, C.; Zhao, X.; Meng, R.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, G.; Guo, N. Synergistic Antimicrobial Effects of Nisin and P-Anisaldehyde on Staphylococcus aureus in Pasteurized Milk. LWT 2017, 84, 222–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Martínez, B.; Obeso, J.M.; Rodríguez, A.; García, P. Nisin-Bacteriophage Crossresistance in Staphylococcus Aureus. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2008, 122, 253–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  221. De, N.; Pimentel-Filho, J.; Mantovani, H.C.; Diez-Gonzalez, F.; Dantas Vanetti, M.C.; Cristina, M.; Vanetti, D. Inhibition of Listeria and Staphylococcus aureus by Bovicin HC5 and Nisin Combination in Milk. J. Agric. Sci. 2013, 5, p188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Alves, F.C.B.; Barbosa, L.N.; Andrade, B.F.M.T.; Albano, M.; Furtado, F.B.; Marques Pereira, A.F.; Rall, V.L.M.; Júnior, A.F. Short Communication: Inhibitory Activities of the Lantibiotic Nisin Combined with Phenolic Compounds against Staphylococcus aureus and Listeria monocytogenes in Cow Milk. J. Dairy Sci. 2016, 99, 1831–1836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Yoon, J.I.; Bajpai, V.K.; Kang, S.C. Synergistic Effect of Nisin and Cone Essential Oil of Metasequoia glyptostroboides Miki Ex Hu against Listeria monocytogenes in Milk Samples. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2011, 49, 109–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  224. Kim, E.L.; Choi, N.H.; Bajpai, V.K.; Kang, S.C. Synergistic Effect of Nisin and Garlic Shoot Juice against Listeria monocytogenes in Milk. Food Chem. 2008, 110, 375–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  225. Field, D.; Daly, K.; O’Connor, P.M.; Cotter, P.D.; Hill, C.; Paul Ross, R. Efficacies of Nisin a and Nisin V Semipurified Preparations Alone and in Combination with Plant Essential Oils for Controlling Listeria monocytogenes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2015, 81, 2762–2769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  226. Campion, A.; Morrissey, R.; Field, D.; Cotter, P.D.; Hill, C.; Ross, R.P. Use of Enhanced Nisin Derivatives in Combination with Food-Grade Oils or Citric Acid to Control Cronobacter Sakazakii and Escherichia coli O157:H7. Food Microbiol. 2017, 65, 254–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  227. Sobrino-Lopez, A.; Viedma-Martínez, P.; Abriouel, H.; Valdivia, E.; Gálvez, A.; Martin-Belloso, O. The Effect of Adding Antimicrobial Peptides to Milk Inoculated with Staphylococcus aureus and Processed by High-Intensity Pulsed-Electric Field. J. Dairy Sci. 2009, 92, 2514–2523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  228. Shahbazi, Y. Ziziphora clinopodioides Essential Oil and Nisin as Potential Antimicrobial Agents against Escherichia coli O157:H7 in Doogh (Iranian Yoghurt Drink). J. Pathog. 2015, 2015, 176024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Chemical structures of the most applicable EO components in foods.
Figure 1. Chemical structures of the most applicable EO components in foods.
Foods 12 03288 g001
Figure 2. The antimicrobial mechanisms of action of essential oils.
Figure 2. The antimicrobial mechanisms of action of essential oils.
Foods 12 03288 g002
Table 2. An overview of applications of essential oils (EO) or their components in minimally processed fruits and vegetables.
Table 2. An overview of applications of essential oils (EO) or their components in minimally processed fruits and vegetables.
Microbial TargetFood and BeveragesEO or ComponentConcentration UsedReference(s)
Total aerobic bacteriaLettuce and carrots
Four season salad
Table grape
Avocado
Sweet cherries
Kiwifruit and melon
Honeydew melon
Oregano and thyme EOs
Oregano EO and citral in packaging
Eugenol thymol
Thyme EO in MAP
Eugenol, thymol, and menthol Eucalyptol
Carvacrol and cinnamic acid
Carvacrol and cinnamic acid
Alone 250 mg/L; combination 125 mg/L
7.5% w/w
75–150 mL in the gas used for MAP
75 mL in the filter
1000 mL in the gas used for MAP
5–15 mM in the dipping solution
1 mM in the dipping solution
[2,108,113,114,115,116,117]
Total aerobic bacteria and inoculated L. innocuaFresh sliced applesOregano, lemongrass, and vanillin used encapsulated0.5–2.0% (w/w)[105]
Total aerobic bacteria, Escherichia coli, Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella enteritidisLamb’s lettuce
Fresh cut apples in MAP
oregano and thyme EOs
Citron EO, hexanal, E(2)hexenal, citral, and carvacrol
250 mg/L
Alone 250 mg/L; combination 125 mg/L
[102,118,119,120]
Salmonella enteritidis, Escherichia coli, Listeria monocytogenesFruit salads
Fresh sliced apples
citral
Citron EO
Hexanal, hexyl acetate, E(2)hexenal
25–125 ppm
300–600 ppm
50–250 ppm
[111,117]
Listeria monocytogenes, Yersinia enterocolitica and Aeromonas hydrophillaIceberg lettuceOregano and rosemary0.003–80 mL/m[103]
Listeria spp., E. coli O157:H7Fresh cut applesVanillin
Oregano EO
12 g/L
0.7–2.1% v/w
[104,121]
E. coli O157:H7Eggplant salad
Carrots
Oregano EO
Thyme EO
0.7–2.1% v/w
0.1–10 mL/L
[106,121]
Salmonella tiphymuriumLettuceOregano EO25–75 mg/L[122]
Streptococcus thermophilus,Pomegranate juiceThymbra capitata EO0.06 and 0.125% v/v[123]
aerobic mesophilic bacteria
Escherichia coli O157:H7Apple JuiceMelissa oil, carvacrol, and oregano oil,0.067 and 0.67% v/w[124]
Salmonella enterica Terpeineol, geraniol, lemon oil, and citral
S. enteritidis, E. coli, L. innocuaApple, pear, and melon juicePalmarosa, clove, and lemongrass5–10 μL/mL[105]
Saccharomyces cerevisiaeOrange and pomegranate juices Cinnamon leaf EO0.02–0.65 mg/mL[125]
S. cerevisiae, S. pombe, Pichia anomalaApple juiceLemon EO0.25 μL/mL[126]
Table 4. Use of essential oil/components in dairy products with their sources and reported properties.
Table 4. Use of essential oil/components in dairy products with their sources and reported properties.
Plant NameEssential Oils/Activity ReportedDairy ProductReferences
Components Used
Mentha piperitaPeppermint oilAdded functional properties without negative effects on rheological and sensorial propertiesIce-cream[195]
Citrus limon, Citrus reticulata, Citrus aurantiumα- and β-Pinene, Limonene, trans- β-Ocimene, Linalool, α-TerpineolIncreased physiochemical, sensorial, and antimicrobial properties[196]
Echinophora platylobaTrans-b-ocimene, 2-Furanone, Myrcene, Linalool, Cis-b-ocimeneIncrease antimicrobial properties and stabilityCream[192]
Metasequoia glyptostroboidesα-Pinene, Totarol, α-Thujene, Bornylene, β-Caryophyllene, δ-3-Carene, and 2-β-PineneAntibacterial and anti-listerial effectMilk/milk samples[197]
Cuminum cyminumCumin oilReduce cholesterol, LDL, and increases HDL[198]
Thymus capitatusThyme oil Enhancement of oxidative and fermentative activity, increases physico-chemical, microbiological, and sensory properties[190,199]
Thymus vulgarisThymolAntimicrobial properties[200]
Pimpinella anisumAnise oilIncreased antimicrobial propertiesYogurt[201]
Syzygium aromaticum, Salvia rosmarinus, Cinnamomum verumEugenol, Acetyl-eugenol, Linalool, β-Caryophyllene, Cineole, Camphor, Camphene, Limonene, α-Pinene, β-Pinene, α-Terpineol, Borneol, and CinnamaldehydeIncreases shelf life and antioxidant properties[202]
Zataria multiflora, Ocimum basilicum, Mentha piperitaZataria, Basil, and Peppermint oilAntimicrobial and antioxidant properties
Satureja cilicicaThymol, Carvacrol, p-Cymene, and c-TerpineneIncreases antioxidant properties and aromaButter[194]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bukvicki, D.; D’Alessandro, M.; Rossi, S.; Siroli, L.; Gottardi, D.; Braschi, G.; Patrignani, F.; Lanciotti, R. Essential Oils and Their Combination with Lactic Acid Bacteria and Bacteriocins to Improve the Safety and Shelf Life of Foods: A Review. Foods 2023, 12, 3288. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12173288

AMA Style

Bukvicki D, D’Alessandro M, Rossi S, Siroli L, Gottardi D, Braschi G, Patrignani F, Lanciotti R. Essential Oils and Their Combination with Lactic Acid Bacteria and Bacteriocins to Improve the Safety and Shelf Life of Foods: A Review. Foods. 2023; 12(17):3288. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12173288

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bukvicki, Danka, Margherita D’Alessandro, Samantha Rossi, Lorenzo Siroli, Davide Gottardi, Giacomo Braschi, Francesca Patrignani, and Rosalba Lanciotti. 2023. "Essential Oils and Their Combination with Lactic Acid Bacteria and Bacteriocins to Improve the Safety and Shelf Life of Foods: A Review" Foods 12, no. 17: 3288. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12173288

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop