Next Article in Journal
Enrichment of Wheat Bread with Platycodon grandiflorus Root (PGR) Flour: Rheological Properties and Microstructure of Dough and Physicochemical Characterization of Bread
Next Article in Special Issue
Antialcohol and Hepatoprotective Effects of Tamarind Shell Extract on Ethanol-Induced Damage to HepG2 Cells and Animal Models
Previous Article in Journal
Lotus Root Polysaccharide-Phenol Complexes: Interaction, Structure, Antioxidant, and Anti-Inflammatory Activities
Previous Article in Special Issue
Revalorization of Melon By-Product to Obtain a Novel Sparkling Fruity-Based Wine
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Foods
Volume 12
Issue 3
10.3390/foods12030579
foods-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comparative Untargeted Metabolic Profiling of Different Parts of Citrus sinensis Fruits via Liquid Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry Coupled with Multivariate Data Analyses to Unravel Authenticity

by
Sherif M. Afifi
1,2,*,
Eman M. Kabbash
3,
Ralf G. Berger
4,
Ulrich Krings
4 and
Tuba Esatbeyoglu
2,*
1
Pharmacognosy Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Sadat City, Sadat City 32897, Egypt
2
Department of Food Development and Food Quality, Institute of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz University Hannover, Am Kleinen Felde 30, 30167 Hannover, Germany
3
Phytochemistry Department, National Organization for Drug Control and Research, Giza 12622, Egypt
4
Institute of Food Chemistry, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz University Hannover, Callinstraße 5, 30167 Hannover, Germany
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2023, 12(3), 579; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12030579
Submission received: 22 December 2022 / Revised: 18 January 2023 / Accepted: 18 January 2023 / Published: 29 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bioactive Compounds from Fruit and Vegetable Waste: Extraction and Possible Utilization)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Differences between seven authentic samples of Citrus sinensis var. Valencia peel (albedo and flavedo) and juices from Spain and Uruguay, in addition to a concentrate obtained from Brazil, were investigated by untargeted metabolic profiling. Sixty-six metabolites were detected by nano-liquid chromatography coupled to a high-resolution electrospray-ionization quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometer (nLC-ESI-qTOF-MS) belonging to phenolic acids, coumarins, flavonoid glycosides, limonoids, terpenes, and fatty acids. Eleven metabolites were detected for the first time in Citrus sinensis and identified as citroside A, sinapic acid pentoside, apigenin-C-hexosyl-O-pentoside, chrysoeriol-C-hexoside, di-hexosyl-diosmetin, perilloside A, gingerol, ionone epoxide hydroxy-sphingenine, xanthomicrol, and coumaryl alcohol-O-hexoside. Some flavonoids were completely absent from the juice, while present most prominently in the Citrus peel, conveying more industrial and economic prospects to the latter. Multivariate data analyses clarified that the differences among orange parts overweighed the geographical source. PCA analysis of ESI-(−)-mode data revealed for hydroxylinoleic acid abundance in flavedo peel from Uruguay the most distant cluster from all others. The PCA analysis of ESI-(+)-mode data provided a clear segregation of the different Citrus sinensis parts primarily due to the large diversity of flavonoids and coumarins among the studied samples.

1. Introduction

Citrus trees bear some of the most popular fruits and are grown globally for food, medicinal and other industrial applications, with a total annual production of nearly 85 million tons [1]. Various species of Citrus genus are valuable, such as C. medica (citron), C. limon (lemon), C. aurantium (sour orange), C. reticulata (mandarin, tangerine), C. paradisi (grapefruit), C. clementina (clementine) and C. sinensis (sweet orange) [2]. They are either consumed as fresh fruits or after processing to juices, beverage products, and jams, with the peel being the main by-product of processing. Anatomically, the fruit consists of two parts—the outer peel and the pulp with juice sac glands [2]. The peel main parts include the outer pigmented flavedo with parenchymatous cells and cuticle, and the white albedo part lying beneath the flavedo [3]. Different plant parts find wide application in many countries in recipes to treat stomach disorders, skin inflammation, cough, muscular pain, and nausea, as well as being used as a slimming agent [4].
Phytochemical investigations have revealed the presence of bioactive coumarins (i.e., bergamottin, scopoletin, and umbelliferone), flavonoids (i.e., rutin, quercetin, and kaempferol), limonoids (i.e., limonin and nomilin), and acridone alkaloids (i.e., citruscridone and citrusinine-I) in Citrus plants [5]. Dietary fiber, minerals, carotenoids, and phenolic phytoconstituents, i.e., phenolic acids, flavanones, and polymethoxylated flavones, were all detected in orange peel [6]. Citrus sinensis var. Valencia fruits revealed superiority as an excellent source of phenolics, flavonoids and ascorbic acid compared to var. Mandora and some grapefruits grown in Cyprus [7]. Another study on var. Valencia pointed out that the flavedo part had highest vitamin C, flavones and carotenoid content, while the albedo part was the main source of flavanones and phenolics [8].
Moreover, previous clinical and animal studies have demonstrated that certain Citrus metabolites have antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, cytotoxic, antimicrobial, antiallergic and antiplatelet aggregation activities [9]. The metabolites in Citrus varieties influence their unique qualities, such as taste, appearance, and the supposed health benefits. Quantitative and qualitative differences in these metabolites are commonly affected by the cultivation environment and Citrus variety [10] and also vary significantly from one part to another within the Citrus fruit.
Although there is a wide variety of Citrus fruits that were intensely investigated for their metabolic composition [11], comparative studies of metabolite profiles within different fruit parts are limited. Because metabolite variability and modification are affected by the plant’s adaptation to physiological, pathological, and diverse chemical stimuli, metabolomics enables quantitative investigation of these dynamic changes [12]. In-depth food analyses help to uncover discriminatory biomarkers, identify various pathways, find therapeutic targets, and discover new potential drug leads by evaluating and verifying the major variations in metabolite profiling [13].
Metabolite profiling by mass spectrometry is regarded as the most powerful analytical tool. Among the most recent detection techniques are: high-performance liquid chromatography–diode array detection (HPLC-DAD), ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to triple quadrupole mass spectrometry (UHPLC-QqQ-MS/MS), and ultra-performance liquid chromatography/quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (UPLC-QTOF-MS/MS) [14]. The analysis of the orange peel matrix has also been performed via HPLC-UV-ESI-MS/MS (high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with ultraviolet and electrospray ionization mass spectrometry) [6]. The current technique involves the use of nano-high-performance liquid chromatography (n-LC) coupled to high-resolution MS to provide fast metabolite analysis of orange peel, to the best of our knowledge, for the first time on a high sensitivity level. Previous studies have been performed via state-of-the-art nano-liquid chromatography–ESI–MS/MS technology to only separate chiral naringenin in Citrus pulp and peel [15].
By adding multivariate data analysis (MVA) techniques, a large-scale metabolomics dataset is presented in this study to provide a detailed insight into C. sinensis secondary metabolites. The use of MVA enables accurate specimen to specimen comparison and highlights distinctive traits [16].
The aim of this work was to investigate the differences in secondary metabolite composition in different parts of C. sinensis presenting the first comparative insights into metabolite profiles derived from various parts of Valencia orange fruits collected from different countries. A detailed identification of metabolites in different C. sinensis parts was considered together with an untargeted metabolic profile for the edible part and the peel as the main by-product during fruit processing.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Orange Samples and Chemicals

Valencia oranges (C. sinensis) from Spain and Uruguay, provided by Symrise (Holzminden, Germany) as depicted in Table 1, were cleaned and squeezed to obtain the juice, then flavedo and albedo were manually stripped by a fruit peeler. After that, all orange samples, including a Brazilian orange concentrate acquired from Symrise, were lyophilized and separately ground to fine powder by a mill rotor cyclone (Tecnal, Piracicaba, Brazil, TE-651/2). Comminuted orange samples were stored at −80 °C until subsequent analysis. All chemicals and solvents were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (Steinheim, Germany).

2.2. Metabolite Mass Fingerprinting

Orange specimens (2 mg), extracted by 1 mL methanol, were spiked with 4 μg mL −1 hesperidin followed by sonication for 30 min, then centrifugation for 20 min at 15,000× g to eliminate any leftover debris. Solid-phase extraction was applied to each extract using a C18 cartridge (JT Baker, Phillipsburg, NJ, USA) as previously reported [17]. The resulting extracts were injected into a nano-LC system EASY-nLC II (Bruker, Bremen, Germany) equipped with a reversed phase column (150 × 0.1 mm, particle size 3 μm; Michrom Bioresources, Auburn, CA, USA) coupled to maXis impact quadrupole-time of-flight (qTOF) MS (Bruker, Bremen, Germany). A captive nano-spray ionization was operated in the negative and positive ion modes under conditions as previously reported [18]. Identification of metabolite mass fingerprints was carried out using exact parent ion masses as well as retention data, reference literature, fragmentation patterns, and the Phytochemical Dictionary of Natural Products Database (https://dnp.chemnetbase.com/ accessed on (16 March 2022)). Semi-quantification was based on the integrated peak areas of each compound after normalization to internal standard. Aiming at comparing the relative abundance of a given compound in the seven different samples, the determination of absolute concentrations by an external calibration of every compound was not required. Three independent replicates of each orange specimen were analyzed in parallel to evaluate the biological variance.

2.3. Multivariate Data Analyses (MVA)

Modeling viz. principal component analysis (PCA) and orthogonal projection to latent structures-discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) was applied to a metabolite dataset of MS abundances produced by nLC-MS either in the negative or positive ion mode via the SIMCA-P+ 13.0 software package (Umetrics, Umeå, Sweden) to pinpoint various markers characterizing each group declared with correlation (pcor) and covariance (p). The iterative permutation testing and diagnostic indices, viz. R2 and Q2 values, were used to assess the validity of models, while all variables were mean centered and Pareto scaled.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Metabolite Identification via nLC–ESI-MS/MS Analysis

nLC-ESI-MS/MS analyses (Figure 1) of Citrus samples resulted in the identification of 66 metabolites, categorized into seven classes: phenolic acids, terpenes, limonoids, coumarins, flavonoids, fatty acids and nitrogenous compounds. The elution order of metabolites followed a sequence of decreasing polarity, whereby phenolic acids eluted first, followed by coumarins, flavonoid glycosides, limonoids, free aglyca and fatty acids. Samples were analyzed in both the negative and positive ionization modes to provide a greater coverage of the metabolome. Fatty acids and flavonoids were preferentially ionized under negative ionization conditions, while coumarins, limonoids and nitrogenous compounds showed better ionization in the positive mode. The list of identified compounds along with their retention time, characteristic molecular and fragment ions and occurrence is presented in Table 2.

3.1.1. Identification of Organic Acids and Phenolics

A number of organic acids were eluted in the first part of the nLC-ESI-MS/MS-chromatogram, as revealed from their MS spectral data. In the analyzed Citrus samples, the most representative phenolic and organic acids were citric, ferulic, sinapic acids and their glycosides. Peak 1—for peak numbers refer to Table 2—[(M−H)− m/z 191.0189 (C6H7O7)−] was identified as citric acid previously reported in Citrus limon ethanolic extract [19]. Peaks 6 and 8 (Suppl. Figure S1), [(M−H)− m/z 355.103 (C16H19O9)−] were annotated as ferulic acid hexoside and sinapic acid pentoside, respectively. Having the same molecular formula; peak 6 yielded a main fragment ion at m/z 193 [M−H−162 (hexose)]−relative to ferulic acid, while peak 8 showed a fragment ion at m/z 223 [M−H−132 (pentose)]− relative to sinapic acid. Sinapic acid pentoside was detected for the first time in all of the examined Citrus samples except Citrus sinensis juice obtained from Uruguay (JU). In addition, citric acid was absent in the albedo of both suppliers (AS: albedo from Spain, and AU: albedo from Uruguay), while sinapoyl hexoside was absent in the juice (JS: juice from Spain, and JU: juice from Uruguay). Peak 17 [(M−H)− m/z 311.1139 (C15H19O7)−] with product ion at m/z 161 corresponding to negatively ionized hexose, was annotated as coumaryl alcohol-O-hexoside, first time to be reported in all Citrus samples. Peak 55 [(M−H)− m/z 293.1763 (C17H25O4)−] was a major constituent detected in all analyzed samples and identified as gingerol, a pungent principle previously detected in the peel of Citrus reticulata [20], but detected for the first time in Citrus sinensis and most prominent in albedo from Uruguay and juice from Spain (AU and JS). Ferulic and p-coumaric acid were major hydroxycinnamic acids detected in both free and bound form in the methanolic extracts of bitter orange (Citrus microcarpa) peel [6].

3.1.2. Identification of Coumarins

Peak 11 [(M−H)− m/z 205.0504 (C11H9O4)−] yielded fragment ions at m/z 175 [M−H−30 (C2H6)]− and m/z 101 corresponding to the loss of CO2 from the pyrone ring, and was identified as citropten, the most abundant coumarin in Citrus (Suppl. Figure S2) [19]. Peak 9 [(M−H)− m/z 175.0392 (C10H7O3)−] was identified as methoxycoumarin and detected in all Citrus samples. Peak 26 [(M−H)− m/z 367.0668 (C16H15O10)− showed a characteristic fragment ion at m/z 191 [M−H−176 (glucuronyl)]− was identified as scopoletin-O-glucuronide. The flavedo part from Uruguay showed the highest level of the identified coumarins. This finding was in accordance with results previously reported by Liu et al. (2017) showing that the highest coumarin content was found in the flavedo part among different studied Citrus cultivars [21], conveying a particular interest regarding the presumed anticancer and antidiabetic effects of this part.
Table
Table 2. Metabolites annotated in various orange samples via nLC -ESI-MS/MS using both the positive and negative ionization modes.
Table 2. Metabolites annotated in various orange samples via nLC -ESI-MS/MS using both the positive and negative ionization modes.
No.Rt (min)Compound NameChemical Class[M−H]−/
[M + H]+		Molecular FormulaMass ErrorMS/MS frag.Ref.ASAUCBFSFUJSJU
1.5.7Citric acidOrganic acid191.0189C6H7O7−4.3111, 87[19]--++++++++
2.11.1FeruloylagmatineCinnamic acid amide307.177C15H23N4O3+1.7264, 177 ++++++-++
3.13.0Hydroxy-phenyl-valeric acid-O-sulphateSulphate ester275.0607C11H15O6S+8.4195 +-++++++
4.13.2Dihydroxymegastigmadienone -O-hexoside
(Citroside A)		Terpene385.1860C19H29O8−0.8223, 153[22]+++++++--
5.13.9Sinapoyl hexosidePhenolic acid385.1141C17H21O10−−1.8223, 190[19]+++++++--
6.13.9Ferulic acid hexosidePhenolic acid355.1030C16H19O9−0.0193, 175, 160[19]+++++++++++++
7.13.7CitroptenCoumarin205.0504C11H9O4−1.1175, 101[19]++++++++
8.13.9Sinapic acid pentosidePhenolic acid355.1037C16H19O10−−0.7223, 205[23]++++++++-
9.13.9MethoxycoumarinCoumarin175.0392C10H7O3−0.2-[24]+++++++
10.14.0Sinapic acidPhenolic acid223.0607C11H11O5−0.2-[19]+++++++++++
11.14.2Di-hexosyl-diosmetinFlavone625.1757C28H33O16+−1-[25]+++++++--
12.14.3Naringenin-O-hexosideFlavanone433.1145C21H21O10−1.2271[26]++++-+---
13.14.7Limononic acidLimonoid degradation183.1024C10H15O3−1.6- +++++++-+
14.13.2Methyl epijasmonateFatty acid degradation223.1337C13H19O3−1.3-[27]++++++++++
15.16.4Apigenin-di-C-hexosideFlavone595.1654C27H31O15+1.5385[26]+++++++++
16.16.5Apigenin-di-O-hexosideFlavone593.1502C27H29O15−8.6431, 269[26]+-++++--
17.16.6Coumaryl alcohol-O-hexosideCinnamyl alcohol glycoside311.1139C15H19O7−1.1269, 161 ++++++++
18.16.8Apigenin-C-hexosyl-O-pentosideFlavone563.1408
565.1550		C26H27O14−
C26H29O14+		0.3
0.3		311
[28]--++++++
19.17.5Naringenin-O-hexosyldeoxyhexosideFlavanone579.1720
581.1867		C27H31O14−
C27H33O14+		1.0
−0.5		271
419, 273		[29]++++++++++
20.17.6Chrysoeriol-C-hexosideFlavone463.1238C22H23O11+−0.1343[26]+++++++++
21.18.2Hesperidin (Hesperetin-O-hexosyldeoxyhexoside)Flavanone609.1833
611.1971		C28H33O15−
C28H35O15+		−2.2
0.1		301
-		[29]+++++++++++++
22.18.3Limonin-hexosideLimonoid649.2507C32H41O14−0.7-[30]+++++++
23.18.7Hesperetin-O-deoxyhexosideFlavanone449.1625C22H25O10+−0.4303[19]+++-++--
24.19.1Azelaic acidDicarboxylic acid187.0969C9H15O4−2.1169, 125 +++++++
25.19.3DeacetylnomilinLimonoid473.2167C26H33O8+−1.7455, 411, 161 ++++++++
26.19.4Scopoletin-O-glucuronideCoumarin367.0668C16H15O10−−0.1191 ++++++++
27.20.2Pyridoxamine phosphateVitamin B6 phosphate249.0614C8H14N2O5P+−8.4169, 81[31]++++++++
28.20.3UnknownAlkaloid 368.1921C15H30NO9+−13- ++-+++++-
29.20.4Decatrienoic acidFatty acid165.0913C10H13O2−−5.0- +++++++
30.21.0Sakuranetin-O-hexosyl-O-deoxyhexosideFlavanone595.2020C28H35O14+−1.2433, 287[28]++++-++--
31.20.7Hydroxyhexadecanedioic acidFatty acid303.2171C16H31O5−1.1259, 214[32]+--+++--
32.20.9Sakuranetin-O-hexosyl deoxyhexosideFlavanone593.1835
595.2018		C28H33O14−
C28H35O14+		1.7
−1.5		285
 +++++++++++
33.21.1Nomilin-hexosideLimonoid693.2723C34H45O15−5.9159[19]++++++++++
34.21.2SakuranetinFlavanone285.0770
287.1042		C16H13O5−
C16H15O5+		2.5
0.7		255
237		[29]+++++++++
35.22.5Perilloside ATerpene313.1651C16H25O6−−0.3-[33]++++++++-
36.23.0Trihydroxy-octadecadienoic acid (trihydroxy-linoleic acid)Fatty acid327.2175C18H31O5−0.9-[28]++++++++
37.23.7Hydroxy-sphingenineCeramide316.2827C18H38NO3+−6.1-[34]+++++++-
38.23.9LinoleamideFatty acid amide280.2677C18H34NO+1.4-[35]+--+-++-
39.24.1Trihydroxy-octadecenoic acidFatty acid329.2333C18H33O5−1.5- ++++++++
40.24.2DemethylnobiletinMethoxy-flavone389.1234C20H21O8+−0.8-[36]---+++--
41.24.3Methyl dihydrojasmonateOrganic acid225.1496C13H21O3−−0.4- +++++++
42.17.7NaringeninFlavanone271.0606C15H11O5−0.0-[37]+++++++++++
43.26.1NobiletinMethoxy-flavone403.1385C21H23O8+−1.2388, 373, 342[38]+++++++--
44.18.5HesperetinFlavanone301.0717C16H13O6−0.9-[29]+++++++++
45.26.5UnknownMethoxy-flavone403.1568C25H23O5+7.4373 --++++++
46.27.2TangeretinMethoxy-flavone373.1312C20H21O7+6.7343, 312[39]+++++++++
47.27.7Methyl-dodecadienoateFatty acid ester209.1548C13H21O2−2.4- ++++++++
48.27.8UnknownAlkaloid272.1862C14H26NO4+−1.8255, 237 ++++++++
49.27.9DimethylkaempferolMethoxy-flavone313.0718C17H13O6−1.9163, 117[40]-++++++--
50.28.0γ-Lactone hydroxy-dodecenedioic acid methyl esterFatty acid ester253.1443C18H15O7−0.0209 +++++++
51.28.1LimoninLimonoid469.1869
471.2018		C26H29O8−
C26H31O8+		1.5
0.2		-
453, 161		[30]++++++++
52.28.3Methyllimonexic acidLimonoid515.1925C27H31O10−1.6469, 229[41]+++-++++
53.28.4Dihydroxytrimethoxyflavone (xanthomicrol)Methoxy-flavone343.0826C18H15O7−0.2298, 270, 242 +-+++++--
54.29.0Tetramethoxyflavone (Tetra-O-methylscutellarein)Methoxy-flavone343.1201C19H19O6+7.2313, 282 +++++++--
55.29.2GingerolPhenylpropen-oid polyketide 293.1763C17H25O4−3.8193[20]+++++++++
56.29.5HeptamethoxyflavoneMethoxy-flavone455.1313
433.1511		C22H24O9Na+
C22H25O9+		−1.1
−4.1		433
403		[42]--++++++--
57.29.9Ionone epoxideTerpene207.1392C13H19O2−−3.4-[43]+++++++
58.28.7Hydroxy-tetradecatrienoyl glycerolAcylglycerol311.1857C17H27O5−−2.2- ++++++++
59.31.6Dihydroxyoctadecadienoic acidFatty acid311.2225C18H31O4−1.2211, 171, 129 +++++++++
60.32.0N-PhenylacetylglycineNitrogenous compound194.0821C10H12NO3−0.8- +++++++++
61.32.5Hydroxy-oxohexadecanoic acidFatty acid285.2069C16H29O4−0.7-[44]+++++++++
62.32.5Hydroxylinolenic acidFatty acid293.2115C18H29O3−−2.4275, 235[45]++-+++--
63.34.1Hydroxyoctadecadienoic acid (Hydroxylinoleic acid)Fatty acid295.2276C18H31O3−1.6- ++++++++
64.35.7Heptyl caffeateCinnamic acid ester301.1421
279.1600		C16H22O4Na+
C16H23O4+		1.7
−3.3		279
 ++-+++++++
65.39.1Erucamide (Docosenamide)Fatty acid amide338.3428C22H44NO+−3.1321[35]--++-++-
66.40.5Linoleic acidFatty acid279.2326C18H31O2−1.3-[45]++++++++
AS: Albedo from Spain; AU: Albedo from Uruguay; CB: concentrate from Brazil; FS: Flavedo from Spain; FU: Flavedo from Uruguay; JS: Juice from Spain; JU: Juice from Uruguay. Signs (-, +, ++ and +++) indicate relative semi-quantification of each compound based on the integrated peak areas of the total ion; - = absent, + = present, ++ = present in higher amount, and +++ = present in highest amount.

3.1.3. Identification of Flavonoids

A total of 22 flavonoid derivatives were identified with better ionization in the negative ion mode as a result of their rapid deprotonation ability. Peak 20 [(M + H)+ m/z 463.1238 (C22H23O11)+], with a fragment ion at m/z 343 [M + H−120]+ was identified as chrysoeriol-C-hexoside. Peak 15 [(M + H)+ m/z 595.1654 (C27H31O5)+] showed a fragment ion at m/z 385 [M + H−120−90]+, indicating di-C-hexoside, and was identified as apigenin-di-C-hexoside (vicenin-2). Vicenin-2 was previously identified in the peels and edible pulp of C. aurantiifolia, and C. unshiu [46]. Both flavones, chrysoeriol-C-hexoside and vicenin-2, were detected in all the analyzed samples with relatively high concentration in flavedo peel of both suppliers.
Peaks 12 and 19 showed the same deprotonated aglycone fragment ion at m/z 271, and were identified as naringenin derivatives. Peak 12 [(M−H)− m/z 433.1145 (C21H21O10)−] with MS2 fragment at m/z 271 [M−H−162 (hexose)]− was identified as naringenin-O-hexoside. Peak 19 [(M + H)+ m/z 581.1867 (C27H33O14)+] showed fragment ions (Suppl. Figure S3) at m/z 419 [M + H−162 (hexose)]+ followed by successive loss of a deoxyhexose at m/z 273 [M + H−162 (hexose)−146 (deoxyhexose)]+, while peak 31 showed a base signal at m/z 273.0756 [M + H−308 (rutinose)]+ indicating that both carbohydrate moieties were linked through an -O-glycosidic bond [47]. Thus, peak 19 was identified as naringenin-O-hexosyldeoxyhexoside.
Likewise, Peaks 16 and 18 showed the same deprotonated fragment ion at m/z 269 indicating apigenin derivatives. Peak 16 [(M−H)− m/z 593.1502 (C27H29O15)−] with MS2 fragments at m/z 431 [M−H−162 (hexose)]− and m/z 269 [M−H−162 (hexose)−162 (hexose)]−, indicating successive losses of two hexose moieties, was identified as apigenin-di-O-hexoside previously detected in different Citrus species [26]. Peak 18 [(M−H)− m/z 563.1408 (C26H27O14)−]/[(M + H)+ m/z 565.1550 (C26H29O14)+] was a mixed O-C flavone, with characteristic fragment ion at m/z 311 [M−H−120 (cross ring cleavage of C-hexosyl)−132 (pentose)]−. It was identified as apigenin-C-hexosyl-O-pentoside, first reported in Citrus sinensis (Suppl. Figure S4). In the studied samples, flavedo peel from Uruguay was found more enriched in apigenin derivatives, while naringenin derivatives were found most abundant in the albedo part of both suppliers.
Peaks 30 showed deprotonated fragment ion at m/z 285, indicating sakuranetin derivatives. Peak 30 showed fragment ions at m/z 433 [M + H−162 (hexose)]+ followed by successive loss of a deoxyhexose at m/z 287 [M + H−162 (hexose)−146 (deoxyhexose)]+. Thus, peak 30 was identified as sakuranetin-O-hexosyl-O-deoxyhexoside.
Peak 21 [(M−H)− m/z 609.1833 (C28H33O15)−]/[(M + H)+ m/z 611.1971 (C28H35O15)+] showed a MS2 fragment ion in the negative ionization mode at m/z 301 [M−H−308 (rutinose)]− and was the main flavanone glycoside identified in all samples (Suppl. Figure S5). It was annotated as hesperidin, previously reported as the main flavanone in the peel of Citrus sinensis L. varieties, which suffers dramatic losses in filtered peel juice due to its relatively low water solubility [48]. Hesperidin is well known for its supposed effects on health including antimicrobial, anticancer, antihypertensive and antiulcer effects, thus attracting medicinal interest to orange peel [49].
A number of polymethoxy flavones (PMF) were identified in the studied samples being more readily ionized in the positive ion mode than in the negative mode. In general, the PMF MS2 spectra had characteristic fragments at [M + H−nCH3]+, [M + H−2CH3−CO]+ and [M + H−2CH3−H2O]+ [50]. Peak 43 [(M + H)+ m/z 403.1385 (C21H23O8)+], peak 46 [(M + H)+ m/z 373.1312 (C20H21O7)+] and peak 53 [(M−H)− m/z 343.0826 (C18H15O7)−] showed typical fragmentation patterns for PMF and were identified as nobiletin, tangeretin and dihydroxytrimethoxy-flavone, respectively. Xanthomicrol (dihydroxytrimethoxy-flavone) was previously isolated from Citrus sudachi [51] but reported herein for first time in C. sinensis. Likewise, peak 54 [(M + H)+ m/z 343.1201 (C19H19O6)+] and peak 56 [(M + H)+ m/z 433.1511 (C22H25O9)+] were annotated as tetra-O-methylscutellarein and heptamethoxyflavone, respectively. In addition to xanthomicrol, other hydroxylated PMFs were detected as demethylnobiletin (peak 40), and dimethylkaempferol (peak 49). Generally, PMFs exhibited extensive range of biological actions, i.e., antiatherogenic, and anti-inflammation activities [52]. However, hydroxylated PMFs revealed potent antineoplastic effects against various cancer types [53]. Flavedo peel from Uruguay was the richest part in methoxy flavones in contrast to the juice from both suppliers. The flavedo extracts of various Citrus fruits encompassed flavanone glycosides (poncirin, hesperidin, neohesperidin, dydimin, naringin, narirutin, and neoeriocitrin), flavonol glycosides (rutin), and flavone glycosides (diosmin, rhoifolin, and isorhoifolin) [6].

3.1.4. Identification of Limonoids and Terpenes

Limonoids are tetranortriterpenoids, found extensively in Rutaceae and Meliaceae [54]. They are widely distributed in different Citrus fruits, such as grapefruit (Citrus paradisi), sweet orange (Citrus sinensis), sour orange (Citrus aurantium), lemon (Citrus limon) and lime (Citrus aurantiifolia) [55]. Water-insoluble limonoid aglycones are mainly distributed within seeds and peels. In contrast, the water-soluble limonoid glycosides are more abundant within juices and pulps [56]. In the studied Citrus samples, limonoids occur in significant amounts as aglycone and glycoside forms. Peak 25 [(M + H)+ m/z 473.2167 (C26H33O8)+] showed MS2 fragments at m/z 455 [M + H−18 (H2O)]+, 411 [M + H−62 (CH2O3)]+ and the characteristic ion for Citrus limonoids at m/z 161 attributed to the furan ring bound to a lactone ring moiety [57] and was identified as deacetylnomilin (Suppl. Figure S6). It was found more abundant in the peel than in juice or concentrate; this may be related to its relatively low water solubility. Peak 51 with protonated and deprotonated molecular ions [(M + H)+ m/z 471.2018 (C26H31O8)+]/[(M−H) m/z 469.1869 (C26H29O8)−] showed a fragment ion m/z 453 [M + H−18 (H2O)]+ and the characteristic fragment ion for Citrus limonoids at m/z 161. It was identified as limonin, a well-known limonoid that possesses various biological, mainly anti-inflammatory activities [58]. Limonin was detected in more abundant content in albedo from Spain (AS), suggestive to have a slightly bitter taste compared to albedo from Uruguay (AU) upon providing a likely sustainable source of food additive [59].
Terpenes are important for plant aroma and flavor playing key roles in fruit quality, plant defense and pollinator attraction. A total of three terpenes was detected ionized most preferentially in the negative ionization mode, from which a gluco-conjugated megastigmadienone was identified as peak 4 [(M−H)− m/z 385.1860 (C19H29O8)−] known as citroside A. Its MS2 fragments showed the characteristic fragment ion at m/z 223 [M−H−162 (hexose)]− relative to the loss of a hexose moiety. Citroside A was reported previously to be a precursor of damascenone and 3-hydroxydamascone, two important industrial flavor compounds. It has been reported in Citrus unshiu leaves, Solanum quitoense leaves [60] and Gynostemma pentaphyllum [61]. Herein it was detected for the first time in the peel of Citrus sinensis being more prominent in albedo peel from Spain and flavedo peel from Uruguay (AS and FU). A number of monoterpenes belonging to different classes were identified: Peak 35 [(M−H) m/z 313.1651 (C16H25O6)−] was a monoterpene glycoside identified as perilloside A, detected for the first time in Citrus and found most prominent in albedo and flavedo peel from Spain (AS and FS), suggestive to be a marker to distinguish between peels from Spain and Uruguay. Peak 57 [(M−H)− m/z 207.1392 (C13H19O2)−] was an apo-carotenoid monoterpene identified as ionone epoxide, a flavoring substance with a fruity and woody flavor previously identified in many foods, such as apricot, raspberry, tea and lemon balm [43].

3.1.5. Identification of Fatty Acids and Fatty Acid Amides

Saturated and unsaturated fatty acids in addition to low molecular mass amide compounds were detected in several orange peel compartments. For details, refer to Supplementary Materials [28,35,44].

3.1.6. Identification of Nitrogenous Compounds

Other metabolites containing nitrogen were detected at trace levels. For details, refer to Supplementary Materials [34].

3.2. Multivariate Data Analyses of Orange Samples

The datasets encompassed a total of 42 nLC-ESI-MS/MS runs (seven different orange samples with three biological replicates each in both the negative and positive ionization modes). Thus, unsupervised and supervised multivariate data analyses were adopted to simplify interpretation of such complex datasets allowing better biomarkers characterization and sample classification [62]. Principal component analysis (PCA), as an unsupervised approach, was reported to evaluate the variance within various samples involving no prior knowledge of the datasets [63]. Table 1 shows the color-coded source of the Citrus sinensis specimens compared.
PCA on negative ionization runs as depicted in Figure 2A–C for all orange samples was illustrated by PC1 and PC2 accounting for 87% of the total variance (Figure 2A). Along PC1, there was a clear separation between flavedo specimens from Spain (FS) and Uruguay (FU), while the latter was distinguished from the other samples and located at upper right quadrant with positive score values, suggesting the impact of geographical source based on their metabolites. The albedo samples were positioned at the lower right quadrant, whereas juice samples were located at upper left quadrant with negative PC1 values. Conversely, orange concentrate from Brazil (CB) appeared near the origin (Figure 2A). The respective loading plot demonstrated that mono-methoxy flavonoids, i.e., hesperetin and sakuranetin along with hydroxy-oxohexadecanoic acid were found more abundant in albedo specimens (Figure 2B). On the other hand, hydroxylinoleic acid was major contributor to flavedo from Uruguay (FU) being the most distant data point. Naringenin was responsible for the clustering of orange juice of both suppliers and flavedo from Spain (FS) in the upper left quadrant, while N-phenylacetylglycine was more abundant in juice from Spain (JS) and orange concentrate (CB). The dendrogram of HCA (Hierarchical clustering analysis), as depicted in Figure 2C, revealed that flavedo from Uruguay (FU) represented one cluster, whereas the other cluster was divided into albedo specimens at one sub-group and the other sub-group encompassed the remaining samples.
Likewise, PCA on positive ionization as illustrated in Figure 2D–F revealed 86% of the total variance, albeit with better segregation (Figure 2D) compared to its negative ionization counterpart. Particularly, all replicates from each orange sample were tightly clustered indicating the superb reproducibility of the experimental analysis in both the negative and positive ionization modes. In agreement with the previous PCA model, flavedo from Uruguay (FU) was also the most distant group. Flavedo specimens showed positive score values separable from other orange parts, while orange juice and concentrate had negative score values. Albedo from both countries (AU and AS) was separated in the upper left quadrant. The respective loading plot (Figure 2E) demonstrated high levels of nobiletin, tangeretin, dihydroxytrimethoxyflavone and heptamethoxyflavone in flavedo samples. Albedo specimens were enriched in sakuranetin-O-hexosyl-O-deoxyhexoside and hesperetin-O-deoxyhexoside, whereas high levels of hesperidin were observed in orange juice and concentrate. The HCA dendrogram, as depicted in Figure 2F, revealed that the flavedo from both suppliers represented one cluster, while the other cluster included the remaining orange parts.
OPLS-DA (orthogonal projection to latent structures-discriminant analysis) as a supervised approach was reported to possess a great potentiality maximizing the segregation of overlapping sample groups by identifying chemical determinants [64]. Being the most distant cluster, flavedo from Uruguay (FU) was further subjected to OPLS-DA against all other specimens (Figure 3) to assess sample discrimination with p value less than 0.001. The first OPLS model on negative ionization (Figure 3A) exhibited 0.96 model predictability (Q2) and 97% total variance (R2). The relevant loading S-plot showed that FU included abundant levels of hydroxylated fatty acids, i.e., hydroxylinoleic, trihydroxy-linoleic, and dihydroxyoctadecadienoic acids (Figure 3B). Conversely, the second OPLS model on positive ionization (Figure 3C) exhibited 0.62 model predictability (Q2) and 72% total variance (R2). The relevant loading S-plot revealed that nobiletin, dihydroxy-trimethoxyflavone, demethylnobiletin and tangeretin were detected in higher levels in FU (flavedo from Uruguay) (Figure 3D). Then, several OPLS models were constructed (Suppl. Figures S7–S10) with p value less than 0.001 to assess chemical determinants in orange parts derived from the various countries. Hence, a model of flavedo from Uruguay (FU) against its counterpart from Spain (FS) was performed (Suppl. Figure S7). On negative mode, OPLS model (Suppl. Figure S7A) revealed the enrichment of flavedo from Uruguay (FU) in hydroxyl-linoleic acid, dimethylkaempferol, apigenin-di-O-hexoside and citropten (Suppl. Figure S7B). Notably, hydroxyl fatty acids other than hydroxylinoleic acid did not appear in this model, which was attributed to their similar levels present in both samples. Conversely, OPLS model in positive mode (Suppl. Figure S7C) exhibited the enrichment of flavedo from Uruguay (FU) in nobiletin, demethylnobiletin, and tangeretin, whereas heptamethoxyflavone was abundant in FS (Suppl. Figure S7D). Another OPLS model was performed with albedo from Uruguay (AU) versus its counterpart from Spain (AS) (Suppl. Figure S8). OPLS model in negative ionization (Suppl. Figure S8A) demonstrated the particular abundance of naringenin-O-hexoside and linoleic acid in albedo from Uruguay (AU), while hesperetin, sakuranetin and hydroxy-oxohexadecanoic acid were found more abundant in albedo from Spain (Suppl. Figure S8B). In positive ionization, the OPLS model (Suppl. Figure S8C) showed significantly higher levels of glycosyl flavonoids, i.e., sakuranetin-O-hexosyl-O-deoxyhexoside, limonin and hesperetin-O-deoxyhexoside in AS (albedo from Spain) (Suppl. Figure S8D). Further and for better discrimination assessment of orange juices derived from various sources, the OPLS model in negative mode (Suppl. Figure S9A) revealed abundant levels of N-phenylacetylglycine, nomilin-hexoside and gingerol in orange juice from Spain (JS) (Suppl. Figure S9B). Lastly, the OPLS model including orange juice from both suppliers and orange concentrate from Brazil (CB) was implemented in positive mode (Suppl. Figure S10A). The relevant loading plot (Suppl. Figure S10B) showed that hesperidin, hydroxy-sphingenine and pyridoxamine phosphate amounted for the major metabolites in orange concentrate (CB). The obvious segregation between orange juice from Uruguay (JU) and Spain (JS) was ascribed to the abundance of heptyl caffeate in the former, while the later was enriched in nomilinhexoside and sakuranetin-O-hexosyl-deoxyhexoside.

4. Conclusions

In this study, the metabolites in the orange peels (albedo and flavedo parts) together with the juice and concentrate from different suppliers were systematically analyzed and identified using state-of-the-art nLC-ESI-MS/MS-based, widely non-targeted metabolome analysis. A total of 66 metabolites were annotated, 37 of which were compounds shared by all samples. Furthermore, 29 differential metabolites were detected, 15 of which were mainly flavonoids and completely absent from the juice. A total of eleven metabolites were detected for the first time in Citrus sinensis: citroside A, sinapic acid pentoside, di-hexosyl-diosmetin, apigenin-C-hexosyl-O-pentoside, chrysoeriol-C-hexoside, perilloside A, hydroxy-sphingenine, xanthomicrol, coumaryl alcohol-O-hexoside, gingerol and ionone epoxide. The annotation of the novel metabolites warrants in-depth functional genomic mining to identify their various biosynthetic pathways. Comparing different fruit parts, a number of flavonoids with proposed preventive therapies against some diseases, i.e., naringenin-O-hexoside, hesperetin-O-deoxyhexoside, sakuranetin-O-hexosyl-O-deoxyhexoside, and demethylnobiletin, were completely absent from the juices, but present most prominent in the peel. Citrus peel is thus considered a renewable bio-resource of functional foods. In addition, hesperetin-O-deoxyhexoside, sakuranetin-O-hexosyl-O-deoxyhexoside and hydroxylinolenic acid were detected only in albedo and flavedo of both suppliers, albeit absent in orange juices and concentrate, suggestive to be a distinctive marker for orange peel and to increase the potential transform of Citrus by-products into valuable food ingredients, nutraceuticals, and perhaps even pharmaceuticals.
The comprehensive nLC-ESI-MS/MS metabolic profiling followed by multivariate data analyses suggested that the differences between orange parts were much more obvious than the geographical source. Generally, albedo was richer in mono-methoxylated flavonoids, while flavedo was richer in poly-methoxylated flavonoids and hydroxylated fatty acids. Moreover, further research is required to more accurately evaluate the effectiveness, the toxicity, and the mechanism of action of many PMFs as well as to increase their bioavailability by using readily accessible and appropriate drug delivery vehicles. Further analysis of more orange samples from other sources has yet to be evaluated to obtain a bigger picture of the entire respective population of orange samples. In addition, other factors, i.e., seasonal variation, storage conditions and agricultural practices may be assessed using the same platform.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/foods12030579/s1, Figure S1: MS2 Spectra of A: ferulic acid hexoside [M−H]− 355.1024, C16H19O9−, B: sinapic acid pentoside [M−H]− 355.1025, C16H19O9−. Figure S2: MS2 spectra of citropten [M−H]− 205.0495, C11H9O4−. Figure S3: MS2 spectra of naringenin-O-hexosyldeoxyhexoside [M−H]− 579. 1687 C27H31O14−. Figure S4: MS2 spectra of apigenin-C-hexoside-O-pentoside [M−H]− 563.1416, C26H27O14−. Figure S5: MS2 spectra of hesperidin [M−H]− 609.1832, C28H33O15−. Figure S6: MS2 spectra of deacetylnomilin [M + H]+ 473.222, C26H33O8+. Figure S7: MS-based OPLS of flavedo from Uruguay (FU) against that from Spain (FS) (n = 3) negative ionization (A) score plot and (B) relevant loading S-plot; positive ionization (C) score plot and (D) relevant loading S-plot. Figure S8: MS-based OPLS of albedo from Uruguay (AU) against that from Spain (AS) (n = 3) negative ionization (A) score plot and (B) relevant loading S-plot; positive ionization (C) score plot and (D) relevant loading S-plot. Figure S9: MS-based OPLS of orange juice from Uruguay (JU) against that from Spain (JS) (n = 3) negative ionization (A) score plot and (B) relevant loading S-plot. Figure S10: MS-based OPLS of orange juice from Uruguay (JU) and Spain (JS) and orange concentrate (CB) (n = 3) positive ionization (A) score plot and (B) relevant loading plot. References [63,64] are cited in the supplementary materials.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.M.A. and T.E.; methodology, S.M.A., E.M.K., U.K., R.G.B. and T.E.; validation, S.M.A. and E.M.K.; formal analysis, S.M.A., U.K. and R.G.B.; investigation, S.M.A., E.M.K., U.K., R.G.B. and T.E.; writing—original draft preparation, S.M.A. and E.M.K.; writing—review and editing, S.M.A., E.M.K., U.K., R.G.B. and T.E.; funding acquisition, R.G.B. and T.E. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research project was partially supported by the German academic exchange program (DAAD; German Egyptian Research Short-Term Scholarship—GERSS program). The publication of this article was funded by the Open Access Fund of Leibniz Universität Hannover.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We thank Silke Hillebrand from Symrise (Holzminden, Germany) for providing the Citrus samples.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Paw, M.; Begum, T.; Gogoi, R.; Pandey, S.K.; Lal, M. Chemical Composition of Citrus limon L. Burmf Peel Essential Oil from North East India. J. Essent. Oil Bear. Plants 2020, 23, 337–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Favela-Hernández, J.M.J.; González-Santiago, O.; Ramírez-Cabrera, M.A.; Esquivel-Ferriño, P.C.; Camacho-Corona, M.D.R. Chemistry and pharmacology of Citrus sinensis. Molecules 2016, 21, 247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Suri, S.; Singh, A.; Nema, P.K. Current applications of citrus fruit processing waste: A scientific outlook. Appl. Food Res. 2022, 2, 100050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Olaiya, C.; Adigun, A. Chemical manipulation of tomato growth and associated biochemical implications on flavonoid, lycopene and mineral contents. Afr. J. Plant Sci. 2010, 4, 167–171. [Google Scholar]
  5. Peixoto, J.S.; Comar, J.F.; Moreira, C.T.; Soares, A.A.; De Oliveira, A.L.; Bracht, A.; Peralta, R.M. Effects of Citrus aurantium (bitter orange) fruit extracts and p-synephrine on metabolic fluxes in the rat liver. Molecules 2012, 17, 5854–5869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Singh, B.; Singh, J.P.; Kaur, A.; Singh, N. Phenolic composition, antioxidant potential and health benefits of citrus peel. Food Res. Int. 2020, 132, 109114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Goulas, V.; Manganaris, G.A. Exploring the phytochemical content and the antioxidant potential of Citrus fruits grown in Cyprus. Food Chem. 2012, 131, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Escobedo-Avellaneda, Z.; Gutiérrez-Uribe, J.; Valdez-Fragoso, A.; Torres, J.A.; Welti-Chanes, J. Phytochemicals and antioxidant activity of juice, flavedo, albedo and comminuted orange. J. Funct. Foods 2014, 6, 470–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Fattahi, J.; Hamidoghli, Y.; Fotouhi, R.; Ghasemnejad, M.; Bakhshi, D. Assessment of fruit quality and antioxidant activity of three citrus species during ripening. South-West. J. Hortic. Biol. Environ. 2011, 2, 113–128. [Google Scholar]
  10. Zhao, X.J.; Xing, T.T.; Li, Y.F.; Jiao, B.N. Analysis of phytochemical contributors to antioxidant capacity of the peel of Chinese mandarin and orange varieties. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019, 70, 825–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Salonia, F.; Ciacciulli, A.; Poles, L.; Pappalardo, H.D.; La Malfa, S.; Licciardello, C. New plant breeding techniques in citrus for the improvement of important agronomic traits. A Review. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 1234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Farag, M.A.; Fathi, D.; Shamma, S.; Shawkat, M.S.A.; Shalabi, S.M.; El Seedi, H.R.; Afifi, S.M. Comparative metabolome classification of desert truffles Terfezia claveryi and Terfezia boudieri via its aroma and nutrients profile. LWT 2021, 142, 111046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ammar, N.M.; Hassan, H.A.; Ahmed, R.F.; AE, G.E.-G.; Abd-ElGawad, A.M.; Farrag, A.R.H.; Farag, M.A.; Elshamy, A.I.; Afifi, S.M. Gastro-protective effect of Artemisia Sieberi essential oil against ethanol-induced ulcer in rats as revealed via biochemical, histopathological and metabolomics analysis. Biomark. Biochem. Indic. Expo. Response Susceptibility Chem. 2022, 27, 247–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kim, D.-S.; Lee, S.; Park, S.M.; Yun, S.H.; Gab, H.-S.; Kim, S.S.; Kim, H.-J. Comparative metabolomics analysis of Citrus varieties. Foods 2021, 10, 2826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Yao, Z.; Wu, S.; Zhang, H.; Feng, X.; Wang, Z.; Lin, M. Chiral determination of naringenin by ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and application in Citrus peel and pulp. Front. Nutr. 2022, 9, 906859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Afifi, S.M.; El-Mahis, A.; Heiss, A.G.; Farag, M.A. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry-based classification of 12 fennel (Foeniculum vulgare Miller) varieties based on their aroma profiles and estragole levels as analyzed using chemometric tools. ACS Omega 2021, 6, 5775–5785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. El-Newary, S.A.; Afifi, S.M.; Aly, M.S.; Ahmed, R.F.; El Gendy, A.E.-N.G.; Abd-ElGawad, A.M.; Farag, M.A.; Elgamal, A.M.; Elshamy, A.I. Chemical profile of Launaea nudicaulis ethanolic extract and its antidiabetic effect in streptozotocin-induced rats. Molecules 2021, 26, 1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Farag, M.A.; Kabbash, E.M.; Mediani, A.; Döll, S.; Esatbeyoglu, T.; Afifi, S.M. Comparative metabolite fingerprinting of four different cinnamon species analyzed via UPLC-MS and GC-MS and chemometric tools. Molecules 2022, 27, 2935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ledesma-Escobar, C.; Priego-Capote, F.; Luque de Castro, M. Characterization of lemon (Citrus limon) polar extract by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry in high resolution mode. J. Mass Spectrom. 2015, 50, 1196–1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, F.; Huang, Y.; Wu, W.; Zhu, C.; Zhang, R.; Chen, J.; Zeng, J. Metabolomics analysis of the peels of different colored citrus fruits (Citrus reticulata cv.‘Shatangju’) during the maturation period based on UHPLC-QQQ-MS. Molecules 2020, 25, 396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Liu, Y.; Ren, C.; Cao, Y.; Wang, Y.; Duan, W.; Xie, L.; Sun, C.; Li, X. Characterization and purification of bergamottin from Citrus grandis (L.) Osbeck cv. Yongjiazaoxiangyou and its antiproliferative activity and effect on glucose consumption in HepG2 cells. Molecules 2017, 22, 1227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Jo, M.S.; Lee, S.; Yu, J.S.; Baek, S.C.; Cho, Y.-C.; Kim, K.H. Megastigmane derivatives from the cladodes of Opuntia humifusa and their nitric oxide inhibitory activities in macrophages. J. Nat. Prod. 2020, 83, 684–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Oszmiański, J.; Kolniak-Ostek, J.; Wojdyło, A. Application of ultra performance liquid chromatography-photodiode detector-quadrupole/time of flight-mass spectrometry (UPLC-PDA-Q/TOF-MS) method for the characterization of phenolic compounds of Lepidium sativum L. sprouts. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2013, 236, 699–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Tine, Y.; Renucci, F.; Costa, J.; Wélé, A.; Paolini, J. A method for LC-MS/MS profiling of coumarins in Zanthoxylum zanthoxyloides (Lam.) B. Zepernich and Timler extracts and essential oils. Molecules 2017, 22, 174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Zagurskaya, Y.V.; Vasil’ev, V.; Bogatyrev, A.; Bayandina, I.; Kukina, T. Flavonoids and hydroxycinnamic acids from Leonurus quinquelobatus. Chem. Nat. Compd. 2015, 51, 156–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Brito, A.; Ramirez, J.E.; Areche, C.; Sepúlveda, B.; Simirgiotis, M.J. HPLC-UV-MS profiles of phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity of fruits from three citrus species consumed in Northern Chile. Molecules 2014, 19, 17400–17421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Katsuno, T.; Kasuga, H.; Kusano, Y.; Yaguchi, Y.; Tomomura, M.; Cui, J.; Yang, Z.; Baldermann, S.; Nakamura, Y.; Ohnishi, T.; et al. Characterisation of odorant compounds and their biochemical formation in green tea with a low temperature storage process. Food Chem. 2014, 148, 388–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Fayek, N.M.; Farag, M.A.; Abdel Monem, A.R.; Moussa, M.Y.; Abd-Elwahab, S.M.; El-Tanbouly, N.D. Comparative metabolite profiling of four citrus peel cultivars via ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with quadrupole-time-of-flight-mass spectrometry and multivariate data analyses. J. Chromatogr. Sci. 2019, 57, 349–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Cho, H.E.; Ahn, S.Y.; Kim, S.C.; Woo, M.H.; Hong, J.-T.; Moon, D.C. Determination of flavonoid glycosides, polymethoxyflavones, and coumarins in herbal drugs of citrus and poncirus fruits by high performance liquid chromatography–electrospray ionization/tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Lett. 2014, 47, 1299–1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Gualdani, R.; Cavalluzzi, M.M.; Lentini, G.; Habtemariam, S. The chemistry and pharmacology of citrus limonoids. Molecules 2016, 21, 1530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Li, K.; Wang, H. Simultaneous determination of matrine, sophoridine and oxymatrine in Sophora flavescens Ait. by high performance liquid chromatography. Biomed. Chromatogr. 2004, 18, 178–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ding, S.; Zhang, J.; Yang, L.; Wang, X.; Fu, F.; Wang, R.; Zhang, Q.; Shan, Y. Changes in cuticle components and morphology of ‘Satsuma’mandarin (Citrus unshiu) during ambient storage and their potential role on Penicillium digitatum infection. Molecules 2020, 25, 412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Yang, H.; Tang, Y.; Wang, L.; Guo, Y.; Luo, D.; Wu, L.; Deng, X.; Li, X.; Bai, L. The potential of Myosoton aquaticum extracts and compounds to control barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli). Weed Res. 2021, 61, 317–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Mukai, K.; Takeuchi, M.; Ohnishi, M.; Kudoh, M.; Imai, H. Characterization of ceramides and glucosylceramides of the Satsuma mandarin (Citrus unshiu) fruit. J. Oleo Sci. 2022, 71, 535–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Ou, M.-C.; Liu, Y.-H.; Sun, Y.-W.; Chan, C.-F. The composition, antioxidant and antibacterial activities of cold-pressed and distilled essential oils of Citrus paradisi and Citrus grandis (L.) Osbeck. Evid. -Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2015, 2015, 804091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Dugo, P.; Bonaccorsi, I.; Ragonese, C.; Russo, M.; Donato, P.; Santi, L.; Mondello, L. Analytical characterization of mandarin (Citrus deliciosa Ten.) essential oil. Flavour Fragr. J. 2011, 26, 34–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lee, S.Y.; Shaari, K. LC–MS metabolomics analysis of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni leaves cultivated in Malaysia in relation to different developmental stages. Phytochem. Anal. 2022, 33, 249–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Dadwal, V.; Joshi, R.; Gupta, M. A multidimensional UHPLC-DAD-QTOF-IMS gradient approach for qualitative and quantitative investigation of Citrus and Malus fruit phenolic extracts and edibles. ACS Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 1, 2006–2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Liu, E.H.; Zhao, P.; Duan, L.; Zheng, G.-D.; Guo, L.; Yang, H.; Li, P. Simultaneous determination of six bioactive flavonoids in Citri Reticulatae Pericarpium by rapid resolution liquid chromatography coupled with triple quadrupole electrospray tandem mass spectrometry. Food Chem. 2013, 141, 3977–3983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Falcão, S.I.; Vale, N.; Gomes, P.; Domingues, M.R.; Freire, C.; Cardoso, S.M.; Vilas-Boas, M. Phenolic profiling of Portuguese propolis by LC–MS spectrometry: Uncommon propolis rich in flavonoid glycosides. Phytochem. Anal. 2013, 24, 309–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Shi, Y.-S.; Zhang, Y.; Li, H.-T.; Wu, C.-H.; El-Seedi, H.R.; Ye, W.-K.; Wang, Z.-W.; Li, C.-B.; Zhang, X.-F.; Kai, G.-Y. Limonoids from Citrus: Chemistry, anti-tumor potential, and other bioactivities. J. Funct. Foods 2020, 75, 104213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Tsukayama, M.; Ichikawa, R.; Yamamoto, K.; Sasaki, T.; Kawamura, Y. Microwave-assisted rapid extraction of polymethoxyflavones from dried peels of Citrus yuko Hort. ex Tanaka. Nippon. Shokuhin Kagaku Kogaku Kaishi = J. Jpn. Soc. Food Sci. Technol. 2009, 56, 359–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Lu, V.; Bastaki, M.; Api, A.M.; Aubanel, M.; Bauter, M.; Cachet, T.; Demyttenaere, J.; Diop, M.M.; Harman, C.L.; Hayashi, S.-m.; et al. Dietary administration of β-ionone epoxide to Sprague-Dawley rats for 90 days. Curr. Res. Toxicol. 2021, 2, 192–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Li, S.; Jiang, Z.; Thamm, L.; Zhou, G. 10-Hydroxy-2-decenoic acid as an antimicrobial agent in draft keg-conditioned wheat beer. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 2010, 68, 114–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Yang, M.; Jiang, Z.; Wen, M.; Wu, Z.; Zha, M.; Xu, W.; Zhang, L. Chemical variation of Chenpi (Citrus peels) and corresponding correlated bioactive compounds by LC-MS metabolomics and multibioassay analysis. Front. Nutr. 2022, 9, 825381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Takiyama, M.; Matsumoto, T.; Watanabe, J. LC-MS/MS detection of citrus unshiu peel-derived flavonoids in the plasma and brain after oral administration of yokukansankachimpihange in rats. Xenobiotica 2019, 49, 1494–1503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Vukics, V.; Guttman, A. Structural characterization of flavonoid glycosides by multi-stage mass spectrometry. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 2010, 29, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lim, T.K. (Ed.) Citrus × aurantium sweet orange group. In Edible Medicinal and Non-Medicinal Plants: Volume 4, Fruits; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2012; pp. 806–831. [Google Scholar]
  49. Ganeshpurkar, A.; Saluja, A. The pharmacological potential of hesperidin. Indian J. Biochem. Biophys. (IJBB) 2019, 56, 287–300. [Google Scholar]
  50. Zhang, J.-Y.; Li, N.; Che, Y.-Y.; Zhang, Y.; Liang, S.-X.; Zhao, M.-B.; Jiang, Y.; Tu, P.-F. Characterization of seventy polymethoxylated flavonoids (PMFs) in the leaves of Murraya paniculata by on-line high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to photodiode array detection and electrospray tandem mass spectrometry. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2011, 56, 950–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Fattahi, M.; Cusido, R.M.; Khojasteh, A.; Bonfill, M.; Palazon, J. Xanthomicrol: A comprehensive review of its chemistry, distribution, biosynthesis and pharmacological activity. Mini Rev. Med. Chem. 2014, 14, 725–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Gao, Z.; Gao, W.; Zeng, S.-L.; Li, P.; Liu, E.H. Chemical structures, bioactivities and molecular mechanisms of citrus polymethoxyflavones. J. Funct. Foods 2018, 40, 498–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Lai, C.-S.; Wu, J.-C.; Ho, C.-T.; Pan, M.-H. Disease chemopreventive effects and molecular mechanisms of hydroxylated polymethoxyflavones. BioFactors 2015, 41, 301–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Tundis, R.; Loizzo, M.R.; Menichini, F. An overview on chemical aspects and potential health benefits of limonoids and their derivatives. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2014, 54, 225–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Russo, M.; Arigò, A.; Calabrò, M.L.; Farnetti, S.; Mondello, L.; Dugo, P. Bergamot (Citrus bergamia Risso) as a source of nutraceuticals: Limonoids and flavonoids. J. Funct. Foods 2016, 20, 10–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Breksa III, A.P.; Hidalgo, M.B.; Yuen, M.L. Liquid chromatography–electrospray ionisation mass spectrometry method for the rapid identification of citrus limonoid glucosides in citrus juices and extracts. Food Chem. 2009, 117, 739–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Pessoa, L.G.A.; Pessoa, L.A.; da Silva Santos, É.; Pilau, E.J.; Gonçalves, J.E.; Gonçalves, R.A.C.; de Oliveira, A.J.B. Limonoid detection and profile in callus culture of sweet orange. Acta Scientiarum. Biol. Sci. 2021, 43, e53075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Vu, T.O.; Seo, W.; Lee, J.H.; Min, B.S.; Kim, J.A. Terpenoids from Citrus unshiu peels and their effects on NO production. Nat. Prod. Sci. 2020, 26, 176–181. [Google Scholar]
  59. Wedamulla, N.E.; Fan, M.; Choi, Y.-J.; Kim, E.-K. Citrus peel as a renewable bioresource: Transforming waste to food additives. J. Funct. Foods 2022, 95, 105163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Dembitsky, V.M.; Maoka, T. Allenic and cumulenic lipids. Prog. Lipid Res. 2007, 46, 328–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Takita, M.A.; Berger, I.J.; Basílio-Palmieri, A.C.; Borges, K.M.; Souza, J.M.d.; Targon, M.L. Terpene production in the peel of sweet orange fruits. Genet. Mol. Biol. 2007, 30, 841–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Farag, M.A.; Afifi, S.M.; Rasheed, D.M.; Khattab, A.R. Revealing compositional attributes of Glossostemon bruguieri Desf. root geographic origin and roasting impact via chemometric modeling of SPME-GC-MS and NMR metabolite profiles. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2021, 102, 104073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Ammar, N.M.; Hassan, H.A.; Abdallah, H.M.I.; Afifi, S.M.; Elgamal, A.M.; Farrag, A.R.H.; El-Gendy, A.E.-N.G.; Farag, M.A.; Elshamy, A.I. Protective effects of naringenin from Citrus sinensis (var. Valencia) peels against CCl4-induced hepatic and renal injuries in rats assessed by metabolomics, histological and biochemical analyses. Nutrients 2022, 14, 841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Farag, M.A.; Khattab, A.R.; Shamma, S.; Afifi, S.M. Profiling of primary metabolites and volatile determinants in mahlab cherry (Prunus mahaleb L.) seeds in the context of its different varieties and roasting as analyzed using chemometric tools. Foods 2021, 10, 728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Foods 12 00579 g001 550
Figure 1. Representative nLC-MS base peak chromatogram of orange parts extracted by methanol on negative ionization (A) albedo from Uruguay, (B) orange concentrate from Brazil, (C) flavedo from Uruguay and on positive ionization, and (D) juice from Uruguay. For peak numbers, refer to Table 2.
Figure 1. Representative nLC-MS base peak chromatogram of orange parts extracted by methanol on negative ionization (A) albedo from Uruguay, (B) orange concentrate from Brazil, (C) flavedo from Uruguay and on positive ionization, and (D) juice from Uruguay. For peak numbers, refer to Table 2.
Foods 12 00579 g001
Foods 12 00579 g002 550
Figure 2. MS-based PCA of all orange samples (n = 3) negative ionization (A) score plot, (B) relevant loading plot and (C) HCA; positive ionization (D) score plot, (E) relevant loading plot and (F) HCA. AS: Albedo from Spain; AU: Albedo from Uruguay; CB: concentrate from Brazil; FS: Flavedo from Spain; FU: Flavedo from Uruguay; JS: Juice from Spain; JU: Juice from Uruguay.
Figure 2. MS-based PCA of all orange samples (n = 3) negative ionization (A) score plot, (B) relevant loading plot and (C) HCA; positive ionization (D) score plot, (E) relevant loading plot and (F) HCA. AS: Albedo from Spain; AU: Albedo from Uruguay; CB: concentrate from Brazil; FS: Flavedo from Spain; FU: Flavedo from Uruguay; JS: Juice from Spain; JU: Juice from Uruguay.
Foods 12 00579 g002
Foods 12 00579 g003 550
Figure 3. MS-based OPLS of flavedo from Uruguay (FU) against all other samples negative ionization (A) score plot and (B) relevant loading S-plot; positive ionization (C) score plot and (D) relevant loading S-plot.
Figure 3. MS-based OPLS of flavedo from Uruguay (FU) against all other samples negative ionization (A) score plot and (B) relevant loading S-plot; positive ionization (C) score plot and (D) relevant loading S-plot.
Foods 12 00579 g003
Table
Table 1. Source of the different Citrus sinensis (var. Valencia) specimens used in the analysis.
Table 1. Source of the different Citrus sinensis (var. Valencia) specimens used in the analysis.
CodeOrange PartCountry
ASFoods 12 00579 i001Albedo peelSpain
AUFoods 12 00579 i002Albedo peelUruguay
CBFoods 12 00579 i003Juice concentrateBrazil
FSFoods 12 00579 i004Flavedo peelSpain
FUFoods 12 00579 i005Flavedo peelUruguay
JSFoods 12 00579 i006JuiceSpain
JUFoods 12 00579 i007JuiceUruguay
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Afifi, S.M.; Kabbash, E.M.; Berger, R.G.; Krings, U.; Esatbeyoglu, T. Comparative Untargeted Metabolic Profiling of Different Parts of Citrus sinensis Fruits via Liquid Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry Coupled with Multivariate Data Analyses to Unravel Authenticity. Foods 2023, 12, 579. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12030579

AMA Style

Afifi SM, Kabbash EM, Berger RG, Krings U, Esatbeyoglu T. Comparative Untargeted Metabolic Profiling of Different Parts of Citrus sinensis Fruits via Liquid Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry Coupled with Multivariate Data Analyses to Unravel Authenticity. Foods. 2023; 12(3):579. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12030579

Chicago/Turabian Style

Afifi, Sherif M., Eman M. Kabbash, Ralf G. Berger, Ulrich Krings, and Tuba Esatbeyoglu. 2023. "Comparative Untargeted Metabolic Profiling of Different Parts of Citrus sinensis Fruits via Liquid Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry Coupled with Multivariate Data Analyses to Unravel Authenticity" Foods 12, no. 3: 579. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12030579

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop