Next Article in Journal
Analytical Platform for the Study of Metabolic Pathway of Propyl Propane Thiosulfonate (PTSO) from Allium spp.
Previous Article in Journal
Simulation and Control of the Formation of Ethyl Carbamate during the Fermentation and Distillation Processes of Chinese Baijiu
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Rapid Quantitative Method Development for Beef and Pork Lymph Nodes Using BAX® System Real Time Salmonella Assay

by David A. Vargas 1, Gabriela K. Betancourt-Barszcz 1, Sabrina E. Blandon 1, Savannah F. Applegate 2, Mindy M. Brashears 1, Markus F. Miller 1, Sara E. Gragg 3 and Marcos X. Sanchez-Plata 1,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Submission received: 18 January 2023 / Revised: 2 February 2023 / Accepted: 14 February 2023 / Published: 15 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Food Analytical Methods)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

See attached detailed recommendations for presentation of results. 

Comments for author File: Comments.docx

Author Response

Reply attached in file.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

 

The manuscript deals with the development of a tool consisting in a Rapid Quantitative Method for Beef and Pork Lymph Nodes using BAX® System Real Time Salmonella Assay. The work has a clear objective of contrasting the efficacy of the proposed methodology and achieves interesting results to be evaluated by the scientific community, and with potential application in its sector.

The work is well designed and developed, although we suggest some aspects that would improve and strengthen.

 Here are my specific comments on:

 

Abstract:

Lines 22-23: “using the” is repeated

 

Introduction

Lines 55-57: It would be convenient to enhance this sentence with a reference

 

Material and Methods:

Section 2.1.3. is missing. ¿Microbiological analyses?

Line 155: According to the Journal Instruction for Authors, “CT” must be defined the first time is mentioned.

Lines 164-170: Why number of samples are different between PCR curve development and comparison of methods?

Lines 164-170 and section 2.1.4.: It would be convenient to hold with references/s that number of samples is enough to develop a curve for a linear model R.

Line 206: A space between words “and” and “incubated” must be adjusted.

 

Results and discussion

Lines 273-290: This paragraph seems to fit better as part of introduction. For discussion section, it should be better to compare results to other similar works (if they have been carried out), or to highlight the contribution of this study

Line 318: “For this case” appears as a separated sentence. Is right? I don’t realize what’s the meaning.

 

References

Line 533: Plata must be written in Capital letter

Author Response

Reply attaached in file.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop