Next Article in Journal
Recent Advances in Light Penetration Depth for Postharvest Quality Evaluation of Fruits and Vegetables
Previous Article in Journal
The Potential Mechanisms of Catechins in Tea for Anti-Hypertension: An Integration of Network Pharmacology, Molecular Docking, and Molecular Dynamics Simulation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in Different Food Groups and Drinking Water

by
Camino González-Machado
1,2,
Carlos Alonso-Calleja
1,2 and
Rosa Capita
1,2,*
1
Department of Food Hygiene and Technology, Veterinary Faculty, University of León, E-24071 León, Spain
2
Institute of Food Science and Technology, University of León, E-24071 León, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2024, 13(17), 2686; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13172686
Submission received: 24 July 2024 / Revised: 14 August 2024 / Accepted: 17 August 2024 / Published: 26 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Food Microbiology)

Abstract

:
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has been included by the World Health Organization in its list of “priority pathogens” because of its widespread prevalence and the severity of the infections it causes. The role of food in infections caused by MRSA is unknown, although strains of this microorganism have been detected in various items for human consumption. In order to gain an overview of any possible role of food in MRSA infections, a review was undertaken of studies published between January 2001 and February 2024 relating to MRSA. These comprised research that focused on fish and shellfish, eggs and egg products, foods of vegetable origin, other foodstuffs (e.g., honey or edible insects), and drinking water. In most of these investigations, no prior enrichment was carried out when isolating strains. Three principal methods were used to confirm the presence of MRSA, namely amplification of the mecA gene by PCR, amplification of the mecA and the mecC genes by PCR, and disc diffusion techniques testing susceptibility to cefoxitin (30 μg) and oxacillin (1 μg). The great diversity of methods used for the determination of MRSA in foods and water makes comparison between these research works difficult. The prevalence of MRSA varied according to the food type considered, ranging between 0.0% and 100% (average 11.7 ± 20.3%) for fish and shellfish samples, between 0.0% and 11.0% (average 1.2 ± 3.5%) for egg and egg products, between 0.0% and 20.8% (average 2.5 ± 6.8%) for foods of vegetable origin, between 0.6% and 29.5% (average 28.2 ± 30.3%) for other foodstuffs, and between 0.0% and 36.7% (average 17.0 ± 14.0%) for drinking water.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

1.1. MRSA

Staphylococcus aureus is a bacterium that commonly colonizes the skin, mucous membranes and nasal passages of healthy people and animals. This microorganism is responsible for staphylococcal poisoning, the cause of which is the consumption of foods contaminated with its toxins. Since many people are asymptomatic carriers of S. aureus, it may be transmitted to foodstuffs as a result of unhygienic practices on the part of food handlers [1]. Staphylococcal poisoning triggers nausea and vomiting, and it can sometimes also cause diarrhea and abdominal pain [2].
In certain circumstances, S. aureus is the etiological agent of infections, generally associated with hospital environments. Methicillin is a semi-synthetic antibiotic widely used for the treatment of staphylococcal infections, although in recent years there has been a marked increase in the prevalence of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) strains. In addition, these microorganisms can present resistance to a range of antibiotics in clinical use, being colloquially termed “superbugs” [3]. Although in the past MRSA transmission occurred in clinical settings, in recent decades its presence in the community, outside hospital environments, has been described, with MRSA strains having been isolated in foodstuffs and animals used for food around the world [2].
The World Health Organization (WHO) has incorporated MRSA into its list of “priority pathogens” because of its extensive presence and the severity of the infections it triggers, which pose a significant therapeutic challenge [3]. MRSA produces an altered penicillin-binding protein (PBP2a), which confers resistance to all beta-lactam antibiotics. Methicillin resistance in staphylococci is due to the presence of the mecA and mecC genes, which are found within the staphylococcal chromosome cassette (SCCmec), although there are also other genes responsible for methicillin resistance (mecB, mecD), which have mostly been described in Macrococcus spp. [4].

1.2. Fish and Seafood

Fish and shellfish have high nutritional value but are often linked to foodborne pathogens. Thus, in many developed countries, such as the United States, European nations, and Canada, these foods are responsible for a considerable percentage of the cases of infection and food poisoning that occur each year [5]. With regard specifically to MRSA, this bacterium has been detected in aquatic animals and fish, even though it is not considered a typical microorganism in their microbiota, and it can contaminate these foods as a consequence of poor hygiene practices, through cross-transfer from surfaces and equipment where it has become present, or as an outcome of contact with infected handlers [6]. Furthermore, MRSA infections are considered a zoonosis, and although there is no clear evidence of direct transmission of MRSA from fish to humans, interaction with the aquatic environment, as well as the handling and consumption of seafood, suggests the possibility that fish contaminated with MRSA might be a source of foodborne infection for humans [7]. It has been demonstrated that MRSA can be transmitted from food handlers to seafood and vice versa [8].

1.3. Egg and Egg Products

Eggs are one of the most affordable and nutritious foods eaten by humans. At the time of laying, the inside of the egg is practically sterile, but the shell can become contaminated when passing through the cloaca, or once it is outside the bird. Lack of hygiene during handling, as well as storage and distribution under inadequate conditions, increase shell contamination [9]. Different microorganisms have been detected on eggshells, including S. aureus, Salmonella spp., Streptococcus spp., Escherichia coli, Bacillus spp. or Listeria monocytogenes. Over time, these microorganisms can break through the covering and penetrate the inside of the egg, increasing the risk of foodborne diseases [10]. In the specific case of Staphylococcus spp., there are several poultry diseases caused by this microorganism, so eggs are a potential source of infection by antibiotic-resistant Staphylococcus strains [11,12].

1.4. Foods of Vegetable Origin

Fruit and vegetables are important foods in a healthy diet. In recent years, people’s search for a healthier lifestyle has led to greater consumption of these products [13]. However, the role of such foodstuffs as potential carriers of pathogenic microorganisms has become increasingly clear, with various sources of contamination being recognized, such as dust, soil, manure, irrigation water, or the feces of wild animals. In addition, these products can suffer cross-contamination through contact with storage equipment, or with surfaces in transport vehicles, as well as through direct touching by agricultural workers and food handlers, especially if hygiene practices are poor [14]. Moreover, a range of plant products are often consumed raw, which increases the risk of infection for consumers [4].
The data available for characterizing S. aureus have focused principally on clinical settings, foods of animal origin and dairy products, so the information available on fruits and vegetables is very limited [15]. Furthermore, most of the work carried out on the incidence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria has been based on phenotypic studies, with few molecular studies carried out to determine the resistance genes present [16].

1.5. Other Foods

The health benefits of honey have attracted the interest of many researchers over the past few decades. This food has important antibacterial properties, with both bacteriostatic and bactericidal effects. The micro-environment of honey is, thus, not favorable for the presence of bacteria, but spore-forming bacteria, such as Bacillus and Clostridium, can nevertheless be found in it, generally at low levels. The presence of Staphylococcus or Enterobacteriaceae is no more than an occasional finding and these microorganisms are probably secondary product contaminants from the air, environment, equipment, or handling. The bacteria isolated from honey seem to be related to the origin of the sample, the quality of the honey, and its state of hygiene [17].
In most developing countries, protein deficiency is a major challenge. It is, therefore, necessary to explore the use of unconventional sources of protein, such as insects. It has been suggested that foods of this nature might be another inadvertent source for the transfer of multidrug-resistant bacteria [18].
Ready-to-eat (RTE) foods can be consumed without any heat treatment or washing, sometimes at the point of sale. Convenience, ease of production, affordability, palatability and availability are some of the attractive factors that make such foods very popular, being enjoyed by people of all classes and age groups, but in particular by workers in urban areas and by young people. In some developing countries, ready-to-eat food vendors have been noted as having limited levels of literacy, leading to a lack of knowledge about good hygiene and food handling practices [19].
RTE products that have frequently been implicated in staphylococcal poisoning include meat and meat products, poultry and egg products, milk and dairy products, salads, bakery goods (particularly cream-filled pastries), and sandwich fillings. However, the foods involved differ from country to country, above all owing to variations in eating habits. Specifically, food contamination by S. aureus is due primarily to its ability to enter the food chain through raw materials containing it, improper handling of processed foods, and failure to maintain the cold chain [20].

1.6. Water for Human Consumption

Any individual’s survival depends on a range of factors, among them being the availability of water, which constitutes around 60% of the human body. Sources from which water is taken include rivers, lakes, streams, ponds, reservoirs, springs, and wells [21]. Transmission of a number of pathogenic microorganisms present in water can occur through the use of water-related devices, such as showers, fountains, bathtubs, oral irrigators, ice machines, humidifiers, sinks, and toilets. Water sources polluted by antimicrobial-resistant pathogenic bacteria provide unique environments for the spread of antibiotic resistance genes. Consequently, it has been shown that sinks, taps, drains, bathtubs, drinking water fountains, ventilation grilles, and showers may be contaminated with one or more species of multi-resistant bacteria [22].
The presence of S. aureus in drinking water has hitherto been little studied, and its possible health risks are unknown. However, there are reports of infections by this microorganism associated with various water sources. Specifically, the presence of MRSA has been detected in water intended for human consumption. In consequence, there is a need to monitor any presence of opportunistic bacteria, such as staphylococci, with control measures appropriate for the protection of human health, this being especially necessary in crowded public places [23].
Two reports have been recently published on the prevalence and types of MRSA in meat and meat products [24] and in dairy products [25]. However, a review on MRSA in other foods and drinking water is lacking. In the light of all the above, the present work was undertaken with the objective of compiling an overview of the literature available on the prevalence of MRSA in a variety of products for human consumption, determining which types are most frequent in given foodstuffs. A description of the methodology used in each of the studies surveyed was also incorporated, making it possible to elucidate which approaches offer better detection, identification, and typing in MRSA-positive samples.

2. Materials and Methods

Various databases including Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, and ScienceDirect were consulted to compile a list of all relevant studies on the prevalence of MRSA in different foods. Studies published between January 2001 and February 2024 were traced. No conditions regarding date, language, article type, or text availability were imposed. A total of 57 articles were selected for fish and shellfish, 18 for eggs and egg products, 18 for vegetables, mushrooms, and fruits, 47 for miscellaneous types of food, such as ready-to-cook or ready-to-eat foods, other prepared items, frozen foods, honey, or insects, and 7 for drinking water.
The details of this research work were drawn up in tables ordered by year of publication and, within the year, in alphabetical order of the authors of the articles. The dates and places of studies, the prevalence of MRSA (in the absence of further clarification, the results shown refer to the detection of the mecA gene), and the typing of the MRSA strains found in the study were analyzed. A numerical code explained at the foot of the tables was established to identify the protocols followed in the various research works within the different methodologies for identifying MRSA.

3. Results

3.1. Fish and Seafood

A total of 57 articles were reviewed for fish and seafood (crustaceans and mollusks), as shown in Table 1. In 19 investigations (33.3% of the total) no prior enrichment was performed for the isolation of MRSA. Only a few articles, six in all (10.5%) described the performance of double enrichment of the samples, and none referred to triple enrichment. The most widely used culture medium was tryptone soy broth (TSB), employed in 16 investigations (28.1%). Six cases (10.5%) were supplemented with 10% NaCl and 1% sodium pyruvate. In seven studies (12.3%), a selective chromogenic medium for MRSA was used, and in five (8.8%), oxacillin resistance screening agar base (ORSAB) supplemented with oxacillin (2 mg/L) was used. Three main methods were used to confirm the presence of MRSA: in the majority of the research, 40 studies (70.2%), there was amplification of the mecA gene carried out using a polymerase chain reaction (PCR), while in 7 investigations (12.3%) there was amplification of the mecA and the mecC genes by PCR, and 15 publications (26.3%) referred to the use of a disc diffusion test for susceptibility to cefoxitin (30 μg) and oxacillin (1 μg). In 34 investigations (59.6%), MRSA strains were detected, the prevalence being less than 3% in the majority of studies with positive samples, although some reports referred to a prevalence as high as 30%.

3.2. Eggs and Egg Products

Eighteen articles relating to eggs and egg products were reviewed (Table 2). In eight publications (44.4%) there was no indication of prior enrichment being undertaken. A single publication (5.6%) referred to the carrying out of double enrichment of the samples. Three principal methods for confirming the presence of MRSA were used. In 13 investigations, the majority (72.2%) of the previous studies, amplification of the mecA gene was achieved by using PCR. In three articles (16.7%), reference was made to amplification of the mecA and mecC genes by PCR, and in one single research work (5.6%), a disc diffusion test for susceptibility to cefoxitin (30 μg) and oxacillin (1 μg) was performed.

3.3. Foods of Plant Origin and Mushrooms

Eighteen publications covering vegetables, mushrooms, and fruits were reviewed (Table 3). No prior enrichment was carried out in six studies (33.3% of the total). In only one investigation (5.6%) was a double enrichment of the samples undertaken. The most widely used culture medium was TSB, employed in five investigations (27.8%), in three cases (16.7%) supplemented with 10% NaCl. Just one of the studies consulted used a selective chromogenic medium for MRSA. Use was made of three main methods for confirming that MRSA was present. In 15 articles, a strong majority (83.3%), amplification of the mecA gene by means of PCR was described. Five publications (27.8%) reported amplification of the mecA and mecC genes with this same technique, whilst one single article (5.6%) noted use of a disc diffusion test for susceptibility to cefoxitin (30 μg) and oxacillin (1 μg). In 12 of the investigations (66.7%) MRSA was detected, with its prevalence varying.

3.4. Other Foods

A total of 47 articles were evaluated for different types of foods, including prepared and cooked foods, RTE, frozen, honey, and insects (Table 4). In a substantial number of the publications, specifically 22 (46.8% of the total), no prior enrichment was reported as having been undertaken. Few works performed double enrichment of the samples (seven; 14.9%). The most frequently used culture medium was TSB, which was employed in ten studies (21.3%); in a good few cases, five in all (10.6%), it was supplemented with 7.5% NaCl. Only one investigation (2.1%) used a selective chromogenic medium for MRSA. The methods utilized to confirm the presence of this bacterium were primarily as follows: 32 publications, a clear majority (68.1%), describe amplification of the mecA gene by means of PCR. In seven articles (14.9%), there was reference to amplification of the mecA and mecC genes by that same method, and five of the articles (10.6%) indicated that confirmation of MRSA was achieved by disc diffusion tests for susceptibility to cefoxitin (30 μg) and oxacillin (1 μg). MRSA was detected in 32 of the articles, representing 68.1% of the total.

3.5. Drinking Water

Seven articles relating to MRSA in drinking water were reviewed (Table 5). In three of the articles (nearly half, at 42.9%) it was indicated that no prior enrichment was undertaken. In none of the works was a double enrichment of the samples performed. Only one research work (14.3%) indicated the use of a selective chromogenic medium for MRSA. Three main methods were used to confirm the presence of MRSA: in two articles (28.6%) reference was made to the amplification of the mecA gene by PCR, one of the articles (14.3%) described amplification of the mecA and mecC genes by this same technique, and in two instances (28.6%) there was testing for susceptibility to cefoxitin (30 μg) and oxacillin (1 μg) employing the disc diffusion method.
Table 1. Prevalence of MRSA in fish and shellfish (in the absence of clarification, the prevalence is considered based on the detection of mecA gene).
Table 1. Prevalence of MRSA in fish and shellfish (in the absence of clarification, the prevalence is considered based on the detection of mecA gene).
SamplesPeriodLocationDetection MethodPrevalenceIdentificationReference
136 fish samples from fish markets: 71 rainbow trout and 65 gibel carp Northern Greece-Homogenized: 1.3.4.
-Two methods:
·1.1.
·1.3.4.
-2.1.2
-3.4.
None of the S. aureus isolates were resistant to oxacillin and glycopeptides [26]
1 fish sampleMarch–July 2008The Netherlands-First: 1.4.1.
-Second: 1.9.2.
-2.9.-2.12.1.
-3.2.
None [27]
165 S. aureus strains isolated from different food samples: 12 fishery products2003–2006Korea-1.1.
-3.4.-3.2.
4/165 (2.4%): 2 fish samples (rockfish and sea bass)-ST1 (sea bass)
-ST72 (rockfish)
[28]
200 samples of retail RTE raw fish (sashimi) from retail grocery stores of five supermarket chainsJanuary–February 2010Hiroshima (Japan)-1.3.2.
-2.1.-2.1.3.-2.4.1.
-3.2.-3.4.
5/200 (2.5%): 3 MRSA isolates did not carry the mecA geneST8/t1767 (2 MRSA isolates harboring mecA)[1]
298 fishery products from retail outlets (fresh products, frozen products, salted fish, ready-to-cook products, smoked fish, fish roes, non-frozen surimi and other RTE products)January 2008–May 2009Vigo, Galicia (Spain)-Homogenized 1.2.
-1.1.
-2.1.1.
-3.4.-3.2.
None [29]
25 aquatic products from markets, grand large hotel and farmsApril–November 2011Anhui (China)-1.1.
-3.4.
None [30]
54 fishery products from wholesale martsFebruary–October 2011Seoul and Gyeonggi, Chungcheong,
Gyeongsang, Jeolla, and Gangwon (Korea)
-1.3.3.
-2.1.2.
-3.4.-3.2.
4/22 (18.2%) of S. aureus isolates [31]
100 samples of RTE fish products (salted pilchards, smoked mackerel, dried chub mackerel, and marinated anchovies) from retail outletsMarch–May 2011Greece-1.3.5.
-2.1.2.-2.4.
-3.2.-3.4.
2/100 (2%) from smoked mackerel and marinated anchovies -ST359/t316
-ST5/t548
[32]
30 fish samples and 18 samples of prepared foods made with fish from the kitchens of public hospitalsJuly 2011–May 2012Salvador (Brazil)-First: 1.4.1.
-Second: 1.9.1.
-2.11.
-3.9.
-9/30 (30%) of raw fish samples
-4/18 (22.2%) of the prepared foods with fish
[33]
330 imported fresh fish samples: 50 red mullet, 30 red sea bream, and
30 emperor fish from each country (Egypt, India, and Yemen)
Jordan-1.3.1.
-2.1.1.
-3.4.-3.2.
21/156 (13.5%) of S. aureus isolates: 13 from Egypt, 8 from Yemen, and none from India [34]
200 food samples sold in a black market at an EU border: fish and fish products (31%)July 2012–February 2013Galati (Romania)-1.1.
-3.4.-3.3.
None [35]
3 aquatic products from different food marketsAugust–October 2010Wuhou District of Chengdu City, Sichuan Province (China)-1.5.
-2.1.1.
-3.2.-3.4.
None [36]
105 marine fish samples from retail fishery outlets Ernakulum,
Alappuzha, and Kottayam (India)
-Homogenized: 1.5.1.
-1.1.
-2.1.-2.10.
-3.4.-3.2.
1/252 (0.4%) of S. aureus isolates [37]
600 samples (fresh and frozen, farm and marine): 150 marine shrimps, 150 farmed shrimps, 150 farmed fish, and 150 marine fishSeptember 2013–September 2014Tehran (Iran)-1.6.
-2.1.1.
-3.4.-3.2.
49/206 (23.8%) of S. aureus isolates: 3 (16.7%) fresh marine shrimp samples, 5 (16.7%) frozen marine shrimp samples, 7 (46.6%) fresh farm shrimp samples, 8 (38%) frozen farm shrimp samples, 6 (16.2%) fresh marine fish samples, 7 (13.2%) frozen marine fish samples, 5 (41.7%) fresh farm fish samples, and 8 (40%) frozen farm fish samples [38]
44 samples from retail shops: 11 salmon, 12 pangasius (shark catfish), 11 shrimp, and 10 oysters August–October 2014Berne (Switzerland)-Two methods:
·1.1. and 2.5.
·1.7. and 2.5.
-3.7.-3.4.
None [39]
200 samples of raw and RTE food illegally sold from a market at the eastern EU Border: 61 fish and fish products (smoked or canned fish), from the Republic of Moldova, Ukraine, and Bulgaria July 2012–
February 2013
Galati (Romania)-1.1.
-2.1.2.
-3.10.
0.01% fish canned in oil with herbs and smoked fish spa type t1606[40]
35 seafood samples from retail markets and landing centers: fish products, salt, seawater and surface swabs Mumbai (India)-1.1.
-2.1.1.
-3.4.-3.2.
1/35 (2.86%): isolated from the salt [41]
233 samples from markets and aquaculture farms: 137 finfishes, 31 crustaceans, 26 mollusks, and 39 environmental samples July 2012–April 2015Ernakulam, Kottayam, and Alappuzha (India)-1.3.1.
-2.1.5.-2.2.-2.6.
-3.4.-3.2.
31/233 (13.4%): 13.8% finfish, 9.3% crustaceans, 12% mollusks and 15.3% in the environment [42]
RTE 149 sushi and 51 sashimi from different food outletsAugust–December 2014Klang Valley (Malaysia)-First: 1.2.
-Second: 1.3.4.
-2.1.1.
-3.4.
4/52 (7.7%) resistant to cefoxitin: 3 sushi and 1 sashimi [43]
9 CPS isolates recovered from raw fish samples Turkey-Homogenized: 1.7.
-1.1.
-2.1.
-3.5.-3.2.
9/9 (100%) [44]
1552 seafood samples from retail outlets and the fish processing industry: 379 chilled whole cleaned fish, 308 fresh fish, 614 frozen whole cleaned fish, 124 samples of processed fish and prawn, and 76 water and 51 ice samples2011–2015Gujarat (India)-2.1.2.-2.2.88/1552 (5.67%) were found to be positive for MRSA on MRSA II selective plates: 14 CA-MRSA samples (7 prawn samples, 5 water, and 2 ice) [45]
40 freshwater fish (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and 40 seawater fish (Sparus aurata) samples from bazaars and supermarkets October
2011–December 2012
Bolu (Turkey)-1.3.4.
-2.1.1.
-3.2.-3.4.-3.6.
None [46]
9 raw fish from the big hospitalsJune 2015–June 2016Isfahan (Iran)-First: 1.2.
-Second: 1.3.1.
-2.1.1.
-3.1.-3.2.
None [47]
25 fish products from food processing industries2013–2016Karachi (Pakistan)-2.1.1.-2.4.-2.3.-2.5.
-3.2.
4/25 (16%)SCCmecA IV/agr type II[48]
Sashimi samples from 20 Japanese restaurants: 21 salmon, 18 tuna, 12 sea bass and 9 others August–October 2013Portugal-1.1.
-2.1.4.
-3.4.
Staphylococcus spp. isolates showed resistance to oxacillin (13.9%) and cefoxitin (7.7%) [49]
17 seafood and fishery environment samples: 10 samples from a landing center and 7 samples from retail fish markets (sampling plan was repeated within a week to validate the procedure with same sample number) Kerala (India)-1.3.1.
-2.1.5.-2.2.-2.4.-2.6.-2.10.
-3.5.-3.2.
-First sampling: 6/17 (35.2%): ice, Scylla serrata, water and Channa striatus (at the landing center), and black clam meat (Villorita cyprinoides) and Indian anchovy (Stolephorus indicus) (retail market)

-Second sampling: 4/17 (23.5%): water and ice (at the landing center) and clam meat and ice (retail market)
-First sampling:
·At the landing center: ice (t311), Scylla serrata (t15669/t311), water (t15669), and Channa striatus (t15669)
·Retail market: black clam meat (Villorita cyprinoides) (t121/t311) and Indian anchovy (Stolephorus indicus) (t186)
-Second sampling:
·At the landing center: water (t15669) and ice (t311/t15669)
·Retail market: clam meat (t15669) and ice (t311/t127)
[50]
267 samples of raw seafood (finfish and shellfish) from retail markets and a fish landing center, and from the aquatic environments (ice, water, and mud) Kerala (India)-1.3.1.
-2.1.5.-2.2.-2.6.-2.10.
-3.2.
65 MRSA isolates-ST5 (CC5)/spa complex I/spa type t002: 2 isolates, 1 sample; needle fish (Xenentodon cancila) (5%)
-ST5 (CC5)/I/t311: 19 isolates, 7 samples; Japanese butter fish (Psenopsis anomala), croaker (Johnius malabaricus), ice, mud crab (Scylla serrata), 2 black clam meat (Villorita cyprinoides), and dried Indian prawn (Penaeus indicus) (38.8%)
-ST772 (CC1)/I/t657: 3 isolates, 2 samples; milk fish (Chanos chanos) and water (11.1%)
-ST8 (CC8)/II/t121: 5 isolates, 1 sample; black clam meat (5%)
-ST5 (CC5)/II/t334: 2 isolates, 1 sample; mackerel (Rastrelliger kanagurta) (5%)
-ST88 (CC88)/III/t186: 6 isolates, 1 sample; anchovy (Stolephorus indicus) (5%)
-ST1 (CC1)/III/t127: 1 isolate, 1 sample; ice (5%)
-ST6 (CC5)/IV/t711: 4 isolates, 2 samples; mackerel, and flat fish
(Cynoglossus malabaricus) (11.1%)
-New profile (420-256-236-66-82-411-477) and CC/spa complex V/t15669: 23 isolates, 6 samples; freshwater prawn (Macrobrachium rosenbergii), snake head fish (Channa striatus), black clam meat, 2 ice, and 1 water from the landing center (33.3%)
[51]
70 raw fish from restaurantsFebruary 2015–February 2016Isfahan (Iran)-1.2.
-2.1.1.
-3.2.-3.4.
None [52]
6 fish and fish products confiscated from passengers on flights from 45 non-European Union countries by the Border AuthoritiesAugust 2012–July 2015Bilbao International Airport (Spain) and Vienna International Airport (Austria)-1.1.
-2.1.
-3.4.-3.3.
None [53]
320 raw aquatic food samples from retail outlets and commercial hypermarkets: 142 freshwater fish, 113 saltwater fish, and 65 shrimpJune 2015–June 2016China-1.3.3.
-2.5.
-3.4.-3.5.-3.3.
-10 isolates by cefoxitin disk diffusion tests
-9 isolates were mecA-positive
-ST1/SCCmec III (freshwater fish)
-ST25/IVa (freshwater fish)
-ST398/III (freshwater fish)
-ST59/IVa (freshwater fish)
-ST338/IVa (saltwater fish)
[54]
16 ABF and 30 conventional fish products from retail storesJanuary–December 2012Iowa (USA)-1.10.1.
-2.1.1.-2.2.
-3.2.-3.4.
None [55]
150 catfish (Clarias gariepinus) were
collected from Bahr Elbaker canal: swab samples from internal organs (pancreas, liver, kidney, and intestine), gills, and skin
Sharkia Governorate (Egypt)-1.1.
-2.4.-2.1.-2.3.1.
-3.4.-3.2.
15/70 (21.4%) of S. aureus isolates [56]
120 dusky kob fish samples (Argyrosomus japonicus) from two aquaculture dusky kob farms and Kariega estuary (100 from fish farms and 20 from the wild)November 2014–October 2015Cape (South Africa)-1.3.
-2.4.
-3.2.-2.10.-3.5.-2.8.
33/202 (16.3%) of S. aureus isolates: cultured fish (32/33, 97%) and wild catch (1/33, 3%)-SCCmec I (1), II (1), III (17) (HA-MRSA)
-SCCmec IVc (10) (CA-MRSA)
-Four strains could not be typed
[7,57]
93 S. aureus isolates from different food samples in supermarket, food market and retail stores 2014Chengdu (China)-3.4.-3.2.None detected with the mecA gene
-14/93 (15.05%) resistant to oxacillin: 2 aquatic products
[58]
80 samples of raw shellfish from retail markets: 40 samples of mussels and 40 samples of cockles January–May 2017Bangi, Kajang, and Serdang (Malaysia)-1.3.5.
-3.8.-3.2.-3.4.
7/80 (8.75%): green mussel (4/40, 10%) and blood cockle (3/40, 7.5%) [59]
5 raw processed fish samples from retail vendors Dhaka (Bangladesh)-1.1.
-2.1.
-3.4.-3.2.
1/5 (20%): fish fingerST361/t315 [60]
80 samples of Maki salmon and Nigiri salmon from 20 sushi outletsNovember–December 2017Copenhagen (Denmark)-Two methods:
·1.1. and 2.8.-2.7.
· 1.3.5. and 2.8.-2.7.
-3.1.-3.2.-3.4.-3.7.
None [61]
19 seafood samples from markets Tripoli, Regdalin, Sabha, Benghazi, Janzour, and Tobruk (Libya)-1.1.
-2.1.1.
-3.4.
None [62]
8 raw fish from street food vendorsSeptember
2015–May 2016
Bareilly (India)-2.13.
-3.2.-3.1.
None [63]
511 S. aureus isolates of aquatic products (freshwater fish, shrimp, and seafood) from 860 samplesJuly 2011–June 2016China-3.5.-3.3.-3.4.26/860 (3%)

-31/511 (6.07%) of S. aureus isolates
-ST59 (15), ST1 (4), ST7 (1), ST338 (4), ST630 (1), ST188 (1), ST3304 (1), ST6 (1), ST45 (1), ST88 (1), and not detected (1)
-t437 (18), t127 (4), t091 (1), t034 (1), t002 (1), t085 (1), t114 (1), t189 (1), t116 (1), t1764 (1) and t5554 (1)
-SCCmec III (5), IVa (21), V (2) and not detected (3)
[64]
104 fish samples from different retail meat shops Silchar, Assam (India)-1.7.
-2.4.-2.1.
-3.1.-3.4.
38/104 (36.53%) [65]
RTE sashimi from Japanese restaurants in Salvador, Brazil. A total of 127 sashimi samples were collected directly from the takeout service in 16 restaurants
-3.1.-3.2.S. aureus was found in 73% of the sashimi samples, including sashimi from tuna (75.5% of samples) and salmon (72.5% of samples). Among those positive samples, 37% were contaminated with MRSA strains, which were found among 38.8% of salmon sashimi and 34.0% of tuna sashimi [66]
53 samples (dried, fried, and stewed) of the RTE shellfish (Corbiculid heterodont) from markets Yenagoa, Bayelsa State (Nigeria)-2.4.
-3.1.-3.4.-3.2.
35/65 (53.8%) of S. aureus isolates

-50% of MRSA isolates showed positive for the mecA gene
[67]
959 samples representing 8 types of animal-based foods (pork, chicken, beef, duck, lamb, aquatic products, eggs, and milk) were collected from randomly selected local markets (including 21 supermarkets and 18 wet markets)July 2018–August 2019Shanghai (China)-1.8.
-2.1.1.
-3.4.-3.2.
None [68]
104 fish samples from retail meat shopsJanuary–April 2017Silchar and Imphal (Northeast India)-1.7.
-2.4.-2.1.
-3.1.-3.2.
38/104 (36.53%): 10.34% isolates harbored the mecA gene [69]
50 samples of salted fish from markets: 25 moloha and 25 fesikh Kafrelsheikh (Egypt)-1.1.
-2.1.-2.1.1.
-3.4.-3.2.
26/50 (52%): 8 moloha and 12 fesikh [70]
60 salted fish samples from random places: salted sardine, Feseikh, and Molouha (20 each) Kafrelsheikh Governorate (Egypt)-1.1.
-2.1.
-3.2.
12/60 (20%): 6 salted sardine, 4 Feseikh, and 2 Molouha [71]
44 fish and seafood samples from various retail outlets: 13 fish, 7 mussels and clams, 15 crustaceans (shrimp), and 9 cephalopods (squid and octopus) Spring of 2019Gdansk, Gdynia, and Sopot (Poland)-1.12.
-2.2.
26/44 (59%): 6 cephalopods, 10 crustaceans, 4 mollusks, and 6 fish [5]
10 frozen fish meat samples from 5 open markets Benin City (Nigeria)-1.1.
-2.4.-2.15.
-3.4.
None [72]
44 samples of fishJanuary–June 2017Southern
Assam (India)
-1.7.
-2.4.
-3.1.
13/73 (17.8%) of S. aureus isolates resistant to both oxacillin and cefoxitin antibiotics (41.93% fish samples) [73]
50 freshly preserved salted fish Gwadar Balochistan area (Pakistan)-1.7.
-2.4.
-3.4.-3.2.
13/50 (26%) [74]
173 samples comprising diverse piscine fauna from retail marketsAugust 2019–February 2020Assam (India)-1.3.1.
-2.4.
-3.4.-3.8.-3.2.
23/95 (24.21%) of S. aureus isolates ST88 (23):
-SCCmec
Type IV/agr I (4): t2526 (3) and not assigned (1)
-SCCmec not assigned/agr III (18): t2526 (17) and not assigned (1)
-SCCmec Not assigned/agr I/t2526 (1)
[75]
180 fish samples from fish markets: finfishes, crustaceans, and mollusks (60 of each)June 2021
–June 2022
Wayanad district, Kerala (India)-1.3.
-2.1.6.
-3.1.-3.2.
-Finfish: 1/54 (1.80%) of S. aureus isolates (most of the isolates were resistant to oxacillin (11.11%), followed by cefoxitin
(7.4%))
-Crustaceans: 4/25 (16%) of S. aureus isolates (most of the isolates showed resistance to oxacillin (24%), followed by cefoxitin (16%))
-Mollusks: none (from a total of 43 S. aureus isolates, most of the isolates showed resistance to oxacillin and none of them revealed resistance to cefoxitin)
[76]
20 S. aureus isolates from various public bazaars and supermarkets: 11 seawater fish (Sparus aurata), 8 freshwater fish (Oncorhynchus mykiss), and 1 seawater fish (Dicentrarchus labrax) Bolu (Northwest Turkey)-3.2.-3.4.None [77]
498 seafood samples from the fish market and the fish processing industries: 108 fresh (raw), 79 chilled, 64 frozen, and 124 processed fish samples, and 76 water and 47 ice samples2012–2017 Veraval region, Gujarat (India)-ISO 6888–1 and ISO 6888–2:2003
-2.1.-2.25.-2.2.
-3.2.-3.4.
15/498 (3%): 3 fresh, 4 chilled, 2 frozen, and 6 processed fish
MRSA strain isolated from dried ribbon fish: ST 243/spa type t021/SCCmec type V [8]
65 fish samples from different foodstuffs August–November 2021Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate (Egypt)-2.6.
-3.3.
6/65 (9.2%)
(none was positive for mecC)
[78]
240 samples of Mugil cephalus were chosen from various fish retail marketplaces: mullet fish skin and dorsal muscle samples (120 each) were collectedMay 2022–March 2023Sharkia Governorate (Egypt)-1.2.
-2.1.1.-2.6.
-3.2.-3.4.
5/45 (11.1%) of S. aureus isolates: 4 skin and 1 muscle [6]
Meaning of the numbers used in the detection method column. 1. Pre-enrichment.: 1.1. Without pre-enrichment; 1.2. Pre-enrichment in buffered peptone water, BPW (1.2.1. BPW containing 5% NaCl); 1.3. Pre-enrichment in tryptone soy broth, TSB [1.3.1. TSB containing 10% NaCl and 1% sodium pyruvate; 1.3.2. 2× TSB containing 10% NaCl and 1% sodium pyruvate; 1.3.3. TSB containing 10% NaCl; 1.3.4. TSB containing 7.5% NaCl; 1.3.5. 2 × TSB containing 10% defibrinated sheep’s blood; 1.3.6. TSB supplemented with 75 mg/L aztreonam and 4 mg/L cefoxitin; 1.3.7. TSB supplemented with 75 mg/L aztreonam and 3.5 mg/L cefoxitin; 1.3.8. TSB supplemented with 50 mg/L aztreonam and 3.5 mg/L cefoxitin; 1.3.9. 2× TSB containing 15% NaCl; 1.3.10. TSB containing 6.5% NaCl; 1.3.11. 2× TSB-YE (yeast extract); 1.3.12. TSB supplemented with 70 mg/mL NaCl; 1.3.13. TSB supplemented with 5 mg/L oxacillin; 1.3.14. TSB supplemented with 7.5 mg/L aztreonam and 5 mg/L cefoxitin; 1.3.15. TSB containing 7% NaCl; 1.3.16. TSB containing 6.5% NaCl and 0.3% yeast extract; 1.3.17. TSB containing 7% NaCl, oxacillin (2 μg/mL) and polymyxin B (5 μg/mL); 1.3.18. TSB containing 2.5% NaCl, aztreonam (20 mg/L) and cefoxitin (3.5 mg/L); 1.3.19. TSB containing cefoxitin (3.5 mg/L); 1.3.20. TSB containing 0.6% yeast extract; 1.3.21. TSB containing 4% NaCl, 1% mannitol, 4 mg/L cefoxitin, and 75 mg/L aztreonam; 1.3.22. TSB supplemented with 75 mg/L aztreonam and 3.5 mg/L cefataxime]; 1.4. Mueller–Hinton Broth, MHB [1.4.1. MHB containing 6.5% NaCl and methicillin (4 mg/L); 1.4.2. MHB containing aztreonam (100 mg/L), methicillin (4 mg/L), NaCl (4.0%), NaN3 (100 mg/L), and polymyxin B (10 mg/L); 1.4.3. MHB containing 6.5% NaCl; 1.4.4. MHB containing 7.5% NaCl; 1.4.5. MHB containing 6% NaCl]; 1.5. Brain heart infusion broth, BHI (1.5.1. BHI containing 6.5% NaCl; 1.5.2. BHI containing 10% NaCl; 1.5.3. BHI containing 2% NaCl; 1.5.4. BHI containing 7% NaCl); 1.6. Giolitti–Cantoni broth, GCB (S. aureus selective enrichment medium) containing 0.1% potassium tellurite; 1.7. Peptone water, PW; 1.8. Sterile Butterfield’s phosphate-buffered dilution water (BPD); 1.9. Saline solution; 1.10. Phosphate buffered saline (PBS); 1.11. Baird– Parker broth, BP (1.11.1. 2× BP broth; 1.11.2. 2× BP broth with tellurite enrichment); 1.12. Giolitti–Cantoni broth, GCB (1.12.1. GCB supplemented with 3.5% potassium tellurite solution); 1.13. Peptone broth; 1.14. Thioglycolate bouillon; 1.15. Mannitol salt broth, MSB; 1.16. Phenol red mannitol broth, PHMB [1.16.1. PHMB containing ceftizoxime (5 μg/mL) and aztreonam (7.5 μg/mL); 1.16.2. PHMB containing ceftizoxime (5 μg/mL) and aztreonam (75 μg/mL); 1.16.3. PHMB containing ceftizoxime (0.4 μg/mL) and aztreonam (75 μg/mL); 1.16.4. PHMB containing cefoxitin (5 mg/L) and aztreonam (75 mg/L); 1.16.5. PHMB containing oxacillin (4 mg/L); 1.16.6. PHMB containing 7% NaCl; 1.16.7. PHMB containing oxacillin (5 mg/L) and aztreonam (75 mg/L); 1.16.8. PHMB containing oxacillin (4 mg/L) and aztreonam (75 mg/L); 1.16.9. PHMB containing ceftizoxime (4 μg/mL) and aztreonam (75 μg/mL)]; 1.17. Enrichment broth containing 10 g/l tryptone, 75 g/l NaCl, 10 g/l mannitol and 2.5 g/l of yeast extract (0.25% yeast extract, 1% mannitol, 1% tryptone, and 7.5% NaCl); 1.18. Enrichment broth containing 7% salt; 1.19. Contrast TM MRSA broth; 1.20. Cooked meat broth; 1.21. Nutrient broth containing 7.5% NaCl and oxacillin (6 μg/mL); 1.22. MRSA enrichment broth; 1.23. Sodium chloride broth 10%; 1.24. Nutrient broth. 2. Solid media: 2.1. Baird–Parker agar, BP [2.1.1. BP supplemented with egg yolk tellurite emulsion; 2.1.2. BP supplemented with rabbit plasma fibrinogen (BP-RPF); 2.1.3. BP with cefoxitin (4 µg/mL); 2.1.4. BP selective media; 2.1.5. BP supplemented with antibiotics; 2.1.6. BP supplemented with egg yolk and potassium tellurite; 2.1.7. BP-RPF containing cefoxitin (3.5 µg/mL) and aztreonam (75 µg/mL) (Staphylococcus-selective agar); 2.1.8. BP supplemented with egg yolk tellurite emulsion and sulfamethazine]; 2.2. Selective MRSA agar (BBL CHROM agar MRSA; BD)/MRSA chromogenic agar; 2.3. Blood agar, BA (2.3.1. BA supplemented with sheep’’s blood; 2.3.2. 5% horse blood agar and a 10 μg cefoxitin disk; 2.3.3. 5% bovine blood agar); 2.4. Mannitol salt agar, MSA (2.4.1. MSA with 2 µg/mL oxacillin; 2.4.2. MSA with 4 µg/mL cefoxitin; 2.4.3. MSA supplemented with 75 mg/L aztreonam and 6 mg/L oxacillin; 2.4.4. Mannitol salt phenol red agar, MSPRA; 2.5. S. aureus-selective CHROM agar plates; 2.6. Oxacillin-resistance-screening-agar-base (ORSAB) supplemented with oxacillin (2 mg/L); 2.7. MacConkey agar; 2.8. Chocolate agar; 2.9. CNA plates (Columbia colistin and nalidixic acid); 2.10. Oxacillin Salt Screen Agar® (MHA with 4% NaCl and 6 µg/mL oxacillin)/oxacillin agar screen sensitivity disk, agar-N supplemented); 2.11. MRSA-ID; 2.12. Columbia agar (CA) (2.12.1. CA supplemented with 5% sheep’s blood); 2.13. MRSA screening; 2.14. Brilliance MRSA Agar (chromogenic selective agar for MRSA); 2.15. Oxoid oxacillin resistance screening agar, ORSA; 2.16. MRSA select® (BioRad) agar (selective chromogenic MRSA agar); 2.17. Hypertonic mannitol agar (HMA); 2.18. MRSA select medium; 2.19. Chrom-ID MRSA agar; 2.20. SA select agar; 2.21. chromogenic media (MRSA-Ident-Agar); 2.22. Tryptone soy agar, TSA (2.22.1. TSA with 5% sheep’s blood and 0.1% esculin; 2.22.2. TSA with 5% sheep’s blood); 2.23. OXA agar oxoid; 2.24. Spectra MRSA (Remel Diagnostics, Lenexa, KS); 2.25. HiChrome MeReSa agar plates with cefoxitin and methicillin supplement (HiMedia). 3. Identification of MRSA: 3.1. Cefoxitin (30 μg) and oxacillin (1 μg) disk diffusion susceptibility tests; 3.2. PCR-based amplification of mecA gene; 3.3. PCR-based amplification of mecA and mecC genes; 3.4. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing; 3.5. Cefoxitin disk diffusion method; 3.6. Determination of beta-lactamase production; 3.7. Susceptibility to cefoxitin and doxycycline using disk diffusion according to CLSI; 3.8. Oxacillin agar plate; 3.9. MRSA latex agglutination test (penicillin-binding protein 2a latex agglutination test); 3.10. S. aureus spa typing; 3.11. Detection of MRSA by the MPN-PCR method; 3.12. Oxacillin E-test strips; 3.13. MICs of oxacillin by broth microdilution method; 3.14. Oxacillin disk diffusion method; 3.15. Micronaut-s MRSA/IFSG GP 4 (Merlin Diagnostika, Bornheim, Germany); 3.16. SPOT Staphytect Plus (Oxoid,DR0100M), which is a latex agglutination test for the detection of aggregation factor, protein A, and some polysaccharides found in MRSA isolates; 3.17. MALDI-TOF-MS (mass spectrometry); 3.18. StaphType DNA microarray assay. Baird–Parker: BP; brain heart infusion: BHI; buffered peptone water: BPW; coagulase-positive Staphylococcus: CPS; Giolitti–Cantoni broth: GCB; mannitol salt agar: MSA; mannitol salt broth: MSB; Mueller–Hinton agar: MHA; Mueller–Hinton broth: MHB; not typable: NT; peptone water: PW; phenol red mannitol broth: PHMB; ready-to-eat: RTE; tryptone soya agar: TSA; tryptone soya broth: TSB.
Table 2. Prevalence of MRSA in egg and egg products (in the absence of clarification, the prevalence is considered based on the detection of the mecA gene).
Table 2. Prevalence of MRSA in egg and egg products (in the absence of clarification, the prevalence is considered based on the detection of the mecA gene).
SamplesPeriodLocationDetection MethodPrevalenceIdentificationReference
270 raw egg samplesJuly 2008–March 2014China-First: 1.2.
-Second: 1.3.
-2.1.1.
-3.4.-3.2.
None [79]
3 eggs confiscated from passengers on flights from non-EU countriesApril 2012–June 2013International Bilbao Airport (Spain)-1.1.
-3.4.-3.3.
None [80]
2 egg products from different food marketsAugust–October 2010Wuhou District of Chengdu City, Sichuan Province (China)-1.4.
-2.1.1.
-3.2.-3.4.
None [36]
455 samples of Indian Rojak food items were collected from 35 different Indian Rojak stalls: 321 cooked items with or without re-heating, 99 serving portions of raw vegetables, and 35 serving portions of gravySeptember 2011–January 2012Singapore-1.1.
-2.1.
-3.2.-3.6.-3.5.
1/11 of S. aureus isolates (9.09%): 1 egg [81]
227 S. aureus isolates from RTE food and food contact surfaces at retail2011–2014Singapore-3.2.-3.6.-3.5.1/227 (0.44%) of S. aureus isolates: 1 fried egg ST80/t1198/SCCmec IV (CA-MRSA) [82]
150 samples of chicken products from different farms and markets: 30 unhatched eggs and 30 table eggs Luxor (Egypt)-Inoculated: 1.2.
-1.1.
-2.4.
-3.2.
14/21 (66.7%) of S. aureus isolates [83]
7 eggs confiscated from passengers on flights from 45 non-European Union countries by the Border AuthoritiesAugust 2012–July 2015Bilbao International Airport (Spain) and Vienna International Airport (Austria)-1.1.
-2.1.
-3.4.-3.3.
None [53]
2500 eggs and egg products from supermarket outlets2015China-1.7.
-2.1.-2.2.
-3.2.-3.4.
14/43 (32.6%) of S. aureus isolates of eggs and egg products [84]
93 S. aureus isolates from different food samples in supermarkets, food markets, and retail stores 2014Chengdu (China)-3.4.-3.2.None detected with the mecA gene
-14/93 (15.05%) resistant to oxacillin: 1 egg product
[58]
300 eggs (220 chicken eggs and 80 quail eggs) from different retail shops and farms January–June 2017Mymensingh (Bangladesh)-1.6.
-2.4.
-3.2.-3.4.
3/23 (13.04%) of S. aureus isolates: chicken eggs
-S. aureus isolates resistant to oxacillin: quail eggs (1/4, 25%) and chicken eggs (6/23, 26.1%)
[11]
300 table eggs from retail shopsDecember 2015–May 2016Haripur (Pakistan)-1.1.
-2.4.
-3.2.-3.4.
33/300 (11%)-ST772 (31/33, 94%)/SCCmec IV: t657 (30) and t8645 (1) (CA-MRSA)
-ST8/IV/t8645 (2/33, 6%) (associated with USA300)
[12]
290 eggs comprising 58 composite samples (5 eggs/composite) from either the eggshell or egg contents: from 13 poultry farms (65) and 45 retail outlets (225)January–April 2016Nsukka and Enugu (Nigeria)-1.2.
-2.4.-2.5.
-3.6.-3.4.
43/75 (57.3%) of S. aureus isolates [85]
125 chicken eggs samples were collected from different retail outlets January–February; and July–August 2019Pokhara (Nepal)-1.1.
-2.4.
-3.5.
-In winter, 34/50 S. aureus samples were isolated: 2 (5.88%) were confirmed as MRSA
-In summer, 55/75 S. aureus samples were isolated: 4 (7.27%) were confirmed as MRSA
[86]
33 raw eggs from street food vendors September
2015–May 2016
Delhi and Bareilly (India)-2.3.
-3.2.-3.1.
None [63]
275 eggs from household chickens
November 2016–March 2017Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
(Pakistan)
-1.1.
-2.4.
-3.4.-3.3.
None [87]
959 samples representing 8 types of animal-based foods (pork, chicken, beef, duck, lamb, aquatic products, egg, and milk) were collected from randomly selected local markets (including 21 supermarkets and 18 wet markets)July 2018–August 2019Shanghai (China)-1.5.
-2.1.1.
-3.4.-3.2.
23/165 (13.9%) of S. aureus isolates resistant to oxacillin: 2 eggs [68]
393 poultry egg samples from hatcheries (238), retail shops (94), and households (61) Ludhiana,
Punjab (India)
-1.1.
-2.1.
-3.2.-3.4.
None [88]
627 fresh brown eggs from 3 poultry farms and 12 retail markets August 2013–November 2014Yangling Shaanxi Province (China)-1.2.
-2.1.1.
-3.2.-3.4.
3/627 (0.5%)-CC45/ST45/t116 (1)
-CC5/ST5/t002 (2)
[10]
Meaning of the numbers used in the detection method column. 1. Pre-enrichment.: 1.1. Without pre-enrichment; 1.2. Buffered peptone water, BPW; 1.3. Tryptone soy broth (TSB) containing 7.5% NaCl; 1.4. Brain heart infusion (BHI); 1.5. Sodium chloride broth 10%; 1.6. Nutrient broth; 1.7. Saline solution. 2. Solid media: 2.1. Baird–Parker agar (BP) (2.1.1. BP supplemented with egg yolk tellurite emulsion); 2.2. Blood agar; 2.3. HiChrome MeReSa agar plates with cefoxitin and methicillin supplement; 2.4. Mannitol salt agar (MSA); 2.5. Oxacillin-resistance-screening-agar-base (ORSAB) supplemented with oxacillin (2 mg/L). 3. Identification of MRSA: 3.1. Cefoxitin (30 μg) and oxacillin (1 μg) disk diffusion susceptibility tests; 3.2. PCR-based amplification of mecA gene; 3.3. PCR-based amplification of mecA and mecC genes; 3.4. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing; 3.5. Cefoxitin disk diffusion method; 3.6. MRSA latex agglutination test (penicillin-binding protein 2a latex agglutination test). Baird–Parker: BP; brain heart infusion: BHI; buffered peptone water: BPW; mannitol salt agar: MSA; tryptone soya broth: TSB.
Table 3. Prevalence of MRSA in vegetables, mushrooms, and fruits (in the absence of clarification, the prevalence is considered based on the detection of the mecA gene).
Table 3. Prevalence of MRSA in vegetables, mushrooms, and fruits (in the absence of clarification, the prevalence is considered based on the detection of the mecA gene).
SamplesPeriodLocationDetection MethodPrevalenceIdentificationReference
120 samples from tomato farms: soils and water, protected houses, packing houses, employees; tomatoes and leaves2004Gyeongnam (Korea)-1.3.2.
-2.4.-2.1.1.
-3.4.
2/14 (14.3%) of S. aureus isolates were resistant to oxacillin: in roller (protected house) and in hydroponic solution
-No MRSA in tomatoes and leaves
[89]
616 vegetable samples from supermarkets and conventional markets: lettuce, bean sprouts, green bean sprouts, spinach, a young radish, and Chinese cabbage January 2003–December
2004
Seoul, Busan, Daejon, and Gwangju (Korea)-1.3.2.
-2.1.1.
-3.4.-3.2.
None [90]
149 strains isolated from samples of food, such as vegetables2004–2010Colombia-1.1.
-2.1.
-3.4.-3.2.
None [91]
53 leaf vegetables samples from markets: sprout, lettuce, and perilla2009–2011Gyeonggi-do (Korea)-1.1.
-2.1.
-3.2.-3.4.
11/53 (20.75%)
-Among the 53 isolates, 15 (28.30%) had a positive reaction on the oxacillin disk test, but 4 of these exhibited negative PCR results for amplification of the mecA gene
[92]
102 fresh vegetable and fruit samples from local grocery stores: leafy greens, mushrooms, apples, and pear July 2010–October 2012Shanghai (China)-1.1.
-3.2.
None [93]
32 pickled vegetables and 4 vegetables and fruits from different food marketsAugust–October 2010Wuhou District of Chengdu City, Sichuan Province (China)-1.5.
-2.1.1.
-3.2.-3.4.
2/103 (1.94%) of S. aureus isolates from pickled vegetables [36]
2162 food samples: pasta, rice, fruit, etc. Collected during official monitoring activities2008Italy-1.1.
-3.5.-3.4.
None [94]
339 samples of fruits and vegetables (fresh-cut, whole, and frozen) and sprouts were randomly collected from different supermarkets, local stores, and green markets 2014Czech Republic-1.2.
-2.2.
-3.2.
1/339 (0.3%): frozen fruit (unpacked plums)ST45/t015 (human origin)[95]
3000 vegetable salads from supermarket outlets2015China-1.4.
-2.1.-2.3.
-3.2.-3.4.
1/85 (1.2%) of S. aureus isolates of vegetable salads [84]
50,316 retail market food samples located in 32 provinces2011China-1.4.
-2.1.-2.3.
-3.2.-3.4.
15 MRSA isolates: 2 in RTE
vegetable salads
-ST630 (CC8)/t4549/MLVA Complex MC8 (1 RTE vegetable salad)
-ST59 (CC59)/t437/MC621 (1 RTE vegetable salad)
[96]
419 retail vegetable samples from supermarkets, fairs, and farmers’ markets: 110 tomatoes, 128 cucumbers, 84 lettuces, 87 caraway, and 10 other vegetablesJuly 2011–June 2016China-1.3.2.
-2.5.
-3.4.-3.3.
5/30 (16.7%) of S. aureus isolates: 3 from lettuce and 2 from caraway-ST59/t437 (3/5, 60%) (2 caraway and 1 lettuce)
-ST1/t114 (1 lettuce)
-ST7/t2874 (1 lettuce)
[97]
Bulk RTE foods: 401 fruit and vegetables2013–2016Sichuan (China)-First: 1.2.
-Second: 1.3.3.
-2.1.1.
-3.2.-3.4.
None [98]
S. aureus strains were isolated from retail foods: 42 isolates from edible mushrooms and 30 isolates from vegetables July 2011–June 2016China-3.5.-3.3.-3.4.-5/699 (0.7%) edible mushrooms: 7/42 (16.67%) of S. aureus isolates
-4/419 (1%) vegetables: 5/30 (16.67%) of S. aureus isolates
-Edible mushrooms:
·ST59/t437 (7): SCCmec IVa (4) and V (3)

-Vegetables:
·ST59 (3), ST1 (1) and ST7 (1)
·t437 (3), t114 (1) and t2874 (1)
·SCCmec IVa (3), IVd (1) and not detected (1)
[64]
397 samples comprised of 16 different raw leafy vegetables from
selected wet markets
May 2015–March 2016Malaysia-1.1.
-2.1.1.
-3.4.-3.2.
9/42 (21.4%) of S. aureus isolates [99]
33 raw vegetables samples from a Moroccan hospital kitchenMay 2015–June 2016Fez (Morocco)-1.2.
-2.1.1.
-3.4.-3.2.
1/7 (14.28%) of S. aureus isolates [100]
143 plant-based products from 10 specialty markets selling imported foods: 88 frozen and 55 dried itemsFebruary–May 2017Saskatoon, Saskatchewan (Canada)-1.2.
-2.4.
-3.4.-3.3.
2/7 (28.6%) of S. aureus isolates-ST834 (1)
-NT
[4]
350 samples from retail centers: 180 raw vegetable and 170 salad samples September 2019–January 2020Chaharmahal Va Bakhtiari province (Iran)-1.3.1.
-2.1.1.
-3.1.-3.2.-3.4.
26/45 (57.77%) of S. aureus isolates: 8 vegetable and 18 salads [101]
143 samples of RTE fruits and vegetables were sold at 2 farmers’ markets, 2 supermarkets, and 2 e-commerce stores: 66 samples were fruits (13 fresh-cut honeydew melon, 13 fresh-cut watermelon, 10 cherry tomato, 10 fresh-cut pear, 10 fresh-cut peach, and 10 grape), and 77 were vegetables (37 lettuce, 15 chicory, 6 purple cabbage, 7 cucumber, 5 coriander, and 7 carrot) June–September 2021Shanghai (China)-1.1.
-2.1.
-3.4.-3.3.
3/47 (6.4%) of S. aureus isolates: lettuce, pear, and cherry tomatoSCCmecIV/ST7208 (3)[14]
Meaning of the numbers used in the detection method column. 1. Pre-enrichment.: 1.1. Without pre-enrichment; 1.2. Buffered peptone water, BPW; 1.3. Tryptone soy broth (TSB) [TSB containing 10% NaCl and 1% sodium pyruvate; 1.3.2. TSB containing 10% NaCl]; 1.4. Saline solution; 1.5. Brain heart infusion (BHI). 2. Solid media: 2.1. Baird–Parker agar (BP) (2.1.1. BP supplemented with egg yolk tellurite emulsion); 2.2. Brilliance MRSA Agar (chromogenic selective agar for MRSA); 2.3. Blood agar; 2.4. Mannitol salt agar; 2.5. S. aureus-selective CHROM agar plates. 3. Identification of MRSA: 3.1. Cefoxitin (30 μg) and oxacillin (1 μg) disk diffusion susceptibility tests; 3.2. PCR-based amplification of mecA gene; 3.3. PCR-based amplification of mecA and mecC genes; 3.4. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing; 3.5. Cefoxitin disk diffusion method. Baird–Parker: BP; brain heart infusion: BHI; buffered peptone water: BPW; mannitol salt agar: MSA; not typable: NT; ready-to-eat: RTE; tryptone soya broth: TSB.
Table 4. Prevalence of MRSA in different food products (honey, insects, ready-to eat foods; in the absence of clarification, the prevalence is considered based on the detection of the mecA gene).
Table 4. Prevalence of MRSA in different food products (honey, insects, ready-to eat foods; in the absence of clarification, the prevalence is considered based on the detection of the mecA gene).
SamplesPeriodLocationDetection MethodPrevalenceIdentificationReference
98 samples from the food service environments of elementary schools: drinking water, kitchen utensils, cookers, and cooked foodsNovember–December 2000Gyeongnam (Korea)-1.3.3.
-2.4.
-3.4.
None [102]
106 samples of RTE foods from 2 food centers (hospital and student cafeteria), and a local marketA period of 3 monthsSongkhla (Thailand)-Homogenized: 1.2.
-1.1.
-2.1.
-3.4.
22/106 (20.75%) were resistant to oxacillin [103]
148 presumptive S. aureus isolates from 21 food products2006–2008Portugal-1.1.
-2.1.2.
-3.2.-3.4.
56/148 (38%) of the isolates were resistant to oxacillin [104]
29 S. aureus isolates from different retail processed foods2003–2006Korea-1.1.
-3.4.-3.2.
None [28]
693 food samples associated with foodborne investigations submitted to the Alberta Provincial Laboratory for Public Health, from restaurants, retail facilities, or private homesJanuary 2007–December 2010Alberta (Canada)-1.1.
-3.2.
None [105]
80 RTE salad samples of 4 salads: cheese, fish roe, eggplant, and tzatziki (20 samples of each)
50 samples of 5 basic salad ingredients: feta cheese, mytzithra, mayonnaise, fish roe, and roasted egg pulp (10 samples of each)
Six-month periodGreece-Two methods:
·1.1.
·1.3.4.
-2.1.2.
-3.4.
None [106]
40 cooked meat products and 20 ice creams from markets, a large grand hotel, and farmsApril–November 2011Anhui (China)-1.1.
-3.4.
None [30]
267 S. aureus strains isolated from 244 RTE foods (precooked foods, meat and fish products, cheese, delicatessen salads, sandwiches and canapés, confectionery and bakery products, and various other RTE foods)August 2007–
July 2008
Switzerland-1.1.
-2.11.1.
-3.2.-2.9.
2/267 (1%) of S. aureus isolates had mecA
-Two strains had genes involved in methicillin resistance (mecA and delta_mecR) but were phenotypically methicillin
sensitive as determined by streaking them on chromID agar
[107]
120 dumplings, 490 RTE foods, 228 powdered infant formula, and 422 infant rice cereal from supermarkets and farmers marketsJuly 2008–December 2012Shaanxi (China)-First: 1.2.
-Second: 1.3.4.
-2.1.1.
-3.2.-3.4.
-3/490 (0.6%) RTE food samples
-3/120 (2.5%) dumpling samples
-ST9/SCCmec IVb/t899: 1 dumpling
-ST88/II/t10793: 2 dumpling
-ST88/V/New spa type: 2 dumpling
-ST630/SCCmec NT/t377: 1 RTE food
-ST59/NT/t437: 1 RTE food
-ST59/NT/t437: 1 RTE food
[108]
63 samples of prepared foods: 15 chicken, 15 beef, 15 pork, and 18 fish from the kitchens of public hospitalsJuly 2011–May 2012Salvador (Brazil)-First: 1.4.
-Second: 1.7.
-2.10.
-3.7.
6/63 (9.5%): chicken products (1/15, 6.7%), pork products (1/15, 6.7%), and fish products (4/18, 22.2%) [33]
490 RTE foods, 120 dumplings, and 447 infant rice cereals July 2008–March 2014China-First: 1.2.
-Second: 1.3.4.
-2.1.1.
-3.4.-3.2.
None [79]
200 food samples sold in a black market at an EU border: 13% others (e.g., eggs, biscuits, spices)July 2012–February 2013Galati (Romania)-1.1.
-3.4.-3.3.
None [35]
100 food samples from the kitchen of a catering firm Kars (Turkey)-1.1.
-2.1.1.
-3.2.
4/100 (4%) [109]
61 frozen food samples (various quick-frozen dumplings with meat and vegetable fillings) which were stored under the freezing conditions for transportation and sale; 68 processed soybean products (35 fresh tofu, 16 tofu skin, and 17 dried tofu products) from local grocery storesJuly 2010–October 2012Shanghai (China)-1.1.
-3.2.
1/20 (5%) of S. aureus isolates in frozen foods

-None in processed soybean products
-ST88 (CC88)/agr III (1) (HA-MRSA) [93]
3 rice products, 31 cooked meat products, 15 soybean products, 5 dry cakes, and 3 confections from different food marketsAugust–October 2010Wuhou District of Chengdu City, Sichuan Province (China)-1.5.
-2.1.1.
-3.2.-3.4.
6/103 (5.83%) of S. aureus isolates: 3 cooked meat products, 2 soybean products, and 1 confection [36]
455 samples of Indian Rojak food items were collected from 35 different Indian Rojak stalls: 321 cooked items with or without re-heating, 99 serving portions of raw vegetables, and 35 serving portions of gravy
Additional raw RTE ingredients: 20 raw cucumber, 20 onion, 20 green chili, 40 raw tofu, and 39 fishcake samples from wet markets and supermarkets
September 2011–January 2012Singapore-1.1.
-2.1.
-3.2.-3.7.-3.5.
2/11 of S. aureus isolates (18.2%): 1 from onions and 1 from prawn fritters from the same Rojak stall [81]
120 food samples from doner kebab restaurants, retail markets, butchers, and barns: 20 chicken doner kebabs July 2012–March 2013Kırşehir (Turkey)-First: 1.2.
-Second: 1.8.
-2.1.1.
-3.2.
None [110]
60 natural untreated and unpasteurized honey samples from different botanical sources purchased in bulk from village open markets Epirus (Greece)-1.1.
-2.1.
-3.4.
8/60 (13.3%) positive S. aureus: 35% resistant to oxacillin [17]
200 samples of raw and RTE Food illegally sold from a market at the eastern EU Border: 13% other food products (spices, dried fruits, jellies, gingerbread, and candies) from the Republic of Moldova, Ukraine, and BulgariaJuly 2012–
February 2013
Galati (Romania)-1.1.
-2.1.2.
-3.8.
None [40]
550 RTE foods from retail markets: 119 cooked pork, 153 cooked chicken, 127 cooked duck, 53 cold vegetable dishes in sauce, 52 cold noodles, and 46 fried rice/sushi samplesDecember 2011–May 2014China-1.3.3.
-2.5.
-3.4.-3.3.
-7/69 of S. aureus isolates were identified by cefoxitin disc diffusion test: 2 cold noodles, 2 cooked duck, 1 cooked chicken, 1 fired rice/sushi, and 1 cold vegetables dish in sauce

-6 isolates were mecA-positive (all except for cold vegetable dishes in sauce)
-ST59/SCCmec IVa (2B) (cooked duck) (2/6, 33.3%) (CA-MRSA)
-ST338/V (5C2) (cold noodles) (CA-MRSA)
-ST3239 (novel ST)/SCCmec NT (2/) (cold noodles)
-ST9/undescribed SCCmec (2C2) (cooked chicken) (LA-MRSA)
-ST1/V (5C2) (fired rice/sushi) (CA-MRSA)
[111]
227 S. aureus isolates from RTE food and food contact surfaces in a retail environment2011–2014Singapore-3.2.-3.7.-3.5.5/227 (2.2%) of S. aureus isolates: 1 sliced onion, 1 prawn fritters, 1 fried egg, and 2 swabs of food handlers’ glovesSCCmec IV (5) (CA-MRSA):
-ST80/t1198 (3) (from sliced onion, prawn fritters, fried egg)
-ST6/t304 (2) (from swabs of food handlers’ gloves)
[82]
78 CPS were collected in a routine analysis from several food companies (1454 food samples)2009Porto (Portugal)-1.1.
-2.4.
-3.2.-3.4.
4/73 (5.5%) of S. aureus isolates: 1 from a fermented meat product, 2 from RTE, and 1 from a pastry product

-Of the S. aureus isolates resistant to oxacillin (5.5%), only one was mecA-positive. The other three MRSA strains did not show oxacillin resistance aside from the presence of the mecA gene
SCCmec IV (1 fermented meat product), V (2 RTE) and NT (1 pastry)[112]
31 meat barbecue, 82 chicken barbecue, 19 grilled fish, 94 soup, 56 salad, and 119 cooked rice samples from big hospitalsJune 2015–June 2016Isfahan (Iran)-First: 1.2.
-Second: 1.3.1.
-2.1.1.
-3.1.-3.2.
-12/132 (9.09%) cooked foods with animal origin: 5 meat barbecue and 7 chicken barbecue
-11/269 (4.08%) cooked foods without animal origin: 6 soups, 4 salads, and 1 rice

-All of the S. aureus isolates of meat barbecue, chicken barbecue, soup, and salad samples had complete resistance against methicillin
-The prevalence of bovine-, ovine-, poultry-, and human-based biotypes in the MRSA strains isolated from various types of hospital food samples were 8.10, 8.10, 32.43, and 48.64%, respectively
-The biotypes of the 2.70% of MRSA strains were determined as unknown
-All of the MRSA strains recovered from soup, salad, and rice samples were related to human-based biotypes
[47]
Sampling of 44 raw and cooked food materials and 65 swab samples of cooking utensils in a hospital kitchenApril 2011–January 2013Tehran (Iran)-1.1.
-2.4.-2.7.-2.3.
-3.4.
-7/44 (16.66%) foods
-32/65 (50%) utensils
[113]
910 hospital food samples: 308 meat, 142 poultry, 179 fruit, 455 vegetable, 210 dairy/eggs, 376 bread/grains, 1 nut, and 200 other samplesMay 2011–July 2012St Louis, Missouri (USA)-1.3.2.
-2.3.1.-2.8.
-3.6.-3.4.
29/910 (3.2%): meat (7/308, 2%), poultry (2/142, 1%), fruit (2/179, 1%), 14/455 vegetable (3%), 7/210 dairy/eggs (3%), 19/376 bread/grains (5%) and 9/200 other (5%) (veggie burger, sauce, pudding, jelly, 2 gravy, fish, 2 cake)SCCmec II (9/29, 31%), III (2/29, 7%), and IV (18/29, 62%)[15]
500 different food samples: 137 vegetarian items, 69 non-vegetarian items, 87 dairy products, 72 bakery, and 135 processed products collected from a bakery, market, hospital canteen, and street vendors Mysuru (India)-1.2.
-2.1.-2.4.2.
-3.2.-3.4.-3.6.
152/152 (100%) of S. aureus isolates [114]
Food samples from food processing industries: 105 candy, 50 candy mix, 85 dates, 15 formula milk, 40 lentil, 30 mayonnaise, 100 meat product, 75 paratha, 109 rice, 40 samosa, and 338 spices mix samples2013–2016Karachi (Pakistan)-2.1.1.-2.4.-2.3.-2.5.
-3.2.
-10/105 (9.52%) in candies
-4/50 (8%) in candy mix
-6/85 (7.06%) in dates
-3/40 (7.5%) in lentils
-3/30 (10%) in mayonnaise
-7/100 (7%) in meat products
-14/75 (18.67%) in paratha
-10/109 (9.17%) in rice
-4/40 (10%) in samosa
-17/338 (5.03%) in spices mix
-Candies: SCCmecA type II (2), III (2), IV (6), agr type I (2) and agr II (8)
-Candy mix: SCCmecA II/agr II (4)
-Dates: SCCmecA IV/agr II (6)
-Lentils: SCCmecA IV/agr I (1) and agr II (2)
-Mayonnaise: SCCmecA II/agr I (3)
-Meat products: SCCmecA III (3), IV (4), agr I (3) and agr II (4)
-Paratha: SCCmecA II (3), IV (11), agr I (6) and agr II (8)
-Rice: SCCmecA IV/agr I (2) and agr II (8)
-Samosa: agr I/SCCmecA II (2) and SCCmecA IV (2)
-Spices mix: SCCmecA IV/agr II (17)
[48]
100 cooked meat, 100 cooked chicken, 100 cooked fish, and 70 soup samples from restaurantsFebruary 2015–February 2016Isfahan (Iran)-1.2.
-2.1.1.
-3.2.-3.4.
60/119 (50.42%) of S. aureus isolates: 25 cooked meat, 30 cooked chicken, 3 cooked fish, and 2 soup

-The prevalence of MRSA strains in all samples was higher in winter seasons than other seasons of the year
-SCCmec V (15 cooked meat, 18 cooked chicken, 2 cooked fish, and 2 soup),
-IVa (14 cooked meat, 18 cooked chicken, 2 cooked fish, and 2 soup),
-IVb (7 cooked meat, 10 cooked chicken, 1 cooked fish, and 1 soup)
-II (2 cooked meat and 2 cooked chicken)
-I (2 cooked meat and 3 cooked chicken)
-III (3 cooked meat, 3 cooked chicken, and 1 cooked fish)
-IVc (5 cooked meat, 6 cooked chicken, and 1 cooked fish)
-IVd (2 cooked meat and 4 cooked chicken)
[52]
3000 rice- and flour products, 3000 sandwiches, 2000 milk products, 500 condiments, 500 bean products), and 500 fruit desserts from supermarket outlets2015China-1.9.
-2.1.-2.3.
-3.2.-3.4.
-9/90 (10%) of S. aureus isolates of rice- and flour products
-5/69 (7.2%) of S. aureus isolates of sandwiches
-1/14 (7.1%) of S. aureus isolates of other foods
[84]
50,316 retail market food samples located in 32 provinces2011China-1.9.
-2.1.-2.3.
-3.2.-3.4.
15 MRSA isolates: 5 cooked meat and 2 cooked noodles-ST9 (CC9): t437/MLVA Complex MC621 (2 cooked meat) and t030/MC8 (1 cooked noodles)
-ST903 (CC9)/t172/MC621 (1 cooked meat)
-ST10 (CC10)/t1244/NMC (1 cooked meat)
-ST59 (CC59)/t337/MC621 (1 cooked meat)
-ST338 (CC59)/t437/MC621 (1 cooked noodles)
[96]
495 food samples from foodstuffs: 105 cooked dishes with samples of foods prepared with chicken (45, e.g., roasted chicken and chicken stew) and beef (60, e.g., seasoned beef strips, beef stew with vegetables, boeuf rôti, and steak)November 2014–November 2015Algeria-1.1.
-2.1.1.
-3.3.-3.4.
26/153 (17%): 2 roasted chicken samples and 1 steak

-40 S. aureus isolates exhibited a methicillin-resistance phenotype

-33/153 (21.5%) of S. aureus isolates were resistant to cefoxitin
SCCmec IV (1 roasted chicken and 1 steak) and V (1 roasted chicken)
[115]
9646 food samples: grain products, meat products, milk products, fishery products, drinks, pastry, fruit products and vegetable products, etc.2013–2015Yunnan (China)-First: 1.2.
-Second: 1.3.4.
-2.1.1.
-3.4.-3.2.
74/251 (29.5%)-ST1/t1775/SCCmec IV (4)
-ST5/t002/IV (9)
-ST6/t701/IV (27)
-ST7/t091: IV (4) and NT (4)
-ST59/t437: IV (9) and V (15)
-ST88/t10777/IV (2)
[116]
127 S. aureus isolates from RTE food samples: 55 from fresh meat, 18 from meat products, 17 from fruits and vegetables, and 37 from cereal productsJuly 2013–December 2015Zhengzhou (China)-3.4.-3.2.38/127 (29.92%) of S. aureus isolates -t002/agrII/SCCmec III (6/38)
-t701/agrI/III (3/38)
-t437/agrI/IVa (3/38)
-SCCmec type III (23/38, 60.53%), IVa (4/38, 10.53%), and NT (11/38)
[117]
93 S. aureus isolates from different food samples in supermarkets, food markets, and retail stores 2014Chengdu (China)-3.4.-3.2.None detected with the mecA gene

-14/93 (15.05%) were resistant to oxacillin: 5 cooked meat, 2 pickle, and 1 fresh food samples
[58]
8700 foods from local markets 2007–2015Sichuan (China)-1.6.
-2.2.
-3.2.-3.4.
19/8700 (0.2%): 6 retail food cake, 1 retail food cooked rice, 1 retail food cooked noodle, and 6 retail food cooked pork-ST965/t062/SCCmec III (2 retail food cakes)
-ST1/t114/IVb (1 retail food cake)
-ST9/IVb: t899 (1 retail food cooked pork) and t1939 (2 retail food cooked pork)
-ST59/IVa/t437 (2 retail food cooked pork, 3 retail food cakes, and 1 retail food cooked rice)
-ST NT/V/t15995/(1 retail food cooked noodle)
-ST338/IVb/t437 (1 retail food cooked pork)
[118]
112 RTE foods and 35 processed raw meat samples from retail vendors Dhaka (Bangladesh)-1.1.
-2.1.
-3.4.-3.2.
-7/112 (6.3%) in RTE foods: burger, sweet, beef kebab, salad, pastry, fuska, and chapati
-1/35 (2.9%) in processed raw meat: meat ball
-ST80 (3): t1198 (2, burger and sweet) and t8731 (1, meat ball)
-ST6 (2): t304 (1, beef kebab) and t10546 (1, salad)
-ST239 (2): t275 (1, pastry) and t037 (1, fuska)
-ST361/t315 (1, chapati)
[60]
Bulk RTE foods: 1209 meat products, 200 dairy products, and 350 desserts2013–2016Sichuan (China)-First: 1.2.
-Second: 1.3.4.
-2.1.1.
-3.2.-3.4.
-1/31 (3.23%) of S. aureus isolates in meat products
-2/8 (25%) of S. aureus isolates in desserts
-None in dairy products
[98]
120 RTE beef products from some public restaurants and street vendors: kofta, burger, shawarma, and luncheon meat samples (30 of each) Benha (Egypt)-3.2.-3.4.2/8 (25%) of examined isolates

-61 S. aureus isolates: resistant to oxacillin (70.5%) and methicillin (70.5%)
[119]
107 RTE (lassi, rasmalai, burfi, pedha, curd, rasgulla, salad, chutney, and masala) and 38 cooked food samples (chicken gravy, omelet, cooked fish, boiled egg, and boiled milk) from street food vendors September
2015–May 2016
Delhi and Bareilly (India)-2.6.
-3.2.-3.1.
None [63]
S. aureus strains were isolated from retail foods: 368 isolates from quick-frozen products (frozen dumplings/steamed stuffed buns and frozen meat), and 148 isolates from RTE food (cold vegetable/noodle dishes in sauce, fried rice/sushi, roast meat, sausage, and ham)July 2011–June 2016China-3.5.-3.3.-3.4.-9/859 (1.1%) RTE food: 11/148 (7.43%) of S. aureus isolates
-16/601 (2.7%) quick-frozen food: 20/368 (5.43%) of S. aureus isolates
-RTE food:
·ST59 (7), ST9 (1), ST1 (2) and ST338 (1)
·t437 (8), t899 (1), t127 (1) and t085 (1)
·SCCmec IVa (7), IVb (1), V (1) and not detected (1)

-Quick-frozen food:
·ST59 (5), ST9 (9), ST398 (3), ST630 (1), ST5 (1) and ST10 (1)
·t437 (2), t899 (8), t127 (1), t034 (2), t002 (1), t1751 (1), t441 (2), t377 (1), t4549 (1) and t528 (1)
·SCCmec III (1), IVa (5), IVb (9), V (3) and not detected (3)
[64]
150 hot meals, 54 salads, and 24 pastries from Moroccan hospital kitchenMay 2015–June 2016Fez (Morocco)-1.2.
-2.1.1.
-3.4.-3.2.
-2/2 (100%) of S. aureus isolates in hot meals
-None in salads and pastries
[100]
120 samples (60 samosa and 60 falafel) from licensed food vendors2015–2016Hamedan (Iran)-1.1.
-2.1.3.
-3.4.-3.2.
10/57 (17.58%) of S. aureus isolates: 5 samosa and 5 falafel samples

-Only 7 mecA-positive isolates were resistant to oxacillin
[120]
83 pastries and 35 sandwiches samples from cafeteria and creameries2017–2018Tizi Ouzou (Algeria)-2.1.1.
-3.3.-3.4.
None [121]
24 commercially processed ready-to-eat products from different vendors: 12 edible worms (Rhynchophorus phoenicis) and 12 snails (Archachatina marginata) November–December 2019Benin City (Nigeria)-1.1.
-2.4.-2.4.1.
-3.4.
Resistant to oxacillin:
-Edible worm: 9/30 (30%) of S. aureus isolates
-Snail: 7/22 (31.8%) of S. aureus isolates
[18]
357 hospital food samples from 13 hospitals: 321 cooked foods and 36 ready-to-eat salads (36 meat barbecue, 36 chicken barbecue, 36 cooked meat, 36 cooked chicken, 33 fried fish, 36 cooked rice, 36 dill rice, 72 mixed or bean rice (mixed rice cooked with either red meat, poultry, vegetables, and/or beans), and 36 soup and 36 salad samples)August 2019–January 2020Mashhad (Iran)-1.3.3
-2.1.3.
-3.1.-3.2.-3.4.
20/87 (22.98%) of S. aureus isolates: 1 dill rice, 1 cooked rice, 1 cooked meat, 1 cooked chicken, 2 soup, 2 fried fish, 3 salad, 4 meat barbecue, and 5 chicken barbecue samples [122]
100 sandwich samples of shawarma poultry meat from fast-food shops Al-Ahsa (Saudi Arabia)-1.1.
-2.1.1.
-3.4.
5/14 (35.7%) of S. aureus isolates were found to be positive for MRSA in an antibiogram analysis [123]
420 RTE food samples, comprising 70 of each food type from vendors: fruit salad, suya (roasted beef), cake, boiled rice, bread, and meat hotpot (cooked meat in tomato sauce)February–August 2020Buea (Cameroon)-1.1.
-2.1.
-3.2.-3.4.
4/420 (0.95%): 1 fruit salad, 1 bread, and 2 meat hotpot samples [19]
Meaning of the numbers used in the detection method column. 1. Pre-enrichment.: 1.1. Without pre-enrichment; 1.2. BPW; 1.3. TSB (1.3.1. Containing 10% NaCl and 1% sodium pyruvate; 1.3.2. Containing 6.5% NaCl; 1.3.3. Containing 10% NaCl; 1.3.4. Containing 7.5% NaCl); 1.4. MHB Containing 6.5% NaCl; 1.5. BHI broth; 1.6. Enrichment broth containing 10 g/l tryptone, 75 g/l NaCl, 10 g/l mannitol and 2.5 g/l of yeast extract (0.25% yeast extract, 1% mannitol, 1% tryptone, and 7.5% NaCl); 1.7. PHMB Containing ceftizoxime (5 μg/mL) and aztreonam (75 μg/mL); 1.8. GCB; 1.9. Saline solution. 2. Solid media: 2.1. Baird–Parker agar, BP agar [2.1.1. BP supplemented with egg yolk tellurite emulsion; 2.1.2. BP supplemented with rabbit plasma fibrinogen (BP-RPF); 2.1.3. BP supplemented with egg yolk and potassium tellurite]; 2.2. Selective MRSA agar (BBL CHROM agar MRSA; BD)/MRSA chromogenic agar; 2.3. Blood agar, BA (2.3.1. BA supplemented with sheep’s blood); 2.4. Mannitol salt agar, MSA (2.4.1. MSA with 2 µg/mL oxacillin; 2.4.2. Mannitol salt phenol red agar, MSPRA; 2.5. S. aureus-selective CHROM agar plates; 2.6. HiChrome MeReSa agar plates with cefoxitin and methicillin supplement; 2.7. MacConkey agar; 2.8. Spectra MRSA; 2.9. Chrom-ID MRSA agar; 2.10. MRSA-ID; 2.11. Columbia agar, CA (2.11.1. CA supplemented with 5% sheep’s blood). 3. Identification of MRSA: 3.1. Cefoxitin (30 μg) and oxacillin (1 μg) disk diffusion susceptibility tests; 3.2. PCR-based amplification of mecA gene; 3.3. PCR-based amplification of mecA and mecC genes; 3.4. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing; 3.5. Cefoxitin disk diffusion method; 3.6. MALDI-TOF-MS (mass spectrometry); 3.7. MRSA latex agglutination test (penicillin-binding protein 2a latex agglutination test); 3.8. S. aureus spa typing. Baird–Parker: BP; brain heart infusion: BHI; buffered peptone water: BPW; coagulase-positive Staphylococcus: CPS; Giolitti–Cantoni broth: GCB; mannitol salt agar: MSA; Mueller–Hinton broth: MHB; not typable: NT; phenol red mannitol broth: PHMB; ready-to-eat: RTE; tryptone soya broth: TSB.
Table 5. Prevalence of MRSA in drinking water (in the absence of clarification, the prevalence is considered based on the detection of the mecA gene).
Table 5. Prevalence of MRSA in drinking water (in the absence of clarification, the prevalence is considered based on the detection of the mecA gene).
SamplesPeriodLocationDetection MethodPrevalenceIdentificationReference
98 samples from the food service environments of elementary schools: drinking water, kitchen utensils, cookers, and cooked foodsNovember–December 2000Gyeongnam (Korea)-1.2.
-2.4.
-3.4.
1/5 (20%) of drinking water samples were resistant to oxacillin [102]
2 sampling campaigns were conducted in order to collect 18, 26, and 26 water samples from River Nile, treated raw water, and groundwater, respectively October 2011–March 2012Sohag (Egypt)-3.2.-3.4.None [124]
16 wastewater samples (8 influent, 8 effluent) of 6 urban wastewater treatment plants (UWTP)December 2012–February 2013La Rioja (Spain)-Two methods:
·1.1.
·1.3.
-2.4.-2.5.
-3.4.-3.3.
Only ST398 S. aureus: obtained from an effluent water sample-ST398/t011[125]
50 drinking water specimens from drinking water supplies Al-Anbar
Province (Iraq)
-1.1.
-2.6.-2.3.-2.4.
-3.4.
12/50 (24%) [126]
552 water samples were collected monthly from 4 public parks: 468 drinking water fountains and 84 biofilm from mist makers March 2017–March 2018São Paulo city-2.1.
-3.1.-3.2.
The mecA gene was only detected in samples from drinking water fountains. Out of 30 isolates, 11 carried the mecA gene (36.7%) [23]
48 grab samples from a drinking water reservoir system August 2018–June 2019Germany-1.1.
-2.2.
-3.4.
None [127]
50 water samples from domestic storage tanks Winter of 2019Sidon (Lebanon)-2.4.
-3.1.-3.2.
Of the detected S. aureus samples, 21% were resistant to the cefoxitin agent: 79.3% of the samples were mecA-negative and 20.7% were mecA-positive [21]
Meaning of the numbers used in the detection method column. 1. Pre-enrichment.: 1.1. Without pre-enrichment; 1.2. Tryptone soy broth (TSB) containing 10% NaCl; 1.3. Brain heart infusion broth (BHI) containing 6.5% NaCl. 2. Solid media: 2.1. Baird–Parker agar (BP); 2.2. Selective MRSA agar (BBL CHROM agar MRSA; BD)/MRSA chromogenic agar; 2.3. Blood agar; 2.4. Mannitol salt agar, MSA; 2.5. Oxacillin-resistance-screening-agar-base (ORSAB) supplemented with oxacillin (2 mg/L); 2.6. MacConkey agar. 3. Identification of MRSA: 3.1. Cefoxitin (30 μg) and oxacillin (1 μg) disk diffusion susceptibility tests; 3.2. PCR-based amplification of mecA gene; 3.3. PCR-based amplification of mecA and mecC genes; 3.4. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Baird–Parker: BP; Brain heart infusion: BHI; mannitol salt agar: MSA; tryptone soya broth: TSB.
The prevalence of MRSA varied between the different food groups evaluated and within the groups, depending on the techniques used and the number of samples, which does not allow for consistent comparisons between research works. The percentage of samples contaminated with MRSA ranged between 0.0% and 100% (average 11.7 ± 20.3%) for fish and shellfish, between 0.0% and 11.0% (average 1.2 ± 3.5%) for eggs and egg products, between 0.0% and 20.8% (average 2.5% ± 6.8%) for foods of vegetable origin, between 0.6% and 29.5% (average 28.2 ± 30.3%) for the group of other foods, and between 0.0% and 36.7% (average 17.0 ± 14.0%) for drinking water. The percentage of isolates identified as MRSA within S. aureus isolates ranged from 0.4% to 53.8% (average 19.3 ± 13.5%) for fish and shellfish, from 0.44% to 66.7% (average 24.9 ± 24.9%) for egg and egg products, from 1.2% to 57.8% (average 18.1 ± 17.4%) for foods of vegetable origin, and from 1.0% to 100% (average 28.2 ± 30.25%) for other foods. Furthermore, of the 147 articles evaluated, the most used technique to confirm the presence of MRSA was amplification of the mecA gene by PCR in 102 of the articles (69.4%), while only 23 of the articles (15.6%) describe the amplification of the mecA and mecC genes.

4. Discussion

The presence of MRSA in foods has a double interest for public health. On the one hand, some MRSA strains produce enterotoxins responsible for food poisoning when favorable conditions for growth and production of toxins exist in the food. There are no differences in the severity of poisoning caused by MSSA and MRSA, because the strain’s antibiotic resistance does not influence toxin production [128]. On the other hand, it has been suggested that MRSA strains present in food can cause infections in the consumer, although it is not yet clear whether this microorganism can act as a foodborne pathogen [129]. For all these reasons, it is advisable to expand knowledge about the epidemiology of MRSA, including its prevalence in different food groups. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first review carried out on the prevalence and types of MRSA in several types of foodstuffs and drinking water.
Anthropogenic activities, such as wastewater from hospitals, livestock farms, crop fields, and wastewater treatment plants, contribute to the spread of antimicrobial-resistant pathogenic bacteria in the environment. Surface water sources, including river waters, act as critical points for the discharge of wastewater, pollutants, antibiotic-resistant bacteria (ARB), and antibiotic-resistant genes (ARG). These environmental factors, along with others, facilitate the dissemination and survival of ARB, in addition to promoting the exchange of ARG [130]. Contamination of food with MRSA depends on its hygienic state, and can come from an infected person, poor hygiene practices, or unhygienic utensils. People are frequently asymptomatic carriers and are responsible for the continued spread of MRSA in food, from handlers to food and vice versa [8]. The current findings emphasize the need for good hygiene practices (GHP) at multiple processing steps, starting with transportation and retail outlets, to limit the risk of transmission of S. aureus and MRSA from food products to humans [131].
Multidrug-resistant bacteria are a serious problem that affects public health and the global economy through increased morbidity and mortality rates, longer duration of illness, and high hospital costs [132]. Diseases caused by antibiotic-resistant foodborne pathogens are among the potential bacterial diseases of public health importance identified in fish. Eating raw or undercooked fish can expose consumers to these bacteria and lead to colonization and infection [6]. Furthermore, prolonged use of antibiotics and their misuse in aquaculture has been associated with environmental pollution, resulting in the development of resistant bacteria in the aquatic environment [133]. Differences in the prevalence of MRSA in fish in different studies may be attributed to different sampling times, sample size, geographical location, fish species, post-harvest contamination, and sanitary conditions during transportation, storage, and processing [134].
Different pathogenic microorganisms, including Salmonella spp., Escherichia coli, and S. aureus, cause foodborne illnesses by egg consumption. S. aureus is not as important a bacteria as other pathogens in fresh eggs. Some of the suspected sources of egg contamination are egg boxes/shelves, feces, egg packaging and storage equipment, clothing, workers’ hands, dust, and the environment. In contact with dirty surfaces, such as feces, bacteria can contaminate the shell in a short time and penetrate the interior of the egg. People and egg trays can be a source of contamination in grocery stores and retailers [135].
Fruits and vegetables are often processed through frequent manual contact, indicating significant potential for S. aureus contamination from both human and environmental sources [14]. Bacteria present on cutting tools, cutting boards, or handlers could be transferred to the surface of freshly cut fruit, which, combined with inadequate refrigeration or prolonged storage, creates an environment conducive to bacterial growth [136]. Ready-to-eat (RTE) foods pose unique food safety issues because they are consumed without additional processing, making them susceptible to transmitting pathogens, such as S. aureus [137]. Most types of foods, including RTE foods, support the growth of staphylococci and are ideal for the production of enterotoxins. High levels of bacterial contamination of ready-to-eat fruits could be due to several factors, such as washing fruits with poor quality water, cross contamination with other fruits washed in the same water, use of dirty trays or dirty processing utensils, such as knives and cutting tables, failure to wash hands thoroughly, and air contamination [19].
Methods to isolate MRSA from foods should include the enrichment of samples. This increases the frequency of MRSA detection. Since staphylococci are relatively tolerant to high salt concentrations, culture broths with 6.5% or 7.5% NaCl are commonly used in MRSA isolation protocols from different samples, which limits the growth of the contaminating microbiota [25]. Strains with mecC are sometimes confused with methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA), raising important implications for MRSA monitoring. To avoid these problems, laboratories should incorporate universal mec gene primers for PCR detection or add mecC-specific primers to differentiate between mecA and mecC MRSA. When S. aureus isolates are negative for mecA and mecC in the detection of MRSA, but show resistance to methicillin, the presence of the plasmid carrying the mecB gene should be investigated [24].
Molecular characterization of S. aureus is essential to trace the origin and spread of infection and contamination, as well as to gain a deeper epidemiological understanding of foods. Both multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and staphylococcal protein A typing (spa) have been shown to be effective in characterizing and identifying genetic relationships between MRSA isolates [14]. MLST has proven to be very useful for macroepidemiological and evolutionary studies. Spa typing shows excellent discriminatory power and shares with MLST the advantages of unambiguous typing results that can be compared across laboratories and over time. Spa typing is easier and less expensive to perform than MLST [138]. Data on the characterization of S. aureus have primarily focused on clinical settings, foods of animal origin, and dairy products, and limited information is available on fruits and vegetables [14]. This highlights the need for more studies focused on these types of foods.
Another promising tool for MRSA analysis is whole-genome sequencing (WGS). WGS of bacterial pathogens has demonstrated its potential for epidemiological surveillance, outbreak detection, and infection control. This technology aids in the tracking of AMR genes and mobile genetic elements, providing the necessary information for the application of quantitative risk assessments and enabling the identification of AMR hot spots and transmission routes through the food chain [139]. WGS is currently a powerful, very affordable and rapid tool for microbial typing, which also achieves much higher resolution than traditional typing methods, such as multilocus variable number tandem repeat analysis (MLVA), pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD), and multilocus sequence typing (MLST) [139]. WGS is a promising alternative to culture methods for resistance prediction in S. aureus, as it is as sensitive and specific as routine antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods [140]. The data obtained by WGS facilitate studies on the epidemiology of foodborne S. aureus, as well as on the plasticity of its genome in terms of the acquisition of various genetic elements related to host adaptation, antimicrobial resistance, and virulence. Furthermore, the results obtained allow the development of preventive measures against human infections caused by this important pathogen in community settings [141]. WGS provides information at the genotypic level, and full gene detection allows for expanded knowledge of S. aureus and the potential of isolates to produce staphylococcal enterotoxins. In addition, WGS can more accurately identify the strains causing an outbreak of staphylococcal food poisoning and, thus, accelerate its management [142].

5. Conclusions

The ability of MRSA strains to cause staphylococcal poisoning and their controversial role in foodborne infections, together with the high prevalence of this microorganism in different foodstuffs (up to 100% of the samples were contaminated in some of the consulted works) highlight the importance of establishing the necessary measures to reduce the presence of MRSA in food and drinking water. The methods utilized in studying MRSA by different authors varied considerably. For this reason, and with an eye to permitting more meaningful comparisons between one investigation and another, it would be advisable to develop a standardized protocol for the study of this microorganism in food and water. In most of the research works consulted, only the mecA gene was investigated in determining the presence of MRSA in foodstuffs. However, in order to avoid false negatives, it is crucial to also to check for the mecB and mecC genes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.G.-M., C.A.-C. and R.C.; Methodology, C.G.-M.; Investigation, C.G.-M.; Resources, C.A.-C.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, C.G.-M.; Writing—Review and Editing, C.G.-M., C.A.-C. and R.C.; Supervision, C.A.-C. and R.C.; Project Administration, R.C.; Funding Acquisition, C.A.-C. and R.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by MINISTERIO DE CIENCIA E INNOVACIÓN, grant numbers RTI2018-098267-R-C33 and PID2022-142329OB-C31, and JUNTA DE CASTILLA Y LEÓN (CONSEJERÍA DE EDUCACIÓN), grant number LE018P20. The APC was funded by MINISTERIO DE CIENCIA E INNOVACIÓN, grant number PID2022-142329OB-C31.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Hammad, A.M.; Watanabe, W.; Fujii, T.; Shimamoto, T. Occurrence and characteristics of methicillin-resistant and -susceptible Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci from Japanese retail ready-to-eat raw fish. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2012, 156, 286–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. da Silva, A.C.; Rodrigues, M.X.; Silva, N. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in food and the prevalence in Brazil: A review. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2020, 51, 347–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Nandhini, P.; Kumar, P.; Mickymaray, S.; Alothaim, A.S.; Somasundaram, J.; Rajan, M. Recent developments in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) treatment: A Review. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Jung, D.; Rubin, J.E. Identification of antimicrobial resistant bacteria from plant-based food products imported into Canada. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2020, 319, 108509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Kukułowicz, A.; Steinka, I.; Siwek, A. Presence of antibiotic-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in fish and seafood originating from points of sale in the tri-city area (Poland). J. Food Prot. 2021, 84, 1911–1914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Attia, A.S.; Abou Elez, R.M.; El-Gazzar, N.; Elnahriry, S.S.; Alfifi, A.E.; Al-Harthi, H.F.; Ibrahim, D. Cross sectional analysis of risk factors associated with Mugil cephalus in retailed fish markets concerning methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Aeromonas hydrophila. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2024, 14, 1348973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Fri, J.; Njom, H.A.; Ateba, C.N.; Ndip, R.N. Antibiotic Resistance and Virulence Gene Characteristics of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Isolated from Healthy Edible Marine Fish. Int. J. Microbiol. 2020, 2020, 9803903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sivaraman, G.K.; Gupta, S.S.; Visnuvinayagam, S.; Muthulakshmi, T.; Elangovan, R.; Perumal, V.; Balasubramanium, G.; Lodha, T.; Yadav, A. Prevalence of S. aureus and/or MRSA from seafood products from Indian seafood products. BMC Microbiol. 2022, 22, 233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gong, H.; Ma, Y.; Wang, M.; Gu, Y.; Deng, R.; Deng, B.; Chen, Z. Microbiota profiles of hen eggs from the different seasons and different sectors of Shanghai, China. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 2519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhang, P.; Wang, P.; Fu, X.; Xu, X.; Ruan, F.; Wang, T.; Chang, G.; Wan, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, X. Prevalence and characterization of Staphylococcus aureus in raw eggs and it’s growth and enterotoxin a production in egg contents. LWT 2023, 2023, 114379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pondit, A.; Haque, Z.F.; Sabuj, A.A.M.; Khan, M.S.R.; Saha, S. Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from chicken and quail eggshell. J. Adv. Vet. Anim. Res. 2018, 5, 466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Syed, M.A.; Shah, S.H.H.; Sherafzal, Y.; Shafi-ur-Rehman, S.; Khan, M.A.; Barrett, J.B.; Woodley, T.A.; Jamil, B.; Abbasi, S.A.; Jackson, C.R. Detection and molecular characterization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from table eggs in Haripur, Pakistan. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2018, 15, 86–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Ruiz-Roldán, L.; Rojo-Bezares, B.; Lozano, C.; López, M.; Chichón, G.; Torres, C.; Sáenz, Y. Occurrence of Pseudomonas spp. in Raw Vegetables: Molecular and Phenotypical Analysis of Their Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence-Related Traits. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 12626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Jia, K.; Qin, X.; Bu, X.; Zhu, H.; Liu, Y.; Wang, X.; Li, Z.; Dong, Q. Prevalence, antibiotic resistance and molecular characterization of Staphylococcus aureus in ready-to-eat fruits and vegetables in Shanghai, China. Curr. Res. Food Sci. 2024, 8, 100669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kwon, J.H.; Reske, K.A.; Hink, T.; Seiler, S.M.; Wallace, M.A.; Bommarito, K.M.; Burnham, C.D.; Dubberke, E.R. An evaluation of the prevalence of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in hospital food. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2017, 38, 1373–1375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Yigrem, C.; Eribo, B.; Sangre, K. Incidence of Antibiotic Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Leafy Greens and Clinical Sources. J. Microbiol. Res. 2022, 12, 13–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bezirtzoglou, E.; Voidarou, C.; Stavropoulou, E.; Kourkoutas, Y.; Alexopoulos, A.; Plessas, S.; Varzakas, T. Emerging antibiotic resistance in honey as a hazard for human health. J. Bacteriol. Mycol. 2016, 2, 6–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Omoruyi, I.M.; Ajayi, H.I. Prevalence of Shigella spp. and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in select commercially processed meat products. Asian Food Sci. J. 2021, 20, 50–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Esemu, S.N.; Njoh, S.T.; Ndip, L.M.; Keneh, N.K.; Kfusi, J.A.; Njukeng, A.P. Ready-to-eat foods: A potential vehicle for the Spread of coagulase-positive Staphylococci and antimicrobial-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Buea Municipality, South West Cameroon. Canadian J. Infect. Dis. Med. Microbiol. 2023, 2023, 9735319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Mekhloufi, O.A.; Chieffi, D.; Hammoudi, A.; Bensefia, S.A.; Fanelli, F.; Fusco, V. Prevalence, Enterotoxigenic Potential and Antimicrobial Resistance of Staphylococcus aureus and Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Isolated from Algerian Ready to Eat Foods. Toxins 2021, 13, 835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Borjac, J.; Zeino, W.; Matar, A.; Khawaja, S.; Merheb, M.; Matar, R. Prevalence of Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria in Domestic Water Storage Tanks in Sidon, Lebanon. Water 2023, 15, 335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hayward, C.; Ross, K.E.; Brown, M.H.; Whiley, H. Water as a Source of Antimicrobial Resistance and Healthcare-Associated Infections. Pathogens 2020, 9, 667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Santos, G.A.C.; Dropa, M.; Rocha, S.M.; Peternella, F.A.S.; Razzolini, M.T.P. Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in drinking water fountains in urban parks. J. Water Health 2020, 18, 654–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. González-Machado, C.; Alonso-Calleja, C.; Capita, R. Prevalence and types of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in meat and meat products from retail outlets and in samples of animal origin collected in farms, slaughterhouses and meat processing facilities. A review. Food Microbiol. 2024, 123, 104580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. González-Machado, C.; Capita, R.; Alonso-Calleja, C. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in dairy products and bulk-tank milk (BTM). Antibiotics 2024, 13, 588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Abrahim, A.; Sergelidis, D.; Kirkoudis, I.; Anagnostou, V.; Kaitsa-Tsiopoulou, E.; Kazila, P.; Papa, A. Isolation and antimicrobial resistance of Staphylococcus spp. in freshwater fish and Greek marketplaces. J. Aquat. Food Prod. Technol. 2010, 19, 93–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. de Jonge, R.; Verdier, J.E.; Havelaar, A.H. Prevalence of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus amongst professional meat handlers in the Netherlands, March–July 2008. Eurosurveillance 2010, 15, 19712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rhee, C.H.; Woo, G.J. Emergence and characterization of foodborne methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Korea. J. Food Prot. 2010, 73, 2285–2290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Vázquez-Sánchez, D.; López-Cabo, M.; Saá-Ibusquiza, P.; Rodríguez-Herrera, J.J. Incidence and characterization of Staphylococcus aureus in fishery products marketed in Galicia (Northwest Spain). Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2012, 157, 286–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hu, S.K.; Liu, S.Y.; Hu, W.F.; Zheng, T.L.; Xu, J.G. Molecular biological characteristics of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from food. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2013, 236, 285–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cho, J.I.; Joo, I.S.; Choi, J.H.; Jung, K.H.; Choi, E.J.; Son, N.R.; Han, M.K.; Jeong, S.J.; Lee, S.H.; Hwang, I.G. Distribution of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in RAW Meat and Fish Samples in Korea. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2014, 23, 999–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sergelidis, D.; Abrahim, A.; Papadopoulos, T.; Soultos, N.; Martziou, E.; Koulourida, V.; Govaris, A.; Pexara, A.; Zdragas, A.; Papa, A. Isolation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus spp. from ready-to-eat fish products. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2014, 59, 500–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Costa, W.L.; Ferreira, J.D.S.; Carvalho, J.S.; Cerqueira, E.S.; Oliveira, L.C.; Almeida, R.C. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in raw meats and prepared foods in public hospitals in salvador, Bahia, Brazil. J. Food Sci. 2015, 80, M147-50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Obaidat, M.M.; Bani Salman, A.E.; Lafi, S.Q. Prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus in imported fish and correlations between antibiotic resistance and enterotoxigenicity. J. Food Prot. 2015, 78, 1999–2005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Oniciuc, E.A.; Ariza-Miguel, J.; Bolocan, A.S.; Diez-Valcarce, M.; Rovira, J.; Hernández, M.; Fernández-Natal, I.; Nicolau, A.I.; Rodríguez-Lázaro, D. Foods from black market at EU border as a neglected route of potential methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus transmission. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2015, 209, 34–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Tang, J.; Zhang, R.; Chen, J.; Zhao, Y.; Tang, C.; Yue, H.; Li, J.; Wang, Q.; Shi, H. Incidence and characterization of Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from food markets. Ann. Microbiol. 2015, 65, 279–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Visnuvinayagam, S.; Joseph, T.C.; Murugadas, V.; Chakrabarti, R.; Lalitha, K.V. Status on methicillin resistant and multiple drug resistant Staphylococcus aureus in fishes of Cochin and Mumbai coast, India. J. Environ. Biol. 2015, 36, 571–575. [Google Scholar]
  38. Arfatahery, N.; Davoodabadi, A.; Abedimohtasab, T. Characterization of Toxin Genes and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus Isolates in Fishery Products in Iran. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 34216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Boss, R.; Overesch, G.; Baumgartner, A. Antimicrobial Resistance of Escherichia coli, Enterococci, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus aureus from Raw Fish and Seafood Imported into Switzerland. J. Food Protect. 2016, 79, 1240–1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ciolacu, L.; Stessl, B.; Bolocan, A.S.; Oniciuc, E.A.; Wagner, M.; Rychli, K.; Nicolau, A.I. Tracking foodborne pathogenic bacteria in raw and ready-to-eat food illegally sold at the eastern EU border. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2016, 13, 148–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kumar, R.G.L.; Kasim, K.A.; Lekshmi, M.; Nayak, B.B.; Kumar, S. Incidence of methicillin-resistant staphylococci in fresh seafood. Adv. Microbiol. 2016, 6, 399–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Murugadas, V.; Joseph, T.C.; Reshmi, K.; Lalitha, K.V. Prevalence of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus in selected seafood markets and aquaculture farms in Kerala, south-west coast of India. Indian J. Fish. 2016, 63, 150–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Puah, S.M.; Chua, K.H.; Mary Anne Tan, J.A. Virulence factors and antibiotic susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus isolates in ready-to-eat foods: Detection of S. aureus contamination and a high prevalence of virulence genes. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2016, 13, 199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Siiriken, B.; Yildirim, T.; Güney, A.K.; Erol, I.; Durupinar, B. Prevalence and Molecular Characterization of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Foods of Animal Origin, Turkey. J. Food Prot. 2016, 79, 1990–1994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Sivaraman, G.K.; Deesha, V.; Prasad, M.M.; Jha, A.K.; Vishnuvinayagam, S.; Nadella, R.K.; Basha, A. Incidence of community acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) in seafood and its environment, Gujarat, India. Int. J. Sci. Manag. Res. 2016, 7, 14279–14282. [Google Scholar]
  46. Arslan, S.; Özdemir, F. Molecular characterization and detection of enterotoxins, methicillin resistance genes and antimicrobial resistance of Staphylococcus aureus from fish and ground beef. Pol. J. Vet. Sci. 2017, 20, 85–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Safarpoor Dehkordi, F.; Gandomi, H.; Basti, A.A.; Misaghi, A.; Rahimi, E. Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of antibiotic resistance of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from hospital food. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control 2017, 6, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Mirani, Z.A.; Aqeel, A.; Naz, S. Prevalence of staphylococci in commercially processed food products in Karachi-Pakistan. J. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2017, 7, 83–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Moura, A.T.; Saraiva, C.; Miguéis, S.; Esteves, A.; Fontes, M.C. Antimicrobial susceptibility of coagulase-positive and coagulase-negative staphylococci in ready-to-eat sashimi. J. Aquat. Food Prod. Technol. 2017, 26, 95–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Murugadas, V.; Joseph, T.C.; Lalitha, K.V. Tracing contamination of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) into seafood marketing chain by staphylococcal protein A typing. Food Control 2017, 78, 43–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Murugadas, V.; Toms, C.J.; Reethu, S.A.; Lalitha, K.V. Multilocus sequence typing and staphylococcal protein a typing revealed novel and diverse clones of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in seafood and the aquatic environment. J. Food Prot. 2017, 80, 476–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Ranjbar, R.; Shahreza, M.H.S.; Rahimi, E.; Jonaidi-Jafari, N. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from Iranian restaurant food samples: Panton-Valentine Leukocidin, SCCmec phenotypes and antimicrobial resistance. Trop. J. Pharm. Res. 2017, 16, 1939–1949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Rodríguez-Lázaro, D.; Oniciuc, E.-A.; García, P.G.; Gallego, D.; Fernández-Natal, I.; Dominguez-Gil, M.; Eiros-Bouza, J.M.; Wagner, M.; Nicolau, A.I.; Hernández, M. Detection and characterization of Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant S. aureus in foods confiscated in EU Borders. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Rong, D.; Xu, M.; Wu, Q.; Zhang, J.; Yu, S. Prevalence, Virulence Genes, Antimicrobial Susceptibility, and Genetic Diversity of Staphylococcus aureus from Retail Aquatic Products in China. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Thapaliya, D.; Forshey, B.M.; Kadariya, J.; Quick, M.K.; Farina, S.; O’ Brien, A.; Nair, R.; Nworie, A.; Hanson, B.; Kates, A.; et al. Prevalence and molecular characterization of Staphylococcus aureus in commercially available meat over a one-year period in Iowa, USA. Food Microbiol. 2017, 65, 122–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Enany, M.E.; Algammal, A.M.; Shagar, G.I.; Hanora, A.M.; Elfeil, W.K.; Elshaffy, N.M. Molecular typing and evaluation of Sidr honey inhibitory effect on virulence genes of MRSA strains isolated from catfish in Egypt. Pak. J. Pharm. Sci. 2018, 31, 1865–1870. [Google Scholar]
  57. Fri, J.; Ndip, R.N.; Njom, H.A.; Clarke, A.M. First report of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus in tank cultured dusky kob (Argyrosomus japonicus), and evaluation of three phenotypic methods in the detection of MRSA. J. Food Saf. 2018, 38, e12411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ma, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Tang, J.; Tang, C.; Chen, J.; Liu, J. Antimicrobial susceptibility and presence of resistance & enterotoxins/enterotoxinlikes genes in Staphylococcus aureus from food. CyTA J. Food 2018, 16, 76–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Othman, B.R.; Kuan, C.H.; Mohammed, A.S.; Cheah, Y.K.; Tan, C.W.; New, C.Y.; Thung, T.Y.; Chang, W.S.; Loo, Y.Y.; Nakaguchi, Y.; et al. Occurrence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in raw shellfish at retail markets in Malaysia and antibacterial efficacies of black seed (Nigella sativa) oil against MRSA. Food Control 2018, 90, 324–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Islam, M.A.; Parveen, S.; Rahman, M.; Huq, M.; Nabi, A.; Khan, Z.U.M.; Ahmed, N.; Wagenaar, J.A. Occurrence and characterization of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus in processed raw foods and ready-to-eat foods in an urban setting of a developing country. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Li, H.; Stegger, M.; Dalsgaard, A.; Leisner, J.J. Bacterial content and characterization of antibiotic resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Danish sushi products and association with food inspector rankings. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2019, 305, 108244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Naas, H.T.; Edarhoby, R.A.; Garbaj, A.M.; Azwai, S.M.; Abolghait, S.K.; Gammoudi, F.T.; Moawad, A.A.; Barbieri, I.; Eldaghayes, I.M. Occurrence, characterization, and antibiogram of Staphylococcus aureus in meat, meat products, and some seafood from Libyan retail markets. Vet. World 2019, 12, 925–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Sivakumar, M.; Dubal, Z.B.; Kumar, A.; Bhilegaonkar, K.; Vinodh Kumar, O.R.; Kumar, S.; Kadwalia, A.; Shagufta, B.; Grace, M.R.; Ramees, T.P.; et al. Virulent methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in street vended foods. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 56, 1116–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Wu, S.; Huang, J.; Zhang, F.; Wu, Q.; Zhang, J.; Pang, R.; Zeng, H.; Yang, X.; Chen, M.; Wang, J.; et al. Prevalence and characterization of food-related methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in China. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Yaiphathoi, S.; Sharma, I. Spa typing and prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated in retail meats from Silchar, Assam, India. Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci. 2019, 7, 694–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Carvalho, J.S.; Neto, A.F.L.; Melo, I.M.; Varjão, L.M.; Andrade, C.A.D.N.; Xavier, D.E.; Leal, N.C.; Almeida, R.C.D.C. Occurrence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in ready-to-eat raw fish from Japanese cuisine restaurants in Salvador, Brazil. J. Food Prot. 2020, 83, 991–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Egege, S.R.; Akani, N.P.; Nwankwo, C.E.I. Detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in ready-to-eat shellfish (Corbiculid heterodont) in Bayelsa State, Nigeria. Microbiol. Res. J. Int. 2020, 30, 22–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Ou, C.; Shang, D.; Yang, J.; Chen, B.; Chang, J.; Jin, F.; Shi, C. Prevalence of multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates with strong biofilm formation ability among animal-based food in Shanghai. Food Control 2020, 112, 107106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Yaiphathoi, S.; Sharma, I. Characterization and Phylogenetic Reconstruction of MecA and Pvl Genes of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus from Retail Meats in North East India. Indian J. Nat. Sci. 2020, 10, 27661–27670. [Google Scholar]
  70. Abdou, M.S.; Ebied, N.A. Isolation of highly antibiotic-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from salted fish sold in markets. Alex. J. Vet. Sci. 2021, 71, 30–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Elkassas, W.M.; Mousa, H.M. Correlation between methicillin resistance and enterotoxins production in Staphylococcus aureus isolated from some Salted Fish. Alex. J. Vet. Sci. 2021, 70, 31–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Ogofure, A.G.; Igbinosa, E.O. Effects of rinsing on Staphylococcus aureus load in frozen meats and fish obtained from open markets in Benin City, Nigeria. African J. Clin. Exp. Microbiol. 2021, 22, 294–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Parbin, N. Characterization of staphylococcal exotoxin (PVL) gene of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) from foods of animal origin. Southern Assam, India. Indiana J. Agric. Life Sci. 2021, 1, 6–9. [Google Scholar]
  74. Rashid, N.; Shafee, M.; Iqbal, S.; Samad, A.; Khan, S.; Hasni, M.; Rehman, Z.; Ullah, S.; Rehman, F.; Khan, G. Enterotoxigenic methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus contamination in salted fish from Gwadar Balochistan. Braz. J. Biol. 2021, 83, e247701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Sivaraman, G.K.; Muneeb, K.H.; Sudha, S.; Shome, B.; Cole, J.; Holmes, M. Prevalence of virulent and biofilm forming ST88-IV-T2526 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clones circulating in local retail fish markets in Assam, India. Food Control 2021, 127, 108098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Anjusha, K.M.; Prejit, H.R.; Jess Vergis, A.K.; Vinod, V.K.; Prasanna, K.S. Assessment of post-harvest contamination of seafood with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in retail markets of Wayanad district, Kerala, India. TPI 2022, 11, 6009–6013. [Google Scholar]
  77. Özdemir, F. Antimicrobial resistance, multilocus sequence, and spa typing of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from retail raw meat products. BioMed Res. Int. 2022, 2022, 6035987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Naeim, D.E.; Eldesoukey, I.E.; Moawad, A.A.; Ahmed, A.M. Molecular detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from different foodstuffs in Egypt. Vet. Res. Forum. 2023, 14, 169. [Google Scholar]
  79. Li, G.; Wu, C.; Wang, X.; Meng, J. Prevalence and characterization of methicillin susceptible Staphylococcus aureus ST398 isolates from retail foods. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2015, 196, 94–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Rodríguez-Lázaro, D.; Ariza-Miguel, J.; Diez-Valcarce, M.; Fernández-Natal, I.; Hernández, M.; Rovira, J. Foods confiscated from non-EU flights as a neglected route of potential methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus transmission. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2015, 209, 29–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Aung, K.T.; Lo, J.A.C.Y.; Chau, M.L.; Kang, J.S.L.; Yap, H.M.; Gutiérrez, R.A.; Yuk, H.G.; Ng, L.C. Microbiological safety assessment and risk mitigation of Indian rojak (deep fried ready-to-eat food) in Singapore. Southeast Asian J. Trop. Med. Public Health 2016, 47, 1231–1245. [Google Scholar]
  82. Aung, K.T.; Hsu, L.Y.; Koh, T.H.; Hapuarachchi, H.C.; Chau, M.L.; Gutiérrez, R.A.; Ng, L.C. Prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in retail food in Singapore. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control 2017, 6, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. El-Nagar, S.; Abd El-Azeem, M.W.; Nasef, S.A.; Sultan, S. Prevalence of toxigenic and methicillin resistant staphylococci in poultry chain production. J. Adv. Vet. Res. 2017, 7, 33–38. [Google Scholar]
  84. Wang, W.; Baloch, Z.; Jiang, T.; Zhang, C.; Peng, Z.; Li, F.; Fanning, S.; Ma, A.; Xu, J. Enterotoxigenicity and antimicrobial resistance of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from retail food in China. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 2256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Anosa, G.N.; Ezenduka, E.V.; Gabriel, K.C.; Ngene, A.; Eze, U.U. Occurrence and antibiogram of Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from table eggs in Nsukka, Enugu State, Nigeria. Sokoto J. Vet. Sci. 2019, 17, 62–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Devkota, S.P.; Paudel, A.; Gurung, K. Vancomycin Intermediate MRSA Isolates Obtained from Retail Chicken Meat and Eggs Collected at Pokhara, Nepal. Nepal J. Biotechnol. 2019, 7, 90–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Syed, M.A.; Jackson, C.R.; Ramadan, H.; Afridi, R.; Bano, S.; Bibi, S.; Fatima, B.; Tabassum, S.; Jamil, B.; Khan, M.F.; et al. Detection and molecular characterization of staphylococci from eggs of household Chickens. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2019, 16, 550–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Sharan, M.; Dhaka, P.; Bedi, J.S.; Singh, R.; Mehta, N. Characterization of chicken eggs associated Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus for biofilm production and antimicrobial resistance traits. Anim. Biotechnol. 2023, 34, 3533–3544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Kim, J.S.; Lee, J.H.; Kim, J.H.; Choi, J.M.; Kim, S.R.; Ha, S.D.; Chung, D.H. Characteristics of enterotoxigenic genes and antibiotic susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from tomato farms in Western Gyeongnam. Korean J. Food Sci. Technol. 2006, 38, 295–303. [Google Scholar]
  90. Moon, J.S.; Lee, A.R.; Jaw, S.H.; Kang, H.M.; Joo, Y.S.; Park, Y.H.; Kim, M.N.; Koo, H.C. Comparison of antibiogram, staphylococcal enterotoxin productivity, and coagulase genotypes among Staphylococcus aureus isolated from animal and vegetable sources in Korea. J. Food Prot. 2007, 70, 2541–2548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Vanegas, M.C.; Moreno, E.J.; Rueda, R.V.; Chirivi, S.J.; Garzón, A.; Arévalo, A.S.; Martínez, M.F.; Gardeazábal, P.A.; Baquero, C. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolated from Colombian foods. Bio 2012, 2, 61–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Hong, J.; Kim, Y.; Kim, J.; Heu, S.; Kim, S.R.; Kim, K.P.; Roh, E. Genetic diversity and antibiotic resistance patterns of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from leaf vegetables in Korea. J. Food Sci. 2015, 80, M1526–M1531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Song, M.; Bai, Y.; Xu, J.; Carter, M.Q.; Shi, C.; Shi, X. Genetic diversity and virulence potential of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from raw and processed food commodities in Shanghai. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2015, 195, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Traversa, A.; Gariano, G.R.; Gallina, S.; Bianchi, D.M.; Orusa, R.; Domenis, L.; Cavallerio, P.; Fossati, L.; Serra, R.; Decastelli, L. Methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from food and wild animal carcasses in Italy. Food Microbiol. 2015, 52, 154–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Vojkovska, H.; Myšková, P.; Gelbíčová, T.; Skočková, A.; Koláčková, I.; Karpíšková, R. Occurrence and characterization of food-borne pathogens isolated from fruit, vegetables and sprouts retailed in the Czech Republic. Food Microbiol. 2017, 63, 147–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Wang, W.; Liu, F.; Zulqarnain, B.; Zhang, C.S.; Ma, K.; Peng, Z.X.; Yan, S.F.; Hu, Y.J.; Gan, X.; Ping, Y.; et al. Genotypic Characterization of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolated from Pigs and Retail Foods in China. Biomed. Environ. Sci. 2017, 30, 570–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Wu, S.; Huang, J.; Wu, Q.; Zhang, F.; Zhang, J.; Lei, T.; Chen, M.; Ding, Y.; Xue, L. Prevalence and Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus Isolated From Retail Vegetables in China. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Lin, Q.; Sun, H.; Yao, K.; Cai, J.; Ren, Y.; Chi, Y. The Prevalence, Antibiotic Resistance and Biofilm Formation of Staphylococcus aureus in Bulk Ready-To-Eat Foods. Biomolecules 2019, 9, 524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Abatcha, M.G. Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from vegetables sold in Malaysian wet markets. Malays. J. Microbiol. 2020, 16, 34–39. [Google Scholar]
  100. Benjelloun Touimi, G.; Bennani, L.; Berrada, S.; Moussa, B.; Bennani, B. Prevalence and antibiotic resistance profiles of Staphylococcus sp. isolated from food, food contact surfaces and food handlers in a Moroccan hospital kitchen. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2020, 70, 241–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Tavakoli-Far, B.; Mousavi, B.; Mashak, Z.; Rezaei, M.A.; Doregiraee, F.; Kachoie, M.A.; Jafari-Eskari, S. Molecular typing and phenotypic and genotypic evaluation of antibiotic resistance and virulence factors of the methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteria isolated from vegetable and salad samples. preprint 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Ha, K.S.; Chung, D.H.; Shim, W.B. Screening of MRSA (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus) and seb gene in producing strains isolated from food service environment of elementary schools. J. Food Hygiene Saf. 2003, 18, 79–86. [Google Scholar]
  103. Ifesan, B.O.T.; Hamtasin, C.; Mahabusarakam, W.; Voravuthikunchai, S.P. Inhibitory effect of Eleutherine americana Merr. extract on Staphylococcus aureus isolated from food. J. Food Sci. 2009, 74, M31–M36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Pereira, V.; Lopes, C.; Castro, A.; Silva, J.; Gibbs, P.; Teixeira, P. Characterization for enterotoxin production, virulence factors, and antibiotic susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from various foods in Portugal. Food Microbiol. 2009, 26, 278–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Crago, B.; Ferrato, C.; Drews, S.J.; Svenson, L.W.; Tyrrell, G.; Louie, M. Prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) in food samples associated with foodborne illness in Alberta, Canada from 2007 to 2010. Food Microbiol. 2012, 32, 202–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Sergelidis, D.; Abrahim, A.; Anagnostou, V.; Govaris, A.; Papadopoulos, T.; Papa, A. Prevalence, distribution, and antimicrobial susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus in ready-to-eat salads and in the environment of a salad manufacturing plant in Northern Greece. Czech J. Food Sci. 2012, 30, 285–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Baumgartner, A.; Niederhauser, I.; Johler, S. Virulence and resistance gene profiles of Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from ready-to-eat foods. J. Food Prot. 2014, 77, 1232–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Wang, X.; Li, G.; Xia, X.; Yang, B.; Xi, M.; Meng, J. Antimicrobial susceptibility and molecular typing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in retail foods in Shaanxi, China. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2014, 11, 281–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Sezer, Ç.; Özgür, Ç.; Aksem, A.; Leyla, V. Food handlers: A bridge in the journey of enterotoxigenic MRSA in food. J. Verbr. Lebensm. 2015, 10, 123–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Avşaroğlu, M.D. Prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from various foods of animal origin in Kırşehir, Turkey and their enterotoxigenicity. Turkish J. Agricul. Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 4, 1179–1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Yang, X.; Zhang, J.; Yu, S.; Wu, Q.; Guo, W.; Huang, J.; Cai, S. Prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus and Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Retail Ready-to-Eat Foods in China. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Castro, A.; Palhau, C.; Cunha, S.; Camarinha, S.; Teixeira, P. Virulence and resistance profile of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from food. Acta Aliment. Hung 2017, 46, 231–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Gholam-Mostafaei, F.S.; Alebouyeh, M.; Zali, M.R. Prevalence, molecular diversity, and antimicrobial resistance patterns of pathogenic bacteria isolated from medical foods, food staff, cooking instruments, and clinical samples in a teaching hospital in Tehran, Iran. Arch. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2017, 12, e62421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Manukumar, H.M.; Umesha, S. MALDI-TOF-MS based identification and molecular characterization of food associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 11414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Chaalal, W.; Chaalal, N.; Bourafa, N.; Kihal, M.; Diene, S.M.; Rolain, J.M. Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus Isolated from Food Products in Western Algeria. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2018, 15, 353–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Liao, F.; Gu, W.; Yang, Z.; Mo, Z.; Fan, L.; Guo, Y.; Fu, X.; Xu, W.; Li, C.; Dai, J. Molecular characteristics of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from food surveillance in southwest China. BMC Microbiol. 2018, 18, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Luo, K.; Shao, F.; Kamara, K.N.; Chen, S.; Zhang, R.; Duan, G.; Yang, H. Molecular characteristics of antimicrobial resistance and virulence determinants of Staphylococcus aureus isolates derived from clinical infection and food. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 2018, 32, e22456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Yang, X.; Liu, J.; Huang, Y.; Meng, J.; Lei, G.; Jia, Y.; Huang, W.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, L.; He, S. Prevalence, molecular characterization, and antimicrobial susceptibility of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from different origins in Sichuan Province, China, 2007–2015. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2018, 15, 705–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Saif, M.; Saad, S.; Hassanin, F.S.; Zaghloul, M. Prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in some ready-to-eat meat products. Benha Vet. Med. J. 2019, 37, 12–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Khaledian, S.; Pajohi-Alamoti, M.; Mahmoodi, P. Molecular characterization of methicillin-resistant enterotoxin-producing Staphylococcus aureus isolated from Samosa and Falafel in Iran. Int. J. Enteric Pathog. 2020, 8, 19–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Titouche, Y.; Houali, K.; Ruiz-Ripa, L.; Vingadassalon, N.; Nia, Y.; Fatihi, A.; Cauquil, A.; Bouchez, P.; Bouhier, L.; Torres, C.; et al. Enterotoxin genes and antimicrobial resistance in Staphylococcus aureus isolated from food products in Algeria. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2020, 129, 1043–1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Afshari, A.; Taheri, S.; Hashemi, M.; Norouzy, A.; Nematy, M.; Mohamadi, S. Methicillin- and Vancomycin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci Isolated from Hospital Foods: Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns. Curr. Microbiol. 2022, 79, 326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Al-Humam, N.A.; Mohamed, A.F. Monitoring of Escherichia coli, Salmonella spp. and Staphylococci in poultry meat-based fast food in Saudi Arabia. Adv. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 159–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. AbdelRahim, K.A.A.; Hassanein, A.M.; Azeiz, H.A.E.H.A.E. Prevalence, plasmids and antibiotic resistance correlation of enteric bacteria in different drinking water resources in Sohag, Egypt. Jundishapur J. Microbiol. 2015, 8, e18648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Gómez, P.; Lozano, C.; Benito, D.; Estepa, V.; Tenorio, C.; Zarazaga, M.; Torres, C. Characterization of staphylococci in urban wastewater treatment plants in Spain, with detection of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398. Environ. Pollut. 2016, 212, 71–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Bdewi, S.Y.; Kareem, M.H.; Shwaish, M.M.; Hasan, M.S. Isolation of MRSA from drinking water supplies in Al-Anbar Province, Iraq. Med. Leg. Update 2020, 20, 715. [Google Scholar]
  127. Voigt, A.M.; Ciorba, P.; Döhla, M.; Exner, M.; Felder, C.; Lenz-Plet, F.; Sib, E.; Skutlarek, D.; Schmithausen, R.M.; Faerber, H.A. The Investigation of Antibiotic Residues, Antibiotic Resistance Genes and Antibiotic-Resistant Organisms in a Drinking Water Reservoir System in Germany. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2020, 224, 113449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Sergelidis, D.; Angelidis, A.S. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: A controversial food-borne pathogen. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2017, 64, 409–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Belhout, C.; Elgroud, R.; Butaye, P. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and other methicillin-resistant Staphylococci and Mammaliicoccus (MRNaS) associated with animals and food products in Arab countries: A review. Vet Sci. 2022, 9, 317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Aguilar-Salazar, A.; Martínez-Vázquez, A.V.; Aguilera-Arreola, G.; de Jesus de Luna-Santillana, E.; Cruz-Hernández, M.A.; Escobedo-Bonilla, C.M.; Lara-Ramírez, E.; Sánchez-Sánchez, M.; Guerrero, A.; Rivera, G.; et al. Prevalence of ESKAPE Bacteria in Surface Water and Wastewater Sources: Multidrug Resistance and Molecular Characterization, an Updated Review. Water 2023, 15, 3200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Ferreira, J.S.; Costa, W.L.R.; Cerqueira, E.S.; Carvalho, J.S.; Oliveira, L.C.; Almeida, R.C.C. Food handler-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in public hospitals in Salvador, Brazil. Food Control 2014, 37, 395–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Capita, R.; Alonso-Calleja, C. Antibiotic-resistant bacteria: A challenge for the food industry. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2013, 53, 11–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Hossain, S.; Heo, G. Ornamental Fish: A Potential Source of Pathogenic and Multidrug-Resistant Motile Aeromonas Spp. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2021, 72, 2–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Hafez, A.E.E.; Darwish, W.S.; Elbayomi, R.M.; Hussein, M.A.; El Nahal, S.M. Prevalence, antibiogram and molecular characterization of Aeromonas hydrophila isolated from frozen fish marketed in Egypt. Slov. Vet. Res. 2018, 55, 445–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Thaha, A.H.; Malaka, R.; Hatta, W.; Maruddin, F. Staphylococcus aureus as a foodborne pathogen in eggs and egg products in Indonesia: A review. Int. J. One Health 2024, 10, 141–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Lehto, M.; Kuisma, R.; Määttä, J.; Kymäläinen, H.-R.; Mäki, M. Hygienic level and surface contamination in fresh-cut vegetable production plants. Food Control 2011, 22, 469–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Beshiru, A.; Isichei-Ukah, B.O.; Uwhuba, K.E.; Igere, B.E.; Igbinosa, E.O. Prevalence, characterization, and implications of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in ready-to-eat foods from Delta, Nigeria: A concern for consumer safety. Sustainable Microbiol. 2024, 1, qvae007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. O’Hara, F.P.; Suaya, J.A.; Ray, G.T.; Baxter, R.; Brown, M.L.; Mera, R.M.; Close, N.M.; Thomas, E.; Amrine-Madsen, H. spa Typing and Multilocus Sequence Typing Show Comparable Performance in a Macroepidemiologic Study of Staphylococcus aureus in the United States. Microb. Drug Resist. 2016, 22, 88–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Oniciuc, E.A.; Likotrafiti, E.; Alvarez-Molina, A.; Prieto, M.; Santos, J.A.; Alvarez-Ordóñez, A. The Present and Future of Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) and Whole Metagenome Sequencing (WMS) for Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistant Microorganisms and Antimicrobial Resistance Genes across the Food Chain. Genes 2018, 9, 268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Gordon, N.C.; Price, J.R.; Cole, K.; Everitt, R.; Morgan, M.; Finney, J.; Kearns, A.M.; Pichon, B.; Young, B.; Wilson, D.J.; et al. Prediction of Staphylococcus aureus Antimicrobial Resistance by Whole-Genome Sequencing. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2014, 52, 1182–1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Mikhaylova, Y.; Shelenkov, A.; Chernyshkov, A.; Tyumentseva, M.; Saenko, S.; Egorova, A.; Manzeniuk, I.; Akimkin, V. Whole-Genome Analysis of Staphylococcus aureus Isolates from Ready-to-Eat Food in Russia. Foods 2022, 11, 2574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Nouws, S.; Bogaerts, B.; Verhaegen, B.; Denayer, S.; Laeremans, L.; Marchal, K.; Roosens, N.H.C.; Vanneste, K.; De Keersmaecker, S.C.J. Whole Genome Sequencing Provides an Added Value to the Investigation of Staphylococcal Food Poisoning Outbreaks. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 750278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

González-Machado, C.; Alonso-Calleja, C.; Capita, R. Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in Different Food Groups and Drinking Water. Foods 2024, 13, 2686. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13172686

AMA Style

González-Machado C, Alonso-Calleja C, Capita R. Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in Different Food Groups and Drinking Water. Foods. 2024; 13(17):2686. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13172686

Chicago/Turabian Style

González-Machado, Camino, Carlos Alonso-Calleja, and Rosa Capita. 2024. "Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in Different Food Groups and Drinking Water" Foods 13, no. 17: 2686. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13172686

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop