Next Article in Journal
An Updated Comprehensive Overview of Different Food Applications of W1/O/W2 and O1/W/O2 Double Emulsions
Previous Article in Journal
Impact of κ-Carrageenan on the Cold-Set Pea Protein Isolate Emulsion-Filled Gels: Mechanical Property, Microstructure, and In Vitro Digestive Behavior
Previous Article in Special Issue
Potential of Arabica Coffee Beans from Northern Thailand: Exploring Antidiabetic Metabolites through Liquid Chromatography with Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) Metabolomic Profiling across Diverse Postharvest Processing Techniques
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Volatilome, Microbial, and Sensory Profiles of Coffee Leaf and Coffee Leaf-Toasted Maté Kombuchas

by
Amanda Luísa Sales
1,2,
Sara C. Cunha
3,
Isabel M.P.L.V.O. Ferreira
3,
Jéssika Morgado
1,
Lauro Melo
4,
Juliana DePaula
1,
Marco Antonio L. Miguel
2,* and
Adriana Farah
1,*
1
Núcleo de Pesquisa em Café Prof. Luiz Carlos Trugo (NUPECAFÉ), Laboratóriode Química e Bioatividade de Alimentos, Instituto de Nutrição, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Avenida Carlos Chagas Filho, 373, CCS, Bl. J, Rio de Janeiro 21941-902, Brazil
2
Laboratório de Microbiologia de Alimentos, Instituto de Microbiologia Paulo de Góes, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Avenida Carlos Chagas Filho, 373, CCS, Bl. I, Rio de Janeiro 21941-902, Brazil
3
LAQV/REQUIMTE, Laboratório de Bromatologia e Hidrologia, Departamento de Ciências Químicas, Faculdade de Farmácia da Universidade do Porto, 4099-030 Porto, Portugal
4
Laboratório de Análise Sensorial e Estudos do Consumidor (LASEC), Escola de Química, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Avenida Athos da Silveira Ramos, 149, CT, Bl. E, Rio de Janeiro 21941-909, Brazil
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2024, 13(3), 484; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13030484
Submission received: 31 December 2023 / Revised: 11 January 2024 / Accepted: 30 January 2024 / Published: 2 February 2024

Abstract

:
Kombucha is a fermented beverage traditionally made from the leaves of Camelia sinensis. The market has drastically expanded recently, and the beverage has become more elaborated with new, healthy food materials and flavors. Pruning and harvesting during coffee production may generate tons of coffee leaves that are discarded although they contain substantial amounts of bioactive compounds, including those found in maté tea and coffee seeds. This study characterized the changes in volatilome, microbial, and sensory profiles of pure and blended arabica coffee leaf tea kombuchas between 3–9 days of fermentation. Acceptance was also evaluated by consumers from Rio de Janeiro (n = 103). Kombuchas (K) were prepared using black tea kombucha starter (BTKS) (10%), sucrose (10%), a symbiotic culture of Bacteria and Yeasts (SCOBY) (2.5%), and a pure coffee leaf infusion (CL) or a 50:50 blend with toasted maté infusion (CL-TM) at 2.5%. The RATA test was chosen for sensory profile characterization. One hundred volatile organic compounds were identified when all infusions and kombucha samples were considered. The potential impact compounds identified in CL K and CL-TM K were: methyl salicylate, benzaldehyde, hexanal, nonanal, pentadecanal, phenylethyl-alcohol, cedrol, 3,5-octadien-2-one, β-damascenone, α-ionone, β-ionone, acetic acid, caproic acid, octanoic acid, nonanoic acid, decanoic acid, isovaleric acid, linalool, (S)-dihydroactinidiolide, isoamyl alcohol, ethyl hexanoate, and geranyl acetone. Aroma and flavor descriptors with higher intensities in CL K included fruity, peach, sweet, and herbal, while CL-TM K included additional toasted mate notes. The highest mean acceptance score was given to CL-TM K and CL K on day 3 (6.6 and 6.4, respectively, on a nine-point scale). Arabica coffee leaf can be a co-product with similar fingerprinting to maté and black tea, which can be explored for the elaboration of potentially healthy fermented beverages in food industries.

1. Introduction

According to the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), sustainable food and agriculture is one in which food is nutritious and accessible to all and where natural resources are managed in a way that sustains ecosystem functions to meet present and future human needs [1]. The Sustainable Development Agenda for 2030 adopted by United Nations member States in 2015 and revised in 2021, was also adopted by FAO as a plan of action that provides a vision for a world free of extreme poverty and hunger, with reduced inequalities and a healthy natural environment through the transformation of developing more efficient, inclusive, resilient, and sustainable agrifood systems [2]. Agrifood wastes can be relevant sources of nutrients and bioactive compounds, providing multiple health benefits and adding value to the production chain.
Coffee is one of the most widely consumed beverages in the world and one of the most traded commodities globally, with worldwide production and overall consumption of approximately 10 million tons, from which Coffea arabica accounts for about 60–65% [3,4]. This market continues to grow for a variety of reasons, including increased consumption in emerging economies, interest in specialty coffee, and product innovations in developed countries [4]. Harvesting during coffee production generates coffee leaves as a byproduct, which are generally considered to be of no or low value as compared to the highly valuable coffee seeds, especially in organic crops. It has been estimated that about 3.3 tons of leaves are discarded per hectare during harvest season in Brazil because of the mechanical and stripping harvest methods practiced in mainstream coffee production [5]. Pruning is practiced in all crops worldwide, including specialty coffee. The discarded leaves can be used to produce various bioproducts, adding value to coffee production.
Coffee leaves have been used for tea production for centuries, particularly in Africa and Asia [6,7]. They contain several phytochemicals such as chlorogenic acids, mangiferin, isomangiferin, rutin, quercetin, theobromine, caffeine, and trigonelline, terpenes, and other compounds that are known to provide antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects and promote benefits such as antihypertensive and immunomodulatory effects, and relief of gastrointestinal symptoms, among others [6,7,8,9,10]. The consumption of coffee leaf tea is growing in Europe and is expected to continue to grow, replacing or complementing coffee or other tea beverages in many homes [11].
Fermented foods have been staples of the human diet for centuries and are an increasingly popular food category [12]. Fermented beverages are on the rise worldwide, growing rapidly and attracting the most health-conscious consumers.
A preliminary sensory analysis revealed that the fermentation of coffee leaves by Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Latilactobacillus plantarum produced promising coffee leaf teas among European consumers [13]. Blending coffee leaf with toasted maté was considered as another alternative for introducing coffee leaf tea to Brazilian consumers [14], given the high and frequent consumption of maté tea in Brazil, including in Rio de Janeiro where it is drunk toasted and cold [15].
Kombucha is traditionally produced through the fermentation of Camellia sinensis teas and sugar in a symbiotic association of bacteria and yeasts called SCOBY. It originated in Asia in around 220 B.C. and was first used for its health properties [16]. The traditional beverage can be prepared using both black and green teas, with the former being more popular [17]. Kombucha has numerous benefits supported by in vitro and in vivo studies, such as antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities [18,19,20]; antiproliferative activity in colon, breast, and lung cancer cells [20,21,22]; antibacterial activity [21]; hypoglycemic effects; and weight loss in diabetic rats [23].
Praised for its digestive benefits, kombucha proliferates in retail, taking up more shelf space in health specialist stores and traditional grocery stores [24]. In 2022, the global market value of kombucha was estimated at over two billion U.S. dollars. By 2028 the market is expected to reach over six billion U.S. dollars [25]. The growing interest in kombucha has attracted the use of new raw materials for fermentation that are different from black tea, such as teas, fruits, herbs, and milk, as well as a wide range of agro-industrial materials, which are mainly byproducts of the fruit industry [26].
A limited number of studies have been performed on the potential use of coffee leaves for the elaboration of food products [27]. Considering the taste, bioactive profile, and market potential of coffee leaf tea, the similarities between Camelia sinensis leaves and Coffea leaves, and the market potential of fermented beverages, elaborating a kombucha beverage from coffee leaf tea seems to be a promising idea for promoting consumer health, sustainability, and the value of coffee production. Therefore, the aim of this study was to characterize the changes in volatilome, microbial, and sensory profiles of kombuchas made with arabica coffee leaf tea, pure and blended with toasted maté, for 3–9 days of fermentation. Acceptance was also evaluated by consumers from Rio de Janeiro.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Samples

All pure tea samples were obtained by combining multiple sample units to form a composite sample of each pure tea. The following samples were used to prepare the infusions for kombucha fermentation: the leading commercial brand of unfermented Coffea arabica leaf tea—CL in the West, harvested and processed in Nicaragua and sold in Canada; the leading commercial brand of black tea (Camellia sinensis)—BT in Brazil; and the leading brand of commercial toasted maté (Ilex paraguariensis)—TM in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil [28]. A blend was also prepared with 50% CL and 50% TM. All leaves were used in bulk.

2.2. Kombucha Consortium and Microbial Analysis

The kombucha consortium was obtained from the Microbiology Institute of the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro in Brazil. In order to stabilize the microbial consortium originally grown in green tea, three separate fermentation processes in black tea, coffee leaves or coffee leaves with maté infusions were performed before experimental use [29]. DNA was extracted from samples of SCOBY and samples of kombuchas that have been fermented for 9 days, according to Yamanaka et al. [30] method adapted by Sales et al. [19].

2.3. Kombucha Preparation

The kombucha preparation protocol was adapted from Nummer [31].
  • Infusions: Infusions of BT were prepared at a concentration of 3%, while infusions of CL and CL-TM were prepared at a concentration of 2.5% (w/v), based on preliminary sensory results. Water at 95 °C was poured over the raw material and allowed to steep for 10 min. The leaves were then removed using a traditional sieve for infusion preparation. BT kombucha starter: BT kombucha starter was prepared by mixing 90% (v/v) BT infusion, 10% (w/v) sugar, 10% (v/v) BT K previously fermented (starter culture), and 2.5% (w/v) of the SCOBY and was fermented at 23 °C for 9 days to be used as a starter (pH = 2.8 ± 0.05) for the other beverages. After fermentation, samples were collected for Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) analyses.
  • CL or CL-TM kombucha: CL kombucha beverages (CL K) were prepared by mixing 90% (v/v) CL or CL-TM infusion, 10% (w/v) sugar, 10% (v/v) BT K starter culture, and 2.5% (w/v) of SCOBY and fermented at 23 °C. Sampling was done every 3 days during the 9 days of fermentation (d0, d3, d6 and d9) After fermentation, the samples were collected for analyses of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs).

2.4. pH, Total Titratable Acidity, Total Soluble Solids, and Sugars Analysis

pH was measured using a pH meter (Kasvi K39-0014PA, São José dos Pinhais, Paraná, Brasil). The total titratable acidity was determined by titration with 0.1 N NaOH and phenolphtalein as the indicator, according to the Adolfo Lutz Institute [32]. The results were expressed in mEq/L. The total soluble solids were evaluated using a handheld refractometer (Pocket Refractometer Pal-1, ATAGO, Tokyo, Japan). The results were expressed in °Brix.
Sucrose was analyzed using a High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Refractive Index Detector (RID) system (mod.# 2414, Waters, Milford, MA, USA), according to Wischral et al. [33] as in Sales et al. [19]. External standards calibration curves were used to identify and quantify all sugars.

2.5. Analyses of Volatile Organic Compounds

The extraction of VOC from the infusions and kombuchas was performed by headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) using a 50/30 μm divinylbenzene/carboxen/polydimethylsiloxane fiber (DVB/CAR/PDMS, Supelco®, Bellefonte, PA, USA). Analysis was performed by a gas chromatographer (Agilent, 6890 Little Falls, DE, USA) coupled to a mass spectrometer (Agilent 5975) (GC-MS), according to the methodology described by Wang et al. [34] and adopted by Sales et al. [35] and DePaula et al. [14].

2.6. Sensory Tests

The Ethical Committee of the Clementino Fraga Filho University Hospital at the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) approved this study (# 4.513.606). The subjects, including students, teachers, visitors, and employees at the UFRJ Health Sciences and Technology Centers living in different areas of Rio de Janeiro provided written consent after being thoroughly informed. The eligible criteria for this study included habitual consumers of kombucha or sparkling beverages, such as sparkling water, ciders, and soft drinks. Individuals who had a positive COVID-19 diagnosis and experienced loss of taste and/or smell were excluded from the study, as were individuals with any other conditions that could affect sensory evaluation. A total of 103 participants took part in the Acceptance, Purchasing Intent, and Rate All That Apply (RATA) tests after exclusions.
Consumer assessors performed the tests on individual benches in the UFRJ Food and Dietetics Lab according to Sales et al. [35].

2.6.1. Consumer Acceptance and Purchase Intent

The assessors used a nine-point hedonic scale (ranging from one, which means extremely disliked, to nine, which means extremely liked) to evaluate the infusions. This was followed by a five-point purchase intent scale (ranging from one, which means certainly would not buy, to five, which means certainly would buy) [36]. To calculate the Acceptability Index (AI) the following equation was used:
AI = (X × 100)/N
where X = Average score given by assessors and N = Highest score given by assessors. An AI equal to or greater than 70% was considered satisfactory [36].

2.6.2. Rate All That Apply (RATA)

The assessors were provided with a pre-prepared checklist of 34 sensory descriptors related to appearance, aroma, flavor, and mouthfeel. These descriptors were identified in a preliminary session by a trained panel of nine experts (aged 28–58) with a minimum of 200 h of experience in evaluating different food products and 30 h of experience in evaluating fermented beverages and infusions. The panelists were asked to generate their individual descriptors using a modified grid method [37]. Afterward, they agreed on the best descriptors for fully describing the samples and the evaluation methods [38]. The sensory descriptors used in the study were organized by alphabetical order as follows: burnt, fermented, fruity, green leaf, herbal, peach, rosé wine, sweet, toasted leaf, white wine (for odor); acidic/sour, bitter, and sweet (for taste); acetic/vinegar, alcoholic, apple vinegar, fruit syrup, fruity, toasted leaf, green apple, green coffee, herbal, peach, white wine, and brewer’s yeast (for flavor); astringency, sparkling, fizzy, full-bodied, refreshing, and watery (for mouthfeel); and clear, brown, and opaque/matte (for appearance). To determine whether assessors perceived the varying intensities in the aroma, taste, and flavor descriptors of the kombucha samples, assessors were asked to score the descriptor based on their intensity using RATA scores (1 = low intensity, 2 = medium intensity, and 3 = high intensity).

2.7. Statistical Analysis

Data from physicochemical analyses are presented as mean ± standard deviation. One-way ANOVA, followed by the Tukey test, was performed to identify significant differences (GraphPad Prism, Version 8.4.2, Informer Technologies, Los Angeles, CA, USA).
Statistical analyses of VOC data was performed by Principal Component Analysis (PCA) using individual peak areas as variables (R version 4.2.2, RStudio team 2022, Boston, MA, USA). Data pretreatment included normalization and scaling, which are required processes for data that present wide-scale differences, as is the case for volatiles.
For sensory tests, statistical analyses were conducted using the XLSTAT software, version 2023.1.1 (Addinsoft, Paris, France). ANOVA followed by the Tukey test was performed for acceptance (fixed factors: fermentation time and maté addition; random factor: consumers; and interaction between fermentation time and maté addition) and purchase intent tests results. For RATA descriptors, ANOVA, followed by Fisher’s test and correspondence analysis based on chi-squared distances, was performed to achieve a sensory map of the samples [39]. The test of independence between rows and columns was carried out at 5% significance. Cluster analysis (agglomerative hierarchical clustering using Euclidean distance for the Ward method) was also applied [40,41]. Differences were considered significant when p ≤ 0.05.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Physicochemical Parameters

Table 1 presents the pH, total acidity, soluble solids, and sucrose values for all evaluated kombuchas. In CL K, the total acidity increased up to d9, and the pH decreased from 3.8/3.9 to 3.4. These values are within the ranges observed in the literature for kombuchas [22,42] and are caused by the fermentation process that forms several organic acids, which are mainly acetic, glucuronic, lactic, and citric acids, and the monosaccharides glucose and fructose [43,44]. The addition of TM to CL made the fermentation process slower; therefore, the pH decreased mildly from d0 to d9, which is in agreement with the literature [45].
The pH values are within the kombucha pH range considered safe for human consumption (2.5 to 4.2) [31]. Kombucha pH values below 2.5 have a high concentration of acetic acid, posing a risk to consumers’ health. Likewise, pH values above 4.2 may compromise the beverage’s microbiological safety [22].
Also, the kombucha pH has been shown by Ulusoy and Tamer [45] to stabilize due to the buffer effect caused by the organic acids and carbon dioxide formed during fermentation. According to the authors, the resulting aqueous solution of carbon dioxide dissociates and produces the amphiprotic hydrocarbonate anion (HCO3), which quickly reacts with hydrogen ions (H+) from organic acids, preventing further changes in the (H+) concentration and contributing to the buffering character of the system.
The final average sucrose content in all kombuchas tended to decrease (37% in CL and 32.7% in CL-TM, from d0 to d9). Fermentation also decreased the soluble solids concentration, probably because of the decrease in the sucrose concentration in the culture medium over time [35,46]. At the beginning of the kombucha fermentation process, yeast produces invertase, which cleaves the disaccharide sucrose to its monosaccharide components: glucose, and fructose [44].

3.2. Microbial Taxonomy

Figure 1 and Figure 2 characterize the microbial community of the SCOBY and the final kombuchas CL K and CL-TM K (d9). The SCOBY composition was similar to that which was reported by the same authors for coffee cascara kombucha [35], with slight differences in microorganism strains and percentages in the CL and CL-TM kombuchas. All samples were found to contain two bacterial phyla, Proteobacteria and Firmicutes, according to the data analysis of the 16S rRNA gene sequence (Figure 1). Proteobacteria was the overwhelmingly dominant phylum, with a percentage exceeding 90%, particularly in CL K and CL-TM K. This result is consistent with previous studies evaluating kombucha beverages’ microbial profile [47,48,49].
Komagataeibacter, the most efficient bacterial cellulose producer [50], was the most abundant genus found in both the liquid and biofilm of all kombuchas, which is consistent with previous studies characterizing kombucha cultures [51]. Only Komagataeibacter rhaeticus was identified in the starter culture, which accounts for about 40% of the total number of bacteria. This bacterium is known to be one of the most abundant members among kombucha fermenting agents [29,51]. In kombucha, Komagateibacter genera are positively correlated with the presence of furfural and benzaldehyde, among other volatile compounds, and less correlated with acetic acid and octanoic acid [52].
In CL K, characterized for the first time, K. rhaeticus comprised more than 70% of CL K microorganisms and about 90% of CL-TM K microorganisms contained in the liquid and solid cultures. In addition to a high percentage of K. rhaeticus (70–90%), K. europaeus (7–22%), K. intermedius (0.3%), and Gluconacetobacter entanii (0.5%) were identified in CL and CL-TM K. K. europaeus and K. intermedius have previously been identified in black tea kombuchas [29,53,54] and in coffee cascara kombucha [35]. According to Yao et al. [55], K. europaeus and K.rhaeticus are positively associated with acid production in kombucha flavor.
The Gluconacetobacter genus has been detected in black tea kombuchas [29,49], as well as in other fermented matrices [56] and kombuchas [57]. This genus possess valuable characteristics that can be combined with yeast strains for glucuronic acid production [58].
Low percentages of Latilactobacillus (0.3–0.8%), Enterobacteriaceae (0.2–0.8%), and Staphylococcus (0.4–1.3%) were observed. Additionally, two lactic acid bacteria, Latilactobacillus sakei and Pediococcus pentosaceus, were identified in BT K, CL K, and CL-TM K. It is worth noting that L. sakei was found to produce volatile compounds such as hexanal, acetic acid, and geranyl acetone in a model kimchi [59,60,61,62]. Pediococcus pentosaceus was confidently chosen to ferment tilapia surimi, resulting in the production of several key aldehydes such as hexanal, nonanal, heptanal, octanal, decanal, undecanal, and benzaldehyde [60,61,62,63], and was only identified in CL-TM K at a low percentage (0.02%).
Staphylococcus carnosus and Staphylococcus xylosus were identified in BT K, CL K, and CL-TM K. It has also been in coffee cascara kombuchas [35]. They are found in several fermented food products and are recognized as non-infective, contributing to acidic and buttery characteristics [61].
As also observed in coffee cascara kombucha, Enterobacteria were identified in CL K and CL-TM K, but in a lower percentage than in black tea kombuchas [35]. Enterobacteria are among commonly isolated microbial groups from spontaneous food fermentations, including kombucha fermentation [29,47,49]. Pantoea septica was an additional Enterobacteriaceae strain identified in the starter kombucha [63]. The Pantoea spp. genus was previously identified in grape cultivars for wine production and was positively correlated with straight-chain fatty alcohols, aromatic aldehydes, and terpenes in wine [64].
The most abundant yeast phyla was Ascomycota (Figure 2). Pichia was the most abundant yeast genera (>70%), followed by Saccharomyces (>20%) and Brettanomyces (5–8%) genera.
Pichia strains were previously identified as the main yeast genera in kombuchas [47,49,54]. Pichia strains identified in CL and CL-TM kombuchas were Pichia fermentans, Pichia barkeri, and Pichia dianae, which are different from coffee cascara kombucha, in which the strains Pichia fermentans and Pichia kluyveri were identified [35].
Brettanomyces bruxellensis was the most common yeast identified in black tea kombucha [29,51,64] and in coffee cascara kombucha [35]. Ester production during the fermentation is performed by the esterases present in Brettanomyces spp., which are responsible for the formation of ethyl esters, such as ethyl acetate and ethyl lactate, along with the hydrolysis of acetate esters, such as isoamyl acetate and phenethyl acetate, although this strain can also produce negative descriptors in fermentation products [65]. In kombucha, Brettanomyces bruxelensis can contribute to alcohols and acids production, such as isoamyl alcohol and phenylehtyl alcohol [66] and is positively associated with the acetic acid formation in kombucha [55].
The percentage of Saccharomyces sp. was similar to that observed by Landis et al. [51] but was lower than coffee cascara kombucha [35]. These genera and strains have been previously identified in kombuchas [47,49,55]. Saccharomyces sp. is the major yeast genus involved in producing alcoholic beverages [67]. Saccharomyces sp. strains have been previously identified in kombuchas [47,49,55]. During fermentation, Saccharomyces cerevisiae (0.4–0.5%) presented a higher abundance in CL-TM K. In kombucha, this strain is correlated with ethanol [53,56]. Another Saccharomyces strain identified was Saccharomyces paradoxus. This strain can produce high concentrations of hexanol, isoamyl alcohol, 2-phenylethyl ethanol, and ethyl acetate, among other volatile compounds, in wine [68].
Saccharomycodes ludgwigii is considered detrimental to the winemaking process [69,70]. This strain has been previously identified in coffee cascara kombucha [35].

3.3. Volatile Organic Compounds

Figure 3 presents the relative peak areas of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) (grouped by classes) in infusions and kombuchas made from CL, TM, and CL-TM. We also evaluated the VOCs from BT K starter culture, given that all kombucha beverages contained 10% of it. Although the area does not directly reflect the concentration of the compound, it serves an indicator of its relative abundance and, together with the total areas of the VOCs, provides the volatile profile, which is useful for comparison purposes [14]. The potential impact of the compounds will be presented later in this section.
The highest peak areas in BT K starter were from acids, alcohols, and esters due to its advanced fermentation stage. Generally, the infusions tended to present higher area percentages of aldehydes, ketones, monoterpene-alcohols, and furans compared to kombuchas, while the kombuchas presented more acids, esters, and phenols due to the fermentation process [71]. The substantial content of alcohols at d0 of fermentation in both kombuchas is derived from CL and TM raw materials and the starter culture [72,73].
For acids, the peak areas tended to increase with fermentation. Volatile acids are produced during alcoholic and acetic fermentation by the symbiosis between acetic acid bacteria and yeasts in SCOBY [73]. The starter culture contributes greatly to the percentage and number of acids found in kombuchas [73]. The high peak area of monoterpene alcohols could be explained by the free odor-producing forms of monoterpene alcohols, given the presence of glycosidically bound monoterpene alcohols in tea. Another possibility is the release of some aroma constituents when the non-volatile materials from tea leaves were fermented [74].
Fermentation products result from several complex and changeable enzymatic and/or chemical reactions involving volatile and nonvolatile precursors. These chemical changes result in the development of aroma and flavor. While BT, CL, TM, and CL-TM infusions can be characterized as having herbal/green leaf and woody aroma and flavor [14], kombucha production develops richer fruity and sometimes flowery aromas and flavors [75]. Common metabolic pathways include those of carbohydrates, amino acids, fatty acids, and other lipidic components, among other classes. These pathways interact and intertwine to shape the unique flavor of foods [76].
The VOCs identified in the BT K starter and the CL, TM, and CL-TM infusions and kombuchas are presented in Table 2. A total of 100 VOCs were identified, considering all beverages, among them 23 esters, 19 aldehydes, 13 alcohols, 12 ketones, nine monoterpenes, eight acids, five monoterpenes alcohols, five furans, two phenols, one pyrrol, and one heterocyclic aromatic compound. In the infusions, 37 VOCs were identified in CL, 48 in TM, and 67 in CL-TM.
Twenty compounds were identified only in the CL infusion and not in TM infusion: nonanoic acid, α-terpineol, and isopropyl palmitate were reported as odor-active compounds in coffee leaf tea [13]; methyl palmitate and 2-methylbutyraldehyde were identified in black tea [77]; the monoterpenes myrcene, 3-δ-carene, and camphene were significant contributors for green, black, and Pu-erh teas [78,79,80,81,82]; Z-3-hexenol and (S)-2-methyl-1-butanol were identified in green tea [81]; cedrol was identified in white tea [83]; 1-terpinen-4-ol was a key component of citrus fruit aroma [84]; and additional compounds included dodecanal, acetic acid, ethyl palmitate, linalyl acetate, (−)-carvone, tetradecanal, 2-methylbutanoic acid, and phenethyl alcohol.
CL and TM infusions showed similar VOC profiles and 16 compounds, among which were nine potential odor-impact compounds: α-ionone, ß-ionone, 3,5-octadien-2-one hexanal, nonanal, benzaldehyde, trans-linalool oxide, linalool, and dihydroactinidiolide [13,85,86,87,88]. Their odor descriptions are listed in Table 2. They will also be discussed in the kombucha section.
Twenty-nine VOCs were only identified in the TM infusion and not in the CL. Among them, six potential impact compounds were identified: 2,4-heptadienal, nonanal, safranal, ethanol, geranyl acetone, and β-damascenone [13,85,86,87,88]. Among the additional compounds were the carotenoid-derived dihydro-β-ionone and megastigmatrienone, which are characteristic of tobacco aroma [89,90]. The heating process (drying and scorching), to which the toasted maté leaves are subjected before consumption, leads to many degradation products and enhances the flavor resembling tobacco [86]. In this study, CL was only dried, not scorched and dried like TM. Regarding the toasted maté compounds, the ketone ketoisophorone, which contributes to woody and aged aromas in C. sinensis An tea [91], is also a freshness marker in saffron [92], while 2,3-butanedione was previously identified in watermelon juice fermented by lactic acid bacteria [93]. The aldehyde benzeneacetaldehyde is an impact compound in oolong tea [94]. Furans and pyrroles are heat treatment markers [95]. These VOCs can be generated by the Maillard reaction during C. sinensis tea manufacturing [96] and also during coffee roasting [97]. Furfural, 5-methylfurfural, 2-ethylfuran, and 1-furfurulpyrrole have been previously identified in toasted maté infusions [14]. Another volatile Maillard reaction product is 4,5-Dimethyl-2-propyloxazole [98]. Additional compounds identified only in TM were benzophenone, 2,6,6-trimethylcyclohexanone, phtalolactone, 2-heptenal, 1-penten-3-ol, p-mentha-1,5,8-triene, and 2-methylallyl butyrate. These compounds were identified in toasted maté by DePaula et al. [14].
When kombuchas were obtained, an increase in the number of VOCs was observed, from 37 to 75 in CL, with 24 derived from the BT K starter and 13 formed during fermentation. Of these newly formed compounds, 54% were esters and 23% were aldehydes. In CL-TM, the number of identified compounds increased from 67 to 90 after fermentation. Of these compounds, 20 were from the BTK starter, and seven were formed during fermentation, with 100% being esters. A similar increase in the number of VOCs was reported for coffee cascara kombucha [35].
Table 2. Volatile compounds identified in coffee leaf and coffee-toasted maté leaf kombuchas.
Table 2. Volatile compounds identified in coffee leaf and coffee-toasted maté leaf kombuchas.
Volatile
Compound
Odor DescriptionCAS# aELRI bLRI cBT K StarterCL
Inf
CL
d0
CL
d3
CL
d6
CL
d9
TM
Inf
CL-TM
Inf
CL-TM d0CL-TM d3CL-TM d6CL-TM d9
Esters
2-Methylbutyl acetateFruit, over ripe fruit, sweet, banana, juicy 1,2624-41-9677848
2-Methylallyl butyratePowerful, fruity, ether, sweet, pineapple, apple, plum 27149-29-3696774
Ethyl acetatePineapple, ethereal, fruity, sweet, weedy, green 1,2141-78-6971977
Ethyl phenylacetateFruit, sweet, floral, honey, rose, balsam, cocoa 1,2101-97-3877904
Ethyl butyrateApple, fruity, juicy, pineapple, cognac 1,2105-54-4765848
Ethyl isobutyrate *Sweet, rubber, ethereal, fruity, alcoholic, fusel, rummy 1,297-62-1882895
Ethyl 2-methylbutyrateSharp, sweet, green, apple, fruity 27452-79-1899947
Ethyl 3-hexenoateFruity, pineapple, green, tart, candy, metallic, tropical, rhubarb, weedy, cheesy 22396-83-0909920
Ethyl (Z)-3-hexenoateGreen, pear, apple, tropical 264187-83-3914933
Ethyl hexanoate *Apple peel, fruit, sweet, pineapple, waxy, green, banana 1,2123-66-0921924
Ethyl valerateYeast, fruit, sweet, apple, pineapple, green, tropical 1,2539-82-2798876
Ethyl octanoateFruit, banana, pear1,2106-32-1876899
Ethyl nonanoateFruity, rose, waxy, rum, wine, natural, tropical 2123-29-5876899
Ethyl decanoateGrape, sweet, waxy, fruity, apple, oily, brandy 1,2110-38-3913928
Ethyl laurateLeaf, sweet, waxy, floral, soapy, clean 1,2106-33-2843880
Ethyl palmitateWax, fruity, creamy, milky, balsamic, greasy, oily 1,2628-97-7739820
Isoamyl acetate *Banana, sweet, fruity, solvent 1,2123-92-2759859
Linalyl acetateSweet, fruit, green, citrus, bergamot, lavender, woody 1,2115-95-7772809
Isopropyl myristateFaint, oily, fatty 2110-27-0856867
Isopropyl palmitateFat, bland, oily 1,2142-91-6826894
Methyl salicylate *Peppermint 1119-36-8889928
Methyl dihydrojasmonateFloral, oily, jasmin, green, lactonic, tropical, natural 224851-98-7785823
Methyl palmitateOily, waxy, fatty, orris 2112-39-0747798
Aldehydes
Ethanal/AcetaldehydePungent, ether, fresh, fruity, musty 1,275-07-0976976
2- MethylbutyraldehydeMusty, cocoa, phenolic, coffee, nutty, malty, fermented, fatty, alcoholic 296-17-3644754
Benzaldehyde *Almond, burnt sugar, tropical fruit 1,2100-52-7736885
BenzeneacetaldehydeHoney, floral, sweet, fermented, chocolate, earthy, green 1,2122-78-1904961
PhenylacetaldehydeHoney, floral, rose, sweet, powdery, fermented, chocolate, earthy, hawthorne, green, hyacinth, clover, cocoa 1,2122-78-1932954
IsovaleraldehydeEthereal, aldehydic, chocolate, peach, fatty 2590-86-3777842
Hexanal *Grass, tallow, fat, fresh, green, aldehydic, leafy, fruity, sweaty 1,266-25-1800855
(E)-2-HeptenalPungent, green, vegetable, fresh, fruity, fatty 218829-55-5773804
2,4-Heptadienal *Fried, nut, fat, green, pungent, fruity, spicy 1,25910-85-0852865
HeptanalFat, citrus, rancid, fresh, aldehydic, green, herbal, wine-lee, ozone 1,2111-71-7909917
OctanalCitrus, soap, lemon, herbal, green, honey 1,2124-13-0877907
Nonanal *Fat, citrus, fresh, orange, green 1,2124-19-6929931
Safranal *Herb, sweet, fresh, phenolic, metallic, rosemary, tobacco, spicy 1,2116-26-7889899
β-cyclocitralSaffron, green, rose, sweet, tobacco, damascene, fruity, mint 1,2432-25-7843850
UndecanalWaxy, soapy, floral, aldehydic, citrus, green, fatty, fresh, laundry 2112-44-772865
DodecanalSoapy, waxy, aldehydic, citrus, green, floral 2112-54-9917963
TridecanalFlower, sweet, must, fresh, clean, aldehydic, soapy, citrus, petal, waxy, grapefruit peel 1,210486-19-8781885
TetradecanalFatty, waxy, amber, incense, dry, citrus, peel, musk 2124-25-4763896
Pentadecanal *Fresh, waxy 1,22765-11-9823956
Alcohols
Ethanol *Sweet164-17-5976976
2-Methyl-1-butanolMalt, wine, onion, ethereal, fusel, alcoholic, fatty, greasy, whiskey, leathery, cocoa 1,2137-32-6855876
(S)-(-)-2-Methyl-1-butanolEthereal, fresh 21565-80-6796847
3-Methyl-1-butanol/
isoamyl alcohol *
Whiskey, malt, burnt, fusel, oil, alcoholic, fruity, banana 1,2123-51-3877894
1-Penten-3-olEthereal, horseradish, green radish, chrysanthemum, vegetable, tropical fruity, truffle, oily, resinous 2616-25-1846846
Z-3-HexenolGrass, fresh, green, cut, foliage, vegetable, herbal, oily 1,2928-96-1881916
2-EthylhexanolRose, green, citrus, fresh, floral, oily, sweet 1,2104-76-7930943
(S)-2-HeptanolMushroom, oily, fatty, blue cheese, moldy 26033-23-4800859
3-OctenolMushroom, earthy, green, oily, fungal, raw chicken, vegetative 220125-85-3852878
Phenethyl alcohol *Honey, spice, rose, lilac, floral, fresh 1,260-12-8888932
1-DodecanolEarthy, soapy, waxy, fatty, honey, coconut 2112-53-8799896
EugenolClove, honey, sweet, spicy, clove, woody 1,297-53-0864868
Cedrol *Cedarwood, woody, dry, sweet, soft 277-53-2661825
Ketones
Geranyl acetone *Magnolia, green, fresh, fruity, waxy, rose, woody, tropical 1,23796-70-1682777
2,3-ButanedioneStrong, butter, sweet, creamy, pungent, caramel, milky 2431-03-8894894
2-OctanoneEarthy, weedy, natural, woody, herbal, dairy, waxy, cheese, woody, mushroom, yeast 2111-13-7842842
3,5-Octadien-2-one *Fruity, fatty, mushroom 238284-27-4879895
IsophoroneCooling, woody, sweet, green, camphor, fruity, musty, cedarwood, tobacco, leather 278-59-1699773
KetoisophoroneMusty, woody, sweet, tea, tobacco, leaf, citrus, floral, musty, tea like with green, sweet, fruity nuances 21125-21-9808808
2,2,6-TrimethylcyclohexanonePungent, thujonic, labdanum, honey, cistus 22408-37-9729729
(−)-CarvoneMint, sweet, spearmint, herbal 1,26485-40-1918921
BenzophenoneBalsamic, herbal, rose, metallic,
Geranium 2
119-61-9623696
β-Damascenone *Apple, rose, honey, tobacco, sweet 1,223726-93-4898955
Dihydro-β-iononeEarthy, woody, mahogany, orris, dry amber 217283-81-7768768
MegastigmatrienoneSweet, nutty, skin, tobacco, spicy238818-55-2815822
Monoterpenes
3-δ-Carene *Citrus, terpenic, herbal, pine, solvent, resinous, phenolic, cypress, medicinal, woody 213466-78-9741825
Myrcene *Balsamic, must, spice, peppery, terpene, plastic 1,2123-35-3834892
MenthoneFresh, green, minty 1,289-80-5844859
Camphene *Camphor, woody, herbal, fir, needle, camphor, terpenic 1,279-92-5815860
α-TerpineolOil, anise, mint, lemon, citrus, 1,298-55-5901921
γ-TerpineolTerpineol, lilac 2586-81-2951956
1,5,8-p-MentatrieneRoasted 221195-59-5735780
α-Ionone *Wood, violet, sweet, floral, orris, tropical, fruity 1,2127-41-3892897
β-Ionone *Seaweed, violet, flower, raspberry, woody, sweet, fruity, berry, tropical, beeswax 1,214901-07-6847849
Acids
Acetic acid *Acidic, sour, pungent, vinegar 1,264-19-7943956
2-methylbutanoic acidPungent, acid, Roquefort, cheese 264-19-7943956
Isovaleric acid *Sweat, acid, rancid, sour, stinky, feet, cheese, tropical 1,2503-74-2818852
Caproic acid *Sweat, sour, fatty, cheese 1,2142-62-1897920
Octanoic acid *Acid, sweat, cheese, fruit notes 1,2124-07-2921934
Nonanoic acid *Green, fat, waxy, dirty, cheese, cultured, dairy 1,2112-05-0887900
Decanoic acid *Rancid, fat, unpleasant, rancid, sour, fatty, citrus 1,2334-48-5924933
Lauric acidMetal, mild, fatty, coconut, bay, oil 1,2143-07-7689826
Monoterpenes alcohol
1-Terpinen-4-olTurpentine, nutmeg, must, pepper, woody, earth, musty, sweet 1,2562-74-3860898
Linalool *Citrus, flower, lavender, sweet, green 1,278-70-6942945
Linalool oxideFlower, wood, musty, camphor, fenchyl, alcohol 1,260047-17-8900928
Trans-Linalool oxide *Flower 1,234995-77-2880892
Cis-Linalool oxideEarthy, floral, sweet, woody 1,25989-33-3838852
Furans
FurfuralBread, almond, sweet, woody 1,298-01-1916945
5-methylfurfuralAlmond, caramel, burnt sugar, spice, maple, sweet, brown, grain, maple-like 1,2620-02-0884911
2-EthylfuranChemical, beany, ethereal, cocoa, bready, malty, coffee, nutty, brown, rooty, earthy, musty 23208-16-0626766
Furfuryl alcoholBurnt, alcoholic, chemical, musty, sweet, caramel, bread, coffee 298-00-0806849
(S)-dihydroactinidio-lide *Musk, coumarin 217092-92-1888905
Phenols
4-EthylphenolPhenolic, castoreum, smoke, guaiacol 2123-07-9817856
4-EthylguaiacolSpice, clove, smoky, bacon, phenolic 1,22785-89-9908939
Pyrrol
1-FurfurylpyrrolePlastic, green, waxy, fruity, coffee, vegetable, vegetative, onion, sharp and metallic 21438-94-4859859
Heterocyclic aromatic organic compound
4,5-Dimethyl-2-propyloxazoleRoasted, burnt 253833-32-2674674
Note: K: kombucha; BT K starter: black tea kombucha starter; CL: coffee leaf; CL-TM: coffee-leaf-toasted maté; TM: toasted maté; Inf: infusion; d0, d3, d6, and d9: 0, 3, 6, and 9 days of fermentation. a CAS# (Chemical Abstracts Service) Registry Number, available in the NIST database [99]; b ELRI: Experimental Linear Retention Index; c LRI: Linear Retention Index based on the literature and the NIST database [99]; 1 http://www.flavornet.org [100]; 2 http://www.thegoodscentscompany.com [101]; * Impact compounds according to the literature: Steger et al. [13]; Ubeda et al. [71]; Tran et al. [72]; Bishop et al. [73]; Wang et al. [80]; Wang et al. [81]; Araújo et al. [85]; Marquez et al. [86]; Mei et al. [87]; Machado et al. [102]; Kang et al. [103]; Procopio et al. [104]; ■ compound identified in the sample; □ compound not identified in the sample.
Aldehydes usually have a low threshold in foods and contribute to their overall flavors [76]. Pentadecanal, benzaldehyde, octanal, and hexanal, identified in CL K and CL-TM K, are key odorants in coffee leaf tea [13,87]. Additionally, octanal and nonanal were previously identified in green maté [105].
In CL-TM K, the aldehyde 2,4-heptadienal is a marker compound in green and toasted maté [85,102]. The formation of this VOC is favored by some steps in the maté processing such as scorching and drying, where the material is subjected to heat treatment [86]. According to Mei et al. [87], 2,4-heptadienal is an impact compound in coffee leaf, although we did not identify it in CL infusion or CL K.
Regarding alcohols, 2-methyl-1-butanol, identified only in CL K samples, was identified in a green coffee spirit [106]. Ethanol, identified in all kombucha samples, can impact the aromatic profile of kombucha [72]. Additional alcohol identified was isoamyl alcohol, one of the most important sensory-active higher alcohols for beer aroma [104]. Regarding acids, nonanoic acid is an odor active compound in coffee leaf tea [13] and was identified in CL K and CL-TM K. Acetic acid is the main acid responsible for kombucha sourness [72,73]. Decanoic and octanoic acid were identified in all CL K and CL-TM K. They are reported as odor-active compounds in sparkling wine [71].
In kombuchas, ethyl acetate and methyl salicylate were identified in all CL Ks and CL-TM Ks; methyl salicylate is an odor-active compound in coffee leaf tea [87], Pu-erh tea [81], and oolong tea [107] and was previously identified in green maté [103]. Ethyl acetate imparted apple and banana traits to wine [108], while ethyl decanoate and ethyl octanoate have been reported as abundant compounds in ciders [109]; ethyl isobutyrate and ethyl hexanoate have been reported as impact compounds in sparkling wine [71]; ethyl phenylacetate is one of the important esters in wine aroma compounds formed during alcoholic fermentation [108]; and ethyl laurate was correlated with positive aroma compounds in beer [110].
According to Steger et al. [13], 3,5-octadien-2-one, α-ionone, and β-ionone are key odorants in coffee leaf tea fermented by yeasts. These compounds were identified in CL infusion prior to kombucha preparation. Additional compounds identified in CL K were menthone and carvone, important contributors to Pu-erh tea aroma [81]. Also, β-damascenone, α-ionone, and β-ionone are odor-active compounds in green maté [86]. Geranyl acetone was previously identified as a marker compound in green maté [85,86,102]. α-terpineol was previously identified in coffee leaf and green maté teas [13,14,87,111]; linalool and linalool oxide are odor active compounds in green maté [86].
The only furan identified in all infusions and kombucha samples was dihydroactinidiolide. This VOC is viewed as critical in determining the aroma characteristics of black tea [96] and Pu-erh tea [81]. It has been previously identified in coffee leaf tea [14] and green maté [85]. This VOC can be generated by photo-oxidation of β-carotene under UV light [96]. The presence of the phenols 4-ethylguiacol and 4-ethylphenol in BT K, CL K, and CL-TM K is probably due to the fermentative process by yeasts from the genus Brettanomyces through conversion of hydroxycinnamic acids [112,113].

3.4. Sensory Tests

3.4.1. Acceptance Test

The consumer assessors’ main characteristics are presented in Table 3. After exclusions, a total of 103 assessors participated in the sensory assessment. The mean acceptance scores for CL K d3, d6, and d9 were 6.4, 5.9, and 5.4, respectively (Figure 4). Considering that in our previous study [14], blending with toasted maté tea increased the acceptance of CL infusions, we chose to blend CL and TM, aiming to increase the acceptability of CL- K. Acceptance of CL-TM K d3, d6, and d9 were 6.6, 6.2, and 5.9, respectively (Figure 4). Therefore, the highest mean scores were given to CL-TM K d3 and CL K d3, with 75% and 77%, of the scores, respectively, between six and nine. When scoring the samples, the assessors could comment on them if they wished. The most cited descriptors were ‘sweet’ for CL K and CL-TM K samples on d3 and d6 and ‘taste of toasted maté’ for CL-TM K. Additional descriptors cited by assessors for CL K and CL-TM K were soft drink, peach, and peach syrup and bitter (consumers often tend to confuse acidity and bitterness sensations).
The preference for higher sweetness was caused by the need to balance the acidity caused by the increased number and abundance of the organic acids during fermentation. The preference of Brazilians for sweeter foods and the higher soluble solids in d3 content were also likely responsible for this result.
According to Meilgaard et al. [41], for a sample to be considered “well-accepted,” it must obtain a 70% Acceptance Index (AI) or higher. Only the two most-accepted samples had higher AI, while the AI for d6 was 67%. The higher acidity was the main reason for the low score given on d9 (AI = 61%, on average). However, in countries where food is less sweet, like in Europe and perhaps in the U.S., d9 might have been better accepted, given that sugar consumption in these countries has decreased considerably over the last years [114,115]. As usual, the purchase intent results were associated with those from the acceptance test (Figure 4A).
The high acceptance mean for CL-TM K may be explained by food pairing. The “food pairing hypothesis” states that two ingredients that share chemical compounds are more likely to taste (and smell) good together [116]. In the present study, the volatile composition of CL and CL-TM infusions and kombuchas were similar (Table 2). Such similarity has also been observed for infusions in our previous study [14] in which the addition of toasted maté tea increased consumers’ acceptance of coffee leaf tea. These two plants also share many non-volatile compounds, including the type and content of polyphenols and methylxanthines [28,117].
Making kombucha from coffee leaf infusions increased its acceptability, as compared to data from DePaula et al. [14] using the same raw materials. The referred study obtained 6.1 as a mean score for coffee leaf tea and 6.3 when a blend with 50% toasted maté was tested. No study using coffee leaf tea as a substrate for kombucha production was found for comparison with the present results. However, a study from the South of Brazil by Dartora et al. [118] conducted a sensory analysis of black tea, green tea, and green maté kombucha prepared with 5% (w/v) sugar, 0.5% (w/v) green maté and a SCOBY composed mainly by Brettanomyces bruxellensis and Komagaeitabacter rhaeticus as the major yeast and bacteria, respectively. Green maté kombucha presented a higher acceptance mean score (6.2) than black tea (5.8) or green tea (5.7) kombuchas. Assessors also expressed good feelings and sensations with emojis for green maté, while for black and green tea kombucha, the emojis were used to express negative feelings. It is worth noting that green maté is largely consumed in the South region of Brazil [118].
In the study conducted by Ulusoy and Tamer [45] in Turkey, the sensory acceptance of kombuchas made from new substrates such as black carrot, cherry laurel, blackthorn, and red raspberry and prepared with 6% w/v of sugar and a similar SCOBY, was evaluated using a nine-point hedonic scale. The beverages fermented for shorter periods (3 and 5 days) received scores between six and eight, while those fermented for 10 and 12 days received scores below five. The authors state that products with ratings below the five-point limit value are unlikely to be commercially successful. Moreover, studies conducted in Brazil and Tunisia have shown that assessors enjoyed herbal and grape kombuchas after 6 days of fermentation, with average acceptance scores ranging from five to seven. [119,120].
Cluster analysis was performed to identify different consumer niches. Cluster 1 (n = 41, mean score for all beverages = 6.9) consistently attributed the highest scores to CL-TM K 3d (acceptance = 7.7, AI = 86%). This cluster was composed of 54% female; 43% were between 18–24 years old, 41% had incomplete graduations, and 36% had family monthly incomes of 2–3 MW. In this cluster, 12% of the assessors were kombucha consumers. This cluster had the highest consumption of soda (71%), sparkling water (46%), sparkling wine (34%), tonic water (24%), cider (20%), and apple juice (15%),
Cluster 2 (n = 30, mean score considering all beverages = 5.1) also consistently attributed the highest scores to CL-TM K 3d (acceptance mean = 7.6, AI = 84%). This cluster was 77% female; 63% were between 18–24 years old and had incomplete graduations, and 33% had family monthly incomes of 2–3 MW. In this cluster, 16% of the assessors were kombucha consumers. Samples with low fermentation time were more accepted by the assessors (p < 0.0001). This cluster had the highest consumption of soda (50%) and the lowest consumption of sparkling wine (37%), sparkling water (30%), cider (17%), tonic water (13%), and apple juice (7%) as compared to cluster 1. The present results reinforce the fact that coffee leaf blends with toasted maté are well-accepted because toasted maté is largely consumed in the southeast of Brazil, especially in Rio de Janeiro [14,15,117].
In Cluster 3 (n = 32, mean acceptance score considering all samples = 5.5), most assessors attributed the highest scores to CL K 3d (mean acceptance score= 6.5; AI = 72%). This cluster was 78% female; 56% were between 18–24 years old; 46% had incomplete graduations, and 38% had family monthly incomes of 2–3 MW. In this cluster, 16% of the assessors were kombucha consumers. This cluster had a high consumption of soda (63%) and sparkling water (50%), followed by tonic water (34%), sparkling wine (31%), apple juice (19%), and cider (13%).
It is worth mentioning that the young age assessors were naturally selected by their will for participating in the study. The type of people willing to participate in a study that offers no reward other than the beverage itself indicates the inclination to consume the product. The study findings suggest that young adults are potential consumers of pure and blended CL K with a low fermentation period. In the questionnaire, it was clear that those who frequently consumed soda, a sparkling sweet beverage, were likely to attribute higher scores to kombuchas fermented for 3 days only (p < 0.0001), the samples with the highest amount of sucrose (Table 1). It is possible that adding CO2 to the beverage will increase acceptance due to the increased resemblance to soda. Considering that the Brazilian consumers show preferences for sweeter beverages, especially among young consumers, d9 samples received low mean acceptance and purchase intent scores. Kombucha is a new beverage in Brazil, and understanding the consumers’ and non-consumers’ sensory perception toward the product brings essential information for the market to launch new products more accurately and assertively [118].
It is worth mentioning that while commercial kombuchas generally receive additives to increase flavor intensity and variety [121], in the present study, the kombuchas were naturally flavored, that is, with no additions of fruits, herbs, or spices to flavor them.

3.4.2. Rate All That Apply (RATA)

A RATA test was performed to identify changes during the fermentation of CL K (Figure 5) and CL-TM K (Figure 6). The fermentation time caused differences in the intensity of the sensory descriptors (p < 0.0001), while the presence of toasted maté in coffee leaf kombucha did not cause statistical differences.
On d3, CL K presented higher intensities for herbal and sweet odors; sweet taste; fruity, herbal, and peach flavors; and clear appearance (Figure 5). This was also observed by Steger et al. [13], who observed that fermented coffee leaf infusions tended to produce sweetish fruity notes, especially a peach-like aroma and flavor. As expected, due to the microbial activity during fermentation, on d6, while the herbal, fruity, and peach flavors and sweet odor and taste decreased, the intensity of the fermented odor increased together with an acidic/sour taste and acetic/vinegar and apple vinegar flavors. CL K d9 presented the low intensity mean mainly for sweet odor and taste and the highest intensity for acidic/sour and acetic/vinegar tastes, apple vinegar flavors, and a fizzy mouthfeel.
The descriptors with the highest intensity means attributed to CL-TM K d3 (Figure 6) were the following: herbal, toasted leaf, fruity and sweet aromas, sweet taste, toasted leaf, herbal flavor, and refreshing. Similar descriptors have been obtained for toasted maté in our previous study [14]. Higher intensity mean for fermented aroma and an acidic/sour taste and an acetic/vinegar flavor were attributed to CL-TM K d6 and d9, while herbal and toasted leaf odors and sweet taste intensities decreased. CL-TM K also showed a higher frequency of herbal descriptors for aroma and flavor, as observed by DePaula et al. [14], for blended coffee leaf and toasted maté infusions.
Some specific aromas and flavors perceived in kombuchas by the assessors (peach, white, and rosé wine aromas and green coffee, fruit syrup, green apple, peach, and white wine flavors) were not identified in the infusions in our previous study using the same raw materials [14]. This result ratifies the change in the sensory profiles and the increases in flavor complexities caused by fermentation by the SCOBY microorganisms. Higher intensities for sweet aromas and tastes on d3 and d6 can be attributed to high soluble solids contents. In comparison, higher intensity means that the acid/sour tastes on d9 are attributed to the higher organic acid concentration reflected in higher TA and lower pH values [121].
Correspondence Analysis (CA) was applied to the RATA descriptors to generate the sensory map shown in Figure 7A. The first and second dimensions of the map explained 73.86% and 12.84% of the experimental data variance, respectively, representing 86.70% of the total variance (p < 0.0001). It is possible to see similarities between CL K on d3 and d6, between CL K on d9 and between CL-TM K on d9 and CL-TM K on d3 and d6 because the same descriptors were used to best describe these samples.
Figure 7B presents the main sensory descriptors reported for the individual samples in the RATA test by the assessors in association with the acceptance scores and classes of volatile compounds used as secondary variables. The first two dimensions explained 83.26% of the variability, with 65.80% of the variance explained by dimension 1 and 17.46% by dimension 2. The descriptors leading to higher acceptance rates were those used to describe the samples at days 3 and 6 of fermentation with a higher intensity mean (Figure 5 and Figure 6), which are associated with fruity, sweet, and herbal descriptors. Although phenols can impart undesirable odors to wine [112], they seem not to impact kombucha aromas because their area in chromatograms was lower than ketones, monoterpenes, and monoterpenes alcohols (Figure 3).
It is worth noting that the distribution of chemical classes in Figure 7B only considered the number of volatile compounds in each chemical class, together with the descriptors obtained in the RATA test. It did not consider the chromatogram peak areas or the odor threshold of the compounds. Nevertheless, the distribution of the classes is reasonably similar to the odor and flavor descriptions in the literature, which can be revisited in Table 2. This type of distribution seems to work better when a food matrix has a high number of volatile compounds of a certain class, given that a small number of important potential impact compounds could be neglected [14]. Table 4 contains the RATA and related aroma and flavor descriptors related with the volatile compounds identified.
The principal component analysis associated the volatile compounds profile withRATA aroma and flavor descriptors. The biplot obtained (Figure 8) highlights that the changes on the profile of these selected volatiles during the kombucha fermentation are in agreement with those observed in the sensory characteristics. The observed changes in sensory characteristics during kombucha fermentation align with the evolution of the profiles of the selected volatiles. Similar changes in the profiles of the selected volatiles were noted in both CL K and CL-TM K from d3 to d9, although differences were observed between the two, as also noted in the RATA test. The PCA biplot explains the higher intensity of fruit, sweet, herbal, and peach flavors on d3 (associated with 3,5-octadien-2-one, α-ionone, phenylacetaldehyde, phenylethyl alcohol, linalool, β-damascenone, safranal, and linalool) and the impact of microbial activity on d6 and d9 that promoted the highest intensity for acidic/sour taste and acetic/vinegar, apple vinegar flavors, and fizzy mouthfeel (linked with nonanal, octanoic acid, decanoic acid, ethyl hexanoate, ethyl octanoate, ethyl decanoate, β-damascenone, linalool, and isoamyl alcohol).

4. Final Considerations and Conclusions

In the present study, a total of 100 volatile organic compounds were identified after considering all infusions and kombucha samples: 36 in the black tea kombucha starter, 75 in coffee leaf kombuchas, and 90 in coffee-leaf-toasted maté kombuchas. Coffee leaf and coffee-leaf-toasted maté kombuchas presented similar volatile profiles. Thirty potential impact compounds were common to them (ethyl hexanoate, ethyl isobutyrate, isoamyl acetate, methyl salicylate, benzaldehyde, hexanal, nonanal, pentadecanal, safranal, phenethyl alcohol, isoamyl alcohol, cedrol, ethanol, 3,5-Octadien-2-one, geranyl acetone, β-damascenone, 3-δ-Carene, myrcene, camphene,α-ionone,β-ionone, acetic acid, caproic acid, decanoic acid, isovaleric acid, nonanoic acid, octanoic acid, linalool, trans-linalool oxide, and (S)-dihydroactinidiolide), while only one impact compound was exclusive of kombuchas containing toasted maté (2,4-heptadienal).
The microbial consortia (SCOBY) used in this study were represented mostly by the acetic acid bacteria and yeasts from the genera Komagateibacter and Pichia, respectively. Komagataeibacter rhaeticus and Saccharomyces cerevisiae were more abundant in coffee-leaf-toasted mate kombuchas than in coffee leaf kombuchas, while the contrary was true of Pichia sp. These differences indicate that raw materials can change the initial SCOBY profile during fermentation. This result is ratified by differences observed between the microbial profile found in this study and the one found in coffee cascara kombucha using the same initial starter culture [35]. More studies are needed to verify the contribution of each food matrix to the SCOBY profile, and the impact of these differences on the aroma, flavor, and bioactivity of the resulting kombuchas.
Coffee leaf kombuchas and coffee-leaf-toasted maté kombuchas, especially those containing higher sucrose content and lower acidity, were accepted by Rio de Janeiro consumers. With herbal, toasted leaves, fruity and sweet traits, and lower acidity, coffee-toasted maté leaf kombuchas were only slightly more accepted than coffee leaf kombuchas. The authors believe that toasting coffee leaves would have increased acceptance by these assessors given the chemical resemblance to toasted maté. The volatile composition of the beverages supported the sensory characterization of kombucha samples.
Most people who agreed to participate in the study (53%) were aged 18–24 years. These were also the people who most regularly consumed similar beverages to kombucha, like soda, sparkling water, and sparkling wine. It has been estimated that the young people in Latin and North America will shape the market for the next decades [134]. Considering that they are looking for natural soft drinks that are perceived as promoting well-being and have a limited amount of added sugar, kombuchas and sparkling kombuchas prepared with pure or blended coffee leaf with other herbs or teas could be of great interest to them, given that these leaves are rich in bioactive compounds and have exerted health-functional properties in vitro [10], with limited amount of caffeine for those who are sensitive to its effect.
In conclusion, coffee leaf was shown to be a suitable raw material for producing aromatic, natural, and potentially healthy kombucha beverages. Given the fact that Brazil is responsible for one-third of the world’s coffee production, the acceptance of coffee leaf kombucha by Brazilians opens a large perspective for the national coffee growers and food industry. Concomitantly, this is a way to reduce the environmental pollution caused by incorrect disposal after harvest season and the pruning of coffee trees, improving the coffee chain value and allowing sustainability to be aligned with the United Nations and FAO goals for 2030. Giving the numerous known health benefits of coffee consumption, the similar chemical composition of the leaf in many aspects, and the potential benefits of fermentation for increasing the bioaccessibility of polyphenols and other components of the beverage, the health effects of usual coffee leaf kombucha drinking should be evaluated in future studies.

Author Contributions

A.L.S.: conceptualization, formal analysis, writing—original draft; S.C.C.: funding acquisition and formal analysis; I.M.P.L.V.O.F.: reviewing and formal analysis; J.M.: formal analysis; L.M.: formal analysis; J.D.: formal analysis; M.A.L.M.: funding acquisition, analysis supervision, reviewing, and editing; A.F.: conceptualization, funding acquisition, project administration, writing—reviewing and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Rio de Janeiro Research Support Foundation—FAPERJ (E26/200.940/2021-259919 and E26/210.107/2018-241762) and the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel—Brazil (CAPES—Finance Code 001). S.C.C. acknowledges FCT for the 2022.07841.CEECIND/CP1724/CT0014 contract; LAQV-REQUIMTE authors acknowledge the financial support from PT national funds (FCT/MCTES, Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia and Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Ensino Superior) through the project UIDB/50006/2020.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was approved (approval # 4.513.606) by the Ethical Committee of Clementino Fraga Filho University Hospital at the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, on 28 January 2021.

Informed Consent Statement

All subjects gave their informed consent for inclusion before they participated in the study. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and the protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Clementino Fraga Filho University Hospital at Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, approved protocol number 4.513.606, on 28 January 2021.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Elisa Cunha Leal, from Laboratório de Desenvolvimento de Bioprocessos, Escola de Química, UFRJ (Rio de Janeiro, Brazil), for the analysis of sucrose and monosaccharides and Thiago Ferreira, from NUPECAFÉ, UFRJ (Rio de Janeiro, Brazil), for the help with the SCOBY characterization.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Sustainable Food and Agriculture. Available online: https://www.fao.org/sustainability/background/en/ (accessed on 12 September 2023).
  2. Farah, A. Coffee By-Products for Sustainable Health Promotion. Proceedings 2023, 89, 20. [Google Scholar]
  3. International Coffee Organization. Coffee Report and Outlook. Available online: https://icocoffee.org/documents/cy2022-23/Coffee_Report_and_Outlook_April_2023_-_ICO.pdf (accessed on 17 November 2023).
  4. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Markets and Trade. Coffee. Available online: https://www.fao.org/markets-and-trade/commodities/coffee/en/ (accessed on 12 September 2023).
  5. Matiello, J.B.; Almeida, S.R.; Rosa, G.N.; Filho, S.L.; Aguiar, E.C.; Araújo, R.A.; Josino, V. Quantificação do processo de reciclagem de folhas em cafezais. In Proceedings of the 36 Congresso Brasileiro de Pesquisas Cafeeiras, Guarapari, Brasil, 26–27 October 2010; Fundação Procafé: Varginha, Brasil, 2010; pp. 46–47. [Google Scholar]
  6. Novita, R.; Kasim, A.; Anggraini, T.; Putra, D.P. Kahwa daun: Traditional knowledge of a coffee leaf herbal tea from West Sumatera, Indonesia. J. Ethn. Foods 2018, 4, 286–291. [Google Scholar]
  7. Trevisan, M.T.S.; Almeida, R.F.; Breuer, A.; Owen, R.W. Phytochemicals from coffea leaves. In Coffee: Production, Quality and Chemistry, 1st ed.; Farah, A., Ed.; Royal Society of Chemistry: Cambridge, UK, 2019; pp. 771–782. [Google Scholar]
  8. DePaula, J.; Farah, A. Phenolic compounds in coffee and by-products. In Coffee Science—Biotechnological Advances, 1st ed.; Economics and Health Benefits; Ramakrishna, A., Parvatam, G., Jeszka-Skowron, M., Eds.; Taylor and Francis (CRC Press): Oxfordshire, UK, 2022; Volume 1, pp. 129–147. [Google Scholar]
  9. Acidri, R.; Sawai, Y.; Sugimoto, Y.; Handa, T.; Sasagawa, D.; Masunaga, T.; Yamamoto, S.; Nishihara, E. Phytochemical Profile and Antioxidant Capacity of Coffee Plant Organs Compared to Green and Roasted Coffee Beans. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chen, X.-M.; Ma, Z.; Kitts, D.D. Effects of processing method and age of leaves on phytochemical profiles and bioactivity of coffee leaves. Food Chem. 2018, 249, 143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Technical Report on the notification of infusion from coffee leaves (Coffea arabica L. and/or Coffea canephora Pierre ex A. Froehner) as a traditional food from a third country pursuant to Article 14 of Regulation (EU) 2015/2283. EFSA Support. Publ. 2020, 17, 1783E. [Google Scholar]
  12. Marco, M.; Sanders, M.E.; Gänzle, M.; Arrieta, M.C.; Cotter, P.D.; De Vuyst, L.; Hill, C.; Holzapfel, M.; Lebber, S.; Merenstein, D.; et al. The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP) consensus statement on fermented foods. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2021, 18, 196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Steger, M.C.; Rigling, M.; Blumenthal, P.; Segatz, V.; Quintanilla-Belucci, A.; Beisel, J.M.; Rieke-Zapp, J.; Schwarz, S.; Lachenmeier, D.W.; Zhang, Y. Coffee Leaf Tea from El Salvador: On-Site Production Considering Influences of Processing on Chemical Composition. Foods 2022, 11, 2553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. DePaula, J.; Cunha, S.C.; Ferreira, I.M.P.L.V.O.; Porto, A.C.V.; Cruz, A.G.; Petrarca, M.; Trevisan, M.T.; Revi, I.; Farah, A. Volatile fingerprinting, sensory characterization, and consumer acceptance of pure and blended arabica coffee leaf teas. Food Res. Int. 2023, 173, 113361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE). Pesquisa de Orçamentos Familiares 2017–2018; Análise do Consumo Alimentar Pessoal no Brasil: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  16. Jayabalan, R.; Malbasa, R.V.; Loncar, E.S.; Vitas, J.S.; Sathishkumar, M. A review on kombucha tea—Microbiology, composition, fermentation, beneficial effects, toxicity, and tea fungus. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2014, 13, 538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Chakravorty, S.; Bhattacharya, S.; Bhattacharya, D.; Sarkar, S.; Gachhui, R. Kombucha: A promising functional beverage prepared from tea. In Non-Alcoholic Beverages, Vol 6: The Science of Beverages; Grumezescu, A.M., Holban, A.M., Eds.; WoodHead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2019; pp. 285–327. [Google Scholar]
  18. Jayabalan, R.; Subathradevi, P.; Marimuthu, S.; Sathishkumar, M.; Swaminathan, K. Changes in free-radical scavenging ability of kombucha tea during fermentation. Food Chem. 2008, 109, 227–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Sales, A.L.; Iriondo-DeHond, A.; DePaula, J.; Ribeiro, M.; Ferreira, I.M.P.L.V.O.; Miguel, M.A.L.; del Castillo, M.D.; Farah, A. Intracellular antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects and bioactive profiles of coffee cascara and black tea kombucha beverages. Foods 2023, 12, 1905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Villarreal-Soto, S.A.; Beaufort, S.; Bouajila, J.; Souchard, J.-P.; Renard, T.; Rollan, S.; Taillandier, P. Impact of fermentation conditions on the production of bioactive compounds with anticancer, anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties in kombucha tea extracts. Process Biochem. 2019, 83, 44–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kaewkod, T.; Bovonsombut, S.; Tragoolpua, Y. Efficacy of kombucha obtained from green, oolong, and black teas on inhibition of pathogenic bacteria, antioxidation and toxicity on colorectal cancer cell line. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Cardoso, R.R.; Neto, R.O.; D’Almeida, C.T.S.; do Nascimento, T.P.; Pressete, C.G.; Azevedo, L.; Martino, H.S.D.; Cameron, L.C.; Ferreira, M.S.L.; de Barros, F.A.R. Kombuchas from green and black teas have different phenolic profile, which impacts their antioxidant capacities, antibacterial and antiproliferative activities. Food Res. Int. 2020, 128, 108782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Srihari, T.; Kathikesan, K.; Ashokkumar, N.; Satyanarayana, U. Antihyperglycaemic efficacy of kombucha in streptozotocin induced rats. J. Funct. Foods 2013, 5, 1794–1802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Euromonitor International. The Rising Popularity of Kombucha in Western Europe. Available online: https://www.euromonitor.com/the-rising-popularity-of-kombucha-in-western-europe/report (accessed on 12 September 2023).
  25. Statista. Market Value of Kombucha Worldwide in 2022 and 2028 (in Billion U.S. Dollars). Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/661382/kombucha-market-value-worldwide/ (accessed on 17 September 2023).
  26. Leonarski, E.; Guimarães, A.C.; Cesca, K.; Poletto, P. Production process and characteristics of kombucha fermented from alternative raw materials. Food Biosci. 2022, 49, 101841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Montis, A.; Souard, F.; Delporte, C.; Stoffelen, P.; Stévigny, C.; Antwerpen, P.V. Coffee leaves: An upcoming novel food? Planta Med. 2021, 87, 949–963. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  28. Lima, J.d.P.; Farah, A. Methylxanthines in stimulant foods and beverages commonly consumed in Brazil. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2019, 79, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Villarreal-Soto, S.A.; Bouajila, J.; Pace, M.; Leech, J.; Cotter, P.D.; Souchard, J.-P.; Taillandier, P.; Beaufort, S. Metabolome microbiome signatures in the fermented beverage, Kombucha. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2020, 333, 108778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yamanaka, L.E.; Abdala, P.; Christoff, A.P. Extração de DNA: Avaliação da Metodologia Utilizada pela Neoprospecta. Neoprospecta Microbiome Technologies. Nota Técnica: Extração de DNA Neo. 2018. Available online: http://neoprospecta.com (accessed on 26 August 2022).
  31. Nummer, B.A. Kombucha brewing under the Food and Drug Administration model food code: Risk analysis and processing guidance. J. Environ. Health 2013, 76, 8–11. [Google Scholar]
  32. Instituto Adolfo Lutz. Métodos Físico-Químicos para Análise de Alimentos, 4th ed.; Instituto Adolfo Lutz: São Paulo, Brazil, 2008. Available online: http://www.ial.sp.gov.br/ial/publicacoes/livros/metodos-fisico-quimicos-para-analise-de-alimentos (accessed on 5 May 2023).
  33. Wischral, D.; Arias, J.M.; Modesto, L.F.; Passos, D.F.; Pereira, N., Jr. Lactic acid production from sugarcane bagasse hydrolysates by Lactobacillus pentosus: Integrating xylose and glucose fermentation. Biotechnol. Prog. 2019, 35, e2718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wang, Z.; Han, B.; Jing, W.; Yi, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Ren, D.; Yi, L. Effects of Different Steeping Temperatures on the Leaching of Aroma Components in Black Tea by SPME–GC–MS Coupled with Chemometric Method. J. AOAC Int. 2019, 102, 1834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sales, A.L.; Cunha, S.C.; Morgado, J.; Cruz, A.; Santos, T.F.; Ferreira, I.M.P.L.V.O.; Fernandes, J.O.; Miguel, M.A.L.; Farah, A. Volatile, Microbial, and Sensory Profiles and Consumer Acceptance of Coffee Cascara Kombuchas. Foods 2023, 12, 2710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Meilgaard, M.; Civille, G.V.; Carr, B.T. Techniques. In Sensory Evaluation Techniques, 4th ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2006; Volume 1, pp. 173–186. [Google Scholar]
  37. Damasio, M.H.; Costell, E. Análisis sensorial descriptivo: Generación de descriptores y selección de catadores. Rev. Agroquim. Tecnol. Aliment. 1991, 31, 165–177. [Google Scholar]
  38. Ares, G.; Giménez, A.; Barreiro, C.; Gámbaro, A. Use of an open-ended question to identify drivers of liking of milk desserts. Comparison with preference mapping techniques. Food Qual. Prefer. 2010, 21, 4286–4294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Meyners, M.; Castura, J.C.; Carr, B.T. Existing and new approaches for the analysis of CATA data. Food Qual. Prefer. 2013, 30, 309–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Qannari, E.M.; Vigneau, E.; Luscan, P. Clustering of variables, application in consumer and sensory studies. Food Qual. Prefer. 1997, 8, 423–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Meilgaard, M.; Civille, G.V.; Carr, B.T. Techniques. In Sensory Evaluation Techniques, 3rd ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1999; p. 448. [Google Scholar]
  42. De Noronha, M.C.; Cardoso, R.R.; D’Almeida, C.T.S.; do Carmo, M.A.V.; Azevedo, L.; Maltarollo, V.G.; Ribeiro Júnior, J.I.; Eller, M.R.; Cameron, L.C.; Ferreira, M.S.L.; et al. Black tea kombucha: Physicochemical, microbiological and comprehensive phenolic profile changes during fermentation, and antimalarial activity. Food Chem. 2022, 384, 132515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Jayabalan, R.; Marimuthu, S.; Swaminathan, K. Changes in content of organic acids and tea polyphenols during kombucha tea fermentation. Food Chem. 2007, 102, 392–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. May, A.; Narayanan, S.; Alcock, J.; Varsani, A.; Maley, C.; Aktips, A. Kombucha: A novel model system for cooperation and conflict in a complex multi-species microbial ecosystem. PeerJ 2019, 7, e7565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Ulusoy, A.; Tamer, C.E. Determination of suitability of black carrot (Daucus carota L. spp. sativus var. atrorubens Alef.) juice concentrate, cherry laurel (Prunus laurocerasus), blackthorn (Prunus spinosa) and red raspberry (Rubus ideaus) for kombucha beverage production. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2019, 13, 1524–1536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Da Silva Júnior, J.C.; Magnani, M.; da Costa, W.K.A.; Madruga, M.S.; Olegário, L.S.; Borges, G.S.C.; Santas, A.M.; Lima, M.S.; de Lima, L.C.; Brito, I.L.; et al. Traditional and flavored kombuchas with pitanga and umbu-cajá pulps: Chemical properties, antioxidants, and bioactive compounds. Food Biosci. 2021, 44, 101380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Chakravorty, S.; Bhattacharya, S.; Chatzinotas, A.; Chakraborty, W.; Bhattacharya, D.; Gachhui, R. Kombucha tea fermentation: Microbial and biochemical dynamics. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2016, 220, 63–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Arikan, M.; Mitchell, A.L.; Finn, R.D.; Gürel, F. Microbial composition of Kombucha determined using amplicon sequencing and shotgun metagenomics. J. Food Sci. 2020, 82, 455–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Marsh, A.; O’Sullivan, O.; Hill, C.; Ross, R.P.; Cotter, P.D. Sequence-based analysis of the bacterial and fungal compositions of multiple kombucha (tea fungus) samples. Food Microbiol. 2014, 38, 171–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Cannazza, P.; Rissanen, A.J.; Guizelini, D.; Losoi, P.; Sarlin, E.; Romano, D.; Santala, V.; Mangayil, R. Characterization of Komagataeibacter Isolate Reveals New Prospects in Waste Stream Valorization for Bacterial Cellulose Production. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 2230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Landis, E.A.; Fogarty, E.; Edwards, J.C.; Popa, O.; Eren, A.M.; Wolfe, B.E. Microbial diversity and interaction specificity in kombucha tea fermentations. mSystems 2022, 7, e0015722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Meng, Y.; Wang, X.; Li, Y.; Chen, J.; Chen, X. Microbial interactions and dynamic changes of volatile flavor compounds during the fermentation of traditional kombucha. Food Chem. 2024, 430, 137060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Barbosa, C.D.; Uetanabaro, A.P.T.; Santos, W.C.R.; Caetano, R.G.; Albano, H.; Kato, R.; Consenza, G.P.; Azeredo, A.; Góes-Neto, A.; Rosa, C.A.; et al. Microbial–physicochemical integrated analysis of kombucha fermentation. LWT—Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 148, 111788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Coton, M.; Pawtowski, A.; Taminiau, B.; Burgaud, G.; Deniel, F.; Couloumme-Labarthe, L.; Fall, A.; Daube, G.; Conto, E. Unraveling microbial ecology of industrial-scale Kombucha fermentations by metabarcoding and culture-based methods. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2017, 93, fix048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Yao, L.; Zhan, J.; Lu, J.; Chen, D.; Song, S.; Wang, H.; Sun, M.; Feng, T. Revealing the influence of microbiota on the flavor of kombucha during natural fermentation process by metagenomic and GC-MS analysis. Food Res. Int. 2023, 169, 112909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Sengun, I.Y.; Karabiyikli, S. Importance of acetic acid bacteria in food industry. Food Control 2011, 22, 647–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Gaggia, F.; Baffoni, L.; Galiano, M.; Nielsen, D.S.; Jakobsen, R.R.; Castro-Mejía, J.L.; Bosi, S.; Truzzi, F.; Musumeci, F.; Dinelli, G.; et al. Kombucha beverage from green, black and rooibos teas: A comparative study looking at microbiology, chemistry and antioxidant activity. Nutrients 2019, 11, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Nguyen, N.K.; Nguyen, P.B.; Nguyen, H.Y.; Le, P.H. Screening the optimal ratio of symbiosis between isolated yeast and acetic acid bacteria strain from traditional kombucha for high-level production of glucuronic acid. LWT—Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 64, 1149–1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Choi, Y.-J.; Yong, S.; Lee, M.J.; Park, S.J.; Yun, Y.-R.; Park, S.-H.; Lee, M.-A. Changes in volatile and non-volatile compounds of model kimchi through fermentation by lactic acid bacteria. LWT—Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 105, 118–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Li, C.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, Y.; Li, L.; Huang, J.; Yang, X.; Chen, S.; Zhao, Y. Contribution of microbial community to flavor formation in tilapia sausage during fermentation with Pediococcus pentosaceus. LWT—Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 154, 112628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Khusri, A.; Aarti, C. Metabolic heterogeneity and techno-functional attributes of fermentedfoods-associated coagulase-negative staphylococci. Food Microbiol. 2022, 105, 104028. [Google Scholar]
  62. Walterson, A.M.; Stavrinides, J. Pantoea: Insights into a highly versatile and diverse genus within the Enterobacteriaceae. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2015, 39, 968–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Zhang, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Yang, H.; Sun, L.; Xia, H.; Sun, W.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, J. Bacterial Communities Related to Aroma Formation during Spontaneous Fermentation of ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ Wine in Ningxia, China. Foods 2022, 11, 2775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Teoh, A.L.; Heard, G.; Cox, J. Yeast ecology of Kombucha fermentation. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2004, 95, 119–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Steensels, J.; Daenen, L.; Malcorps, P.; Derdelinckx, G.; Verachtert, H.; Verstrepen, K.J. Brettanomyces yeasts—From spoilage organisms to valuable contributors to industrial fermentations. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2015, 206, 24–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Ferremi Leali, N.; Binati, R.L.; Martelli, F.; Gatto, V.; Luzzini, G.; Salini, A.; Slaghenaufi, D.; Fusco, S.; Ugliano, M.; Torriani, S.; et al. Reconstruction of Simplified Microbial Consortia to Modulate Sensory Quality of Kombucha Tea. Foods 2022, 11, 3045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Coppeti, M.V. Yeasts and molds in fermented food production: An ancient bioprocess. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2019, 25, 57–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Orlic, S.; Redzepovic, S.; Jeromel, A.; Herjavec, S.; Iacumin, L. Influence of indigenous Saccharomyces paradoxus strains on Chardonnay wine fermentation aroma. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2007, 42, 95–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Vejarano, R. Saccharomycodes ludwigii, control and potential uses in winemaking process. Fermentation 2018, 4, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Ellis, D.J.; Kerr, E.D.; Schenk, G.; Schulz, B.L. Metabolomics of Non-Saccharomyces Yeasts in Fermented Beverages. Beverages 2022, 8, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Ubeda, C.; Kania-Zelada, I.; del Barrio-Galán, R.; Medel-Marabolí, M.; Gil, M.; Peña-Neira, A. Study of the changes in volatile compounds, aroma and sensory attributes during the production process of sparkling wine by traditional method. Food Res. Int. 2019, 119, 554–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Tran, T.; Grandvalet, C.; Verdier, F.; Martin, A.; Alexandre, H.; Tourdot-Maréchal, R. Microbiological and technological parameters impacting the chemical composition and sensory quality of kombucha. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2020, 19, 2050–2070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Bishop, P.; Pitts, E.R.; Budner, D.; Thompson-Witrick, K.A. Kombucha: Biochemical and microbiological impacts on the chemical and flavor profile. Food Chem. A 2022, 1, 100025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Huafu, W.; Xiaoqing, Y. Free and glycosidically bound monoterpene alcohols in Qimen black tea. Food Chem. 1996, 56, 395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Parker, M.; Capone, D.L.; Francis, I.L.; Herderich, M.J. Aroma Precursors in Grapes and Wine: Flavor Release during Wine Production and Consumption. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 2281–2286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Zhang, K.; Zhang, T.-T.; Guo, R.-R.; Ye, Q.; Zhao, H.-L.; Huang, X.-H. The regulation of key flavor of traditional fermented food by microbial metabolism: A review. Food Chem. X 2023, 19, 100871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Zhou, J.; He, C.; Qin, M.; Luo, Q.; Jiang, X.; Zhu, J.; Qiu, L.; Yu, Z.; Zhang, D.; Chen, Y.; et al. Characterizing and Decoding the Effects of Different Fermentation Levels on Key Aroma Substances of Congou Black Tea by Sensomics. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2023, 71, 14706–14719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Su, D.; He, J.-J.; Zhou, Y.-Z.; Li, Y.-L.; Zhou, H.-J. Aroma effects of key volatile compounds in Keemun black tea at different grades: HS-SPME-GC-MS, sensory evaluation, and chemometrics. Food Chem. 2022, 373, 131587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Yin, P.; Kong, Y.-S.; Liu, P.-P.; Wang, J.-J.; Zhu, Y.; Wang, G.-M.; Sun, M.-F.; Chen, Y.; Guo, G.-Y.; Liu, Z.-H. A critical review of key odorants in green tea: Identification and biochemical formation pathway. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 129, 221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Wang, B.; Qu, F.; Wang, P.; Zhao, L.; Wang, Z.; Han, Y.; Zhang, X. Characterization analysis of flavor compounds in green teas at different drying temperature. LWT 2022, 161, 113394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Wang, Z.; Su, D.; Ren, H.; Lv, Q.; Ren, L.; Li, Y.; Zhou, H. Effect of different drying methods after fermentation on the aroma of Pu-erh tea (ripe tea). LWT—Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 171, 114129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Guo, X.; Ho, C.-T.; Schwab, W.; Wan, X. Aroma profiles of green tea made with fresh tea leaves plucked in summer. Food Chem. 2021, 363, 130328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Ma, L.; Sun, Y.; Wang, X.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, L.; Yin, Y.; Wu, Y.; Du, L.; Du, Z. The characteristic of the key aroma-active components in white tea using GC-TOF-MS and GC-olfactometry combined with sensory-directed flavor analysis. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2023, 103, 7136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Galvan-Lima, A.; Cunha, S.C.; Martins, Z.E.; Soares, A.G.; Ferreira, I.M.P.L.V.O.; Farah, A. Headspace volatolome of peel flours from citrus fruits grown in Brazil. Food Res. Int. 2021, 150, 110801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Araújo, H.C.; Lacerda, M.E.G.; Lopes, D.; Bizzo, H.R.; Kaplan, M.A.C. Studies on the aroma of maté (Ilex paraguariensis St. Hil.) using headspace solid-phase microextraction. Phytochem. Anal. 2007, 18, 469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Márquez, V.; Martínez, N.; Guerra, M.; Fariña, L.; Boido, E.; Dellacasa, E. Characterization of aroma-impact compounds in yerba mate (Ilex paraguariensis) using GC–olfactometry and GC–MS. Food Res. Int. 2013, 53, 808–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Mei, S.; Ding, J.; Chen, X. Identification of differential volatile and non-volatile compounds in coffee leaves prepared from different tea processing steps using HS-SPME/GC–MS and HPLC-Orbitrap-MS/MS and investigation of the binding mechanism of key phytochemicals with olfactory and taste receptors using molecular docking. Food Res. Int. 2023, 168, 112760. [Google Scholar]
  88. Kawakami, M.; Kobayashi, A. Volatile constituents of green mate and roasted mate. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1991, 39, 1275–1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Popova, V.; Ivanova, T.; Prokopov, T.; Nikolova, M.; Stoyanova, A.; Zheljazkov, V.D. Carotenoid-Related Volatile Compounds of Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) Essential Oils. Molecules 2019, 24, 3446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Slaghenaufi, D.; Perello, M.-C.; Marchand, S.; de Revel, G. Quantification of megastigmatrienone, a potential contributor to tobacco aroma in spirits. Food Chem. 2016, 203, 41–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Shen, S.; Wu, H.; Li, T.; Sun, H.; Wang, Y.; Ning, J. Formation of aroma characteristics driven by volatile components during long-term storage of An tea. Food Chem. 2023, 411, 135487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Farag, M.A.; Hegazi, N.; Dokhalahy, E.; Khattab, A.R. Chemometrics based GC-MS aroma profiling for revealing freshness, origin and roasting indices in saffron spice and its adulteration. Food Chem. 2020, 331, 127358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Mandha, J.; Shumoy, H.; Devaere, J.; Schouteten, J.J.; Gellynck, X.; de Winne, A.; Matemu, A.O.; Raes, K. Effect of lactic acid fermentation of watermelon juice on its sensory acceptability and volatile compounds. Food Chem. 2021, 358, 129809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Guo, X.; Schwab, W.; Ho, C.-H.; Song, C.; Wan, X. Characterization of the aroma profiles of oolong tea made from three tea cultivars by both GC–MS and GC-IMS. Food Chem. 2022, 376, 131933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Pua, A.; Choo, W.X.D.; Goh, R.M.; Liu, S.Q.; Cornuz, M.; Ee, K.-H.; Sun, J.; Lassabliere, B.; Yu, B. A systematic study of key odourants, non-volatile compounds, and antioxidant capacity of cascara (dried Coffea arabica pulp). LWT 2021, 138, 110630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Ho, C.-T.; Zheng, X.; Li, S. Tea aroma formation. Food Sci. Hum. Wellness 2015, 4, 9–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Farah, A. Flavor Development during Roasting. In Drying and Roasting of Cocoa and Coffee; Hii, C.L., Borém, F.M., Eds.; Taylor and Francis (CRC Press): Oxfordshire, UK, 2019; Volume 1, p. 43. [Google Scholar]
  98. Fors, S. Sensory Properties of Volatile Maillard Reaction Products and Related Compounds. In The Maillard Reaction in Foods and Nutrition; Waller, G., Feather, M.S., Eds.; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, USA, 1983; pp. 185–286. [Google Scholar]
  99. NIST V2.2 (National Institute of Standards and Technology, USA) Library Database. Available online: https://webbook.nist.gov/chemistry/name-ser/ (accessed on 25 May 2023).
  100. Flavornet and Human Odor Space. Available online: http://www.flavornet.org (accessed on 7 June 2023).
  101. The Good Scents Company Information System. Available online: https://www.thegoodscentscompany.com/ (accessed on 7 June 2023).
  102. Machado, C.C.B.; Bastos, D.H.M.; Janzantti, N.S.; Facanali, R.; Marques, M.O.M.; Franco, M.R.B. Determinação do perfil de compostos voláteis e avaliação do sabor e aroma de bebidas produzidas a partir da erva-mate (Ilex paraguariensis). Quím. Nova 2007, 30, 513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Kang, S.; Yan, H.; Zhu, Y.; Liu, X.; Lv, H.-P.; Zhang, Y.; Sai, W.-D.; Guo, L.; Tan, J.-F.; Peng, Q.-H.; et al. Identification and quantification of key odorants in the world’s four most famous black teas. Food Res. Int. 2019, 121, 73–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Procopio, S.; Qian, F.; Becker, T. Function and regulation of yeast genes involved in higher alcohol and ester metabolism during beverage fermentation. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2011, 233, 721–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Polidoro, A.d.S.; Scapin, E.; Malmann, M.; do Carmo, J.U.; Machado, M.E.; Caramão, E.B.; Jacques, R.A. Characterization of volatile fractions in green mate and mate leaves (Ilex paraguariensis A. St. Hil.) by comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography coupled to time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GC × GC/TOFMS). Microchem. J. 2016, 128, 118–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Lopes, A.C.A.; Andrade, R.P.; Casagrande, M.R.; Santiago, W.D.; de Resende, M.L.V.; Cardoso, M.G.; Vilanova, M.; Duarte, W.F. Production and characterization of a new distilled beverage from green coffee seed residue. Food Chem. 2022, 377, 131960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Zheng, Y.; Hu, Q.; Wu, Z.; Bi, W.; Chen, B.; Hao, Z.; Wu, L.; Ye, N.; Sun, Y. Volatile metabolomics and coexpression network analyses provide insight into the formation of the characteristic cultivar aroma of oolong tea (Camellia sinensis). LWT—Food Sci. Tech. 2022, 164, 113666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Kong, C.-L.; Zhu, D.-Y.; Zhao, Y.; Zhao, T.Y.; Tao, Y.-S. Spent yeast polysaccharides in mixed alcoholic fermentation between Pichia kluyveri, Pichia fermentans and Saccharomyces cerevisiae retarded wine fruity ester hydrolysis. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2022, 105, 104200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Kliks, J.; Kawa-Rygielska, J.; Gasinski, A.; Rebas, J.; Szumny, A. Changes in the volatile composition of apple and apple/pear ciders affected by the different dilution rates in the continuous fermentation system. LWT 2021, 147, 111630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Benucci, I.; Cecchi, T.; Lombardelli, C.; Maresca, D.; Mauriello, G.; Esti, M. Novel microencapsulated yeast for the primary fermentation of green beer: Kinetic behavior, volatiles and sensory profile. Food Chem. 2021, 340, 127900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Kaltbach, P.; Gillmeister, M.; Kabrodt, K.; Schellenberg, I. Screening of Volatile Compounds in Mate (Ilex paraguariensis) Tea—Brazilian Chimarrão Type—By HS-SPDE and Hydrodistillation Coupled to GC-MS. Separations 2021, 8, 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Nieto-Rojo, R.; Ancín-Azpilicueta, C.; Garrido, J.J. Sorption of 4-ethylguaiacol and 4-ethylphenol on yeast cell walls, using a synthetic wine. Food Chem. 2014, 152, 399–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Vanbeneden, N.; Gils, F.; Delvaux, F.; Delvaux, F.R. Formation of 4-vinyl and 4-ethyl derivatives from hydroxycinnamic acids: Occurrence of volatile phenolic flavour compounds in beer and distribution of Pad1-activity among brewing yeasts. Food Chem. 2008, 107, 221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. European Food Safety Authority. Added and Free Sugars Should Be as Low as Possible. 2022. Available online: https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/news/added-and-free-sugars-should-be-low-possible (accessed on 7 June 2023).
  115. United States Department of Health and Human Services. 2015–2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 8th ed, December 2015, United States. Available online: https://health.gov/sites/default/files/2019-09/2015-2020_Dietary_Guidelines.pdf (accessed on 11 May 2023).
  116. Arellano-Covarrubias, A.; Varela, P.; Escalona-Buendía, H.B.; Gómez-Corona, C. A food and beverage map: Exploring food-beverage pairing through projective mapping. Food Qual. Prefer. 2022, 96, 104431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Lima, J.d.P.; Farah, A.; King, B.; de Paulis, T.; Martin, P.R. Distribution of Major Chlorogenic Acids and Related Compounds in Brazilian Green and Toasted Ilex paraguariensis (Maté) Leaves. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2016, 64, 2361–2370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Dartora, B.; Crepalde, L.T.; Hickert, L.R.; Fabricio, M.F.; Ayub, M.A.Z.; Veras, F.F.; Brandelli, A.; Perez, K.J.; Sant’Anna, V. Kombuchas from black tea, green tea, and yerba-mate decocts: Perceived sensory map, emotions, and physicochemical parameters. Int. J. Gastron. Food Sci. 2023, 33, 100789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Zhang, J.; Mullen, J.V.; Dias, D.R.; Schwan, R.F. The chemistry and sensory characteristics of new herbal tea-based kombuchas. J. Food Sci. 2021, 83, 740–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Ayed, L.; Abid, S.B.; Hamdi, M. Development of a beverage from red grape juice fermented with the Kombucha consortium. Ann. Microbiol. 2017, 67, 111–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Andresen, M.; Kazantseva, J.; Kuldjärv, R.; Malv, E.; Vaikma, H.; Kaleda, A.; Kütt, M.-L.; Vilu, R. Characterization of chemical, microbial and sensory profiles of commercial kombuchas. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2022, 373, 109715. [Google Scholar]
  122. Wang, S.; Li, C.; Wang, Y.; Wang, S.; Zou, Y.; Sun, Z.; Yuan, L. Changes on physiochemical properties and volatile compounds of Chinese kombucha during fermentation. Food Biosci. 2023, 55, 103029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Sun, P.; Xu, B.; Wang, Y.; Lin, X.; Chen, C.; Zhu, J.; Jia, H.; Wang, X.; Shen, J.; Feng, T. Characterization of volatile constituents and odorous compounds in peach (Prunus persica L) fruits of different varieties by gas chromatography–ion mobility spectrometry, gas chromatography–mass spectrometry, and relative odor activity value. Front. Nutr. 2022, 9, 965796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Zhang, Y.; Liu, W.; Zhang, B.; Zhang, Y.; Cai, Z.; Song, H.; Ma, R.; Yu, M. Analysis of volatile compounds and their potential regulators in four high-quality peach (Prunus persica L.) cultivars with unique aromas. LWT—Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 160, 113195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Nunes, C.; Coimbra, M.A.; Saraiva, J.; Rocha, S.M. Study of the volatile components of a candied plum and estimation of their contribution to the aroma. Food Chem. 2008, 111, 897–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Yang, S.; Li, D.; Li, S.; Yang, H.; Zhao, Z. GC-MS Metabolite and Transcriptome Analyses Reveal the Differences of Volatile Synthesis and Gene Expression Profiling between Two Apple Varieties. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 2939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Pinho, O.; Ferreira, I.M.; Santos, L.H. Method optimization by solid-phase microextraction in combination with gas chromatography with mass spectrometry for analysis of beer volatile fraction. J. Chromatogr. A 2006, 1121, 145–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Genovese, A.; Piombino, P.; Gambuti, A.; Moio, L. Simulation of retronasal aroma of white and red wine in a model mouth system. Investigating the influence of saliva on volatile compound concentrations. Food Chem. 2009, 114, 100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Roberts, R.; Khomenko, I.; Eyres, G.T.; Bremer, P.; Silcock, P.; Betta, E.; Biasioli, F. Online monitoring of higher alcohols and esters throughout beer fermentation by commercial Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces pastorianus yeast. Mass Spectrom. 2023, 9999, e4959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Toci, A.T.; Farah, A. Volatile compounds as potential defective coffee beans’ markers. Food Chem. 2008, 108, 1133–1141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Toci, A.T.; Farah, A. Volatile fingerprint of Brazilian defective coffee seeds: Corroboration of potential marker compounds and identification of new low quality indicators. Food Chem. 2014, 153, 298–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Yang, Y.; Zhu, H.; Chen, J.; Xie, J.; Shen, S.; Deng, Y.; Zhu, J.; Yuan, H.; Jiang, Y. Characterization of the key aroma compounds in black teas with different aroma types by using gas chromatography electronic nose, gas chromatography-ion mobility spectrometry, and odor activity value analysis. LWT—Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 163, 113492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Ma, T.; Sam, F.E.; Didi, S.A.; Atuna, R.A.; Amagloh, F.K.; Zhang, B. Contribution of edible flowers on the aroma profile of dealcoholized pinot noir rose wine. LWT 2022, 170, 114034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Euromonitor International. Soft Drinks in the Americas: How Gen Z is Investing in Health. Available online: https://www.euromonitor.com/article/soft-drinks-in-the-americas-how-gen-z-is-investing-in-health (accessed on 14 September 2023).
Figure 1. Characterization of the bacterial composition of the black tea kombucha starter (BT K) and that of coffee leaf (CL K) and coffee-leaf-toasted maté (CL-TM K) kombucha consortia after 9 days of fermentation.
Figure 1. Characterization of the bacterial composition of the black tea kombucha starter (BT K) and that of coffee leaf (CL K) and coffee-leaf-toasted maté (CL-TM K) kombucha consortia after 9 days of fermentation.
Foods 13 00484 g001
Figure 2. Yeast composition of the black tea kombucha starter (BT K) and the coffee leaf (CL K) and coffee-leaf-toasted maté (CL-TM K) kombucha consortia after 9 days of fermentation.
Figure 2. Yeast composition of the black tea kombucha starter (BT K) and the coffee leaf (CL K) and coffee-leaf-toasted maté (CL-TM K) kombucha consortia after 9 days of fermentation.
Foods 13 00484 g002
Figure 3. Relative peak areas (%) of volatile organic compounds in black tea kombucha starter (BT K), coffee leaf (CL K), and coffee leaf-toasted maté (CL-TM K) kombucha beverages grouped into chemical classes. Note.; Inf: infusion; d0, d3, d6, and d9: days of fermentation; HAOC: heterocyclic aromatic organic compounds.
Figure 3. Relative peak areas (%) of volatile organic compounds in black tea kombucha starter (BT K), coffee leaf (CL K), and coffee leaf-toasted maté (CL-TM K) kombucha beverages grouped into chemical classes. Note.; Inf: infusion; d0, d3, d6, and d9: days of fermentation; HAOC: heterocyclic aromatic organic compounds.
Foods 13 00484 g003
Figure 4. Mean acceptance scores (A) and mean purchase intent scores (B) of coffee leaf (CL K) and coffee leaf-toasted maté (CL-TM K) kombuchas by Rio de Janeiro consumers (n = 103). Different letters over the bars indicate significant difference (at p < 0.05) by ANOVA followed by the Tukey test. Note: d0, d3, d6, and d9: 0, 3, 6, and 9 days of fermentation.
Figure 4. Mean acceptance scores (A) and mean purchase intent scores (B) of coffee leaf (CL K) and coffee leaf-toasted maté (CL-TM K) kombuchas by Rio de Janeiro consumers (n = 103). Different letters over the bars indicate significant difference (at p < 0.05) by ANOVA followed by the Tukey test. Note: d0, d3, d6, and d9: 0, 3, 6, and 9 days of fermentation.
Foods 13 00484 g004
Figure 5. Intensity means for odor (A), taste (B), flavor (C), and mouthfeel and appearance (D) for coffee leaf kombuchas (CL K) with 3, 6, and 9 days of fermentation (3d, 6d, and 9d). Note: O: odor; T: taste; F: flavor; M: mouthfeel; A: appearance. d0, d3, d6, and d9: 0, 3, 6, and 9 days of fermentation.
Figure 5. Intensity means for odor (A), taste (B), flavor (C), and mouthfeel and appearance (D) for coffee leaf kombuchas (CL K) with 3, 6, and 9 days of fermentation (3d, 6d, and 9d). Note: O: odor; T: taste; F: flavor; M: mouthfeel; A: appearance. d0, d3, d6, and d9: 0, 3, 6, and 9 days of fermentation.
Foods 13 00484 g005
Figure 6. Intensity means for odor (A), taste (B), flavor (C), and mouthfeel and appearance (D) for CL-TM kombuchas with 3, 6 and 9 days of fermentation. Note: O: odor; T: taste; F: flavor; M: mouthfeel; A: appearance; CL-TM: coffee leaves with toasted maté. d0, d3, d6, and d9: 0, 3, 6, and 9 days of fermentation.
Figure 6. Intensity means for odor (A), taste (B), flavor (C), and mouthfeel and appearance (D) for CL-TM kombuchas with 3, 6 and 9 days of fermentation. Note: O: odor; T: taste; F: flavor; M: mouthfeel; A: appearance; CL-TM: coffee leaves with toasted maté. d0, d3, d6, and d9: 0, 3, 6, and 9 days of fermentation.
Foods 13 00484 g006
Figure 7. Correspondence analysis (CA): bi-dimensional plot of the samples of coffee leaf (CL K) and coffee-toasted maté leaf (CL-TM K) kombuchas after 3, 6, and 9 days of fermentation (d3, d6, and d9) (A) and sensory descriptors attributed by consumer assessors (n = 103) through the RATA test, distributing volatile compounds and descriptors that make up the best acceptance of samples among consumers (B). Overall liking and the volatile compounds were considered to be supplementary variables. Note: O: odor; T: taste; F: flavor; M: mouthfeel; A: appearance.
Figure 7. Correspondence analysis (CA): bi-dimensional plot of the samples of coffee leaf (CL K) and coffee-toasted maté leaf (CL-TM K) kombuchas after 3, 6, and 9 days of fermentation (d3, d6, and d9) (A) and sensory descriptors attributed by consumer assessors (n = 103) through the RATA test, distributing volatile compounds and descriptors that make up the best acceptance of samples among consumers (B). Overall liking and the volatile compounds were considered to be supplementary variables. Note: O: odor; T: taste; F: flavor; M: mouthfeel; A: appearance.
Foods 13 00484 g007
Figure 8. Biplot of the principal component analysis (PCA) of the volatile compounds relevant for RATA attributes, as summarized in Table 4. Coffee leaf (CL K) and coffee-toasted maté leaf (CL-TM K) kombuchas after 3, 6, and 9 days of fermentation (d3, d6, and d9).
Figure 8. Biplot of the principal component analysis (PCA) of the volatile compounds relevant for RATA attributes, as summarized in Table 4. Coffee leaf (CL K) and coffee-toasted maté leaf (CL-TM K) kombuchas after 3, 6, and 9 days of fermentation (d3, d6, and d9).
Foods 13 00484 g008
Table 1. Physicochemical characteristics of coffee leaf and coffee-leaf-toasted maté kombuchas.
Table 1. Physicochemical characteristics of coffee leaf and coffee-leaf-toasted maté kombuchas.
SamplesDays of FermentationTitrable Acidity (mEq/L)pHSoluble Solids
(°Brix)
Sucrose
(g/100 mL)
CL00.1 ± 0.04 a3.9 ± 0.21 a12.2 ± 0.00 a11.1 ± 1.06 a
30.3 ± 0.06 b3.8 ± 0.14 a9.7 ± 0.28 b8.8 ± 1.06 b
60.8 ± 0.00 c3.6 ± 0.07 a9.4 ± 0.07 b8.4 ± 1.06 b
90.9 ± 0.10 c3.4 ± 0.07 b9.2 ± 0.07 b7.0 ± 1.06 c
CL-TM00.1 ± 0.04 a4.0 ± 0.00 a11.8 ± 0.91 a10.7 ± 1.06 a
30.1 ± 0.04 a4.0 ± 0.00 a9.9 ± 0.28 a10.2 ± 1.06 a
60.2 ± 0.05 a3.9 ± 0.01 a9.6 ± 0.28 a9.1 ± 1.06 b
90.3 ± 0.06 b3.9 ± 0.01 a9.1 ± 0.91 a7.2 ± 1.06 c
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3); different superscript letters on the same column for the same beverage indicate significant difference (at p < 0.05) by ANOVA followed by the Tukey test; CL: coffee leaf tea; CL-TM: blend of coffee leaf tea and toasted maté tea.
Table 3. Socio-economic profiles of the sensory tests assessors.
Table 3. Socio-economic profiles of the sensory tests assessors.
GenderAge
MaleFemale18–2425–3434–4445–59≥56
32%68%53%32%6%4%5%
Level of education
Basic educationUndergraduatedIncomplete
graduation
Complete
graduation
Master’s or
doctoral degree
2%48%15%12%24%
Family income (MW: minimum wages)
1 MW2–3 MW4–5 MW>5 MW
22%37%19%22%
Know kombuchaDrink kombucha
YesNoYesNo
64%36%16%84%
Sparkling beverages/soft drinks consumption
Sparkling waterApple juiceSodaTonic waterSparkling wineCider
44%13%62%24%34%17%
Table 4. RATA aroma and flavor descriptors for coffee leaf and coffee leaf-toasted maté kombuchas and the corresponding volatile compounds identified in the present study (from Table 2).
Table 4. RATA aroma and flavor descriptors for coffee leaf and coffee leaf-toasted maté kombuchas and the corresponding volatile compounds identified in the present study (from Table 2).
RATA and Related Aroma and Flavor DescriptorsCorresponding Volatile CompoundsReferences
Foods 13 00484 i001 Fruity3,5-octadien-2-one, α-ionone, geranyl acetone, isophorone, hexanal, benzaldehyde, ethyl acetate[13,14,55,87,122]
Foods 13 00484 i002 Herbal/Green leafHexanal, heptanal, nonanal, octanal, Z-3-hexenol, phenylacetaldehyde, phenylethyl alcohol, linalool[14,79,87]
Foods 13 00484 i003SweetBenzaldehyde, α-ionone, β-damascenone, safranal, linalool[14,87]
Foods 13 00484 i004FermentedHexanal, benzaldehyde, nonanal, phenylacetaldehyde, ethanol, octanoic acid, isoamyl alcohol[122]
Foods 13 00484 i005 VinegarAcetic acid[72]
Foods 13 00484 i006 PeachBenzaldehyde, hexanal, geranyl acetone, linalool, myrcene, eugenol, β-ionone, β-damascenone[123,124]
Foods 13 00484 i007Toasted leafFurfural[14]
Foods 13 00484 i008 Fruit syrupEthyl octanoate, nonanal, linalool, benzaldehyde[125]
Foods 13 00484 i009 Green apple2-methyl-1-butanol, hexanal, nonanal[126]
Foods 13 00484 i010 Yeast (Brewer’s yeast)Nonanal, ethanol, octanoic acid,
isoamyl alcohol, ethyl decanoate, ethyl hexanoate
[127]
Foods 13 00484 i011 White wineEthyl acetate, ethyl hexanoate, ethyl octanoate, ethyl nonanoate, ethanol, acetic acid, decanoic acid, octanoic acid, benzaldehyde, β -damascenone[128]
Foods 13 00484 i012 AlcoholicEthyl acetate, ethyl hexanoate, ethyl decanoate, linalool oxide, ethanol, isoamyl alcohol[58,122,129]
Foods 13 00484 i013 Green coffeeAcetic acid, isoamyl alcohol, 2-ethylhexanol, phenylethyl alcohol[130,131]
Foods 13 00484 i014 Burnt2-methylbutanal; isoamyl alcohol[100,132]
Foods 13 00484 i015 Rosé wineNonanal, 1-dodecanol, 1-heptanol, octanoic acid, decanoic acid, ethyl hexanoate, ethyl octanoate, ethyl decanoate, β-damascenone, linalool[133]
Foods 13 00484 i016 Sparkling wineHexanoic acid, octanoic acid, ethyl isobutyrate, ethyl hexanoate, isoamyl acetate[71]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sales, A.L.; Cunha, S.C.; Ferreira, I.M.P.L.V.O.; Morgado, J.; Melo, L.; DePaula, J.; Miguel, M.A.L.; Farah, A. Volatilome, Microbial, and Sensory Profiles of Coffee Leaf and Coffee Leaf-Toasted Maté Kombuchas. Foods 2024, 13, 484. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13030484

AMA Style

Sales AL, Cunha SC, Ferreira IMPLVO, Morgado J, Melo L, DePaula J, Miguel MAL, Farah A. Volatilome, Microbial, and Sensory Profiles of Coffee Leaf and Coffee Leaf-Toasted Maté Kombuchas. Foods. 2024; 13(3):484. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13030484

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sales, Amanda Luísa, Sara C. Cunha, Isabel M.P.L.V.O. Ferreira, Jéssika Morgado, Lauro Melo, Juliana DePaula, Marco Antonio L. Miguel, and Adriana Farah. 2024. "Volatilome, Microbial, and Sensory Profiles of Coffee Leaf and Coffee Leaf-Toasted Maté Kombuchas" Foods 13, no. 3: 484. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13030484

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop