Next Article in Journal
Changes in Protein Non-Covalent Bonds and Aggregate Size during Dough Formation
Next Article in Special Issue
Breathing New Life to Ancient Crops: Promoting the Ancient Philippine Grain “Kabog Millet” as an Alternative to Rice
Previous Article in Journal
Identification of Emerging Hazards in Mussels by the Galician Emerging Food Safety Risks Network (RISEGAL). A First Approach
Previous Article in Special Issue
Barley C-Hordein as the Calibrant for Wheat Gluten Quantification
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Antifungal Activity of Aromatic Plants of the Lamiaceae Family in Bread

by
Adriana Skendi
1,2,*,
Dimitrios Ν. Katsantonis
1,
Paschalina Chatzopoulou
1,
Maria Irakli
1 and
Maria Papageorgiou
2
1
Hellenic Agricultural Organization—Demeter, Institute of Plant Breeding and Genetic Resources, 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece
2
Department of Food Science and Technology, International Hellenic University, 57400 Thessaloniki, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2020, 9(11), 1642; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9111642
Submission received: 24 October 2020 / Revised: 4 November 2020 / Accepted: 7 November 2020 / Published: 10 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Insights into Cereals and Cereal-Based Foods)

Abstract

:
The antifungal effect of aromatic plants (oregano, thyme, and Satureja) in dry form and as essential oils was evaluated in vitro (in potato dextrose agar (PDA)) and in bread against two phytopathogenic fungi found in food (Aspergillus niger and Penicillium). Gas and liquid chromatography were used to analyze essential oils attained by hydrodistillation of the aerial parts of the aromatic plants and of the dried plant aqueous solutions that were autoclaved for 20 min at 121 °C before analysis. Carvacrol, α-pinene, p-cymene, and γ-terpinene were the main components of the essential oils, whereas carvacrol, rosmarinic and caffeic acids were the main components of the water extracts. In vitro antifungal test results showed that the addition of plants in dry form had great antifungal potential against both fungal strains studied. Penicillium was more sensitive to the presence of aromatic plants than Aspergillus. Among the three plant species tested, thyme was the most potent antifungal against both fungi. For the bread product, all three aromatic plants studied showed inhibitory effects against both fungi. Results presented here suggest that oregano, thyme and Satureja incorporated in a bread recipe possess antimicrobial properties and are a potential source of antimicrobial ingredients for the food industry.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Generally recognized as safe (GRAS), aromatic plants are excellent alternatives for chemical additives used in the food industry. Plants of the Lamiaceae family, mainly found in the Mediterranean region, are utilized to produce essential oils that show antioxidant and antimicrobial properties [1]. Consumer demand for less processed foods, together with the increased concern about the use of synthetic preservatives, have directed the interest of the food industry towards natural sources of preservatives. Essential oils have been used in vitro for their antimicrobial and antioxidant properties in different fungi and bacterial species, aiming to use them as a promising technology in order to increase the shelf life of foods [2,3,4,5].
The essential oils of the Lamiaceae family have been extensively studied with respect to their use as food preservatives [1,6,7], and among them, oregano and thyme are of major importance due to their antimicrobial and antifungal activities [6,8,9,10,11,12]. Essential oils are usually extracted from plants by steam distillation, and they contain a variety of volatile molecules such as terpenes and terpenoids, phenol-derived aromatic components, as well as aliphatic compounds [13,14]. Carvacrol, an essential oil compound present in several taxa of the Lamiaceae family, is known to act as a natural preservative [15,16]. It was reported that carvacrol interacts with the membrane of bacteria by changing its permeability, resulting in the dissipation of ion gradients that in turn leads to impairment of essential processes in the cell, resulting in cell death. On the other hand, carvacrol does not exhibit adverse effects on human health, since the levels at which it exhibits its antimicrobial activity are not toxic at the cellular level [17].
It was reported that synergism exists between carvacrol and its precursor, p-cymene [16]. Genotype, as well as environmental and agronomic conditions, affect the chemical composition of essential oils with consequences for their antibacterial/antifungal activity [16,18]. Carvacrol is the main phenolic compound of oregano, thyme and Satureja [19].
The majority of the studies in the literature are focused on the evaluation of the antifungal/antibacterial effect of the essential oils, ignoring the real effect of the plant material and the potential efficacy of other groups of compounds. By incorporation of the aromatic plant in their dry form in vitro, we tried to evaluate their antifungal effect for the first time. Moreover, we investigated the antifungal effect of aromatic plants by incorporating them in the bread matrix for the first time.
The objective of the present work was to explore the antifungal activities of three aromatic plants (in the dry form) common to the Mediterranean area, and widely used as spices (Origanum vulgare ssp. hirtum (oregano), Thymus capitatus (thyme) and Satureja thymbra (Satureja)) in potato dextrose agar (PDA) against two fungi, Aspergillus niger van Tieghem (BPIC 2539) and Penicillium, isolated from bread. Moreover, the antifungal activities of the selected plants (when added as essential oil or in dry form) in a bread matrix were also studied, while possible relationships were evaluated between the components of oregano, thyme and Satureja and their antifungal activity. Finally, our breadmaking trials determined, for the first time, the extent of inhibition that these aromatic plants have when applied in bread at concentrations that are acceptable from a sensorial–organoleptic point of view, as established in one our previous studies [20].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials and Chemicals

Antifungal activity tests were performed for Origanum vulgare ssp. hirtum (oregano), Thymus capitatus (thyme), and Satureja thymbra (Satureja). Samples were provided by the Hellenic Agricultural Organization—Demeter, Plant Breeding and Genetic Resources Institute, (Thessaloniki, Greece). The aerial parts (flowers and leaves) of aromatic plants were collected in summer 2014, dried in the shade at ambient temperature, and ground into powder to pass through a 0.5 mm sieve as reported in [20].
Potato dextrose agar (PDA) was purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany), whereas acetonitrile, methanol, and water (HPLC gradient grade) were supplied by Chem-Lab (Zedelgem, Belgium). Other chemicals and reagents were of HPLC or analytical grade.
The investigated fungi Aspergillus niger van Tieghem (BPIC 2539) was a donation from the collection of Benaki Phytopathological Institute (Athens, Greece), whereas Penicillium fungi was isolated from bread purchased in a local supermarket, according to the procedure in Section 2.2. below.

2.2. Isolation and Identification of Pencillum

Bread slices were left in open air at room temperature to develop green mold. Fungal isolation from the overgrown colonies was carried out by touching the tip of the conidiophores and transferring them into sterilized water to dilute and inoculate PDA petri dishes for monoconidial isolation. Colonies belonging to the Penicillium genera were identified according to their macromorphological characteristics, transferred onto PDA, and incubated for 7 days at 25 ± 2 °C [21] in order to obtain pure stock cultures, which were stored at 4 °C. The identification of Penicillium genera was conducted based on colony diameter, color, and texture, as well as by observing microscopic characteristics such as hyphae and conidiophore appearance, and the size and shape of vesicles, metulae, phialides, and conidia [22].

2.3. Preparation of Essential Oils

Fifty grams of each dried comminute plant material from oregano, thyme and Satureja was submitted, separately, to a hydrodistillation process (450 mL of deionized water) in a Clevenger-type apparatus for 2 h. The essential oil was collected, then dried over anhydrous sodium sulphate (Na2SO4) and finally stored at 4 °C in the dark for further use.

2.4. Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry

The essential oils were analyzed by GC/MS as reported previously [23] in order to detect the potential relationship between chemical composition and biological activity as antifungal agents. The analyses were performed by using a gas chromatograph 17A Ver. 3 (Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Inc., Kyoto, Japan) interfaced with a mass spectrometer Shimadzu QP-5050A, supported by the GC/MS Solution Ver. 1.21 software. The GC was equipped with a fused silica DB-5 capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm, film thickness 0.25 μm), and the optimal temperature program used was as follows: (a) 55–120 °C (3 °C/min), 120–200 °C (4 °C/min), 200–220 °C (6 °C/min), and 220 °C for 5 min; (b) from 60 to 240 °C with temperature rate 3 °C/min. The injector temperature was maintained at 260 °C; interface temperature 300 °C, ion source heating 200 °C, carrier gas helium (54.8 kPa); split ratio 1:30. The volume injected was 1 μL. Mass spectra were recorded at 70 eV. The acquisition mass range was m/z 41–450 at a scan time of 0.5 s.
The identification of the constituents was based on comparisons of the retention time with those of authentic samples, comparing their linear indices relative to a series of n-alkanes (C7–C22). Further identifications were also made using a library of mass spectra built up from pure substances and components of known oils, and MS literature data (National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Gaithersburg, MD, USA) [24]. The percentage of each component identified was determined as the average of two replicates.

2.5. HPLC Analysis

Aqueous solutions containing 1% (w/v) dry matter of aromatic plants were prepared in glass bottles and autoclaved for 20 min at 121 °C. Aliquots of each plant extract were filtered through a 0.22 µm nylon filter before injected to the HPLC system. HPLC analysis was performed utilizing an Agilent 1200 system (Agilent Technology, Urdorf, Switzerland) equipped with a quaternary pump and a rheodyne injector valve with a 20 µL loop.
Phenolic compounds in the water extract were separated in a Nucleosil 100 C18 5 µm (250 mm × 4.6 mm) column maintained at 30 °C as explained in detail elsewhere [19]. The extracts were analyzed for the presence of 24 phenolics at least in duplicate and the results were expressed as micrograms per g (µg/g). The phenolic compounds were detected utilizing a diode-array detector (DAD) at different wavelengths as follows: 260 nm for protocatechuic acid (PRCA), 4-hydroxybenzoic acid (4-HBA), vanillic acid (VA) and rutin (RUT); 270 nm for gallic acid (GA), (−)-epigallocatechine (EPIG) and syringic acid (SRA); 280 nm for (+)-catechin (CAT), (−)-epicatechin (EPI), trans-cinnamic acid (CIN), (±)-naringenin (NAR), carvacrol (CAR) and thymol (THY); 320 nm for caffeic acid (CA), p-coumaric acid (PCA), ferulic acid (FA) and sinapic acid (SA); 330 nm for chlorogenic acid (CLA), rosmarinic acid (RMA) and kaempferol (KAM); and 360 nm for myricetin (MYR), quercetin (QUE), luteolin (LUT) and apigenin (API).
Chromatograms were recorded and integrated using Agilent Chemstation software (version B.04.01, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA).

2.6. Bread Preparation

The recipe and breadmaking procedure is described in detail elsewhere [20]. The recipe for bread production consisted of wheat flour (300 g), salt (6 g), dry yeast (5 g), water (49.3% on flour basis), and dried aromatic plants at four different levels (0%, 0.25%, 0.5% and 1% in 100 g flour basis) or essential oil at four addition levels (0, 12.5, 25, and 50 μL). All ingredients were mixed for 5 min in a farinograph bowl and then a two-step bulk fermentation (30–32 °C) and proofing up to the optimum volume was performed. Bread loaves were baked for at least 23 min at 210 °C then cooled for at least one hour at room temperature, sealed in polyethylene bags, and stored in the freezer. Before the test, bread loaves were allowed to reach room temperature and were then immediately sliced and sized, and finally placed in petri dishes. The level of aromatic plants and essential oil added in the present study was determined by the results of sensory tests performed and described elsewhere [20].

2.7. Preparation of Media and Fungal Spore Suspension

The effect of the addition of 1% dry aromatic plants on Aspergillus niger and Penicillium growth was determined on petri plates with PDA media. PDA was prepared in 400 mL aliquots. The amount of dry aromatic plants to obtain concentrations of 0.5% and 1% (w/v) were added to PDA before water addition, and then the suspension was autoclaved at 121 °C for 20 min. After cooling to 45 °C, the solutions containing PDA alone or with the added dry aromatic plants were poured into sterile petri plates. Care was taken to ensure that the suspended particles of aromatic plants were evenly distributed within the petri plates.
The fungal conidia that were sub-cultured for 7 days on plates with PDA for mass production were collected by scraping the conidial layers formed on the plate surface using a sterilized scalpel [21,25]. Preparation of the fungal spore suspension was made with spores that were harvested with a sterile loop in sterile distilled water and aseptically transferred into sterile test tubes [21]. The spore suspensions were adjusted to give a final spore concentration of 15 × 106 spores/mL using a hemocytometer.

2.8. Inoculation and Incubation of PDA Petri Dishes

Petri plates were centrally inoculated by spotting 10 µL of a spore suspension (1.5 × 103 spores/mL) in the middle of the plate (one inoculum per plate). The control sample was inoculated by spotting 10 µL of sterile distilled water. The plates were sealed with parafilm and then incubated at 25 °C for 12 days. Antifungal activity was evaluated by calculating the area of mycelium growth [12]. The determination was performed for at least 12 biological replicates (petri dishes). A high-resolution photo of each petri dish was analyzed utilizing the eCognition Developer 9 software from Trimble (Trimble Germany GmbH, Munich, Germany).

2.9. Inoculation and Incubation of Bread Samples

Bread samples, 8 cm in diameter and 12.5 mm in thickness (whole slice) in Petri dishes, were exposed to ultraviolet light for 30 min and then inoculated with 10 µL of the suspension containing 15 × 106 spores/mL. The bread inoculated with fungal spores were sealed with parafilm and then incubated at 25 °C for 10 days. The determination was done for at least 12 biological replicates (bread slices in petri dishes). A high-resolution photo of each bread slice was analyzed similarly to Section 2.8.

2.10. Statistical Analysis

The determination of the effect of aromatic plants on the growth of Aspergillus and Penicillium species was carried out in two replications. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Duncan’s multiple range test was used to determine significant differences between the means of colony surface of PDA/bread samples on the same day of storage. A general linear model was used to detect the general effect of the type of aromatic plant, level of addition, storage day and fungi species. Significance for all tests was determined at a p-value of ≤0.05, with statistical analyses performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows (Version 25.0, IBM Corp. Armonk, NY, USA).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Composition of Essential Oil

The content (% of essential oil) of the compounds determined in the essential oils of the three aromatic plants under investigation varied depending on the plant species (Table 1). There were 19, 20 and 25 compounds identified that represent 99.1%, 99.4%, and 99.8% of the essential oils of oregano, thyme and Satureja, respectively.
Table 1 reveals that the essential oil of oregano consisted mainly of monoterpene phenolic compounds (82.64%), monoterpene hydrocarbons (12.61%) and fewer sesquiterpenes (2.14%) and other oxygenated monoterpenes (1.12%). The main component is carvacrol (82.48%), followed by p-cymene (5.00%), and γ-terpinene (2.62%). Other major components are β-mycene (1.61%), followed by trans-caryophyllene (1.23%), α-terpinene (0.97%) and β-bisabolene (0.91%). The amount of carvacrol in our samples is significantly higher (82.48% vs. 59.7%) than those that Lagouri et al. [26] found in a sample of Greek oregano, whereas the amount of thymol was significantly lower (0.16% vs. 13.70%). The species Origanum vulgare ssp. hirtum, also known as Greek oregano, is widely distributed throughout the Mediterranean basin [27]. Analysis of the composition of its essential oil, as reported in the literature, showed that the main components are carvacrol accompanied by two monoterpenic hydrocarbons, p-cymene and γ-terpine. Carvacrol and thymol participate in giving the plant its aroma. Generally, the amounts of carvacrol and thymol are negatively correlated. The same applies between their sum and the sum of the two monoterpenic hydrocarbons [28,29].
The main chemical group identified in Thymus capitatus essential oil was that of monoterpene phenolic compounds (99.37%), with the main representative being carvacrol (76.19%), followed by p-cymene (7.18%) and γ-terpinene (4.9%). It is known that γ-terpinene and the p-cymene are precursors of thymol and its isomeric carvacrol [30,31].
The chemical composition of the essential oil of Satureja thymbra is shown in Table 1. The main chemical group for Satureja essential oil was monoterpene phenolic compounds (46.33%), with carvacrol (44.93%) accounting for approximately 97% of this group. Monoterpene hydrocarbons accounted for 44.99% of the total essential oil compounds present, with γ-terpinene being the main representative compound (29.28%).
Carvacrol and thymol are two components that are present not only in the essential oil obtained from these aromatic plants, but also in aqueous methanolic extracts. In one of our previous studies, HPLC analysis showed that the content of phenolic compounds in oregano, thyme and Satureja was 49.99, 41.07, and 39.93 mg/g, respectively [19], with carvacrol being the main phenolic compound present in the dry aromatic plants.

3.2. Antifungal Activity of Aromatic Plants in Petri Dishes

Since the direct addition of aromatic plants in dry form in PDA media is impossible due to the inherent microbial load that the dry material carries, the dry form was mixed with the PDA before sterilization and subsequently sterilized at 121 °C for 20 min. Thus, the amount of phenolic compounds extracted from the dry mater in the aqueous solution was analyzed and linked with the antifungal activity of the aromatic plant in PDA. The profile and the amount of phenolic compounds in the aqueous solution autoclaved for 20 min at 121 °C is shown in Table 2. It was observed that the highest number of phenolic compounds were present in the oregano aqueous solution, followed by Satureja and thyme. In general, aqueous solutions were rich in the phenolic compounds carvacrol and rosmarinic acid. The total amount of phenolic compounds in oregano, thyme and Satureja was 204.83, 121.99 and 156.82 µg/mL, respectively. This amount (if converted to dry matter) is higher compared to the respective amount reported in the literature for water-soluble phenolics from oregano, thyme and Satureja [19]. It appears that although some compounds (i.e., ferulic acid, sinapic acid, p-coumaric acid and trans-cinnamic acid) were negatively affected by sterilization at 121 °C, the extracted amount of other phenolic compounds was higher, suggesting a high sensitivity for these compounds to high temperature.
The results of the antifungal activity of the studied aromatic plants in the dry form on PDA medium are shown in Figure 1. In general, the higher the content of aromatic plant, the higher the inhibition for each fungus studied. No fungal (Aspergillus, Penicillium) growth was observed after two days of storage at the highest concentration (1%) for all the aromatic plants studied. At the concentration of 0.5%, thyme efficiently inhibited 100% of the Aspergillus and Penicillium growth, while oregano and Satureja inhibited 91.92% and 92.10% of Aspergillus growth, and 60.94% and 81.54% of Penicillium growth, respectively.
After five days of storage, the maximum (95.03%) and minimum (12.92%) inhibition of Aspergillus was recorded for thyme 1% and Satureja 0.5%, respectively. After eight days of storage, two Satureja samples (at 0.5% and 1%) and oregano at 0.5% showed that the surface occupied by the Aspergillus colony was greater than that of the respective control (no added dry aromatic plants after eight days of storage). It seems that Penicillium growth was inhibited from a minimum of 39.82% (Satureja 0.5%) to a maximum of 89.15% (thyme 1%) in all PDA samples. After 12 days of storage, only PDA with thyme showed Aspergillus colony surfaces similar to that of the respective control, with the rest of the samples showing significantly higher values (Figure 1B). It seems that beyond this period, the addition of the aromatic plants promotes the growth of Aspergillus. Both PDA samples with thyme and the sample with oregano 1% inhibited the growth of Penicillium after 12 days of storage, whereas Satureja at 1% and oregano at 0.5% exhibited similar values to that of the control (Figure 1A). Only Satureja at 0.5% showed a colony surface area higher than the control.
Although a significant increase in the fungal surface with increasing storage was observed, thyme exhibited a higher inhibition effect, followed by oregano and Satureja. In general, the aromatic plants were significantly more efficient in inhibiting the Penicillium species than Aspergillus. It seems that at 0.5%, the dry aromatic plants encouraged Aspergillus growth since it was observed that the overall mean was significantly higher than that of the control. Contrary, the aromatic plants were effective in inhibiting the growth of Penicillium at the concentrations used.

3.3. Antifungal Activity in Bread

The antifungal properties of dry aromatic plants and their respective essential oils in bread are presented in Figure 2 and Figure 3. The addition of aromatic plants (dry matter as well as essential oil) in the bread recipe resulted in antifungal activity against both Penicillium and Aspergillus. Other recent studies have examined the use of essential oils in order to extend the shelf-life of bread. The authors of [32,33] used starch microcapsules containing essential oils (citral and eugenol) to inhibit P. roqueforti and A. niger and extended the shelf life of bread. On the other hand, Gonçalves da Rosa et al. [33] observed that the addition of essential oils from Origanum vulgare Linneus and Thymus vulgaris incorporated in nanocapsules also extended the shelf life of bread. Both studies demonstrated that the inclusion of essential oils in nanocapsules before their incorporation in the bread recipe represents a great potential for the preservation of baked foods. In the study by Vasileva et al. [34], the breads with 2.5% and 5% added lavender (Lavandula angustifolia) waste had increased shelf life compared to control bread without added plant waste, showing no fungal or bacterial spoilage for four days, indicating its potential as a bread preservative. They observed that there was no difference in antimicrobial/antifungal activity among the two levels of addition. In the present study, it was observed that the level of addition played a significant (p < 0.05) effect in decreasing the fungal colony surface, regardless of the type of fungus. The higher the level of addition, the higher the inhibition effect against the fungi. Among the aromatic plants, thyme had significant antifungal activity, with values of 53.34–71.15%, which was the greatest activity observed against Penicillium when added in the bread recipe in dry form and the least against Aspergillus when added as an essential oil. On the other hand, Satureja exhibited the lowest inhibition values against both fungi among the three aromatic plants. A general linear model applied to these data revealed that both forms of addition (essential oil and dry material) had the greatest activity (significance p < 0.5) against Penicillium compared to Aspergillus. In general, when the aromatic plants are added in the dry form in the bread recipe, they were more effective compared to essential oils.
The antimicrobial activity of the aqueous extract of aromatic plants may be attributed to the high content of phenolics. Among the compounds present in aromatic plants, carvacrol and thymol are recognized for their strong antifungal effect. They damage cell membranes by interacting with sterols, in particular with ergosterol [35]. This fact can explain the higher inhibition against fungi observed for thyme and oregano when added as essential oils compared to Satureja, but not the rate of inhibition (see levels of carvacrol and thymol in Table 1). The presence of compounds other than carvacrol and thymol, which were found in much lower levels, may have high inhibition capacity or they have synergistic/antagonistic effects, which could affect the inhibition capacity.
Plant phenolics, together with terpenoids, alkaloids, and lectins and polypeptides, are recognized to have antimicrobial properties [36]. Phenolic and flavonoid compounds possess both antifungal and antimicrobial activity [37,38,39]. Flavonoids have been reported to be involved in the inhibition of nucleic acid biosynthesis and other metabolic processes [40], as well as in the inhibition of the spore germination of plant pathogens [41]. Moreover, flavonoids are synthesized by plants in response to microbial infection. Phenolic compounds with a C3 side chain at a lower level of oxidation and containing no oxygen groups have often been reported to be antimicrobials [42]. Based on previously published data [19,20], it was expected that the inhibition of fungi should vary in the following range: oregano > thyme > Satureja, since total phenolics among the raw dry aromatic plants and in bread vary in this order (402.19, 379.49 and 357.24 μg/g bread, respectively). When added in dry form, theoretically, oregano should have shown the highest inhibition level, whereas Satureja should have shown the lowest. It seems that the profile of phenolic compounds, especially the amount of flavonoids that enriched the bread recipe, could affect the level of inhibition. Indeed, bread made with thyme (76.85 μg/g bread) showed the highest level of flavonoids compared to Satureja (72.99 μg/g bread) and oregano (41.05 μg/g bread) [20]. Thus, the final effect on the inhibition of fungi is a result of the combination of the profile of phenolic compounds with the level of each compound present.

4. Conclusions

Growth inhibitory potential against fungi by incorporating aromatic plants (in dry form or as essential oils) in food systems represent a very interesting approach that holds economic value. The enrichment of a bread recipe with aromatic plants, not only added as essential oils but also in dry form, could inhibit the mycelial growth of Penicillium and Aspergillus fungi at a concentration range where the breads are considered acceptable based on sensory tests. It was observed that aromatic plants were more efficient in the inhibition of the growth of Penicillium compared to Aspergillus. This presents an advantage since Penicillium represents the primary fungal contaminant of bread. Moreover, the addition of aromatic plants in the dry form in the bread recipe is more effective against both fungi studied compared to essential oils. However, further research is needed to evaluate the effect of bread recipe and processing parameters on the inhibition effect in order to further augment it. In conclusion, at the levels used in this stidy, aromatic plants in dry form or as essential oils may be useful as natural and safe additives for promoting the safety and quality of ready-to-eat bread.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: A.S. and D.N.K.; Methodology, A.S. and D.N.K.; Validation, A.S.; Formal Analysis, A.S.; Investigation, A.S.; Resources, A.S., P.C., D.N.K., and M.I.; Data Curation, A.S.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, A.S.; Writing—Review and Editing, A.S., D.N.K., P.C., M.I. and M.P.; Visualization, A.S. and M.P.; Supervision, A.S.; Project Administration, A.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received funding from Research & Technology Development Innovation Projects AgroETAK and MIS 453350.

Acknowledgments

This research was funded under the ‘Research & Technology Development Innovation Projects’ AgroETAK and MIS 453350 in the framework of the Operational Program ‘Human Resources Development’. It is co-funded by the European Social Fund through the National Strategic Reference Framework (Research Funding Program 2007–2013) and coordinated by the Hellenic Agricultural Organization DEMETER. Grant holder: Adriana Skendi.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

(−)-epicatechin (EPI); (−)-epigallocatechine (EPIG); (+)-catechin (CAT); (±)-naringenin (NAR); 4-hydroxybenzoic acid (4-HBA); apigenin (API); caffeic acid (CA); carvacrol (CAR); chlorogenic acid (CLA); diode-array detector (DAD); ferulic acid (FA); gallic acid (GA); gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS); generally recognized as safe (GRAS); high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC); kaempferol (KAM); luteolin (LUT); myricetin (MYR); one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA); oregano dry matter (OD); oregano essential oil (OE); Origanum vulgare ssp. hirtum (oregano); p-coumaric acid (PCA); potato dextrose agar (PDA); protocatechuic acid (PRCA); quercetin (QUE); rosmarinic acid (RMA); rutin (RUT); Satureja dry matter (SD); Satureja essential oil (SE); Satureja thymbra (Satureja); sinapic acid (SA); syringic acid (SRA); thyme dry matter (TD); thyme essential oil (TE); thymol (THY); Thymus capitatus (thyme); trans-cinnamic acid (CIN); vanillic acid (VA).

References

  1. Nieto, G. Biological Activities of Three Essential Oils of the Lamiaceae Family. Medicines 2017, 4, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Kordali, S.; Kotan, R.; Mavi, A.; Cakir, A.; Ala, A.; Yildirim, A. Determination of the chemical composition and antioxidant activity of the essential oil of Artemisia dracunculus and of the antifungal and antibacterial activities of Turkish Artemisia absinthium, A. dracunculus, Artemisia santonicum, and Artemisia spicigera essential oils. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 9452–9458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Murbach Teles Andrade, B.F.; Nunes Barbosa, L.; da Silva Probst, I.; Fernandes Júnior, A. Antimicrobial activity of essential oils. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2014, 26, 34–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bounar, R.; Krimat, S.; Boureghda, H.; Dob, T. Chemical analyses, antioxidant and antifungal effects of oregano and thyme essential oils alone or in combination against selected Fusarium species. Int. Food Res. J. 2020, 27, 66–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Reyes-Jurado, F.; Cervantes-Rincón, T.; Bach, H.; López-Malo, A.; Palou, E. Antimicrobial activity of Mexican oregano (Lippia berlandieri), thyme (Thymus vulgaris), and mustard (Brassica nigra) essential oils in gaseous phase. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2019, 131, 90–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Císarová, M.; Hleba, L.; Tančinová, D.; Florková, M.; Foltinová, D.; Charousová, I.; Vrbová, K.; Božik, M.; Klouček, P. Inhibitory effect of essential oils from some Lamiaceae species on growth of Eurotium Spp. Isolated From Bread. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. Food Sci. 2018, 8, 857–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Debonne, E.; Van Bockstaele, F.; Samapundo, S.; Eeckhout, M.; Devlieghere, F. The use of essential oils as natural antifungal preservatives in bread products. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2018, 30, 309–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Dorman, H.J.; Deans, S.G. Antimicrobial agents from plants: Antibacterial activity of plant volatile oils. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2000, 88, 308–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Burt, S.A.; Reinders, R.D. Antibacterial activity of selected plant essential oils against Escherichia coli O157:H7. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2003, 36, 162–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Ristic, M.D.; Duletic-Lausevic, S.; Knezevic-Vukcevic, J.; Marin, P.D.; Simic, D.; Vukojevic, J.; Janackovic, P.; Vajs, V. Antimicrobial activity of essential oils and ethanol extract of Phlomis fruticosa L. (Lamiaceae). Phytother. Res. 2000, 14, 267–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rota, C.; Carraminana, J.J.; Burillo, J.; Herrera, A. In vitro antimicrobial activity of essential oils from aromatic plants against selected foodborne pathogens. J. Food Prot. 2004, 67, 1252–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Debonne, E.; Van Bockstaele, F.; De Leyn, I.; Devlieghere, F.; Eeckhout, M. Validation of in-vitro antifungal activity of thyme essential oil on Aspergillus niger and Penicillium paneum through application in par-baked wheat and sourdough bread. LWT 2018, 87, 368–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bakkali, F.; Averbeck, S.; Averbeck, D.; Idaomar, M. Biological effects of essential oils—A review. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2008, 46, 446–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Muslim, S.N.; Hussin, Z.S. Chemical compounds and synergistic antifungal properties of Thymus kotschanus essential oil plus ketoconazole against Candida spp. Gene Rep. 2020, 21, 100916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ultee, A.; Kets, E.P.; Smid, E.J. Mechanisms of action of carvacrol on the food-borne pathogen Bacillus cereus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1999, 65, 4606–4610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Burt, S. Essential oils: Their antibacterial properties and potential applications in foods—A review. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2004, 94, 223–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Marinelli, L.; Di Stefano, A.; Cacciatore, I. Carvacrol and its derivatives as antibacterial agents. Phytochem. Rev. 2018, 17, 903–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Omidbeygi, M.; Barzegar, M.; Hamidi, Z.; Naghdibadi, H. Antifungal activity of thyme, summer savory and clove essential oils against Aspergillus flavus in liquid medium and tomato paste. Food Control 2007, 18, 1518–1523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Skendi, A.; Irakli, M.; Chatzopoulou, P. Analysis of phenolic compounds in Greek plants of Lamiaceae family by HPLC. J. Appl. Res. Med. Aromat. Plants 2017, 6, 62–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Skendi, A.; Irakli, M.; Chatzopoulou, P.; Papageorgiou, M. Aromatic plants of Lamiaceae family in a traditional bread recipe: Effects on quality and phytochemical content. J. Food Biochem. 2019, 43, e13020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tamil Selvi, A.; Joseph, G.S.; Jayaprakasha, G.K. Inhibition of growth and aflatoxin production in Aspergillus flavus by Garcinia indica extract and its antioxidant activity. Food Microbiol. 2003, 20, 455–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Vico, I.; Duduk, N.; Vasić, M.; Nikolić, M. Identification of Penicillium expansum causing postharvest blue mold decay of apple fruit. Pestic. Fitomed. 2014, 29, 257–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bampidis, V.A.; Christodoulou, V.; Florou-Paneri, P.; Christaki, E.; Chatzopoulou, P.S.; Tsiligianni, T.; Spais, A.B. Effect of dietary dried oregano leaves on growth performance, carcase characteristics and serum cholesterol of female early maturing turkeys. Br. Poult. Sci. 2005, 46, 595–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Adams, R.P. Identification of Essential Oil Components by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy; Allured Publishing: Carol Stream, IL, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  25. Moosavi-Nasab, M.; Jamalian, J.; Heshmati, H.; Haghighi-Manesh, S. The inhibitory potential of Zataria multiflora and Syzygium aromaticum essential oil on growth and aflatoxin production by Aspergillus flavus in culture media and Iranian white cheese. Food Sci. Nutr. 2017, 6, 318–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lagouri, V.; Blekas, G.; Tsimidou, M.; Kokkini, S.; Boskou, D. Composition and antioxidant activity of essential oils from Oregano plants grown wild in Greece. Z. Lebensm. Unters. Forsch. 1993, 197, 20–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kokkini, S.; Vokou, D. Carvacrol-rich plants in Greece. Flavour Fragr. J. 1989, 4, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Vokou, D.; Kokkini, S.; Bessiere, J.-M. Geographic variation of Greek oregano (Origanum vulgare ssp. hirtum) essential oils. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 1993, 21, 287–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kokkini, S.; Karousou, R.; Hanlidou, E. Herbs of the Labiatae. In Encyclopedia of Food Science and Nutrition; Academic Press: Amsterdam, The Nederlands, 2003; Volume 5, pp. 3082–3090. [Google Scholar]
  30. Vernet, P.; Gouyon, R.H.; Valdeyron, G. Genetic control of the oil content in Thymus vulgaris L: A case of polymorphism in a biosynthetic chain. Genetica 1986, 69, 227–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Piccaglia, R.; Marotti, M. Characterization of several aromatic plants grown in northern Italy. Flavour Fragr. J. 1993, 8, 115–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ju, J.; Chen, X.; Xie, Y.; Yu, H.; Cheng, Y.; Qian, H.; Yao, W. Simple microencapsulation of plant essential oil in porous starch granules: Adsorption kinetics and antibacterial activity evaluation. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2019, 43, e14156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Gonçalves da Rosa, C.; Zapelini de Melo, A.P.; Sganzerla, W.G.; Machado, M.H.; Nunes, M.R.; de Oliveira Brisola Maciel, M.V.; Bertoldi, F.C.; Manique Barreto, P.L. Application in situ of zein nanocapsules loaded with Origanum vulgare Linneus and Thymus vulgaris as a preservative in bread. Food Hydrocoll. 2020, 99, 105339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Vasileva, I.; Denkova, R.; Chochkov, R.; Teneva, D.; Denkova, Z.; Dessev, T.; Denev, P.; Slavov, A. Effect of lavender (Lavandula angustifolia) and melissa (Melissa Officinalis) waste on quality and shelf life of bread. Food Chem. 2018, 253, 13–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Nazzaro, F.; Fratianni, F.; Coppola, R.; Feo, V.D. Essential Oils and Antifungal Activity. Pharmaceuticals 2017, 10, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Cowan, M.M. Plant products as antimicrobial agents. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 1999, 12, 564–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Zheng, W.F.; Tan, R.X.; Yang, L.; Liu, Z.L. Two Flavones from Artemisia giraldii and their Antimicrobial Activity. Planta Med. 1996, 62, 160–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Cafarchia, C.; De Laurentis, N.; Milillo, M.A.; Losacco, V.; Puccini, V. Antifungal activity of Apulia region propolis. Parassitologia 1999, 41, 587–590. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  39. Afolayan, A.J.; Meyer, J.J.M. The antimicrobial activity of 3,5,7-trihydroxyflavone isolated from the shoots of Helichrysum aureonitens. J. Ethnopharmacol. 1997, 57, 177–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Cushnie, T.P.T.; Lamb, A.J. Antimicrobial activity of flavonoids. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2005, 26, 343–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Harborne, J.B.; Williams, C.A. Advances in flavonoid research since 1992. Phytochemistry 2000, 55, 481–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Berkada, B. Preliminary report on warfarin for the treatment of herpes 210 simplex. J. Ir. Coll. Physicians Surg. 1978, 22, 56. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Average growth (cm2) in potato dextrose agar (PDA) medium for (A) Penicillium and (B) Aspergillus with treatment during 12 days of storage. Similar number superscripts (reported above each column) in the same incubation day are not significantly different (p < 0.05) by Duncan’s multiple range test.
Figure 1. Average growth (cm2) in potato dextrose agar (PDA) medium for (A) Penicillium and (B) Aspergillus with treatment during 12 days of storage. Similar number superscripts (reported above each column) in the same incubation day are not significantly different (p < 0.05) by Duncan’s multiple range test.
Foods 09 01642 g001
Figure 2. Average growth (cm2) in bread for (A) Penicillium and (B) Aspergillus following treatment with dried aromatic plants after 7 days of storage. OD—oregano, TD—thyme, and SD—Satureja dry matter. Similar number superscripts (reported above each column) for the same plant are not significantly different (p < 0.05) by Duncan’s multiple range test.
Figure 2. Average growth (cm2) in bread for (A) Penicillium and (B) Aspergillus following treatment with dried aromatic plants after 7 days of storage. OD—oregano, TD—thyme, and SD—Satureja dry matter. Similar number superscripts (reported above each column) for the same plant are not significantly different (p < 0.05) by Duncan’s multiple range test.
Foods 09 01642 g002
Figure 3. Average growth (cm2) in bread for (A) Penicillium and (B) Aspergillus following treatment with essential oils after 7 days of storage. OE—oregano, TE—thyme, and SE—Satureja essential oil. Similar number superscripts (reported above each column) in the same plant are not significantly different (p < 0.05) by Duncan’s multiple range test.
Figure 3. Average growth (cm2) in bread for (A) Penicillium and (B) Aspergillus following treatment with essential oils after 7 days of storage. OE—oregano, TE—thyme, and SE—Satureja essential oil. Similar number superscripts (reported above each column) in the same plant are not significantly different (p < 0.05) by Duncan’s multiple range test.
Foods 09 01642 g003
Table 1. Chemical composition (content %) of the essential oils of the three aromatic plants obtained by hydrodistillation and determined by GC/MS: Origanum vulgare ssp. hirtum, Thymus capitatus and Satureja thymbra *.
Table 1. Chemical composition (content %) of the essential oils of the three aromatic plants obtained by hydrodistillation and determined by GC/MS: Origanum vulgare ssp. hirtum, Thymus capitatus and Satureja thymbra *.
CompoundElution Time (min)Origanum vulgare ssp. hirtumThymus capitatusSatureja thymbra
Mean ± SDMean ± SDMean ± SD
Monoterpene hydrocarbons 12.6219.3544.99
α-thujene7.80.64 ± 0.03 a0.69 ± 0.01 a1.45 ± 0.01 b
α-pinene8.10.78 ± 0.03 a0.84 ± 0.01 b1.17 ± 0.02 c
camphene8.80.15 ± 0.00 a0.16 ± 0.00 b0.31 ± 0.01 c
β-pinene10.10.14 ± 0.00 a0.14 ± 0.01 a0.40 ± 0.01 b
cis-sabinene hydrate16.0- ± - a- ± - a0.09 ± 0.01 b
trans-sabinene hydrate18.1- ± - a0.71 ± 0.04 b1.01 ± 0.05 c
β-myrcene10.91.61 ± 0.06 b1.97 ± 0.02 c0.33 ± 0.01 a
α-phellandrene11.80.19 ± 0.01 b0.29 ± 0.01 c0.09 ± 0.00 a
β-phellandrene13.30.38 ± 0.01 a0.60 ± 0.01 b0.67 ± 0.01 b
α-terpinene12.50.97 ± 0.04 a1.66 ± 0.04 b3.40 ± 0.01 c
p-cymene13.05.00 ± 0.07 a7.18 ± 0.16 c6.67 ± 0.01 b
γ-terpinene15.32.62 ± 0.05 a4.90 ± 0.11 b29.28 ± 0.19 c
α-terpinolene17.30.14 ± 0.01 b0.21 ± 0.00 c0.12 ± 0.00 a
Oxygenated monoterpenes 1.121.170.98
borneol23.60.25 ± 0.03 a0.28 ± 0.03 a0.38 ± 0.02 a
terpinen-4-ol24.60.87 ± 0.04 b0.89 ± 0.05 b0.60 ± 0.02 a
Sesquiterpenes 2.141.944.92
trans-caryophyllene44.41.23 ± 0.00 a1.80 ± 0.02 b4.52 ± 0.06 c
α-humulene46.4- ± - a- ± - a0.19 ± 0.00 b
β-bisabolene49.80.91 ± 0.00 c0.14 ± 0.00 a0.21 ± 0.01 b
Oxygenated sesquiterpenes
caryophyllene oxide - ± - a0.16 ± 0.01 b0.21 ± 0.01 c
Monoterpene phenols 82.6476.3746.34
carvacrol3682.48 ± 0.62 c76.19 ± 0.18 b44.93 ± 0.35 a
thymol35.10.16 ± 0.03 a0.18 ± 0.01 a1.41 ± 0.02 b
Alcohols
1-octen-3-ol10.30.45 ± 0.06 b0.42 ± 0.04 b0.21 ± 0.03 a
Ketones
3-octanone10.80.15 ± 0.01 b- ± - a2.02 ± 0.04 c
Total 99.1099.3797.18
* Values are means of duplicate measurements and reported with the respective standard deviation (SD); means with any similar superscripts in the same line are not significantly different (p = 0.05) by Duncan’s multiple range test.
Table 2. Content (µg/mL) of phenolic compounds in aqueous solutions containing 1% dry matter of three aromatic plants autoclaved for 20 min at 121 °C *.
Table 2. Content (µg/mL) of phenolic compounds in aqueous solutions containing 1% dry matter of three aromatic plants autoclaved for 20 min at 121 °C *.
PhytochemicalsOriganum vulgare ssp. hirtumThymus capitatusSaturejathymbra
Mean ± SDMean ± SDMean ± SD
Phenolic acids and their derivatives90.5322.6655.44
4-hydroxybenzoic acid0.23 ± 0.02 a0.32 ± 0.04 b1.02 ± 0.04 c
gallic acid0.14 ± 0.02 b0.36 ± 0.03 c0.08 ± 0.01 a
protocatechuic acid0.93 ± 0.06 b0.68 ± 0.04 a0.73 ± 0.05 a
syringic acid0.22 ± 0.02 a0.64 ± 0.02 c0.35 ± 0.04 b
vanillic acid0.75 ± 0.01 a1.05 ± 0.07 b0.75 ± 0.05 a
trans-cinnamic acidNDND0.04 ± 0.01
caffeic acid5.66 ± 0.09 b2.79 ± 0.06 a6.85 ± 0.03 c
ferulic acidNDNDND
sinapic acidNDNDND
p-coumaric acidNDNDND
chlorogenic acid0.27 ± 0.01 a0.34 ± 0.01 bND
rosmarinic acid82.34 ± 0.13 c16.48 ± 0.09 a45.61 ± 0.16 b
Flavonoids9.1117.1510.01
luteolin0.41 ± 0.03LLQLLQ
apigeninNDNDND
quercetinND1.18 ± 0.07 b0.78 ± 0.04 a
kaempferol0.67 ± 0.02 a0.70 ± 0.04 a0.78 ± 0.03 b
myricetinND5.62 ± 0.09 b0.28 ± 0.05 a
rutin1.62 ± 0.01NDND
(±)-naringeninNDND1.17 ± 0.03
(+)-catechinND0.71 ± 0.03 a1.93 ± 0.12 b
(−)-epicatechin5.96 ± 0.08 b8.78 ± 0.18 c5.07 ± 0.14 a
(−)-epigallocatechine0.46 ± 0.05 b0.16 ± 0.03 aND
Phenolic monoterpenes105.1982.1791.37
carvacrol105.19 ± 0.15 c82.17 ± 0.22 a91.37 ± 0.18 b
thymolNDNDND
Total phenolics204.83121.99156.82
ND—not detected; LLQ—lower than LOQ (Limit of quantification). * Values are means of duplicate analysis and reported with the respective standard deviation (SD); means with any similar superscripts in the same line are not significantly different (p = 0.05) by Duncan’s multiple range test.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Skendi, A.; Katsantonis, D.Ν.; Chatzopoulou, P.; Irakli, M.; Papageorgiou, M. Antifungal Activity of Aromatic Plants of the Lamiaceae Family in Bread. Foods 2020, 9, 1642. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9111642

AMA Style

Skendi A, Katsantonis DΝ, Chatzopoulou P, Irakli M, Papageorgiou M. Antifungal Activity of Aromatic Plants of the Lamiaceae Family in Bread. Foods. 2020; 9(11):1642. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9111642

Chicago/Turabian Style

Skendi, Adriana, Dimitrios Ν. Katsantonis, Paschalina Chatzopoulou, Maria Irakli, and Maria Papageorgiou. 2020. "Antifungal Activity of Aromatic Plants of the Lamiaceae Family in Bread" Foods 9, no. 11: 1642. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9111642

APA Style

Skendi, A., Katsantonis, D. Ν., Chatzopoulou, P., Irakli, M., & Papageorgiou, M. (2020). Antifungal Activity of Aromatic Plants of the Lamiaceae Family in Bread. Foods, 9(11), 1642. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9111642

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop